US20160251243A1

US20160251243A1 - Systems and methods for creating an oxidation reduction potential (orp) in water for pathogenic control

Info

Publication number: US20160251243A1
Application number: US15/050,777
Authority: US
Inventors: Daniel W. Lynn
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: BIOSECURITY TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Priority date: 2015-02-27
Filing date: 2016-02-23
Publication date: 2016-09-01
Also published as: US20190039924A1; US10836661B2; WO2016138069A1

Abstract

Systems and methods for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control are described. The systems and methods generate an oxidation reduction potential that provides pathogenic control of the solution as well as pathogenic control of the surfaces with which the solution comes in immediate contact.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/121,770, entitled SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING AN OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL (ORP) IN WATER FOR PATHOGENIC CONTROL, filed Feb. 27, 2015. U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/121,770 is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

Water intended for potable use (e.g., drinking water), may contain disease-causing organisms, or pathogens, which can originate from the source of the water, from resistance to water treatment techniques, from improper or ineffectual water treatment techniques, or so forth. Pathogens include various types of bacteria, viruses, protozoan parasites, and other organisms. To protect drinking water from disease-causing organisms, or pathogens, water suppliers often add a disinfectant, such as chlorine, to the water. However, disinfection practices can be ineffectual because certain microbial pathogens, such as Cryptosporidium, are highly resistant to traditional disinfection practices. Also, disinfectants themselves can react with naturally-occurring materials in the water to form byproducts, such as trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids, which may pose health risks.
A major challenge for water suppliers is how to control and limit the risks from pathogens and disinfection byproducts. It is important to provide protection from pathogens while simultaneously minimizing health risks to the population from disinfection byproducts. Oxidation reduction potential (ORP) can be used for water system monitoring to reflect the antimicrobial potential of the water, without regard to the water quality, with the benefit of a single-value measure of the disinfection potential, showing the activity of the disinfectant rather than the applied dose.

SUMMARY

Systems and methods for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control are described. A system embodiment includes an ozone generator, a water inlet, a venturi, and a water outlet. The venturi is positioned to receive ozone generated by the ozone generator and to receive water from the water inlet, where the venturi provides mixing of the water and ozone to provide a water and ozone solution having an ORP suitable for pathogenic control.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.

DRAWINGS

The detailed description is described with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the use of the same reference numbers in different instances in the description and the figures may indicate similar or identical items.

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a system for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control in accordance with example implementations of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a top view of a system for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control in accordance with example implementations of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 is a top view of a system for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control in accordance with example implementations of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4 is a partial cross-sectional view of a flow control portion of a system for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control, such as the system shown in FIG. 2 or 3.

FIG. 5 shows distribution systems for water treated by the systems for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control in accordance with example implementations of the present disclosure.

FIG. 6 is a chart of relative oxidation strength of certain oxidizers.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Overview
An Oxidation reduction potential (ORP) value can be used for water system monitoring to reflect the antimicrobial potential of a given sample of water. ORP is measured in millivolts (mV), with typically no correction for solution temperature, where a positive voltage shows a solution attracting electrons (e.g., an oxidizing agent). For instance, chlorinated water will show a positive ORP value whereas sodium sulfite (a reducing agent) loses electrons and will show a negative ORP value. Similar to pH, ORP is not a measurement of concentration directly, but rather of activity level. In a solution of only one active component, ORP indicates concentration. The World Health Organization (WHO) adopted an ORP standard for drinking water disinfection of 650 millivolts. That is, the WHO stated that when the oxidation-reduction potential in a body of water measures 650 (about ⅔ of a volt), the sanitizer in the water is active enough to destroy harmful organisms almost instantaneously. For example E. coli, Salmonella, Listeria, and Staph pathogens have survival times of under 30 seconds when the ORP is above 650 mV, compared against >300 seconds when it is below 485 mV.
An example ORP sensor uses a small platinum surface to accumulate charge without reacting chemically. That charge is measured relative to the solution, so the solution “ground” voltage comes from the reference junction. For example, an ORP probe can be considered a millivolt meter, measuring the voltage across a circuit formed by a reference electrode constructed of silver wire (in effect, the negative pole of the circuit), and a measuring electrode constructed of a platinum band (the positive pole), with the water in-between.
Increasingly, microbial issues are commanding the attention of water treatment operators, regulators, media, and consumers. There are many treatment options to eliminate pathogenic microbes from drinking water. One such option includes ozone (O₃), an oxidizing agent approved for drinking water treatment by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. For instance, ozone is one of the strongest disinfectants approved for potable water treatment capable of inactivating bacteria, viruses, Giardia, and Cryptosporidium.
Accordingly, the present disclosure is directed to systems and methods for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control. An example system includes an ozone generator, a water inlet, a water outlet, and a venturi (e.g., a Venturi tube, venturi injector, etc.) coupled with each of the ozone generator, the water inlet, and the water outlet. Such example system is configured to output water having an ORP of about 600 mV to about 800 mV, with particular implementations being configured to output water having an ORP of about 650 mV to about 750 mV to provide pathogenic control.
Example Implementations
Referring generally to FIGS. 1-3, a system 100 for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control is shown in accordance with example implementations of the present disclosure. As shown, the system 100 generally includes an ozone generator 102, a water inlet 104, a water outlet 106, and a venturi 108 (e.g., a Venturi tube, venturi injector, etc.) coupled with each of the ozone generator 108, the water inlet 104, and the water outlet 106. The system 100 can include a housing 110 for receiving the water inlet 104 and the water outlet 106 and the venturi 108 there-between and for mounting the ozone generator 102. The housing 110 can include a removable cover portion 112 which can enclose (e.g., when secured) and provide access to (e.g., when removed) the components housed in an interior portion 114 of the housing 110. The removable cover portion 114 can be secured to the housing 110 via one or more fasteners 116 (e.g., screws to mate with bores in the housing 110). The housing 110 can further include coupling portions to couple with a power source 118, a switch 120 to engage or disengage power to the system 100, an indicator 122 (e.g., a light source), and the like.
In implementations, the ozone generator 102 includes a corona discharge tube configured to use oxygen from the surrounding air to generate ozone, such as through splitting of oxygen molecules in the air through electrical discharge caused by supplying power to a dielectric material within the corona discharge tube. For example, the ozone generator 102 can include an input port 124 to receive ambient air within the housing 110 into the ozone generator 102 to convert oxygen from the ambient air into ozone. The housing 110 can include an aperture 126 to receive ambient air into the housing 110, such as when the removable cover portion 112 is secured in place. In implementations, the power source 118 can include a 120V power supply that is converted to a direct current (DC) power supply via converter 128 suitable for applying the voltage to the dielectric within the corona discharge tube of the ozone generator 102. For example, the ozone generator 102 can be operated at 110 volts/60 Hz and have an operating frequency of about 450 KHz and 550 KHz, with a power rating of less than about 15 watts, and with a unit performance for electrical consumption of about 32 watts. In implementations, the ozone generator 102 has an operating frequency of about 480 KHz. Further, the ozone generator 102 can be provided according to ISO 9001 CE standards. The ozone generator 102 can produce from about 800 mg ozone per hour to about 1200 mg ozone per hour. In implementations, the ozone generator 102 produces about 1000 mg ozone per hour. The ozone generator 102 can include other methods and systems for generating ozone, including but not limited to, electrochemical cells configured to generate ozone from water by placing an anode and a cathode in contact with opposite sides of a proton exchange membrane (PEM), and supplying power to the cell, whereby water flowing over the surface of the anode breaks down into hydrogen atoms and oxygen atoms that assemble to form O₃(ozone).
The system 100 can include one or more of a filter 125 (or dryer) and a compressor 127 in communication with the input port 124 via a coupling 129 to filter and/or compress ambient air received by the ozone generator 102. For example, the compressor 127 can include a port to receive ambient air (e.g., air within the interior region 114 of the housing 110), whereby the filter 125 interact with the air, which is then introduced to the ozone generator 102 via the coupling 129 and the input port 124. The filter 125 can dry the air received by the compressor 127 by removing water vapor or moisture therefrom, where the water could inhibit the production of ozone by the ozone generator 102. The pressure provided by the compressor 127 can vary depending on the water pressure supplied to the system 100 via the water inlet 104, where the pressure applied by the compressor 127 can be balanced based on the flow rate of air received by the ozone generator 102 via the input port 124 and the water pressure supplied to the system 100 via the water inlet 104 to obtain a particular ORP of the water at the water outlet 106. For example, in implementations, the compressor 127 can compress the filtered air at least about 15 KPa (e.g., more particularly at a pressure of 18 KPa or about 2.6 psi) to provide a gas throughput in the ozone generator 102 of about 8 SCFH (standard cubic feet per hour), where the water pressure at the water inlet 104 is about 50 psi to 55 psi (e.g., a reasonable rating for many residential and commercial facilities), to provide an ORP in the water at the water outlet of at least about 600 mV (e.g., about 600 mV to about 800 mV, more particularly about 650 mV to about 750 mV). At these pressures, the ozone generator 102 has a residence time of the gas of about three seconds. The pressure applied by the compressor 127 of the ozone generator 102 can affect the rate at which the gas flows through the ozone generator 102, which can affect contact time of the air with the components of the ozone generator 102, which can also affect mass gas transfer rates within the ozone generator 102.
In implementations, the system 100 can include a plurality of ozone generators 102. For example, as shown in FIG. 3, the system 100 includes a first ozone generator 102 a and a second ozone generator 102 b in series with the first ozone generator 102 a. The first ozone generator 102 a is supplied with DC power from a first converter 128 a coupled with the power source 118, whereas the second ozone generator 102 b is supplied with DC power from a second converter 128 b also coupled with the power source 118. Ambient air from within the housing 110 can be drawn into the first ozone generator 102 a via the port 124 a (where such air can be filtered and compressed), where fluids can be subsequently introduced to the second ozone generator 102 b in series with the first ozone generator 102 a via coupling 130. In implementations, the plurality of ozone generators 102 provides one or more backup ozone generators 102 in case of malfunction or inoperability of one or more of the other ozone generators 102. Each ozone generator 102 can include an operating life of about 10,000 working hours.
Referring to FIGS. 2-4, the venturi 108 can include an injector venturi design (e.g., a “T” design), where the venturi 108 is coupled between the water inlet 104 and the water outlet 106, and where ozone generated by the ozone generator 102 is introduced to the venturi 108 through another port (e.g., port 132) positioned perpendicular to the flow path of the water (from the water inlet 104 to the water outlet 106). In implementations, the venturi 108 is coupled to the ozone generator via a coupling 134 connected to port 132. During operation, the ozone generated by the ozone generator 102 is drawn into the venturi 108 and mixed with the water stream flowing from the water inlet 104 to the water outlet 106. A pressure differential between the water inlet 104 and the water outlet 106 is utilized to facilitate drawing the ozone into the venturi 108 and to facilitate mixing of the ozone and the water. FIG. 4 provides a diagrammatic representation of ozone molecules 136 mixing with water 138 (e.g., via vortex action) within the venturi 108, and further mixing downstream from the port 132 toward the water outlet 106. In an implementation, a pressure differential greater than 20 psi inlet over outlet (e.g., at least a 20 psi difference between the water inlet 104 and the water outlet 106, with pressure higher at the water inlet 104) is provided to generate negative suction in the venturi 108 relative to the ozone generator 102 to thereby draw in the generated ozone through the port 132, while assuring the energy for water flow and pressure for operation of the venturi 108.
In implementations, in order to further increase effectiveness of the mixing process delivered by the venturi 108, the water and ozone solution passes through an in-line mixer 140 coupled between the venturi 108 and the water outlet 106. The in-line mixer 140 can facilitate further breaking or mixing of ozone bubbles already introduced to the water to generate a mixture (or solution) of water and substantially uniform-sized ozone bubbles. The small uniform-size ozone bubbles can adhere to each other to lower the surface tension of the water and ozone solution. For example, water can have a surface tension of about 72 Newtons (N), whereas the solution of water and substantially uniform-sized ozone bubbles can have a surface tension of about 58 Newtons (N). In implementations, the in-line mixer 140 has an internal diameter that equals an internal diameter of the output port of the venturi to which the in-line mixer 140 is coupled. The same internal diameter can provide an uninterrupted transition of the fluid flowing from the venturi 108 to the in-line mixer 140, such as to maintain a vortex action or mixing action of the water and the ozone bubbles. The in-line mixer 140 also provides increased contact time between the water and ozone bubbles and can facilitate preparation of uniform ozone bubble size. In implementations, the in-line mixture 140 has a length of about two inches downstream from the venturi 108, which can allow sufficient time for the velocity of the vortex action caused by the pressure differential of the venturi 108 to crush the gaseous bubbles entrained in the solution into uniformed size bubbles. The in-line mixer 140 can also reintroduce undissolved gas back into the solution resulting in increased efficiency as well as reduced off-gas at the point of application. The in-line mixer 140 can include multiple chambers through which the water and ozone solution flows. The size of the chambers can be determined based on the water flow (e.g., throughput), gas mixing, and desired time exposure. In implementations, operation of the system 100 produces a water stream at the water outlet 106 having a molar concentration of ozone of at least 20%, or more particularly at least 25%, far surpassing previous systems that have mass gas transfer rates of less than 10%.
In implementations, the system 100 is an ultra-compact system (e.g., 8″×8″×4″ enclosure, 12″×12″×6″ enclosure, or the like) configured to provide an ozone-rich water stream at a rate of about 3 gal/min, and can treat water having inlet pressures of between 15 psi and 85 psi to provide water having an ORP of between 650 mV and 750 mV to provide pathogenic control without introduction of harsh treatment chemicals, such as chlorine. After operation of the system 100, the output water/ozone mixture can provide removal of organic and inorganic compounds, can provide removal of micro-pollutants (e.g., pesticides), can provide enhancement of the flocculation/coagulation decantation process, can provide enhanced disinfection while reducing disinfection by-products, can provide odor and taste elimination of the treated water, and so forth. The solubility of ozone in water is quite good, about 10 to 15 times greater than for oxygen under normal drinking water treatment conditions. About 0.1 to 0.6 liters of ozone will dissolve in one liter of water. The size of the ozone gas bubble in the system 100 can influence gas transfer characteristics. In implementations, the venturi 108 and in-line mixer 140 provide an ozone bubble size of about 2 to about 3 microns. For instance, micro-bubbles can be produced via the venturi 108, and/or sheared into uniformed micro-size bubbles as the solution passed through the in-line mixer 140.
Corona discharge ozone can be used virtually anywhere, such as with portable implementations of the system 100. Since ozone is made on site, as needed and where needed, there is no need to ship, store, handle or dispose of it, nor any containers associated with shipping, storing, handling, and disposing a treatment chemical, as is the situation with most chemicals utilized in water treatment.
The system 100 can provide indications pertaining to the operation status of the system 100, such as to ensure proper operation, or to provide an indication regarding a need for adjustment, servicing, or maintenance. For example, with general reference to FIGS. 1-4 in an implementation, the system 100 further includes a flow meter 142 coupled between the water inlet 104 and the water outlet 106. The flow meter 142 is shown coupled between the water inlet 104 and the venturi 108, however in implementations, a flow meter 142 could be additionally or alternatively coupled between the venturi 108 and the water outlet 106. The flow meter 142 can be configured to provide an electric signal indicative of a flow of fluid through the system 100. For example, the flow meter 142 can include a mechanical flow meter, an electromagnetic flow meter, a pressure-based flow meter, an optical flow meter, or the like, configured to provide an electric signal indicative of a flow of fluid (e.g., water) through the system 100. In implementations, the flow meter 142 can include a solenoid-based flow detector, such as to avoid significant restriction of flow between the water inlet 104 and the water outlet 106. The flow meter 142 can be configured to send the signal to the indicator 122 that provides a visual, tactile, or audible indication that the fluid (e.g., water) is flowing through the system 100. In an implementation, the indicator 122 is a light source (e.g., an LED) configured to illuminate upon receiving a signal from the flow meter 142. In an implementation, the indicator 122 is also coupled to a sensor (e.g., a relay) configured to measure that a voltage is applied to the ozone generator 102. When a proper voltage is applied to the ozone generator 102, the sensor can send a signal to the indicator 122. In an implementation, the indicator will provide a visual, tactile, or audible indication when each of the sensor and the flow meter 142 provide their respective signals to the indicator 122. For example, the system 100 can include a relay 144 coupled to each of the power source 118 and the flow meter 142. The relay 144 is configured to send an activation signal to the indicator 122 when the power source 118 is providing power to the ozone generator 102 and when the flow meter 142 provides a signal regarding fluid flow through the system 100. In such a configuration, the indicator 122 can verify that the system 100 is operating under design conditions (e.g., having an active flow of water, and having a sufficient power supply to the ozone generator 102).
The system 100 can be configured to provide multiple options for distribution of the solution of water and ozone provided at the water outlet 106. For example, referring to FIG. 5, the system can include a distribution line 146 configured to couple the water outlet 106 with one or more of a spray nozzle 148 and a faucet system 150 to provide access to the solution of water and ozone. In implementations, the distribution line 146 can be coupled with a filter (e.g., a carbon or charcoal filter) to strip the ozone from the water to provide potable water that has been sanitized by the ozone during production and distribution. In implementations, the system 100 can include an in-line ORP meter positioned to measure the ORP of the water and ozone solution, such as adjacent the water outlet (e.g., within the housing 110, outside the housing 110, etc.), coupled with the distribution line 146, or the like. The in-line ORP meter can be coupled with the relay 144, such that the in-line ORP meter provides a signal to the relay 144 upon detection of a desired ORP or range of ORPs (e.g., at least 600 mV, at least 650 mV, etc.). The relay 144 can then provide an activation signal to the indicator 122 upon proper functioning of the system 100 (e.g., when the power source 118 is providing power to the ozone generator 102, when the flow meter 142 provides a signal regarding fluid flow through the system 100, and when the in-line ORP meter detects a desired ORP of the water and ozone solution generated by the system 100). When the indicator 122 is not activated, this can provide an indication that a component or components of the system 100 may need adjustment, servicing, or maintenance. Alternatively, the system 100 can be configured to activate the indicator 122 upon failure of one or more of the components of the system 100 (e.g., no power supplied to the ozone generator 102, no flow of water detected by the flow meter 142, or an undesired ORP detected by the in-line ORP meter).
By providing an ORP of between 650 mV and 750 mV with the system, the output water can be utilized to destroy various pathogens, including, but not limited to, algae (e.g., blue-green), bacteria (e.g., Aeromonas & Actinomycetes, Bacillus, Campylobacters, Clostridium botulinum, Escherichia coli (E. coli), Flavobacterium, Helicobacter (pylori), Heterotrophic Bacteria, Legionella pneumophila, Micrococcus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella, Shigella shigellosis (dysentery), Staphylococcus sp, albus, aureus, Streptococcus, Vibrio: alginolyticus, anguillarium, parahemolyticus, Yersinia enterocolitica), fungi, molds, yeasts, mold spores, nematodes, protozoa (e.g., Acanthamoeba & Naegleria, Amoeboe Trophozoites, Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora, Entamobea (histolytica), Giardia lamblia, Giardia muris, Microsporidium, N. gruberi), trematodes, viruses (e.g., Adenovirus, Astrovirus, Callcivirus, Echovirus, Encephalomyocarditis, Enterovirus, coxsachie, poliovirus, Hepatitis A, B and C, Myxovirus influenza, Norwalk, Picobirnavirus, Reovirus, Rotavirus).
Water Treatment
Microbiological organisms/species can reside in water sources, including water intended for drinking recreation. Among the microbiological threats is the protozoan parasite—cryptosporidium (crypto). Crypto can be a particular challenge for the water treatment industry, however, ozone can eliminate it. Ozone, molecularly known as O₃, is a sanitizer and is relentless in its attack of organic microbes (bacteria, viruses, cysts, etc). Through a process known as lysing, ozone breaks down cell walls or membranes, where it can then destroy the nucleus of the microbe. In addition to sanitation, ozone can provide for the oxidizing of inorganic material that could be present in water, such as metals (e.g., iron and manganese). Although there are a few stronger oxidizers, ozone is the strongest that is readily available for commercial or residential use. FIG. 6 provides a chart showing relative oxidizer strength for a variety of oxidizers. As shown, ozone is about 1.5 times stronger than chlorine, and can provide a faster oxidizing action. Furthermore, because of this higher oxidation strength, ozone does build up a tolerance to microbes unlike other sanitizers, such as chlorine. Within the microbial world protozoa, such as crypto, are some of the most resistant to all types of disinfectants. One reason for this resistance is due to its hard outer protective shell, which must be broken through prior to the microbe being inactivated. Crypto can cause a variety of ailments, including abdominal cramping, diarrhea, fever and nausea that can last as long as a month, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Disinfectants used to ward off cryptosporidium for water treatment applications can include chlorine (liquid state), chloramines, chlorine-dioxide (gaseous state), and ozone. However, their ability to perform this inactivation duty should not be regarded equal, as each sanitizer requires a specific level of concentration and contact time to take effect, as described by the following.
To better determine the specific amount of the disinfectant required to inactivate or destroy a microbe, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined Ct Values. These Ct Values are the product of the disinfectant's concentration (C, expressed in mg/L) and the contact time (t, expressed in minutes). These Ct Values are calculated specifically to the percentage of microbial kill or better known as the log reduction, e.g. 1-Log=90.0 percent, 2-Log=99.0 percent or 3-Log=99.9 percent inactivation of the particular microbe. According to the EPA, chlorine dioxide would require a Ct of 226, which would correlate to 226 mg/L, at one minute of contact time, at 25° C. to achieve a 3-Log reduction or 99.9 percent inactivation. Although, ozone would only require a Ct of 7.4, correlating to 7.4 mg/L, to achieve the same 99.9 percent inactivation with the same parameters as chlorine dioxide. Ct is a product of concentration and time, and as such, both can be manipulated, as long as the given Ct Value is obtained for the desired log reduction (e.g. Ozone Ct of 7.4 can be achieved with a concentration 3.7 mg/L for two minutes of time).
Cryptosporidium outbreaks in public drinking waters and recreational swimming pools are becoming more and more of an evident issue. Unfortunately, forms of chlorine sanitation are not often the best solution, especially for high organic and inorganic contaminant levels, as they will create chlorine oxidation by-products, such as trihalomethanes (THM) and chloramine derivatives. These by-products are the typical cause of (what most associate as being over chlorinated) the chlorine smell in drinking or pool waters, and are the cause of itchy, smelly skin and burning eyes in pool water. Although with a properly sized system, ozone can be used as the primary sanitizing and oxidizing agent, oxidizing the contaminants completely. Using ozone in this manner would then allow chlorine to be used as the secondary residual sanitizer to satisfy regulatory requirements, without the production of chloramines and chlorine's side effects.
Further, ozone can be used to remove iron and manganese from water, forming a precipitate that can be filtered:
2 Fe²⁺+O₃+5 H₂O→2 Fe (OH)₃(s)+O₂+4 H⁺
2 Mn²⁺+2 O₃+4 H₂O→2 MN (OH)₂(s)+2 O₂+4 H⁺
Ozone will also reduce dissolved hydrogen sulfide in water to sulfurous acid:
3 O₃+H₂S→3 H₂SO₃O₂
The reactions involved iron, manganese, and hydrogen sulfide can be especially important in the use of ozone-based well water treatment. Further, ozone will also detoxify cyanides by converting the cyanides to cyanates (on the order of 1,000 times less toxic):
CN⁻+O₃→CNO⁻+O₂
Ozone will also completely decompose urea, where recent outbreaks of E-coli in lettuce have been impacted by urea:
(NH₂)₂CO+O₃→N₂+CO₂+2 H₂O

CONCLUSION

Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or process operations, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A system for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control, comprising:

an ozone generator configured to generate ozone;

a water inlet configured to receive water from a water source;

a venturi coupled with the water source to receive water within the venturi, the venturi also coupled with the ozone generator and configured to introduce ozone generated by the ozone generator to water received at the water inlet to provide a water and ozone solution having an ORP of at least 600 millivolts; and

a water outlet coupled with the venturi, the water outlet having a fluid pressure of the water and ozone solution less than a fluid pressure of water received at the water inlet.

2. The system of claim 1, further comprising:

a housing for receiving each of the ozone generator, the water inlet, the venturi, and the water outlet.

3. The system of claim 2, further comprising:

a cover portion coupled with the housing to enclose at least the ozone generator and the venturi within an interior portion of the housing when the cover portion is secured to the housing.

4. The system of claim 1, further comprising:

an in-line mixer coupled between the venturi and the water outlet, the inline mixer configured to provide contact time between the ozone and the water during a vortex generated by the venturi.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein the in-line mixer includes an internal diameter that is the same as an internal diameter of an outlet port of the venturi to which the in-line mixer is coupled.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the ozone generator includes a corona discharge tube.

7. The system of claim 1, further comprising:

a compressor coupled to an input port of the ozone generator, the compressor configured to receive ambient air and apply a pressure to the ambient air; and

a filter positioned to filter the received ambient air.

8. The system of claim 7, wherein the filter is configured to absorb at least a portion of water vapor from the received ambient air.

9. The system of claim 7, wherein the compressor is configured to apply a pressure to the received ambient air of at least 15 KPa.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein the water and ozone solution has a molar concentration of ozone of at least twenty percent.

11. The system of claim 1, further comprising:

a flow meter coupled between the water inlet and the water outlet, the flow meter positioned to detect a flow of water received from the water source.

12. The system of claim 11, further comprising:

an indicator coupled with the flow meter, the indicator configured to receive a signal upon detection by the flow meter of the flow of water and provide an indication in response thereto.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the indicator includes a light source, and the indication includes illumination of the light source.

14. The system of claim 12, further comprising:

a power source coupled with the ozone generator to provide power to generate the ozone; and

a relay coupled to each of the power source, the flow meter, and the indicator, the relay configured to provide an activation signal to the indicator upon receipt of a signal from each of the power source and the flow meter.

15. The system of claim 1, wherein the water and ozone solution has an ORP of at least 650 millivolts.

16. A method for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control, comprising:

receiving ambient air with an ozone generator;

generating ozone from oxygen in the ambient air via the ozone generator;

receiving the generated ozone with a venturi;

receiving a flow of water with the venturi;

mixing the generated ozone with the flow of water in at least a portion of the venturi to provide a water and ozone solution having an ORP of at least 600 millivolts.

17. The method of claim 16, further comprising:

removing at least a portion of water vapor from the ambient air received by the ozone generator.

18. The method of claim 16, further comprising:

compressing at least a portion of the ambient air received by the ozone generator.

19. The method of claim 16, further comprising:

detecting the flow of water with a flow meter;

generating a detection signal responsive to detection of the flow of water;

providing power to the ozone generator; and

activating an indicator responsive to (i) receipt of the detection signal and (ii) providing power to the ozone generator.

20. The method of claim 16, wherein the water and ozone solution has a molar concentration of ozone of at least twenty percent.