US20180239936A1 - Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation - Google Patents
Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20180239936A1 US20180239936A1 US15/551,565 US201615551565A US2018239936A1 US 20180239936 A1 US20180239936 A1 US 20180239936A1 US 201615551565 A US201615551565 A US 201615551565A US 2018239936 A1 US2018239936 A1 US 2018239936A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- level
- barcode tag
- tube
- images
- low
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 title description 11
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000004931 aggregating effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000003066 decision tree Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012706 support-vector machine Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003203 everyday effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010191 image analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007637 random forest analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
- G06V10/00—Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding
- G06V10/70—Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding using pattern recognition or machine learning
- G06V10/764—Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding using pattern recognition or machine learning using classification, e.g. of video objects
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N35/00—Automatic analysis not limited to methods or materials provided for in any single one of groups G01N1/00 - G01N33/00; Handling materials therefor
- G01N35/00584—Control arrangements for automatic analysers
- G01N35/00722—Communications; Identification
- G01N35/00732—Identification of carriers, materials or components in automatic analysers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F18/00—Pattern recognition
- G06F18/20—Analysing
- G06F18/25—Fusion techniques
- G06F18/253—Fusion techniques of extracted features
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06K—GRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
- G06K7/00—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
- G06K7/10—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation
- G06K7/10544—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation by scanning of the records by radiation in the optical part of the electromagnetic spectrum
- G06K7/10712—Fixed beam scanning
- G06K7/10722—Photodetector array or CCD scanning
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06K—GRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
- G06K7/00—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
- G06K7/10—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation
- G06K7/14—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation using light without selection of wavelength, e.g. sensing reflected white light
- G06K7/1404—Methods for optical code recognition
- G06K7/1408—Methods for optical code recognition the method being specifically adapted for the type of code
- G06K7/1413—1D bar codes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06K—GRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
- G06K7/00—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
- G06K7/10—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation
- G06K7/14—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation using light without selection of wavelength, e.g. sensing reflected white light
- G06K7/1404—Methods for optical code recognition
- G06K7/1439—Methods for optical code recognition including a method step for retrieval of the optical code
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06K—GRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
- G06K7/00—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
- G06K7/10—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation
- G06K7/14—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation using light without selection of wavelength, e.g. sensing reflected white light
- G06K7/1404—Methods for optical code recognition
- G06K7/146—Methods for optical code recognition the method including quality enhancement steps
- G06K7/1491—Methods for optical code recognition the method including quality enhancement steps the method including a reconstruction step, e.g. stitching two pieces of bar code together to derive the full bar code
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
- G06V10/00—Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding
- G06V10/40—Extraction of image or video features
- G06V10/44—Local feature extraction by analysis of parts of the pattern, e.g. by detecting edges, contours, loops, corners, strokes or intersections; Connectivity analysis, e.g. of connected components
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
- G06V10/00—Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding
- G06V10/70—Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding using pattern recognition or machine learning
- G06V10/77—Processing image or video features in feature spaces; using data integration or data reduction, e.g. principal component analysis [PCA] or independent component analysis [ICA] or self-organising maps [SOM]; Blind source separation
- G06V10/80—Fusion, i.e. combining data from various sources at the sensor level, preprocessing level, feature extraction level or classification level
- G06V10/806—Fusion, i.e. combining data from various sources at the sensor level, preprocessing level, feature extraction level or classification level of extracted features
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01L—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL LABORATORY APPARATUS FOR GENERAL USE
- B01L3/00—Containers or dishes for laboratory use, e.g. laboratory glassware; Droppers
- B01L3/54—Labware with identification means
- B01L3/545—Labware with identification means for laboratory containers
- B01L3/5453—Labware with identification means for laboratory containers for test tubes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N35/00—Automatic analysis not limited to methods or materials provided for in any single one of groups G01N1/00 - G01N33/00; Handling materials therefor
- G01N35/00584—Control arrangements for automatic analysers
- G01N35/00722—Communications; Identification
- G01N35/00732—Identification of carriers, materials or components in automatic analysers
- G01N2035/00742—Type of codes
- G01N2035/00752—Type of codes bar codes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
- G06V2201/00—Indexing scheme relating to image or video recognition or understanding
- G06V2201/06—Recognition of objects for industrial automation
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to detection of conditions of barcode tags, and, more particularly, to utilizing side view sample tube images to classify conditions of barcode tags on sample tubes.
- Barcode tags are frequently used on sample tubes in clinical laboratory automation systems to uniquely identify and track the sample tubes, and are often the only means that associate a patient with a sample inside a particular sample tube. Through normal, everyday use, the condition of the barcode tags may deteriorate, including tearing, peeling, discoloring, and other deformations. Such deterioration hinders lab automation systems from streamlining the sample tube processing.
- Embodiments are directed to detecting barcode tag conditions on sample tubes from side view images to streamline sample tube handling in advanced clinical laboratory automation systems.
- FIG. 1 is a representation of an exemplary tube characterization station to which sample tubes are transferred for detecting barcode tag conditions on the sample tubes from side view images, according to an embodiment
- FIG. 2 is a depiction of exemplary sample tubes with barcode tags, according to embodiments
- FIG. 3 illustrates a workflow utilizing several parallel low-level cues, which are combined into a mid-level representation, for the barcode tag detection according to embodiments;
- FIG. 4 is a representation of conditions of barcode tags, according to an embodiment
- FIG. 5 illustrates use of a low level cue for a detection of barcode tag conditions, according to an embodiment
- FIG. 6 illustrates use of an additional low level cue for a detection of barcode tag conditions, according to an embodiment.
- Embodiments are directed to classifying barcode tag conditions on sample tubes from side view images to streamline sample tube handling in advanced clinical laboratory automation systems.
- the classification of barcode tag conditions advantageously leads to the automatic detection of problematic barcode tags, allowing for the system, or a user, to take necessary steps to fix the problematic barcode tags.
- the identified sample tubes with problematic barcode tags may be dispatched to a separate workflow apart from the normal tube handling procedures to rectify the problematic barcode tags.
- a method enables barcode tag detection in tube images to derive an automated decision about the tag condition.
- the conditions of the barcode tag may be classified into the classes OK, WARNING, and ERROR.
- Each of the three classes are divided, according to an embodiment, into a list of additional subcategories, enabling a refined decision about the quality of the barcode tag.
- These subcategories cover individual characteristics of the tag quality, such as perfect, peeled, damaged, folded, skewed, deformed, or colored, for example. Additional or alternate classes and subcategories may be used.
- a tube characterization station is utilized to obtain the side view images for the classification of barcode tag conditions on sample tubes.
- the TCS enables the simultaneous collection of three images for each tube, resulting in a 360 degree side view for each tube.
- the proposed method is based on a supervised scene understanding concept, resulting in an explanation of each pixel into its semantic meaning.
- two parallel low-level cues for condition recognition in combination with a tube model extraction cue, are utilized.
- the semantic scene information is then integrated into a mid-level representation for final decision making into one of the three condition classes.
- Semantic segmentation focuses on the explanation of each pixel in the image domain with respect to defined semantic object labels. Due to pixel level segmentation, the object boundaries can be captured accurately. Evaluations on benchmark datasets show that supervised concepts perform best in terms of reliability and classification accuracies. Typically these approaches are based on training and testing phases, taking into account sophisticated and combined features descriptors derived at various levels and hierarchies.
- a triplet of images is acquired by using a TCS.
- the condition of the barcode tag can vary in location, orientation, quality of attachment, and bar code readability.
- the detection of barcode tag condition requires a mid-level representation which accurately captures spatial and appearance features with respect to the tube model. This mid-level representation captures multi-view information (e.g., 360 degree view from a triplet of images) from various parallel low-level cues which are trained and evaluated individually on relevant image structures.
- FIG. 1 is a representation of an exemplary tube characterization station to which sample tubes are transferred for classifying barcode tag conditions on the sample tubes from side view images, according to an embodiment.
- the sample tubes may be transferred to the TCS from, for example, a drawer system in which tube trays and sample tubes contained thereon are stored.
- one or more drawers are provided in a work envelope for a sample handler in an in vitro diagnostics (IVD) environment.
- the sample tubes may be transferred to the TCS via an arm movable between the drawer system and the TCS.
- the TCS includes three cameras, each configured to capture an image of a particular sample tube to together capture a full 360 degree view.
- FIG. 2 is a depiction of exemplary sample tubes with barcode tags. As shown, the tube model type and barcode tag condition can vary drastically between sample tubes.
- the input data for the system is comprised of three images showing a full 360 degree view of a tube.
- the proposed method takes as input a triplet of tube images and outputs a label for the condition of the barcode tag (OK, WARNING, ERROR).
- FIG. 3 shows the proposed workflow: several parallel low-level cues are utilized, which are combined into a mid-level representation. This representation captures the multi-view information and is used for final decision making about the barcode tag condition. Low-level cues include separate semantic segmentations into barcode/tag and background regions, and good vs. bad regions, respectively. An additional low-level cue supports the extraction of the tube model and provides important spatial information for generating the mid-level representation.
- the proposed method is not limited to these specific cues and may be extended to additional or alternate cues.
- the proposed concept is based on the training and evaluation phase, requiring labeled input data for the training phase.
- FIG. 4 is a representation of conditions of barcode tags in classes, and the subcategories that cover individual characteristics of the tag quality, according to an embodiment.
- the proposed concept is based on multiple cues running in a supervised mode. These cues make extensive use of complementary feature descriptors, like color and orientation histograms, statistical descriptors and approximated local binary patterns, which are trained and evaluated on the pixel level. Since short response times are expected, the proposed concept exploits efficient image structures like integral images and uses quick classifiers like random decision trees or decision trees.
- the training phases require labeled input data: due to pixel level classification, the annotation can be accomplished quickly by image regions annotation using strokes. Training has to be performed once and includes data from different acquisitions with various characteristics. For each low-level cue individually, individual random forest classifiers are trained for binary (Good/Bad regions) and multi-class tasks (Barcode/Tag/Background regions).
- FIG. 5 illustrates exemplary responses of a semantic segmentation low-level cue applied to sample tubes.
- the segmented tube region and some support segments in the images are used.
- the tube model can either be derived by using a calibrated 3 D setup and external tube detection information (i.e., rendering of the tube's geometry into the images) or also extracted from the images individually (i.e., robust extraction of tube boundaries by using robust line detection methods and logic processing or reasoning). Having the tube model segmented in the images, enables the portioning of the tube and neighboring regions into smaller patches. These patches are used to aggregate classifier responses from the low-level cues as well as information directly from the images.
- FIG. 6 illustrates exemplary responses of a tube model extraction low-level cue applied to sample tubes.
- the proposed method makes use of aggregation of low-level cue responses into a mid-level representation, which can be seen as descriptor for a triplet of input images.
- the descriptor is comprised of, but not limited to, classifier responses as well as image features extracted with support of the tube model segmentation (e.g., orientation information and color statistics). Since the representation includes information from multiple views, a data sequence ordering according to the size of the covered barcode regions is applied.
- classifiers such as random decision trees or Support Vector Machines (SVM) are used.
- SVM Support Vector Machines
- a controller is provided for managing the image analysis of the images taken by the cameras for classifying barcode tag conditions on sample tubes from side view images.
- the controller may be, according to an embodiment, part of a sample handler that is used in an in vitro diagnostics (IVD) environment to handle and move the tube trays and the tubes between storage locations to analyzers.
- IVD in vitro diagnostics
- One or more memory devices may be associated with the controller.
- the one or more memory devices may be internal or external to the controller.
Abstract
Description
- This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/117,270 entitled “BARCODE TAG DETECTION IN SIDE VIEW SAMPLE TUBE IMAGES FOR LABORATORY AUTOMATION,” filed on Feb. 17, 2015, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
- This application relates to several of the concepts described in US Patent Application Publication No. US 2016/0025757, and in International Publication No. WO 2015/191702, which are incorporated, herein by reference, in their entirety.
- The present invention relates generally to detection of conditions of barcode tags, and, more particularly, to utilizing side view sample tube images to classify conditions of barcode tags on sample tubes.
- Barcode tags are frequently used on sample tubes in clinical laboratory automation systems to uniquely identify and track the sample tubes, and are often the only means that associate a patient with a sample inside a particular sample tube. Through normal, everyday use, the condition of the barcode tags may deteriorate, including tearing, peeling, discoloring, and other deformations. Such deterioration hinders lab automation systems from streamlining the sample tube processing.
- Thus, there is a need for detecting barcode tag conditions on sample tubes to streamline sample tube handling in advanced clinical laboratory automation systems. There is also a need for such classification to be automatic, efficient, and unobtrusive.
- Embodiments are directed to detecting barcode tag conditions on sample tubes from side view images to streamline sample tube handling in advanced clinical laboratory automation systems.
- The foregoing and other aspects of the present invention are best understood from the following detailed description when read in connection with the accompanying drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings embodiments that are presently preferred, it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the specific instrumentalities disclosed. Included in the drawings are the following Figures:
-
FIG. 1 is a representation of an exemplary tube characterization station to which sample tubes are transferred for detecting barcode tag conditions on the sample tubes from side view images, according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 2 is a depiction of exemplary sample tubes with barcode tags, according to embodiments; -
FIG. 3 illustrates a workflow utilizing several parallel low-level cues, which are combined into a mid-level representation, for the barcode tag detection according to embodiments; -
FIG. 4 is a representation of conditions of barcode tags, according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 5 illustrates use of a low level cue for a detection of barcode tag conditions, according to an embodiment; and -
FIG. 6 illustrates use of an additional low level cue for a detection of barcode tag conditions, according to an embodiment. - Embodiments are directed to classifying barcode tag conditions on sample tubes from side view images to streamline sample tube handling in advanced clinical laboratory automation systems. The classification of barcode tag conditions, according to embodiments provided herein, advantageously leads to the automatic detection of problematic barcode tags, allowing for the system, or a user, to take necessary steps to fix the problematic barcode tags. For example, the identified sample tubes with problematic barcode tags may be dispatched to a separate workflow apart from the normal tube handling procedures to rectify the problematic barcode tags.
- A method according to embodiments provided herein enables barcode tag detection in tube images to derive an automated decision about the tag condition. The conditions of the barcode tag may be classified into the classes OK, WARNING, and ERROR. Each of the three classes are divided, according to an embodiment, into a list of additional subcategories, enabling a refined decision about the quality of the barcode tag. These subcategories cover individual characteristics of the tag quality, such as perfect, peeled, damaged, folded, skewed, deformed, or colored, for example. Additional or alternate classes and subcategories may be used.
- According to an embodiment, a tube characterization station (TCS) is utilized to obtain the side view images for the classification of barcode tag conditions on sample tubes. The TCS enables the simultaneous collection of three images for each tube, resulting in a 360 degree side view for each tube. The proposed method is based on a supervised scene understanding concept, resulting in an explanation of each pixel into its semantic meaning. According to an embodiment, two parallel low-level cues for condition recognition, in combination with a tube model extraction cue, are utilized. The semantic scene information is then integrated into a mid-level representation for final decision making into one of the three condition classes.
- Semantic segmentation focuses on the explanation of each pixel in the image domain with respect to defined semantic object labels. Due to pixel level segmentation, the object boundaries can be captured accurately. Evaluations on benchmark datasets show that supervised concepts perform best in terms of reliability and classification accuracies. Typically these approaches are based on training and testing phases, taking into account sophisticated and combined features descriptors derived at various levels and hierarchies.
- A triplet of images is acquired by using a TCS. The condition of the barcode tag can vary in location, orientation, quality of attachment, and bar code readability. The detection of barcode tag condition requires a mid-level representation which accurately captures spatial and appearance features with respect to the tube model. This mid-level representation captures multi-view information (e.g., 360 degree view from a triplet of images) from various parallel low-level cues which are trained and evaluated individually on relevant image structures.
-
FIG. 1 is a representation of an exemplary tube characterization station to which sample tubes are transferred for classifying barcode tag conditions on the sample tubes from side view images, according to an embodiment. The sample tubes may be transferred to the TCS from, for example, a drawer system in which tube trays and sample tubes contained thereon are stored. In an embodiment, one or more drawers are provided in a work envelope for a sample handler in an in vitro diagnostics (IVD) environment. The sample tubes may be transferred to the TCS via an arm movable between the drawer system and the TCS. - The TCS includes three cameras, each configured to capture an image of a particular sample tube to together capture a full 360 degree view.
-
FIG. 2 is a depiction of exemplary sample tubes with barcode tags. As shown, the tube model type and barcode tag condition can vary drastically between sample tubes. - Input Data:
- The input data for the system is comprised of three images showing a full 360 degree view of a tube.
- Overview:
- The proposed method takes as input a triplet of tube images and outputs a label for the condition of the barcode tag (OK, WARNING, ERROR).
FIG. 3 shows the proposed workflow: several parallel low-level cues are utilized, which are combined into a mid-level representation. This representation captures the multi-view information and is used for final decision making about the barcode tag condition. Low-level cues include separate semantic segmentations into barcode/tag and background regions, and good vs. bad regions, respectively. An additional low-level cue supports the extraction of the tube model and provides important spatial information for generating the mid-level representation. The proposed method is not limited to these specific cues and may be extended to additional or alternate cues. The proposed concept is based on the training and evaluation phase, requiring labeled input data for the training phase. -
FIG. 4 is a representation of conditions of barcode tags in classes, and the subcategories that cover individual characteristics of the tag quality, according to an embodiment. - Low-Level Cue: Semantic Segmentation:
- The proposed concept is based on multiple cues running in a supervised mode. These cues make extensive use of complementary feature descriptors, like color and orientation histograms, statistical descriptors and approximated local binary patterns, which are trained and evaluated on the pixel level. Since short response times are expected, the proposed concept exploits efficient image structures like integral images and uses quick classifiers like random decision trees or decision trees. The training phases require labeled input data: due to pixel level classification, the annotation can be accomplished quickly by image regions annotation using strokes. Training has to be performed once and includes data from different acquisitions with various characteristics. For each low-level cue individually, individual random forest classifiers are trained for binary (Good/Bad regions) and multi-class tasks (Barcode/Tag/Background regions). During runtime the trained classifier provides probabilities on a pixel level with respect to the trained semantic classes. These classifier responses are directly integrated into the mid-level representation as discriminative attributes for final decision making.
FIG. 5 illustrates exemplary responses of a semantic segmentation low-level cue applied to sample tubes. - Low-Level Cue: Tube Model Extraction:
- In order to provide spatial information for data aggregation, the segmented tube region and some support segments in the images are used. The tube model can either be derived by using a calibrated 3D setup and external tube detection information (i.e., rendering of the tube's geometry into the images) or also extracted from the images individually (i.e., robust extraction of tube boundaries by using robust line detection methods and logic processing or reasoning). Having the tube model segmented in the images, enables the portioning of the tube and neighboring regions into smaller patches. These patches are used to aggregate classifier responses from the low-level cues as well as information directly from the images.
FIG. 6 illustrates exemplary responses of a tube model extraction low-level cue applied to sample tubes. - Mid-Level Representation:
- To derive a final decision for the barcode tag condition, the proposed method makes use of aggregation of low-level cue responses into a mid-level representation, which can be seen as descriptor for a triplet of input images. The descriptor is comprised of, but not limited to, classifier responses as well as image features extracted with support of the tube model segmentation (e.g., orientation information and color statistics). Since the representation includes information from multiple views, a data sequence ordering according to the size of the covered barcode regions is applied.
- Barcode Tag Condition Classification:
- In order to derive a final class label of the condition, classifiers such as random decision trees or Support Vector Machines (SVM) are used. A refinement of the classification results into subcategories and may be accomplished by an additional classification stage or directly on the mid-level representation.
- A controller is provided for managing the image analysis of the images taken by the cameras for classifying barcode tag conditions on sample tubes from side view images. The controller may be, according to an embodiment, part of a sample handler that is used in an in vitro diagnostics (IVD) environment to handle and move the tube trays and the tubes between storage locations to analyzers. One or more memory devices may be associated with the controller. The one or more memory devices may be internal or external to the controller.
- Although the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it is not limited thereto. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that numerous changes and modifications may be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention and that such changes and modifications may be made without departing from the true spirit of the invention. It is therefore intended that the appended claims be construed to cover all such equivalent variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims (16)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/551,565 US10824832B2 (en) | 2015-02-17 | 2016-02-16 | Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201562117270P | 2015-02-17 | 2015-02-17 | |
US15/551,565 US10824832B2 (en) | 2015-02-17 | 2016-02-16 | Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation |
PCT/US2016/018084 WO2016133908A1 (en) | 2015-02-17 | 2016-02-16 | Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20180239936A1 true US20180239936A1 (en) | 2018-08-23 |
US10824832B2 US10824832B2 (en) | 2020-11-03 |
Family
ID=56692704
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/551,565 Active 2036-08-06 US10824832B2 (en) | 2015-02-17 | 2016-02-16 | Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US10824832B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3259068B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP6791864B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN107206384B (en) |
CA (1) | CA2976771C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2016133908A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20190025263A1 (en) * | 2017-07-18 | 2019-01-24 | Perkinelmer Health Sciences, Inc. | Automated thermal desorption systems and methods |
US10816516B2 (en) | 2018-03-28 | 2020-10-27 | Perkinelmer Health Sciences, Inc. | Autosamplers and gas chromatographic systems and methods including same |
US20220334141A1 (en) * | 2021-04-19 | 2022-10-20 | Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. | Method for classifying an identification tag on a sample tube containing a sample and an automated laboratory system |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP7012746B2 (en) * | 2017-04-13 | 2022-01-28 | シーメンス・ヘルスケア・ダイアグノスティックス・インコーポレーテッド | Label correction method and equipment during sample evaluation |
US11238318B2 (en) | 2017-04-13 | 2022-02-01 | Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. | Methods and apparatus for HILN characterization using convolutional neural network |
EP3610269A4 (en) | 2017-04-13 | 2020-04-22 | Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. | Methods and apparatus for determining label count during specimen characterization |
WO2018209057A1 (en) * | 2017-05-11 | 2018-11-15 | The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York | System and method associated with predicting segmentation quality of objects in analysis of copious image data |
EP3737930A4 (en) | 2018-01-10 | 2021-03-10 | Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for bio-fluid specimen characterization using neural network having reduced training |
CN109272001B (en) * | 2018-09-28 | 2021-09-03 | 深圳市飞点健康管理有限公司 | Structure training method and device of urine test recognition classifier and computer equipment |
CN109727643B (en) * | 2018-12-05 | 2022-07-19 | 云南中烟工业有限责任公司 | Single-target gene editing T1 tobacco substitute strain screening method |
DE102021004734B3 (en) * | 2021-09-21 | 2022-11-17 | Vmt Vision Machine Technic Bildverarbeitungssysteme Gmbh | Method for automatic inspection of a variety of sheet-like plastic substrates |
Citations (44)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5286959A (en) * | 1990-10-05 | 1994-02-15 | Toa Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus for reading an identification code from a sample container as it is rotated |
US5334825A (en) * | 1992-04-27 | 1994-08-02 | Ncr Corporation | System and method for monitoring barcode label quality |
US5637854A (en) * | 1995-09-22 | 1997-06-10 | Microscan Systems Incorporated | Optical bar code scanner having object detection |
US5663545A (en) * | 1995-08-23 | 1997-09-02 | Ljl Biosystems Inc. | Labware identification system |
US6039252A (en) * | 1995-12-14 | 2000-03-21 | Intermec Corporation | Bar code reading system for reconstructing irregularly damaged bar codes |
US20010049147A1 (en) * | 1998-12-30 | 2001-12-06 | Pierre Bierre | System and method for universal identification of biological samples |
US20020055861A1 (en) * | 2000-11-08 | 2002-05-09 | King Daniel A. | Claiming system and method |
US20020195491A1 (en) * | 2001-06-26 | 2002-12-26 | Bunch Earnest B. | Apparatus and method for--at the time rented video media is returned--identifying damage, generating damage documentation in remote data base, and providing customer record detailing damage |
US6598796B2 (en) * | 2001-01-10 | 2003-07-29 | Becton, Dickinson And Company | Method and apparatus for aligning labels applied to a specimen collection container |
US20030141368A1 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2003-07-31 | Florante Pascual | System and method for obtaining information from a bar code for use with a healthcare system |
US20030220761A1 (en) * | 2002-05-23 | 2003-11-27 | Sysmex Corporation | Sample analyzer |
US20050036907A1 (en) * | 2003-07-10 | 2005-02-17 | Jeol Ltd. | Inspection system |
US20050196323A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-08 | Ids Company., Ltd. | Bar-code reading device having a mechanism for pulling up test tubes from holders |
US20060043188A1 (en) * | 2004-08-27 | 2006-03-02 | Gregg Kricorissian | Imaging method and apparatus for object identification |
US20070036686A1 (en) * | 2005-05-31 | 2007-02-15 | Mehdi Hatamian | Systems for tracking and testing of medical specimens and data |
US20070053794A1 (en) * | 2005-09-08 | 2007-03-08 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Sample identification system having plural readers |
US7227622B2 (en) * | 2004-03-22 | 2007-06-05 | Ids Company, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for sensing blood sample contained in sample container |
US20080003148A1 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2008-01-03 | Dause Shari L | Coded test tubes |
US7382911B1 (en) * | 2001-02-16 | 2008-06-03 | Hand Held Products, Inc. | Identification card reader |
US20080297355A1 (en) * | 2007-06-04 | 2008-12-04 | Seiji Matsumoto | Container with Electronic Tag and RFID System Using the Container with Electronic Tag |
US7490773B2 (en) * | 2004-12-03 | 2009-02-17 | Mcvicker Henry J | Apparatus and method for obtaining an image of an arcuate surface |
US20090090786A1 (en) * | 2005-04-25 | 2009-04-09 | Gregory Hovis | Segmented circular bar code |
US20090272809A1 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2009-11-05 | Keyence Corporation | Bar Code Reading Apparatus and Bar Code Reading Method |
US20100123551A1 (en) * | 2008-11-20 | 2010-05-20 | Abbott Laboratories | System for tracking vessels in automated laboratory analyzers by radio frequency identification |
US20100299179A1 (en) * | 2009-05-20 | 2010-11-25 | Ahold Licensing Sa | Automated area inspection and recordkeeping system and method |
US20110045521A1 (en) * | 2009-08-18 | 2011-02-24 | Teruaki Itoh | Sample processing apparatus and sample processing method |
US20110085951A1 (en) * | 2008-06-10 | 2011-04-14 | Yoko Nakahana | Sample storage |
US20110102542A1 (en) * | 2009-11-03 | 2011-05-05 | Jadak, Llc | System and Method For Panoramic Image Stitching |
US20110174708A1 (en) * | 2008-10-03 | 2011-07-21 | Arkray, Inc. | Sample stirring device, liquid chromatography device using same, and sample container stand |
US20110181875A1 (en) * | 2008-03-13 | 2011-07-28 | Yoko Nakahana | Sample storage |
US20120080515A1 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2012-04-05 | Apple Inc. | Barcode Recognition Using Data-Driven Classifier |
US20120138674A1 (en) * | 2008-06-25 | 2012-06-07 | Jadak Llc | System and Method for Test Tube and Cap Identification |
US20130076882A1 (en) * | 2011-09-28 | 2013-03-28 | Teruaki Itoh | Test preprocessing apparatus, test preprocessing method, and specimen processing apparatus |
US20130129166A1 (en) * | 2011-11-07 | 2013-05-23 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Specimen container detection |
US20130142596A1 (en) * | 2011-12-06 | 2013-06-06 | Hirata Corporation | Sorting apparatus |
US20140374480A1 (en) * | 2012-02-03 | 2014-12-25 | Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. | Barcode reading test tube holder |
US20160025757A1 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2016-01-28 | Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. | Tube tray vision system |
US20160086001A1 (en) * | 2013-03-12 | 2016-03-24 | ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a body corporate of the state of Arozona acting for and on behalf | Dendritic structures and tags |
US20180033256A1 (en) * | 2016-07-28 | 2018-02-01 | Datalogic ADC, Inc. | Automatic barcode verifier |
US20180046883A1 (en) * | 2015-02-17 | 2018-02-15 | Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. | Classification of barcode tag conditions from top view sample tube images for laboratory automation |
US20180136096A1 (en) * | 2015-06-12 | 2018-05-17 | A.M.T. S.R.L. | A machinery for an automated analysis of the slides in accordance with the indirect immunofluorescence assay - IFA |
US10114999B1 (en) * | 2016-12-02 | 2018-10-30 | Koupon Media, Inc. | Using dynamic occlusion to protect against capturing barcodes for fraudulent use on mobile devices |
US20190035497A1 (en) * | 2016-03-16 | 2019-01-31 | Codonics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for labeling and managing inventory of medicinal substances |
US10509934B1 (en) * | 2018-02-01 | 2019-12-17 | Accusoft Corporation | Methods and apparatus for improving QR code locator detectability and/or finding the corners of a locator pattern |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH091791A (en) | 1995-06-23 | 1997-01-07 | Dainippon Printing Co Ltd | Device for determining printing quality |
JPH11224304A (en) | 1998-02-06 | 1999-08-17 | Toshiba Tec Corp | Information symbol checking device |
JP2009196134A (en) | 2008-02-20 | 2009-09-03 | Panasonic Corp | Inspecting method of printing state of individual recognition information and inspecting apparatus thereof |
ES2402227T3 (en) | 2008-07-25 | 2013-04-29 | F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ag | A storage and recovery laboratory system and a method for handling laboratory sample tubes |
US8415642B2 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2013-04-09 | Performance Indicator, Llc | Photolytically and environmentally stable multilayer structure for high efficiency electromagnetic energy conversion and sustained secondary emission |
JP5966277B2 (en) | 2011-08-19 | 2016-08-10 | 大日本印刷株式会社 | Barcode appearance inspection system, barcode appearance inspection method, image processing apparatus |
JP5908858B2 (en) | 2013-03-26 | 2016-04-26 | 株式会社サンテック | Defective adhesive material collection device |
CN107003124B (en) | 2014-06-10 | 2020-07-07 | 西门子医疗保健诊断公司 | Drawer vision system |
-
2016
- 2016-02-16 EP EP16752907.2A patent/EP3259068B1/en active Active
- 2016-02-16 CA CA2976771A patent/CA2976771C/en active Active
- 2016-02-16 JP JP2017542016A patent/JP6791864B2/en active Active
- 2016-02-16 WO PCT/US2016/018084 patent/WO2016133908A1/en active Application Filing
- 2016-02-16 US US15/551,565 patent/US10824832B2/en active Active
- 2016-02-16 CN CN201680010493.4A patent/CN107206384B/en active Active
Patent Citations (44)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5286959A (en) * | 1990-10-05 | 1994-02-15 | Toa Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus for reading an identification code from a sample container as it is rotated |
US5334825A (en) * | 1992-04-27 | 1994-08-02 | Ncr Corporation | System and method for monitoring barcode label quality |
US5663545A (en) * | 1995-08-23 | 1997-09-02 | Ljl Biosystems Inc. | Labware identification system |
US5637854A (en) * | 1995-09-22 | 1997-06-10 | Microscan Systems Incorporated | Optical bar code scanner having object detection |
US6039252A (en) * | 1995-12-14 | 2000-03-21 | Intermec Corporation | Bar code reading system for reconstructing irregularly damaged bar codes |
US20010049147A1 (en) * | 1998-12-30 | 2001-12-06 | Pierre Bierre | System and method for universal identification of biological samples |
US20020055861A1 (en) * | 2000-11-08 | 2002-05-09 | King Daniel A. | Claiming system and method |
US6598796B2 (en) * | 2001-01-10 | 2003-07-29 | Becton, Dickinson And Company | Method and apparatus for aligning labels applied to a specimen collection container |
US7382911B1 (en) * | 2001-02-16 | 2008-06-03 | Hand Held Products, Inc. | Identification card reader |
US20020195491A1 (en) * | 2001-06-26 | 2002-12-26 | Bunch Earnest B. | Apparatus and method for--at the time rented video media is returned--identifying damage, generating damage documentation in remote data base, and providing customer record detailing damage |
US20030141368A1 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2003-07-31 | Florante Pascual | System and method for obtaining information from a bar code for use with a healthcare system |
US20030220761A1 (en) * | 2002-05-23 | 2003-11-27 | Sysmex Corporation | Sample analyzer |
US20050036907A1 (en) * | 2003-07-10 | 2005-02-17 | Jeol Ltd. | Inspection system |
US20050196323A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-08 | Ids Company., Ltd. | Bar-code reading device having a mechanism for pulling up test tubes from holders |
US7227622B2 (en) * | 2004-03-22 | 2007-06-05 | Ids Company, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for sensing blood sample contained in sample container |
US20060043188A1 (en) * | 2004-08-27 | 2006-03-02 | Gregg Kricorissian | Imaging method and apparatus for object identification |
US7490773B2 (en) * | 2004-12-03 | 2009-02-17 | Mcvicker Henry J | Apparatus and method for obtaining an image of an arcuate surface |
US20090090786A1 (en) * | 2005-04-25 | 2009-04-09 | Gregory Hovis | Segmented circular bar code |
US20070036686A1 (en) * | 2005-05-31 | 2007-02-15 | Mehdi Hatamian | Systems for tracking and testing of medical specimens and data |
US20070053794A1 (en) * | 2005-09-08 | 2007-03-08 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Sample identification system having plural readers |
US20080003148A1 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2008-01-03 | Dause Shari L | Coded test tubes |
US20080297355A1 (en) * | 2007-06-04 | 2008-12-04 | Seiji Matsumoto | Container with Electronic Tag and RFID System Using the Container with Electronic Tag |
US20110181875A1 (en) * | 2008-03-13 | 2011-07-28 | Yoko Nakahana | Sample storage |
US20090272809A1 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2009-11-05 | Keyence Corporation | Bar Code Reading Apparatus and Bar Code Reading Method |
US20110085951A1 (en) * | 2008-06-10 | 2011-04-14 | Yoko Nakahana | Sample storage |
US20120138674A1 (en) * | 2008-06-25 | 2012-06-07 | Jadak Llc | System and Method for Test Tube and Cap Identification |
US20110174708A1 (en) * | 2008-10-03 | 2011-07-21 | Arkray, Inc. | Sample stirring device, liquid chromatography device using same, and sample container stand |
US20100123551A1 (en) * | 2008-11-20 | 2010-05-20 | Abbott Laboratories | System for tracking vessels in automated laboratory analyzers by radio frequency identification |
US20100299179A1 (en) * | 2009-05-20 | 2010-11-25 | Ahold Licensing Sa | Automated area inspection and recordkeeping system and method |
US20110045521A1 (en) * | 2009-08-18 | 2011-02-24 | Teruaki Itoh | Sample processing apparatus and sample processing method |
US20110102542A1 (en) * | 2009-11-03 | 2011-05-05 | Jadak, Llc | System and Method For Panoramic Image Stitching |
US20120080515A1 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2012-04-05 | Apple Inc. | Barcode Recognition Using Data-Driven Classifier |
US20130076882A1 (en) * | 2011-09-28 | 2013-03-28 | Teruaki Itoh | Test preprocessing apparatus, test preprocessing method, and specimen processing apparatus |
US20130129166A1 (en) * | 2011-11-07 | 2013-05-23 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Specimen container detection |
US20130142596A1 (en) * | 2011-12-06 | 2013-06-06 | Hirata Corporation | Sorting apparatus |
US20140374480A1 (en) * | 2012-02-03 | 2014-12-25 | Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. | Barcode reading test tube holder |
US20160086001A1 (en) * | 2013-03-12 | 2016-03-24 | ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a body corporate of the state of Arozona acting for and on behalf | Dendritic structures and tags |
US20160025757A1 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2016-01-28 | Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. | Tube tray vision system |
US20180046883A1 (en) * | 2015-02-17 | 2018-02-15 | Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. | Classification of barcode tag conditions from top view sample tube images for laboratory automation |
US20180136096A1 (en) * | 2015-06-12 | 2018-05-17 | A.M.T. S.R.L. | A machinery for an automated analysis of the slides in accordance with the indirect immunofluorescence assay - IFA |
US20190035497A1 (en) * | 2016-03-16 | 2019-01-31 | Codonics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for labeling and managing inventory of medicinal substances |
US20180033256A1 (en) * | 2016-07-28 | 2018-02-01 | Datalogic ADC, Inc. | Automatic barcode verifier |
US10114999B1 (en) * | 2016-12-02 | 2018-10-30 | Koupon Media, Inc. | Using dynamic occlusion to protect against capturing barcodes for fraudulent use on mobile devices |
US10509934B1 (en) * | 2018-02-01 | 2019-12-17 | Accusoft Corporation | Methods and apparatus for improving QR code locator detectability and/or finding the corners of a locator pattern |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
Chen ' 542 * |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20190025263A1 (en) * | 2017-07-18 | 2019-01-24 | Perkinelmer Health Sciences, Inc. | Automated thermal desorption systems and methods |
US10598637B2 (en) * | 2017-07-18 | 2020-03-24 | Perkinelmer Health Sciences, Inc. | Automated thermal desorption systems configured to determine sample tube orientation and/or cap presence, and related methods |
US10816516B2 (en) | 2018-03-28 | 2020-10-27 | Perkinelmer Health Sciences, Inc. | Autosamplers and gas chromatographic systems and methods including same |
US20220334141A1 (en) * | 2021-04-19 | 2022-10-20 | Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. | Method for classifying an identification tag on a sample tube containing a sample and an automated laboratory system |
EP4080515A1 (en) | 2021-04-19 | 2022-10-26 | Roche Diagnostics GmbH | A method for classifying an identification tag on a sample tube containing a sample and an automated laboratory system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2018512567A (en) | 2018-05-17 |
EP3259068A4 (en) | 2018-03-14 |
CN107206384B (en) | 2020-12-22 |
CA2976771A1 (en) | 2016-08-25 |
EP3259068B1 (en) | 2023-03-29 |
CN107206384A (en) | 2017-09-26 |
CA2976771C (en) | 2023-09-26 |
WO2016133908A1 (en) | 2016-08-25 |
EP3259068A1 (en) | 2017-12-27 |
US10824832B2 (en) | 2020-11-03 |
JP6791864B2 (en) | 2020-11-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10824832B2 (en) | Barcode tag detection in side view sample tube images for laboratory automation | |
JP2018512567A5 (en) | ||
US20180268257A1 (en) | Surface defect detection | |
JP6560757B2 (en) | Classification of barcode tag states from top view sample tube images for laboratory automation | |
CN110378420A (en) | A kind of image detecting method, device and computer readable storage medium | |
US11699283B2 (en) | System and method for finding and classifying lines in an image with a vision system | |
CN112633297B (en) | Target object identification method and device, storage medium and electronic device | |
US11354549B2 (en) | Method and system for region proposal based object recognition for estimating planogram compliance | |
Khutlang et al. | Automated detection of tuberculosis in Ziehl‐Neelsen‐stained sputum smears using two one‐class classifiers | |
CN109977824B (en) | Article taking and placing identification method, device and equipment | |
JP2016191589A (en) | Defect classification device defect classification method | |
Ghoshal et al. | An improved scene text and document image binarization scheme | |
CN109359683B (en) | Target detection method, device, terminal and computer-readable storage medium | |
CN114332058A (en) | Serum quality identification method, device, equipment and medium based on neural network | |
CN112990245A (en) | Article identification method, apparatus, device and storage medium | |
CN115953635B (en) | Sorting method, AR (augmented reality) glasses and system for multi-class targets | |
US20240078801A1 (en) | System and method for finding and classifying lines in an image with a vision system | |
CN117474924B (en) | Label defect detection method based on machine vision | |
Golec et al. | Gesture Detection in Digital Image Processing based on the Use of Convolutional Neuronal Networks | |
CN106446902A (en) | Non-character image recognition method and device | |
Theiler et al. | Approach to target detection based on relevant metric for scoring performance | |
Han et al. | Tracking articulated human movements with a component based approach to boosted multiple instance learning | |
JP2018198034A (en) | Image classification system, manufacturing apparatus with image classification function, discriminator for image classification, and image classification method | |
Sreelekshmi | Identification of Distorted Images along with Text Recognition using SIFT algorithm | |
Han et al. | Tracking articulated human movements witha component based approach to boosted multiple instance learning |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SIEMENS CORPORATION, NEW JERSEY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KLUCKNER, STEFAN;CHANG, YAO-JEN;WU, WEN;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20150810 TO 20150811;REEL/FRAME:053908/0366 Owner name: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC., NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SIEMENS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:053908/0381 Effective date: 20150813 Owner name: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC., NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:POLLACK, BENJAMIN;REEL/FRAME:053908/0434 Effective date: 20150806 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |