US20200052640A1 - Motor control device, motor control system, runaway state detection method, and program - Google Patents
Motor control device, motor control system, runaway state detection method, and program Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20200052640A1 US20200052640A1 US16/485,781 US201816485781A US2020052640A1 US 20200052640 A1 US20200052640 A1 US 20200052640A1 US 201816485781 A US201816485781 A US 201816485781A US 2020052640 A1 US2020052640 A1 US 2020052640A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- motor
- torque command
- runaway
- control device
- sign
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P29/00—Arrangements for regulating or controlling electric motors, appropriate for both AC and DC motors
- H02P29/02—Providing protection against overload without automatic interruption of supply
- H02P29/024—Detecting a fault condition, e.g. short circuit, locked rotor, open circuit or loss of load
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P29/00—Arrangements for regulating or controlling electric motors, appropriate for both AC and DC motors
- H02P29/02—Providing protection against overload without automatic interruption of supply
- H02P29/024—Detecting a fault condition, e.g. short circuit, locked rotor, open circuit or loss of load
- H02P29/028—Detecting a fault condition, e.g. short circuit, locked rotor, open circuit or loss of load the motor continuing operation despite the fault condition, e.g. eliminating, compensating for or remedying the fault
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P21/00—Arrangements or methods for the control of electric machines by vector control, e.g. by control of field orientation
- H02P21/14—Estimation or adaptation of machine parameters, e.g. flux, current or voltage
- H02P21/18—Estimation of position or speed
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P21/00—Arrangements or methods for the control of electric machines by vector control, e.g. by control of field orientation
- H02P21/14—Estimation or adaptation of machine parameters, e.g. flux, current or voltage
- H02P21/20—Estimation of torque
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P29/00—Arrangements for regulating or controlling electric motors, appropriate for both AC and DC motors
- H02P29/02—Providing protection against overload without automatic interruption of supply
- H02P29/032—Preventing damage to the motor, e.g. setting individual current limits for different drive conditions
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P29/00—Arrangements for regulating or controlling electric motors, appropriate for both AC and DC motors
- H02P29/10—Arrangements for regulating or controlling electric motors, appropriate for both AC and DC motors for preventing overspeed or under speed
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P6/00—Arrangements for controlling synchronous motors or other dynamo-electric motors using electronic commutation dependent on the rotor position; Electronic commutators therefor
- H02P6/10—Arrangements for controlling torque ripple, e.g. providing reduced torque ripple
Definitions
- the invention relates to a motor control device detecting runaway of a motor.
- the servomotor may fall into a runaway state in which the servomotor accelerates in a direction opposite to the command.
- a method of detecting such runaway is determining that the runaway state is present in the case where a torque command to the servomotor and the acceleration direction of the servomotor are different when the servomotor is accelerating.
- a torque command to the servomotor and the acceleration direction of the servomotor are different when the servomotor is accelerating.
- erroneous detection occurs in the case where the motor is moved by an offset or biased load.
- Patent Document 1 monitors the speed when the servomotor starts to accelerate, compares the speed with a displacement speed which is a peak speed, and updates the displacement speed and performs runaway detection of the servomotor if the speed is higher than the displacement speed.
- this method has issues such as unable to detect the runaway until the motor speed exceeds the peak speed, and time-consuming to detect the runaway particularly in the case where there is a large inertial load.
- erroneous detection may occur even in the case where the oscillation of control instability occurs due to the gain setting of a controller.
- the objective of the invention is to detect runaway of a motor in a short time while suppressing erroneous detection.
- the invention compares the sign of a jerk (also referred to as an acceleration change rate or a jerk degree) and the sign of a torque command differential value and determines that a runaway state is present in the case where a mismatch between the sign of the jerk and the sign of the torque command differential value continues for a predetermined time or more.
- a jerk also referred to as an acceleration change rate or a jerk degree
- a motor control device is a motor control device generating a torque command, such that a detection speed of a motor matches a command speed, and controlling the motor, and includes: a torque command differential component taking a differential of the torque command and obtaining a torque command differential value; a motor actual speed second order differential component taking a second order differential of the detection speed of the motor and obtaining a motor jerk; and a runaway detection component determining that the motor is in a runaway state in a case where an abnormal state in which a sign of the motor jerk and a sign of the torque command differential value do not match continues for a predetermined time or more.
- the motor control device of the aspect can quickly detect the runaway of the motor without erroneous detection even in the case where a biased load is present.
- the runaway detection component of the aspect compares the signs of the torque command differential value and the motor jerk at a predetermined interval and can determine that the motor is in the runaway state in the case where a determination result of mismatch is repeatedly detected for a predetermined number of times. For example, in a case where the predetermined time is 10 milliseconds, it preferable that the determination on match/mismatch of signs is made every millisecond, and the runaway state is determined as present when the mismatch occurs ten consecutive times.
- the runaway detection component also determines that the abnormal state is present in a case where a sign of a motor acceleration, which is a first order differential value of the motor, and a sign of the torque command do not match when the torque command is other than 0 and a differential value of the torque command is 0.
- the torque command differential value becomes 0, and the runaway cannot be detected by comparing the signs of the torque command differential value and the motor jerk. Therefore, in the case where the torque command is other than 0 and the torque command differential value is 0, it is preferable to detect the runaway according to the sign of the motor acceleration and the sign of the torque command. Since the state in which the motor acceleration and the torque command do not match despite that the torque is saturated is not a normal operation, an erroneous detection does not occur even in the determination based on the sign of the motor acceleration and the sign of the torque command when the torque is saturated.
- the runaway state detection component may also consider the abnormal state based on the mismatch between the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk and the abnormal state based on the mismatch between the torque command and the motor acceleration when the torque command is saturated as the same abnormal state, and determine that the motor runs away in the case where one of the abnormal states is satisfied for the predetermined time or more.
- the runaway state detection component may consider the two runaway states as different and determine that the motor runs away in the case where one of the conditions continues for the predetermined time or more.
- the runaway detection component of the aspect resets a duration of the abnormal state to zero in a case where the sign of the motor jerk and the sign of the torque command differential value match before the abnormal state has continued for the predetermined time or more. It may also be that the runaway detection component of the aspect resets a duration of the abnormal state to zero in a case where the sign of the motor acceleration and the sign of the torque command match when the torque command is other than 0 and the differential value of the torque command is 0 before the abnormal state has continued for the predetermined time or more.
- the erroneous detections due to mismatch of signs resulting from accidentally occurring sign mismatches or noise, etc. can be eliminated.
- the torque command differential component and the motor actual speed second order differential component apply a low-pass filter for an input signal and obtain a differential value.
- the band of the differential component is not limited, the gain becomes higher as the frequency becomes higher, the noise increases, and the erroneous detection occurs more easily.
- the motor control device in the aspect further includes an emergency stop component stopping the motor by at least one of cutting off current supply to the motor, using a dynamic brake, and setting the torque command to 0 when the runaway detection component detects the runaway state of the motor.
- the motor can be stopped immediately when the runaway of the motor is detected.
- a motor control device is a motor control device generating a torque command, such that a detection speed of a motor matches a command speed, and controlling the motor, and includes: a runaway state detection component determining that an abnormal state is present in a case where a sign of a motor jerk, which is a second order differential value of the detection speed of the motor, and a sign of a differential value of the torque command do not match, and determining that the motor is in a runaway state in a case where the abnormal state continues for a predetermined time or more.
- a motor control system includes a motor and the motor control system above.
- the invention can be construed as a motor control device having at least a portion of the functions.
- the invention can be construed as a control method executing at least a portion of the processes.
- the invention can be construed as a computer program for executing the method in a computer or a computer readable storage medium non-transitory storing the computer program.
- Each component and process can be combined with each other within a possible extent to configure the invention.
- the motor control device can detect the runaway of the motor in a short time while suppressing the erroneous detection.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a motor control device in a first embodiment.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a runaway state detection process in the first embodiment.
- FIG. 3 is a diagram describing runaway state detection in a case of miswiring in the first embodiment.
- FIG. 4 is a diagram describing runaway state detection in a case where a disturbance occurs in the first embodiment.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a motor control device in a second embodiment.
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a runaway state detection process in the second embodiment.
- FIG. 7 is a diagram describing a runaway state detection process in the second embodiment.
- FIG. 8A is a diagram describing a differentiator in a third embodiment.
- FIG. 8B is a diagram describing an effect according to a low-pass filter of the differentiator in the third embodiment.
- FIG. 8C is a diagram describing a differentiator without a low-pass filter.
- FIG. 1 shows a schematic configuration of a motor control system in which a motor control device of the invention is installed.
- the motor system includes a motor control device 1 , a motor 2 and an encoder 3 .
- the motor control device 1 has a function of generating a torque command, such that the speed of the motor 2 matches a speed command from a controller (not shown), to control the motor 2 and detecting runaway of the motor 2 .
- the motor 2 is installed in the device as an actuator of various machinery devices (e.g., arms and transfer devices of industrial robots) that are not shown herein.
- the motor 2 is an AC motor.
- the encoder 3 is attached to the motor 2 to detect an operation of the motor 2 .
- the encoder 3 includes location information concerning a rotational location (angle) of a rotational axis of the motor 2 , information of a rotational speed of the rotational axis, etc.
- a general incremental encoder or an absolute encoder can be used as the encoder 3 .
- the motor control device 1 includes a speed command input part 11 , a speed control part 12 , a current controller 13 , a speed detector 14 , a torque command differentiator 15 , a motor actual speed second order differentiator 16 , a comparator 17 , a runaway state detecting part 18 , and a motor stop part 19 .
- the torque command differentiator 15 , the motor actual speed second order differentiator 16 , the comparator 17 , and the runaway state detecting part 18 are functional parts for detecting the runaway of the motor 2 .
- the speed command input part 11 receives a command speed of the motor 2 from a controller (not shown).
- the speed detector 14 obtains the actual speed (detection speed) of the motor 2 based on a feedback signal from the encoder 3 .
- the speed control part 12 generates a torque command such that the command speed matches the detection speed.
- the current controller 13 turns on/off a switching element such as an IGBT based on the torque command to supply AC power to the motor 2 .
- the torque command differentiator 15 receives the torque command generated by the speed control part 12 and calculates its differential value (first-order differential value).
- the output of the torque command differentiator 15 is referred to as a torque command differential value.
- the motor actual speed second order differentiator 16 receives a motor actual speed output by the speed detector 14 and calculates its second order differential value.
- the second order differential of the speed (the first order differential of the acceleration) is referred to as jerk, jerk degree, acceleration change rate, etc.
- the output of the motor actual speed second order differentiator 16 is referred to as a motor jerk.
- the comparator 17 receives the torque command differential value from the torque command differentiator 15 and the motor jerk from the motor actual speed second order differentiator 16 , and determines whether the signs of these values match.
- the comparison result by the comparator 17 is input to the runaway state detecting part 18 .
- the runaway state detecting part 18 uses the comparison result by the comparator 17 to determine whether the motor 2 is in the runaway state. Specifically, the runaway state detecting part 18 determines that an abnormal state is present in the case where the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk do not match, and determines that the motor 2 is in the runaway state in the case where the abnormal state continues for a predetermined time or more. In addition, while FIG. 1 shows that only the comparison result of the comparator 17 is input to the runaway state detecting part 18 , a torque command value or a motor actual speed (detection speed) is actually input. These pieces of information are also used to detect the runaway state of the motor 2 . Details of the runaway state detection process are described below with reference to the flowchart.
- the torque command differentiator 15 , the motor actual speed second order differentiator 16 , the comparator 17 and the runaway state detecting part 18 may be implemented as digital circuits or analog circuits. Also, these functional parts may be realized by a combination of a digital signal processor (DSP), a field programmable gate array (FGPA), a microprocessor unit (MPU) and a program.
- DSP digital signal processor
- FGPA field programmable gate array
- MPU microprocessor unit
- the motor stop part 19 When receiving a signal indicating that the runaway state has been detected from the runaway state detecting part 18 , the motor stop part 19 puts an emergency stop on the motor 2 .
- the motor stop part 19 stops the motor 2 by one of cutting off the current supply from the current controller 13 to the motor 2 , using a dynamic brake (regenerative brake), or setting the torque command to zero, or a combination of a plurality of the aforementioned.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a flow of the runaway state detection process by the runaway state detecting part 18 .
- the process shown in FIG. 2 is executed periodically, and the execution interval thereof may be arbitrary, but, for example, can be set at about one millisecond.
- the runaway state detecting part 18 confirms in Step S 11 that the motor detection speed is equal to or higher than a first threshold and in Step S 12 that the torque command is equal to or higher than a second threshold.
- the determination in Step S 11 is to confirm that the motor is in operation, and a sufficiently small value is set as the first threshold.
- the determination in Step S 12 is a determination to avoid erroneous detection, and, for example, a value of about 10% of a rated torque is set as the second threshold.
- Step S 11 and S 12 In the case where one of the determinations in Steps S 11 and S 12 is not satisfied (S 11 —NO or S 12 —NO), the process proceeds to Step S 17 , and the runaway state detecting part 18 sets an abnormal duration for counting the continuation of the abnormal state to zero.
- Step S 11 the process proceeds to Step S 13 , and the runaway state detecting part 18 determines whether the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk are different. This determination is made based on the output from the comparator 17 .
- Step S 14 the process proceeds to Step S 14 , and the runaway state detecting part 18 increases the abnormal duration.
- the process proceeds to Step S 17 , and the runaway state detecting part 18 resets the abnormal duration to zero.
- Step S 15 the runaway state detecting part 18 determines whether the abnormal duration is equal to or greater than a third threshold (predetermined time).
- the third threshold is a time with which the motor can be determined as running away in the case where the mismatch between the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk continues for the predetermined time or more. For example, 10 milliseconds (10 in the value of a counter) can be adopted as the third threshold.
- the runaway state detecting part 18 ends the process while holding the determination.
- the process proceeds to Step S 16 , and the runaway state detecting part 18 determines that the motor 2 is in the runaway state.
- the motor stop part 19 implements an emergency stop procedure of the motor 2 .
- FIG. 3 is a diagram showing (A) torque command value, (B) motor acceleration, (C) motor speed, (D) torque command differential value, and (E) motor jerk in the case where the connection between the motor control device 1 and the motor 2 is erroneous.
- the direction of the torque command and the rotational direction of the motor are opposite, and a speed control loop constitutes a positive feedback. Therefore, the torque command increases with time, and the speed of the motor 2 also increases in the opposite direction.
- the runaway of the motor 2 can be detected quickly regardless of the size of the load inertia of the motor.
- This embodiment does not require, as the condition for runaway detection, that the motor speed exceeds the peak speed, but sets a mismatch between the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk as the condition.
- the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk become different immediately after the motor is driven (T 1 ), and therefore the runaway of the motor can be detected at T 2 after the predetermined time has elapsed from T 1 .
- FIG. 4 is a diagram showing (A) torque command value, (B) motor acceleration, (C) motor speed, (D) torque command differential value, and (E) motor jerk in the case where a disturbance such as a biased load is present.
- a disturbance such as a biased load is present.
- the motor held by a brake, etc. is released from a holding state after driving starts, and acceleration is generated by the biased load.
- this embodiment can avoid erroneously detecting that the motor runs away even though the motor does not run away.
- the runaway can be detected quickly regardless of the load inertia of the motor, and the erroneous detection in the case where a disturbance occurs can be suppressed.
- FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a configuration of the motor control device 1 according to this embodiment. Among the functional parts shown in FIG. 5 , those substantially identical to the functional parts shown in FIG. 1 are referred to with the same reference symbols, and the detailed description thereof is omitted.
- the motor control device 1 includes a motor actual speed first order differentiator 20 and a comparator 21 .
- the motor actual speed first order differentiator 20 receives a motor actual speed output by the speed detector 14 and calculates its first order differential value.
- the output of the motor actual speed first order differentiator 20 is referred to as motor acceleration.
- the comparator 21 receives the torque command value from the speed control part 12 and the motor acceleration from the motor actual speed first order differentiator 20 , and determines whether the signs of these values match. The comparison result by the comparator 21 is input to the runaway state detecting part 18 .
- the runaway state detecting part 18 in this embodiment receives a comparison result of the comparator 21 and the torque command differential value from the torque command differentiator 15 in addition to the comparison result of the comparator 17 .
- the runaway state detection process in the runaway state detecting part 18 of this embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. 6 .
- Step S 18 determines in Step S 18 whether the torque command differential value is zero. In the case where the torque command differential value is not zero (S 18 —NO), the process proceeds to Step S 13 and the same determination as in the first embodiment is performed. That is, if the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk are different, it is determined that the abnormal state is present and the abnormal duration is increased, otherwise the abnormal duration is reset to zero.
- Step S 19 the runaway state detecting part 18 uses the comparison result by the comparator 21 to determine whether the sign of the torque command value and the sign of the motor acceleration are different. Although the torque command is saturated, it cannot be said that the state in which the rotational direction of the motor is opposite to the command is a normal state. Therefore, in the case where these signs are different, it is determined that the abnormal state is present, and the process proceeds to Step S 14 to increase the abnormal duration. On the other hand, in the case where these signs match, it is determined that the abnormal state is not present, and the process proceeds to Step S 17 to reset the abnormal duration to zero.
- the subsequent processes are the same as those in the first embodiment.
- FIG. 7 is a diagram showing (A) torque command value, (B) motor acceleration, (C) motor speed, (D) torque command differential value, and (E) motor jerk in the case where the torque command is saturated when the motor control device 1 and the motor 2 are incorrectly connected. Due to miswiring, the sign of the torque command differential value differs from the sign of the motor jerk. Here, it is assumed that the time until the torque command is saturated (time from T 7 to T 8 ) is shorter than the threshold time for runaway detection. After T 8 , since the differential value of the torque command becomes zero and therefore the motor jerk becomes zero, the runaway detection based on the signs of these values cannot be performed. However, in this embodiment, when the torque command differential value is zero, the sign of the torque command and the sign of the motor acceleration can be compared to detect the runaway of the motor.
- the runaway state detecting part 18 determines that the runaway state is present in the case where a state in which one of the determination of Step S 13 and the determination of Step S 19 is affirmed continues for the predetermined time or more.
- the runaway state detecting part 18 may also consider the state in which Step S 13 is affirmed and the state in which Step S 19 is affirmed as different abnormal states respectively and make a determination that the runaway state is present in the case where one of the abnormal states continues for the predetermined time or more.
- the motor control device may also perform location control.
- the motor control device 1 may also be an inverter.
- an induction motor can serve as an example.
- a band limiting differentiator 80 consisting of a low-pass filter 81 and a differentiator 82 may also be adopted.
- the band limiting differentiator 80 can limit the band of the differentiator 82 by applying the low-pass filter for an input signal and obtaining the differential value.
- the band of the differentiator is not limited by the low-pass filter, as shown in FIG. 8C , the gain becomes higher as the frequency becomes higher, and the noise increases. Therefore, the erroneous detection of the runaway state occurs more easily.
- the gain under a high frequency can be suppressed, and the noise can be reduced. Therefore, the occurrence of the erroneous detection of the runaway state due to the noise generated by taking a differential can be suppressed.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Control Of Electric Motors In General (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The invention relates to a motor control device detecting runaway of a motor.
- Because of reasons such as miswiring of a servomotor, the servomotor may fall into a runaway state in which the servomotor accelerates in a direction opposite to the command.
- A method of detecting such runaway is determining that the runaway state is present in the case where a torque command to the servomotor and the acceleration direction of the servomotor are different when the servomotor is accelerating. However, there is an issue that erroneous detection occurs in the case where the motor is moved by an offset or biased load.
- To address this issue,
Patent Document 1 monitors the speed when the servomotor starts to accelerate, compares the speed with a displacement speed which is a peak speed, and updates the displacement speed and performs runaway detection of the servomotor if the speed is higher than the displacement speed. However, this method has issues such as unable to detect the runaway until the motor speed exceeds the peak speed, and time-consuming to detect the runaway particularly in the case where there is a large inertial load. In addition, there is a possibility that erroneous detection may occur even in the case where the oscillation of control instability occurs due to the gain setting of a controller. -
- Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent No. 3058360
- The objective of the invention is to detect runaway of a motor in a short time while suppressing erroneous detection.
- To solve the above issue, the invention compares the sign of a jerk (also referred to as an acceleration change rate or a jerk degree) and the sign of a torque command differential value and determines that a runaway state is present in the case where a mismatch between the sign of the jerk and the sign of the torque command differential value continues for a predetermined time or more.
- Specifically, a motor control device according to an aspect of the invention is a motor control device generating a torque command, such that a detection speed of a motor matches a command speed, and controlling the motor, and includes: a torque command differential component taking a differential of the torque command and obtaining a torque command differential value; a motor actual speed second order differential component taking a second order differential of the detection speed of the motor and obtaining a motor jerk; and a runaway detection component determining that the motor is in a runaway state in a case where an abnormal state in which a sign of the motor jerk and a sign of the torque command differential value do not match continues for a predetermined time or more.
- In the case of a biased load, etc., even though it is possible that the signs of the torque command and the motor acceleration do not match even in a normal operation, the signs of the torque command differential value and the motor jerk match if the operation is normal. Therefore, the motor control device of the aspect can quickly detect the runaway of the motor without erroneous detection even in the case where a biased load is present.
- The runaway detection component of the aspect compares the signs of the torque command differential value and the motor jerk at a predetermined interval and can determine that the motor is in the runaway state in the case where a determination result of mismatch is repeatedly detected for a predetermined number of times. For example, in a case where the predetermined time is 10 milliseconds, it preferable that the determination on match/mismatch of signs is made every millisecond, and the runaway state is determined as present when the mismatch occurs ten consecutive times.
- It is preferable that, in the aspect, the runaway detection component also determines that the abnormal state is present in a case where a sign of a motor acceleration, which is a first order differential value of the motor, and a sign of the torque command do not match when the torque command is other than 0 and a differential value of the torque command is 0.
- It is assumed that the torque command value is saturated in the runaway. In this case, the torque command differential value becomes 0, and the runaway cannot be detected by comparing the signs of the torque command differential value and the motor jerk. Therefore, in the case where the torque command is other than 0 and the torque command differential value is 0, it is preferable to detect the runaway according to the sign of the motor acceleration and the sign of the torque command. Since the state in which the motor acceleration and the torque command do not match despite that the torque is saturated is not a normal operation, an erroneous detection does not occur even in the determination based on the sign of the motor acceleration and the sign of the torque command when the torque is saturated.
- The runaway state detection component may also consider the abnormal state based on the mismatch between the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk and the abnormal state based on the mismatch between the torque command and the motor acceleration when the torque command is saturated as the same abnormal state, and determine that the motor runs away in the case where one of the abnormal states is satisfied for the predetermined time or more. Alternatively, the runaway state detection component may consider the two runaway states as different and determine that the motor runs away in the case where one of the conditions continues for the predetermined time or more.
- It may also be that the runaway detection component of the aspect resets a duration of the abnormal state to zero in a case where the sign of the motor jerk and the sign of the torque command differential value match before the abnormal state has continued for the predetermined time or more. It may also be that the runaway detection component of the aspect resets a duration of the abnormal state to zero in a case where the sign of the motor acceleration and the sign of the torque command match when the torque command is other than 0 and the differential value of the torque command is 0 before the abnormal state has continued for the predetermined time or more.
- According to such configurations, the erroneous detections due to mismatch of signs resulting from accidentally occurring sign mismatches or noise, etc., can be eliminated.
- In the aspect, it is preferable that the torque command differential component and the motor actual speed second order differential component apply a low-pass filter for an input signal and obtain a differential value. In the case where the band of the differential component is not limited, the gain becomes higher as the frequency becomes higher, the noise increases, and the erroneous detection occurs more easily. By limiting the band of the differential signal by providing the low pass filter in the differential component, the erroneous detection caused by the noise generated through taking a differential can be suppressed.
- It is preferable that the motor control device in the aspect further includes an emergency stop component stopping the motor by at least one of cutting off current supply to the motor, using a dynamic brake, and setting the torque command to 0 when the runaway detection component detects the runaway state of the motor.
- According to such configuration, the motor can be stopped immediately when the runaway of the motor is detected.
- According to another aspect of the invention, a motor control device is a motor control device generating a torque command, such that a detection speed of a motor matches a command speed, and controlling the motor, and includes: a runaway state detection component determining that an abnormal state is present in a case where a sign of a motor jerk, which is a second order differential value of the detection speed of the motor, and a sign of a differential value of the torque command do not match, and determining that the motor is in a runaway state in a case where the abnormal state continues for a predetermined time or more.
- According to still another aspect of the invention, a motor control system includes a motor and the motor control system above.
- The invention can be construed as a motor control device having at least a portion of the functions. In addition, the invention can be construed as a control method executing at least a portion of the processes. Moreover, the invention can be construed as a computer program for executing the method in a computer or a computer readable storage medium non-transitory storing the computer program. Each component and process can be combined with each other within a possible extent to configure the invention.
- The motor control device can detect the runaway of the motor in a short time while suppressing the erroneous detection.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a motor control device in a first embodiment. -
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a runaway state detection process in the first embodiment. -
FIG. 3 is a diagram describing runaway state detection in a case of miswiring in the first embodiment. -
FIG. 4 is a diagram describing runaway state detection in a case where a disturbance occurs in the first embodiment. -
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a motor control device in a second embodiment. -
FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a runaway state detection process in the second embodiment. -
FIG. 7 is a diagram describing a runaway state detection process in the second embodiment. -
FIG. 8A is a diagram describing a differentiator in a third embodiment. -
FIG. 8B is a diagram describing an effect according to a low-pass filter of the differentiator in the third embodiment. -
FIG. 8C is a diagram describing a differentiator without a low-pass filter. - [Configuration]
-
FIG. 1 shows a schematic configuration of a motor control system in which a motor control device of the invention is installed. The motor system includes amotor control device 1, amotor 2 and anencoder 3. Themotor control device 1 has a function of generating a torque command, such that the speed of themotor 2 matches a speed command from a controller (not shown), to control themotor 2 and detecting runaway of themotor 2. Themotor 2 is installed in the device as an actuator of various machinery devices (e.g., arms and transfer devices of industrial robots) that are not shown herein. For example, themotor 2 is an AC motor. Theencoder 3 is attached to themotor 2 to detect an operation of themotor 2. Theencoder 3 includes location information concerning a rotational location (angle) of a rotational axis of themotor 2, information of a rotational speed of the rotational axis, etc. A general incremental encoder or an absolute encoder can be used as theencoder 3. - A more specific configuration of the
motor control device 1 is described. Themotor control device 1 includes a speedcommand input part 11, aspeed control part 12, acurrent controller 13, aspeed detector 14, atorque command differentiator 15, a motor actual speedsecond order differentiator 16, acomparator 17, a runawaystate detecting part 18, and amotor stop part 19. Among these configurations, thetorque command differentiator 15, the motor actual speedsecond order differentiator 16, thecomparator 17, and the runawaystate detecting part 18 are functional parts for detecting the runaway of themotor 2. - The speed
command input part 11 receives a command speed of themotor 2 from a controller (not shown). Thespeed detector 14 obtains the actual speed (detection speed) of themotor 2 based on a feedback signal from theencoder 3. Thespeed control part 12 generates a torque command such that the command speed matches the detection speed. Thecurrent controller 13 turns on/off a switching element such as an IGBT based on the torque command to supply AC power to themotor 2. - The
torque command differentiator 15 receives the torque command generated by thespeed control part 12 and calculates its differential value (first-order differential value). Hereinafter, the output of thetorque command differentiator 15 is referred to as a torque command differential value. - The motor actual speed
second order differentiator 16 receives a motor actual speed output by thespeed detector 14 and calculates its second order differential value. The second order differential of the speed (the first order differential of the acceleration) is referred to as jerk, jerk degree, acceleration change rate, etc. Hereinafter, the output of the motor actual speedsecond order differentiator 16 is referred to as a motor jerk. - The
comparator 17 receives the torque command differential value from thetorque command differentiator 15 and the motor jerk from the motor actual speedsecond order differentiator 16, and determines whether the signs of these values match. The comparison result by thecomparator 17 is input to the runawaystate detecting part 18. - The runaway
state detecting part 18 uses the comparison result by thecomparator 17 to determine whether themotor 2 is in the runaway state. Specifically, the runawaystate detecting part 18 determines that an abnormal state is present in the case where the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk do not match, and determines that themotor 2 is in the runaway state in the case where the abnormal state continues for a predetermined time or more. In addition, whileFIG. 1 shows that only the comparison result of thecomparator 17 is input to the runawaystate detecting part 18, a torque command value or a motor actual speed (detection speed) is actually input. These pieces of information are also used to detect the runaway state of themotor 2. Details of the runaway state detection process are described below with reference to the flowchart. - The
torque command differentiator 15, the motor actual speedsecond order differentiator 16, thecomparator 17 and the runawaystate detecting part 18 may be implemented as digital circuits or analog circuits. Also, these functional parts may be realized by a combination of a digital signal processor (DSP), a field programmable gate array (FGPA), a microprocessor unit (MPU) and a program. - When receiving a signal indicating that the runaway state has been detected from the runaway
state detecting part 18, themotor stop part 19 puts an emergency stop on themotor 2. For example, themotor stop part 19 stops themotor 2 by one of cutting off the current supply from thecurrent controller 13 to themotor 2, using a dynamic brake (regenerative brake), or setting the torque command to zero, or a combination of a plurality of the aforementioned. - [Process]
-
FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a flow of the runaway state detection process by the runawaystate detecting part 18. The process shown inFIG. 2 is executed periodically, and the execution interval thereof may be arbitrary, but, for example, can be set at about one millisecond. - First, as a premise of the runaway state detection, the runaway
state detecting part 18 confirms in Step S11 that the motor detection speed is equal to or higher than a first threshold and in Step S12 that the torque command is equal to or higher than a second threshold. The determination in Step S11 is to confirm that the motor is in operation, and a sufficiently small value is set as the first threshold. The determination in Step S12 is a determination to avoid erroneous detection, and, for example, a value of about 10% of a rated torque is set as the second threshold. - In the case where one of the determinations in Steps S11 and S12 is not satisfied (S11—NO or S12—NO), the process proceeds to Step S17, and the runaway
state detecting part 18 sets an abnormal duration for counting the continuation of the abnormal state to zero. - In the case where both of the determinations in Steps S11 and S12 are satisfied (S11—YES and S12—YES), the process proceeds to Step S13, and the runaway
state detecting part 18 determines whether the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk are different. This determination is made based on the output from thecomparator 17. - In the case where the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk are different (S13—YES), the process proceeds to Step S14, and the runaway
state detecting part 18 increases the abnormal duration. On the other hand, in the case where the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk match (S13—NO), the process proceeds to Step S17, and the runawaystate detecting part 18 resets the abnormal duration to zero. - In Step S15, the runaway
state detecting part 18 determines whether the abnormal duration is equal to or greater than a third threshold (predetermined time). The third threshold is a time with which the motor can be determined as running away in the case where the mismatch between the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk continues for the predetermined time or more. For example, 10 milliseconds (10 in the value of a counter) can be adopted as the third threshold. - In the case where the abnormal duration is less than the third threshold (S14—NO), the runaway
state detecting part 18 ends the process while holding the determination. On the other hand, in the case where the abnormal duration is greater than or equal to the third threshold (S14—YES), the process proceeds to Step S16, and the runawaystate detecting part 18 determines that themotor 2 is in the runaway state. In the case where the runaway of themotor 2 is detected, themotor stop part 19 implements an emergency stop procedure of themotor 2. - Detailed cases in the runaway state detection process are described with reference to
FIGS. 3 and 4 . -
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing (A) torque command value, (B) motor acceleration, (C) motor speed, (D) torque command differential value, and (E) motor jerk in the case where the connection between themotor control device 1 and themotor 2 is erroneous. In this case, the direction of the torque command and the rotational direction of the motor are opposite, and a speed control loop constitutes a positive feedback. Therefore, the torque command increases with time, and the speed of themotor 2 also increases in the opposite direction. - In this embodiment, the runaway of the
motor 2 can be detected quickly regardless of the size of the load inertia of the motor. The reason is that this embodiment does not require, as the condition for runaway detection, that the motor speed exceeds the peak speed, but sets a mismatch between the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk as the condition. The sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk become different immediately after the motor is driven (T1), and therefore the runaway of the motor can be detected at T2 after the predetermined time has elapsed from T1. -
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing (A) torque command value, (B) motor acceleration, (C) motor speed, (D) torque command differential value, and (E) motor jerk in the case where a disturbance such as a biased load is present. In this example, it is assumed that the motor held by a brake, etc., is released from a holding state after driving starts, and acceleration is generated by the biased load. - In the case where the biased load is present, there is a case where the sign of the torque command and the sign of the motor acceleration do not match. In the example of the figure, the sign of the torque command and the sign of the motor acceleration do not match in a period from driving to T3 and a period from T6 to T7. Therefore, in the case where runaway detection is performed based on the sign of the torque command and the sign of the motor acceleration, as in the prior art, there is a possibility that erroneous detection may occur.
- However, the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk match in all periods. Therefore, even in the case where a disturbance, such as a biased load, is present, this embodiment can avoid erroneously detecting that the motor runs away even though the motor does not run away.
- As described above, according to the embodiment, the runaway can be detected quickly regardless of the load inertia of the motor, and the erroneous detection in the case where a disturbance occurs can be suppressed.
- [Configuration]
- The second embodiment makes it possible to detect runaway of a motor even when the torque command is saturated.
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a configuration of themotor control device 1 according to this embodiment. Among the functional parts shown inFIG. 5 , those substantially identical to the functional parts shown inFIG. 1 are referred to with the same reference symbols, and the detailed description thereof is omitted. - Compared with the first embodiment, the
motor control device 1 according to this embodiment includes a motor actual speedfirst order differentiator 20 and acomparator 21. - The motor actual speed
first order differentiator 20 receives a motor actual speed output by thespeed detector 14 and calculates its first order differential value. Hereinafter, the output of the motor actual speedfirst order differentiator 20 is referred to as motor acceleration. - The
comparator 21 receives the torque command value from thespeed control part 12 and the motor acceleration from the motor actual speedfirst order differentiator 20, and determines whether the signs of these values match. The comparison result by thecomparator 21 is input to the runawaystate detecting part 18. - The runaway
state detecting part 18 in this embodiment receives a comparison result of thecomparator 21 and the torque command differential value from thetorque command differentiator 15 in addition to the comparison result of thecomparator 17. The runaway state detection process in the runawaystate detecting part 18 of this embodiment will be described with reference toFIG. 6 . - [Process]
- In the flowchart of
FIG. 6 , those substantially identical to the processes shown inFIG. 2 are referred to with the same reference symbols, and the detailed description thereof is omitted. In this embodiment, in the case where both of the determinations in Steps S11 and S12 are satisfied, the runawaystate detecting part 18 determines in Step S18 whether the torque command differential value is zero. In the case where the torque command differential value is not zero (S18—NO), the process proceeds to Step S13 and the same determination as in the first embodiment is performed. That is, if the sign of the torque command differential value and the sign of the motor jerk are different, it is determined that the abnormal state is present and the abnormal duration is increased, otherwise the abnormal duration is reset to zero. - On the other hand, in the case where the torque command differential value is zero (S18—YES), the process proceeds to Step S19. In Step S19, the runaway
state detecting part 18 uses the comparison result by thecomparator 21 to determine whether the sign of the torque command value and the sign of the motor acceleration are different. Although the torque command is saturated, it cannot be said that the state in which the rotational direction of the motor is opposite to the command is a normal state. Therefore, in the case where these signs are different, it is determined that the abnormal state is present, and the process proceeds to Step S14 to increase the abnormal duration. On the other hand, in the case where these signs match, it is determined that the abnormal state is not present, and the process proceeds to Step S17 to reset the abnormal duration to zero. The subsequent processes are the same as those in the first embodiment. -
FIG. 7 is a diagram showing (A) torque command value, (B) motor acceleration, (C) motor speed, (D) torque command differential value, and (E) motor jerk in the case where the torque command is saturated when themotor control device 1 and themotor 2 are incorrectly connected. Due to miswiring, the sign of the torque command differential value differs from the sign of the motor jerk. Here, it is assumed that the time until the torque command is saturated (time from T7 to T8) is shorter than the threshold time for runaway detection. After T8, since the differential value of the torque command becomes zero and therefore the motor jerk becomes zero, the runaway detection based on the signs of these values cannot be performed. However, in this embodiment, when the torque command differential value is zero, the sign of the torque command and the sign of the motor acceleration can be compared to detect the runaway of the motor. - As described above, in this embodiment, even in the case where the torque command is saturated, the runaway of the motor can be reliably detected.
- In this embodiment, the runaway
state detecting part 18 determines that the runaway state is present in the case where a state in which one of the determination of Step S13 and the determination of Step S19 is affirmed continues for the predetermined time or more. However, the runawaystate detecting part 18 may also consider the state in which Step S13 is affirmed and the state in which Step S19 is affirmed as different abnormal states respectively and make a determination that the runaway state is present in the case where one of the abnormal states continues for the predetermined time or more. - Even though the examples of performing speed control on the motor have been described in the above embodiments, the motor control device may also perform location control. In addition, even though it is assumed that the
motor control device 1 is a servo driver, themotor control device 1 may also be an inverter. As a motor driven by an inverter, an induction motor can serve as an example. - As the differentiator (the first order differential differentiator, the second order differentiator) in the above embodiments, as shown in
FIG. 8A , aband limiting differentiator 80 consisting of a low-pass filter 81 and adifferentiator 82 may also be adopted. Theband limiting differentiator 80 can limit the band of thedifferentiator 82 by applying the low-pass filter for an input signal and obtaining the differential value. In the case where the band of the differentiator is not limited by the low-pass filter, as shown inFIG. 8C , the gain becomes higher as the frequency becomes higher, and the noise increases. Therefore, the erroneous detection of the runaway state occurs more easily. Regarding this, by limiting the band of the differentiator by the low-pass filter, as shown inFIG. 8B , the gain under a high frequency can be suppressed, and the noise can be reduced. Therefore, the occurrence of the erroneous detection of the runaway state due to the noise generated by taking a differential can be suppressed. -
-
- 1: motor control device
- 2: motor
- 3: encoder
- 11: speed command input part
- 12: speed control part
- 13: current controller
- 14: speed detector
- 15: torque command differentiator
- 16: motor actual speed second order differentiator
- 17: comparator
- 18: runaway state detecting part
- 19: motor stop part
- 20: motor actual speed first order differentiator
- 21: comparator
Claims (18)
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2017-042178 | 2017-03-06 | ||
JP2017042178A JP6409893B2 (en) | 2017-03-06 | 2017-03-06 | Motor control device |
JPJP2017-042178 | 2017-03-06 | ||
PCT/JP2018/002704 WO2018163655A1 (en) | 2017-03-06 | 2018-01-29 | Motor control device, motor control system, runaway state detection method, and program |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20200052640A1 true US20200052640A1 (en) | 2020-02-13 |
US11025190B2 US11025190B2 (en) | 2021-06-01 |
Family
ID=63447692
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/485,781 Active 2038-03-20 US11025190B2 (en) | 2017-03-06 | 2018-01-29 | Motor control device, motor control system, runaway state detection method, and non-transitory computer readable storage medium |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US11025190B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3595169B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP6409893B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN110291716B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2018163655A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111474913B (en) * | 2019-01-23 | 2021-07-20 | 北京新能源汽车股份有限公司 | Program operation monitoring method and device and electric automobile |
CN111416557A (en) * | 2020-05-11 | 2020-07-14 | 台州中盟联动企业管理合伙企业(有限合伙) | Alternating current servo control system |
CN115869155B (en) * | 2022-12-02 | 2024-06-21 | 杭州晴川科技有限公司 | Anti-pinch detection method for electric telescopic leg beautifying of massage armchair |
Family Cites Families (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2158000A1 (en) * | 1971-10-30 | 1973-06-08 | Berkeley Stephens Hender | |
JPH01120607A (en) * | 1987-11-04 | 1989-05-12 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Motor controller |
JP3058360B2 (en) | 1991-07-12 | 2000-07-04 | 株式会社安川電機 | Servo motor runaway detection / prevention method |
JP3362537B2 (en) * | 1994-12-27 | 2003-01-07 | 日産自動車株式会社 | Fail-safe control of drive motor for electric vehicles |
JP3058360U (en) | 1998-10-09 | 1999-06-18 | アートウエルド株式会社 | Beverage bottle strap |
JP3988065B2 (en) * | 1999-05-18 | 2007-10-10 | 株式会社デンソー | DC motor drive device and electric power steering control device |
JP4085112B2 (en) * | 2006-01-31 | 2008-05-14 | ファナック株式会社 | Motor control method and motor control apparatus |
JP4602921B2 (en) * | 2006-03-07 | 2010-12-22 | 株式会社日立産機システム | Motor control device and motor control method |
JP2008048464A (en) * | 2006-08-10 | 2008-02-28 | Shinko Electric Co Ltd | Electrical inertia controller, and its control method |
JP5120082B2 (en) * | 2008-06-12 | 2013-01-16 | 富士電機株式会社 | Robot runaway determination method and robot control device |
JP5341534B2 (en) * | 2009-01-23 | 2013-11-13 | セミコンダクター・コンポーネンツ・インダストリーズ・リミテッド・ライアビリティ・カンパニー | Motor speed control device |
JP5127767B2 (en) * | 2009-04-14 | 2013-01-23 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Drive control device |
US8494700B2 (en) * | 2010-01-19 | 2013-07-23 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Derivative-based hybrid drive motor control for driveline oscillation smoothing |
CN103025565B (en) * | 2010-07-23 | 2015-07-15 | 日产自动车株式会社 | Abnormal torque evaluation apparatus for electrically driven vehicle |
US8736212B2 (en) * | 2010-12-16 | 2014-05-27 | St. Jude Medical, Atrial Fibrillation Division, Inc. | System and method of automatic detection and prevention of motor runaway |
CN102882457B (en) * | 2012-10-10 | 2015-04-22 | 深圳市航盛电子股份有限公司 | Traction motor control device and method |
CN104842818B (en) * | 2014-08-13 | 2017-07-11 | 北汽福田汽车股份有限公司 | The torque monitoring method and its system of electric automobile |
JP6017513B2 (en) * | 2014-11-07 | 2016-11-02 | ファナック株式会社 | Motor control device for generating command limited by motor torque |
-
2017
- 2017-03-06 JP JP2017042178A patent/JP6409893B2/en active Active
-
2018
- 2018-01-29 US US16/485,781 patent/US11025190B2/en active Active
- 2018-01-29 EP EP18763677.4A patent/EP3595169B1/en active Active
- 2018-01-29 WO PCT/JP2018/002704 patent/WO2018163655A1/en unknown
- 2018-01-29 CN CN201880010930.1A patent/CN110291716B/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3595169A4 (en) | 2021-03-10 |
JP6409893B2 (en) | 2018-10-24 |
US11025190B2 (en) | 2021-06-01 |
EP3595169B1 (en) | 2022-07-06 |
EP3595169A1 (en) | 2020-01-15 |
WO2018163655A1 (en) | 2018-09-13 |
CN110291716B (en) | 2022-12-06 |
CN110291716A (en) | 2019-09-27 |
JP2018148706A (en) | 2018-09-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11025190B2 (en) | Motor control device, motor control system, runaway state detection method, and non-transitory computer readable storage medium | |
JP6377985B2 (en) | Motor control device with torque command limiting function during power failure | |
US8436570B2 (en) | Motor driving system, motor controller, and safety function expander | |
US9166514B2 (en) | Motor control apparatus including at least two resistance discharge units | |
EP3388906B1 (en) | Motor control system, motor controller, and method for setting safety function | |
EP1814217A2 (en) | Motor control method and motor control apparatus | |
JP2012039847A (en) | Motor controller and motor control method | |
US10996654B2 (en) | Servo controller | |
US10048654B2 (en) | Torque control apparatus | |
CN104137414A (en) | Motor control apparatus | |
JP3541675B2 (en) | Control device for electric motor for electric vehicle | |
CN111416557A (en) | Alternating current servo control system | |
CN108099692B (en) | Vehicle and fault processing method and system of motor driving system of vehicle | |
US7218490B2 (en) | Process and device for determining a run-away condition of a rotation-speed controlled, permanent-excited synchronous motor | |
JPH11308894A (en) | Process for power failure of motor | |
CN109213128B (en) | Closed-loop control failure detection method and system | |
JP6340913B2 (en) | Control apparatus and control method | |
CN109703570B (en) | Fault processing method and device of motor control system | |
CN108462426B (en) | Motor control device and motor control method | |
JP2016092882A (en) | Motor control device | |
JP5361506B2 (en) | Motor control device with protection function | |
JP2013167955A (en) | Master/slave control method, control device and system | |
JP2008211953A (en) | Servo controller for motor | |
JP2006227719A (en) | Motion control system | |
WO2017068821A1 (en) | Power conversion device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: OMRON CORPORATION, JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ONO, YASUSHI;REEL/FRAME:050057/0756 Effective date: 20190709 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: AWAITING TC RESP., ISSUE FEE NOT PAID |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT RECEIVED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |