US20190072565A1 - Protein preparation - Google Patents

Protein preparation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20190072565A1
US20190072565A1 US16/070,225 US201716070225A US2019072565A1 US 20190072565 A1 US20190072565 A1 US 20190072565A1 US 201716070225 A US201716070225 A US 201716070225A US 2019072565 A1 US2019072565 A1 US 2019072565A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
methionine
enzyme
sample
sulfoxide
protein
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US16/070,225
Inventor
John Rogers
Robert Cunningham
Juozas Siurkus
Bhavinkumar Patel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltics UAB
Pierce Biotechnology Inc
Original Assignee
Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltics UAB
Pierce Biotechnology Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltics UAB, Pierce Biotechnology Inc filed Critical Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltics UAB
Priority to US16/070,225 priority Critical patent/US20190072565A1/en
Assigned to PIERCE BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. reassignment PIERCE BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ROGERS, JOHN, PATEL, BHAVINKUMAR, CUNNINGHAM, ROBERT
Assigned to THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC BALTICS UAB reassignment THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC BALTICS UAB ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SIURKUS, JUOZAS
Publication of US20190072565A1 publication Critical patent/US20190072565A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/68Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids
    • G01N33/6803General methods of protein analysis not limited to specific proteins or families of proteins
    • G01N33/6848Methods of protein analysis involving mass spectrometry
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/70Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for E. coli
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/87Introduction of foreign genetic material using processes not otherwise provided for, e.g. co-transformation
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/0004Oxidoreductases (1.)
    • C12N9/0051Oxidoreductases (1.) acting on a sulfur group of donors (1.8)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12PFERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P21/00Preparation of peptides or proteins
    • C12P21/02Preparation of peptides or proteins having a known sequence of two or more amino acids, e.g. glutathione
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K2319/00Fusion polypeptide
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12YENZYMES
    • C12Y108/00Oxidoreductases acting on sulfur groups as donors (1.8)
    • C12Y108/01Oxidoreductases acting on sulfur groups as donors (1.8) with NAD+ or NADP+ as acceptor (1.8.1)
    • C12Y108/01008Protein-disulfide reductase (1.8.1.8), i.e. thioredoxin
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12YENZYMES
    • C12Y108/00Oxidoreductases acting on sulfur groups as donors (1.8)
    • C12Y108/01Oxidoreductases acting on sulfur groups as donors (1.8) with NAD+ or NADP+ as acceptor (1.8.1)
    • C12Y108/01009Thioredoxin-disulfide reductase (1.8.1.9), i.e. thioredoxin-reductase
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12YENZYMES
    • C12Y108/00Oxidoreductases acting on sulfur groups as donors (1.8)
    • C12Y108/04Oxidoreductases acting on sulfur groups as donors (1.8) with a disulfide as acceptor (1.8.4)
    • C12Y108/04013L-Methionine (S)-S-oxide reductase (1.8.4.13)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12YENZYMES
    • C12Y108/00Oxidoreductases acting on sulfur groups as donors (1.8)
    • C12Y108/04Oxidoreductases acting on sulfur groups as donors (1.8) with a disulfide as acceptor (1.8.4)
    • C12Y108/04014L-Methionine (R)-S-oxide reductase (1.8.4.14)
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2560/00Chemical aspects of mass spectrometric analysis of biological material

Definitions

  • This disclosure relates to the field of protein preparation, for example, protein preparation prior to liquid chromatography and/or mass spectrometry analysis.
  • Methionine (Met) is a sulfur-containing essential amino acid that is highly susceptible to oxidation by reactive oxygen species (ROS) during stress, aging, and disease in vivo. Met residues are believed to act as a scavenger for reactive oxygen species, minimizing oxidative damage to other amino acids and biomolecules in the cell and protecting active site residues from oxidation. Met oxidation can also affect protein structure and function and can serve as a biological switch that is sensitive to oxidative stress. Methionine oxidation is also commonly observed during protein purification and analysis in vitro. The product of Met oxidation is Met sulfoxide (MetO), which exists in the form of two diastereomers, methionine S-sulfoxide and methionine R-sulfoxide.
  • ROS reactive oxygen species
  • Methionine oxidation can occur during protein sample preparation and purification.
  • the release of peroxisomal contents during tissue and cellular lysis, the exposure of protein-containing solutions during sample processing to air, ionizing light and radiation, and exposure to metals that produce free radicals via the Fenton reaction can all cause methionine oxidation during preparation or storage.
  • Variable methionine oxidation of purified proteins, including biotherapeutic proteins, leads to lower and variable product quality, and the ability to reverse or prevent methionine oxidation would benefit protein therapeutics.
  • oxidation can be prevented by free radical scavengers (e.g. glycerols) or metal chelators (e.g. EDTA), but some of the oxidation may be introduced naturally in the cell prior to any processing.
  • free radical scavengers e.g. glycerols
  • metal chelators e.g. EDTA
  • methionine oxidation whether introduced in vivo or in vitro, with chemical treatment has been described, but this requires extreme pH conditions that may affect proteins in undesirable ways (e.g. precipitation, deamidation, or other modifications).
  • Complete oxidation of methionine to sulfone has also been attempted, but the side reactions from over-oxidation at cysteine, tryptophan, and other amino acids produced undesirable results.
  • Methionine oxidation is commonly observed by mass spectrometry. Oxidation of methionines and other amino acids typically manifests itself as a series of 15.995 Da mass increases from the original unmodified mass spectral peak of the proteoforms of interest.
  • variable oxidation may interfere with protein liquid chromatography and/or mass spectrometry analysis in at least four ways: 1) poor peak shape and resolution during liquid chromatography; 2) increased complexity and poorer depth of analysis of intact proteins due to multiple oxidized proteoforms; 3) increased complexity and poorer depth of analysis of peptides from protein digests due to multiple oxidized forms, and; 4) impaired quantitation of specific methionine-containing peptides due to reduced sensitivity and variability in the stoichiometry of oxidized peptides.
  • the increased hydrophilicity of a protein caused by methionine oxidation affects retention and chromatography. This results in peaks for each oxidized form of a protein, less intense peaks from each protein form due to dilution of the protein forms across multiple peaks, and greater variability in peak areas because of random, incomplete, and variable stoichiometry of oxidation at each methionine in a sequence.
  • the diasteromers of methionine sulfoxide in a protein or peptide may be resolved or spread into overlapping peaks with high performance liquid chromatography. This peak broadening and poor resolution further affects sensitivity, peak integration, and quantitation.
  • the reversal of methionine oxidation can improve protein chromatography by improving sample purity and chromatographic behavior.
  • Mass spectrometry is used to characterize intact proteins and complexes at the molecular level. While the analysis of intact proteins can provide important insights, the isolation and fragmentation of these proteins in the mass spectrometer by collisional and non-ergodic approaches provides information about the complete sequence and sites of modification of a protein. This intact protein MS/MS approach is often referred to as “top-down” or “middle-down” protein analysis. Methionine oxidation increases sample complexity and severely impairs top-down protein analysis because it increases sample complexity and complicates the data analysis. For each methionine in a protein (N), the number of proteoforms caused by variable oxidation of each methionine to the sulfoxide form may be up to the factorial of N.
  • Oxidation of proteins during electrospray ionization has been known for over 20 years. Methionine oxidation has been shown to occur during the electrospray ionization of proteins for MS analysis. This oxidation can be limited or prevented by using polished metal surfaces and by modifying the liquid chromatography or electrochemical junction to avoid direct application of high voltage to protein containing solution.
  • the present disclosure provides methods of reducing or eliminating methionine oxidation in protein samples prior to separation and/or analysis, such as, for example, liquid chromatography and/or mass spectrometry analysis.
  • methods of preparing a polypeptide sample for separation and/or analysis comprising contacting the polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide: reductase enzyme under conditions suitable for reducing oxidized methionines in the polypeptide sample.
  • at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide.
  • the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide and at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide.
  • the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with an MsrA enzyme and an MsrB enzyme.
  • an MsrA is derived from an MsrA enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas , and Natrinema .
  • an MsrA is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_049944603.1, WP_005043086.1, WP_058572480.1, WP_015322392.1, WP_015408133.1, and WP_006431385.1.
  • an MsrB is derived from an MsrB enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas, Natrinema , and Candidatus Halobonum .
  • an MsrB is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_004963222.1, WP_049996544.1, WP_007275637.1, WP_008423757.1, WP_015408129.1, WP_007109050.1, and WP_023395429.1.
  • an MsrA and MsrB may be from the same or different organism.
  • the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide. In some embodiments, the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with an MsrAB enzyme.
  • the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase from an organism selected from Neisseria, Lautropia, Cardiobacterium, Gammaproteobacteria, Pelistega, Marinospirillum, Basilea, Oligella, Alcagenaceae, Psychrobacter, Brackiella, Taylorella, Moraxella, Enhydrobacter, Fusobacterium, Helcococcus, Paenibacillus, Eremococcus, Methanobrevibacter, Methanomassiliicoccales, Methanocorpusculum , Thermoplasmatales, Methanometylophilus, Methanoculleus , and Methanocella .
  • the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a bacterial methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme.
  • the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitides, Neisseria lactamica, Neisseria polysaccharea, Neisseria flavescens, Neisseria sicca, Neisseria macacacae , or Neisseria mucosa .
  • the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 10 to 34.
  • the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is bound to a solid support. In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is bound to a resin or a bead. In some embodiments, the method further comprises removing the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme following reduction of oxidized methionines in the polypeptide sample.
  • the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is present at a weight ratio of between 1:100 and 1:2 enzyme:polypeptide.
  • the contacting occurs under reducing conditions. In some embodiments, the contacting occurs in the presence of dithiothreitol (DTT) and/or dithioerythritol (DTE).
  • the method comprises preparing a sample for liquid chromatography. In some embodiments, the method further comprises subjecting polypeptides of the polypeptide sample to liquid chromatography. In some embodiments, the liquid chromatography is high performance liquid chromatography.
  • the method comprises preparing a sample for capillary electrophoresis. In some embodiments, the method further comprises subjecting polypeptides of the polypeptide sample to capillary electrophoresis.
  • the method comprises preparing a sample for mass spectrometry. In some embodiments, the method further comprises subjecting polypeptides of the polypeptide sample to mass spectrometry.
  • the method comprises fragmenting the polypeptides of the polypeptide sample. In some embodiments, the method comprises fragmenting the polypeptides by proteolytic or chemical cleavage. In some embodiments, the fragmented polypeptides are peptides consisting of 5 to 50 amino acids. In some embodiments, the method comprises fragmenting the polypeptides by digestion with trypsin, chymotrypsin, AspN, GluC, LysC, LysN, ArgC, proteinase K, or thermolysin, or by chemical cleavage with CNBr. In some embodiments, the method comprises separating the polypeptides on a gel and then fragmenting the polypeptides in gel.
  • the polypeptides of the polypeptide sample were previously fragmented. In some embodiments, the polypeptides were fragmented by proteolytic or chemical cleavage. In some embodiments, the polypeptide fragments are peptides consisting of 5 to 50 amino acids. In some embodiments, the polypeptide fragments were produced by digestion with trypsin, chymotrypsin, AspN, GluC, LysC, LysN, ArgC, proteinase K, or thermolysin, or by chemical cleavage with CNBr. In some embodiments, the polypeptide fragments were produced in solution or in gel following gel separation of the protein.
  • the method comprises separating the polypeptides or polypeptide fragments from other components of the polypeptide sample. In some embodiments, the method comprises subjecting the polypeptides or polypeptide fragments to mass spectrometry analysis. In some embodiments, the mass spectrometry analysis comprises internal fragmentation of the polypeptides or polypeptide fragments.
  • methods of producing a mass spectrometry spectrum comprising contacting polypeptides of a polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme under conditions suitable for reducing oxidized methionines in the polypeptide sample, and injecting the polypeptides into a liquid chromatograph/mass spectrometer detection system or directly into a mass spectrometer detection system, wherein the polypeptides of the polypeptide sample have not been fragmented.
  • At least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide.
  • the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide and at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide.
  • the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with an MsrA enzyme and an MsrB enzyme.
  • an MsrA is derived from an MsrA enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas , and Natrinema .
  • an MsrA is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_049944603.1, WP_005043086.1, WP_058572480.1, WP_015322392.1, WP_015408133.1, and WP_006431385.1.
  • an MsrB is derived from an MsrB enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas, Natrinema , and Candidatus Halobonum .
  • an MsrB is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_004963222.1, WP_049996544.1, WP_007275637.1, WP_008423757.1, WP_015408129.1, WP_007109050.1, and WP_023395429.1.
  • an MsrA and MsrB may be from the same or different organism.
  • the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide. In some embodiments, the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with an MsrAB enzyme.
  • the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase from an organism selected from Neisseria, Lautropia, Cardiobacterium, Gammaproteobacteria, Pelistega, Marinospirillum, Basilea, Oligella, Alcagenaceae, Psychrobacter, Brackiella, Taylorella, Moraxella, Enhydrobacter, Fusobacterium, Helcococcus, Paenibacillus, Eremococcus, Methanobrevibacter, Methanomassiliicoccales, Methanocorpusculum, Thermoplasmatales, Methanometylophilus, Methanoculleus , and Methanocella .
  • the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a bacterial methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme.
  • the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is derived from a Neisseria methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme.
  • the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitides, Neisseria lactamica, Neisseria polysaccharea, Neisseria flavescens, Neisseria sicca, Neisseria macacae , or Neisseria mucosa .
  • the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 10 to 34.
  • the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is bound to a solid support. In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is bound to a resin or a bead. In some embodiments, the method further comprises removing the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme following reduction of oxidized methionines in the polypeptide sample.
  • each methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is present at a weight ratio of between 1:100 and 1:2 enzyme:polypeptide.
  • the contacting occurs under reducing conditions. In some embodiments, the contacting occurs in the presence of dithiothreitol (DTT) or dithioerythritol (DTE).
  • DTT dithiothreitol
  • DTE dithioerythritol
  • kits comprising at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme are provided.
  • a kit comprises at least one reagent for fragmenting a polypeptide sample for mass spectrometry analysis.
  • the kit comprises at least one reagent selected from trypsin, chymotrypsin, AspN, GluC, LysC, LysN, ArgC, proteinase K, thermolysin, and CNBr.
  • the at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide.
  • the kit comprises at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide and at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide.
  • the kit comprises an MsrA enzyme and an MsrB enzyme.
  • an MsrA is derived from an MsrA enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas , and Natrinema .
  • an MsrA is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_049944603.1, WP_005043086.1, WP_058572480.1, WP_015322392.1, WP_015408133.1, and WP_006431385.1.
  • an MsrB is derived from an MsrB enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas, Natrinema , and Candidatus Halobonum .
  • an MsrB is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_004963222.1, WP_049996544.1, WP_007275637.1, WP_008423757.1, WP_015408129.1, WP_007109050.1, and WP_023395429.1.
  • an MsrA and MsrB may be from the same or different organism.
  • the kit comprises at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide.
  • the kit comprises an MsrAB enzyme.
  • the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase from an organism selected from Neisseria, Lautropia, Cardiobacterium, Gammaproteobacteria, Pelistega, Marinospirillum, Basilea, Oligella, Alcagenaceae, Psychrobacter, Brackiella, Taylorella, Moraxella, Enhydrobacter, Fusobacterium, Helcococcus, Paenibacillus, Eremococcus, Methanobrevibacter, Methanomassiliicoccales, Methanocorpusculum , Thermoplasmatales, Methanometylophilus, Methanoculleus , and Methanocella .
  • the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a bacterial methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme.
  • the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitides, Neisseria lactamica, Neisseria polysaccharea, Neisseria flavescens, Neisseria sicca, Neisseria macacacae , or Neisseria mucosa .
  • the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 10 to 34.
  • a kit comprises at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme bound to a solid support.
  • the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is bound to a resin or a bead.
  • methods of reducing the complexity of a protein sample are provided.
  • methods of reducing the complexity of a protein sample prior to analysis by mass spectrometry (MS) are provided.
  • oxidized methionine stereoisomers are reduced by methionine sulfoxide reductase A and methionine sulfoxide reductase B (MsrA and MsrB) to restore methionine sulfoxide residues back to native methionine amino acids. See, e.g., FIG. 1 .
  • this reduces sample variability and complexity by consolidating multiple versions of a methionine-containing protein into one species, which in some instances permits more efficient and sensitive MS acquisition and faster data analysis.
  • the sample may be a purified or enriched protein sample, or may be a complex biological sample.
  • the purpose of analysis may, in various embodiments, be identification, characterization, and/or quantitation of a protein.
  • the reduction of methionine sulfoxide to methionine may be performed before, during, and/or after the reduction of cysteines and cysteine disulfides and/or fragmentation of the protein.
  • the methods are used in a diagnostic assay. In some embodiments, the methods are used during multi-sample analysis and/or multi-target analysis.
  • a method comprises (a) preparing a sample containing a target protein or peptide of interest for mass spectrometry analysis, (b) adding an isotope-labeled peptide or protein (such as a heavy, stable isotope-labeled peptide or protein) having at least one subsequence of the target protein or peptide containing methionine, (c) mixing the isotope labeled peptides or proteins at known concentrations with the sample, (d) treating the sample with a methionine sulfoxide reductase (such as MsrA/B) and reagents suitable for MsrA/B activity, to reduce methionine sulfoxide residues to methionine, (e) subjecting the mixture containing the prepared sample and the isotope-labeled proteins or peptides to mass spectrometry analysis.
  • an isotope-labeled peptide or protein such as a heavy, stable isotope-lab
  • a single additive heavy peptide mass spectrometry peak is obtained with the corresponding single light peptide (i.e., non-isotope-labeled peptide) mass spectrometry peak.
  • the method further comprises (f) subjecting the mass peaks to isolation and fragmentation by mass spectrometry analysis.
  • unique and confirming mass spectrometry peaks are obtained representing the protein or peptide fragments of the light and isotope-labeled (such as heavy isotope labeled) proteins or peptides.
  • the method further comprises (g) generating a light peptide intensity: heavy peptide intensity ratio, and (h) quantifying the intensity of each of the plurality of mass spectrometry peaks based on the intensity of the heavy isotope labeled peptides, e.g., to quantify the amount of protein or peptide in the sample.
  • the isotope-labeled peptides and proteins are prepared by synthesizing the peptides or proteins in vitro or in vivo with amino acid precursors that contain isotopes or oxidized methionine, resulting in isotope-labeled peptides and proteins that may contain native or oxidized methionine.
  • a method of using a methionine sulfoxide reductase (Msr) protein sequence to monitor the consistency and completeness of fragmentation (such as digestion) of a protein sample is provided.
  • a known amount of soluble Msr enzyme may be added to a sample to reverse methionine oxidation prior to proteolytic digestion, and the known and unique peptides from the Msr enzyme may be monitored to assess the efficiency of fragmentation and recovery of peptides.
  • methods of reversing protein methionine oxidation which use an Msr enzyme containing an affinity tag or Msr enzyme immobilized on a resin or bead.
  • a protein sample may have an unknown or undesired level of methionine oxidation, but it may be undesirable to contaminate the sample with the Msr protein.
  • the Msr enzyme is added to the protein sample under conditions such that methionine sulfoxide can be reversed, and the Msr enzyme can then be efficiently removed by addition of an affinity resin to capture the tagged Msr enzyme, and the resin with captured or immobilized Msr can be removed by centrifugation or filtration.
  • methods of reducing the complexity of intact protein samples prior to MS/MS analysis by mass spectrometry are provided.
  • the use of high resolution MS and multiple fragmentation methods to determine the complete structure of a protein may be referred to as “top-down” proteomics.
  • the stochastic nature of methionine oxidation may result in multiple isobaric and non-isobaric variants of a protein, resulting in increased sample complexity and difficulty interpreting the protein fragments from co-isolated, isobaric protein species containing oxidized methionine at different locations.
  • the reduction of methionine sulfoxides by Msr reduces the complexity of the intact protein(s) and the fragmentation products while increasing the signal to noise ratio.
  • methods of reducing methionine oxidation prior to liquid chromatography or other analysis or purification methods are also provided.
  • FIG. 1 shows structures of oxidized methionine and reduction by methionine sulfoxide reductases.
  • ROS is “reactive oxygen species.”
  • FIG. 2 shows intact protein MS analysis of methionine oxidation of TurboLuc in the absence of peroxide treatment. Un-oxidized samples or samples treated with the Msrs ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB are presented.
  • FIG. 3 shows intact protein MS analysis of methionine oxidation of TurboLuc following 10 ⁇ peroxide treatment. Samples were oxidized alone or oxidized and then treated with the Msrs ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB.
  • FIG. 4 shows intact protein MS analysis of methionine oxidation of TurboLuc following 25 ⁇ peroxide treatment. Samples were oxidized alone or oxidized and then treated with the Msrs ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB.
  • FIG. 5 shows intact protein MS analysis of methionine oxidation of TurboLuc following 75 ⁇ peroxide treatment. Samples were oxidized alone or oxidized and then treated with the Msrs ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB.
  • FIG. 6 shows intact protein MS analysis of methionine oxidation of TurboLuc following 100 ⁇ peroxide treatment. Samples were oxidized alone or oxidized and then treated with the Msrs ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB.
  • FIG. 7 shows intact protein MS analysis of methionine oxidation of TurboLuc following 500 ⁇ peroxide treatment. Samples were oxidized alone or oxidized and then treated with the Msrs ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB.
  • FIG. 8 outlines an exemplary procedure for shotgun proteomic analysis.
  • FIG. 9 shows shotgun proteomic analysis results on methionine oxidation of a 6-protein sample. Reversal of methionine oxidation was measured for samples treated with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB. The percentage of oxidized methionine and doubly oxidized methionine are presented for control (no oxidation), 1:25, 1:50, and 1:100 methionine:peroxide ratios. Met, methionine.
  • FIGS. 10A and 10B present the protocol (A) and actual readout (B) of parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) of a representative experiment.
  • FIGS. 11A and 11B present the effect of treatment with nmMsrAB and ngMsrAB on the disappearance of an oxidized peptide standard (SEQ ID No: 4) and appearance of the corresponding reduced peptide (SEQ ID No: 5) using PRM analysis.
  • FIGS. 12A and 12B present the effect of treatment with nmMsrAB and ngMsrAB on the disappearance of an oxidized phosphopeptide (SEQ ID No: 6) and appearance of the corresponding reduced peptide (SEQ ID No: 7) using PRM analysis.
  • FIGS. 13A and 13B present the effect of treatment with nmMsrAB and ngMsrAB on the disappearance of another oxidized phosphopeptide (SEQ ID No: 8) and corresponding appearance of a reduced phosphopeptide (SEQ ID No: 9) using PRM analysis.
  • FIG. 14 shows the sequence of His-tagged/WQ MsrAB from Neisseria gonorrhoeae (SEQ ID NO: 1).
  • the His tag/WQ protease site is shown in italics.
  • a coommassie-stained gel showing the predominant expressed species is also shown.
  • the terms “ngMsrAB” and “ngMsrAB-T” are used interchangeably.
  • FIG. 15 shows the sequence of His-tagged/WQ MsrAB from Neisseria meningitidis (SEQ ID NO: 2).
  • the His tag/WQ protease site is shown in italics.
  • a coommassie-stained gel showing the predominant expressed species is also shown.
  • the terms “nmMsrAB” and “nmMsrAB-T” are used interchangeably.
  • FIG. 16 shows how the theoretical reversal of methionine oxidation results in a less convoluted spectrum in “top down” protein MS/MS analysis.
  • methionine sulfoxide reductase As used herein, the terms “methionine sulfoxide reductase”, “Msr”, “MetSR”, and “Msr enzyme” are used interchangeably to refer to a methionine sulfoxide reductase that is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide and/or methionine-R-sulfoxide.
  • a Msr domain that is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide to methionine is referred to as an “A domain.”
  • a Msr domain that is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide to methionine is referred to as an “B domain.”
  • the terms “methionine sulfoxide reductase”, “Msr”, “MetSR”, and “Msr enzyme” refer generically to a methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that comprises a methionine sulfoxide reductase A domain alone, B domain alone, or both an A domain and a B domain.
  • a Msr is a MsrAB.
  • a Msr is a MsrA.
  • a Msr is a MsrB.
  • the terms “methionine sulfoxide reductase AB”, “MsrAB”, “MetSR-AB”, and “MsrAB enzyme” are used interchangeably to refer to a methionine sulfoxide reductase comprising a methionine sulfoxide reductase A domain and a methionine sulfoxide reductase B domain, wherein the reductase is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide.
  • the MsrAB enzyme comprises a thioredoxin (Trx) domain.
  • the MsrAB enzyme may be referred to as a MsrAB-T enzyme.
  • methionine sulfoxide reductase A methionine sulfoxide reductase A
  • MsrA MetalSR-A
  • MsrA enzyme a methionine sulfoxide reductase comprising a methionine sulfoxide reductase A domain, wherein the reductase is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide.
  • methionine sulfoxide reductase B methionine sulfoxide reductase B
  • MsrB MetalSR-B
  • MsrB enzyme are used interchangeably to refer to a methionine sulfoxide reductase comprising a methionine sulfoxide reductase A domain, wherein the reductase is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide.
  • protein As used herein “protein”, “peptide”, and “polypeptide” are used interchangeably throughout to mean a chain of amino acids wherein each amino acid is connected to the next by a peptide bond. In some embodiments, when a chain of amino acids consists of about two to fifty amino acids, the term “peptide” is used. However, the term “peptide” should not be considered limiting unless expressly indicated.
  • methionine sulfoxides are reduced back to methionine by stereospecific reductases MsrA and MsrB ( FIG. 1 ).
  • the observed methionine-sulfoxide proteome represents a steady-state condition in which oxidation, a chemical event, is balanced by reduction, an enzymatic process.
  • the Msr system protects cells against oxidative damage by a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging mechanism in which methionine residues in proteins function as catalytic antioxidants, and the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzymes then repair the damage to the reversibly oxidized proteins.
  • ROS reactive oxygen species
  • MsrA and MsrB enzymes The enzymatic reversal of methionine oxidation with purified MsrA and MsrB enzymes has been demonstrated in vitro and detected by gel mobility shift, Western blotting with methionine sulfoxide-specific antibodies, and by MS analysis of intact proteins. While some Msr enzymes utilize DTT and other reducing agents in vitro without supplementary enzymes, other Msr enzymes rely on reducing enzymes, such as thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase with NADPH and reducing buffer conditions (e.g. dithiothreitol, DTT) in the reaction to maintain Msr catalytic activity.
  • reducing enzymes such as thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase with NADPH and reducing buffer conditions (e.g. dithiothreitol, DTT) in the reaction to maintain Msr catalytic activity.
  • the invention relates to the use of methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme to reverse methionine oxidation in proteins and peptides prior to purification or analysis, such as liquid chromatography and/or mass spectrometry.
  • sample variability and complexity is reduced by the reversal of methionine oxidation and consolidation of multiple peptide species. In some embodiments, this enables easier interpretation of data, better sensitivity, and/or more accurate quantitation of proteins and peptides in samples, including biological samples.
  • nucleic acids encoding the Msr proteins are provided.
  • Msr proteins are provided which have enzymatic activity in a reducing buffer.
  • methods for treating protein and peptide samples prior to MS analysis are provided. The present disclosure demonstrates that Msr proteins effectively reverse methionine oxidation and improve protein or peptide sample quality and MS results.
  • the reversal of methionine oxidation reduces the number of proteoforms with different masses and the consolidation into fewer intact masses increases the intensity and signal to noise of each form. See, e.g., FIGS. 2 to 7 .
  • each intact mass may be composed of multiple forms of a protein with the same total number of oxidized methionines but at different positions. Such proteoforms appear as one intact mass but can produce a complex combination of unique fragment ions during MS/MS. This increased complexity complicates the data analysis and reduces the sensitivity because of the dilution of signal across many species.
  • the reversal of methionine oxidation by the methods described herein reduces sample complexity, reduces the data analysis time, and improves the quality and confidence in the results. See FIG. 16 .
  • methionines are oxidized in complex proteomic samples after reduction, alkylation, fragmentation (e.g., digestion), and desalting. Methionine oxidation may occur in the cell before lysis, during cell lysis, and/or during the subsequent sample preparation or analysis.
  • methionine sulfoxide reductase can be functional during the reduction of protein disulfides in a mass spectrometry workflow, it may be possible to reduce cysteine disulfides and oxidized methionine simultaneously. See FIG. 8 .
  • MS mass spectrometry
  • peptide samples are analyzed by mass spectrometry (MS), and the resulting spectra are compared with theoretical spectra from known proteins to determine the peptides and proteins in a sample.
  • MS database searches permit methionine oxidation as a variable modification, but such inclusion may double the database search time.
  • the methods provided herein can simplify the MS database searches and reduce the database search time.
  • sample complexity is reduced, improving the database search scores, e.g., by reducing the degrees of freedom and number of false positive hits, and shortening the database search time by eliminating the need to search for methionine oxidation as a variable modification.
  • Targeted quantitation of proteins with mass spectrometry is typically performed by quantifying specific unique peptides of the protein.
  • known amounts of isotope-labeled (e.g., heavy isotope-labeled) versions of these targeted peptides can be used as internal standards for absolute quantitation.
  • peptides containing methionine are avoided because of the potential for oxidation and the resulting variability in quantitative measurements.
  • methionine-containing peptides limits the choice of peptides that can be used to quantify proteins, and may prevent the quantitation of specific peptides of interest, such as when methionine-containing peptides also contain important signaling or regulatory modifications, such as phosphorylation, methylation, acetylation, or ubiquitinylation.
  • treatment using methionine sulfoxide reductases according to the methods described herein can reverse methionine oxidation and permit the targeted quantification of methionine-containing peptides. See, e.g., FIGS. 11 to 13 .
  • methionine oxidation can be removed without altering other modifications, so methionine sulfoxide reductase treatment permits methionine-containing peptides to be monitored with targeted MS assays that may be otherwise difficult or impossible to measure. See, e.g., FIG. 13 .
  • Nonlimiting exemplary Msr enzymes are described herein, and include MsrABs comprising the sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 10-34, and MsrABs that are at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 10-34.
  • the Msr enzyme is derived from a bacterial Msr enzyme. In some embodiments, the Msr enzyme is derived from a bacteria selected from Neisseria, Lautropia, Cardiobacterium, Gammaproteobacteria, Pelistega, Marinospirillum, Basilea, Oligella, Alcagenaceae, Psychrobacter, Brackiella, Taylorella, Moraxella, Enhydrobacter, Fusobacterium, Helcococcus, Paenibacillus , and Eremococcus .
  • a bacteria selected from Neisseria, Lautropia, Cardiobacterium, Gammaproteobacteria, Pelistega, Marinospirillum, Basilea, Oligella, Alcagenaceae, Psychrobacter, Brackiella, Taylorella, Moraxella, Enhydrobacter, Fusobacterium, Helcococcus, Paenibacillus , and Eremococcus .
  • Msr enzymes from
  • the Msr enzyme is derived from a bacterial MsrAB enzyme, i.e., a bacterial enzyme comprising a methionine sulfoxide reductase A domain and a methionine sulfoxide reductase B domain.
  • the bacterial Msr enzyme may optionally comprise a thioredoxin domain.
  • the Msr enzyme is derived from a Neisseria bacteria.
  • the Msr enzyme is derived from Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitides, Neisseria lactamica, Neisseria polysaccharea, Neisseria flavescens, Neisseria sicca, Neisseria macacae , or Neisseria mucosa.
  • ng denotes an MsrAB enzyme from Neisseria gonorrhoeae (e.g., ngMsrAB or ngMsrAB-T).
  • nm denotes an MsrAB enzyme from Neisseria meningitides (e.g., nmMsrAB or nmMsrAB-T).
  • the Msr enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 10-34.
  • the Msr enzyme is from a nonbacterial organism.
  • the Msr enzyme is derived from an Msr enzyme of an organism selected from Methanobrevibacter , Methanomassiliicoccales, Methanocorpusculum , Thermoplasmatales, Methanometylophilus, Methanoculleus, Methanocella , and the like.
  • the Msr enzyme is an MsrAB enzyme.
  • Methanobrevibacter Methanomassiliicoccales, Methanocorpusculum , Thermoplasmatales, Methanometylophilus, Methanoculleus, Methanocella , and the like.
  • the Msr enzyme is an MsrAB enzyme.
  • suitable MsrAB enzymes for use in the present methods.
  • the Msr enzyme from a non-Neisseriaceae bacteria or nonbacterial organism comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID Nos: 10-34.
  • the Msr enzyme is an MsrA enzyme or an MsrB enzyme.
  • the MSR-A comprises a peptide-methionine (S)-S-oxide reductase.
  • an MsrA is derived from an MsrA enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas , and Natrinema .
  • Nonlimiting exemplary such MsrA enzymes can be found in various protein databases and include, for example, MsrA enzymes under accession numbers WP_049944603.1, WP_005043086.1, WP_058572480.1, WP_015322392.1, WP_015408133.1, and WP_006431385.1.
  • an MsrA is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_049944603.1, WP_005043086.1, WP_058572480.1, WP_015322392.1, WP_015408133.1, or WP_006431385.1.
  • the Msr-B comprises a peptide-methionine (R)-S-oxide reductase.
  • an MsrB is derived from an MsrB enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas, Natrinema , and Candidatus Halobonum .
  • MsrB enzymes can be found in various protein databases and include, for example, MsrB enzymes under accession numbers WP_004963222.1, WP_049996544.1, WP_007275637.1, WP_008423757.1, WP_015408129.1, WP_007109050.1, and WP_023395429.1.
  • an MsrB is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_004963222.1, WP_049996544.1, WP_007275637.1, WP_008423757.1, WP_015408129.1, WP_007109050.1, or WP_023395429.1.
  • MsrA and MsrB are derived from MsrA and MsrB enzymes of the same organism.
  • MsrA and MsrB are derived from MsrA and MsrB enzymes of the different organisms. In some embodiments, MsrA and MsrB are derived from MsrA and MsrB enzymes of organisms of the same genus, but different species.
  • an Msr enzyme that is “derived from” an Msr enzyme of a particular organism or of a particular sequence may be modified, such as by truncation or addition of amino acids (such as addition of a tag sequence and/or protease sequence for removal of the tag) relative to the parental Msr enzyme, but retains at least MsrA or MsrB activity.
  • the Msr enzyme derived from an Msr enzyme of a particular organism or of a particular sequence retains at least 50% of the MsrA or MsrB activity (but not necessarily both) of the parental enzyme.
  • a method comprises contacting a polypeptide sample with a mixture of different Msr's. In some embodiments, a single Msr is used. In some embodiments, when a mixture of Msrs is used, the mixture comprises at least one MsrA and at least one MsrB. In some embodiments, a method comprises contacting a polypeptide sample with an MsrAB, with or without additional Msrs. In some embodiments, an MsrAB may be used in conjunction with an MsrA and/or an MsrB.
  • the Msr used is at a concentration of about 100 ng/ml-1 mg/ml, or about 100 ng/ml-500 ⁇ g/ml, or about 100 ng/ml-100 ⁇ g/ml, or about 1 ⁇ g/ml-1 mg/ml, or about 1 ⁇ g/ml-500 ⁇ g/ml, or about 1 ⁇ g/ml-100 ⁇ g/ml, or about 10 ⁇ g/mg-1 mg/ml, or about 10 ⁇ g/mg-500 ⁇ g/ml, or about 10 ⁇ g/mg-100 ⁇ g/ml.
  • the method comprises contacting a polypeptide sample with at least one Msr under conditions suitable for reduction of methionine sulfoxides for 10 minutes to 48 hours, or 30 minutes to 48 ours, or 30 minutes to 24 hours, or 30 minutes to 16 hours, or 1 hour to 48 hours, or 1 hour to 24 hours, or 1 hour to 16 hours, or 1 to 8 hours, or 1 to 6 hours, or 1 to 4 hours.
  • the Msr reaction is incubated at a temperature between 20° C. and 45° C., or between 20° C. and 40° C., or between 22° C. and 40° C., or between 25° C. and 37° C. In some embodiments, the Msr reaction is incubated at 37° C. or 30° C.
  • contacting the Msr with the polypeptide sample occurs under reducing conditions. In some embodiments, contacting of the Msr with the protein sample occurs in the presence of dithiothreitol (DTI) or dithioerythritol (DTE).
  • DTI dithiothreitol
  • DTE dithioerythritol
  • the Msr reaction is terminated. In some embodiments the Msr is removed following reduction of oxidized methionines in the protein sample. In some embodiments the Msr is removed by spinning or pelleting of the sample. In some such embodiments, the Msr enzyme is bound to a solid support, such as a resin or bead. The step to terminate the Msr reaction may occur before, after, or concurrently with a treatment to fragment (e.g., digest) the protein sample.
  • a treatment to fragment e.g., digest
  • Msr methionine sulfoxide reductase
  • Mass spectrometry is a primary technique for analysis of proteins on the basis of their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). MS techniques generally include ionization of compounds and optional fragmentation of the resulting ions, as well as detection and analysis of the m/z of the ions and/or fragment ions followed by calculation of corresponding ionic masses.
  • a “mass spectrometer” generally includes an ionizer and an ion detector. “Mass spectrometry,” “mass spec,” “mass spectroscopy,” and “MS” are used interchangeably throughout.
  • the methods disclosed herein may be applied to any type of MS analysis.
  • the invention is not limited by the specific equipment or analysis used.
  • the use of any equipment with the intent of analyzing the m/z of a sample would be included in the definition of mass spectrometry.
  • Non-limiting examples of MS analysis and/or equipment that may be used include electrospray ionization, ion mobility, time-of-flight, tandem, ion trap, and Orbitrap.
  • the invention is neither limited by the type of ionizer or detector used in the MS analysis nor by the specific configuration of the MS.
  • the invention is not limited to use with the specific equipment and analysis described in the Examples.
  • the invention comprises use of an Msr enzyme for preparing a protein sample for top-down MS analysis, wherein the protein sample is contacted with an Msr enzyme prior to MS analysis.
  • the protein sample is intact (e.g., not fragmented) when contacted with an Msr enzyme.
  • the protein sample is not intact (e.g., fragmented) prior to Msr enzyme contact.
  • the invention comprises use of an Msr enzyme for preparing a protein sample for MS analysis, wherein the MS analysis comprises the step of disassociating intact protein or protein complexes.
  • the use comprises internal fragmentation of the proteins of the sample.
  • the internal fragmentation step may be accomplished by way of Collision Induced Dissociation (CID), Electron Capture Dissociation (ECD), Electron Transfer Dissociation (ETD), or Surface Induced Dissociation (SID), for example.
  • CID Collision Induced Dissociation
  • ECD Electron Capture Dissociation
  • ETD Electron Transfer Dissociation
  • SID Surface Induced Dissociation
  • the disassociating step is prior to Msr enzyme contact, whereas in some embodiments the disassociating step is after Msr enzyme contact.
  • top-down mass spectrometry analysis intact proteins and/or protein complexes are subjected to fragmentation inside the mass spectrometer.
  • top-down analysis preserves the post-translationally modified forms of proteins.
  • top-down analysis may provide close to 100% sequence coverage and may facilitate the study of coordinated regulation of multiple modification sites within a single protein.
  • top-down analysis has the ability to detect protein degradation products, sequence variants, and combination of post-translational modifications and their locations within the intact protein.
  • Methionine oxidation presents a problem for top-down analysis because it increases sample complexity data analysis dramatically. For example, in some instances, each oxidized methionine can split the MS signal (e.g., into non-oxidized and oxidized peaks), a problem that is magnified by the number of methionines in a protein.
  • proteins in a sample are fragmented, for example, by enzymatic digestion using enzymes such as trypsin, and then identified, in some embodiments, using high performance liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry.
  • proteins are denatured, reduced to remove disulfide bonds, and then free cysteines are alkylated to prevent formation of new disulfide bonds.
  • the proteins are then fragmented.
  • the resulting peptides are then separated by liquid chromatography. Mass spectrometry may then be used to identify the peptides, e.g., by matching the fragmentation pattern to theoretical tandem mass spectrometry databases.
  • Msr enzyme for preparing a protein sample may be combined with any other steps taken to prepare samples for MS analysis.
  • proteins within the sample are separated from other components of samples. In some embodiments, the proteins in the sample are not fragmented. In some embodiments, proteins in the sample are subjected to liquid chromatography before or after reduction of methionine sulfoxides according to the present methods. In some embodiments, proteins in the sample are subjected to capillary electrophoresis before or after reduction of methionine sulfoxides according to the present methods.
  • liquid chromatography is used for physical separation of protein samples.
  • HPLC high performance liquid chromatography
  • Nonlimiting exemplary LC includes reversed phase LC (RP-LC) and normal phase LC (NP-LC).
  • RP-LC reversed phase LC
  • NP-LC normal phase LC
  • CE capillary electrophoresis
  • LC may be used in conjunction with MS.
  • an LC system may be linked to an MS (i.e., LC-MS or HPLC-MS), see Thompson M, AMC Technical Brief #34, 2008.
  • capillary electrophoresis CE
  • the LC-MS ionization technique is electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI), or atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI), see Basics of LCIMS, Agilent Technologies, 2001.
  • LC-MS any type of mass analyzer may be used for LC-MS, including quadrupole, time-of-flight, ion trap, or Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR or FT-MS).
  • FT-ICR Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance
  • LC-MS includes internal fragmentation during the MS analysis.
  • the protein sample comprises fragmented protein.
  • the fragmented protein sample includes proteins or peptides of a size that can be analyzed by the selected method.
  • a fragmented protein sample comprises peptide of 5 to 100 amino acids in length.
  • the protein sample comprises predominantly peptides of between 2-100, 5-100, 5-90, 5-80, 5-70, 5-60, 5-50, 5-40, 5-30, 10-90, 10-80, 10-70, 10-60, 10-50, 10-40, 10-30, or 10-20 amino acids in length.
  • the protein fragments comprises predominantly peptides of 5 to 50 amino acids in length.
  • the protein sample comprises protein fragments.
  • the protein fragments are generated by an enzyme.
  • the protein sample comprises fragmented protein (e.g., protease-digested protein fragments).
  • a method provided herein comprises use of an Msr for preparing a protein sample for bottom-up MS analysis.
  • the protein sample contacted with the Msr is fragmented before or after treatment with the Msr.
  • a method provided herein comprises use of an Msr for preparing a protein sample for top-down MS analysis.
  • the protein is contacted with the Msr enzyme prior to fragmentation.
  • protein samples are denatured or solubilized before fragmentation.
  • the fragmentation protocol uses chemical cleavage. In some embodiments, the chemical cleavage uses CNBr. In some embodiments, the fragmentation protocol is done using an enzyme. In some embodiments, the fragmentation protocol uses MS-grade commercially available proteases. Examples of proteases that may be used to digest samples include trypsin, endoproteinase GluC, endoproteinase ArgC, pepsin, chymotrypsin, LysN protease, LysC protease, GluC protease, AspN protease, proteinase K, and thermolysin. In some embodiments, a mixture of different proteases are used and the individual results are combined together after the digestion and analysis.
  • the digestion is incomplete in order to see larger, overlapping peptides.
  • the antibody digestion is performed with IdeS, IdeZ, pepsin, or papain to generate large antibody domains for “middle-down” protein characterization.
  • the fragmentation protocol uses trypsin that is modified.
  • a protein:protease ratio (w/w) of 10:1, 20:1, 25:1, 50:1, 66:1, or 100:1 may be used.
  • the trypsin used is at a concentration of about 100 ng/ml-1 mg/ml, or about 100 ng/ml-500 ⁇ g/ml, or about 100 ng/ml-100 ⁇ g/ml, or about 1 ⁇ g/ml-1 mg/ml, or about 1 ⁇ g/ml-500 ⁇ g/ml, or about 1 ⁇ g/ml-100 ⁇ g/ml, or about 10 ⁇ g/mg-1 mg/ml, or about 10 ⁇ g/mg-500 ⁇ g/ml, or about 10 ⁇ g/mg-100 ⁇ g/ml.
  • the digestion step is for 10 minutes to 48 hours, or 30 minutes to 48 ours, or 30 minutes to 24 hours, or 30 minutes to 16 hours, or 1 hour to 48 hours, or 1 hour to 24 hours, or 1 hour to 16 hours, or 1 to 8 hours, or 1 to 6 hours, or 1 to 4 hours.
  • the digestion step is incubated at a temperature between 20° C. and 45° C., or between 20° C. and 40° C., or between 22° C. and 40° C., or between 25° C. and 37° C.
  • the digestion step is incubated at 37° C. or 30° C.
  • a step is included to end the digestion step.
  • the step to end the digestion protocol may be addition of a stop solution or a step of spinning or pelleting of a sample.
  • the step to end the digestion step may occur before, after, or concurrently with treatment with the Msr.
  • the digestion is followed by guanidation.
  • the fragmentation protocol includes use of protein gels. In some embodiments, the fragmentation protocol comprises in-gel digestion.
  • An exemplary commercially available kit for performing in-gel digestion is the In-Gel Tryptic Digestion Kit (Thermo Fisher Cat#89871).
  • the fragmentation protocol is carried out in solution.
  • An exemplary commercially available kit for performing in-solution digestion is the In-Solution Tryptic Digestion and Guanidiation Kit (Thermo Fisher Cat#89895).
  • the fragmentation protocol uses beads. In some embodiments, the fragmentation protocol comprises on-bead digestion. In some embodiments, agarose beads or Protein G beads are used. In some embodiments, magnetic beads are used.
  • protein samples are separated using liquid chromatography before MS analysis.
  • fragmented samples are separated using liquid chromatography before MS analysis.
  • kits comprising at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase (Msr) enzyme.
  • the at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide.
  • the kit comprises at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide and at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide.
  • the kit comprises an MsrA enzyme and an MsrB enzyme.
  • the kit comprises at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide, such as an MsrAB enzyme.
  • Nonlimiting exemplary Msr enzymes that may be included in kits are described herein, and include, for example, MsrAB enzymes derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase from an organism selected from Neisseria, Lautropia, Cardiobacterium, Gammaproteobacteria, Pelistega, Marinospirillum, Basilea, Oligella, Alcagenaceae, Psychrobacter, Brackiella, Taylorella, Moraxella, Enhydrobacter, Fusobacterium, Helcococcus, Paenibacillus, Eremococcus, Methanobrevibacter, Methanomassiliicoccales, Methanocorpusculum, Thermoplasmatales, Methanometylophilus, Methanoculleus , and Methanocella .
  • MsrAB enzymes derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase from an organism selected from Neisseria, Lautropia, Cardiobacter
  • the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a bacterial enzyme.
  • the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitides, Neisseria lactamica, Neisseria polysaccharea, Neisseria flavescens, Neisseria sicca, Neisseria macacae , or Neisseria mucosa .
  • the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 10 to 34.
  • the one or more Msr enzymes in a kit may be bound to a solid support, such as a resin or bead.
  • Kits may further comprises one or more additional reagents for preparing a polypeptide sample for liquid chromatography. Kits may further comprises one or more additional reagents for preparing a polypeptide sample for mass spectrometry analysis.
  • a kit comprises at least one reagent for fragmenting a polypeptide sample for mass spectrometry analysis.
  • Nonlimiting exemplary reagents for fragmenting a polypeptide sample include trypsin, chymotrypsin, AspN, GluC, LysC, LysN, ArgC, proteinase K, thermolysin, and CNBr.
  • Methionine oxidation causes signal splitting of mass spectrometry (MS) of intact proteins, thus leading to increases in data complexities. Means of reducing methionine oxidation may thus improve MS data. Therefore, a model system was developed to study methionine oxidation and reduction that uses H 2 O 2 , which has been described as a means of monitoring methionine oxidation of methionine-rich proteins (see Le D T et al., Biochemistry 47(25):6685-6694 (2008) and Liang et al., BMC Biochemistry 13:21 (2012)).
  • oxidized methionines i.e., methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide
  • Msrs methionine sulfoxide reductases
  • Turboluciferase (TurboLuc, SEQ ID No: 3) was selected for optimization of methionine oxidation and reduction reactions due to its compatibility with mass spectrometry.
  • Initial experiments showed that treatment of 5 ⁇ g/ml of TurboLuc with 1 mM, 10 mM, or 100 mM hydrogen peroxide reduced the activity of TurboLuc by greater than 1000-fold using the TurboLuc flash assay (data not shown), indicating that TurboLuc was susceptible to oxidation.
  • oxidation conditions were assessed by determining the number of moles of methionine in a sample and adding different ratios of moles of peroxide to each. After oxidation, each sample had DIT added to a final concentration of 5 mM while keeping the solution at a neutral pH and either ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB were added. Ratios of methionine:peroxide of 10:1, 1:1, 1:10, 1:25, 1:75, 1:100, and 1:500 were examined using the following conditions:
  • the incubation with hydrogen peroxide was at 37° C. for 1 hour.
  • the sample was spun down using a using a 3K MWCO buffer exchange protein concentrator (Fisher, Product #11345402) for 1 hour at 16,000 ⁇ g.
  • the sample was then buffer exchanged into a slightly basic solution of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer and appropriate water to create a concentration of 0.5 ⁇ g/ ⁇ L.
  • Reduction reactions were performed by reacting the oxidized sample with methionine sulfoxide reductase (Msr) enzymes, using either ngMsrAB (SEQ ID No: 1) or nmMsrAB (SEQ ID No: 2).
  • Msr methionine sulfoxide reductase
  • SEQ ID No: 1 is an N-terminal histidine tagged protein with a WQ domain fused to the full-length MsrAB from Neisseria gonorrhoeae , also known as “ngMsrAB”.
  • ngMsrAB methionine sulfoxide reductase
  • SEQ ID No: 2 is an N-terminal histidine tagged protein with a WQ domain fused to the full-length MsrAB from Neisseria meningitides , also known as “nmMsrAB”.
  • the Msr enzyme fusion proteins of SEQ ID Nos: 1 and 2 were expressed, purified, and used for determining the effect of methionine reduction on MS profiles.
  • Coomassie gels shown in FIGS. 14 and 15 indicate that a predominant protein of the expected molecular weight was obtained for SEQ ID No: 1 (“ngMsrAB”) and SEQ ID No: 2 (“nmMsrAB”).
  • one of the two Msrs was added to the oxidized TurboLuc solution at an enzyme:sample protein ratio of 1:4 and DTI of a final concentration of 5 mM. Both enzymes were used in separate experiments as shown below.
  • samples plus Msr were incubated at 37° C. for 2 hours with gentle vortexing throughout. Samples were cleaned using 3K MWCO concentrators, and the volume was brought up to 200 ⁇ l with 0.1% formic acid.
  • the other half of the cleaned-up intact protein sample was injected onto a ProSwift RP-4H 100 ⁇ m ⁇ 25 cm monolithic column and separated by a gradient of water and acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid. Automatic fragmentation was performed using data dependent analysis. Data analysis and visualization were done using ProSight Lite v1.2 Build 1.2.5595.15524 software that allows identification and characterization via intact protein analysis and top-down analysis.
  • FIG. 2 shows MS data in the absence of hydrogen peroxide for un-oxidized samples and for samples treated with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB. Peaks corresponding to native TurboLuc and oxidized TurboLuc are indicated with boxes. These data indicate a relatively low level of baseline methionine oxidation of TurboLuc.
  • FIG. 4 indicates that 25 ⁇ peroxide treatment (25:1 peroxide:methionine corresponding to 1.35 mM H 2 O 2 ) increased methionine oxidation of TurboLac. This is apparent in new peaks in spectrum region corresponding to oxidized TurboLac as well as larger relative abundance of the peaks corresponding to oxidized TurboLuc.
  • Treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB (at a ratio of 1:4 of enzyme to sample) counteracted the effect of 25 ⁇ peroxide treatment, and the MS data obtained with these samples were similar to those shown in FIG. 2 for un-oxidized sample not reacted with hydrogen peroxide.
  • FIGS. 4-7 outline successful conditions for reduction of methionine oxidation of TurboLac with Msr treatment using LC-MS for intact protein analysis.
  • Msr enzymes ngMsrAB and nmMsrAB there was successful reversal of methionine oxidation of TurboLuc following peroxide treatment with use of the Msr enzymes ngMsrAB and nmMsrAB.
  • the present protocol indicates that the hybrid Msr treatment is a novel means to improve MS analysis of intact proteins due to the reduction of methionine oxidation. Therefore, top-down proteomic analysis can be significantly improved by this novel use of Msr enzymes, such as ngMsrAB and nmMsrAB, to reduce the complexity of data induced by peak splitting of oxidized methionines.
  • the protocol for top-down analysis of intact proteins was performed as follows. First, 24.6 ⁇ l of 0.5M dithiothreitol (DTT) was added to 1.23 mL of 700 ⁇ g/ml of whole protein to make a final DIT concentration of 10 mM and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Next, 126 ⁇ l of 0.5M iodoacetamide (IAM) was added to the mixture to make a final IAM concentration of 50 mM, and the mixture was incubated in dark at room temperature for 20 minutes. Then, 126 ⁇ l of 0.5M IAM was added to make a final IAM concentration of 50 mM, and the mixture was further incubated in dark at room temperature for 20 minutes. Next, 54.3 ⁇ l of 0.5M DIT was added to bring its final concentration to 20 mM, and the mixture was incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature.
  • DTT dithiothreitol
  • IAM iodoacetamide
  • the sample was spun down using a using a 3K MWCO buffer exchange protein concentrator (Fisher, Product #11345402) for 1 hour at 16,000 ⁇ g.
  • the sample was then buffer exchanged into a slightly basic solution of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer and appropriate water to create a concentration of 0.333 ⁇ g/ ⁇ L.
  • the preceding procedures were used to create a 500 ⁇ l sample of 5 ⁇ g/ml for each condition from a 10 ⁇ g/ml TurboLuc stock sample for further steps for reduction of the methionines or for a control oxidized sample.
  • FIG. 16 is a theoretical image presenting the tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) spectra for a native and Msr-treated protein.
  • the theoretical native protein shows multiple oxidized (“ox”) peaks, while the Msr-treated protein contains a predominant peak that is non-oxidized.
  • the starred region in the upper panels shows the m/z (mass-to-charge ratio) region selected for MS fragmentation.
  • the lower panels show that the native protein has an MS/MS that is convoluted due to the large number of oxidized precursors that are shifting many of the MS/MS peaks by 16 Da for each oxidized methionine whereas proteins can have dozens of potentially oxidizable methionines.
  • the number of oxidized methionines is indicative of the shift in m/z from the number (N) of 16 Da mass shifts.
  • the Msr-treated sample of the same protein shows a cleaner MS/MS spectrum, due to the fact that there is only one dominant precursor non-oxidized peak that was present in the m/z range selected for fragmentation.
  • the process of shotgun proteomic analysis is outlined in FIG. 8 . Proteins were digested and the resulting peptides were separated by LC followed by mass spectrometry.
  • the PierceTM 6 Protein Digest, equimolar, LC-MS grade (product #88342) was used as a complex digestion mixture with an estimated methionine concentration for oxidation and subsequent reduction by ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB.
  • a non-oxidized peptide mixture was set-aside as a control to be reduced by ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB later in the protocol.
  • the following conditions for the oxidation reactions are as follows:
  • the clean peptide sample was collected with 300 ⁇ L 80% acetonitrile, and SpeedVac was used to dry the sample.
  • the sample was re-suspended in 700 ⁇ l of 0.1% formic acid, and a peptide concentration assay was done to determine the peptide concentration for further steps.
  • Tris-HCl was added to a final concentration of 50 mM to produce a basic pH and appropriate water to create a concentration of 0.333 ⁇ g/ ⁇ L.
  • Samples were treated with ngMsrAB and nmMsrAB using the following conditions.
  • the peptide mixtures were then injected onto a C18 column (Acclaim PepMap 100 75 ⁇ m ⁇ 100 ⁇ m C18) and separated by a gradient of water and acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid.
  • the resulting liquid flow was infused into the Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer via electrospray ionization utilizing data dependent analysis for collection of MS/MS spectra.
  • the resulting raw data were processed using Thermo Proteome Discoverer 1.4, and a database search was performed matching theoretical spectra to experimental spectra. For the database search, oxidation was selected as a variable modification or oxidation was not selected at all.
  • FIG. 9 outlines the percentage of methionine oxidation seen with different methionine:peroxide ratios. Results are presented both for oxidized methionine (O) and doubly oxidized methionine (D). In addition, the ratio of oxidized methionines to total methionines is presented for each condition. For each methionine:peroxide ratio, one sample was included that did not include either ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB and thus provided a measure of 100% methionine oxidation for those conditions. As shown in FIG. 9 , data confirmed high levels of methionine oxidation in all samples that were not treated with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB.
  • PRM parallel reaction monitoring
  • Quantitative PRM analysis was done using the Q Exactive HF Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (QE-HF) (Thermo Fisher).
  • QE-HF Q Exactive HF Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer
  • the sample used to validate methionine reduction by Msr treatment was a 3-peptide mix prepared from commercially prepared peptide standards that included SEQ ID Nos: 4, 6, and 8 as listed in the following table.
  • the three oxidized heavy peptides including both phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated peptides were mixed with a digested 6-protein mix background matrix (40 ng/ ⁇ l, as described in Example 2) and IM tetraethylammonium bromide (TEAB) to a concentration of 2 mM to produce a slightly basic pH.
  • a digested 6-protein mix background matrix 40 ng/ ⁇ l, as described in Example 2
  • IM tetraethylammonium bromide TEAB
  • the ratio of enzyme:protein was 1:4, and DTT had a final concentration of 5 mM for all reactions.
  • Samples were incubated at 37° C. for 2 hours with gentle vortexing throughout.
  • the resulting peptide mixture was then injected onto a C18 column (Easy-Spray PepMap C18, 3 ⁇ m, 75 ⁇ m ⁇ 150 cm) and separated by a gradient of water and acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid.
  • the resulting liquid flow was infused into the Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer via electrospray ionization utilizing parallel reaction monitoring for collection of targeted spectra.
  • the resulting raw data were processed and visualized using Skyline 3.1.0.7382 open source PRM analysis software.
  • FIG. 11A shows the disappearance of methionine oxidation of one peptide in the mix (SEQ ID No: 4) following treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB
  • FIG. 11B shows the appearance of the peptide reduced at the methionine residue with treatment (SEQ ID No: 5).
  • the bar graph areas show the cumulative area under the curve of individual b-ion and y-ion fragments (shown with different gray-scale shading) following treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB.
  • Msr treatment was performed on the phosphoprotein SEQ ID No: 6, wherein there is a phosphorylated serine residue in addition to an oxidized methionine and cysteine residue.
  • Treatment of SEQ ID No: 6 with ngMsrAB or nmMsrABT produced a disappearance of SEQ ID No: 6 (as shown in FIG. 12A ) and the appearance of the phosphopeptide SEQ ID No: 7 that retained phosphorylation of the serine and oxidation of cysteine residues, but had reduction of the methionine residue (as shown in FIG. 12B ).
  • Msr treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB can produce a quantitative reduction of methionine oxidation with high specificity such that other post-translational modifications (including cysteine oxidation and serine phosphorylation) are maintained.
  • Msr treatment was further confirmed with the third peptide in the 3-peptide mix, SEQ ID No: 8, which is also a phosphopeptide (i.e., the second phosphopeptide).
  • SEQ ID No: 8 has both a phosphorylated serine and an oxidized methionine residue.
  • FIG. 13A Msr treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB produced a disappearance of SEQ ID No: 8.
  • FIG. 13B shows that these treatments caused the appearance of a reduced phophopeptide that lacked an oxidated methionine but maintained the serine phosphorylation (SEQ ID No: 9).
  • FIG. 16 is a theoretical image presenting the tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) spectra for a native and Msr-treated protein.
  • the theoretical native protein shows multiple oxidized (“ox”) peaks, while the Msr-treated protein contains a predominant peak that is non-oxidized.
  • the starred region in the upper panels shows the m/z (mass-to-charge ratio) region selected for MS fragmentation.
  • the lower panels show that the native protein has an MS/MS that is convoluted due to the large number of oxidized precursors that are shifting many of the MS/MS peaks by 16 Daltons (Da) for each oxidized methionine whereas proteins can have dozens of potentially oxidizable methionines.
  • the number of oxidized methionines is indicative of the shift in m/z from the number (N) of 16 Da mass shifts.
  • the Msr-treated sample of the same protein shows a cleaner MS/MS spectrum, due to the fact that there is only one dominant precursor non-oxidized peak that was present in the m/z range selected for fragmentation.
  • FIGS. 11, 12, and 13 indicate that Msr treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB can overcome variable oxidation of methionine residues in targeted analysis.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Enzymes And Modification Thereof (AREA)
  • Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
  • Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

This disclosure relates to the field of protein preparation and mass spectrometry analysis. In some embodiments, the disclosure relates to compositions and methods for simplifying mass spectrometry analysis by reducing methionine oxidation of protein samples.

Description

  • This application is a 371 National Stage filing of PCT/US2017/012121, filed Jan. 4, 2017, which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/279,421, filed Jan. 15, 2016, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/368,336, filed Jul. 29, 2016, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for any purpose.
  • This disclosure relates to the field of protein preparation, for example, protein preparation prior to liquid chromatography and/or mass spectrometry analysis.
  • Methionine (Met) is a sulfur-containing essential amino acid that is highly susceptible to oxidation by reactive oxygen species (ROS) during stress, aging, and disease in vivo. Met residues are believed to act as a scavenger for reactive oxygen species, minimizing oxidative damage to other amino acids and biomolecules in the cell and protecting active site residues from oxidation. Met oxidation can also affect protein structure and function and can serve as a biological switch that is sensitive to oxidative stress. Methionine oxidation is also commonly observed during protein purification and analysis in vitro. The product of Met oxidation is Met sulfoxide (MetO), which exists in the form of two diastereomers, methionine S-sulfoxide and methionine R-sulfoxide.
  • Methionine oxidation can occur during protein sample preparation and purification. The release of peroxisomal contents during tissue and cellular lysis, the exposure of protein-containing solutions during sample processing to air, ionizing light and radiation, and exposure to metals that produce free radicals via the Fenton reaction can all cause methionine oxidation during preparation or storage. Variable methionine oxidation of purified proteins, including biotherapeutic proteins, leads to lower and variable product quality, and the ability to reverse or prevent methionine oxidation would benefit protein therapeutics.
  • Some of this oxidation can be prevented by free radical scavengers (e.g. glycerols) or metal chelators (e.g. EDTA), but some of the oxidation may be introduced naturally in the cell prior to any processing. The reversal of methionine oxidation, whether introduced in vivo or in vitro, with chemical treatment has been described, but this requires extreme pH conditions that may affect proteins in undesirable ways (e.g. precipitation, deamidation, or other modifications). Complete oxidation of methionine to sulfone has also been attempted, but the side reactions from over-oxidation at cysteine, tryptophan, and other amino acids produced undesirable results.
  • Methionine oxidation is commonly observed by mass spectrometry. Oxidation of methionines and other amino acids typically manifests itself as a series of 15.995 Da mass increases from the original unmodified mass spectral peak of the proteoforms of interest. The stochastic nature of this variable oxidation may interfere with protein liquid chromatography and/or mass spectrometry analysis in at least four ways: 1) poor peak shape and resolution during liquid chromatography; 2) increased complexity and poorer depth of analysis of intact proteins due to multiple oxidized proteoforms; 3) increased complexity and poorer depth of analysis of peptides from protein digests due to multiple oxidized forms, and; 4) impaired quantitation of specific methionine-containing peptides due to reduced sensitivity and variability in the stoichiometry of oxidized peptides.
  • Further, the increased hydrophilicity of a protein caused by methionine oxidation affects retention and chromatography. This results in peaks for each oxidized form of a protein, less intense peaks from each protein form due to dilution of the protein forms across multiple peaks, and greater variability in peak areas because of random, incomplete, and variable stoichiometry of oxidation at each methionine in a sequence. In addition, the diasteromers of methionine sulfoxide in a protein or peptide may be resolved or spread into overlapping peaks with high performance liquid chromatography. This peak broadening and poor resolution further affects sensitivity, peak integration, and quantitation. The reversal of methionine oxidation can improve protein chromatography by improving sample purity and chromatographic behavior.
  • Mass spectrometry is used to characterize intact proteins and complexes at the molecular level. While the analysis of intact proteins can provide important insights, the isolation and fragmentation of these proteins in the mass spectrometer by collisional and non-ergodic approaches provides information about the complete sequence and sites of modification of a protein. This intact protein MS/MS approach is often referred to as “top-down” or “middle-down” protein analysis. Methionine oxidation increases sample complexity and severely impairs top-down protein analysis because it increases sample complexity and complicates the data analysis. For each methionine in a protein (N), the number of proteoforms caused by variable oxidation of each methionine to the sulfoxide form may be up to the factorial of N.
  • Oxidation of proteins during electrospray ionization has been known for over 20 years. Methionine oxidation has been shown to occur during the electrospray ionization of proteins for MS analysis. This oxidation can be limited or prevented by using polished metal surfaces and by modifying the liquid chromatography or electrochemical junction to avoid direct application of high voltage to protein containing solution.
  • The present disclosure provides methods of reducing or eliminating methionine oxidation in protein samples prior to separation and/or analysis, such as, for example, liquid chromatography and/or mass spectrometry analysis.
  • In some embodiments, methods of preparing a polypeptide sample for separation and/or analysis are provided, comprising contacting the polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide: reductase enzyme under conditions suitable for reducing oxidized methionines in the polypeptide sample. In some embodiments, at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide. In some embodiments, the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide and at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide. In some embodiments, the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with an MsrA enzyme and an MsrB enzyme. In some embodiments, an MsrA is derived from an MsrA enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas, and Natrinema. In some embodiments, an MsrA is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_049944603.1, WP_005043086.1, WP_058572480.1, WP_015322392.1, WP_015408133.1, and WP_006431385.1. In some embodiments, an MsrB is derived from an MsrB enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas, Natrinema, and Candidatus Halobonum. In some embodiments, an MsrB is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_004963222.1, WP_049996544.1, WP_007275637.1, WP_008423757.1, WP_015408129.1, WP_007109050.1, and WP_023395429.1. In various embodiments, an MsrA and MsrB may be from the same or different organism.
  • In some embodiments, the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide. In some embodiments, the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with an MsrAB enzyme. In some embodiments, the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase from an organism selected from Neisseria, Lautropia, Cardiobacterium, Gammaproteobacteria, Pelistega, Marinospirillum, Basilea, Oligella, Alcagenaceae, Psychrobacter, Brackiella, Taylorella, Moraxella, Enhydrobacter, Fusobacterium, Helcococcus, Paenibacillus, Eremococcus, Methanobrevibacter, Methanomassiliicoccales, Methanocorpusculum, Thermoplasmatales, Methanometylophilus, Methanoculleus, and Methanocella. In some embodiments, the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a bacterial methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme. In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitides, Neisseria lactamica, Neisseria polysaccharea, Neisseria flavescens, Neisseria sicca, Neisseria macacacae, or Neisseria mucosa. In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 10 to 34.
  • In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is bound to a solid support. In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is bound to a resin or a bead. In some embodiments, the method further comprises removing the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme following reduction of oxidized methionines in the polypeptide sample.
  • In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is present at a weight ratio of between 1:100 and 1:2 enzyme:polypeptide. In some embodiments, the contacting occurs under reducing conditions. In some embodiments, the contacting occurs in the presence of dithiothreitol (DTT) and/or dithioerythritol (DTE). In some embodiments, the method comprises preparing a sample for liquid chromatography. In some embodiments, the method further comprises subjecting polypeptides of the polypeptide sample to liquid chromatography. In some embodiments, the liquid chromatography is high performance liquid chromatography.
  • In some embodiments, the method comprises preparing a sample for capillary electrophoresis. In some embodiments, the method further comprises subjecting polypeptides of the polypeptide sample to capillary electrophoresis.
  • In some embodiments, the method comprises preparing a sample for mass spectrometry. In some embodiments, the method further comprises subjecting polypeptides of the polypeptide sample to mass spectrometry.
  • In some embodiments, the method comprises fragmenting the polypeptides of the polypeptide sample. In some embodiments, the method comprises fragmenting the polypeptides by proteolytic or chemical cleavage. In some embodiments, the fragmented polypeptides are peptides consisting of 5 to 50 amino acids. In some embodiments, the method comprises fragmenting the polypeptides by digestion with trypsin, chymotrypsin, AspN, GluC, LysC, LysN, ArgC, proteinase K, or thermolysin, or by chemical cleavage with CNBr. In some embodiments, the method comprises separating the polypeptides on a gel and then fragmenting the polypeptides in gel.
  • In some embodiments, the polypeptides of the polypeptide sample were previously fragmented. In some embodiments, the polypeptides were fragmented by proteolytic or chemical cleavage. In some embodiments, the polypeptide fragments are peptides consisting of 5 to 50 amino acids. In some embodiments, the polypeptide fragments were produced by digestion with trypsin, chymotrypsin, AspN, GluC, LysC, LysN, ArgC, proteinase K, or thermolysin, or by chemical cleavage with CNBr. In some embodiments, the polypeptide fragments were produced in solution or in gel following gel separation of the protein. In some embodiments, the method comprises separating the polypeptides or polypeptide fragments from other components of the polypeptide sample. In some embodiments, the method comprises subjecting the polypeptides or polypeptide fragments to mass spectrometry analysis. In some embodiments, the mass spectrometry analysis comprises internal fragmentation of the polypeptides or polypeptide fragments.
  • In some embodiments, methods of producing a mass spectrometry spectrum are provided, comprising contacting polypeptides of a polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme under conditions suitable for reducing oxidized methionines in the polypeptide sample, and injecting the polypeptides into a liquid chromatograph/mass spectrometer detection system or directly into a mass spectrometer detection system, wherein the polypeptides of the polypeptide sample have not been fragmented. In some embodiments, at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide. In some embodiments, the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide and at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide. In some embodiments, the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with an MsrA enzyme and an MsrB enzyme. In some embodiments, an MsrA is derived from an MsrA enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas, and Natrinema. In some embodiments, an MsrA is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_049944603.1, WP_005043086.1, WP_058572480.1, WP_015322392.1, WP_015408133.1, and WP_006431385.1. In some embodiments, an MsrB is derived from an MsrB enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas, Natrinema, and Candidatus Halobonum. In some embodiments, an MsrB is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_004963222.1, WP_049996544.1, WP_007275637.1, WP_008423757.1, WP_015408129.1, WP_007109050.1, and WP_023395429.1. In various embodiments, an MsrA and MsrB may be from the same or different organism.
  • In some embodiments, the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide. In some embodiments, the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with an MsrAB enzyme. In some embodiments, the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase from an organism selected from Neisseria, Lautropia, Cardiobacterium, Gammaproteobacteria, Pelistega, Marinospirillum, Basilea, Oligella, Alcagenaceae, Psychrobacter, Brackiella, Taylorella, Moraxella, Enhydrobacter, Fusobacterium, Helcococcus, Paenibacillus, Eremococcus, Methanobrevibacter, Methanomassiliicoccales, Methanocorpusculum, Thermoplasmatales, Methanometylophilus, Methanoculleus, and Methanocella. In some embodiments, the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a bacterial methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme. In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is derived from a Neisseria methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme. In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitides, Neisseria lactamica, Neisseria polysaccharea, Neisseria flavescens, Neisseria sicca, Neisseria macacae, or Neisseria mucosa. In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 10 to 34.
  • In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is bound to a solid support. In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is bound to a resin or a bead. In some embodiments, the method further comprises removing the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme following reduction of oxidized methionines in the polypeptide sample.
  • In some embodiments, each methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is present at a weight ratio of between 1:100 and 1:2 enzyme:polypeptide. In some embodiments, the contacting occurs under reducing conditions. In some embodiments, the contacting occurs in the presence of dithiothreitol (DTT) or dithioerythritol (DTE).
  • In some embodiments, kits comprising at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme are provided. In some embodiments, a kit comprises at least one reagent for fragmenting a polypeptide sample for mass spectrometry analysis. In some embodiments, the kit comprises at least one reagent selected from trypsin, chymotrypsin, AspN, GluC, LysC, LysN, ArgC, proteinase K, thermolysin, and CNBr. In some embodiments, the at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide. In some embodiments, the kit comprises at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide and at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide. In some embodiments, the kit comprises an MsrA enzyme and an MsrB enzyme. In some embodiments, an MsrA is derived from an MsrA enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas, and Natrinema. In some embodiments, an MsrA is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_049944603.1, WP_005043086.1, WP_058572480.1, WP_015322392.1, WP_015408133.1, and WP_006431385.1. In some embodiments, an MsrB is derived from an MsrB enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas, Natrinema, and Candidatus Halobonum. In some embodiments, an MsrB is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_004963222.1, WP_049996544.1, WP_007275637.1, WP_008423757.1, WP_015408129.1, WP_007109050.1, and WP_023395429.1. In various embodiments, an MsrA and MsrB may be from the same or different organism.
  • In some embodiments, the kit comprises at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide. In some embodiments, the kit comprises an MsrAB enzyme. In some embodiments, the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase from an organism selected from Neisseria, Lautropia, Cardiobacterium, Gammaproteobacteria, Pelistega, Marinospirillum, Basilea, Oligella, Alcagenaceae, Psychrobacter, Brackiella, Taylorella, Moraxella, Enhydrobacter, Fusobacterium, Helcococcus, Paenibacillus, Eremococcus, Methanobrevibacter, Methanomassiliicoccales, Methanocorpusculum, Thermoplasmatales, Methanometylophilus, Methanoculleus, and Methanocella. In some embodiments, the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a bacterial methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme. In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitides, Neisseria lactamica, Neisseria polysaccharea, Neisseria flavescens, Neisseria sicca, Neisseria macacacae, or Neisseria mucosa. In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 10 to 34.
  • In some embodiments, a kit comprises at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme bound to a solid support. In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is bound to a resin or a bead.
  • In some embodiments, methods of reducing the complexity of a protein sample are provided. In some embodiments, methods of reducing the complexity of a protein sample prior to analysis by mass spectrometry (MS) are provided. In some embodiments, oxidized methionine stereoisomers are reduced by methionine sulfoxide reductase A and methionine sulfoxide reductase B (MsrA and MsrB) to restore methionine sulfoxide residues back to native methionine amino acids. See, e.g., FIG. 1. In some embodiments, this reduces sample variability and complexity by consolidating multiple versions of a methionine-containing protein into one species, which in some instances permits more efficient and sensitive MS acquisition and faster data analysis. In various embodiments, the sample may be a purified or enriched protein sample, or may be a complex biological sample. The purpose of analysis may, in various embodiments, be identification, characterization, and/or quantitation of a protein. Further, in various embodiments, the reduction of methionine sulfoxide to methionine may be performed before, during, and/or after the reduction of cysteines and cysteine disulfides and/or fragmentation of the protein. In various embodiments, the methods are used in a diagnostic assay. In some embodiments, the methods are used during multi-sample analysis and/or multi-target analysis.
  • In some embodiments, methods for protein or peptide quantitation by mass spectrometry are provided. In some such embodiments, a method comprises (a) preparing a sample containing a target protein or peptide of interest for mass spectrometry analysis, (b) adding an isotope-labeled peptide or protein (such as a heavy, stable isotope-labeled peptide or protein) having at least one subsequence of the target protein or peptide containing methionine, (c) mixing the isotope labeled peptides or proteins at known concentrations with the sample, (d) treating the sample with a methionine sulfoxide reductase (such as MsrA/B) and reagents suitable for MsrA/B activity, to reduce methionine sulfoxide residues to methionine, (e) subjecting the mixture containing the prepared sample and the isotope-labeled proteins or peptides to mass spectrometry analysis. In some embodiments, a single additive heavy peptide mass spectrometry peak is obtained with the corresponding single light peptide (i.e., non-isotope-labeled peptide) mass spectrometry peak. In some embodiments, the method further comprises (f) subjecting the mass peaks to isolation and fragmentation by mass spectrometry analysis. In some embodiments, unique and confirming mass spectrometry peaks are obtained representing the protein or peptide fragments of the light and isotope-labeled (such as heavy isotope labeled) proteins or peptides. In some embodiments, the method further comprises (g) generating a light peptide intensity: heavy peptide intensity ratio, and (h) quantifying the intensity of each of the plurality of mass spectrometry peaks based on the intensity of the heavy isotope labeled peptides, e.g., to quantify the amount of protein or peptide in the sample. In some embodiments, the isotope-labeled peptides and proteins are prepared by synthesizing the peptides or proteins in vitro or in vivo with amino acid precursors that contain isotopes or oxidized methionine, resulting in isotope-labeled peptides and proteins that may contain native or oxidized methionine.
  • In some embodiments, a method of using a methionine sulfoxide reductase (Msr) protein sequence to monitor the consistency and completeness of fragmentation (such as digestion) of a protein sample is provided. For example, a known amount of soluble Msr enzyme may be added to a sample to reverse methionine oxidation prior to proteolytic digestion, and the known and unique peptides from the Msr enzyme may be monitored to assess the efficiency of fragmentation and recovery of peptides.
  • In some embodiments, methods of reversing protein methionine oxidation are provided, which use an Msr enzyme containing an affinity tag or Msr enzyme immobilized on a resin or bead. In some such embodiments, a protein sample may have an unknown or undesired level of methionine oxidation, but it may be undesirable to contaminate the sample with the Msr protein. In some such embodiments, the Msr enzyme is added to the protein sample under conditions such that methionine sulfoxide can be reversed, and the Msr enzyme can then be efficiently removed by addition of an affinity resin to capture the tagged Msr enzyme, and the resin with captured or immobilized Msr can be removed by centrifugation or filtration.
  • In some embodiments, methods of reducing the complexity of intact protein samples prior to MS/MS analysis by mass spectrometry are provided. The use of high resolution MS and multiple fragmentation methods to determine the complete structure of a protein may be referred to as “top-down” proteomics. The stochastic nature of methionine oxidation may result in multiple isobaric and non-isobaric variants of a protein, resulting in increased sample complexity and difficulty interpreting the protein fragments from co-isolated, isobaric protein species containing oxidized methionine at different locations. In some embodiments, the reduction of methionine sulfoxides by Msr reduces the complexity of the intact protein(s) and the fragmentation products while increasing the signal to noise ratio.
  • In some embodiments, methods of reducing methionine oxidation prior to liquid chromatography or other analysis or purification methods are also provided.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • FIG. 1 shows structures of oxidized methionine and reduction by methionine sulfoxide reductases. ROS is “reactive oxygen species.”
  • FIG. 2 shows intact protein MS analysis of methionine oxidation of TurboLuc in the absence of peroxide treatment. Un-oxidized samples or samples treated with the Msrs ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB are presented.
  • FIG. 3 shows intact protein MS analysis of methionine oxidation of TurboLuc following 10× peroxide treatment. Samples were oxidized alone or oxidized and then treated with the Msrs ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB.
  • FIG. 4 shows intact protein MS analysis of methionine oxidation of TurboLuc following 25× peroxide treatment. Samples were oxidized alone or oxidized and then treated with the Msrs ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB.
  • FIG. 5 shows intact protein MS analysis of methionine oxidation of TurboLuc following 75× peroxide treatment. Samples were oxidized alone or oxidized and then treated with the Msrs ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB.
  • FIG. 6 shows intact protein MS analysis of methionine oxidation of TurboLuc following 100× peroxide treatment. Samples were oxidized alone or oxidized and then treated with the Msrs ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB.
  • FIG. 7 shows intact protein MS analysis of methionine oxidation of TurboLuc following 500× peroxide treatment. Samples were oxidized alone or oxidized and then treated with the Msrs ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB.
  • FIG. 8 outlines an exemplary procedure for shotgun proteomic analysis.
  • FIG. 9 shows shotgun proteomic analysis results on methionine oxidation of a 6-protein sample. Reversal of methionine oxidation was measured for samples treated with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB. The percentage of oxidized methionine and doubly oxidized methionine are presented for control (no oxidation), 1:25, 1:50, and 1:100 methionine:peroxide ratios. Met, methionine.
  • FIGS. 10A and 10B present the protocol (A) and actual readout (B) of parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) of a representative experiment.
  • FIGS. 11A and 11B present the effect of treatment with nmMsrAB and ngMsrAB on the disappearance of an oxidized peptide standard (SEQ ID No: 4) and appearance of the corresponding reduced peptide (SEQ ID No: 5) using PRM analysis.
  • FIGS. 12A and 12B present the effect of treatment with nmMsrAB and ngMsrAB on the disappearance of an oxidized phosphopeptide (SEQ ID No: 6) and appearance of the corresponding reduced peptide (SEQ ID No: 7) using PRM analysis.
  • FIGS. 13A and 13B present the effect of treatment with nmMsrAB and ngMsrAB on the disappearance of another oxidized phosphopeptide (SEQ ID No: 8) and corresponding appearance of a reduced phosphopeptide (SEQ ID No: 9) using PRM analysis.
  • FIG. 14 shows the sequence of His-tagged/WQ MsrAB from Neisseria gonorrhoeae (SEQ ID NO: 1). The His tag/WQ protease site is shown in italics. A coommassie-stained gel showing the predominant expressed species is also shown. The terms “ngMsrAB” and “ngMsrAB-T” are used interchangeably.
  • FIG. 15 shows the sequence of His-tagged/WQ MsrAB from Neisseria meningitidis (SEQ ID NO: 2). The His tag/WQ protease site is shown in italics. A coommassie-stained gel showing the predominant expressed species is also shown. The terms “nmMsrAB” and “nmMsrAB-T” are used interchangeably.
  • FIG. 16 shows how the theoretical reversal of methionine oxidation results in a less convoluted spectrum in “top down” protein MS/MS analysis.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • This description and exemplary embodiments should not be taken as limiting. For the purposes of this specification and appended claims, unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities, percentages, or proportions, and other numerical values used in the specification and claims, are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about,” to the extent they are not already so modified. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
  • It is noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the,” and any singular use of any word, include plural referents unless expressly and unequivocally limited to one referent. As used herein, the term “include” and its grammatical variants are intended to be non-limiting, such that recitation of items in a list is not to the exclusion of other like items that can be substituted or added to the listed items.
  • As used herein, the terms “methionine sulfoxide reductase”, “Msr”, “MetSR”, and “Msr enzyme” are used interchangeably to refer to a methionine sulfoxide reductase that is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide and/or methionine-R-sulfoxide. A Msr domain that is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide to methionine is referred to as an “A domain.” A Msr domain that is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide to methionine is referred to as an “B domain.” Thus, the terms “methionine sulfoxide reductase”, “Msr”, “MetSR”, and “Msr enzyme” refer generically to a methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that comprises a methionine sulfoxide reductase A domain alone, B domain alone, or both an A domain and a B domain. In some embodiments, a Msr is a MsrAB. In some embodiments, a Msr is a MsrA. In some embodiments, a Msr is a MsrB.
  • As used herein, the terms “methionine sulfoxide reductase AB”, “MsrAB”, “MetSR-AB”, and “MsrAB enzyme” are used interchangeably to refer to a methionine sulfoxide reductase comprising a methionine sulfoxide reductase A domain and a methionine sulfoxide reductase B domain, wherein the reductase is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide. In some embodiments, the MsrAB enzyme comprises a thioredoxin (Trx) domain. In some such embodiments, the MsrAB enzyme may be referred to as a MsrAB-T enzyme.
  • The terms “methionine sulfoxide reductase A”, “MsrA”, “MetSR-A, and “MsrA enzyme” are used interchangeably to refer to a methionine sulfoxide reductase comprising a methionine sulfoxide reductase A domain, wherein the reductase is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide.
  • The terms “methionine sulfoxide reductase B”, “MsrB”, “MetSR-B”, and “MsrB enzyme” are used interchangeably to refer to a methionine sulfoxide reductase comprising a methionine sulfoxide reductase A domain, wherein the reductase is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide.
  • As used herein “protein”, “peptide”, and “polypeptide” are used interchangeably throughout to mean a chain of amino acids wherein each amino acid is connected to the next by a peptide bond. In some embodiments, when a chain of amino acids consists of about two to fifty amino acids, the term “peptide” is used. However, the term “peptide” should not be considered limiting unless expressly indicated.
  • In cells, methionine sulfoxides are reduced back to methionine by stereospecific reductases MsrA and MsrB (FIG. 1). The observed methionine-sulfoxide proteome represents a steady-state condition in which oxidation, a chemical event, is balanced by reduction, an enzymatic process. The Msr system protects cells against oxidative damage by a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging mechanism in which methionine residues in proteins function as catalytic antioxidants, and the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzymes then repair the damage to the reversibly oxidized proteins. The enzymatic reversal of methionine oxidation with purified MsrA and MsrB enzymes has been demonstrated in vitro and detected by gel mobility shift, Western blotting with methionine sulfoxide-specific antibodies, and by MS analysis of intact proteins. While some Msr enzymes utilize DTT and other reducing agents in vitro without supplementary enzymes, other Msr enzymes rely on reducing enzymes, such as thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase with NADPH and reducing buffer conditions (e.g. dithiothreitol, DTT) in the reaction to maintain Msr catalytic activity.
  • In some embodiments, the invention relates to the use of methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme to reverse methionine oxidation in proteins and peptides prior to purification or analysis, such as liquid chromatography and/or mass spectrometry. In some embodiments, sample variability and complexity is reduced by the reversal of methionine oxidation and consolidation of multiple peptide species. In some embodiments, this enables easier interpretation of data, better sensitivity, and/or more accurate quantitation of proteins and peptides in samples, including biological samples.
  • In some embodiments, nucleic acids encoding the Msr proteins are provided. In some embodiments, Msr proteins are provided which have enzymatic activity in a reducing buffer. Further, in some embodiments, methods for treating protein and peptide samples prior to MS analysis are provided. The present disclosure demonstrates that Msr proteins effectively reverse methionine oxidation and improve protein or peptide sample quality and MS results.
  • In some embodiments, the reversal of methionine oxidation reduces the number of proteoforms with different masses and the consolidation into fewer intact masses increases the intensity and signal to noise of each form. See, e.g., FIGS. 2 to 7. In some instances, each intact mass may be composed of multiple forms of a protein with the same total number of oxidized methionines but at different positions. Such proteoforms appear as one intact mass but can produce a complex combination of unique fragment ions during MS/MS. This increased complexity complicates the data analysis and reduces the sensitivity because of the dilution of signal across many species. In some embodiments, the reversal of methionine oxidation by the methods described herein reduces sample complexity, reduces the data analysis time, and improves the quality and confidence in the results. See FIG. 16.
  • In some instances, it is found that 10-30% of methionines are oxidized in complex proteomic samples after reduction, alkylation, fragmentation (e.g., digestion), and desalting. Methionine oxidation may occur in the cell before lysis, during cell lysis, and/or during the subsequent sample preparation or analysis. In some embodiments, since methionine sulfoxide reductase can be functional during the reduction of protein disulfides in a mass spectrometry workflow, it may be possible to reduce cysteine disulfides and oxidized methionine simultaneously. See FIG. 8. In some embodiments, after fragmentation (e.g., digestion), peptide samples are analyzed by mass spectrometry (MS), and the resulting spectra are compared with theoretical spectra from known proteins to determine the peptides and proteins in a sample. To avoid missing peptides, in some instances, MS database searches permit methionine oxidation as a variable modification, but such inclusion may double the database search time. Thus, in some embodiments, the methods provided herein can simplify the MS database searches and reduce the database search time. That is, in some embodiments, by reversing methionine oxidation, sample complexity is reduced, improving the database search scores, e.g., by reducing the degrees of freedom and number of false positive hits, and shortening the database search time by eliminating the need to search for methionine oxidation as a variable modification.
  • Targeted quantitation of proteins with mass spectrometry is typically performed by quantifying specific unique peptides of the protein. In some embodiments, known amounts of isotope-labeled (e.g., heavy isotope-labeled) versions of these targeted peptides can be used as internal standards for absolute quantitation. In some instances, when choosing peptides for targeted MS assays, peptides containing methionine are avoided because of the potential for oxidation and the resulting variability in quantitative measurements. The avoidance of methionine-containing peptides limits the choice of peptides that can be used to quantify proteins, and may prevent the quantitation of specific peptides of interest, such as when methionine-containing peptides also contain important signaling or regulatory modifications, such as phosphorylation, methylation, acetylation, or ubiquitinylation. In some embodiments, treatment using methionine sulfoxide reductases according to the methods described herein can reverse methionine oxidation and permit the targeted quantification of methionine-containing peptides. See, e.g., FIGS. 11 to 13. In some embodiments, methionine oxidation can be removed without altering other modifications, so methionine sulfoxide reductase treatment permits methionine-containing peptides to be monitored with targeted MS assays that may be otherwise difficult or impossible to measure. See, e.g., FIG. 13.
  • Nonlimiting exemplary Msr enzymes are described herein, and include MsrABs comprising the sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 10-34, and MsrABs that are at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 10-34.
  • In some embodiments, the Msr enzyme is derived from a bacterial Msr enzyme. In some embodiments, the Msr enzyme is derived from a bacteria selected from Neisseria, Lautropia, Cardiobacterium, Gammaproteobacteria, Pelistega, Marinospirillum, Basilea, Oligella, Alcagenaceae, Psychrobacter, Brackiella, Taylorella, Moraxella, Enhydrobacter, Fusobacterium, Helcococcus, Paenibacillus, and Eremococcus. One skilled in the art can identify Msr enzymes from various bacterial sources. In some embodiments, the Msr enzyme is derived from a bacterial MsrAB enzyme, i.e., a bacterial enzyme comprising a methionine sulfoxide reductase A domain and a methionine sulfoxide reductase B domain. The bacterial Msr enzyme may optionally comprise a thioredoxin domain. In some embodiments, the Msr enzyme is derived from a Neisseria bacteria. In some embodiments, the Msr enzyme is derived from Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitides, Neisseria lactamica, Neisseria polysaccharea, Neisseria flavescens, Neisseria sicca, Neisseria macacae, or Neisseria mucosa.
  • In this application, “ng” denotes an MsrAB enzyme from Neisseria gonorrhoeae (e.g., ngMsrAB or ngMsrAB-T). In this application, “nm” denotes an MsrAB enzyme from Neisseria meningitides (e.g., nmMsrAB or nmMsrAB-T).
  • In some embodiments, the Msr enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 10-34.
  • In some embodiments, the Msr enzyme is from a nonbacterial organism. In some embodiments, the Msr enzyme is derived from an Msr enzyme of an organism selected from Methanobrevibacter, Methanomassiliicoccales, Methanocorpusculum, Thermoplasmatales, Methanometylophilus, Methanoculleus, Methanocella, and the like. In some such embodiments, the Msr enzyme is an MsrAB enzyme. One skilled in the art can identify suitable MsrAB enzymes for use in the present methods. In some embodiments, the Msr enzyme from a non-Neisseriaceae bacteria or nonbacterial organism comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID Nos: 10-34.
  • In some embodiments, the Msr enzyme is an MsrA enzyme or an MsrB enzyme. One skilled in the art can identify suitable MsrA and/or MsrB enzymes for use in the methods described herein. In some embodiments, the MSR-A comprises a peptide-methionine (S)-S-oxide reductase. In some embodiments, an MsrA is derived from an MsrA enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas, and Natrinema. Nonlimiting exemplary such MsrA enzymes can be found in various protein databases and include, for example, MsrA enzymes under accession numbers WP_049944603.1, WP_005043086.1, WP_058572480.1, WP_015322392.1, WP_015408133.1, and WP_006431385.1. In some embodiments, an MsrA is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_049944603.1, WP_005043086.1, WP_058572480.1, WP_015322392.1, WP_015408133.1, or WP_006431385.1. In some embodiments, the Msr-B comprises a peptide-methionine (R)-S-oxide reductase. In some embodiments, an MsrB is derived from an MsrB enzyme of an organism selected from Haloarcula, Halococcus, Haloferax, Natronococcus, Natronomonas, Natrinema, and Candidatus Halobonum. Nonlimiting exemplary such MsrB enzymes can be found in various protein databases and include, for example, MsrB enzymes under accession numbers WP_004963222.1, WP_049996544.1, WP_007275637.1, WP_008423757.1, WP_015408129.1, WP_007109050.1, and WP_023395429.1. In some embodiments, an MsrB is at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to an MsrA enzyme under accession number WP_004963222.1, WP_049996544.1, WP_007275637.1, WP_008423757.1, WP_015408129.1, WP_007109050.1, or WP_023395429.1. In some embodiments, MsrA and MsrB are derived from MsrA and MsrB enzymes of the same organism. In some embodiments, MsrA and MsrB are derived from MsrA and MsrB enzymes of the different organisms. In some embodiments, MsrA and MsrB are derived from MsrA and MsrB enzymes of organisms of the same genus, but different species.
  • As used herein, an Msr enzyme that is “derived from” an Msr enzyme of a particular organism or of a particular sequence may be modified, such as by truncation or addition of amino acids (such as addition of a tag sequence and/or protease sequence for removal of the tag) relative to the parental Msr enzyme, but retains at least MsrA or MsrB activity. In some embodiments, the Msr enzyme derived from an Msr enzyme of a particular organism or of a particular sequence retains at least 50% of the MsrA or MsrB activity (but not necessarily both) of the parental enzyme.
  • In some embodiments, a method comprises contacting a polypeptide sample with a mixture of different Msr's. In some embodiments, a single Msr is used. In some embodiments, when a mixture of Msrs is used, the mixture comprises at least one MsrA and at least one MsrB. In some embodiments, a method comprises contacting a polypeptide sample with an MsrAB, with or without additional Msrs. In some embodiments, an MsrAB may be used in conjunction with an MsrA and/or an MsrB.
  • In some embodiments, an Msr:protein ratio (w/w) of 1:100 to 1:2 in used. In some embodiments, an Msr:protein ratio (w/w) of 1:2, 1:4, 1:10, 1:20, 1:25, 1:50, 1:66, 1:75 or 1:100 is used. In some embodiments, the Msr used is at a concentration of about 100 ng/ml-1 mg/ml, or about 100 ng/ml-500 μg/ml, or about 100 ng/ml-100 μg/ml, or about 1 μg/ml-1 mg/ml, or about 1 μg/ml-500 μg/ml, or about 1 μg/ml-100 μg/ml, or about 10 μg/mg-1 mg/ml, or about 10 μg/mg-500 μg/ml, or about 10 μg/mg-100 μg/ml. In some embodiments, the method comprises contacting a polypeptide sample with at least one Msr under conditions suitable for reduction of methionine sulfoxides for 10 minutes to 48 hours, or 30 minutes to 48 ours, or 30 minutes to 24 hours, or 30 minutes to 16 hours, or 1 hour to 48 hours, or 1 hour to 24 hours, or 1 hour to 16 hours, or 1 to 8 hours, or 1 to 6 hours, or 1 to 4 hours. In some embodiments, the Msr reaction is incubated at a temperature between 20° C. and 45° C., or between 20° C. and 40° C., or between 22° C. and 40° C., or between 25° C. and 37° C. In some embodiments, the Msr reaction is incubated at 37° C. or 30° C.
  • In some embodiments, contacting the Msr with the polypeptide sample occurs under reducing conditions. In some embodiments, contacting of the Msr with the protein sample occurs in the presence of dithiothreitol (DTI) or dithioerythritol (DTE).
  • In some embodiments, the Msr reaction is terminated. In some embodiments the Msr is removed following reduction of oxidized methionines in the protein sample. In some embodiments the Msr is removed by spinning or pelleting of the sample. In some such embodiments, the Msr enzyme is bound to a solid support, such as a resin or bead. The step to terminate the Msr reaction may occur before, after, or concurrently with a treatment to fragment (e.g., digest) the protein sample.
  • Described herein are uses of methionine sulfoxide reductase (Msr) enzymes in the preparation of protein samples before purification or analysis, such as for liquid chromatography and/or mass spectrometry analysis. The reduction of oxidized methionine residues using Msr enzymes is shown to improve liquid chromatography and/or mass spectrometry data and simplify analysis.
  • Mass spectrometry (MS) is a primary technique for analysis of proteins on the basis of their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). MS techniques generally include ionization of compounds and optional fragmentation of the resulting ions, as well as detection and analysis of the m/z of the ions and/or fragment ions followed by calculation of corresponding ionic masses. A “mass spectrometer” generally includes an ionizer and an ion detector. “Mass spectrometry,” “mass spec,” “mass spectroscopy,” and “MS” are used interchangeably throughout.
  • The methods disclosed herein may be applied to any type of MS analysis. The invention is not limited by the specific equipment or analysis used. The use of any equipment with the intent of analyzing the m/z of a sample would be included in the definition of mass spectrometry. Non-limiting examples of MS analysis and/or equipment that may be used include electrospray ionization, ion mobility, time-of-flight, tandem, ion trap, and Orbitrap. The invention is neither limited by the type of ionizer or detector used in the MS analysis nor by the specific configuration of the MS. The invention is not limited to use with the specific equipment and analysis described in the Examples.
  • In some embodiments, the invention comprises use of an Msr enzyme for preparing a protein sample for top-down MS analysis, wherein the protein sample is contacted with an Msr enzyme prior to MS analysis. In some embodiments, the protein sample is intact (e.g., not fragmented) when contacted with an Msr enzyme. In some embodiments, the protein sample is not intact (e.g., fragmented) prior to Msr enzyme contact. In some embodiments, the invention comprises use of an Msr enzyme for preparing a protein sample for MS analysis, wherein the MS analysis comprises the step of disassociating intact protein or protein complexes. In some embodiments, the use comprises internal fragmentation of the proteins of the sample. The internal fragmentation step may be accomplished by way of Collision Induced Dissociation (CID), Electron Capture Dissociation (ECD), Electron Transfer Dissociation (ETD), or Surface Induced Dissociation (SID), for example. In some embodiments, the disassociating step is prior to Msr enzyme contact, whereas in some embodiments the disassociating step is after Msr enzyme contact.
  • In “top-down” mass spectrometry analysis, intact proteins and/or protein complexes are subjected to fragmentation inside the mass spectrometer. In some instances, top-down analysis preserves the post-translationally modified forms of proteins. Further, in some instances, top-down analysis may provide close to 100% sequence coverage and may facilitate the study of coordinated regulation of multiple modification sites within a single protein. In some embodiments, top-down analysis has the ability to detect protein degradation products, sequence variants, and combination of post-translational modifications and their locations within the intact protein. Methionine oxidation presents a problem for top-down analysis because it increases sample complexity data analysis dramatically. For example, in some instances, each oxidized methionine can split the MS signal (e.g., into non-oxidized and oxidized peaks), a problem that is magnified by the number of methionines in a protein.
  • In “bottom-up” mass spectrometry analysis, proteins in a sample are fragmented, for example, by enzymatic digestion using enzymes such as trypsin, and then identified, in some embodiments, using high performance liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry. In some embodiments, proteins are denatured, reduced to remove disulfide bonds, and then free cysteines are alkylated to prevent formation of new disulfide bonds. In some embodiments, the proteins are then fragmented. In some embodiments, the resulting peptides are then separated by liquid chromatography. Mass spectrometry may then be used to identify the peptides, e.g., by matching the fragmentation pattern to theoretical tandem mass spectrometry databases.
  • Use of an Msr enzyme for preparing a protein sample may be combined with any other steps taken to prepare samples for MS analysis.
  • In some embodiments, proteins within the sample are separated from other components of samples. In some embodiments, the proteins in the sample are not fragmented. In some embodiments, proteins in the sample are subjected to liquid chromatography before or after reduction of methionine sulfoxides according to the present methods. In some embodiments, proteins in the sample are subjected to capillary electrophoresis before or after reduction of methionine sulfoxides according to the present methods.
  • In some embodiments, liquid chromatography (LC) is used for physical separation of protein samples. When LC is performed at relatively high pressure, it may be termed high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Nonlimiting exemplary LC includes reversed phase LC (RP-LC) and normal phase LC (NP-LC). In some embodiments, capillary electrophoresis (CE) is used for physical separation of protein samples.
  • In some embodiments, LC may be used in conjunction with MS. In some such embodiments, an LC system may be linked to an MS (i.e., LC-MS or HPLC-MS), see Thompson M, AMC Technical Brief #34, 2008. In some embodiments, capillary electrophoresis (CE) may be used in conjunction with MS. In some embodiments, the LC-MS ionization technique is electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI), or atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI), see Basics of LCIMS, Agilent Technologies, 2001. Any type of mass analyzer may be used for LC-MS, including quadrupole, time-of-flight, ion trap, or Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR or FT-MS). In some embodiments, LC-MS includes internal fragmentation during the MS analysis.
  • In some embodiments, the protein sample comprises fragmented protein. In some embodiments, the fragmented protein sample includes proteins or peptides of a size that can be analyzed by the selected method. In some embodiments, a fragmented protein sample comprises peptide of 5 to 100 amino acids in length. In some embodiments, the protein sample comprises predominantly peptides of between 2-100, 5-100, 5-90, 5-80, 5-70, 5-60, 5-50, 5-40, 5-30, 10-90, 10-80, 10-70, 10-60, 10-50, 10-40, 10-30, or 10-20 amino acids in length. In some embodiments, the protein fragments comprises predominantly peptides of 5 to 50 amino acids in length.
  • In some embodiments, the protein sample comprises protein fragments. In some such embodiments, the protein fragments are generated by an enzyme. In some embodiments, the protein sample comprises fragmented protein (e.g., protease-digested protein fragments).
  • In some embodiments, a method provided herein comprises use of an Msr for preparing a protein sample for bottom-up MS analysis. In some embodiments, the protein sample contacted with the Msr is fragmented before or after treatment with the Msr.
  • In some embodiments, a method provided herein comprises use of an Msr for preparing a protein sample for top-down MS analysis. In some embodiments, the protein is contacted with the Msr enzyme prior to fragmentation.
  • In some embodiments, protein samples are denatured or solubilized before fragmentation.
  • In some embodiments, the fragmentation protocol uses chemical cleavage. In some embodiments, the chemical cleavage uses CNBr. In some embodiments, the fragmentation protocol is done using an enzyme. In some embodiments, the fragmentation protocol uses MS-grade commercially available proteases. Examples of proteases that may be used to digest samples include trypsin, endoproteinase GluC, endoproteinase ArgC, pepsin, chymotrypsin, LysN protease, LysC protease, GluC protease, AspN protease, proteinase K, and thermolysin. In some embodiments, a mixture of different proteases are used and the individual results are combined together after the digestion and analysis. In some embodiments, the digestion is incomplete in order to see larger, overlapping peptides. In some embodiments, the antibody digestion is performed with IdeS, IdeZ, pepsin, or papain to generate large antibody domains for “middle-down” protein characterization. In some embodiments, the fragmentation protocol uses trypsin that is modified. In some embodiments, a protein:protease ratio (w/w) of 10:1, 20:1, 25:1, 50:1, 66:1, or 100:1 may be used. In some embodiments, the trypsin used is at a concentration of about 100 ng/ml-1 mg/ml, or about 100 ng/ml-500 μg/ml, or about 100 ng/ml-100 μg/ml, or about 1 μg/ml-1 mg/ml, or about 1 μg/ml-500 μg/ml, or about 1 μg/ml-100 μg/ml, or about 10 μg/mg-1 mg/ml, or about 10 μg/mg-500 μg/ml, or about 10 μg/mg-100 μg/ml. In some embodiments, the digestion step is for 10 minutes to 48 hours, or 30 minutes to 48 ours, or 30 minutes to 24 hours, or 30 minutes to 16 hours, or 1 hour to 48 hours, or 1 hour to 24 hours, or 1 hour to 16 hours, or 1 to 8 hours, or 1 to 6 hours, or 1 to 4 hours. In some embodiments, the digestion step is incubated at a temperature between 20° C. and 45° C., or between 20° C. and 40° C., or between 22° C. and 40° C., or between 25° C. and 37° C. In some embodiments, the digestion step is incubated at 37° C. or 30° C. In some embodiments, a step is included to end the digestion step. The step to end the digestion protocol may be addition of a stop solution or a step of spinning or pelleting of a sample. The step to end the digestion step may occur before, after, or concurrently with treatment with the Msr. In some embodiments, the digestion is followed by guanidation.
  • In some embodiments, the fragmentation protocol includes use of protein gels. In some embodiments, the fragmentation protocol comprises in-gel digestion. An exemplary commercially available kit for performing in-gel digestion is the In-Gel Tryptic Digestion Kit (Thermo Fisher Cat#89871).
  • In some embodiments, the fragmentation protocol is carried out in solution. An exemplary commercially available kit for performing in-solution digestion is the In-Solution Tryptic Digestion and Guanidiation Kit (Thermo Fisher Cat#89895).
  • In some embodiments, the fragmentation protocol uses beads. In some embodiments, the fragmentation protocol comprises on-bead digestion. In some embodiments, agarose beads or Protein G beads are used. In some embodiments, magnetic beads are used.
  • In some embodiments, protein samples are separated using liquid chromatography before MS analysis. In some embodiments, fragmented samples are separated using liquid chromatography before MS analysis.
  • In some embodiments, kits are provided, comprising at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase (Msr) enzyme. In some embodiments, the at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide. In some embodiments, the kit comprises at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide and at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide. In some such embodiments, the kit comprises an MsrA enzyme and an MsrB enzyme. In some embodiments, the kit comprises at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide, such as an MsrAB enzyme.
  • Nonlimiting exemplary Msr enzymes that may be included in kits are described herein, and include, for example, MsrAB enzymes derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase from an organism selected from Neisseria, Lautropia, Cardiobacterium, Gammaproteobacteria, Pelistega, Marinospirillum, Basilea, Oligella, Alcagenaceae, Psychrobacter, Brackiella, Taylorella, Moraxella, Enhydrobacter, Fusobacterium, Helcococcus, Paenibacillus, Eremococcus, Methanobrevibacter, Methanomassiliicoccales, Methanocorpusculum, Thermoplasmatales, Methanometylophilus, Methanoculleus, and Methanocella. In some embodiments, the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a bacterial enzyme. In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitides, Neisseria lactamica, Neisseria polysaccharea, Neisseria flavescens, Neisseria sicca, Neisseria macacae, or Neisseria mucosa. In some embodiments, the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 10 to 34. In some embodiments, the one or more Msr enzymes in a kit may be bound to a solid support, such as a resin or bead.
  • Kits may further comprises one or more additional reagents for preparing a polypeptide sample for liquid chromatography. Kits may further comprises one or more additional reagents for preparing a polypeptide sample for mass spectrometry analysis. In some embodiments, a kit comprises at least one reagent for fragmenting a polypeptide sample for mass spectrometry analysis. Nonlimiting exemplary reagents for fragmenting a polypeptide sample include trypsin, chymotrypsin, AspN, GluC, LysC, LysN, ArgC, proteinase K, thermolysin, and CNBr.
  • EXAMPLES
  • The following examples are provided to illustrate certain disclosed embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of this disclosure in any way.
  • Example 1. Intact Protein Analysis and Top-Down Analysis of Methionine Oxidation of TurboLuc by Hydrogen Peroxide
  • Methionine oxidation causes signal splitting of mass spectrometry (MS) of intact proteins, thus leading to increases in data complexities. Means of reducing methionine oxidation may thus improve MS data. Therefore, a model system was developed to study methionine oxidation and reduction that uses H2O2, which has been described as a means of monitoring methionine oxidation of methionine-rich proteins (see Le D T et al., Biochemistry 47(25):6685-6694 (2008) and Liang et al., BMC Biochemistry 13:21 (2012)).
  • As shown in FIG. 1, oxidized methionines (i.e., methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide) can be reduced by methionine sulfoxide reductases (Msrs), such as MetSR-A and MetSR-B. The ability of Msr treatment to improve MS data by reduction of methionine oxidation was investigated using a variety of MS procedures.
  • Turboluciferase (TurboLuc, SEQ ID No: 3) was selected for optimization of methionine oxidation and reduction reactions due to its compatibility with mass spectrometry. Initial experiments showed that treatment of 5 μg/ml of TurboLuc with 1 mM, 10 mM, or 100 mM hydrogen peroxide reduced the activity of TurboLuc by greater than 1000-fold using the TurboLuc flash assay (data not shown), indicating that TurboLuc was susceptible to oxidation.
  • For standardization of oxidation, a systematic ratio of moles of peroxide to moles of methionine must be maintained. Therefore, a concentration of 18 μM TurboLuc was used for all experiments. As there are three moles of methionine per mole of TurboLuc, the methionine concentration in experiments was 54 μM.
  • A variety of oxidation conditions were assessed by determining the number of moles of methionine in a sample and adding different ratios of moles of peroxide to each. After oxidation, each sample had DIT added to a final concentration of 5 mM while keeping the solution at a neutral pH and either ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB were added. Ratios of methionine:peroxide of 10:1, 1:1, 1:10, 1:25, 1:75, 1:100, and 1:500 were examined using the following conditions:
  • ngMsrAB-T or
    TLuc amount Molar Ratio Peroxide final nmMsrAB-T
    (μg) (Sample:Peroxide) concentration added (μg)
    45 1:0  0 11.25
    45 10:1  5.4 μM 11.25
    45 1:1  54 μM 11.25
    45 1:10 540 μM 11.25
    45 1:25 1.35 mM 11.25
    45 1:50 2.7 mM 11.25
    45 1:75 4.05 mM 11.25
    45  1:100 5.4 mM 11.25
    45  1:500 27 mM 11.25
  • The incubation with hydrogen peroxide was at 37° C. for 1 hour. The sample was spun down using a using a 3K MWCO buffer exchange protein concentrator (Fisher, Product #11345402) for 1 hour at 16,000×g. The sample was then buffer exchanged into a slightly basic solution of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer and appropriate water to create a concentration of 0.5 μg/μL.
  • Reduction reactions were performed by reacting the oxidized sample with methionine sulfoxide reductase (Msr) enzymes, using either ngMsrAB (SEQ ID No: 1) or nmMsrAB (SEQ ID No: 2). As shown in FIG. 14, SEQ ID No: 1 is an N-terminal histidine tagged protein with a WQ domain fused to the full-length MsrAB from Neisseria gonorrhoeae, also known as “ngMsrAB”. As shown in FIG. 15, SEQ ID No: 2 is an N-terminal histidine tagged protein with a WQ domain fused to the full-length MsrAB from Neisseria meningitides, also known as “nmMsrAB”. The Msr enzyme fusion proteins of SEQ ID Nos: 1 and 2 were expressed, purified, and used for determining the effect of methionine reduction on MS profiles. Coomassie gels shown in FIGS. 14 and 15 indicate that a predominant protein of the expected molecular weight was obtained for SEQ ID No: 1 (“ngMsrAB”) and SEQ ID No: 2 (“nmMsrAB”).
  • To perform the reduction reactions, one of the two Msrs (either ngMsrAB [SEQ ID No: l] or nmMsrAB [SEQ ID No: 2]) was added to the oxidized TurboLuc solution at an enzyme:sample protein ratio of 1:4 and DTI of a final concentration of 5 mM. Both enzymes were used in separate experiments as shown below.
  • Starting ngMsrAB-T nmMsrAB-T 5 mM DTT
    Samples Sample volume added volume added (from 100 mM
    (Methionine:Peroxide) Volume (45 μg) (11.25 μg total) (11.25 μg total) Stock)
    Control 90 μl 7.5 μl  4.9 μl
    Control
    90 μl 3.41 μl 4.67 μl
    1:25 90 μl 7.5 μl  4.9 μl
    1:25 90 μl 3.41 μl 4.67 μl
    1:50 90 μl 7.5 μl  4.9 μl
    1:50 90 μl 3.41 μl 4.67 μl
     1:100 90 μl 7.5 μl  4.9 μl
     1:100 90 μl 3.41 μl 4.67 μl
  • The samples plus Msr were incubated at 37° C. for 2 hours with gentle vortexing throughout. Samples were cleaned using 3K MWCO concentrators, and the volume was brought up to 200 μl with 0.1% formic acid.
  • Half of the cleaned-up intact protein sample was diluted to 40% acetonitrile (ACN), 60% 0.1% formic acid for direct injection into the Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer. Manual selection of peaks and MS/MS fragmentation were performed.
  • The other half of the cleaned-up intact protein sample was injected onto a ProSwift RP-4H 100 μm×25 cm monolithic column and separated by a gradient of water and acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid. Automatic fragmentation was performed using data dependent analysis. Data analysis and visualization were done using ProSight Lite v1.2 Build 1.2.5595.15524 software that allows identification and characterization via intact protein analysis and top-down analysis.
  • FIG. 2 shows MS data in the absence of hydrogen peroxide for un-oxidized samples and for samples treated with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB. Peaks corresponding to native TurboLuc and oxidized TurboLuc are indicated with boxes. These data indicate a relatively low level of baseline methionine oxidation of TurboLuc.
  • TurboLuc samples reacted with 10× peroxide treatment (10:1 peroxide:methionine, corresponding to 540 μM H2O2) are shown in FIG. 3. The 10:1 peroxide to methionine reaction conditions did not produce pronounced differences from those obtained in the absence of hydrogen peroxide (FIG. 2). In addition, the 10:1 and 1:1 methionine to peroxide reaction conditions showed no detectable methionine oxidation (data not shown).
  • FIG. 4 indicates that 25× peroxide treatment (25:1 peroxide:methionine corresponding to 1.35 mM H2O2) increased methionine oxidation of TurboLac. This is apparent in new peaks in spectrum region corresponding to oxidized TurboLac as well as larger relative abundance of the peaks corresponding to oxidized TurboLuc. Treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB (at a ratio of 1:4 of enzyme to sample) counteracted the effect of 25× peroxide treatment, and the MS data obtained with these samples were similar to those shown in FIG. 2 for un-oxidized sample not reacted with hydrogen peroxide.
  • Data on increasingly concentrated hydrogen peroxide treatment are shown for 75× peroxide treatment (4.05 mM H2O2, FIG. 5), 100× peroxide treatment (5.4 mM H2O2, FIG. 6), and 500× peroxide treatment (27 mM H2O2, FIG. 7). Data with 75×-500× peroxide treatment show increases in oxidized methionines in TurboLuc, as well as other modifications to TurboLuc such as oxidation of other amino acids, in oxidized samples that were not reduced. Treatment with ngMsrAB and nmMsrAB counteracted the effect of higher peroxide treatment on methionine oxidation of TurboLuc (for example, see FIG. 5), but treatment with these Msr enzymes did not affect doubly oxidized methionine sulfone or oxidation of other amino acids (for example, see FIG. 7) due to their specificity for methionine. Thus, higher levels of peroxide treatment produced other modifications that could not be counteracted by Msr treatment, such as oxidation of other amino acids, and that led to significant splitting of the signal.
  • Data presented in FIGS. 4-7 outline successful conditions for reduction of methionine oxidation of TurboLac with Msr treatment using LC-MS for intact protein analysis. In all experiments, there was successful reversal of methionine oxidation of TurboLuc following peroxide treatment with use of the Msr enzymes ngMsrAB and nmMsrAB. The present protocol indicates that the hybrid Msr treatment is a novel means to improve MS analysis of intact proteins due to the reduction of methionine oxidation. Therefore, top-down proteomic analysis can be significantly improved by this novel use of Msr enzymes, such as ngMsrAB and nmMsrAB, to reduce the complexity of data induced by peak splitting of oxidized methionines.
  • The protocol for top-down analysis of intact proteins was performed as follows. First, 24.6 μl of 0.5M dithiothreitol (DTT) was added to 1.23 mL of 700 μg/ml of whole protein to make a final DIT concentration of 10 mM and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Next, 126 μl of 0.5M iodoacetamide (IAM) was added to the mixture to make a final IAM concentration of 50 mM, and the mixture was incubated in dark at room temperature for 20 minutes. Then, 126 μl of 0.5M IAM was added to make a final IAM concentration of 50 mM, and the mixture was further incubated in dark at room temperature for 20 minutes. Next, 54.3 μl of 0.5M DIT was added to bring its final concentration to 20 mM, and the mixture was incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature.
  • The sample was spun down using a using a 3K MWCO buffer exchange protein concentrator (Fisher, Product #11345402) for 1 hour at 16,000×g. The sample was then buffer exchanged into a slightly basic solution of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer and appropriate water to create a concentration of 0.333 μg/μL. The preceding procedures were used to create a 500 μl sample of 5 μg/ml for each condition from a 10 μg/ml TurboLuc stock sample for further steps for reduction of the methionines or for a control oxidized sample.
  • FIG. 16 is a theoretical image presenting the tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) spectra for a native and Msr-treated protein. The theoretical native protein shows multiple oxidized (“ox”) peaks, while the Msr-treated protein contains a predominant peak that is non-oxidized. The starred region in the upper panels shows the m/z (mass-to-charge ratio) region selected for MS fragmentation. The lower panels show that the native protein has an MS/MS that is convoluted due to the large number of oxidized precursors that are shifting many of the MS/MS peaks by 16 Da for each oxidized methionine whereas proteins can have dozens of potentially oxidizable methionines. The number of oxidized methionines is indicative of the shift in m/z from the number (N) of 16 Da mass shifts. In contrast, the Msr-treated sample of the same protein shows a cleaner MS/MS spectrum, due to the fact that there is only one dominant precursor non-oxidized peak that was present in the m/z range selected for fragmentation.
  • Example 2. Shotgun Proteomic Analysis Coupled with Reversal of Methionine Oxidation
  • Next, reversal of methionine oxidation via Msr treatment together with shotgun proteomic analysis was investigated using a 6-protein standard (Thermo Scientific Pierce™ 6 Protein Digest, equimolar, LC-MS grade, Product 88342). Analysis of the 6-protein digested standard stored in liquid indicated that it was highly oxidized due to the long-term liquid storage.
  • The process of shotgun proteomic analysis is outlined in FIG. 8. Proteins were digested and the resulting peptides were separated by LC followed by mass spectrometry.
  • The Pierce™ 6 Protein Digest, equimolar, LC-MS grade (product #88342) was used as a complex digestion mixture with an estimated methionine concentration for oxidation and subsequent reduction by ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB. In addition, a non-oxidized peptide mixture was set-aside as a control to be reduced by ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB later in the protocol. The following conditions for the oxidation reactions are as follows:
  • Sample Peroxide
    Volume Peroxide Concentration
    (μl) Volume (Stock - Methionine:Peroxide Water
    (100 μg) (μl) 50.4 mM) ratio (μl)
    212.7 7.5 1.25 mM 1:25 79.8
    212.7 15 2.52 mM 1:50 72.3
    212.7 30 5.04 mM  1:100 57.3
  • The incubation with hydrogen peroxide was at 37° C. for 1 hour. Then the sample was acidified as needed to obtain a pH˜4 before solid-phase extraction (SPE). SPE was performed using C18 (Sep-Pak vac 1 cc, C-18 cartridges) to clean up the peptide mixture and remove the peroxide using the following protocol. The column was washed with 1 ml of 80% acetonitrile, then equilibrated using 1 ml of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). Sample was then added and washed with 2.2 ml of 0.1% formic acid in water.
  • The clean peptide sample was collected with 300 μL 80% acetonitrile, and SpeedVac was used to dry the sample. The sample was re-suspended in 700 μl of 0.1% formic acid, and a peptide concentration assay was done to determine the peptide concentration for further steps.
  • After the peptide concentration was determined, Tris-HCl was added to a final concentration of 50 mM to produce a basic pH and appropriate water to create a concentration of 0.333 μg/μL. Samples were treated with ngMsrAB and nmMsrAB using the following conditions.
  • 5 mM
    Sample DTT
    Volume (from
    Samples (μl) ngMsrAB-T nmMsrAB-T 100 mM
    (Methionine:Peroxide) (30 μg) volume (μl) volume (μl) Stock)
    Control 90 μl 7.5 μl  4.9 μl
    Control
    90 μl 3.41 μl 4.67 μl
    1:25 90 μl 7.5 μl  4.9 μl
    1:25 90 μl 3.41 μl 4.67 μl
    1:50 90 μl 7.5 μl  4.9 μl
    1:50 90 μl 3.41 μl 4.67 μl
     1:100 90 μl 7.5 μl  4.9 μl
     1:100 90 μl 3.41 μl 4.67 μl
  • The peptide mixtures were then injected onto a C18 column (Acclaim PepMap 100 75 μm×100 μm C18) and separated by a gradient of water and acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid. The resulting liquid flow was infused into the Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer via electrospray ionization utilizing data dependent analysis for collection of MS/MS spectra.
  • The resulting raw data were processed using Thermo Proteome Discoverer 1.4, and a database search was performed matching theoretical spectra to experimental spectra. For the database search, oxidation was selected as a variable modification or oxidation was not selected at all.
  • FIG. 9 outlines the percentage of methionine oxidation seen with different methionine:peroxide ratios. Results are presented both for oxidized methionine (O) and doubly oxidized methionine (D). In addition, the ratio of oxidized methionines to total methionines is presented for each condition. For each methionine:peroxide ratio, one sample was included that did not include either ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB and thus provided a measure of 100% methionine oxidation for those conditions. As shown in FIG. 9, data confirmed high levels of methionine oxidation in all samples that were not treated with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB.
  • Treatment of samples with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB at, 1:25, 1:50, and 1:100 methionine:peroxide ratios, as well as unoxidized control samples, were evaluated. Substantial reversal of methionine oxidation was seen with all methionine:peroxide ratios with approximately 80% reversal for all reaction ratios greater than 1:100. In contrast, the DTI control did not show any reversal of methionine oxidation, which confirms the specificity of treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB. In addition, there was approximately 70% sequence coverage with no loss of coverage based on the methionine reduction.
  • There was an approximately 20% residual methionine oxidation even following treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB. This oxidation may be due to the electrospray ionization (ESI) using in the LC analysis, which has been shown to cause oxidation of solution-phase proteins (see Kim K et al., EuPA Open Proteomics 8:40-47 (2015)).
  • These results with shotgun proteomics analysis following Msr treatment confirm the ability to reproducibly reduce methionine oxidation of a highly oxidized sample. Critically, this reduction of methionine oxidation occurred without sample loss. Normally, methionine oxidation is included as a permitted variable modification, compromising database searches following shotgun proteomic analysis. Therefore, treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB is a novel means to simplify and improve database searching for large shotgun discovery proteomics experiments by reducing the data variability induced by methionine oxidation.
  • Example 3. Targeted Protein Analysis of Methionine Reduction by Parallel Reaction Monitoring
  • Based on the results using shotgun proteomics, targeted protein analysis following reduction of methionine oxidation was investigated using parallel reaction monitoring (PRM). The basis of PRM is a targeted proteomics strategy where all fragmentation products of a target peptide are simultaneously monitored under conditions that offer high resolution and mass accuracy, as outlined in FIG. 10A (see also Peterson A C, et al., Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 11:1475-1488 (2012)). In PRM, the mass spectrometer isolates a target peptide ion and subjects it to fragmentation, followed by simultaneous analysis of the masses of all fragment ions. FIG. 10B shows representative experimental data wherein intensity is plotted against retention time to give a readout of the masses of all fragment ions.
  • Quantitative PRM analysis was done using the Q Exactive HF Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (QE-HF) (Thermo Fisher). The sample used to validate methionine reduction by Msr treatment was a 3-peptide mix prepared from commercially prepared peptide standards that included SEQ ID Nos: 4, 6, and 8 as listed in the following table.
  • Sequence and post-translational
    SEQ ID Nos. modifications
    SEQ ID No: 4 RTTSFAESCKPVQQPSAFGSMKV
    Wherein C indicates a carbamidomethyl
    C, and
    Wherein M indicates an oxidized M
    SEQ ID No: 5 RTTSFAESCKPVQQPSAFGSMKV
    Wherein C indicates a carbamidomethyl
    C
    SEQ ID No: 6 RTTSFAESCKPVQQPSAFGSMKV
    Wherein S indicates a phosphorylated
    S,
    Wherein C indicates a carbamidomethyl
    C, and
    Wherein M indicates an oxidized M
    SEQ ID No: 7 RTTSFAESCKPVQQPSAFGSMKV
    Wherein S indicates a phosphorylated
    S, and
    Wherein C indicates a carbamidomethyl
    C
    SEQ ID No: 8 RTESITATSPASMVGGKPGSFRV
    Wherein S indicates a phosphorylated
    S, and
    Wherein M indicates an oxidized M
    SEQ ID No: 9 RTESITATSPASMVGGKPGSFRV
    Wherein S indicates a phosphorylated S
  • The three oxidized heavy peptides including both phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated peptides (100 fmol/μl) were mixed with a digested 6-protein mix background matrix (40 ng/μl, as described in Example 2) and IM tetraethylammonium bromide (TEAB) to a concentration of 2 mM to produce a slightly basic pH.
  • The amount of sample, enzyme, water, and DTT added are shown below for each sample reacted with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB:
  • 5 mM DTT
    Sample Enzyme from 100 mM
    Volume Volume stock
    Sample (μl) (μl) Water (μl)
    Sample mix 100 7 μl
    Control
    Sample mix
    100 1 5.05
    with ngMsrAB, 1
    Sample mix 100 2.27 5.11
    with nmMsrAB, 1
    Sample mix 100 1 5.05
    with
    ngMsrAB15
    Sample mix 100 2.27 5.11
    with nmMsrAB,
    15
  • The ratio of enzyme:protein was 1:4, and DTT had a final concentration of 5 mM for all reactions. Samples were incubated at 37° C. for 2 hours with gentle vortexing throughout. The resulting peptide mixture was then injected onto a C18 column (Easy-Spray PepMap C18, 3 μm, 75 μm×150 cm) and separated by a gradient of water and acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid.
  • The resulting liquid flow was infused into the Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer via electrospray ionization utilizing parallel reaction monitoring for collection of targeted spectra. The resulting raw data were processed and visualized using Skyline 3.1.0.7382 open source PRM analysis software.
  • FIG. 11A shows the disappearance of methionine oxidation of one peptide in the mix (SEQ ID No: 4) following treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB, while FIG. 11B shows the appearance of the peptide reduced at the methionine residue with treatment (SEQ ID No: 5). In FIGS. 11A and 11B, the bar graph areas show the cumulative area under the curve of individual b-ion and y-ion fragments (shown with different gray-scale shading) following treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB. These data indicate that greater than 90% reduction of an oxidized methionine is produced by treatment with the Msrs ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB, with a corresponding increase in the peptide with a reduced methionine. Note that oxidation of the cysteine residue of SEQ ID No: 4 and 5 was not affected by treatment with Msrs, as ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB are specific for reduction of oxidized methionines.
  • Next, Msr treatment was performed on the phosphoprotein SEQ ID No: 6, wherein there is a phosphorylated serine residue in addition to an oxidized methionine and cysteine residue. Treatment of SEQ ID No: 6 with ngMsrAB or nmMsrABT produced a disappearance of SEQ ID No: 6 (as shown in FIG. 12A) and the appearance of the phosphopeptide SEQ ID No: 7 that retained phosphorylation of the serine and oxidation of cysteine residues, but had reduction of the methionine residue (as shown in FIG. 12B). These data indicate that Msr treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB can produce a quantitative reduction of methionine oxidation with high specificity such that other post-translational modifications (including cysteine oxidation and serine phosphorylation) are maintained.
  • The specificity of Msr treatment was further confirmed with the third peptide in the 3-peptide mix, SEQ ID No: 8, which is also a phosphopeptide (i.e., the second phosphopeptide). SEQ ID No: 8 has both a phosphorylated serine and an oxidized methionine residue. As shown in FIG. 13A, Msr treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB produced a disappearance of SEQ ID No: 8. In contrast, FIG. 13B shows that these treatments caused the appearance of a reduced phophopeptide that lacked an oxidated methionine but maintained the serine phosphorylation (SEQ ID No: 9). These data confirm that Msr treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB is specific for reduction of oxidized methionine residues while maintaining the serine phosphorylation of treated peptides.
  • As noted above, FIG. 16 is a theoretical image presenting the tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) spectra for a native and Msr-treated protein. The theoretical native protein shows multiple oxidized (“ox”) peaks, while the Msr-treated protein contains a predominant peak that is non-oxidized. The starred region in the upper panels shows the m/z (mass-to-charge ratio) region selected for MS fragmentation. The lower panels show that the native protein has an MS/MS that is convoluted due to the large number of oxidized precursors that are shifting many of the MS/MS peaks by 16 Daltons (Da) for each oxidized methionine whereas proteins can have dozens of potentially oxidizable methionines. The number of oxidized methionines is indicative of the shift in m/z from the number (N) of 16 Da mass shifts. In contrast, the Msr-treated sample of the same protein shows a cleaner MS/MS spectrum, due to the fact that there is only one dominant precursor non-oxidized peak that was present in the m/z range selected for fragmentation.
  • The data in FIGS. 11, 12, and 13 indicate that Msr treatment with ngMsrAB or nmMsrAB can overcome variable oxidation of methionine residues in targeted analysis.
  • The results described herein demonstrate that treatment with methionine sulfoxide reductase can simplify mass spectrometry analysis by reducing the occurrence of oxidized methionine, and the resulting analysis complexity.
  • TABLE OF SEQUENCES
    SEQ
    ID NO Description Sequence
    1 MsrAB from Neisseria HHHHHHSSGL VPRGSHMWEL QLALGACSPK IVDAGAATVP
    gonorrhoeae, with His HTLSTLKTAD NRPASVYLKK DKPTLIKFWA SWCPLCLSEL
    tag/WQ protease site GQAEKWAQDA KFSSANLITV ASPGFLHEKK DGEFQKWYAG
    LNYPKLPVVT DNGGTIAQNL NISVYPSWAL IGKDGDVQRI
    VKGSINEAQA LALIRNPNAD LGSLKHSFYK PDTQKKDSAI
    MNTRTIYLAG GCFWGLEAYF QRIDGVVDAV SGYANGNTEN
    PSYEDVSYRH TGHAETVKVT YDADKLSLDD ILQYYFRVVD
    PTSLNKQGND TGTQYRSGVY YTDPAEKAVI AAALKREQQK
    YQLPLVVENE PLKNFYDAEE YHQDYLIKNP NGYCHIDIRK
    ADEPLPGKTK AAPQGKGFDA ATYKKPSDAE LKRTLTEEQY
    QVTQNSATEY AFSHEYDHLF KPGIYVDVVS GEPLFSSADK
    YDSGCGWPSF TRPIDAKSVT EHDDFSFNMR RTEVRSRAAD
    SHLGHVFPDG PRDKGGLRYC INGASLKFIP LEQMDAAGYG
    ALKGKVK
    10 MsrAB from Neisseria LALGACSPKI VDAGAATVPH TLSTLKTADN RPASVYLKKD
    gonorrhoeae KPTLIKFWAS WCPLCLSELG QAEKWAQDAK FSSANLITVA
    SPGFLHEKKD GEFQKWYAGL NYPKLPVVTD NGGTIAQNLN
    ISVYPSWALI GKDGDVQRIV KGSINEAQAL ALIRNPNADL
    GSLKHSFYKP DTQKKDSAIM NTRTIYLAGG CFWGLEAYFQ
    RIDGVVDAVS GYANGNTENP SYEDVSYRHT GHAETVKVTY
    DADKLSLDDI LQYYFRVVDP TSLNKQGNDT GTQYRSGVYY
    TDPAEKAVIA AALKREQQKY QLPLVVENEP LKNFYDAEEY
    HQDYLIKNPN GYCHIDIRKA DEPLPGKTKA APQGKGFDAA
    TYKKPSDAEL KRTLTEEQYQ VTQNSATEYA FSHEYDHLFK
    PGIYVDVVSG EPLFSSADKY DSGCGWPSFT RPIDAKSVTE
    HDDFSFNMRR TEVRSRAADS HLGHVFPDGP RDKGGLRYCI
    NGASLKFIPL EQMDAAGYGA LKGKVK
    2 MsrAB from Neisseria HHHHHHSSGL VPRGSHMWEL QLALGACSPK IVDAGAATVP
    meningitides, with His HTLSTLKTAD NRPASVYLKK DKPTLIKFWA SWCPLCLSEL
    tag/WQ protease site GQTEKWAQDA KFSSANLITV ASPGFLHEKK DGDFQKWYAG
    LNYPKLPVVT DNGGTIAQSL NISVYPSWAL IGKDSDVQRI
    VKGSINEAQA LALIRDPNAD LGSLKHSFYK PDTQKKDSKI
    MNTRTIYLAG GCFWGLEAYF QRIDGVVDAV SGYANGNTKN
    PSYEDVSYRH TGHAETVKVT YDADKLSLDD ILQYFFRVVD
    PTSLNKQGND TGTQYRSGVY YTDPAEKAVI AAALKREQQK
    YQLPLVVENE PLKNFYDAEE YHQDYLIKNP NGYCHIDIRK
    ADEPLPGKTK TAPQGKGFDA ATYKKPSDAE LKRTLTEEQY
    QVTQNSATEY AFSHEYDHLF KPGIYVDVVS GEPLFSSADK
    YDSGCGWPSF TRPIDAKSVT EHDDFSYNMR RTEVRSHAAD
    SHLGHVFPDG PRDKGGLRYC INGASLKFIP LEQMDAAGYG
    ALKGKVK
    11 MsrAB from Neisseria LALGACSPKI VDAGAATVPH TLSTLKTADN RPASVYLKKD
    meningitides KPTLIKFWAS WCPLCLSELG QTEKNAQDAK FSSANLITVA
    SPGFLHEKKD GDFQKWYAGL NYPKLPVVTD NGGTIAQSLN
    ISVYPSWALI GKDSDVQRIV KGSINEAQAL ALIRDPNADL
    GSLKHSFYKP DTQKKDSKIM NTRTIYLAGG CFWGLEAYFQ
    RIDGVVDAVS GYANGNTKNP SYEDVSYRHT GHAETVKVTY
    DADKLSLDDI LQYFFRVVDP TSLNKQGNDT GTQYRSGVYY
    TDPAEKAVIA AALKREQQKY QLPLVVENEP LKNFYDAEEY
    HQDYLIKNPN GYCHIDIRKA DEPLPGKTKT APQGKGFDAA
    TYKKPSDAEL KRTLTEEQYQ VTQNSATEYA FSHEYDHLFK
    PGIYVDVVSG EPLFSSADKY DSGCGWPSFT RPIDAKSVTE
    HDDFSYNMRR TEVRSHAADS HLGHVFPDGP RDKGGLRYCI
    NGASLKFIPL EQMDAAGYGA LKGKVK
    12 Methionine sulfoxide FALGACSPKI ADAEAATVPH TLSTLKTADN RPADVYLKKD
    reductase, Neisseria KPTLIKFWAS WCPLCLSELG QTEKWAQDAK FGSANLITVA
    lactamica SPGFLHEKKD GDFQKWYAGL NYPKLPVVTD NGGTIAQSLN
    ISVYPSWALI GKDGDVQRIV KGSINEAQAL ALIRDPNADL
    GSLKHSFYKP DTQKKDSKIM NTRTIYLAGG CFWGLEAYFQ
    RIDGVVDAVS GYANGNTKNP SYEDVSYRHT GHAETVKVTY
    DADKLSLDDI LQYYFRVVDP TSLNKQGNDT GTQYRSGVYY
    TDPAEKAVIA AALKREQQKY KLPLVVENEP LKNFYDAEEY
    HQDYLIKNPN GYCHIDIRKA DEPLPGKTKT APQGKGFDAA
    TYKKPSDAEL KRTLTEEQYQ VTQKSATEYA FSHEYDHLFK
    PGIYVDVVSG EPLFSSADKY DSGCGWPSFT RPIDAKSVTE
    HDDFSFNMRR TEVRSHAADS HLGHVFPDGP RDKGGLRYCI
    NGASLKFIPL EQMDAAGYGA LKGKVK
    13 Methionine sulfoxide FALGACSPKI ADAEAATVPH TLSTLKTADN RPADVYLKKD
    reductase, Neisseria KPTLIKFWAS WCPLCLSELG QTEKWAODAK FGSANLITVA
    polysaccharea SPGFLHEKKD GDFQKWYAGL NYPKLPVVTD NGGTIAQSLN
    ISVYPSWALI GKDGDVQRIV KGSINEAQAL ALIRDPNADL
    GSLKHSFYKP DTQKKDSKIM NTRTIYLAGG CFWGLEAYFQ
    RIDGVVDAVS GYANGNTKNP SYEDVSYRHT GHAETVKVTY
    DADKLSLDDI LQYYFRVVDP TSLNKQGNDT GTQYRSGVYY
    TDPAEKTVIA AALKREQQKY KLPLVVENEP LKNFYDAEEY
    HQDYLIKNPN GYCHIDIRKA DEPLPGKTKT APQGKGFDAA
    TYKKPSDAEL KRTLTEEQYQ VTQHSATEYA FSHEYDHLFK
    PGIYVDVVSG EPLFSSADKY DSGCGWPSFT RPIDAKSVTE
    HDDFSYNMRR TEVRSHAADS HLGHVFPDGP RDKGGLRYCI
    NGASLKFIPL EQMDAAGYGA LKGKVK
    14 Methionine sulfoxide FALGACSPKT ADAGAATVPH TLSTLKTADN RPAGVYLKKD
    reductase, Neisseria KPTLIKFWAS WCPLCLSELG QTEKWAQDAK FGSANLITVA
    flavescens SPGFLHEKKD GDFQKWYAGL NYPKLPVVTD NGGTIAQSLN
    ISVYPSWALI GKDGDVQRIV KGSINEAQAL ALIRDPNADL
    GSLKHSFYKP DTQKKDSKIM NTRTIYLAGG CFWGLEAYFQ
    RIDGVVDAVS GYANGNTKNP SYEDVSYRHT GHAETVKVTY
    DADRLSLDDI LQYYFRVVDP TSLNKQGNDT GTQYRSGVYY
    TDPAEKAVIA AALKREQQKY KLPLVVENEP LKNFYDAEEY
    HQDYLIKNPN GYCHIDIRKA DEPLAGKTQT APQGKGFDAA
    TYKKPSDAEL KRTLTEEQYQ VTQHSATEYA FSHEYDHLFK
    PGIYVDVVSG EPLFSSADKY DSGCGWPSFT RPIDAKSVTE
    HNDFSYNMRR TEVRSHAADS HLGHVFPDGP RDKGGLRYCI
    NGASLKFIPL EQMDAAGYGA LKGKVK
    15 Methionine sulfoxide FALGACSPKI ADAEAATVPH TLSTLKTADN RPASVYLKKD
    reductase, Neisseria KPTLIKFWAS WCPLCLSELG QTEKWAQDKR FSSANLITVA
    sicca SPGFLHEKKD GDFQKWYAGL NYPKLPVVTD NGGTIAQSLN
    ISVYPSWALI GKDGDVQRIV KGSINEAQAL ALIRDPNADL
    GRLKNAFYKP DTQKKDSKIM NTRTIYLAGG CFWGLEAYFQ
    RIDGVVDAVS GYANGKTKNP SYEDVSYRDT GHAETVKVTY
    DADKLSLDDI LQYYFRVVDP TSLNKQGNDT GTQYRSGVYY
    TDPAEKAVIA AALKREQQKY KQPLVVENEP LKNFYDAEEY
    HQDYLIKNPN GYCHIDIRKA DEPLPGKTKA APQGKGFDAA
    TYKKPSDAEL KRILTEEQYQ VTQKSATEYA FSHEYDHLFK
    PGIYVDVVSG EPLFSSADKF DSGCGWPSFT RPINAAAVTE
    HDDFSYNMRR TEVRSHAADS HLGHVFPDGP KDKGGLRYCI
    NGASLKFIPL EQMDAAGYGA LKGKVK
    16 Methionine sulfoxide FALGACSPKI ADAEAATVPH TLSTLKTADN RPASVYLRKD
    reductase, Neisseria KPTLIKFWAS WCPLCLSELG QTEKWAQDKR FSSANLITVA
    macacae SPGFLHEKKD GDFQKWYAGL NYPKLPVVTD NGGTIAQSLN
    ISVYPSWALI GKDGDVQRIV KGSINEAQAL ALIRDPNADL
    GRLKNAFYKP DTQKKDSKIM NTRTIYLAGG CFWGLEAYFQ
    RIDGVVDAVS GYANGKTKNP SYEDVSYRDT GHAETVKVTY
    DADKLSLDDI LQYYFRVVDP TSLNKQGNDT GTQYRSGVYY
    TDPAEKAVIA AALKREQQKY KQPLVVENEP LKNFYDAEEY
    HQDYLIKNPN GYCHIDIRKA DEPLPGKTKA APQGKGFDAA
    TYKKPSDAEL KRILTEEQYQ VTQKSATEYA FSHEYDHLFK
    PGIYVDVVSG EPLFSSADKF DSGCGWPSFT RPINAAAVTE
    HDDFSYNMRR TEVRSHAADS HLGHVFPDGP KDKGGLRYCI
    NGASLKFIPL EQMDAAGYGA LKGKVK
    17 Methionine sulfoxide FALGACSPKI ADAEAATVPH TLSTLKTADN RPASVYLKKD
    reductase, Neisseria KPTLIKFWAS WCPLCLSELG QTEKWAQDKR FSSANLITVA
    mucosa SPGFLHEKKD GDFQKWYAGL NYPKLPVVTD NGGTIAQSLN
    ISVYPSWALI GKDGDVQRIV KGSINEAQAL ALIRDPNADL
    GRLKNAFYKP DTQKKDSKIM NTRTIYLAGG CFWGLEAYFQ
    RIDGVVDAVS GYANGKTKNP SYEDVSYRDT GHAETVKVTY
    DADKLSLDDI LQYYFRVVDP TSLNKQGNDT GTQYRSGVYY
    TDPAEKAVIA AALKREQQKY KQPLVIENEP LKNFYDAEEY
    HQDYLIKNPN GYCHIDIRKA DEPLPGKTKA APQGKGFDAA
    TYKKPSDAEL KRILTEEQYQ VTQKSATEYA FSHEYDHLFK
    PGIYVDVVSG EPLFSSADKF DSGCGWPSFT RPINAAAVTE
    HDDFTYNMRR TEVRSHAADS HLGHVFADGP QDKGGLRYCI
    NGASLKFIPL EQMDAAGYGA LKGKVK
    18 Methionine sulfoxide LALGACSSKI MDTEAATVPQ ALSSLKTPDN RPASVFLKKD
    reductase, Neisseria KPTLIKFWAS WCPLCLSELG QTEKWAQDTK FGSANLITVA
    flavescens SPGFLHEKKD GDFQKWYAGL NYPKLPVVTD NGGTIAQSLN
    ISVYPSWALI GKDGDVQRIV KGSINEAQAL ALIRDPNADL
    GRLKNSFYKP DTQKKDSAIM NTRTIYLAGG CFWGLEAYFQ
    RIDGVVDAVS GYANGKTENP SYEDVSYRDT GHAETVKVTY
    DADKLSLDDI LQYFFRVVDP TSLNKQGNDT GTQYRSGVYY
    TDPAEKAVIA AALKREQQKY KQPLVVENEP LKNFYDAEEY
    HQDYLIKNPN GYCHIDIRKA DEPLPGKTKA APQGKGFDAA
    TYKKPGAAEL KRLLTEEQYQ VTQNSATEYA FSHEYDHLFK
    PGIYVDVVSG EPLFSSADKF DSGCGWPSFT HPINASAVTE
    HDDFSYNMRR TEVRSHAADS HLGHVFPDGP KDKGGLRYCI
    NGASLKFIPL EQMDAAGYGA LKGKVK
    19 Methionine sulfoxide MIMRRLLTPR NLLLLVLLAV MFWSFYSGAS PSHGTPPASA
    reductase, Lautropia DKAATAQGGG AAGAAQASDG APEQPVGLPL AYLQKLKDVA
    mirabilis DKPATTYIKP GRPTLVKFWA SWCPLCLSEL ADTNAWATDE
    RFSSAVNLVT LASPGFLHEK PQADFVTWYG GLDYPAMPVL
    LDVGGLLARQ LGVRVYPSWV LLDADGGVAR VVRGRLSEAQ
    ALALIEDPEA DLARLAQAER ASFYQPDSQK SSKVMNTKTI
    YLAGGCFWGV EAYFQRIPGV VDAVSGYANG RTQNPSYEDV
    IRGAGHAETV KVTYDADRLS LADILQYYFR IIDPTSLNKQ
    GNDRGAQYRT GVYYTDAADK ATIQQALDAL QQKYSRPLVV
    ENLPLQNFYE AEEYHQDYLA KNPNGYCHID VRKADEPLPG
    KPAGNPPAAA AVGRGFDVAS YRKASDAELK QRLSAEQYRV
    TQQSGTERAF THEYDHLFAP GIYVDVVSGQ PLFSSKDKFD
    SGCGWPSFTR PIQPSAVTEH EDLSYNMRRV EVRSQAADSH
    LGHVFPDGPR DKGGLRYCIN GASLRFIPLE KMAEEGYGNL
    VDAVK
    20 Methionine sulfoxide MKNPRQTLCS LIACVLFAGA VAPLPVLADA HASRAEAPLP
    reductase, HQLQQRLLAL KDPRDQPAAD YLDQSKPTLI KFWASWCPLC
    Cardiobacierium LATLEETQAW RGDKAFAGVN LVTIASPDHL GENDEATFKE
    hominis WYRGLDYPNL PVLVNNGGDI ARDIGVAVYP SWALLDKNGN
    VARVIKGHIN REQALALLAN PQAELAQPAQ KFYKPKPKGA
    TNMNTKTIHL AGGCFWGLEA YFERIPGVVD AVSGYANGKT
    KNPSYEDVSH RGTGHAETVK VTYDPERISL DDLLRYYFRV
    VDPTSLNQQG NDRGVQYRSG VYYTDPAERA TIEKAFAEEQ
    KKHQKPLVVE NLPLDNFYEA EEYHQDYLAK NPNGYCHIDI
    RKADIPLEKP AATAPAPAQT DANGEPVIDA AKYHKPDAAE
    LKQKLDAQAY EVTQNSATER AFSHEYDHLF APGLYVDVVS
    GEPLFSSADK FQSGCGWPSF TKPINRAVVT EHDDTSYNMH
    RTEIRSRVAD AHLGHVFPDG PKDKGGLRYC INGASLKFIP
    LAEMEKAGYG DLVDAVKKGE KL
    21 Methionine sulfoxide MKNPRQTLCS LIACVLFAGA VAPLPVLADA HASRAEAPLP
    reductase, HQLQQRLLAL KDPRDKPAAD YLDQSKPTLI KFWASWCPLC
    Gammaproteobacteria LATLEETQAW RGDKAFAGVN LVTIASPDHL GENDEATFKE
    WYRGLDYPNL PVLVNNGGDI ARDIGVAVYP SWALLDKNGN
    VARVIKGHIN REQALALLAN PQAELAQPAQ KFYKPKPKGA
    TNMNTKTIHL AGGCFWGLEA YFERIPGVVD AVSGYANGKT
    KNPSYEDVSH RGTGHAETVK VTYDPERISL DDILRYYFRV
    VDPTSLNQQG NDRGVQYRSG VYYTDPAERA TIEKAFAEEQ
    KKHQKPLVVE NLPLDNFYEA EEYHQDYLAK NPNGYCHIDI
    RKADIPLEKP AATAPAPAQT DANGEPVIDA TKYHKPDAAE
    LKKKLDAQAY EVTQNSATER AFSHEYDHLF APGLYVDVVS
    GEPLFSSADK FQSGCGWPSF TKPINRAVVT EHDDTSYNMH
    RTEIRSRVAD AHLGHVFPDG PKDKGGLRYC INGASLKFIP
    LAEMAKAGYG DLVDAVKKGE KL
    22 Methionine sulfoxide MKSPLAKANK PNFFQQLTQL QPVTNGSSNM QFNNNRPTLV
    reductase, KLWASWCPLC LSELELTQSW ANDPDFAQVN LTTLASPGVL
    Marinospirillum GELSLEEFKQ WYAGLDYPDL PLQLDPSGEL VKKLGVQVYP
    insulare SWAVLDAQGN LQRVVKGSIN KAQALALIAN PEADLKQLQT
    TFYQPKQPAQ ALPINTQSVY LAGGCFWGVE GYFERIDGVV
    DAVSGYANGR TENPSYEDVI YRNTGHAETV KVTYNSDKLS
    LDDILVYFFR IIDPTSLNKQ GNDRGTQYRT GIYTTDPAEQ
    RLVATALARL EEEYTQPILV ENLPLSGFYE AEEYHQDYLL
    KNPNGYCHVD LNKADIPLPN QLTNQSTDKN TPKPFDPNNF
    QKPDTASLKQ RLTSEQFHVT QNNGTERAFT HEYDDLFEPG
    LYVDIVSGEP LFSSKDKYQA GCGWPSFVKP IEENALVEVV
    DTSYNMRRIE VRSRLADSHL GHVFPDGPKD RGGLRYCING
    ASLKFIPLAE MQAQGYGDWQ ALIN
    23 methionine sulfoxide MPFLYFLRTI ILGIMALYSS TLFAQTINFN ALKDINNQKA
    reductase, Pelistega NFYIKNNKPT VVKFWASWCP LCLGELEQTE QWVQDKDFAM
    indica VNMVTLASPG YLGEKKAADF SQWALSLPYK KLPILIDTEQ
    TIAKSLNIRV YPSWVLLDSN GQLVKVVKGT LSKEQLLGVI
    KNPDAPIQKA STTFYKADTN SEHKKPIRTE TIYLAGGCFW
    GLEGYFQRIP GVIDAVSGYA NGNTQNPSYE DVVYRHTGHA
    ETVKVTYDID KLSFADILEY YFRVIDPTSL NQQGNDKGTQ
    YRTGIYYTKA DYQPLIAEAI KKEQTKYKKP IVVENKPLAN
    FYPAEEYHQD YLLKNPNGYC HIDLNKADEP LSTPSPKGFN
    MKEYKKPSQS ELRQRLTPEQ YRVTQESGTE YAFSHEYDEL
    FAPGLYVDIV SGQPLFSSDD KFNSHCGWPS FTQPIEKTVV
    TEHKDFSHNM YRIEVRSQAA DSHLGHVFPD GPADRGGLRY
    CINGASLRFI PYADLDKEGY GEWKDKIKQK
    24 methionine sulfoxide MKKIFALCVT LGIALVTLAF AKLPNSSTDK ATQGADDKAF
    reductase, Basilea TYLLSLDDIH QQPAKQLIDT NRPTLVKLWA SWCSSCLSEL
    psittacipulmonis DEVEAWSKDK RFKAINFVTV VSPSLYSEKN KDDFTKWFLS
    LDYPQTKVLL DTKGTLSRTL NIRAYPSWAL FDEKGHLVRV
    IKGSISKVQA LALIDNPQAD LKSVQEKANR VTKKEVIDPM
    YQKTIYLAGG CFWGVEAYFE RIDGVIDAVS GYANGRTENP
    KYEDVIYRHT GHAETVKVTF DTRRLSLADI LQYYFRVIDP
    TSLNKQGNDR GTQYRTGVYY TDEKDKAVID AALANEQKKY
    TKPLVVENLP LRNFYLAEDY HQDYLKKNPN GYCHIDISLA
    DRPLERGTNI DKPVRFWETY EKPSDNELRQ QLSNEQYRIT
    QKNGTEYAFS HAYDHLFEPG LYVDIVSGEP LFTSTDKYDS
    GCGWPSFTQP IQAQAITEHE DLSYNMRRIE VRSRYADSHL
    GHVFPDGPSD KGGLRYCING ASLRFIPLEQ MAAEGYAEFI
    PLIKKP
    25 methionine sulfoxide MVQKIPHFFL SILFLTLTVL SLPAQSFSFS TKQHLGPRLE
    reductase, Oligella KLNDVQGVKA TEFLQTSRPT LVKFWASWCP LCLATLEETR
    ureolytica DWRLDPDFSN TDIVTLASPG YLKEQSPKDF RQWYQGVNIE
    HLPVLVNDGG DLTREIGVSV YPSWALLDAQ GRLQRVIKGH
    ITKEQALGLI ADKDFDIQRS APTFYRPSTD TAQQQKDKSN
    LMNSKEIYLA GGCFWGVEAY FERIPGVLDA ISGYANGNTQ
    NPTYEQVIYM GTGHAETVKV VYDPERVDLE TILRHFFRII
    DPTSLNRQGN DRGTQYRTGI YYTDASDAAL ITAALAREQS
    KWQKPLVVEN EALDAFYVAE EYHQDYLAKN PNGYCHVDLN
    LVDQPLEKEE FELEMKSGEN TQTMQNLKSE IRINPADYSV
    PSDEELRQKL SPLEYQVTQQ NATERAFTHS YDNLYEPGIY
    VDIVSGEPLF SSDDKYDSGC GWPSFTKPIV PEVVTEHLDT
    TYNMQRIETR SRVADAHLGH VFPDGPRDRG GLRYCINGAS
    LKFIPKAEMA AAGYGDLLPL VSDK
    26 methionine sulfoxide MHTLFRILST LLFLSLSFFS FSAHSVGVSS QPHVGQRIAK
    reductase, LKDFQDKPAT DYLKKGQPSL VKFWASWCPL CLATLEETRD
    Alcaligenaceae WRLDPDFAGV NIISLASPGY LNEQSPKEFR QWYRGVNFDN
    LPVIVNDGGE LTRAIGISAY PSWGLIDAEG RLQRVIKGHI
    TKEQALALVA DKDYEIKRKT PDFYRPSKDT AQQQKDKANL
    MKTKEIYLAG GCFWGVEAYF ERIPGVVNAV SGYANGKTRQ
    PTYEQVIYMN TGHAETVKVV YDPERIDLET ILRHYLRIID
    PTSLNRQGND RGTQYRTGIY YSEPSDKDII TAVLAREQSK
    WERPIVVENQ PLIAFDEAEE YHQDYLAKNP NGYCHIDLNL
    VDKPLAEEKT PLNLQNGSNT KAMQEHNAQS SITVNPADYH
    VPKEEELRKT LSPLSYQVTQ QNATERAFTH PYDHLFEAGI
    YVDIVSGEPL FSSDDKYDSG CGWPSFTKPI VPEVITEHLD
    TSYNMQRIET RSRVADAHLG HVFPDGPRDR GGLRYCINGA
    ALKFIPKAEM EAAGYGYLLP LVSDK
    27 methionine sulfoxide MSYKNNQKNS NHEEIKKPRS SSWLKNVSAF SMTTVLSAGI
    reductase, LVACGQMSNA ESSASSSTKS GSQNTGVTSS RDMLPSDMLK
    Psychrobacterpiscatorii QMQALPQLTK GLGDTGAAVI DPNKPTLVKF WASWCPLCLG
    TLEETETWRT DPKFSGLNVV TVASPGHLNE KADGEFSTWY
    AGVQADYPKL PVLTDPSGEL INKLGVQVYP SWAILDKNGN
    LVHLVKGNIS AEQAYALAEN AGNGFAELKA GNAKPANAQA
    SDNNKIETIK QKDGVYYNET GKPINTRSIY LAGGCFWGVE
    AYMERVDGVI DAVSGYANGD TANPSYEQVI RGSGHAETVK
    VTYDADKTDL DTILKYYFRV VDPTSLNKQG NDRGVQYRSG
    VYYTDKEDKA VIDAALKRVQ SKYEQKVVVE NEPLDNFYLA
    EMYHQDYLAK NPNGYCHIDL SLADDKPEGA ARTKLAPVET
    IAETLDPKRY AKFDKDALKN TLTKAQYNIT QEAGTERAFS
    HEYDDLFAPG IYVDVVSGEP LFLSTDKYQS GCGWPSFTKP
    IDIQVITQHQ DTAFNMVRTE VRSRVADSHL GHVFPDGPKD
    RGGLRYCING GALQFIPVDV MPQSGYAPLV KLVKS
    28 methionine sulfoxide MLKQRQLPRF RSLGLSLSVL AVLLGLHSTR VLAAPQSQVA
    reductase, Brackiella PNSDLRSALG QLTTVTGQSG QNYLRADRPT LVKFWASWCP
    oedipodis LCLASLHETS AWSRDQDFAA FNIVSVAAPG YFNELPLEQF
    KHWFAGVDEA DKKGLVVLLN EGGQLTRRLG IAAYPSWALL
    DRQGRLQRIV KGQLSKEQAL GLLTNKDYSL KPAPKSFYKK
    SSASQQDSAT LMNTKTIYLA GGCFWGVEAY FERIPGVVDA
    VSGYANGKSR HPSYEDVVYR NTGHAETVAV TYDPKQINLA
    QLLTHYFRLI NPTSLNQQGN DRGTQYRTGI YYTDTADKAV
    ISRALADLQH HYKAPIVVEN QPLAAFDKAE DYHQDYLAKN
    PNGYCHIDLR QADQPLSQEE LKQVQHIQDA TQTDASAPKS
    PELTPQRFKV PSPEELKKTL SPLAYDVTQN NATERAFTSE
    LDHVFEPGIY VDVVSGEPLF SSTDKFDSGC GWPSFTKPIK
    ADLITEHSDH SYNMIRTEVR SHTANSHLGH VFNDGPKDKG
    GLRYCINGAA LKFIPKDKMQ EAGYGDYLQY VK
    29 methionine sulfoxide MGKFLKVLFS VFLVAATQIA CSQAKSNSTL SQLKDVDNKS
    reductase, Taylorella FNIDSSKPTL IKFWASWCPL CLGELPDVEN WYKDEAFKGV
    asinigenitalis NLVTIASPSY LSEKKEEAFK NWAKQSGIYK SGSFPIYVDP
    KGSHAKKWGI KVYPSWVLLD KNQQVQRIIK GSISKKQALA
    LINNKDANLM ETEKKYYKES NNGESKIPLR TETIYLAGGC
    FWGVEAYFQK IPGIVDAVSG YANGNVENPH YRLVTTGTTG
    FTETVKITYD IDKIGIQEIL AHYFRIIDPT SLNKQGNDRG
    TQYRTGIYYE KPEYKEIVAK ALEDLQKKYS EPVVVENMQL
    KNFYMAEEYH QDYLIKNPNG YCHIDLSLAD KPLEGVKKMK
    KGFDEASYVK PSDEELRKTL TPEQYRVTQE EGTEFAFSHE
    YDNLFEPGIY VDVVSGEPLF SSDDKYNSGC GWPSFSKPIE
    DDNIHEKKDF KIGYPRTEVR SSAADSHLGH VFNDGPKELG
    GLRYCINGAS LRFIPYSEMK EQGYEEWMDK VKPIKGGATE
    VNKK
    30 methionine sulfoxide MTKPRLRSHA CAISLGIFAS LSMLSACGKP NDIQTQSVTH
    reductase, Moraxella QDMLPSDTLA QLSALPQLTQ GLGDTGKSVI DPNKPTLVKF
    catarrhalis WASWCPLCLS TLQETHDWRG DPNLAGFNII TVASPTHLNE
    KNTQDFTNWY QVLQADYPNL PVLIDSSGQL IKSLGIQVYP
    SWAILDKNGQ LVYLSKGNLS VEQVSYLAKN PQALNELKAQ
    SHQTAMPTKD KDGVHYNDQG MPLNTKTIYL AGGCFWGVEA
    YFERIDGVVD AVSGYANGDE TLKNPSYEQV IAGSGHAETV
    KVVYDADKMD LDTLLRYYFR IIDPTSVNKQ GNDRGIQYRT
    GVYYTDPSDK AIIDNALNEL QQKYKAPIVV ENLPLSHFAL
    AEDYHQDYLT KNPNGYCHVD LSLANDKIVS KAQTLPKAST
    IQEALDPKRY QAFDKDNLKN TLTKAQYDIT QNAGTERAFS
    HAYDHLFDDG LYVDIVSGEP LFLSTDKYNS GCGWPSFTKP
    IDPQVITEHT DTSYNMVRTE VRSRTADSHL GHVFPDGPKA
    RGGLRYCING DALKFIPKAD MDKHGYGALL PLIKPAQP
    31 methionine sulfoxide MFLIKNLLEC QLTAIFDALQ IDEKCTMVNF PQSAKNLTIT
    reductase, LLISSLLLLG CQKMNAKENA TYAGAASKAD VLPTDTLATL
    Enhydrobacter QGLSQINPKL GKMGRHVIDP NKPTVVKFWA SWCPLCLATL
    aerosaccus QESDAWAKQY PDMNVISVVS PGHLSEKSSQ DFQTWYTVLA
    KDYANLAVLM DNNGKLIKQF GVQVYPSFAI LDKQGNLLKL
    VKGNLTPTQI QALSDNASND FAELKALNQA KTPYSQTAQA
    HEQANNQASK QAASIKALAP INHNGVYYQA DGKTPIRTHT
    IYLAGGCFWG LEAYMERVDG VVDAISGYAN GNSANPSYEQ
    VIAGSGHAET VKVIYDIDKT NLATLLAYYV RVIDPTSLNK
    QGNDRGAQYR TGIYYTDAND KPIIDKTLAD LAKKYPQKIV
    VENKPLANFY DAENYHQDYL SKNPNGYCHI DINLANQKIP
    VIKSLAPATT VTEALNPSRY QNYDKNVKSR LTQAQYDVTQ
    NAATERAFSH QYDHLFAKGL YVDIVSGEPL FLSTDKYDSG
    CGWPSFTKPI SANVITTSTD SSFNMTRTEV RSRVANSHLG
    HVFDDGPKDK GGLRYCINGD ALQFIALADM QAAGYGALMP
    LVK
    32 methionine sulfoxide MKKFYKIFLT FLFLIGGTMV FANRRGIENF ELKTLDGKEY
    reductase, TLPKGKKVYL KAWASWCPIC LSSLEELDSF TKEEDRIEIV
    Fusobacterium TVVFPGKSGE MSKEEFKKWY SSLGYKNIKV LVDEKGELLK
    mortiferum KARIRAFPTS IFIDETGEIK GVVPGQLPKE QILKIMGVDS
    QKKEEVVKKE DNVPVTSKNE GQKIEEIYLA GGCFWGVEAY
    MERIYGVVDA VSGYANGKTE NPRYEDVVYR DTGHAETVKV
    TYDSNKISLS TLLEYYFRIV DPTSLNKQGN DRGTQYRTGI
    YYIKAEDEKV VTQALENLQK KYDKKVVIEN KPLENFYLAE
    EYHQDYLKKN PNGYCHIDLN KANDIIVDAS KYKKLSDKEL
    REKLSEKEYR ITQLNDTERA FDNEYWNFFE PGIYVDITTG
    EPLFSSKDKY NSMCGWPSFT KPISEDVVTY HTDRSFNMVR
    TEVRSRVGDA HLGHVFEDGP KDKGGLRYCI NSGALNFIPV
    DEMEKEGYGY LLKLVK
    33 methionine sulfoxide MKKRFLLIVF AVIFSITACT SKRDVTNSDE KKKDEIRKQI
    reductase, Helcococcus DEIISQHQNE NNDENPNDSI DYSKTKLKTI YLAGGCFWGV
    sueciensis EAYMEKVYGV ADVVSGYANG NTENPTYEDV LYKNTEHAET
    VKVDYDPEKI SLEKILDYYL LVVDPTSLNK QGNDRGTQYR
    SGVYFTDENE RKIIEERLKK EQEKYKDKIV VEVQKLENFY
    EAEEYHQDYL KKNPNGYCHI DISKANEIII DQSKYPKPSD
    EELKKKLTEA QYRVTQENDT EHAFSNEYWD NKEKGIYVDV
    ATGEPLFGST DKYDSGCGWP SFTKPISKEV VTYHKDFSFN
    MERTEVRSRS GDSHLGHVFD DGPKESGGLR FCINSASIRF
    IPLEDMEKEG YGYLTHIIK
    34 methionine sulfoxide MKKILLLMVL AATLLVTAYI VKANTTHNEL ANSEMTNKEM
    reduclase, Eremococcus THNEMKNDDT RNKIDEIITQ QQKKSADENP NDAVDYSKAE
    coleocola LKTIYLAGGC FWGVEAYLEK VYGVADVVSG YANGDTENPT
    YEDVSYKNSG HAETVKVDYD PARISLEQIL DYYLLVVDPT
    SMNRQGNDRG LQYRSGVYYT DESERKIIEE RLNKEQAKYE
    DKIVVEVEKL DNFYEAEEYH QDYLKKNPNG YCHIDISKAN
    EVIIDQSKYP KPSDEELKKK LTDVQYKVTQ ENDTEHAFSN
    EYWDNKDKGI YVDVATGEPL FSSTDKFDSG CGWPSFSKPI
    AKEVVTYHTD LSYNMKRTEV RSRSGNSHLG HVFEDGPKEL
    GGLRYCINSA SIRFVPLEEM EQEGYGYLTH LIK
    3 TurboLuc MEAEAERGKL PGKKLPLEVL IELEANARKA GCTRGCLTCL
    SKIKCTAKMK KYIPGRCADY GGDKKIGQAG IVGAIVDIPE
    ISGFKEMEPM EQFIAQVDRC ADCTTGCLKG LANVKCSDLL
    KKWLPGRCAT FADKIQSEVD NIKGLAGD
    4 Peptide 1 RTTSFAESCKPVQQPSAFGSMKV,
    Wherein C indicates an carbamidomethyl C, and
    Wherein A indicates an oxidized M
    5 Peptide 1, reduced RTTSFAESCKPVQQPSAFGSMKV
    Wherein C indicates an carbamidomethyl C
    6 Peptide 2 RTTSFAESCKPVQQPSAFGSMKV
    Wherein S indicates a phosphorylated S,
    Wherein C indicates an carbamidomethyl C, and
    Wherein M indicates an oxidized M
    7 Peptide 2, reduced RTTSFAESCKPVQQPSAFGSMKV
    Wherein S indicates a phosphorylated S, and
    Wherein C indicates an oxidized C
    8 Peptide 3 RTESITATSPASMVGGKPGSFRV
    Wherein S indicates a phosphorylated S, and
    Wherein M indicates an oxidized M
    9 Peptide 3, reduced RTESITATSPASMVGGKPGSFRV
    Wherein S indicates a phosphorylated S
    35 Msr-A, accession # mteqatfagg cfwctesvfk qidgvtdvvs gyagghvadp
    WP_049944603.1 syeavcreet ghaecvqlty dpeevsyedl lavhftthtp
    ttkdregndv gtqyrsavfy hdeaqretve alieeiepgy
    dsdivtevep letfypaeey hqdyfeknpd qsycqltipp
    kieklkqkha ella
    36 Msr-A, accession # mateteratl aggcfwciea pmeeldgvhd vtsgyagght
    WP_005043086.1 enptyravcs gdtghaevvq ieydpdriay edlldvlftv
    hdptqlnrqg pdvgtqyrsa ifthdesqhe taaayidald
    aeggyddpvv teiepletfy easeehqnyy eknpedaycs
    fhaqpkiekv rekfaekta
    37 Msr-A, accession # messqtatfg ggcfwcieaa fkeldgisdv tsgyaggtve
    WP_058572480.1 nptyeqvcsg ttghaeviqv eydpsvvdyd elldvffavh
    dptqlnrqgp dvgtqyrsiv lyhdddqrrl aeayvealdd
    sydddvvtel apfetfyeae ayhqdyfekn pndaycqfha
    spkiekvrek fadklan
    38 Msr-A, accession # meratfgggc fwcveaafeq legvdsvtsg yagghtedpt
    WP_015322392.1 yeavcsgstg haevvqveyn pdeiayedll evfftvhdpt
    tkdregpdvq sqyrsaiyah deaqletaea fadeleaegl
    yegivteiep ldtfyeaeqy hqnyfeknpn daycsmhaap
    kvetvrekfg envapeh
    39 Msr-A, accession # msdashddel etatlgggcf wcveavlkel dgvrsvtsgy
    WP_015408133.1 agghvedpsy eavcrgetgh aevvqvafap etiafrdlle
    vfftihtptt lnregpdvgs qyrsavyyhn deqrrvvesv
    igeleplydd divteveple tfypaeeyhq dyfdknpsdt
    yctvnvnpkl sklrekhael la
    40 Msr-A, accession # meratfgggc fwcteaamke legvdsvtsg yagghtedps
    WP_006431385.1 yrevcsgntg haevvqveyd pdaigydell evffathdpt
    qlnrqgpdvg tqyrsivlyh dddqrtqaea yidaldseyd
    ddvvtelepl etfyraeekh qdyfeknpnd ayctmhaapk
    vekvrekfae nvaaeh
    41 Msr-B, accession # mseseeelpd kdeewreils deeyrilres gteprfssdl
    WP_004963222.1 idvedegvft cagcgtelfd sdrkfesetg wpsfwdvyqe
    gnvetradns hgmertevic aecgghlghv fddgpepsgk
    rycingaald fese
    42 Msr-B, accession # msnepattge lpetdeewre vltdeeyeil reqgtepkfs
    WP_049996544.1 gelldqhddg tfvcagcgte lfssdtkfes ktgwpsfsdv
    adegnvelrr dtshgmerte vvcatcgghl ghvfddgpep
    tgkrycinsa algfdgdes
    43 Msr-B, accession # msdsefslse sewrerlsed ayrvlreqgt eprfsgehvd
    WP_007275637.1 rsddgvyrca gcgtelfdse tkydsncgwp sfyaaedsni
    elrrdlshgm drtevvcstc gghlghvfdd gpeptgkrfc
    insaaldfea dee
    44 Msr-B, accession # msnepdvptd dgewreeltd eqyrilreag teapfsgeyv
    WP_008423757.1 dhkddgsyac vgcgttlfds etkfdsgcgw psfsdvdddr
    vetrldtshg mrrtevlcan cgghlghvfd dgpeptgkry
    cinsavlefd ge
    45 Msr-B, accession # mdsklpqtda ewrevltdee yrilreqgte pkfsgehlga
    WP_015408129A.1 dadgvyrcag cgaelfdset kfdsnsgwps fydaeegave
    lredrshgmv rtevvcarce ghlghvfedg pdptgqrycm
    nsvalefdde a
    46 Msr-B, accession # msdesdhvpt ndeewrerls deeyrilrea gtetpfsgey
    WP_007109050.1 vdhkadgsya cagcgaelfd setkfdsgcg wpsfydaddd
    rietrtdtsh gmrrtevvca ncgghlghvf ddgpeptgkr
    ycinsvalef de
    47 Msr-B, accession # msetdetptd errsdeslpe tddewrerls deeyeilrer
    WP_023395429.1 gtearfsgeh vdrdddgvye cagcgtvifd sgtkydsgcg
    wpsfyaadds kvtlrdddrh gmsrvevlca ncdghlghvf
    qdgpeptger fcinsvaldf esrerad

Claims (31)

1. A method of preparing a polypeptide sample for separation and/or analysis, comprising contacting the polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase (MSR) enzyme under conditions suitable for reducing oxidized methionines in the polypeptide sample.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide, or is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-S-sulfoxide and at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing methionine-R-sulfoxide.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the method comprises contacting the polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme that is capable of reducing both methionine-S-sulfoxide and methionine-R-sulfoxide.
5. (canceled)
6. (canceled)
7. The method of claim 4, wherein the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase from an organism selected from Neisseria, Lautropia, Cardiobacterium, Gammaproteobacteria, Pelistega, Marinospirillum, Basilea, Oligella, Alcagenaceae, Psychrobacter, Brackiella, Taylorella, Moraxella, Enhydrobacter, Fusobacterium, Helcococcus, Paenibacillus, Eremococcus, Methanobrevibacter, Methanomassiliicoccales, Methanocorpusculum, Thermoplasmatales, Methanometylophilus, Methanoculleus, and Methanocella.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the MsrAB enzyme is derived from a bacterial methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is derived from a methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitides, Neisseria lactamica, Neisseria polysaccharea, Neisseria flavescens, Neisseria sicca, Neisseria nacacae, or Neisseria mucosa.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 70% identical to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 10 to 34.
11. (canceled)
12. (canceled)
13. The method of claim 13, further comprising removing the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme following reduction of oxidized methionines in the polypeptide sample.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme is present at a weight ratio of between 1:100 and 1:2 enzyme:polypeptide.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein the contacting occurs under reducing conditions.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the contacting occurs in the presence of dithiothreitol (DTT) and/or dithioerythritol (DTE).
17. The method of claim 1, which is a method of preparing a sample for liquid chromatography.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein the method further comprises subjecting polypeptides of the polypeptide sample to liquid chromatography.
19. (canceled)
20. The method of claim 1, which is a method of preparing a sample for capillary electrophoresis.
21. The method of claim 20, wherein the method further comprises subjecting polypeptides of the polypeptide sample to capillary electrophoresis.
22. The method of claim 1, which is a method of preparing a sample for mass spectrometry.
23. (canceled)
24. (canceled)
25. (canceled)
26. The method of claim 1, wherein the method comprises fragmenting the polypeptides by digestion with trypsin, chymotrypsin, AspN, GluC, LysC, LysN, ArgC, proteinase K, or thermolysin, or by chemical cleavage with CNBr.
27.-35. (canceled)
36. A method of producing a mass spectrometry spectra comprising contacting polypeptides of a polypeptide sample with at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme under conditions suitable for reducing oxidized methionines in the polypeptide sample, and injecting the polypeptides into a liquid chromatograph/mass spectrometer detection system or directly into a mass spectrometer detection system, wherein the polypeptides of the polypeptide sample have not been fragmented.
37.-52. (canceled)
53. A kit comprising at least one methionine sulfoxide reductase enzyme.
54.-66. (canceled)
US16/070,225 2016-01-15 2017-01-04 Protein preparation Abandoned US20190072565A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/070,225 US20190072565A1 (en) 2016-01-15 2017-01-04 Protein preparation

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201662279421P 2016-01-15 2016-01-15
US201662368336P 2016-01-29 2016-01-29
US16/070,225 US20190072565A1 (en) 2016-01-15 2017-01-04 Protein preparation
PCT/US2017/012121 WO2017123440A1 (en) 2016-01-15 2017-01-04 Protein preparation by reduction of oxidized methionines

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20190072565A1 true US20190072565A1 (en) 2019-03-07

Family

ID=57985012

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/070,225 Abandoned US20190072565A1 (en) 2016-01-15 2017-01-04 Protein preparation

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20190072565A1 (en)
EP (2) EP3402894A1 (en)
WO (2) WO2017123440A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110747182A (en) * 2019-08-14 2020-02-04 山东寿光巨能金玉米开发有限公司 Cell scaffold aggrecanase and preparation method and application thereof

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2018222345A1 (en) 2017-06-01 2018-12-06 Thermo Finnigan Llc Automated determination of mass spectrometer collision energy
CN108611332A (en) * 2018-05-11 2018-10-02 遵义医学院 A kind of sulfoxide reductase and its application in chiral sulfoxide synthesis
EP3897706A4 (en) * 2018-12-21 2022-11-23 Griffith University Compositions, methods and uses for eliciting an immune response
CN110387380B (en) * 2019-07-09 2021-05-04 武汉华肽生物科技有限公司 Production method of gene recombinant protein Tat-hMsrA

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5660701A (en) * 1996-02-29 1997-08-26 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Protein separations by capillary electrophoresis using amino acid-containing buffers
WO1997039141A1 (en) * 1996-04-14 1997-10-23 Promega Corporation Novel reagent, method, and kit for the quantitation of oxidation-reduction phenomena in proteins and peptides
US20170152541A1 (en) * 2015-11-23 2017-06-01 California Institute Of Technology Reduction of oxidated methionine peptides for mass spectrometry

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101974089B (en) * 2010-06-11 2012-09-26 华中科技大学 Recombination fusion protein Trx-TAT-hMsrA and application thereof to aspect of nerve cell protection

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5660701A (en) * 1996-02-29 1997-08-26 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Protein separations by capillary electrophoresis using amino acid-containing buffers
WO1997039141A1 (en) * 1996-04-14 1997-10-23 Promega Corporation Novel reagent, method, and kit for the quantitation of oxidation-reduction phenomena in proteins and peptides
US20170152541A1 (en) * 2015-11-23 2017-06-01 California Institute Of Technology Reduction of oxidated methionine peptides for mass spectrometry

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Khor article from mAbs, 2-3, January 1, 2010, pages 299-308, submitted in the IDS filed on February 1, 2019 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110747182A (en) * 2019-08-14 2020-02-04 山东寿光巨能金玉米开发有限公司 Cell scaffold aggrecanase and preparation method and application thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3402895A1 (en) 2018-11-21
WO2017123440A1 (en) 2017-07-20
WO2017123886A1 (en) 2017-07-20
WO2017123886A8 (en) 2017-10-12
EP3402894A1 (en) 2018-11-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20190072565A1 (en) Protein preparation
Schmidt et al. A novel strategy for quantitative proteomics using isotope‐coded protein labels
Ashcroft Protein and peptide identification: the role of mass spectrometry in proteomics
Shevchenko et al. “De novo” sequencing of peptides recovered from in-gel digested proteins by nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry
US8338122B2 (en) Method for determining the amino acid sequence of peptides
EP1736480B9 (en) Artificial protein, method for absolute quantification of proteins and uses thereof
JP2010509567A (en) Compounds and methods for double labeling of polypeptides to allow multiplexing in mass spectrometry analysis
JP2007024631A (en) Isotope labeling method
US7250266B2 (en) Selective labeling agent for phosphoproteome analysis and phosphorylated site analysis
Balderrama et al. Analysis of sulfated peptides from the skin secretion of the Pachymedusa dacnicolor frog using IMAC‐Ga enrichment and high‐resolution mass spectrometry
Nakajima et al. A method for N-terminal de novo sequencing of N α-blocked proteins by mass spectrometry
US7371514B2 (en) Serial derivatization of peptides for de novo sequencing using tandem mass spectrometry
JP4659040B2 (en) In-gel labeling and in-gel isolation method for analysis of phosphorylated protein and protein phosphorylation site identification method using the same
Cao et al. Improvement of hydrophobic integral membrane protein identification by mild performic acid oxidation-assisted digestion
WO2015125216A1 (en) Protein detection method using mass spectrometry
Li et al. Chemoenzymatic enrichment of phosphotyrosine-containing peptides
She et al. Sequencing of rat liver cytosolic proteins by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry following electrophoretic separation and extraction
JP7010601B2 (en) Enzyme digestion method of protein
Guo et al. MALDI-TOF MS/microwave-assisted acid hydrolysis identification of HbG Coushatta
EP2529233B1 (en) Mass spectrometry-based protein identification
JP4524811B2 (en) Method for identifying amino terminal peptide of amino terminal modified protein
Fang et al. A stable isotopic pre‐digestion labeling method for protein quantitative analysis using matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry
Solis et al. BMP-1 CCR-1 CID
Solis et al. Characterizing the Termini of Recombinant Proteins
Lee et al. Proteomic study of micro-algae: sample preparation for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and de novo peptide sequencing using MALDI-TOF MS

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: APPLICATION UNDERGOING PREEXAM PROCESSING

AS Assignment

Owner name: THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC BALTICS UAB, LITHUANIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SIURKUS, JUOZAS;REEL/FRAME:047816/0708

Effective date: 20180802

Owner name: PIERCE BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC., ILLINOIS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ROGERS, JOHN;CUNNINGHAM, ROBERT;PATEL, BHAVINKUMAR;SIGNING DATES FROM 20180802 TO 20180810;REEL/FRAME:047816/0486

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: APPLICATION DISPATCHED FROM PREEXAM, NOT YET DOCKETED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION