US20180322105A2 - Method and system for formation of electronic documents - Google Patents
Method and system for formation of electronic documents Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20180322105A2 US20180322105A2 US14/448,889 US201414448889A US2018322105A2 US 20180322105 A2 US20180322105 A2 US 20180322105A2 US 201414448889 A US201414448889 A US 201414448889A US 2018322105 A2 US2018322105 A2 US 2018322105A2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- document
- template
- customized
- electronic
- legal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 34
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 title description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 38
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 23
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 claims 3
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 97
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 27
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 19
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/95—Retrieval from the web
- G06F16/955—Retrieval from the web using information identifiers, e.g. uniform resource locators [URL]
- G06F16/9566—URL specific, e.g. using aliases, detecting broken or misspelled links
-
- G06F17/24—
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/10—Text processing
- G06F40/166—Editing, e.g. inserting or deleting
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/56—Provisioning of proxy services
- H04L67/565—Conversion or adaptation of application format or content
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/10—Text processing
- G06F40/166—Editing, e.g. inserting or deleting
- G06F40/186—Templates
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99941—Database schema or data structure
- Y10S707/99943—Generating database or data structure, e.g. via user interface
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Document Processing Apparatus (AREA)
- Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
Abstract
A method and system for creation of customized documents over a network as well as for negotiation of contents for documents over a network (e.g., Internet) are disclosed. In one aspect, professional documents can be created in an automated manner. In another aspect, negotiation of documents (or their contents) can be performed in an automated manner. In either case, the customization and/or negotiation is efficient, cost-effective and useful.
Description
- This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/878,199, filed Sep. 9, 2010, and entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR FORMATION OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS,” the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/093,002, filed Mar. 28, 2005, and entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ELECTRONIC NEGOTIATION OF DOCUMENTS,” the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/458,834, filed Dec. 13, 1999, and entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED DOCUMENT GENERATION,” the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/112,234, filed Dec. 14, 1998, and entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED DOCUMENT GENERATION,” the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference, and which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/152,683, filed Sep. 7, 1999, and entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC FILING OF DOCUMENTS, PROVIDING AND UPDATING ON-LINE FORMS AND REGISTRATIONS, OR MONITORING DOMAINS”, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
- The present invention relates to document creation and, more particularly, to automated document generation.
- Various types of documents often need to be created for all types of uses. Many times the documents require careful wording for clarity or legal purposes. As an example, legal documents need to be carefully crafted to provide the legal protection sought. However, the creation of documents is largely still manually performed by skilled or experienced persons. There are many books and sample documents that can be found after some effort, but it is difficult to not only locate the appropriate samples or forms but also to complete or alter the samples or forms for a user's particular situation. There are difficulties in finding the appropriate form to utilize and then, if found, how to properly complete the form is very difficult.
- Also documents, such as legal documents, are often negotiated using paper versions. The paper version are sent between parties or attorneys who negotiate certain portions of the documents until all terms are agreed to or the negotiation fails. The paper versions are sent by manual mail or facsimile. Recently, documents are have been transmitted electronically between parties or attorneys. Even still, the negotiation of the contents is not efficient, particularly in the nature which changes to provision are made.
- Neither document creation through use of forms nor document negotiation are easily performed without expert assistance. In the case of legal documents, the expert assistance needed is provided by an attorney.
- Thus, there is a need for improved approaches to create or negotiate documents in an efficient and simplified way without the need for expert assistance.
- Broadly speaking, the invention relates to creation of customized documents over a network as well as for negotiation of contents for documents over a network. In one aspect of the invention, professional documents can be created in an automated manner. In another aspect of the invention, negotiation of documents (or their contents) can be performed in an automated manner. In either case, the customization and/or negotiation according to the invention is efficient, cost-effective and useful.
- The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a method, a computer system, an apparatus, and a computer readable media.
- As a computer-implemented method for producing a customized document using a network, one embodiment of the invention can, for example, include at least: receiving, from a local machine, a customization request to customize a document template at a server machine, the server machine being coupleable to the local machine via the network; retrieving, at the server machine, an interview question set for the selected document template; sending the interview question set to the local machine where questions from the interview question set are able to be presented; receiving, at the server machine, answers to the questions of the interview question set; performing expert processes to produce a customized document based on the selected document template and the answers; and transmitting the customized document to the local machine or other machine via the network.
- As a computer-implemented method for producing a customized document using a network, one embodiment of the invention can, for example, include at least: receiving a customization request for an electronic document, the customization request including or associating to customization data; determining a template document based on the customization request; obtaining a command set for use by an application program; and producing a customized electronic document from the template document in accordance with at least a portion of the customization data by using the command set operating on the application program.
- As a method for enhancing functionality of a server coupled to a network, one embodiment of the invention can, for example, include at least: operating the server to receive a request for a file from a requestor; linking an application program to the web server; operating the application program in accordance with a command set to produce a processed file; and returning the processed file to the requestor.
- The advantages of the invention are numerous. Different embodiments or implementations may yield one or more of the following advantages. One potential advantage of the invention is that document customization can be performed over a network using an automated system that is readily available whenever needed by a requestor. Another potential advantage of the invention is that negotiation of the contents of documents can be performed over a network in a manageable manner. Yet another potential advantage of the invention is that the document customization and/or negotiation can be centrally controlled and managed by a server machine. Still another potential advantage is the ability to produce professional quality documents in an efficient, cost-effective and automated way.
- Other aspects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of the invention.
- The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements, and in which:
-
FIG. 1A is a block diagram of a document creation and delivery system according to one embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 1B is a block diagram of a document server according to one embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of document processing according to one embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of document processing according to another embodiment of the invention; -
FIGS. 4A and 4B are flow diagrams of client-side document processing according to one embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of server-side document processing according to one embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of document creation and delivery business processing; -
FIG. 7A is a block diagram of a document negotiation system according to one embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 7B is a block diagram of a server machine that manages document negotiation for the document negotiation system according to one embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of electronic negotiation processing according to one embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 9 is a flow diagram of first party processing according to one embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 10 is a flow diagram of second party processing according to one embodiment of the invention; -
FIGS. 11A and 11B are flow charts of negotiation server processing according to one embodiment of the invention; and -
FIG. 12 is a flow diagram of document customization processing according to one embodiment of the invention. - The invention relates to an invention relates to creation of customized documents over a network as well as for negotiation of contents for documents over a network. The invention is able to perform the creation and/or negotiation in an automated manner such that the customization and/or negotiation is efficient, cost-effective and useful.
- A first aspect of the invention pertains to the creation of customized documents over the Internet. The documents can be of a variety of types. One particular document type particularly suited for use with the first aspect of the invention are legal documents. Many documents have a legal character to them some include contracts, employment agreements, registration forms, license agreements, etc.
-
FIG. 1A is a block diagram of a document creation anddelivery system 100 according to one embodiment of the invention. The document creation anddelivery system 100 includes adocument server 102 and a document requestor'smachine 104. Thedocument server 102 couples to theInternet 106, typically through a high speed data link. The document requestor'smachine 104 typically couples to theInternet 106 through an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 108. TheISP 108 typically connects to theInternet 106 using a high speed data link. Examples of high speed data links include T1, T4, ISDN or xDSL. The document requestor'smachine 104 couples to theISP 108 over a data link such as typically provided by the Public Service Telephone Network (PSTN). The data link can be provided in a wired or wireless manner. Generally speaking, the requestor will interact with the document requestor'smachine 104 to request the creation and delivery of a specified document from thedocument server 102 to the document requestor'smachine 104. Thedocument server 102 will operate to question or interrogate the requestor through communications over theInternet 106 to obtain the information needed to produce the specified document. Once thedocument server 102 has sufficient information to produce the specified document, thedocument server 102 produces the specified document in a customized way for the requestor and then forwards the specified document that has been created to the document requestor'smachine 104 through theInternet 106. -
FIG. 1B is a block diagram of adocument server 150 according to one embodiment of the invention. Thedocument server 150 is, for example, suitable for use as thedocument server 102 illustrated inFIG. 1A . Thedocument server 150 includes adocument server module 152 that control the operation of thedocument server 150. Thedocument server 150 also includes apayment module 154, adocument template storage 156, a question setstorage 158,expert logic 160, anduser library storage 162. Thepayment module 154 is used to accept electronic payment for the production of a specified document in accordance with the invention. As an example, the electronic payment can be provided by accepting a credit card number and expiration date for the production of a specified document for a requestor. Thedocument template storage 156 stores various document templates that are supported by thedocument server 150. The question setstorage 158 stores the question sets for the various document templates stored in the document template storage. Theexpert logic 160 is provided and predetermined so that thedocument server 150 is able to automatically customize a particular document template in accordance with the answers to the particular question set. The expert logic and the question sets are specific to particular document templates. Theuser library storage 162 provides for storage for document storage that have been produced for subsequent usage or for storage of general information to minimize subsequent question sets or for archival purposes. -
FIG. 2 is a flow diagram ofdocument processing 200 according to one embodiment of the invention. Thedocument processing 200 is, for example, performed by the document requestor'smachine 104 and thedocument server 102 illustrated inFIG. 1A . In this embodiment, the document being processed or produced is a legal document. - The
document processing 200 initially selects a legal document template atblock 202. The selected legal document template represents the type of legal document that the requestor desires to receive. Then, atblock 204, a question set for the selected legal document template is retrieved. A question set is typically retrieved from a storage location associated with the document server 102 (e.g., question set storage 158). The question set is typically particular to the selected legal document template. Followingblock 204, the questions from the question set are displayed inblock 206. Here, the display of the questions from the question set is on the document requestor'smachine 104 so that the requestor (user) is able to understand the questions. Typically, the requestor would read the displayed questions; however, the questions could also be presented to the requestor in an audio or video manner. Next, atblock 208, responses to the displayed questions are obtained. Here, the requestor responds to the questions as is appropriate. Then, atblock 210, the selected legal document template is customized, in accordance with the responses that have been obtained and expert legal logic, to produce a customized legal document. The expert legal logic is associated with the selected legal document and is used to produced the customized legal document by selecting or producing appropriate language (i.e., text) for the customized legal document. Typically, the customization would be performed on thedocument server 102, which would thereafter forward the customized legal document to the document requestor'smachine 104. Followingblock 210, thedocument processing 200 is complete and end. - The expert legal logic (expert knowledge) can be predetermined for the selected legal document template. Hence, the responses to the questions from the question set are used in accordance with the expert legal logic to make legal decisions about the content to be placed in the customized legal document. Hence, the expert legal logic can impact the particular paragraphs of text placed in (or removed from) the customized legal document as well as the particular verbiage used in the paragraphs.
-
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram ofdocument processing 300 according to another embodiment of the invention. Thedocument processing 300 is, for example, performed by the document requestor'smachine 104 and/or thedocument server 102 illustrated inFIG. 1A . In this embodiment, the document being processed or produced is a legal document. - The
document processing 300 initially selects the legal document template inblock 302. Then, inblock 304, an associated question set for the selected legal document template is received from a server machine. For example, the server machine can be thedocument server 102 illustrated inFIG. 1A or thedocument server 150 illustrated inFIG. 1B . Next, the requestor is automatically queried for responses to the questions of the associated question set inblock 306. The presentation of the questions to the requestors can be controlled by the server machine or the client machine. In one implementation, the question set is a question and logic set because it includes not only questions but also logic. The question and logic set can allow for more sophisticated presentation of the questions to the requestor. For example, the sequence or ordering of the questions can be altered based on answers to previous questions and the logic. As another example, one or more questions can by skipped based on answers to previous questions and the logic. In general, the questions can appear differently to requestors depending on answers to previous questions and the logic. The logic within the question and logic set can also operate to reduce erroneous inputs. Preferably, the question set is not a mere form that the requestor completes on their own, but instead a sophisticated series of questions that guide the requestor in providing information needed so that expert legal logic can determine the appropriate text to provide in the customized legal document. In one implementation, one or more of the questions presents a predetermined list of acceptable or representative answers from which the user can choose. - In
block 308, the responses to the questions are then transmitted to the server machine. Followingblock 308, a customized legal document is produced 310 in accordance with the responses to the questions and expert legal logic. Here, the customized legal document can be created by completing certain predefined areas in the legal document template or, instead, by producing the legal document (at least portions thereof) from the responses to the questions and the expert legal logic. In either case, the expert legal logic controls the content and verbiage of the customized legal document being produced. In one embodiment the expert legal logic is implemented by computer program code. Thereafter, the customized legal document is forwarded inblock 312 to the requestor's machine in a protected form such that the customized legal document cannot be altered. In other words, the customized legal document can be displayed and printed by the requestor but its content cannot be edited or altered. Followingblock 312, thedocument processing 300 is complete and ends. - The document processing is typically performed by a combination of client-side processing and server-side processing. The client-side processing is performed on a client-side computer, such as the document requestor's
machine 104 illustrated inFIG. 1A , and the server-side processing is, for example, performed by thedocument server 102 illustrated inFIG. 1A . The client-side computer and the server-side computer communicate through a network, such as theInternet 106 illustrated inFIG. 1A . -
FIGS. 4A and 4B are flow diagrams of client-side document processing 400 according to one embodiment of the invention. The client-side document processing 400 initially requests a web page for document customization inblock 402. Here, the requestor will direct a network browser to a particular web page that is designed to perform document customization. Next, atdecision block 404, the client-side document processing 400 determines whether a response to the request for the web page has been received. When the requested web page has not yet been received, the client-side document processing 400 awaits the reception of the requested web page. Once the requested web page has arrived, the web page is displayed atblock 406. Here, the web page being displayed contains available document types. The available document types associated with the web page can be provided, displayed or presented in a variety of different ways. One way the document types can be provided is in a list which may or may not be categorized into different types or groupings. Another way the document templates can be provided is through the use of a document selection wizard (search assistant) that would assist the requestor in locating a particular document type for a specific document that is desired. In one implementation, the document types are templates. - Next, in
block 408, a document type to be customized is selected. An interview question set for the selected document type is then requested inblock 410. At this point, the client-side document processing 400 waits for the arrival of the interview question set. Inblock 412, the client-side document processing 400 determines whether the interview question set has been received. As long as the interview question set has not yet been received, the client-side document processing 400 repeats theblock 412. - Once the client-
side document processing 400 receives the interview question set, one or more of the questions from the interview question set are displayed atblock 414. Then, answers to the displayed one or more questions are provided inblock 416. Here, the requestor will interact with the requestor's machine (e.g., via network browser) to provide the answers to the one or more questions associated with the interview question set that are displayed. Next, inblock 418, a determination of whether there are more questions in the interview question set to be processed. When theblock 418 determines that there are more questions to be processed, the client-side document processing 400 returns to repeat theblock 414 and subsequent blocks. - On the other hand, when the
decision block 418 determines that there are no more questions to be processed, the answers to the interview questions are submitted to the server machine along with a request for the customized document inblock 420. Then, the client-side document processing 400 awaits the reception of the customized document atblock 422. - Once the customized document has been received from the server machine, the customized document can be printed, stored or displayed at
block 424. Typically, the customized document will not be able to be altered, edited or otherwise changed so that the integrity of the document is preserved, and the document is not inappropriately used in the future for another different situation than the one it was originally intended. One way to provide the locked or unalterable format is in a portable document form (e.g., pdf) with the content protected so it is unalterable. Additionally, by preventing the customized document from being altered, edited or otherwise changed, the web site providing the document customization is more likely revisited the next time the requestor needs a document supported by the document processing system. Followingblock 424, the client-side document processing 400 is complete and ends. -
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of server-side document processing 500 according to one embodiment of the invention. The server-side document processing 500 begins with adecision block 502 that determines whether the incoming request to the server machine is a request to begin document customization. When the incoming request is determined to be a request to begin document customization atblock 502, then a web page with available document types is sent to the requestor's machine inblock 504. Followingblock 504, the server-side document processing 500 is complete and ends. - On the other hand, when the incoming request is not a request to begin document customization, a
decision block 506 determines whether the incoming request is a request for a question set. When thedecision block 506 determines that the incoming request is a request for a question set, then an interview question set for the selected document type is identified inblock 508. Then, followingblock 508, the identified interview question set is sent 510 to the requestor's machine. Followingblock 510, the server-side document processing 500 is complete and ends. - Alternatively, when the incoming request is neither a request to begin document customization nor a request for a question set, a
decision block 512 determines whether the incoming request is a request to produce a customized document. When thedecision block 512 determines that the incoming request is a request to produce a customized document, then answers to the questions of the identified interview question set are received atblock 514. In one implementation, the answers to the questions of the identified interview question set can be provided together with the request to produce the customized document. In another implementation, the answers to the questions of the identified interview question set are separately sent to the server machine. Next, the answers that have been received can be processed using predetermined expert logic for the selected document type to produce a customized document inblock 516. The customized document is then sent to the requestor's machine that block 518. Followingblock 518, the server-side document processing 500 is complete and ends. - Additionally, in the situation in which the incoming request is determined in the
block 512 not to be a request to produce a customized document, the server-side document processing 500 is also complete and ends. In this case, the receive request is assumed to be unrelated to the document processing according to the invention. However, the server machine can service a variety of other types of requests and support other functionality as understood by those skilled in the art. -
FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of document creation and delivery business processing. The document creation anddelivery business processing 600 is, for example, suitable as a method for doing business over the Internet or other type of network that supports a variety of users. - The document creation and
delivery business processing 600 begins by providing an Internet site having available at least one customizable legal document atblock 602. After the Internet site is provided and made available, eventually a request will be received at the Internet site from a remote user requesting to customize the customizable legal document atblock 604. Next, electronic payment of a fee to produce a customized legal document can be accepted at the Internet site atblock 606. Then, the remote user that has requested the creation of the customized legal document is interviewed atblock 608 to obtain answers to a question set associated with the customizable legal document. Thereafter, the customized legal document is produced inblock 610. The customized legal document is produced in accordance with the answers to the questions of the question set, predetermined expert legal logic, and the customizable legal document itself. Once the customized legal document is produced, the customized legal document is supplied to the remote user atblock 612 such that its content cannot be altered. In other words, the customized legal document that is delivered to the remote user enables the user to view, print and store the customized legal document but does not permit the remote user to thereafter edit or alter the customized legal document. By not permitting the customized legal document that is provided to the remote user to be altered, the document creation anddelivery business processing 600 encourages its remote users to revisit the Internet site when other supported legal documents are needed. It also discourages its remote users from later misusing the customized legal document for different situations. Following theblock 612, the document creation anddelivery business processing 600 is complete and ends. - Further, the invention can be provided as a document processing system in which a web server automatically utilizes an application program (such as a word processing application) to produce a customized document. The web server activates the application program (e.g., word processor, spreadsheet or database program) to produce the customized document by executing a macro or embedded program. Typically, application programs like word processor, spreadsheet or database programs support macros and some further support embedded programs. For example, Microsoft Word, Excel and Access, for example, all support macros and/or embedded programs. With Microsoft, the embedded programs are based on Visual Basic and often referred to as Visual Basic Applications (e.g., VBA). In any case, by activating the application program and the macro or embedded program, the web server can produce a customized document. In one implementation, the customized document is produced by customizing a template document. The customization can, if desired, utilize computer implemented expert logic and requestor's answers to various questions as noted above. Hence, the web server's functionality is able to be enhanced with the functionality of existing application programs and macro or embedded programs that operate therein.
-
FIG. 12 is a flow diagram ofdocument customization processing 1200 according to one embodiment of the invention. Thedocument customization processing 1200 pertains to an embodiment in which a macro within a word processing application is used, though as noted above embedded programs within application programs could also be used. Thedocument customization processing 1200 is, for example, performed on thedocument server 102 ofFIG. 1 which can operate as a web server. - The
document customization processing 1200 begins with adecision 1202 that determines whether a custom document request has been received. In one implementation, the custom document request is provided from a network browser operating on a user machine that couples to the web server over a network (e.g., the Internet). When thedecision 1202 determines that a custom document request has not yet been received, thedocument customization processing 1200 awaits the reception of the custom document request. Once thedecision 1202 determines that a custom document request has been received, the custom document request is parsed 1204 to obtain document type and question set answers. More generally, the question set answers contain customization information used to produce the customized document. Typically, the customization information (e.g., question set answers) is provided by a user using the network browser. Next, a template document and a macro file are determined 1206 based on the document type and the question set answers. The macro file could alternatively be an embedded program. The customized document is then produced 1208 by modifying the template document in accordance with the question set answers using the macro file executed by a word processing application. In other words, the word processing application (or other application programs) produce the customized document. The word processing application can operate on the web server or another computing machine coupled thereto. After the customized document is produced 1208, the customized document is forwarded 1210 to the requestor. Optionally, the customized document can be provided in an unalterable format. Followingblock 1210, thedocument customization processing 1200 is complete and ends. - An additional feature of the invention can optionally provide document packages instead of single documents to a requestor. These document packages can group several customizable documents which are often needed by requestors at about the same time. In such a case, the question set can be efficiently used for multiple documents that are within a document package. The customized documents provided by the document package are able to be delivered to the requestor as a document package. The document packages can be for lots of different circumstances. One example of a document package is a new employee legal document package. Such a new employee legal document package might, for example, include an employment contract, invention agreement, tax withholding form, and company policies. Another example of a document package is a departing employee legal package. Yet another example of a document package is a stockholder's legal package. Such a stockholder's legal package might, for example, include a stockholder's agreement, a disclosure or registration statement document, and a right of first refusal agreement. Still another example of a document package is a software development package. Such a software development package might, for example, include a software development agreement, software specification document, and copyright assignment.
- Yet another feature of the invention is to optionally provide for library storage for requestors. Requestors who foresee reusing the document creation system of the invention can be provided with a virtual library where they can store the documents they previously created or descriptive information about the requestor. The document creation system can then make use of the information stored in the library storage by reducing the number of questions in the question set and thus reducing the interaction required with the requestor to produce subsequent document. The library storage provided by the virtual library can act as a document archive for requestors, and thus facilitate retrieval of copies of documents previously created using the document creation system. An example of the library storage is the
user library storage 162 illustrated inFIG. 1B . - Still another feature of the invention is that the system can also provide a certification indication for the resulting documents that have been created. In one implementation, the certification is formed in and becomes part of the resulting document. Preferably, the certification would be done in the server machine. The certification can serve as an indication that the document creation system was used to create the document in a fair manner. Alternatively or additionally, the certification can indicate the relative balance of rights in the resulting document or provide a power rating. For example, a high power rating can mean that the document favors its creator, a neutral power rating can indicate that the document is largely neutral and a low power rating can indicate that the document disfavors its creator. The certification can indicate relative balance of rights or power rating in many ways, such as numerically (e.g., 1-10) or graphically through a scale or bar graph. One particular implementation of a scale graph is where each side of the scale graph represents a party to the customized legal document, and the relative heights of the side of the scale graph indicate the relative advantages the customized legal document offers to the party associated with the higher height of the side of the scale graph.
- A second aspect of the invention pertains to the negotiation of the contents of documents. The documents can be of a variety of types. One particular document type particularly suited for negotiation of its content are legal documents. The second aspect can be used alone or together with the first aspect of the invention.
-
FIG. 7A is a block diagram of adocument negotiation system 700 according to one embodiment of the invention. Thedocument negotiation system 700 includes aserver machine 702, afirst party machine 704 and asecond party machine 706. The first and second parties are parties to a document that is negotiated between the first and second parties and controlled by theserver machine 702. Theserver machine 702 provides automated management of the negotiated contents of the document. Thefirst party machine 704 and thesecond party machine 706 communicate with theserver machine 702 through theInternet 708. Thefirst party machine 704 couples to theInternet 708 through, for example, an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 710. Thesecond party machine 706 couples to theInternet 708 through, for example, aprivate network 712. -
FIG. 7B is a block diagram of aserver machine 750 that manages the document negotiation for a document negotiation system according to one embodiment of the invention. Theserver machine 750 is, for example, suitable for use as theserver machine 702 illustrated inFIG. 7A . Theserver machine 750 includes anegotiation manager 752 that manages the negotiation of the document contents through communications with first and second parties. Thenegotiation manager 752 couples to anetwork interface 754 to facilitate the communications with the first and second parties over a network (e.g., Internet 708). Apayment module 756 provides processing that enables a requestor to provide electronic payment for the use of the document negotiation system. Adocument storage 758 provides for storage of the documents being negotiated. Anegotiation state storage 760 can provide storage of information describing the negotiation state for a particular document. For example, the negotiation state information can include provisions agreed to, provisions not agreed to, information on parties, party due to respond, etc. -
FIG. 8 is a flow diagram ofelectronic negotiation processing 800 according to one embodiment of the invention. Theelectronic negotiation processing 800 can, for example, be performed by thedocument negotiation system 700 illustrated inFIG. 7A . - The
electronic negotiation processing 800 initially forms an electronic document inblock 802. The electronic document is formed by an originator of the electronic document. Here, the electronic document can be merely retrieved from a storage location or the electronic document can be actually created from a template or otherwise (such as using techniques discussed above with respect to the first aspect, for example). Next, the electronic document is electronically sent to a remotely located person with a summary explanation and a review question set atblock 804. - The originator thus creates or selects the electronic document, and then the electronic document is sent to the remotely located person. The remotely located person is then asked to accept the contents of the electronic document in its current state or provide alterations to the content of the electronic document. To facilitate the remotely located person's understanding of the electronic document, the summary explanation explains the general outline of the provisions of the electronic document. The summary explanation is particularly useful for those not skilled in the area to understand the provisions of the electronic document. The review question set are questions that are presented to the remotely located person to facilitate their review of the electronic document.
- Next, responses to the questions from the review question set are obtained from the remotely located person at
block 806. These responses are generally associated with whether the remotely located person accepts the contents of the electronic document or what proposed alterations the remotely located person has for the electronic document. - Then, in
block 808, the responses to the review question set are electronically sent to the originator together with a reply summary explanation. Here, the reply summary explanation indicates the extent to which the remotely located person has consented to the content of the electronic document. For example, the remotely located person could accept the electronic document as it was prepared by the originator or can accept a portion of the electronic document and request that certain alterations be made. Followingblock 806, theelectronic negotiation processing 800 is complete and ends. However, it should be noted that additional processing can occur to alter the electronic document in accordance with the responses from the remotely located person or to partially or completely deny the proposed alterations (by originator) and respond back electronically to the remotely located person. Thus, the processing can continue such that the electronic document is reviewed by the parties until entirely accepted or one party breaks off negotiations. -
FIGS. 9-11B are flow diagrams that pertain negotiation processing between first and second parties with use of a negotiation manager (negotiation server) according to the invention. -
FIG. 9 is a flow diagram of thefirst party processing 900 according to one embodiment of the invention. Thefirst party processing 900 is, for example, the processing performed by thefirst party machine 704 illustrated inFIG. 7A . - The
first party processing 900 initially forms an electronic document atblock 902. In one embodiment, the electronic document can be formed in accordance with the first aspect of the invention. In other embodiment, the electronic document can be formed by retrieval from a storage device or creation using a word-processing program. Then, atblock 904, the electronic document is sent to the negotiation server. Here, the electronic document is sent to the negotiation server for delivery to the second party. - At this point, the
first party processing 900 can operate to form and send out other electronic documents or receive a negotiation request from the second party that is responsive to the electronic document that the negotiation server sent to the second party. To form and send out other electronic documents, blocks 902 and 904 can be repeated. - A
decision block 906 causes thefirst party processing 900 to await the reception of a negotiation request. In other words, when thedecision block 906 determines that a negotiation request has been received from the negotiation server, additional processing is invoked or can be invoked. It is understood that in this embodiment the negotiation request will include some sort of summary explanation together with a reply question set. Inblock 908, the reply summary explanation and at least one question of the rely question set are displayed for the first party. Here, the reply summary explanation and the at least one question are displayed on a display device associated with the first party machine. Next, the first party responds to questions of the reply question set inblock 910. The responses to the questions enable the first party to easily accept or decline a proposed alteration to the content of the electronic document. Next, the responses are electronically sent to the negotiation server atblock 912. Followingblock 912, thefirst party processing 900 is complete and ends. -
FIG. 10 is a flow diagram ofsecond party processing 1000 according to one embodiment of the invention. Thesecond party processing 1000 is, for example, performed by a second party machine, such as thesecond party machine 706 illustrated inFIG. 7A . - The
second party processing 1000 begins by determining whether a negotiation request has been received atblock 1002. As long as a negotiation request has not been received, thesecond party processing 1000 is essentially inactive. Once a negotiation request has been received, thesecond party processing 1000 is invoked or can be invoked. Once invoked, a summary explanation and at least one question of the review question set are displayed atblock 1004. Here, the summary explanation and the at least one question of the review question set are displayed on a display device associated with the second party machine. Then, responses to the questions of the review question set are obtained inblock 1006. These responses enable the second party to either accept, decline or propose alterations to the contents of the electronic document. After the responses are obtained, the responses are electronically sent to the negotiation server atblock 1008. Followingblock 1008, thesecond party processing 1000 is complete and ends. -
FIGS. 11A and 11B are flow charts ofnegotiation server processing 1100 according to one embodiment of the invention. Thenegotiation server processing 1100 is, for example, performed by the server machine, such as theserver machine 702 illustrated inFIG. 7A . - The
negotiation server processing 1100 begins with adecision block 1102 that determines whether an electronic document has been received. When an electronic document has been received, thenegotiation server processing 1100 operates to initiate a negotiation session between the first party and the second party. Here, it is assumed that the electronic document has only two parties to the document. However, it should be understood that with documents having additional parties, the negotiation processing according to the invention can interact with more than two parties. In any case, when thedecision block 1102 determines that an electronic document has been received for negotiation processing, a summary explanation and a review question set are prepared for the electronic document atblock 1104. In an implementation where the electronic document is created using the first aspect of the invention, the summary explanation and the review question set are, as an example, able to be predetermined or automatically determined from codes accompanying or embedded in the electronic document. Then, atblock 1106, the electronic document, the summary explanation and the review question set are electronically sent to the second party as a negotiation request. Followingblock 1106, thenegotiation server processing 1100 is finished processing the electronic document that has been received and thus awaits additional requests. However, the server machine records the state and contents of the electronic document for subsequent use. - On the other hand, when the
decision block 1102 determines that an electronic document has not been received, adecision block 1108 determines whether second party responses have been received. When thedecision block 1108 determines that second party responses have been received, adecision block 1110 determines whether the second party has accepted the current contents of the electronic document. When thedecision block 1110 determines that the second party has not accepted the contents of the electronic document, then thenegotiation server processing 1100 continues to negotiate the electronic document. Namely, a reply summary explanation and a reply question set are prepared for the electronic document atblock 1112. Here, the reply summary explanation and the reply question set are determined in accordance with the second party responses. In one implementation, the reply summary explanation and the reply question set are, as an example, predetermined or automatically determined from the second party responses as well as the state and contents of the electronic document. Then, atblock 1114, the electronic document, the reply summary explanation and the reply question sent are electronically set to the first party as a negotiation request. In this case, the second party has not accepted the contents of the electronic document, but has proposed alterations to the electronic document. Hence, the first party is notified of the proposed alterations that the second party has requested in the negotiation request. Followingblock 1114, thenegotiation server processing 1100 is complete and ends as the request including the second party responses has been fully processed. - Alternatively, when the
decision block 1110 determines that the second party responses indicate that the second party has accepted the contents of the electronic document, then the negotiation of the contents for the electronic document is completed. Hence, the electronic document is then finalized atblock 1116. Thereafter, the finalized electronic document is distributed to the first and second parties atblock 1118. In one implementation, the finalized electronic document is sent to the first and second parties in a locked or unalterable format such that the parties can view, read or print but not edit or alter the finalized electronic document. One way to provide the locked or unalterable format is in a portable document form (e.g., pdf) with the content protected so it is unalterable. Followingblock 1118, thenegotiation server processing 1100 is complete and ends as the negotiation has been completed and the electronic document has been finalized. - On the other hand, when the
decision block 1108 determines that the incoming request does not include second party responses, adecision block 1120 determines whether the incoming request includes first party responses. When thedecision block 1120 determines that the incoming request does not include first party responses, then thenegotiation server processing 1100 is complete and ends. Alternatively, when thedecision block 1120 determines that the incoming request does include first party responses, then thenegotiation server processing 1100 performs the following operations. Initially, adecision block 1122 determines whether the first party responses indicate that the first party has accepted the current contents of the electronic document. If so, the processing associated withblocks block 1124. Then, the electronic document, the reply summary explanation and the reply question set are electronically sent to the second party as a negotiation request inblock 1126. In one implementation, the reply summary explanation and the reply question set are, as an example, predetermined or automatically determined from the first party responses as well as the state and contents of the electronic document. Followingblock 1126, thenegotiation server processing 1100 is complete and ends. - The communications with the parties negotiating the electronic document can be through a variety of mediums. For example, the communications can be through electronic mail or the parties can interact with a web site supporting the document negotiation system. In the case of the web site implementation, electronic mail, paging or telephone can signal a party to access the web site for further negotiating of the electronic document. The communications with the parties can also be protected (or made secure) through password requirements and/or encryption schemes.
- While the document negotiation system described above uses a negotiation server in some embodiments, the system can also operate without a server be providing additional processing at the client side. One advantage of a server based design is that the client side can be “thin” clients, such as a network browser (e.g., HTML browser).
- A further feature of the invention is that signatures can be electronically attached to the finalized electronic document. The electronic signature can be a bitmap image of a party's signature or instead just a “click acceptance” effective signature. Another feature is that the document negotiation system can provide for document archival. In the event of a dispute as to the document's execution (signature) or contents in the future, the document could be retrieved from the document negotiation system. Also the document's creation history could also be archived for subsequent retrieval in the event of a dispute.
- The invention can also be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium is any data storage device that can store data which can be thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of the computer readable medium include read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, magnetic tape, optical data storage devices. The computer readable medium can also be distributed over a network coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
- The advantages of the invention are numerous. Different embodiments or implementations may yield one or more of the following advantages. One potential advantage of the invention is that document customization can be performed over a network using an automated system that is readily available whenever needed by a requestor. Another potential advantage of the invention is that negotiation of the contents of documents can be performed over a network in a manageable manner. Yet another potential advantage of the invention is that the document customization and/or negotiation can be centrally controlled and managed by a server machine. Still another potential advantage is the ability to produce professional quality documents in an efficient, cost-effective and automated way.
- The many features and advantages of the present invention are apparent from the written description, and thus, it is intended by the appended claims to cover all such features and advantages of the invention. Further, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation as illustrated and described. Hence, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to as falling within the scope of the invention.
Claims (46)
1. A server machine configured to produce a customized legal document, said server machine couples to a network, said server machine comprising:
a memory that stores expert processes; and
at least one processor configured to:
receive, from a local machine via the network, a customization request to customize a selected document template for a legal document at said server machine;
retrieve an interview question set for the selected document template, the interview question set being retrieved from a group of question sets that are predetermined and the interview question set being retrieved is associated with the selected document template;
send the interview question set to the local machine via the network where questions from the interview question set are able to be presented via the local machine;
receive, from the local machine via the network, answers to the questions of the interview question set;
perform one or more of the expert processes to produce a customized legal document based on the selected document template and the answers to the questions of the interview question set, the expert processes are implemented by computer program code which when performed controls content and verbiage of at least a portion of the customized legal document being produced, the customized legal document being an electronic document; and
after the customized legal document has been produced, electronically transmit the customized legal document to the local machine or other machine via the network,
wherein the selected document template is used at said server machine to produce the customized legal document, and wherein the customized legal document is electronically transmitted to the local machine or other machine after the answers to the questions of the interview question set for the selected document template have been received at said server machine.
2. A server machine as recited in claim 1 , wherein the customized legal document has a non-editable format, such that when received from the server machine, the customized legal document is useable but not alterable.
3. A server machine as recited in claim 1 , wherein at least one the answers are used to select from available alternative portions associated with the selected document template.
4. A server machine as recited in claim 1 ,
wherein the selected document template to be customized corresponds to a document package, and
wherein the expert processes operate to produce a plurality of related customized documents based on the selected document package and the answers.
5. An electronic document generation system for producing customized documents using a network, said electronic document generation system comprising:
a document template storage to store a plurality of document templates;
a question set storage to store a plurality of question sets that are associated with the document templates;
an expert logic storage to store expert processes associated with the document templates; and
a document server machine configured to:
receive, from a user machine via the network, a customization request to customize a selected document template at the document server;
identify an interview question set for the selected document template from the plurality of question sets stored in the question set storage, the interview question set being identified is associated with the selected document template, wherein different ones of the document templates have different ones of the interview question sets associated therewith;
retrieve the interview question set for the selected document template;
send the interview question set to the user machine via the network where questions from the interview question set are able to be presented via the user machine;
receive, from a user machine via the network, answers to the questions of the interview question set;
perform one or more of the expert processes to produce a customized legal document based on the selected document template and the answers to the questions of the interview question set, the expert processes are implemented by computer program code which when performed controls content and verbiage of at least a portion of the customized legal document being produced; and
after the customized legal document has been produced, electronically transmit the customized legal document to the user machine or other machine via the network,
wherein the selected document template is used at said document server machine to produce the customized legal document, and wherein the customized legal document is electronically transmitted to the local machine or other machine after the answers to the questions of the interview question set for the selected document template have been received at said document server machine.
6. A non-transitory computer readable medium including at least computer program code for producing a customized electronic document, said computer readable medium comprising:
computer program code for receiving a customization request for an electronic document, the customization request including or associating to document data;
computer program code for determining a template document for the electronic document based on the document data, the template document being determined from a plurality of available template documents;
computer program code for obtaining a question set that is predetermined and associated with but separate from the template document;
computer program code for receiving responses to the question set;
computer program code for producing a customized electronic legal document from the template document and the responses to the question set, expert processes are associated with the template document and are implemented by computer program code which when performed controls content and verbiage of at least a portion of the customized electronic legal document being produced; and
computer program code transmitting the customized electronic legal document to the local machine or other machine via a network, after the customized electronic legal document has been produced,
wherein the template document is not provided to the local machine or other machine via the network.
7. A non-transitory computer readable medium as recited in claim 6 , wherein the customized electronic legal document is a completed electronic form.
8. A non-transitory computer readable medium as recited in claim 6 , wherein the customization request is initiated by a requestor, and
wherein said computer readable medium comprises:
sending the customized electronic legal document to the requestor via the network.
9. A non-transitory computer readable medium as recited in claim 6 , wherein the customization request is initiated by a requestor, and
wherein the responses to the question set result from answers by the requestor to the question set.
10. A non-transitory computer readable medium as recited in claim 6 , wherein different template documents have different ones of the available question sets corresponding thereto.
11. A non-transitory computer readable medium as recited in claim 6 , wherein the customized electronic legal document has a non-editable format, such that the customized electronic legal document is useable but not alterable by a recipient.
12. A non-transitory computer readable medium as recited in claim 6 ,
wherein the template document pertains to a plurality of different electronic documents, and
wherein said computer program code for producing produces a set of customized electronic documents from the template document and the responses to the question set.
13. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 5 , wherein the customized legal document is a completed electronic form.
14. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 5 , wherein the customization request is initiated by a requestor, and
wherein said electronic document generation system comprises:
sending the customized legal document to the requestor via the network.
15. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 5 , wherein the customization request is initiated by a requestor, and
wherein the answers to the interview question set result from answers by the requestor to the interview question set.
16. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 5 , wherein different ones of the document templates have different ones of the interview question sets corresponding thereto.
17. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 5 , wherein the customized legal document has a non-editable format, such that the customized legal document is an non-alterable format.
18. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 5 , wherein the customization request is initiated by a requestor, and
wherein the answers to the interview question set result from answers by the requestor to the interview question set, and
wherein different ones of the template documents have different ones of the interview question sets corresponding thereto.
19. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 18 ,
wherein the selected document template pertains to a plurality of different electronic documents, and
wherein said document server performs the one or more of the expert processes to produce a set of customized electronic documents from the selected document template and the responses to the interview question set, the customized electronic documents including at least the customized legal document.
20. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 5 ,
wherein the selected document template and the associated interview question set pertains to a plurality of different electronic documents, and
wherein said document server machine performs the one or more of the expert processes to produce a plurality of customized electronic documents from the selected document template and the responses to the interview question set, the customized electronic documents including at least the customized legal document and another customized legal document.
21. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 20 , wherein at least one the answers are used to select from available alternative portions associated with the selected document template.
22. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 5 ,
wherein the selected document template to be customized corresponds to a document package, and
wherein the expert processes operate to produce a plurality of related customized legal documents based on the document package and the answers.
23. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 22 ,
wherein the selected document template and the associated interview question set pertains to a plurality of different electronic legal documents, and
wherein said document server machine performs the one or more of the expert processes to produce the plurality of electronic legal documents from the selected document template and the answers to the interview question set, the plurality of different electronic legal documents including at least the customized legal document and another customized legal document.
24. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 23 , wherein at least one the answers are used to select from available alternative portions associated with the selected document template.
25. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 23 , wherein, due to predetermined associations, the selection of the selected document template from the document template storage not only selects the selected document template but also identifies the interview question set for the selected document template that is to be retrieved and also the expert processes for use with the selected document template.
26. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 23 , wherein the electronic document generation system comprises:
a user library storage to store the customized legal document that has been produced such that the electronic document generation system archives previously produced customized legal documents for a given user such that the given user is able to later retrieve copies of the previously produced customized legal documents for the given user.
27. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 26 , wherein the user library storage stores the previously produced customized legal documents for a given user as well as other information previously acquired from the given user, and wherein the document server machine of the electronic document generation system is further configured to reduce required interaction with the given user with respect to the interview question set through use of the information stored in the user storage library for the given user.
28. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 26 , wherein the user library storage stores the previously produced customized legal documents for a given user as well as other information previously acquired from the given user, and wherein the document server machine of the electronic document generation system is further configured to remove or omit one or more questions from the interview question set for the selected document template that are to be presented via the user machine through use of the information stored in the user library storage for the given user.
29. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 5 , wherein, due to predetermined associations, the selection of the selected document template from the document template storage not only selects the selected document template but also identifies the interview question set for the selected document template that is to be retrieved and also the expert processes for use with the selected document template.
30. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 5 , wherein the electronic document generation system comprises:
a user library storage to store the customized legal document that has been produced such that the electronic document generation system archives previously produced customized legal documents for a given user such that the given user is able to later retrieve copies of the previously produced customized legal documents for the given user.
31. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 30 , wherein the user library storage stores the previously produced customized legal documents for a given user as well as other information previously acquired from the given user, and wherein the document server machine of the electronic document generation system is further configured to reduce required interaction with the given user with respect to the interview question set through use of the information stored in the user storage library for the given user.
32. An electronic document generation system as recited in claim 30 , wherein the user library storage stores the previously produced customized legal documents for a given user as well as other information previously acquired from the given user, and wherein the document server machine of the electronic document generation system is further configured to remove one or more questions from the interview question set for the selected document template that are to be presented via the user machine through use of the information stored in the user library storage for the given user.
33. A computer readable medium as recited in claim 6 ,
wherein the template document to be customized corresponds to a document package, and
wherein the expert processes operate to produce a plurality of related customized legal documents based on the document package and the answers.
34. A computer readable medium as recited in claim 33 ,
wherein the template document and the question set pertains to a plurality of different electronic legal documents, and
wherein the computer program code for producing the customized legal document includes at least computer program code for performing one or more of the expert processes to produce the plurality of electronic legal documents from the template document and the answers to the question set, the plurality of different electronic legal documents including at least the customized electronic legal document and another customized electronic legal document.
35. A computer readable medium as recited in claim 34 , wherein at least one the answers are used to select from available alternative portions associated with the template document.
36. A computer readable medium as recited in claim 34 , wherein, due to predetermined associations, the determination of the template document not only selects the template document from the plurality of available template documents but also identifies the question set for the template document that is to be retrieved and also the expert processes for use with the template document.
37. A computer readable medium as recited in claim 6 , due to predetermined associations, the determination of the template document not only selects the template document from the plurality of available template documents but also identifies the question set for the template document that is to be retrieved and also the expert processes for use with the template document.
38. A computer readable medium as recited in claim 37 ,
wherein the template document to be customized corresponds to a document package, and
wherein the expert processes operate to produce a plurality of related customized legal documents based on the document package and the answers.
39. A computer readable medium as recited in claim 38 ,
wherein the template document and the question set pertains to a plurality of different electronic legal documents, and
wherein the computer program code for producing the customized legal document includes at least computer program code for performing one or more of the expert processes to produce the plurality of electronic legal documents from the template document and the answers to the question set, the plurality of different electronic legal documents including at least the customized electronic legal document and another customized electronic legal document.
40. A server machine as recited in claim 1 , wherein presentation of at least one of the questions from the interview question set via the local machine is dependent on predetermined logic associated with the interview question set, and wherein the predetermined logic impacts sequencing or ordering of at least one of the questions from the interview question set.
41. A server machine as recited in claim 1 , wherein presentation of at least one of the questions from the interview question set via the local machine is dependent on predetermined logic associated with the interview question set, and wherein the predetermined logic impacts skipping of at least one of the questions from the interview question set.
42. A server machine as recited in claim 1 , wherein the local machine is associated with a requestor, and wherein presentation of at least one of the questions from the interview question set via the local machine differs for different requestors dependent on predetermined logic associated with the interview question set, and wherein the predetermined logic impacts skipping or ordering of at least one of the questions from the interview question set.
43. A server machine as recited in claim 1 ,
wherein the selected document template pertains to a plurality of different electronic documents, and
wherein the at least one processor is configured to performs the one or more of the expert processes to produce a set of customized electronic documents from the selected document template and the responses to the interview question set, the customized electronic documents including at least the customized legal document.
44. A server machine as recited in claim 1 , wherein the server machine includes or couples to a user storage library, and
wherein the user storage library stores the previously produced customized legal documents for a given user as well as other information previously acquired from the given user, and wherein the at least one processor is further configured to remove one or more questions from the interview question set for the selected document template that are to be presented via the local machine through use of the information stored in the user storage library for the given user.
45. A server machine as recited in claim 44 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
access at least a portion of the other information previously acquired from the given user and stored in the user storage library corresponding to the given user, and
reduce required interaction with the given user via the local machine to produce the customized legal document via the interview question set for the selected document template through use of at least a portion of the other information stored in the user storage library for the given user.
46. A server machine as recited in claim 1 , wherein, due to predetermined associations, the selected document template has a corresponding interview question set for the selected document template and also has corresponding expert processes for use with the selected document template.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/448,889 US10289663B2 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2014-07-31 | Method and system for formation of electronic documents |
Applications Claiming Priority (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11223498P | 1998-12-14 | 1998-12-14 | |
US15268399P | 1999-09-07 | 1999-09-07 | |
US09/458,834 US6873992B1 (en) | 1999-09-07 | 1999-12-13 | Method and system for automated document generation |
US11/093,002 US7844569B2 (en) | 1999-09-07 | 2005-03-28 | Method and system for electronic negotiation of documents |
US12/878,199 US20100332974A1 (en) | 1999-09-07 | 2010-09-09 | Method and System for Formation of Electronic Documents |
US14/448,889 US10289663B2 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2014-07-31 | Method and system for formation of electronic documents |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/878,199 Division US20100332974A1 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2010-09-09 | Method and System for Formation of Electronic Documents |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20140344677A1 US20140344677A1 (en) | 2014-11-20 |
US20180322105A2 true US20180322105A2 (en) | 2018-11-08 |
US10289663B2 US10289663B2 (en) | 2019-05-14 |
Family
ID=34317343
Family Applications (5)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/458,834 Expired - Lifetime US6873992B1 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 1999-12-13 | Method and system for automated document generation |
US11/093,002 Expired - Fee Related US7844569B2 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2005-03-28 | Method and system for electronic negotiation of documents |
US12/878,199 Abandoned US20100332974A1 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2010-09-09 | Method and System for Formation of Electronic Documents |
US13/801,854 Abandoned US20130198616A1 (en) | 1999-09-07 | 2013-03-13 | Method and system for formation of electronic documents |
US14/448,889 Expired - Lifetime US10289663B2 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2014-07-31 | Method and system for formation of electronic documents |
Family Applications Before (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/458,834 Expired - Lifetime US6873992B1 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 1999-12-13 | Method and system for automated document generation |
US11/093,002 Expired - Fee Related US7844569B2 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2005-03-28 | Method and system for electronic negotiation of documents |
US12/878,199 Abandoned US20100332974A1 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2010-09-09 | Method and System for Formation of Electronic Documents |
US13/801,854 Abandoned US20130198616A1 (en) | 1999-09-07 | 2013-03-13 | Method and system for formation of electronic documents |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (5) | US6873992B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (76)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6873992B1 (en) | 1999-09-07 | 2005-03-29 | Robolaw Corporation | Method and system for automated document generation |
US7747592B2 (en) | 1999-09-07 | 2010-06-29 | Thomas C Douglass | Method and system for monitoring domain name registrations |
US9311399B2 (en) | 1999-09-07 | 2016-04-12 | C. Douglass Thomas | System and method for providing an updating on-line forms and registrations |
AU2001243513A1 (en) * | 2000-03-07 | 2001-09-17 | Broadcom Corporation | An interactive system for and method of automating the generation of legal documents |
GB2364141A (en) * | 2000-06-28 | 2002-01-16 | Peter David Hudson | System for producing a patent specification and application |
CA2322601A1 (en) * | 2000-10-06 | 2002-04-06 | Ibm Canada Limited-Ibm Canada Limitee | System and method for generating a filtered product list from a master product list in a contract |
CA2322600A1 (en) * | 2000-10-06 | 2002-04-06 | Ibm Canada Limited-Ibm Canada Limitee | System and method for presentation of user interface for conducting contractual activity over a computer network |
US7861161B1 (en) * | 2001-06-19 | 2010-12-28 | Microstrategy, Inc. | Report system and method using prompt objects |
GB2380278A (en) | 2001-10-01 | 2003-04-02 | Sun Microsystems Inc | Generating documents |
US7562053B2 (en) * | 2002-04-02 | 2009-07-14 | Soluble Technologies, Llc | System and method for facilitating transactions between two or more parties |
US7415663B1 (en) * | 2002-11-18 | 2008-08-19 | David Ray Kraus | Advanced logic controller that deploys user customized logic in the administration of questionnaires |
JP4789802B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2011-10-12 | アップル インコーポレイテッド | Graphical user interface for browsing, searching and presenting media items |
US20040215534A1 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2004-10-28 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and system for network-based allowance control |
WO2005010866A1 (en) * | 2003-07-23 | 2005-02-03 | Nexidia Inc. | Spoken word spotting queries |
US20050085243A1 (en) * | 2003-09-29 | 2005-04-21 | Avaya Technlogy Corp. | Contextual communications |
US7844548B2 (en) * | 2003-10-15 | 2010-11-30 | Apple Inc. | Techniques and systems for electronic submission of media for network-based distribution |
US8392226B1 (en) * | 2003-11-04 | 2013-03-05 | Viabridge, Inc. | Controlling meta-data of information resources |
DE112005002887T5 (en) * | 2004-11-23 | 2008-01-03 | Intuit, Inc., Mountain View | Model-driven user interview |
US20060287966A1 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2006-12-21 | Oracle International Corporation | Methods and systems for authoring customized contracts using contract templates that include user-configured rules and questions |
CN1912902A (en) * | 2005-08-12 | 2007-02-14 | 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 | Legal document generating system and method |
US8700668B2 (en) * | 2005-08-23 | 2014-04-15 | Business Integrity Limited | Completeness in dependency networks |
US20070143674A1 (en) * | 2005-12-20 | 2007-06-21 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | LDAP based scan templates |
US7962634B2 (en) | 2006-05-15 | 2011-06-14 | Apple Inc. | Submission of metadata content and media content to a media distribution system |
US20070265969A1 (en) * | 2006-05-15 | 2007-11-15 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Computerized management of media distribution agreements |
US8015237B2 (en) | 2006-05-15 | 2011-09-06 | Apple Inc. | Processing of metadata content and media content received by a media distribution system |
US7827162B2 (en) * | 2006-05-15 | 2010-11-02 | Apple Inc. | Media package format for submission to a media distribution system |
US10176540B2 (en) | 2006-10-17 | 2019-01-08 | First American Title Insurance Company | Apparatus and method for generating title products |
GB2443447A (en) * | 2006-10-30 | 2008-05-07 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | A method of constructing an output document by adding data from a variable data document to a template document |
GB2443446B (en) * | 2006-10-30 | 2011-11-30 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | A method of identifying an extractable portion of a source machine-readable document |
GB2443443A (en) * | 2006-10-30 | 2008-05-07 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | method of defining editable portions within the template document |
GB2443444A (en) * | 2006-10-30 | 2008-05-07 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | Remotely editing a template document |
GB2443445A (en) * | 2006-10-30 | 2008-05-07 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | Remote document construction using templates and variable data |
GB0621770D0 (en) * | 2006-11-01 | 2006-12-13 | Kilgour Simon | Interactive database |
CN101201815B (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2012-03-28 | 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 | System and method for generating patent application file |
US20080183679A1 (en) * | 2007-01-25 | 2008-07-31 | First American Title Insurance Company | Apparatus and method for generating legal descriptions |
US7756920B2 (en) * | 2007-11-28 | 2010-07-13 | Apple Inc. | Resubmission of media for network-based distribution |
US8373879B1 (en) | 2008-04-10 | 2013-02-12 | First American Title Insurance Company | Apparatus and method for generating real time mail |
GB0807296D0 (en) * | 2008-04-22 | 2008-05-28 | Thunderhead Ltd | Template author and method of driving data capture in document templates |
US10255580B2 (en) | 2008-05-05 | 2019-04-09 | Apple Inc. | Network-based distribution of application products |
US9342287B2 (en) | 2008-05-05 | 2016-05-17 | Apple Inc. | Software program ratings |
US9076176B2 (en) | 2008-05-05 | 2015-07-07 | Apple Inc. | Electronic submission of application programs for network-based distribution |
US20090276333A1 (en) * | 2008-05-05 | 2009-11-05 | Cortes Ricardo D | Electronic submission and management of digital products for network-based distribution |
US20090307682A1 (en) * | 2008-06-08 | 2009-12-10 | Sam Gharabally | Techniques for Acquiring Updates for Application Programs |
US8126837B2 (en) * | 2008-09-23 | 2012-02-28 | Stollman Jeff | Methods and apparatus related to document processing based on a document type |
US8086951B2 (en) * | 2008-10-22 | 2011-12-27 | Appone Services, Inc. | Remote web-based document creation system and method |
US20100235889A1 (en) * | 2009-03-16 | 2010-09-16 | Michael Kuohao Chu | Application products with in-application subsequent feature access using network-based distribution system |
US8505105B2 (en) * | 2009-03-27 | 2013-08-06 | Efficiency Products Llc | Managing signature pages of a transactional deal using a taxonomy displayable by a computing device |
US20100299219A1 (en) * | 2009-05-25 | 2010-11-25 | Cortes Ricardo D | Configuration and Management of Add-ons to Digital Application Programs for Network-Based Distribution |
US9729609B2 (en) * | 2009-08-07 | 2017-08-08 | Apple Inc. | Automatic transport discovery for media submission |
US8935217B2 (en) * | 2009-09-08 | 2015-01-13 | Apple Inc. | Digital asset validation prior to submission for network-based distribution |
US9002700B2 (en) | 2010-05-13 | 2015-04-07 | Grammarly, Inc. | Systems and methods for advanced grammar checking |
US20120131445A1 (en) * | 2010-11-23 | 2012-05-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Template-based content creation |
US8972848B2 (en) | 2010-11-23 | 2015-03-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Document renewal and translation |
AU2012272977A1 (en) * | 2011-06-20 | 2014-01-16 | Tandemseven, Inc. | System and method for building and managing user experience for computer software interfaces |
WO2013009879A1 (en) | 2011-07-11 | 2013-01-17 | Paper Software LLC | System and method for processing document |
AU2012281166B2 (en) | 2011-07-11 | 2017-08-24 | Paper Software LLC | System and method for processing document |
WO2013009889A1 (en) | 2011-07-11 | 2013-01-17 | Paper Software LLC | System and method for searching a document |
CA2840231A1 (en) * | 2011-07-11 | 2013-01-17 | Paper Software LLC | System and method for processing document |
US20130091422A1 (en) * | 2011-10-10 | 2013-04-11 | Gururaj Potnis | System and Method for Dynamically Creating a Document Using a Template Tree |
US20140297376A1 (en) * | 2011-11-09 | 2014-10-02 | Tanya Robertson | System for aggregated distribution of public notices |
US9203624B2 (en) | 2012-06-04 | 2015-12-01 | Apple Inc. | Authentication and notification heuristics |
US8990188B2 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2015-03-24 | Apple Inc. | Managed assessment of submitted digital content |
US9087341B2 (en) | 2013-01-11 | 2015-07-21 | Apple Inc. | Migration of feedback data to equivalent digital assets |
US20140250020A1 (en) * | 2013-03-04 | 2014-09-04 | In the Moment Legal LLC | System and method for forming a legal entity using a mobile device |
US20160012031A1 (en) * | 2014-07-08 | 2016-01-14 | Bank Of America Corporation | Template-based message generation tool |
US9948698B2 (en) * | 2015-06-04 | 2018-04-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Web services documentation |
US10930389B2 (en) * | 2016-01-20 | 2021-02-23 | Change Healthcare Holdings, Llc | Systems and methods for the classification and indexing of contract documentation |
US11341507B2 (en) | 2017-03-14 | 2022-05-24 | Avalara, Inc. | Compliance document creation, modification, and provisioning |
US10637900B2 (en) | 2017-12-08 | 2020-04-28 | Beatrice T. O'Brien | Computerized network system for initiating, facilitating, auditing, and managing communications and documents involving professional expertise |
US11232403B2 (en) | 2017-12-08 | 2022-01-25 | Beatrice T. O'Brien | Computerized network system for initiating, facilitating, auditing, and managing communications and documents involving professional expertise |
US11468421B1 (en) * | 2019-06-14 | 2022-10-11 | Avalara, Inc. | Establishing sales tax exemption status in an electronic marketplace environment |
US11861524B1 (en) | 2019-08-27 | 2024-01-02 | Ironclad, Inc. | Automatic intake of electronic message content and attachments into contract workflow |
US20210224937A1 (en) * | 2020-01-16 | 2021-07-22 | Keeleg Tech, Inc. | System and method for automated attorney referral and legal document preparation |
CN111651680A (en) * | 2020-07-20 | 2020-09-11 | 在先信息技术(天津)有限公司 | Method and system for self-help generation of legal documents |
WO2022046794A1 (en) * | 2020-08-24 | 2022-03-03 | Last Minute Justice Llc | Removing biases in a process for retaining service providers |
CN112560449B (en) * | 2021-02-23 | 2021-06-18 | 北京远鉴信息技术有限公司 | Text quality detection method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
Family Cites Families (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4750119A (en) | 1986-10-10 | 1988-06-07 | Tradevest, Inc. | Purchasing system with rebate feature |
US5253165A (en) | 1989-12-18 | 1993-10-12 | Eduardo Leiseca | Computerized reservations and scheduling system |
JPH0594436A (en) * | 1990-10-10 | 1993-04-16 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Document processor |
CA2056865C (en) * | 1990-12-11 | 1999-01-05 | Barbara Clapp | Interactive computerized document assembly system |
US5879163A (en) * | 1996-06-24 | 1999-03-09 | Health Hero Network, Inc. | On-line health education and feedback system using motivational driver profile coding and automated content fulfillment |
US5627973A (en) | 1994-03-14 | 1997-05-06 | Moore Business Forms, Inc. | Method and apparatus for facilitating evaluation of business opportunities for supplying goods and/or services to potential customers |
US5535383A (en) | 1994-03-17 | 1996-07-09 | Sybase, Inc. | Database system with methods for controlling object interaction by establishing database contracts between objects |
JPH08137842A (en) * | 1994-11-08 | 1996-05-31 | Canon Inc | System and method for language information processing |
US5692206A (en) * | 1994-11-30 | 1997-11-25 | Taco Bell Corporation | Method and apparatus for automating the generation of a legal document |
US5918222A (en) * | 1995-03-17 | 1999-06-29 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Information disclosing apparatus and multi-modal information input/output system |
WO1997004410A1 (en) | 1995-07-18 | 1997-02-06 | Sloo Marshall A | On-line contract negotiating apparatus and method |
US5826244A (en) * | 1995-08-23 | 1998-10-20 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for providing a document service over a computer network using an automated brokered auction |
US6684188B1 (en) * | 1996-02-02 | 2004-01-27 | Geoffrey C Mitchell | Method for production of medical records and other technical documents |
US5987480A (en) * | 1996-07-25 | 1999-11-16 | Donohue; Michael | Method and system for delivering documents customized for a particular user over the internet using imbedded dynamic content |
US6603487B1 (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 2003-08-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for electronically developing and processing a document |
JP3048129B2 (en) * | 1996-11-28 | 2000-06-05 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and information processing method, information providing apparatus, and information processing system |
US6081262A (en) * | 1996-12-04 | 2000-06-27 | Quark, Inc. | Method and apparatus for generating multi-media presentations |
US6026433A (en) * | 1997-03-17 | 2000-02-15 | Silicon Graphics, Inc. | Method of creating and editing a web site in a client-server environment using customizable web site templates |
AU751847B2 (en) | 1997-04-28 | 2002-08-29 | Ariba, Inc. | Operating resource management system |
US6684369B1 (en) * | 1997-06-19 | 2004-01-27 | International Business Machines, Corporation | Web site creator using templates |
US6304886B1 (en) * | 1997-06-19 | 2001-10-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for building a web site using specific interface |
US6560634B1 (en) | 1997-08-15 | 2003-05-06 | Verisign, Inc. | Method of determining unavailability of an internet domain name |
US6192380B1 (en) * | 1998-03-31 | 2001-02-20 | Intel Corporation | Automatic web based form fill-in |
US6182095B1 (en) * | 1998-04-30 | 2001-01-30 | General Electric Capital Corporation | Document generator |
US6067531A (en) | 1998-07-21 | 2000-05-23 | Mci Communications Corporation | Automated contract negotiator/generation system and method |
US6314415B1 (en) * | 1998-11-04 | 2001-11-06 | Cch Incorporated | Automated forms publishing system and method using a rule-based expert system to dynamically generate a graphical user interface |
US6873992B1 (en) | 1999-09-07 | 2005-03-29 | Robolaw Corporation | Method and system for automated document generation |
US20010011222A1 (en) * | 1998-12-24 | 2001-08-02 | Andrew W. Mclauchlin | Integrated procurement management system using public computer network |
EP1183632A2 (en) | 1999-04-22 | 2002-03-06 | Network Solutions, Inc. | Business rule engine |
US6681369B2 (en) | 1999-05-05 | 2004-01-20 | Xerox Corporation | System for providing document change information for a community of users |
US6880007B1 (en) | 1999-06-07 | 2005-04-12 | Register Com, Inc. | Domain manager and method of use |
US7251826B1 (en) | 1999-06-07 | 2007-07-31 | Register.Com, Inc. | Domain manager for plural domains and method of use |
US6496851B1 (en) * | 1999-08-04 | 2002-12-17 | America Online, Inc. | Managing negotiations between users of a computer network by automatically engaging in proposed activity using parameters of counterproposal of other user |
US7051364B1 (en) * | 1999-09-09 | 2006-05-23 | Daimlerchrysler Financial Services Americas Llc | System and method for preparing, executing, and securely managing electronic documents |
-
1999
- 1999-12-13 US US09/458,834 patent/US6873992B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2005
- 2005-03-28 US US11/093,002 patent/US7844569B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-09-09 US US12/878,199 patent/US20100332974A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2013
- 2013-03-13 US US13/801,854 patent/US20130198616A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2014
- 2014-07-31 US US14/448,889 patent/US10289663B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US10289663B2 (en) | 2019-05-14 |
US20050240529A1 (en) | 2005-10-27 |
US6873992B1 (en) | 2005-03-29 |
US20100332974A1 (en) | 2010-12-30 |
US7844569B2 (en) | 2010-11-30 |
US20140344677A1 (en) | 2014-11-20 |
US20130198616A1 (en) | 2013-08-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10289663B2 (en) | Method and system for formation of electronic documents | |
US6957384B2 (en) | Document management system | |
US6701376B1 (en) | Web server enabling browser access to HTML and Non-HTML documents | |
US7082475B2 (en) | Web server with automated workflow | |
US6301621B1 (en) | Web server with direct mail capability | |
EP1255205B1 (en) | System, computer program product and method for exchanging documents with an application service provider | |
CN100418081C (en) | Automated management of internet and/or web contert | |
US6725220B2 (en) | System and method for integrating paper-based business documents with computer-readable data entered via a computer network | |
US20050028073A1 (en) | Method and system for automating workflows | |
US7979434B2 (en) | System and method for storing and retrieving digital content with physical file systems | |
Nebel et al. | Form-based file upload in HTML | |
US20040148234A1 (en) | Methods and systems for online self-service receivables management and automated online receivables dispute resolution | |
US20110106762A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for sending and tracking resume data sent via url | |
EP1906321A1 (en) | System, apparatus and method for document management | |
US20120278436A1 (en) | Methods of providing a registry service and a registry service | |
US20080071678A1 (en) | System and method for facilitating loan provision | |
US6678738B2 (en) | Web server providing html pages embedded with non-HTML views | |
US20030004707A1 (en) | Method and system for structured processing of personal information | |
US20050021646A1 (en) | E-mail based decision process in a hierarchical organization | |
JPH11345270A (en) | Business processing system | |
Nebel et al. | RFC1867: Form-based file upload in HTML | |
JP2002314612A (en) | Server, information providing support system and method, and program | |
WO2001065414A2 (en) | Computerized communication platform for electronic documents | |
EP1923813B1 (en) | XSL Transformation (XSLT) for digital signatures for an electronic marketplace | |
JP2003331067A (en) | Business support system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT RECEIVED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: APPLICATION INVOLVED IN COURT PROCEEDINGS |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |