US20160016671A1 - Processing of aircraft alarm and maintenance messages - Google Patents

Processing of aircraft alarm and maintenance messages Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20160016671A1
US20160016671A1 US14/803,044 US201514803044A US2016016671A1 US 20160016671 A1 US20160016671 A1 US 20160016671A1 US 201514803044 A US201514803044 A US 201514803044A US 2016016671 A1 US2016016671 A1 US 2016016671A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
maintenance
efb
electronic
alarm
aircraft
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US14/803,044
Other versions
US9663242B2 (en
Inventor
François Fournier
Stéphanie PEYRAT
Rémi Huynh
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Thales SA
Original Assignee
Thales SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Thales SA filed Critical Thales SA
Assigned to THALES reassignment THALES ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HUYNH, Rémi, Peyrat, Stéphanie, FOURNIER, François
Publication of US20160016671A1 publication Critical patent/US20160016671A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US9663242B2 publication Critical patent/US9663242B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64DEQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLIGHT SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
    • B64D45/00Aircraft indicators or protectors not otherwise provided for
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01CMEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C23/00Combined instruments indicating more than one navigational value, e.g. for aircraft; Combined measuring devices for measuring two or more variables of movement, e.g. distance, speed or acceleration
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07CTIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C5/00Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
    • G07C5/008Registering or indicating the working of vehicles communicating information to a remotely located station
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01Protocols
    • H04L67/12Protocols specially adapted for proprietary or special-purpose networking environments, e.g. medical networks, sensor networks, networks in vehicles or remote metering networks
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64DEQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLIGHT SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
    • B64D45/00Aircraft indicators or protectors not otherwise provided for
    • B64D2045/0075Adaptations for use of electronic flight bags in aircraft; Supports therefor in the cockpit
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64DEQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLIGHT SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
    • B64D45/00Aircraft indicators or protectors not otherwise provided for
    • B64D2045/0085Devices for aircraft health monitoring, e.g. monitoring flutter or vibration

Definitions

  • the invention relates to the field of avionics, and in particular that of the processing of the alarm and maintenance messages of an aircraft.
  • Aircraft comprise a great deal of electrical, mechanical and computerized onboard equipment.
  • the functioning of this onboard equipment is monitored notably by the crew of the aircraft during the flight. Any failure of one of the items of equipment can be reported either by the crew of the aircraft, or by the item of equipment itself, or by an onboard maintenance system to which the item of equipment can be linked. On returning to the ground, all the data relating to failures, if any, are collected and then analysed by a ground maintenance team.
  • faults and malfunctions are closely monitored and processed in a specific manner.
  • the fault and maintenance messages form the subject of reports.
  • the flight register or “Logbook” allows the pilot to inform the maintenance personnel of the various malfunctions of the aeroplane.
  • the maintenance teams consult the paper or electronic documentation in relation to these malfunctions.
  • a computer implemented method for managing alarm and maintenance messages of an aircraft comprising the steps consisting in collecting or receiving information relating to the alarm, aircraft status and maintenance messages; and transmitting the information collected to an electronic device of EFB or electronic flight bag type, the said electronic device being able to correlate the alarm messages with the maintenance messages and to associate the descriptions of the alarms with links and electronic maintenance documents.
  • the step of collecting the information comprises the acquisition of one or more images of the onboard avionics equipment and the subsequent extraction of this information from the said images.
  • the extraction of data can be done by extracting data from images (so-called “scraping”). Data such as text (by OCR, Optical Character Recognition), numerical values, cursor or dial positions, etc. may be extracted. Extractions of data or information from audio streams are also possible (separately or in combination).
  • the step of collecting the information comprises listening to communications on an avionics bus between a centralized maintenance system CMS and a printing service Printer and/or ground equipment of AGARS or VHF type.
  • the method furthermore comprises a step of transmitting the data collected from the avionics bus to an EFB or electronic flight bag.
  • the method furthermore comprises a step of interpretation by the EFB or electronic flight bag of the data collected from the avionics bus by means of a model of avionics protocols.
  • the method furthermore comprises a step of association by the EFB or electronic flight bag of the description of the alarm and maintenance messages, as well as their link with the electronic documentation.
  • At least one link is a hyperlink to an electronic document.
  • the method furthermore comprises a step of reception by the EFB or electronic flight bag of a selection of an alarm or maintenance message.
  • the electronic device of EFB type comprises user interface means and the method furthermore comprising a step of making available by the said user interface means one or more appropriate maintenance procedures and/or documents in relation to the alarm or maintenance message selected.
  • embodiments of the invention make it possible to establish a direct link between the context noted or observed in the aeroplane (alerts, alarms, faults) and the alarms and the actions required by the maintenance personnel.
  • the information relating to the state of the craft can be entered automatically (via the connection with the aircraft systems in particular).
  • the “logbook”, “maintenance report” and “electronic documentation” functions installed and accessible via a portable electronic device of EFB (“Electronic Flight Bag”) type can retrieve the aircraft status, the alarms and maintenance messages and propose the appropriate maintenance procedures and/or the documents to the pilot and to the maintenance personnel.
  • EFB Electronic Flight Bag
  • the solution makes it possible to automate and to integrate the information processing chain (alarm, logbook, maintenance, documentation) on earlier-generation aeroplanes.
  • embodiments make it possible to reduce the cognitive burden of the pilot and maintenance personnel, by unburdening them of tedious manipulations, lessening for example the constraints in regard to data input and thereby allowing more sustained attention in regard to data verification and associated actions.
  • various embodiments of the invention will be able to be implemented in the onboard equipment, in one or more EFBs, in the flight cabin or on the ground.
  • the embodiments of the invention allow or aid centralization of the data (alarms, aircraft status, maintenance), appropriate verification and distribution of the verified data, the relevant proposal of the appropriate information in regard to logbook function, maintenance report reporting and electronic documentation.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates the global technical environment of the invention
  • FIG. 2 schematically illustrates the structure and the functions of a centralized maintenance system of known CMS type
  • FIG. 3 presents an overall view and examples of steps of the method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 4 details certain examples of steps of the method according to the invention.
  • An “Electronic Flight Bag” with acronym or initials EFB corresponds refers to onboard electronic libraries.
  • An electronic flight bag (or electronic flight tablet) EFB is a portable electronic device used by flight personnel (for example pilots, maintenance or cabin staff etc.).
  • An EFB can provide the crew with flight information, helping them to perform tasks (with less paper). In practice, it generally entails an off-the-shelf computer tablet.
  • One or more applications allow the management of information for flight management tasks.
  • These general-purpose computing platforms are intended to reduce or replace the reference material in paper form, often found in the hand luggage of the “Pilot Flight Bag” and whose manipulation may be tedious.
  • the reference paper documentation generally comprises the flight manuals, the various navigation maps and the ground operations manuals. This documentation is advantageously rendered paperless in an EFB.
  • an EFB can host software applications specially designed to automate operations conducted manually in normal time, such as for example takeoff performance computations (computation of limit speed, etc.).
  • Class 1 EFBs are portable electronic devices (PEDs), which are normally not used during takeoff and the disembarkation operations. This class of device does not require an administrative process of particular certification or authorization.
  • EFB devices of class 2 are normally disposed in the cockpit, e.g. mounted in a position where they are used in all the flight phases. This class of devices requires prior authorization of use.
  • Class 1 and 2 devices are considered to be portable electronic devices.
  • Fixed installations of class 3 such as computing media or fixed docking stations installed in the cockpit of aircraft, generally demand the approval and a certification on the part of the regulator.
  • FMS corresponds to the terminology “Flight Management System” and refers to the flight management systems of aircraft.
  • the crew input various items of information relating to the progress of the flight, typically by using an FMS aircraft flight management facility.
  • An FMS comprises input means and display means, as well as computation means.
  • An operator for example the pilot or the copilot, can input via the input means information such as RTAs, or “waypoints”, associated with route points, that is to say points vertically above which the aircraft must pass.
  • the computation means make it possible notably to compute, on the basis of the flight plan comprising the list of waypoints, the trajectory of the aircraft, as a function of the geometry between the waypoints and/or of the altitude and speed conditions.
  • MMI corresponds to Man-Machine Interface (or HMI, Human Machine Interface).
  • HMI Human Machine Interface
  • the inputting of the information and the display of the information input or computed by the display means constitute such a man-machine interface.
  • a dedicated display displayed by the display means When the operator inputs a route point, he does so via a dedicated display displayed by the display means.
  • This display may optionally also display information relating to the temporal situation of the aircraft in relation to the route point considered. The operator can then input and view a time constraint imposed for this route point.
  • the MMI means allow the inputting and the consultation of the flight plan information.
  • the “Flight Warning System” is a system for centralized management of alerts.
  • the main functions of the system for centralized management of alerts are the collection of the data of the avionics systems, the detection of alerts, the filtering of alerts and the announcement of alerts.
  • This system is capable of alerting the crew, of advising of the defects of the aeroplane and of listing for the crew the procedures to be applied in response to the alerts displayed by the system.
  • a centralized system for managing alerts constitutes an advance with respect to reports of alerts by sub-systems that did not afford the crew an overall view if several alerts were to arise concomitantly.
  • the system for centralized management of alerts comprises the means for dispatching the detected and processed alerts to a flight data recording system as well as to a maintenance system of the aircraft and for synchronizing the audio messages associated with the alerts.
  • the avionics systems also host their own mechanism for detecting functional anomalies whose result is thereafter transmitted directly to the alerts management function. More generally, one distinguishes the “Monitoring” part, that is to say the part for monitoring the functional anomalies, which is hosted mainly in the avionics systems and partially in the alerts management function and the “Consolidation” function which is hosted in the alerts management system which, with a monitoring result, according to the flight conditions, associates an alert.
  • CMS Centralized Maintenance System
  • BITE equipment the acronym standing for “Built-In Test Equipment”, whose function is to carry out tests on the onboard equipment for the purposes of diagnosis and storage of the events and alarms that have arisen during the flight.
  • the centralized maintenance system of the aeroplane of the CFDIU (“Centralized Fault Display Interface Unit”) or CMC (“Centralized Maintenance Computer”) type, generally establishes a flight report, called PFR for “Post Flight Report”.
  • the intervention of the maintenance personnel is based on the consideration of the Logbook, of the tests carried out by the BITE function, of the PFR, and optionally of other elements related to the general state of the aircraft, such as deduced from the status of the onboard sensors and which is accessible by way of reports of the ALMS (“Aircraft Condition & Monitoring System”) type.
  • the events mentioned in the Logbook and the PFR may demand maintenance operations.
  • a document referred to by the acronym MEL standing for “Minimum Equipment List” the maintenance personnel may deduce the necessity or otherwise to perform maintenance operations in the immediate future. If diagnosis actions have to be undertaken, they are summarized in a manual often called the FIM for “Fault Isolation Manual” or the TSM for “Troubleshooting Manual”. The maintenance personnel then have at their disposal various documentary sources, generally dispersed, and several levels of documents detailing the procedures and the various individual tasks to be undertaken. The procedures are detailed in documentation referred to by the acronym AMM standing for “Aircraft Maintenance Manual”.
  • “Jobcards” are printed: they comprise the set of tasks that a given maintenance operator has to achieve. “Check-lists” are also produced: they comprise a list of actions or of verificatory checks allowing the maintenance operator to make sure of the correct performance of his tasks. Finally, the maintenance operator, after having carried out his duties, is generally required to fill in a “Workreport”, which corresponds to a sheet summarizing the set of tasks actually performed by the operator.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates the global technical environment of the invention.
  • Avionics equipment or airport means 100 for example a control tower linked with the air traffic control systems
  • An aircraft is a means of transport capable of deploying within the terrestrial atmosphere.
  • an aircraft can be an aeroplane or a helicopter (or else still a drone).
  • the aircraft comprises a flight cabin or a cockpit 120 .
  • piloting equipment 121 within the cockpit are situated piloting equipment 121 (so-called avionics equipment), comprising for example one or more onboard computers (means of computation, of saving and of storing data), including an FMS, means of display or viewing and inputting of data, communication means, as well as (optionally) haptic feedback means.
  • An EFB 122 may be situated onboard, in a portable manner or integrated into the cockpit.
  • the said EFB can interact (bilateral communication 123 ) with the avionics equipment 121 .
  • the EFB can also be in communication 124 with external computing resources, accessible by the network (for example cloud computing 125 ).
  • the computations can be performed locally on the EFB or partially or totally in the computation means accessible by the network.
  • the onboard equipment 121 is generally certified and regulated while the EFB 122 and the connected computing means 125 are generally not (or to a lesser extent). This architecture makes it possible to inject flexibility on the side of the EFB 122 by ensuring a controlled security on the side of the onboard avionics 121 .
  • Several EFBs may be on board.
  • FIG. 2 schematically illustrates the centralized maintenance facility structure and functions according to the prior art.
  • the CMS 201 for “Centralized Maintenance System” receives the following data as input: fault indicators 202 , originating from systems or equipment 203 of the aircraft; alerts 205 originating from an FWS 206 of the aircraft, an onboard journal 207 or logbook kept by the crew of the aircraft.
  • the CMS 201 performs a temporal correlation 204 of the data received 202 , 205 , 207 .
  • the correlated data are thereafter transmitted to a first man-machine interface 208 of the first CMS 201 .
  • the CMS 201 comprises notably a database 209 comprising aircraft configuration data which can be used by the correlation 204 so as to provide additional information associated with the data presented on the man-machine interface 208 .
  • a centralized maintenance system such as this allows curative processing of the faults detected in the course of the flight.
  • FIG. 3 presents an overall view and examples of steps of the method according to the invention.
  • An EFB 300 communicates with aircraft interface equipment 310 , which is in interaction with avionics systems 320 (“Aircraft Systems”).
  • the EFB in particular can comprise one or more applications (“app”), each application comprising one or more functions.
  • the EFB can for example comprise an Electronic Logbook 302 application (or function), a Maintenance Report 303 application (or function), an electronic documentation (“Electronic Documentation” 304 ) application (or function).
  • the avionics systems 320 for their part can comprise, in particular, the Flight Warning System 330 which communicates 331 with the Central Maintenance System 340 which communicates 341 with the Printer or Communication 350 .
  • the Flight Warning System can communicate 332 directly with the Aircraft Interface equipment 310 , which in its turn can communicate 242 directly with the Printer 350 .
  • the EFB system 300 includes a logbook 302 , maintenance report 303 and documentation 304 function. It is linked to the aircraft equipment 310 .
  • the EFB retrieves the aircraft context information and the alarms, mainly via the Flight Warning System function through the link between the Flight Warning System 330 and the centralized maintenance system ( 201 , 340 ) and also via the information of the viewing systems 350 .
  • the EFB retrieves the information regarding faults and alarms correlated via the centralized maintenance system ( 201 , 340 ) through the link between the centralized maintenance system ( 201 , 340 ) and the printer or communication function 350 .
  • FIG. 4 details certain examples of steps of the method according to the invention.
  • the aircraft system Flight Warning System
  • the aircraft system transmits on the avionics bus (for example A 429 ) the report of the alarms.
  • the data such as those of the “aircraft status” and the “alarms” are collected.
  • Other data can be collected (for example by means of acquisition of images or captures of the screens of the instrument panel or of the onboard MMI equipment, which images or captures allow the recognition of characters or the extraction or the “evasion” of information from the embedded instruments on board).
  • the information can be collected (for example) by “spying” on the communication between the Printer function and the centralized maintenance.
  • the avionics systems transmit (for example on the avionics bus) the maintenance messages.
  • These maintenance messages or data are for example collected from the data of the “maintenance report” via the centralized maintenance system CMS by “spying” on the communications with the printer Printer or the onboard/ground communication.
  • the aircraft system (for centralized maintenance) transmits on the avionics bus the Post Flight Report 404 report grouping together the alarms and the maintenance messages of the current flight for printing (Printer) or for transmission to the ground (AGARS, VHF).
  • the aircraft interface equipment retrieves the data of the avionics bus and transmits them to the EFB (via USB or Ethernet for example).
  • the EFB decodes and transmits the aircraft data to the applications installed in the EFB.
  • the EFB retrieves the data, interprets the avionics protocol (Printer or AGARS, for example by means of a model of avionics protocols 421 ) and retrieves the correlated alarms and maintenance message (comprising for example information of code and message type).
  • the correlated alarms and Maintenance messages 423 are processed by the EFB: in step 430 , the EFB associates the description of the alarms and maintenance data as well as their link (for example hyperlink) with the electronic documentation (for example by means of a file 431 comprising the descriptions and the links of the alarms and maintenance messages.
  • the “logbook”, “maintenance report” and “electronic documentation” functions installed and accessible on the EFB can therefore retrieve the “aircraft status”, the “alarms” and the “maintenance messages” and propose the appropriate maintenance procedures and/or the documents to the pilot and to the maintenance personnel.
  • the EFB makes the alarms available to the pilot for example via the “Technical Logbook” application installed on the said EFB.
  • the pilot can select one or more alarms (and for example the aircraft status) by way of the logbook.
  • the EFB makes available to the maintenance personnel the maintenance messages correlated with the alarms selected by the pilot in the “Technical Logbook” application as well as with the associated documents.
  • the maintenance personnel can open the selected alarms, access the associated maintenance messages (within the report of the centralized maintenance system) and finally access (directly) the aeroplane documentation.
  • a “scraping” operation corresponds to an extraction of information by means of the acquisition of one or more images, and of the subsequent processing of these images.
  • the operation refers to an operation of retrieval or capture of information on a digital object, the said retrieval or capture not being originally scheduled by the digital object.
  • this retrieval of information may comprise the acquisition of one or more images and then the recognition of characters within the captured images.
  • An “opportunistic” information retrieval or evasion or capture operation such as this makes it possible to establish a link between certified avionics systems (that is to say inter alia controlled and regulated, rather closed, the computer security of which is comparatively more controlled or at the very least monitored) and the non-avionics systems (non-certified open systems, that are more prone to computing attacks but correlatively that evolve faster).
  • the information retrieval or capture operation is unilateral: the extraction of information is performed from the avionics systems to the open systems (and not the reverse). For example, there is no injection of non-avionics data and/or programs into the avionics systems (or else in a controlled manner).
  • the pilot or the copilot or some other member of the flight personnel triggers an acquisition of images, for example by means of an EFB electronic tablet equipped with a photographic device.
  • the snapshot is thereafter analysed, cropped, and the captured information is extracted from the image.
  • the pre-established knowledge of the type of image captured allows specific recognition. For example, an alarm displayed on the FWS will be in a pre-established and known format. Accordingly the information capture will be optimized.
  • the snapshot will be of video type (that is to say acquisition of a succession of still images, the large number of captured images allowing notably optimization of the information capture and/or robustness to the movements of the user carrying the image acquisition means).
  • the image acquisition means are mounted in a fixed manner in the cockpit of the aircraft. By this means, information capture or retrieval can be performed in a continuous manner.
  • the image acquisition means can correspond to photographic devices or video cameras fixed on virtual or augmented reality headsets.
  • the “alarms” information is available on the pilot's viewing screen. It is also available via the MCDU “Multi Purpose Display Unit” by consulting the reports of the centralized maintenance computer. These two MMI sources allow extraction of the information and its “reinjection” via the EFB. The information of “maintenance message” type is also accessible via the MCDU (by consulting the appropriate reports). Finally, it is possible to undertake the acquisition of images of the malfunctions which are not linked with alarms but which make it possible to back up the pilot's remarks, if any. Although in this case there is no “automatic” correlation with the maintenance messages, this information source will help the understanding and resolution of the maintenance problems.
  • the present invention can be implemented on the basis of hardware and/or software elements. It may be available in the guise of computer program product on a computer readable medium.
  • the medium may be electronic, magnetic, optical or electromagnetic.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

A computer implemented method for managing alarm and maintenance messages of an aircraft, comprises collecting information relating to the alarm, aircraft status and maintenance messages; transmitting the information collected to an electronic device of EFB or electronic flight bag type, the electronic device being able to correlate the alarm messages with the maintenance messages and to associate the descriptions of the alarms with links and electronic maintenance documents. Developments describe notably the extracting of data from images or audio streams; listening to the communications on an avionics bus between the centralized maintenance system CMS and the printing service Printer and/or ground equipment of AGARS or VHF type; and the establishing of links with the electronic documentation and the use of an electronic flight bag EFB.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application claims priority to foreign French patent application No. FR 1401622, filed on Jul. 18, 2014, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to the field of avionics, and in particular that of the processing of the alarm and maintenance messages of an aircraft.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Aircraft comprise a great deal of electrical, mechanical and computerized onboard equipment. The functioning of this onboard equipment, the processings of which are necessary for proper flight progress, is monitored notably by the crew of the aircraft during the flight. Any failure of one of the items of equipment can be reported either by the crew of the aircraft, or by the item of equipment itself, or by an onboard maintenance system to which the item of equipment can be linked. On returning to the ground, all the data relating to failures, if any, are collected and then analysed by a ground maintenance team.
  • One of the issues in aircraft maintenance is that of being able to identify as rapidly as possible critical faults of the onboard equipment, as well as their origin so as to afford fast correction, in order to avoid to the utmost the grounding of an aircraft, something that is very expensive for airlines.
  • In an aeroplane, faults and malfunctions are closely monitored and processed in a specific manner. Several functions are concerned. The fault and maintenance messages form the subject of reports. The flight register or “Logbook” allows the pilot to inform the maintenance personnel of the various malfunctions of the aeroplane. In response to this information provided by the pilot, the maintenance teams consult the paper or electronic documentation in relation to these malfunctions.
  • In existing systems, as a function of the context specific to an aeroplane or in response to the noting of one or more alarms displayed in the cockpit, the pilot must manually fill in the paper or electronic logbook. Subsequently, the maintenance personnel conduct various investigations so as to make the link between the information provided by the pilot and the reports or information available within the centralized maintenance system.
  • In existing systems, the maintenance operations are generally guided and conducted by entirely manual actions on the part of the pilot and the maintenance personnel.
  • These existing solutions are not optimized, may be slow and cause risks of errors.
  • There exists a need for schemes and systems for managing faults, alerts and alarms in an optimal manner with a view to the ground maintenance operations.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • There is disclosed a computer implemented method for managing alarm and maintenance messages of an aircraft, comprising the steps consisting in collecting or receiving information relating to the alarm, aircraft status and maintenance messages; and transmitting the information collected to an electronic device of EFB or electronic flight bag type, the said electronic device being able to correlate the alarm messages with the maintenance messages and to associate the descriptions of the alarms with links and electronic maintenance documents.
  • In a development, the step of collecting the information comprises the acquisition of one or more images of the onboard avionics equipment and the subsequent extraction of this information from the said images.
  • The extraction of data (for example textual) can be done by extracting data from images (so-called “scraping”). Data such as text (by OCR, Optical Character Recognition), numerical values, cursor or dial positions, etc. may be extracted. Extractions of data or information from audio streams are also possible (separately or in combination).
  • In a development, the step of collecting the information comprises listening to communications on an avionics bus between a centralized maintenance system CMS and a printing service Printer and/or ground equipment of AGARS or VHF type.
  • In a development, the method furthermore comprises a step of transmitting the data collected from the avionics bus to an EFB or electronic flight bag.
  • In a development, the method furthermore comprises a step of interpretation by the EFB or electronic flight bag of the data collected from the avionics bus by means of a model of avionics protocols.
  • In a development, the method furthermore comprises a step of association by the EFB or electronic flight bag of the description of the alarm and maintenance messages, as well as their link with the electronic documentation.
  • In a development, at least one link is a hyperlink to an electronic document.
  • In a development, the method furthermore comprises a step of reception by the EFB or electronic flight bag of a selection of an alarm or maintenance message.
  • In a development, the electronic device of EFB type comprises user interface means and the method furthermore comprising a step of making available by the said user interface means one or more appropriate maintenance procedures and/or documents in relation to the alarm or maintenance message selected.
  • There is disclosed a computer program product, comprising code instructions making it possible to perform one or more steps of the method, when the said program is executed on a computer.
  • There is disclosed a system comprising means for implementing one or more steps of the method.
  • Advantageously, embodiments of the invention make it possible to establish a direct link between the context noted or observed in the aeroplane (alerts, alarms, faults) and the alarms and the actions required by the maintenance personnel. For example, the information relating to the state of the craft can be entered automatically (via the connection with the aircraft systems in particular).
  • Advantageously, the “logbook”, “maintenance report” and “electronic documentation” functions installed and accessible via a portable electronic device of EFB (“Electronic Flight Bag”) type can retrieve the aircraft status, the alarms and maintenance messages and propose the appropriate maintenance procedures and/or the documents to the pilot and to the maintenance personnel.
  • Advantageously, the solution makes it possible to automate and to integrate the information processing chain (alarm, logbook, maintenance, documentation) on earlier-generation aeroplanes.
  • Advantageously, embodiments make it possible to reduce the cognitive burden of the pilot and maintenance personnel, by unburdening them of tedious manipulations, lessening for example the constraints in regard to data input and thereby allowing more sustained attention in regard to data verification and associated actions.
  • Advantageously, various embodiments of the invention will be able to be implemented in the onboard equipment, in one or more EFBs, in the flight cabin or on the ground.
  • Advantageously, the embodiments of the invention allow or aid centralization of the data (alarms, aircraft status, maintenance), appropriate verification and distribution of the verified data, the relevant proposal of the appropriate information in regard to logbook function, maintenance report reporting and electronic documentation.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • Various aspects and advantages of the invention will appear in support of the description of a preferred but nonlimiting mode of implementation of the invention, with reference to the figures hereinbelow:
  • FIG. 1 illustrates the global technical environment of the invention;
  • FIG. 2 schematically illustrates the structure and the functions of a centralized maintenance system of known CMS type;
  • FIG. 3 presents an overall view and examples of steps of the method according to the invention;
  • FIG. 4 details certain examples of steps of the method according to the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Certain technical terms and environments are defined hereinafter.
  • An “Electronic Flight Bag” with acronym or initials EFB corresponds refers to onboard electronic libraries. An electronic flight bag (or electronic flight tablet) EFB is a portable electronic device used by flight personnel (for example pilots, maintenance or cabin staff etc.). An EFB can provide the crew with flight information, helping them to perform tasks (with less paper). In practice, it generally entails an off-the-shelf computer tablet. One or more applications allow the management of information for flight management tasks. These general-purpose computing platforms are intended to reduce or replace the reference material in paper form, often found in the hand luggage of the “Pilot Flight Bag” and whose manipulation may be tedious. The reference paper documentation generally comprises the flight manuals, the various navigation maps and the ground operations manuals. This documentation is advantageously rendered paperless in an EFB. Furthermore, an EFB can host software applications specially designed to automate operations conducted manually in normal time, such as for example takeoff performance computations (computation of limit speed, etc.).
  • Various classes of EFB hardware exist. Class 1 EFBs are portable electronic devices (PEDs), which are normally not used during takeoff and the disembarkation operations. This class of device does not require an administrative process of particular certification or authorization. EFB devices of class 2 are normally disposed in the cockpit, e.g. mounted in a position where they are used in all the flight phases. This class of devices requires prior authorization of use. Class 1 and 2 devices are considered to be portable electronic devices. Fixed installations of class 3, such as computing media or fixed docking stations installed in the cockpit of aircraft, generally demand the approval and a certification on the part of the regulator.
  • The acronym (or initials) FMS corresponds to the terminology “Flight Management System” and refers to the flight management systems of aircraft. During flight preparation or during rerouting, the crew input various items of information relating to the progress of the flight, typically by using an FMS aircraft flight management facility. An FMS comprises input means and display means, as well as computation means. An operator, for example the pilot or the copilot, can input via the input means information such as RTAs, or “waypoints”, associated with route points, that is to say points vertically above which the aircraft must pass. The computation means make it possible notably to compute, on the basis of the flight plan comprising the list of waypoints, the trajectory of the aircraft, as a function of the geometry between the waypoints and/or of the altitude and speed conditions.
  • The acronym MMI corresponds to Man-Machine Interface (or HMI, Human Machine Interface). The inputting of the information and the display of the information input or computed by the display means constitute such a man-machine interface. With known facilities of FMS type, when the operator inputs a route point, he does so via a dedicated display displayed by the display means. This display may optionally also display information relating to the temporal situation of the aircraft in relation to the route point considered. The operator can then input and view a time constraint imposed for this route point. Generally, the MMI means allow the inputting and the consultation of the flight plan information.
  • The “Flight Warning System” (FWS) is a system for centralized management of alerts. The main functions of the system for centralized management of alerts are the collection of the data of the avionics systems, the detection of alerts, the filtering of alerts and the announcement of alerts. This system is capable of alerting the crew, of advising of the defects of the aeroplane and of listing for the crew the procedures to be applied in response to the alerts displayed by the system. A centralized system for managing alerts constitutes an advance with respect to reports of alerts by sub-systems that did not afford the crew an overall view if several alerts were to arise concomitantly. Furthermore, the system for centralized management of alerts comprises the means for dispatching the detected and processed alerts to a flight data recording system as well as to a maintenance system of the aircraft and for synchronizing the audio messages associated with the alerts. The avionics systems also host their own mechanism for detecting functional anomalies whose result is thereafter transmitted directly to the alerts management function. More generally, one distinguishes the “Monitoring” part, that is to say the part for monitoring the functional anomalies, which is hosted mainly in the avionics systems and partially in the alerts management function and the “Consolidation” function which is hosted in the alerts management system which, with a monitoring result, according to the flight conditions, associates an alert.
  • The system called the “Centralized Maintenance System” (CMS) ensures in particular the maintenance of an aircraft on the ground, which maintenance comprises various steps, comprising firstly the filling in by the onboard personnel of a flight register, or “Logbook” as it is known, listing the set of alarms, anomalies, or other events noted by the crew during the flight. All recent aircraft furthermore comprise so-called BITE equipment, the acronym standing for “Built-In Test Equipment”, whose function is to carry out tests on the onboard equipment for the purposes of diagnosis and storage of the events and alarms that have arisen during the flight. After the flight, the centralized maintenance system of the aeroplane, of the CFDIU (“Centralized Fault Display Interface Unit”) or CMC (“Centralized Maintenance Computer”) type, generally establishes a flight report, called PFR for “Post Flight Report”. Subsequently, the intervention of the maintenance personnel is based on the consideration of the Logbook, of the tests carried out by the BITE function, of the PFR, and optionally of other elements related to the general state of the aircraft, such as deduced from the status of the onboard sensors and which is accessible by way of reports of the ALMS (“Aircraft Condition & Monitoring System”) type. The events mentioned in the Logbook and the PFR may demand maintenance operations. After having consulted the document which creates an inventory of the necessary and sufficient equipment with a view to performing a flight, a document referred to by the acronym MEL standing for “Minimum Equipment List”, the maintenance personnel may deduce the necessity or otherwise to perform maintenance operations in the immediate future. If diagnosis actions have to be undertaken, they are summarized in a manual often called the FIM for “Fault Isolation Manual” or the TSM for “Troubleshooting Manual”. The maintenance personnel then have at their disposal various documentary sources, generally dispersed, and several levels of documents detailing the procedures and the various individual tasks to be undertaken. The procedures are detailed in documentation referred to by the acronym AMM standing for “Aircraft Maintenance Manual”. When maintenance operations have to be carried out, “Jobcards” are printed: they comprise the set of tasks that a given maintenance operator has to achieve. “Check-lists” are also produced: they comprise a list of actions or of verificatory checks allowing the maintenance operator to make sure of the correct performance of his tasks. Finally, the maintenance operator, after having carried out his duties, is generally required to fill in a “Workreport”, which corresponds to a sheet summarizing the set of tasks actually performed by the operator.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates the global technical environment of the invention. Avionics equipment or airport means 100 (for example a control tower linked with the air traffic control systems) are in communication with an aircraft 110. An aircraft is a means of transport capable of deploying within the terrestrial atmosphere. For example, an aircraft can be an aeroplane or a helicopter (or else still a drone). The aircraft comprises a flight cabin or a cockpit 120. Within the cockpit are situated piloting equipment 121 (so-called avionics equipment), comprising for example one or more onboard computers (means of computation, of saving and of storing data), including an FMS, means of display or viewing and inputting of data, communication means, as well as (optionally) haptic feedback means. An EFB 122 may be situated onboard, in a portable manner or integrated into the cockpit. The said EFB can interact (bilateral communication 123) with the avionics equipment 121. The EFB can also be in communication 124 with external computing resources, accessible by the network (for example cloud computing 125). In particular, the computations can be performed locally on the EFB or partially or totally in the computation means accessible by the network. The onboard equipment 121 is generally certified and regulated while the EFB 122 and the connected computing means 125 are generally not (or to a lesser extent). This architecture makes it possible to inject flexibility on the side of the EFB 122 by ensuring a controlled security on the side of the onboard avionics 121. Several EFBs may be on board.
  • FIG. 2 schematically illustrates the centralized maintenance facility structure and functions according to the prior art. The CMS 201 for “Centralized Maintenance System” receives the following data as input: fault indicators 202, originating from systems or equipment 203 of the aircraft; alerts 205 originating from an FWS 206 of the aircraft, an onboard journal 207 or logbook kept by the crew of the aircraft. The CMS 201 performs a temporal correlation 204 of the data received 202, 205, 207. The correlated data are thereafter transmitted to a first man-machine interface 208 of the first CMS 201. The CMS 201 comprises notably a database 209 comprising aircraft configuration data which can be used by the correlation 204 so as to provide additional information associated with the data presented on the man-machine interface 208. A centralized maintenance system such as this allows curative processing of the faults detected in the course of the flight.
  • FIG. 3 presents an overall view and examples of steps of the method according to the invention. An EFB 300 communicates with aircraft interface equipment 310, which is in interaction with avionics systems 320 (“Aircraft Systems”). The EFB in particular can comprise one or more applications (“app”), each application comprising one or more functions. The EFB can for example comprise an Electronic Logbook 302 application (or function), a Maintenance Report 303 application (or function), an electronic documentation (“Electronic Documentation” 304) application (or function). The avionics systems 320 for their part can comprise, in particular, the Flight Warning System 330 which communicates 331 with the Central Maintenance System 340 which communicates 341 with the Printer or Communication 350. The Flight Warning System can communicate 332 directly with the Aircraft Interface equipment 310, which in its turn can communicate 242 directly with the Printer 350.
  • The EFB system 300 includes a logbook 302, maintenance report 303 and documentation 304 function. It is linked to the aircraft equipment 310. The EFB retrieves the aircraft context information and the alarms, mainly via the Flight Warning System function through the link between the Flight Warning System 330 and the centralized maintenance system (201, 340) and also via the information of the viewing systems 350. The EFB retrieves the information regarding faults and alarms correlated via the centralized maintenance system (201, 340) through the link between the centralized maintenance system (201, 340) and the printer or communication function 350.
  • FIG. 4 details certain examples of steps of the method according to the invention. In step 401, the aircraft system (Flight Warning System) transmits on the avionics bus (for example A429) the report of the alarms. Via the FWS, the data such as those of the “aircraft status” and the “alarms” are collected. Other data can be collected (for example by means of acquisition of images or captures of the screens of the instrument panel or of the onboard MMI equipment, which images or captures allow the recognition of characters or the extraction or the “evasion” of information from the embedded instruments on board). According to one embodiment, the information can be collected (for example) by “spying” on the communication between the Printer function and the centralized maintenance. In step 402 (in parallel, or sequentially, e.g. previously or subsequently), the avionics systems transmit (for example on the avionics bus) the maintenance messages. These maintenance messages or data are for example collected from the data of the “maintenance report” via the centralized maintenance system CMS by “spying” on the communications with the printer Printer or the onboard/ground communication. In step 403, the aircraft system (for centralized maintenance) transmits on the avionics bus the Post Flight Report 404 report grouping together the alarms and the maintenance messages of the current flight for printing (Printer) or for transmission to the ground (AGARS, VHF). In step 410, the aircraft interface equipment retrieves the data of the avionics bus and transmits them to the EFB (via USB or Ethernet for example). The EFB decodes and transmits the aircraft data to the applications installed in the EFB. In step 422, the EFB retrieves the data, interprets the avionics protocol (Printer or AGARS, for example by means of a model of avionics protocols 421) and retrieves the correlated alarms and maintenance message (comprising for example information of code and message type). The correlated alarms and Maintenance messages 423 are processed by the EFB: in step 430, the EFB associates the description of the alarms and maintenance data as well as their link (for example hyperlink) with the electronic documentation (for example by means of a file 431 comprising the descriptions and the links of the alarms and maintenance messages. The “logbook”, “maintenance report” and “electronic documentation” functions installed and accessible on the EFB can therefore retrieve the “aircraft status”, the “alarms” and the “maintenance messages” and propose the appropriate maintenance procedures and/or the documents to the pilot and to the maintenance personnel. For example, in step 440, the EFB makes the alarms available to the pilot for example via the “Technical Logbook” application installed on the said EFB. The pilot can select one or more alarms (and for example the aircraft status) by way of the logbook. Finally in step 450, the EFB makes available to the maintenance personnel the maintenance messages correlated with the alarms selected by the pilot in the “Technical Logbook” application as well as with the associated documents. Alternatively, the maintenance personnel can open the selected alarms, access the associated maintenance messages (within the report of the centralized maintenance system) and finally access (directly) the aeroplane documentation.
  • Concerning the mode of collection of the data (401 and 402), a particular embodiment is described hereinafter. A “scraping” operation corresponds to an extraction of information by means of the acquisition of one or more images, and of the subsequent processing of these images. The operation refers to an operation of retrieval or capture of information on a digital object, the said retrieval or capture not being originally scheduled by the digital object. For example, this retrieval of information may comprise the acquisition of one or more images and then the recognition of characters within the captured images.
  • An “opportunistic” information retrieval or evasion or capture operation such as this makes it possible to establish a link between certified avionics systems (that is to say inter alia controlled and regulated, rather closed, the computer security of which is comparatively more controlled or at the very least monitored) and the non-avionics systems (non-certified open systems, that are more prone to computing attacks but correlatively that evolve faster). In a noteworthy manner, the information retrieval or capture operation is unilateral: the extraction of information is performed from the avionics systems to the open systems (and not the reverse). For example, there is no injection of non-avionics data and/or programs into the avionics systems (or else in a controlled manner).
  • In the present avionics context, several embodiments are described. In one embodiment, the pilot or the copilot or some other member of the flight personnel triggers an acquisition of images, for example by means of an EFB electronic tablet equipped with a photographic device. The snapshot is thereafter analysed, cropped, and the captured information is extracted from the image. The pre-established knowledge of the type of image captured allows specific recognition. For example, an alarm displayed on the FWS will be in a pre-established and known format. Accordingly the information capture will be optimized. In a variant, the snapshot will be of video type (that is to say acquisition of a succession of still images, the large number of captured images allowing notably optimization of the information capture and/or robustness to the movements of the user carrying the image acquisition means). According to another embodiment, the image acquisition means are mounted in a fixed manner in the cockpit of the aircraft. By this means, information capture or retrieval can be performed in a continuous manner. According to another embodiment, the image acquisition means can correspond to photographic devices or video cameras fixed on virtual or augmented reality headsets.
  • In this instance, the “alarms” information is available on the pilot's viewing screen. It is also available via the MCDU “Multi Purpose Display Unit” by consulting the reports of the centralized maintenance computer. These two MMI sources allow extraction of the information and its “reinjection” via the EFB. The information of “maintenance message” type is also accessible via the MCDU (by consulting the appropriate reports). Finally, it is possible to undertake the acquisition of images of the malfunctions which are not linked with alarms but which make it possible to back up the pilot's remarks, if any. Although in this case there is no “automatic” correlation with the maintenance messages, this information source will help the understanding and resolution of the maintenance problems.
  • The present invention can be implemented on the basis of hardware and/or software elements. It may be available in the guise of computer program product on a computer readable medium. The medium may be electronic, magnetic, optical or electromagnetic.

Claims (11)

1. A computer implemented method for managing alarm and maintenance messages of an aircraft, comprising the steps of:
collecting information relating to the alarm, aircraft status and maintenance messages;
transmitting the information collected to an electronic device of EFB or electronic flight bag type, the said electronic device being able to correlate the alarm messages with the maintenance messages and to associate the descriptions of the alarms with links and electronic maintenance documents.
2. The method according to claim 1, the step of collecting the information comprising the acquisition of one or more images of the onboard avionics equipment and the subsequent extraction of this information from the said images.
3. The method according to claim 1, the step of collecting the information comprising listening to communications on an avionics bus between a centralized maintenance system CMS and a printing service Printer and/or ground equipment of AGARS or VHF type.
4. The method according to claim 2, further comprising a step of transmitting the data collected from the avionics bus to an EFB or electronic flight bag.
5. The method according to claim 4, further comprising a step of interpretation by the EFB or electronic flight bag of the data collected from the avionics bus by means of a model of avionics protocols.
6. The method according to claim 5, further comprising a step of association by the EFB or electronic flight bag of the description of the alarm and maintenance messages, as well as their link with the electronic documentation.
7. The method according to claim 6, at least one link being a hyperlink to an electronic document.
8. The method according to claim 6, further comprising a step of reception by the EFB or electronic flight bag of a selection of an alarm or maintenance message.
9. The method according to claim 8, the electronic device of EFB type comprising user interface means and the method furthermore comprising a step of making available by the said user interface means one or more appropriate maintenance procedures and/or documents in relation to the alarm or maintenance message selected.
10. A computer program product, comprising code instructions making it possible to perform the steps of the method according to claim 1, when the said program is executed on a computer.
11. A system comprising means for implementing one or more steps of the method according to claim 1.
US14/803,044 2014-07-18 2015-07-18 Processing of aircraft alarm and maintenance messages Active 2035-08-26 US9663242B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR1401622 2014-07-18
FR1401622A FR3023938B1 (en) 2014-07-18 2014-07-18 TREATMENT OF ALARM MESSAGES AND MAINTENANCE OF AN AIRCRAFT

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20160016671A1 true US20160016671A1 (en) 2016-01-21
US9663242B2 US9663242B2 (en) 2017-05-30

Family

ID=51982617

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/803,044 Active 2035-08-26 US9663242B2 (en) 2014-07-18 2015-07-18 Processing of aircraft alarm and maintenance messages

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US9663242B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2975363B1 (en)
FR (1) FR3023938B1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9480010B2 (en) * 2015-02-27 2016-10-25 Airbus Operations Sas Onboard avionic system for communication between an aircraft and the ground and method for managing a radio channel of such a system
EP3312696A3 (en) * 2016-10-24 2018-10-17 The Boeing Company Systems for aircraft message monitoring
US10293955B1 (en) * 2017-10-31 2019-05-21 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for consolidating, ratifying and escalation of uncertified applications notifications
EP3654313A1 (en) * 2018-11-16 2020-05-20 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for saving data to a portable computing device
US20210316868A1 (en) * 2018-06-01 2021-10-14 4031202 Canada Inc. Air quality improvement for pressurized aircraft
FR3115911A1 (en) * 2020-11-04 2022-05-06 Airbus Helicopters Surveillance architecture of at least one aircraft and associated surveillance method

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9824595B1 (en) * 2016-11-15 2017-11-21 Jeremiah T. Pate Aircraft monitoring and analysis using edge computing
US10991255B2 (en) 2018-04-05 2021-04-27 Ge Aviation Systems Llc Providing an open interface to a flight management system
CN113920767B (en) * 2021-10-22 2023-02-24 南京智慧交通信息股份有限公司 Operation and maintenance alarming method, system, device and computer readable storage medium

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030003872A1 (en) * 2001-02-13 2003-01-02 Brinkley Roger R. Methods and apparatus for wireless upload and download of aircraft data
US20050149238A1 (en) * 2004-01-05 2005-07-07 Arinc Inc. System and method for monitoring and reporting aircraft quick access recorder data
US20080215194A1 (en) * 2006-12-08 2008-09-04 Thales Formulation of a preventive maintenance message relating to the functional degradations of an aircraft
US20100152924A1 (en) * 2008-12-12 2010-06-17 Honeywell International Inc. Next generation electronic flight bag
US7788002B2 (en) * 2005-08-08 2010-08-31 The Boeing Company Fault data management
US20120218127A1 (en) * 2012-05-10 2012-08-30 Christopher Finley Kroen Terminal Intelligent Monitoring System
US20140207314A1 (en) * 2012-03-27 2014-07-24 Dassault Aviation Display system for an aircraft and associated method

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4943919A (en) * 1988-10-17 1990-07-24 The Boeing Company Central maintenance computer system and fault data handling method
US8732233B2 (en) * 2005-07-13 2014-05-20 The Boeing Company Integrating portable electronic devices with electronic flight bag systems installed in aircraft

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030003872A1 (en) * 2001-02-13 2003-01-02 Brinkley Roger R. Methods and apparatus for wireless upload and download of aircraft data
US20050149238A1 (en) * 2004-01-05 2005-07-07 Arinc Inc. System and method for monitoring and reporting aircraft quick access recorder data
US7788002B2 (en) * 2005-08-08 2010-08-31 The Boeing Company Fault data management
US20080215194A1 (en) * 2006-12-08 2008-09-04 Thales Formulation of a preventive maintenance message relating to the functional degradations of an aircraft
US20100152924A1 (en) * 2008-12-12 2010-06-17 Honeywell International Inc. Next generation electronic flight bag
US20140207314A1 (en) * 2012-03-27 2014-07-24 Dassault Aviation Display system for an aircraft and associated method
US20120218127A1 (en) * 2012-05-10 2012-08-30 Christopher Finley Kroen Terminal Intelligent Monitoring System

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9480010B2 (en) * 2015-02-27 2016-10-25 Airbus Operations Sas Onboard avionic system for communication between an aircraft and the ground and method for managing a radio channel of such a system
EP3312696A3 (en) * 2016-10-24 2018-10-17 The Boeing Company Systems for aircraft message monitoring
US10325421B2 (en) 2016-10-24 2019-06-18 The Boeing Company Systems and methods for aircraft message monitoring
US10293955B1 (en) * 2017-10-31 2019-05-21 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for consolidating, ratifying and escalation of uncertified applications notifications
US20210316868A1 (en) * 2018-06-01 2021-10-14 4031202 Canada Inc. Air quality improvement for pressurized aircraft
US12116137B2 (en) * 2018-06-01 2024-10-15 4031202 Canada Inc. Air quality improvement for pressurized aircraft
EP3654313A1 (en) * 2018-11-16 2020-05-20 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for saving data to a portable computing device
FR3115911A1 (en) * 2020-11-04 2022-05-06 Airbus Helicopters Surveillance architecture of at least one aircraft and associated surveillance method
EP3996056A1 (en) 2020-11-04 2022-05-11 Airbus Helicopters Architecture for monitoring at least one aircraft and associated monitoring method
US11699307B2 (en) 2020-11-04 2023-07-11 Airbus Helicopters Architecture for monitoring at least one aircraft and associated monitoring method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2975363B1 (en) 2017-06-21
EP2975363A1 (en) 2016-01-20
FR3023938A1 (en) 2016-01-22
FR3023938B1 (en) 2016-08-26
US9663242B2 (en) 2017-05-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9663242B2 (en) Processing of aircraft alarm and maintenance messages
EP3210891B1 (en) Method and system for integration of portable devices with flight deck displays
US10109117B2 (en) Aircraft performance computation
US9583008B2 (en) Managing data exchange between an avionic core and an open world device
US9171273B2 (en) Integrated electronic checklist display system
US20130124018A1 (en) Method and apparatus for using electronic flight bag (efb) to enable flight operations quality assurance (foqa)
EP3772030A1 (en) Systems and methods to utilize flight monitoring data
US20180044034A1 (en) Auxiliary Security System for Aircraft Black Box System
EP2430399B1 (en) Aircraft dispatch information
US9002571B1 (en) Automated preflight walk around tool
FR3023911A1 (en) DATA PROCESSING OF A FLIGHT PLAN
US9087419B2 (en) Method and apparatus for remote e-Enabled aircraft solution management using an electronic flight bag (EFB)
CN102124486A (en) Apparatus, and associated method, for tracking aircraft status
EP3477619A1 (en) System and method for consolidating, ratifying and escalation of uncertified applications notifications
CN110765180A (en) Method and device for checking order association
US20090055767A1 (en) Method and system for synchronizing a display context
US9650158B2 (en) Centralized maintenance device for aircraft
US9260198B2 (en) Display system for aircraft cockpit
WO2013147991A1 (en) Information handling for aircraft flight decks
US20120004794A1 (en) Device and Method for Task Management for Piloting an Aircraft
Liu et al. Design of Real-Time Flight Data Analysis System Based on the ATG Network
US20200023992A1 (en) Network for managing an aircraft minimum equipment list
Schulze et al. Proposal of a Future Flight Management System Architecture Based on Reallocation of Functionality
US20240308692A1 (en) Service issue forecasting that adapts to aircraft operations
EP4432177A1 (en) Service issue forecasting that adapts to aircraft operations

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: THALES, FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FOURNIER, FRANCOIS;PEYRAT, STEPHANIE;HUYNH, REMI;SIGNING DATES FROM 20150921 TO 20151109;REEL/FRAME:037122/0890

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4