US20160351874A1

US20160351874A1 - Separator including microbial cellulose, method of producing the separator, and use of the separator

Info

Publication number: US20160351874A1
Application number: US15/167,868
Authority: US
Inventors: Jinkyu KANG; Hyeyun Kim; Jiae Yun; Soonchun Chung; Kwangmyung Cho
Original assignee: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
Current assignee: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
Priority date: 2015-05-27
Filing date: 2016-05-27
Publication date: 2016-12-01
Anticipated expiration: 2036-05-27
Also published as: EP3098880A1; EP3098880B1; US10164230B2

Abstract

Provided is a separator including microbial cellulose, a battery comprising the separator, and a method of producing the separator.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefits of Korean Patent Application No. 10-2015-0073931, filed on May 27, 2015, and Korean Patent Application No. 10-2016-0057815, filed on May 11, 2016 in the Korean Intellectual Property Office, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

INCORPORATION-BY-REFERENCE OF MATERIAL SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY

Incorporated by reference in its entirety herein is a computer-readable nucleotide/amino acid sequence listing submitted concurrently herewith and identified as follows: One 23,459 Byte ASCII (Text) file named “724437_ST25.TXT,” created on May 23, 2016.

BACKGROUND

1. Field
The present disclosure relates to a separator including microbial cellulose, a method of producing the separator, and use thereof.
2. Description of the Related Art
Separators prevent any contact between a positive electrode and a negative electrode in a battery. In view of the increase of the energy density of a battery, dependence on separators has increased in relation to battery safety. In the development of separators for lithium batteries required to have high capacity and high power output, safe separators are needed.
Generally used separators are made of olefin-based polymers such as polyethylene or polypropylene. When the olefin-based polymers are used in lithium batteries for electric vehicles, the lithium batteries may experience a thermal runaway event due to low heat resistance, resulting in breakdown thereof. For this reason, separators having high heat resistance have been developed, and a technique of coating an olefin-based polymer separator with a ceramic material having high heat resistance has been suggested. However, this technique increases the price of separators.
Further, use of lignocelluloses has been studied, but a safety problem occurs since the poor tensile strength of lignocelluloses reduces the durability of a lithium ion battery against external impacts. Accordingly, there is a need for high-strength separators made of cellulose materials and having improved heat resistance.

SUMMARY

Provided herein is a separator including a microbial cellulose nanofiber with a tensile strength of 39 MPa to 290 MPa, a lithium battery including the separator. Also provided is a method for producing the separator comprising culturing a microorganism to obtain a microbial cellulose; and preparing the separator comprising a cellulose nanofiber from the obtained microbial cellulose, wherein the separator has a tensile strength of 39 MPa to 290 MPa.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and/or other aspects will become apparent and more readily appreciated from the following description of the exemplary embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a graph of tensile strength plotted against aspect ratio for separators with various porosities having a junction strength of 3.5 MPa;

FIG. 2 is a graph of tensile strength plotted against aspect ratio for separators with various porosities having a junction strength of 4.6 MPa;

FIG. 3 is a graph of simulation results illustrating the relationship between DPw and tensile strength at different porosities;

FIG. 4 shows scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (SU9000, Hitach) of an M1 separator; and

FIG. 5 shows scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (SU9000, Hitach) of a Celgard #2320 separator.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Provided herein is a separator including a microbial cellulose nanofiber and having a tensile strength of about 39 MPa to about 290 MPa.
A separator is a permeable membrane that can be placed between the positive and negative electrodes of a battery to prevent short circuit contact between the positive electrode and the negative electrode, while allowing transport of ionic charge carriers (ions of an electrolyte). The separator also prevents passage of other materials that may be generated from the positive electrode or negative electrode. The separator may also have an electrolyte-retaining ability. The separator may be a separator for a secondary battery, particularly a lithium secondary battery. The separator is not limited to any particular size or shape, which will be determined by the particular application (battery) in which the separator is used.
The microbial cellulose refers to extracellular cellulose produced by microorganisms such as bacteria. The microbial cellulose may be also referred to as bacterial cellulose or biocellulose.
The microbial cellulose may be a ribbon-like polymer, referred to as cellulose I, or an amorphous polymer, referred to as cellulose II.
The microorganism producing microbial cellulose may produce microbial cellulose by polymerization of glucose into the β-1,4-glucan chain. The microbial cellulose may be formed by cellulose synthase. The microbial cellulose may be formed in the membrane of the microorganism and secreted along the longitudinal axis of the cell. The microbial cellulose may be a three-dimensional cellulose fiber layer.
The separator may be in the form of a non-woven fabric comprising a cellulose nanofiber from the microbial cellulose. The cellulose nanofiber may have a crosslinked non-woven fabric structure. The separator may have a non-woven fabric structure in which microbial celluloses are chemically linked to each other. The chemical linkage may be a hydrogen bond. The separator may be a non-woven fabric. The separator may be in the shape of sheet such as a membrane or film. The separator may have thickness of about 5 nm to about 100 nm, 5 nm to about 50 nm, 5 nm to about 30 nm,about 10 nm to about 100 nm, about 10 nm to about 80 nm, about 10 nm to about 50 nm, about 10 nm to about 40 nm, or about 10 nm to about 30 nm.
In one embodiment, the microbial cellulose does not include any substantial amount of lignin or hemicelluloses, or is nearly or completely free of such materials. Preferably, the microbial cellulose does not include lignin or hemicelluloses.
The separator including the cellulose nanofiber including the microbial cellulose may have a tensile strength of about 39 MPa to about 290 MPa, such as about 49 MPa to about 290 MPa, or about 54 MPa to about 290 MPa. The tensile strength may be a strength at the time when the separator is torn by applying a force. The tensile strength may be measured by a method known to those skilled in the art. The tensile strength may be measured by, for example, a text analyzer, a universal testing machine, or an injector. The tensile strength may be measured in accordance with ASTM D882.
The microbial cellulose nanofiber may have an aspect ratio of about 200 to about 2,000. The “average aspect ratio” is an “average length/average diameter ratio”, which refers to a ratio of an average length of a cellulose nanofiber to an average diameter of the cellulose nanofiber. The average aspect ratio may be 200 to 2000, for example, about 300 or more, about 400 or more, about 450 or more, about 500 or more, or about 550 or more. The average diameter may be an average of the values which are obtained by measuring the diameter of the cellulose nanofiber. The average length may be an average of the values which are obtained by measuring the length of the cellulose nanofiber. The diameter of the cellulose nanofiber may be measured by, for example, scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The diameter of the cellulose nanofiber may be measured by SEM, for example, with 50,000× magnification or higher. The average diameter of the cellulose nanofiber may be about 4 nm to about 100 nm, for example, about 5 nm to about 100 nm, about 6 nm to about 100 nm, about 7 nm to about 100 nm, about 10 nm to about 50 nm, about 10 nm to about 40 nm, about 20 nm to about 50 nm, about 20 nm to about 40 nm, about 4 nm to about 50 nm, about 4 nm to about 40 nm, or about 15 nm to about 50 nm. The length of the cellulose nanofiber may be measured by, for example, Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM).
The weight-average degree of polymerization (DPw) of the microbial cellulose nanofiber may be about 4000 to about 20,000, for example, about 5000 to about 20,000, about 6000 to about 20,000, or about 6100 to about 20,000. Here, the weight-average degree of polymerization may be a weight-average degree of polymerization not of a microbial cellulose nanofiber at the time it is obtained from a microorganism, but a microbial cellulose nanofiber included in the separator. For example, the weight-average degree of polymerization may be obtained after defibration, for example, after passing the microbial cellulose through a microchannel under a pressure. The pressure may be about 10 MPa to about 300 MPa, for example, about 50 MPa to about 300 MPa, about 70 MPa to about 300 MPa, about 100 MPa to about 300 MPa, about 10 MPa to about 200 MPa, about 50 MPa to about 200 MPa, about 70 MPa to about 200 MPa, or about 100 MPa to about 200 MPa. The microchannel may have a diameter of about 1 um to about 1000 um, for example, about 1 um to about 500 um, about 1 um to about 300 um, about 1 um to about 100 um, about 1 um to about 50 um, about 1 um to about 30 um, or about 1 um to about 20 um. The microchannel may have a length of about 1 um to about 1000 um, for example, about 10 um to about 1000 um, about 50 um to about 1000 um, about 50 um to about 500 um, about 50 um to about 300 um, about 1 um to about 500 um, or about 1 um to about 300 um. The length of the microchannel may be about 1.5 times or longer, about 2 times or longer, or about 3 times or longer than the diameter thereof. The passing may be performed once or more times, for example, about once to about twenty times, about once to about ten times, about once to about seven times, about once to about six times, about twice to about ten times, or about three times to about ten times.
The separator may have porosity of about 30 to 80%, for example, about 30% to about 70%, about 30% to about 60%, about 45% to about 90%, about 50 to about 80%, or about 60 to about 70% (void volume based on the total volume of the separator. The separator may have the largest pore of about 1.0 μm or smaller, for example, about 0.5 pm or smaller, about 0.1 to about 1.0 μm, or about 0.1 to about 0.5 μm.
The porosity of the separator may be determined by controlling the amount of a pore forming agent used in manufacturing the separator. The pore forming agent may be, for example, one or more selected from polyethylene glycol (PEG), polypropylene alcohol, polypropylene, and hydroxy cellulose. Further, pores may be formed in the separator by dispersing the separator in a solvent. The solvent may be an organic solvent or water. The organic solvent may be alcohol such as ethyl alcohol. Further, the separator and the pore forming agent are dispersed in the solvent to form pores in the separator.
The separator may have air permeability of about 50 sec/100 cc to about 3000 sec/100 cc, for example, about 50 sec/100 cc to about 1000 sec/100 cc, about 50 sec/100 cc to about 2000 sec/100 cc, about 100 sec/100 cc to about 2000 sec/100 cc, about 200 sec/100 cc to about 2000 sec/100 cc, about 300 sec/100 cc to about 2000 sec/100 cc, about 100 sec/100 cc to about 1000 sec/100 cc, to about 100 sec/100 cc to about 500 sec/100 cc. The air permeability may be determined by a method known to those skilled in the art, for example, ASTM D726 or permeability test method.
The microbial cellulose separator may further include a crosslinking agent. The crosslinking agent may be a component that helps linkage between microbial celluloses. The crosslinking agent may be added in an amount of about 1 to 50 parts by weight, based on 100 parts by weight of the microbial cellulose. For example, the crosslinking agent may be added in an amount of about 1 to 30 parts by weight, about 1 to 20 parts by weight, or about 1 to 15 parts by weight, based on 100 parts by weight of the microbial cellulose. The crosslinking agent may be one or more selected from the group consisting of isocyanate, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyamide epichlorohydrin (PAE).
The separator may further include a binder. The binder used in the separator may be a component that assists binding between the cellulose nanofibers. The binder may be added in an amount of about 1 to 50 parts by weight, based on 100 parts by weight of microbial cellulose. For example, the binder may be added in an amount of about 1 to 30 parts by weight, about 1 to 20 parts by weight, or about 1 to 15 parts by weight, based on 100 parts by weight of microbial cellulose. The binder may be one or more selected from cellulose single nanofiber, methyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl methyl cellulose, carboxyl methyl cellulose, or ethyl cellulose, polyvinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene, polyvinylidene fluoride-co-trichloroethylene, polymethylmethacrylate, polyacrylonitrile, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinylacetate, polyethylene-co-vinyl acetate, polyimide, polyethylene oxide, cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate butyrate, cellulose acetate propionate, cyanoethylpullulan, cyanoethylpolyvinylalcohol, cyanoethylcellulose, cyanoethylsucrose, pullulan, and polyvinylalcohol.
The microbial cellulose may be derived from the genus Enterobacter, Gluconacetobacter, Acetobacter, Achromobacter, Agrobacterium, Alcaligenes, Azotobacter, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Sarcina, Klebsiella, or Escherichia. The microorganism belonging to the genus Acetobacter may be Actetobacter pasteurianus. The microorganism belonging to the genus Agrobacterium may be Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The microorganism belonging to the genus Rhizobium may be Rhizobium leguminosarum. The microorganism belonging to the genus Sarcina may be Sarcina ventriculi. The microorganism belonging to the genus Gluconacetobacter may be Gluconacetobacter xylinum. The microorganism belonging to the genus Klebsiella may be Klebsiella pneumoniae. The microorganism belonging to the genus Escherichia may be E. coli.
The microorganism may be a non-natural microorganism. The non-natural microorganism refers to a microorganism having one or more genetic modifications that are not generally found in the wild-type strain of the referenced microorganism. The non-natural microorganism may be a genetically engineered microorganism. The non-natural microorganism may be a strain including metabolic engineering. The metabolic engineering may include metabolic pathway engineering. The metabolic pathway engineering may include metabolic pathway alteration.
The term “parent strain” or “parent cell” may be used to indicate a subject genetic modification. Since the parent cell may be identical to a subject cell, except the genetic modification, the parent cell may be a reference cell with respect to the genetic modification. The term “genetic modification” means an artificial alteration of a constitution or structure of a genetic material of a cell. The parent cell may be a cell that does not have a corresponding genetic modification, for example, a genetic modification of increasing the activity of cellulose synthase. The genetic modification includes a modification of introducing a polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide, or substitution, addition, insertion, or deletion of one or nucleotides in a genetic material of a parent cell, or a chemical mutation of a genetic material of a parent cell. The genetic modification also includes modifications in non-coding regulatory regions that are capable of modifying expression of a gene or an operon, in which the non-coding regions include a 5′-non coding sequence and/or a 3′-non coding sequence.
The term “wild-type” polypeptide or polynucleotide may be a polypeptide or polynucleotide having no particular genetic modification, and the genetic modification is to obtain a genetically engineered polypeptide or polynucleotide.
The term “increase in substrate specificity”, or “increase in activity” may refer to a substrate specificity level or an activity level that is higher than that of a comparative polypeptide of the same type that does not have a given genetic modification.
The term “increase in activity” or “increased activity”, as used herein, may refer to a detectable increase in an activity of a cell, a protein, or an enzyme. The “increase in activity” or “increased activity” may also refer to an activity level of a modified (e.g., genetically engineered) cell, protein, or enzyme that is higher than that of a comparative cell, protein, or enzyme of the same type, such as a cell, protein, or enzyme that does not have a given genetic modification (e.g., original or “wild-type” cell, protein, or enzyme). The “cell activity” may refer to an activity of a particular protein or enzyme of a cell. For example, an activity of a modified or engineered cell, protein, or enzyme may be increased by about 5% or more, about 10% or more, about 15% or more, about 20% or more, about 30% or more, about 50% or more, about 60% or more, about 70% or more, or about 100% or more than an activity of a non-engineered cell, protein, or enzyme of the same type, i.e., a wild-type cell, protein, or enzyme. An activity of a particular protein or enzyme in a cell may be increased by about 5% or more, about 10% or more, about 15% or more, about 20% or more, about 30% or more, about 50% or more, about 60% or more, about 70% or more, or about 100% or more than an activity of the same protein or enzyme in a parent cell, e.g., a non-engineered cell. A cell having an increased activity of a protein or an enzyme may be identified by using any method known in the art. The cell having the increased activity may have one or more genetic modifications of increasing the activity of the enzyme or polypeptide, compared to a cell having no genetic modification.
The term “decrease in activity” or “decreased activity”, as used herein, means that a cell has an activity of an enzyme or a polypeptide being lower than that measured in a parent cell (e.g., a non-genetically engineered cell). Also, the “decrease in activity” or “decreased activity” means that an isolated enzyme or a polypeptide has an activity being lower than that of an original or a wild-type enzyme or polypeptide. The decrease in activity or decreased activity encompasses no activity. For example, a modified (e.g., genetically engineered) cell or enzyme has enzymatic activity of converting a substrate to a product, which shows about 20% or more, about 30% or more, about 40% or more, about 50% or more, about 55% or more, about 60% or more, about 70% or more, about 75% or more, about 80% or more, about 85% or more, about 90% or more, about 95% or more, or about 100% decrease, compared to that of a cell or enzyme that does not have the modification, i.e., a parent cell or a “wild-type” cell or enzyme. Decreased activity of an enzyme or a cell may be confirmed by any methods known in the art. The decrease in activity includes the case that an enzyme has no activity or decreased activity even though the enzyme is expressed, or the case that an enzyme-encoding gene is not expressed or expressed at a low level, compared to a cell having a non-modified gene, i.e., a parent cell or a wild-type cell. The cell having the decreased activity may have one or more genetic modifications of decreasing the activity of the enzyme or polypeptide, compared to a cell having no genetic modification.
The non-natural microorganism may have an increase in substrate specificity for glucose and/or an increase in cellulose synthase activity, compared to its parent cell. Cellulose synthase is an enzyme that may catalyze the following reaction: UDP-glucose+(1,4-beta-D-glucosyl)_n⇄H UDP+(1,4-beta-D-glucosyl)_n+1.
In this reaction, glucosyl may be glucosyl of glucose, and (1,4-beta-D-glucosyl)_n+1is an extended chain of the glucosyl residue, which represents cellulose. The cellulose synthase may be an enzyme classified as EC 2.4.1.12. The cellulose synthase may be derived from Gluconacetobacter xylinus. The cellulose synthase may have an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1. A gene encoding the cellulose synthase may have a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2. The cellulose synthase may be cyclic bis-(3′,5′) diguanylic acid (cyclic-di-GMP)-independent. The cellulose synthase may not bind with cyclic-di-GMP.
The microorganism (strain) producing microbial cellulose may be a recombinant or non-natural microorganism having a modified cellulase activity, compared to its parent cell. Further, the strain may have an increased cellulase activity, compared to its parent cell.
The cellulase may be one or more selected from endocellulase, exocellulase, cellobiase, oxidative cellulase, cellulose phosphorylase, endoglucanase, and cellobiose phophorylase. The endocellulase may be an enzyme classified as EC 3.2.1.4. The exocellulase may be an enzyme classified as EC 3.2.1.91. The cellobiase may be an enzyme classified as EC 3.2.1.21. The endoglucanase may be endo-1,4-beta-glucanase. The endo-1,4-beta-glucanase may be an enzyme classified as EC 3.2.1.6. The cellobiose phophorylase may be an enzyme classified as EC 2.4.1.20. The cellobiose phophorylase may catalyze the following reaction: cellobiose+phosphate alpha-D-glucose 1-phosphate+D-glucose. The endocellulase may have an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3. A gene encoding the endocellulase may have a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4. The endo-1,4-beta-glucanase may have an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or 7. A gene encoding the endo-1,4-beta-glucanase may have a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6 or 8. The cellobiose phophorylase may have an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 9. A gene encoding the cellobiose phophorylase may have a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 10.
The non-natural microorganism may have a degree of cellulose polymerization, which shows about 5% to 100%, about 10% to 100%, about 15% to 100%, about 20% to 100%, about 25% to 100%, about 30% to 100%, about 35% to 100%, about 45% to 100%, or about 50% to 100% increase, compared to its parent strain.
Another aspect provides a method of producing a separator, which method includes culturing the microorganism to obtain microbial cellulose; and preparing the separator including a cellulose nanofiber including the obtained microbial cellulose and having a tensile strength of about 39 MPa to about 290 MPa.
The method of producing the separator may include culturing the microorganism to obtain microbial cellulose. The microbial cellulose can be obtained from the culture by separating a cellulose pellicle which is formed on a top layer of the culture.
The obtaining of microbial cellulose may also include combining the obtained microbial cellulose (e.g., pellicle) with a base (e.g., sodium hydroxide or the like). The base may be provided to remove microorganisms from the isolated cellulose. The base may be sodium hydroxide. The concentration of sodium hydroxide may be about 0.1 N.
The culturing may be performed under suitable conditions for the microorganism used. Such culture conditions may include, for example, a carbon source, a nitrogen source, or an oxygen condition utilized by the microorganism. The carbon source may include monosaccharides, disaccharides, or polysaccharides. The carbon source may be glucose, fructose, sucrose, mannitol, mannose, maltose, lactose, xylose, glycerol, sorbitol, cellobiose, ethanol, or galactose. The nitrogen source that can be utilized by the microorganism may be an organic nitrogen compound or an inorganic nitrogen compound. The nitrogen source may be exemplified by amino acids, amides, amines, nitrates, or ammonium salts. The medium used for culturing the microorganism may be any general medium that is suitable for host cell growth, such as a minimal or complex medium containing proper supplements. The suitable medium may be commercially available or prepared by a known preparation method. The medium used for culturing may be a medium that satisfies requirements of the microorganism. The medium may be a medium selected from the group consisting of a carbon source, a nitrogen source, a salt, trace elements and combinations thereof.
The culturing may be performed under aerobic conditions. The culture temperature may be about 25 to 30° C. pH of the culture medium may be about 4 to about 7. The culturing may be performed by static culture or under stirring.
The preparing of the separator including the cellulose nanofiber may include nano-fibrillation and/or defibration of the obtained microbial cellulose. The defibration may include separating of cellulose structures condensed by reactions between cellulose nanofibers into respective cellulose nanofibers, or increasing of the distance between the cellulose nanofibers, and can be performed mechanically and/or chemically. The defibration may include, for example, passing the microbial cellulose through a microchannel while applying a pressure thereto. The pressure may be about 10 MPa to about 300 MPa, for example, about 50 MPa to about 300 MPa, about 70 MPa to about 300 MPa, about 100 MPa to about 300 MPa, about 10 MPa to about 200 MPa, about 50 MPa to about 200 MPa, about 70 MPa to about 200 MPa, or about 100 MPa to about 200 MPa. The microchannel may have a diameter of about 1 um to about 1000 um, for example, about 1 um to about 500 um, about 1 um to about 300 um, about 1 um to about 100 um, about 1 um to about 50 um, about 1 um to about 30 um, or about 1 um to about 20 um. The microchannel may have a length of about 1 um to about 1000 um, for example, about 10 um to about 1000 um, about 50 um to about 1000 um, about 50 um to about 500 um, about 50 um to about 300 um, about 1 um to about 500 um, or about 1 um to about 300 um. The length of the microchannel may be about 1.5 times or longer, about 2 times or longer, or about 3 times or longer than the diameter thereof. The passing may be performed once or more times, several times, for example, about once to about twenty times, about once to about ten times, about once to about seven times, or about once to about six times. The defibration may be passing of the cellulose nanofiber under a pressure of about 10 MPa to about 300 MPa through the microchannel having a diameter of about 1 um to 100 um, a length of about 1 um to 1000 um, and a ratio of length to diameter of about 1.5 or more, for example, about 1.5 to about 1000, about 5 to about 1000, about 10 to about 1000, about 1.5 to about 500, or about 1 to about 100, once or more times, for example, about once to about ten times.
The defibrating may include homogenization of the obtained microbial cellulose, and the homogenization may include homogenizing using a homogenizer (e.g., microchannel homogenizer).
Alternatively, or in addition, chemical defibration can be used. The chemical defibration may include oxidation of OH to —COOH in the cellulose nanofiber. A negative charge produced from —COOH by the oxidation may increase the distance between the cellulose nanofibers. In the oxidation of OH to —COOH, a proper oxidant, for example, TEMPO, etc. may be used.
The preparing the separator may include combining cellulose nanofibers, a pore forming agent, and a suitable solvent to obtain a cellulose nanofibers solution and forming a sheet from the cellulose nanofibers solution. The cellulose nanofibers may be fibrillated/defibrated cellulose nanofibers obtained by method described above. The pore forming agent may be polyalkylene ether such polyethylene glycol(PEG), silica or like. The solvent may be any liquid material capable of dispersing the cellulose nanofibe, for example, water, organic solvent, or mixture of water and organic solvent. The organic solvent may be alcohol. The alcohol may be C1-C6 such as isopropyl alcohol. The combining may performed by mixing with stirring. The solution may a homogeneous dispersion of fibrillated/defibrated cellulose nanofibers. Forming a sheet may include depositing the solution on a substate and drying the solution. Forming a sheet may include pressing the solution or dyied solution. The preparing the separator may include forming pores by removing the pore forming agent. The pore forming agent may be removed by solubilizing it in a solvent such as toluene.
Still another aspect provides a battery, especially a secondary battery, including the above-described separator. A structure of the battery is not particularly limited, but the separator may be used in all kinds of battery such as a prismatic type, a cylindrical type, a pouch-type, a coin-type, etc. Further, an active material used in the positive electrode and the negative electrode is not particularly limited. For example, the secondary battery may be a lithium battery using lithium as the active material. The secondary battery may include the positive electrode, the negative electrode, the electrolyte, and the separator between the positive electrode and the negative electrode. The electrolyte may be included in a positive electrode chamber, of which at least part is defined by the positive electrode and the separator, and a negative electrode chamber, of which at least part is defined by the negative electrode and the separator.
Still another aspect provides a lithium battery including the positive electrode; the negative electrode; the electrolyte; and the separator including the microbial cellulose nanofiber and having a tensile strength of about 39 MPa to about 290 MPa.
The lithium battery may be a lithium ion battery. The lithium battery may have a positive electrode, an electrode, and an electrolyte disposed between the positive electrode and electrode.
The separator may be a single-layer separator. The separator is the same as described above.
The positive electrode may include a positive electrode active material. The positive electrode active material may be a material which can reversibly intercalate and deintercalate lithium ions. The positive electrode active material may be, for example, a compound represented by any one chemical formula of Li_aA_1-bB_bD₂(wherein 0.90≦a≦1, and 0≦b≦0.5); Li_aE_1-bB_bO_2-cD_c(wherein 0.90≦a≦1, 0≦b≦0.5, 0≦c=0.05); LiE_2-bB_bO_4-cD_c(wherein 0≦b≦0.5, 0≦c≦0.05); Li_aN_1-b-cCo_bB_cD_α (wherein 0.90≦a≦1, 0≦b≦0.5, 0≦c≦0.05, 0<α≦2); Li_aNi_1-b-cCo_bB_cO_2-αF_α (wherein 0.90≦a≦1, 0≦b≦0.5, 0≦c≦0.05, 0<α<2); Li_aNi_1-b-cCo_bB_cO_2-αF₂(wherein 0.90≦a≦1, 0≦b≦0.5, 0≦c≦0.05, 0<α<2); Li_aNi_1-b-cMn_bB_cD_α (wherein 0.90≦a≦1, 0≦b≦0.5, 0≦c≦0.05, 0<α≦2); Li_aNi_1-b-cMn_bB_cO_2-αF_α (wherein 0.90≦a≦1, 0≦b≦0.5, 0≦c≦0.05, 0<α<2); Li_aNi_1-b-cMn_bB_cO_2-αF₂(wherein 0.90≦a≦1, 0≦b≦0.5, 0≦c≦0.05, 0<α<2); Li_aNi_bE_cG_dO₂(wherein 0.90≦a≦1, 0≦b≦0.9, 0≦c≦0.5, 0.001≦d≦0.1); Li_aNi_bCo_cMn_dG_eO₂(wherein 0.90≦a≦1, 0≦b≦0.9, 0≦c≦0.5, 0≦d≦0.5, 0.001≦e≦0.1); Li_aNiG_bO₂(wherein 0.90≦a≦1, 0.001≦b≦0.1); Li_aCoG_bO₂(wherein 0.90≦a≦1, 0.001≦b≦0.1); Li_aMnG_bO₂(wherein 0.90≦a≦1, 0.001≦b≦0.1); Li_aMn₂G_bO₄(wherein 0.90≦a≦1, 0.001≦b≦0.1); QO₂; QS₂; LiQS₂; V₂O₅; LiV₂O₅; LiIO₂; LiNiVO₄; Li_(3-f)J₂(PO₄)₃(0≦f≦2); Li_(2-f)Fe₂(PO₄)₃(0≦f≦2); and LiFePO₄.
In the above chemical formulae, A is Ni, Co, Mn, or a combination thereof; B is Al, Ni, Co, Mn, Cr, Fe, Mg, Sr, V, a rare earth element, or a combination thereof; D is O, F, S, P, or a combination thereof; E is Co, Mn, or a combination thereof; F is F, S, P, or a combination thereof; G is Al, Cr, Mn, Fe, Mg, La, Ce, Sr, V, or a combination thereof; Q is Ti, Mo, Mn, or a combination thereof; I is Cr, V, Fe, Sc, Y, or a combination thereof; J is V, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, or a combination thereof.
The positive electrode active material may be, for example, lithium cobalt oxide (LCO), lithium nickel oxide, lithium nickel cobalt oxide, lithium nickel manganese oxide, lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide (hereinafter, referred to as “NCA”), lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide (hereinafter, referred to as “NCM”), lithium manganese oxide, lithium iron phosphate, nickel sulfide, copper sulfide, sulfur, iron oxide, or vanadium oxide. These positive electrode active materials may be used alone or in combination of two or more thereof.
The positive electrode may further include additives, for example, a conductive agent, a binder, an electrolyte, a filler, a dispersing agent, or an ion conductive agent, in addition to the positive electrode active material.
The conductive agent may provide a conductive path for the positive electrode active material. The conductive agent may be, for example, carbonaceous materials such as graphite, carbon black, acetylene black, ketjen black, and carbon fiber; metal-based materials such as copper, nickel, aluminum, or silver in a powder form or a fiber form; conductive polymers such as polyphenylene derivatives, or mixtures thereof. A weight ratio of the positive electrode active material and the conductive agent may be in the range of 99:1 to 90:10.
The binder may be, for example, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyvinylidene fluoride, or polyethylene. The binder may be used alone or in combination.
The filler, dispersing agent or ion conductive agent may be a material which is known to be used in the electrodes of secondary lithium batteries.
The negative electrode may include a negative electrode active material.
The negative electrode active material may be a material capable of forming an alloy with lithium, or a material which can reversibly intercalate and deintercalate lithium ions. The negative electrode active material may be, for example, a metal such as lithium, indium, tin, aluminum, or silicon, and an alloy thereof; a transition metal oxide such as Li_4/3Ti_5.3O₄, SnO; non-transition metal oxide; or a carbonaceous material such as artificial graphite, graphite carbon fiber, resin-baked carbon, pyrolytic vapor grown carbon, cokes, mesocarbon microbead (MCMB), furfuryl alcohol resin based carbon, polyacene, pitch-based carbon fiber, vapor grown carbon fiber, natural graphite, and non-graphitizable carbon. These negative electrode active materials may be used alone or in combination of two or more thereof.
The metal alloyable with lithium may be, for example, Si, Sn, Al, Ge, Pb, Bi, Sb, Si—Y alloy (wherein Y is an alkaline metal, an alkaline earth metal, a Group 13 element, a Group 14 element, a transition metal, a rare earth element, or combinations thereof (except for Si)), Sn—Y alloy (wherein Y is an alkaline metal, an alkaline earth metal, a Group 13 element, a Group 14 element, a transition metal, a rare earth element, or combinations thereof (except for Sn)). The element Y may be Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Ra, Sc, Y, Ti, Zr, Hf, Rf, V, Nb, Ta, Db, Cr, Mo, W, Sg, Tc, Re, Bh, Fe, Pb, Ru, Os, Hs, Rh, Ir, Pd, Pt, Cu, Ag, Au, Zn, Cd, B, Al, Ga, Sn, In, Ti, Ge, P, As, Sb, Bi, S, Se, Te, Po, or a combination thereof. The transition metal oxide may be, for example, lithium titanium oxide, vanadium oxide, or lithium vanadium oxide. The non-transition metal oxide may be, for example, SnO₂or SiO_x(0<x<2). The carbonaceous materials may be, for example, crystalline carbon, amorphous carbon, or a mixture thereof. The crystalline carbon may be, for example, natural graphite or artificial graphite that is in amorphous, plate, flake, spherical, or fibrous form. The amorphous carbon may be, for example, soft carbon, hard carbon, meso-phase pitch carbides, or sintered cokes.
The negative electrode may further include additives, for example, a conductive agent, a binder, an electrolyte, a filler, a dispersing agent, or an ion conductive agent, in addition to the negative electrode active material. Specific examples thereof are the same as those in the above described positive electrode.
In addition, the positive electrode active material and the negative electrode active material may further include a plasticizer. The plasticizer may form pores inside the electrode plates.
The electrolyte may be, for example, a liquid electrolyte. The liquid electrolyte may be an organic liquid electrolyte. The organic liquid electrolyte may be prepared by dissolving lithium salts in an organic solvent.
The organic solvent may be any solvent commonly used in the art. Examples thereof include propylene carbonate, ethylene carbonate, fluoroethylene carbonate, butylene carbonate, dimethyl carbonate, diethyl carbonate, methylethyl carbonate, methylpropyl carbonate, ethylpropyl carbonate, methylisopropyl carbonate, dipropyl carbonate, dibutyl carbonate, benzonitrile, acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran, 2-methyltetrahydrofuran, γ-butyrolactone, dioxorane, 4-methyldioxorane, N,N-dimethyl formamide, dimethyl acetamide, dimethylsulfoxide, dioxane, 1,2-dimethoxyethane, sulforane, dichloroethane, chlorobenzene, nitrobenzene, diethylene glycol, dimethyl ether, and mixtures thereof.
The lithium salt may be any lithium salt commonly used in the art. Examples of the lithium salt may include LiPF₆, LiBF₄, LiSbF₆, LiAsF₆, LiClO₄, LiCF₃SO₃, Li(CF₃SO₂)₂N, LiC₄F₉SO₃, LiAlO₂, LiAlCl₄, LiN(C_xF_2x+1SO₂)(C_yF_2y+1SO₂) (Here, x and y are natural number), LiCl, LiI, and mixtures thereof.
If necessary, the electrolyte may be a gel or solid electrolyte as well as a liquid electrolyte. Examples of the solid electrolyte may include boron oxide and lithium oxynitride, but are not limited thereto. In addition, any solid electrolyte commonly used in the art may be also used. The gel or solid electrolyte may be formed on the negative electrode by sputtering.
The lithium battery may be used as a power source for small-sized devices and also used as a unit battery of a middle- or large-sized battery module having a plurality of battery cells. The middle- or large-sized device may be, for example, a power tool; xEV including an electric vehicle (EV), a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) and a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV); an electric two-wheeled vehicle including E-bike and E-scooter; an electric golf cart; an electric truck; an electric commercial vehicle; or an electric storage system. Further, the lithium battery may be suitable for any use, in which high-power output, high voltage and operation under high temperature conditions are required. The lithium battery may be used in an electric vehicle (EV). The electric vehicle may be, for example, a hybrid vehicle such as plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV).
The separator according to an aspect may provide a separator having a high tensile strength.
The method of producing the separator according to an aspect may provide a separator having a high tensile strength.
The lithium battery according to an aspect may provide a separator having heat resistance.
Reference will now be made in detail to exemplary embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout. In this regard, the present exemplary embodiments may have different forms and should not be construed as being limited to the descriptions set forth herein. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments are merely described below, by referring to the figures, to explain aspects. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the exemplary embodiments. However, the exemplary embodiments described herein should be considered in a descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.

EXAMPLE 1

Production of Microbial Cellulose and Manufacture of Separator including Microbial Cellulose

1. Production of Microbial Cellulose
A wild-type strain, Gluconacetobacter xylinum was transferred to 100 ml of Hestrin-Schramm (HS) medium in a 250-ml flask, followed by static culture at 30° C. for 48 hours. The HS medium included 20 g/L of glucose, 5 g/L of bacto-peptone, 5 g/L of yeast extract, 2.7 g/L of Na₂HPO₄, and 1.15 g/L of citric acid in water.
The resulting cellulose pellicle was harvested and washed with distilled water three times, followed by heating with a 2% NaOH aqueous solution at 121° C. for 15 minutes. Cells and impurities present in the cellulose pellicle were hydrolysed, followed by washing with distilled water. Thus, a purified cellulose pellicle was obtained. The purified cellulose pellicle was cut in a proper size, and then mixed with water, and pre-homogenized using a general homogenizer (DAIHAN Scientific, Homogenizer HG-15A, Korea) to prepare 500 mL of 0.5 wt % cellulose suspension.
2. Defibration of Microbial Cellulose
The cellulose pellicle suspension obtained in Section 1 was passed through a microchannel (Interaction chamber, length of 200 um) of a high pressure homogenizer, Nano Disperser (IIshin autoclave, ISA-NH500, Korea) under 150 MPa 10 times to obtain a slurry-type cellulose nanofiber suspension. The pressure after passing through the microchannel becomes lower than the internal pressure of the microchannel, because a space before and after the microchannel is wider than the microchannel. The cellulose nanofiber suspension passed through the microchannel was centrifuged to remove water, and a concentrated cellulose nanofiber suspension was finally obtained.
3. Oxidation of Cellulose Nanofiber
The cellulose nanofiber obtained in Section 2 was oxidized using 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical (TEMPO) to increase degree of dispersion. The oxidation procedure was performed according to a method described in Saito et al., Biomacromolecules, 2007, 8(8), pp. 2485-24791. In detail, cellulose nanofiber (1 g) was suspended in 100 mL of water containing TEMPO (0.016 g, 0.1 mmol) and NaBr (0.1 g, 1 mmol). A 12% NaClO solution (pH 10) was added to the nanofiber dispersion at a concentration of 5.0 mmol per gram of cellulose nanofiber, and reaction was allowed at room temperature for 3 hours under stirring at 500 rpm. During the reaction, 0.5 M NaOH was added to maintain pH 10.0, and the reaction was terminated when there was no further change in pH. The obtained mixture was washed with centrifugation and water three times to five times. As a result, TEMPO-oxidized cellulose, namely, a cellulose nanofiber dispersion having high degree of dispersion, of which surface was introduced with —COONa groups, was obtained.
4. Physical Properties of Defibrillated Cellulose Nanofiber having High Degree of Dispersion
Physical properties of the cellulose nanofiber (CNF) obtained in Section 3 were measured.
(1) Diameter and Aspect Ratio of Cellulose Nanofiber
With regard to the diameter of the cellulose nanofiber, several images of a properly diluted CNF solution were obtained by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM, Veeco, Dimension V model), and analyzed by an image analyzer to measure diameters and lengths of 100 cellulose fibers. An average diameter and an average length were calculated.
(2) Weight Average Degree of Polymerization of Cellulose Nanofiber
Degree of polymerization (DP) of CNF was calculated as degree of polymerization determined by viscosity measurement (DPv) and weight average degree of polymerization (DPw).
With regard to DPw, 5 mg of freeze-dried CNF was taken and 10 ml of pyridine and 1 ml of phenyl isocyanate were added to a 12-ml vial, and derivatization reaction was allowed at 100° C. for 48 hours. 2 ml of methanol was added to the sample, followed by washing with 100 ml of 70% methanol twice and 50 ml of H₂O twice. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was used to determine a molecular weight, a molecular weight distribution, and a length distribution of CNF. The GPC experiment was performed on a Waters Allinace e2695 separation module (Milford, Mass., USA) equipped with a Waters 2414 refractive index detector and three columns, that is, Styragel HR2, HR4, and HMW7 columns. Chloroform as an eluent was used at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. A concentration of the sample was 1 mg/mL, and an injection volume thereof was 20 ul. Polystyrene (PS, #140) standards were used to calibrate the curve.
The used samples were cellulose nanofiber (hereinafter, also referred to as “M”) obtained in Section 3 and FMa (Sugino Ltd., FMa-10002), WMa (Sugino Ltd., Wma-1002), and IMa (Sugino Ltd., IMa-10002) as commercial lignocelluloses. Table 1 shows the diameter and DPw of bacterial cellulose and lignocellulosic nanofibers.

TABLE 1

No.	Name	Diameter (nm)	DPw(Da)

1	FMa	39.2 ± 55.5	360
2	WMa	26.2 ± 16.5	1792
3	IMa	39.1 ± 48.4	2339
4	M	38.0 ± 40.0	6201

As shown in Table 1, DPw of bacterial cellulose nanofiber was much higher than those of the lignocellulosic nanofibers.

EXAMPLE 2

Test of Properties of Separator including Microbial Cellulose

The cellulose nanofiber prepared in Section 3 of Example 1 was used to manufacture a separator and to measure physical properties thereof.
1. Manufacture of Separator
0.423 g of a pore forming agent, polyethylene glycol (PEG, number average molecular weight: 6,000) was added to 30 ml of the cellulose nanofiber dispersion obtained by Section 3 of Example 1, which was diluted with water at a concentration of 0.5 wt %, followed by stirring at room temperature and 1000 rpm for 1 hour. 13.8 g of the dispersion thus obtained was poured in a Petri dish having a diameter of 50 cm, and dried at 90° C. for 2 hours. A cellulose nanofiber film (hereinafter, referred to as “non-woven fabric”) formed on the Petri dish was immersed by addition of toluene, and washed with four times to five times to prepare a PEG-removed non-woven fabric, which was dried at room temperature for 3 to 4 hours.
The dried non-woven fabric was pressed by using a hot press (Carver Inc., Model 12-12H) with a force of 5 ton (5 MPa) for 10 minutes to manufacture a separator in the form of a pressed non-woven fabric (hereinafter, referred to as “M1”).
Further, a separator (hereinafter, referred to as “M2”) was manufactured in the same manner as above, except that 0.3 g/g of a cellulose single nanofiber CNF (Daiichi kogyou seiyaku, Rheocrysta) as a binder was added to the cellulose nanofiber dispersion, together with PEG.
2. Physical properties of Separator
(1) Test of Tensile Strength
The separator obtained in Section 1 was prepared in a size of 15 mm×50 mm and stretched using a texture analyzer (TA.XT plus, Stable Micro Systems) at 5 mm/min to determine tensile strength as stress at break. Table 2 shows tensile strength of the separator manufactured by using the cellulose nanofiber.

TABLE 2

No.	Name	Tensile strength (MPa)

1	FMa	not manufacturable
2	WMa	20.4
3	IMa	25.9
4	M1	54.6

As shown in Table 2, tensile strength of the separator manufactured from the bacterial cellulose nanofiber was much higher than those of the separators manufactured from the lignocellulosic nanofibers. Considering DPw of Table 1, as DPw was higher, tensile strength was more excellent. Meanwhile, tensile strength of M2 separator was 78.5 MPa.
To examine a relationship between the aspect ratio of the cellulose nanofiber and the tensile strength of the separator manufactured therefrom, simulation of the tensile strength of the separator according to the aspect ratio was performed. A diameter of the cellulose nanofiber used in the simulation was 38 nm, a thickness of the separator was 20 um, and a junction strength which is a strength at a junction of a cellulose nanofiber and a cellulose nanofiber was regarded as 3.5 MPa (FIGS. 1) and 4.6 MPa (FIG. 2), and an aspect ratio and a tensile strength according to different porosities were predicted (Japanese Patent Publication No. 2003-247198).
FIGS. 1 and 2 show the tensile strength of the separator. As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, as the aspect ratio increased, tensile strength increased.
Further, to examine a relationship between DPw of the cellulose nanofiber and the tensile strength of the separator manufactured therefrom, simulation of the tensile strength of the separator according to DPw was performed. A diameter of the cellulose nanofiber used in the simulation was 38 nm, a thickness of the separator was 20 um, and a junction strength which is a strength at a junction of a cellulose nanofiber and a cellulose nanofiber was regarded as 10.2 MPa, and DPw and a tensile strength according to different porosities were predicted (Japanese Patent Publication No. 2003-247198).
FIG. 3 shows simulation results of a relationship between DPw and tensile strength according to different porosities. As shown in FIG. 3, as DPw increased, tensile strength increased.
(3) Test of Porosity and Air Permeability
Porosity of the separator manufactured in Section 1 was calculated by a weight measurement method according to the following equation. The used equation was Porosity (%)=[1−{(weight of sample (g))/(volume of sample (cm³))×1.6 (g/cm³)N×100. Herein, 1.6 g/cm³represents a density of the cellulose fiber. Further, air permeability of microbial cellulose was measured by a permeability tester (TOYOSEKI CO. Ltd., G-B3). Air permeability is expressed in terms of the gurley value. The gurley value is the period of time (sec) that is needed for 100 cc of air to permeate the separator, and is an index widely used for quantitative analysis of the pore structure of the separator. When pores of the separator are well formed, air easily permeates to show a low gurley value. Table 3 shows measured thickness, porosity, and gurley air permeability of M1 separator. Table 4 shows physical properties of Celgard #2320 which is a separator made from a synthetic polymer as a comparison of the bacterial cellulose nanofiber. Celgard #2320 is a commercially available separator having three polymer layers of PP/PE/PP.

TABLE 3

Sample	Physical properties	Measured value

M1

Thickness

20

um

	Porosity	51%
	Gurley air permeability (sec/100 c)	350

	Initial charge capacity	225	mAh
	Initial discharge capacity	199	mAh

Total discharge efficiency

88.10%

	Discharge capacity (0.2 C)	194.5	mAh
	Discharge capacity (5 C)	163.7	mAh

	Discharge load (5 C/0.2 C)	84%

Meanwhile, air permeability and porosity of M2 sample were 200 sec/100 cc and 50%, respectively.

TABLE 4

Sample	Physical properties	Measured value

Celgard #2320

Thickness

20

um

	Porosity	39%
	Gurley air permeability (sec/100 c)	530

	Initial charge capacity	230	mAh
	Initial discharge capacity	187	mAh

Total discharge efficiency

81.20%

	Discharge capacity (0.2 C)	489	mAh
	Discharge capacity (5 C)	141	mAh

	Discharge load (5 C/0.2 C)	75%

As shown in Tables 3 and 4, M1 separator has separator characteristics of excellent initial charge/discharge efficiency and excellent discharge load, compared to Celgard #2320 separator.
The electrical characteristics shown in Tables 3 and 4 were measured by a coin cell-type lithium ion battery including the above mentioned cellulose nanofiber separator between the positive electrode and the negative electrode. The positive electrode, the negative electrode, and the electrolyte used in the lithium ion battery are as follows. Positive electrode: NCA(CSE222):DA187; Denka black:AN 1: BM720=98.875(wt %),

LL:10 mg/sq., ED:3-33, 13φ
Negative electrode: graphite (16.3φ)
Liquid electrolyte: 40 uL×2, EC/EMC/DMC=2/2/6 in 1.15M LiPF6, 0.5% VC, 1% AB43

Here, EC represents ethylene carbonate, EMC represents ethylene methylene carbonate, DMC represents dimethylcarbonate, and VC represents vinyl carbonate.
Further, the surfaces of M1 separator and Celgard #2320 separator were photographed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (SU9000, Hitachi). FIG. 4 shows scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (SU9000, Hitach) of the M1 separator. FIG. 5 shows scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (SU9000, Hitach) of the Celgard #2320 separator.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A separator comprising a microbial cellulose nanofiber and having a tensile strength of 39 MPa to 290 MPa.

2. The separator of claim 1, wherein an average degree of polymerization of the cellulose nanofiber is about 4,000 to about 20,0000.

3. The separator of claim 1, wherein the cellulose nanofiber has a diameter of about 4 nm to about 100 nm.

4. The separator of claim 1, wherein the cellulose nanofiber has a diameter of about 20 nm to about 50 nm.

5. The separator of claim 1, wherein the separator has a porosity of about 30% to about 70%.

6. The separator of claim 1, wherein the separator has an air permeability of about 50 sec/100 cc to about 2000 sec/100 cc.

7. The separator of claim 1, further comprising a cross-linking agent.

8. The separator of claim 7, wherein the cross-linking agent comprises isocyanate, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyamide epichlorohydrin (PAE), or combination thereof.

9. The separator of claim 1, further comprising a binder.

10. The separator of claim 9, wherein the binder comprises cellulose single nanofiber, methyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl methyl cellulose, carboxyl methyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, polyvinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene, polyvinylidene fluoride-co-trichloroethylene, polymethylmethacrylate, polyacrylonitrile, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinylacetate, polyethylene-co-vinyl acetate, polyimide, polyethylene oxide, cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate butyrate, cellulose acetate propionate, cyanoethylpullulan, cyanoethylpolyvinylalcohol, cyanoethylcellulose, cyanoethylsucrose, pullulan, polyvinylalcohol, or combination thereof.

11. The separator of claim 1, wherein the microbial cellulose is from a microorganism of the genus Acetobacter, Gluconacetobacter, Enterobacter, Achromobacter, Agrobacterium, Alcaligenes, Azotobacter, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Sarcina, Klebsiella, or Escherichia.

12. The separator of claim 1, wherein the microbial cellulose is from Gluconacetobacter xylinum.

13. A method of producing a separator of claim 1, the method comprising:

culturing a microorganism to obtain a microbial cellulose; and

preparing a separator comprising a cellulose nanofiber from the obtained microbial cellulose, wherein the separator has a tensile strength of 39 MPa to 290 MPa.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein preparing of the separator comprises passing the microbial cellulose through a microchannel while applying pressure thereto.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the pressure is 10 MPa to 300 MPa.

16. The method of claim 14, further comprising pressing the cellulose nanofiber to provide a pressed, non-woven fabric that provides the separator.

17. A lithium ion battery comprising a separator according to claim 1.