US20160034677A1 - Method and system for verification of human presence at a mobile device - Google Patents

Method and system for verification of human presence at a mobile device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20160034677A1
US20160034677A1 US14/879,816 US201514879816A US2016034677A1 US 20160034677 A1 US20160034677 A1 US 20160034677A1 US 201514879816 A US201514879816 A US 201514879816A US 2016034677 A1 US2016034677 A1 US 2016034677A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
recited
response
captcha
captcha challenge
verification
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/879,816
Inventor
Fraser THOMPSON
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mantis Messaging Inc
MOBILE MESSENGER GLOBAL Inc
Original Assignee
Mantis Messaging Inc
Mobile Messenger Americas Inc
Post Sms Global Co Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mantis Messaging Inc, Mobile Messenger Americas Inc, Post Sms Global Co Inc filed Critical Mantis Messaging Inc
Priority to US14/879,816 priority Critical patent/US20160034677A1/en
Assigned to MOBILE MESSENGER AMERICAS INC reassignment MOBILE MESSENGER AMERICAS INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: THOMPSON, Fraser
Publication of US20160034677A1 publication Critical patent/US20160034677A1/en
Assigned to MOBILE MESSENGER AMERICAS INC reassignment MOBILE MESSENGER AMERICAS INC CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE'S ADDRESS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 036939 FRAME 0601. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: THOMPSON, Fraser
Assigned to MOBILE MESSENGER GLOBAL, INC. reassignment MOBILE MESSENGER GLOBAL, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MOBILE MESSENGER AMERICAS INC.
Assigned to POST SMS GLOBAL CO., INC. reassignment POST SMS GLOBAL CO., INC. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MOBILE MESSENGER GLOBAL, INC.
Assigned to MANTIS MESSAGING, INC. reassignment MANTIS MESSAGING, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: POST SMS GLOBAL CO. INC.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/30Authentication, i.e. establishing the identity or authorisation of security principals
    • G06F21/31User authentication
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/30Authentication, i.e. establishing the identity or authorisation of security principals
    • G06F21/31User authentication
    • G06F21/36User authentication by graphic or iconic representation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2221/00Indexing scheme relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F2221/21Indexing scheme relating to G06F21/00 and subgroups addressing additional information or applications relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F2221/2133Verifying human interaction, e.g., Captcha

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to verification on internet in general. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method and system for verification of human presence at a communication device.
  • Computer systems are capable of mimicking human interactions with other computers.
  • One computer can be programmed to fill in forms, submit those forms, and generally behave in an automated way to accomplish certain tasks, especially in on-line forums like bulletin boards, blogs, online polls, commerce sites, and so forth. While many such automation tasks are benign and even helpful, the same technology can be used to automate fraud and/or attacks.
  • the concept of verification by sending a random PIN to a mobile device was conceived. For example, to verify that a transaction on a website is being made by authorized user, the user is sent a randomly generated PIN to his registered mobile device. The user is then required to enter the PIN on the website to complete the transaction. For example, for verifying that humans are present at the opt-in for mobile phone transactions, such as mobile payments, purchases by mobile phone, prepaid card top-ups, premium mobile content subscription opt-ins, standard-rated mobile messaging campaign opt-ins and the like.
  • PINs are sent via test message to mobile devices, and the presumption is that human user reads the PIN number and then copies it into the website.
  • the above and other objects of the present invention are achieved by providing a method and system for verifying human presence at a mobile device.
  • the method includes receiving a request for verification, where the request is received from a user. Further, the method includes sending a CAPTCHA (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) challenge to the communication device of the user. Further, the method includes receiving a response to the CAPTCHA challenge, where the response is sent by the user. Finally, the method includes verifying the human presence by matching the response received to the CAPTCHA challenge sent.
  • CAPTCHA Computer Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a system for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of a method for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows a flow chart of a method for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a process flow for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a process flow for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 shows examples of human interpretable challenges, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • mobile device and “communication device” have been used interchangeably, and refer to computing device which has the capability of communicating or interacting with its users.
  • the present invention provides a method and system for verifying human presence at a mobile device.
  • the method includes receiving a request for verification, where the request is received from a user. Further, the method includes sending a CAPTCHA (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) challenge to the communication device of the user. Further, the method includes receiving a response to the CAPTCHA challenge, where the response is sent by the user. Finally, the method includes verifying the human presence by matching the response received to the CAPTCHA challenge sent.
  • CAPTCHA Computer Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a system 100 for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the mobile device include, but are not limited to, a desktop computer, a laptop, a mobile phone, a tablet PC, a netbook, an e-book reader and a PDA.
  • the system 100 includes a request reception module 102 , a code module 104 , a response reception module 106 and a verification module 108 .
  • the request reception module 102 receives a request for verification, where the request is received from a user.
  • the user accesses a web portal or a mobile application, and is asked for verification to complete a transaction.
  • the web portal or the mobile application sends the request for verification to the system 100 via web server or Internet.
  • the code module 104 sends a CAPTCHA (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) challenge to the communication device of the user.
  • the code module 104 sends the CAPTCHA challenge via a multi-media message (MMS), a SMS, a voice call, an Email, one-time internet or URL hyperlink, a WAP push, an alert sent via a smart phone app, and a video call to the mobile device of the user.
  • MMS multi-media message
  • SMS SMS
  • voice call a voice call
  • Email Email
  • one-time internet or URL hyperlink a WAP push
  • an alert sent via a smart phone app and a video call to the mobile device of the user.
  • Examples of the CAPTCHA challenge include, but are not limited to, one or more of an image, a video, a question, a word, a phrase, a number, a motion, an interaction, an
  • the code module 104 includes a code generation module for generating the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • the code generation module generates the CAPTCHA challenge by one of random rules and pre-specified rules.
  • the code module 104 includes a code reception module for sending the CAPTCHA challenge generated by a third party server. In this case, the code module 104 uses APIs of a third party CAPTCHA generating server to send the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • the response reception module 106 receives a response to the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • the response is manually entered by the user of the mobile device.
  • the response is entered in the same web portal or mobile application from where the request for verification was generated.
  • the verification module 108 verifies the human presence by matching the response received to the CAPTCHA challenge sent.
  • the verification module 108 matches the response to expected response of the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • the verification module 108 sends the response to the third party server which generated the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of a method for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • the system 100 receives a request for verification. For example, a user may initiate a transaction on a web portal or a mobile application, and may be asked for verification to complete the transaction. Examples include mobile phone transactions, such as mobile payments, purchases by mobile phone, prepaid card top-ups, premium mobile content subscription opt-ins, standard-rated mobile messaging campaign opt-ins and the like.
  • the web portal or the mobile application sends the request for verification to the system 100 via web server or Internet.
  • the system 100 sends a CAPTCHA challenge to the communication device of the user.
  • the CAPTCHA challenge is sent via a multi-media message (MMS), a SMS, a voice call, an Email and a video call to the mobile device of the user.
  • MMS multi-media message
  • the CAPTCHA challenge include, but are not limited to, one or more of an image, a video, a question, a word, a phrase, a number, a motion, an interaction, an audio and a vibration.
  • the system 100 receives a response to the CAPTCHA challenge, where the response is sent by the user.
  • the response may be manually entered by the user of the mobile device. In an embodiment, the response may be entered in the same web portal or mobile application from where the request for verification was generated.
  • the system 100 verifies the human presence by matching the response received to the CAPTCHA challenge sent.
  • the response is matched to expected response of the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • the response may be sent to a third party server that generated the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • FIG. 3 shows a flow chart of a method for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the system 100 receives a request for verification.
  • it is checked if a CAPTCHA challenge can be generated by the system 100 .
  • the system 100 is capable of generating a CAPTCHA challenge.
  • the system 100 generates a CAPTCHA challenge.
  • the system 100 is not capable of generating a CAPTCHA challenge.
  • the system 100 requests a CAPTCHA challenge from a third party server.
  • the system 100 uses APIs of a third party CAPTCHA generating server to send the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • the system 100 sends the CAPTCHA challenge to the communication device of the user.
  • the CAPTCHA challenge is sent via a multi-media message (MMS), a WAP push, a hyperlink embedded in a message, a mobile alert delivered via a smart phone or tablet app, a SMS, a voice call, an Email and a video call to the mobile device of the user.
  • MMS multi-media message
  • Examples of the CAPTCHA challenge include, but are not limited to, one or more of an image, a video, a question, a motion, an interaction, an audio and a vibration.
  • the system 100 receives a response to the CAPTCHA challenge, where the response is sent by the user. The response is manually entered by the user of the mobile device.
  • the response is entered in the same web portal or mobile application from where the request for verification was generated.
  • the system 100 verifies the human presence by matching the response received to the CAPTCHA challenge sent.
  • the response is matched to expected response of the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • the response is sent to the third party server which generated the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a process flow for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • a user logs into a portal and makes a transaction by entering mobile phone number on the portal.
  • the portal then sends a verification request to the system 100 .
  • the system 100 then sends a CAPTCHA challenge to the mobile phone number entered by the user.
  • the user interprets the CAPTCHA and enters the response to the portal.
  • the portal then sends the response back to the system 100 for verification.
  • the system 100 verifies transaction by matching the CAPTCHA response with the expected response to the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a process flow for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • a user logs into a portal and makes a transaction by entering mobile phone number on the portal.
  • the portal then sends a verification request to the system 100 .
  • the system 100 requests a third party server to generate a CAPTCHA challenge.
  • the system 100 then sends a CAPTCHA challenge to the mobile phone number entered by the user.
  • the user interprets the CAPTCHA and enters the response to the portal.
  • the portal then sends the response back to the system 100 for verification.
  • the system 100 verifies transaction at the third party server by matching the CAPTCHA response with the expected response to the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • FIG. 6 shows examples of human interpretable challenges, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the FIG. 6 shows CAPTCHA challenges 602 , 604 and 606 .
  • the PIN number sent in graphical form that can be read only by a human user.
  • an MO opt-in campaign can use this same verification technique.
  • the CAPTCHA challenge 602 shows that rather than sending the cell phone an SMS message with the PIN number “ 12345 ,” under the present invention, the user would receive an MMS message containing the PIN number within a human-readable graphic.
  • the type of multimedia can change (image, sound, video, vibration) and the contents of those images and videos and sounds can change.
  • the images for example may be of numbers, objects, colours, shapes etc.
  • video, sound, and other multimedia can vary in its form.
  • the “human present” test can take other forms, such as asking the human to respond to simple questions about graphics such as asking color of the dot in the CAPTCHA challenge 604 or by asking the type of the object that does not belong to the CAPTCHA challenge 606 .
  • This use of MMS to verify human authentication can include, images, sounds, videos and other multimedia events such as discerning the haptic vibration pattern a phone is making.
  • Such graphical images are human-readable images of language, numbers, shapes or other information that takes substitutes for the function of a unique one-time personal identification number.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Telephonic Communication Services (AREA)
  • Telephone Function (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

A method and system is provided for verifying human presence at a mobile device. The method includes receiving a request for verification. Further, the method includes sending a Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart (CAPTCHA) challenge to the mobile device. Further, the method includes receiving a response to the CAPTCHA challenge. Finally, the method includes verifying the human presence by matching the response received to the CAPTCHA challenge sent.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/574,557 titled “Method and System for Verifying that a Human is Present at a Mobile Device” filed on Aug. 5, 2011, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to verification on internet in general. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method and system for verification of human presence at a communication device.
  • 2. Description of the Prior Art
  • Computer systems are capable of mimicking human interactions with other computers. One computer can be programmed to fill in forms, submit those forms, and generally behave in an automated way to accomplish certain tasks, especially in on-line forums like bulletin boards, blogs, online polls, commerce sites, and so forth. While many such automation tasks are benign and even helpful, the same technology can be used to automate fraud and/or attacks. In response to increasing automated attacks, the concept of verification by sending a random PIN to a mobile device was conceived. For example, to verify that a transaction on a website is being made by authorized user, the user is sent a randomly generated PIN to his registered mobile device. The user is then required to enter the PIN on the website to complete the transaction. For example, for verifying that humans are present at the opt-in for mobile phone transactions, such as mobile payments, purchases by mobile phone, prepaid card top-ups, premium mobile content subscription opt-ins, standard-rated mobile messaging campaign opt-ins and the like.
  • Sending a PIN to a mobile device, and requiring the user to enter the PIN into the website, is thought to be a superior level of authentication than sending a PIN to an email address, since this PIN-to-mobile technique verifies that the human user also is in possession of his mobile phone, elevating the phone itself to the role of physical token security factor. Normally, PINs are sent via test message to mobile devices, and the presumption is that human user reads the PIN number and then copies it into the website.
  • But with the advent of smart phones designed on open platforms such as Android, mobile phones themselves have the capability of copying PIN numbers from text messages and entering those PIN numbers onto websites, unbeknownst to any user. The mobile devices are also capable of being affected by virus and malware. Therefore there lies a risk of text messages being monitored and used to make unauthorized transactions.
  • In the light of the foregoing discussion, there is a need for a method and system for increasing the security to ensure human authentication of mobile transactions. Thus, there is a need for a method and system that can verify human presence at a mobile device.
  • SUMMARY
  • Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a method and system for increasing the security of transactions involving mobile transactions or website or digital authentications.
  • It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a method and system for requiring human presence at a mobile device. The above and other objects of the present invention are achieved by providing a method and system for verifying human presence at a mobile device. The method includes receiving a request for verification, where the request is received from a user. Further, the method includes sending a CAPTCHA (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) challenge to the communication device of the user. Further, the method includes receiving a response to the CAPTCHA challenge, where the response is sent by the user. Finally, the method includes verifying the human presence by matching the response received to the CAPTCHA challenge sent.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For a more complete understanding of the present invention, the needs satisfied thereby, and the objects, features, and advantages thereof, reference now is made to the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a system for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of a method for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows a flow chart of a method for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a process flow for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a process flow for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 shows examples of human interpretable challenges, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of embodiments of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Before describing in detail the particular method and system for verifying human presence at a mobile device in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, it should be observed that the present invention resides primarily in combinations of method and system components related to computing device of the present invention.
  • Accordingly, the system components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the present invention so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
  • In this document, relational terms such as ‘first’ and ‘second’, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms ‘comprises’, ‘comprising’, or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by ‘comprises . . . a’ does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises the element.
  • The terms “mobile device” and “communication device” have been used interchangeably, and refer to computing device which has the capability of communicating or interacting with its users.
  • [00021]The present invention provides a method and system for verifying human presence at a mobile device. The method includes receiving a request for verification, where the request is received from a user. Further, the method includes sending a CAPTCHA (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) challenge to the communication device of the user. Further, the method includes receiving a response to the CAPTCHA challenge, where the response is sent by the user. Finally, the method includes verifying the human presence by matching the response received to the CAPTCHA challenge sent.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a system 100 for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Examples of the mobile device include, but are not limited to, a desktop computer, a laptop, a mobile phone, a tablet PC, a netbook, an e-book reader and a PDA. The system 100 includes a request reception module 102, a code module 104, a response reception module 106 and a verification module 108. The request reception module 102 receives a request for verification, where the request is received from a user. In an embodiment, the user accesses a web portal or a mobile application, and is asked for verification to complete a transaction. The web portal or the mobile application sends the request for verification to the system 100 via web server or Internet. On receiving the request for verification, the code module 104 sends a CAPTCHA (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) challenge to the communication device of the user. In an embodiment of the present invention, the code module 104 sends the CAPTCHA challenge via a multi-media message (MMS), a SMS, a voice call, an Email, one-time internet or URL hyperlink, a WAP push, an alert sent via a smart phone app, and a video call to the mobile device of the user. Examples of the CAPTCHA challenge include, but are not limited to, one or more of an image, a video, a question, a word, a phrase, a number, a motion, an interaction, an audio and a vibration.
  • In an embodiment of the present invention, the code module 104 includes a code generation module for generating the CAPTCHA challenge. The code generation module generates the CAPTCHA challenge by one of random rules and pre-specified rules. In another embodiment of the present invention, the code module 104 includes a code reception module for sending the CAPTCHA challenge generated by a third party server. In this case, the code module 104 uses APIs of a third party CAPTCHA generating server to send the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • The response reception module 106 receives a response to the CAPTCHA challenge. The response is manually entered by the user of the mobile device. In an embodiment, the response is entered in the same web portal or mobile application from where the request for verification was generated. Finally, the verification module 108 verifies the human presence by matching the response received to the CAPTCHA challenge sent. In an embodiment of the present invention, the verification module 108 matches the response to expected response of the CAPTCHA challenge. In another embodiment of the present invention, the verification module 108 sends the response to the third party server which generated the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of a method for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. At step 202, the system 100 receives a request for verification. For example, a user may initiate a transaction on a web portal or a mobile application, and may be asked for verification to complete the transaction. Examples include mobile phone transactions, such as mobile payments, purchases by mobile phone, prepaid card top-ups, premium mobile content subscription opt-ins, standard-rated mobile messaging campaign opt-ins and the like. The web portal or the mobile application sends the request for verification to the system 100 via web server or Internet. At step 204, the system 100 sends a CAPTCHA challenge to the communication device of the user. In an embodiment of the present invention, the CAPTCHA challenge is sent via a multi-media message (MMS), a SMS, a voice call, an Email and a video call to the mobile device of the user. Examples of the CAPTCHA challenge include, but are not limited to, one or more of an image, a video, a question, a word, a phrase, a number, a motion, an interaction, an audio and a vibration. At step 206, the system 100 receives a response to the CAPTCHA challenge, where the response is sent by the user. The response may be manually entered by the user of the mobile device. In an embodiment, the response may be entered in the same web portal or mobile application from where the request for verification was generated. Finally, at step 208, the system 100 verifies the human presence by matching the response received to the CAPTCHA challenge sent. In an embodiment of the present invention, the response is matched to expected response of the CAPTCHA challenge. In another embodiment of the present invention, the response may be sent to a third party server that generated the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • FIG. 3 shows a flow chart of a method for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. At step 202, the system 100 receives a request for verification. At step 302, it is checked if a CAPTCHA challenge can be generated by the system 100. In an embodiment, the system 100 is capable of generating a CAPTCHA challenge. At step 304, the system 100 generates a CAPTCHA challenge. In another embodiment of the present invention, the system 100 is not capable of generating a CAPTCHA challenge. At step 306, the system 100 requests a CAPTCHA challenge from a third party server. The system 100 uses APIs of a third party CAPTCHA generating server to send the CAPTCHA challenge. At step 204, the system 100 sends the CAPTCHA challenge to the communication device of the user. In an embodiment of the present invention, the CAPTCHA challenge is sent via a multi-media message (MMS), a WAP push, a hyperlink embedded in a message, a mobile alert delivered via a smart phone or tablet app, a SMS, a voice call, an Email and a video call to the mobile device of the user. Examples of the CAPTCHA challenge include, but are not limited to, one or more of an image, a video, a question, a motion, an interaction, an audio and a vibration. At step 206, the system 100 receives a response to the CAPTCHA challenge, where the response is sent by the user. The response is manually entered by the user of the mobile device. In an embodiment, the response is entered in the same web portal or mobile application from where the request for verification was generated. Finally, at step 208, the system 100 verifies the human presence by matching the response received to the CAPTCHA challenge sent. In an embodiment of the present invention, the response is matched to expected response of the CAPTCHA challenge. In another embodiment of the present invention, the response is sent to the third party server which generated the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a process flow for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. A user logs into a portal and makes a transaction by entering mobile phone number on the portal. The portal then sends a verification request to the system 100. The system 100 then sends a CAPTCHA challenge to the mobile phone number entered by the user. The user then interprets the CAPTCHA and enters the response to the portal. The portal then sends the response back to the system 100 for verification. Finally, the system 100 verifies transaction by matching the CAPTCHA response with the expected response to the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a process flow for verifying human presence at a mobile device, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. A user logs into a portal and makes a transaction by entering mobile phone number on the portal. The portal then sends a verification request to the system 100. The system 100 then requests a third party server to generate a CAPTCHA challenge. The system 100 then sends a CAPTCHA challenge to the mobile phone number entered by the user. The user then interprets the CAPTCHA and enters the response to the portal. The portal then sends the response back to the system 100 for verification. Finally, the system 100 verifies transaction at the third party server by matching the CAPTCHA response with the expected response to the CAPTCHA challenge.
  • FIG. 6 shows examples of human interpretable challenges, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The FIG. 6 shows CAPTCHA challenges 602, 604 and 606. Namely, in the case of a web-landing page opt-in, in which the transaction commences with a user entering the cell phone number on a web page, and then requires them to verify by entering a PIN that has been sent to the mobile device, under the present invention, the PIN number sent in graphical form that can be read only by a human user. Likewise, an MO opt-in campaign can use this same verification technique. By requesting an Opt-in, and user can be presented with an MMS MT containing a picture, sound or video. By verifying some quality of the picture, video, or sound back via MO, the users has again utilized this more advanced authentication technique. The CAPTCHA challenge 602 shows that rather than sending the cell phone an SMS message with the PIN number “12345,” under the present invention, the user would receive an MMS message containing the PIN number within a human-readable graphic.
  • The type of multimedia can change (image, sound, video, vibration) and the contents of those images and videos and sounds can change. The images for example may be of numbers, objects, colours, shapes etc. Likewise video, sound, and other multimedia can vary in its form. The “human present” test can take other forms, such as asking the human to respond to simple questions about graphics such as asking color of the dot in the CAPTCHA challenge 604 or by asking the type of the object that does not belong to the CAPTCHA challenge 606. This use of MMS to verify human authentication can include, images, sounds, videos and other multimedia events such as discerning the haptic vibration pattern a phone is making. Such graphical images are human-readable images of language, numbers, shapes or other information that takes substitutes for the function of a unique one-time personal identification number.
  • While the present invention has been described in connection with preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that variations and modifications of the preferred embodiments described above may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. Other embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art from a consideration of the specification or from a practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and the described examples are considered exemplary only, with the true scope of the invention indicated by the following claims.

Claims (16)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for verification of human presence at a communication device, the method comprising:
receiving a request for verification;
sending a Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart (CAPTCHA) challenge to the communication device;
receiving a response to the CAPTCHA challenge; and
verifying the human presence by matching the response received to the CAPTCHA challenge sent.
2. The method recited in claim 1, wherein sending the CAPTCHA challenge comprises generating the CAPTCHA challenge.
3. The method recited in claim 1, wherein the CAPTCHA challenge is generated by a third party server.
4. The method recited in claim 1, wherein the CAPTCHA challenge is sent via a multi-media message (MMS), a SMS, a voice call, an Email, and a video call.
5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the CAPTCHA challenge is one or more of an image, a video, a question, a motion, an interaction, an audio and a vibration.
6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the response is one or more of a text, a voice, a motion and an interaction.
7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the communication device is one of a desktop, a laptop, a mobile phone, a tablet PC, a netbook, an e-book reader and a PDA.
8. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the request for verification is received over internet.
9. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the request for verification is received from a web server.
10. A system for verification of human presence at a communication device, the system comprising:
a request reception module for receiving a request for verification;
a code module for sending a Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart (CAPTCHA) challenge to the communication device;
a response reception module for receiving a response to the CAPTCHA challenge; and
a verification module for verifying the human presence by matching the response received to the CAPTCHA challenge sent.
11. The system recited in claim 1, wherein the code module comprises a code generation module for generating the CAPTCHA challenge.
12. The system recited in claim 1, wherein the code module comprises a code reception module for sending the CAPTCHA challenge generated by a third party server.
13. The system recited in claim 1, wherein the code module is capable of sending the CAPTCHA challenge via a multi-media message (MMS), a SMS, a voice call, an Email and a video call.
14. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein the CAPTCHA challenge is one or more of an image, a video, a question, a motion, an interaction, an audio and a vibration.
15. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein the response reception module is capable of receiving the response via one or more of a text, a voice, a motion and an interaction.
16. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein the communication device is one of a desktop, a laptop, a mobile phone, a tablet PC, a netbook, an e-book reader and a PDA.
US14/879,816 2011-08-05 2015-10-09 Method and system for verification of human presence at a mobile device Abandoned US20160034677A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/879,816 US20160034677A1 (en) 2011-08-05 2015-10-09 Method and system for verification of human presence at a mobile device

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161574557P 2011-08-05 2011-08-05
US13/567,537 US9183362B2 (en) 2011-08-05 2012-08-06 Method and system for verification of human presence at a mobile device
US14/879,816 US20160034677A1 (en) 2011-08-05 2015-10-09 Method and system for verification of human presence at a mobile device

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/567,537 Continuation US9183362B2 (en) 2011-08-05 2012-08-06 Method and system for verification of human presence at a mobile device

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20160034677A1 true US20160034677A1 (en) 2016-02-04

Family

ID=47668861

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/567,537 Expired - Fee Related US9183362B2 (en) 2011-08-05 2012-08-06 Method and system for verification of human presence at a mobile device
US14/879,816 Abandoned US20160034677A1 (en) 2011-08-05 2015-10-09 Method and system for verification of human presence at a mobile device

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/567,537 Expired - Fee Related US9183362B2 (en) 2011-08-05 2012-08-06 Method and system for verification of human presence at a mobile device

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (2) US9183362B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2844262A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2013022839A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10313322B2 (en) 2016-09-02 2019-06-04 Ca, Inc. Distinguishing human-generated input from programmatically-generated input

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013022839A1 (en) * 2011-08-05 2013-02-14 M-Qube, Inc. Method and system for verification of human presence at a mobile device
RU2522024C2 (en) * 2012-10-15 2014-07-10 Общество С Ограниченной Ответственностью "Лаборатория Эландис" Method of signing electronic documents with analogue-digital signature with additional verification
US20140129441A1 (en) * 2012-11-02 2014-05-08 German Blanco Systems and methods for authorizing sensitive purchase transactions with a mobile device
US20140273987A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-09-18 Google Inc. Challenge Response System to Detect Automated Communications
US9736130B1 (en) 2013-07-05 2017-08-15 Sonus Networks, Inc. Communications methods and apparatus related to web initiated sessions
CN104468107B (en) * 2013-09-18 2018-12-11 深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司 Verify data processing method and processing device
US10686781B1 (en) * 2013-12-24 2020-06-16 Affirm Inc. System and method for passwordless logins
KR101686181B1 (en) 2015-01-12 2016-12-28 주식회사 엔터플 Method and apparatus for secured communication using predefined url
CN106155298B (en) * 2015-04-21 2019-11-08 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 The acquisition method and device of man-machine recognition methods and device, behavioural characteristic data
US9571475B2 (en) * 2015-06-09 2017-02-14 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Call encryption systems and methods
US10148759B2 (en) 2016-04-04 2018-12-04 Gogo Llc Presence-based network authentication
US10877560B2 (en) * 2017-12-22 2020-12-29 Mastercard International Incorporated Haptic feedback for authentication and security in computer systems
US11204648B2 (en) 2018-06-12 2021-12-21 Mastercard International Incorporated Handshake to establish agreement between two parties in virtual reality
KR102636409B1 (en) 2018-12-28 2024-02-15 삼성전자주식회사 Electronic apparatus and the control method thereof

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090055193A1 (en) * 2007-02-22 2009-02-26 Pudding Holdings Israel Ltd. Method, apparatus and computer code for selectively providing access to a service in accordance with spoken content received from a user
US20090150983A1 (en) * 2007-08-27 2009-06-11 Infosys Technologies Limited System and method for monitoring human interaction
US20100049526A1 (en) * 2008-08-25 2010-02-25 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System and method for auditory captchas
US20110150267A1 (en) * 2009-12-22 2011-06-23 Disney Enterprises, Inc. Human verification by contextually iconic visual public turing test
US20110208716A1 (en) * 2010-02-19 2011-08-25 Microsoft Corporation Image-Based CAPTCHA Exploiting Context in Object Recognition
US20110209076A1 (en) * 2010-02-24 2011-08-25 Infosys Technologies Limited System and method for monitoring human interaction
US20120254971A1 (en) * 2011-04-01 2012-10-04 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Captcha method and system
US20120323700A1 (en) * 2011-06-20 2012-12-20 Prays Nikolay Aleksandrovich Image-based captcha system
US8380503B2 (en) * 2008-06-23 2013-02-19 John Nicholas and Kristin Gross Trust System and method for generating challenge items for CAPTCHAs
US20130145441A1 (en) * 2011-06-03 2013-06-06 Dhawal Mujumdar Captcha authentication processes and systems using visual object identification
US9183362B2 (en) * 2011-08-05 2015-11-10 Mobile Messenger Global, Inc. Method and system for verification of human presence at a mobile device

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8145914B2 (en) * 2005-12-15 2012-03-27 Microsoft Corporation Client-side CAPTCHA ceremony for user verification
US8261071B2 (en) * 2006-01-31 2012-09-04 Microsoft Corporation Stateless human detection for real-time messaging systems
US7721107B2 (en) * 2006-02-10 2010-05-18 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Physical token for supporting verification of human presence in an online environment
US8036902B1 (en) * 2006-06-21 2011-10-11 Tellme Networks, Inc. Audio human verification
US8417791B1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2013-04-09 Google Inc. Hosted calling service
US8019127B2 (en) * 2006-09-13 2011-09-13 George Mason Intellectual Properties, Inc. Image based turing test
US20080209223A1 (en) * 2007-02-27 2008-08-28 Ebay Inc. Transactional visual challenge image for user verification
US20090328163A1 (en) * 2008-06-28 2009-12-31 Yahoo! Inc. System and method using streaming captcha for online verification
US8522010B2 (en) * 2008-10-20 2013-08-27 Microsoft Corporation Providing remote user authentication
US8307412B2 (en) * 2008-10-20 2012-11-06 Microsoft Corporation User authentication management
US8688940B2 (en) * 2008-12-18 2014-04-01 Sandisk Technologies Inc. Method for using a CAPTCHA challenge to protect a removable mobile flash memory storage device
US8239465B2 (en) * 2009-02-19 2012-08-07 Microsoft Corporation Generating human interactive proofs
US8910251B2 (en) * 2009-03-06 2014-12-09 Facebook, Inc. Using social information for authenticating a user session
US20100318669A1 (en) * 2009-06-16 2010-12-16 Kevin Chugh Human Interactive Proof System and Apparatus that Enables Public Contribution of Challenges for Determining Whether an Agent is a Computer or a Human
US8671058B1 (en) * 2009-08-07 2014-03-11 Gary Isaacs Methods and systems for generating completely automated public tests to tell computers and humans apart (CAPTCHA)
WO2012107879A2 (en) * 2011-02-10 2012-08-16 Site Black Box Ltd. DISTINGUISH VALID USERS FROM BOTS, OCRs AND THIRD PARTY SOLVERS WHEN PRESENTING CAPTCHA
US20120272302A1 (en) * 2011-04-21 2012-10-25 Microsoft Corporation Human User Verification

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090055193A1 (en) * 2007-02-22 2009-02-26 Pudding Holdings Israel Ltd. Method, apparatus and computer code for selectively providing access to a service in accordance with spoken content received from a user
US20090150983A1 (en) * 2007-08-27 2009-06-11 Infosys Technologies Limited System and method for monitoring human interaction
US8380503B2 (en) * 2008-06-23 2013-02-19 John Nicholas and Kristin Gross Trust System and method for generating challenge items for CAPTCHAs
US20100049526A1 (en) * 2008-08-25 2010-02-25 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System and method for auditory captchas
US20110150267A1 (en) * 2009-12-22 2011-06-23 Disney Enterprises, Inc. Human verification by contextually iconic visual public turing test
US20110208716A1 (en) * 2010-02-19 2011-08-25 Microsoft Corporation Image-Based CAPTCHA Exploiting Context in Object Recognition
US20110209076A1 (en) * 2010-02-24 2011-08-25 Infosys Technologies Limited System and method for monitoring human interaction
US20120254971A1 (en) * 2011-04-01 2012-10-04 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Captcha method and system
US20130145441A1 (en) * 2011-06-03 2013-06-06 Dhawal Mujumdar Captcha authentication processes and systems using visual object identification
US20120323700A1 (en) * 2011-06-20 2012-12-20 Prays Nikolay Aleksandrovich Image-based captcha system
US9183362B2 (en) * 2011-08-05 2015-11-10 Mobile Messenger Global, Inc. Method and system for verification of human presence at a mobile device

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10313322B2 (en) 2016-09-02 2019-06-04 Ca, Inc. Distinguishing human-generated input from programmatically-generated input

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2013022839A1 (en) 2013-02-14
US9183362B2 (en) 2015-11-10
US20130205386A1 (en) 2013-08-08
CA2844262A1 (en) 2013-02-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9183362B2 (en) Method and system for verification of human presence at a mobile device
US9560033B2 (en) Method and system for authenticating user identity
CN107851254B (en) Seamless transactions with minimized user input
JP6503357B2 (en) Approve payment by reading QR code generated by separate user or device
US9088457B1 (en) Transmission of an application download via an encoded image identifying the authorized recipient
EP3843328B1 (en) User authentication and authorization using personas
CN109257321B (en) Secure login method and device
US9270666B2 (en) Verification of user communication addresses
Petrova et al. QR codes advantages and dangers
CN110351672B (en) Information pushing method and device and electronic equipment
JP2015531501A (en) Managing digital receipts
TWM539667U (en) System of online credentials application for network transaction via carrier
US20140215592A1 (en) Method, apparatus and system for user authentication
US9356971B1 (en) Broadcast-based trust establishment
US11888844B2 (en) Electrical circuit testing device and method
WO2014117563A1 (en) Method, apparatus and system for user authentication
Jakobsson Social Engineering Resistant 2FA
TW201824129A (en) System for applying for certificate online through carrier for transaction and method thereof
KR101631661B1 (en) Method of providing card transaction service using social network and server performing the same
TW202217609A (en) System for driving smart card by third-party device for identity verification and method thereof
TWI536299B (en) Online system and method of registration and certification
KR102092377B1 (en) User authentication system and method thereof, and apparatus applied to the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MOBILE MESSENGER AMERICAS INC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:THOMPSON, FRASER;REEL/FRAME:036939/0601

Effective date: 20080623

AS Assignment

Owner name: MOBILE MESSENGER AMERICAS INC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE'S ADDRESS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 036939 FRAME 0601. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:THOMPSON, FRASER;REEL/FRAME:040415/0314

Effective date: 20080623

AS Assignment

Owner name: MOBILE MESSENGER GLOBAL, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MOBILE MESSENGER AMERICAS INC.;REEL/FRAME:040431/0403

Effective date: 20161121

AS Assignment

Owner name: POST SMS GLOBAL CO., INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:MOBILE MESSENGER GLOBAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:040708/0238

Effective date: 20150116

AS Assignment

Owner name: MANTIS MESSAGING, INC., DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:POST SMS GLOBAL CO. INC.;REEL/FRAME:040460/0347

Effective date: 20151101

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION