US20180053316A1 - Surface metallographic method for characterizing the degree of sensitization of aluminum-magnesium alloys - Google Patents
Surface metallographic method for characterizing the degree of sensitization of aluminum-magnesium alloys Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20180053316A1 US20180053316A1 US15/224,692 US201615224692A US2018053316A1 US 20180053316 A1 US20180053316 A1 US 20180053316A1 US 201615224692 A US201615224692 A US 201615224692A US 2018053316 A1 US2018053316 A1 US 2018053316A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- image
- black
- sample
- beta phase
- sensitization
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/90—Determination of colour characteristics
-
- G06T7/408—
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23F—NON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
- C23F1/00—Etching metallic material by chemical means
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
- G06T7/0004—Industrial image inspection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
- G06T7/0004—Industrial image inspection
- G06T7/0008—Industrial image inspection checking presence/absence
-
- G06T7/0083—
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/10—Segmentation; Edge detection
- G06T7/11—Region-based segmentation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/10—Segmentation; Edge detection
- G06T7/12—Edge-based segmentation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/10—Segmentation; Edge detection
- G06T7/13—Edge detection
-
- G06T7/401—
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/40—Analysis of texture
- G06T7/41—Analysis of texture based on statistical description of texture
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23F—NON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
- C23F1/00—Etching metallic material by chemical means
- C23F1/02—Local etching
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
- G06T2207/10024—Color image
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
- G06T2207/10056—Microscopic image
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/20—Special algorithmic details
- G06T2207/20112—Image segmentation details
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30108—Industrial image inspection
- G06T2207/30136—Metal
Definitions
- the present invention relates to aluminum-magnesium alloys, specifically to a method for characterizing the degree of sensitization of such alloys.
- Heat sensitization of aluminum 5xxx aluminum-magnesium alloys is associated with the formation of a magnesium-rich (compared to the solid solution) Mg 2 Al 3 phase on the grain boundaries when the alloy is exposed to elevated temperatures.
- This magnesium-rich phase known as beta phase Mg 2 Al 3 , or often simply as “beta phase,” on the grain boundaries is anodic with respect to the surrounding aluminum-magnesium solid solution, thus presence of beta phase on the grain boundaries increases the potential for intergranular corrosion, stress-corrosion cracking, and intergranular corrosion-fatigue, leading to degradation of ship structure mechanical reliability.
- DOS degree of sensitization
- ASTM G67 Nitric Acid Mass Loss Test set forth in ASTM G67-13, “Standard Test Method for Determining the Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion of 5XXX Series Aluminum Alloys by Mass Loss After Exposure to Nitric Acid (NAMLT Test),” (2013) available from ASTM International, Inc.
- NAMLT Test Standard Test Method for Determining the Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion of 5XXX Series Aluminum Alloys by Mass Loss After Exposure to Nitric Acid
- beta phase can exist intragranularly in addition to being on the grain boundaries, though the intragranular beta phase does not affect the intergranular corrosion significantly.
- techniques that seek to assess DOS based on measures of the amount of beta phase in the bulk tend to be either insufficiently sensitive, or yield overestimates of the effect of grain boundary beta.
- the ElectraWatch DoS Probe works by measuring the electrochemical currents and voltages as the beta phase undergoes reaction to a reagent is applied to the surface. While this works well in the laboratory, it is a specialized instrument that must have access to a large flat area of surface to seal against, to contain the electrochemical reaction volume. Further, it can be temperature sensitive and requires specially trained personnel to operate.
- a viable DOS characterization tool must be specific to grain boundary beta phase.
- Microstructure analysis studies by NRL see R. Goswami and R. L Holtz, “Transmission Electron Microscopy Investigations of Grain Boundary Beta Phase Precipitation in Al 5083 Aged at 373K,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 44A, pp 1279-1289 (2013), and others have shown that high values of DOS as measured by the mass loss test are directly associated with the degree of coverage of the grain boundaries by beta phase.
- the beta phase is present primarily as isolated, precipitates, the G67 mass loss is very low.
- the beta phase is a continuous or nearly continuous layer, the mass loss is very high.
- beta coverage of the grain boundaries provides a metallographic option for estimating DOS, if calibrated against G67. Such an approach would be non-destructive to the bulk of the material, thus could be used in-situ in some circumstances, and eliminates the generation of large amounts of acid waste.
- Metallographic etching can be used to dissolve beta phase in aluminum-magnesium alloys, and if the beta phase is concentrated along grain boundaries, the etching patterns are easily seen with optical metallography.
- Qualitative assessment of sensitization via etching and metallography has been commonly done since the sensitization phenomenon was first identified. This is suggested in ASTM B928; see also S. Jain, J. L. Hudson, and J. R. Scully, “Effects of constituent particles and sensitization on surface spreading of intergranular corrosion on a sensitized AA5083 alloy,” Electrochimica Acta 108 (2013) 253-264.
- no quantitative metallographic technique has been developed for this purpose.
- the present invention provides a method for assessing the “degree of sensitization,” or “DOS,” of ship structures formed from aluminum-magnesium marine service alloys.
- the method of the present invention involves the use of a very light acid etch which only slightly affects the surface and does not damage the structural integrity of the metal, and so may be described as being “non-destructive.”
- the method of the present invention includes the following steps/features:
- Step (4) is then repeated a number of times to delineate a plurality of grain boundaries shown in the image. Once a number of grain boundaries are delineated, the next step is
- FIGS. 1A and 1B are optical metallographs depicting an aluminum-magnesium alloy sample that has been etched in accordance with the method of the present invention, where FIG. 1A is the original micrograph image and FIG. 1B is the image after it has been thresholded and converted to a black-and-white-binary image.
- FIG. 2 is an enlargement of the boxed portion of the image in FIG. 1B in which line segments are applied to delineate a grain boundary in accordance with the method of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is an exemplary thresholded binary optical metallograph having an average grain boundary beta phase density of about 75% as estimated using the method in accordance with the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a plot showing the results of a preliminary calibration of the degree of sensitization versus average grain boundary beta phase density estimated using the method in accordance with the present invention.
- the present invention provides a method for assessing the “degree of sensitization,” or “DOS,” of ship structures formed from aluminum-magnesium marine service alloys conforming to the standards set by ASTM International standard ASTM B928. See “Standard Specification for High Magnesium Aluminum Alloy Sheet and Plate for Marine Service and Similar Environments,” ASTM B 928-15, ASTM International, Inc., (2015).
- the method of the present invention involves the use of a very light acid etch which only slightly affects the surface and does not damage the structural integrity of the metal, and so may be described as being “non-destructive.”
- the method of the present invention includes the following steps/features:
- a sensitized aluminum-magnesium material sample to be analyzed is polished and then is etched.
- This etching step prepares the surface for microscopic examination and dissolves small amounts of the beta phase in the material to create a visible contrast between the beta phase and the rest of the material.
- the samples will be etched using ammonium persulfate, which has been shown to be a highly selective etch for beta phase in aluminum-magnesium alloy materials, see J. Buczynski, “Electrochemical analysis if etchants used to detect sensitization in marine grade 5xxx aluminum-magnesium alloys,” M. S. Thesis, University of Virginia (2012), in a temperature-controlled bath.
- Etching times can range from 20 to 100 minutes, with the best etching time of approximately 60 minutes corresponding to the time after which no significant changes occur.
- this etching step was performed using ammonium persulfate at a 0.2 M concentration adjusted to a pH of 1.2 in a temperature-controlled bath at a temperature of 35° C. for approximately 60 minutes, though other suitable etchants and etching conditions may be used as appropriate.
- a metallographic recording of the polished and etched surface is made, for example, by means of optical microscopy at magnifications ranging from 10 ⁇ to 100 ⁇ .
- magnifications ranging from 10 ⁇ to 100 ⁇ .
- the best results are obtained when a large number of grain boundaries are contained in an image, to ensure good statistical confidence, but at sufficient magnification to resolve particles and separations between particles down to less than 1 micrometer in size.
- magnifications 20 ⁇ to 50 ⁇ , recording the images in high-resolution (150 dpi) TIFF format, though any suitable graphics format or resolution can be used as appropriate.
- a metallograph of an exemplary etched sample is shown in FIG. 1A .
- the next step involves enhancement of the optical images of the etched sample to produce high-quality binary, i.e., black-and-white, images of the etched sample, where the where the etched, i.e., dissolved, beta phase areas appear in the image as spots formed from black pixels and the unetched portions of the sample are shown by white pixels.
- Enhancement of the image can be achieved using any suitable image manipulation software such as the Fiji or ImageJ applications known in the art. See J. Schindelin, et al., “Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis,” Nature methods, 9(7), 676-682 (2012); and C. A. Schneider, W. S. Rasband, and K. W. Eliceiri, “NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis,” Nature methods, 9(7), 671-675 (2012).
- the raw images are first converted to a greyscale format, e.g., an 8-bit greyscale format, and a thresholding procedure is then applied to enhance the contrast between etched areas and unetched areas in the image, particularly along the grain boundaries.
- a thresholding procedure can be used to enhance the contrast, such as the ImageJ.net Auto Local Threshold procedure. See G Landini, et al., Auto Local Threshold , http://fiji.sc/wiki/index.php/Auto_Local_Threshold#Bernsen (“Auto Local Threshold”).
- the ideal thresholding procedures are those for which the final beta phase coverage results are not sensitive to thresholding parameters. The most consistent results obtained by the inventors used an automatic local threshold process with a radius of 5 to 15 pixels, using the Bernsen or Otsu methods described in Auto Local Threshold, supra.
- FIG. 1B shows the result of this thresholding and binary conversion of the image shown in FIG. 1A , which has converted the gray-scale tones of FIG. 1A into a clear black and white image.
- the enhanced images are analyzed to provide statistical information about the etched versus the unetched areas.
- the average “black” value along a grain boundary represents an estimate of the percentage of grain boundary covered by beta phase.
- a series of linked straight or curved line segments are used to connect the black spots in the image corresponding to the etched, i.e., dissolved, grain boundary beta phase particles.
- the endpoint of each line segment is located in the middle of a black spot in the image, with a length and a curvature of the line segments being configured so that they sequentially connect a plurality of black spots in the image to form a single line that represents a grain boundary.
- the line segments are configured so that the line goes through the middle of the black spots to be linked, and can have any appropriate linewidth, from 1 pixel up to the width of the smallest linked black spot.
- the linewidths can all be the same for a given linked line, while in other embodiments, the linewidths can vary depending on the size of the spots to be connected, though care should be given since linewidths that are too large capture too much white space in the image while linewidths too narrow risk missing smaller dark spots. In many cases, the best linewidths can be found by trying increasing values starting from 1 pixel and determining the range of linewidths from which a resulting beta phase coverage estimate is reproducible.
- FIG. 2 provides an illustrative example, and depicts an enlarged view of the boxed portion of the image in FIG. 1B in which one grain boundary is shown by a series of line segments connecting the chain of black spots delineating the grain boundary.
- a series of linked line segments having a linewidth of 3 pixels were used, where the endpoint of each line segment is located in the middle of a corresponding black spot representing an etched, i.e., dissolved, grain boundary beta phase particle.
- This process of using connected line segments to delineate a grain boundary is then repeated a number of times to delineate all of the grain boundaries in the image.
- the statistical distribution of black versus white pixels along the grain boundary is calculated, using any suitable graphics processing methodology such as the ImageJ application described above, and the average black pixel coverage for that grain boundary is determined, where the average black pixel coverage for a grain boundary is associated with the average beta phase present in that grain boundary. While the correspondence is not exact (the etched areas tend to be slightly bigger than the actual beta phase particles) we find a clear systematic relationship between average coverage of the black vs. the white pixels and the bulk ASTM G67 DOS values that serve as a calibration as discussed below. Thus, based on this statistical analysis, it was determined that the grain boundary delineated by the line segments shown in FIG. 2 has a black density of 48%, with the average black density for all of the grain boundaries in the image being 50%, while the sample shown in the image in FIG. 3 has a higher concentration of grain boundary beta phase particles, about 75%.
- the statistical distribution of black versus white pixels and average black pixel coverage can be calculated for a first grain boundary before a second grain boundary is delineated, while in other embodiments, the statistical distribution and average black pixel coverage can be calculated after all of the grain boundaries in the image are delineated.
- the line segments are connected to delineate multiple, separate grain boundaries, it may be possible to use the line segments connect all of the grain boundaries in the image in a single line, and in such a case, only one calculation for each of the statistical distribution and the black pixel coverage is needed, with the calculation of black pixel coverage serving as the image-wise average of total black pixel grain boundary coverage referenced below.
- the average black pixel coverage for all grain boundaries in the image is then totaled and this total is averaged over the number of delineated grain boundaries in the image to produce an image-wise average of the total black pixel grain boundary coverage in the image, where the image-wise average is associated with the grain boundary beta phase percentage present in all of the grain boundaries in the image.
- This image-wise average is then converted to an expression of the degree of sensitization in the sample.
- Measured correlation between the grain boundary beta phase percentage and the degree of sensitization measured by the standard ASTM G67 method gives the calibration for converting measured beta phase coverage to DOS values. Calibration was performed by comparing the beta phase coverage determined by the image analysis method described above on samples that had known ASTM G67 values from other measurements.
- grain boundary beta phase particle densities of less than 60% do not reflect any significant degree of sensitization in the material, while for densities greater than 60% there is a nearly linear correlation between the density and the DOS such that the DOS can be easily determined once the grain boundary beta phase particle density is found.
- the method of the present invention can be used to analyze the DOS of a metal sample by analyzing only the surface, and so does not require cutting/removal of material from the subject structure, and so is structurally non-destructive, in contrast to the standard ASTM G67 method of the prior art.
- the method of the present invention can be applied to a single surface having any surface contour in any orientation so long as the material surface can be polished, and so can be used for both horizontal and vertical surfaces without having to treat the entire structure.
- the method of the present invention uses a fairly weak acid that just wets the surface and so does not generate large quantities of hazardous waste.
- the etching performed in the method of the present invention does not penetrate significantly into the material and therefore does not degrade the structural properties of the material or remove mass, and the etched layer can be easily restored if needed by polishing or sanding.
- the method of the present invention uses commonly available laboratory metallographic facilities and so is inexpensive and can be readily performed without the need for specialized equipment or facilities.
- DOS estimation method in accordance with the present invention can employ manual, i.e., visual, selection of the grain boundaries in the enhanced images, it may also be possible to use computational algorithms can be used to automatically find and select the grain boundaries.
- any suitable etchant, etching temperature, and/or etching time can be used.
- any known beta phase etchant can be used for aluminum-magnesium alloys.
- the DOS estimation method of the present invention can be used for other metallic alloys that also exhibit sensitization phenomena, for example corrosion resistant steels, provided that suitable etchants are available.
- the present invention provides a simple, inexpensive, and easily scalable method for estimating the degree of sensitization of metal alloys such as aluminum-magnesium alloys used in marine environments, and provides an alternative to the conventional methods set forth in ASTM G67-13.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Investigating And Analyzing Materials By Characteristic Methods (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This Application is a Nonprovisional of and claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 based on U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/202,190 filed on Aug. 7, 2015. The Provisional Application and all references cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference into the present disclosure in their entirety.
- The present invention relates to aluminum-magnesium alloys, specifically to a method for characterizing the degree of sensitization of such alloys.
- Heat sensitization of aluminum 5xxx aluminum-magnesium alloys is associated with the formation of a magnesium-rich (compared to the solid solution) Mg2Al3 phase on the grain boundaries when the alloy is exposed to elevated temperatures. This magnesium-rich phase, known as beta phase Mg2Al3, or often simply as “beta phase,” on the grain boundaries is anodic with respect to the surrounding aluminum-magnesium solid solution, thus presence of beta phase on the grain boundaries increases the potential for intergranular corrosion, stress-corrosion cracking, and intergranular corrosion-fatigue, leading to degradation of ship structure mechanical reliability.
- Conventionally, the degree of sensitization (DOS) is characterized with the ASTM G67 Nitric Acid Mass Loss Test set forth in ASTM G67-13, “Standard Test Method for Determining the Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion of 5XXX Series Aluminum Alloys by Mass Loss After Exposure to Nitric Acid (NAMLT Test),” (2013) available from ASTM International, Inc. In this test, a specimen of the material in question is immersed in temperature-controlled concentrated nitric acid for a period of time, and the amount of mass lost from the specimen after the test versus before the test is measured. Essentially, the test is contrived to allow the acid to severely etch the grain boundaries, and the result is that grains fall out, accounting for the mass loss. Obviously this approach is destructive and generates undesirable hazardous waste, and so cannot be used in-situ on a ship.
- The total amount of beta phase present in the worst case of sensitization is very small, while the effects on corrosion of grain boundaries is very high. A number of approaches for assessing the DOS based on measures of the amount of beta phase in the bulk material have been tried or speculated about, including use of microwave cavity resonance perturbation, electrical conductivity, hardness, ultrasonic attenuation, x-ray composition analysis, and so on. See, e.g., http://www.alphasense.net/nde.html (microwave cavity resonance perturbation); C. Chukunonye, “Sensitization Characterization of 5083 and 5456 Aluminum Alloys using Ultrasound,” Dissertation, University of Louisiana at Lafayette (2015) (“ultrasonic method”); M. Shedd, G. Bunget, F. Friedersdorf, and N. Brown, “Embedded Long Service Life Monitoring System for Aluminum Alloy Sensitization,” ASNE MegaRust Conference, (2013) (“eddy current method”); and B. A. Shaw, “Fieldable Probe for Quantitative Assessment of Degree of Sensitization in Marine Aluminum Alloys,” 2009 Navy SBIR Topic N09-T022, Award 90313 (2009) (“x-ray diffraction method).
- Certain mechanical properties of the alloys, such as hardness, also correlate with the DOS. See I. N. A. Oguocha, O. J. Adigun, and S. Yannacopoulos, “Effect of sensitization heat treatment on properties of Al—Mg alloy AA5083-H116,” J. Matter. Sci. (2008) 43:4208-4214. These correlations also could form the basis of a DOS measurement approach. Hardness in particular is a very easy measurement to make. Researchers at the Naval Research Laboratory have done exploratory research on using hardness measurements for estimating DOS. The hardness, for example Rockwell Hardness or Vicker's Hardness, decreases rapidly with degree of sensitization. However this approach requires a known unsensitized reference sample of the material being tested, which is not always available.
- In addition, beta phase can exist intragranularly in addition to being on the grain boundaries, though the intragranular beta phase does not affect the intergranular corrosion significantly. Thus techniques that seek to assess DOS based on measures of the amount of beta phase in the bulk tend to be either insufficiently sensitive, or yield overestimates of the effect of grain boundary beta.
- An alternative to the ASTM G67 DOS test is the portable electrochemical system known as the ElectraWatch DoS Probe developed under funding from the Department of the Navy. See Electrawatch, Inc., Degree of Sensitization (DoS) Probe, which can be found at http://www.electrawatch.com/DoS.html; see also W. J. Golumbfskie, K. T. Tran, J. M. Noland, R. Park, D. J. Stiles, G. Grogan, and C. Wong,” Survey of Detection, Mitigation, and Repair Technologies to Address Problems Caused by Sensitization of Al—Mg Alloys on Navy Ships,” CORROSION, Vol. 72, No. 2, pp. 314-328. The ElectraWatch DoS Probe works by measuring the electrochemical currents and voltages as the beta phase undergoes reaction to a reagent is applied to the surface. While this works well in the laboratory, it is a specialized instrument that must have access to a large flat area of surface to seal against, to contain the electrochemical reaction volume. Further, it can be temperature sensitive and requires specially trained personnel to operate.
- A viable DOS characterization tool must be specific to grain boundary beta phase. Microstructure analysis studies by NRL, see R. Goswami and R. L Holtz, “Transmission Electron Microscopy Investigations of Grain Boundary Beta Phase Precipitation in Al 5083 Aged at 373K,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 44A, pp 1279-1289 (2013), and others have shown that high values of DOS as measured by the mass loss test are directly associated with the degree of coverage of the grain boundaries by beta phase. When the beta phase is present primarily as isolated, precipitates, the G67 mass loss is very low. When the beta phase is a continuous or nearly continuous layer, the mass loss is very high. While the exact role the continuity or topology of the beta coverage plays in G67 mass loss is not entirely known, it is sufficiently clear that measuring beta coverage of the grain boundaries provides a metallographic option for estimating DOS, if calibrated against G67. Such an approach would be non-destructive to the bulk of the material, thus could be used in-situ in some circumstances, and eliminates the generation of large amounts of acid waste.
- Metallographic etching can be used to dissolve beta phase in aluminum-magnesium alloys, and if the beta phase is concentrated along grain boundaries, the etching patterns are easily seen with optical metallography. Qualitative assessment of sensitization via etching and metallography has been commonly done since the sensitization phenomenon was first identified. This is suggested in ASTM B928; see also S. Jain, J. L. Hudson, and J. R. Scully, “Effects of constituent particles and sensitization on surface spreading of intergranular corrosion on a sensitized AA5083 alloy,” Electrochimica Acta 108 (2013) 253-264. However, prior to the current invention disclosure, no quantitative metallographic technique has been developed for this purpose.
- This summary is intended to introduce, in simplified form, a selection of concepts that are further described in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter. Instead, it is merely presented as a brief overview of the subject matter described and claimed herein.
- The present invention provides a method for assessing the “degree of sensitization,” or “DOS,” of ship structures formed from aluminum-magnesium marine service alloys. The method of the present invention involves the use of a very light acid etch which only slightly affects the surface and does not damage the structural integrity of the metal, and so may be described as being “non-destructive.”
- The method of the present invention includes the following steps/features:
- (1) Selective etching of the beta phase in a sensitized aluminum-magnesium alloy to prepare the surface for microscopic examination and to dissolve small amounts of the beta phase, which creates visible contrast between the beta phase and the rest of the alloy;
- (2) Metallographic recording of the etched surface, e.g., by means of optical microscopy at magnifications ranging from 10× to 100×;
- (3) Image enhancement to produce high-contrast binary images of etched and unetched areas in the metallographic image of the etched sample, where the etched, i.e., dissolved, beta phase areas appear in the image as spots formed from black pixels and the unetched portions of the sample are shown by white pixels; and
- (4) Image analysis of the enhanced images using line segments connecting black spots in the image to delineate a grain boundary to provide statistical information about the etched versus the unetched areas, where the average grain boundary black spot density along a grain boundary delineated by the line segments represents an estimate of the percentage of that grain boundary covered by beta phase.
- Step (4) is then repeated a number of times to delineate a plurality of grain boundaries shown in the image. Once a number of grain boundaries are delineated, the next step is
- (5) Calibration, whereby the grain boundary beta phase percentage is converted to an expression of the degree of sensitization in the sample. Grain boundary black spot densities of less than 60% do not reflect any significant degree of sensitization in the material, while for densities greater than 60% there is a nearly linear correlation between the density and the DOS such that the DOS can be easily determined once the grain boundary black spot density is found.
-
FIGS. 1A and 1B are optical metallographs depicting an aluminum-magnesium alloy sample that has been etched in accordance with the method of the present invention, whereFIG. 1A is the original micrograph image andFIG. 1B is the image after it has been thresholded and converted to a black-and-white-binary image. -
FIG. 2 is an enlargement of the boxed portion of the image inFIG. 1B in which line segments are applied to delineate a grain boundary in accordance with the method of the present invention. -
FIG. 3 is an exemplary thresholded binary optical metallograph having an average grain boundary beta phase density of about 75% as estimated using the method in accordance with the present invention. -
FIG. 4 is a plot showing the results of a preliminary calibration of the degree of sensitization versus average grain boundary beta phase density estimated using the method in accordance with the present invention. - The aspects and features of the present invention summarized above can be embodied in various forms. The following description shows, by way of illustration, combinations and configurations in which the aspects and features can be put into practice. It is understood that the described aspects, features, and/or embodiments are merely examples, and that one skilled in the art may utilize other aspects, features, and/or embodiments or make structural and functional modifications without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
- The present invention provides a method for assessing the “degree of sensitization,” or “DOS,” of ship structures formed from aluminum-magnesium marine service alloys conforming to the standards set by ASTM International standard ASTM B928. See “Standard Specification for High Magnesium Aluminum Alloy Sheet and Plate for Marine Service and Similar Environments,” ASTM B928-15, ASTM International, Inc., (2015). The method of the present invention involves the use of a very light acid etch which only slightly affects the surface and does not damage the structural integrity of the metal, and so may be described as being “non-destructive.”
- The method of the present invention includes the following steps/features:
- (1) Selective Etching of Beta Phase in Sensitized Aluminum-Magnesium Alloy.
- In a first step, the surface of a sensitized aluminum-magnesium material sample to be analyzed is polished and then is etched. This etching step prepares the surface for microscopic examination and dissolves small amounts of the beta phase in the material to create a visible contrast between the beta phase and the rest of the material. In most cases, the samples will be etched using ammonium persulfate, which has been shown to be a highly selective etch for beta phase in aluminum-magnesium alloy materials, see J. Buczynski, “Electrochemical analysis if etchants used to detect sensitization in marine grade 5xxx aluminum-magnesium alloys,” M. S. Thesis, University of Virginia (2012), in a temperature-controlled bath. Etching times can range from 20 to 100 minutes, with the best etching time of approximately 60 minutes corresponding to the time after which no significant changes occur. In an exemplary embodiment analyzed for this disclosure, this etching step was performed using ammonium persulfate at a 0.2 M concentration adjusted to a pH of 1.2 in a temperature-controlled bath at a temperature of 35° C. for approximately 60 minutes, though other suitable etchants and etching conditions may be used as appropriate.
- (2) Metallographic Recording of the Polished and Etched Surface.
- In a next step, a metallographic recording of the polished and etched surface is made, for example, by means of optical microscopy at magnifications ranging from 10× to 100×. The best results are obtained when a large number of grain boundaries are contained in an image, to ensure good statistical confidence, but at sufficient magnification to resolve particles and separations between particles down to less than 1 micrometer in size. For the aluminum alloy samples used for our demonstration, the best results have been obtained with magnifications of 20× to 50×, recording the images in high-resolution (150 dpi) TIFF format, though any suitable graphics format or resolution can be used as appropriate. A metallograph of an exemplary etched sample is shown in
FIG. 1A . - (3) Image Enhancement to Produce High-Contrast Binary Images of Etched and Unetched Areas.
- The next step involves enhancement of the optical images of the etched sample to produce high-quality binary, i.e., black-and-white, images of the etched sample, where the where the etched, i.e., dissolved, beta phase areas appear in the image as spots formed from black pixels and the unetched portions of the sample are shown by white pixels. Enhancement of the image can be achieved using any suitable image manipulation software such as the Fiji or ImageJ applications known in the art. See J. Schindelin, et al., “Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis,” Nature methods, 9(7), 676-682 (2012); and C. A. Schneider, W. S. Rasband, and K. W. Eliceiri, “NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis,” Nature methods, 9(7), 671-675 (2012).
- Thus, in this step, the raw images are first converted to a greyscale format, e.g., an 8-bit greyscale format, and a thresholding procedure is then applied to enhance the contrast between etched areas and unetched areas in the image, particularly along the grain boundaries. Any suitable thresholding procedure can be used to enhance the contrast, such as the ImageJ.net Auto Local Threshold procedure. See G Landini, et al., Auto Local Threshold, http://fiji.sc/wiki/index.php/Auto_Local_Threshold#Bernsen (“Auto Local Threshold”). Irrespective of the method used, the ideal thresholding procedures are those for which the final beta phase coverage results are not sensitive to thresholding parameters. The most consistent results obtained by the inventors used an automatic local threshold process with a radius of 5 to 15 pixels, using the Bernsen or Otsu methods described in Auto Local Threshold, supra.
- After the thresholding operation, the image is converted to pure binary format with a white background, which results in black and white images where the etched, i.e., dissolved, beta phase areas appear in the image as spots formed from black pixels and the unetched portions of the sample are shown by white pixels.
FIG. 1B shows the result of this thresholding and binary conversion of the image shown inFIG. 1A , which has converted the gray-scale tones ofFIG. 1A into a clear black and white image. - (4) Image Analysis of the Enhanced Images Using Line Segments Along Grain Boundaries.
- In the next step, the enhanced images are analyzed to provide statistical information about the etched versus the unetched areas. In this analysis, the average “black” value along a grain boundary represents an estimate of the percentage of grain boundary covered by beta phase.
- To perform this image analysis, a series of linked straight or curved line segments are used to connect the black spots in the image corresponding to the etched, i.e., dissolved, grain boundary beta phase particles. The endpoint of each line segment is located in the middle of a black spot in the image, with a length and a curvature of the line segments being configured so that they sequentially connect a plurality of black spots in the image to form a single line that represents a grain boundary. The line segments are configured so that the line goes through the middle of the black spots to be linked, and can have any appropriate linewidth, from 1 pixel up to the width of the smallest linked black spot. In some embodiments, the linewidths can all be the same for a given linked line, while in other embodiments, the linewidths can vary depending on the size of the spots to be connected, though care should be given since linewidths that are too large capture too much white space in the image while linewidths too narrow risk missing smaller dark spots. In many cases, the best linewidths can be found by trying increasing values starting from 1 pixel and determining the range of linewidths from which a resulting beta phase coverage estimate is reproducible.
-
FIG. 2 provides an illustrative example, and depicts an enlarged view of the boxed portion of the image inFIG. 1B in which one grain boundary is shown by a series of line segments connecting the chain of black spots delineating the grain boundary. In the exemplary case shown inFIG. 2 , a series of linked line segments having a linewidth of 3 pixels were used, where the endpoint of each line segment is located in the middle of a corresponding black spot representing an etched, i.e., dissolved, grain boundary beta phase particle. - This process of using connected line segments to delineate a grain boundary is then repeated a number of times to delineate all of the grain boundaries in the image.
- Next, for each delineated grain boundary, the statistical distribution of black versus white pixels along the grain boundary is calculated, using any suitable graphics processing methodology such as the ImageJ application described above, and the average black pixel coverage for that grain boundary is determined, where the average black pixel coverage for a grain boundary is associated with the average beta phase present in that grain boundary. While the correspondence is not exact (the etched areas tend to be slightly bigger than the actual beta phase particles) we find a clear systematic relationship between average coverage of the black vs. the white pixels and the bulk ASTM G67 DOS values that serve as a calibration as discussed below. Thus, based on this statistical analysis, it was determined that the grain boundary delineated by the line segments shown in
FIG. 2 has a black density of 48%, with the average black density for all of the grain boundaries in the image being 50%, while the sample shown in the image inFIG. 3 has a higher concentration of grain boundary beta phase particles, about 75%. - In some embodiments, the statistical distribution of black versus white pixels and average black pixel coverage can be calculated for a first grain boundary before a second grain boundary is delineated, while in other embodiments, the statistical distribution and average black pixel coverage can be calculated after all of the grain boundaries in the image are delineated. In addition, while in some embodiments, the line segments are connected to delineate multiple, separate grain boundaries, it may be possible to use the line segments connect all of the grain boundaries in the image in a single line, and in such a case, only one calculation for each of the statistical distribution and the black pixel coverage is needed, with the calculation of black pixel coverage serving as the image-wise average of total black pixel grain boundary coverage referenced below.
- (5) Calibration.
- The average black pixel coverage for all grain boundaries in the image is then totaled and this total is averaged over the number of delineated grain boundaries in the image to produce an image-wise average of the total black pixel grain boundary coverage in the image, where the image-wise average is associated with the grain boundary beta phase percentage present in all of the grain boundaries in the image. This image-wise average is then converted to an expression of the degree of sensitization in the sample. Measured correlation between the grain boundary beta phase percentage and the degree of sensitization measured by the standard ASTM G67 method gives the calibration for converting measured beta phase coverage to DOS values. Calibration was performed by comparing the beta phase coverage determined by the image analysis method described above on samples that had known ASTM G67 values from other measurements.
- An initial calibration is shown in the plot in
FIG. 4 . The known ASTM G67 DOS for a sample having an average grain boundary beta phase particle density of 65% is 0, while a sample having a grain boundary beta phase particle density of 75% estimated in accordance with the present invention had a measured DOS of about 10 mg/cm2 and a sample having a grain boundary beta phase particle density of 90% estimated in accordance with the present invention had a measured DOS of about 40 mg/cm2. Thus, as can be seen from the plot inFIG. 4 , grain boundary beta phase particle densities of less than 60% do not reflect any significant degree of sensitization in the material, while for densities greater than 60% there is a nearly linear correlation between the density and the DOS such that the DOS can be easily determined once the grain boundary beta phase particle density is found. - We note that a limitation of the estimation method of the present invention occurs when the amount of grain boundary beta phase present is very low. When it is very low, it is difficult to identify with certainty what features are grain boundaries, versus other apparent but possibly random patterns of etched areas. In any case, for practical purposes, very low beta concentrations are of little interest, as the materials in such condition are effectively unsensitized anyway.
- Advantages and New Features
- The method of the present invention can be used to analyze the DOS of a metal sample by analyzing only the surface, and so does not require cutting/removal of material from the subject structure, and so is structurally non-destructive, in contrast to the standard ASTM G67 method of the prior art.
- In addition, the method of the present invention can be applied to a single surface having any surface contour in any orientation so long as the material surface can be polished, and so can be used for both horizontal and vertical surfaces without having to treat the entire structure.
- Moreover, while the standard ASTM G67 test uses 100 CC of concentrated nitric acid for every measurement, the method of the present invention uses a fairly weak acid that just wets the surface and so does not generate large quantities of hazardous waste. The etching performed in the method of the present invention does not penetrate significantly into the material and therefore does not degrade the structural properties of the material or remove mass, and the etched layer can be easily restored if needed by polishing or sanding.
- Finally, the method of the present invention uses commonly available laboratory metallographic facilities and so is inexpensive and can be readily performed without the need for specialized equipment or facilities.
- Alternatives
- While the DOS estimation method in accordance with the present invention can employ manual, i.e., visual, selection of the grain boundaries in the enhanced images, it may also be possible to use computational algorithms can be used to automatically find and select the grain boundaries.
- Any suitable image thresholding procedure and line segment criteria can be used, provided these other approaches do not artificially over- or under-estimate the grain boundary beta phase coverage.
- Any suitable etchant, etching temperature, and/or etching time can be used. For example, while not as highly specific as the ammonium persulfate described herein, any known beta phase etchant can be used for aluminum-magnesium alloys.
- In addition, the DOS estimation method of the present invention can be used for other metallic alloys that also exhibit sensitization phenomena, for example corrosion resistant steels, provided that suitable etchants are available.
- Thus, the present invention provides a simple, inexpensive, and easily scalable method for estimating the degree of sensitization of metal alloys such as aluminum-magnesium alloys used in marine environments, and provides an alternative to the conventional methods set forth in ASTM G67-13.
- Although particular embodiments, aspects, and features have been described and illustrated, it should be noted that the invention described herein is not limited to only those embodiments, aspects, and features, and it should be readily appreciated that modifications may be made by persons skilled in the art. The present application contemplates any and all combinations and modifications to those embodiments described and claimed herein, and all such combinations and embodiments are within the scope and spirit of the present disclosure.
Claims (10)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/224,692 US9898832B1 (en) | 2015-08-07 | 2016-08-01 | Surface metallographic method for characterizing the degree of sensitization of aluminum-magnesium alloys |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201562202190P | 2015-08-07 | 2015-08-07 | |
US15/224,692 US9898832B1 (en) | 2015-08-07 | 2016-08-01 | Surface metallographic method for characterizing the degree of sensitization of aluminum-magnesium alloys |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US9898832B1 US9898832B1 (en) | 2018-02-20 |
US20180053316A1 true US20180053316A1 (en) | 2018-02-22 |
Family
ID=61189030
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/224,692 Active 2036-08-05 US9898832B1 (en) | 2015-08-07 | 2016-08-01 | Surface metallographic method for characterizing the degree of sensitization of aluminum-magnesium alloys |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9898832B1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111307801A (en) * | 2019-10-29 | 2020-06-19 | 西北稀有金属材料研究院宁夏有限公司 | Method for measuring average intercept of metallographic structure of cast beryllium aluminum |
WO2021173963A1 (en) * | 2020-02-26 | 2021-09-02 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Artificial intelligence methods for correlating laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (libs) measurements with degree of sensitization (dos) values to determine the sensitization of an alloy |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109615630A (en) * | 2019-01-18 | 2019-04-12 | 东北大学 | Semi-continuous casting alusil alloy Analysis on Microstructure method based on image processing techniques |
CN110766709B (en) * | 2019-10-30 | 2021-03-30 | 成都理工大学 | Landslide particle accumulation characteristic identification method based on image identification |
CN113607807A (en) * | 2021-08-06 | 2021-11-05 | 中国特种设备检测研究院 | Austenitic stainless steel sensitization damage test grading method and device |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2928400B2 (en) * | 1991-03-19 | 1999-08-03 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Method and apparatus for detecting sensitization of stainless steel |
US9315886B1 (en) | 2014-06-27 | 2016-04-19 | The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Desensitization of aluminum alloys using pulsed electron beams |
-
2016
- 2016-08-01 US US15/224,692 patent/US9898832B1/en active Active
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111307801A (en) * | 2019-10-29 | 2020-06-19 | 西北稀有金属材料研究院宁夏有限公司 | Method for measuring average intercept of metallographic structure of cast beryllium aluminum |
WO2021173963A1 (en) * | 2020-02-26 | 2021-09-02 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Artificial intelligence methods for correlating laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (libs) measurements with degree of sensitization (dos) values to determine the sensitization of an alloy |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US9898832B1 (en) | 2018-02-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9898832B1 (en) | Surface metallographic method for characterizing the degree of sensitization of aluminum-magnesium alloys | |
Zhu et al. | Metal pitting corrosion characterized by scanning acoustic microscopy and binary image processing | |
Sathiyanarayanan et al. | Corrosion monitoring of steel in concrete by galvanostatic pulse technique | |
Srinivasan et al. | A high-throughput artificial pit technique to measure kinetic parameters for pitting stability | |
Örnek et al. | Time-dependent in situ measurement of atmospheric corrosion rates of duplex stainless steel wires | |
Vallabhaneni et al. | 3D X-ray microtomography and mechanical characterization of corrosion-induced damage in 7075 aluminium (Al) alloys | |
Shi et al. | Variations of galvanic currents and corrosion forms of 2024/Q235/304 tri-metallic couple with multivariable cathode/anode area ratios: Experiments and modeling | |
Beretta et al. | From atmospheric corrosive attack to crack propagation for A1N railway axles steel under fatigue: Damage process and detection | |
Singaravelu et al. | 3D time-resolved observations of fatigue crack initiation and growth from corrosion pits in Al 7XXX alloys using in situ synchrotron X-ray tomography | |
Varela et al. | An electrochemical method for measuring localized corrosion under cathodic protection | |
Lillard et al. | Quantifying alloy 625 crevice corrosion using an image differencing technique: part I. Initiation and propagation | |
Cheng et al. | Depth sizing of partial-contact stress corrosion cracks from ECT signals | |
Key et al. | Establishing first order correlations between pitting corrosion initiation and local microstructure in AA5083 using automated image analysis | |
Liu et al. | Quantifying 3D crack propagation in nodular graphite cast iron using advanced digital volume correlation and X-ray computed tomography | |
Margetan et al. | Detectability of small flaws in advanced engine alloys | |
Koshti | Probability of detection analysis in multi-hit flaw detection | |
Eckermann et al. | In situ microtomographically monitored and electrochemically controlled corrosion initiation and propagation in AlMgSi alloy AA6016 | |
Yan et al. | Corrosion characteristics and evaluation of galvanized high-strength steel wire for bridge cables based on 3D laser scanning and image recognition | |
Angst et al. | Chloride-induced corrosion of steel in concrete—insights from bimodal neutron and X-ray microtomography combined with ex-situ microscopy | |
Kopf et al. | Thermographic identification of hidden corrosion | |
Li et al. | Characterization of pitting resistance of metal materials with ultrasonic microscope | |
Xiao et al. | 3D characterization of closure of surface and internal fatigue cracks in nodular cast iron using Digital Volume Correlation of laboratory X-ray tomography images | |
Marrow et al. | High-resolution, in-situ, tomographic observations of stress corrosion cracking | |
Hoshi et al. | Real-Time Imaging of Brass Cross-Section with Dezincification Corrosion by Electrochemical Measurement Combined with Video Observation | |
Fanijo et al. | Effects of thermal history on the corrosion kinetics of rolled aluminum 6111 alloy |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HOLTZ, RONALD L.;HORTON, DEREK;SIGNING DATES FROM 20160725 TO 20160726;REEL/FRAME:039299/0493 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PETITION RELATED TO MAINTENANCE FEES GRANTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: PTGR) |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |