US20180082499A1 - Method of detecting elevator tab failure - Google Patents
Method of detecting elevator tab failure Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20180082499A1 US20180082499A1 US15/810,587 US201715810587A US2018082499A1 US 20180082499 A1 US20180082499 A1 US 20180082499A1 US 201715810587 A US201715810587 A US 201715810587A US 2018082499 A1 US2018082499 A1 US 2018082499A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- elevator
- time
- rotational position
- tab
- range
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 27
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 38
- 230000015654 memory Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 21
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 description 16
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 15
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 11
- RZVHIXYEVGDQDX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 9,10-anthraquinone Chemical group C1=CC=C2C(=O)C3=CC=CC=C3C(=O)C2=C1 RZVHIXYEVGDQDX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000001154 acute effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000010006 flight Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006855 networking Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010223 real-time analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64D—EQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLIGHT SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
- B64D45/00—Aircraft indicators or protectors not otherwise provided for
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C5/00—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
- G07C5/08—Registering or indicating performance data other than driving, working, idle, or waiting time, with or without registering driving, working, idle or waiting time
- G07C5/0816—Indicating performance data, e.g. occurrence of a malfunction
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C13/00—Control systems or transmitting systems for actuating flying-control surfaces, lift-increasing flaps, air brakes, or spoilers
- B64C13/24—Transmitting means
- B64C13/38—Transmitting means with power amplification
- B64C13/40—Transmitting means with power amplification using fluid pressure
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C13/00—Control systems or transmitting systems for actuating flying-control surfaces, lift-increasing flaps, air brakes, or spoilers
- B64C13/24—Transmitting means
- B64C13/38—Transmitting means with power amplification
- B64C13/40—Transmitting means with power amplification using fluid pressure
- B64C13/42—Transmitting means with power amplification using fluid pressure having duplication or stand-by provisions
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C9/00—Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders
- B64C9/10—Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders one surface adjusted by movement of another, e.g. servo tabs
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C9/00—Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders
- B64C9/12—Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders surfaces of different type or function being simultaneously adjusted
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64D—EQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLIGHT SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
- B64D45/00—Aircraft indicators or protectors not otherwise provided for
- B64D45/0005—Devices specially adapted to indicate the position of a movable element of the aircraft, e.g. landing gear
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64D—EQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLIGHT SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
- B64D45/00—Aircraft indicators or protectors not otherwise provided for
- B64D2045/0085—Devices for aircraft health monitoring, e.g. monitoring flutter or vibration
Definitions
- This disclosure relates generally to detecting a latent fault in an aircraft control system, and in particular, to detecting a fault in the operation of elevator tabs used with an aircraft's elevator.
- the “Next Generation” 737 was designed to fly higher, faster, carry heavier loads, and be more fuel efficient than its predecessor, the 737 Classic, which is manufactured by the Boeing Company.
- airlines flying the 737 Classic at the time of the planned upgrade wanted to limit changes to specific features of the 737 Classic to control costs associated with the upgrade.
- the 737NG has the same—or nearly the same—airframe, wing area, and control surfaces as the 737 Classic, and the size of the 737 Classic elevators (a control surface on the horizontal tail wings of an aircraft that control pitch) were not changed on the larger and heavier 737NG.
- the 737NG has more powerful engines and higher gross weights than the 737 Classic, and the 737NG therefore requires more aerodynamic authority then the existing 737 Classic elevators were capable of developing. Consequently, with reference FIG.
- the “balance” function of the elevator tabs 12 a, 12 b relates to the redundant flight control functions of the 737NG.
- the 737NG has two primary hydraulic systems, but the 737NG is capable of operating with one or even both of those hydraulic systems failed. In the case of dual failure of the hydraulic systems, the pilot can still control the 737NG by physical strength combined with the help of aerodynamic and mechanical devices and couplings.
- the “balance” function of the elevator tabs 10 a, 10 b displaces the elevator tabs 10 a, 10 b in opposition to displacement of the elevators 12 a, 12 b.
- a second elevator tab engagement scenario involves a takeoff from a runway with a limited length when an engine fails just after the aircraft has achieved V 1 speed (the speed reached during takeoff where it is just possible to stop the aircraft with the remaining distance of runway). If V 1 speed is exceeded, the aircraft is required to complete the takeoff or it will overrun the remaining runway if the takeoff is aborted.
- the elevator tabs 10 a, 10 b perform an “anti-balance” function in which the elevator tabs 10 a, 10 b displace in concert with the elevators 12 a, 12 b.
- the techniques include determining the occurrence of a verification event that includes movement of the left elevator tab relative to the left elevator and the right elevator tab relative to the right elevator, wherein the verification event occurs at a start time, wherein the left elevator is at an initial rotational position and the right elevator is at an initial rotational position at the start time.
- the techniques also include determining a first rotational position of the left elevator at a first time and a first rotational position of the right elevator at the first time, and the first time occurs after the start time.
- the first rotational position of the left elevator at the first time is compared to the first rotational position of the right elevator at the first time. If the first rotational position of the left elevator at the first time is not different than the first rotational position of the right elevator at the first time by at least a first value, a first alert is issued associated with the left elevator tab.
- a second rotational position of the left elevator at a second time and a second rotational position of the right elevator at the second time are determined, and the second time occurs after the first time.
- the difference between the start time and the second time is equal to an intentional delay between functionality of the left elevator tab and the right elevator tab.
- the second rotational position of the left elevator at the second time is compared to the second rotational position of the right elevator at the elevator at the first time. If the second rotational position of the right elevator at the second time is not within a second range of the second rotational position of the left elevator at the second time, a second alert is issued associated with the right elevator tab.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of the method for verifying proper operation of a left elevator tab disposed at an end portion of a left elevator of an aircraft and a right elevator tab disposed at an end portion of a right elevator of the aircraft;
- FIG. 2 is a partial plan view of a rear portion of an aircraft showing the horizontal stabilizers
- FIG. 3A is sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B of FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 3B is sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B of FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 3C is sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B of FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 4A is sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B of FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 4B is sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B of FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 4C is sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B of FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 4D is sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B of FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 5A is partial sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B of FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 5B is partial sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B of FIG. 2 ;
- FIGS. 6A to 6C are partial sectional views taken along line A-A of FIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively;
- FIGS. 6D to 6F are partial sectional views taken along line B-B of FIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively;
- FIGS. 7A to 7C are partial sectional views taken along line A-A of FIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively;
- FIGS. 7D to 7F are partial sectional views taken along line B-B of FIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively;
- FIGS. 8A to 8C are partial sectional views taken along line A-A of FIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively;
- FIGS. 8D to 8F are partial sectional views taken along line B-B of FIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively;
- FIGS. 9A to 9C are partial sectional views taken along line A-A of FIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively;
- FIGS. 9D to 9F are partial sectional views taken along line B-B of FIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively;
- FIG. 10 is a schematic view of a system for assessing and verifying proper elevator tab operation in aircraft.
- FIG. 11 is a schematic view of modules of a process of the system of the embodiment of FIG. 10 .
- a method for verifying proper operation of a first elevator tab (such as a left elevator tab) disposed at an end portion of a first elevator (such as a left elevator) of an aircraft and a second elevator tab (such as a right elevator tab) disposed at an end portion of a second elevator (such as a right elevator) of the aircraft.
- the provided method utilizes an intentional delay (e.g., a ten-second time delay) between the function of the left elevator tab and the subsequent function of the right elevator tab when the flaps are first extended.
- the techniques herein may be implemented by a flight diagnostic system such as that provided in FIG. 10 (discussed below). The techniques analyze flight data of the aircraft after one or more flights have been completed.
- the analysis involves automatic identification of a verification event, which may be the operation of the horizontal stabilizers of an aircraft and includes movement of the left elevator tab relative to the left elevator and the right elevator tab relative to the right elevator, wherein the verification event occurs at a start time.
- a verification event which may be the operation of the horizontal stabilizers of an aircraft and includes movement of the left elevator tab relative to the left elevator and the right elevator tab relative to the right elevator, wherein the verification event occurs at a start time.
- the left elevator tab moves relative to the left elevator.
- the right elevator tab does not move relative to the right elevator. Because the deployment of the left elevator tab relative to the left elevator creates aerodynamic forces, the left elevator immediately displaces relative to its position at or just prior to the initiation of the verification event.
- the right elevator does not displace immediately after the initiation of the verification. Accordingly, by analyzing flight data, the diagnostic system can infer or detect a displacement of the left elevator tab following a verification event, by confirming that the left elevator immediately displaced (relative to both or
- the right elevator tab displaces relative to the right elevator, and this displacement creates aerodynamic forces on the right elevator that immediately displaces the right elevator relative to its position at or just prior to the expiration of the intentional delay.
- a displacement of the right elevator tab can be inferred or detected following the expiration of the intentional delay by confirming that the right elevator immediately displaced (relative to both or either of its initial position or to the left elevator). The techniques therefore allow the proper operation of the left elevator tab and the right elevator tab to be indirectly verified by data analysis of existing flight parameters, thereby avoiding the installation of costly new sensors, parts, and instrumentation.
- available flight data (such as, for example, data from a Digital Flight Data Recorder (“DFDR”) or a quick access recorder (“QAR”)) is automatically analyzed by a diagnostic system (e.g., FIG. 10 ) that employs an elevator tab comparison algorithm to determine if a verification event has occurred during a flight of the aircraft.
- a verification event which may be an operation that involves movement of the left elevator tab 10 a (see FIG. 2 ) relative to the left elevator 12 a of the horizontal stabilizer 14 and the right elevator tab 10 b relative to the right elevator 12 b of the horizontal stabilizers, the system performs the assessment and verification.
- the diagnostic system which may operate on historical available flight data or in real time on collected flight data, can identify a verification event typically on each flight. Because the operation of the elevator tabs 10 a, 10 b cannot be directly controlled (or monitored) by the pilot, the verification event is an operation of the elevators 12 a, 12 b that automatically involves the rotational displacement of the left and right elevator tabs 10 a, 10 b relative to the left and right elevators 12 a, 12 b, respectively.
- An example of a verification event may be, for example, a flight operation, such as moving the aircraft's flap control lever out of the “up” detent or disengaging either or both of the aircraft's redundant hydraulic systems that operate the left and right elevators 12 a, 12 b.
- a further example of a verification event may be a failure of one or both of the redundant hydraulic systems.
- the verification event occurs at a start time, and at this start time and/or immediately prior to this start time (e.g., 0.5 to 0.25 seconds before), the left elevator 12 a is at an initial rotational position and the right elevator 12 b is at an initial rotational position.
- This and all positional and time information relating the left and right elevator tabs 10 a, 10 b and the left and right elevators 12 a, 12 b is stored as flight data (see, for example, stored flight data 216 of FIG. 10 ).
- the flight data may be real-time data (or may in part be real-time data) that may be available to the controller 204 and/or stored the memory 206 of FIG. 10 .
- the occurrence of the verification event at the start time may be determined, for example, by the computer system 200 of FIG. 10 , which will be described in more detail below.
- the computer system 200 may be particularly configured to automatically access stored flight data (e.g., over a communication network), where such access may be performed on a periodic basis determined by a schedule or based on a number of flights since the last analysis or some other event.
- the computer system 200 accesses flight data based on a triggering event, whether in real-time during flight or after a flight.
- the computer system 200 may automatically search for the verification event data stored in the flight data and from there begin analysis and verification.
- FIG. 3A An example of an initial rotational position of the left elevator 12 a is provided in FIG. 3A , which illustrates that a longitudinal axis 16 a of the left elevator 12 a is aligned (e.g., collinearly aligned) with a longitudinal axis 18 a of the left elevator tab 10 a.
- the longitudinal axis 16 a of the left elevator 12 a and the longitudinal axis 18 a of the left elevator tab 10 a may extend across the length of the left elevator tab 10 a and the left elevator 12 a, respectively along the sectional line A-A of FIG. 2 .
- the longitudinal axis 16 a of the left elevator 12 a and the longitudinal axis 18 a of the left elevator tab 10 a may bisect or substantially bisect the left elevator tab 10 a and the left elevator 12 a, respectively along the sectional line A-A of FIG. 2 .
- the left elevator tab 10 a and the left elevator 12 a act as a single control surface that rotates as a unit relative to a portion of the left horizontal stabilizer 14 a about a left elevator rotational point 20 a, as illustrated in FIG. 3A .
- the longitudinal axis 16 a of the left elevator 12 a and the longitudinal axis 18 a of the left elevator tab 10 a may be aligned with a longitudinal axis 22 a of the left horizontal stabilizer 14 a, as illustrated in FIG. 3A .
- longitudinal axis 16 a of the left elevator 12 a and the longitudinal axis 18 a of the left elevator tab 10 a may form an acute angle (either clockwise or counterclockwise) with the longitudinal axis 22 a of the left horizontal stabilizer 14 a, as illustrated in FIGS. 3B and 3C .
- the right elevator 12 b is at an initial rotational position and the right elevator 12 b is at an initial rotational position.
- An example of an initial rotational position of the right elevator 12 b is provided in FIG. 3A , which illustrates that a longitudinal axis 16 b of the right elevator 12 b is aligned (e.g., collinearly aligned) with a longitudinal axis 18 b of the right elevator tab 10 b.
- the longitudinal axis 16 b of the right elevator 12 b and the longitudinal axis 18 b of the right elevator tab 10 b may extend across the length of the right elevator tab 10 b and the right elevator 12 b, respectively along the sectional line B-B of FIG. 2 .
- the longitudinal axis 16 b of the right elevator 12 b and the longitudinal axis 18 b of the right elevator tab 10 b may bisect or substantially bisect the right elevator tab 10 b and the right elevator 12 b, respectively along the sectional line B-B of FIG. 2 .
- the right elevator tab 10 b and the right elevator 12 b act as a single control surface that rotates as a unit relative to a portion of the right horizontal stabilizer 14 b about a right elevator rotational point 20 b, as illustrated in FIG. 3A .
- the longitudinal axis 16 b of the right elevator 12 b and the longitudinal axis 18 b of the right elevator tab 10 b may be aligned with a longitudinal axis 22 a of the right horizontal stabilizer 14 b, as illustrated in FIG. 3A .
- longitudinal axis 16 b of the right elevator 12 b and the longitudinal axis 18 b of the right elevator tab 10 b may form an acute angle (either clockwise or counterclockwise) with the longitudinal axis 22 b of the right horizontal stabilizer 14 b, as illustrated in FIGS. 3B and 3C .
- the left elevator tab 10 a rotates relative to the left elevator 12 a, while due to the intentional delay, the right elevator tab 10 b does not rotate or displace relative to the right elevator 12 b.
- the first time may occur after the start time but before the intentional delay expires, and the first time may be any length of time that allows a displacement (i.e., a statistically significant rotational displacement) of the left elevator 12 a relative to the right elevator 12 b to be detected by analyzing flight data.
- the first time may occur between 0.0 to 1.0 second after the start time.
- the left elevator tab 10 a may rotatably displace in one of two directions relative to the left elevator 12 (or relative to a point on the left elevator). As illustrated in FIG. 5A (in which the left horizontal stabilizer 14 a is eliminated for clarity), the left elevator tab 10 a may rotate counter-clockwise about a left tab rotation point 24 a that is disposed at or adjacent to a leading edge 26 a of the left elevator tab 10 a (and/or at or adjacent to a trailing edge 28 a of the left elevator 12 a ).
- Such a counter-clockwise rotation of the left elevator tab 10 a is involved in the “balance” function of the left elevator tab 10 a when the left elevator 12 a rotates clockwise relative to the left elevator 12 a (or clockwise about the left elevator rotational point 20 a ), as illustrated in FIG. 4D .
- a counter-clockwise rotation of the left elevator tab 10 a is involved in the “anti-balance” function of the left elevator tab 10 a when the left elevator 12 a rotates counter-clockwise relative to the left elevator 12 a (or counter-clockwise about the left elevator rotational point 20 a ), as illustrated in FIG. 4A .
- the left elevator tab 10 a may also rotate clockwise about the left tab rotation point 24 a. Such a clockwise rotation of the left elevator tab 10 a is involved in the “balance” function of the left elevator tab 10 a when the left elevator tab 10 a rotates counter-clockwise relative to the left elevator 12 a (or counter-clockwise about the left elevator rotational point 20 a ), as illustrated in FIG. 4B .
- a clockwise rotation of the left elevator tab 10 a is involved in the “anti-balance” function of the left elevator tab 10 a when the left elevator tab 10 a rotates clockwise relative to the left elevator 12 a (or clockwise about the left elevator rotational point 20 a ), as illustrated in FIG. 4B .
- the rotated or deployed left elevator tab 10 a (in either “balance” or ‘anti-balance” mode) will have different aerodynamic characteristics that the right elevator 12 b and the right elevator tab 10 b. Accordingly, the left elevator 12 a will be in a different relative position than the right elevator 12 b at the first time when the flight data is analyzed. Specifically, as illustrated in FIG. 6A (with the “anti-balance” configuration illustrated as an example only), the longitudinal axis 16 a of the left elevator 12 a (and the longitudinal axis 18 a of the left elevator tab 10 a ) extends through a left reference axis 30 a at (or just prior to) the start time. At the first time, as illustrated in FIG.
- the longitudinal axis 16 a of the left elevator 12 a makes an angle 32 a with the left reference axis 30 a at (or just prior to) the start time, and this position of the left elevator 12 a may be the first rotational position of the left elevator 12 a at the first time.
- the angle 32 a may be an acute angle that may be clockwise or counter-clockwise, and the value of the angle may depend on many variables, such as airspeed and/or initial angle of the left elevator 12 a relative to the left horizontal stabilizer 14 a, airspeed, for example.
- the right elevator tab 10 has not rotated relative to the right elevator 12 a. That is, at both the start time and at the first time, the longitudinal axis 16 b of the right elevator 12 b (and the longitudinal axis 18 b of the right elevator tab 10 b ) extends through a right reference axis 30 b that is aligned with the left reference axis 30 a of the left elevator 12 a, and this position of the right elevator 12 b may be the first rotational position of the right elevator 12 b at the first time.
- the right reference axis 30 b of the right elevator 12 b is aligned with (or corresponds to) the left reference axis 30 a of the left elevator 12 a in space. That is, a plane may extend through or along each of the left reference axis 30 a and the right reference axis 30 b, and the plane may be parallel to an axis or rotation of the left elevator 12 a (that extends through the left elevator rotational point 20 a of FIG. 3A ) and an axis or rotation of the right elevator 12 b (that extends through the right elevator rotational point 20 b of FIG. 3A ).
- the flight data may be analyzed to compare the first rotational position of the left elevator 12 a (illustrated in FIG. 6B ) to the first rotational position of the right elevator 12 b (illustrated in FIG. 6E ).
- This analysis of the flight data (as well as all analysis of flight data described in the following sections) may be performed by the computer system 200 of FIG. 10 , which will be described in more detail below. If the first rotational position of the left elevator 12 a at the first time is different than the first rotational position of the right elevator at the first time by at least a first value or within a first range, an alert may be issued that the left elevator tab 10 a is operating properly.
- the angle 32 a between the left reference axis 30 a and the longitudinal axis 16 a of the left elevator 12 a is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.5° to) 3.0° and the angle 32 b between the right reference axis 30 b and the longitudinal axis 16 b of the right elevator 12 b is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.0° to) 0.4°.
- an alert may be issued that the left elevator tab 10 a is operating properly.
- An example of proper operation of the left elevator tab 10 a between the start time and the first time can be found in FIGS. 6A and 6B .
- the flight data may be analyzed to compare the first rotational position of the left elevator 12 a (illustrated in FIG. 6B ) to the position of the first rotational position of the left elevator 12 a at or just prior to the start time (illustrated in FIG. 6A ). If the first rotational position of the left elevator 12 a at the first time is different than the rotational position of the left elevator 12 a at the start time by at least a first value or within a first range, an alert may be issued that the left elevator tab 10 a is operating properly.
- the angle 32 a between the left reference axis 30 a and the longitudinal axis 16 a of the left elevator 12 a is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.5° to) 3.0° at the first time, and the angle 32 a between the left reference axis 30 a and the longitudinal axis 16 a of the left elevator 12 a is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.0° to 0.4°) at the start time, an alert may be issued that the left elevator tab 10 a is operating properly.
- analysis of the flight data may show that the left elevator tab 10 a is not functional. For example, if analysis of the flight data shows the first rotational position of the left elevator 12 a at the first time is not different than (or is equal or approximately equal to) the first rotational position of the right elevator 12 b at the first time, the first alert may be issued. As another example, if analysis of the flight data shows that the angle 32 a between the left reference axis 30 a and the longitudinal axis 16 a of the left elevator 12 a is not at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.5° to 3.0°) at the first time (as illustrated in FIG.
- the first alert may be issued.
- the right elevator tab 10 a rotationally displaces relative to the right elevator 12 a.
- the intentional delay may be any suitable length of time between operation of the left elevator tab 10 a and the right elevator tab 10 b.
- the intentional delay may be 5 to 20 seconds, for example. More specifically, the intentional delay may be 5 to 20 seconds, or may be 10 seconds. If the intentional delay is triggered by the verification event that occurs at the start time, the second time is the value of the intentional delay.
- the right elevator tab 10 b and the right elevator 12 b act as a single control surface that rotates as a unit relative to a portion of the right horizontal stabilizer 14 b about a right elevator rotational point 20 b, as illustrated in FIG. 3A .
- the right elevator tab 10 b may rotatably displace in one of two directions relative to the right elevator 12 b (or relative to a point on the right elevator 12 b ). As illustrated in FIG.
- the right elevator tab 10 a may rotate counter-clockwise about a right tab rotation point 24 b that is disposed at or adjacent to a leading edge 26 b of the right elevator tab 10 b (and/or at or adjacent to a trailing edge 28 b of the right elevator 12 b ).
- Such a counter-clockwise rotation of the right elevator tab 10 b is involved in the “balance” function of the right elevator tab 10 b when the right elevator tab 10 b rotates clockwise relative to the right elevator 12 a (or clockwise about the right elevator rotational point 20 b ), as illustrated in FIG. 4D .
- a counter-clockwise rotation of the right elevator tab 10 b is involved in the “anti-balance” function of the right elevator tab 10 b when the right elevator 12 b rotates counter-clockwise relative to the right elevator 12 b (or counter-clockwise about the right elevator rotational point 20 b ), as illustrated in FIG. 4A .
- the right elevator tab 10 b makes (or finished making) a displacement that corresponds to the displacement of the left elevator tab 10 a. That is, the right elevator tab 10 b displaces (e.g., rotationally displaces) in the same direction and to the same degree as the left elevator tab 10 a (illustrated in FIGS. 4A to 4D ), with the only difference between the two being the timing of the start of the rotational displacement. For example, if the left elevator 12 a is rotated counter-clockwise and the left elevator tab 10 a is in the “anti-balance” position of FIG.
- the left elevator 12 a and the left elevator tab 10 a should have a cross-section that is identical or nearly identical to the right elevator 12 b and the right elevator tab 10 b.
- the rotated or deployed right elevator tab 10 b (in either “balance” or ‘anti-balance” mode) will have the same aerodynamic characteristics of the deployed left elevator tab 12 a (also in either “balance” or ‘anti-balance” mode). Accordingly, the right elevator 12 b will move from the first rotational position of FIG. 6E into the same (or nearly the same) relative position as the left elevator 12 a at or slightly after the second time when the flight data is analyzed. Specifically, as illustrated in FIG.
- the longitudinal axis 16 b of the right elevator 12 b makes an angle 32 b with the right reference axis 30 b due to aerodynamic forces acting on the right elevator tab 10 b, and this position of the right elevator 12 b may be the second rotational position of the right elevator 12 b at the second time. Because the position of the left elevator tab 10 a and the left elevator 12 a do not change from the first time to the second time, the second rotational position of the left elevator 12 a at the second time is equal to or approximately equal to the first rotational position of the left elevator 12 a at the first time. That is, the angle 32 a does not change between the first time and the second time.
- the flight data may be analyzed to compare the first rotational position of the right elevator 12 b (illustrated in FIG. 6E ) to the second rotational position of the right elevator 12 b (illustrated in FIG. 6F ). If the second rotational position of the right elevator 12 b at the second time is different than the first rotational position of the right elevator 12 b at the first time by at least a first value or within a first range, an alert may be issued that the right elevator 12 b is operating properly.
- the angle 32 b between the right reference axis 30 b and the longitudinal axis 16 b of the right elevator 12 b is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.0° to 0.4°) at the first time
- a desired value or within a desired range for example only, 0.5° to 3.0°
- an alert may be issued that the right elevator tab 10 a is operating properly.
- An example of proper operation of the right elevator tab 10 a between the first time and the second time can be found in FIGS. 6E and 6F .
- the flight data may be analyzed to compare the second rotational position of the right elevator 12 b (illustrated in FIG. 6F ) to the second rotational position of the left elevator 12 a (illustrated in FIG. 6C ). If the second rotational position of the right elevator 12 b at the second time is equal to (or approximately equal to) or is the same as the second rotational position of the left elevator 12 a at the second time (relative to the left reference axis 30 a and the right reference axis 30 b ), the right elevator tab 10 b is functioning properly. An alert may then be issued that the right elevator tab 10 b is operating properly.
- the angle 32 b between the right reference axis 30 b and the longitudinal axis 16 b of the right elevator 12 b is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.5° to 3.0°) at the second time
- a desired value or within a desired range for example only, 0.5° to 3.0°
- an alert may be issued that the right elevator tab 10 a is operating properly.
- analysis of the flight data may show that the left elevator tab 10 a is functional but that the right elevator tab 10 b is not functional.
- the flight data is analyzed to compare the first rotational position of the right elevator 12 b (illustrated in FIG. 8E ) to the second rotational position of the right elevator 12 b (illustrated in FIG. 8F ). If the second rotational position of the right elevator 12 b at the second time is not different than (or is approximately equal to) the first rotational position of the right elevator 12 b at the first time, a second alert may be issued that the right elevator 12 b is not operating properly.
- the second alert may be issued.
- the flight data may be analyzed to compare the second rotational position of the right elevator 12 b (illustrated in FIG. 8F ) to the second rotational position of the left elevator 12 a (illustrated in FIG. 8C ). If the second rotational position of the right elevator 12 b at the second time is not equal to (or approximately equal to) or within a range of (for example only, 0.0° to 0.4°) the second rotational position of the left elevator 12 a at the second time (relative to the left reference axis 30 a and the right reference axis 30 b ), the second alert may be issued.
- the angle 32 a between the left reference axis 30 a and the longitudinal axis 16 a of the left elevator 12 a is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.5° to 3.0°) before the second alert is issued.
- analysis of the flight data may show that the left elevator tab 10 a is not functional and that the right elevator tab 10 b is not functional.
- a first determining condition if analysis of the flight data shows the first rotational position of the left elevator 12 a at the first time (see FIG. 9B ) is not different than (or is equal or approximately equal to) the first rotational position of the right elevator 12 b (see FIG. 9E ) at the first time, then the left elevator tab 10 a is not functional.
- a second determining condition if analysis of the flight data shows the second rotational position of the right elevator 12 a at the first time (see FIG.
- An alternative analysis of the flight data may show that the left elevator tab 10 a is not functional and that the right elevator tab 10 b is not functional.
- the third alert is issued a.
- the range is an angle 32 a between the left reference axis 30 a and the longitudinal axis 16 a of the left elevator 12 a or an angle 32 b between the right reference axis 30 b and the longitudinal axis 16 b of the right elevator 12 b.
- the flight data may be analyzed and compared (and alerts may be issued) by any system or software (or combination of systems or software) known in the art.
- the flight data may be analyzed and compared by an algorithm, such as a filter placed within the recorded flight data.
- a computing device may be employed, and the computing device may include a memory and a processor, with logic stored on the memory and executable by the processor.
- the flight data may be analyzed for proper operation of the left and right elevator tabs 10 a, 10 b at any time, and such an analysis may be formed at any suitable time.
- the flight data may be analyzed for proper operation of the left and right elevator tabs 10 a, 10 b after every flight of a particular aircraft, or periodically over a sample of a fleet of aircraft.
- the data may be analyzed in real time (either on board the aircraft and/or remote from the aircraft to determine proper operation of the left and right elevator tabs 10 a, 10 b. If either or both of the left and right elevator tabs 10 a, 10 b, are determined to be non-functional, a first, second, or third alert can be issued to the pilot, who can then take corrective action.
- FIG. 10 illustrates a computer system 200 for assessing and verifying operation of elevator tabs.
- the computer system 200 accesses available stored flight data 216 , such as a flight data database implemented as a Digital Flight Data Recorder (“DFDR”), a quick access recorder (“QAR”) or other database, to assess operation of elevator tabs, in accordance with the examples described herein.
- the system 200 may be implemented in a desktop computer, laptop computer, tablet computer, mobile device, smart-phone, network-enabled device, cloud based server, an application server, a web server, etc.
- the computer system 200 may represent a single one of these processing machines or a distributed combination of such processing machines.
- a signal-processing device 202 (or “signal processor” or “diagnostic device”) is coupled the stored flight data 216 through a wired or wireless communication network.
- the signal-processing device 202 may have a controller 204 operatively connected to a database 214 via a link 222 connected to an input/output (I/O) circuit 212 . It should be noted that, while not shown, additional databases may be linked to the controller 204 in a known manner.
- the controller 204 includes a program memory 206 , one or more processors 208 (may be called microcontrollers or a microprocessors), a random-access memory (RAM) 210 , and the input/output (I/O) circuit 212 , all of which are interconnected via an address/data bus 220 . It should be appreciated that although only one processor 208 is shown, the controller 204 may include multiple microprocessors 208 . Similarly, the memory of the controller 204 may include multiple RAMs 210 and multiple program memories 206 . Although the I/O circuit 212 is shown as a single block, it should be appreciated that the I/O circuit 212 may include a number of different types of I/O circuits.
- the RAM(s) 210 and the program memories 206 may be implemented as semiconductor memories, magnetically readable memories, and/or optically readable memories, for example.
- a link 224 which may include one or more wired and/or wireless (Bluetooth, WLAN, etc.) connections, may operatively connect the controller 204 to stored flight data 216 through the I/O circuit 212 .
- a (pneumatic, electronic, optical, or some combination thereof) flight controller 225 is coupled to the stored flight data 216 , through the link 224 , to allow for automated control of the operation of the elevator tabs in the event of a fault condition or other operation automatically determined.
- the program memory 206 and/or the RAM 210 may store various applications (i.e., machine readable instructions) for execution by the processor 208 .
- applications i.e., machine readable instructions
- an operating system may generally control the operation of the signal-processing device 202 and provide a user interface for the signal-processing device 202 to implement the stages of the method 100 of FIG. 1 .
- the program memory 206 and/or the RAM 210 may also store a variety of subroutines 232 for accessing specific functions of the signal-processing device 202 .
- the subroutines 232 may include, among other things: a subroutine for determining an occurrence of a verification event that includes movement of a first elevator tab (e.g., a left elevator tab) relative to a first elevator (e.g., the left elevator) and a second elevator tab (e.g., a right elevator tab) relative to a second elevator (e.g., a right elevator), wherein the verification event occurs at a start time, wherein the first elevator is at an initial rotational position and the second elevator is at an initial rotational position at the start time; a subroutine for determining a first rotational position of the first elevator at a first time and a first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time, the first time occurring after the start time; a subroutine for comparing the first rotational position of the first elevator at the first time to the first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time; a subroutine to issue a first alert associated with the first elevator tab if the
- the subroutines 232 may include a subroutine to generate an alert and/or alarm condition, for example, using the display 226 . That alert and/or alarm condition may be displayed as a web page, mobile device alert, tactile alert or alarm (e.g., via a vibrating function of a smartwatch or smartphone), or any other suitable visual and/or tactile (haptic) display.
- the subroutines 232 may communicate this alert and/or alarm condition to a separate computing device connected to the system 200 through a network connection.
- Such separate computing devices may include a server, laptop computer, handheld computer, monitor, mobile device such as a cellular phone or Wi-Fi-enabled tablet, or other device.
- the subroutines 232 may include a subroutine to communicate the alert or other analysis thereof to a flight control system for operation of the elevators, elevator tabs, or other system to compensate for a detected fault condition.
- the subroutines 232 may also include other subroutines, for example, implementing software keyboard functionality, interfacing with other hardware in the signal-processing device 202 , etc.
- the subroutines 232 may also include other subroutines, for example, implementing software keyboard functionality, interfacing with other hardware in the signal-processing device 202 , etc.
- the program memory 206 and/or the RAM 210 may further store data related to the configuration and/or operation of the signal-processing device 202 , and/or related to the operation of the one or more subroutines 232 .
- the data may be data gathered by in the flight data 216 , data determined and/or calculated by the processor 208 , etc.
- the signal-processing device 202 may include other hardware resources.
- the signal-processing device 202 may also include various types of input/output hardware such as a visual display 226 and input device(s) 228 (e.g., keypad, keyboard, etc.).
- the display 226 is touch-sensitive, and may cooperate with a software keyboard routine as one of the software routines 232 to accept user input. It may be advantageous for the signal-processing device 202 to communicate with a broader flight control systems (not shown) through any of a number of known networking devices and techniques.
- the controller 204 may include any number of modules to analyze flight data to verify proper operation of the left and right elevator tabs 10 a, 10 b, and these modules may represent software code or hardware or stored instructions that implement the techniques described herein.
- the controller 204 may include a flight data module 302 that includes the aircraft's (or multiple aircrafts') flight data.
- the controller 204 may also include a verification event detection module 304 that analyzes the flight data to determine the occurrence of a verification event that includes movement of a first elevator tab (e.g., the left elevator tab 10 a ) relative to the first elevator (e.g., the left elevator 12 a ) and the second elevator tab (the right elevator tab 10 b ) relative to the second elevator (the right elevator 12 b ).
- the verification event detection module 304 may also determine an initial rotational position of the first elevator and an initial rotational position of the second elevator at a start time, which is the time or point in time that the verification event occurred.
- the controller 204 may additionally include a first rotational position module 306 to analyze the flight data to determine a first rotational position of the first elevator at a first time and a first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time, the first time occurring after the start time.
- a first rotational position module 306 to analyze the flight data to determine a first rotational position of the first elevator at a first time and a first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time, the first time occurring after the start time.
- the controller 204 may include a first comparison module 308 to compare the first rotational position of the first elevator at the first time to the first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time.
- the controller 204 may include a first detection module 310 that issues a first alert associated with the first elevator tab if the first rotational position of the first elevator at the first time is not different than the first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time by at least a first value or by a first range.
- the first detection module 310 may also issue a first alert based on other parameters described earlier to determine if the first elevator tab is functional.
- the controller 204 may additionally include a second rotational position module 312 to analyze the flight data to determine a second rotational position of the first elevator at a second time and a second rotational position of the second elevator at the second time.
- the second time occurs after the first time and the difference between the start time and the second time being equal to an intentional delay between functionality of the first elevator tab and the second elevator tab.
- the controller 204 may include a second comparison module 314 to compare the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time to the second rotational position of the second elevator at the elevator at the second time.
- the controller 204 may include a second detection module 316 that issues a second alert associated with the second elevator tab if the second rotational position of the second elevator at the second time is not within a second range of the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time.
- the second detection module 316 may also issue a second alert based on other parameters described earlier to determine if the second elevator tab is functional.
- the controller 204 may include a third detection module 318 that issues a third alert associated with both the first elevator tab and the second elevator tab if (a) the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time is within a third range of the initial rotational position of the first elevator at the start time and (b) the second rotational position of the second elevator at the second time is within the third range of the initial rotational position of the second elevator at the start time.
- the third detection module 318 may also issue a third alert based on other parameters described earlier to determine if both the first and second elevator tabs are functional.
- the controller 204 may also include an optional corrective measures flight data control interface module 320 that may initiate corrective measures based on the issuance of a first, second, and/or third alert.
- the corrective measures may provide information that identifies the fault and the aircraft, for example.
- the corrective measures may also be in-flight instructions or relating to the first, second, and/or third alert.
- the controller 204 may analyze the flight data after a flight has occurred or may perform real-time analysis of flight data.
- the modules 312 - 320 are represented as discrete, independent modules in FIG. 11 , a single module (or multiple modules) could perform any of the functionalities associated with any of the modules provided in FIG. 11 .
- the first elevator tab may be the right elevator tab disposed at an end portion of the first elevator, which is the right elevator of the aircraft.
- the second elevator tab may be the left elevator tab disposed at an end portion of the second elevator, which may be the left elevator of the aircraft.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
- Navigation (AREA)
Abstract
A method is provided for verifying proper operation of a left elevator tab disposed at an end portion of a left elevator of an aircraft and a right elevator tab disposed at an end portion of a right elevator of the aircraft. Because proper operation of the elevator tabs cannot be directly verified by existing aircraft instrument, the operation of the elevator tabs can be indirectly verified by analyzing flight data of the aircraft. After identification of a verification event, in which the elevator tabs move relative to the elevators, the positions of the left elevator and right elevator can be measured, and differences in the positions of the left elevator and right elevator can indicate proper operation of the left and right elevator tabs.
Description
- This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/099,547, entitled “Method of Detecting Elevator Tab Failure” and filed Apr. 14, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- This disclosure relates generally to detecting a latent fault in an aircraft control system, and in particular, to detecting a fault in the operation of elevator tabs used with an aircraft's elevator.
- The background description provided herein is for the purpose of generally presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named inventors, to the extent it is described in this background section, as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as prior art against the present disclosure.
- The “Next Generation” 737 (the “737NG”) was designed to fly higher, faster, carry heavier loads, and be more fuel efficient than its predecessor, the 737 Classic, which is manufactured by the Boeing Company. However, airlines flying the 737 Classic at the time of the planned upgrade wanted to limit changes to specific features of the 737 Classic to control costs associated with the upgrade. Specifically, the airlines wanted the 737NG to have the same type rating as the 737 Classic so that 737 Classic pilots would not need costly recertification to fly the 737NG. In addition, the airlines wanted the 737NG to have the same basic design and same airframe as the 737 Classic to utilize the same mechanics, tooling, and spare parts as the 737 Classic.
- In accordance with this direction, the 737NG has the same—or nearly the same—airframe, wing area, and control surfaces as the 737 Classic, and the size of the 737 Classic elevators (a control surface on the horizontal tail wings of an aircraft that control pitch) were not changed on the larger and heavier 737NG. However, the 737NG has more powerful engines and higher gross weights than the 737 Classic, and the 737NG therefore requires more aerodynamic authority then the existing 737 Classic elevators were capable of developing. Consequently, with reference
FIG. 2 , engineers developed dual-functioningelevator tabs elevator horizontal stabilizer respective elevator elevator tabs FIGS. 4B and 4D ) as a portion of theelevators elevator tabs FIGS. 4A and 4C ) to displace relative to eachcorresponding elevator - The “balance” function of the
elevator tabs FIGS. 4B and 4D , the “balance” function of theelevator tabs elevator tabs elevators elevator trailing edge FIG. 4B ), thecorresponding elevator tab elevator tabs elevator FIG. 4D ), thecorresponding elevator tab elevator elevator tabs - A second elevator tab engagement scenario involves a takeoff from a runway with a limited length when an engine fails just after the aircraft has achieved V1 speed (the speed reached during takeoff where it is just possible to stop the aircraft with the remaining distance of runway). If V1 speed is exceeded, the aircraft is required to complete the takeoff or it will overrun the remaining runway if the takeoff is aborted. In such a takeoff, the
elevator tabs elevator tabs elevators elevator elevator corresponding elevator tab elevator tabs FIG. 4A ), and when theelevator corresponding elevator tab FIG. 4C ). This in-concert displacement movement generates a greater elevator surface hinge moment than the elevator of a 737 Classic, thereby allowing theelevators elevator tabs - While the elevator tabs perform a critical function in the two scenarios described above, the operation of the elevator tabs is entirely controlled by computer, and the pilots have no ability to manually or specifically control their operation. In addition, because the elevator tabs are not a part native to the 737 Classic, no instrumentation is connected to or in communication with the elevator tabs to directly detect failures, and the pilot (and flight computer) has no indication that the elevator tabs are functioning (or can function) properly. Accordingly, there is a need for a method or system to indirectly detect proper operation of the elevator tabs to ensure that the “balance” or “anti-balance” functions are available in an emergency.
- Techniques are provided for assessing and verifying proper operation of a left elevator tab disposed at an end portion of a left elevator of an aircraft and a right elevator tab disposed at an end portion of a right elevator of the aircraft. The techniques include determining the occurrence of a verification event that includes movement of the left elevator tab relative to the left elevator and the right elevator tab relative to the right elevator, wherein the verification event occurs at a start time, wherein the left elevator is at an initial rotational position and the right elevator is at an initial rotational position at the start time. The techniques also include determining a first rotational position of the left elevator at a first time and a first rotational position of the right elevator at the first time, and the first time occurs after the start time. The first rotational position of the left elevator at the first time is compared to the first rotational position of the right elevator at the first time. If the first rotational position of the left elevator at the first time is not different than the first rotational position of the right elevator at the first time by at least a first value, a first alert is issued associated with the left elevator tab.
- A second rotational position of the left elevator at a second time and a second rotational position of the right elevator at the second time are determined, and the second time occurs after the first time. The difference between the start time and the second time is equal to an intentional delay between functionality of the left elevator tab and the right elevator tab. The second rotational position of the left elevator at the second time is compared to the second rotational position of the right elevator at the elevator at the first time. If the second rotational position of the right elevator at the second time is not within a second range of the second rotational position of the left elevator at the second time, a second alert is issued associated with the right elevator tab. If (a) the second rotational position of the left elevator at the second time is within a third range of the initial rotational position of the left elevator at the start time and (b) the second rotational position of the right elevator at the second time is within the third range of the initial rotational position of the right elevator at the start time, a third alert is issued associated with both the left elevator tab and the right elevator tab.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of the method for verifying proper operation of a left elevator tab disposed at an end portion of a left elevator of an aircraft and a right elevator tab disposed at an end portion of a right elevator of the aircraft; -
FIG. 2 is a partial plan view of a rear portion of an aircraft showing the horizontal stabilizers; -
FIG. 3A is sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B ofFIG. 2 ; -
FIG. 3B is sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B ofFIG. 2 ; -
FIG. 3C is sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B ofFIG. 2 ; -
FIG. 4A is sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B ofFIG. 2 ; -
FIG. 4B is sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B ofFIG. 2 ; -
FIG. 4C is sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B ofFIG. 2 ; -
FIG. 4D is sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B ofFIG. 2 ; -
FIG. 5A is partial sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B ofFIG. 2 ; -
FIG. 5B is partial sectional view taken along line A-A and B-B ofFIG. 2 ; -
FIGS. 6A to 6C are partial sectional views taken along line A-A ofFIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively; -
FIGS. 6D to 6F are partial sectional views taken along line B-B ofFIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively; -
FIGS. 7A to 7C are partial sectional views taken along line A-A ofFIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively; -
FIGS. 7D to 7F are partial sectional views taken along line B-B ofFIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively; -
FIGS. 8A to 8C are partial sectional views taken along line A-A ofFIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively; -
FIGS. 8D to 8F are partial sectional views taken along line B-B ofFIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively; -
FIGS. 9A to 9C are partial sectional views taken along line A-A ofFIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively; -
FIGS. 9D to 9F are partial sectional views taken along line B-B ofFIG. 2 at a start time, a first time, and a second time, respectively; -
FIG. 10 is a schematic view of a system for assessing and verifying proper elevator tab operation in aircraft; and -
FIG. 11 is a schematic view of modules of a process of the system of the embodiment ofFIG. 10 . - As illustrated schematically in
FIG. 1 , a method is provided for verifying proper operation of a first elevator tab (such as a left elevator tab) disposed at an end portion of a first elevator (such as a left elevator) of an aircraft and a second elevator tab (such as a right elevator tab) disposed at an end portion of a second elevator (such as a right elevator) of the aircraft. The provided method utilizes an intentional delay (e.g., a ten-second time delay) between the function of the left elevator tab and the subsequent function of the right elevator tab when the flaps are first extended. The techniques herein may be implemented by a flight diagnostic system such as that provided inFIG. 10 (discussed below). The techniques analyze flight data of the aircraft after one or more flights have been completed. The analysis involves automatic identification of a verification event, which may be the operation of the horizontal stabilizers of an aircraft and includes movement of the left elevator tab relative to the left elevator and the right elevator tab relative to the right elevator, wherein the verification event occurs at a start time. In an example, at the start of the verification event, the left elevator tab moves relative to the left elevator. However, due to the intentional delay, the right elevator tab does not move relative to the right elevator. Because the deployment of the left elevator tab relative to the left elevator creates aerodynamic forces, the left elevator immediately displaces relative to its position at or just prior to the initiation of the verification event. By contrast, the right elevator does not displace immediately after the initiation of the verification. Accordingly, by analyzing flight data, the diagnostic system can infer or detect a displacement of the left elevator tab following a verification event, by confirming that the left elevator immediately displaced (relative to both or either of its initial position or to the right elevator). - While examples herein are described in reference to movement of the left elevator tab preceding that of the right elevator tab, it is noted that the converse ordering may be implemented with the same results. The examples are described with the left elevator tab leading, because that corresponds to the present operation specifications of certain example aircraft.
- At the expiration of the intentional delay, the right elevator tab displaces relative to the right elevator, and this displacement creates aerodynamic forces on the right elevator that immediately displaces the right elevator relative to its position at or just prior to the expiration of the intentional delay. By analyzing flight data, a displacement of the right elevator tab can be inferred or detected following the expiration of the intentional delay by confirming that the right elevator immediately displaced (relative to both or either of its initial position or to the left elevator). The techniques therefore allow the proper operation of the left elevator tab and the right elevator tab to be indirectly verified by data analysis of existing flight parameters, thereby avoiding the installation of costly new sensors, parts, and instrumentation.
- In an example implementation, available flight data (such as, for example, data from a Digital Flight Data Recorder (“DFDR”) or a quick access recorder (“QAR”)) is automatically analyzed by a diagnostic system (e.g.,
FIG. 10 ) that employs an elevator tab comparison algorithm to determine if a verification event has occurred during a flight of the aircraft. In response to triggering by a verification event, which may be an operation that involves movement of theleft elevator tab 10 a (seeFIG. 2 ) relative to theleft elevator 12 a of thehorizontal stabilizer 14 and theright elevator tab 10 b relative to theright elevator 12 b of the horizontal stabilizers, the system performs the assessment and verification. The diagnostic system, which may operate on historical available flight data or in real time on collected flight data, can identify a verification event typically on each flight. Because the operation of theelevator tabs elevators right elevator tabs right elevators right elevators - The verification event occurs at a start time, and at this start time and/or immediately prior to this start time (e.g., 0.5 to 0.25 seconds before), the
left elevator 12 a is at an initial rotational position and theright elevator 12 b is at an initial rotational position. This and all positional and time information relating the left andright elevator tabs right elevators flight data 216 ofFIG. 10 ). However, the flight data may be real-time data (or may in part be real-time data) that may be available to thecontroller 204 and/or stored thememory 206 ofFIG. 10 . The occurrence of the verification event at the start time may be determined, for example, by thecomputer system 200 ofFIG. 10 , which will be described in more detail below. Thecomputer system 200 may be particularly configured to automatically access stored flight data (e.g., over a communication network), where such access may be performed on a periodic basis determined by a schedule or based on a number of flights since the last analysis or some other event. In some examples, thecomputer system 200 accesses flight data based on a triggering event, whether in real-time during flight or after a flight. Thecomputer system 200 may automatically search for the verification event data stored in the flight data and from there begin analysis and verification. - An example of an initial rotational position of the
left elevator 12 a is provided inFIG. 3A , which illustrates that alongitudinal axis 16 a of theleft elevator 12 a is aligned (e.g., collinearly aligned) with alongitudinal axis 18 a of theleft elevator tab 10 a. Thelongitudinal axis 16 a of theleft elevator 12 a and thelongitudinal axis 18 a of theleft elevator tab 10 a may extend across the length of theleft elevator tab 10 a and theleft elevator 12 a, respectively along the sectional line A-A ofFIG. 2 . In some embodiments, thelongitudinal axis 16 a of theleft elevator 12 a and thelongitudinal axis 18 a of theleft elevator tab 10 a may bisect or substantially bisect theleft elevator tab 10 a and theleft elevator 12 a, respectively along the sectional line A-A ofFIG. 2 . - At (and/or just prior to) the start time, the
left elevator tab 10 a and theleft elevator 12 a act as a single control surface that rotates as a unit relative to a portion of the lefthorizontal stabilizer 14 a about a left elevatorrotational point 20 a, as illustrated inFIG. 3A . Thus, at the initial rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a, thelongitudinal axis 16 a of theleft elevator 12 a and thelongitudinal axis 18 a of theleft elevator tab 10 a may be aligned with alongitudinal axis 22 a of the lefthorizontal stabilizer 14 a, as illustrated inFIG. 3A . In addition, thelongitudinal axis 16 a of theleft elevator 12 a and thelongitudinal axis 18 a of theleft elevator tab 10 a may form an acute angle (either clockwise or counterclockwise) with thelongitudinal axis 22 a of the lefthorizontal stabilizer 14 a, as illustrated inFIGS. 3B and 3C . - Also at the start time and/or immediately prior to this start time (e.g., 0.5 to 0.25 seconds before), the
right elevator 12 b is at an initial rotational position and theright elevator 12 b is at an initial rotational position. An example of an initial rotational position of theright elevator 12 b is provided inFIG. 3A , which illustrates that alongitudinal axis 16 b of theright elevator 12 b is aligned (e.g., collinearly aligned) with alongitudinal axis 18 b of theright elevator tab 10 b. Thelongitudinal axis 16 b of theright elevator 12 b and thelongitudinal axis 18 b of theright elevator tab 10 b may extend across the length of theright elevator tab 10 b and theright elevator 12 b, respectively along the sectional line B-B ofFIG. 2 . In some embodiments, thelongitudinal axis 16 b of theright elevator 12 b and thelongitudinal axis 18 b of theright elevator tab 10 b may bisect or substantially bisect theright elevator tab 10 b and theright elevator 12 b, respectively along the sectional line B-B ofFIG. 2 . - At (and/or just prior to) the start time, the
right elevator tab 10 b and theright elevator 12 b act as a single control surface that rotates as a unit relative to a portion of the righthorizontal stabilizer 14 b about a right elevatorrotational point 20 b, as illustrated inFIG. 3A . Thus, at the initial rotational position of theright elevator 12 b, thelongitudinal axis 16 b of theright elevator 12 b and thelongitudinal axis 18 b of theright elevator tab 10 b may be aligned with alongitudinal axis 22 a of the righthorizontal stabilizer 14 b, as illustrated inFIG. 3A . In addition, thelongitudinal axis 16 b of theright elevator 12 b and thelongitudinal axis 18 b of theright elevator tab 10 b may form an acute angle (either clockwise or counterclockwise) with thelongitudinal axis 22 b of the righthorizontal stabilizer 14 b, as illustrated inFIGS. 3B and 3C . - At a first time, which occurs immediately or nearly immediately after the verification event, the
left elevator tab 10 a rotates relative to theleft elevator 12 a, while due to the intentional delay, theright elevator tab 10 b does not rotate or displace relative to theright elevator 12 b. The first time may occur after the start time but before the intentional delay expires, and the first time may be any length of time that allows a displacement (i.e., a statistically significant rotational displacement) of theleft elevator 12 a relative to theright elevator 12 b to be detected by analyzing flight data. For example, the first time may occur between 0.0 to 1.0 second after the start time. - The
left elevator tab 10 a may rotatably displace in one of two directions relative to the left elevator 12 (or relative to a point on the left elevator). As illustrated inFIG. 5A (in which the lefthorizontal stabilizer 14 a is eliminated for clarity), theleft elevator tab 10 a may rotate counter-clockwise about a lefttab rotation point 24 a that is disposed at or adjacent to aleading edge 26 a of theleft elevator tab 10 a (and/or at or adjacent to a trailingedge 28 a of theleft elevator 12 a). Such a counter-clockwise rotation of theleft elevator tab 10 a is involved in the “balance” function of theleft elevator tab 10 a when theleft elevator 12 a rotates clockwise relative to theleft elevator 12 a (or clockwise about the left elevatorrotational point 20 a), as illustrated inFIG. 4D . In addition, a counter-clockwise rotation of theleft elevator tab 10 a is involved in the “anti-balance” function of theleft elevator tab 10 a when theleft elevator 12 a rotates counter-clockwise relative to theleft elevator 12 a (or counter-clockwise about the left elevatorrotational point 20 a), as illustrated inFIG. 4A . - Referring to
FIG. 5B (in which the lefthorizontal stabilizer 14 a is eliminated for clarity), theleft elevator tab 10 a may also rotate clockwise about the lefttab rotation point 24 a. Such a clockwise rotation of theleft elevator tab 10 a is involved in the “balance” function of theleft elevator tab 10 a when theleft elevator tab 10 a rotates counter-clockwise relative to theleft elevator 12 a (or counter-clockwise about the left elevatorrotational point 20 a), as illustrated inFIG. 4B . In addition, a clockwise rotation of theleft elevator tab 10 a is involved in the “anti-balance” function of theleft elevator tab 10 a when theleft elevator tab 10 a rotates clockwise relative to theleft elevator 12 a (or clockwise about the left elevatorrotational point 20 a), as illustrated inFIG. 4B . - At this first time, the rotated or deployed
left elevator tab 10 a (in either “balance” or ‘anti-balance” mode) will have different aerodynamic characteristics that theright elevator 12 b and theright elevator tab 10 b. Accordingly, theleft elevator 12 a will be in a different relative position than theright elevator 12 b at the first time when the flight data is analyzed. Specifically, as illustrated inFIG. 6A (with the “anti-balance” configuration illustrated as an example only), thelongitudinal axis 16 a of theleft elevator 12 a (and thelongitudinal axis 18 a of theleft elevator tab 10 a) extends through aleft reference axis 30 a at (or just prior to) the start time. At the first time, as illustrated inFIG. 6B , due to aerodynamic forces on theleft elevator tab 10 a, thelongitudinal axis 16 a of theleft elevator 12 a makes anangle 32 a with theleft reference axis 30 a at (or just prior to) the start time, and this position of theleft elevator 12 a may be the first rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a at the first time. Theangle 32 a may be an acute angle that may be clockwise or counter-clockwise, and the value of the angle may depend on many variables, such as airspeed and/or initial angle of theleft elevator 12 a relative to the lefthorizontal stabilizer 14 a, airspeed, for example. - At the start time (illustrated in
FIG. 6D ) and at the first time (illustrated inFIG. 6E ), and due to the intentional delay, the right elevator tab 10 has not rotated relative to theright elevator 12 a. That is, at both the start time and at the first time, thelongitudinal axis 16 b of theright elevator 12 b (and thelongitudinal axis 18 b of theright elevator tab 10 b) extends through aright reference axis 30 b that is aligned with theleft reference axis 30 a of theleft elevator 12 a, and this position of theright elevator 12 b may be the first rotational position of theright elevator 12 b at the first time. - The
right reference axis 30 b of theright elevator 12 b is aligned with (or corresponds to) theleft reference axis 30 a of theleft elevator 12 a in space. That is, a plane may extend through or along each of theleft reference axis 30 a and theright reference axis 30 b, and the plane may be parallel to an axis or rotation of theleft elevator 12 a (that extends through the left elevatorrotational point 20 a ofFIG. 3A ) and an axis or rotation of theright elevator 12 b (that extends through the right elevatorrotational point 20 b ofFIG. 3A ). - Accordingly, at the first time, the flight data may be analyzed to compare the first rotational position of the
left elevator 12 a (illustrated inFIG. 6B ) to the first rotational position of theright elevator 12 b (illustrated inFIG. 6E ). This analysis of the flight data (as well as all analysis of flight data described in the following sections) may be performed by thecomputer system 200 ofFIG. 10 , which will be described in more detail below. If the first rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a at the first time is different than the first rotational position of the right elevator at the first time by at least a first value or within a first range, an alert may be issued that theleft elevator tab 10 a is operating properly. For example, if theangle 32 a between theleft reference axis 30 a and thelongitudinal axis 16 a of theleft elevator 12 a is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.5° to) 3.0° and theangle 32 b between theright reference axis 30 b and thelongitudinal axis 16 b of theright elevator 12 b is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.0° to) 0.4°, an alert may be issued that theleft elevator tab 10 a is operating properly. An example of proper operation of theleft elevator tab 10 a between the start time and the first time can be found inFIGS. 6A and 6B . - In addition, or alternatively, the flight data may be analyzed to compare the first rotational position of the
left elevator 12 a (illustrated inFIG. 6B ) to the position of the first rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a at or just prior to the start time (illustrated inFIG. 6A ). If the first rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a at the first time is different than the rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a at the start time by at least a first value or within a first range, an alert may be issued that theleft elevator tab 10 a is operating properly. For example, if theangle 32 a between theleft reference axis 30 a and thelongitudinal axis 16 a of theleft elevator 12 a is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.5° to) 3.0° at the first time, and theangle 32 a between theleft reference axis 30 a and thelongitudinal axis 16 a of theleft elevator 12 a is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.0° to 0.4°) at the start time, an alert may be issued that theleft elevator tab 10 a is operating properly. - As illustrated in
FIGS. 7A to 7F , analysis of the flight data may show that theleft elevator tab 10 a is not functional. For example, if analysis of the flight data shows the first rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a at the first time is not different than (or is equal or approximately equal to) the first rotational position of theright elevator 12 b at the first time, the first alert may be issued. As another example, if analysis of the flight data shows that theangle 32 a between theleft reference axis 30 a and thelongitudinal axis 16 a of theleft elevator 12 a is not at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.5° to 3.0°) at the first time (as illustrated inFIG. 7B ) and/or if the difference in theangle 32 a at the first time is not greater than a value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.5° to 3.0°) then theangel 32 a at the start time (illustrated in 7A), then the first alert may be issued. - At the expiration of the intentional delay, which occurs at a second time, the
right elevator tab 10 a rotationally displaces relative to theright elevator 12 a. The intentional delay may be any suitable length of time between operation of theleft elevator tab 10 a and theright elevator tab 10 b. For example, the intentional delay may be 5 to 20 seconds, for example. More specifically, the intentional delay may be 5 to 20 seconds, or may be 10 seconds. If the intentional delay is triggered by the verification event that occurs at the start time, the second time is the value of the intentional delay. - Between the start time (and the first time) and just prior to the second time, the
right elevator tab 10 b and theright elevator 12 b act as a single control surface that rotates as a unit relative to a portion of the righthorizontal stabilizer 14 b about a right elevatorrotational point 20 b, as illustrated inFIG. 3A . However, at the second time, theright elevator tab 10 b may rotatably displace in one of two directions relative to theright elevator 12 b (or relative to a point on theright elevator 12 b). As illustrated inFIG. 5A (in which the righthorizontal stabilizer 14 b is eliminated for clarity), theright elevator tab 10 a may rotate counter-clockwise about a righttab rotation point 24 b that is disposed at or adjacent to aleading edge 26 b of theright elevator tab 10 b (and/or at or adjacent to a trailingedge 28 b of theright elevator 12 b). Such a counter-clockwise rotation of theright elevator tab 10 b is involved in the “balance” function of theright elevator tab 10 b when theright elevator tab 10 b rotates clockwise relative to theright elevator 12 a (or clockwise about the right elevatorrotational point 20 b), as illustrated inFIG. 4D . In addition, a counter-clockwise rotation of theright elevator tab 10 b is involved in the “anti-balance” function of theright elevator tab 10 b when theright elevator 12 b rotates counter-clockwise relative to theright elevator 12 b (or counter-clockwise about the right elevatorrotational point 20 b), as illustrated inFIG. 4A . - At or immediately after the expiration of the intentional delay (i.e., at the second time), the
right elevator tab 10 b makes (or finished making) a displacement that corresponds to the displacement of theleft elevator tab 10 a. That is, theright elevator tab 10 b displaces (e.g., rotationally displaces) in the same direction and to the same degree as theleft elevator tab 10 a (illustrated inFIGS. 4A to 4D ), with the only difference between the two being the timing of the start of the rotational displacement. For example, if theleft elevator 12 a is rotated counter-clockwise and theleft elevator tab 10 a is in the “anti-balance” position ofFIG. 4A , than theright elevator 12 b is rotated counter-clockwise (to the same degree as theleft elevator 12 a) and theright elevator tab 10 b is in the “anti-balance” position ofFIG. 4A (to the same degree as theleft elevator tab 10 a). Put another way, after the expiration of the intentional delay following the verification event, theleft elevator 12 a and theleft elevator tab 10 a should have a cross-section that is identical or nearly identical to theright elevator 12 b and theright elevator tab 10 b. - At this second time, the rotated or deployed
right elevator tab 10 b (in either “balance” or ‘anti-balance” mode) will have the same aerodynamic characteristics of the deployed leftelevator tab 12 a (also in either “balance” or ‘anti-balance” mode). Accordingly, theright elevator 12 b will move from the first rotational position ofFIG. 6E into the same (or nearly the same) relative position as theleft elevator 12 a at or slightly after the second time when the flight data is analyzed. Specifically, as illustrated inFIG. 6F (with the “balance” configuration illustrated as an example only), thelongitudinal axis 16 b of theright elevator 12 b makes anangle 32 b with theright reference axis 30 b due to aerodynamic forces acting on theright elevator tab 10 b, and this position of theright elevator 12 b may be the second rotational position of theright elevator 12 b at the second time. Because the position of theleft elevator tab 10 a and theleft elevator 12 a do not change from the first time to the second time, the second rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a at the second time is equal to or approximately equal to the first rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a at the first time. That is, theangle 32 a does not change between the first time and the second time. - Consequently, at the second time, the flight data may be analyzed to compare the first rotational position of the
right elevator 12 b (illustrated inFIG. 6E ) to the second rotational position of theright elevator 12 b (illustrated inFIG. 6F ). If the second rotational position of theright elevator 12 b at the second time is different than the first rotational position of theright elevator 12 b at the first time by at least a first value or within a first range, an alert may be issued that theright elevator 12 b is operating properly. For example, if theangle 32 b between theright reference axis 30 b and thelongitudinal axis 16 b of theright elevator 12 b is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.0° to 0.4°) at the first time, and if theangle 32 b between theright reference axis 30 b and thelongitudinal axis 16 b of theright elevator 12 b is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.5° to 3.0°) at the second time, an alert may be issued that theright elevator tab 10 a is operating properly. An example of proper operation of theright elevator tab 10 a between the first time and the second time can be found inFIGS. 6E and 6F . - In addition (or alternatively), the flight data may be analyzed to compare the second rotational position of the
right elevator 12 b (illustrated inFIG. 6F ) to the second rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a (illustrated inFIG. 6C ). If the second rotational position of theright elevator 12 b at the second time is equal to (or approximately equal to) or is the same as the second rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a at the second time (relative to theleft reference axis 30 a and theright reference axis 30 b), theright elevator tab 10 b is functioning properly. An alert may then be issued that theright elevator tab 10 b is operating properly. For example, if theangle 32 b between theright reference axis 30 b and thelongitudinal axis 16 b of theright elevator 12 b is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.5° to 3.0°) at the second time, and if theangle 32 a between theleft reference axis 30 a and thelongitudinal axis 16 a of theleft elevator 12 a is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.5° to 3.0°) at the second time, an alert may be issued that theright elevator tab 10 a is operating properly. - As illustrated in
FIGS. 8A to 8F , analysis of the flight data may show that theleft elevator tab 10 a is functional but that theright elevator tab 10 b is not functional. For example, at the second time, the flight data is analyzed to compare the first rotational position of theright elevator 12 b (illustrated inFIG. 8E ) to the second rotational position of theright elevator 12 b (illustrated inFIG. 8F ). If the second rotational position of theright elevator 12 b at the second time is not different than (or is approximately equal to) the first rotational position of theright elevator 12 b at the first time, a second alert may be issued that theright elevator 12 b is not operating properly. For example, if theangle 32 b between theright reference axis 30 b and thelongitudinal axis 16 b of theright elevator 12 b is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.0° to 0.4°) at the first time, and if theangle 32 b between theright reference axis 30 b and thelongitudinal axis 16 b of theright elevator 12 b is not at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.5° to 3.0°) at the second time, the second alert may be issued. - In addition (or alternatively), the flight data may be analyzed to compare the second rotational position of the
right elevator 12 b (illustrated inFIG. 8F ) to the second rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a (illustrated inFIG. 8C ). If the second rotational position of theright elevator 12 b at the second time is not equal to (or approximately equal to) or within a range of (for example only, 0.0° to 0.4°) the second rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a at the second time (relative to theleft reference axis 30 a and theright reference axis 30 b), the second alert may be issued. It may also be desired that theangle 32 a between theleft reference axis 30 a and thelongitudinal axis 16 a of theleft elevator 12 a is at a desired value or within a desired range (for example only, 0.5° to 3.0°) before the second alert is issued. - As illustrated in
FIGS. 9A to 9F , analysis of the flight data may show that theleft elevator tab 10 a is not functional and that theright elevator tab 10 b is not functional. For example, as a first determining condition, if analysis of the flight data shows the first rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a at the first time (seeFIG. 9B ) is not different than (or is equal or approximately equal to) the first rotational position of theright elevator 12 b (seeFIG. 9E ) at the first time, then theleft elevator tab 10 a is not functional. In addition, as a second determining condition, if analysis of the flight data shows the second rotational position of theright elevator 12 a at the first time (seeFIG. 9F ) is not different than (or is equal or approximately equal to) the first rotational position of theright elevator 12 b (seeFIG. 9E ) at the first time, then theright elevator tab 10 b is not functional. If both the first and second determining condition are satisfied, then the a third alert is issued, with the third alert corresponding to a failure of both the left andright elevator tabs - An alternative analysis of the flight data may show that the
left elevator tab 10 a is not functional and that theright elevator tab 10 b is not functional. For example, as a first determining condition, if the second rotational position of theleft elevator 12 a at the second time (seeFIG. 9C ) is within a range (0.0 to 0.4°) of the initial rotational position of the left elevator at the start time (seeFIG. 9C ) and if the second rotational position of theright elevator 12 b at the second time (seeFIG. 9F ) is within the range (0.0 to 0.4°) of the initial rotational position of theright elevator 12 b at the start time (seeFIG. 9D ), the third alert is issued a. The range is anangle 32 a between theleft reference axis 30 a and thelongitudinal axis 16 a of theleft elevator 12 a or anangle 32 b between theright reference axis 30 b and thelongitudinal axis 16 b of theright elevator 12 b. - The flight data may be analyzed and compared (and alerts may be issued) by any system or software (or combination of systems or software) known in the art. For example, the flight data may be analyzed and compared by an algorithm, such as a filter placed within the recorded flight data. In some systems, a computing device may be employed, and the computing device may include a memory and a processor, with logic stored on the memory and executable by the processor.
- The flight data may be analyzed for proper operation of the left and
right elevator tabs right elevator tabs - In contemplated embodiments, the data may be analyzed in real time (either on board the aircraft and/or remote from the aircraft to determine proper operation of the left and
right elevator tabs right elevator tabs -
FIG. 10 illustrates acomputer system 200 for assessing and verifying operation of elevator tabs. Thecomputer system 200 accesses available storedflight data 216, such as a flight data database implemented as a Digital Flight Data Recorder (“DFDR”), a quick access recorder (“QAR”) or other database, to assess operation of elevator tabs, in accordance with the examples described herein. Thesystem 200 may be implemented in a desktop computer, laptop computer, tablet computer, mobile device, smart-phone, network-enabled device, cloud based server, an application server, a web server, etc. Thecomputer system 200 may represent a single one of these processing machines or a distributed combination of such processing machines. - A signal-processing device 202 (or “signal processor” or “diagnostic device”) is coupled the stored
flight data 216 through a wired or wireless communication network. The signal-processingdevice 202 may have acontroller 204 operatively connected to adatabase 214 via alink 222 connected to an input/output (I/O)circuit 212. It should be noted that, while not shown, additional databases may be linked to thecontroller 204 in a known manner. Thecontroller 204 includes aprogram memory 206, one or more processors 208 (may be called microcontrollers or a microprocessors), a random-access memory (RAM) 210, and the input/output (I/O)circuit 212, all of which are interconnected via an address/data bus 220. It should be appreciated that although only oneprocessor 208 is shown, thecontroller 204 may includemultiple microprocessors 208. Similarly, the memory of thecontroller 204 may includemultiple RAMs 210 andmultiple program memories 206. Although the I/O circuit 212 is shown as a single block, it should be appreciated that the I/O circuit 212 may include a number of different types of I/O circuits. The RAM(s) 210 and theprogram memories 206 may be implemented as semiconductor memories, magnetically readable memories, and/or optically readable memories, for example. Alink 224, which may include one or more wired and/or wireless (Bluetooth, WLAN, etc.) connections, may operatively connect thecontroller 204 to storedflight data 216 through the I/O circuit 212. In some examples, a (pneumatic, electronic, optical, or some combination thereof)flight controller 225 is coupled to the storedflight data 216, through thelink 224, to allow for automated control of the operation of the elevator tabs in the event of a fault condition or other operation automatically determined. - The
program memory 206 and/or theRAM 210 may store various applications (i.e., machine readable instructions) for execution by theprocessor 208. For example, an operating system may generally control the operation of the signal-processingdevice 202 and provide a user interface for the signal-processingdevice 202 to implement the stages of themethod 100 ofFIG. 1 . Theprogram memory 206 and/or theRAM 210 may also store a variety ofsubroutines 232 for accessing specific functions of the signal-processingdevice 202. By way of example, and without limitation, the subroutines 232 may include, among other things: a subroutine for determining an occurrence of a verification event that includes movement of a first elevator tab (e.g., a left elevator tab) relative to a first elevator (e.g., the left elevator) and a second elevator tab (e.g., a right elevator tab) relative to a second elevator (e.g., a right elevator), wherein the verification event occurs at a start time, wherein the first elevator is at an initial rotational position and the second elevator is at an initial rotational position at the start time; a subroutine for determining a first rotational position of the first elevator at a first time and a first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time, the first time occurring after the start time; a subroutine for comparing the first rotational position of the first elevator at the first time to the first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time; a subroutine to issue a first alert associated with the first elevator tab if the first rotational position of the first elevator at the first time is not different than the first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time by at least a first value or by a first range; a subroutine to compare the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time to the second rotational position of the second elevator at the elevator at the second time; a subroutine to issue a second alert associated with the second elevator tab if the second rotational position of the second elevator at the second time is not within a second range of the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time; and a subroutine to determine that if (a) the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time is within a third range of the initial rotational position of the first elevator at the start time and (b) the second rotational position of the second elevator at the second time is within the third range of the initial rotational position of the second elevator at the start time, a third alert is issued associated with both the first elevator tab and the second elevator tab. - As previously explained, the
subroutines 232 may include a subroutine to generate an alert and/or alarm condition, for example, using thedisplay 226. That alert and/or alarm condition may be displayed as a web page, mobile device alert, tactile alert or alarm (e.g., via a vibrating function of a smartwatch or smartphone), or any other suitable visual and/or tactile (haptic) display. Thesubroutines 232 may communicate this alert and/or alarm condition to a separate computing device connected to thesystem 200 through a network connection. Such separate computing devices may include a server, laptop computer, handheld computer, monitor, mobile device such as a cellular phone or Wi-Fi-enabled tablet, or other device. Thesubroutines 232 may include a subroutine to communicate the alert or other analysis thereof to a flight control system for operation of the elevators, elevator tabs, or other system to compensate for a detected fault condition. Thesubroutines 232 may also include other subroutines, for example, implementing software keyboard functionality, interfacing with other hardware in the signal-processingdevice 202, etc. Thesubroutines 232 may also include other subroutines, for example, implementing software keyboard functionality, interfacing with other hardware in the signal-processingdevice 202, etc. Theprogram memory 206 and/or theRAM 210 may further store data related to the configuration and/or operation of the signal-processingdevice 202, and/or related to the operation of the one ormore subroutines 232. For example, the data may be data gathered by in theflight data 216, data determined and/or calculated by theprocessor 208, etc. In addition to thecontroller 204, the signal-processingdevice 202 may include other hardware resources. The signal-processingdevice 202 may also include various types of input/output hardware such as avisual display 226 and input device(s) 228 (e.g., keypad, keyboard, etc.). In an embodiment, thedisplay 226 is touch-sensitive, and may cooperate with a software keyboard routine as one of thesoftware routines 232 to accept user input. It may be advantageous for the signal-processingdevice 202 to communicate with a broader flight control systems (not shown) through any of a number of known networking devices and techniques. - The
controller 204 may include any number of modules to analyze flight data to verify proper operation of the left andright elevator tabs FIG. 11 , thecontroller 204 may include aflight data module 302 that includes the aircraft's (or multiple aircrafts') flight data. Thecontroller 204 may also include a verificationevent detection module 304 that analyzes the flight data to determine the occurrence of a verification event that includes movement of a first elevator tab (e.g., theleft elevator tab 10 a) relative to the first elevator (e.g., theleft elevator 12 a) and the second elevator tab (theright elevator tab 10 b) relative to the second elevator (theright elevator 12 b). The verificationevent detection module 304 may also determine an initial rotational position of the first elevator and an initial rotational position of the second elevator at a start time, which is the time or point in time that the verification event occurred. - The
controller 204 may additionally include a firstrotational position module 306 to analyze the flight data to determine a first rotational position of the first elevator at a first time and a first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time, the first time occurring after the start time. - The
controller 204 may include afirst comparison module 308 to compare the first rotational position of the first elevator at the first time to the first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time. - The
controller 204 may include afirst detection module 310 that issues a first alert associated with the first elevator tab if the first rotational position of the first elevator at the first time is not different than the first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time by at least a first value or by a first range. Thefirst detection module 310 may also issue a first alert based on other parameters described earlier to determine if the first elevator tab is functional. - The
controller 204 may additionally include a secondrotational position module 312 to analyze the flight data to determine a second rotational position of the first elevator at a second time and a second rotational position of the second elevator at the second time. The second time occurs after the first time and the difference between the start time and the second time being equal to an intentional delay between functionality of the first elevator tab and the second elevator tab. - The
controller 204 may include asecond comparison module 314 to compare the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time to the second rotational position of the second elevator at the elevator at the second time. - The
controller 204 may include asecond detection module 316 that issues a second alert associated with the second elevator tab if the second rotational position of the second elevator at the second time is not within a second range of the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time. Thesecond detection module 316 may also issue a second alert based on other parameters described earlier to determine if the second elevator tab is functional. - The
controller 204 may include athird detection module 318 that issues a third alert associated with both the first elevator tab and the second elevator tab if (a) the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time is within a third range of the initial rotational position of the first elevator at the start time and (b) the second rotational position of the second elevator at the second time is within the third range of the initial rotational position of the second elevator at the start time. Thethird detection module 318 may also issue a third alert based on other parameters described earlier to determine if both the first and second elevator tabs are functional. - The
controller 204 may also include an optional corrective measures flight datacontrol interface module 320 that may initiate corrective measures based on the issuance of a first, second, and/or third alert. The corrective measures may provide information that identifies the fault and the aircraft, for example. The corrective measures may also be in-flight instructions or relating to the first, second, and/or third alert. - The
controller 204 may analyze the flight data after a flight has occurred or may perform real-time analysis of flight data. Although the modules 312-320 are represented as discrete, independent modules inFIG. 11 , a single module (or multiple modules) could perform any of the functionalities associated with any of the modules provided inFIG. 11 . - While various embodiments have been described above, this disclosure is not intended to be limited thereto. Variations can be made to the disclosed embodiments that are still within the scope of the appended claims. For example, the first elevator tab may be the right elevator tab disposed at an end portion of the first elevator, which is the right elevator of the aircraft. Correspondingly, the second elevator tab may be the left elevator tab disposed at an end portion of the second elevator, which may be the left elevator of the aircraft.
Claims (18)
1. A method of verification of proper operation of a first elevator tab disposed at an end portion of a first elevator of an aircraft and a second elevator tab disposed at an end portion of a second elevator of the aircraft, the method comprising:
determine the occurrence of a verification event that includes movement of the first elevator tab relative to the first elevator and the second elevator tab relative to the second elevator, wherein the verification event occurs at a start time, wherein the first elevator is at an initial rotational position and the second elevator is at an initial rotational position at the start time;
determine a first rotational position of the first elevator at a first time and a first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time, the first time occurring after the start time;
compare the first rotational position of the first elevator at the first time to the first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time;
if the first rotational position of the first elevator at the first time is not different than the first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time by at least a first value or by a first range, issue a first alert associated with the first elevator tab;
determine a second rotational position of the first elevator at a second time and a second rotational position of the second elevator at the second time, the second time occurring after the first time and the difference between the start time and the second time being equal to an intentional delay between functionality of the first elevator tab and the second elevator tab;
compare the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time to the second rotational position of the second elevator at the elevator at the second time;
if the second rotational position of the second elevator at the second time is not within a second range of the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time, issue a second alert associated with the second elevator tab; and
if (a) the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time is within a third range of the initial rotational position of the first elevator at the start time and (b) the second rotational position of the second elevator at the second time is within the third range of the initial rotational position of the second elevator at the start time, issue a third alert associated with both the first elevator tab and the second elevator tab.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first elevator is a left elevator and the first elevator tab is a left elevator tab, and the second elevator is a right elevator and the second elevator tab is a right elevator tab.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the intentional delay is between 6 and 20 seconds.
4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the intentional delay is between 8 and 14 seconds.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the verification event is moving the aircraft's flap handle out of an “up” detent.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the verification event is a detection of a failure of one or both of the primary and secondary hydraulic systems of the aircraft.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first range is between about 0.5° and about 3.0°.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second range is between about 0.0° and about 0.4°.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the third range is between about 0.0° and about 0.4°.
10. A system to analyze flight data to verify proper operation of a first elevator tab disposed at an end portion of a first elevator of an aircraft and a second elevator tab disposed at an end portion of a second elevator of the aircraft, the system comprising a computing device including a memory and a processor, the memory adapted to store non-transitory computer executable instructions, wherein the non-transitory computer executable instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the system to:
analyze the flight data to determine the occurrence of a verification event that includes movement of the first elevator tab relative to the first elevator and the second elevator tab relative to the second elevator, wherein the verification event occurs at a start time, wherein the first elevator is at an initial rotational position and the second elevator is at an initial rotational position at the start time;
analyze the flight data to determine a first rotational position of the first elevator at a first time and a first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time, the first time occurring after the start time;
compare the first rotational position of the first elevator at the first time to the first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time;
wherein if the first rotational position of the first elevator at the first time is not different than the first rotational position of the second elevator at the first time by at least a first value or by a first range, issue a first alert associated with the first elevator tab;
analyze the flight date to determine a second rotational position of the first elevator at a second time and a second rotational position of the second elevator at the second time, the second time occurring after the first time and the difference between the start time and the second time being equal to an intentional delay between functionality of the first elevator tab and the second elevator tab;
compare the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time to the second rotational position of the second elevator at the elevator at the second time;
wherein if the second rotational position of the second elevator at the second time is not within a second range of the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time, issue a second alert associated with the second elevator tab; and
wherein if (a) the second rotational position of the first elevator at the second time is within a third range of the initial rotational position of the first elevator at the start time and (b) the second rotational position of the second elevator at the second time is within the third range of the initial rotational position of the second elevator at the start time, issue a third alert associated with both the first elevator tab and the second elevator tab.
11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the first elevator is a left elevator and the first elevator tab is a left elevator tab, and the second elevator is a right elevator and the second elevator tab is a right elevator tab.
12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the intentional delay is between 6 and 20 seconds.
13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the intentional delay is between 8 and 14 seconds.
14. The system of claim 10 , wherein the verification event is moving the aircraft's flap handle out of an “up” detent.
15. The system of claim 10 , wherein the verification event is a detection of a failure of one or both of the primary and secondary hydraulic systems of the aircraft.
16. The system of claim 10 , wherein the first range is between about 0.5° and about 3.0°.
17. The system of claim 10 , wherein the second range is between about 0.0° and about 0.4°.
18. The system of claim 10 , wherein the third range is between about 0.0° and about 0.4°.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/810,587 US20180082499A1 (en) | 2016-04-14 | 2017-11-13 | Method of detecting elevator tab failure |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/099,547 US9824513B2 (en) | 2016-04-14 | 2016-04-14 | Method of detecting elevator tab failure |
US15/810,587 US20180082499A1 (en) | 2016-04-14 | 2017-11-13 | Method of detecting elevator tab failure |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/099,547 Continuation US9824513B2 (en) | 2016-04-14 | 2016-04-14 | Method of detecting elevator tab failure |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20180082499A1 true US20180082499A1 (en) | 2018-03-22 |
Family
ID=60038368
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/099,547 Active US9824513B2 (en) | 2016-04-14 | 2016-04-14 | Method of detecting elevator tab failure |
US15/810,587 Abandoned US20180082499A1 (en) | 2016-04-14 | 2017-11-13 | Method of detecting elevator tab failure |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/099,547 Active US9824513B2 (en) | 2016-04-14 | 2016-04-14 | Method of detecting elevator tab failure |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US9824513B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11661175B2 (en) * | 2020-03-05 | 2023-05-30 | Ruben Leon | Wireless autopilot system |
Family Cites Families (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2556353A (en) * | 1947-01-10 | 1951-06-12 | Curtiss Wright Corp | Aircraft control system |
US3261573A (en) * | 1964-12-14 | 1966-07-19 | Bocing Company | Aircraft control system |
US3295797A (en) * | 1964-12-14 | 1967-01-03 | Boeing Co | Aircraft control systems |
US6397128B1 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2002-05-28 | Honeywell International Inc. | Flight data recorder system |
US6671589B2 (en) | 2001-02-13 | 2003-12-30 | William Holst | Method and apparatus to support remote and automatically initiated data loading and data acquisition of airborne computers using a wireless spread spectrum aircraft data services link |
US6567729B2 (en) | 2001-03-28 | 2003-05-20 | Pt Holdings Ltd. | System and method of analyzing aircraft removal data for preventative maintenance |
US7539597B2 (en) | 2001-04-10 | 2009-05-26 | Smartsignal Corporation | Diagnostic systems and methods for predictive condition monitoring |
US8266066B1 (en) | 2001-09-04 | 2012-09-11 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Maintenance, repair and overhaul management |
US20080039997A1 (en) | 2003-11-10 | 2008-02-14 | Aeromechanical Services Ltd. | Aircraft flight data management system |
US7620374B2 (en) | 2004-09-16 | 2009-11-17 | Harris Corporation | System and method of transmitting data from an aircraft |
US7774112B2 (en) | 2004-09-27 | 2010-08-10 | Teledyne Technologies Incorporated | System and method for flight data recording |
US20080177439A1 (en) | 2005-05-24 | 2008-07-24 | Betters W Bradley | System and method of analyzing aircraft removal data for preventative maintenance |
US20070219831A1 (en) | 2005-08-15 | 2007-09-20 | Ne Meth Louis G | Flight risk management system |
US8255112B2 (en) | 2005-10-28 | 2012-08-28 | The Boeing Company | Remote aircraft maintenance in a networked environment |
FR2908532B1 (en) * | 2006-11-10 | 2008-12-26 | Thales Sa | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AIRCRAFT TRACKING OF A DOWNHILL TRACK |
WO2008101167A2 (en) | 2007-02-16 | 2008-08-21 | Intelligent Automation Corporation | Vehicle monitoring system |
FR2935186B1 (en) | 2008-08-20 | 2010-09-17 | Airbus France | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AIDING THE DIAGNOSIS AND DECISION TO OPERATE AN AIRCRAFT |
US9189352B1 (en) | 2009-10-12 | 2015-11-17 | The Boeing Company | Flight test onboard processor for an aircraft |
US8914149B2 (en) | 2009-10-12 | 2014-12-16 | The Boeing Company | Platform health monitoring system |
FR2952258B1 (en) | 2009-11-05 | 2011-11-11 | Airbus | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ACCESSING MAINTENANCE FUNCTIONS OF AN AIRCRAFT FROM A MOBILE MAINTENANCE TERMINAL |
US9165414B2 (en) | 2010-02-16 | 2015-10-20 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and system for predicting performance of an aircraft |
FR2958766B1 (en) | 2010-04-13 | 2021-07-09 | Thales Sa | TRANSPORTABLE DEVICE FOR RECORDING FLIGHT DATA. |
CN102656432B (en) * | 2010-12-24 | 2014-07-02 | 丰田自动车株式会社 | Torque detection device |
US8924789B2 (en) | 2011-04-25 | 2014-12-30 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for providing virtual machine diagnostic information using a flight recorder functionality |
US8843348B2 (en) | 2011-06-14 | 2014-09-23 | Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation | Engine noise monitoring as engine health management tool |
GB2492328A (en) | 2011-06-24 | 2013-01-02 | Ge Aviat Systems Ltd | Updating troubleshooting procedures for aircraft maintenance |
US20130138632A1 (en) | 2011-11-28 | 2013-05-30 | Dennis Yost | Aircraft trending systems and methods |
FR2983598B1 (en) | 2011-12-06 | 2013-12-27 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC MONITORING OF AIR OPERATIONS REQUIRING GUARANTEE OF NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE AND GUIDANCE |
US8798817B2 (en) | 2012-01-31 | 2014-08-05 | Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation | Methods and systems for requesting and retrieving aircraft data during flight of an aircraft |
US20130197739A1 (en) | 2012-01-31 | 2013-08-01 | Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation | Methods and systems for aircraft health and trend monitoring |
US8825237B2 (en) | 2012-04-26 | 2014-09-02 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | System and method for economic usage of an aircraft |
US9061770B2 (en) | 2013-01-28 | 2015-06-23 | Honeywell International Inc. | Electronic flight bag systems and methods for verifying correct takeoff performance data entry |
CN103164617B (en) | 2013-02-07 | 2016-11-23 | 中国国际航空股份有限公司 | A kind of aircraft behavior prediction system and Forecasting Methodology |
US9177479B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2015-11-03 | General Electric Company | System and method for determining aircraft operational parameters and enhancing aircraft operation |
-
2016
- 2016-04-14 US US15/099,547 patent/US9824513B2/en active Active
-
2017
- 2017-11-13 US US15/810,587 patent/US20180082499A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US9824513B2 (en) | 2017-11-21 |
US20170301155A1 (en) | 2017-10-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3335985B1 (en) | Methods and apparatus to control and monitor a folding wingtip actuation system | |
JP5848388B2 (en) | How to predict speed brake system failures | |
US11014645B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus to validate an aircraft control system command | |
US8989953B2 (en) | Method for predicting a trailing edge flap fault | |
CA2865181A1 (en) | Methods and systems for aircraft health and trend monitoring | |
US9302763B2 (en) | Method for diagnosing a trailing edge flap fault | |
Srivastava et al. | Software health management: a necessity for safety critical systems | |
CN103979114A (en) | Method for predicting faults in an aircraft thrust reverser system | |
US9580054B2 (en) | Method for diagnosing a speed brake system fault | |
De Lemos | Human in the loop: What is the point of no return? | |
US9824513B2 (en) | Method of detecting elevator tab failure | |
Demirci | The requirements for automation systems based on Boeing 737 MAX crashes | |
Johnson et al. | Design for validation | |
Wang et al. | Reliability analysis for flight control systems using probabilistic model checking | |
Oveisi et al. | A new approach to promote safety in the software life cycle | |
Morel | Model-based safety approach for early validation of integrated and modular avionics architectures | |
Abrecht et al. | A new approach to hazard analysis for rotorcraft | |
Savelev et al. | Functional hazards assessment of an integrated flight control system validation using model-based design | |
Kiran et al. | Autopilot mode transitions and voter logic validation using model checking: a design study of formal methods | |
Ahrenbach et al. | Formal analysis of pilot error with agent safety logic | |
Wang et al. | A system safety analysis method based on multiple category hazard factors | |
Farooq | Model based verification of Electronic Control Unit (ECU) in high lift systems: Verification and validation | |
Kotti et al. | The research framework for quantitative safety assessment for safety-critical computer systems | |
Kansal | Testing the effects of violating component axioms in validation of complex aircraft systems | |
CN115675916A (en) | Steering engine detection method and device and control surface control method and device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |