US20200060135A1

US20200060135A1 - Low fiber yellow canola seeds comprising high oleic, low linolenic oil

Info

Publication number: US20200060135A1
Application number: US16/671,243
Authority: US
Inventors: Chibwe Chungu; Thomas J. Kubik; Gerhard Rakow; John P. Raney
Original assignee: Canada, As Rep; Dow AgroSciences LLC
Current assignee: Canada, As Rep; Corteva Agriscience LLC
Priority date: 2005-08-01
Filing date: 2019-11-01
Publication date: 2020-02-27
Also published as: BRPI0614476A2; EP1915050A4; CA2617366C; AU2006275510B2; US20100303999A1; JP5313672B2; JP2020048576A; EP1915050A2; JP2013176384A; WO2007016521A3; US20150334976A1; WO2007016521A2; CN102524087A; JP2015109869A; JP2009502199A; CN101262760A; CA2617366A1; JP2022063335A; BRPI0614476B1; EP3069604A1

Abstract

The subject invention provides low fiber, yellow-seeded canola, and related canola meal and animal feed. Oil produced from this seed has at least 68% oleic acid and no more than 3% linolenic acid, relative to the total fatty acids in the oil. Specific canola lines exhibiting these characteristics are also provided. Canola seed offering the combined advantages of excellent oil together with high-quality meal has not heretofore been provided.

Description

CROSS REFERENCES

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/997,225, with 371(c) date of May 25, 2010, which is a national stage entry of International Patent application No. PCT/US06/29813, filed on Aug. 1, 2006, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/704,469, filed on Aug. 1, 2005. The disclosures of which are expressly incorporated herein entirely.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Canola is an important oil crop. Canola oil is considered to be a superior edible oil due to its low levels of saturated fatty acids. “Canola” refers to rapeseed (Brassica spp.) that has an erucic acid (C22:1) content of at most 2 percent by weight (compared to the total fatty acid content of a seed) and that produces (after crushing) an air-dried meal containing less than 30 micromoles (μmol) of glucosinolates per gram of defatted (oil-free) meal. These types of rapeseed are distinguished by their edibility in comparison to more traditional varieties of the species.
Regular canola oil (extracted from natural and earlier commercial varieties of rapeseed) is relatively high (8%-10%) in α-linolenic acid content (C_18:3) (ALA). This fatty acid is unstable and easily oxidized during cooking, which in turn creates off-flavors of the oil. It also develops off odors and rancid flavors during storage.
It is known that reducing the α-linolenic content level by hydrogenation increases the oxidative stability of the oil. Hydrogenation is routinely used to reduce the polyunsaturates content of vegetable oils. The food industry has used hydrogenation to raise the melting point of vegetable oils, leading to the creation of oil-based products with textures similar to butter, lard and tallow. During hydrogenation, trans isomers of unsaturated fatty acids are commonly produced. However, the nutritional properties of trans fatty acids mimic saturated fatty acids, thereby reducing the overall desirability of hydrogenated oils.
The development of NATREON (a trademark of Dow AgroSciences) oil has created an even healthier canola oil and increased the oxidative stability of the oil. NEXERA seeds are related. NATREON canola oil typically has over 70% oleic acid (C18:1) and less than 3% linolenic acid (C18:3). The dietary effects of high oleic and low linolenic have been shown to have dramatic effects on health by lowering the low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and have little or no adverse effects in the high-density lipoproteins. LDLs mediate the deposition of cholesterol on blood vessels leading to artherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. U.S. Pat. No. 6,489,543 (SV095-08); U.S. Pat. No. 6,433,254 (Nex 705); U.S. Pat. No. 6,455,763 (S010); and U.S. Pat. No. 6,444,879 (1709) relate to agronomically superior high oleic canola varieties. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,965,755 and 6,169,190 (AG019) relate to high oleic, low linolenic acid canola oil.
Although rapeseed meal is relatively high in protein, its high fiber content decreases its digestibility and its value as an animal feed. Compared to soybean meal, regular canola meal contains higher values of dietary fiber. Because of its high dietary fiber, canola meal has about 20% less metabolizable energy (ME) than soybean meal. As a result, the value of the meal has remained low relative to other oilseed meals such as soybean meal. Rakow (2004a) reports that canola meal is sold for about 60-70% of the price of soybean meal mainly because of the high fiber content of canola meal (about 12% crude fiber) compared to soybean meal (about 4% crude fiber), which reduces its feed value particularly in rations for pigs and poultry. Canola meal contains approximately 36-38% crude protein whereas soybean meal contains 48% on an as-is basis. Also, the presence of glucosinolates decreases the value of some canola meal due to the deleterious effects these compounds have on the growth and reproduction of livestock.
In canola, most genetic selection to date has been focused on oil content and agronomic characteristics. The improvement of meal quality in Brassica napus canola must focus on increasing the metabolizable energy (ME) content of the meal in order to make it more competitive with other high protein feed such as soybean meal in rations for monogastric animals. Reduction in fiber levels would increase the nutritive value of canola meal by elevating the ratio of protein and ME.
Canola with yellow seed coats have been found to have thinner hulls and thus less fiber and more oil and protein than varieties with dark color seed coats. Seed coat color is generally divided into two main classes, yellow or black (or dark brown), although varying shades of these colors, such as reddish brown and yellowish brown, are also observed. Seedcoat color in rapeseed may be different depending on the particular species and variety of Brassica. Yellow-seeded rapeseed varieties are common in Asian countries, and in China, there is an abundance of yellow-seeded cultivars in production, particularly in B. juncea and B. rapa varieties.
Stringam et al. (1974) reported that yellow seeds of B. rapa had higher oil, higher protein, and lower fiber content than brown seeds. Bell & Shires (1982) studied the composition of yellow and brown canola seed hulls and compared their digestibility by pigs. The brown hulls contained more fiber and lignin. Shirzadegan & Robbelen (1985) reported an average of 2.6% higher oil and protein content in brown versus black seeds, and a 3% reduction in fiber and hull contents of yellow and brown seeds compared to common black seeded forms.
Bell (1995) noted that canola meal had high nutritional quality but the presence of hulls in the meal reduced the levels of available energy and protein, as well as amino acids and minerals. The nutritional value of canola meal can be improved by reducing fiber and/or hull contents, leading to greater digestibility of available protein and amino acids. The development of yellow-seeded varieties with less hull is offered as a possibility to increase the feed value of canola meal.
Simbaya et al. (1995) compared yellow-seeded meals from B. napus, B. juncea, and B. rapa to brown-seeded canola. On average, yellow-seeded samples had higher protein and lower dietary fiber (and lignin).
Getinet & Rakow (1997) studied the inheritance patterns of seed coat pigmentation repression in B. carinata. Slominski et al. (1999) compared the nutritive value for broiler chickens fed meals derived from these lines/varieties.
For more than 20 years, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC)-Saskatoon has conducted research towards the development of yellow-seeded B. napus and has produced different sources of yellow-seeded B. napus germplasm (Rashid et al. 1994; Rashid & Rakow 1995; Rakow et al. 1999 a & b; and Relf-Eckstein et al. 2003), the latter of which compares YN97-262 and three other yellow seeded lines to 46A65.
Rashid et al. (1994) relates to an interspecific crossing scheme used to develop yellow-seeded B. napus (with traits such as improved fertility). Rakow et al. (1999a) notes that in B. napus, no yellow-seeded types occur naturally; all have been developed through inter-specific hybridizations with B. napus, B. juncea, and B. rapa in various crossing combinations. Early lines had lower oil content than black seed lines (attributed to poor embryo development), were low yielding, and highly susceptible to blackleg (Leptosphaeria maculans). Rakow et al. (1999b) relates to a “much needed” new source of yellow-seeded B. napus, which was developed from interspecific crosses between black-seeded WESTAR and yellow-seeded B. juncea and B. carinata. The yellow-seeded lines thus obtained were reported to have low erucic acid, low glucosinolates, 60-65% oleic acid, 18-20% linoleic acid, and 7-9% linolenic acid.
Rakow (2004b) reports that yellow-seeded Brassica oil seeds have significantly reduced meal fiber levels and increased seed oil content, as compared to black or brown-seeded forms. This reference discusses results of a December 2003 report where yellow-seeded line YN01-429 was compared to black-seeded 46A65. The results are as follows:

	TABLE 1

	YN01-429	46A65

Yield (kg/ha)	1640	1520
Color (WIE*)	−46.6	1.9
Seed Oil %	47.86	43.88
Meal Protein %	52.55	54.27
Seed Weight (g/1000 s)	3.33	2.79
glucosinolates (umol/g)	11.1	14.1
TSAT %	6.58	6.91
C22:1	0.016	0.021
Blackleg (% Westar)	53	15
ADF % meal	9.62	15.69
ADL % meal	1.82	7.36

(*color was measured by method E313, white index)

This reference also reports of an increasing demand for high oleic/low linolenic acid, heat-stable, low trans fatty acid vegetable oils for frying applications. This reference reports of a desire to reduce fiber content and glucosinolate content to enhance the overall nutritional value of canola meal to meet an increasing demand for plant-based, high protein meal sources for the feed industry. This reference further reports that germplasm lines with low total saturated fat content (4.5-5.0%), low total glucosinolate content (<3 μmoles/gram of seed), high seed weight (>3 gram/100 seeds) and disease resistance have been developed in yellow-seeded forms of B. napus, and that future goals include continuing to increase such gene pools, and increasing meal protein content and seed size.
Rakow & Raney (2003) notes that rapeseed (canola) oil is high in oleic acid and essential polyunsaturated fatty acids, and that further oil quality improvements would include the development of very high oleic acid/low linolenic acid (HOLL) varieties for use in frying applications, and the creation of low and very low (zero) saturated fat oils. According to this reference, meal quality improvements will focus on fiber reductions (especially lignin) through the creation of yellow-seeded B. napus forms. Reduction or elimination of glucosinolates is listed as a further breeding goal. This reference further notes that new Brassica oil seed crops, such as B. juncea and B. carinata, are under development, but it is noted that each species has specific seed oil and meal quality challenges that need to be addressed, including modification of fatty acid compositions to improve oil quality.
Improved oil levels and protein levels are primary objectives of rapeseed breeding programs. Thus, introduction of a yellow seed coat trait into canola varieties is desirable, in the interest of providing improvements in both the seed oil and protein levels. However, integration of genes controlling seed pigmentation from related Brassica species into valuable oilseed Brassica varieties, such as canola varieties, is complicated by the fact that multiple recessive alleles are involved in the inheritance of yellow seed coats in presently available yellow seeded lines. Pod curling is also a common problem due to poor chromosome pairing when yellow-seed color is introgressed from other Brassica species, such as juncea and carinata.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,547,711 and 6,380,466 relate to rapeseed having a yellow-seed coat controlled by a single locus mutation. EP 1 031 577 relates to a Brassica plant transformed with a transparent seed coat gene.
The development, and potential advantages, of yellow-seeded canola combined with having certain advantageous oil profiles has not heretofore been achieved.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The subject invention provides yellow-seeded canola that can be used to produce not only oil having advantageous fatty acid profiles (more than 68% oleic acid, by weight, and less than 3% linolenic acid, relative to total fatty acids) but also highly nutritious meal for animals such as chickens. Canola seed of the subject invention offers the highly advantageous combination of health oil (for the cooking industry and the like) together with high-protein, low-fiber animal feed. This combination has not heretofore been available from a single type of seed.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Canola oil refers to oil extracted from commercial varieties of rapeseed. To produce canola oil, seed is typically graded and blended at grain elevators to produce an acceptably uniform product. The blended seed is then crushed, the oil is typically extracted with hexane, and then refined. The resulting oil is then sold for use. Oil content is typically measured as percent of the whole dried seed and is characteristic of different varieties of canola. (Oil content can be determined using various analytical techniques such as NMR, NIR, and Soxhlet extraction.) Percentage of total fatty acids is typically determined by extracting a sample of oil from seed, producing the methyl esters of fatty acids present in that oil sample, and analyzing the proportions of the various fatty acid in the sample using gas chromatography. The fatty acid composition can also be a distinguishing characteristic of a variety.
While canola oil, in general, has been recognized as very healthful oil, the meal component of the seed (left over after extracting the oil component) is inferior to (and not economically competitive with) soybean meal because of the high fiber content (and corresponding decreased nutritional value). Thus, the subject invention provides a highly nutritious and economical source of animal feed—canola meal—which has heretofore been a lower-value byproductis now. The subject invention provides for recapturing value from this “byproduct.” Thus, the subject invention also saves valuable resources.
The subject invention relates in part to yellow-seeded canola capable of yielding canola oil having a NATREON-type oil profile. As used herein, a “NATREON-type” or “NATREON-like” oil profile signifies an oleic acid content preferably in a range of 68-80%, 70-78%, 71-77%, and 72-75% (more preferably), all with an alpha linolenic content below 3%. The subject invention, however, is not limited to yellow seeds that yield such oils, but includes oil from such seeds having an oleic acid content greater than 80%, for example. There are many ways known in the art for measuring such fatty acid content. Preferred measurement methods are discussed herein, particularly in the Examples. Oils of the subject invention are naturally stable; they are not artificially hydrogenated.
Thus, the subject invention includes, in some embodiments, yellow canola seeds comprising an oil fraction and a meal fraction, said oil fraction having an α-linolenic acid content of 3% or less relative to the total fatty acid content of said seeds, and an oleic acid content of 68% or more relative to the total fatty acid content of said seeds. By definition, the erucic acid (C22:1) content is also less than 2 percent by weight (compared to the total fatty acid content of a seed), and each gram of defatted (oil-free) meal (after crushing and an air-drying) contains less than 30 micromoles (μmol) of glucosinolates.
The yellow color of the seeds is significant because it corresponds with improved nutritional characteristics of the meal component obtained after extraction of the oil. Various improved components are discussed in more detail below, such as decreased lignin, decreased phytates, and increased sugars and starch.
The subject invention now provides, for the first time, yellow-seeded, low-fiber canola that also provides a superior, high oleic and low linolenic oil. In addition, the subject invention surprisingly further provides these traits in combination with other valuable traits (such as excellent yield, high protein content, and high oil content (in addition to quality). Generally, the yellow seeds of the subject invention have a considerably thinner seed coat than black and brown ones. The thinner seed coat results in a reduced fiber content in the meal and an associated increase in seed oil and protein content as compared with normal levels of oil and protein. The subject yellow-seeded genotypes generally have higher oil and protein concentrations in their seeds. Furthermore, when edible protein products are made from rapeseed meal the dark color of black seed is a considerable problem. The black-seed coat gives an unpleasant grey color to protein products made from rapeseed meal. Therefore the reduction in seed coat color of the rapeseed of the invention increases protein quality and improves the overall available energy provided by the meals of the subject invention.
Plant lines capable of yielding NATREON-like oil profiles, combined with the yellow seed trait and associated improvements in the resulting meal, have not previously been achieved. Thus, the subject invention advantageously provides not only yellow-seeded canola lines, but yellow-seeded canola lines having advantageous NATREON-like oil profiles. Further surprising is that these advantageous oil profiles could be achieved, with yellow seeds, while providing excellent yield, protein quality, and other advantageous qualities.
Thus, the subject invention provides, for the first time, canola seeds having two highly useful components: an excellent oil component, and a highly nutritional meal component. Various aspects of these components are described in more detail below.
In some specific embodiments, the subject invention provides yellow-seeded varieties of Brassica napus having advantageous (naturally stable (not hydrogenate) high oleic, low linolenic) oil profiles, wherein some of the varieties are selected from DN03-3743, DN03-3745, DN03-3746, DN03-3747, DN03-3748, DN03-3749, DN03-3744, and DN03-4169. Canola lines of the subject invention have been stabilized to produce yellow seeds having a linolenic acid content of less than 3% and an oleic acid content of 68% or more relative to total fatty acid content. In accordance with the present invention, a substantially uniform assemblage of rapeseed can be produced. Such seed can be used to produce a substantially uniform field of rape plants.
As shown herein, these are the minimum requirements for the oil, and even better results have been achieved. For example, in preferred embodiments, seed (of the subject invention) obtained from plants (of the subject invention) yield oil having over 70%, over 71%, over 71.5%, and over 72% (and in some cases, up to 72.4% and 72.7%) oleic acid, while having linolenic acid content of less than 2.4%, less than 2%, less than 1.9%, less than 1.8%, and down to 1.7%. These advantageous oil profiles have been achieved while retaining various other valuable characteristics in the meal component, as discussed above and in more detail below.
Still further, oils having these profiles have been obtained from plants having a seed color rating of less than 2, less than 1, and as low as 1. Unless otherwise indicated, as reported herein, the seed color rating or “seed color” is generally scored on a 1-5 scale based on seeds obtained from healthy plants at or near complete seed maturity. “1” signifies a good yellow color. “2” signifies mainly yellow with some brown. “3” indicates a mixture of brown and yellow. “4” and “5” signify brown and black, respectively. Whiteness index (WI) scores are also provided in Table 2 and are described in more detail below in the Examples. Yellow-seeded parent lines YN97-262 and 9592 have whiteness index scores of −34.6 and −33.2, respectively, and seed color scores of 1. Black-seeded NATREON lines, Nex 715 and Nex 705 have whiteness index scores of −0.2 and −4.4, respectively, and seed color scores of 4. Black-seeded comparison lines 46A65 and Q2 have whiteness index scores of 0.3 and −3.9, respectively, and seed color scores of 5. The exemplified 7 “DN03” yellow-seeded-NATREON lines have whiteness index scores between −22.6 and −36.2, and a seed color score of 1 to 2. Thus, yellowness of the subject seeds can also be described in terms of a percentage or other ratio as compared to any of these control or check lines.

TABLE 2

Mean agronomic and quality data BC₁F₆progenies and checks from a replicated yield trial carried out
at AAFC-Saskatoon site in Year 3.

							% of
							avg. of		Avg. of
ID				LDG		Yield	46A65		nearest
(Average)	DTF	DTM	Ht	(1-5)	sdwt	kg/ha	& Q2	BLk	Westars	C18:1	C18:2	C18:3

DN03-3743	47	88	104	1	2.9	1075	70	1.00	2.05	72.4	16.2	1.9
DN03-3744	46	88	107	1	3.4	981	70	0.28	2.05	71.8	17.1	1.9
DN03-3745	48	88	105	1	3.1	1064	69	0.95	2.04	71.3	17.1	2.3
DN03-3746	48	89	101	1	3.0	1221	80	0.88	2.04	72.1	16.7	1.8
DN03-3747	44	87	94	1	3.2	1195	78	1.20	2.80	72.2	17.0	1.7
DN03-3748	47	90	100	1	3.3	954	62	0.61	2.80	72.0	17.0	1.8
DN03-3749	47	90	98	1	3.4	942	61	0.84	2.55	72.7	16.3	1.8
Nex 715	45	87	102	1	3.2	1300	85	0.23	2.55	77.2	12.3	1.8
Nex 705	46	89	95	1	3.5	1729	112	1.08	2.60	76.6	13.0	1.9
DN99-6738	50	88	107	1	2.9	1535	100	0.15	2.60	75.0	13.9	1.8
Arg
DN99-	51	89	104	1	2.7	1464	95	—	—	75.4	13.5	1.8
6738-GH
YN97-262	46	89	98	1	3.5	1240	80	1.47	2.89	65.7	18.9	5.9
YN9592	46	86	104	1	3.0	992	65	1.89	2.89	55.6	22.3	12.9
46A65	42	85	93	1	2.5	1436	94	0.30	2.65	66.9	17.7	6.1
Q2	46	87	101	1	2.9	1637	106	0.15	2.65	66.4	17.0	7.2
Grand	46	88	101	1		1255
Mean
CV	4.0	0.7	6	—		16
LSD	2.0	0.7	7	—		216
SED	1.5	0.5	5	—		165

				Seed
ID	%			color			%		%		%
(Average)	Sat	% Oil	Glucs	(1-5)	WI	ADF	Red	ADL	Red	NDF	Red

DN03-3743	7.0	44.30	13.00	1.0	−33.4	8.3	43.0	1.2	83.0	16.1	32
DN03-3744	6.7	45.41	12.20	2.0	−22.6	8.2	43.0	1.3	81.0	1.1	29
DN03-3745	6.8	44.33	12.30	1.5	−35.8	8.2	43.0	1.2	85.0	16.4	31
DN03-3746	6.8	44.48	11.80	1.0	−36.2	8.2	43.0	1.2	83.0	16.3	29
DN03-3747	6.6	44.91	11.50	1.0	−35.8	8.1	44.0	1.3	84.0	15.7	28
DN03-3748	6.6	44.22	11.50	1.5	−35.1	7.5	48.0	1.2	86.0	16.4	35
DN03-3749	6.7	43.52	11.20	1.5	−34.8	7.7	47.0	1.0	83.0	16.0	37
Nex 715	6.4	42.79	10.50	4.0	−0.2	15.2	−5.0	5.3	−6.0	20.8	−1
Nex 705	6.4	47.84	11.10	4.0	−4.4	11.3	21.0	2.9	44.0	17.5	12
DN99-6738	6.9	45.73	10.60	4.0	−7.5	10.0	31.0	1.9	57.0	15.6	23
Arg
DN99-	7.0	45.84	10.40	4.0	−9.9	9.5	34.0	2.0	60.0	16.1	23
6738-GH
YN97-262	7.2	47.29	16.90	1.0	−34.6	6.9	52.0	1.2	86.0	16.5	40
YN9592	6.8	42.44	12.50	1.0	−33.2	7.0	48.0	1.0	81.0	15.9	35
46A65	7.0	44.21	14.70	5.0	0.3	13.0	5.0	4.9	6.0	19.6	1
Q2	7.0	43.79	13.70	5.0	−3.9	10.5	22.0	3.3	36.0	18.6	16
Grand		44.65
Mean
CV		1.3
LSD		0.7
SED		0.5

1 = erect
5 = flat on ground

The meal component of seeds of the subject invention has high protein, low fiber, low lignin, low glucosinolates, low phytates, and/or low sinapic acid esters (SAEs), for example. Insoluble fiber, lignin, glucosinolates, phytates, and SAEs are antinutritional and impair protein and amino acid digestion. Plants store phosphorous in the form of phytate, so undigested phytate-phosphorous in animal waste is a significant environmental concern.
The subject meal components and animal feeds comprising them are especially good for monogastric animals such as pigs and chickens. While the digestive systems of ruminant animals (such as cattle) are well-suited for fiber and phytate consumption and digestion, those animals do not make good use of the high quality protein component of canola meal because the proteins are rapidly used by rumen bacteria. Thus, reducing fiber, phytate, and SAE components of the subject canola meal can greatly increase the nutritional value of these meals for pigs, chickens, and the like.
As discussed in more detail in the Examples below, the yellow-seeded strains of the subject invention have good yields and produce seeds having much lower acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) compared to any of the “control” lines. It should be noted that any of the data points on any of the Tables presented herein can be used to define plants, seeds, and oil of the subject invention. (Any of the exemplified numbers can be used as endpoints to define ranges above, below, or in between any of the exemplified numbers.) Some of these ranges for oil characteristics have been discussed above. The same can also be illustrated for other factors. Lines and seeds of the subject invention can also be defined by combinations of such ranges. For example, the oil characteristics discussed above together with characteristic fiber levels and phytate levels, for example, can be used to define lines and seeds of the subject invention.
Other combinations of such characteristics are also possible. For example, combined total oil and protein content of the seeds is also a useful measure and a unique characteristic of the subject seeds.
As another, more specific example, the eight exemplified “DN03” lines have ADL scores of 1.0, 1.2, 1.3, and 1.7. See Table 2. These scores signify lignin reductions of 81, 83, 84, 85, 86, and 71% (depending on the variety of the subject invention), as compared to Nex 715. Lignin is an especially important component of fiber to reduce for monogastric animal feed because lignin is completely indigestible by such animals. Thus, decreasing lignin in the meal source can greatly increase the metabolizable energy and nutritional value of the meal for such animals.
Furthermore, preferred seeds (and meal) of the subject invention, while providing superior oil as discussed above, also have very desirably low levels of glucosinolates. For example, glucosinolate concentrations can be less than 13 micromoles per gram, less than 12.3, less than 12.2, less than 11.8, less than 11.5, and as low as 11.2 micromoles per gram (measured using standard methodology unless indicated otherwise). Thus, the subject invention includes crushed seeds, wherein said seeds are Brassica napus seeds, having an average glucosinolate content (per grams of meal) in the ranges specified above.
Phytate characteristics can also be used to define seeds, plants, and lines or varieties of the subject invention. Phytate for DN03-3746, for example, was determined to be 1.3%, which is lower than all of the “controls” except for Nex 715. Nex 715, however, is a lower-oil line (but is blackleg resistant). See Table 14, below. See also Table 2, which shows about 44.5% oil for DN03-3746 and about 42.8% oil for Nex 715.
In addition to fiber levels and other factors discussed above, metabolizable energy values may be related to sucrose (and other sugar) content in the meal. The subject invention provides canola varieties with high sucrose (and other sugar) content, with improved metabolizable energy and therefore meal value. For example, DN03-3746 has a sucrose content of about 12%, which is considerably higher than 46A65, Nex 705, Nex 715, and Nex 720. DN03-3746 has a glucose content of about 19%, which is considerably higher than Q2, 46A65, Nex 705, Nex 715, Nex 710, and Nex 720. DN03-3746 also has levels of rhamnose, fucose, arabinose (6.1%) and mannose (over 1.8%) that are higher than those for all of Q2, 46A65, Nex 705, Nex 715, Nex 710, and Nex 720. Galactose levels for DN03-3746 of about 4.7% are also higher than those of Nex 705, Nex 715, and Nex 710, and are comparable to those of Nex 720.
Crude protein for DN03-3746 (about 51%) was also higher than that of Q2, 46A65, Nex 705, Nex 715, Nex 710, and Nex 720.
Combined with these aspects of the meal component, the subject invention also includes seeds wherein the oil fraction has an α-linolenic acid content between 1.7% and about 2.3% (or less than this range) relative to the total fatty acid content of said seeds. Further, the oil component can comprise oleic acid from about 71.3% to about 72.7% (or higher). The subject seeds are yellow seeds, having a color score preferably in the range of about 1 to about 2, with corresponding reductions in fiber (including lignin), glucosinolates, phytates, and/or SAE and the like. Preferred ranges for these components of the meal fraction are provided above and elsewhere herein.
One exemplified line of the subject invention (DN03-3746, for example) produces seeds having a seed color score of 1, a whiteness index score of about −36.2, about 44.5% total oil, an oil content comprising about 72% oleic acid and about 1.8% linolenic acid, and a meal component having about 8.2% ADF, about 1.2% ADL, about 16.3% NDF, about 47% protein, and about 1.3% phytate. Not all of these characteristics are needed to define lines and seeds of the subject invention, but additional characteristics can be used to define lines and seeds of the subject invention (such as % sucrose, AME, etc.). The main characteristics are the yellow seed coat and the advantageous (high oleic, low linolenic) oil profiles.
Various combinations of traits can also be identified in, and are exemplified by, the DN04 or “04” lines provided in Examples below. Particularly noteworthy in these Examples for these lines are the yield, % oil, and % protein numbers, in addition to the oil profile and reduced fiber contents. These lines illustrate that the subject invention can be used to provide and obtain various new and unexpected combinations of a wide variety of advantageous canola characteristics and traits.
Advantageous traits of the subject Brassica napus lines can be transferred to other types of Brassica (through conventional breeding and the like), such as Brassica rapa, with the resulting plants producing seeds having yellow seed coats and improved oil content (oleic acid content greater than 68% and linolenic acid content less than 3%). Meals and seeds of the subject invention have a decreased level of seed fiber and other related characteristics.
Thus, the subject invention addresses a need for canola seed lines with improved oil and utilizable protein contents, and decreased fiber content. The invention is drawn to rapeseeds that have the advantageous combination of a superior oil content together with yellow seed coats. There are related aspects of the subject invention, such as the plants that produce such rapeseeds. The subject invention includes not only yellow seeds of canola having NATREON oil profiles, but also plants grown or otherwise produced from such seeds, and tissue cultures of regenerable cells of the subject canola plants. It should also be noted that the exemplified lines were obtained without genetic engineering and without mutagenesis.
The subject invention relates generally to any yellow-seeded canola plant, or yellow seed itself, wherein the seed has NATREON-type oil profiles. In some specific embodiments, the present invention is directed to specific lines as disclosed herein. Seed from two representative lines has been deposited. As part of this disclosure, at least 2500 seeds of DN03-3746 and DN03-4169 have been deposited and made available to the public without restriction (but subject to patent rights), with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, Md. 20852. The deposits have been designated as ATCC Deposit Nos. PTA-6806 and PTA-6807, respectively, with a deposit date of Jun. 24, 2005. The deposits will be maintained without restriction at the ATCC depository, which is a public depository, for a period of 30 years, or five years after the most recent request, or for the effective life of the patent, whichever is longer, and will be replaced if it becomes nonviable during that period.
The subject invention includes seed of any of the Brassica napus varieties disclosed herein. The subject invention also includes Brassica napus plants produced by such seed, as well as tissue cultures of regenerable cells of such plants. Also included is a Brassica napus plant regenerated from such tissue culture, particularly where said plant is capable of expressing all the morphological and physiological properties of an exemplified variety. Preferred Brassica napus plants of the subject invention have the important and/or identifying physiological and morphological characteristics of a plant grown from the deposited seed.
This invention further comprises progeny of such seed and seed possessing the quality traits of interest. This invention further includes processes of making crosses using lines and/or varieties of the subject invention as at least one parent of the progeny of the above-described seeds and oil derived from said seeds.
For example, the subject invention includes an F₁hybrid Brassica napus plant having as one or both parents any of the plants exemplified herein. Also within the subject invention is Brassica napus seed produced by such F₁hybrids of the subject invention. This invention includes a method for producing an F₁hybrid Brassica napus seed by crossing an exemplified plant with a different in-bred parent canola plant and harvesting the resultant hybrid seed. The subject invention includes an exemplified plant that is either a female parent or a male parent.
The exemplified oil and protein levels and profiles can be further improved by crossing the plants of the invention with other lines having high oil and protein levels. Likewise, other characteristics may be improved by careful consideration of the parent plant. Lines of the subject invention are beneficial for crossing the yellow-seed and ideal oil profile traits into other rape or canola lines. These traits can now be transferred into other plants within the same species by conventional plant breeding techniques including cross-pollination and selection of the progeny. Also, the desired traits can be transferred between species using the same convention plant breeding techniques involving pollen transfer and selection. See, e.g., Brassica crops and wild allies biology and breeding, edited by S. Tsunada et al., Japan Scientific Press, Tokyo (1980); Physiological Potentials for Yield Improvement of Annual Oil and Protein Crops, edited by Diepenbrock and Becker, Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag Berlin, Vienna (1995); Canola and Rapeseed, edited by F. Shahidi, Van Nostrand Reinhold, N.Y. (1990); and Breeding Oilseed Brassicas, edited by Labana et al., Narosa Publishing House, New Dehli (1993).
Having obtained and produced representative lines of the subject invention, the subject yellow seed coat color and oil traits can now be readily transferred into other plants, including Brassica campestris species, by conventional plant breeding techniques and the like. Such conventional techniques include cross-pollination and selection of the progeny. Such techniques can likewise be used to transfer the trait between species. Commercially available campestris varieties, for example, include Tobin, Horizon, Colt, and the like. One approach includes, following the interspecific cross, self-pollinating members of the F₁generation to produce F₂seed. Backcrossing can then be conducted to obtain lines exhibiting the desired trait. Additionally, protoplast fusion and nuclear transplant methods can be used to transfer the trait from one species to another. See, generally, “Fusion of Higher Plant Protoplasts” by Albert W. Ruesink, Methods in Enzymology, Vol. LVIII, Jakoby and Pastan. (eds). Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y. (1979), and the references cited therein; and Carlson et al. (1972), Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 69:2292.
The present invention includes varieties of Brassica napus, as well as essentially derived varieties that have been essentially derived from at least one of the exemplified varieties. In addition, the present invention includes a plant of at least one of the exemplified varieties, a plant of such an essentially derived variety, and a rape plant regenerated from such plants or tissue (including pollen, seeds, and cells) thereof.
It will be readily apparent that, given one of the subject varieties as a starting point, the particular benefits afforded by this variety can be manipulated in a number of ways by the skilled practitioner without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, the seed oil profile present in an exemplified variety can be transferred into other agronomically desirable Brassica napus varieties by conventional plant breeding techniques involving cross-pollination and selection of the progeny, for example.
Plant cells can be selected that are capable of regeneration such as seeds, microspores, ovules, pollen, vegetative parts, particularly microspores. For the most part, such plant cells can be selected from any variety of Brassica, particularly those having desired agronomic traits.
Regeneration techniques are known in the art. One can initially select cells capable of regeneration (e.g., seeds, microspores, ovules, pollen, vegetative parts) from a selected plant or variety. These cells can optionally be subjected to mutagenesis. A plant is then developed from the cells using regeneration, fertilization, and/or growing techniques based on the type of cells (and whether they are mutagenized). Applicable regeneration techniques are known to those in the art; see, for example, Armstrong, C. L., and Green, C. E., Planta 164:207-214 (1985); Duncan, D. R. et al., Planta 165:322-332 (1985); and, Close, K. R., and Ludeman, L. A., Plant Science 52:81-89 (1987).
Such manipulations of plants or seeds, or parts thereof, may lead to the creation of what may be termed “essentially derived” varieties. The International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) has provided the following guideline for determining if a variety has been essentially derived from a protected variety:

- [A] variety shall be deemed to be essentially derived from another variety (“the initial variety”) when
- (i) it is predominantly derived from the initial variety, or from a variety that is itself predominantly derived from the initial variety, while retaining the expression of the essential characteristics that result from the genotype or combination of genotypes of the initial variety;
- (ii) it is clearly distinguishable from the initial variety; and
- (iii) except for the differences which result from the act of derivation, it conforms to the initial variety in the expression of the essential characteristics that result from the genotype or combination of genotypes of the initial variety.
- UPOV, Sixth Meeting with International Organizations, Geneva, Oct. 30, 1992; document prepared by the Office of the Union.

Preferred embodiments of the subject invention include meals wherein said meal comprises canola seed wherein said seed has oil and meal characteristics as discussed above. The subject invention includes hexane-extracted, air-dried canola meal having a novel combination of characteristics as discussed above. The subject invention includes meal produced from the deposited Brassica napus seeds, and meal produced from seeds of progeny of said deposited seeds.
As used herein, a “line” is a group of plants that display little or no genetic variation between individuals for at least one trait. Such lines may be created by several generations of self-pollination and selection, or vegetative propagation from a single parent using tissue or cell culture techniques. As used herein, the terms “cultivar” and “variety” are synonymous and refer to a line that is used for commercial production.
“Stability” or “stable” means that with respect to the given component, the component is maintained from generation to generation and, preferably, at least three generations at substantially the same level, e.g., preferably ±15%, more preferably ±10%, most preferably ±5%. The stability may be affected by temperature, location, stress and the time of planting. Comparison of subsequent generations under field conditions should produce the component in a similar manner.
“Commercially useful” lines have good plant vigor and high fertility, such that the crop can be produced by farmers using conventional farming equipment, and the oil with the described components can be extracted from the seed using conventional crushing and extraction equipment. To be commercially useful, the yield, as measured by both seed weight, oil content, and total oil produced per acre, is typically within 15% of the average yield of an otherwise comparable commercial canola variety without the premium value traits grown in the same region. “Agronomically elite” lines have desirable agronomic characteristics such as yield, maturity, disease resistance, and standability.
Following is a list of the common names of fatty acids, as used herein, together with their number of carbon atoms and double bonds. Saturated fats have zero double bonds.

TABLE 3

	Number of	Number of
	Carbon Atoms	Double Bonds
Name	Per Molecule	Per Molecule

Lauric	12	0
Myristic	14	0
Palmitic	16	0
Palmitoleic	16	1
Stearic	18	0
Oleic*	18	1
Vaccenic**	18	1
Linoleic	18	2
Alpha-Linolenic	18	3
Arachidic	20	0
Eicosenoic	20	1
Behenic	22	0
Erucic	22	1
Lignoceric	24	0
Nervonic	24	1

*= double bond at delta-9 position
**= double bond at delta-11 position

“Saturated fatty acid” refers to the combined content of lauric (C12:0), myristic (C:14:0), palmitic (C16:0), stearic (C18:0), arachidic (C20:0), behenic (C22:0), and lignoceric (24:0) acids. “Polyunsaturated fatty acid” refers to the combined content of linoleic and α-linolenic acids. The amount of fatty acids, such as oleic and linolenic acids, that are characteristic of the subject oils are expressed as a percentage of the total fatty acid content of the oil (unless otherwise specified).
“Protein content” is measured as percent of whole dried seed, and different varieties have different characteristic protein contents. Protein content can be determined using various analytical techniques such as NIR and Kjeldahl.
Glucosinolates are measured in micromoles (μm) of total alipathic glucosinolates per gram of air-dried oil-free meal. The level of glucosinolates is somewhat influenced by the sulfur fertility of the soil but is also controlled by the genetic makeup of each variety (and thus can be useful in characterizing varieties).
Unless otherwise indicated, all calculations (for fiber content and the like) were obtained using techniques that are known in the art and accepted in the industry.
The present invention has of necessity been discussed herein by reference to certain specific methods and materials. The enumeration of these methods and materials is merely illustrative and in no way constitutes any limitation on the scope of the present invention. It is to be expected that those skilled in the art may discern and practice variations of or alternatives to the specific teachings provided herein, without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Unless indicated otherwise, the terms “a” and “an” as used herein refer to at least one.
All patents, patent applications, provisional applications, and publications referred to or cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety to the extent they are not inconsistent with the explicit teachings of this specification.
Following are examples that illustrate procedures for practicing the invention. These examples should not be construed as limiting. All percentages are by weight and all solvent mixture proportions are by volume unless otherwise noted.

Example 1—Parent Lines and Year 0

In Year 0, the following parent lines were selected: DAS NATREON B. napus Nex 705 (M94S007) and Nex 715 (M97A222), and AAFC yellow-seed lines YN97-262 and 9592. Nex 715 is lower in oil than Nex 710, but Nex 715 has blackleg resistance genes. Quality and agronomic data of these lines was measured for comparative purposes and to track the progress and improvement of subsequent lines.
Nex 705 was used in backcrosses to create the following two progenies: YN97-262/Nex 715//Nex 705 and 9592/Nex715//Nex 705.
To introgress blackleg resistance genes, these progeny were backcrossed with Nex 715 to produce the following two progenies: YN97-262/Nex 705//Nex 715 and 705, 9592/Nex 705//Nex 715.
1235 BC₁F₁plants were grown to produce BC₁F₂seeds.

Example 2—Year 1

In Year 1, 1092 BC₁F₂rows were grown in Saskatoon. These comprised of 540 BC1F2 progenies from [9592/Nex705//Nex 705] and [9592/Nex715//Nex 705], and 552 BC1F2 progenies from [YN97-262/Nex 705//Nex 715] and [YN97-262/Nex 715//Nex 705]. 268 BC1F2 progeny rows were also grown from the 9592 crosses, and 252 BC1F2 progeny rows from the YN97-262 crosses.
In addition, 272 BC1F2 progenies rows from the 9592 cross, and 300 BC1F2 progenies from YN97-262 crosses were grown at AAFC site in Saskatoon
Each BC1F2 row was replicated twice, and the parents were used as checks every 10^throw in the nursery.
For the plants grown at the Moon Lake location, rows segregating for yellow-seeded color were identified. All plants in each BC1F2 row were evaluated for seed color in the first replication, and only plants with good yellow color were harvested. In the second replication, only lines that exhibited seed color rating of 3 or better in 1^streplication were harvested.
For the plants grown in AAFC Saskatoon site, the first replication was combine harvested, and then the seeds were rated for the presence of yellow. Based on this selection, all plants from segregating yellow-seeded rows were harvested from the second replicate, including some rows of parental checks.
For seed obtained from both sites, bulk fatty acid analysis was first conducted on selected BC1F3 plants followed by half-seed fatty acid analysis in plants that exhibited high C18:1 and low C18:3.

Example 3—December Year 1 to April Year 2

BC1F3 plants were grown to produce BC1F4 seed in the greenhouse. Seed color selection was carried out, and only 189 BC1F4 plants were selected for Year 2 field evaluation.
The BC1F4 lines were evaluated in a replicated nursery at the Moon Lake site and at the Saskatoon site. Two replications were seeded at each site. 28 lines exhibiting good agronomic characteristics at both sites were selected, and 10 single plants were harvested from each row. Remaining plants from each row were bulked and analyzed for oil and fatty acid profile.
Individual plants were color rated using a scale of 1-5. Plants with a rating of 2 or better were sent for fatty acid analysis. Seven single plants from 3 BC1F4 rows were selected and ½-seed analysis was carried out.
The following four true-breeding, yellow, NATREON-type B. napus BC1F5 lines were identified: DN02-0548, DN02-0590, DN02-0591, and DN02-0592. Bulk seed samples from these four lines and checks were used to determine the oil and fiber levels. Relative to the black seeded variety Nex 715, the 4 lines had an average of a 34% reduction in acid detergent fiber, a 68% reduction in acid detergent lignin, and a 14% reduction in neutral detergent fiber.

Example 4—Winter Year 2 to Year 3

Half-seeding was done in seven BC1F5 lines from DN02-0590, DN02-0591, and DN02-0592. These were grown in a greenhouse in the winter of Years 2-3.
In addition, a BC2F1 cross was produced by crossing BC1F5 plants to a Natreon line DN99-6738 (which has high oil and protein, is R-rated for blackleg, and has a good Natreon profile). The BC2F1 were microspore cultured to produce yellow NATREON-type DH lines evaluated in the nursery in Year 4.
In a replicated yield trial in Year 3, bulk selfed seed of BC1F6 plants was used to assess the agronomic and quality performance of the yellow NATREON-type lines relative to Nexera commercial varieties and WCC/RRC (Western Canadian Canola/Rapeseed Recommending Committee) black-seeded check varieties (Q2 and 46A65).

Example 5—Development of Further Lines

The 7 BC1F6 lines developed from the cross of YN97-262/Nex 715//Nex 705 through traditional backcrossing methods, followed by reselection of yellow & NATREON quality in backcross generations were designated as DN03-3743, DN03-3744, DN03-3745, DN03-3746, DN03-3747, DN03-3748, and DN03-3749. DN03-4169 is another yellow-seeded line produced from 9592/Nex 715/Nex 705 cross. These lines exhibited NATREON-type oil quality and very stable yellow seed color.
Table 2 indicates, for field grown material from these lines, reductions in fiber levels that were achieved, relative to mean of Nex 715 & 46A65.
These lines are stable and uniform after 6 generations of selection. No off-type plants have been exhibited in various evaluations. The most advanced cross with these lines is a BC2F1-derived population that was in stage 1B in the summer of year 4.
These lines with yellow-seeded NATREON-type oil profiles have exhibited commercially valuable characteristics in multi-year evaluations. The true-breeding yellow NATREON-type lines are also valuable material for use in feed, where the value (including monetary) of the reduction in dietary fiber can be readily demonstrated.
Data obtained from these eight lines grown at the Saskatoon site are provided in Table 2. These data include: days to flower (DTF), days to maturity (DTM), height, lodging, seed weight, yield, and blackleg resistance. Also included are percent of C18:1, C18:2, and C18:3 fatty acids, total % saturates, % oil (total oil content) (American Oil Chemists' Society (AOCS) official Method Am 2-92), glucosinolates (AOCS Official Method Ak 1-92 (93)), seed color score, ADF, ADL, and NDF (and the percent reduction of the latter three fiber scores as compared to Nex 715). Table 4 presents data from these six lines grown at the Moon Lake site, in addition to the parental NATREON lines DN99-6738 (A.K.A. NQC02X01). The % protein for the lines of the subject invention is also noteworthy.

TABLE 4

Mean agronomic and quality data BC₁F₆progenies and checks from a replicated yield trial carried out at Moon Lake in Year 3

%

Pro-

Name

Source

Pedigree

DTF

DTM

HGT

LDG

C18:1

C18:2

C18:3

Sats

oil

tein

Color

DN033743	DN02-0591 F4	YN97-262/M97A222//M94S007	54	88	110	1.0	72.6	16.1	2.0	6.8	45.7	47.3	2
DN033744	DN02-0591 F4	YN97-262/M97A222//M94S007	52	87	110	1.5	73.5	16.4	1.6	6.2	46.9	47.2	2.5
DN033745	DN02-0590 F4	YN97-262/M97A222//M94S007	50	87	103	1.5	72.1	16.5	2.1	6.9	45.9	47.3	1.5
DN033746	DN02-0590 F4	YN97-262/M97A222//M94S007	52	89	110	1.0	72.7	16.8	1.7	6.5	45.0	47.0	1.5
DN033747	DN02-0590 F4	YN97-262/M97A222//M94S007	51	87	105	1.5	72.9	16.6	1.6	6.6	47.3	47.6	2
DN033748	DN02-0592 F4	YN97-262/M97A222//M94S007	52	89	108	1.5	71.4	17.8	1.8	6.4	43.1	45.1	1.5
DN033749	DN02-0592 F4	YN97-262/M97A222//M94S007	51	88	108	2.0	72.2	17.2	1.9	6.4	44.0	45.9	1.5
DN034169	DN02-0548 F4	9592/M97A222//M94S007	51	88	100	2.0	72.5	15.9	2.4	6.7	43.4	46.0	1.5
46A65			45	85	103	1.5	66.3	17.8	6.6	7.1	48.0	42.8	5
9592			52	86	103	1.5	57.7	22.0	11.0	7.0	42.7	46.5	2
NQC02X01-			54	88	110	1.5	75.6	13.6	1.6	7.0	46.8	46.1	4.5
ARG
NQC02X01-			55	88	100	1.5	75.5	13.8	1.5	6.9	47.3	46.2	4.5
GH
Q2			52	86	108	2.5	66.8	17.0	7.0	7.0	47.4	45.4	5
YN97262			54	87	110	1.5	67.0	18.0	5.6	7.2	49.1	47.6	2

Example 6—Protocol for Determination of Metabolizable Energy and Chemical Composition of Yellow-Seeded Canola Meal, and Performance of Broiler Chickens

Amino acid digestibility (ileal) was determined with commercial broiler cockerels housed in cages. Chicks were fed commercial meal diet from 1 to 27 days of age and transferred to a treatment diet containing 0 or 40% of the Canola meal. Test meal was added to the basal diet at the expense of the diet as a whole. After an adjustment period of 7 days, the birds were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the contents of the distal ileum (the section between 12 cm and 2 cm anterior to the ileal cecal junction) were collected and frozen for analysis at a later period. Each diet was fed to 4 groups of 2 birds each. Ileal contents were freeze-dried, ground, and mixed thoroughly before analysis for gross nitrogen (AOAC, 1980), amino acid content, and acid insoluble ash (Newkirk et al., 2003).
Nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy (AMEn) was determined in the same trial, but feces were collected daily for the last 3 days of the trial. The feces were frozen immediately after each collection. The frozen feces were dried at 50° C. in a forced air oven, and then pooled with feces from other collections of the same rep and treatment. The samples were ground (1 mm grind) and analyzed for gross energy, acid insoluble ash, and nitrogen.
AMEn and illeal apparent amino acid digestibility were calculated using the method reported by Newkirk et al. (2003). Data were collected as follows:

TABLE 5

Date	Bird Age	Detail

Feb 13/Year 3	0	Place birds, feed commercial starter diet
March 13/Year 3	28	Record bird weights, place on
		experimental diet
March 17/Year 3	32	Remove feces, place plastic under trays
		pm fecal collection
March 18/Year 3	33	Collect feces AM & PM
March 19/Year 3	34	Collect feces, weight feed and birds,
		collect ileal samples (AM)

Further details of the studies were as follows:
1. Feeding Study: February Year 3-May Year 3
a. Treatments: 6 NATREON varieties (Nex 705, Nex 710, Nex 715, Nex 720, CMI #1-transgenic and CMI #1-Null) from Dow AgroSciences plus 1 reference diet (yellow-seeded line DN03-3746) will used in the project. 10 kg of seed of each varieties will be crushed by POS to obtain 5-kg oil free meal. Each of the treatment will be assigned randomly to pens and blocked with pen.
b. Experimental design: a completely randomized block design with 6 replications will be used. One way analysis of variance with mean separation will be used for data analysis. Multivariate regression analysis will be applied to chemical composition and metabolisable energy data.
c. Bird Class: bird type: broiler; strain: Ross 308; sex: male; source: Wynard; 84 birds
d. Temperature: Standard curve: Day 0-35° C. by Day 34-22° C.
e. Lighting: 50 lux light was maintained on a 23 hour light: 1 hour dark cycle, for days 1-34
f. Feed and Water: ad libitum; feeders were kept at a moderate level; birds were fed often; the amount of feed spillage was especially minimized during fecal collection period.
g. Litter management: Removed as necessary, on Day 31 remove all feces and place plastic sheets under the birds for fecal collection.
h. Feed requirements: Birds aged 0-26 days consumed 2 kg/bird commercial starter; birds aged 27-34 days consumed 1 kg/bird experimental diet
i. Meal requirements: 6 reps*2 birds/rep*1 kg/bird feed*40% meal=4.8 kg for diet, 200 g for analysis=5 kg/meal
j. Dietary specifications:

TABLE 6

Experimental Diets

	Ingredient	Reference diet %	Test Diet %

Basal premix	Corn	91.89	53.35
	Canola oil	3.46	2.0
Micronutrient premix	Celite	1.0	1.0
	vitamin/mineral	0.5	0.5
	Choline Cl	0.1	0.1
	Dical	1.81	1.81
	Limestone	.84	.84
	Salt	.40	.40
Test ingredient	Canola meal		40.00

	Calculated nutrient content	%

CP	7.7	18.92
AME_n(kcal/kg)	3380	2755
Available P	.42	.5
Ca	.74	1.0
Lysine	.24	.942
Met + Cys	.34	.87

TABLE 7

Micro Nutrient Premix

	Ingredient	%	Kg

Dical	35.14	2.460
Celite3	19.42	1.358
Limestone	16.31	1.142
Vitamin mineral premix	9.71	0.680
Salt	7.77	0.544
Choline	1.94	0.136
Total		6.32.000

TABLE 8

Basal Premix (2, 40 kg batches intermixed)

	Ingredient	%	Kg

Corn	96.35	38.54
Canola Oil	3.65	1.46
Total	100	40

TABLE 9

Diet composition (12 kg; 12 birds * 1 kg/bird)

Reference diet

Test Diet

Ingredient	%	Kg	%	kg

Basal premix	94.85	14.22	54.85	6.58
Micronutrient premix	5.15	.773	5.15	.618
Test ingredient	0	0	40	4.8
Total	100	14.993	100	12

TABLE 10

Analyses to be conducted on meals (DAA to conduct)

	Energy contributing	Energy diluting

	Protein	Total dietary fiber
		(including soluble and insoluble fiber)
	Amino acids	NDF
	Ether extract	ADF
	Sucrose	Ash
	Oligosaccharides	Moisture
	Starch	Lignin (ADL, NDL)

Data Reporting: Data was obtained by mid-April Year 3 and analysis done by mid-May Year 3 except for the detailed analysis of total dietary fiber fractions and oligosaccharides which were not completed until August 3.
2. Germplasm Screening to Select Lines for Use in Nutrient Retention Tests:
40 g of seed from 37 NATREON Breeding lines were assessed for chemical composition of the meal using the parameters identified herein. Based on the results obtained, lines were identified for use in broiler chicken nutrient retention testing.
The seed was solvent extracted with hexane at POS Pilot Plant in Saskatoon, SK. The air-desolventized meal was provided to the University of Saskatchewan for chemical analysis.
The meal was ground through a 1 mm screen prior to chemical analysis. Each sample was analysed in duplicate for the chemical compositions (except amino acids) shown in Table 10.
Crude protein was determined by combustion using the Leco method. Ether extract was determined using the AOAC (1990) method with a Labconco Model 35001 Goldfisch extractor. The meal was extracted for 4 hours extraction using diethyl ether.
Sucrose, free glucose, stachyose, and raffinose were analysed by GLC using a DB1701 column and TMSI derivitization. Oligosacharides (dp 3-10) were analysed by HPLC by gel permeation and refractive index detection. Starch was determined by the method of Salmonsson, A. C. et al, (1984, Swed. J. Agric. Res., 14:111-117).
Soluble, insoluble, and total dietary fiber were determined using the method of Mongeau and Brassard (1990, Cereal Foods World 35:319-322). The soluble and insoluble fiber fractions were subjected to total sugar analysis (Englyst, H. N. and Hudson, G. J., 1987 Animal Feed Sci. and Tech., 23:27-42). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and NDF-lignin and ADF-lignin determination was conducted using the method of Van Soest, et al. (1991. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597).
Ash and moisture content (another energy diluter) were determined using the method of AOAC, (1990 Official Methods of Analysis. 15^thed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, D.C.).
3. May Year 3 to November Year 3:
Carried out seed increase of 10-15 lines to produce 10 kg seed per variety and completed the detailed analysis of total dietary fiber fractions and oligosaccharides of initial 6 varieties.
4. November Year 3-February Year 4
a. Obtained 5-kg oil free meal from each of the 10-15 varieties
b. Carried out a trial to assess broiler chicken nutrient retention
Treatments: 15 NATREON lines including the Yellow-seeded line DN03-3746, 4 Dow AgroSciences commercial controls from the first trial (Nex 705, Nex 710, Nex 715 and Nex 720) and 1 reference diet were used in the project. 10 kg of seed of each varieties was crushed by POS to obtain 5-kg oil free meal. Each of the treatment was assigned randomly to pens and blocked with pen.
Experimental design: a completely randomized block design with 6 replications was used. Due to limited space in the battery cages, 3 replications were conducted in bird trial #1 and 3 remaining replications were conducted in trial 2. Data was analysed by blocking within trial. One-way analysis of variance with mean separation was used for data analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was applied to chemical composition and metabolisable energy data.
Data Reporting: Data was reported mid-January Year 4 and analysis done by mid-February Year 4.
5. November Year 3-November Year 4
Development of chemical predictors of metabolisable energy in canola meal. The meal from the 15 lines increased during the summer of Year 3 had undergone chemical analysis, and data was regressed against the metabolisable energy of the meals to determine the relationship between measured components and metabolisable energy. Multivariate approaches was used, including PCA, to develop predictive equations. Resulting regression equations was then used to determine the best ways of selecting for future higher valued varieties of canola meal.
Oil free, air desolventized meal was ground through a 1 mm screen prior to chemical analysis. Each sample was analysed in duplicate for the chemical composition (protein, ether extract, sucrose, oligosaccharides, starch, total dietary fiber (soluble and insoluble), NDF, ADF, ash, moisture and lignin (ADL and NDL) except amino acids). Crude protein was determined by combustion using the Leco method. Ether extract determination was by the AOAC (1990) method a Labconco Model 35001 Goldfisch extractor. The meal was extracted for 4 hours using diethyl ether. Sucrose, free glucose, stachyose and rafinose was analysed by GLC using a DB1701 column and TMSI derivitization. Oligosacharides (dp 3-10) analysis was done by HPLC by gel permeation and refractive index detection. Determination of starch was by the method of Salmonsson, A. C., O. Theander, and E. Westerlund (1984, Swed. J. Agric. Res., 14:111-117). Soluble, insoluble and Total dietary fiber were determined using the method of Mongeau and Brassard (1990, Cereal Foods World 35:319-322). The soluble and insoluble fiber fractions were subjected to total sugar analysis (Englyst, H. N.; Hudson, G. J., 1987. Animal Feed Sci. and Tech., 23:27-42). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and NDF-lignin and ADF-lignin analyses were conducted using the method of Van Soest, T. J., J. B. Robertson, B. A. Lewis (1991. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597). Ash and moisture content analyses were determined using the method of AOAC, (1990 Official Methods of Analysis. 15^thed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, D.C.).
Data Reporting: Data was obtained by mid-December Year 4.

Example 7—Results and Determination of Digestibility (Apparent Metabolizable Energy and Amino Acid Utilization) of Canola Meal by Broiler Chickens, and Chemical Characterization of the Canola Meal

The subject Example discusses the results of measuring the metabolizable energy and amino acid digestibility, by broiler chickens, of special varieties of canola. These samples were also assayed for components that can influence energy utilization. The chemical analyses of these canola samples is also related to digestibility data. Further, this Example discusses chemical characteristics that predict the AME of meals for broiler chickens.
Apparent Metabolizable Energy.
One yellow-seeded line of the subject invention, DN03-3746, was compared to other “check” lines. The measurements for nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy (AME) are shown in Table 11. As seen in Table 11 (and in Table 12), the AME of the tested yellow-seeded variety, DN03-3746 is superior to that of Nex 705, Nex 715, Q2 (Check 1), and 46A65 (Check 2). Again, only one yellow seeded line of the subject invention was tested; further testing of the other lines of the subject invention is expected to show further improvements in AME.

TABLE 11

Nitrogen corrected apparent metabolizable energy (AMEn) on an as-
is basis and dry-matter basis (kcal/g), and apparent ileal protein
digestibility (in broiler chickens) of protein in canola varieties.

			Ileal
Sample	AMEn as-is	AMEn DM	Prot dig

#16 - Nex 705	1626	1750	75.2
#17 - Nex 715	1609	1733	75.5
#18 - Nex 710	1852	1988	79.2
#19 - Nex 720	1806	1934	79.5
#20 - DN03-3746	1794	1918	74.9
#21 - Check 1	1685	1810	74.6
#22 - Check 2	1709	1836	73.8
#23 - Nex 710 Transgenic	1987	2123	80.4
#24 - Nex 710 Null Transgenic	1783	1907	79.0
SEM	16.4	17.8	0.24
Range	1600-1994	1732-2154	73.8-80.4

TABLE 12

Digestibility and chemical analyses of canola meal samples shown on a dry matter basis

%

% total

Ileal

digest.

Average aa

%

AME¹

AME²

CP

aa

digest.

%

Sample ID

DM

(kcal/kg)

digest.

content³

coefficient⁴

CP

Ash

EE

Starch

Sucrose

Phytate

Nex 705	92.88	1750	1625	75.2	28.58	0.792	48.91	6.33	1.42	0.65	6.79	1.31
Nex 715	92.88	1733	1637	75.5	29.14	0.809	46.96	5.48	1.08	0.91	9.68	1.12
Nex 710	93.16	1988	1865	79.2	31.01	0.838	48.65	5.81	1.39	0.69	13.22	1.36
Nex 720	92.94	1943	1843	79.5	30.39	0.831	49.43	5.89	1.14	0.46	9.14	1.93
DN03-3746	93.56	1918	1813	74.9	30.54	0.770	50.95	6.38	1.19	1.03	11.98	1.30
Check 1	93.08	1810	1693	74.6	27.63	0.813	44.85	6.20	1.32	0.32	12.87	1.48
Check 2	93.06	1836	1768	73.8	27.68	0.767	47.97	5.76	0.77	0.21	10.32	1.73
Nex 710	93.61	2123	2020	80.4	35.49	0.851	52.20	7.29	1.17	0.15	15.13	1.89
Transgenic
Nex 710 Null	93.38	1910	1814	79.0	33.73	0.835	52.38	7.28	1.09	0.21	15.19	2.03
Transgenic
SEM		17.6		0.24
P Value		0.0005		0.0001
Mean			1789		30.13	0.81	48.9	6.25	1.32	0.62	10.5	1.60
Standard			112.9		2.095	0.02	2.15	0.51	0.32	0.24	2.20	0.30
Deviation
Minimum			1625		26.51	0.77	44.7	5.48	0.77	0.15	6.79	1.12
Maximum			2020		35.49	0.85	52.6	7.29	2.44	1.03	15.19	2.21

¹AME on a dry matter basis.
²AME on a dry matter basis and corrected to zero percent fat.
³Sum of amino acid levels × amino acid digestibility coefficients.
⁴Average of amino acid digestibility coefficients.

Protein and Amino Acid Digestibility.
The effects of canola meal sample on ileal protein digestibility are also shown in Tables 11 and 12. As shown in Tables 11 and 12, the ileal protein digestibility (in broiler chickens) of the DN03-3746 variety is better than that of Q2 and 46A65.
Chemical Analyses.
Results of chemical analyses are found in Tables 12 and 13. In Table 12, the categories tested and compared for DN03-3746 include percent dry matter, AME, protein digestibility and average amino acid digestibility coefficient for all samples. Also included in Table 12 are the crude protein contents, ash content (ash is another energy-diluting component), ether extract (EE—an energy-contributing component), starch, sucrose, and phytate contents. Table 13 includes total dietary fiber (TDF), insoluble TDF (TDF-I), soluble TDF (TDF-S), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), neutral detergent insoluble nitrogen (NDIN) and gross energy (GE). Also indicated in Table 13 are amounts of various types of sugars.

TABLE 13

Further digestibility and chemical analyses of canola meal samples shown on a dry matter basis

	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	GE
Sample ID	TDF	TDF-I	TDF-S	ADF	ADL	NDF	NDIN	(kcal/kg)

Nex 705	33.30	32.18	4.23	17.12	4.91	31.66	10.38	4745
Nex 715	35.96	32.94	3.93	19.89	7.54	30.88	9.19	4765
Nex 710	32.47	29.96	5.35	15.84	3.89	29.19	8.85	4765
Nex 720	32.73	32.59	3.69	20.31	7.64	30.47	8.50	4790
DN03-3746	26.55	24.91	4.37	10.32	1.16	21.16	5.97	4769
Check 1	33.42	32.95	5.73	18.80	6.30	30.68	9.67	4727
Check 2	32.95	32.57	4.16	19.66	7.87	30.47	8.84	4788
Nex 710	28.77	27.73	4.02	14.18	3.92	25.32	6.03	4735
Transgenic
Nex 710 Null	27.95	27.20	4.58	14.30	3.51	24.86	6.26	4740
Transgenic
Mean	32.51	30.73	4.70	17.06	5.14	29.00	8.665	4750
Standard	2.546	2.489	0.961	2.934	2.322	2.969	1.272	48.8
Deviation
Minimum	26.55	24.91	2.65	10.32	1.16	21.16	5.97	4621
Maximum	38.59	37.22	6.13	23.72	10.47	36.50	10.91	4821

	%	%	%	%	%	%	%
Sample ID	Rham	Fucose	Arab	Xylose	Mann	Galact	Glucose

Nex 705	0.300	0.236	5.198	2.009	1.291	3.983	13.713
Nex 715	0.282	0.243	5.423	2.028	1.430	4.368	15.864
Nex 710	0.263	0.247	5.245	2.140	1.614	4.212	16.936
Nex 720	0.348	0.282	4.903	2.250	1.399	4.716	15.866
DN03-3746	0.381	0.315	6.105	2.679	1.841	4.696	18.810
Check 1	0.329	0.244	5.036	2.258	1.561	4.963	17.625
Check 2	0.312	0.232	5.143	2.148	1.516	4.929	15.992
Nex 710	0.288	0.240	5.001	2.104	1.720	4.082	16.882
Transgenic
Nex 710 Null	0.237	0.201	4.146	1.788	2.139	3.035	14.213
Transgenic
Mean	0.315	0.262	5.533	2.227	1.533	4.417	15.993
Standard	0.0373	0.0410	0.6312	1.533	0.1903	0.4228	1.5968
Deviation
Minimum	0.237	0.201	4.146	1.788	1.264	3.035	13.537
Maximum	0.381	0.412	7.111	2.689	2.139	5.003	18.810

As can be seen on Table 13, total dietary fiber for DN03-3746 was very low, as was insoluble fiber. Insoluble fiber is very undesirable in animal feed and meal. ADF, ADL, and NDF contents for this line are also relatively very low. Insoluble nitrogen (NDIN) is also relatively quite low. This is desirable, as insoluble nitrogen cannot be used nutritionally (and ties up nitrogen that could otherwise be used by the animal that consumes the meal). Also advantageously, the sugar contents are relatively high. Crude protein for DN03-3746 was also higher than all the check/control lines.
Table 14 shows digestibility and chemical analyses of additional sugars, sinapines, and the like. DN03-3746 has advantageously low levels of sinapine and phytate, and high GE and percentage inositol.

TABLE 14

Digestibility and chemical analyses of canola meal samples shown on a dry matter basis.

				Sinapic
	Inositol	Raffinose	Stachyose	acid	Sinapine	Phytate	GE
Sample ID	(%)	(%)	(%)	(%)	(%)	(%)	(kcal/kg)

Nex 705	0.0651	0.1051	0.0216	0.0239	0.826	1.38	4745
Nex 715	0.0834	0.1352	0.0052	0.0183	0.725	1.13	4765
Nex 710	0.0890	0.2067	0.0126	0.0230	0.870	1.43	4765
Nex 720	0.0828	0.1520	0.0057	0.0182	0.702	2.02	4790
DN033746	0.1240	0.1666	0.0000	0.0237	0.684	1.33	4769
Check 1	0.0857	0.3045	0.0000	0.0225	0.778	1.52	4727
Check 2	0.0867	0.2308	0.0000	0.0269	1.003	1.77	4788
Nex 710 Null	0.0509	0.0996	0.0000	0.0175	1.002	1.96	4735
Transgenic
Nex 710	0.0352	0.0755	0.0000	0.0205	0.431	2.10	4740
Transgenic
Mean	0.0789	0.1676	0.0038	0.0165	0.814	1.65	4750
Standard	0.0205	0.0745	0.0067	0.0056	0.1606	0.3031	48.8
deviation
Minimum	0.0352	0.05730	0.0000	0.0063	0.431	1.13	4621
Maximum	0.1240	0.3383	0.0217	0.0269	1.123	2.24	4821

Table 15 shows total amino acid content of meals from various varieties, including DN03-3746, which had the highest content of almost all the tested amino acids (including essential amino acids). Table 16 shows apparent ileal amino acid digestibility, for these lines, by the broiler chickens.

TABLE 15

Total amino acid content of meals from
Nexera varieties (% dm basis, Year 2)

Sample	CYS	ASP	MET	THR	SER	GLU

Nex 705	1.302	3.597	0.827	2.036	2.068	8.439
Nex 715	1.350	3.295	0.784	2.914	2.060	8.891
Nex 710	1.357	3.346	0.820	2.017	2.066	8.821
Nex 720	1.407	3.246	0.824	1.939	2.025	9.019
DN033746	1.473	3.586	0.870	2.131	2.194	9.390
Check 1	1.215	3.119	0.778	1.872	1.894	8.011
Check 2	1.293	3.284	0.805	1.960	1.963	8.513
Nex 710 Null	1.378	3.937	0.894	2.227	2.244	9.900
Transgenic
Nex 710	1.368	3.839	0.855	2.125	2.092	9.587
Transgenic

Sample	PRO	GLY	ALA	VAL	ISO	LEU

Nex 705	2.942	2.382	2.090	2.144	1.710	3.307
Nex 715	2.844	2.330	2.039	2.155	1.706	3.266
Nex 710	2.986	2.450	2.114	2.300	1.828	3.335
Nex 720	3.045	2.389	2.078	2.218	1.766	3.263
DN033746	2.746	2.526	2.280	2.470	1.963	3.557
Check 1	2.463	2.253	1.970	2.175	1.733	3.093
Check 2	2.837	2.414	2.027	2.315	1.813	3.249
Nex 710 Null	3.074	2.730	2.357	2.611	2.090	3.772
Transgenic
Nex 710	3.077	2.636	2.279	2.616	2.063	3.643
Transgenic

Sample	PHE	HIS	LYS	AMM	ARG

Nex 705	1.795	1.239	2.670	1.178	2.782
Nex 715	1.765	1.289	2.683	1.187	2.895
Nex 710	1.817	1.309	2.783	1.200	2.900
Nex 720	1.765	1.312	2.742	1.198	2.867
DN033746	1.947	1.346	2.993	1.270	3.028
Check 1	1.656	1.238	2.670	1.114	2.663
Check 2	1.771	1.288	2.719	1.191	2.887
Nex 710 Null	2.049	1.527	3.019	1.354	3.270
Transgenic
Nex 710	1.969	1.459	2.956	1.308	3.205
Transgenic

TABLE 16

Apparent ileal amino acid digestibility (in broiler chickens)
of Nexera canola varieties (Year 2)

Sample	CYS	ASP	MET	THR	SER	GLU

Nex 705	0.727	0.788	0.885	0.683	0.721	0.873
Nex 715	0.749	0.793	0.889	0.708	0.733	0.875
Nex 710	0.783	0.820	0.913	0.748	0.758	0.902
Nex 720	0.791	0.824	0.903	0.730	0.767	0.893
DN033746	0.675	0.754	0.869	0.633	0.701	0.864
Check 1	0.775	0.796	0.898	0.714	0.736	0.887
Check 2	0.717	0.760	0.849	0.678	0.700	0.843
Nex 710 Null	0.805	0.849	0.924	0.759	0.778	0.916
Transgenic
Nex 710	0.786	0.838	0.908	0.726	0.749	0.905
Transgenic
SEM	0.0038	0.0032	0.0025	0.0040	0.0036	0.0024
P VALUE	0.0001	0.0001	0.0001	0.0004	0.0025	0.0019

Sample	PRO	GLY	ALA	VAL	ISO	LEU

Nex 705	0.719	0.771	0.811	0.737	0.762	0.798
Nex 715	0.742	0.795	0.828	0.788	0.810	0.826
Nex 710	0.785	0.821	0.850	0.811	0.830	0.842
Nex 720	0.767	0.821	0.850	0.797	0.827	0.842
DN033746	0.712	0.744	0.791	0.718	0.734	0.783
Check 1	0.731	0.808	0.825	0.783	0.797	0.809
Check 2	0.704	0.753	0.785	0.716	0.728	0.762
Nex 710 Null	0.782	0.845	0.863	0.827	0.839	0.857
Transgenic
Nex 710	0.757	0.831	0.851	0.801	0.827	0.840
Transgenic
SEM	0.0038	0.0032	0.0030	0.0039	0.0038	0.0033
P VALUE	0.0003	0.0001	0.0014	0.0001	0.0001	0.0004

Sample	PHE	HIS	LYS	AMM	ARG

Nex 705	0.831	0.859	0.820	0.743	0.883
Nex 715	0.843	0.853	0.837	0.799	0.881
Nex 710	0.866	0.892	0.869	0.809	0.912
Nex 720	0.846	0.874	0.859	0.778	0.906
DN033746	0.811	0.835	0.805	0.689	0.889
Check 1	0.835	0.866	0.846	0.790	0.897
Check 2	0.797	0.820	0.796	0.704	0.862
Nex 710 Null	0.874	0.903	0.879	0.833	0.924
Transgenic
Nex 710	0.856	0.889	0.875	0.832	0.917
Transgenic
SEM	0.0030	0.0028	0.0029	0.0041	0.0022
P VALUE	0.0013	0.0001	0.0001	0.0001	0.0001

Again, these numbers and other numbers in Tables 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 (and in any other Table) can be used to define end points of ranges of characteristics of seeds and lines of the subject invention.

Example 8—Development of Still Further Lines—Year 4

The 6 BC1F5 lines that gave rise to the BC1F6 lines (DN033743, DN033744, DN033745, DN033746, DN033747, DN033748, DN033749) were crossed with the DAS black seeded NATREON line DN996738 (aka NQC02X01). F1 plants from each cross were taken through the microspore culture process and dihaploid progeny produced. The BC1F6 lines, DH progeny, and check varieties were evaluated in replicated nurseries at AAFC Saskatoon and Dow AgroSciences (DAS) Moonlake. Nursery plots were single 10 foot long rows, planted at a 2 foot row spacing, replicated up to 4 times across the two locations.
Agronomic assessments were made on Days to Flower (DTF), Days to Maturity (DTM), Lodging (LDG), and Late Season Vigor (LSV) at the DAS Moonlake site. Seed samples were collected from plots at both locations and analyzed for seed quality parameters by the respective organizations analytical chemistry labs with the exception of Whiteness index and fiber. Whiteness Index (WImini), a measurement of seed color, was produced from samples at both locations using the Hunter Analytical Instrument by AAFC. Seed fiber (Neutral Detergent Fiber=NDF, Acid Detergent Fiber=ADF, Acid Detergent Lignin=ADL) was determined on samples from the AAFC location using NIR and is expressed on a dry matter basis. Fatty acid composition was determined by gas chromatography using fatty acid methyl ester analysis. Individual fatty acids are reported as a percentage of the total profile and total saturates calculated by adding all of the saturated fatty acids. Oil content on a dry matter basis (DM), protein content (DM) of the seed, and total glucosinolate content were determined using NIR. Protein content expressed on an oil free meal basis (% Meal Protein DM) was calculated.
Colder than average growing conditions followed by an early fall frost impacted the trials at both sites, and can be noted in the lower than normally expected Oleic acid contents. These data were used to identify superior individuals expressing the desired fatty acid profile in combination with fiber reduction as well as acceptable maturity, and content of oil, protein, and glucosinolates. A summary of the mean quality data for BC1F6 progenies, DH progeny selected for advancement, and checks from the AAFC location are provided in Table 17. A summary of the mean agronomic and quality data for BC1F6 progenies, DH progeny selected for advancement, and checks from the DAS location are provided in Table 18.

TABLE 17

Mean quality data BC1F6 progenies, selected DH progenies and checks from a replicated nursery trial carried out at AAFC Saskatoon in Year 4

% Oil

% Protein

% Meal

Total

%

SOURCE/ID

Code

DM

Seed DM

Protein DM

Gluc

ADFdm

ADLdm

NDFdm

WImini

C18:1

C18:2

C18:3

C22:1

Saturates

DN03-3743	2672	43.0	27.4	48.1	26.1	9.5	1.9	18.3	−13.1	63.2	22.9	2.8	0.1	7.0
DN03-3744	2714	44.0	26.6	47.6	16.1	12.9	3.8	19.4	−6.7
DN03-3745	2715	43.4	28.8	50.9	18.3	9.5	1.6	17.8	−13.6
DN03-3746	2716	43.6	27.6	48.9	25.4	10.0	1.7	17.7	−15.1	64.6	21.9	2.9	0.1	6.8
DN03-3747	2717	41.1	27.9	47.4	23.3	10.1	1.9	18.4	−13.1
DN03-3748	2718	44.0	26.6	47.6	18.0	9.4	1.7	18.2	−13.1
DN03-3749	2719	42.4	28.6	49.6	18.4	10.0	1.8	18.6	−12.5	65.2	20.6	3.2	0.2	6.9
DN99-6738	2674	49.3	27.3	54.0	6.3	12.5	3.9	18.6	−0.9	70.9	17.9	2.2	0.1	5.9
Nex 705	2687	47.7	27.0	51.7	11.6	13.7	5.0	20.4	−0.5	71.6	17.1	2.8	0.1	5.6
YN01-429	2700	48.9	24.7	48.4	8.3	9.2	1.4	16.9	−22.4
YN97-262	2673	44.4	26.1	46.9	5.8	10.2	2.1	18.5	−13.8
DN04-1247	2205	46.1	26.8	49.7	10.3	10.0	1.9	17.5	−11.5	67.3	20.8	2.2	0.1	6.4
DN04-1261	2217	40.2	29.5	49.4	31.8	9.8	1.8	18.0	−12.0	64.4	20.8	2.5	0.2	7.6
DN04-1266	2221	45.6	28.0	51.6	14.9	9.9	1.9	17.1	−14.3	67.0	20.8	2.5	0.1	6.2
DN04-1273	2228	42.9	26.8	47.0	21.4	9.9	1.7	18.4	−15.4	65.2	21.5	2.3	0.1	7.1
DN04-1279	2233	44.5	28.1	50.6	16.7	9.9	1.9	17.8	−12.4	67.4	19.6	2.5	0.1	7.0
DN04-1317	2265	42.2	30.1	52.0	23.4	9.2	1.7	17.1	−13.3
DN04-1326	2270	41.8	29.0	49.8	19.8	9.9	1.9	18.7	−11.6	64.9	21.2	2.5	0.1	7.4
DN04-1358	2297	44.9	30.0	54.4	6.6	9.1	1.7	17.0	−15.4	66.3	20.9	2.8	0.1	6.5
DN04-1371	2308	46.0	28.0	51.8	12.3	10.0	1.9	17.5	−12.5	65.8	22.0	2.3	0.1	6.4
DN04-1415	2346	48.4	26.8	51.9	10.6	9.5	1.6	17.5	−16.0	66.3	20.4	3.0	0.1	6.7
DN04-1495	2408	47.9	27.1	52.0	17.0	10.1	2.1	17.3	−13.2
DN04-1506	2419	43.0	28.9	50.8	24.3	10.1	2.0	18.4	−9.2
DN04-1510	2423	44.9	30.2	54.7	15.8	9.6	2.5	17.5	−11.5
DN04-1516	2429	43.4	28.5	50.3	15.1	9.0	1.8	18.3	−12.7
DN04-1524	2434	41.4	31.4	53.7	15.6	8.9	1.8	17.6	−12.9
DN04-1537	2445	44.2	28.0	50.2	16.1	11.1	2.9	18.3	−4.8
DN04-1593	2490	50.3	25.6	51.5	6.8	11.4	2.6	18.0	−7.5
DN04-1709	2573	46.2	28.4	52.7	16.4	9.6	1.8	16.4	−14.8	68.8	19.0	2.6	0.1	6.3
DN04-1718	2580	42.3	28.7	49.7	17.4	10.3	2.0	18.2	−11.8	65.4	21.7	2.4	0.1	6.8
DN04-1768	2616	46.2	25.8	47.9	11.7	11.0	2.0	17.1	−11.4	67.5	19.9	2.1	0.1	7.1

TABLE 18

Mean agronomic and quality data for BC1F6 progenies, selected DH progenies and checks from a replicated nursery trial carried out at AAFC
Saskatoon in Year 4

%

% Meal

%

Oil

Protein

Tot

Name

Source Pop

DTF

DTM

LDG

LSV 1

LSV 2

C18:1

C18:2

C18:3

Sats

DM

WImini

Gluc

Nex 705	Polo/	57	114	3.0	3.1	2.7	73.0	16.0	2.6	5.7	51.4	21.0	43.2	0.0	14.9
	SVO95-09
YN01429	.	58	114	3.0	3.1	2.7	60.1	20.4	11.0	6.0	54.3	22.0	48.3	−26.5	16.2
YN97262	.	53	112	3.0	3.0	3.0	60.9	20.9	8.9	7.0	50.9	23.4	47.6	−20.7	14.3
DN033748	DN023434	51	114	3.0	4.0	4.0	68.0	21.6	2.1	5.6	48.9	23.1	45.3	−20.6	13.0
DN033746	DN023431	58	112	3.0	3.0	3.0	68.4	20.5	2.1	6.5	51.2	22.8	46.8	−24.0	12.0
DN041247	DN023429/	57	115	3.5	3.0	2.5	68.7	19.9	2.2	6.4	50.2	22.9	46.0	−15.2	12.7
	DN996738
DN041261	DN023429/	57	113	3.5	3.5	3.5	69.9	18.9	2.3	6.2	47.9	23.6	45.3	−15.0	17.6
	DN996738
DN041266	DN023429/	55	114	3.5	4.0	3.5	70.0	19.3	2.3	5.6	48.6	23.7	46.1	−16.4	15.0
	DN996738
DN041273	DN023429/	58	115	3.0	4.0	3.5	68.5	20.2	2.2	6.4	48.4	23.6	45.8	−16.3	11.5
	DN996738
DN041279	DN023429/	57	112	3.5	4.0	3.5	69.9	17.9	2.5	6.9	49.3	22.8	45.0	−14.6	14.7
	DN996738
DN041317	DN023429/	58	115	3.5	4.0	3.5	68.2	20.1	2.4	6.4	49.5	23.1	45.8	−16.3	17.2
	DN996738
DN041326	DN023429/	58	114	3.0	4.0	3.0	69.1	19.4	2.3	6.6	52.0	22.2	46.2	−18.8	16.6
	DN996738
DN041358	DN023430/	60	114	3.0	3.0	2.5	70.3	18.1	2.4	6.4	49.0	22.2	43.6	−20.1	13.7
	DN996738
DN041371	DN023430/	60	115	3.0	4.0	3.5	68.7	19.9	2.5	6.1	49.2	22.7	44.8	−13.9	15.0
	DN996738
DN041415	DN023430/	60	111	3.0	4.0	3.5	69.2	18.5	3.1	6.4	50.6	22.5	45.5	−19.9	11.7
	DN996738
DN041495	DN023431/	60	114	2.5	3.5	3.5	69.9	19.4	2.3	5.8	50.4	22.2	44.8	−15.8	16.0
	DN996738
DN041506	DN023431/	67	114	2.5	4.0	4.0	70.0	19.1	2.5	5.9	50.8	22.9	46.5	−13.6	13.5
	DN996738
DN041510	DN023431/	59	114	3.0	4.0	3.0	72.1	17.3	2.0	6.0	52.5	21.1	44.5	−13.8	13.7
	DN996738
DN041516	DN023431/	58	114	3.0	4.5	4.0	68.4	20.3	2.2	6.0	50.3	22.1	44.4	−17.2	13.8
	DN996738
DN041524	DN023431/	67	115	3.0	4.0	3.5	69.0	19.8	2.5	6.0	48.6	22.5	43.8	−19.4	15.5
	DN996738
DN041537	DN023431/	60	115	3.0	3.5	2.5	70.4	19.1	2.1	5.5	53.8	21.8	47.3	−8.2	15.3
	DN996738
DN041593	DN023433/	61	114	3.0	4.0	4.0	73.5	15.5	2.3	6.2	53.4	21.6	46.4	−10.6	13.8
	DN996738
DN041667	DN023434/	56	116	3.0	5.0	3.0	72.3	16.9	1.8	6.2	53.3	22.4	48.0	−14.0	12.2
	DN996738
DN041709	DN023434/	57	116	3.0	5.0	4.0	70.7	18.0	2.5	6.1	46.4	24.1	45.1	−14.3	17.4
	DN996738
DN041718	DN023434/	57	116	3.0	3.0	3.0	69.8	19.3	2.1	6.3	52.3	22.3	46.7	−15.7	14.8
	DN996738
DN041768	DN023435/	59	114	3.0	3.0	2.5	69.0	19.5	2.1	6.4	51.0	22.8	46.6	−10.9	14.5
	DN996738

Example 9—Yield Trials—Year 5

The DH progeny summarized in Tables 17 and 18 were selected for advancement into replicated yield trials conducted in Year 5. Twenty-one DH progeny along with 2 BC1F6 lines, and yellow seeded as well as black seeded checks were compared under small plot conditions using a 4 replicate Randomized Complete Block design. Four locations (DAS Rosthern, DAS Saskatoon, DAS Moonlake, AAFC Saskatoon) were planted in Year 5.
Heavy rains and flooding resulted in the complete loss of the Moonlake trial, and two replicates of the AAFC Saskatoon location and unacceptable plant stand at the Rosthern location resulted in data from that site being discarded. Below average temperatures were experienced in Year 5.
Agronomic assessments were made on Days to Flower (DTF), Days to Maturity (DTM), Height (HGT), and Lodging (LDG). Plots were harvested using small plot harvest equipment. Yield was determined by measuring the quantity of seed harvested from each plot and expressing it on a kilograms per hectare basis. Seed quality parameters (Oil DM, Protein DM, Total Glucosinolates, % NDFdm, % ADFdm, % ADLdm, Chlorophyll) were measured using NIR by the respective organizations analytical chemistry labs. Protein content expressed on an oil free meal basis (% Meal Protein DM) was calculated. Whiteness Index (WI) was measured by AAFC on samples from the AAFC Saskatoon location using the Hunter Analytical Instrument. Fatty acid composition was determined by gas chromatography, using fatty acid methyl ester analysis. Individual fatty acids are reported as a percentage of the total profile and total saturates calculated by adding all of the saturated fatty acids.
Data confirmed that lines with the combination of a desired fatty acid profile similar to the Nexera check varieties and reduced level of fiber similar to the yellow seeded canola checks were advanced from the nurseries in Year 4. The additional agronomic data on maturity, height, and lodging as well as the seed yield reveals that several of the advanced DH lines are competitive with industry standards and Nexera check varieties. See Tables 19 and 20.
Yields achieved, as reported in Tables 19 and 20, are especially noteworthy.

TABLE 19

Mean agronomic and quality data for BC1F6 progenies, selected DH progenies and checks
from a replicated yield trial carried out at AAFC Saskatoon in Year 5

				Seed						%
				Yield					%	Oil	% Protein
EXPT	NAME	DTF	DTM	kg/ha	C18:1	C18:2	C18:3	C22:1	Saturates	DM	Seed DM

05RYT28	Q2	43.5	96.0	2706	62.25	19.68	9.25	0.04	6.15	48.8	25.5
05RYT28	46A65	44.5	96.0	2064	60.03	20.04	10.54	0.09	6.72	47.5	24.9
05RYT28	Nex 705	44.0	101.5	2798	72.56	16.48	2.57	0.04	5.80	50.7	25.7
05RYT28	Nex 715	44.5	98.5	2482	74.18	14.34	2.81	0.04	6.07	46.7	26.6
05RYT28	Nex 822 CL	46.0	97.0	2492	71.19	17.32	2.32	0.03	5.98	47.2	28.4
05RYT28	YN97-262	44.5	96.5	3121	59.84	21.56	9.22	0.04	6.81	48.3	24.9
05RYT28	YN01-429	46.0	101.0	2807	60.12	21.82	8.86	0.03	6.65	49.8	23.1
05RYT28	DN03-3746	47.0	101.5	2319	65.96	20.94	3.41	0.06	6.82	48.3	24.9
05RYT28	DN03-3748	46.0	99.0	2188	64.94	20.94	4.73	0.03	6.58	48.9	24.6
05RYT28	DN04-1667	44.5	100.0	1522	70.74	17.84	2.07	0.03	6.62	51.2	24.6
05RYT28	DN04-1709	44.0	98.5	2267	70.97	17.62	2.49	0.03	6.21	50.6	25.7
05RYT28	DN04-1358	48.0	102.5	2291	70.77	17.49	2.20	0.04	6.78	49.6	26.2
05RYT28	DN04-1506	48.5	97.5	2805	69.36	18.76	2.26	0.03	6.83	49.7	25.4
05RYT28	DN04-1266	44.5	99.5	2319	68.69	19.59	2.42	0.06	6.32	48.5	25.6
05RYT28	DN04-1279	46.0	101.0	2396	70.09	17.86	2.17	0.09	7.02	50.1	25.3
05RYT28	DN04-1495	47.5	100.5	2414	69.46	19.00	2.40	0.04	6.40	48.8	25.7
05RYT28	DN04-1261	46.5	100.0	1938	68.71	19.44	2.49	0.03	6.56	47.9	26.1
05RYT28	DN04-1718	44.5	100.5	2028	68.43	19.76	2.29	0.03	6.66	49.1	25.6
05RYT28	DN04-1415	48.5	102.0	2185	68.55	18.86	2.79	0.04	7.01	49.3	24.0
05RYT28	DN04-1326	46.5	100.5	2207	70.23	18.23	2.15	0.07	6.66	49.9	25.7
05RYT28	DN04-1768	46.0	99.0	2045	68.98	19.14	2.15	0.04	7.03	50.1	24.1
05RYT28	DN04-1247	45.5	99.0	2305	68.56	19.63	2.38	0.03	6.65	48.8	25.7
05RYT28	DN04-1516	47.0	101.0	2012	68.61	19.74	2.17	0.03	6.58	48.4	25.0
05RYT28	DN04-1524	49.0	102.0	1956	70.05	18.30	2.24	0.02	6.70	48.1	26.2
05RYT28	DN04-1317	46.5	100.0	1901	67.29	20.73	2.27	0.05	6.80	49.6	26.1
05RYT28	DN04-1371	48.0	102.0	2026	68.96	19.43	2.26	0.08	6.52	49.9	24.6
05RYT28	DN04-1273	46.5	100.5	2415	68.01	20.15	2.20	0.05	6.78	49.0	23.7
05RYT28	DN04-1593	49.0	101.0	2939	71.90	17.12	2.13	0.02	6.31	50.9	25.0
05RYT28	DN04-1510	46.0	99.0	2322	70.19	18.51	2.05	0.04	6.57	49.6	26.6
05RYT28	DN04-1537	47.5	99.0	3032	69.95	18.88	2.17	0.03	6.32	50.6	24.7

		% Meal
		Protein	Tot
EXPT	NAME	DM	Gluc	% ADFdm	% ADLdm	% NDFdm	WI

05RYT28	Q2	49.7	20.0	19.6	8.5	22.9	2.5
05RYT28	46A65	47.4	7.8	16.4	5.9	21.7	2.8
05RYT28	Nex 705	52.1	11.5	15.4	5.9	20.6	1.8
05RYT28	Nex 715	49.8	23.8	18.8	8.6	22.9	1.3
05RYT28	Nex 822 CL	53.8	11.0	13.9	4.5	18.9	1.7
05RYT28	YN97-262	48.2	16.0	13.0	3.8	18.7	−17.0
05RYT28	YN01-429	46.0	20.3	10.8	2.0	16.9	−27.5
05RYT28	DN03-3746	48.2	22.8	10.2	1.4	17.0	−24.5
05RYT28	DN03-3748	48.1	21.6	11.0	2.1	17.6	−21.4
05RYT28	DN04-1667	50.4	13.6	10.6	2.2	16.7	−17.1
05RYT28	DN04-1709	52.1	15.7	11.2	2.5	16.6	−16.5
05RYT28	DN04-1358	52.0	17.8	10.4	1.9	15.9	−19.7
05RYT28	DN04-1506	50.5	10.6	13.1	3.5	18.8	−4.5
05RYT28	DN04-1266	49.7	28.3	11.7	2.6	17.8	−17.1
05RYT28	DN04-1279	50.7	14.4	11.5	2.5	17.3	−15.0
05RYT28	DN04-1495	50.3	22.1	11.1	2.3	17.3	−16.1
05RYT28	DN04-1261	50.0	18.1	11.6	2.6	17.4	−13.8
05RYT28	DN04-1718	50.3	18.5	11.3	2.3	17.3	−16.5
05RYT28	DN04-1415	47.3	24.8	11.1	1.8	17.6	−20.6
05RYT28	DN04-1326	51.4	12.9	12.4	3.5	18.4	−7.9
05RYT28	DN04-1768	48.3	19.0	12.3	2.6	18.5	−13.3
05RYT28	DN04-1247	50.3	23.8	11.4	2.6	17.2	−15.7
05RYT28	DN04-1516	48.5	20.0	10.3	1.6	17.2	−19.7
05RYT28	DN04-1524	50.5	16.1	11.3	2.5	17.2	−13.5
05RYT28	DN04-1317	51.7	27.4	11.0	2.0	16.0	−23.5
05RYT28	DN04-1371	49.2	17.1	11.5	2.2	17.5	−14.5
05RYT28	DN04-1273	46.4	21.5	10.8	1.9	17.8	−21.6
05RYT28	DN04-1593	50.9	10.0	13.0	3.3	18.4	−7.1
05RYT28	DN04-1510	52.8	17.5	11.3	2.7	17.4	−14.5
05RYT28	DN04-1537	50.0	7.9	13.8	3.8	19.5	−4.5

TABLE 20

Mean agronomic and quality data for BC1F6 progenies, selected DH progenies and checks
from a replicated yield trial carried out at DAS Saskatoon in Year 5

						Yield					%	% Oil
Field Name	Name	DTF	DTM	HGT	LDG	(Kg/Ha)	C18:1	C18:2	C18:3	C22:1	Sats	DM

MSSAS:RYT	Q2	53.0	102.0	97	2.0	2209	60.6	19.0	10.4	0.2	6.9	47.6
MSSAS:RYT	46A65	51.3	100.0	100	2.0	2280	61.9	19.4	9.4	0.0	6.6	48.4
MSSAS:RYT	Nex 705	52.0	110.0	98	2.0	2151	72.2	16.2	2.8	0.0	6.2	51.0
MSSAS:RYT	Nex 715	52.7	99.3	93	2.7	2015	72.5	15.4	2.9	0.1	6.5	45.6
MSSAS:RYT	Nex 822 CL	54.0	106.3	93	2.3	2047	70.9	17.5	2.4	0.0	6.2	46.3
MSSAS:RYT	YN97262	53.3	107.3	103	2.0	2622	59.9	21.5	8.9	0.0	7.0	50.1
MSSAS:RYT	YN01429	53.0	108.7	103	2.0	2263	60.1	21.3	8.8	0.0	6.9	49.6
MSSAS:RYT	DN033746	56.0	112.3	97	2.0	1821	66.7	20.7	2.4	0.0	7.1	48.4
MSSAS:RYT	DN033748	51.8	110.5	98	2.0	1734	66.9	20.4	3.0	0.0	6.5	48.2
MSSAS:RYT	DN041247	54.3	108.3	115	2.0	1756	68.7	19.0	2.2	0.2	7.1	49.4
MSSAS:RYT	DN041261	55.0	111.7	97	2.0	1480	67.7	20.3	2.4	0.1	6.4	48.0
MSSAS:RYT	DN041266	53.3	109.3	100	2.7	1483	69.0	19.1	2.3	0.0	6.6	48.4
MSSAS:RYT	DN041273	54.7	110.7	97	2.3	1885	68.5	19.6	2.2	0.0	6.8	49.2
MSSAS:RYT	DN041279	55.0	111.0	97	2.0	2273	69.8	17.8	2.4	0.0	7.2	50.8
MSSAS:RYT	DN041317	55.3	110.5	93	2.5	1680	67.1	20.6	2.4	0.0	7.0	48.9
MSSAS:RYT	DN041326	55.0	111.3	100	2.0	1720	67.2	20.1	2.6	0.0	7.2	48.0
MSSAS:RYT	DN041358	55.7	112.7	110	2.0	1810	69.9	17.7	2.4	0.0	7.1	47.3
MSSAS:RYT	DN041371	55.3	112.3	103	2.0	1839	69.1	18.6	2.5	0.0	7.0	49.3
MSSAS:RYT	DN041415	56.3	113.3	97	2.0	1896	68.1	18.9	2.6	0.0	7.3	47.2
MSSAS:RYT	DN041495	55.3	112.0	100	2.0	2331	69.4	19.1	2.3	0.0	6.4	50.2
MSSAS:RYT	DN041506	55.3	107.7	110	1.7	2679	69.2	18.5	2.2	0.0	7.0	48.1
MSSAS:RYT	DN041510	55.0	109.0	110	2.0	2421	70.8	17.7	2.1	0.0	6.7	50.7
MSSAS:RYT	DN041516	55.7	112.0	98	2.0	2043	68.7	19.5	2.2	0.0	6.8	49.5
MSSAS:RYT	DN041524	56.0	112.3	97	2.0	1350	68.8	18.9	2.3	0.0	7.1	45.4
MSSAS:RYT	DN041537	55.7	110.7	103	2.0	2575	70.0	18.5	2.3	0.0	6.6	51.8
MSSAS:RYT	DN041593	54.7	111.7	105	1.3	2737	71.6	16.7	2.4	0.0	6.6	51.2
MSSAS:RYT	DN041667	53.3	108.0	97	2.0	2259	69.4	18.1	2.2	0.0	7.2	51.0
MSSAS:RYT	DN041709	52.7	108.3	90	2.0	2133	71.4	17.2	2.2	0.0	6.4	49.3
MSSAS:RYT	DN041718	52.7	111.0	93	2.0	1670	68.9	19.0	2.4	0.1	6.8	50.2
MSSAS:RYT	DN041768	55.0	110.0	90	2.0	1799	70.0	18.1	2.0	0.0	7.2	50.6

		% Protein	% Meal	Tot			Chlorophyll
Field Name	Name	Seed DM	Protein DM	Gluc	% NDFdm	% ADFdm	PPM

MSSAS:RYT	Q2	24.1	46.0	13.4	24.9	15.0	16.2
MSSAS:RYT	46A65	22.5	43.7	18.9	26.7	16.9	9.6
MSSAS:RYT	Nex 705	22.1	45.2	11.1	25.5	14.1	13.3
MSSAS:RYT	Nex 715	23.9	44.0	11.0	26.9	17.9	11.7
MSSAS:RYT	Nex 822 CL	24.1	44.8	13.4	22.0	11.8	10.5
MSSAS:RYT	YN97262	25.2	50.5	13.5	18.7	9.4	4.6
MSSAS:RYT	YN01429	26.0	51.5	11.2	20.0	10.3	9.9
MSSAS:RYT	DN033746	25.8	50.0	7.7	21.8	10.9	25.1
MSSAS:RYT	DN033748	25.5	49.2	11.0	20.1	10.4	14.6
MSSAS:RYT	DN041247	24.9	49.2	9.4	21.3	11.3	13.0
MSSAS:RYT	DN041261	25.0	48.1	12.5	21.1	10.9	13.1
MSSAS:RYT	DN041266	25.0	48.5	9.9	22.7	11.3	21.1
MSSAS:RYT	DN041273	25.5	50.1	8.2	22.1	10.9	23.7
MSSAS:RYT	DN041279	24.8	50.3	6.3	23.1	12.2	17.9
MSSAS:RYT	DN041317	25.3	49.6	10.3	21.6	10.6	21.0
MSSAS:RYT	DN041326	25.3	48.6	10.9	21.0	11.0	19.8
MSSAS:RYT	DN041358	25.4	48.3	8.9	19.4	10.2	16.7
MSSAS:RYT	DN041371	25.0	49.3	10.8	22.7	12.5	18.5
MSSAS:RYT	DN041415	26.1	49.4	6.9	21.5	11.1	37.8
MSSAS:RYT	DN041495	24.7	49.7	12.8	22.4	11.1	20.6
MSSAS:RYT	DN041506	25.0	48.1	9.1	21.4	12.7	32.0
MSSAS:RYT	DN041510	23.9	48.5	9.9	20.6	10.7	9.5
MSSAS:RYT	DN041516	25.0	49.5	8.8	20.1	10.4	22.9
MSSAS:RYT	DN041524	25.7	47.0	7.7	20.7	11.2	42.2
MSSAS:RYT	DN041537	23.9	49.6	12.2	23.1	12.2	28.5
MSSAS:RYT	DN041593	24.1	49.4	8.7	22.5	11.9	16.4
MSSAS:RYT	DN041667	24.7	50.3	8.4	19.0	10.8	24.6
MSSAS:RYT	DN041709	25.0	49.3	13.8	18.6	9.8	21.0
MSSAS:RYT	DN041718	24.4	49.1	12.8	20.5	10.4	24.2
MSSAS:RYT	DN041768	24.6	49.8	9.2	22.3	12.0	27.0

Example 10—Further Feeding Study

Seven of the highest yielding DH lines as well as yellow and black seeded checks, observed in the Year 5 replicated yield trials, were selected for use in Poultry feeding trials to assess amino acid digestibility and energy content of meal from lower fiber yellow seeded lines in comparison to yellow and black seeded canola lines. Fifteen hundred grams of seed of each line selected for feeding, harvested from the first replicate of the Year 5 DAS Saskatoon yield trial was cold pressed, using a continuous screw press (Komet, type CA59; IBG Monforts Ockotec Gmbttt&Co Germany), and hexane extracted. Hexane extraction was achieved by immersing the remaining solids in hexane in sealed vessel at room temperature for 16 hours. After contact period the bulk of the hexane was decanted from the sample and the sample was placed in a large funnel lined with a paper tower to allow remaining solvent to drain. Samples were allowed to evaporate for 1 day in a shallow pan in a fume hood so that hexane was removed. Residual oil content was determined on 3 gram subsamples using a GoldfischExtractor with hexane as a solvent (model 22166B, Labconco Corp.; Kansas city, Missouri, 64132, U.S.A.), comparing the weight of sample before solvent extraction and after. Residual moisture content was determine by weighing 1 gram subsamples of meal before and after drying with forced air at 130 degrees celcius for 2 hours.
45 Ground canola meal samples were tested for true metabolizable energy content (TME_n) and amino acid (AA) digestibility in poultry. The techniques being employed to measure TME_nand AA digestibility are based on the regression analysis technique. This method of bioassay was first described by Sibbald (1976) for use in the measurement of true metabolizable energy in feedstuffs, and further adapted to account for energy retained in the bird as nitrogen (Sibbald, 1979). The method used for this study to measure both TME_nand amino acid digestibility is described by Parsons et al. (1997). Following a 24-hr period without feed, birds were given 30-gram portions of the test diet via crop intubation, while additional birds were deprived of feed during the entire experimental period to measure endogenous excretion of dry matter, energy, nitrogen and amino acids. A plastic tray was placed under each bird's cage, and excreta was collected quantitatively for 48 hours after intubation. The excreta samples were then lyophilized, weighed, and ground to pass through a 60-mesh screen. Gross energy, nitrogen, and amino acid concentrations were then determined on at least two replicates of each individual sample of excreta. True digestibilities of amino acids are calculated according to the method described by Sibbald (1979), and TME_nby the method of Parsons et al. (1982). TME_nwas corrected to 0% oil using a conversion that 1% oil contributes 80 Kcal of energy but displaces 25 Kcal of protein energy, therefore every 1% residual oil adds 55 Kcal of non-protein energy.
Results are provided in Tables 21 and 22.

TABLE 21

Amino Acid Digestibility (Percent) for meal prepared from DH lines, yellow seeded canola lines, and black seeded canola lines

Line

Asp

Thr

Ser

Glu

Pro

Ala

Cys

Val

Met

Iso

Leu

Tyr

Phe

His

Lys

Arg

Try

DN041279	90.60	85.26	87.10	94.89	87.55	90.31	86.67	87.31	94.12	90.08	92.00	89.29	92.55	91.71	92.13	93.40	97.41
DN041495	90.64	86.56	88.24	94.86	86.92	90.27	86.57	86.61	94.86	89.53	92.82	90.06	93.58	92.97	92.08	95.18	97.19
DN041506	90.11	87.19	89.06	94.77	87.73	90.29	89.85	87.71	94.17	89.42	92.23	90.03	92.45	92.55	93.39	93.55	97.14
DN041510	90.60	86.51	89.29	94.49	87.32	89.51	86.08	87.03	93.84	89.08	92.29	89.54	92.75	91.63	92.02	91.87	97.18
DN041537	87.36	83.46	85.37	92.68	85.88	86.14	83.58	83.66	92.02	85.10	89.12	87.01	90.25	90.53	91.76	93.13	96.69
DN041593	90.22	87.48	90.03	94.57	89.01	90.03	88.03	87.73	93.95	88.79	92.14	90.12	92.78	91.03	93.32	94.36	96.83
DN041667	89.69	87.20	90.08	94.35	87.82	88.22	88.25	84.61	93.56	86.42	91.02	89.53	92.20	91.30	92.97	94.50	87.81
YN97262	87.81	83.68	86.97	93.51	86.06	86.63	84.78	84.32	92.19	85.81	89.05	87.21	90.44	90.35	91.23	91.01	96.95
YN01429	87.31	83.52	85.85	92.92	85.30	87.68	83.09	84.13	92.95	86.86	90.62	87.45	91.19	91.34	91.37	93.29	97.13
Yellow Checks	87.56	83.60	86.41	93.21	85.68	87.16	83.94	84.22	92.57	86.34	89.84	87.33	90.81	90.85	91.30	92.15	97.04
46A65	86.09	82.27	84.28	91.19	85.23	84.87	81.49	81.96	89.67	83.44	86.78	87.00	88.34	88.72	88.89	91.17	96.14
Q2	87.19	84.99	87.50	93.42	87.62	87.16	85.05	85.87	92.87	87.35	90.56	88.39	90.98	90.22	91.30	91.80	97.09
Black Checks	86.64	83.63	85.89	92.31	86.42	86.02	83.27	83.91	91.27	85.40	88.67	87.69	89.66	89.47	90.09	91.49	96.61
Nex 822 CL	92.50	89.39	91.12	95.90	90.09	92.94	89.64	90.60	95.87	92.52	94.68	91.25	94.63	93.57	94.12	93.38	97.31

TABLE 22

Mean True Metabolizable Energy
of canola meal corrected to 0% oil content

	Line	Mean TMEn Oil Free

	YN97262	2650
	DN041593	2638
	Nex 822 CL	2580
	DN041279	2573
	DN041506	2482
	DN041510	2471
	DN041495	2459
	DN041537	2425
	YN01429	2424
	DN041667	2414
	46A65	2248
	Q2	2230

REFERENCES

Bell, J. M., Shires, A. 1982. Composition and digestibility by pigs of hulls fractions from rapeseed cultivars with yellow or brown seed coats. Can. J. Animal Science 62:557-565.
American Oil Chemists' Society (AOCS) Official Methods Am 2-92 Oil content in Oilseeds
AOCS Official Methods Ba 4e-93 Combustion Method for the Determination of Crude Protein
AOCS Official Method Ak 1-92 (93) Determination of glucosinolates content in rapeseed and canola by HPLC
Bell, J. M. 1993. Feeding studies of yellow-seeded Brassica. Can. J. Animal Sci. 73:679-697.
Bell, J. M. 1995. Meal and by-product utilization in animal nutrition, pp. 301-337. In: Brassica oilseeds, production and utilization. Ed. D. Kimber and D. I. McGregor. Cab International, Wallingford, Oxon, OX108DE, UK.
Getinet, A., G. Rakow. 1997. Repression of seed coat pigmentation in Ethiopian mustard. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77:501-505.
Newkirk, R. W., H. L. Classen and M. J. Edney. 2003. The digestibility and content of amino acids in toasted and non-toasted canola meals. Canadian Journal of Animal Sci. 83:131-139
Rakow, G., Relf-Eckstein, J., Raney, P. and Gugel, R. 1999a. Development of high yielding, disease resistant, yellow-seeded Brassica napus. Proc. 10^thInt. Rapeseed Congress, Canberra, Australia, Sep. 26-29, 1999. Oral presentation, session C 07.
Rakow, G., Raney, P. and Relf-Eckstein, J. 1999b. Agronomic performance and seed quality of a new source of yellow-seeded Brassica napus. Proc. 10^thInt. Rapeseed Congress, Canberra, Australia, Sep. 26-29, 1999. Poster #9.
Rakow, G., J. P. Raney. 2003. Present status and future perspectives of breeding for seed quality in Brassica oilseed crops. Proc. 11^thInt. Rapeseed Cong., Copenhagen, Denmark, 6-10 Jul. 2003, 1:181-185, oral keynote (invited).
Rakow, G. (2004a). Canola meal quality improvement through the breeding of yellow-seeded varieties—an historical perspective. AAFC Sustainable Production Systems Bulletin. 2 PP.
Rakow, G. (2004b). Yellow-seeded Brassica napus canola for the Canadian canola Industry. AAFC Sustainable Production Systems Bulletin. 2 pp.
Rashid, A. and Rakow, G. 1995. Seed quality improvements in yellow seeded Brassica napus. Proc. 9^thInt. Rapeseed Congress, Cambridge, England, Jul. 4-7, 1995. Vol. 4: 1144-1146.
Rashid, A., Rakow, G. and Downey, R. K. 1994. Development of yellow-seeded Brassica napus L. through interspecific crosses. Plant Breeding 112: 127-134.
Relf-Eckstein, J., G. Rakow and J. P. Raney 2003. Yellow-seeded Brassica napus canola—a new generation of high quality canola for Canada. Proc. 11^thInt. Rapeseed Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark, Jul. 6-10, 2003. Vol. 2: 458-460.
Shirzadegan, M., G. Röbbelen. 1985. Influence of seed color and hull proportion on quality properties of seeds in Brassica napus L. Götingen Fette Seifen Anstrichmittel 87:235-237.
Simbaya, J., Slominski, B. A., Rakow, G., Campbell, L. D., Downey, R. K. and Bell, J. M. 1995. Quality characteristics of yellow-seeded Brassica seed meals: protein, carbohydrate and dietary fiber compounds. J. Agr. Food Chem. 43: 2062-2066.
Slominski, B. A., Campbell L. D. and Guenter, W. 1994. Carbohydrates and dietary fiber components of yellow-seeded and brown-seeded canola. J. Agric Food Chem. 42:704-707
Stringham, G. D., McGregor, D. L. and Pawlowski, S. H. 1974. Chemical and morphological characteristics associated with seed coat color in rapeseed. In Proceedings of the 4^thInternational Rapeseed Congress, Giessen, Germany pp. 99-108.

Claims

1-19. (canceled)

20. Crushed canola seed preparation, comprising:

an oil fraction comprising linolenic acid (C18:3) content of about 3% or less by weight and oleic acid (C18:1) content of about 68% or greater by weight, relative to total C12, C14, C16, C18, C22, and C24 fatty acids; and

a meal fraction comprising at least about 45% protein and no more than 2% acid detergent lignin (ADL) on a dry matter basis (DM).

21. The crushed canola seed preparation of claim 20, wherein the oil fraction comprises linolenic acid (C18:3) content of 2.5% or less and oleic acid (C18:1) content of 70% or greater.

22. The crushed canola seed preparation of claim 20, wherein the oil fraction comprises linolenic acid (C18:3) content between about 1.5% and about 2.5% and oleic acid (C18:1) content of about 70% to about 75%.

23. The crushed canola seed preparation of claim 20, wherein the oil fraction comprises linolenic acid (C18:3) content about 1.8% and oleic acid (C18:1) content of about 72%.

24. The crushed canola seed preparation of claim 20, wherein the meal fraction further comprises about 15% or less acid detergent fiber (ADF).

25. The crushed canola seed preparation of claim 20, wherein the meal fraction further comprises about 25% or less neutral detergent fiber (NDF).

26. The crushed canola seed preparation of claim 20, wherein the meal fraction further comprises about 1.5% or less phytate.

27. The crushed canola seed preparation of claim 20, wherein the meal fraction further comprises about 12% or less acid detergent fiber (ADF), about 20% or less neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and about 1.3% phytate.

28. The crushed canola seed preparation of claim 27, wherein the meal fraction comprises about 8.2% acid detergent fiber (ADF), about 16.3% neutral detergent fiber (NDF), about 1.3% phytate, about 47% protein, and about 1.2% acid detergent lignin (ADL).

29. A method of producing canola oil and canola meal, comprising

crushing canola seed to produce the crushed canola seed preparation of claim 20;

separating the oil fraction and the meal fraction from the crushed seed;

extracting the oil fraction to produce canola oil comprising alpha linolenic acid (C18:3) content of 3% or less by weight and oleic acid (C18:1) content of 68% or greater by weight; and

producing canola meal from the meal fraction comprising at least 47% protein and no more than 2% acid detergent lignin (ADL) on a dry matter basis (DM);

wherein the oil fraction and the meal fraction are derived from the same crushed seed.

30. The method of claim 29, wherein the oil fraction is extracted with hexane.

31. The method of claim 29, wherein the canola oil comprises linolenic acid (C18:3) content of 2.5% or less and oleic acid (C18:1) content of 70% or greater.

32. The method of claim 29, wherein the canola oil comprises linolenic acid (C18:3) content between about 1.5% and about 2.5% and oleic acid (C18:1) content of about 70% to about 75%.

33. The method of claim 29, wherein the canola oil comprises linolenic acid (C18:3) content about 1.8% and oleic acid (C18:1) content of about 72%.

34. The method of claim 29, wherein the canola meal further comprises about 15% or less acid detergent fiber (ADF).

35. The method of claim 29, wherein the canola meal further comprises about 25% or less neutral detergent fiber (NDF).

36. The method of claim 29, wherein the canola meal further comprises about 1.5% or less phytate.

37. The method of claim 29, wherein the canola meal further comprises about 12% or less acid detergent fiber (ADF), about 20% or less neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and about 1.3% phytate.

38. The method of claim 37, wherein the canola meal comprises about 8.2% acid detergent fiber (ADF), about 16.3% neutral detergent fiber (NDF), about 1.3% phytate, about 47% protein, and about 1.2% acid detergent lignin (ADL).