US20200067977A1 - Countering phishing attacks - Google Patents

Countering phishing attacks Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20200067977A1
US20200067977A1 US16/106,337 US201816106337A US2020067977A1 US 20200067977 A1 US20200067977 A1 US 20200067977A1 US 201816106337 A US201816106337 A US 201816106337A US 2020067977 A1 US2020067977 A1 US 2020067977A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
computer
synthetic
information
hosted
target site
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US16/106,337
Other versions
US11159566B2 (en
Inventor
Cheng-Ta Lee
Russell Couturier
Andrii Iesiev
Iosif Onut
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
International Business Machines Corp
Original Assignee
International Business Machines Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by International Business Machines Corp filed Critical International Business Machines Corp
Priority to US16/106,337 priority Critical patent/US11159566B2/en
Assigned to INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION reassignment INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: COUTURIER, Russell, ONUT, IOSIF, LEE, CHENG-TA, IESIEV, ANDRII
Publication of US20200067977A1 publication Critical patent/US20200067977A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US11159566B2 publication Critical patent/US11159566B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/14Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic
    • H04L63/1441Countermeasures against malicious traffic
    • H04L63/1483Countermeasures against malicious traffic service impersonation, e.g. phishing, pharming or web spoofing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/08Key distribution or management, e.g. generation, sharing or updating, of cryptographic keys or passwords
    • H04L9/0861Generation of secret information including derivation or calculation of cryptographic keys or passwords
    • H04L9/0866Generation of secret information including derivation or calculation of cryptographic keys or passwords involving user or device identifiers, e.g. serial number, physical or biometrical information, DNA, hand-signature or measurable physical characteristics
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/14Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic
    • H04L63/1441Countermeasures against malicious traffic
    • H04L63/1491Countermeasures against malicious traffic using deception as countermeasure, e.g. honeypots, honeynets, decoys or entrapment
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/08Key distribution or management, e.g. generation, sharing or updating, of cryptographic keys or passwords
    • H04L9/0816Key establishment, i.e. cryptographic processes or cryptographic protocols whereby a shared secret becomes available to two or more parties, for subsequent use
    • H04L9/0819Key transport or distribution, i.e. key establishment techniques where one party creates or otherwise obtains a secret value, and securely transfers it to the other(s)
    • H04L9/0825Key transport or distribution, i.e. key establishment techniques where one party creates or otherwise obtains a secret value, and securely transfers it to the other(s) using asymmetric-key encryption or public key infrastructure [PKI], e.g. key signature or public key certificates
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/08Key distribution or management, e.g. generation, sharing or updating, of cryptographic keys or passwords
    • H04L9/0861Generation of secret information including derivation or calculation of cryptographic keys or passwords
    • H04L9/0869Generation of secret information including derivation or calculation of cryptographic keys or passwords involving random numbers or seeds
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/32Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials
    • H04L9/3247Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials involving digital signatures
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/903Querying
    • G06F17/30964

Definitions

  • Phishing refers to attempting to fraudulently obtain sensitive information such as user names, passwords, and credit card information. Phishing typically involves designing communications media such as emails and web sites to appear as being associated with trustworthy entities, and thereby trick victims into providing sensitive information when they encounter such media. Designers of phishing attacks gather such sensitive information for later malicious use, and often sell such information to other malicious actors.
  • a method for countering phishing attacks by generating multiple synthetic victims, where each of the synthetic victims includes synthetic victim information that represents a computer user identity and includes associated sensitive information, where the computer user identity and its associated sensitive information are fictitious in that they are not known to be associated with a legitimate computer user, providing any of the synthetic victim information of the synthetic victims to a computer-hosted phishing site, storing the synthetic victim information in a computer-accessible database, receiving from a computer-hosted target site information provided to the computer-hosted target site by a requestor, identifying in the computer-accessible database database synthetic victim information matching the requestor information, and notifying the computer-hosted target site that the requestor information is of a synthetic victim
  • FIG. 1 is a simplified conceptual illustration of a system for countering phishing attacks, constructed and operative in accordance with an embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is a simplified action diagram of an exemplary method of operation of the system of FIG. 1 for seeding phishing sites with synthetic victims, operative in accordance with an embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 3 is a simplified action diagram of an exemplary method of operation of the system of FIG. 1 for detecting use of synthetic victim information, operative in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a simplified block diagram illustration of an exemplary hardware implementation of a computing system, constructed and operative in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 1 is a simplified conceptual illustration of a system for countering phishing attacks, constructed and operative in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
  • a computer referred to herein as protector 100
  • a computer network 102 such as the Internet
  • phishing sites and target sites in the manner described hereinbelow, such as with a phishing site 104 and a target site 106 .
  • Phishing site 104 is identified, in accordance with conventional techniques, as a computer-hosted web site that performs “phishing,” which are attempts to fraudulently obtain sensitive information, such as valid user name and password credentials of legitimate computer users of target site 106 , which may, for example, be a banking web site. Identification of such phishing sites is performed by protector 100 and/or is performed by other parties that make the identities of such phishing sites publicly available or otherwise available to protector 100 .
  • Protector 100 is configured to maintain a database 108 of synthetic victims, where a synthetic victim includes information that represents a computer user identity, and includes associated sensitive information, such as, but not limited to, user name and password credentials, credit card information, and Social Security number, but where the computer user identity and its associated sensitive information are fictitious in that they are not known to be associated with a legitimate computer user.
  • Database 108 preferably includes a large number, such as millions or tens of millions or more, of synthetic victims and associated sensitive information, any or all of which protector 100 provides to phishing site 104 , preferably in a manner appearing to phishing site 104 as that of an ordinary victim of phishing site 104 .
  • any of the synthetic victims and their associated sensitive information in database 108 are generated by protector 100 . Additionally or alternatively, any of the synthetic victims and their associated sensitive information are generated and maintained by target site 106 , a copy of which is provided by target site 106 to protector 100 for storage in database 108 .
  • target site 106 upon receiving information from a requestor 110 in association with target site 106 , such as where a user name and a password are received as part of a login request to access target site 106 , target site 106 determines that the requestor information is not associated with a legitimate user known as such to target site 106 . Target site 106 then communicates the requestor information to protector 100 , which searches database 108 for a synthetic victim whose information matches the requestor information. If a match is identified, protector 100 notifies target site 106 that the requestor information is that of a synthetic victim.
  • protector 100 generates a synthetic victim user name using any known technique and then uses a predefined algorithm to derive an associated password using the user name and a predefined salt, optionally encoding additional information into the password, such as the network address of phishing site 104 , and optionally signing the password, such as with an asymmetric private key belonging to protector 100 and that is paired with an asymmetric public key also belonging to protector 100 .
  • Protector 100 provides the predefined algorithm and salt to target site 106 .
  • target site 106 Upon receiving the user name and password from requestor 110 during a login attempt, target site 106 validates the signature in accordance with conventional techniques, such as using the asymmetric public key belonging to protector 100 , and uses the predefined algorithm and salt to determine whether the password was derived from the user name, as well as extract the aforementioned additional information that may have been encoded into the password. If target site 106 determines that the password was derived from the user name using the predefined algorithm and salt, this indicates that the user name and password are those of a synthetic victim.
  • target site 106 receives a user name and password during a login attempt by requestor 110 , and the user name and password belong to a synthetic victim that was generated and maintained by target site 106 as described hereinabove, target site 106 is able to independently determine that the user name and password are those of a synthetic victim.
  • target site 106 preferably considers requestor 110 to be an attacker who either acquired the synthetic victim information directly or indirectly from phishing site 104 , or where requestor 110 is in fact phishing site 104 .
  • target site 106 communicates the received synthetic victim information and/or the network address of requestor 110 to protector 100 , which protector 100 preferably stores in database 108 in association with the matching synthetic victim, preferably together with a timestamp of the attack attempt, any of which information protector 100 preferably makes available to parties for security purposes.
  • target site 106 takes one or more predefined security actions.
  • target site 106 prevents requestor 110 from interacting further with target site 106 .
  • target site 106 directs requestor 110 to a “honeypot,” which may be a facsimile of target site 106 with which requestor 110 is allowed to interact, such as for the purpose of learning the behavior of requestor 110 and gathering other information regarding requestor 110 .
  • FIG. 1 Any of the elements shown in FIG. 1 are preferably implemented by one or more computers in computer hardware and/or in computer software embodied in a non-transitory, computer-readable medium in accordance with conventional techniques.
  • FIG. 2 is a simplified action diagram of an exemplary method of operation of the system of FIG. 1 for seeding phishing sites with synthetic victims, operative in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
  • synthetic victims and their associated sensitive information are created by protector 100 (step 200 ) and optionally provided to target site 106 (step 202 ), and/or are created by target site 106 (step 204 ) and then provided by target site 106 to protector 100 (step 206 ), and are stored by protector 100 in database 108 (step 208 ).
  • Protector 100 seeds phishing site 104 with sensitive information associated with a synthetic victim, such as with a user name and a password, by providing the sensitive information to phishing site 104 (step 210 ), preferably storing records in database 108 identifying the synthetic victims whose sensitive information protector 100 provides to phishing site 104 , the IP address and/or domain name of phishing site 104 , and a count of the number of synthetic victims whose sensitive information protector 100 provides to phishing site 104 (step 212 ).
  • target site 106 determines that the information received from phishing site 104 is that of a synthetic victim using any of the techniques described herein (step 216 ), i.e., independently or by querying database 108 or protector 100 with any information provided by phishing site 104 , including its IP address or domain name, and, preferably if this is the first time that target site 106 receives the information for this synthetic victim, responds to phishing site 104 by indicating to phishing site 104 that the information received from phishing site 104 is valid (step 218 ), such as by providing a landing page indicating a successful login.
  • Phishing site 104 stores the synthetic victim information for later use (step 220 ).
  • Protector 100 preferably provides sensitive information of multiple synthetic victims to phishing site 104 in accordance with the method of FIG. 2 , such as of a predefined number of synthetic victims and/or in accordance with a predefined schedule.
  • target site 106 receives synthetic victim information from requestor 110 (step 300 ), such as a user name and password as part of a login request, which information target site 106 determines is not associated with a legitimate user known as such to target site 106 (step 302 ).
  • Target site 106 independently determines that the information received from requestor 110 is that of a synthetic victim (step 304 ).
  • target site 106 uses any information received from requestor 110 , including its IP address or domain name, to query database 108 for matching synthetic victim information or a known IP address or domain name of a phishing site or other attacker, either directly or by providing the information received from requestor 110 to protector 100 as part of a query (step 306 ), whereupon the query response indicates that the information is that of a synthetic victim (step 308 ), optionally providing additional information regarding the synthetic victim and/or phishing site 104 as may be stored in database 108 .
  • Target site 106 preferably reports the receipt of synthetic victim information from requestor 110 to protector 100 (step 310 ), which protector 100 preferably notes in database 108 in association with the matching synthetic victim, preferably together with a timestamp of the attack attempt (step 312 ).
  • Target site 106 preferably takes one or more predefined security actions as described hereinabove (step 314 ).
  • block diagram 400 illustrates an exemplary hardware implementation of a computing system in accordance with which one or more components/methodologies of the invention (e.g., components/methodologies described in the context of FIGS. 1-3 ) may be implemented, according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • the invention may be implemented in accordance with a processor 410 , a memory 412 , I/O devices 414 , and a network interface 416 , coupled via a computer bus 418 or alternate connection arrangement.
  • processor as used herein is intended to include any processing device, such as, for example, one that includes a CPU (central processing unit) and/or other processing circuitry. It is also to be understood that the term “processor” may refer to more than one processing device and that various elements associated with a processing device may be shared by other processing devices.
  • memory as used herein is intended to include memory associated with a processor or CPU, such as, for example, RAM, ROM, a fixed memory device (e.g., hard drive), a removable memory device (e.g., diskette), flash memory, etc. Such memory may be considered a computer readable storage medium.
  • input/output devices or “I/O devices” as used herein is intended to include, for example, one or more input devices (e.g., keyboard, mouse, scanner, etc.) for entering data to the processing unit, and/or one or more output devices (e.g., speaker, display, printer, etc.) for presenting results associated with the processing unit.
  • input devices e.g., keyboard, mouse, scanner, etc.
  • output devices e.g., speaker, display, printer, etc.
  • Embodiments of the invention may include a system, a method, and/or a computer program product.
  • the computer program product may include a computer readable storage medium (or media) having computer readable program instructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of the invention.
  • the computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that can retain and store instructions for use by an instruction execution device.
  • the computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but is not limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
  • a non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of the computer readable storage medium includes the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such as punch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructions recorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing.
  • RAM random access memory
  • ROM read-only memory
  • EPROM or Flash memory erasable programmable read-only memory
  • SRAM static random access memory
  • CD-ROM compact disc read-only memory
  • DVD digital versatile disk
  • memory stick a floppy disk
  • a mechanically encoded device such as punch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructions recorded thereon
  • a computer readable storage medium is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire.
  • Computer readable program instructions described herein can be downloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computer readable storage medium or to an external computer or external storage device via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network and/or a wireless network.
  • the network may comprise copper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/or edge servers.
  • a network adapter card or network interface in each computing/processing device receives computer readable program instructions from the network and forwards the computer readable program instructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium within the respective computing/processing device.
  • Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations of the invention may be assembler instructions, instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions, machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions, state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages.
  • the computer readable program instructions may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server.
  • the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
  • electronic circuitry including, for example, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readable program instructions by utilizing state information of the computer readable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry, in order to perform aspects of the invention.
  • These computer readable program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
  • These computer readable program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can direct a computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the computer readable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises an article of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects of the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
  • the computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computer implemented process, such that the instructions which execute on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
  • each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s).
  • the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures.
  • two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved.

Abstract

Countering phishing attacks by generating multiple synthetic victims, where each of the synthetic victims includes synthetic victim information that represents a computer user identity and includes associated sensitive information, where the computer user identity and its associated sensitive information are fictitious in that they are not known to be associated with a legitimate computer user, providing any of the synthetic victim information of the synthetic victims to a computer-hosted phishing site, storing the synthetic victim information in a computer-accessible database, receiving from a computer-hosted target site information provided to the computer-hosted target site by a requestor, identifying in the computer-accessible database database synthetic victim information matching the requestor information, and notifying the computer-hosted target site that the requestor information is of a synthetic victim.

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • Phishing refers to attempting to fraudulently obtain sensitive information such as user names, passwords, and credit card information. Phishing typically involves designing communications media such as emails and web sites to appear as being associated with trustworthy entities, and thereby trick victims into providing sensitive information when they encounter such media. Designers of phishing attacks gather such sensitive information for later malicious use, and often sell such information to other malicious actors.
  • SUMMARY
  • In one aspect of the invention a method is provided for countering phishing attacks by generating multiple synthetic victims, where each of the synthetic victims includes synthetic victim information that represents a computer user identity and includes associated sensitive information, where the computer user identity and its associated sensitive information are fictitious in that they are not known to be associated with a legitimate computer user, providing any of the synthetic victim information of the synthetic victims to a computer-hosted phishing site, storing the synthetic victim information in a computer-accessible database, receiving from a computer-hosted target site information provided to the computer-hosted target site by a requestor, identifying in the computer-accessible database database synthetic victim information matching the requestor information, and notifying the computer-hosted target site that the requestor information is of a synthetic victim
  • In other aspects of the invention systems and computer program products embodying the invention are provided.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Aspects of the invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the appended drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a simplified conceptual illustration of a system for countering phishing attacks, constructed and operative in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 2 is a simplified action diagram of an exemplary method of operation of the system of FIG. 1 for seeding phishing sites with synthetic victims, operative in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 3 is a simplified action diagram of an exemplary method of operation of the system of FIG. 1 for detecting use of synthetic victim information, operative in accordance with an embodiment of the invention; and
  • FIG. 4 is a simplified block diagram illustration of an exemplary hardware implementation of a computing system, constructed and operative in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Reference is now made to FIG. 1, which is a simplified conceptual illustration of a system for countering phishing attacks, constructed and operative in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the system of FIG. 1, a computer, referred to herein as protector 100, is configured to communicate via a computer network 102, such as the Internet, with one or more phishing sites and target sites in the manner described hereinbelow, such as with a phishing site 104 and a target site 106. Phishing site 104 is identified, in accordance with conventional techniques, as a computer-hosted web site that performs “phishing,” which are attempts to fraudulently obtain sensitive information, such as valid user name and password credentials of legitimate computer users of target site 106, which may, for example, be a banking web site. Identification of such phishing sites is performed by protector 100 and/or is performed by other parties that make the identities of such phishing sites publicly available or otherwise available to protector 100.
  • Protector 100 is configured to maintain a database 108 of synthetic victims, where a synthetic victim includes information that represents a computer user identity, and includes associated sensitive information, such as, but not limited to, user name and password credentials, credit card information, and Social Security number, but where the computer user identity and its associated sensitive information are fictitious in that they are not known to be associated with a legitimate computer user. Database 108 preferably includes a large number, such as millions or tens of millions or more, of synthetic victims and associated sensitive information, any or all of which protector 100 provides to phishing site 104, preferably in a manner appearing to phishing site 104 as that of an ordinary victim of phishing site 104. In one embodiment, any of the synthetic victims and their associated sensitive information in database 108 are generated by protector 100. Additionally or alternatively, any of the synthetic victims and their associated sensitive information are generated and maintained by target site 106, a copy of which is provided by target site 106 to protector 100 for storage in database 108.
  • In one embodiment, upon receiving information from a requestor 110 in association with target site 106, such as where a user name and a password are received as part of a login request to access target site 106, target site 106 determines that the requestor information is not associated with a legitimate user known as such to target site 106. Target site 106 then communicates the requestor information to protector 100, which searches database 108 for a synthetic victim whose information matches the requestor information. If a match is identified, protector 100 notifies target site 106 that the requestor information is that of a synthetic victim.
  • In one embodiment, protector 100 generates a synthetic victim user name using any known technique and then uses a predefined algorithm to derive an associated password using the user name and a predefined salt, optionally encoding additional information into the password, such as the network address of phishing site 104, and optionally signing the password, such as with an asymmetric private key belonging to protector 100 and that is paired with an asymmetric public key also belonging to protector 100. Protector 100 provides the predefined algorithm and salt to target site 106. Upon receiving the user name and password from requestor 110 during a login attempt, target site 106 validates the signature in accordance with conventional techniques, such as using the asymmetric public key belonging to protector 100, and uses the predefined algorithm and salt to determine whether the password was derived from the user name, as well as extract the aforementioned additional information that may have been encoded into the password. If target site 106 determines that the password was derived from the user name using the predefined algorithm and salt, this indicates that the user name and password are those of a synthetic victim.
  • In one embodiment, where target site 106 receives a user name and password during a login attempt by requestor 110, and the user name and password belong to a synthetic victim that was generated and maintained by target site 106 as described hereinabove, target site 106 is able to independently determine that the user name and password are those of a synthetic victim.
  • Once it becomes known to target site 106 that it has received credentials or other sensitive information associated with a synthetic victim, target site 106 preferably considers requestor 110 to be an attacker who either acquired the synthetic victim information directly or indirectly from phishing site 104, or where requestor 110 is in fact phishing site 104. In various embodiments target site 106 communicates the received synthetic victim information and/or the network address of requestor 110 to protector 100, which protector 100 preferably stores in database 108 in association with the matching synthetic victim, preferably together with a timestamp of the attack attempt, any of which information protector 100 preferably makes available to parties for security purposes. In various embodiments target site 106 takes one or more predefined security actions. In one such security action, target site 106 prevents requestor 110 from interacting further with target site 106. In another such security action, target site 106 directs requestor 110 to a “honeypot,” which may be a facsimile of target site 106 with which requestor 110 is allowed to interact, such as for the purpose of learning the behavior of requestor 110 and gathering other information regarding requestor 110.
  • Any of the elements shown in FIG. 1 are preferably implemented by one or more computers in computer hardware and/or in computer software embodied in a non-transitory, computer-readable medium in accordance with conventional techniques.
  • Additional reference is now made to FIG. 2, which is a simplified action diagram of an exemplary method of operation of the system of FIG. 1 for seeding phishing sites with synthetic victims, operative in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the method of FIG. 2, synthetic victims and their associated sensitive information are created by protector 100 (step 200) and optionally provided to target site 106 (step 202), and/or are created by target site 106 (step 204) and then provided by target site 106 to protector 100 (step 206), and are stored by protector 100 in database 108 (step 208). Protector 100 seeds phishing site 104 with sensitive information associated with a synthetic victim, such as with a user name and a password, by providing the sensitive information to phishing site 104 (step 210), preferably storing records in database 108 identifying the synthetic victims whose sensitive information protector 100 provides to phishing site 104, the IP address and/or domain name of phishing site 104, and a count of the number of synthetic victims whose sensitive information protector 100 provides to phishing site 104 (step 212). Should phishing site 104 attempt to validate the synthetic victim information by providing the synthetic victim information to target site 106 (step 214), target site 106 determines that the information received from phishing site 104 is that of a synthetic victim using any of the techniques described herein (step 216), i.e., independently or by querying database 108 or protector 100 with any information provided by phishing site 104, including its IP address or domain name, and, preferably if this is the first time that target site 106 receives the information for this synthetic victim, responds to phishing site 104 by indicating to phishing site 104 that the information received from phishing site 104 is valid (step 218), such as by providing a landing page indicating a successful login. Phishing site 104 stores the synthetic victim information for later use (step 220). Protector 100 preferably provides sensitive information of multiple synthetic victims to phishing site 104 in accordance with the method of FIG. 2, such as of a predefined number of synthetic victims and/or in accordance with a predefined schedule.
  • Additional reference is now made to FIG. 3, which is a simplified action diagram of an exemplary method of operation of the system of FIG. 1 for detecting use of synthetic victim information, operative in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the method of FIG. 3, target site 106 receives synthetic victim information from requestor 110 (step 300), such as a user name and password as part of a login request, which information target site 106 determines is not associated with a legitimate user known as such to target site 106 (step 302). Target site 106 independently determines that the information received from requestor 110 is that of a synthetic victim (step 304). Additionally or alternatively, target site 106 uses any information received from requestor 110, including its IP address or domain name, to query database 108 for matching synthetic victim information or a known IP address or domain name of a phishing site or other attacker, either directly or by providing the information received from requestor 110 to protector 100 as part of a query (step 306), whereupon the query response indicates that the information is that of a synthetic victim (step 308), optionally providing additional information regarding the synthetic victim and/or phishing site 104 as may be stored in database 108. Target site 106 preferably reports the receipt of synthetic victim information from requestor 110 to protector 100 (step 310), which protector 100 preferably notes in database 108 in association with the matching synthetic victim, preferably together with a timestamp of the attack attempt (step 312). Target site 106 preferably takes one or more predefined security actions as described hereinabove (step 314).
  • Referring now to FIG. 4, block diagram 400 illustrates an exemplary hardware implementation of a computing system in accordance with which one or more components/methodologies of the invention (e.g., components/methodologies described in the context of FIGS. 1-3) may be implemented, according to an embodiment of the invention. As shown, the invention may be implemented in accordance with a processor 410, a memory 412, I/O devices 414, and a network interface 416, coupled via a computer bus 418 or alternate connection arrangement.
  • It is to be appreciated that the term “processor” as used herein is intended to include any processing device, such as, for example, one that includes a CPU (central processing unit) and/or other processing circuitry. It is also to be understood that the term “processor” may refer to more than one processing device and that various elements associated with a processing device may be shared by other processing devices.
  • The term “memory” as used herein is intended to include memory associated with a processor or CPU, such as, for example, RAM, ROM, a fixed memory device (e.g., hard drive), a removable memory device (e.g., diskette), flash memory, etc. Such memory may be considered a computer readable storage medium.
  • In addition, the phrase “input/output devices” or “I/O devices” as used herein is intended to include, for example, one or more input devices (e.g., keyboard, mouse, scanner, etc.) for entering data to the processing unit, and/or one or more output devices (e.g., speaker, display, printer, etc.) for presenting results associated with the processing unit.
  • Embodiments of the invention may include a system, a method, and/or a computer program product. The computer program product may include a computer readable storage medium (or media) having computer readable program instructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of the invention.
  • The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that can retain and store instructions for use by an instruction execution device. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but is not limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of the computer readable storage medium includes the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such as punch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructions recorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. A computer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire.
  • Computer readable program instructions described herein can be downloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computer readable storage medium or to an external computer or external storage device via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprise copper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/or edge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in each computing/processing device receives computer readable program instructions from the network and forwards the computer readable program instructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium within the respective computing/processing device.
  • Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations of the invention may be assembler instructions, instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions, machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions, state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The computer readable program instructions may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider). In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readable program instructions by utilizing state information of the computer readable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry, in order to perform aspects of the invention.
  • Aspects of the invention are described herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer readable program instructions.
  • These computer readable program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can direct a computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the computer readable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises an article of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects of the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
  • The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computer implemented process, such that the instructions which execute on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
  • The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of the invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
  • The descriptions of the various embodiments of the invention have been presented for purposes of illustration but are not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the described embodiments. The terminology used herein was chosen to best explain the principles of the embodiments, the practical application or technical improvement over technologies found in the marketplace, or to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the embodiments disclosed herein.

Claims (18)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for countering phishing attacks, the method comprising:
generating a plurality of synthetic victims, wherein each of the synthetic victims includes synthetic victim information that represents a computer user identity and includes associated sensitive information, wherein the computer user identity and its associated sensitive information are fictitious in that they are not known to be associated with a legitimate computer user;
providing any of the synthetic victim information of the synthetic victims to a computer-hosted phishing site;
storing the synthetic victim information in a computer-accessible database;
receiving from a computer-hosted target site, information provided to the computer-hosted target site by a requestor;
identifying in the computer-accessible database database synthetic victim information matching the requestor information; and
notifying the computer-hosted target site that the requestor information is of a synthetic victim.
2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the generating comprises:
generating a user name;
using a predefined algorithm to derive an associated password using the user name and a predefined salt; and
providing the predefined algorithm and the salt to the computer-hosted target site, wherein the computer-hosted target site is configured, upon receiving the user name and the password from a requestor, to use the predefined algorithm and the salt to determine that the password was derived from the user name, and thereby determine that the user name and the password are associated with the synthetic victim.
3. The method according to claim 2 wherein the generating comprises encoding additional information into the password, wherein the computer-hosted target site is configured to extract the additional information encoded into the password.
4. The method according to claim 3 wherein the encoding comprises encoding a network address of the phishing site into the password.
5. The method according to claim 2 wherein the generating comprises signing the password with an asymmetric private key, wherein the computer-hosted target site is configured to validate the signature using an asymmetric public key paired with the asymmetric private key.
6. The method according to claim 1 and further comprising:
receiving from the computer-hosted target site a network address of the requestor;
storing in the computer-accessible database, in association with the synthetic victim information, the network address of the requestor and a timestamp; and
making any information stored in the computer-accessible database available to parties for security purposes.
7. A system for countering phishing attacks, the system comprising:
a computer-accessible database; and
a computer-hosted protector configured to
generate a plurality of synthetic victims, wherein each of the synthetic victims includes synthetic victim information that represents a computer user identity and includes associated sensitive information, wherein the computer user identity and its associated sensitive information are fictitious in that they are not known to be associated with a legitimate computer user,
provide any of the synthetic victim information of the synthetic victims to a computer-hosted phishing site,
store the synthetic victim information in the computer-accessible database,
receive from a computer-hosted target site, information provided to the computer-hosted target site by a requestor,
identify in the computer-accessible database database synthetic victim information matching the requestor information, and
notify the computer-hosted target site that the requestor information is of a synthetic victim.
8. The system according to claim 7 wherein the computer-hosted protector is configured to:
generate any of the synthetic victims by
generating a user name, and
using a predefined algorithm to derive an associated password using the user name and a predefined salt; and
provide the predefined algorithm and the salt to the computer-hosted target site, wherein the computer-hosted target site is configured, upon receiving the user name and the password from a requestor, to use the predefined algorithm and the salt to determine that the password was derived from the user name, and thereby determine that the user name and the password are associated with the synthetic victim.
9. The system according to claim 8 wherein the computer-hosted protector is configured to encode additional information into the password, wherein the computer-hosted target site is configured to extract the additional information encoded into the password.
10. The system according to claim 9 wherein the computer-hosted protector is configured to encode a network address of the phishing site into the password.
11. The system according to claim 8 wherein the computer-hosted protector is configured to encode sign the password with an asymmetric private key, wherein the computer-hosted target site is configured to validate the signature using an asymmetric public key paired with the asymmetric private key.
12. The system according to claim 7 wherein the computer-hosted protector is configured to:
receive from the computer-hosted target site a network address of the requestor;
store in the computer-accessible database, in association with the synthetic victim information, the network address of the requestor and a timestamp; and
make any information stored in the computer-accessible database available to parties for security purposes.
13. A computer program product for countering phishing attacks, the computer program product comprising:
a non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium; and
computer-readable program code embodied in the storage medium, wherein the computer-readable program code is configured to
generate a plurality of synthetic victims, wherein each of the synthetic victims includes synthetic victim information that represents a computer user identity and includes associated sensitive information, wherein the computer user identity and its associated sensitive information are fictitious in that they are not known to be associated with a legitimate computer user,
provide any of the synthetic victim information of the synthetic victims to a computer-hosted phishing site,
store the synthetic victim information in the computer-accessible database,
receive from a computer-hosted target site, information provided to the computer-hosted target site by a requestor,
identify in the computer-accessible database database synthetic victim information matching the requestor information, and
notify the computer-hosted target site that the requestor information is of a synthetic victim.
14. The computer program product according to claim 13 wherein the computer-readable program code is configured to:
generate any of the synthetic victims by
generating a user name, and
using a predefined algorithm to derive an associated password using the user name and a predefined salt; and
provide the predefined algorithm and the salt to the computer-hosted target site, wherein the computer-hosted target site is configured, upon receiving the user name and the password from a requestor, to use the predefined algorithm and the salt to determine that the password was derived from the user name, and thereby determine that the user name and the password are associated with the synthetic victim.
15. The computer program product according to claim 14 wherein the computer-readable program code is configured to encode additional information into the password, wherein the computer-hosted target site is configured to extract the additional information encoded into the password.
16. The computer program product according to claim 15 wherein the computer-readable program code is configured to encode a network address of the phishing site into the password.
17. The computer program product according to claim 14 wherein the computer-readable program code is configured to encode sign the password with an asymmetric private key, wherein the computer-hosted target site is configured to validate the signature using an asymmetric public key paired with the asymmetric private key.
18. The computer program product according to claim 13 wherein the computer-readable program code is configured to:
receive from the computer-hosted target site a network address of the requestor;
store in the computer-accessible database, in association with the synthetic victim information, the network address of the requestor and a timestamp; and
make any information stored in the computer-accessible database available to parties for security purposes.
US16/106,337 2018-08-21 2018-08-21 Countering phishing attacks Active 2039-12-20 US11159566B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/106,337 US11159566B2 (en) 2018-08-21 2018-08-21 Countering phishing attacks

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/106,337 US11159566B2 (en) 2018-08-21 2018-08-21 Countering phishing attacks

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20200067977A1 true US20200067977A1 (en) 2020-02-27
US11159566B2 US11159566B2 (en) 2021-10-26

Family

ID=69587226

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/106,337 Active 2039-12-20 US11159566B2 (en) 2018-08-21 2018-08-21 Countering phishing attacks

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US11159566B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113726825A (en) * 2021-11-04 2021-11-30 北京微步在线科技有限公司 Network attack event countercheck method, device and system
US11398908B2 (en) 2019-08-21 2022-07-26 Mcafee, Llc Methods and apparatus to deconflict malware or content remediation
US11405397B2 (en) * 2019-08-21 2022-08-02 Mcafee, Llc Methods and apparatus to deconflict malware or content remediation

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1321507C (en) 2004-04-26 2007-06-13 中国科学院成都计算机应用研究所 Soft certification anti-false method based on graphic code primary and secondary signet series information association mechanism
US7992204B2 (en) 2004-05-02 2011-08-02 Markmonitor, Inc. Enhanced responses to online fraud
US9203648B2 (en) 2004-05-02 2015-12-01 Thomson Reuters Global Resources Online fraud solution
US20060059363A1 (en) * 2004-09-16 2006-03-16 Mese John C Method for controlling access to a computerized device
US8640231B2 (en) 2006-02-23 2014-01-28 Microsoft Corporation Client side attack resistant phishing detection
US8122251B2 (en) 2007-09-19 2012-02-21 Alcatel Lucent Method and apparatus for preventing phishing attacks
US8880453B2 (en) 2011-08-29 2014-11-04 Steven Howard Snyder Method of pattern recognition for artificial intelligence
US10289846B2 (en) 2015-04-17 2019-05-14 Easy Solutions Enterprises Corp. Systems and methods for detecting and addressing remote access malware
US10063571B2 (en) * 2016-01-04 2018-08-28 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Systems and methods for the detection of advanced attackers using client side honeytokens
US10873458B2 (en) * 2016-04-28 2020-12-22 Arnold G. Reinhold System and method for securely storing and utilizing password validation data
GB2562563A (en) * 2017-03-07 2018-11-21 Rescon Ltd Session-limited, manually-entered user authentication information

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11398908B2 (en) 2019-08-21 2022-07-26 Mcafee, Llc Methods and apparatus to deconflict malware or content remediation
US11405397B2 (en) * 2019-08-21 2022-08-02 Mcafee, Llc Methods and apparatus to deconflict malware or content remediation
CN113726825A (en) * 2021-11-04 2021-11-30 北京微步在线科技有限公司 Network attack event countercheck method, device and system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US11159566B2 (en) 2021-10-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11888888B2 (en) Systems and methods for passive key identification
US9866566B2 (en) Systems and methods for detecting and reacting to malicious activity in computer networks
US10230756B2 (en) Resisting replay attacks efficiently in a permissioned and privacy-preserving blockchain network
US9584507B1 (en) Distributed password verification
US10360402B2 (en) Intercepting sensitive data using hashed candidates
US11388006B2 (en) Systems and methods for authenticated control of content delivery
US11159566B2 (en) Countering phishing attacks
US10812272B1 (en) Identifying computing processes on automation servers
Blue et al. A novel approach for secure identity authentication in legacy database systems
US20170147826A1 (en) Password Theft Protection for Controlling Access to Computer Software
Blue et al. A novel approach for protecting legacy authentication databases in consideration of GDPR
Chang et al. Information security modeling for the operation of a novel highly trusted network in a virtualization environment
Unsel et al. Risk-Based Authentication for OpenStack: A Fully Functional Implementation and Guiding Example
Li On Enhancing Security of Password-Based Authentication
WO2022229731A1 (en) Systems and methods for side scanning
Burchett Quantifying Computer Network Security

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LEE, CHENG-TA;COUTURIER, RUSSELL;IESIEV, ANDRII;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20180815 TO 20180820;REEL/FRAME:046641/0521

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT RECEIVED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE