US20180023350A1 - Method for preventing formation of a slug flow regime of a gas-liquid mixture in a non-linear wellbore or pipeline - Google Patents

Method for preventing formation of a slug flow regime of a gas-liquid mixture in a non-linear wellbore or pipeline Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20180023350A1
US20180023350A1 US15/655,995 US201715655995A US2018023350A1 US 20180023350 A1 US20180023350 A1 US 20180023350A1 US 201715655995 A US201715655995 A US 201715655995A US 2018023350 A1 US2018023350 A1 US 2018023350A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
flow
gas
pipeline
liquid mixture
wellbore
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US15/655,995
Inventor
Natalia Anatolievna Lebedeva
Andrei Alexandrovich Osiptsov
Dean Michael Willberg
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Original Assignee
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Schlumberger Technology Corp filed Critical Schlumberger Technology Corp
Assigned to SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION reassignment SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LEBEDEVA, NATALIA ANATOLIEVNA, WILLBERG, DEAN MICHAEL
Publication of US20180023350A1 publication Critical patent/US20180023350A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D19/00Degasification of liquids
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B17/00Drilling rods or pipes; Flexible drill strings; Kellies; Drill collars; Sucker rods; Cables; Casings; Tubings
    • E21B17/006Accessories for drilling pipes, e.g. cleaners
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D19/00Degasification of liquids
    • B01D19/0063Regulation, control including valves and floats
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01FMIXING, e.g. DISSOLVING, EMULSIFYING OR DISPERSING
    • B01F23/00Mixing according to the phases to be mixed, e.g. dispersing or emulsifying
    • B01F23/02Maintaining the aggregation state of the mixed materials
    • B01F23/024Maintaining mixed ingredients in movement to prevent separation of the ingredients after mixing
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01FMIXING, e.g. DISSOLVING, EMULSIFYING OR DISPERSING
    • B01F23/00Mixing according to the phases to be mixed, e.g. dispersing or emulsifying
    • B01F23/20Mixing gases with liquids
    • B01F23/23Mixing gases with liquids by introducing gases into liquid media, e.g. for producing aerated liquids
    • B01F23/232Mixing gases with liquids by introducing gases into liquid media, e.g. for producing aerated liquids using flow-mixing means for introducing the gases, e.g. baffles
    • B01F23/2323Mixing gases with liquids by introducing gases into liquid media, e.g. for producing aerated liquids using flow-mixing means for introducing the gases, e.g. baffles by circulating the flow in guiding constructions or conduits
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01FMIXING, e.g. DISSOLVING, EMULSIFYING OR DISPERSING
    • B01F23/00Mixing according to the phases to be mixed, e.g. dispersing or emulsifying
    • B01F23/20Mixing gases with liquids
    • B01F23/23Mixing gases with liquids by introducing gases into liquid media, e.g. for producing aerated liquids
    • B01F23/233Mixing gases with liquids by introducing gases into liquid media, e.g. for producing aerated liquids using driven stirrers with completely immersed stirring elements
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01FMIXING, e.g. DISSOLVING, EMULSIFYING OR DISPERSING
    • B01F25/00Flow mixers; Mixers for falling materials, e.g. solid particles
    • B01F25/40Static mixers
    • B01F25/42Static mixers in which the mixing is affected by moving the components jointly in changing directions, e.g. in tubes provided with baffles or obstructions
    • B01F25/43Mixing tubes, e.g. wherein the material is moved in a radial or partly reversed direction
    • B01F25/432Mixing tubes, e.g. wherein the material is moved in a radial or partly reversed direction with means for dividing the material flow into separate sub-flows and for repositioning and recombining these sub-flows; Cross-mixing, e.g. conducting the outer layer of the material nearer to the axis of the tube or vice-versa
    • B01F25/4321Mixing tubes, e.g. wherein the material is moved in a radial or partly reversed direction with means for dividing the material flow into separate sub-flows and for repositioning and recombining these sub-flows; Cross-mixing, e.g. conducting the outer layer of the material nearer to the axis of the tube or vice-versa the subflows consisting of at least two flat layers which are recombined, e.g. using means having restriction or expansion zones
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01FMIXING, e.g. DISSOLVING, EMULSIFYING OR DISPERSING
    • B01F27/00Mixers with rotary stirring devices in fixed receptacles; Kneaders
    • B01F27/05Stirrers
    • B01F27/11Stirrers characterised by the configuration of the stirrers
    • B01F27/118Stirrers in the form of brushes, sieves, grids, chains or springs
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01FMIXING, e.g. DISSOLVING, EMULSIFYING OR DISPERSING
    • B01F27/00Mixers with rotary stirring devices in fixed receptacles; Kneaders
    • B01F27/50Pipe mixers, i.e. mixers wherein the materials to be mixed flow continuously through pipes, e.g. column mixers
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01FMIXING, e.g. DISSOLVING, EMULSIFYING OR DISPERSING
    • B01F27/00Mixers with rotary stirring devices in fixed receptacles; Kneaders
    • B01F27/55Mixers with rotary stirring devices in fixed receptacles; Kneaders with stirrers driven by the moving material
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B47/00Survey of boreholes or wells
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F17STORING OR DISTRIBUTING GASES OR LIQUIDS
    • F17DPIPE-LINE SYSTEMS; PIPE-LINES
    • F17D1/00Pipe-line systems

Definitions

  • the disclosure relates to methods for preventing formation of slugs of fluid blocking a pipe cross-section when transporting a gas-liquid mixture in wellbores and pipelines during production of hydrocarbons in the oil and gas industry.
  • slug flow regime In cases where a wellbore or a pipeline is not straight and in addition to the horizontal sections it contains ascending, descending and vertical segments, the so-called slug flow regime can be established. In this regime, intermittent single-phase portions of gas and liquid (slugs) are transported in the pipe.
  • the high-speed slug flow regime is dangerous for surface equipment. It also leads to pressure oscillations at the bottom-hole of a wellbore, which in turn can lead to undesirable geomechanical effects, such as damage to a near-wellbore part of a stratum and deterioration of its conductivity, extensive solid-phase migration to the wellbore, and proppant backflow, especially in case of stimulation by a multistage hydraulic fracturing of the stratum.
  • the stratified flow regime is usually established, in which gas moves over a layer of heavier liquid (oil or oil with mixture of water).
  • a pipe lumen in the knees can be blocked periodically by the liquid accumulated in lower regions of the pipeline.
  • a fluid slug is also developed.
  • rapid segregation takes place, in which the liquid blocks the entrance to the vertical section, thus preventing the free passage of incoming gas.
  • the gas is accumulated behind it, in which the pressure rises with time. In the course of time, the pressure of the accumulated gas becomes sufficient to push through a portion of the accumulated fluid, thus establishing the non-stationary flow regime with periodic splashes of large portions of the liquid phase.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,803 A describes a device and a method for preventing formation of slug flow regime in an ascending segment in which the inlet stratified flow is converted into a non-stratified regime (annular or bubble).
  • the apparatus includes a convergent nozzle and a divergent diffuser.
  • Application US 20090301729 A1 discloses a device for controlling the slugging in a multi-phase flow, being a pipe having a specific structure of sections of 1 to 30 feet long, inclined at an angle of 5-90 degrees to the horizon.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,716,268 B2 relates to control of development of slugs in a riser by controlling gas pressure at the bottom of the riser.
  • a separation tank is used, which includes a valve to control gas velocity in a pipeline. If the monitored pressure exceeds some empirically determined value, the valve opens and changes the gas velocity, which prevents the appearance of plugs.
  • the known methods and devices are mainly intended to be used only at the entrances to risers and do not allow ensuring the reliable prevention of slug flow regime formation, since they consider neither the expected flow rate of the gas-liquid mixture nor the geometry of the pipeline.
  • the disclosure ensures reliable prevention of slugs development during a gas-liquid mixture flowing in non-linear wellbores and pipelines due to consideration of an expected flow rate of the gas-liquid mixture and a geometry of a wellbore or a pipeline when choosing the mounting location of the device for preventing slugs.
  • the disclosed method for preventing formation of a slug flow regime of a gas-liquid mixture in a non-linear wellbore or a pipeline comprises determining at least one most probable place of fluid slugs development in a wellbore or a pipeline by mathematical simulation based on expected values of the gas-liquid mixture flow and the known geometry of the wellbore or the pipeline and mounting a device, in the determined place of fluid slug development, that converts the stratified gas-liquid mixture flow into a dispersed flow.
  • Vortex-type devices for example, vortex-type devices, twisted-tube bundle devices, mixer-type devices, rotating brush type devices, can be used to convert the stratified gas-liquid mixture flow into the dispersed flow.
  • FIG. 1 shows a diagram of a gas-liquid mixture flow with a fluid slug developed in a wellbore having inclined and vertical sections;
  • FIG. 2 shows a diagram of the gas-liquid mixture flow in the same wellbore with the devices mounted therein, that provide conversion of the stratified flow into the dispersed bubble flow;
  • FIG. 3 shows an example of a device for conversion of the slug flow regime into a dispersed one, configured as a bundle of tubes,
  • FIG. 4 shows an example of a device for conversion of the slug flow regime into the dispersed one, configured as a rotating brush;
  • FIG. 5 shows an example of a pipeline geometry
  • FIG. 6 shows a slope of the pipeline of FIG. 5 , depending on the coordinate of the pipe
  • FIG. 7 shows distribution of oil volume fraction across the pipeline at the moment of appearance of fluid slugs, obtained as a result of mathematical simulation.
  • the disclosed method is aimed at preventing formation of a slug flow regime in inclined and vertical sections of a wellbore or a pipeline, in those places where such regime is most probable upon results of mathematical simulation of the gas-liquid flow in a wellbore or a pipeline.
  • a geometry of the wellbore or the pipeline is used as obtained, for example, from a drilling log for the case of a wellbore, or directly measured where possible.
  • the flow regimes of the gas-liquid mixture in the wellbore or the pipeline containing, in addition to the horizontal section, inclined and vertical parts are determined based on the numerical simulation, and at least one most probable place of development of fluid slugs is detected.
  • Devices that convert the stratified flow of the gas-liquid mixture into the dispersed bubble flow are mounted in the determined most probable places of development of fluid slugs, which significantly increases the segregation time and significantly reduces the period between the fluid slugs and thus alleviates negative consequences of the slug flow regime.
  • FIG. 1 The geometric configuration of a wellbore such as that shown in FIG. 1 leads to the formation of a slug flow regime in vertical and inclined sections due to gravitational segregation of the gas-liquid flow.
  • a gas-liquid mixture enters a wellbore 1 from the side 2 and exits from the side 3 .
  • a liquid phase 4 can move as a layer under a gas phase 5 and develop slugs in the zones 6 a and 6 b due to the influence of gravity and deviations of the pipeline from the horizontal position.
  • the risk of geomechanical damage to the near-wellbore area directly depends on the rate of change in pressure, i.e. from the derivative of the pressure over time (the higher its value, the higher the risk of damage).
  • the decrease in frequency of pressure oscillations helps to reduce the risk of damage to the stratum.
  • FIG. 2 shows a diagram of gas-liquid mixture flow in a wellbore having inclined and vertical sections where the stratified flow 8 is converted by means of a special device 7 a into the dispersed bubble flow 9 , which in turn can be segregated into the stratified one and then re-converted into the dispersed flow 10 by means of the device 7 b.
  • the devices of various types can be used, for example, of the vortex type (http://www.chengfluid.com/), in the form of a twisted-tube bundle ( FIG. 3 ), various variants of mixers (http://Www.stamixco-usa.com/plug-flow-reactors), in the form of a rotating brush ( FIG. 4 ), etc.
  • the vortex type http://www.chengfluid.com/
  • mixers http://Www.stamixco-usa.com/plug-flow-reactors
  • FIG. 4 rotating brush
  • the device shown schematically in FIG. 3 is a bundle of twisted tubes (not less than 2). Being mounted in the stratified gas-liquid flow, this device redirects the gas phase from the upper part of the flow to the lower one, and the liquid phase—in the opposite way, which leads to phase mixing and formation of a dispersed mixture.
  • the length of such device shall exceed the diameter of the pipeline.
  • the device can be made of various materials, for example, plastic or metal.
  • the device of FIG. 4 is a rotating brush for mixing the stratified gas and liquid phases.
  • the length of such device shall exceed the diameter of the pipeline.
  • the device can be made of various materials, for example, plastic or metal. The exact position of the device is determined on the basis of mathematical numerical simulation of the gas-liquid flow in a pipeline of a given configuration.
  • the method can be implemented as follows.
  • Simulation can be based on solving non-steady-state equations of a multi-fluid model or a drift model derived from the laws of conservation of mass and pulse of continuum mechanics. The details of these methods and the features of the numerical solution of the determining equations are presented, for example, in the work (Theuveny B. C. et. al. Integrated approach to simulation of near-wellbore and wellbore cleanup//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. —Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2013).
  • FIGS. 5-7 show an example of numerical simulation of the oil and gas flow in a pipeline.
  • FIG. 5 is a general view of the pipeline geometry
  • FIG. 6 shows the slope of the pipeline depending on the coordinate of the pipe defining the side-view in FIG. 5 a .
  • Numerical simulation was carried out for constant oil and gas flow rates specified at the pipeline inlet and presented in Table 1.
  • the outlet of the pipeline is considered to be open into a region with constant atmospheric pressure (see Table 1).
  • FIG. 7 shows distribution of oil volume fraction across the pipeline at the moment of appearance of fluid slugs, obtained as a result of mathematical simulation.
  • the points S 1 and S 2 in FIG. 7 denote the sites where the slugs will appear and before which it is necessary to mount a device for converting the stratified flow into the dispersed one.
  • the calculated exact coordinates of these points are given in Table 1.

Abstract

A method for preventing formation of a slug flow regime of a gas-liquid mixture in a non-linear wellbore or a pipeline comprises determining at least one most probable place of fluid slugs development in the wellbore or the pipeline by mathematical simulation based on expected values of the gas-liquid mixture flow and known geometry of the wellbore or the pipeline and mounting a device, in the determined place of fluid slug development, that converts the stratified gas-liquid mixture flow into a dispersed flow.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application claims priority to Russian Application No. 2016129941 filed Jul. 21, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • BACKGROUND
  • The disclosure relates to methods for preventing formation of slugs of fluid blocking a pipe cross-section when transporting a gas-liquid mixture in wellbores and pipelines during production of hydrocarbons in the oil and gas industry.
  • In cases where a wellbore or a pipeline is not straight and in addition to the horizontal sections it contains ascending, descending and vertical segments, the so-called slug flow regime can be established. In this regime, intermittent single-phase portions of gas and liquid (slugs) are transported in the pipe. The high-speed slug flow regime is dangerous for surface equipment. It also leads to pressure oscillations at the bottom-hole of a wellbore, which in turn can lead to undesirable geomechanical effects, such as damage to a near-wellbore part of a stratum and deterioration of its conductivity, extensive solid-phase migration to the wellbore, and proppant backflow, especially in case of stimulation by a multistage hydraulic fracturing of the stratum. In the horizontal part of the pipe, the stratified flow regime is usually established, in which gas moves over a layer of heavier liquid (oil or oil with mixture of water). When the pipeline deviates from the horizontal level, a pipe lumen in the knees can be blocked periodically by the liquid accumulated in lower regions of the pipeline. In the case where the horizontal section becomes vertical, a fluid slug is also developed. When the mixture enters the vertical section, rapid segregation takes place, in which the liquid blocks the entrance to the vertical section, thus preventing the free passage of incoming gas. As a result of development of a fluid slug blocking the pipeline, the gas is accumulated behind it, in which the pressure rises with time. In the course of time, the pressure of the accumulated gas becomes sufficient to push through a portion of the accumulated fluid, thus establishing the non-stationary flow regime with periodic splashes of large portions of the liquid phase.
  • Various methods for controlling slugging in a gas-liquid mixture flow are known from the prior art. Thus, U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,803 A describes a device and a method for preventing formation of slug flow regime in an ascending segment in which the inlet stratified flow is converted into a non-stratified regime (annular or bubble). The apparatus includes a convergent nozzle and a divergent diffuser.
  • Application US 20090301729 A1 discloses a device for controlling the slugging in a multi-phase flow, being a pipe having a specific structure of sections of 1 to 30 feet long, inclined at an angle of 5-90 degrees to the horizon.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,716,268 B2 relates to control of development of slugs in a riser by controlling gas pressure at the bottom of the riser. For this purpose, a separation tank is used, which includes a valve to control gas velocity in a pipeline. If the monitored pressure exceeds some empirically determined value, the valve opens and changes the gas velocity, which prevents the appearance of plugs.
  • The article “Experimental investigation of terrain slugging development, evolution and potential for mitigation” of Brasjen, B. J., et. al., 16th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology, The BHR Group, 2013, describes a set of devices to be mounted in circumhorizontal inclined pipes for dissipation of fluid plugs. In the experiments, the authors observed the decrease in pressure fluctuation up to 16%.
  • The known methods and devices are mainly intended to be used only at the entrances to risers and do not allow ensuring the reliable prevention of slug flow regime formation, since they consider neither the expected flow rate of the gas-liquid mixture nor the geometry of the pipeline.
  • SUMMARY
  • The disclosure ensures reliable prevention of slugs development during a gas-liquid mixture flowing in non-linear wellbores and pipelines due to consideration of an expected flow rate of the gas-liquid mixture and a geometry of a wellbore or a pipeline when choosing the mounting location of the device for preventing slugs.
  • The disclosed method for preventing formation of a slug flow regime of a gas-liquid mixture in a non-linear wellbore or a pipeline comprises determining at least one most probable place of fluid slugs development in a wellbore or a pipeline by mathematical simulation based on expected values of the gas-liquid mixture flow and the known geometry of the wellbore or the pipeline and mounting a device, in the determined place of fluid slug development, that converts the stratified gas-liquid mixture flow into a dispersed flow.
  • Different types of devices, for example, vortex-type devices, twisted-tube bundle devices, mixer-type devices, rotating brush type devices, can be used to convert the stratified gas-liquid mixture flow into the dispersed flow.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
  • The disclosure is explained by the drawings, where FIG. 1 shows a diagram of a gas-liquid mixture flow with a fluid slug developed in a wellbore having inclined and vertical sections;
  • FIG. 2 shows a diagram of the gas-liquid mixture flow in the same wellbore with the devices mounted therein, that provide conversion of the stratified flow into the dispersed bubble flow;
  • FIG. 3 shows an example of a device for conversion of the slug flow regime into a dispersed one, configured as a bundle of tubes,
  • FIG. 4 shows an example of a device for conversion of the slug flow regime into the dispersed one, configured as a rotating brush;
  • FIG. 5 shows an example of a pipeline geometry,
  • FIG. 6 shows a slope of the pipeline of FIG. 5, depending on the coordinate of the pipe,
  • FIG. 7 shows distribution of oil volume fraction across the pipeline at the moment of appearance of fluid slugs, obtained as a result of mathematical simulation.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The disclosed method is aimed at preventing formation of a slug flow regime in inclined and vertical sections of a wellbore or a pipeline, in those places where such regime is most probable upon results of mathematical simulation of the gas-liquid flow in a wellbore or a pipeline. In mathematical simulation, a geometry of the wellbore or the pipeline is used as obtained, for example, from a drilling log for the case of a wellbore, or directly measured where possible. For the expected flow rates, the flow regimes of the gas-liquid mixture in the wellbore or the pipeline containing, in addition to the horizontal section, inclined and vertical parts, are determined based on the numerical simulation, and at least one most probable place of development of fluid slugs is detected. Devices that convert the stratified flow of the gas-liquid mixture into the dispersed bubble flow are mounted in the determined most probable places of development of fluid slugs, which significantly increases the segregation time and significantly reduces the period between the fluid slugs and thus alleviates negative consequences of the slug flow regime.
  • The geometric configuration of a wellbore such as that shown in FIG. 1 leads to the formation of a slug flow regime in vertical and inclined sections due to gravitational segregation of the gas-liquid flow. A gas-liquid mixture enters a wellbore 1 from the side 2 and exits from the side 3. Here, a liquid phase 4 can move as a layer under a gas phase 5 and develop slugs in the zones 6 a and 6 b due to the influence of gravity and deviations of the pipeline from the horizontal position. At bottom points of the inclined sections, heavy fluid accumulates and blocks the lumen of the pipe 6 a, then the gas-liquid flow from the circumhorizontal section enters the vertical part where, due to the gravity action, rapid segregation occurs and a heavy liquid blocks a lumen of the pipe, thereby preventing free passage of the gas. As a result, pressure in the blocked gas volume rises and the fluid slug is pushed upward. Such splashes produce high-frequency pressure oscillations, which in turn can lead to undesirable geomechanical damage to the near-wellbore area, reduction in conductivity of the crack and reduction in hydrocarbon production from the stratum.
  • The risk of geomechanical damage to the near-wellbore area directly depends on the rate of change in pressure, i.e. from the derivative of the pressure over time (the higher its value, the higher the risk of damage). Thus, the decrease in frequency of pressure oscillations helps to reduce the risk of damage to the stratum.
  • To prevent high-frequency pressure oscillations, it is proposed to increase segregation time as far as possible in the regions where slugs are most likely to appear. For this purpose, it is proposed to convert the stratified flow into the dispersed flow by means of special devices. The stratified flow, passing through such devices, will be converted into a bubble or gas-droplet flow (depending on the volume fractions of the phases). For a dispersed flow, the segregation time is significantly higher, which will either completely prevent the development of fluid slugs or significantly reduce the rate of their development. FIG. 2 shows a diagram of gas-liquid mixture flow in a wellbore having inclined and vertical sections where the stratified flow 8 is converted by means of a special device 7 a into the dispersed bubble flow 9, which in turn can be segregated into the stratified one and then re-converted into the dispersed flow 10 by means of the device 7 b.
  • To convert the stratified flow into the dispersed one, the devices of various types can be used, for example, of the vortex type (http://www.chengfluid.com/), in the form of a twisted-tube bundle (FIG. 3), various variants of mixers (http://Www.stamixco-usa.com/plug-flow-reactors), in the form of a rotating brush (FIG. 4), etc.
  • The device shown schematically in FIG. 3, is a bundle of twisted tubes (not less than 2). Being mounted in the stratified gas-liquid flow, this device redirects the gas phase from the upper part of the flow to the lower one, and the liquid phase—in the opposite way, which leads to phase mixing and formation of a dispersed mixture. The length of such device shall exceed the diameter of the pipeline. The device can be made of various materials, for example, plastic or metal.
  • The device of FIG. 4 is a rotating brush for mixing the stratified gas and liquid phases. For effective mixing, the length of such device shall exceed the diameter of the pipeline. The device can be made of various materials, for example, plastic or metal. The exact position of the device is determined on the basis of mathematical numerical simulation of the gas-liquid flow in a pipeline of a given configuration.
  • The method can be implemented as follows.
  • Based on the well-known pipeline geometry derived from direct measurements or basing on drilling log data and typical flow rate of the phases, one can determine the possibility of establishment of the slug flow regime, as well as the exact place of the slug development, for which purpose, mathematical numerical simulation is used. Simulation can be based on solving non-steady-state equations of a multi-fluid model or a drift model derived from the laws of conservation of mass and pulse of continuum mechanics. The details of these methods and the features of the numerical solution of the determining equations are presented, for example, in the work (Theuveny B. C. et. al. Integrated approach to simulation of near-wellbore and wellbore cleanup//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. —Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2013).
  • FIGS. 5-7 show an example of numerical simulation of the oil and gas flow in a pipeline. FIG. 5 is a general view of the pipeline geometry, FIG. 6 shows the slope of the pipeline depending on the coordinate of the pipe defining the side-view in FIG. 5a . Numerical simulation was carried out for constant oil and gas flow rates specified at the pipeline inlet and presented in Table 1. The outlet of the pipeline is considered to be open into a region with constant atmospheric pressure (see Table 1).
  • TABLE 1
    The gas flow rate at the pipeline inlet, m/s 0.14
    The oil flow rate at the pipeline inlet, m/s 0.027
    Pipeline outlet pressure, atm. 1.0
    Coordinates of slug development points, m S1 = 150.5
    S2 = 758.9
  • FIG. 7 shows distribution of oil volume fraction across the pipeline at the moment of appearance of fluid slugs, obtained as a result of mathematical simulation. The points S1 and S2 in FIG. 7 denote the sites where the slugs will appear and before which it is necessary to mount a device for converting the stratified flow into the dispersed one. The calculated exact coordinates of these points are given in Table 1.

Claims (5)

1. A method for preventing formation of a slug flow regime of a gas-liquid mixture in a non-linear wellbore or pipeline, the method comprising:
determining at least one most probable place of fluid slugs formation in the non-linear wellbore or pipeline by mathematical simulation based on expected values of the gas-liquid mixture flow and known geometry of the wellbore or the pipeline, and
mounting a device, in the determined place of fluid slug development, that converts a stratified gas-liquid mixture flow into a dispersed flow.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein a vortex-type device is used as the device that converts the stratified gas-liquid mixture flow into the dispersed flow.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein a twisted-tube bundle device is used as the device that converts the stratified gas-liquid mixture flow into the dispersed flow.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein a mixer-type device is used as the device that converts the stratified gas-liquid mixture flow into the dispersed flow.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein a rotating brush type device is used as the device that converts the stratified gas-liquid mixture flow into the dispersed flow.
US15/655,995 2016-07-21 2017-07-21 Method for preventing formation of a slug flow regime of a gas-liquid mixture in a non-linear wellbore or pipeline Abandoned US20180023350A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
RU2016129941 2016-07-21
RU2016129941A RU2638236C1 (en) 2016-07-21 2016-07-21 Method for preventing formation of plug of gas-liquid mixture flow in non-straight well or pipeline

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20180023350A1 true US20180023350A1 (en) 2018-01-25

Family

ID=60718567

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/655,995 Abandoned US20180023350A1 (en) 2016-07-21 2017-07-21 Method for preventing formation of a slug flow regime of a gas-liquid mixture in a non-linear wellbore or pipeline

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20180023350A1 (en)
RU (1) RU2638236C1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10808506B2 (en) 2013-07-25 2020-10-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Sand control system and methodology
US11143002B2 (en) 2017-02-02 2021-10-12 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Downhole tool for gravel packing a wellbore

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6041803A (en) * 1998-09-17 2000-03-28 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. -Petrobras Device and method for eliminating severe slugging in multiphase-stream flow lines
US6679949B2 (en) * 2001-02-28 2004-01-20 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. Method and device to allow a rigid pig to pass into a flow pipe which requires the use of a hollow flow-constricting device
US20060041392A1 (en) * 2000-12-06 2006-02-23 Hakan Korske Method, computer program product and use of a computer program for stabilizing a multiphase flow
US20090140133A1 (en) * 2007-11-29 2009-06-04 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Pipeline pig and method for irradiation of bacteria in a pipeline
US20090173390A1 (en) * 2005-05-10 2009-07-09 Abb Research Ltd. Method and a System for Enhanced Flow Line Control
US20090301729A1 (en) * 2005-09-19 2009-12-10 Taras Yurievich Makogon Device for Controlling Slugging
US20130037974A1 (en) * 2006-04-05 2013-02-14 Horiba Stec, Co., Ltd. Liquid material vaporizer
US20150368999A1 (en) * 2013-11-28 2015-12-24 Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.- Petrobas Advanced automated control system for minimizing slugging

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU2118746C1 (en) * 1997-03-19 1998-09-10 Сергей Александрович Эйгенсон Method and device for transportation of viscous products
EP1409834A2 (en) * 2000-01-17 2004-04-21 Lattice Intellectual Property Limited Slugging control
WO2007111789A2 (en) * 2006-03-24 2007-10-04 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Composition and method for producing a pumpable hydrocarbon hydrate slurry at high water-cut

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6041803A (en) * 1998-09-17 2000-03-28 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. -Petrobras Device and method for eliminating severe slugging in multiphase-stream flow lines
US20060041392A1 (en) * 2000-12-06 2006-02-23 Hakan Korske Method, computer program product and use of a computer program for stabilizing a multiphase flow
US6679949B2 (en) * 2001-02-28 2004-01-20 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. Method and device to allow a rigid pig to pass into a flow pipe which requires the use of a hollow flow-constricting device
US20090173390A1 (en) * 2005-05-10 2009-07-09 Abb Research Ltd. Method and a System for Enhanced Flow Line Control
US20090301729A1 (en) * 2005-09-19 2009-12-10 Taras Yurievich Makogon Device for Controlling Slugging
US20130037974A1 (en) * 2006-04-05 2013-02-14 Horiba Stec, Co., Ltd. Liquid material vaporizer
US20090140133A1 (en) * 2007-11-29 2009-06-04 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Pipeline pig and method for irradiation of bacteria in a pipeline
US20150368999A1 (en) * 2013-11-28 2015-12-24 Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.- Petrobas Advanced automated control system for minimizing slugging

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10808506B2 (en) 2013-07-25 2020-10-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Sand control system and methodology
US11143002B2 (en) 2017-02-02 2021-10-12 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Downhole tool for gravel packing a wellbore

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
RU2638236C1 (en) 2017-12-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11141682B2 (en) Apparatus and method for gas-liquid separation
US6923871B2 (en) Coiled tubing wellbore cleanout
Veeken et al. New perspective on gas-well liquid loading and unloading
US20120211228A1 (en) Artificial Lift Modeling Methods and Systems
US9816367B2 (en) System, apparatus and method for well deliquification
Lane et al. Considerations for optimizing artificial lift in unconventionals
EA012384B1 (en) Device for controlling slugging
US20180023350A1 (en) Method for preventing formation of a slug flow regime of a gas-liquid mixture in a non-linear wellbore or pipeline
US10670575B2 (en) Multiphase flow meters and related methods having asymmetrical flow therethrough
RU2347889C2 (en) Fluid maintenance or decrease method and mechanism used in gas well bottom holes
NO20200017A1 (en) Systems and method for mitigating an uncontrolled fluid flow from a target wellbore using a relief wellbore
Almukhametova et al. Study of water-oil mixture separation in bottomhole area via drift flow model
Skalle et al. Experimental study of gas rise velocity and its effect on bottomhole pressure in a vertical well
Shea et al. A new method of predicting wellbore load up
Xie et al. Experimental study on effective operating envelops of nozzle to mitigate liquid loading in gas wells
Joseph et al. A practical approach to the evalution of subcritical multiphase flow trough down-hole safecty valves (storm chokes)
Igbokwe Severe slugging with multiphase fluid transport and phase separation in subsea pipelines
Wordu et al. A Study of Pressure Gradient in Multiphase Flow in Vertical Pipes
Leahy et al. Flow assurance application to unconventional gas wells: down-hole separation efficiency calculations with computational fluid dynamics
Fossmark Multiphase-flow correlations' ability to model vertical lift performance
Murashov Severe slugging phenomenon and a novel method for its mitigation based on the Surface Jet Pump technology
Shihui et al. A Mechanistic Model for Pressure Prediction in Deviated Wells During UBD Operations.
Fernandes et al. A PRESSURE TRAVERSE ALGORITHM FOR MULTILATERAL OIL AND GAS WELLS
Pham et al. Multiphase flow assurance in subsea pipeline from Ca Ngu Vang oilfield to central processing platform 3 of Bach Ho oilfield
Song et al. Flow regime behavior in the vicinity of the wellhead flowline junctions in subsea completions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LEBEDEVA, NATALIA ANATOLIEVNA;WILLBERG, DEAN MICHAEL;SIGNING DATES FROM 20171201 TO 20171206;REEL/FRAME:044392/0054

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION