US20190226142A1 - Method for improved pulping using an environmentally friendly pulping aid - Google Patents

Method for improved pulping using an environmentally friendly pulping aid Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20190226142A1
US20190226142A1 US15/732,965 US201815732965A US2019226142A1 US 20190226142 A1 US20190226142 A1 US 20190226142A1 US 201815732965 A US201815732965 A US 201815732965A US 2019226142 A1 US2019226142 A1 US 2019226142A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
pulping
aid
pulp
terpene
lignocellulosic biomass
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US15/732,965
Inventor
Jim Constantacos
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US15/732,965 priority Critical patent/US20190226142A1/en
Publication of US20190226142A1 publication Critical patent/US20190226142A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21CPRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C3/00Pulping cellulose-containing materials
    • D21C3/003Pulping cellulose-containing materials with organic compounds
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21CPRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C3/00Pulping cellulose-containing materials
    • D21C3/22Other features of pulping processes
    • D21C3/222Use of compounds accelerating the pulping processes
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21CPRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C3/00Pulping cellulose-containing materials
    • D21C3/02Pulping cellulose-containing materials with inorganic bases or alkaline reacting compounds, e.g. sulfate processes
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21CPRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C3/00Pulping cellulose-containing materials
    • D21C3/02Pulping cellulose-containing materials with inorganic bases or alkaline reacting compounds, e.g. sulfate processes
    • D21C3/022Pulping cellulose-containing materials with inorganic bases or alkaline reacting compounds, e.g. sulfate processes in presence of S-containing compounds
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21CPRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C3/00Pulping cellulose-containing materials
    • D21C3/04Pulping cellulose-containing materials with acids, acid salts or acid anhydrides
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21CPRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C3/00Pulping cellulose-containing materials
    • D21C3/04Pulping cellulose-containing materials with acids, acid salts or acid anhydrides
    • D21C3/06Pulping cellulose-containing materials with acids, acid salts or acid anhydrides sulfur dioxide; sulfurous acid; bisulfites sulfites
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21CPRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C3/00Pulping cellulose-containing materials
    • D21C3/20Pulping cellulose-containing materials with organic solvents or in solvent environment

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method of improving the digestion of lignocellulose biomass used in the production of pulp, paper and paperboard products through the addition of a novel environmentally friendly pulping aid.
  • the present invention also relates to a method of improving the production of pulp, paper and paperboard products by the addition of a novel environmentally friendly pulping aid.
  • lignocellulosic materials The pulping of lignocellulosic materials is well known. As described by Smook (2002, pp. 67-84), there are many pulping processes available. The pulping process of highest commercial relevance is the kraft process. Briefly described, in the kraft pulping process lignocellulosic material, typically in the form of wood chips of specified dimensions, is contacted with the “cooking liquor,” which is an aqueous mixture of pulping chemicals, principally sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfide. These chemicals, in combination with temperature, pressure and time, act to break the chemical bonds between lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose, and thus liberate cellulose fibers from the lignocellulosic matrix.
  • cooking liquor an aqueous mixture of pulping chemicals, principally sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfide.
  • wood chips a common form of lignocellulosic biomass
  • pulping chemicals are “cooked” for a period of up to 3.5 hours or more at a temperature of about 170° C. in a large pressurized vessel or digester.
  • the contents of the digester are discharged into a blow tank, wherein volatile vapors are collected and where the softened chips are allowed to disintegrate into fibers and form a slurry. Heat may also be recovered during this step.
  • Additional processing steps usually follow including: the screening of the pulp slurry to remove uncooked or partially cooked wood chips (otherwise known as “rejects”); the washing of the fibers within the pulp slurry to remove residual pulping chemicals and cook by-products such as solubilized forms of lignin degradation products; and the collection and recovery of valuable residual pulping chemicals.
  • the washed usually brown pulp is directed to the papermachine where it is formed into a final paper product.
  • the brown pulp is bleached with a combination of bleaching chemicals, such as oxygen, ozone, chlorine dioxide and hydrogen peroxide, to achieve a specific whiteness and brightness.
  • Smook (2002, pp. 164-181) describes the variety of pulp bleaching methods that are typically used in the production of bleached pulp.
  • Pulping aids can provide benefits to the pulping process. Pulping aids are typically added directly to the pulping chemicals and thus require little-to-no additional capital investment in new pulping equipment that would otherwise limit their use.
  • An ideal pulping aid will increase the reactivity between the lignocellulose and the pulping chemicals. Under certain conditions, higher reactivity is desirable as it allows increased throughput and production levels and/or reduced bleaching costs.
  • An ideal pulping aid will also eliminate or reduce unwanted effects of the pulping process. For example, wood species contain varying amounts of extractives or resinous materials that can agglomerate and form unwanted deposits or pitch within the papermaking process. Pitch deposits are objectionable, as they are not easily removed from the pulp.
  • pitch deposits are not removed from the pulp they will be carried over to the final pulp or paper product, which can result in costly quality-related losses. Further, they will contaminate the surfaces on pulp and papermaking equipment, which will reduce operational efficiencies as, for example, when production must be interrupted to clean these surfaces.
  • anthraquinone is one well-known example.
  • AQ promotes the delignification of lignocellulose by inhibiting condensation reactions between intermediates formed during pulping and the fiber.
  • Another well-known example of a pulping aid is the use of surfactants such as ethoxylated alkyl phenols.
  • surfactants lower the surface tension of the cooking liquor and thus promote wetting with the hydrophobic components of the wood chips. Surfactants allow reacted surface constituents of the wood chip to diffuse into the bulk thus exposing new reactive surfaces to the cooking liquor.
  • Terpenes are derived from natural sources and as such are biodegradable (U.S. Pat. No. 5,720,825).
  • pure terpenes generally have low flash points and are thus not suitable to pulp and papermaking applications.
  • the cyclic terpene ⁇ -pinene has a reported closed cup flash point of 91° F. or 33° C. (PubChem Database).
  • terpenes are excellent cleaning agents.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,863,385 discloses the effectiveness of oil-in-water emulsions made from hydrocarbons, fatty alcohols, terpenes and other non-polar agents as general cleaning agents.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,890,405 discloses the use of d-limonene as an effective detackifier for papermachines that produce recycled paper.
  • no terpene-based pulping aid has been used in the pulping processes.
  • pulping aids have been shown to be environmentally unfriendly and/or pose safety risks. As described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,025,762, the disposal of some pulping aids is difficult, which limits their adoption. Moreover, many pulping aids, such as AQ, have been identified as carcinogens and have been discontinued in many jurisdictions (Hart and Rudie, 2014). Ethoxylated alkyl phenol degradation products have also been identified as being highly toxic to aquatic organisms, and organic solvents such as kerosene have long been discontinued due to their toxicity and flammability (Brogdon and Adiwinata, 2011).
  • pulping aid that can improve the pulping process, enhance black liquor combustion, reduce and most probably eliminate the use of defoamers, as well as pitch control surfactants that can adversely affect papermachine runnability.
  • This pulping aid would ideally increase the reactivity between lignocellulosic biomass and the cooking liquor and remove unwanted extractives that lead to pitch deposits. In doing so, the pulping aid would increase the screened yield in the production of pulp from wood and reduce or eliminate deposits that negatively influence pulping operations and the quality attributes of the final product.
  • a safe and environmentally friendly pulping aid composed of a terpene mixture and a dispersant blend, which comprises a surfactant-based dispersant and a silicone-free defoamer.
  • the terpene component of the pulping aid is ideally derived from a class of natural products, namely cyclic terpenoids and the like, including the citrus by-product, d-limonene.
  • the pulping aid is added to the pulping process, either in the pretreatment of the lignocellulosic biomass or during digestion or both.
  • the pulping aid is designed to have a high flash point of at least 49° C. to 93° C. and preferably at least 60° C. to 77° C. to ensure safe storage and handling, and to minimize the release of harmful VOCs.
  • the pulping aid is thought to act on pitch-generating molecules or particles, especially those formed from the saponifiable (fatty and resin acids) as well as the unsaponifiable (neutrals) components released from lignocellulosic biomass, such that they can be removed during subsequent pulping operations, namely pulp washing.
  • the removal of pitch-forming chemicals from lignocelluslosic biomass makes it more accessible to the pulping chemicals, which leads to enhanced pulping characteristics.
  • the addition of the pulping aid results in a beneficial reduction in the extractives content of the pulp.
  • FIG. 1 depicts a typical batch pulping process that will be used to illustrate the typical addition points of the pulping aid. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that pulp mills with continuous digesters can equally benefit from this invention.
  • Lignocellulosic biomass such as wood chips
  • a digester ( 1 ) in which they may be subjected to a pretreatment such as preheating of the wood chips by steam or pre-impregnation of the wood chips by pulping chemicals.
  • the wood chips are then contacted by the pulping chemicals, heated to the pulping temperature, and allowed to delignify or cook.
  • the contents of the digesters are transferred to the blow tank ( 2 ).
  • an improvement in a pulping process whereby lignocellulosic biomass is contacted by a pulping aid of this invention comprising a terpene or a blend of terpene fractions derived from natural sources such as plants, fruits and vegetables or trees to the cooking liquor, the terpene being added in an amount of at least 0.2 lb to 10 lbs per ton (2,000 lbs) of dry wood chips.
  • the pulping aid of the present invention may be utilized in a chemical pulping process. As kraft is the most widely used process, reference will be made to this process with the understanding that one may also use the pulping aid in the sulfite process or other aqueous-based pulping processes, including those processes used in the production of dissolving pulps. With reference to FIG. 1 , the preferred addition points in the pulping process are either at a pretreatment stage (in the case of mills with continuous digesters) or at the digester ( 1 ) (in the case of mills with either batch or continuous digesters).
  • the terpene or terpene blends will be recovered in the blow tank ( 2 ), washers ( 4 ), and from recirculated process flows.
  • the recovered terpene or terpene blends can be isolated as a by-product or used as a fuel for their heating value.
  • the terpenes and their selected fractions utilized in the present invention may be derived from a variety of sources including: plants, camphor, conifers, orange or lemon peels, as well as the sulphite process and/or the kraft process. Although some insects produce terpenes, they are not a major source thereof. It should be recognized that other suitable sources are available such as terpenes derived from the destructive distillation of rubber.
  • the terpenes used in the present invention are selected from one or more of the following terpenes: ⁇ -pinene, ⁇ -pinene, camphene, 3-carene, l-limonene, d-limonene, m-cymene, p-cymene, ⁇ -terpineol, ⁇ -phellandrene and ⁇ -phellandrene and derivatives thereof.
  • the terpenes be used in combination with an environmentally friendly dispersant blend.
  • the dispersant blend will be between 3% and 90% by weight of the final formula.
  • the preferred dispersant blend is composed of one non-phenolic alcohol ethoxylate selected from the following: decyl alcohol ethoxylate, dodecyl alcohol ethoxylate, and tridecyl alcohol ethoxylate.
  • the ethoxylated alcohols act as wetting agents and are selected in part on their hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB), which is typically between 13 and 14.
  • HLB hydrophilic-lipophilic balance
  • the dispersant blend includes preferably one silicone-free defoamer selected from the group of difunctional block copolymers based on ethylene oxide and propylene oxide and having a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB), typically between 3 and 4.
  • HLB hydrophilic-lipophilic balance
  • the amount of silicone-free defoamer will generally be between 1% and 10% by weight of the dispersant blend.
  • the dispersant blend is nontoxic, silicone-free and readily biodegradable.
  • the volume of pulping aid added to the cooking liquor may vary widely depending on the wood species being pulped or their blends. Thus, while a certain amount of the pulping aid will give improved results, it will be understood that larger or smaller amounts may be used with the result varying accordingly. It will be further understood that the amount to add will be a question that is answered by providing the optimum amount needed to provide improved pulp properties cost effectively.
  • the volume added will further depend upon the particular terpene or mixture of terpenes added to the cooking liquor, which may vary depending on market prices. Thus, many different terpenes are available as a mixture thereof and the amount added to the pulping process will depend upon the particular make up of that mixture. It suffices to say that one skilled in the art could determine the ideal amount with appropriate experimentation.
  • the amount of pulping aid added to the digester will be at least 0.2 lbs to 10 lb per ton (2,000 lbs) of dry wood chips. It has been found that with many terpenes, this level of addition provides an improvement and at 0.5 lb per ton to 2.5 lb per ton of dry pulp, a substantial improvement in the pulping process is observed.
  • a lower H-factor is desirable as the process throughput is increased as the H-factor is lowered.
  • Rejects are wood chips that are partially defiberized or not defiberized and removed by the knotters ( 3 ). It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that a lower level of rejects is preferred as the overall screened pulp yield is increased as rejects are lowered. Extractives will be recognized as the dichloromethane-extractable content of pulp, which represents a measure of such substances as waxes, fats, resins, sterols and non-volatile hydrocarbons as described by TAPPI Standard Method T 204 cm-97. All results were compared to a control.
  • a multi-day trial was used to determine the impact of the pulping aid of this invention on mill pulp production.
  • Hardwood chips comprising a majority of maple wood chips were contacted with between 0.2 lbs and 4.0 lbs of pulping aid per ton of dry pulp, the pulping aid being a mixture of 60% terpenes and 40% of a dispersant blend.
  • the H-factor was unchanged.
  • rejects were reduced by 45% and the pulp extractives content was reduced by 57.3%.
  • the incremental fiber production realized from the lower rejects level was about 14.4 dry tons per day.
  • the use of a surfactant-based pitch control chemical was eliminated and the use of defoamers was reduced by about 20%.
  • a multi-day trial was used to determine the impact of the pulping aid of this invention on mill pulp production.
  • Hardwood chips comprising a majority of aspen wood chips were contacted with between 0.2 lbs and 4.0 lbs of pulping aid per ton of dry pulp, the pulping aid being a mixture of 60% terpenes and 40% of a dispersant blend.
  • the H-factor was reduced by 8.0%; rejects were reduced by 53% and the pulp extractives content was reduced by 27.3%.
  • the pulp production rate of the mill was increased by 4.4% from the base rate.
  • the incremental fiber production realized from the lower rejects level was 7.5 dry tons per day.
  • the use of a surfactant-based pitch control chemical was eliminated and the use of defoamers was reduced by about 20%.
  • benefits observed during the trial periods included a reduction in knotter rejects, a reduction in pitch deposits, the ability to reduce pitch control chemical addition, the ability to decrease defoamer in the fiber line, and the ability to lower cooking liquor alkalinity, at reduced H-Factor, while achieving brown stock kappa number targets.

Abstract

A safe and environmentally friendly pulping aid comprising a mixture of natural terpene-based chemicals and a dispersant blend. The pulping aid is used in the pulping of lignocellulosic biomass to simultaneously increase screened pulp yield and reduce the extractives content of pulp. The flash point of the pulping aid is at least 49° C.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a method of improving the digestion of lignocellulose biomass used in the production of pulp, paper and paperboard products through the addition of a novel environmentally friendly pulping aid. The present invention also relates to a method of improving the production of pulp, paper and paperboard products by the addition of a novel environmentally friendly pulping aid.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The pulping of lignocellulosic materials is well known. As described by Smook (2002, pp. 67-84), there are many pulping processes available. The pulping process of highest commercial relevance is the kraft process. Briefly described, in the kraft pulping process lignocellulosic material, typically in the form of wood chips of specified dimensions, is contacted with the “cooking liquor,” which is an aqueous mixture of pulping chemicals, principally sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfide. These chemicals, in combination with temperature, pressure and time, act to break the chemical bonds between lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose, and thus liberate cellulose fibers from the lignocellulosic matrix.
  • In a typical kraft process, wood chips, a common form of lignocellulosic biomass, in contact with pulping chemicals are “cooked” for a period of up to 3.5 hours or more at a temperature of about 170° C. in a large pressurized vessel or digester. In one common variation of the pulping process, at the completion of the cook, the contents of the digester are discharged into a blow tank, wherein volatile vapors are collected and where the softened chips are allowed to disintegrate into fibers and form a slurry. Heat may also be recovered during this step. Additional processing steps usually follow including: the screening of the pulp slurry to remove uncooked or partially cooked wood chips (otherwise known as “rejects”); the washing of the fibers within the pulp slurry to remove residual pulping chemicals and cook by-products such as solubilized forms of lignin degradation products; and the collection and recovery of valuable residual pulping chemicals. In the production of industrial papers, such as containerboard, the washed usually brown pulp is directed to the papermachine where it is formed into a final paper product. In the production of bleached pulp, printing papers, hygienic products, and the like, the brown pulp is bleached with a combination of bleaching chemicals, such as oxygen, ozone, chlorine dioxide and hydrogen peroxide, to achieve a specific whiteness and brightness. Smook (2002, pp. 164-181) describes the variety of pulp bleaching methods that are typically used in the production of bleached pulp.
  • It is widely known to those skilled in the art that the addition of certain chemicals or “pulping aids” can provide benefits to the pulping process. Pulping aids are typically added directly to the pulping chemicals and thus require little-to-no additional capital investment in new pulping equipment that would otherwise limit their use. An ideal pulping aid will increase the reactivity between the lignocellulose and the pulping chemicals. Under certain conditions, higher reactivity is desirable as it allows increased throughput and production levels and/or reduced bleaching costs. An ideal pulping aid will also eliminate or reduce unwanted effects of the pulping process. For example, wood species contain varying amounts of extractives or resinous materials that can agglomerate and form unwanted deposits or pitch within the papermaking process. Pitch deposits are objectionable, as they are not easily removed from the pulp. If these pitch deposits are not removed from the pulp they will be carried over to the final pulp or paper product, which can result in costly quality-related losses. Further, they will contaminate the surfaces on pulp and papermaking equipment, which will reduce operational efficiencies as, for example, when production must be interrupted to clean these surfaces.
  • Brogdon and Adiwinata (2011) describe a number of methods that have been developed to reduce pitch deposits including the addition of materials and chemicals such as adsorptive minerals like bentonite and talc; sodium thiosulphate as a de-tackifying agent; and a variety of dispersants and emulsifying agents such as papermaker's alum (aluminum sulfate). Methods for enzymatic degradation of pitch and pitch precursors using lipases and other enzymes (U.S. Pat. No. 5,176,796) have been developed but are not widely practiced due to the relatively high cost of enzymes. More recently, the addition of novel and most likely expensive inorganic materials, such as chemically modified zeolites (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/450,298) and precipitated calcium carbonate (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/129,524), have been proposed.
  • Of the many pulping aids that are available, anthraquinone (AQ) is one well-known example. As first described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,012,280, AQ promotes the delignification of lignocellulose by inhibiting condensation reactions between intermediates formed during pulping and the fiber. Another well-known example of a pulping aid is the use of surfactants such as ethoxylated alkyl phenols. As described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,673,460, surfactants lower the surface tension of the cooking liquor and thus promote wetting with the hydrophobic components of the wood chips. Surfactants allow reacted surface constituents of the wood chip to diffuse into the bulk thus exposing new reactive surfaces to the cooking liquor. As a result, the rate of delignification is increased. Surfactants can also partly solubilize wood resins or pitch thus reducing unwanted pitch deposit formation. However, surfactants also promote foam formation. Foam is generally regarded as a problem in most pulp and paper operations. For example, foam will impede the dewatering of the pulp slurry, resulting in operational inefficiencies, especially during pulp washing and papermaking. To control foam formation, pulp and paper producers will use defoaming agents, such as silicone-based emulsions (Spence, 1997). These defoamers are typically added in the fiber line at the brown stock washing and pulp bleaching unit operations. The addition of defoamer adds cost and can result in unwanted deposits on both papermaking equipment and in the final pulp or paper product. Yet another well-known example is the use of solvents such as the addition of kerosene as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,144,756, wherein pitch is first dissolved by an organic solvent then emulsified in situ to be removed by subsequent pulp washing steps. As discussed by Thomas (2011), the use of solvents, such as aliphatic hydrocarbons, are effective for removing organic deposits on papermachine surfaces but are currently not used because of their low flash points and their potential of generating high levels of volatile organic carbon (VOC) compounds. The flash point is the lowest temperature at which vapors of the chemical will ignite given the presence of an ignition source. Pulping aids with low flash points are not desirable because they pose environmental and safety hazards. Alternatives to petroleum-derived solvents, such as terpenes, are well-known. Terpenes are derived from natural sources and as such are biodegradable (U.S. Pat. No. 5,720,825). However, pure terpenes generally have low flash points and are thus not suitable to pulp and papermaking applications. For example, the cyclic terpene α-pinene has a reported closed cup flash point of 91° F. or 33° C. (PubChem Database).
  • It is well-known that terpenes are excellent cleaning agents. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,863,385 discloses the effectiveness of oil-in-water emulsions made from hydrocarbons, fatty alcohols, terpenes and other non-polar agents as general cleaning agents. U.S. Pat. No. 6,890,405 discloses the use of d-limonene as an effective detackifier for papermachines that produce recycled paper. However, no terpene-based pulping aid has been used in the pulping processes.
  • Many pulping aids have been shown to be environmentally unfriendly and/or pose safety risks. As described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,025,762, the disposal of some pulping aids is difficult, which limits their adoption. Moreover, many pulping aids, such as AQ, have been identified as carcinogens and have been discontinued in many jurisdictions (Hart and Rudie, 2014). Ethoxylated alkyl phenol degradation products have also been identified as being highly toxic to aquatic organisms, and organic solvents such as kerosene have long been discontinued due to their toxicity and flammability (Brogdon and Adiwinata, 2011). These chemicals exhibit toxicity to aquatic organisms at relatively low concentrations and must be removed from mill effluents before entering receiving waters (Borchardt et al. 1998). In contrast, Borchardt et al. have shown that linear (non-phenolic) alcohol-based surfactants biodegrade rapidly to produce non-toxic degradation products.
  • These examples underscore the need for a relatively low-cost, safe, environmentally friendly pulping aid that can improve the pulping process, enhance black liquor combustion, reduce and most probably eliminate the use of defoamers, as well as pitch control surfactants that can adversely affect papermachine runnability. This pulping aid would ideally increase the reactivity between lignocellulosic biomass and the cooking liquor and remove unwanted extractives that lead to pitch deposits. In doing so, the pulping aid would increase the screened yield in the production of pulp from wood and reduce or eliminate deposits that negatively influence pulping operations and the quality attributes of the final product.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved method for pulping lignocellulosic biomass through the addition of a safe and environmentally friendly pulping aid composed of a terpene mixture and a dispersant blend, which comprises a surfactant-based dispersant and a silicone-free defoamer. The combination of these materials has led to the discovery of a pulping aid that simultaneously improves screened pulp yield and reduces the extractives content of the pulp, thus reducing or eliminating the deposition of extractive-containing pitch. The pulping aid is safe, biodegradable and thus environmentally friendly. The terpene component of the pulping aid is ideally derived from a class of natural products, namely cyclic terpenoids and the like, including the citrus by-product, d-limonene. The pulping aid is added to the pulping process, either in the pretreatment of the lignocellulosic biomass or during digestion or both. The pulping aid is designed to have a high flash point of at least 49° C. to 93° C. and preferably at least 60° C. to 77° C. to ensure safe storage and handling, and to minimize the release of harmful VOCs. Not to be bound by any specific mechanism or mode of action, the pulping aid is thought to act on pitch-generating molecules or particles, especially those formed from the saponifiable (fatty and resin acids) as well as the unsaponifiable (neutrals) components released from lignocellulosic biomass, such that they can be removed during subsequent pulping operations, namely pulp washing. The removal of pitch-forming chemicals from lignocelluslosic biomass makes it more accessible to the pulping chemicals, which leads to enhanced pulping characteristics. Further, the addition of the pulping aid results in a beneficial reduction in the extractives content of the pulp.
  • It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved method for pulping wherein the amount of pitch-generating components present in the pulp is reduced to improve the efficiency of pulping processes used to produce kraft, sulfite, and soda-based pulps, and dissolving pulps.
  • It is a further object of the present invention to provide an additive that increases the efficiency of the pulping process by increasing the screened pulp yield.
  • It is a still further object of the present invention to provide an additive for the pulping process that reduces and most probably eliminates the need to use other additives such as silicone-based defoamers, dispersants, talc and the like.
  • It is a still further object of the present invention to provide an additive for the pulping process that enhances the papermachine runnability by reducing or eliminating foam without the use of defoamers added in the fiber line.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 depicts a typical batch pulping process that will be used to illustrate the typical addition points of the pulping aid. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that pulp mills with continuous digesters can equally benefit from this invention. Lignocellulosic biomass, such as wood chips, are transferred to a digester (1) in which they may be subjected to a pretreatment such as preheating of the wood chips by steam or pre-impregnation of the wood chips by pulping chemicals. The wood chips are then contacted by the pulping chemicals, heated to the pulping temperature, and allowed to delignify or cook. Following the digestion step, the contents of the digesters are transferred to the blow tank (2). Typically, this is accomplished by a release of pressure from the digester to the blow tank, which is at or near atmospheric pressure. During the discharge of the blow tank, volatile low-molecular weight chemicals are flashed off and recovered. The contents in the blow tank are held for a period of time to allow wood chips to defiberize completely into a pulp slurry of relatively high consistency (solids content). Wood chips that are partially defiberized or not defiberized are rejected at screening elements or knotters (3). These rejects are often repulped, landfilled, or combusted for their heating value. The pulp slurry is then washed in pulp washers (4) to remove residual pulping chemicals, solubilized lignin and other pulping by-products, including solubilized extractives. The washed pulp may then be directed to the papermaking process in the case of containerboard production and the like or to the bleach plant for bleaching and removal of chromophores that give unbleached pulp its brown color and achieve the pulp's target whiteness and brightness.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an improvement in a pulping process whereby lignocellulosic biomass is contacted by a pulping aid of this invention comprising a terpene or a blend of terpene fractions derived from natural sources such as plants, fruits and vegetables or trees to the cooking liquor, the terpene being added in an amount of at least 0.2 lb to 10 lbs per ton (2,000 lbs) of dry wood chips.
  • The pulping aid of the present invention may be utilized in a chemical pulping process. As kraft is the most widely used process, reference will be made to this process with the understanding that one may also use the pulping aid in the sulfite process or other aqueous-based pulping processes, including those processes used in the production of dissolving pulps. With reference to FIG. 1, the preferred addition points in the pulping process are either at a pretreatment stage (in the case of mills with continuous digesters) or at the digester (1) (in the case of mills with either batch or continuous digesters). It will be recognized that in an efficient recovery process either the terpene or terpene blends will be recovered in the blow tank (2), washers (4), and from recirculated process flows. The recovered terpene or terpene blends can be isolated as a by-product or used as a fuel for their heating value.
  • As a natural product, the terpenes and their selected fractions utilized in the present invention may be derived from a variety of sources including: plants, camphor, conifers, orange or lemon peels, as well as the sulphite process and/or the kraft process. Although some insects produce terpenes, they are not a major source thereof. It should be recognized that other suitable sources are available such as terpenes derived from the destructive distillation of rubber. Preferably, the terpenes used in the present invention are selected from one or more of the following terpenes: α-pinene, β-pinene, camphene, 3-carene, l-limonene, d-limonene, m-cymene, p-cymene, α-terpineol, α-phellandrene and β-phellandrene and derivatives thereof.
  • It is preferred that the terpenes be used in combination with an environmentally friendly dispersant blend. The dispersant blend will be between 3% and 90% by weight of the final formula. The preferred dispersant blend is composed of one non-phenolic alcohol ethoxylate selected from the following: decyl alcohol ethoxylate, dodecyl alcohol ethoxylate, and tridecyl alcohol ethoxylate. The ethoxylated alcohols act as wetting agents and are selected in part on their hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB), which is typically between 13 and 14. Additionally, the dispersant blend includes preferably one silicone-free defoamer selected from the group of difunctional block copolymers based on ethylene oxide and propylene oxide and having a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB), typically between 3 and 4. The amount of silicone-free defoamer will generally be between 1% and 10% by weight of the dispersant blend. The dispersant blend is nontoxic, silicone-free and readily biodegradable.
  • The volume of pulping aid added to the cooking liquor may vary widely depending on the wood species being pulped or their blends. Thus, while a certain amount of the pulping aid will give improved results, it will be understood that larger or smaller amounts may be used with the result varying accordingly. It will be further understood that the amount to add will be a question that is answered by providing the optimum amount needed to provide improved pulp properties cost effectively.
  • The volume added will further depend upon the particular terpene or mixture of terpenes added to the cooking liquor, which may vary depending on market prices. Thus, many different terpenes are available as a mixture thereof and the amount added to the pulping process will depend upon the particular make up of that mixture. It suffices to say that one skilled in the art could determine the ideal amount with appropriate experimentation.
  • Generally, the amount of pulping aid added to the digester will be at least 0.2 lbs to 10 lb per ton (2,000 lbs) of dry wood chips. It has been found that with many terpenes, this level of addition provides an improvement and at 0.5 lb per ton to 2.5 lb per ton of dry pulp, a substantial improvement in the pulping process is observed.
  • To illustrate the benefits of the present invention three pulping trials were conducted at a kraft pulp mill using standard kraft cooks with cooking temperatures around 170° C. In all cases, the pulping aid was introduced in the digester at a dosage level of between 0.2 lbs to 10.0 lbs per ton of wood chips (on an oven dry basis). The total contact time between the pulping aid and the wood chips was approximately 3.5 hours. Three wood chip types or blends were considered. H-factor, rejects and pulp extractives content were used to measure the impact of the pulping aid addition of this invention. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that H-factor is an important dimensionless kinetic factor describing the impact of time and temperature on the rate of delignification. In general, a lower H-factor is desirable as the process throughput is increased as the H-factor is lowered. Rejects are wood chips that are partially defiberized or not defiberized and removed by the knotters (3). It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that a lower level of rejects is preferred as the overall screened pulp yield is increased as rejects are lowered. Extractives will be recognized as the dichloromethane-extractable content of pulp, which represents a measure of such substances as waxes, fats, resins, sterols and non-volatile hydrocarbons as described by TAPPI Standard Method T 204 cm-97. All results were compared to a control.
  • The following examples illustrate various aspects of the invention but are not to be interpreted as limiting it. These examples are merely representative and are not inclusive of all of the possible embodiments of the invention. Results are summarized in Table 1.
  • Example 1
  • A multi-day trial was used to determine the impact of the pulping aid of this invention on mill pulp production. Hardwood chips comprising a majority of maple wood chips were contacted with between 0.2 lbs and 4.0 lbs of pulping aid per ton of dry pulp, the pulping aid being a mixture of 60% terpenes and 40% of a dispersant blend. As summarized in Table 1, at a constant addition level of 2.5 lbs per dry ton of pulp, the H-factor was unchanged. However, rejects were reduced by 45% and the pulp extractives content was reduced by 57.3%. The incremental fiber production realized from the lower rejects level was about 14.4 dry tons per day. Furthermore, the use of a surfactant-based pitch control chemical was eliminated and the use of defoamers was reduced by about 20%.
  • Example 2
  • A multi-day trial was used to determine the impact of the pulping aid of this invention on mill pulp production. Hardwood chips comprising a majority of aspen wood chips were contacted with between 0.2 lbs and 4.0 lbs of pulping aid per ton of dry pulp, the pulping aid being a mixture of 60% terpenes and 40% of a dispersant blend. As summarized in Table 1, at a constant addition level of 2.5 lbs per dry ton of pulp, the H-factor was reduced by 8.0%; rejects were reduced by 53% and the pulp extractives content was reduced by 27.3%. In addition, the pulp production rate of the mill was increased by 4.4% from the base rate. The incremental fiber production realized from the lower rejects level was 7.5 dry tons per day. Furthermore, the use of a surfactant-based pitch control chemical was eliminated and the use of defoamers was reduced by about 20%.
  • Example 3
  • A relatively long (multi-week) trial was used to determine the robustness of the method of this invention on mill pulp production. Hardwood chips comprising a blend of aspen and maple wood chips were contacted with 0.2 lbs and 4.0 lbs of pulping aid per ton of dry pulp, the pulping aid being a mixture of 60% terpenes and 40% of a dispersant blend. As summarized in Table 1, at a constant addition level of 0.5 lbs per dry ton of pulp the H-factor was reduced by 6.7%; alkalinity was reduced by 4.3% from 23.0 g/L; rejects were reduced by 47% and the pulp extractives content was reduced by 36.1%. Further, the pulp production rate of mill was increased by 4.8% from the base rate. The incremental pulp fiber production realized from the lower rejects level was 5.5 dry tons per day. Furthermore, the use of a surfactant-based pitch control chemical was eliminated and the use of defoamers was reduced by about 20%.
  • TABLE 1
    H-Factor Extractives (g/L) Rejects
    Percent Percent Incremental Tons
    Example Baseline Change Baseline Change per Day as Pulp
    1 350  0.0% 0.10 −57.3% 14.4
    2 275 −8.0% 0.15 −27.3%  7.5
    3 350 −6.7% 0.10 −36.1%  5.5
  • In summary, benefits observed during the trial periods included a reduction in knotter rejects, a reduction in pitch deposits, the ability to reduce pitch control chemical addition, the ability to decrease defoamer in the fiber line, and the ability to lower cooking liquor alkalinity, at reduced H-Factor, while achieving brown stock kappa number targets.
  • LIST OF REFERENCES
    • U.S. Pat. No. 2,144,756
    • U.S. Pat. No. 4,012,280
    • U.S. Pat. No. 4,673,460
    • U.S. Pat. No. 5,176,796
    • U.S. Pat. No. 5,720,825
    • U.S. Pat. No. 6,890,405
    • U.S. Pat. No. 8,025,762
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/450,298
    • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/129,524
    NON PATENT LITERATURE
  • Borchardt, J. K., Cano, M. L., Tortorici, P. L., Wallace, J. C., Kravetz, L., Guin, K. F., and Dubey, S. T., “Environmental Aspects of Alcohol Ethoxylates in Pulp and Paper Mills. Part 1 Surfactant Chemical Structure Effects,” 1998 Environmental Conference Proceedings, TAPPI Press, 1998.
  • Brogdon, Brian N. and John Adiwinata, “A Review of Deresinators as Digester Additives for Kraft Pulping,” TAPPI 2011 PEERS Conference, TAPPI Press, October 2011, pp. 935-961.
  • Hart, Peter W. and Alan W. Rudie, “Anthraquinone-A Review of the Rise and Fall of a Pulping Catalyst,” TAPPI Journal, 13(10), 23-31, 2014.
  • National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Database; CID=6654, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/6654 (accessed Dec. 31, 2017).
  • Smook, Gary A., “Handbook for Pulp & Paper Technologists,” 3rd ed., Angus Wilde Publications, 2002.
  • Spence, Gavin G., “Defoamers for Brown Stock Washers,” TAPPI 1997 Pulping Conference Proceedings, TAPPI Press, 1997.
  • Thomas, George S., “Agricultural Based Solvent Cleaners for the Pulp and Paper Industry,” TAPPI PaperCon'09 Conference, June 2009.
  • T 204 cm-97, “Solvent extractives of wood and pulp,” TAPPI Press, 1997.

Claims (17)

I claim:
1. A safe and environmentally friendly pulping aid comprising a mixture of at least one terpene and a dispersant blend.
2. The pulping aid according to claim 1 wherein the terpene mixture is selected from but not limited to one or more of the following biodegradable terpenes: α-pinene, β-pinene, camphene, 3-carene, l-limonene, d-limonene, o-cymene, m-cymene, p-cymene, α-terpineol, α-phellandrene and β-phellandrene, α-terpinolene, α-terpinene and β-terpinene.
3. The pulping aid according to claim 1 wherein the dispersant blend is a non-phenolic, readily biodegradable alcohol ethoxylate selected from but not limited to the following: decyl alcohol ethoxylate, dodecyl alcohol ethoxylate, and tridecyl alcohol ethoxylate, and one or more defoamers selected from but not limited to the group of difunctional block copolymers based on ethylene oxide and propylene oxide.
4. The pulping aid according to claim 1 wherein the terpene content has a range between 10% and 97%.
5. The pulping aid according to claim 1 wherein the dispersant blend has a range between 3% and 90%.
6. The pulping aid according to claim 1, wherein the closed cup flashpoint is at least 49° C.
7. A method of using an environmentally friendly pulping aid containing a mixture of at least one terpene and a dispersant blend is brought into contact with lignocellulosic biomass during the pulping process.
8. The method according to claim 7 where the pulping process is a kraft pulping process.
9. The method according to claim 7 where the pulping process is a sulfite pulping process.
10. The method according to claim 7 where the pulping process is soda pulping process.
11. The method according to claim 7 where the pulping additive is brought into contact with lignocellulosic biomass during the pretreatment stage.
12. The method according to claim 7 where the pulping additive is brought into contact with lignocellulosic biomass during the digestion stage.
13. The method according to claim 7 where the pulping additive is brought into contact with lignocellulosic biomass in both the pretreatment and digestion stages.
14. The method according to claim 7 where the contact time between the pulping aid and the lignocellulosic biomass during pulping is at least 2 hours and the pulping temperature is at least 130° C. in the case of sulphite pulping and at least 160° C. in the case of kraft pulping.
15. The method according to claim 7 where the addition level of the pulping additive is between 0.2 lbs and 4.0 lbs per ton of dry pulp.
16. A pulp product derived from lignocellulosic biomass produced using a safe and environmentally friendly pulping aid comprising a mixture of at least one terpene and a dispersant blend where the extractives content of the unbleached pulp is reduced by at least 25%.
17. A pulping process employing a safe and environmentally friendly pulping aid comprising a mixture of at least one terpene and a dispersant blend where at the same brownstock kappa number target as the control, the rejects are reduced by at least 45%, the pulp production is increased by at least 4.0%, the surfactant-based pitch control chemical is eliminated and the use of defoamers in the fiber line is reduced by at least 20%.
US15/732,965 2018-01-19 2018-01-19 Method for improved pulping using an environmentally friendly pulping aid Abandoned US20190226142A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/732,965 US20190226142A1 (en) 2018-01-19 2018-01-19 Method for improved pulping using an environmentally friendly pulping aid

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/732,965 US20190226142A1 (en) 2018-01-19 2018-01-19 Method for improved pulping using an environmentally friendly pulping aid

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20190226142A1 true US20190226142A1 (en) 2019-07-25

Family

ID=67299179

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/732,965 Abandoned US20190226142A1 (en) 2018-01-19 2018-01-19 Method for improved pulping using an environmentally friendly pulping aid

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20190226142A1 (en)

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3661698A (en) * 1969-10-08 1972-05-09 Pulp Paper Res Inst Production of pulp by a multi-stage ammonium polysulphide pulping process
US6017415A (en) * 1997-09-05 2000-01-25 International Paper Company Method for co-pulping waste cellulosic material and wood chips
US20020148573A1 (en) * 1998-02-24 2002-10-17 Weyerhaeuser Company Method for removing wax from a pulp furnish
US20030094252A1 (en) * 2001-10-17 2003-05-22 American Air Liquide, Inc. Cellulosic products containing improved percentage of calcium carbonate filler in the presence of other papermaking additives
US20050098287A1 (en) * 2003-11-12 2005-05-12 Mah Thomas C. Method of controlling tackiness in papermaking
US20100316738A1 (en) * 2009-06-12 2010-12-16 Desmond JIMENEZ Methods of inhibiting, preventing, killing and/or repelling insects using simulated blends of chenopodium extracts
US20170204567A1 (en) * 2016-01-19 2017-07-20 Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products Lp Nanofibrillated Cellulose Ply Bonding Agent Or Adhesive and Multi-Ply Absorbent Sheet Made Therewith
US20170314196A1 (en) * 2014-11-05 2017-11-02 Obshestvo S Ogranichennoy Otvetstvennostyu"Twin Te Chnology Company" A cellulose production method

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3661698A (en) * 1969-10-08 1972-05-09 Pulp Paper Res Inst Production of pulp by a multi-stage ammonium polysulphide pulping process
US6017415A (en) * 1997-09-05 2000-01-25 International Paper Company Method for co-pulping waste cellulosic material and wood chips
US20020148573A1 (en) * 1998-02-24 2002-10-17 Weyerhaeuser Company Method for removing wax from a pulp furnish
US20030094252A1 (en) * 2001-10-17 2003-05-22 American Air Liquide, Inc. Cellulosic products containing improved percentage of calcium carbonate filler in the presence of other papermaking additives
US20050098287A1 (en) * 2003-11-12 2005-05-12 Mah Thomas C. Method of controlling tackiness in papermaking
US20100316738A1 (en) * 2009-06-12 2010-12-16 Desmond JIMENEZ Methods of inhibiting, preventing, killing and/or repelling insects using simulated blends of chenopodium extracts
US20170314196A1 (en) * 2014-11-05 2017-11-02 Obshestvo S Ogranichennoy Otvetstvennostyu"Twin Te Chnology Company" A cellulose production method
US20170204567A1 (en) * 2016-01-19 2017-07-20 Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products Lp Nanofibrillated Cellulose Ply Bonding Agent Or Adhesive and Multi-Ply Absorbent Sheet Made Therewith

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Sridach The environmentally benign pulping process of non-wood fibers.
Kaur et al. Prospects of rice straw as a raw material for paper making
Bajpai Pulp and paper industry: Chemicals
Batalha et al. Dissolving pulp production from bamboo
US20180245285A1 (en) Methods of producing a paper product
US6245196B1 (en) Method and apparatus for pulp yield enhancement
NO330358B1 (en) Procedure for illuminating mechanical pulp
BRPI0608719A2 (en) product and processes from an integrated forest biorefinery
EP0465579A1 (en) Improved method of producing pulp
Salehi et al. Comparison of MEA/AQ, soda and soda/AQ pulping of wheat and rye straw
Fatriasari et al. The Kraft Pulp And Paper Properties of Sweet Sorghum Bagasse (Sorghum bicolor L Moench).
Leponiemi Non-wood pulping possibilities-a challenge for the chemical pulping industry
NO300928B1 (en) Cellulose pulp based on recycled corrugated cardboard, bleached pulp, pulp production and installation
CA1283512C (en) Sulfite cooking method for the production of cellulose from materials containing lignocellulose with recovery of the cooking chemicals
SK97594A3 (en) Oxygen delignification of waste cellulosic paper products
EP0637351B1 (en) Wood-free pulp and white paper product
JP2010144273A (en) Method for producing chemical pulp of lignocellulose material
Hedjazi et al. Bagasse alkaline sulfite-anthraquinone (AS/AQ) pulping and totally chlorine free (TCF) bleaching
AU2005269835A1 (en) Use of cyclodextrin for reducing yellowing of pulp and paper
US20190226142A1 (en) Method for improved pulping using an environmentally friendly pulping aid
Hamzeh et al. Application of surfactants as pulping additives in soda pulping of bagasse
EP3514283A1 (en) Method for improved pulping using an environmentally friendly pulping aid
CA2992331A1 (en) Method for improved pulping using an environmentally friendly pulping aid
Wang et al. TCF bleaching character of soda-anthraquinone pulp from oil palm frond
Ribas Batalha et al. DISSOLVING PULP PRODUCTION FROM BAMBOO.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: ADVISORY ACTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION