US20170226438A1 - Membrane Filter Element With Multiple Fiber Types - Google Patents

Membrane Filter Element With Multiple Fiber Types Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20170226438A1
US20170226438A1 US15/495,611 US201715495611A US2017226438A1 US 20170226438 A1 US20170226438 A1 US 20170226438A1 US 201715495611 A US201715495611 A US 201715495611A US 2017226438 A1 US2017226438 A1 US 2017226438A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
gas
membrane element
membrane
fibers
fabricated
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US15/495,611
Inventor
Richard D. Peters
George E. Mahley, III
Atsushi Morisato
Fatimah Binti A. Karim
Hatarmizi Bin Hassan
Zalina Binti Ali
Wan Atikahsari Wan Zakaria
Faudzi Mat Isa
Faizal Bin Mohamad Fadzillah
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd
Cameron Solutions Inc
Original Assignee
Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd
Cameron Solutions Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd, Cameron Solutions Inc filed Critical Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd
Priority to US15/495,611 priority Critical patent/US20170226438A1/en
Assigned to PETRONAS CARIGALI SDN BHD, NATIONAL TANK COMPANY reassignment PETRONAS CARIGALI SDN BHD ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: PETERS, RICHARD D., MAHLEY, GEORGE E., III, MORISATO, ATSUSHI, ALI, ZALINA BINTI, FADZILLAH, FAIZAL BIN MOHAMAD, HASSAN, HATARMIZI BIN, ISA, FAUDZI MAT, KARIM, FATIMAH BINTI A., WAN ZAKARIA, WAN ATIKAHSARI
Assigned to CAMERON SOLUTIONS, INC. reassignment CAMERON SOLUTIONS, INC. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NATIONAL TANK COMPANY
Publication of US20170226438A1 publication Critical patent/US20170226438A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10LFUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G, C10K; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADDING MATERIALS TO FUELS OR FIRES TO REDUCE SMOKE OR UNDESIRABLE DEPOSITS OR TO FACILITATE SOOT REMOVAL; FIRELIGHTERS
    • C10L3/00Gaseous fuels; Natural gas; Synthetic natural gas obtained by processes not covered by subclass C10G, C10K; Liquefied petroleum gas
    • C10L3/06Natural gas; Synthetic natural gas obtained by processes not covered by C10G, C10K3/02 or C10K3/04
    • C10L3/10Working-up natural gas or synthetic natural gas
    • C10L3/101Removal of contaminants
    • C10L3/102Removal of contaminants of acid contaminants
    • C10L3/103Sulfur containing contaminants
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D63/00Apparatus in general for separation processes using semi-permeable membranes
    • B01D63/02Hollow fibre modules
    • B01D63/04Hollow fibre modules comprising multiple hollow fibre assemblies
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/22Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/22Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion
    • B01D53/225Multiple stage diffusion
    • B01D53/227Multiple stage diffusion in parallel connexion
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D63/00Apparatus in general for separation processes using semi-permeable membranes
    • B01D63/02Hollow fibre modules
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D63/00Apparatus in general for separation processes using semi-permeable membranes
    • B01D63/02Hollow fibre modules
    • B01D63/031Two or more types of hollow fibres within one bundle or within one potting or tube-sheet
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D63/00Apparatus in general for separation processes using semi-permeable membranes
    • B01D63/02Hollow fibre modules
    • B01D63/04Hollow fibre modules comprising multiple hollow fibre assemblies
    • B01D63/043Hollow fibre modules comprising multiple hollow fibre assemblies with separate tube sheets
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10LFUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G, C10K; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADDING MATERIALS TO FUELS OR FIRES TO REDUCE SMOKE OR UNDESIRABLE DEPOSITS OR TO FACILITATE SOOT REMOVAL; FIRELIGHTERS
    • C10L3/00Gaseous fuels; Natural gas; Synthetic natural gas obtained by processes not covered by subclass C10G, C10K; Liquefied petroleum gas
    • C10L3/06Natural gas; Synthetic natural gas obtained by processes not covered by C10G, C10K3/02 or C10K3/04
    • C10L3/10Working-up natural gas or synthetic natural gas
    • C10L3/101Removal of contaminants
    • C10L3/102Removal of contaminants of acid contaminants
    • C10L3/104Carbon dioxide
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/22Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion
    • B01D2053/221Devices
    • B01D2053/223Devices with hollow tubes
    • B01D2053/224Devices with hollow tubes with hollow fibres
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2257/00Components to be removed
    • B01D2257/30Sulfur compounds
    • B01D2257/304Hydrogen sulfide
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2257/00Components to be removed
    • B01D2257/50Carbon oxides
    • B01D2257/504Carbon dioxide
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2258/00Sources of waste gases
    • B01D2258/06Polluted air
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2319/00Membrane assemblies within one housing
    • B01D2319/06Use of membranes of different materials or properties within one module
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10LFUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G, C10K; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADDING MATERIALS TO FUELS OR FIRES TO REDUCE SMOKE OR UNDESIRABLE DEPOSITS OR TO FACILITATE SOOT REMOVAL; FIRELIGHTERS
    • C10L2290/00Fuel preparation or upgrading, processes or apparatus therefore, comprising specific process steps or apparatus units
    • C10L2290/54Specific separation steps for separating fractions, components or impurities during preparation or upgrading of a fuel
    • C10L2290/548Membrane- or permeation-treatment for separating fractions, components or impurities during preparation or upgrading of a fuel
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02CCAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
    • Y02C20/00Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
    • Y02C20/40Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of CO2

Definitions

  • This disclosure relates generally to apparatuses used in the treatment of gas. More particularly, the disclosure relates to semi-permeable membranes used in gas separation processes to remove acid gas and other components from a gas stream so that the gas may be usable for fuel.
  • membrane configurations include fiber materials made of organic polymers and copolymers including polysulfones, polycarbonates, cellulose acetates, cellulose triacetates, polyamides, polyimides, and mixed-matrix membranes. Regardless of the fiber material used, the membrane elements are fabricated with the same type of fiber material throughout. Therefore, these membranes are limited to a single and set range of performance characteristics even though gas properties and volumes change throughout the membrane as permeation occurs. Additionally, current technology may require the operation of the membrane elements in multiple stages, so that gas is passed through multiple groups of membranes in series to partially compensate for the inefficiencies in the performance of each individual membrane stage. The result is additional equipment requirements and less than optimal membrane separation performance.
  • membrane element performance can be restricted by these uniform performance characteristics.
  • a membrane fiber that performs well in higher CO 2 conditions may be less effective at lower CO 2 concentrations (and vice versa).
  • system design is often based on a compromise limited by the performance characteristics of the membrane fiber.
  • additional equipment and additional stages of membrane elements are required to remove high percentages of CO 2 .
  • the membrane separation performance achieved with a single fiber type may be less efficient overall, resulting in higher hydrocarbon losses to permeate.
  • the inlet gas has a high percentage (generally 10-95%) of inlet CO 2 and membrane elements are used to bulk remove CO 2 .
  • the membrane elements often are configured to operate in series with multiple stages of membranes in operation. This can result in an inefficient configuration for equipment, which requires interconnect piping between stages, thereby creating a larger overall equipment footprint and higher equipment cost. Having multiple stages of membranes may also result in difficulty in balancing the flow rates and CO 2 removal duties for each stage of membranes, as the amount of membrane surface area installed in each stage may have to be individually adjusted in order to maintain the desired separation performance characteristics.
  • FIG. 1 shows older, prior art 5-inch and 12-inch diameter CYNARA® membrane elements 10 (Cameron International Corporation, Houston, Tex.) which have 500 and 2,500 square feet of active membrane fiber area, respectively.
  • newer larger 16-inch and 30-inch diameter membranes have been developed that have between 9,000 and 40,000 square feet of active fiber area, respectively.
  • these larger diameter membranes are single fiber type membranes.
  • the shear surface area of these larger diameter membranes provides greater capacity and allows for fewer stages of processing when compared to the number of processing stages needed when smaller diameter membranes are used.
  • these larger membranes experience a larger gradient in, for example, CO 2 concentration between the inlet and outlet side of the membrane when compared to the smaller diameter membranes. This larger gradient can reduce the effectiveness of these larger diameter, single fiber type membrane elements.
  • the relative composition of the gas changes as the gas travels through the membrane bundle and permeable components are separated from the non-permeate components.
  • the inlet to non-permeate gas volume is reduced as gas passes through the membrane bundle and permeation occurs, with the inlet gas first entering the membrane being higher in volume and permeable components than the non-permeate gas exiting the membrane bundle.
  • the gas oftentimes undergoes significant and non-uniform compositional changes as it travels through the membrane. Therefore, a need exists for a membrane element that has the requisite performance characteristics for improved gas separation even as the gas volume and composition change as the gas travels through the membrane.
  • the membrane element includes at least two concentric, cylindrical-shaped zones spanning a total height of the membrane element and extending around the membrane element.
  • One of the zones is defined by first fibers fabricated to provide a selected first gas selectivity, a selected first gas permeability, or a selected first gas selectivity and permeability performance and arranged so a first gas permeate exits an end of the membrane element.
  • a method of treating a gas using the membrane element includes flowing the gas through the membrane element in a single stage of processing.
  • a membrane filter element at least two different hollow fiber types are used.
  • the hollow fiber types are wrapped about a perforated non-permeate pipe located at the center of the filter element to provide at least two circumferential zones.
  • the first circumferential zone includes the first hollow fiber type and is located toward the inlet gas stream (or feed) side of the element.
  • the second (or any subsequent) circumferential zone includes the second (or subsequent) hollow fiber type and is located between the first zone and the perforated non-permeate pipe.
  • the hollow fiber types are fabricated to differ from one another in targeted acid-gas selectivity and permeability performance, and because the first and second hollow fiber types are arranged in their respective zones, the selectivity and permeability performance characteristics in the first zone differ from those of the second zone as does the composition and volume of the natural gas stream to which each zone is exposed.
  • the different performance characteristics may be a function of intentional differences in bore size, wall thickness, material, manufacturing process, or some combination thereof between the multiple hollow fiber types.
  • the hollow fiber types differ in permeability (capacity or flux) and selectivity (separation or alpha).
  • the hollow fiber types may differ in CO 2 and H 2 S removal capacity or hydrocarbon removal capacity.
  • the hollow fiber types may differ in water dew pointing or hydrocarbon dew pointing performance.
  • Embodiments include a single membrane filter element that effectively accomplishes a range of separation from high CO 2 to low CO 2 (or vice versa).
  • the membrane filter element can be optimized to two or more distinct separation functions including but not limited to CO 2 and H 2 S separation or CO 2 and hydrocarbon dewpointing to the membrane filter element can provide for improved membrane efficiency and a better overall separation and capacity and simplify process control by reducing the number of filtering stages that require monitoring and eliminating the need for plant operators to rebalance flow rates between multiple stages of membrane filter elements or to change the relative loading between these stages.
  • to the membrane filter element may provide for increased flexibility in accommodating changes in inlet gas composition over time.
  • the membrane filter element can create more resistance to bypass or gas channeling and, therefore, eliminate the need for internal baffles or other gas distribution mechanisms.
  • FIG. 1 compares membrane filter element sizes—ranging in diameter from about 5 to 30 inches.
  • the two smaller diameter membrane filter elements 10 are examples of prior art single fiber type filter elements. In many applications, several of these single fiber elements must be deployed in series or stages to treat an incoming natural gas stream. In some embodiments, a membrane element with a diameter greater than 12 inches is used for producing the multiple fiber membrane filter element of this disclosure. However, because of the greater bundle depth recently provided by large membrane elements, multiple fiber types may be used effectively in a single filter element, eliminating the need for several single fiber filter elements and multiple processing stages. Therefore, for the purpose of this disclosure, the two larger diameter membrane filter elements 20 are non-limiting examples of a multiple fiber type filter element.
  • FIG. 2 is a graphical depiction of the hollow fibers that make up the multiple fiber membrane filter element 20 of FIG. 1 .
  • the hollow fibers are arranged about a perforated non-permeate pipe.
  • the fibers may be arranged in bundles and then wrapped about the pipe.
  • FIG. 3 is a graphical depiction of the several hollow fibers of one of the bundles of FIG. 2 .
  • the fibers are isolated to indicate the size of the individual fibers.
  • FIG. 4 is an end view of one of the hollow fibers of FIG. 3 as it might appear under magnification.
  • the multiple fiber membrane filter element includes many hundreds of thousands of these hollow fibers.
  • FIG. 5 is an end view of the multiple fiber membrane filter element 20 of FIG. 1 as it experiences an outside-in gas flow.
  • the fiber types are generally arranged in two circumferential zones. Bundles located in the first circumferential zone include hollow fibers of one type and bundles located in the second zone hollow fibers of another type. Because the hollow fiber types are intentionally fabricated to differ from one another and provide a different target selectivity and permeability, the first zone exhibits different performance than does the second zone. Alternatively, gas flow could occur “inside out,” flowing first through the second zone and then through the first zone.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic illustrating a prior art process that makes use of single fiber filter elements arranged in series, or two different single fiber type membranes with one fiber type used in Stage 1 and the second fiber type used in Stage 2.
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic illustrating a process that makes use of a filter element embodiment.
  • the multiple fiber type filter element allows for single-stage processing.
  • connection In the specification and appended claims: the terms “connect”, “connection”, “connected”, “in connection with”, and “connecting” are used to mean “in direct connection with” or “in connection with via one or more elements”; and the term “set” is used to mean “one element” or “more than one element”. Further, the terms “couple”, “coupling”, “coupled”, “coupled together”, and “coupled with” are used to mean “directly coupled together” or “coupled together via one or more elements”.
  • membrane 20 the larger diameter membranes of FIG. 1 are labeled as membrane 20 .
  • Membrane element 20 takes advantage of manufacturing improvements that have enabled the production of much larger diameter semi-permeable membrane filter elements for CO 2 /natural gas separation.
  • Single fiber membrane elements 10 are available in sizes similar to that of membrane element 20 , but membrane element 20 as disclosed herein is not a prior art membrane element.
  • the cylindrical-shaped membrane 10 , 20 is typically housed within a pressure vessel connected by way of piping to an inlet gas stream (not shown) and may be configured for an “outside in” flow or “inside out” flow. Regardless of the direction of flow, as the inlet gas stream travels through the membrane 10 , 20 , acid gas and other undesirable components are removed to the permeate.
  • single fiber membrane element 10 may be generally less than 15 inches in diameter and from about 24 inches to about 48 inches in height. Because membrane 10 does not have sufficient depth to minimize bypass—and because it employs a single fiber type that cannot account for the changes in gas volume and composition as the gas stream travels through the membrane 10 —two or more membranes 10 must be arranged in series (see FIG. 6 ) with separation being performed in at least two stages. Selection of the fiber type for use in membrane 10 at each stage typically involves a trade-off between permeability (known as flow capacity or flux) and selectivity (called permeation rate or alpha). By way of example, as permeability increases in a polymeric membrane fiber, selectivity decreases (and vice versa).
  • flow capacity or flux permeability
  • selectivity permeation rate or alpha
  • Membrane fibers that exhibit better hydrocarbon separation attributes (higher selectivity) and lower permeability may be selected for use in membrane 10 at the first stage of processing. Conditions at this stage are typically characterized by higher gas flow rates and higher CO 2 concentrations. For hydrocarbon/CO 2 separation applications, the majority of CO 2 is permeated in this first stage, and the majority of “hydrocarbon losses” occur in this stage. Although the higher alpha fibers selected for use have a slightly lower flux, the fibers still operate efficiently due to the high CO 2 concentrations.
  • membrane fibers that exhibit higher permeability and lower selectivity may be used. Conditions at this stage are typically characterized by lower gas flow rates and lower CO 2 concentrations. Therefore, element 10 can exhibit higher permeability at this stage in order to minimize the amount of membrane area and associated equipment required.
  • a multiple fiber membrane element 20 replaces multiple single fiber membranes 10 and multiple stages of separation processing.
  • the improved processing performance provided by membrane 20 is due in part to the use of different types of hollow fibers 21 in different zones 31 , 33 of the membrane 20 and the increased surface area and bundle depth 29 provided by membrane 20 .
  • membrane 20 is about 30 inches in diameter and 72 inches in height.
  • multiple fiber membrane filter element 20 generally has about 10 times the surface area and about 3 times the bundle depth 29 as that of membrane 10 .
  • membrane 20 includes hundreds of thousands of two or more different types of hollow fibers 21 .
  • the fibers 21 are wrapped about a perforated non-permeate tube or pipe 35 that shares a central longitudinal axis 37 with membrane 20 .
  • the fibers 21 may be arranged in bundles 27 and wrapped about pipe 35 .
  • Fibers 21 are arranged so permeate that permeates the wall 23 and enters the bore 25 of the hollow fibers 21 may exit through the top and bottom of membrane 20 .
  • Membrane 20 is fabricated as a divided membrane element with two distinct circumferential zones 31 , 33 , with line 45 indicating the division between the two zones.
  • Fibers 21 located in a first circumferential zone 31 of the membrane 20 have a different type (or types) of hollow fibers 21 than fibers 21 B located in a second circumferential zone 33 .
  • the performance characteristics of each zone 31 , 33 differ because the hollow fibers 21 or combination of hollow fibers 21 fabricated and selected for use in zone 31 have been fabricated to achieve, for a composition and volume of the natural gas stream flowing through the zone 31 , a different selectivity and permeability than the hollow fibers 21 B or combination of hollow fibers 21 B in zone 22 for the composition and volume of the natural gas stream flowing through the zone 33 .
  • the hollow fibers 21 in each zone 31 , 33 are selected in order to maximize the overall capacity and separation performance of membrane 20 as a gas stream passes through it, thereby reducing or eliminating the need for multiple processing or separation stages (see FIG. 7 ).
  • a higher separation, lower permeability hollow fiber 21 may be located nearest to the inlet or feed side 41 of the membrane 20 , in circumferential zone 31 , where maximum permeation flow volumes occur, in order to reduce the hydrocarbon losses to the permeate.
  • a higher permeability but lower separation hollow fiber 21 may be located nearest to the outlet or non-permeate side 43 of the membrane 20 , in circumferential zone 33 , to improve capacity where CO 2 is lower.
  • a first hollow fiber 21 having a higher permeation of one component may be bundled with a second hollow fiber 21 having higher permeation of another component (e.g. CO 2 or hydrocarbon dewpointing) or vice versa.
  • one component e.g. H 2 S
  • another component e.g. CO 2 or hydrocarbon dewpointing
  • Configuring membrane 20 with multiple types of hollow fibers 21 can optimize performance by taking advantage of the performance characteristics of the different types of hollow fibers 21 included in each zone 31 , 33 relative to the gas composition and more than two zones 31 , 33 may be deployed. For example:
  • Membrane 20 results in fewer stages of membrane elements because it performs a much greater CO 2 removal duty than its single fiber predecessor membrane 10 .
  • a greater amount of CO 2 can be removed in membrane 20 because there is more permeation of CO 2 , which results in a greater differential between inlet CO 2 and exiting non-permeate CO 2 inside of membrane 20 . Because of this, the gas passing through membrane 20 now has a higher percentage of CO 2 on the feed side 41 of membrane 20 than it does in the middle or on the exiting non-permeate side 43 .
  • a membrane 20 can provide a number of benefits. Because of the increased fiber bundle depth 29 , the larger membrane 20 may replace two stages of smaller conventional membranes 10 . Equivalent scale-up is not possible with spiral wound membrane elements due to the restriction in gas flow paths between layers of the membrane.
  • CO 2 is selectively separated within the membrane element 20 as the flowing mixed CO 2 /hydrocarbon gas comes in contact with the fibers 21 .
  • CO 2 passes through the wall 23 of each fiber 21 into the bore 25 of each fiber 21 and exits through the ends of the membrane element 20 as permeate gas.
  • the inlet gas is reduced in CO 2 as the gas travels through membrane 20 , resulting in the exiting non-permeate gas having a lower CO 2 concentration than the inlet gas.
  • each successive array of fibers 21 actually processes gas with progressively lower and lower CO 2 content.
  • the actual CO 2 content that each individual hollow fiber 21 is exposed to depends on the position of the fiber 21 in the membrane 20 relative to the feed gas side 41 , with fibers 21 located near the inlet operating on higher CO 2 gas than fibers 21 that are located downstream, nearer to the gas outlet or non-permeate side 45 .
  • the larger bundle depth 29 thus enables the use of multiple fiber types in a single membrane element 20 and provides separation performance similar to that which previously required gas to pass through two or more membranes 10 in series. Furthermore, within membrane 20 there is a greater change in gas volume and composition due to permeation than with previous smaller membranes 10 .
  • membrane 20 is not only processing more gas but is also operating with a greater differential in gas composition between the feed gas side 41 and the non-permeate side 43 enabling the use of multiple fiber types.
  • the resulting membrane performance over the range of gas conditions present in the membrane 10 may be sub-optimal.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Separation Using Semi-Permeable Membranes (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)

Abstract

A membrane filter element includes at least two cylindrical-shaped, fiber bundles, one of the fiber bundles containing first fibers fabricated to provide a selected first gas selectivity, a selected first gas permeability, or a selected first gas selectivity and permeability performance and arranged so a first gas permeate exits the membrane element; another of the fiber bundles containing second fibers fabricated to provide a selected second, different gas selectivity, a selected second different gas permeability, or a selected second gas selectivity and permeability performance and arranged so a second different gas permeate exits the membrane element. The different performance characteristics can reduce the number of membrane elements required for gas separation and to improve gas separation performance due to changing gas composition as the gas travels through the membrane element.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO PENDING APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/706,105, filed Feb. 16, 2010, which claimed the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/154,219, filed Feb. 20, 2009, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Field
  • This disclosure relates generally to apparatuses used in the treatment of gas. More particularly, the disclosure relates to semi-permeable membranes used in gas separation processes to remove acid gas and other components from a gas stream so that the gas may be usable for fuel.
  • Description of the Related Art
  • Much of the world's produced natural gas contains unacceptably high concentrations of acid gas—primarily CO2 and H2S—which must be removed before the gas is usable for fuel. The utilization of semi-permeable membranes for CO2/natural gas separation is well known and spiral wound and hollow fiber membrane configurations have been used for this purpose.
  • Commonly used membrane configurations include fiber materials made of organic polymers and copolymers including polysulfones, polycarbonates, cellulose acetates, cellulose triacetates, polyamides, polyimides, and mixed-matrix membranes. Regardless of the fiber material used, the membrane elements are fabricated with the same type of fiber material throughout. Therefore, these membranes are limited to a single and set range of performance characteristics even though gas properties and volumes change throughout the membrane as permeation occurs. Additionally, current technology may require the operation of the membrane elements in multiple stages, so that gas is passed through multiple groups of membranes in series to partially compensate for the inefficiencies in the performance of each individual membrane stage. The result is additional equipment requirements and less than optimal membrane separation performance.
  • For applications that require a significant amount of CO2 removal, membrane element performance can be restricted by these uniform performance characteristics. For example, a membrane fiber that performs well in higher CO2 conditions may be less effective at lower CO2 concentrations (and vice versa). As a result, system design is often based on a compromise limited by the performance characteristics of the membrane fiber. Because of less than optimal membrane separation performance, additional equipment and additional stages of membrane elements are required to remove high percentages of CO2. In addition, the membrane separation performance achieved with a single fiber type may be less efficient overall, resulting in higher hydrocarbon losses to permeate.
  • In many applications, the inlet gas has a high percentage (generally 10-95%) of inlet CO2 and membrane elements are used to bulk remove CO2. As discussed previously, for high CO2 applications, the membrane elements often are configured to operate in series with multiple stages of membranes in operation. This can result in an inefficient configuration for equipment, which requires interconnect piping between stages, thereby creating a larger overall equipment footprint and higher equipment cost. Having multiple stages of membranes may also result in difficulty in balancing the flow rates and CO2 removal duties for each stage of membranes, as the amount of membrane surface area installed in each stage may have to be individually adjusted in order to maintain the desired separation performance characteristics.
  • Recent improvements in membrane manufacturing have led to significant increases in membrane fiber surface area in a single membrane element. For example, FIG. 1 shows older, prior art 5-inch and 12-inch diameter CYNARA® membrane elements 10 (Cameron International Corporation, Houston, Tex.) which have 500 and 2,500 square feet of active membrane fiber area, respectively. In comparison, newer larger 16-inch and 30-inch diameter membranes have been developed that have between 9,000 and 40,000 square feet of active fiber area, respectively. In the prior art—and unlike the embodiments disclosed herein—these larger diameter membranes are single fiber type membranes. The shear surface area of these larger diameter membranes provides greater capacity and allows for fewer stages of processing when compared to the number of processing stages needed when smaller diameter membranes are used. However, these larger membranes experience a larger gradient in, for example, CO2 concentration between the inlet and outlet side of the membrane when compared to the smaller diameter membranes. This larger gradient can reduce the effectiveness of these larger diameter, single fiber type membrane elements.
  • For membrane gas separation applications, the relative composition of the gas changes as the gas travels through the membrane bundle and permeable components are separated from the non-permeate components. At the same time, the inlet to non-permeate gas volume is reduced as gas passes through the membrane bundle and permeation occurs, with the inlet gas first entering the membrane being higher in volume and permeable components than the non-permeate gas exiting the membrane bundle. In other words, the gas oftentimes undergoes significant and non-uniform compositional changes as it travels through the membrane. Therefore, a need exists for a membrane element that has the requisite performance characteristics for improved gas separation even as the gas volume and composition change as the gas travels through the membrane.
  • SUMMARY
  • In general, disclosed herein are methods, systems, and apparatuses for a membrane fiber element. In some embodiments, the membrane element includes at least two concentric, cylindrical-shaped zones spanning a total height of the membrane element and extending around the membrane element. One of the zones is defined by first fibers fabricated to provide a selected first gas selectivity, a selected first gas permeability, or a selected first gas selectivity and permeability performance and arranged so a first gas permeate exits an end of the membrane element. Another of the zones defined by second fibers fabricated to provide a selected second, different gas selectivity, a selected second different gas permeability, or a selected second gas selectivity and permeability performance and arranged so a second different gas permeate exits an end of the membrane element. A method of treating a gas using the membrane element includes flowing the gas through the membrane element in a single stage of processing.
  • In other embodiments of a membrane filter element at least two different hollow fiber types are used. The hollow fiber types are wrapped about a perforated non-permeate pipe located at the center of the filter element to provide at least two circumferential zones. The first circumferential zone includes the first hollow fiber type and is located toward the inlet gas stream (or feed) side of the element. The second (or any subsequent) circumferential zone includes the second (or subsequent) hollow fiber type and is located between the first zone and the perforated non-permeate pipe. Because the hollow fiber types are fabricated to differ from one another in targeted acid-gas selectivity and permeability performance, and because the first and second hollow fiber types are arranged in their respective zones, the selectivity and permeability performance characteristics in the first zone differ from those of the second zone as does the composition and volume of the natural gas stream to which each zone is exposed.
  • The different performance characteristics may be a function of intentional differences in bore size, wall thickness, material, manufacturing process, or some combination thereof between the multiple hollow fiber types. For example, in an embodiment, the hollow fiber types differ in permeability (capacity or flux) and selectivity (separation or alpha). Or, the hollow fiber types may differ in CO2 and H2S removal capacity or hydrocarbon removal capacity. Additionally, the hollow fiber types may differ in water dew pointing or hydrocarbon dew pointing performance.
  • Embodiments include a single membrane filter element that effectively accomplishes a range of separation from high CO2 to low CO2 (or vice versa). The membrane filter element can be optimized to two or more distinct separation functions including but not limited to CO2 and H2S separation or CO2 and hydrocarbon dewpointing to the membrane filter element can provide for improved membrane efficiency and a better overall separation and capacity and simplify process control by reducing the number of filtering stages that require monitoring and eliminating the need for plant operators to rebalance flow rates between multiple stages of membrane filter elements or to change the relative loading between these stages. to the membrane filter element may provide for increased flexibility in accommodating changes in inlet gas composition over time. The membrane filter element can create more resistance to bypass or gas channeling and, therefore, eliminate the need for internal baffles or other gas distribution mechanisms.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • So that the manner in which the above recited features can be understood in detail, a more particular description may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate various embodiments and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, and may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
  • FIG. 1 compares membrane filter element sizes—ranging in diameter from about 5 to 30 inches. For the purpose of this disclosure, the two smaller diameter membrane filter elements 10 are examples of prior art single fiber type filter elements. In many applications, several of these single fiber elements must be deployed in series or stages to treat an incoming natural gas stream. In some embodiments, a membrane element with a diameter greater than 12 inches is used for producing the multiple fiber membrane filter element of this disclosure. However, because of the greater bundle depth recently provided by large membrane elements, multiple fiber types may be used effectively in a single filter element, eliminating the need for several single fiber filter elements and multiple processing stages. Therefore, for the purpose of this disclosure, the two larger diameter membrane filter elements 20 are non-limiting examples of a multiple fiber type filter element.
  • FIG. 2 is a graphical depiction of the hollow fibers that make up the multiple fiber membrane filter element 20 of FIG. 1. The hollow fibers are arranged about a perforated non-permeate pipe. Optionally, the fibers may be arranged in bundles and then wrapped about the pipe.
  • FIG. 3 is a graphical depiction of the several hollow fibers of one of the bundles of FIG. 2. The fibers are isolated to indicate the size of the individual fibers.
  • FIG. 4 is an end view of one of the hollow fibers of FIG. 3 as it might appear under magnification. The multiple fiber membrane filter element includes many hundreds of thousands of these hollow fibers.
  • FIG. 5 is an end view of the multiple fiber membrane filter element 20 of FIG. 1 as it experiences an outside-in gas flow. The fiber types are generally arranged in two circumferential zones. Bundles located in the first circumferential zone include hollow fibers of one type and bundles located in the second zone hollow fibers of another type. Because the hollow fiber types are intentionally fabricated to differ from one another and provide a different target selectivity and permeability, the first zone exhibits different performance than does the second zone. Alternatively, gas flow could occur “inside out,” flowing first through the second zone and then through the first zone.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic illustrating a prior art process that makes use of single fiber filter elements arranged in series, or two different single fiber type membranes with one fiber type used in Stage 1 and the second fiber type used in Stage 2.
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic illustrating a process that makes use of a filter element embodiment. The multiple fiber type filter element allows for single-stage processing.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of some embodiments of the present disclosure. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the system and/or methodology may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments may be possible.
  • In the specification and appended claims: the terms “connect”, “connection”, “connected”, “in connection with”, and “connecting” are used to mean “in direct connection with” or “in connection with via one or more elements”; and the term “set” is used to mean “one element” or “more than one element”. Further, the terms “couple”, “coupling”, “coupled”, “coupled together”, and “coupled with” are used to mean “directly coupled together” or “coupled together via one or more elements”. As used herein, the terms “up” and “down”, “upper” and “lower”, “upwardly” and downwardly”, “upstream” and “downstream”; “above” and “below”; and other like terms indicating relative positions above or below a given point or element are used in this description to more clearly describe some embodiments of the disclosure
  • Embodiments of a membrane element that has multiple hollow fiber types will now be described by making reference to the drawings and the following elements illustrated in the drawings:
  • 10 Single fiber membrane element
    20 Multiple fiber membrane element
    21 Hollow fiber
    23 Wall of 21
    25 Bore of 21
    27 Fiber bundle
    29 Bundle depth
    31 First circumferential zone of fibers
    33 Second circumferential zone of fibers
    35 Perforated non-permeate pipe
    37 Central longitudinal axis of 20 & 35
    41 Gas inlet or feed side of 20
    43 Outlet or non-permeate side of 20
    45 Membrane division
  • Referring now to FIG. 1, two prior art, single fiber membrane elements 10 are shown. Because membrane elements that have a diameter greater than 12 inches are useful for producing a multiple fiber membrane element, the larger diameter membranes of FIG. 1 are labeled as membrane 20. Membrane element 20 takes advantage of manufacturing improvements that have enabled the production of much larger diameter semi-permeable membrane filter elements for CO2/natural gas separation. Single fiber membrane elements 10 are available in sizes similar to that of membrane element 20, but membrane element 20 as disclosed herein is not a prior art membrane element. The cylindrical-shaped membrane 10, 20 is typically housed within a pressure vessel connected by way of piping to an inlet gas stream (not shown) and may be configured for an “outside in” flow or “inside out” flow. Regardless of the direction of flow, as the inlet gas stream travels through the membrane 10, 20, acid gas and other undesirable components are removed to the permeate.
  • For the purpose of comparison with multiple fiber membrane element 20, single fiber membrane element 10 may be generally less than 15 inches in diameter and from about 24 inches to about 48 inches in height. Because membrane 10 does not have sufficient depth to minimize bypass—and because it employs a single fiber type that cannot account for the changes in gas volume and composition as the gas stream travels through the membrane 10—two or more membranes 10 must be arranged in series (see FIG. 6) with separation being performed in at least two stages. Selection of the fiber type for use in membrane 10 at each stage typically involves a trade-off between permeability (known as flow capacity or flux) and selectivity (called permeation rate or alpha). By way of example, as permeability increases in a polymeric membrane fiber, selectivity decreases (and vice versa).
  • Because of the trade-off between permeability and selectivity, some membrane fibers are better suited to higher concentrations of permeable components, while others are better suited to higher grade separations at lower concentrations of permeable components. Membrane fibers that exhibit better hydrocarbon separation attributes (higher selectivity) and lower permeability may be selected for use in membrane 10 at the first stage of processing. Conditions at this stage are typically characterized by higher gas flow rates and higher CO2 concentrations. For hydrocarbon/CO2 separation applications, the majority of CO2 is permeated in this first stage, and the majority of “hydrocarbon losses” occur in this stage. Although the higher alpha fibers selected for use have a slightly lower flux, the fibers still operate efficiently due to the high CO2 concentrations. At the second stage, however, membrane fibers that exhibit higher permeability and lower selectivity may be used. Conditions at this stage are typically characterized by lower gas flow rates and lower CO2 concentrations. Therefore, element 10 can exhibit higher permeability at this stage in order to minimize the amount of membrane area and associated equipment required.
  • Turning now to FIGS. 5 & 7, a multiple fiber membrane element 20 replaces multiple single fiber membranes 10 and multiple stages of separation processing. The improved processing performance provided by membrane 20 is due in part to the use of different types of hollow fibers 21 in different zones 31, 33 of the membrane 20 and the increased surface area and bundle depth 29 provided by membrane 20. For example, in one embodiment membrane 20 is about 30 inches in diameter and 72 inches in height. Compared to a 12-inch diameter single fiber membrane 10, multiple fiber membrane filter element 20 generally has about 10 times the surface area and about 3 times the bundle depth 29 as that of membrane 10.
  • Referring now to FIGS. 2 to 5, membrane 20 includes hundreds of thousands of two or more different types of hollow fibers 21. The fibers 21 are wrapped about a perforated non-permeate tube or pipe 35 that shares a central longitudinal axis 37 with membrane 20. Alternatively, the fibers 21 may be arranged in bundles 27 and wrapped about pipe 35. Fibers 21 are arranged so permeate that permeates the wall 23 and enters the bore 25 of the hollow fibers 21 may exit through the top and bottom of membrane 20. Membrane 20 is fabricated as a divided membrane element with two distinct circumferential zones 31, 33, with line 45 indicating the division between the two zones. Fibers 21 located in a first circumferential zone 31 of the membrane 20 have a different type (or types) of hollow fibers 21 than fibers 21B located in a second circumferential zone 33. The performance characteristics of each zone 31, 33 differ because the hollow fibers 21 or combination of hollow fibers 21 fabricated and selected for use in zone 31 have been fabricated to achieve, for a composition and volume of the natural gas stream flowing through the zone 31, a different selectivity and permeability than the hollow fibers 21B or combination of hollow fibers 21B in zone 22 for the composition and volume of the natural gas stream flowing through the zone 33.
  • The hollow fibers 21 in each zone 31, 33 are selected in order to maximize the overall capacity and separation performance of membrane 20 as a gas stream passes through it, thereby reducing or eliminating the need for multiple processing or separation stages (see FIG. 7). For example, a higher separation, lower permeability hollow fiber 21 may be located nearest to the inlet or feed side 41 of the membrane 20, in circumferential zone 31, where maximum permeation flow volumes occur, in order to reduce the hydrocarbon losses to the permeate. A higher permeability but lower separation hollow fiber 21 may be located nearest to the outlet or non-permeate side 43 of the membrane 20, in circumferential zone 33, to improve capacity where CO2 is lower. Alternatively, a first hollow fiber 21 having a higher permeation of one component (e.g. H2S) may be bundled with a second hollow fiber 21 having higher permeation of another component (e.g. CO2 or hydrocarbon dewpointing) or vice versa.
  • Configuring membrane 20 with multiple types of hollow fibers 21 can optimize performance by taking advantage of the performance characteristics of the different types of hollow fibers 21 included in each zone 31, 33 relative to the gas composition and more than two zones 31, 33 may be deployed. For example:
      • 1. Combining larger bore hollow fibers 21 on the high CO2 zone nearest the feed gas side 41 of element 20 and smaller bore fibers 21 on the low CO2 zone nearest the non-permeate side 43 of element 20 to add more relative surface area in low CO2 conditions.
      • 2. Combining hollow fibers 21 that have greater CO2 partial pressure resistance in the zone nearest the feed gas side 41 with hollow fibers 21 having higher flux in the zone nearest the non-permeate side 43.
      • 3. Combining hollow fibers 21 that exhibit different separations, such as combining a hollow fiber 21 for dehydration with a fiber 21 for CO2/hydrocarbon separation or combining a fiber 21 for CO2 removal with a fiber 21 for H2S removal or for hydrocarbon dewpointing.
  • Membrane 20 results in fewer stages of membrane elements because it performs a much greater CO2 removal duty than its single fiber predecessor membrane 10. A greater amount of CO2 can be removed in membrane 20 because there is more permeation of CO2, which results in a greater differential between inlet CO2 and exiting non-permeate CO2 inside of membrane 20. Because of this, the gas passing through membrane 20 now has a higher percentage of CO2 on the feed side 41 of membrane 20 than it does in the middle or on the exiting non-permeate side 43.
  • By way of example, consider an inlet gas stream entering membrane 20 that contains about 50% inlet CO2. As the gas passes through membrane 20 and travels toward the inner core or central longitudinal axis 37, CO2 is permeated. As a result, the hollow fibers 21 located closer to the central longitudinal axis 35 of element 20 (that is, the non-permeate side 43) are presented with gas having successively lower and lower amounts of CO2. For example, depending on the type of hollow fibers 21 selected for use, non-permeate gas may exit the membrane 20 with about 10% CO2. In this example, although the removal of CO2 through the membrane 20 is a continuous process, for simplification purposes zone 31 is a labeled a high-CO2 zone where CO2 is removed from about 50% to 25%. The hollow fibers 21 located farther away from the feed side 41 and toward the non-permeate side 43 reside in zone 33 or the low-CO2 zone, where CO2 is removed from about 25% to 10%. Again, these values are simply illustrative ones.
  • A membrane 20 can provide a number of benefits. Because of the increased fiber bundle depth 29, the larger membrane 20 may replace two stages of smaller conventional membranes 10. Equivalent scale-up is not possible with spiral wound membrane elements due to the restriction in gas flow paths between layers of the membrane. CO2 is selectively separated within the membrane element 20 as the flowing mixed CO2/hydrocarbon gas comes in contact with the fibers 21. CO2 passes through the wall 23 of each fiber 21 into the bore 25 of each fiber 21 and exits through the ends of the membrane element 20 as permeate gas. The inlet gas is reduced in CO2 as the gas travels through membrane 20, resulting in the exiting non-permeate gas having a lower CO2 concentration than the inlet gas.
  • As gas passes through membrane element 20, each successive array of fibers 21 actually processes gas with progressively lower and lower CO2 content. The actual CO2 content that each individual hollow fiber 21 is exposed to depends on the position of the fiber 21 in the membrane 20 relative to the feed gas side 41, with fibers 21 located near the inlet operating on higher CO2 gas than fibers 21 that are located downstream, nearer to the gas outlet or non-permeate side 45. The larger bundle depth 29 thus enables the use of multiple fiber types in a single membrane element 20 and provides separation performance similar to that which previously required gas to pass through two or more membranes 10 in series. Furthermore, within membrane 20 there is a greater change in gas volume and composition due to permeation than with previous smaller membranes 10. Therefore, membrane 20 is not only processing more gas but is also operating with a greater differential in gas composition between the feed gas side 41 and the non-permeate side 43 enabling the use of multiple fiber types. With current single fiber membranes 10, the resulting membrane performance over the range of gas conditions present in the membrane 10 may be sub-optimal.
  • While a membrane filter element having multiple fiber types and a method for its use has been described with a certain degree of particularity, many changes may be made in the details of construction and the arrangement of components and steps without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure. A filter element and method according to this disclosure, therefore, is limited only by the scope of the attached claims, including the full range of equivalency to which each element thereof is entitled.

Claims (20)

What is claimed is:
1. A membrane element comprising:
at least two concentric, cylindrical-shaped zones spanning a total height of the membrane element and surrounding a central longitudinal axis of the membrane element;
one of the zones defined by first fibers fabricated to provide a selected first gas selectivity and arranged so a first gas permeate exits an end of the membrane element;
another of the zones defined by second fibers fabricated to provide a selected second, different gas selectivity so a second different gas permeate exits an end of the membrane element.
2. A membrane element according to claim 1 wherein the first fibers are fabricated to provide a selected first gas permeability and the second fibers are fabricated to provide a second, different gas permeability.
3. A membrane element according to claim 2 wherein the first and second fibers are fabricated to provide, relative to one another, a different target CO2 permeability.
4. A membrane element according to claim 2 wherein the first and second fibers are fabricated to provide, relative to one another, a different target H2S permeability.
5. A membrane element according to claim 1 relative to one another, a different target CO2 selectivity.
6. A membrane element according to claim 1 wherein the first and second fibers are fabricated to provide, relative to one another, a different target H2S selectivity.
7. A membrane element according to claim 1 wherein the first and second fibers are fabricated to provide, relative to one another, a different target water dew pointing performance.
8. A membrane element according to claim 1 wherein the first and second fibers are fabricated to provide, relative to one another, a different target hydrocarbon dew pointing performance.
9. A membrane element according to claim 1 wherein depth of the zones differs from one another.
10. A membrane element according to claim 1 wherein at least one of zones is an innermost zone or an outermost zone of the membrane fiber element.
11. A membrane element according to claim 1 wherein the two zones are located adjacent one another.
12. A membrane element according to claim 1 further comprising the first and second fibers including hollow fibers.
13. A membrane element according to claim 1 wherein the first and the second different gas permeates exit a same end of the membrane element.
14. A membrane element according to claim 1 wherein the first and second different gas permeates mix with one another after exiting the same end.
15. A method of treating a gas, the method comprising:
flowing the gas through a membrane element containing at least two concentric, cylindrical-shaped zones spanning a total height of the membrane element and extending around the membrane element;
wherein one of the zones is defined by first fibers fabricated to provide a selected first gas selectivity and arranged so a first gas permeate exits an end of the membrane element; and
wherein another of the zones is defined by second fibers fabricated to provide a selected second, different gas selectivity and arranged so a second different gas permeate exits an end of the membrane element.
16. A method according to claim 15 wherein the first and second fibers are fabricated to provide a selected first gas permeability and the second fibers are fabricated to provide a second, different gas permeability.
17. A method according to claim 15 wherein the first and second fibers are fabricated to provide, relative to one another, a different target water dew pointing performance.
18. A method according to claim 15 wherein the first and second fibers are fabricated to provide, relative to one another, a different target hydrocarbon dew pointing performance.
19. A method according to claim 15 wherein the first and second fibers include hollow fibers.
20. A method according to claim 15 further comprising mixing the first and second different gas permeates with one another after exiting a respective end of the membrane element.
US15/495,611 2009-02-20 2017-04-24 Membrane Filter Element With Multiple Fiber Types Abandoned US20170226438A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/495,611 US20170226438A1 (en) 2009-02-20 2017-04-24 Membrane Filter Element With Multiple Fiber Types

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15421909P 2009-02-20 2009-02-20
US12/706,105 US9630141B2 (en) 2009-02-20 2010-02-16 Membrane filter element with multiple fiber types
US15/495,611 US20170226438A1 (en) 2009-02-20 2017-04-24 Membrane Filter Element With Multiple Fiber Types

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/706,105 Continuation US9630141B2 (en) 2009-02-20 2010-02-16 Membrane filter element with multiple fiber types

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20170226438A1 true US20170226438A1 (en) 2017-08-10

Family

ID=42629774

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/706,105 Active 2030-11-24 US9630141B2 (en) 2009-02-20 2010-02-16 Membrane filter element with multiple fiber types
US15/495,611 Abandoned US20170226438A1 (en) 2009-02-20 2017-04-24 Membrane Filter Element With Multiple Fiber Types

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/706,105 Active 2030-11-24 US9630141B2 (en) 2009-02-20 2010-02-16 Membrane filter element with multiple fiber types

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (2) US9630141B2 (en)
JP (1) JP5541636B2 (en)
AR (1) AR075538A1 (en)
AU (1) AU2010216092B2 (en)
BR (1) BRPI1005823A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2753143C (en)
GB (1) GB2480218B (en)
MY (1) MY164749A (en)
TW (1) TW201039905A (en)
WO (1) WO2010096455A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20170080381A1 (en) * 2015-09-21 2017-03-23 Fujifilm Manufacturing Europe B.V. Gas Separation Process
US20170080380A1 (en) * 2015-09-21 2017-03-23 Fujifilm Manufacturing Europe B.V. Gas Separation Process

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9630141B2 (en) * 2009-02-20 2017-04-25 Cameron Solutions, Inc. Membrane filter element with multiple fiber types
FR2979106A1 (en) * 2011-08-15 2013-02-22 Cms Technologies Holdings Inc COMBINED MEMBRANE SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING NITROGEN-ENHANCED AIR
KR101559201B1 (en) * 2013-02-19 2015-10-12 주식회사 엘지화학 Membrane sepreation apparatus
US9273876B2 (en) * 2013-03-20 2016-03-01 Carrier Corporation Membrane contactor for dehumidification systems
US9186629B2 (en) 2013-08-26 2015-11-17 Cameron Solutions, Inc. Single end, shell-side feed, hollow fiber membrane separation module
WO2017010270A1 (en) * 2015-07-16 2017-01-19 東洋紡株式会社 Hollow fiber membrane element, hollow fiber membrane module, and forward osmosis water treatment method
JP6558199B2 (en) * 2015-10-16 2019-08-14 東洋紡株式会社 Reverse osmosis water treatment method
FR3063437B1 (en) * 2017-03-02 2019-03-29 L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MEMBRANE PERMEATION TREATMENT OF A GAS SUPPLY FLOW COMPRISING METHANE AND CARBON DIOXIDE
CN107653016B (en) * 2017-11-14 2020-09-22 安徽名膜环境技术有限公司 Method for separating and purifying biogas by combining membrane separation and pressure swing adsorption
FR3084841B1 (en) * 2018-08-08 2020-07-24 Air Liquide TREATMENT BY MEMBRANE PERMEATION WITH ADJUSTMENT OF THE PRESSURE OF THE SUPPLY GAS FLOW ACCORDING TO THE CH4 CONCENTRATION IN THE SECOND RETENTAT
US12083474B2 (en) * 2021-12-15 2024-09-10 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Stacked membranes and their use in gas separation

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4397661A (en) * 1980-06-27 1983-08-09 Monsanto Company Gas permeation apparatus having permeate rate controlled valving
US5538536A (en) * 1994-09-12 1996-07-23 L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'eploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude Process and apparatus for separation of a gaseous mixture by successive membranes of different selectivities
US9630141B2 (en) * 2009-02-20 2017-04-25 Cameron Solutions, Inc. Membrane filter element with multiple fiber types

Family Cites Families (52)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3033641A (en) * 1956-03-21 1962-05-08 Union Carbide Corp Process for cation separation using zeolitic materials
US3842515A (en) * 1972-11-20 1974-10-22 Helium A Ltd Method for drying water-wet membranes
US4561864A (en) * 1974-03-21 1985-12-31 Institute Of Gas Technology Gas sweetening by membrane permeation
US4127625A (en) * 1975-03-27 1978-11-28 Daicel Ltd. Process for preparing hollow fiber having selective gas permeability
US4080743A (en) * 1976-06-22 1978-03-28 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Membrane drying process
US4276176A (en) * 1976-07-08 1981-06-30 Systems Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. Water purification system
US4230463A (en) * 1977-09-13 1980-10-28 Monsanto Company Multicomponent membranes for gas separations
US4130403A (en) * 1977-08-03 1978-12-19 Cooley T E Removal of H2 S and/or CO2 from a light hydrocarbon stream by use of gas permeable membrane
US4181675A (en) * 1978-09-19 1980-01-01 Monsanto Company Process for methanol production
US4386944A (en) * 1980-07-24 1983-06-07 General Electric Company System and process for increasing the combustible component content of a gaseous mixture
CA1173763A (en) * 1980-08-21 1984-09-04 Roger W. Fenstermaker Engine performance operating on field gas as engine fuel
US4357254A (en) * 1981-01-12 1982-11-02 Chemical Sciences, Inc. Cleaning composition
US4374657A (en) * 1981-06-03 1983-02-22 Fluor Corporation Process of separating acid gases from hydrocarbons
US4466946A (en) * 1982-03-12 1984-08-21 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) CO2 Removal from high CO2 content hydrocarbon containing streams
US4430807A (en) * 1982-05-17 1984-02-14 The Dow Chemical Company Process for drying water-wet membranes
US4421529A (en) * 1982-07-02 1983-12-20 The Dow Chemical Company Membrane system for intermittent gas separation
US4659343A (en) * 1985-09-09 1987-04-21 The Cynara Company Process for separating CO2 from other gases
DE3782120T2 (en) * 1986-08-15 1993-02-11 Permea Inc ASYMMETRIC GAS SEPARATION MEMBRANES, THE SKIN OF WHICH HAVE A DENSITY RADIENT.
DE3803693A1 (en) * 1987-03-10 1988-09-22 Akzo Gmbh MULTI-LAYER HOLLOW FILM BODY
US4767533A (en) * 1987-03-13 1988-08-30 Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc. Method of making a family of blended fiber filtration devices
JPH01281126A (en) * 1988-05-02 1989-11-13 Daikin Ind Ltd Membrane-type gas separation device
US5026479A (en) * 1990-02-13 1991-06-25 Union Carbide Industrial Gases Technology Corporation Fluid separation device
US5096586A (en) * 1990-08-28 1992-03-17 Regents Of The University Of California Membranes having selective permeability
US5837032A (en) * 1991-01-30 1998-11-17 The Cynara Company Gas separations utilizing glassy polymer membranes at sub-ambient temperatures
US5215554A (en) * 1991-06-12 1993-06-01 Permea, Inc. Membranes having enhanced selectivity and method of producing such membranes
US5407466A (en) * 1993-10-25 1995-04-18 Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. Sour gas treatment process including membrane and non-membrane treatment steps
US5558698A (en) * 1993-10-25 1996-09-24 Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. Acid gas fractionation process
US5702503A (en) * 1994-06-03 1997-12-30 Uop Composite gas separation membranes and making thereof
US5525143A (en) * 1994-10-17 1996-06-11 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Hollow fiber membrane dryer with internal sweep
US5779897A (en) * 1996-11-08 1998-07-14 Permea, Inc. Hollow fiber membrane device with inert filaments randomly distributed in the inter-fiber voids
US6271023B1 (en) * 1997-02-04 2001-08-07 Akzo Nobel N.V. Module made of at least two-type hollow fibres, and production of same
US6113782A (en) 1998-07-28 2000-09-05 Terumo Cardiovascular Systems Corporation Potting of tubular bundles in housing
US7011694B1 (en) * 2001-05-14 2006-03-14 University Of Kentucky Research Foundation CO2-selective membranes containing amino groups
SG108269A1 (en) * 2001-08-15 2005-01-28 Inst Materials Research & Eng Chemical modification of polyimides
US6572678B1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-06-03 Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. Natural gas separation using nitrogen-selective membranes of modest selectivity
US6565626B1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-05-20 Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. Natural gas separation using nitrogen-selective membranes
US6630011B1 (en) * 2002-09-17 2003-10-07 Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. Nitrogen removal from natural gas using two types of membranes
JP2004209418A (en) * 2003-01-07 2004-07-29 Nok Corp Hollow fiber membrane module
US6648944B1 (en) * 2003-01-28 2003-11-18 Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. Carbon dioxide removal process
TWI406703B (en) * 2003-11-17 2013-09-01 Asahi Kasei Medical Co Ltd Purify blood with hollow fiber membrane and use its blood purifier
JP2007523744A (en) * 2004-02-25 2007-08-23 ダウ グローバル テクノロジーズ インコーポレーテッド Equipment for processing highly osmotic solutions
US20060081524A1 (en) 2004-10-15 2006-04-20 Amitava Sengupta Membrane contactor and method of making the same
US7390760B1 (en) * 2004-11-02 2008-06-24 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Composite nanofiber materials and methods for making same
US7485173B1 (en) * 2005-12-15 2009-02-03 Uop Llc Cross-linkable and cross-linked mixed matrix membranes and methods of making the same
US7758751B1 (en) * 2006-11-29 2010-07-20 Uop Llc UV-cross-linked membranes from polymers of intrinsic microporosity for liquid separations
US7575624B2 (en) * 2006-12-19 2009-08-18 Uop Pllc Molecular sieve and membrane system to purify natural gas
WO2009003171A1 (en) * 2007-06-27 2008-12-31 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Sorbent fiber compositions and methods of temperature swing adsorption
US7803274B2 (en) 2008-04-30 2010-09-28 Celgard Llc Contained liquid membrane contactor and a method of manufacturing the same
US8127936B2 (en) * 2009-03-27 2012-03-06 Uop Llc High performance cross-linked polybenzoxazole and polybenzothiazole polymer membranes
US8127937B2 (en) * 2009-03-27 2012-03-06 Uop Llc High performance cross-linked polybenzoxazole and polybenzothiazole polymer membranes
US8561812B2 (en) * 2009-03-27 2013-10-22 Uop Llc Blend polymer membranes comprising thermally rearranged polymers derived from aromatic polyimides containing ortho-positioned functional groups
US8132677B2 (en) * 2009-03-27 2012-03-13 Uop Llc Polymer membranes prepared from aromatic polyimide membranes by thermal treating and UV crosslinking

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4397661A (en) * 1980-06-27 1983-08-09 Monsanto Company Gas permeation apparatus having permeate rate controlled valving
US5538536A (en) * 1994-09-12 1996-07-23 L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'eploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude Process and apparatus for separation of a gaseous mixture by successive membranes of different selectivities
US9630141B2 (en) * 2009-02-20 2017-04-25 Cameron Solutions, Inc. Membrane filter element with multiple fiber types

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20170080381A1 (en) * 2015-09-21 2017-03-23 Fujifilm Manufacturing Europe B.V. Gas Separation Process
US20170080380A1 (en) * 2015-09-21 2017-03-23 Fujifilm Manufacturing Europe B.V. Gas Separation Process
US10335734B2 (en) * 2015-09-21 2019-07-02 Fujifilm Manufacturing Europe B.V. Gas separation process
US10335733B2 (en) * 2015-09-21 2019-07-02 Fujifilm Manufacturing Europe B.V. Gas separation process

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20100212501A1 (en) 2010-08-26
MY164749A (en) 2018-01-30
US9630141B2 (en) 2017-04-25
GB2480218B (en) 2014-04-09
TW201039905A (en) 2010-11-16
CA2753143C (en) 2016-10-11
BRPI1005823A2 (en) 2017-05-02
JP2012518529A (en) 2012-08-16
AR075538A1 (en) 2011-04-06
GB201115801D0 (en) 2011-10-26
GB2480218A (en) 2011-11-09
CA2753143A1 (en) 2010-08-26
JP5541636B2 (en) 2014-07-09
AU2010216092A1 (en) 2011-09-22
WO2010096455A1 (en) 2010-08-26
AU2010216092B2 (en) 2015-03-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20170226438A1 (en) Membrane Filter Element With Multiple Fiber Types
US4119417A (en) Gas separator
US5711882A (en) Gas separation membrane module and process
US5580452A (en) Moving liquid membrane modules
DE69112657T2 (en) Fluid separation device.
US7150830B1 (en) Permselective membrane module
US4140499A (en) Gas mixture-separating device
EP1598105B1 (en) Hollow fiber membrane module and module arrangement group thereof
RU2587447C2 (en) Membrane separation units
JPH04265111A (en) Method and device for drying using diaphragm
US9545599B2 (en) Hybrid membrane system for gas streams with condensable hydrocarbons
KR102009550B1 (en) Multi-stage reverse osmosis membrane device, and operation method therefor
JPH057739A (en) Swirl type filter and method for using same
JP2022523064A (en) Equipment and membrane processes for separating gas components from gas streams with varying compositions or flow rates
KR20040086835A (en) Spiral separation membrane element
CN110958912B (en) Hollow fiber membrane module
KR101787942B1 (en) Membrane module for membrane contactor
WO2011150206A2 (en) Hollow fiber membrane module
KR101557544B1 (en) Hollow fiber membrane module
CN114364448B (en) Membrane permeate recycling system for use with pressure swing adsorption apparatus
US11376548B2 (en) Membrane permeate recycle process for use with pressure swing adsorption processes
US20130161257A1 (en) Axial bypass sleeve
RU2797676C1 (en) Membrane permeate recycling system for application with a adsorption processes at variable pressure
US20230398494A1 (en) Gas separation membrane bundle with convertible flow configurations
US20230398496A1 (en) Gas separation membrane bundle with convertible flow configurations

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: PETRONAS CARIGALI SDN BHD, MALAYSIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PETERS, RICHARD D.;MAHLEY, GEORGE E., III;MORISATO, ATSUSHI;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090716 TO 20090817;REEL/FRAME:042133/0750

Owner name: NATIONAL TANK COMPANY, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PETERS, RICHARD D.;MAHLEY, GEORGE E., III;MORISATO, ATSUSHI;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090716 TO 20090817;REEL/FRAME:042133/0750

Owner name: CAMERON SOLUTIONS, INC., TEXAS

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NATIONAL TANK COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:042333/0163

Effective date: 20100304

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: ADVISORY ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION