US20180239936A1 - Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation - Google Patents

Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20180239936A1
US20180239936A1 US15/551,565 US201615551565A US2018239936A1 US 20180239936 A1 US20180239936 A1 US 20180239936A1 US 201615551565 A US201615551565 A US 201615551565A US 2018239936 A1 US2018239936 A1 US 2018239936A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
level
barcode tag
tube
images
low
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US15/551,565
Other versions
US10824832B2 (en
Inventor
Stefan Kluckner
Yao-Jen Chang
Wen Wu
Benjamin Pollack
Terrence Chen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc
Original Assignee
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc filed Critical Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc
Priority to US15/551,565 priority Critical patent/US10824832B2/en
Publication of US20180239936A1 publication Critical patent/US20180239936A1/en
Assigned to SIEMENS CORPORATION reassignment SIEMENS CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CHANG, YAO-JEN, CHEN, TERRENCE, KLUCKNER, STEFAN, WU, WEN
Assigned to SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC. reassignment SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SIEMENS CORPORATION
Assigned to SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC. reassignment SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: POLLACK, BENJAMIN
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US10824832B2 publication Critical patent/US10824832B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V10/00Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding
    • G06V10/70Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding using pattern recognition or machine learning
    • G06V10/764Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding using pattern recognition or machine learning using classification, e.g. of video objects
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N35/00Automatic analysis not limited to methods or materials provided for in any single one of groups G01N1/00 - G01N33/00; Handling materials therefor
    • G01N35/00584Control arrangements for automatic analysers
    • G01N35/00722Communications; Identification
    • G01N35/00732Identification of carriers, materials or components in automatic analysers
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F18/00Pattern recognition
    • G06F18/20Analysing
    • G06F18/25Fusion techniques
    • G06F18/253Fusion techniques of extracted features
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06KGRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K7/00Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
    • G06K7/10Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation
    • G06K7/10544Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation by scanning of the records by radiation in the optical part of the electromagnetic spectrum
    • G06K7/10712Fixed beam scanning
    • G06K7/10722Photodetector array or CCD scanning
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06KGRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K7/00Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
    • G06K7/10Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation
    • G06K7/14Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation using light without selection of wavelength, e.g. sensing reflected white light
    • G06K7/1404Methods for optical code recognition
    • G06K7/1408Methods for optical code recognition the method being specifically adapted for the type of code
    • G06K7/14131D bar codes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06KGRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K7/00Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
    • G06K7/10Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation
    • G06K7/14Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation using light without selection of wavelength, e.g. sensing reflected white light
    • G06K7/1404Methods for optical code recognition
    • G06K7/1439Methods for optical code recognition including a method step for retrieval of the optical code
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06KGRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K7/00Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
    • G06K7/10Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation
    • G06K7/14Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation using light without selection of wavelength, e.g. sensing reflected white light
    • G06K7/1404Methods for optical code recognition
    • G06K7/146Methods for optical code recognition the method including quality enhancement steps
    • G06K7/1491Methods for optical code recognition the method including quality enhancement steps the method including a reconstruction step, e.g. stitching two pieces of bar code together to derive the full bar code
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V10/00Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding
    • G06V10/40Extraction of image or video features
    • G06V10/44Local feature extraction by analysis of parts of the pattern, e.g. by detecting edges, contours, loops, corners, strokes or intersections; Connectivity analysis, e.g. of connected components
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V10/00Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding
    • G06V10/70Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding using pattern recognition or machine learning
    • G06V10/77Processing image or video features in feature spaces; using data integration or data reduction, e.g. principal component analysis [PCA] or independent component analysis [ICA] or self-organising maps [SOM]; Blind source separation
    • G06V10/80Fusion, i.e. combining data from various sources at the sensor level, preprocessing level, feature extraction level or classification level
    • G06V10/806Fusion, i.e. combining data from various sources at the sensor level, preprocessing level, feature extraction level or classification level of extracted features
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01LCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL LABORATORY APPARATUS FOR GENERAL USE
    • B01L3/00Containers or dishes for laboratory use, e.g. laboratory glassware; Droppers
    • B01L3/54Labware with identification means
    • B01L3/545Labware with identification means for laboratory containers
    • B01L3/5453Labware with identification means for laboratory containers for test tubes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N35/00Automatic analysis not limited to methods or materials provided for in any single one of groups G01N1/00 - G01N33/00; Handling materials therefor
    • G01N35/00584Control arrangements for automatic analysers
    • G01N35/00722Communications; Identification
    • G01N35/00732Identification of carriers, materials or components in automatic analysers
    • G01N2035/00742Type of codes
    • G01N2035/00752Type of codes bar codes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V2201/00Indexing scheme relating to image or video recognition or understanding
    • G06V2201/06Recognition of objects for industrial automation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to detection of conditions of barcode tags, and, more particularly, to utilizing side view sample tube images to classify conditions of barcode tags on sample tubes.
  • Barcode tags are frequently used on sample tubes in clinical laboratory automation systems to uniquely identify and track the sample tubes, and are often the only means that associate a patient with a sample inside a particular sample tube. Through normal, everyday use, the condition of the barcode tags may deteriorate, including tearing, peeling, discoloring, and other deformations. Such deterioration hinders lab automation systems from streamlining the sample tube processing.
  • Embodiments are directed to detecting barcode tag conditions on sample tubes from side view images to streamline sample tube handling in advanced clinical laboratory automation systems.
  • FIG. 1 is a representation of an exemplary tube characterization station to which sample tubes are transferred for detecting barcode tag conditions on the sample tubes from side view images, according to an embodiment
  • FIG. 2 is a depiction of exemplary sample tubes with barcode tags, according to embodiments
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a workflow utilizing several parallel low-level cues, which are combined into a mid-level representation, for the barcode tag detection according to embodiments;
  • FIG. 4 is a representation of conditions of barcode tags, according to an embodiment
  • FIG. 5 illustrates use of a low level cue for a detection of barcode tag conditions, according to an embodiment
  • FIG. 6 illustrates use of an additional low level cue for a detection of barcode tag conditions, according to an embodiment.
  • Embodiments are directed to classifying barcode tag conditions on sample tubes from side view images to streamline sample tube handling in advanced clinical laboratory automation systems.
  • the classification of barcode tag conditions advantageously leads to the automatic detection of problematic barcode tags, allowing for the system, or a user, to take necessary steps to fix the problematic barcode tags.
  • the identified sample tubes with problematic barcode tags may be dispatched to a separate workflow apart from the normal tube handling procedures to rectify the problematic barcode tags.
  • a method enables barcode tag detection in tube images to derive an automated decision about the tag condition.
  • the conditions of the barcode tag may be classified into the classes OK, WARNING, and ERROR.
  • Each of the three classes are divided, according to an embodiment, into a list of additional subcategories, enabling a refined decision about the quality of the barcode tag.
  • These subcategories cover individual characteristics of the tag quality, such as perfect, peeled, damaged, folded, skewed, deformed, or colored, for example. Additional or alternate classes and subcategories may be used.
  • a tube characterization station is utilized to obtain the side view images for the classification of barcode tag conditions on sample tubes.
  • the TCS enables the simultaneous collection of three images for each tube, resulting in a 360 degree side view for each tube.
  • the proposed method is based on a supervised scene understanding concept, resulting in an explanation of each pixel into its semantic meaning.
  • two parallel low-level cues for condition recognition in combination with a tube model extraction cue, are utilized.
  • the semantic scene information is then integrated into a mid-level representation for final decision making into one of the three condition classes.
  • Semantic segmentation focuses on the explanation of each pixel in the image domain with respect to defined semantic object labels. Due to pixel level segmentation, the object boundaries can be captured accurately. Evaluations on benchmark datasets show that supervised concepts perform best in terms of reliability and classification accuracies. Typically these approaches are based on training and testing phases, taking into account sophisticated and combined features descriptors derived at various levels and hierarchies.
  • a triplet of images is acquired by using a TCS.
  • the condition of the barcode tag can vary in location, orientation, quality of attachment, and bar code readability.
  • the detection of barcode tag condition requires a mid-level representation which accurately captures spatial and appearance features with respect to the tube model. This mid-level representation captures multi-view information (e.g., 360 degree view from a triplet of images) from various parallel low-level cues which are trained and evaluated individually on relevant image structures.
  • FIG. 1 is a representation of an exemplary tube characterization station to which sample tubes are transferred for classifying barcode tag conditions on the sample tubes from side view images, according to an embodiment.
  • the sample tubes may be transferred to the TCS from, for example, a drawer system in which tube trays and sample tubes contained thereon are stored.
  • one or more drawers are provided in a work envelope for a sample handler in an in vitro diagnostics (IVD) environment.
  • the sample tubes may be transferred to the TCS via an arm movable between the drawer system and the TCS.
  • the TCS includes three cameras, each configured to capture an image of a particular sample tube to together capture a full 360 degree view.
  • FIG. 2 is a depiction of exemplary sample tubes with barcode tags. As shown, the tube model type and barcode tag condition can vary drastically between sample tubes.
  • the input data for the system is comprised of three images showing a full 360 degree view of a tube.
  • the proposed method takes as input a triplet of tube images and outputs a label for the condition of the barcode tag (OK, WARNING, ERROR).
  • FIG. 3 shows the proposed workflow: several parallel low-level cues are utilized, which are combined into a mid-level representation. This representation captures the multi-view information and is used for final decision making about the barcode tag condition. Low-level cues include separate semantic segmentations into barcode/tag and background regions, and good vs. bad regions, respectively. An additional low-level cue supports the extraction of the tube model and provides important spatial information for generating the mid-level representation.
  • the proposed method is not limited to these specific cues and may be extended to additional or alternate cues.
  • the proposed concept is based on the training and evaluation phase, requiring labeled input data for the training phase.
  • FIG. 4 is a representation of conditions of barcode tags in classes, and the subcategories that cover individual characteristics of the tag quality, according to an embodiment.
  • the proposed concept is based on multiple cues running in a supervised mode. These cues make extensive use of complementary feature descriptors, like color and orientation histograms, statistical descriptors and approximated local binary patterns, which are trained and evaluated on the pixel level. Since short response times are expected, the proposed concept exploits efficient image structures like integral images and uses quick classifiers like random decision trees or decision trees.
  • the training phases require labeled input data: due to pixel level classification, the annotation can be accomplished quickly by image regions annotation using strokes. Training has to be performed once and includes data from different acquisitions with various characteristics. For each low-level cue individually, individual random forest classifiers are trained for binary (Good/Bad regions) and multi-class tasks (Barcode/Tag/Background regions).
  • FIG. 5 illustrates exemplary responses of a semantic segmentation low-level cue applied to sample tubes.
  • the segmented tube region and some support segments in the images are used.
  • the tube model can either be derived by using a calibrated 3 D setup and external tube detection information (i.e., rendering of the tube's geometry into the images) or also extracted from the images individually (i.e., robust extraction of tube boundaries by using robust line detection methods and logic processing or reasoning). Having the tube model segmented in the images, enables the portioning of the tube and neighboring regions into smaller patches. These patches are used to aggregate classifier responses from the low-level cues as well as information directly from the images.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates exemplary responses of a tube model extraction low-level cue applied to sample tubes.
  • the proposed method makes use of aggregation of low-level cue responses into a mid-level representation, which can be seen as descriptor for a triplet of input images.
  • the descriptor is comprised of, but not limited to, classifier responses as well as image features extracted with support of the tube model segmentation (e.g., orientation information and color statistics). Since the representation includes information from multiple views, a data sequence ordering according to the size of the covered barcode regions is applied.
  • classifiers such as random decision trees or Support Vector Machines (SVM) are used.
  • SVM Support Vector Machines
  • a controller is provided for managing the image analysis of the images taken by the cameras for classifying barcode tag conditions on sample tubes from side view images.
  • the controller may be, according to an embodiment, part of a sample handler that is used in an in vitro diagnostics (IVD) environment to handle and move the tube trays and the tubes between storage locations to analyzers.
  • IVD in vitro diagnostics
  • One or more memory devices may be associated with the controller.
  • the one or more memory devices may be internal or external to the controller.

Abstract

Barcode tag conditions on sample tubes are detected utilizing side view images of sample tubes for streamlining handling in clinical laboratory automation systems. The condition of the tags may be classified into classes, each divided into a list of additional subcategories that cover individual characteristics of the tag quality. According to an embodiment, a tube characterization station (TCS) is utilized to obtain the side view images. The TCS enables the simultaneous or near-simultaneous collection of three images for each tube, resulting in a 360 degree side view for each tube. The method is based on a supervised scene understanding concept, resulting in an explanation of each pixel into its semantic meaning. Two parallel low-level cues for condition recognition, in combination with a tube model extraction cue, may be utilized. The semantic scene information is then integrated into a mid-level representation for final decision making into one of the condition classes.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/117,270 entitled “BARCODE TAG DETECTION IN SIDE VIEW SAMPLE TUBE IMAGES FOR LABORATORY AUTOMATION,” filed on Feb. 17, 2015, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
  • This application relates to several of the concepts described in US Patent Application Publication No. US 2016/0025757, and in International Publication No. WO 2015/191702, which are incorporated, herein by reference, in their entirety.
  • TECHNOLOGY FIELD
  • The present invention relates generally to detection of conditions of barcode tags, and, more particularly, to utilizing side view sample tube images to classify conditions of barcode tags on sample tubes.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Barcode tags are frequently used on sample tubes in clinical laboratory automation systems to uniquely identify and track the sample tubes, and are often the only means that associate a patient with a sample inside a particular sample tube. Through normal, everyday use, the condition of the barcode tags may deteriorate, including tearing, peeling, discoloring, and other deformations. Such deterioration hinders lab automation systems from streamlining the sample tube processing.
  • Thus, there is a need for detecting barcode tag conditions on sample tubes to streamline sample tube handling in advanced clinical laboratory automation systems. There is also a need for such classification to be automatic, efficient, and unobtrusive.
  • SUMMARY
  • Embodiments are directed to detecting barcode tag conditions on sample tubes from side view images to streamline sample tube handling in advanced clinical laboratory automation systems.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The foregoing and other aspects of the present invention are best understood from the following detailed description when read in connection with the accompanying drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings embodiments that are presently preferred, it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the specific instrumentalities disclosed. Included in the drawings are the following Figures:
  • FIG. 1 is a representation of an exemplary tube characterization station to which sample tubes are transferred for detecting barcode tag conditions on the sample tubes from side view images, according to an embodiment;
  • FIG. 2 is a depiction of exemplary sample tubes with barcode tags, according to embodiments;
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a workflow utilizing several parallel low-level cues, which are combined into a mid-level representation, for the barcode tag detection according to embodiments;
  • FIG. 4 is a representation of conditions of barcode tags, according to an embodiment;
  • FIG. 5 illustrates use of a low level cue for a detection of barcode tag conditions, according to an embodiment; and
  • FIG. 6 illustrates use of an additional low level cue for a detection of barcode tag conditions, according to an embodiment.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Embodiments are directed to classifying barcode tag conditions on sample tubes from side view images to streamline sample tube handling in advanced clinical laboratory automation systems. The classification of barcode tag conditions, according to embodiments provided herein, advantageously leads to the automatic detection of problematic barcode tags, allowing for the system, or a user, to take necessary steps to fix the problematic barcode tags. For example, the identified sample tubes with problematic barcode tags may be dispatched to a separate workflow apart from the normal tube handling procedures to rectify the problematic barcode tags.
  • A method according to embodiments provided herein enables barcode tag detection in tube images to derive an automated decision about the tag condition. The conditions of the barcode tag may be classified into the classes OK, WARNING, and ERROR. Each of the three classes are divided, according to an embodiment, into a list of additional subcategories, enabling a refined decision about the quality of the barcode tag. These subcategories cover individual characteristics of the tag quality, such as perfect, peeled, damaged, folded, skewed, deformed, or colored, for example. Additional or alternate classes and subcategories may be used.
  • According to an embodiment, a tube characterization station (TCS) is utilized to obtain the side view images for the classification of barcode tag conditions on sample tubes. The TCS enables the simultaneous collection of three images for each tube, resulting in a 360 degree side view for each tube. The proposed method is based on a supervised scene understanding concept, resulting in an explanation of each pixel into its semantic meaning. According to an embodiment, two parallel low-level cues for condition recognition, in combination with a tube model extraction cue, are utilized. The semantic scene information is then integrated into a mid-level representation for final decision making into one of the three condition classes.
  • Semantic segmentation focuses on the explanation of each pixel in the image domain with respect to defined semantic object labels. Due to pixel level segmentation, the object boundaries can be captured accurately. Evaluations on benchmark datasets show that supervised concepts perform best in terms of reliability and classification accuracies. Typically these approaches are based on training and testing phases, taking into account sophisticated and combined features descriptors derived at various levels and hierarchies.
  • A triplet of images is acquired by using a TCS. The condition of the barcode tag can vary in location, orientation, quality of attachment, and bar code readability. The detection of barcode tag condition requires a mid-level representation which accurately captures spatial and appearance features with respect to the tube model. This mid-level representation captures multi-view information (e.g., 360 degree view from a triplet of images) from various parallel low-level cues which are trained and evaluated individually on relevant image structures.
  • FIG. 1 is a representation of an exemplary tube characterization station to which sample tubes are transferred for classifying barcode tag conditions on the sample tubes from side view images, according to an embodiment. The sample tubes may be transferred to the TCS from, for example, a drawer system in which tube trays and sample tubes contained thereon are stored. In an embodiment, one or more drawers are provided in a work envelope for a sample handler in an in vitro diagnostics (IVD) environment. The sample tubes may be transferred to the TCS via an arm movable between the drawer system and the TCS.
  • The TCS includes three cameras, each configured to capture an image of a particular sample tube to together capture a full 360 degree view.
  • FIG. 2 is a depiction of exemplary sample tubes with barcode tags. As shown, the tube model type and barcode tag condition can vary drastically between sample tubes.
  • Input Data:
  • The input data for the system is comprised of three images showing a full 360 degree view of a tube.
  • Overview:
  • The proposed method takes as input a triplet of tube images and outputs a label for the condition of the barcode tag (OK, WARNING, ERROR). FIG. 3 shows the proposed workflow: several parallel low-level cues are utilized, which are combined into a mid-level representation. This representation captures the multi-view information and is used for final decision making about the barcode tag condition. Low-level cues include separate semantic segmentations into barcode/tag and background regions, and good vs. bad regions, respectively. An additional low-level cue supports the extraction of the tube model and provides important spatial information for generating the mid-level representation. The proposed method is not limited to these specific cues and may be extended to additional or alternate cues. The proposed concept is based on the training and evaluation phase, requiring labeled input data for the training phase.
  • FIG. 4 is a representation of conditions of barcode tags in classes, and the subcategories that cover individual characteristics of the tag quality, according to an embodiment.
  • Low-Level Cue: Semantic Segmentation:
  • The proposed concept is based on multiple cues running in a supervised mode. These cues make extensive use of complementary feature descriptors, like color and orientation histograms, statistical descriptors and approximated local binary patterns, which are trained and evaluated on the pixel level. Since short response times are expected, the proposed concept exploits efficient image structures like integral images and uses quick classifiers like random decision trees or decision trees. The training phases require labeled input data: due to pixel level classification, the annotation can be accomplished quickly by image regions annotation using strokes. Training has to be performed once and includes data from different acquisitions with various characteristics. For each low-level cue individually, individual random forest classifiers are trained for binary (Good/Bad regions) and multi-class tasks (Barcode/Tag/Background regions). During runtime the trained classifier provides probabilities on a pixel level with respect to the trained semantic classes. These classifier responses are directly integrated into the mid-level representation as discriminative attributes for final decision making. FIG. 5 illustrates exemplary responses of a semantic segmentation low-level cue applied to sample tubes.
  • Low-Level Cue: Tube Model Extraction:
  • In order to provide spatial information for data aggregation, the segmented tube region and some support segments in the images are used. The tube model can either be derived by using a calibrated 3D setup and external tube detection information (i.e., rendering of the tube's geometry into the images) or also extracted from the images individually (i.e., robust extraction of tube boundaries by using robust line detection methods and logic processing or reasoning). Having the tube model segmented in the images, enables the portioning of the tube and neighboring regions into smaller patches. These patches are used to aggregate classifier responses from the low-level cues as well as information directly from the images. FIG. 6 illustrates exemplary responses of a tube model extraction low-level cue applied to sample tubes.
  • Mid-Level Representation:
  • To derive a final decision for the barcode tag condition, the proposed method makes use of aggregation of low-level cue responses into a mid-level representation, which can be seen as descriptor for a triplet of input images. The descriptor is comprised of, but not limited to, classifier responses as well as image features extracted with support of the tube model segmentation (e.g., orientation information and color statistics). Since the representation includes information from multiple views, a data sequence ordering according to the size of the covered barcode regions is applied.
  • Barcode Tag Condition Classification:
  • In order to derive a final class label of the condition, classifiers such as random decision trees or Support Vector Machines (SVM) are used. A refinement of the classification results into subcategories and may be accomplished by an additional classification stage or directly on the mid-level representation.
  • A controller is provided for managing the image analysis of the images taken by the cameras for classifying barcode tag conditions on sample tubes from side view images. The controller may be, according to an embodiment, part of a sample handler that is used in an in vitro diagnostics (IVD) environment to handle and move the tube trays and the tubes between storage locations to analyzers. One or more memory devices may be associated with the controller. The one or more memory devices may be internal or external to the controller.
  • Although the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it is not limited thereto. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that numerous changes and modifications may be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention and that such changes and modifications may be made without departing from the true spirit of the invention. It is therefore intended that the appended claims be construed to cover all such equivalent variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims (16)

We claim:
1. A method of detecting barcode tag conditions on sample tubes, the method comprising:
acquiring, by an image capture system comprised of a plurality of cameras, side view images of a sample tube containing a barcode tag; and
analyzing, by one or more processors in communication with the image capture system, the side view images, the analyzing comprising:
applying a plurality of low-level cues to the side view images of the sample tube to obtain semantic segmentation and spatial information of the sample tube;
aggregating results of the application of the plurality of low-level cues to form a mid-level representation; and
identifying a class of the barcode tag based upon the mid-level representation.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of low-level cues comprise two parallel low-level cues for condition recognition and a tube model extraction cue for spatial information.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the two parallel low-level cues comprise (i) a semantic segmentation for barcode tag and background regions and (ii) a semantic segmentation for barcode tag quality regions.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the mid-level representation comprises a descriptor for the side view images, the descriptor comprising classifier responses and image feature extractions.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the classifier responses and image feature extractions are used to identify the class from a plurality of pre-defined classes.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the pre-defined classes each comprise a plurality of sub-categories.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the image capture system is comprised of three cameras for acquiring a 360 degree view of the sample tube.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the images are acquired simultaneously.
9. A vision system for use in an in vitro diagnostics environments for detecting barcode tag conditions on sample tubes, the vision system comprising:
a plurality of cameras configured to capture side view images of a sample tube containing a barcode tag;
a processor in communication with the plurality of cameras, the processor configured to perform the following steps:
apply a plurality of low-level cues to the side view images of the sample tube to obtain semantic segmentation and spatial information of the sample tube;
aggregate results of the application of the plurality of low-level cues to form a mid-level representation; and
identify a class of the barcode tag based upon the mid-level representation.
10. The system of claim 9, wherein the plurality of low-level cues comprise two parallel low-level cues for condition recognition and a tube model extraction cue for spatial information.
11. The system of claim 10, wherein the two parallel low-level cues comprise (i) a semantic segmentation for barcode tag and background regions and (ii) a semantic segmentation for barcode tag quality regions.
12. The system of claim 9, wherein the mid-level representation comprises a descriptor for the side view images, the descriptor comprising classifier responses and image feature extractions.
13. The system of claim 12, wherein the classifier responses and image feature extractions are used to identify the class from a plurality of pre-defined classes.
14. The system of claim 13, wherein the pre-defined classes each comprise a plurality of sub-categories.
15. The system of claim 9, wherein the image capture system is comprised of three cameras for acquiring a 360 degree view of the sample tube.
16. The system of claim 9, wherein the images are acquired simultaneously.
US15/551,565 2015-02-17 2016-02-16 Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation Active 2036-08-06 US10824832B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/551,565 US10824832B2 (en) 2015-02-17 2016-02-16 Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201562117270P 2015-02-17 2015-02-17
US15/551,565 US10824832B2 (en) 2015-02-17 2016-02-16 Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation
PCT/US2016/018084 WO2016133908A1 (en) 2015-02-17 2016-02-16 Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20180239936A1 true US20180239936A1 (en) 2018-08-23
US10824832B2 US10824832B2 (en) 2020-11-03

Family

ID=56692704

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/551,565 Active 2036-08-06 US10824832B2 (en) 2015-02-17 2016-02-16 Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US10824832B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3259068B1 (en)
JP (1) JP6791864B2 (en)
CN (1) CN107206384B (en)
CA (1) CA2976771C (en)
WO (1) WO2016133908A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20190025263A1 (en) * 2017-07-18 2019-01-24 Perkinelmer Health Sciences, Inc. Automated thermal desorption systems and methods
US10816516B2 (en) 2018-03-28 2020-10-27 Perkinelmer Health Sciences, Inc. Autosamplers and gas chromatographic systems and methods including same
US20220334141A1 (en) * 2021-04-19 2022-10-20 Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. Method for classifying an identification tag on a sample tube containing a sample and an automated laboratory system

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7012746B2 (en) * 2017-04-13 2022-01-28 シーメンス・ヘルスケア・ダイアグノスティックス・インコーポレーテッド Label correction method and equipment during sample evaluation
US11238318B2 (en) 2017-04-13 2022-02-01 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. Methods and apparatus for HILN characterization using convolutional neural network
EP3610269A4 (en) 2017-04-13 2020-04-22 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. Methods and apparatus for determining label count during specimen characterization
WO2018209057A1 (en) * 2017-05-11 2018-11-15 The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York System and method associated with predicting segmentation quality of objects in analysis of copious image data
EP3737930A4 (en) 2018-01-10 2021-03-10 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. Methods and apparatus for bio-fluid specimen characterization using neural network having reduced training
CN109272001B (en) * 2018-09-28 2021-09-03 深圳市飞点健康管理有限公司 Structure training method and device of urine test recognition classifier and computer equipment
CN109727643B (en) * 2018-12-05 2022-07-19 云南中烟工业有限责任公司 Single-target gene editing T1 tobacco substitute strain screening method
DE102021004734B3 (en) * 2021-09-21 2022-11-17 Vmt Vision Machine Technic Bildverarbeitungssysteme Gmbh Method for automatic inspection of a variety of sheet-like plastic substrates

Citations (44)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5286959A (en) * 1990-10-05 1994-02-15 Toa Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus for reading an identification code from a sample container as it is rotated
US5334825A (en) * 1992-04-27 1994-08-02 Ncr Corporation System and method for monitoring barcode label quality
US5637854A (en) * 1995-09-22 1997-06-10 Microscan Systems Incorporated Optical bar code scanner having object detection
US5663545A (en) * 1995-08-23 1997-09-02 Ljl Biosystems Inc. Labware identification system
US6039252A (en) * 1995-12-14 2000-03-21 Intermec Corporation Bar code reading system for reconstructing irregularly damaged bar codes
US20010049147A1 (en) * 1998-12-30 2001-12-06 Pierre Bierre System and method for universal identification of biological samples
US20020055861A1 (en) * 2000-11-08 2002-05-09 King Daniel A. Claiming system and method
US20020195491A1 (en) * 2001-06-26 2002-12-26 Bunch Earnest B. Apparatus and method for--at the time rented video media is returned--identifying damage, generating damage documentation in remote data base, and providing customer record detailing damage
US6598796B2 (en) * 2001-01-10 2003-07-29 Becton, Dickinson And Company Method and apparatus for aligning labels applied to a specimen collection container
US20030141368A1 (en) * 2002-01-29 2003-07-31 Florante Pascual System and method for obtaining information from a bar code for use with a healthcare system
US20030220761A1 (en) * 2002-05-23 2003-11-27 Sysmex Corporation Sample analyzer
US20050036907A1 (en) * 2003-07-10 2005-02-17 Jeol Ltd. Inspection system
US20050196323A1 (en) * 2004-03-08 2005-09-08 Ids Company., Ltd. Bar-code reading device having a mechanism for pulling up test tubes from holders
US20060043188A1 (en) * 2004-08-27 2006-03-02 Gregg Kricorissian Imaging method and apparatus for object identification
US20070036686A1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2007-02-15 Mehdi Hatamian Systems for tracking and testing of medical specimens and data
US20070053794A1 (en) * 2005-09-08 2007-03-08 Beckman Coulter, Inc. Sample identification system having plural readers
US7227622B2 (en) * 2004-03-22 2007-06-05 Ids Company, Ltd. Method and apparatus for sensing blood sample contained in sample container
US20080003148A1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2008-01-03 Dause Shari L Coded test tubes
US7382911B1 (en) * 2001-02-16 2008-06-03 Hand Held Products, Inc. Identification card reader
US20080297355A1 (en) * 2007-06-04 2008-12-04 Seiji Matsumoto Container with Electronic Tag and RFID System Using the Container with Electronic Tag
US7490773B2 (en) * 2004-12-03 2009-02-17 Mcvicker Henry J Apparatus and method for obtaining an image of an arcuate surface
US20090090786A1 (en) * 2005-04-25 2009-04-09 Gregory Hovis Segmented circular bar code
US20090272809A1 (en) * 2008-04-30 2009-11-05 Keyence Corporation Bar Code Reading Apparatus and Bar Code Reading Method
US20100123551A1 (en) * 2008-11-20 2010-05-20 Abbott Laboratories System for tracking vessels in automated laboratory analyzers by radio frequency identification
US20100299179A1 (en) * 2009-05-20 2010-11-25 Ahold Licensing Sa Automated area inspection and recordkeeping system and method
US20110045521A1 (en) * 2009-08-18 2011-02-24 Teruaki Itoh Sample processing apparatus and sample processing method
US20110085951A1 (en) * 2008-06-10 2011-04-14 Yoko Nakahana Sample storage
US20110102542A1 (en) * 2009-11-03 2011-05-05 Jadak, Llc System and Method For Panoramic Image Stitching
US20110174708A1 (en) * 2008-10-03 2011-07-21 Arkray, Inc. Sample stirring device, liquid chromatography device using same, and sample container stand
US20110181875A1 (en) * 2008-03-13 2011-07-28 Yoko Nakahana Sample storage
US20120080515A1 (en) * 2010-09-30 2012-04-05 Apple Inc. Barcode Recognition Using Data-Driven Classifier
US20120138674A1 (en) * 2008-06-25 2012-06-07 Jadak Llc System and Method for Test Tube and Cap Identification
US20130076882A1 (en) * 2011-09-28 2013-03-28 Teruaki Itoh Test preprocessing apparatus, test preprocessing method, and specimen processing apparatus
US20130129166A1 (en) * 2011-11-07 2013-05-23 Beckman Coulter, Inc. Specimen container detection
US20130142596A1 (en) * 2011-12-06 2013-06-06 Hirata Corporation Sorting apparatus
US20140374480A1 (en) * 2012-02-03 2014-12-25 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. Barcode reading test tube holder
US20160025757A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2016-01-28 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. Tube tray vision system
US20160086001A1 (en) * 2013-03-12 2016-03-24 ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a body corporate of the state of Arozona acting for and on behalf Dendritic structures and tags
US20180033256A1 (en) * 2016-07-28 2018-02-01 Datalogic ADC, Inc. Automatic barcode verifier
US20180046883A1 (en) * 2015-02-17 2018-02-15 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. Classification of barcode tag conditions from top view sample tube images for laboratory automation
US20180136096A1 (en) * 2015-06-12 2018-05-17 A.M.T. S.R.L. A machinery for an automated analysis of the slides in accordance with the indirect immunofluorescence assay - IFA
US10114999B1 (en) * 2016-12-02 2018-10-30 Koupon Media, Inc. Using dynamic occlusion to protect against capturing barcodes for fraudulent use on mobile devices
US20190035497A1 (en) * 2016-03-16 2019-01-31 Codonics, Inc. Method and apparatus for labeling and managing inventory of medicinal substances
US10509934B1 (en) * 2018-02-01 2019-12-17 Accusoft Corporation Methods and apparatus for improving QR code locator detectability and/or finding the corners of a locator pattern

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH091791A (en) 1995-06-23 1997-01-07 Dainippon Printing Co Ltd Device for determining printing quality
JPH11224304A (en) 1998-02-06 1999-08-17 Toshiba Tec Corp Information symbol checking device
JP2009196134A (en) 2008-02-20 2009-09-03 Panasonic Corp Inspecting method of printing state of individual recognition information and inspecting apparatus thereof
ES2402227T3 (en) 2008-07-25 2013-04-29 F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ag A storage and recovery laboratory system and a method for handling laboratory sample tubes
US8415642B2 (en) * 2010-09-30 2013-04-09 Performance Indicator, Llc Photolytically and environmentally stable multilayer structure for high efficiency electromagnetic energy conversion and sustained secondary emission
JP5966277B2 (en) 2011-08-19 2016-08-10 大日本印刷株式会社 Barcode appearance inspection system, barcode appearance inspection method, image processing apparatus
JP5908858B2 (en) 2013-03-26 2016-04-26 株式会社サンテック Defective adhesive material collection device
CN107003124B (en) 2014-06-10 2020-07-07 西门子医疗保健诊断公司 Drawer vision system

Patent Citations (44)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5286959A (en) * 1990-10-05 1994-02-15 Toa Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus for reading an identification code from a sample container as it is rotated
US5334825A (en) * 1992-04-27 1994-08-02 Ncr Corporation System and method for monitoring barcode label quality
US5663545A (en) * 1995-08-23 1997-09-02 Ljl Biosystems Inc. Labware identification system
US5637854A (en) * 1995-09-22 1997-06-10 Microscan Systems Incorporated Optical bar code scanner having object detection
US6039252A (en) * 1995-12-14 2000-03-21 Intermec Corporation Bar code reading system for reconstructing irregularly damaged bar codes
US20010049147A1 (en) * 1998-12-30 2001-12-06 Pierre Bierre System and method for universal identification of biological samples
US20020055861A1 (en) * 2000-11-08 2002-05-09 King Daniel A. Claiming system and method
US6598796B2 (en) * 2001-01-10 2003-07-29 Becton, Dickinson And Company Method and apparatus for aligning labels applied to a specimen collection container
US7382911B1 (en) * 2001-02-16 2008-06-03 Hand Held Products, Inc. Identification card reader
US20020195491A1 (en) * 2001-06-26 2002-12-26 Bunch Earnest B. Apparatus and method for--at the time rented video media is returned--identifying damage, generating damage documentation in remote data base, and providing customer record detailing damage
US20030141368A1 (en) * 2002-01-29 2003-07-31 Florante Pascual System and method for obtaining information from a bar code for use with a healthcare system
US20030220761A1 (en) * 2002-05-23 2003-11-27 Sysmex Corporation Sample analyzer
US20050036907A1 (en) * 2003-07-10 2005-02-17 Jeol Ltd. Inspection system
US20050196323A1 (en) * 2004-03-08 2005-09-08 Ids Company., Ltd. Bar-code reading device having a mechanism for pulling up test tubes from holders
US7227622B2 (en) * 2004-03-22 2007-06-05 Ids Company, Ltd. Method and apparatus for sensing blood sample contained in sample container
US20060043188A1 (en) * 2004-08-27 2006-03-02 Gregg Kricorissian Imaging method and apparatus for object identification
US7490773B2 (en) * 2004-12-03 2009-02-17 Mcvicker Henry J Apparatus and method for obtaining an image of an arcuate surface
US20090090786A1 (en) * 2005-04-25 2009-04-09 Gregory Hovis Segmented circular bar code
US20070036686A1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2007-02-15 Mehdi Hatamian Systems for tracking and testing of medical specimens and data
US20070053794A1 (en) * 2005-09-08 2007-03-08 Beckman Coulter, Inc. Sample identification system having plural readers
US20080003148A1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2008-01-03 Dause Shari L Coded test tubes
US20080297355A1 (en) * 2007-06-04 2008-12-04 Seiji Matsumoto Container with Electronic Tag and RFID System Using the Container with Electronic Tag
US20110181875A1 (en) * 2008-03-13 2011-07-28 Yoko Nakahana Sample storage
US20090272809A1 (en) * 2008-04-30 2009-11-05 Keyence Corporation Bar Code Reading Apparatus and Bar Code Reading Method
US20110085951A1 (en) * 2008-06-10 2011-04-14 Yoko Nakahana Sample storage
US20120138674A1 (en) * 2008-06-25 2012-06-07 Jadak Llc System and Method for Test Tube and Cap Identification
US20110174708A1 (en) * 2008-10-03 2011-07-21 Arkray, Inc. Sample stirring device, liquid chromatography device using same, and sample container stand
US20100123551A1 (en) * 2008-11-20 2010-05-20 Abbott Laboratories System for tracking vessels in automated laboratory analyzers by radio frequency identification
US20100299179A1 (en) * 2009-05-20 2010-11-25 Ahold Licensing Sa Automated area inspection and recordkeeping system and method
US20110045521A1 (en) * 2009-08-18 2011-02-24 Teruaki Itoh Sample processing apparatus and sample processing method
US20110102542A1 (en) * 2009-11-03 2011-05-05 Jadak, Llc System and Method For Panoramic Image Stitching
US20120080515A1 (en) * 2010-09-30 2012-04-05 Apple Inc. Barcode Recognition Using Data-Driven Classifier
US20130076882A1 (en) * 2011-09-28 2013-03-28 Teruaki Itoh Test preprocessing apparatus, test preprocessing method, and specimen processing apparatus
US20130129166A1 (en) * 2011-11-07 2013-05-23 Beckman Coulter, Inc. Specimen container detection
US20130142596A1 (en) * 2011-12-06 2013-06-06 Hirata Corporation Sorting apparatus
US20140374480A1 (en) * 2012-02-03 2014-12-25 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. Barcode reading test tube holder
US20160086001A1 (en) * 2013-03-12 2016-03-24 ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a body corporate of the state of Arozona acting for and on behalf Dendritic structures and tags
US20160025757A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2016-01-28 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. Tube tray vision system
US20180046883A1 (en) * 2015-02-17 2018-02-15 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. Classification of barcode tag conditions from top view sample tube images for laboratory automation
US20180136096A1 (en) * 2015-06-12 2018-05-17 A.M.T. S.R.L. A machinery for an automated analysis of the slides in accordance with the indirect immunofluorescence assay - IFA
US20190035497A1 (en) * 2016-03-16 2019-01-31 Codonics, Inc. Method and apparatus for labeling and managing inventory of medicinal substances
US20180033256A1 (en) * 2016-07-28 2018-02-01 Datalogic ADC, Inc. Automatic barcode verifier
US10114999B1 (en) * 2016-12-02 2018-10-30 Koupon Media, Inc. Using dynamic occlusion to protect against capturing barcodes for fraudulent use on mobile devices
US10509934B1 (en) * 2018-02-01 2019-12-17 Accusoft Corporation Methods and apparatus for improving QR code locator detectability and/or finding the corners of a locator pattern

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Chen ' 542 *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20190025263A1 (en) * 2017-07-18 2019-01-24 Perkinelmer Health Sciences, Inc. Automated thermal desorption systems and methods
US10598637B2 (en) * 2017-07-18 2020-03-24 Perkinelmer Health Sciences, Inc. Automated thermal desorption systems configured to determine sample tube orientation and/or cap presence, and related methods
US10816516B2 (en) 2018-03-28 2020-10-27 Perkinelmer Health Sciences, Inc. Autosamplers and gas chromatographic systems and methods including same
US20220334141A1 (en) * 2021-04-19 2022-10-20 Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. Method for classifying an identification tag on a sample tube containing a sample and an automated laboratory system
EP4080515A1 (en) 2021-04-19 2022-10-26 Roche Diagnostics GmbH A method for classifying an identification tag on a sample tube containing a sample and an automated laboratory system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2018512567A (en) 2018-05-17
EP3259068A4 (en) 2018-03-14
CN107206384B (en) 2020-12-22
CA2976771A1 (en) 2016-08-25
EP3259068B1 (en) 2023-03-29
CN107206384A (en) 2017-09-26
CA2976771C (en) 2023-09-26
WO2016133908A1 (en) 2016-08-25
EP3259068A1 (en) 2017-12-27
US10824832B2 (en) 2020-11-03
JP6791864B2 (en) 2020-11-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10824832B2 (en) Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation
JP2018512567A5 (en)
US20180268257A1 (en) Surface defect detection
JP6560757B2 (en) Classification of barcode tag states from top view sample tube images for laboratory automation
CN110378420A (en) A kind of image detecting method, device and computer readable storage medium
US11699283B2 (en) System and method for finding and classifying lines in an image with a vision system
CN112633297B (en) Target object identification method and device, storage medium and electronic device
US11354549B2 (en) Method and system for region proposal based object recognition for estimating planogram compliance
Khutlang et al. Automated detection of tuberculosis in Ziehl‐Neelsen‐stained sputum smears using two one‐class classifiers
CN109977824B (en) Article taking and placing identification method, device and equipment
JP2016191589A (en) Defect classification device defect classification method
Ghoshal et al. An improved scene text and document image binarization scheme
CN109359683B (en) Target detection method, device, terminal and computer-readable storage medium
CN114332058A (en) Serum quality identification method, device, equipment and medium based on neural network
CN112990245A (en) Article identification method, apparatus, device and storage medium
CN115953635B (en) Sorting method, AR (augmented reality) glasses and system for multi-class targets
US20240078801A1 (en) System and method for finding and classifying lines in an image with a vision system
CN117474924B (en) Label defect detection method based on machine vision
Golec et al. Gesture Detection in Digital Image Processing based on the Use of Convolutional Neuronal Networks
CN106446902A (en) Non-character image recognition method and device
Theiler et al. Approach to target detection based on relevant metric for scoring performance
Han et al. Tracking articulated human movements with a component based approach to boosted multiple instance learning
JP2018198034A (en) Image classification system, manufacturing apparatus with image classification function, discriminator for image classification, and image classification method
Sreelekshmi Identification of Distorted Images along with Text Recognition using SIFT algorithm
Han et al. Tracking articulated human movements witha component based approach to boosted multiple instance learning

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

AS Assignment

Owner name: SIEMENS CORPORATION, NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KLUCKNER, STEFAN;CHANG, YAO-JEN;WU, WEN;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20150810 TO 20150811;REEL/FRAME:053908/0366

Owner name: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC., NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SIEMENS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:053908/0381

Effective date: 20150813

Owner name: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC., NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:POLLACK, BENJAMIN;REEL/FRAME:053908/0434

Effective date: 20150806

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4