US20180218828A1 - Inductor with variable permeability core - Google Patents

Inductor with variable permeability core Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20180218828A1
US20180218828A1 US15/418,141 US201715418141A US2018218828A1 US 20180218828 A1 US20180218828 A1 US 20180218828A1 US 201715418141 A US201715418141 A US 201715418141A US 2018218828 A1 US2018218828 A1 US 2018218828A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
inductor
magnetic core
core
magnetic
ferrite material
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US15/418,141
Inventor
Masanori Ishigaki
Ercan Mehmet DEDE
Danny J. LOHAN
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America Inc
Original Assignee
Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America Inc filed Critical Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America Inc
Priority to US15/418,141 priority Critical patent/US20180218828A1/en
Assigned to TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC. reassignment TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LOHAN, DANNY J., DEDE, ERCAN MEHMET, ISHIGAKI, MASANORI
Priority to JP2018009628A priority patent/JP7154767B2/en
Publication of US20180218828A1 publication Critical patent/US20180218828A1/en
Priority to US17/307,134 priority patent/US20210257138A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F3/00Cores, Yokes, or armatures
    • H01F3/10Composite arrangements of magnetic circuits
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F27/00Details of transformers or inductances, in general
    • H01F27/28Coils; Windings; Conductive connections
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F17/00Fixed inductances of the signal type 
    • H01F17/04Fixed inductances of the signal type  with magnetic core
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F27/00Details of transformers or inductances, in general
    • H01F27/24Magnetic cores
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F29/00Variable transformers or inductances not covered by group H01F21/00
    • H01F29/14Variable transformers or inductances not covered by group H01F21/00 with variable magnetic bias
    • H01F29/146Constructional details
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F3/00Cores, Yokes, or armatures
    • H01F3/10Composite arrangements of magnetic circuits
    • H01F3/14Constrictions; Gaps, e.g. air-gaps
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F38/00Adaptations of transformers or inductances for specific applications or functions
    • H01F38/02Adaptations of transformers or inductances for specific applications or functions for non-linear operation
    • H01F38/023Adaptations of transformers or inductances for specific applications or functions for non-linear operation of inductances
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F3/00Cores, Yokes, or armatures
    • H01F3/10Composite arrangements of magnetic circuits
    • H01F2003/106Magnetic circuits using combinations of different magnetic materials
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F17/00Fixed inductances of the signal type 
    • H01F17/04Fixed inductances of the signal type  with magnetic core
    • H01F17/06Fixed inductances of the signal type  with magnetic core with core substantially closed in itself, e.g. toroid
    • H01F2017/067Core with two or more holes to lead through conductor

Definitions

  • Non-linear inductor performance characteristics of planar inductors can result in non-uniform flux densities and widespread flux density saturation, which causes inductor losses and degraded inductor performance.
  • U.S. Patent Application Publication 2014/0210585 to Peck describes an electromagnetic device with a variable magnetic flux core having a plurality of core sections stacked on top of one another having varied geometries and materials to provide a predetermined inductance performance.
  • an inductor includes a magnetic core composed of a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of design parameters or operational parameters of the inductor that includes one or more air gaps.
  • a coil is wound through the one or more air gaps and is configured to be excited by an electric current.
  • the inductor can be a planar inductor.
  • the design parameters can include at least one of dimensions of the magnetic core, shape of the magnetic core, positions of the one or more air gaps on the magnetic core, size of the one or more air gaps, or material properties of the magnetic core.
  • the operational parameters can include at least one of an inductance, direct current (DC) bias, flux density characteristics, or core loss characteristics of the inductor.
  • DC direct current
  • the variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core can correspond to an amount of permeability nonlinearity in which a permeability for a predetermined amount of flux density is greater than a predetermined threshold.
  • the variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core can also correspond to a flux density saturation area of the magnetic core that is less than a predetermined threshold.
  • the variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core can also correspond to a core loss density in the magnetic core that is less than a predetermined threshold.
  • a shape of the one or more air gaps in the magnetic core can correspond to a predetermined flux density pattern across the magnetic core.
  • the shape of the one or more air gaps can be an oval shape.
  • the magnetic core can be a single structure produced using a binder (e.g., resin) matrix with magnetic filler material via three-dimensional (3D) printing.
  • a binder e.g., resin
  • 3D three-dimensional
  • the magnetic core can be composed of a heterogeneous ferrite material having a plurality of densities throughout the magnetic core.
  • Each of the plurality of densities throughout the magnetic core can correspond to a ratio of the ferrite material to air at one or more locations throughout the magnetic core, wherein the ratio of the ferrite material to air is based on the variable permeability characteristics.
  • the magnetic core can be composed of a homogenous ferrite material having a plurality of slits in which the plurality of slits are configured at predetermined locations and orientations throughout the magnetic core based on the variable permeability characteristics.
  • the magnetic core can be composed of a heterogeneous ferrite material having a first ferrite material with a first density at one or more first locations within the magnetic core, and a second ferrite material with a second density at one or more second locations within the magnetic core in which the first density and the second density are based on a ratio of the ferrite material to air.
  • the first density of the first ferrite material can be greater than the second density of the second ferrite material.
  • the magnetic core can include a plurality of slits configured at predetermined locations and orientations throughout the magnetic core based on the variable permeability characteristics.
  • the one or more first locations of the first ferrite material and the one or more second locations of the second ferrite material can be based on the variable permeability characteristics.
  • the inductor can further include a plurality of stacked magnetic cores composed of a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of the design parameters or the operational parameters of the inductor.
  • a process includes determining design parameters for an inductor including at least one of dimensions of a magnetic core, shape of the magnetic core, positions of one or more air gaps on the magnetic core, size of the one or more air gaps, or material properties of the magnetic core; determining operational parameters for the inductor including at least one of an inductance, DC bias, flux density characteristics, or core loss characteristics; and providing a magnetic core composed of a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of the design parameters or the operational parameters of the inductor that includes one or more air gaps.
  • a magnetic core for an inductor includes a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of design parameters or operational parameters of the inductor that includes one or more air gaps in which the one or more air gaps are configured to receive a coil wound through the one or more air gaps configured to be excited by an electric current.
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary illustration of core structure, flux density, and core loss density of an inductor magnetic core
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary graph of inductor permeability versus flux density for an inductor
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary illustration of core structure, flux density, and core loss density of an inductor magnetic core
  • FIG. 4 is an exemplary graph of inductance versus direct current (DC) bias for an inductor
  • FIG. 5 is an exemplary illustration of core structure, flux density, and core loss density of an inductor magnetic core
  • FIG. 6 is an exemplary illustration of core structure, flux density, and core loss density of an inductor magnetic core
  • FIG. 7 is an exemplary illustration of core structure, flux density, and core loss density of an inductor magnetic core
  • FIG. 8 is an exemplary graph of core weight versus core losses for various magnetic core designs
  • FIG. 9 is an exemplary illustration of an inductor with stacked magnetic cores
  • FIG. 10 is an exemplary graph of inductance versus DC bias for various magnetic core designs
  • FIG. 11 is an exemplary graph of inductance versus DC bias for various stacked magnetic core designs
  • FIG. 12 is an exemplary flowchart of a variable permeability core design process 1200 .
  • the terms “approximately,” “about,” and similar terms generally refer to ranges that include the identified value within a margin of 20%, 10%, or preferably 5%, and any values therebetween.
  • aspects of the present disclosure are directed to implementations for a planar inductor having a magnetic core made of non-linear magnetic material.
  • planar inductor implementations where an inductor coil is wound through holes in a magnetic core, magnetic flux spreads through the magnetic core based on a non-uniform magnetic resistance of the magnetic core, which results in a non-uniform flux density.
  • the non-uniformity of the magnetic resistance and non-linear characteristics can increase a design complexity of magnetic cores and result in increased magnetic core size.
  • the implementations described herein are directed to improving flux density distributions and reducing inductor losses by designing variable permeability magnetic cores using structural design optimization techniques and three-dimensional (3D) printing in order to design smaller magnetic cores with more uniform and predictable magnetic flux distributions.
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary illustration of core structure 100 , flux density 102 , and core loss density 104 of a magnetic core of a planar inductor.
  • the plated magnetic core has one or more holes 106 for winding copper windings of the inductor, and a top and bottom of the windings are connected with plane copper layers by using PCB technology.
  • the core structure 100 is composed of a homogeneous ferrite material and has a rectangular shape.
  • various design parameters can be taken into account to achieve predetermined operational parameters of the planar inductor.
  • the design parameters can include at least one of dimensions of the magnetic core, shape of the magnetic core, positions of the one or more air gaps on the magnetic core, size of the one or more air gaps, or material properties of the magnetic core.
  • the magnetic core When the copper windings are excited by an electric current, the magnetic core has flux density characteristics as shown in flux density illustration 102 and core loss characteristics as shown in core loss illustration 104 .
  • the flux density of the planar inductor having core structure 100 is non-uniform. For example, some areas have a high flux density that reaches saturation, and some areas have low flux density. In some implementations, flux density saturation results in an inductance reduction due to reduced permeability while areas of lower flux densities have higher permeability and inductance than the areas of flux density saturation.
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary graph 200 of inductor permeability versus flux density for the planar inductor described in FIG. 1 .
  • the permeability of the magnetic core is higher than at higher flux densities due to a non-linear performance of the planar inductor. Because of the non-linear characteristics and flux density distribution shown in the graph 200 , designing inductance and loss properties of the inductor can be difficult.
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary illustration of core structure 300 , flux density 302 , and core loss density 304 of a magnetic core of a planar inductor that has a structure that is similar to the planar inductor described with respect to FIG. 1 but has a smaller length and width but a larger depth than the inductor of FIG. 1 .
  • the core structure 300 also includes one or more holes 106 for winding copper windings of the inductor and is composed of a homogenous ferrite material. While the core structure 300 may provide the same amount of inductance in a smaller volume than the core structure 100 , as shown in flux density illustration 302 , a larger amount of the core structure 300 reaches saturation, and core losses are also greater, as shown in the core loss density illustration 304 . Due to the high flux density experienced by a large area of the core structure 300 , an amount of inductance that can be achieved by the inductor may be limited.
  • FIG. 4 is an exemplary graph 400 of inductance versus direct current (DC) bias for the planar inductors described previously with respect FIG. 1 and FIG. 3 .
  • curve 402 corresponds to the inductor from FIG. 1
  • curve 404 corresponds to the inductor from FIG. 3 .
  • both inductors are biased to a predetermined inductance for a predetermined current, but the curve 404 has a steeper reduction in inductance as the current (I DC ) due to an increased core area that experiences flux density saturation.
  • variable permeability characteristics are described that provide increased inductance over a wider range of DC current values.
  • the variable permeability characteristics are determined with a goal of reducing inductor nonlinearities so that a permeability for a predetermined amount of flux density is greater than a predetermined threshold, which results in an increased inductance for a wide range of current values, which reduces losses in the inductor.
  • the variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core can be designed so a flux density saturation area of the magnetic core is less than a predetermined threshold and/or a core loss density is less than a predetermined threshold.
  • variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core can be designed based on design parameters of the inductor and/or operational parameters of the inductor.
  • the operational parameters can include at least one of an inductance, direct current (DC) bias, flux density characteristics, or core loss characteristics of the inductor.
  • FIG. 5 is an exemplary illustration of core structure 500 , flux density 502 , and core loss density 504 of a magnetic core of a planar inductor having variable permeability characteristics.
  • the structure of the magnetic core 500 is composed of a heterogeneous ferrite material having multiple densities throughout the magnetic core.
  • the shading of the core structure 500 indicates a relative amount of ferrite material or air at various locations throughout the core structure 500 .
  • each of the densities throughout the magnetic core correspond to a ratio of the ferrite material to air at one or more locations throughout the magnetic core, in which the ratio of the ferrite material to air is based on the variable permeability characteristics.
  • ferrite material to air ratios for various locations throughout the core structure are determined using a topology optimization software tool where the variable permeability characteristics can be determined to achieve a predetermined amount of inductance while maintaining losses below a predetermined amount.
  • increasing the amount of air present at various locations throughout the core structure 500 can reduce an overall strength of the core structure 500 , which is another design consideration that goes into effect when determining the densities throughout the magnetic core.
  • the core structure 500 and associated coils can be determined to achieve operational parameters for the planar inductor.
  • the core structure 500 has a non-rectangular shape with cutouts around an outer edge of the core structure 500 .
  • the cutouts can have a rounded shape.
  • Locations and shapes for one or more air gaps 506 in the core structure 50 can also be determined in order to achieve a predetermined flux density pattern across the magnetic core.
  • the air gaps 506 can have an oval shape, which corresponds to an oval flux density pattern, as shown in the flux density illustration 504 .
  • At least one coil is wound through the one or more air gaps 506 and is configured to be excited by an electric current passing through the inductor, which produces the oval-shaped flux density pattern.
  • the oval-shaped flux density pattern generates smaller amounts of core losses than the implementations described previously with respect to FIG. 1 and FIG. 3 , as shown in the core loss density illustration 504 .
  • the core structure 500 is generated via three-dimensional (3D) printing as a single structure produced using a binder (e.g., resin) matrix with magnetic filler material.
  • FIG. 6 is an exemplary illustration of core structure 600 , flux density 602 , core loss density 604 , and 3D core structure 606 of a magnetic core of a planar inductor having variable permeability characteristics.
  • the structure of the magnetic core 600 is composed of a homogenous ferrite material having multiple slits 608 , which are configured at predetermined locations and orientations throughout the core structure 600 based on the variable permeability characteristics.
  • the slits that are cut into the core structure 600 are configured so that a flux density pattern as shown in the flux density illustration 602 approximates the oval-shaped flux density pattern of the core structure 500 described previously ( FIG. 5 ).
  • the dimensions, orientations, and lengths of the slits 608 can be determined by using a topology optimization tool.
  • the core structure 600 also includes oval-shaped air gaps that correspond to the oval-shaped flux density pattern, and the illustration of the 3D core structure 606 shows how coil 610 is wound through the air gaps.
  • a geometry of the core structure 600 is also similar to the core structure 500 with a non-rectangular shape and rounded cutouts around an outer edge of the core structure 600 . While the planar inductor with the core structure 600 has greater core losses than the core structure 500 , as shown in the core loss density illustration 604 , the core losses are still less than the core losses for planar inductors having the core structures 100 and 300 . Also, manufacturing the core structure 600 that is made of a homogenous ferrite material is less complex and less expensive than manufacturing the core structure 500 that is made of the heterogeneous ferrite material.
  • FIG. 7 is an exemplary illustration of core structure 700 , flux density 702 , and core loss density 704 of a magnetic core of a planar inductor having variable permeability characteristics, in which the core structure 700 includes features of both core structures 500 and 600 .
  • the core structure 700 can be composed of a heterogeneous ferrite material that uses two types of ferrite material having two different densities and corresponding permeabilities in addition to locations of air within the core structure 700 .
  • the core structure can include a first ferrite material with a first density at one or more first locations within the magnetic core, and a second ferrite material at a second density at one or more second locations within the magnetic core.
  • the densities of the first ferrite material and the second ferrite material are based on a ratio of the ferrite material to air.
  • the first ferrite material is 100% ferrite and 0% air
  • the second ferrite material is 60% ferrite and 40% air, resulting in the first density of the first ferrite material being greater than the second density of the second ferrite material.
  • locations having a darkest amount of shading correspond to the first ferrite material and areas of lighter shading correspond to the second ferrite material.
  • the locations of the first ferrite material, the second ferrite material, and the air within the core structure 700 can be determined using a topology optimization tool based on variable permeability characteristics that result in predetermined operational parameters of the planar inductor.
  • the core structure 700 also includes multiple slits configured at predetermined locations and orientations throughout the magnetic core based on the variable permeability characteristics.
  • the slits that are cut into the core structure 700 are configured so that a flux density pattern as shown in the flux density illustration 702 approximates the oval-shaped flux density pattern of the core structure 500 described previously ( FIG. 5 ).
  • the dimensions, orientations, and lengths of the slits can be determined by using the topology optimization tool.
  • the core structure 700 also includes oval-shaped air gaps that correspond to the oval-shaped flux density pattern, and a coil that is wound through the air gaps.
  • a geometry of the core structure 700 is also similar to the core structure 500 with a non-rectangular shape and rounded cutouts around an outer edge of the core structure 700 .
  • the planar inductor with the core structure 700 has greater core losses than the core structure 500 , as shown in the core loss density illustration 704 , the core losses are still less than the core losses for planar inductors having the core structures 100 , 300 , and 600 .
  • manufacturing the core structure 700 that is made of a heterogeneous ferrite material that includes only two density variations is less complex and less expensive than manufacturing the core structure 500 that is made of the heterogeneous ferrite material having a larger number of density variations.
  • FIG. 8 is an exemplary graph 800 of core weight versus core losses for various magnetic core designs described previously herein.
  • point 802 corresponds to core structure 100 or core structure 300
  • point 810 corresponds to core structure 500
  • point 804 corresponds to core structure 600
  • point 808 corresponds to core structure 700 .
  • Inductances for all of the core structures are designed to the same value, and a size of each illustrates a loss density [W/mm 2 ], which provides an indication of cooling difficulty.
  • the core structure 500 indicated by point 810 has the best loss performance, and the core structures 600 (point 804 ) and 700 (point 808 ) have better loss performance as compared to core structures 100 and 300 (point 802 ).
  • FIG. 9 is an exemplary illustration of an inductor 900 with stacked magnetic cores, where each of the magnetic cores has variable permeability characteristics such as those described previously herein with respect to FIG. 5 , FIG. 6 , and FIG. 7 .
  • the inductor 900 is able to have alternative inductive properties than those for with a single magnetic core.
  • FIG. 10 is an example graph 1000 of inductance versus DC bias for various variable permeability magnetic core designs.
  • curves 1002 , 1004 , and 1006 represent inductance properties over a range of DC current values for three different magnetic core designs.
  • curve 1102 represents stacked magnetic cores represented by curves 1002 and 1004 in FIG. 10
  • curve 1104 represents stacked magnetic cores represented by curves 1004 and 1006
  • curve 1106 represents stacked magnetic cores represented by curves 1002 , 1004 , and 1006 .
  • FIG. 12 is an exemplary flowchart of a variable permeability core design process 1200 .
  • the variable permeability core design process 1200 is described herein with respect to variable magnetic core structures 500 , 600 , and 700 , but it can be understood that the process 1200 can also be applied to other types of variable permeability core structures.
  • design parameters for a planar inductor are determined.
  • various design parameters can be taken into account to achieve predetermined operational parameters of the planar inductor.
  • the design parameters can include at least one of dimensions of the magnetic core, shape of the magnetic core, positions of the one or more air gaps on the magnetic core, size of the one or more air gaps, or material properties of the magnetic core.
  • Other design parameters that can be taken into account include size constraints for a circuit in which the planar inductor is installed.
  • operational parameters for the planar inductor are determined, which can include including at least one of an inductance, DC bias, flux density characteristics, or core loss characteristics.
  • the operational parameters of the planar inductor can include a minimum allowable inductance for a particular DC current value.
  • a magnetic core is provided that is composed of a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of the design parameters or the operational parameters of the inductor.
  • Magnetic cores having variable permeability characteristics provide increased inductance over a wide range of DC current values.
  • the variable permeability characteristics are determined with a goal of reducing inductor nonlinearities so that a permeability for a predetermined amount of flux density is greater than a predetermined threshold, which results in an increased inductance for a wide range of current values, which reduces losses in the inductor.
  • the variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core can be designed so a flux density saturation area of the magnetic core is less than a predetermined threshold and/or a core loss density is less than a predetermined threshold.
  • the variability permeability magnetic cores can have structures that correspond to those described previously with respect to core structures 500 , 600 , and 700 and can include heterogeneous or homogenous ferrite material and may include slits that are configured at predetermined locations and orientations around the magnetic core.
  • ferrite material to air ratios for various locations throughout the core structure and/or locations, lengths and orientation of the slits can be determined using a topology optimization software tool where the variable permeability characteristics can be determined to achieve a predetermined amount of inductance while maintaining losses below a predetermined amount.
  • the core structure is generated via three-dimensional (3D) printing as a single structure produced using a binder (e.g., resin) matrix with magnetic filler material.
  • variable permeability core implementations described herein provide improved flux density distributions and reduced inductor losses by designing variable permeability magnetic cores using structural design optimization techniques and three-dimensional (3D) printing in order to design smaller magnetic cores with more uniform and predictable magnetic flux distributions.

Abstract

An inductor includes a magnetic core composed of a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of design parameters or operational parameters of the inductor that includes one or more air gaps. A coil is wound through the one or more air gaps and is configured to be excited by an electric current.

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • Non-linear inductor performance characteristics of planar inductors can result in non-uniform flux densities and widespread flux density saturation, which causes inductor losses and degraded inductor performance. U.S. Patent Application Publication 2014/0210585 to Peck describes an electromagnetic device with a variable magnetic flux core having a plurality of core sections stacked on top of one another having varied geometries and materials to provide a predetermined inductance performance.
  • SUMMARY
  • In an exemplary implementation, an inductor includes a magnetic core composed of a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of design parameters or operational parameters of the inductor that includes one or more air gaps. A coil is wound through the one or more air gaps and is configured to be excited by an electric current.
  • The inductor can be a planar inductor.
  • The design parameters can include at least one of dimensions of the magnetic core, shape of the magnetic core, positions of the one or more air gaps on the magnetic core, size of the one or more air gaps, or material properties of the magnetic core.
  • The operational parameters can include at least one of an inductance, direct current (DC) bias, flux density characteristics, or core loss characteristics of the inductor.
  • The variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core can correspond to an amount of permeability nonlinearity in which a permeability for a predetermined amount of flux density is greater than a predetermined threshold. The variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core can also correspond to a flux density saturation area of the magnetic core that is less than a predetermined threshold. The variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core can also correspond to a core loss density in the magnetic core that is less than a predetermined threshold.
  • A shape of the one or more air gaps in the magnetic core can correspond to a predetermined flux density pattern across the magnetic core. The shape of the one or more air gaps can be an oval shape.
  • The magnetic core can be a single structure produced using a binder (e.g., resin) matrix with magnetic filler material via three-dimensional (3D) printing.
  • The magnetic core can be composed of a heterogeneous ferrite material having a plurality of densities throughout the magnetic core. Each of the plurality of densities throughout the magnetic core can correspond to a ratio of the ferrite material to air at one or more locations throughout the magnetic core, wherein the ratio of the ferrite material to air is based on the variable permeability characteristics.
  • The magnetic core can be composed of a homogenous ferrite material having a plurality of slits in which the plurality of slits are configured at predetermined locations and orientations throughout the magnetic core based on the variable permeability characteristics.
  • The magnetic core can be composed of a heterogeneous ferrite material having a first ferrite material with a first density at one or more first locations within the magnetic core, and a second ferrite material with a second density at one or more second locations within the magnetic core in which the first density and the second density are based on a ratio of the ferrite material to air. The first density of the first ferrite material can be greater than the second density of the second ferrite material. The magnetic core can include a plurality of slits configured at predetermined locations and orientations throughout the magnetic core based on the variable permeability characteristics. The one or more first locations of the first ferrite material and the one or more second locations of the second ferrite material can be based on the variable permeability characteristics.
  • The inductor can further include a plurality of stacked magnetic cores composed of a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of the design parameters or the operational parameters of the inductor.
  • In another exemplary implementation, a process includes determining design parameters for an inductor including at least one of dimensions of a magnetic core, shape of the magnetic core, positions of one or more air gaps on the magnetic core, size of the one or more air gaps, or material properties of the magnetic core; determining operational parameters for the inductor including at least one of an inductance, DC bias, flux density characteristics, or core loss characteristics; and providing a magnetic core composed of a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of the design parameters or the operational parameters of the inductor that includes one or more air gaps.
  • In another exemplary implementation, a magnetic core for an inductor includes a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of design parameters or operational parameters of the inductor that includes one or more air gaps in which the one or more air gaps are configured to receive a coil wound through the one or more air gaps configured to be excited by an electric current.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or application publication with colors drawings will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
  • A more complete appreciation of this disclosure and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary illustration of core structure, flux density, and core loss density of an inductor magnetic core;
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary graph of inductor permeability versus flux density for an inductor;
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary illustration of core structure, flux density, and core loss density of an inductor magnetic core;
  • FIG. 4 is an exemplary graph of inductance versus direct current (DC) bias for an inductor;
  • FIG. 5 is an exemplary illustration of core structure, flux density, and core loss density of an inductor magnetic core;
  • FIG. 6 is an exemplary illustration of core structure, flux density, and core loss density of an inductor magnetic core;
  • FIG. 7 is an exemplary illustration of core structure, flux density, and core loss density of an inductor magnetic core;
  • FIG. 8 is an exemplary graph of core weight versus core losses for various magnetic core designs;
  • FIG. 9 is an exemplary illustration of an inductor with stacked magnetic cores;
  • FIG. 10 is an exemplary graph of inductance versus DC bias for various magnetic core designs;
  • FIG. 11 is an exemplary graph of inductance versus DC bias for various stacked magnetic core designs;
  • FIG. 12 is an exemplary flowchart of a variable permeability core design process 1200.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • In the drawings, like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views. Further, as used herein, the words “a,” “an” and the like generally carry a meaning of “one or more,” unless stated otherwise. The drawings are generally drawn to scale unless specified otherwise or illustrating schematic structures or flowcharts.
  • Furthermore, the terms “approximately,” “about,” and similar terms generally refer to ranges that include the identified value within a margin of 20%, 10%, or preferably 5%, and any values therebetween.
  • Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to implementations for a planar inductor having a magnetic core made of non-linear magnetic material. In planar inductor implementations where an inductor coil is wound through holes in a magnetic core, magnetic flux spreads through the magnetic core based on a non-uniform magnetic resistance of the magnetic core, which results in a non-uniform flux density. The non-uniformity of the magnetic resistance and non-linear characteristics can increase a design complexity of magnetic cores and result in increased magnetic core size. The implementations described herein are directed to improving flux density distributions and reducing inductor losses by designing variable permeability magnetic cores using structural design optimization techniques and three-dimensional (3D) printing in order to design smaller magnetic cores with more uniform and predictable magnetic flux distributions.
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary illustration of core structure 100, flux density 102, and core loss density 104 of a magnetic core of a planar inductor. As shown in the illustration of the core structure 100, the plated magnetic core has one or more holes 106 for winding copper windings of the inductor, and a top and bottom of the windings are connected with plane copper layers by using PCB technology. In some implementations, the core structure 100 is composed of a homogeneous ferrite material and has a rectangular shape. When the core structure 100 is designed, various design parameters can be taken into account to achieve predetermined operational parameters of the planar inductor. For example, the design parameters can include at least one of dimensions of the magnetic core, shape of the magnetic core, positions of the one or more air gaps on the magnetic core, size of the one or more air gaps, or material properties of the magnetic core.
  • When the copper windings are excited by an electric current, the magnetic core has flux density characteristics as shown in flux density illustration 102 and core loss characteristics as shown in core loss illustration 104. As can be seen from the flux density illustration 102, the flux density of the planar inductor having core structure 100 is non-uniform. For example, some areas have a high flux density that reaches saturation, and some areas have low flux density. In some implementations, flux density saturation results in an inductance reduction due to reduced permeability while areas of lower flux densities have higher permeability and inductance than the areas of flux density saturation.
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary graph 200 of inductor permeability versus flux density for the planar inductor described in FIG. 1. At low flux densities, the permeability of the magnetic core is higher than at higher flux densities due to a non-linear performance of the planar inductor. Because of the non-linear characteristics and flux density distribution shown in the graph 200, designing inductance and loss properties of the inductor can be difficult.
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary illustration of core structure 300, flux density 302, and core loss density 304 of a magnetic core of a planar inductor that has a structure that is similar to the planar inductor described with respect to FIG. 1 but has a smaller length and width but a larger depth than the inductor of FIG. 1. The core structure 300 also includes one or more holes 106 for winding copper windings of the inductor and is composed of a homogenous ferrite material. While the core structure 300 may provide the same amount of inductance in a smaller volume than the core structure 100, as shown in flux density illustration 302, a larger amount of the core structure 300 reaches saturation, and core losses are also greater, as shown in the core loss density illustration 304. Due to the high flux density experienced by a large area of the core structure 300, an amount of inductance that can be achieved by the inductor may be limited.
  • FIG. 4 is an exemplary graph 400 of inductance versus direct current (DC) bias for the planar inductors described previously with respect FIG. 1 and FIG. 3. For example, curve 402 corresponds to the inductor from FIG. 1, and curve 404 corresponds to the inductor from FIG. 3. As shown in the graph 400, both inductors are biased to a predetermined inductance for a predetermined current, but the curve 404 has a steeper reduction in inductance as the current (IDC) due to an increased core area that experiences flux density saturation.
  • In the implementations described further herein, magnetic cores having variable permeability characteristics are described that provide increased inductance over a wider range of DC current values. In some implementations, the variable permeability characteristics are determined with a goal of reducing inductor nonlinearities so that a permeability for a predetermined amount of flux density is greater than a predetermined threshold, which results in an increased inductance for a wide range of current values, which reduces losses in the inductor. In addition, the variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core can be designed so a flux density saturation area of the magnetic core is less than a predetermined threshold and/or a core loss density is less than a predetermined threshold. The variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core can be designed based on design parameters of the inductor and/or operational parameters of the inductor. For example, the operational parameters can include at least one of an inductance, direct current (DC) bias, flux density characteristics, or core loss characteristics of the inductor.
  • FIG. 5 is an exemplary illustration of core structure 500, flux density 502, and core loss density 504 of a magnetic core of a planar inductor having variable permeability characteristics. The structure of the magnetic core 500 is composed of a heterogeneous ferrite material having multiple densities throughout the magnetic core. For example, the shading of the core structure 500 indicates a relative amount of ferrite material or air at various locations throughout the core structure 500. For example, each of the densities throughout the magnetic core correspond to a ratio of the ferrite material to air at one or more locations throughout the magnetic core, in which the ratio of the ferrite material to air is based on the variable permeability characteristics. Areas of increasingly darker shading indicate that more ferrite material is present than air at a particular location, and areas of lighter shading indicate that more air is present than ferrite material at a particular location. In some implementations, ferrite material to air ratios for various locations throughout the core structure are determined using a topology optimization software tool where the variable permeability characteristics can be determined to achieve a predetermined amount of inductance while maintaining losses below a predetermined amount. In some examples, increasing the amount of air present at various locations throughout the core structure 500 can reduce an overall strength of the core structure 500, which is another design consideration that goes into effect when determining the densities throughout the magnetic core.
  • In some implementations, other design characteristics for the core structure 500 and associated coils can be determined to achieve operational parameters for the planar inductor. For example, the core structure 500 has a non-rectangular shape with cutouts around an outer edge of the core structure 500. In some examples, the cutouts can have a rounded shape. Locations and shapes for one or more air gaps 506 in the core structure 50 can also be determined in order to achieve a predetermined flux density pattern across the magnetic core. For example, the air gaps 506 can have an oval shape, which corresponds to an oval flux density pattern, as shown in the flux density illustration 504. In addition, at least one coil is wound through the one or more air gaps 506 and is configured to be excited by an electric current passing through the inductor, which produces the oval-shaped flux density pattern. In some implementations, the oval-shaped flux density pattern generates smaller amounts of core losses than the implementations described previously with respect to FIG. 1 and FIG. 3, as shown in the core loss density illustration 504. When the design parameters and variable permeability characteristics have been determined, the core structure 500 is generated via three-dimensional (3D) printing as a single structure produced using a binder (e.g., resin) matrix with magnetic filler material.
  • FIG. 6 is an exemplary illustration of core structure 600, flux density 602, core loss density 604, and 3D core structure 606 of a magnetic core of a planar inductor having variable permeability characteristics. The structure of the magnetic core 600 is composed of a homogenous ferrite material having multiple slits 608, which are configured at predetermined locations and orientations throughout the core structure 600 based on the variable permeability characteristics. For example, the slits that are cut into the core structure 600 are configured so that a flux density pattern as shown in the flux density illustration 602 approximates the oval-shaped flux density pattern of the core structure 500 described previously (FIG. 5). The dimensions, orientations, and lengths of the slits 608 can be determined by using a topology optimization tool.
  • The core structure 600 also includes oval-shaped air gaps that correspond to the oval-shaped flux density pattern, and the illustration of the 3D core structure 606 shows how coil 610 is wound through the air gaps. In addition, a geometry of the core structure 600 is also similar to the core structure 500 with a non-rectangular shape and rounded cutouts around an outer edge of the core structure 600. While the planar inductor with the core structure 600 has greater core losses than the core structure 500, as shown in the core loss density illustration 604, the core losses are still less than the core losses for planar inductors having the core structures 100 and 300. Also, manufacturing the core structure 600 that is made of a homogenous ferrite material is less complex and less expensive than manufacturing the core structure 500 that is made of the heterogeneous ferrite material.
  • FIG. 7 is an exemplary illustration of core structure 700, flux density 702, and core loss density 704 of a magnetic core of a planar inductor having variable permeability characteristics, in which the core structure 700 includes features of both core structures 500 and 600. The core structure 700 can be composed of a heterogeneous ferrite material that uses two types of ferrite material having two different densities and corresponding permeabilities in addition to locations of air within the core structure 700. For example, the core structure can include a first ferrite material with a first density at one or more first locations within the magnetic core, and a second ferrite material at a second density at one or more second locations within the magnetic core. The densities of the first ferrite material and the second ferrite material are based on a ratio of the ferrite material to air. In some implementations, the first ferrite material is 100% ferrite and 0% air, and the second ferrite material is 60% ferrite and 40% air, resulting in the first density of the first ferrite material being greater than the second density of the second ferrite material. In the illustration of the core structure 700, locations having a darkest amount of shading correspond to the first ferrite material and areas of lighter shading correspond to the second ferrite material. The locations of the first ferrite material, the second ferrite material, and the air within the core structure 700 can be determined using a topology optimization tool based on variable permeability characteristics that result in predetermined operational parameters of the planar inductor.
  • In addition to the heterogeneous ferrite material, the core structure 700 also includes multiple slits configured at predetermined locations and orientations throughout the magnetic core based on the variable permeability characteristics. Like the core structure 600 (FIG. 6), the slits that are cut into the core structure 700 are configured so that a flux density pattern as shown in the flux density illustration 702 approximates the oval-shaped flux density pattern of the core structure 500 described previously (FIG. 5). The dimensions, orientations, and lengths of the slits can be determined by using the topology optimization tool.
  • The core structure 700 also includes oval-shaped air gaps that correspond to the oval-shaped flux density pattern, and a coil that is wound through the air gaps. In addition, a geometry of the core structure 700 is also similar to the core structure 500 with a non-rectangular shape and rounded cutouts around an outer edge of the core structure 700. While the planar inductor with the core structure 700 has greater core losses than the core structure 500, as shown in the core loss density illustration 704, the core losses are still less than the core losses for planar inductors having the core structures 100, 300, and 600. Also, manufacturing the core structure 700 that is made of a heterogeneous ferrite material that includes only two density variations is less complex and less expensive than manufacturing the core structure 500 that is made of the heterogeneous ferrite material having a larger number of density variations.
  • FIG. 8 is an exemplary graph 800 of core weight versus core losses for various magnetic core designs described previously herein. For example, point 802 corresponds to core structure 100 or core structure 300, point 810 corresponds to core structure 500, point 804 corresponds to core structure 600, and point 808 corresponds to core structure 700. Inductances for all of the core structures are designed to the same value, and a size of each illustrates a loss density [W/mm2], which provides an indication of cooling difficulty. The core structure 500 indicated by point 810 has the best loss performance, and the core structures 600 (point 804) and 700 (point 808) have better loss performance as compared to core structures 100 and 300 (point 802).
  • FIG. 9 is an exemplary illustration of an inductor 900 with stacked magnetic cores, where each of the magnetic cores has variable permeability characteristics such as those described previously herein with respect to FIG. 5, FIG. 6, and FIG. 7. By stacking the magnetic cores, the inductor 900 is able to have alternative inductive properties than those for with a single magnetic core. FIG. 10 is an example graph 1000 of inductance versus DC bias for various variable permeability magnetic core designs. For example, curves 1002, 1004, and 1006 represent inductance properties over a range of DC current values for three different magnetic core designs. By combining magnetic cores into a multi-layer stack, additional design solution are obtained without having to re-design individual magnetic core structures. FIG. 11 is an exemplary graph 1100 of inductance versus DC bias for various stacked magnetic core designs. For example, curve 1102 represents stacked magnetic cores represented by curves 1002 and 1004 in FIG. 10, curve 1104 represents stacked magnetic cores represented by curves 1004 and 1006, and curve 1106 represents stacked magnetic cores represented by curves 1002, 1004, and 1006.
  • FIG. 12 is an exemplary flowchart of a variable permeability core design process 1200. The variable permeability core design process 1200 is described herein with respect to variable magnetic core structures 500, 600, and 700, but it can be understood that the process 1200 can also be applied to other types of variable permeability core structures.
  • At step 1202, design parameters for a planar inductor are determined. When the core structure is designed, various design parameters can be taken into account to achieve predetermined operational parameters of the planar inductor. For example, the design parameters can include at least one of dimensions of the magnetic core, shape of the magnetic core, positions of the one or more air gaps on the magnetic core, size of the one or more air gaps, or material properties of the magnetic core. Other design parameters that can be taken into account include size constraints for a circuit in which the planar inductor is installed.
  • At step 1204, operational parameters for the planar inductor are determined, which can include including at least one of an inductance, DC bias, flux density characteristics, or core loss characteristics. For example, the operational parameters of the planar inductor can include a minimum allowable inductance for a particular DC current value.
  • At step 1206, a magnetic core is provided that is composed of a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of the design parameters or the operational parameters of the inductor. Magnetic cores having variable permeability characteristics provide increased inductance over a wide range of DC current values. In some implementations, the variable permeability characteristics are determined with a goal of reducing inductor nonlinearities so that a permeability for a predetermined amount of flux density is greater than a predetermined threshold, which results in an increased inductance for a wide range of current values, which reduces losses in the inductor. In addition, the variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core can be designed so a flux density saturation area of the magnetic core is less than a predetermined threshold and/or a core loss density is less than a predetermined threshold.
  • In some implementations, the variability permeability magnetic cores can have structures that correspond to those described previously with respect to core structures 500, 600, and 700 and can include heterogeneous or homogenous ferrite material and may include slits that are configured at predetermined locations and orientations around the magnetic core. In some implementations, ferrite material to air ratios for various locations throughout the core structure and/or locations, lengths and orientation of the slits can be determined using a topology optimization software tool where the variable permeability characteristics can be determined to achieve a predetermined amount of inductance while maintaining losses below a predetermined amount. When the variable permeability characteristics for the magnetic core have been determined, the core structure is generated via three-dimensional (3D) printing as a single structure produced using a binder (e.g., resin) matrix with magnetic filler material.
  • Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to implementations for a planar inductor having a magnetic core made of non-linear magnetic material. The variable permeability core implementations described herein provide improved flux density distributions and reduced inductor losses by designing variable permeability magnetic cores using structural design optimization techniques and three-dimensional (3D) printing in order to design smaller magnetic cores with more uniform and predictable magnetic flux distributions.
  • A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure. For example, preferable results may be achieved if the steps of the disclosed techniques were performed in a different sequence, if components in the disclosed systems were combined in a different manner, or if the components were replaced or supplemented by other components. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope that may be claimed.

Claims (20)

1. An inductor comprising:
a magnetic core composed of a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of design parameters or operational parameters of the inductor that includes one or more air gaps; and
a coil wound through the one or more air gaps configured to be excited by an electric current.
2. The inductor of claim 1, wherein the inductor is a planar inductor.
3. The inductor of claim 1, wherein the design parameters include at least one of dimensions of the magnetic core, shape of the magnetic core, positions of the one or more air gaps on the magnetic core, size of the one or more air gaps, or material properties of the magnetic core.
4. The inductor of claim 1, wherein the operational parameters include at least one of an inductance, direct current (DC) bias, flux density characteristics, or core loss characteristics of the inductor.
5. The inductor of claim 1, wherein the variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core correspond to an amount of permeability nonlinearity wherein a permeability for a predetermined amount of flux density is greater than a predetermined threshold.
6. The inductor of claim 1, wherein the variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core correspond to a flux density saturation area of the magnetic core that is less than a predetermined threshold.
7. The inductor of claim 1, wherein the variable permeability characteristics of the magnetic core correspond to a core loss density in the magnetic core that is less than a predetermined threshold.
8. The inductor of claim 1, wherein a shape of the one or more air gaps in the magnetic core correspond to a predetermined flux density pattern across the magnetic core.
9. The inductor of claim 8, wherein the shape of the one or more air gaps is an oval shape.
10. The inductor of claim 1, wherein the magnetic core is a single structure produced using a binder matrix with magnetic filler material via three-dimensional (3D) printing.
11. The inductor of claim 1, wherein the magnetic core is composed of a heterogeneous ferrite material having a plurality of densities throughout the magnetic core.
12. The inductor of claim 11, wherein each of the plurality of densities throughout the magnetic core correspond to a ratio of the ferrite material to air at one or more locations throughout the magnetic core, wherein the ratio of the ferrite material to air is based on the variable permeability characteristics.
13. The inductor of claim 1, wherein the magnetic core is composed of a homogenous ferrite material having a plurality of slits, wherein the plurality of slits are configured at predetermined locations and orientations throughout the magnetic core based on the variable permeability characteristics.
14. The inductor of claim 1, wherein the magnetic core is composed of a heterogeneous ferrite material having
a first ferrite material with a first density at one or more first locations within the magnetic core, and
a second ferrite material with a second density at one or more second locations within the magnetic core,
wherein the first density and the second density are based on a ratio of the ferrite material to air.
15. The inductor of claim 14, wherein the first density of the first ferrite material is greater than the second density of the second ferrite material.
16. The inductor of claim 14, wherein the magnetic core includes a plurality of slits configured at predetermined locations and orientations throughout the magnetic core based on the variable permeability characteristics.
17. The inductor of claim 14, wherein the one or more first locations of the first ferrite material and the one or more second locations of the second ferrite material are based on the variable permeability characteristics.
18. The inductor of claim 1, further comprising:
a plurality of stacked magnetic cores composed of a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of the design parameters or the operational parameters of the inductor.
19. A method comprising:
determining design parameters for an inductor including at least one of dimensions of a magnetic core, shape of the magnetic core, positions of one or more air gaps on the magnetic core, size of the one or more air gaps, or material properties of the magnetic core;
determining operational parameters for the inductor including at least one of an inductance, DC bias, flux density characteristics, or core loss characteristics; and
providing a magnetic core composed of a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of the design parameters or the operational parameters of the inductor that includes one or more air gaps.
20. A magnetic core for an inductor comprising:
a magnetic material having variable permeability characteristics based on at least one of design parameters or operational parameters of the inductor that includes one or more air gaps, wherein
the one or more air gaps are configured to receive a coil wound through the one or more air gaps configured to be excited by an electric current.
US15/418,141 2017-01-27 2017-01-27 Inductor with variable permeability core Abandoned US20180218828A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/418,141 US20180218828A1 (en) 2017-01-27 2017-01-27 Inductor with variable permeability core
JP2018009628A JP7154767B2 (en) 2017-01-27 2018-01-24 Inductor with variable permeability core
US17/307,134 US20210257138A1 (en) 2017-01-27 2021-05-04 Inductor with variable permeability core

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/418,141 US20180218828A1 (en) 2017-01-27 2017-01-27 Inductor with variable permeability core

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/307,134 Division US20210257138A1 (en) 2017-01-27 2021-05-04 Inductor with variable permeability core

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20180218828A1 true US20180218828A1 (en) 2018-08-02

Family

ID=62980154

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/418,141 Abandoned US20180218828A1 (en) 2017-01-27 2017-01-27 Inductor with variable permeability core
US17/307,134 Pending US20210257138A1 (en) 2017-01-27 2021-05-04 Inductor with variable permeability core

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/307,134 Pending US20210257138A1 (en) 2017-01-27 2021-05-04 Inductor with variable permeability core

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US20180218828A1 (en)
JP (1) JP7154767B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20210358685A1 (en) * 2020-05-16 2021-11-18 Tektronix, Inc. Test and measurement instrument for determining magnetic core losses
US20220013276A1 (en) * 2020-07-10 2022-01-13 Infineon Technologies Austria Ag Inductor devices and stacked power supply topologies

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102325001B1 (en) * 2020-10-05 2021-11-10 김하정 Magnetic core with permeability control device and magnetic device with the same

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4758808A (en) * 1983-08-16 1988-07-19 Tdk Corporation Impedance element mounted on a pc board
US4845452A (en) * 1987-10-08 1989-07-04 Tdk Corporation Composite bead element
JPH0344012A (en) * 1989-07-11 1991-02-25 Tokin Corp Manufacture of porous bead inductor
JPH05243051A (en) * 1992-02-27 1993-09-21 Taiyo Yuden Co Ltd Bead inductor
US5684678A (en) * 1995-12-08 1997-11-04 Delco Electronics Corp. Resonant converter with controlled inductor
US5774028A (en) * 1995-06-07 1998-06-30 Samsung Electro-Mechanics Surface mount line filter with solder gas discharge paths in the core
US20020097127A1 (en) * 2000-10-25 2002-07-25 Tokin Corporation Magnetic core including bias magnet and inductor component using the same
US20040080978A1 (en) * 2000-09-20 2004-04-29 Ionel Jitaru Planar inductive element
US6980077B1 (en) * 2004-08-19 2005-12-27 Coldwatt, Inc. Composite magnetic core for switch-mode power converters
US9799440B2 (en) * 2013-03-29 2017-10-24 Tamura Corporation Coupled inductor

Family Cites Families (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5037369B1 (en) * 1970-02-27 1975-12-02
US4520335A (en) * 1983-04-06 1985-05-28 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Transformer with ferromagnetic circuits of unequal saturation inductions
US4785273A (en) * 1985-03-27 1988-11-15 Doty David F Strip-line-core transformer
JP2612324B2 (en) * 1988-11-23 1997-05-21 ティーディーケイ株式会社 Inductor trimming method
JPH04318906A (en) * 1991-04-17 1992-11-10 Nippon Steel Corp Composite toroidal core for common mode choke excellent in magnetic property
JP3247702B2 (en) * 1991-06-03 2002-01-21 日本ケミコン株式会社 Composite magnetic core and method of manufacturing the same
JP2578498Y2 (en) * 1992-06-24 1998-08-13 アルプス電気株式会社 Magnetic head
JPH07297037A (en) * 1994-04-27 1995-11-10 Tokyo Parts Ind Co Ltd Balun transformer
EP0821375A1 (en) * 1996-07-26 1998-01-28 SIEMENS MATSUSHITA COMPONENTS GmbH & CO. KG Use of a suppression choke in switching power supplies
JP2000228319A (en) 1999-02-08 2000-08-15 Hitachi Metals Ltd Choke coil and noise filter
JP3776281B2 (en) 1999-04-13 2006-05-17 アルプス電気株式会社 Inductive element
JP3560530B2 (en) * 2000-03-08 2004-09-02 Fdk株式会社 Automatic mounting type coil
JP2004288882A (en) 2003-03-24 2004-10-14 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Noise filter
JP2007165346A (en) * 2005-12-09 2007-06-28 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Reactor
KR20070082539A (en) * 2006-02-15 2007-08-21 쿠퍼 테크놀로지스 컴파니 Gapped core structure for magnetic components
US7864015B2 (en) * 2006-04-26 2011-01-04 Vishay Dale Electronics, Inc. Flux channeled, high current inductor
JP5216536B2 (en) 2008-11-05 2013-06-19 株式会社日立産機システム Iron core for stationary equipment
JP5598372B2 (en) 2010-02-25 2014-10-01 住友電気工業株式会社 Reactor and reactor manufacturing method
CN102782782B (en) * 2010-03-09 2015-04-15 三菱电机株式会社 Static apparatus
US9455084B2 (en) * 2012-07-19 2016-09-27 The Boeing Company Variable core electromagnetic device
TWI539473B (en) * 2012-08-21 2016-06-21 乾坤科技股份有限公司 Variable coupled inductor
JP5474251B1 (en) 2013-02-04 2014-04-16 Necトーキン株式会社 Magnetic core and inductor
JP6337463B2 (en) 2013-12-19 2018-06-06 スミダコーポレーション株式会社 Coil parts and coil parts set
CN110121753A (en) 2016-12-28 2019-08-13 株式会社村田制作所 Inductor and DC-DC converter

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4758808A (en) * 1983-08-16 1988-07-19 Tdk Corporation Impedance element mounted on a pc board
US4845452A (en) * 1987-10-08 1989-07-04 Tdk Corporation Composite bead element
JPH0344012A (en) * 1989-07-11 1991-02-25 Tokin Corp Manufacture of porous bead inductor
JPH05243051A (en) * 1992-02-27 1993-09-21 Taiyo Yuden Co Ltd Bead inductor
US5774028A (en) * 1995-06-07 1998-06-30 Samsung Electro-Mechanics Surface mount line filter with solder gas discharge paths in the core
US5684678A (en) * 1995-12-08 1997-11-04 Delco Electronics Corp. Resonant converter with controlled inductor
US20040080978A1 (en) * 2000-09-20 2004-04-29 Ionel Jitaru Planar inductive element
US20020097127A1 (en) * 2000-10-25 2002-07-25 Tokin Corporation Magnetic core including bias magnet and inductor component using the same
US6980077B1 (en) * 2004-08-19 2005-12-27 Coldwatt, Inc. Composite magnetic core for switch-mode power converters
US9799440B2 (en) * 2013-03-29 2017-10-24 Tamura Corporation Coupled inductor

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20210358685A1 (en) * 2020-05-16 2021-11-18 Tektronix, Inc. Test and measurement instrument for determining magnetic core losses
US20220013276A1 (en) * 2020-07-10 2022-01-13 Infineon Technologies Austria Ag Inductor devices and stacked power supply topologies
EP3944264A1 (en) * 2020-07-10 2022-01-26 Infineon Technologies Austria AG Inductor devices and stacked power supply topologies
US11735352B2 (en) * 2020-07-10 2023-08-22 Infineon Technologies Austria Ag Inductor devices and stacked power supply topologies

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP7154767B2 (en) 2022-10-18
US20210257138A1 (en) 2021-08-19
JP2018152551A (en) 2018-09-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20210257138A1 (en) Inductor with variable permeability core
US10498245B2 (en) Integrated magnetic component
EP2797087B1 (en) Magnetic core and magnetic component using the same
JP6464582B2 (en) Magnetic circuit parts
US6617950B2 (en) Common mode/differential mode choke
US8203417B2 (en) Inductor assembly
US20120326820A1 (en) Magnetic unit
KR102394054B1 (en) Magnetic core assembly and coil component including the same
US20120299681A1 (en) Flat band winding for an inductor core
JP2018152551A5 (en)
US20230368959A1 (en) Magnetic core and magnetic device
US9799440B2 (en) Coupled inductor
EP2528069B1 (en) Multi gap inductor core, multi gap inductor, transformer and corresponding manufacturing method
KR102394053B1 (en) Magnetic core and coil component including the same
US20110080243A1 (en) Inductor
Quilici Embedded magnetic power transformer
JP5900741B2 (en) Composite magnetic core, reactor and power supply
KR102535253B1 (en) Magnetic core and coil component including the same
EP0896419A2 (en) Power converter incorporated in a magnetic circuit
US9887032B2 (en) Magnetic component and transformer
JP7261839B2 (en) Saturation suppressing electromagnetic device
KR20180115869A (en) Core gap construction for eliminating SMPS flux leakage
US20230106053A1 (en) Coil component, circuit board, and electronic device
JP2017162902A (en) Inductor
Gomez et al. Comparative Analysis of Coil Parameters for the Optimization of Coupling Factor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AME

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ISHIGAKI, MASANORI;DEDE, ERCAN MEHMET;LOHAN, DANNY J.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20170125 TO 20170127;REEL/FRAME:041540/0390

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: ADVISORY ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: ADVISORY ACTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION