US20160063350A1 - Method and apparatus for contrast enhanced photography of wind turbine blades - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for contrast enhanced photography of wind turbine blades Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20160063350A1
US20160063350A1 US14/835,966 US201514835966A US2016063350A1 US 20160063350 A1 US20160063350 A1 US 20160063350A1 US 201514835966 A US201514835966 A US 201514835966A US 2016063350 A1 US2016063350 A1 US 2016063350A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
image
wind turbine
turbine blade
image processing
processing computer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/835,966
Inventor
John W. Newman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Electric Co
Original Assignee
Digital Wind Systems Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Digital Wind Systems Inc filed Critical Digital Wind Systems Inc
Priority to US14/835,966 priority Critical patent/US20160063350A1/en
Publication of US20160063350A1 publication Critical patent/US20160063350A1/en
Assigned to DIGITAL WIND SYSTEMS, INC. reassignment DIGITAL WIND SYSTEMS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NEWMAN, JOHN W.
Priority to US15/909,139 priority patent/US10776660B2/en
Assigned to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY reassignment GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DIGITAL WIND SYSTEMS, INC.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G06K9/6215
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03DWIND MOTORS
    • F03D17/00Monitoring or testing of wind motors, e.g. diagnostics
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60RVEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B60R11/00Arrangements for holding or mounting articles, not otherwise provided for
    • B60R11/04Mounting of cameras operative during drive; Arrangement of controls thereof relative to the vehicle
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/84Systems specially adapted for particular applications
    • G01N21/88Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination
    • G01N21/8806Specially adapted optical and illumination features
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/84Systems specially adapted for particular applications
    • G01N21/88Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination
    • G01N21/95Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination characterised by the material or shape of the object to be examined
    • G01N21/9515Objects of complex shape, e.g. examined with use of a surface follower device
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F18/00Pattern recognition
    • G06F18/20Analysing
    • G06F18/22Matching criteria, e.g. proximity measures
    • G06K9/4661
    • G06K9/52
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • G06T7/0004Industrial image inspection
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • G06T7/0004Industrial image inspection
    • G06T7/001Industrial image inspection using an image reference approach
    • G06T7/0024
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/60Analysis of geometric attributes
    • G06T7/62Analysis of geometric attributes of area, perimeter, diameter or volume
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05BINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2270/00Control
    • F05B2270/80Devices generating input signals, e.g. transducers, sensors, cameras or strain gauges
    • F05B2270/804Optical devices
    • F05B2270/8041Cameras
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/84Systems specially adapted for particular applications
    • G01N21/88Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination
    • G01N21/8806Specially adapted optical and illumination features
    • G01N2021/8848Polarisation of light
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2201/00Features of devices classified in G01N21/00
    • G01N2201/06Illumination; Optics
    • G01N2201/061Sources
    • G01N2201/0616Ambient light is used
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/20Special algorithmic details
    • G06T2207/20212Image combination
    • G06T2207/20224Image subtraction
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/30Subject of image; Context of image processing
    • G06T2207/30108Industrial image inspection
    • G06T2207/30164Workpiece; Machine component
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/70Wind energy
    • Y02E10/72Wind turbines with rotation axis in wind direction

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method and apparatus for remotely detecting surface features and anomalies on wind turbine blades in situ, in particular utilizing digital photographic imaging technology.
  • the invention facilitates such inspections from the ground, on stationary operating wind turbine generators and has utility for remotely detecting propagating latent defects and existing damage on the surface of a wind turbine blade. This permits surface defects to be detected before they become too large for repair in situ, which provides significant economic advantages, as the cost of repairing the wind turbine blade in situ is typically 10% of the cost of replacing a blade.
  • Shearography with either thermal stress or during flexure testing of the blade in the factory can be used to detect fiberwaves in spar caps and other areas of the blade, but the technique is slow, expensive and is usually performed only if known issues are suspected. Angle beam ultrasonic techniques are very slow and may not work through thick carbon fiber spar caps.
  • blades are commonly installed on towers and put into service with a significant probability of latent manufacturing defects.
  • composite blades are subject to extreme temperature variations. Entrapped water in blades can undergo freeze/thaw cycles, which can cause internal damage. Cyclic forces of gravity and varying forces from the wind acting on the blades as they rotate can cause fatigue damage or the propagation of latent defects over time while manufacturing process mistakes can lead to early blade failure. Defects can grow below the surface of a wind turbine blade to the point that by the time cracks and damage breach the surface and can be detected visually, the damage may not be repairable on tower.
  • the sizing and location of anomalies can be used to classify blade status to provide a useful definition of actions needed to maintain safe turbine operation.
  • a system for inspecting utility scale wind turbine generator blades from the ground for propagating subsurface anomalies during normal operation comprises a digital camera and an adjustable polarizing filter on a stable platform that is used to record multiple digital images with varying polarization angles during daylight hours. Images with the same or similar registration but different polarization angles are subsequently image processed using subtraction or absolute difference routines to yield high resolution, high contrast images with reduced glare and excellent surface definition over the field of view. Images of blades may be calibrated to determine the location, signal to noise ratio, size, or other quantitative measurements of anomalies, and such early detection may allow repair of the blade up tower instead of more costly replacement.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a utility scale, horizontal axis, wind turbine generator
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a wind turbine blade cross section
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a first preferred embodiment of the invention using a single camera and polarizer rotated manually or automatically;
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram of a second embodiment of the invention using multiple cameras in pairs or singling with fixed or automatic polarization rotation;
  • FIG. 5 shows a first image with 0 degrees polarization
  • FIG. 6 shows a second image with 90 degrees polarization
  • FIG. 7 shows the final image after digital image subtraction and brightness and contrast adjustment
  • FIG. 8 is photograph of a wind turbine blade after image processing.
  • FIG. 1 a schematic diagram of a horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) that is typical of both land based and off-shore turbine generators.
  • HAWT horizontal axis wind turbine
  • the view 1 from behind the turbine facing the wind includes tower 6 extending up from the ground or ocean surface 2 to support the nacelle 8 which contains the generator and gear reducers, unless it is a direct drive generator.
  • FIG. 2 shows the construction cross section of a typical HAWT blade. Wind turbine blades are generally manufactured with adhesively bonded composite shells forming the high pressure side 16 and the low pressure side 14 .
  • the trailing edge 21 is adhesively bonded, as is the leading edge 20 , with adhesive bonding in some cases between two flanges 22 formed by the inner and outer fiberglass skins that make up sandwich panels 18 .
  • Two spar caps 26 which may be made from fiberglass or carbon fiber laminate, are bonded to the edges of the sandwich panels 18 .
  • the blade spar web 30 can be a solid fiberglass laminate or a sandwich construction with fiberglass or carbon fiber face sheets and a core material made with foam, balsa wood or other suitable material with high compressive strength.
  • the spar web 30 is bonded with adhesive 28 to the spar caps 26 to form an I-beam.
  • FIG. 3 shows a schematic diagram of a single camera 102 setup with a single rotatable polarizer 112 .
  • the camera 102 is preferably mounted on a remotely controlled pan/tilt mechanism 122 located on an outside of a vehicle 124 , such as a car, truck, boat, or the like. While a rotatable polarizer 112 is shown, any type of adjustable polarizer filter that allows for variation of the amount of passed light can be used, such as other types of mechanical polarizer filters, adjustable liquid crystal phase retarders, or the like, or combinations thereof.
  • the filter rotation of 90 degrees may be manual or automatic.
  • the resulting images must either be in perfect registration using a tripod (not shown) or a means must be available to align the images into registration with each other.
  • the images are the subtracted or the absolute difference is calculated using the image processing computer.
  • the image may also be further enhanced with a brightness and contrast adjustment to yield a glare-free, very high contrast image revealing even subtle surface waviness, repairs, gel coat defects, blade erosion and surface cracking.
  • multiple cameras 102 , 104 with fixed or automatic polarizer 112 , 114 rotation may be used for stationary blades.
  • simultaneity of the exposures is critical to maintain image registration.
  • Both cameras 102 , 104 must record the same field of view at the same time. The slight parallax between the two cameras 102 , 104 does not significantly degrade the final image.
  • pixel counting software may be used to measure features, locations and areas.
  • Digital photography images are formed by focusing electromagnetic energy with a lens onto a flat sensor comprised of energy sensitive elements or pixels positioned in generally a rectangular array, for example 3000 horizontal by 2400 vertical.
  • the image scale measured in pixels per unit distance on the surface of the object, changes continuously over the field of view as the angle ⁇ between the camera lens and the position of each imaged point on the target changes. For a large flat object with the camera pointed straight on, the line from the center of the camera lens to the target is the shortest distance and the image scale will be largest value. As one moves to an edge of the field of view, the angle and distance increase and the image scale decreases.
  • Objects in the field in a digital image may be measured with respect to other objects of features in the image.
  • the digital image must be calibrated by counting the number of pixels in a line segment that crosses and ends at the extremes of a feature of known dimension, located at approximately the same distance from the camera to the feature desired to be measured.
  • the number of pixels counted divided by the feature's known dimension gives the image scale at that location in pixels/unit of measure (ft. or meters).
  • Other features or objects can then be measured by counting pixels for either their length or wide or distance from a known datum, if in the field of view, the dimension being the pixel count divided by the image scale.
  • a calibration feature in the digital image that changes in apparent width with changes in distance, but does not change if the viewing angle changes, giving a more reliable measurement.
  • One example of such an object is a sphere, whose diameter changes with distance, but not with the viewing angle.
  • a cylinder is another example.
  • the root end of wind turbine blades are cylindrical where they attach to the pitch bearing in the hub. Regardless of the blade pitch or the viewing angle from the ground, the blade root end diameter can be used to calibrate the image scale of a wind turbine blade and then allow measurement of other features at the same approximate distance.
  • Another area of known dimension could be the diameter of the tower at the base of the nacelle or at a visible weld joint. Due to the increased thickness of steel at the tower joint welds, these joints retain heat from the sun and remain visible with infrared cameras during most of the night, when thermal inspection of wind turbine blades is best due to washout of defects with thermal emissions.
  • the known dimensions at the blade roots or at tower welds may be used to calibrate the image scale.
  • the imaging of the area of known dimension could be done using digital thermography, photography or any other passive or active imaging technique.
  • Software is then used to determine an image scale in units of pixels/ft., pixels/meter, or any other scale of pixels to length.
  • Pixel counting is then used to determine a dimension calibrated in pixels of the size and/or area of the indication. This will permit the software to comparatively determine the dimensions of other features or objects, such as anomalies, that are located at approximately the same distance.
  • the dimensions of such features or anomalies may then be converted back to a conventional dimensional measurement, such as feet, meters, or other units of length.
  • the imaging software may then integrate dimensional measurements to determine the surface area of the feature or anomaly.
  • Such imaging may be conducted with the wind turbine blade at multiple radial angles of rotation in order to generate an image scale template that corrects for image distortion over the field of view of the digital image as the wind turbine blade rotates.
  • the imaging may be performed as the wind turbine blade rotates, so it is not necessary to immobilize the wind turbine blade or take the unit off-line during the inspection process.
  • the angle of the arc subtended by a defect indication on the blade in the image is relatively small, so the error in sizing and locating the defect is relatively small.
  • Images where the blade is pointing at angles other than horizontally have an image scale much more distorted by changes in the distance from the IR camera to points on the blade. If the blade is pointing down, the distance from the camera to the blade tip is approximately equal half the height of the tower.
  • the image scale at the blade tip would be twice the value for the image scale at the root and defect measurements would be twice the actual size.
  • a sequence of digital thermal images or photographs may be played back, frame by frame to allow the analyst the ability to select frames with optimal image quality for the definition of the boundaries of an anomaly.
  • Image measurement tools that measure each pixel value along a line through a defect indication can be programmed to measure the signal to noise ratio, which may be defined as the pixel values for the area adjacent to the defect squared divided by the pixel values for the defect indication squared. Such a tool, among many known to those skilled in the art of image processing, may be used to quantitatively select the image with the best image quality.
  • the field operator may image the wind turbine blade in position segments in order to capture a sequence of multiple images of all three blades at least once as they pass through the camera field of view. This may be followed by a rotation of the camera on its mount to capture the next blade segment in order to image a sequence of multiple images of all three blades at least once as they pass through the camera field and so forth until images of the entire blade are captured.
  • FIG. 5 is a photograph of a wind turbine blade in the polarized solar light with the polarizer set to transmit the minimum light reflected from the blade.
  • FIG. 6 is a photograph of a wind turbine blade in a polarized solar light with the polarizer set to transmit the maximum rate reflected from the blade.
  • FIG. 8 depicts an area on a final high contrast image selected, using a dotted line segment by clicking on one side of the indication in dragging the cursor across the indication.
  • the signal-to-noise ratio is the pixel value of adjacent areas divided by the pixel value of the indication, as shown in FIG. 8 .
  • Signal-to-noise ratio is 1.4.
  • Other arithmetic routines may be used so long as each method is defined in the context of use.
  • Another routine to measure the signal to noise ratio is to square the pixel values, prior to the division.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
  • Wind Motors (AREA)
  • Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)

Abstract

A method and apparatus for inspecting utility scale wind turbine generator blades from the ground includes a digital camera and an adjustable polarizing filter on a stable platform. The camera is used to record multiple digital images with varying polarization angles using an artificial polarized or polarized solar illumination to produce images with the same or similar registration but different polarization angles, followed by image processing using subtraction or absolute difference routines to yield high resolution, high contrast images with reduced glare and excellent surface definition over the field of view.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/042,102, filed on Aug. 26, 2014, currently pending, entitled “Method and Apparatus Contrast Enhanced Photography of Wind Turbine Blades,” the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
  • INCORPORATIONS BY REFERENCE
  • Applicant hereby incorporates by reference, as if set forth fully herein, the entirety of the disclosures of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/731,085, filed Dec. 30, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,553,233, and having the title “Method and Apparatus for the Remote Nondestructive Evaluation of an Object,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/837,145, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, and having the title “Method and Apparatus for Monitoring Wind Turbine Blades During Operation,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/839,908, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, and having the title “System and Method for Ground Based Inspection of Wind Turbine Blades,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/840,470, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, and having the title “Nondestructive Acoustic Doppler Testing of Wind Turbine Blades from the Ground During Operation,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/469,292, filed Aug. 26, 2014, and having the title “Method and Apparatus for Remote Feature Measurement in Distorted Images.”
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to a method and apparatus for remotely detecting surface features and anomalies on wind turbine blades in situ, in particular utilizing digital photographic imaging technology. The invention facilitates such inspections from the ground, on stationary operating wind turbine generators and has utility for remotely detecting propagating latent defects and existing damage on the surface of a wind turbine blade. This permits surface defects to be detected before they become too large for repair in situ, which provides significant economic advantages, as the cost of repairing the wind turbine blade in situ is typically 10% of the cost of replacing a blade.
  • Due to their large size, extensive surface area and complex shape, wind turbine blades are difficult to nondestructively inspect even within a fabrication or repair facility. Visual inspection cannot identify defects below the surface of the outer skin of the wind turbine blade, which typically is fabricated from a fiberglass material. Active thermography inspection techniques using heat are effective for near surface defects but can give false positives and false negatives due to variations in material thickness and surface emissivity.
  • Shearography with either thermal stress or during flexure testing of the blade in the factory can be used to detect fiberwaves in spar caps and other areas of the blade, but the technique is slow, expensive and is usually performed only if known issues are suspected. Angle beam ultrasonic techniques are very slow and may not work through thick carbon fiber spar caps.
  • As a result, blades are commonly installed on towers and put into service with a significant probability of latent manufacturing defects. Furthermore, composite blades are subject to extreme temperature variations. Entrapped water in blades can undergo freeze/thaw cycles, which can cause internal damage. Cyclic forces of gravity and varying forces from the wind acting on the blades as they rotate can cause fatigue damage or the propagation of latent defects over time while manufacturing process mistakes can lead to early blade failure. Defects can grow below the surface of a wind turbine blade to the point that by the time cracks and damage breach the surface and can be detected visually, the damage may not be repairable on tower.
  • Detecting progressive damage and propagating defects in wind turbine blades in situ is difficult for a number of different reasons. Inspectors using sky cranes or rope access are expensive, time consuming and put personnel in a very dangerous working environment. While on tower, close access allows inspectors to visually detect blade defects such as gel coat cracking, lightning damage, and blade erosion, which may be precursors to further degradation of the blade over time. Access to a wind turbine blade in situ with portable instruments for nondestructive testing also requires rope access or sky platforms and cranes. Blade and tower crawlers with nondestructive testing sensors for in situ inspection have been developed and tested, but they can be extremely expensive, slow to operate.
  • It is also common practice to use optical and digital photographic imaging of blades in an attempt to detect visible damage from the ground. Standard telephotography often has very low contrast, even with post image processing with current contrast enhancement software. Pixels may be saturated with glare or areas of the blade may be in shadows. The normalization of the histogram, a frequent image processing function, may not be effective in achieving the effect of uniform blade illumination, except in small areas of the blade in the images.
  • There accordingly exists a need for a fast, cost-effective inspection method and apparatus for wind turbine blades using digital imaging to detect latent and propagating damage, which includes a method and apparatus for precision measurement of features or anomalies and locating these on the target blade.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide images and analysis of digital photographic images of turbine blade surfaces for fast, cost-effective surface inspection for wind turbine blades to detect latent and propagating damage early enough to allow on-tower repair before it becomes necessary to remove the wind turbine blade from the tower and repair it off-site or replace it with a new blade. The sizing and location of anomalies can be used to classify blade status to provide a useful definition of actions needed to maintain safe turbine operation.
  • In accordance with the embodiment described herein, a system for inspecting utility scale wind turbine generator blades from the ground for propagating subsurface anomalies during normal operation comprises a digital camera and an adjustable polarizing filter on a stable platform that is used to record multiple digital images with varying polarization angles during daylight hours. Images with the same or similar registration but different polarization angles are subsequently image processed using subtraction or absolute difference routines to yield high resolution, high contrast images with reduced glare and excellent surface definition over the field of view. Images of blades may be calibrated to determine the location, signal to noise ratio, size, or other quantitative measurements of anomalies, and such early detection may allow repair of the blade up tower instead of more costly replacement.
  • These and various other advantages and features of novelty that characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed hereto and forming a part hereof. However, for a better understanding of the invention, its advantages, and the objects obtained by its use, reference should be made to the drawings which form a further part hereof, and to the accompanying descriptive matter, in which there is illustrated and described a preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustration, there are shown in the drawings embodiments which are presently preferred. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a utility scale, horizontal axis, wind turbine generator;
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a wind turbine blade cross section;
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a first preferred embodiment of the invention using a single camera and polarizer rotated manually or automatically;
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram of a second embodiment of the invention using multiple cameras in pairs or singling with fixed or automatic polarization rotation;
  • FIG. 5 shows a first image with 0 degrees polarization;
  • FIG. 6 shows a second image with 90 degrees polarization;
  • FIG. 7 shows the final image after digital image subtraction and brightness and contrast adjustment; and
  • FIG. 8 is photograph of a wind turbine blade after image processing.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Certain terminology is used in the following description for convenience only and is not limiting. The words “right”, “left”, “lower”, and “upper” designate directions in the drawings to which reference is made. The words “inwardly” and “outwardly” refer to directions toward and away from, respectively, the geometric center of the device and designated parts thereof. The terminology includes the above-listed words, derivatives thereof, and words of similar import. Additionally, the words “a” and “an”, as used in the claims and in the corresponding portions of the specification, mean “at least one.”
  • Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals indicate corresponding structure throughout the views, and referring in particular to FIG. 1, provided is a schematic diagram of a horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) that is typical of both land based and off-shore turbine generators. The view 1 from behind the turbine facing the wind includes tower 6 extending up from the ground or ocean surface 2 to support the nacelle 8 which contains the generator and gear reducers, unless it is a direct drive generator.
  • There are typically three blades on a utility scale wind turbine having root ends 10 and blade tips 21. As seen from the side view 2, the blade root ends attach to the rotatable hub 18. Blade side 16 facing the wind 4 is often referred to as the high pressure side. The blade side 14, facing away from the wind is referred to as the low pressure or suction side. As the blade speed increases the blade pitch is adjusted to the optimal angle of attack to the wind to create the maximum lift and torque required to drive the electricity generator. FIG. 2 shows the construction cross section of a typical HAWT blade. Wind turbine blades are generally manufactured with adhesively bonded composite shells forming the high pressure side 16 and the low pressure side 14. The trailing edge 21 is adhesively bonded, as is the leading edge 20, with adhesive bonding in some cases between two flanges 22 formed by the inner and outer fiberglass skins that make up sandwich panels 18. Two spar caps 26, which may be made from fiberglass or carbon fiber laminate, are bonded to the edges of the sandwich panels 18. The blade spar web 30 can be a solid fiberglass laminate or a sandwich construction with fiberglass or carbon fiber face sheets and a core material made with foam, balsa wood or other suitable material with high compressive strength. The spar web 30 is bonded with adhesive 28 to the spar caps 26 to form an I-beam.
  • The preferred embodiment includes a digital camera with a polarizing filter and an image processing computer. FIG. 3 shows a schematic diagram of a single camera 102 setup with a single rotatable polarizer 112. The camera 102 is preferably mounted on a remotely controlled pan/tilt mechanism 122 located on an outside of a vehicle 124, such as a car, truck, boat, or the like. While a rotatable polarizer 112 is shown, any type of adjustable polarizer filter that allows for variation of the amount of passed light can be used, such as other types of mechanical polarizer filters, adjustable liquid crystal phase retarders, or the like, or combinations thereof.
  • With the blade stopped, two images of a section of a wind turbine blade are photographed with the polarized filter 112 set at first to reduce the amount of reflected light from the blade then second, to pass the maximum amount of reflected light from the blade. The filter rotation of 90 degrees may be manual or automatic. The resulting images must either be in perfect registration using a tripod (not shown) or a means must be available to align the images into registration with each other. The images are the subtracted or the absolute difference is calculated using the image processing computer. The image may also be further enhanced with a brightness and contrast adjustment to yield a glare-free, very high contrast image revealing even subtle surface waviness, repairs, gel coat defects, blade erosion and surface cracking.
  • As shown in FIG. 4, multiple cameras 102, 104 with fixed or automatic polarizer 112, 114 rotation may be used for stationary blades. For blades in rotation, simultaneity of the exposures is critical to maintain image registration. Both cameras 102, 104 must record the same field of view at the same time. The slight parallax between the two cameras 102, 104 does not significantly degrade the final image.
  • As with any digital image, pixel counting software may be used to measure features, locations and areas. Digital photography images are formed by focusing electromagnetic energy with a lens onto a flat sensor comprised of energy sensitive elements or pixels positioned in generally a rectangular array, for example 3000 horizontal by 2400 vertical. As with any image of an object, the image scale, measured in pixels per unit distance on the surface of the object, changes continuously over the field of view as the angle θ between the camera lens and the position of each imaged point on the target changes. For a large flat object with the camera pointed straight on, the line from the center of the camera lens to the target is the shortest distance and the image scale will be largest value. As one moves to an edge of the field of view, the angle and distance increase and the image scale decreases.
  • Objects in the field in a digital image may be measured with respect to other objects of features in the image. First, the digital image must be calibrated by counting the number of pixels in a line segment that crosses and ends at the extremes of a feature of known dimension, located at approximately the same distance from the camera to the feature desired to be measured. The number of pixels counted divided by the feature's known dimension gives the image scale at that location in pixels/unit of measure (ft. or meters). Other features or objects can then be measured by counting pixels for either their length or wide or distance from a known datum, if in the field of view, the dimension being the pixel count divided by the image scale.
  • For wind turbine generators, one can select a calibration feature in the digital image that changes in apparent width with changes in distance, but does not change if the viewing angle changes, giving a more reliable measurement. One example of such an object is a sphere, whose diameter changes with distance, but not with the viewing angle. A cylinder is another example. The root end of wind turbine blades are cylindrical where they attach to the pitch bearing in the hub. Regardless of the blade pitch or the viewing angle from the ground, the blade root end diameter can be used to calibrate the image scale of a wind turbine blade and then allow measurement of other features at the same approximate distance.
  • Another area of known dimension could be the diameter of the tower at the base of the nacelle or at a visible weld joint. Due to the increased thickness of steel at the tower joint welds, these joints retain heat from the sun and remain visible with infrared cameras during most of the night, when thermal inspection of wind turbine blades is best due to washout of defects with thermal emissions. The known dimensions at the blade roots or at tower welds may be used to calibrate the image scale.
  • The imaging of the area of known dimension could be done using digital thermography, photography or any other passive or active imaging technique. Software is then used to determine an image scale in units of pixels/ft., pixels/meter, or any other scale of pixels to length. Pixel counting is then used to determine a dimension calibrated in pixels of the size and/or area of the indication. This will permit the software to comparatively determine the dimensions of other features or objects, such as anomalies, that are located at approximately the same distance. The dimensions of such features or anomalies may then be converted back to a conventional dimensional measurement, such as feet, meters, or other units of length. The imaging software may then integrate dimensional measurements to determine the surface area of the feature or anomaly.
  • Such imaging may be conducted with the wind turbine blade at multiple radial angles of rotation in order to generate an image scale template that corrects for image distortion over the field of view of the digital image as the wind turbine blade rotates. The imaging may be performed as the wind turbine blade rotates, so it is not necessary to immobilize the wind turbine blade or take the unit off-line during the inspection process. With the blade oriented horizontally, the angle of the arc subtended by a defect indication on the blade in the image is relatively small, so the error in sizing and locating the defect is relatively small. Images where the blade is pointing at angles other than horizontally have an image scale much more distorted by changes in the distance from the IR camera to points on the blade. If the blade is pointing down, the distance from the camera to the blade tip is approximately equal half the height of the tower. The image scale at the blade tip would be twice the value for the image scale at the root and defect measurements would be twice the actual size.
  • A sequence of digital thermal images or photographs may be played back, frame by frame to allow the analyst the ability to select frames with optimal image quality for the definition of the boundaries of an anomaly. Image measurement tools that measure each pixel value along a line through a defect indication can be programmed to measure the signal to noise ratio, which may be defined as the pixel values for the area adjacent to the defect squared divided by the pixel values for the defect indication squared. Such a tool, among many known to those skilled in the art of image processing, may be used to quantitatively select the image with the best image quality.
  • The field operator may image the wind turbine blade in position segments in order to capture a sequence of multiple images of all three blades at least once as they pass through the camera field of view. This may be followed by a rotation of the camera on its mount to capture the next blade segment in order to image a sequence of multiple images of all three blades at least once as they pass through the camera field and so forth until images of the entire blade are captured.
  • FIG. 5 is a photograph of a wind turbine blade in the polarized solar light with the polarizer set to transmit the minimum light reflected from the blade.
  • FIG. 6 is a photograph of a wind turbine blade in a polarized solar light with the polarizer set to transmit the maximum rate reflected from the blade.
  • FIG. 7 is a photograph of a wind turbine blade made by taking the absolute difference images between the blade photographs, as shown in FIG. 5 and FIG. 6, followed by adjusting the brightness. This can be shown as P3=[P1−P2]. Note that this is the absolute value for each pixel in the digital image after the subtraction of the images.
  • FIG. 8 depicts an area on a final high contrast image selected, using a dotted line segment by clicking on one side of the indication in dragging the cursor across the indication. The signal-to-noise ratio is the pixel value of adjacent areas divided by the pixel value of the indication, as shown in FIG. 8. Signal-to-noise ratio is 1.4. Other arithmetic routines may be used so long as each method is defined in the context of use. Another routine to measure the signal to noise ratio is to square the pixel values, prior to the division.
  • It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes could be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the broad inventive concept thereof. It is understood, therefore, that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but it is intended to cover modifications within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims (15)

I claim:
1. A method of remotely inspecting a stationary land or offshore wind turbine blade in situ, the wind turbine blade being illuminated by polarized solar or polarized artificial light, the method comprising:
acquiring a first image of the wind turbine blade using a digital visible light camera equipped with an adjustable polarizer set to a first condition for passing a first amount of polarized light;
acquiring a second image of the wind turbine blade using the digital visible light camera with the adjustable polarizer set to a second condition for passing a second amount of polarized light, the first amount of polarized light being different than the second amount of polarized light;
in an image processing computer, aligning the first and second images into registration with one another; and
in the image processing computer, performing image subtraction or calculating an absolute difference of the first and second images to yield a final image of the wind turbine blade.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
obtaining, by the image processing computer, a quantitative measurement of at least one of size, area, or location of one or more anomalies detected in the final image of the wind turbine blade.
3. The method of claim 2, further comprising:
defining, in the image processing computer, a calibration feature in the final image, the calibration feature being an object of known dimension;
measuring, by the image processing computer, the calibration feature in the image by number of pixels; and
determining, by the image processing computer, an image scale in units of pixels/unit distance,
wherein the quantitative measurement of the one or more anomalies is obtained using the image scale.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the calibration feature is located approximately at a same distance from the camera as one of the one or more anomalies.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
in the image processing computer, performing at least one of a brightness adjustment or a contrast adjustment to the final image of the wind turbine blade.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the camera and adjustable polarizer are mounted on a remotely controlled pan/tilt mechanism located on an outside of a vehicle.
7. A method of remotely inspecting a stationary or rotating land or offshore wind turbine blade in situ, the wind turbine blade being illuminated by polarized solar or polarized artificial light, the method comprising:
acquiring a first image of the wind turbine blade using a first digital visible light camera equipped with a first polarizer having a first polarization angle;
simultaneously acquiring a second image of the wind turbine blade using a second digital visible light camera equipped with a second polarizer having a second polarization angle different from the first polarization angle;
in an image processing computer, aligning the first and second images into registration with one another; and
in the image processing computer, performing image subtraction or calculating an absolute difference of the first and second images to yield a final image of the wind turbine blade.
8. The method of claim 7, further comprising:
obtaining, by the image processing computer, a quantitative measurement of at least one of size, area, or location of one or more anomalies detected in the final image of the wind turbine blade.
9. The method of claim 8, further comprising:
defining, in the image processing computer, a calibration feature in the final image, the calibration feature being an object of known dimension;
measuring, by the image processing computer, the calibration feature in the image by number of pixels; and
determining, by the image processing computer, an image scale in units of pixels/unit distance,
wherein the quantitative measurement of the one or more anomalies is obtained using the image scale.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the calibration feature is located approximately at a same distance from the cameras as one of the one or more anomalies.
11. The method of claim 7, wherein the first and second cameras each capture a series of first and second images while the wind turbine blade is rotating so as to yield a series of final images based on the image subtraction or absolute difference calculation performed for each corresponding pair of first and second images.
12. The method of claim 11, further comprising:
obtaining, by the image processing computer, a quantitative measurement of at least one of size, area, or location of one or more anomalies detected in at least one of the series of final images of the wind turbine blade.
13. The method of claim 12, further comprising:
selecting at least two of the final images;
defining, in the image processing computer, a calibration feature in the at least two selected images, wherein the wind turbine blade in each of the selected images is at a different radial angle of rotation, the calibration feature being an object of known dimension;
measuring, by the image processing computer, the calibration feature in each of the at least two selected images by number of pixels; and
generate an image scale template to correct image distortion over the field of view in the final images.
14. The method of claim 7, further comprising:
in the image processing computer, performing at least one of a brightness adjustment or a contrast adjustment to the final image of the wind turbine blade.
15. The method of claim 7, wherein the cameras and corresponding polarizers are mounted on a remotely controlled pan/tilt mechanism located on an outside of a vehicle.
US14/835,966 2014-08-26 2015-08-26 Method and apparatus for contrast enhanced photography of wind turbine blades Abandoned US20160063350A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/835,966 US20160063350A1 (en) 2014-08-26 2015-08-26 Method and apparatus for contrast enhanced photography of wind turbine blades
US15/909,139 US10776660B2 (en) 2014-08-26 2018-03-01 Method and apparatus for contrast enhanced photography of wind turbine blades

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201462042102P 2014-08-26 2014-08-26
US14/835,966 US20160063350A1 (en) 2014-08-26 2015-08-26 Method and apparatus for contrast enhanced photography of wind turbine blades

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/909,139 Continuation US10776660B2 (en) 2014-08-26 2018-03-01 Method and apparatus for contrast enhanced photography of wind turbine blades

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20160063350A1 true US20160063350A1 (en) 2016-03-03

Family

ID=54066214

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/835,966 Abandoned US20160063350A1 (en) 2014-08-26 2015-08-26 Method and apparatus for contrast enhanced photography of wind turbine blades
US15/909,139 Active US10776660B2 (en) 2014-08-26 2018-03-01 Method and apparatus for contrast enhanced photography of wind turbine blades

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/909,139 Active US10776660B2 (en) 2014-08-26 2018-03-01 Method and apparatus for contrast enhanced photography of wind turbine blades

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US20160063350A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2016033181A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110566415A (en) * 2019-08-19 2019-12-13 华电电力科学研究院有限公司 rapid photographing vehicle and photographing method for surface faults of blades of wind turbine generator
US20200158092A1 (en) * 2016-03-14 2020-05-21 Ventus Engineering GmbH Method of condition monitoring one or more wind turbines and parts thereof and performing instant alarm when needed
US11386545B2 (en) * 2020-03-31 2022-07-12 The Boeing Company Surface crack detection
US11421660B2 (en) * 2018-10-31 2022-08-23 Beijing Gold Wind Science & Creation Windpower Equipment Co., Ltd. Video monitoring method and system for wind turbine blade
WO2023013058A1 (en) * 2021-08-06 2023-02-09 日本電気株式会社 State determination device, state determination method, and computer-readable recording medium
CN116740619A (en) * 2023-08-10 2023-09-12 中国海洋大学 Marine wind turbine angular velocity measurement method based on digital image processing

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109117858B (en) * 2017-06-26 2024-02-13 北京金风科创风电设备有限公司 Method and device for monitoring icing of wind driven generator blade
EP3543522A1 (en) 2018-03-22 2019-09-25 Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S Rotor blade monitoring system
CN113123928B (en) * 2019-12-31 2022-10-14 新疆金风科技股份有限公司 Wind generating set and tower clearance monitoring method and device thereof
US11080828B1 (en) 2020-01-09 2021-08-03 United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Weighted summing of component chiral images for improved contrast enhancement
EP3859150A1 (en) * 2020-02-03 2021-08-04 Ventus Engineering GmbH Method and system for visual inspection of wind turbine generators
GB202009315D0 (en) 2020-06-18 2020-08-05 General Electric Renovables Espana Sl A wind turbine blade measurement system and a method of improving accuracy of a wind turbine blade measurement system
CN113309673A (en) * 2021-06-29 2021-08-27 新疆金风科技股份有限公司 Static clearance distance determining method and device of wind generating set

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110205348A1 (en) * 2010-12-16 2011-08-25 General Electric Company System and method for performing an external inspection on a wind turbine rotor blade
US20120076345A1 (en) * 2010-09-29 2012-03-29 Peter James Fritz System and method for wind turbine inspection
US20130149145A1 (en) * 2011-12-09 2013-06-13 Euros Entwicklungsgesellschaft Fur Windkraftanlagen Mbh Wind turbine
US20140293038A1 (en) * 2013-03-28 2014-10-02 General Electric Company Methods and devices for adjusting brightness of a light source
US20150219498A1 (en) * 2014-02-06 2015-08-06 The Boeing Company Systems and Methods for Measuring Polarization of Light in Images

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2550692C (en) 2005-06-30 2012-01-24 James Plant Method and apparatus for real-time polarization difference imaging (pdi) video
AU2008326247B2 (en) * 2008-06-11 2011-09-22 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Wind turbine generator
EP2517175A4 (en) * 2009-12-25 2018-01-10 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Object identifying apparatus, moving body control apparatus, and information providing apparatus
EP2369176A1 (en) * 2010-02-24 2011-09-28 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Wind turbine and method for measuring the pitch angle of a wind turbine rotor blade
EP2481924B1 (en) 2011-02-01 2016-12-14 ALSTOM Renewable Technologies Device and method for visual analysis of a wind turbine blade
CN104126070B (en) * 2011-12-21 2017-02-15 维斯塔斯风力系统有限公司 A wind turbine rotor blade with a cone angle and a method of manufacturing a wind turbine rotor blade with a cone angle

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120076345A1 (en) * 2010-09-29 2012-03-29 Peter James Fritz System and method for wind turbine inspection
US20110205348A1 (en) * 2010-12-16 2011-08-25 General Electric Company System and method for performing an external inspection on a wind turbine rotor blade
US20130149145A1 (en) * 2011-12-09 2013-06-13 Euros Entwicklungsgesellschaft Fur Windkraftanlagen Mbh Wind turbine
US20140293038A1 (en) * 2013-03-28 2014-10-02 General Electric Company Methods and devices for adjusting brightness of a light source
US20150219498A1 (en) * 2014-02-06 2015-08-06 The Boeing Company Systems and Methods for Measuring Polarization of Light in Images

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20200158092A1 (en) * 2016-03-14 2020-05-21 Ventus Engineering GmbH Method of condition monitoring one or more wind turbines and parts thereof and performing instant alarm when needed
US11549492B2 (en) * 2016-03-14 2023-01-10 Ventus Engineering GmbH Method of condition monitoring one or more wind turbines and parts thereof and performing instant alarm when needed
US11421660B2 (en) * 2018-10-31 2022-08-23 Beijing Gold Wind Science & Creation Windpower Equipment Co., Ltd. Video monitoring method and system for wind turbine blade
CN110566415A (en) * 2019-08-19 2019-12-13 华电电力科学研究院有限公司 rapid photographing vehicle and photographing method for surface faults of blades of wind turbine generator
US11386545B2 (en) * 2020-03-31 2022-07-12 The Boeing Company Surface crack detection
WO2023013058A1 (en) * 2021-08-06 2023-02-09 日本電気株式会社 State determination device, state determination method, and computer-readable recording medium
CN116740619A (en) * 2023-08-10 2023-09-12 中国海洋大学 Marine wind turbine angular velocity measurement method based on digital image processing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2016033181A1 (en) 2016-03-03
US10776660B2 (en) 2020-09-15
US20190050679A1 (en) 2019-02-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10776660B2 (en) Method and apparatus for contrast enhanced photography of wind turbine blades
US9996747B2 (en) System and method for ground based inspection of wind turbine blades
JP6555729B2 (en) System and method for ground based inspection of wind turbine blades
US8553233B2 (en) Method and apparatus for the remote nondestructive evaluation of an object using shearography image scale calibration
JP6635441B2 (en) Non-destructive acoustic Doppler inspection of operating wind turbine blades from the ground
US10605783B2 (en) System and method for progressive damage monitoring and failure event prediction in a composite structure
JP6415034B2 (en) System and method for remote inspection of aircraft structures
CN115372412B (en) Characteristic measurement method for turbine blade based on six-point positioning
WO2012003372A2 (en) Method and apparatus for the remote nondestructive evaluation of an object
ES2808528T3 (en) Rotor blade diagnosis
CN111608731B (en) Shield tunnel safety state monitoring and early warning device and monitoring and early warning method thereof
DE102013110898C5 (en) Procedure to improve the informative value of thermographically collected data on the condition of rotor blades on wind turbines in operation
KR20110098127A (en) Calibration device and method for revision of crack detection system by using image processing technology
Poozesh et al. A multiple stereo-vision approach using three dimensional digital image correlation for utility-scale wind turbine blades
KR20230036299A (en) Method and device for detecting defects on outside of buildings through drone photography and measuring size using lasers
KR102615169B1 (en) Method and apparatus for building safety diagnosis using laser beam irradiation
CN219640897U (en) Bolt loosening angle detection algorithm test platform device based on vision
JP6857432B1 (en) Non-contact inspection method for blades of wind power generation equipment
CN117367344A (en) Coating thickness measuring system and method based on infrared nondestructive testing technology
Miyamoto An automatic crack recognition system for concrete bridge inspection by image processing approach
CN114577817A (en) Infrared rapid detection device for pipeline defects and defect risk assessment method
Reagan et al. Feasibility of using Digital Image Correlation for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Structural Health Monitoring of
JP2019134616A (en) Inspection apparatus for photovoltaic power generation panel

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: DIGITAL WIND SYSTEMS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NEWMAN, JOHN W.;REEL/FRAME:040046/0511

Effective date: 20161006

AS Assignment

Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DIGITAL WIND SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:045682/0329

Effective date: 20180216

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION