US20160237814A1 - Estimation of Formation Properties by Analyzing Response to Pressure Changes in a Wellbore - Google Patents
Estimation of Formation Properties by Analyzing Response to Pressure Changes in a Wellbore Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20160237814A1 US20160237814A1 US14/381,575 US201314381575A US2016237814A1 US 20160237814 A1 US20160237814 A1 US 20160237814A1 US 201314381575 A US201314381575 A US 201314381575A US 2016237814 A1 US2016237814 A1 US 2016237814A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- wellbore
- formation
- pressure
- time period
- change
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 142
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 title claims description 20
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 75
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims description 104
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 65
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 34
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 abstract description 39
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 abstract description 11
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 abstract description 11
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 abstract description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 110
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 24
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 20
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009849 deactivation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000019738 Limestone Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000003190 augmentative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009530 blood pressure measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002405 diagnostic procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000295 fuel oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003673 groundwater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000006028 limestone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007420 reactivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B49/00—Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/12—Methods or apparatus for controlling the flow of the obtained fluid to or in wells
- E21B43/121—Lifting well fluids
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/12—Methods or apparatus for controlling the flow of the obtained fluid to or in wells
- E21B43/121—Lifting well fluids
- E21B43/128—Adaptation of pump systems with down-hole electric drives
-
- E21B47/0003—
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/003—Determining well or borehole volumes
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/04—Measuring depth or liquid level
- E21B47/047—Liquid level
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/06—Measuring temperature or pressure
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B49/00—Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
- E21B49/008—Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells by injection test; by analysing pressure variations in an injection or production test, e.g. for estimating the skin factor
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates generally to systems and methods for determining the properties of a geological formation that surrounds one or more wells by monitoring the response of the formation to changes in pressure in the wells.
- Wells are drilled at various depths to access and produce oil, gas, minerals, and other naturally-occurring deposits from subterranean geological formations.
- the drilling of a well is typically accomplished with a drill bit that is rotated within the well to advance the well by removing topsoil, sand, clay, limestone, calcites, dolomites, or other materials.
- the well is typically completed through a number of additional tasks that may include installing casing through the wellbore, perforating the casing in regions of the formation that are expected to produce hydrocarbons, and by inserting additional tools that may enhance the performance of the well.
- additional tools may assist the extraction of fluids from the wellbore or inject fluids from the surface into the geological formation surrounding the wellbore.
- an artificial lift system may be deployed to assist the oil to reach the surface.
- Such an artificial lift system may include an electric submersible pump that augments the flow of fluid from the formation toward the surface of the well.
- the electric submersible pump may be powered by an electrical power cable that supplies power to the pump from a power source located at the surface of the well.
- the electric submersible pump may be controlled by a surface controller that is operable to adjust the rate at which the pump operates.
- a well operator may conduct a variety of diagnostic processes to gather information about the well and a geological formation that surrounds the well.
- the well operator may gather information that is indicative of the ability of the well to produce hydrocarbons.
- the well operator may conduct tests that indicate formation properties such as permeability, resistivity to flow, porosity, pressure, and the density of fluids produced by the formation.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic view of a well in which a system for determining the properties of a formation surrounding a wellbore by monitoring the formation's response to a change in wellbore pressure is deployed;
- FIG. 2 depicts a front, detail view of a submersible pump deployed within the wellbore in the system of FIG. 1 ;
- FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a power source, submersible pump, sensor, and controller deployed in the well of FIG. 1 ;
- FIG. 4 is a graph showing a change in the amount of power delivered to the pump of FIG. 3 in correlation with a sensor output showing the level of fluid in the well;
- FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a wellbore pressure regulator operable to change the wellbore pressure in response to input from a controller;
- FIG. 6 is a graph showing a change in the wellbore pressure in correlation with a sensor output showing the level of fluid in the well;
- FIG. 7 is a schematic view of a hydrocarbon-producing field having three wells and two potential well sites;
- FIG. 8 is a set of graphs showing a change in pump rate for one of the three wells of FIG. 7 in correlation with changes in fluid level of all three of the wells;
- FIG. 9 is a schematic view of a field having four producing wells and one pressurization well;
- FIG. 10 is a set of graphs showing how power pulses may be provided to pumps deployed in the pressurizing well and three of the producing wells in correlation with changes in fluid level of the fourth producing well;
- FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing an illustrative process for determining a formation property in response to varying a wellbore pressure
- FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing an illustrative process for determining formation properties near a plurality of wellbores in response to varying wellbore pressure in the plurality of wellbores.
- a well operator When conducting conventional formation testing, such as drill stem testing, a well operator may have to choose between operating the well to produce hydrocarbons and removing production equipment from the well in order to deploy dedicated testing components that are able to conduct the desired testing but do not facilitate normal operation of the well. In some instances, deployment of dedicated testing equipment may require significant downtime and delay the well's return to production.
- the systems, devices, and methods described herein relate to the testing of a geological formation surrounding a wellbore using equipment that can be included in a production string. Including such equipment in the production string may be beneficial because extensive testing can be conducted without extended interruption of well operation, which may prove costly to the well owner.
- the systems, devices and methods described herein may be deployed in a single well system to gather information about the formation in one or more zones that correspond to different depths in the wellbore.
- the systems, devices, and methods described herein may be deployed across a number of wells in a hydrocarbon-producing field to generate data that indicates the extent to which flow or pressure in one well affects the flow and pressure in other wells in the field, and the extent to which multiple wells may be connected through the same geological formation.
- FIG. 1 shows an example of a production system 100 that includes diagnostic functionalities for determining the properties of a geological formation 106 surrounding a wellbore 108 .
- the production system 100 includes a rig 116 atop the surface 132 of a well 101 . Beneath the rig 116 , the wellbore 108 is formed within the geological formation 106 , which is expected to produce hydrocarbons.
- the wellbore 108 may be formed in the geological formation 106 using a drill string that includes a drill bit to remove material from the geological formation 106 .
- the wellbore 108 may follow a vertical, partially vertical, angled, or even a partially horizontal path through the geological formation 106 .
- a production tool string 112 may be deployed that includes tools for use in the wellbore 108 to operate and maintain the well 101 .
- the production tool string 112 may include an artificial lift system to assist fluids from the geological formation to reach the surface 132 of the well 101 .
- Such an artificial lift system may include an electric submersible pump 102 , sucker rods, a gas lift system, or any other suitable system for generating a pressure differential.
- the pump 102 receives power from the surface 132 from a power transmission cable 110 , which may also be referred to as an “umbilical cable.”
- a well operator may monitor the condition of the well 101 and components of the production tool string 112 to ensure that the well operates efficiently.
- the well operator may monitor the power transmission cable 110 , pump, or other components connected thereto to verify that power is being effectively transferred to the pump 102 , to ensure that the pump 102 provides the desired amount of lift in the wellbore 108 , and to ensure that there are no unplanned outages of an operating well that includes such an artificial lift system.
- a typical electric submersible pump configuration may include on or more staged centrifugal pump sections that are tuned to the production characteristics and wellbore characteristics of a well.
- the electric submersible pump may be formed by two or more independent electric submersible pumps coupled together in series for redundancy and augmented flow.
- the surface controller 120 provides the functionality of both a power source and a controller relative to the electric submersible pump 102 .
- the surface controller 120 may also include a signal generator and a wired or wireless transceiver for communicating with sensors deployed in the wellbore 108 .
- the electric submersible pump 102 is deployed from the rig 116 , which may be a drilling rig, a completion rig, a workover rig, or another type of rig.
- the rig 116 includes a derrick 109 and a rig floor 111 .
- the production tool string 112 extends downward through the rig floor, through a fluid diverter 144 and blowout preventer 142 that provide a fluidly sealed interface between the wellbore 108 and external environment, and into the wellbore 108 and formation 106 .
- the rig 116 may also include a motorized winch 130 and other equipment for extending the tool string 112 into the wellbore 108 , retrieving the tool string 112 from the wellbore 108 , and positioning the tool string 112 at a selected depth within the wellbore 108 .
- FIG. 1 relates to a stationary, land-based rig 116 for raising, lowering and setting the tool string 112
- mobile rigs, wellbore servicing units such as coiled tubing units, slickline units, or wireline units
- the systems and methods described herein may instead be operated in subsea well configurations accessed by a fixed or floating platform.
- fluids 146 are extracted from the formation 106 and delivered to the surface 132 via the wellbore 108 .
- the submersible pump 102 may be used to provide a reduced pressure in the wellbore and pump fluid from the wellbore 108 to the surface 132 through the production tool string 112 .
- the wellbore 108 may pass through multiple zones within the formation 106 , each of which may be operated at a different pressure. Each such zone may be separated from an adjacent zone by a packer 154 that inflates or expands and forms a fluid seal in the annulus 118 between the wellbore casing 114 and production tool string 112 .
- a submersible pump 102 may decrease pressure in the annulus 118 to encourage fluids 146 from the formation 106 while increasing pressure in the production tool string 112 which forms a fluid flow path to the surface 132 .
- the fluid passes through the blowout preventer 142 and a fluid diverter 144 that diverts fluid 146 to a collection tank 140 for subsequent processing and refinement.
- a sensor 150 which may be a contact sensor that contacts fluid 146 for diagnostic purposes, may be affixed to the pump 102 or otherwise coupled to the tool string 112 .
- a second sensor 148 which may be a noncontact sensor, such as an echo-meter, may be deployed to monitor the fluid level 152 of the fluid 146 and the wellbore 108 .
- FIG. 2 shows a detail view of the submersible pump 102 of FIG. 1 showing the pump 102 partially submerged in fluid 146 that is being extracted from the formation 106 .
- the sensor 150 is shown being deployed on the production tool string 112 and in contact with the fluid 146 .
- the sensor 150 may be operable to determine a number of fluid properties, including the fluid level 152 , fluid density, and wellbore pressure.
- FIG. 3 shows a schematic view of the system 100 of FIG. 1 deployed in a well configuration that enables testing of the surrounding formation 106 .
- the submersible pump 102 is deployed within the formation 106 in the wellbore 108 , and is deployed in conjunction with the sensor 150 .
- the submersible pump 102 is coupled to a power source 122 and to the controller 120 , which may be a computer or computing system that communicates with the pump 102 and sensor 150 .
- the computer includes a memory, a power source, a processer, and a transceiver.
- the transceiver is operable to communicate with the sensor 150 and any other sensors included within the system 100 in addition to the pump 102 and other devices in the tool string 112 .
- the memory which may also be referred to as a computer readable medium, includes instructions to cause the processor to initiate and control the test processes described herein.
- the controller 120 is operable to control the pump 102 either directly or via the power source 122 to adjust the pressure differential supplied by the pump 102 , which may also be referred to as the pump rate.
- the controller 120 is also operable to receive data from the sensor 150 and any other sensors included within the system 100 .
- the pump rate may be adjusted to alter the pressure differential supplied by the pump 102 , thereby changing the pressure in the wellbore 108 , or zone of the wellbore 108 subject to test.
- the pump 102 may be deactivated at the second time and the pressure in the wellbore 108 may increase.
- the fluid level 152 may be monitored by the sensor 150 , which is in contact with the fluid 146 .
- the rate of change of the fluid level and the rate of change of the rate of change of the fluid level which, respectively, may also be referred to as the first derivative and second derivative of the fluid level viewed over time, are indicative of the permeability, porosity, pressure, resistivity to flow, and recoverable reserve of the formation 106 .
- these traits may be referred to as formation properties or properties of the formation 106 .
- production from the pump 102 or other artificial lift source may not be completely ceased. Instead, the rate of production from the artificial lift may merely be altered.
- the mathematical relationships between the wellbore properties described above may not be easily derived using a closed form solution.
- an iterative solution or numerical method known to one of skill in the art such as a finite element technique, a finite difference technique, or a sequential partial differential equation, may be applied in lieu of the equations above.
- an operator may account for additional variations in wellbore properties, such as skin thickness, reservoir fractures, mixed phases, trapped gasses, and different compressibility.
- the fluid level increases over time with a positive first derivative, a negative second derivative, and a varying third derivative. These rates of change may be monitored and analyzed to determine or estimate properties of the formation 106 .
- the operator may return the pump 102 to normal operation.
- reactivation of the pump 102 prompts a second change in the fluid level 152 , which may be further monitored and analyzed to determine properties of the formation 106 .
- a similar test may be conducted by changing the pressure in a wellbore 208 using a pressure regulator 258 in addition to or instead of altering the operation of a submersible pump 102 .
- the pressure regulator 258 may be a pressure release valve, a pneumatic or fluid pump, gas lift system or any other suitable device.
- a pump 202 may again be deployed within a production tool string 212 , but instead of varying the power level or pump rate of the pump 202 , the pressure in the wellbore is varied using the pressure regulator 258 .
- the operator changes the pressure in the wellbore 108 after a first time period extending from an initial time to a second time.
- the fluid level 252 increases over time with a positive first derivative, a negative second derivative, and a varying third derivative.
- the operator may return the wellbore 108 to its original operating pressure.
- Each change in the fluid level 152 may be further monitored and analyzed to estimate properties of the formation 106 .
- the test process described above is deployed across a geographic area that is expected to produce hydrocarbons, which may be referred to as a field. Each such field may include multiple wells.
- the test process is used to estimate the extent to which operation in a well affects operation of another well, formation properties in the portion of the formation that surrounds each well, and the extent to which wells may be interconnected to the same hydrocarbon producing formation.
- FIG. 7 is a schematic view of a field 300 overlying a formation 301 and including one or more wells and potential well locations.
- the field 300 includes a first well 302 , a second well 304 , and a third well 306 , in addition to a first potential well site 308 and a second potential well site 310 .
- the test processes described above may be performed in each of the wells 302 , 304 , and 306 to estimate the formation properties in the portion of the formation 301 that surrounds each well, and to provide an estimate of formation properties at locations between the wells 302 , 304 , and 306 .
- the test process may be implemented and executed by varying the pump rate or pressure of the wellbore of the wells 302 , 304 , and 306 .
- the pump rate 322 may be varied at the second pump 304 to change the pressure of the wellbore of the well 304 for an extended time period.
- the fluid level 320 of the second well may vary in correspondence to the change in pressure. If the first and third wells 302 , 306 are fluidly connected to the same formation that surrounds the second well 304 , then fluid level changes may also be observed at the first and third wells 302 , 306 .
- the pump rate of the first well 332 and pump rate of the third well 342 are held constant over the test period.
- the fluid level of the third well 340 varies in response to the change in pump rate 332 at the second well.
- the fluid level at the first well 330 remains constant.
- the wells may be referred to as “coupled.” Based on the locations of the first potential well site 308 and second potential well site 310 , and the results of the test, a geologist or well driller may estimate that the second potential well site 310 is more likely to be a productive location to place a well because it resides in a region that is likely to be coupled to the formation between the second well 304 and the third well 306 .
- the time delay between seeing the pressure change and the change in fluid level may indicate the degree to which the second well 304 and third well 306 are coupled via the formation 301 and may be used to estimate the permeability, porosity, volume of fluid, and other formation properties of the portion of the formation 301 between the second well 304 and third well 306 .
- FIG. 9 illustrates a 1 ⁇ 4 field configuration having a positively pressurized well 410 and wellbore 420 for pressurizing a formation 406 , and four producing wells including a first producing well 412 and wellbore 422 , a second producing well 414 and wellbore 424 , a third producing well 416 and wellbore 426 , and a fourth producing well 418 and wellbore 428 .
- the field 400 overlies a first formation 406 and second formation 408 .
- an operator may alter the pressure in, for example, the positive pressure well 410 and wellbore 418 and derive an estimation or determination that producing wells 412 , 414 , and 416 are coupled via the first formation 406 , and that the fourth producing well 418 is not coupled to the first formation 406 but instead produces fluids from a second formation 408 that is isolated from the first formation 406 .
- multiple tests may be run at the same time using the methodology described below.
- Running multiple tests at the same time may render it difficult or confusing to determine how the application of the test process in each of the wells 410 , 412 , 414 , 416 and 418 affects the other wells 410 , 412 , 414 , 416 and 418 .
- Such confusion may arise from an operator not being able to determine which well pressure is affecting the other wells if multiple well pressures are changed at the same time.
- the pump rate may be varied in each well according to a different timescale or over different time intervals or time slots, effectively multiplexing the pressure variations so that multiple wells can be tested at the same time while minimizing confusion as to which, and the extent to which, each well test affects nearby wells. For example, as shown in FIG.
- pressure changes or pump rate changes may be applied for a first time period T 1 at the positively pressurized well 410 , a second time period T 2 at the second producing well 414 , a third time period T 3 at the third producing well 416 , and a fourth time period at the fourth producing well 418 , with each such time period being different.
- Such varying timescales may be regular and periodic, or randomized but known by an operator or controller so that the effects of the pressure variations that are actively applied to each well will be properly attributed to that well when the effects of such variations are experienced at a test well.
- this staggering of the test time periods to effectively vary the pressure in each well during different time slots enables a test operator to discern or disambiguate the pressure-related system responses due to the pressure changes as experienced at the first producing well 412 attributable to each of the wells 410 , 414 , 416 , and 418 from which the pressure or pump rate variances are applied.
- This concept is analogous to time division multiplexing.
- the test results may be used to estimate formation properties between the wells 410 , 412 , 414 , 416 , 418 , and to identify potential future well sites that are likely to be productive in the case of potential producing wells or enhance productivity of nearby wells in the case of potential positive pressurization wells.
- the multiple well testing results may enable the operator to estimate the extent of formation coupling or cross-well communication, by examining the cross-correlation between fluid level and pressure measurements versus the pressure variations generated at the other wells. An operator may look at the amplitude and phase of the cross-correlation to conduct such an analysis. In addition, the operator may determine the extent to which wells are connected by applying a transfer function, a statistical regression, a simple correlation, a multiple regression numerical analysis, or any other suitable method, as described above.
- FIG. 11 shows a representative process 500 for applying the testing process described above in a single well implementation.
- the process 500 involves deploying one or more pumps, or other pressurization devices, to one or more zones in a wellbore 502 .
- the deployment of the pumps, for the purposes of testing, may be only to zones that are to be tested. Each such zone may correspond to a portion of the formation surrounding the formation so that an operator may determine the properties of the formation at each zone.
- the process 500 also includes operating the pump or pumps at a first pump rate for a first time period 504 , operating the pump or pumps at a second pump rate for a second time period 506 , and monitoring the system response, or rate of change of the fluid level, and analyzing the system response of the well to estimate formation properties 508 .
- the operator may determine the extent to which each zone is coupled via the surrounding formation and the properties of the wellbore surrounding each zone. This concept may also be applied to identify additional zones for production by identifying productive zones and extrapolating that additional zones between the productive zones may also be productive, applying a similar methodology to the process for identifying potentially productive well sites described with regard to FIG. 7 .
- FIG. 12 shows a representative process 600 for applying the testing process described above in a multiple well implementation.
- the process 600 involves deploying one or more pumps or other pressurization devices to a plurality of wells 602 .
- the process also involves operating the first, second, third, . . . , and nth wells at a first pump rate for a first time period 604 that corresponds to a first set of distinct and different time slots, and then operating the first, second, third, . . . , and nth wells at a second pump rate for a second time period 606 that corresponds to a second set of distinct and different time slots, and monitoring and analyzing the system responses of the wells.
- the process 600 involves determining the system responses in the first, second, third, . . . , and nth wells to the changes in the pump rates in the other wells to estimate the properties of the formations surrounding each well, and the extent to which each well is cross-connected.
- a method for estimating the properties of a geological formation near a wellbore comprising:
- monitoring the change of a fluid level in the wellbore over the second time period to estimate a property of the wellbore comprises estimating the porosity of the geological formation.
- monitoring the change of a fluid level in the wellbore over the second time period to estimate a property of the wellbore comprises estimating the pressure of a fluid flowing through the geological formation.
- monitoring the change of a fluid level in the wellbore over the second time period to estimate a property of the wellbore comprises estimating the resistivity to flow of the geological formation.
- monitoring the change of a fluid level in the wellbore over the second time period to estimate a property of the wellbore comprises estimating a property selected from the group consisting of formation pressure, permeability, and recoverable reserve.
- monitoring the change in fluid level is comprises measuring the fluid height or the measuring pressure of the fluid head.
- a method for estimating the properties of a geological formation near a wellbore comprising:
- monitoring the change of a fluid level comprises measuring the level of fluid in the wellbore using a contact sensor.
- monitoring the change of a fluid level comprises measuring the level of fluid in the wellbore using a non-contact sensor.
- monitoring a change of a fluid level in the wellbore from the first time to estimate a property of the formation comprises estimating a property selected from the group consisting of the density of a fluid from the formation, resistivity to flow, formation pressure, permeability, porosity and recoverable reserve.
- example 8 or 9 further comprising operating an artificial lift system at a third rate from a third time to a fourth time, and monitoring the system response from the third time to determine a second property of the wellbore.
- a method for estimating the properties of a geological formation near a first wellbore comprising:
- altering the pressure of the second wellbore for a second time period comprises increasing the pump rate of a submersible pump in the second wellbore.
- monitoring and analyzing a change of the fluid level in the first wellbore during the second time period to estimate a property of the formation comprises estimating a property selected from the group consisting of the porosity of the formation, the density of a fluid from the formation, the resistivity to flow of the formation, formation permeability, and the recoverable reserve of the formation.
- monitoring and analyzing a change of the fluid level in the first wellbore during the second time period to estimate a property of the formation comprises estimating the extent to the first wellbore and second wellbore are fluidly coupled to the same geological formation.
- example 14 further comprising monitoring and analyzing a second change of fluid in a third wellbore during the second time period to determine a property of the formation.
- a system for mapping the properties of a geological formation comprising:
- the pressure adjustment device comprises a submersible pump and wherein varying the pressure comprises changing the pump rate of the submersible pump.
- estimating a property of the geological formation comprises estimating a property selected from the group consisting of the porosity of the formation, the density of a fluid extracted from the formation, the resistivity to flow of the formation, the formation pressure, the formation permeability, and the formation's recoverable reserve.
- estimating a property of the geological formation comprises determining the extent to which the first wellbore and second wellbore are fluidly coupled to the same geological formation.
- the system of example 22 or 23 further comprising a second sensor deployable in a third wellbore and operable to monitor the fluid level in the third wellbore, and a second pressure adjustment device operable to adjust the pressure in the third wellbore, wherein the memory further comprises instructions for:
- the memory further comprises instructions for selecting a location for a fourth wellbore based on the estimated property of the formation between the first well bore and third wellbore and between the second wellbore and third wellbore.
Abstract
Description
- The present disclosure relates generally to systems and methods for determining the properties of a geological formation that surrounds one or more wells by monitoring the response of the formation to changes in pressure in the wells.
- Wells are drilled at various depths to access and produce oil, gas, minerals, and other naturally-occurring deposits from subterranean geological formations. The drilling of a well is typically accomplished with a drill bit that is rotated within the well to advance the well by removing topsoil, sand, clay, limestone, calcites, dolomites, or other materials.
- After drilling, the well is typically completed through a number of additional tasks that may include installing casing through the wellbore, perforating the casing in regions of the formation that are expected to produce hydrocarbons, and by inserting additional tools that may enhance the performance of the well. Such additional tools may assist the extraction of fluids from the wellbore or inject fluids from the surface into the geological formation surrounding the wellbore.
- In wells that contain heavy oil, an artificial lift system may be deployed to assist the oil to reach the surface. Such an artificial lift system may include an electric submersible pump that augments the flow of fluid from the formation toward the surface of the well. The electric submersible pump may be powered by an electrical power cable that supplies power to the pump from a power source located at the surface of the well. In addition, the electric submersible pump may be controlled by a surface controller that is operable to adjust the rate at which the pump operates.
- During the operation of a pressurized well that includes an artificial lift system, a well operator may conduct a variety of diagnostic processes to gather information about the well and a geological formation that surrounds the well. In particular, the well operator may gather information that is indicative of the ability of the well to produce hydrocarbons. For example, the well operator may conduct tests that indicate formation properties such as permeability, resistivity to flow, porosity, pressure, and the density of fluids produced by the formation.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic view of a well in which a system for determining the properties of a formation surrounding a wellbore by monitoring the formation's response to a change in wellbore pressure is deployed; -
FIG. 2 depicts a front, detail view of a submersible pump deployed within the wellbore in the system ofFIG. 1 ; -
FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a power source, submersible pump, sensor, and controller deployed in the well ofFIG. 1 ; -
FIG. 4 is a graph showing a change in the amount of power delivered to the pump ofFIG. 3 in correlation with a sensor output showing the level of fluid in the well; -
FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a wellbore pressure regulator operable to change the wellbore pressure in response to input from a controller; -
FIG. 6 is a graph showing a change in the wellbore pressure in correlation with a sensor output showing the level of fluid in the well; -
FIG. 7 is a schematic view of a hydrocarbon-producing field having three wells and two potential well sites; -
FIG. 8 is a set of graphs showing a change in pump rate for one of the three wells ofFIG. 7 in correlation with changes in fluid level of all three of the wells; -
FIG. 9 is a schematic view of a field having four producing wells and one pressurization well; -
FIG. 10 is a set of graphs showing how power pulses may be provided to pumps deployed in the pressurizing well and three of the producing wells in correlation with changes in fluid level of the fourth producing well; -
FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing an illustrative process for determining a formation property in response to varying a wellbore pressure; and -
FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing an illustrative process for determining formation properties near a plurality of wellbores in response to varying wellbore pressure in the plurality of wellbores. - In the following detailed description of the illustrative embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical structural, mechanical, electrical, and chemical changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. To avoid detail not necessary to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments described herein, the description may omit certain information known to those skilled in the art. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the illustrative embodiments is defined only by the appended claims.
- When conducting conventional formation testing, such as drill stem testing, a well operator may have to choose between operating the well to produce hydrocarbons and removing production equipment from the well in order to deploy dedicated testing components that are able to conduct the desired testing but do not facilitate normal operation of the well. In some instances, deployment of dedicated testing equipment may require significant downtime and delay the well's return to production.
- The systems, devices, and methods described herein relate to the testing of a geological formation surrounding a wellbore using equipment that can be included in a production string. Including such equipment in the production string may be beneficial because extensive testing can be conducted without extended interruption of well operation, which may prove costly to the well owner. The systems, devices and methods described herein may be deployed in a single well system to gather information about the formation in one or more zones that correspond to different depths in the wellbore. In addition, the systems, devices, and methods described herein may be deployed across a number of wells in a hydrocarbon-producing field to generate data that indicates the extent to which flow or pressure in one well affects the flow and pressure in other wells in the field, and the extent to which multiple wells may be connected through the same geological formation.
- Referring now to the figures,
FIG. 1 shows an example of aproduction system 100 that includes diagnostic functionalities for determining the properties of ageological formation 106 surrounding awellbore 108. Theproduction system 100 includes arig 116 atop thesurface 132 of awell 101. Beneath therig 116, thewellbore 108 is formed within thegeological formation 106, which is expected to produce hydrocarbons. Thewellbore 108 may be formed in thegeological formation 106 using a drill string that includes a drill bit to remove material from thegeological formation 106. Thewellbore 108 inFIG. 1 is shown as being near-vertical, but may be formed at any suitable angle to reach a hydrocarbon-rich portion of thegeological formation 106. As such, in an embodiment, thewellbore 108 may follow a vertical, partially vertical, angled, or even a partially horizontal path through thegeological formation 106. - Following or during formation of the
wellbore 108, aproduction tool string 112 may be deployed that includes tools for use in thewellbore 108 to operate and maintain thewell 101. For example, theproduction tool string 112 may include an artificial lift system to assist fluids from the geological formation to reach thesurface 132 of thewell 101. Such an artificial lift system may include an electricsubmersible pump 102, sucker rods, a gas lift system, or any other suitable system for generating a pressure differential. Thepump 102 receives power from thesurface 132 from apower transmission cable 110, which may also be referred to as an “umbilical cable.” In such systems, a well operator may monitor the condition of thewell 101 and components of theproduction tool string 112 to ensure that the well operates efficiently. For example, the well operator may monitor thepower transmission cable 110, pump, or other components connected thereto to verify that power is being effectively transferred to thepump 102, to ensure that thepump 102 provides the desired amount of lift in thewellbore 108, and to ensure that there are no unplanned outages of an operating well that includes such an artificial lift system. - A typical electric submersible pump configuration may include on or more staged centrifugal pump sections that are tuned to the production characteristics and wellbore characteristics of a well. In some embodiments, the electric submersible pump may be formed by two or more independent electric submersible pumps coupled together in series for redundancy and augmented flow. In the embodiment of
FIG. 1 , thesurface controller 120 provides the functionality of both a power source and a controller relative to the electricsubmersible pump 102. In an embodiment, thesurface controller 120 may also include a signal generator and a wired or wireless transceiver for communicating with sensors deployed in thewellbore 108. - The electric
submersible pump 102 is deployed from therig 116, which may be a drilling rig, a completion rig, a workover rig, or another type of rig. Therig 116 includes a derrick 109 and a rig floor 111. Theproduction tool string 112 extends downward through the rig floor, through afluid diverter 144 andblowout preventer 142 that provide a fluidly sealed interface between thewellbore 108 and external environment, and into thewellbore 108 andformation 106. Therig 116 may also include amotorized winch 130 and other equipment for extending thetool string 112 into thewellbore 108, retrieving thetool string 112 from thewellbore 108, and positioning thetool string 112 at a selected depth within thewellbore 108. - While the operating environment shown in
FIG. 1 relates to a stationary, land-basedrig 116 for raising, lowering and setting thetool string 112, in alternative embodiments, mobile rigs, wellbore servicing units (such as coiled tubing units, slickline units, or wireline units), and the like may be used to lower thetool string 112. Further, while the operating environment is generally discussed as relating to a land-based well, the systems and methods described herein may instead be operated in subsea well configurations accessed by a fixed or floating platform. - In operation,
fluids 146 are extracted from theformation 106 and delivered to thesurface 132 via thewellbore 108. Thesubmersible pump 102 may be used to provide a reduced pressure in the wellbore and pump fluid from thewellbore 108 to thesurface 132 through theproduction tool string 112. Thewellbore 108 may pass through multiple zones within theformation 106, each of which may be operated at a different pressure. Each such zone may be separated from an adjacent zone by apacker 154 that inflates or expands and forms a fluid seal in theannulus 118 between thewellbore casing 114 andproduction tool string 112. Within each zone, asubmersible pump 102 may decrease pressure in theannulus 118 to encouragefluids 146 from theformation 106 while increasing pressure in theproduction tool string 112 which forms a fluid flow path to thesurface 132. Asfluid 146 is transported to thesurface 132, the fluid passes through theblowout preventer 142 and a fluid diverter 144 that divertsfluid 146 to acollection tank 140 for subsequent processing and refinement. - Once the
production tool string 112 is deployed, it may be difficult, expensive, and time consuming to extract theproduction tool string 112 from thewellbore 108 to conduct further testing of thewellbore 108 and surroundingformation 106. However, to intelligently continue operations of the well 101, subsequent development of the well 101, and subsequent development of a hydrocarbon-producing field that surrounds the well 101, subsequent testing may be beneficial. To facilitate and mitigate the costs of such testing, asensor 150, which may be a contact sensor that contacts fluid 146 for diagnostic purposes, may be affixed to thepump 102 or otherwise coupled to thetool string 112. Additionally or in the alternative, at the top of a zone, or the top of the wellbore that comprises only one zone, asecond sensor 148, which may be a noncontact sensor, such as an echo-meter, may be deployed to monitor thefluid level 152 of the fluid 146 and thewellbore 108. -
FIG. 2 shows a detail view of thesubmersible pump 102 ofFIG. 1 showing thepump 102 partially submerged influid 146 that is being extracted from theformation 106. Affixed to thepump 102, thesensor 150 is shown being deployed on theproduction tool string 112 and in contact with thefluid 146. Thesensor 150 may be operable to determine a number of fluid properties, including thefluid level 152, fluid density, and wellbore pressure. -
FIG. 3 shows a schematic view of thesystem 100 ofFIG. 1 deployed in a well configuration that enables testing of the surroundingformation 106. Thesubmersible pump 102 is deployed within theformation 106 in thewellbore 108, and is deployed in conjunction with thesensor 150. Thesubmersible pump 102 is coupled to apower source 122 and to thecontroller 120, which may be a computer or computing system that communicates with thepump 102 andsensor 150. In an embodiment, the computer includes a memory, a power source, a processer, and a transceiver. The transceiver is operable to communicate with thesensor 150 and any other sensors included within thesystem 100 in addition to thepump 102 and other devices in thetool string 112. The memory, which may also be referred to as a computer readable medium, includes instructions to cause the processor to initiate and control the test processes described herein. - In the embodiment of
FIG. 3 , thecontroller 120 is operable to control thepump 102 either directly or via thepower source 122 to adjust the pressure differential supplied by thepump 102, which may also be referred to as the pump rate. Thecontroller 120 is also operable to receive data from thesensor 150 and any other sensors included within thesystem 100. - To test the properties of the surrounding
formation 106, after operating thepump 102 for a first time period extending from an initial time to a second time, the pump rate may be adjusted to alter the pressure differential supplied by thepump 102, thereby changing the pressure in thewellbore 108, or zone of thewellbore 108 subject to test. For example, thepump 102 may be deactivated at the second time and the pressure in thewellbore 108 may increase. Upon the change in wellbore pressure, thefluid level 152 may be monitored by thesensor 150, which is in contact with thefluid 146. By monitoring and analyzing the fluid level fluctuations over time whenpump 102 is, for example, deactivated, certain properties of the formation may be estimated. For example, the rate of change of the fluid level and the rate of change of the rate of change of the fluid level, which, respectively, may also be referred to as the first derivative and second derivative of the fluid level viewed over time, are indicative of the permeability, porosity, pressure, resistivity to flow, and recoverable reserve of theformation 106. Collectively, these traits may be referred to as formation properties or properties of theformation 106. - An example equation that demonstrates the relationship between the aforementioned wellbore properties is given by “Application of the Drill-Stem Test to Hydrogeology” by D. A. Hackbarth in Vol 16, No 1 of Ground Water, January-February 1978, which states that during a complete cessation of the artificial lift system (i.e., deactivation of the pump), shut-in pressure (Pw), can be calculated as a function of the reservoir pressure (Po), the flow rate during production (q), the ease of flow through the formation as dictated by the permeability (k), pay thickness (h), and viscosity of the liquid (μ), as expressed in the following equation:
-
- where:
- t=total flowing time, and
- Δt=time since shut-in started (time since deactivation of the pump or lift system). Further, when pressure is known, this equation can be solved for permeability as follows:
-
- It follows that, depending on which wellbore parameters are known, other wellbore properties may also be estimated by applying the principles set forth in the equations above.
- In an embodiment, production from the
pump 102 or other artificial lift source may not be completely ceased. Instead, the rate of production from the artificial lift may merely be altered. As a result, the mathematical relationships between the wellbore properties described above may not be easily derived using a closed form solution. Thus, an iterative solution or numerical method known to one of skill in the art, such as a finite element technique, a finite difference technique, or a sequential partial differential equation, may be applied in lieu of the equations above. Using such techniques, an operator may account for additional variations in wellbore properties, such as skin thickness, reservoir fractures, mixed phases, trapped gasses, and different compressibility. - As shown in the graph of
FIG. 4 , as the operator temporarily reduces the power delivered to thepump 102, the fluid level increases over time with a positive first derivative, a negative second derivative, and a varying third derivative. These rates of change may be monitored and analyzed to determine or estimate properties of theformation 106. At a third time following the second time, the operator may return thepump 102 to normal operation. In an embodiment, reactivation of thepump 102 prompts a second change in thefluid level 152, which may be further monitored and analyzed to determine properties of theformation 106. - In the embodiment of
FIG. 5 , a similar test may be conducted by changing the pressure in awellbore 208 using apressure regulator 258 in addition to or instead of altering the operation of asubmersible pump 102. Thepressure regulator 258 may be a pressure release valve, a pneumatic or fluid pump, gas lift system or any other suitable device. In such an embodiment, apump 202 may again be deployed within aproduction tool string 212, but instead of varying the power level or pump rate of thepump 202, the pressure in the wellbore is varied using thepressure regulator 258. - As shown in the graph of
FIG. 6 , the operator changes the pressure in thewellbore 108 after a first time period extending from an initial time to a second time. Again, after the change in wellbore pressure, thefluid level 252 increases over time with a positive first derivative, a negative second derivative, and a varying third derivative. At a third time following the second time, the operator may return thewellbore 108 to its original operating pressure. Each change in thefluid level 152 may be further monitored and analyzed to estimate properties of theformation 106. - In an embodiment, the test process described above is deployed across a geographic area that is expected to produce hydrocarbons, which may be referred to as a field. Each such field may include multiple wells. In such an embodiment, the test process is used to estimate the extent to which operation in a well affects operation of another well, formation properties in the portion of the formation that surrounds each well, and the extent to which wells may be interconnected to the same hydrocarbon producing formation.
- For example,
FIG. 7 is a schematic view of a field 300 overlying a formation 301 and including one or more wells and potential well locations. Here, the field 300 includes afirst well 302, asecond well 304, and athird well 306, in addition to a firstpotential well site 308 and a secondpotential well site 310. The test processes described above may be performed in each of thewells wells - In accordance with the embodiment of
FIG. 7 , and as shown in the graphs ofFIG. 8 , the test process may be implemented and executed by varying the pump rate or pressure of the wellbore of thewells pump rate 322 may be varied at thesecond pump 304 to change the pressure of the wellbore of the well 304 for an extended time period. Thefluid level 320 of the second well may vary in correspondence to the change in pressure. If the first andthird wells second well 304, then fluid level changes may also be observed at the first andthird wells - As shown in the graphs of
FIG. 8 , for example, the pump rate of thefirst well 332 and pump rate of the third well 342 are held constant over the test period. Despite the constant pump rates in each of these wells, however, the fluid level of thethird well 340 varies in response to the change inpump rate 332 at the second well. Over the same time period, the fluid level at the first well 330 remains constant. Such test results may indicate that thesecond well 304 and third well 306 share a production region of the same formation 301, while thefirst well 302 is isolated from thesecond well 304 andthird well 306. To the extent thesecond well 304 and third well 306 share a production region, the wells may be referred to as “coupled.” Based on the locations of the firstpotential well site 308 and secondpotential well site 310, and the results of the test, a geologist or well driller may estimate that the secondpotential well site 310 is more likely to be a productive location to place a well because it resides in a region that is likely to be coupled to the formation between thesecond well 304 and thethird well 306. - Further, as with the test processes described above, the time delay between seeing the pressure change and the change in fluid level may indicate the degree to which the
second well 304 and third well 306 are coupled via the formation 301 and may be used to estimate the permeability, porosity, volume of fluid, and other formation properties of the portion of the formation 301 between thesecond well 304 andthird well 306. - A more complex field pattern is shown in
FIG. 9 , which illustrates a 1×4 field configuration having a positively pressurized well 410 and wellbore 420 for pressurizing aformation 406, and four producing wells including a first producing well 412 and wellbore 422, a second producing well 414 and wellbore 424, a third producing well 416 and wellbore 426, and a fourth producing well 418 andwellbore 428. Thefield 400 overlies afirst formation 406 andsecond formation 408. As with the test process described above with regard toFIGS. 7 and 8 , an operator may alter the pressure in, for example, the positive pressure well 410 and wellbore 418 and derive an estimation or determination that producingwells first formation 406, and that the fourth producing well 418 is not coupled to thefirst formation 406 but instead produces fluids from asecond formation 408 that is isolated from thefirst formation 406. In addition, as shown in the graphs ofFIG. 10 , multiple tests may be run at the same time using the methodology described below. - Running multiple tests at the same time, however, may render it difficult or confusing to determine how the application of the test process in each of the
wells other wells FIG. 10 , pressure changes or pump rate changes may be applied for a first time period T1 at the positively pressurized well 410, a second time period T2 at the second producing well 414, a third time period T3 at the third producing well 416, and a fourth time period at the fourth producing well 418, with each such time period being different. Such varying timescales may be regular and periodic, or randomized but known by an operator or controller so that the effects of the pressure variations that are actively applied to each well will be properly attributed to that well when the effects of such variations are experienced at a test well. - In an embodiment, this staggering of the test time periods to effectively vary the pressure in each well during different time slots enables a test operator to discern or disambiguate the pressure-related system responses due to the pressure changes as experienced at the first producing well 412 attributable to each of the
wells FIGS. 7 and 8 , the test results may be used to estimate formation properties between thewells -
FIG. 11 shows arepresentative process 500 for applying the testing process described above in a single well implementation. Theprocess 500 involves deploying one or more pumps, or other pressurization devices, to one or more zones in awellbore 502. The deployment of the pumps, for the purposes of testing, may be only to zones that are to be tested. Each such zone may correspond to a portion of the formation surrounding the formation so that an operator may determine the properties of the formation at each zone. Theprocess 500 also includes operating the pump or pumps at a first pump rate for afirst time period 504, operating the pump or pumps at a second pump rate for asecond time period 506, and monitoring the system response, or rate of change of the fluid level, and analyzing the system response of the well to estimateformation properties 508. By operating a first pump in a first zone of a wellbore, a second pump in a second zone of the wellbore, a third pump in a third zone of the wellbore, and so on, the operator may determine the extent to which each zone is coupled via the surrounding formation and the properties of the wellbore surrounding each zone. This concept may also be applied to identify additional zones for production by identifying productive zones and extrapolating that additional zones between the productive zones may also be productive, applying a similar methodology to the process for identifying potentially productive well sites described with regard toFIG. 7 . - Similarly,
FIG. 12 shows arepresentative process 600 for applying the testing process described above in a multiple well implementation. Theprocess 600 involves deploying one or more pumps or other pressurization devices to a plurality ofwells 602. The process also involves operating the first, second, third, . . . , and nth wells at a first pump rate for afirst time period 604 that corresponds to a first set of distinct and different time slots, and then operating the first, second, third, . . . , and nth wells at a second pump rate for asecond time period 606 that corresponds to a second set of distinct and different time slots, and monitoring and analyzing the system responses of the wells. In addition, theprocess 600 involves determining the system responses in the first, second, third, . . . , and nth wells to the changes in the pump rates in the other wells to estimate the properties of the formations surrounding each well, and the extent to which each well is cross-connected. - The illustrative systems, methods, and devices described herein may also be described by the following examples:
- A method for estimating the properties of a geological formation near a wellbore, the method comprising:
-
- operating an artificial lift system within a wellbore at a first rate for a first time period;
- operating the artificial lift system at a second rate for a second time period;
- monitoring the change of a fluid level in the wellbore over the second time period to estimate a property of the geological formation.
- The method of example 1, wherein monitoring the change of a fluid level in the wellbore over the second time period to estimate a property of the wellbore comprises estimating the porosity of the geological formation.
- The method of example 1, wherein monitoring the change of a fluid level in the wellbore over the second time period to estimate a property of the wellbore comprises estimating the pressure of a fluid flowing through the geological formation.
- The method of example 1, wherein monitoring the change of a fluid level in the wellbore over the second time period to estimate a property of the wellbore comprises estimating the resistivity to flow of the geological formation.
- The method of example 1, wherein monitoring the change of a fluid level in the wellbore over the second time period to estimate a property of the wellbore comprises estimating a property selected from the group consisting of formation pressure, permeability, and recoverable reserve.
- The method of example 1, further comprising operating the artificial lift system at a third rate during a third time period following the second time period and monitoring the change of a fluid level in the wellbore to estimate a second property of the geological formation.
- The method of example 1 wherein monitoring the change in fluid level is comprises measuring the fluid height or the measuring pressure of the fluid head.
- A method for estimating the properties of a geological formation near a wellbore, the method comprising:
-
- changing the pressure in the wellbore from a first pressure to a second pressure at a first time, the second pressure being greater than the first pressure ;
- monitoring a change of a fluid level in the wellbore from the first time to estimate a property of the formation.
- The method of example 8, wherein monitoring the change of a fluid level comprises measuring the level of fluid in the wellbore using a contact sensor.
- The method of example 8, wherein monitoring the change of a fluid level comprises measuring the level of fluid in the wellbore using a non-contact sensor.
- The method of example 8 or 9, wherein monitoring a change of a fluid level in the wellbore from the first time to estimate a property of the formation comprises estimating a property selected from the group consisting of the density of a fluid from the formation, resistivity to flow, formation pressure, permeability, porosity and recoverable reserve.
- The method of example 8 or 9, further comprising operating an artificial lift system at a third rate from a third time to a fourth time, and monitoring the system response from the third time to determine a second property of the wellbore.
- The method of example 8 or 9, further comprising comparing an estimated property of the formation estimated at the second time to the estimated property of the formation estimated at a third time to verify the estimation.
- A method for estimating the properties of a geological formation near a first wellbore, the method comprising:
-
- operating an artificial lift system within a second wellbore for a first time period at a first pressure;
- altering the pressure of the second wellbore for a second time period;
- monitoring and analyzing a change of a fluid level in the first wellbore during the second time period to estimate a property of the formation.
- The method of example 14, wherein altering the pressure of the second wellbore for a second time period comprises increasing the static pressure in the second wellbore using a pressure regulator.
- The method of example 14, wherein altering the pressure of the second wellbore for a second time period comprises increasing the pump rate of a submersible pump in the second wellbore.
- The method of example 14, wherein monitoring and analyzing a change of the fluid level in the first wellbore during the second time period to estimate a property of the formation comprises estimating a property selected from the group consisting of the porosity of the formation, the density of a fluid from the formation, the resistivity to flow of the formation, formation permeability, and the recoverable reserve of the formation.
- The method of example 14, wherein monitoring and analyzing a change of the fluid level in the first wellbore during the second time period to estimate a property of the formation comprises estimating the extent to the first wellbore and second wellbore are fluidly coupled to the same geological formation.
- The method of example 14, further comprising monitoring and analyzing a second change of fluid in a third wellbore during the second time period to determine a property of the formation.
- The method of example 19, further comprising estimating the extent to which the first wellbore, second wellbore, and third wellbore are coupled through the formation.
- The method of example 19, further comprising:
-
- varying the pressure in third wellbore from a third period to a fourth time period;
- varying the pressure in a fourth wellbore from a fifth time period to a sixth time period analyzing the second change of the fluid level in the third wellbore over the second time period in response to the change in pressure in the first wellbore;
- analyzing the third change of the fluid level in the second wellbore over the third time period and fourth time period;
- analyzing a fourth change of a fluid level in the fourth wellbore over the second time period and third time period; and
- estimating the extent to which the first wellbore, second wellbore, third wellbore, and fourth wellbore are coupled through the formation based on analyzing the change of fluid level in the first wellbore, the second change of fluid level in the third wellbore, the third change of the fluid level in the second wellbore, and the fourth change of the fluid level in the fourth wellbore.
- A system for mapping the properties of a geological formation, the system comprising:
-
- a pressure adjustment device for deployment in a first wellbore;
- a sensor for monitoring the fluid level in a second wellbore;
- a control system that is operable to communicate with the pressure adjustment device and the sensor, the controller including a memory having instructions for:
- varying the pressure in the first wellbore from a first time period to a second time period;
- analyzing the change of a fluid level in the second wellbore over the second time period in response to the change in pressure in the first wellbore; and
- estimating a property of a geological formation between the first wellbore and second wellbore based on said analyzing.
- The system of example 22, wherein the sensor is a contact sensor.
- The system of example 23, wherein the contact sensor is a hydrophone.
- The system of example 22, wherein the sensor is a non-contact sensor.
- The system of example 25, wherein the non-contact sensor is an echo-meter.
- The system of example 22, wherein the pressure adjustment device comprises a submersible pump and wherein varying the pressure comprises changing the pump rate of the submersible pump.
- The system of example 27, wherein changing the pump rate of the submersible pump comprises stopping the pump.
- The system of example 22 or 23, wherein estimating a property of the geological formation comprises estimating a property selected from the group consisting of the porosity of the formation, the density of a fluid extracted from the formation, the resistivity to flow of the formation, the formation pressure, the formation permeability, and the formation's recoverable reserve.
- The system of example 22 or 23, wherein estimating a property of the geological formation comprises determining the extent to which the first wellbore and second wellbore are fluidly coupled to the same geological formation.
- The system of example 22 or 23 further comprising a second sensor deployable in a third wellbore and operable to monitor the fluid level in the third wellbore, and a second pressure adjustment device operable to adjust the pressure in the third wellbore, wherein the memory further comprises instructions for:
-
- varying the pressure in third wellbore from a third period to a fourth time period;
- analyzing the change of a fluid level in the third wellbore over the second time period in response to the change in pressure in the first wellbore;
- analyzing the change of a fluid level in the second wellbore over the fourth time period in response to the change in pressure in the third wellbore; and
- estimating a property of a geological formation between the first wellbore and third wellbore and between the second wellbore and third wellbore based on said analyzing.
- The system of example 31, wherein the memory further comprises instructions for selecting a location for a fourth wellbore based on the estimated property of the formation between the first well bore and third wellbore and between the second wellbore and third wellbore.
- It should be apparent from the foregoing that an invention having significant advantages has been provided. While the invention is shown in only a few of its forms, it is not limited to only these embodiments but is susceptible to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.
Claims (20)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/064582 WO2015053784A1 (en) | 2013-10-11 | 2013-10-11 | Estimation of formation properties by analyzing response to pressure changes in a wellbore |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20160237814A1 true US20160237814A1 (en) | 2016-08-18 |
Family
ID=52813473
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/381,575 Abandoned US20160237814A1 (en) | 2013-10-11 | 2013-10-11 | Estimation of Formation Properties by Analyzing Response to Pressure Changes in a Wellbore |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20160237814A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015053784A1 (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20170268328A1 (en) * | 2016-03-17 | 2017-09-21 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Identification of pumping system placement |
US20190146115A1 (en) * | 2016-06-20 | 2019-05-16 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Tube wave analysis of well communication |
US10689958B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2020-06-23 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Apparatus and methods for operating gas lift wells |
CN112211627A (en) * | 2020-10-30 | 2021-01-12 | 西南石油大学 | Selection method of low-permeability gas reservoir interference well testing test well |
US11085291B2 (en) | 2018-02-21 | 2021-08-10 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Permeability prediction using a connected reservoir regions map |
WO2022002147A1 (en) * | 2020-07-01 | 2022-01-06 | 浙江都美电气技术股份有限公司 | Automatic control method, apparatus and system for working fluid level |
US11466567B2 (en) * | 2020-07-16 | 2022-10-11 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | High flowrate formation tester |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106522927A (en) * | 2015-09-11 | 2017-03-22 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Improved calculating method of reasonable bottom hole flowing pressure |
NO342709B1 (en) | 2015-10-12 | 2018-07-23 | Cameron Tech Ltd | Flow sensor assembly |
CN108487902B (en) * | 2018-03-01 | 2021-07-06 | 北京中油瑞飞信息技术有限责任公司 | Method and device for determining bottom hole flow pressure and storage medium |
US10822895B2 (en) | 2018-04-10 | 2020-11-03 | Cameron International Corporation | Mud return flow monitoring |
CN114222863A (en) * | 2019-09-25 | 2022-03-22 | 哈里伯顿能源服务公司 | Method of calculating viscous performance of a pump based on its aqueous performance characteristics and new dimensionless parameters for controlling and monitoring viscosity, flow and pressure |
CN110952976B (en) * | 2019-12-19 | 2022-05-13 | 西南石油大学 | Single-well exploitation stable yield potential evaluation method in gas reservoir development mode |
CN111997597A (en) * | 2020-09-03 | 2020-11-27 | 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 | Method for controlling methane in stratum to invade shaft |
CN114109367B (en) * | 2021-11-25 | 2023-07-25 | 四川轻化工大学 | Method and system for monitoring annular liquid level of well bore |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5634522A (en) * | 1996-05-31 | 1997-06-03 | Hershberger; Michael D. | Liquid level detection for artificial lift system control |
EP1257728B1 (en) * | 2000-02-22 | 2012-04-11 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Artificial lift apparatus with automated monitoring of fluid height in the borehole |
US7668694B2 (en) * | 2002-11-26 | 2010-02-23 | Unico, Inc. | Determination and control of wellbore fluid level, output flow, and desired pump operating speed, using a control system for a centrifugal pump disposed within the wellbore |
US8353677B2 (en) * | 2009-10-05 | 2013-01-15 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | System and method for sensing a liquid level |
CA2762269C (en) * | 2010-11-17 | 2014-01-21 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining a level of a fluid in communication with a downhole pump |
-
2013
- 2013-10-11 US US14/381,575 patent/US20160237814A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2013-10-11 WO PCT/US2013/064582 patent/WO2015053784A1/en active Application Filing
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20170268328A1 (en) * | 2016-03-17 | 2017-09-21 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Identification of pumping system placement |
US20190146115A1 (en) * | 2016-06-20 | 2019-05-16 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Tube wave analysis of well communication |
US11921248B2 (en) * | 2016-06-20 | 2024-03-05 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Tube wave analysis of well communication |
US10689958B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2020-06-23 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Apparatus and methods for operating gas lift wells |
US10920546B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2021-02-16 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Apparatus and methods for operating gas lift wells |
US11085291B2 (en) | 2018-02-21 | 2021-08-10 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Permeability prediction using a connected reservoir regions map |
WO2022002147A1 (en) * | 2020-07-01 | 2022-01-06 | 浙江都美电气技术股份有限公司 | Automatic control method, apparatus and system for working fluid level |
US11466567B2 (en) * | 2020-07-16 | 2022-10-11 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | High flowrate formation tester |
CN112211627A (en) * | 2020-10-30 | 2021-01-12 | 西南石油大学 | Selection method of low-permeability gas reservoir interference well testing test well |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2015053784A1 (en) | 2015-04-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20160237814A1 (en) | Estimation of Formation Properties by Analyzing Response to Pressure Changes in a Wellbore | |
US9803467B2 (en) | Well screen-out prediction and prevention | |
US9822626B2 (en) | Planning and performing re-fracturing operations based on microseismic monitoring | |
CA2969515C (en) | Energy industry operation characterization and/or optimization | |
Glandt | Reservoir management employing smart wells: a review | |
Dong et al. | Geomechanical analysis on casing deformation in Longmaxi shale formation | |
US10126448B2 (en) | Formation measurements using downhole noise sources | |
CN109415936B (en) | Methods and systems for establishing well performance during plug mill out or cleanup/workover operations | |
AU2013219864A1 (en) | Method for determining a permeability or mobility of a radial flow response of a reservoir | |
US20200325759A1 (en) | Geological settings prone to casing deformation post hydraulic fracture injection | |
US11867034B2 (en) | Systems and methods for automated gas lift monitoring | |
US11409018B2 (en) | System and method for monitoring a ballooning potential of a wellbore | |
US20200325751A1 (en) | Mitigation of casing deformation associated with geological settings prone to casing deformation post hydraulic fracture injection | |
US11499425B2 (en) | Borehole gravity analysis for reservoir management | |
WO2018075019A1 (en) | Relative permeability estimation methods and systems employing downhole pressure transient analysis, saturation analysis, and porosity analysis | |
US20240069238A1 (en) | Determining hydrocarbon production zones in a subterranean reservoir | |
Zambrano-Narvaez et al. | Case study of the cementing phase of an observation well at the Pembina Cardium CO2 monitoring pilot, Alberta, Canada | |
US9228427B2 (en) | Completion method to allow dual reservoir saturation and pressure monitoring | |
US20220403734A1 (en) | Data driven in-situ injection and production flow monitoring | |
US11230924B2 (en) | Interpretation of pressure test data | |
Patni et al. | In-well monitoring for Deepwater Wells-Operator's View | |
WO2018156142A1 (en) | Wellbore skin effect calculation using temperature measurements | |
Onur et al. | A Novel Infinite-Acting-Radial-Flow Analysis Procedure for Estimating Permeability Anisotropy From an Observation-Probe Pressure Response at a Vertical, Horizontal, or Inclined Wellbore |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FRIPP, MICHAEL LINLEY;DYKSTRA, JASON;BU, FANPING;SIGNING DATES FROM 20131017 TO 20131024;REEL/FRAME:031502/0950 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FRIPP, MICHAEL LINLEY;DYKSTRA, JASON;BU, FANPING;SIGNING DATES FROM 20131017 TO 20131024;REEL/FRAME:033624/0387 Owner name: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FRIPP, MICHAEL LINLEY;DYKSTRA, JASON;BU, FANPING;SIGNING DATES FROM 20131017 TO 20131024;REEL/FRAME:033624/0414 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |