US20150347635A1 - Method of designing a strong lightweight laminate - Google Patents

Method of designing a strong lightweight laminate Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20150347635A1
US20150347635A1 US14/721,372 US201514721372A US2015347635A1 US 20150347635 A1 US20150347635 A1 US 20150347635A1 US 201514721372 A US201514721372 A US 201514721372A US 2015347635 A1 US2015347635 A1 US 2015347635A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
thickness
interlayer
laminate
glass
outer layer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/721,372
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Yuki SHITANOKI
Stephen J. Bennison
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Performance Materials NA Inc
Original Assignee
EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co filed Critical EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Priority to US14/721,372 priority Critical patent/US20150347635A1/en
Assigned to E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY reassignment E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BENNISON, STEPHEN J., SHITANKOKI, YUKI
Publication of US20150347635A1 publication Critical patent/US20150347635A1/en
Assigned to PERFORMANCE MATERIALS NA, INC. reassignment PERFORMANCE MATERIALS NA, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B43/00Operations specially adapted for layered products and not otherwise provided for, e.g. repairing; Apparatus therefor
    • G06F17/50
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B17/00Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres
    • B32B17/06Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material
    • B32B17/10Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material of synthetic resin
    • B32B17/10005Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material of synthetic resin laminated safety glass or glazing
    • B32B17/10009Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material of synthetic resin laminated safety glass or glazing characterized by the number, the constitution or treatment of glass sheets
    • B32B17/10036Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material of synthetic resin laminated safety glass or glazing characterized by the number, the constitution or treatment of glass sheets comprising two outer glass sheets
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B17/00Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres
    • B32B17/06Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material
    • B32B17/10Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material of synthetic resin
    • B32B17/10005Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material of synthetic resin laminated safety glass or glazing
    • B32B17/1055Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material of synthetic resin laminated safety glass or glazing characterized by the resin layer, i.e. interlayer
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B17/00Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres
    • B32B17/06Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material
    • B32B17/10Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material of synthetic resin
    • B32B17/10005Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material of synthetic resin laminated safety glass or glazing
    • B32B17/1055Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material of synthetic resin laminated safety glass or glazing characterized by the resin layer, i.e. interlayer
    • B32B17/10743Layered products essentially comprising sheet glass, or glass, slag, or like fibres comprising glass as the main or only constituent of a layer, next to another layer of a specific material of synthetic resin laminated safety glass or glazing characterized by the resin layer, i.e. interlayer containing acrylate (co)polymers or salts thereof
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B39/00Layout of apparatus or plants, e.g. modular laminating systems
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B2307/00Properties of the layers or laminate
    • B32B2307/70Other properties
    • B32B2307/718Weight, e.g. weight per square meter

Definitions

  • a method of designing a strong lightweight laminate uses effective thickness principles to calculate the structure of a laminate that has equal strength and lighter weight compared to a target monolith.
  • safety glass laminates are designed.
  • the safety glass laminates have lower areal weight at equal strength, compared to a monolithic glass sheet of thickness equal to that of the safety glass laminate.
  • reinforced concrete uses the high strength and flexibility of steel bars to balance the brittleness of concrete.
  • a polymeric interlayer having a good tensile strength provides needed toughness to a glass laminate.
  • the basic material is selected. Based on its physical properties and the requirements of the structure, a thickness is selected for a monolith of the basic material. For example, the design of a large storage tank may require stainless steel having a certain thickness.
  • a candidate for an interlayer is selected, for example a rigid polymer such as polycarbonate, or a lightweight ceramic.
  • a shear transfer coefficient ⁇ is calculated for the steel/interlayer/steel laminate using the Woelfel-Bennison approach described in the following references, for example: Calderone I., Davies P. S., Bennison S. J., Huang X., Gang L.
  • the intersection of the value of the shear transfer coefficient ⁇ and the curve for the targeted weight reduction provides the ratio s of the thicknesses of the interlayer and the outer layers.
  • Another mathematical relationship provides the thicknesses of the individual layers. Because the Woelfel-Bennison approach is followed, the strength of the steel/interlayer/steel laminate is the same as that of the monolithic steel at equal thickness.
  • FIG. A is a cross-sectional view of a monolithic sheet.
  • FIG. B is a cross-sectional view of a laminate.
  • the term “about” means that amounts, sizes, formulations, parameters, and other quantities and characteristics are not and need not be exact, but may be approximate and/or larger or smaller, as desired, reflecting tolerances, conversion factors, rounding off, measurement error and the like, and other factors known to those of skill in the art. In general, an amount, size, formulation, parameter or other quantity or characteristic is “about” or “approximate” whether or not expressly stated to be such.
  • ranges set forth herein include their endpoints unless expressly stated otherwise in limited circumstances. Further, when an amount, concentration, or other value or parameter is given as a range, one or more preferred ranges or a list of upper preferable values and lower preferable values, this is to be understood as specifically disclosing all ranges formed from any pair of any upper range limit or preferred value and any lower range limit or preferred value, regardless of whether such pairs are separately disclosed.
  • the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “containing,” “characterized by,” “has,” “having” or any other synonym or variation thereof refer to a non-exclusive inclusion.
  • a process, method, article, or apparatus that is described as comprising a particular list of elements is not necessarily limited to those particularly listed elements but may further include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
  • indefinite articles “a” and “an” are employed to describe elements and components of the invention. The use of these articles means that one or at least one of these elements or components is present. Although these articles are conventionally employed to signify that the modified noun is a singular noun, as used herein the articles “a” and “an” also include the plural, unless otherwise stated in specific instances. Similarly, the definite article “the”, as used herein, also signifies that the modified noun may be singular or plural, again unless otherwise stated in specific instances.
  • the term “monolithic”, as used herein, refers to a sheet, layer or block fabricated of a single bulk material and having uniform properties throughout its mass, for example a glass sheet, a concrete layer, or a metal block.
  • laminate refers to a structure having at least two layers that are adhered or bonded firmly to each other.
  • the layers may be adhered to each other directly or indirectly. “Directly” means that there is no additional material, such as an interlayer or an adhesive layer, between the two layers, and “indirectly” means that there is additional material between the two layers.
  • area density refers to the weight of a laminate divided by its projected surface area.
  • the projected surface area is the product of the length and width of the laminate, and does not include the surface areas of the laminate's sides and bottom.
  • the term “effective thickness,” as used herein refers to the actual thickness of a monolithic glass beam having a bending stiffness that is equal to that of a laminated beam having the structure “material/interlayer/material”.
  • the effective thickness can be used in place of the laminate's actual thickness in analytic equations for the deformation of laminated beams.
  • the mechanical properties of laminates having the structure “material/interlayer/material” are modelled using effective thickness principles. More specifically, effective thickness principles are based on the shear coupling ⁇ between the two plies of material through the interlayer.
  • the shear coupling ⁇ depends primarily on the interlayer's shear stiffness or modulus, the interlayer's material properties, and the laminate's geometry and length scale.
  • material/polymer/material laminates are lighter than monolithic sheets having the same thickness.
  • Equation (A) is a determinant equation describing the relationship of the ratio s of interlayer/material thickness and that of the moduli of the interlayer E int and the material E mtl .
  • the monolith 100 may be made of any basic or “structural” material including, without limitation, glass; metal; ceramic; concrete; minerals such as granite, marble, limestone, and mica; wood; composites of wood with polymers, for example cardboard and paper; cloth, for example nonwoven fiber mats; polymers; and composites of minerals and polymers.
  • glass as used herein includes window glass, plate glass, silicate glass, sheet glass, low iron glass, tempered glass, tempered CeO-free glass, float glass, colored glass, specialty glass (such as glass that includes ingredients to control, e.g., solar heating), coated glass (such as glass sputtered with metals (e.g., silver or indium tin oxide) for solar control purposes), E-glass, Toroglass, and SolexiaTM glass (available from PPG Industries, Inc., of Pittsburgh, Pa.).
  • specialty glasses are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,615,989; 5,173,212; 5,264,286; 6,150,028; 6,340,646; 6,461,736; and 6,468,934, for example.
  • the outer layers 21 and 23 of the laminate 200 are made of the same structural material that is used in the monolith 100 .
  • Glass is a preferred rigid structural material.
  • the laminate 200 need not be symmetrical, that is, the thickness of the first outer layer 21 need not be equal to that of the second outer layer 23 .
  • the interlayer 22 comprises a material that whose properties complement those of the structural material in the outer layers in some way. For example, a polymeric interlayer having a good tensile strength provides needed toughness to a safety glass laminate. Similarly, a polymeric interlayer having a good viscoelasticity can compensate brittleness of glass materials and add safety performance to glazing, for example by preventing the scattering of glass pieces upon breakage.
  • Suitable materials for the interlayer include the materials that are suitable for use in the monolith 100 . Also suitable are less rigid materials, such as for example polymers having a modulus of 200 MPa to 600 MPa.
  • Equation (A), above may be used to identify materials that are suitable for use in the methods described herein. Specifically, Equation (A) may be used to identify a suitable range of moduli for candidate materials, based on the modulus of one selected material and in light of the parameter s, the ratio of layer thicknesses in the laminate 200 .
  • Polymers are preferred interlayer materials, and particularly preferred are polycarbonates; polystyrenes; silicone elastomers; epoxy resins; polystyrenes; polyvinylchlorides; polyurethanes; polyethylene homopolymers and copolymers of ethylene with other alkenes, including metallocene-catalyzed materials such as linear low density polyethylenes; polyolefin block elastomers; ethylene acid copolymers such as those available under the trademark Nucrel® from E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company of Wilmington, Del.
  • DuPont ionomers of ethylene acid copolymers such as those available from DuPont under the trademark SentryGlas®; poly(vinyl acetals) including poly(vinyl butyrals) such as those available from Kuraray America, Inc., of Houston, Tex., under the trademark Butacite®; copolymers of ethylene with polar comonomers such as vinyl acetate (for example, those available from DuPont under the trademark Elvax®) and alkyl (meth)acrylates including methyl acrylate and butyl acrylate (for example, those available from DuPont under the trademark Elvaloy®).
  • SentryGlas® poly(vinyl acetals) including poly(vinyl butyrals)
  • Butacite® copolymers of ethylene with polar comonomers
  • vinyl acetate for example, those available from DuPont under the trademark Elvax®
  • the effective thickness principles described herein apply to a wide variety of laminates comprising a wide variety of materials.
  • the following discussion focusses on glass laminates having the structure “glass/interlayer/glass”, wherein the interlayer is polymeric.
  • the shear modulus of interlayer 22 , G is obtained by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) followed by time-temperature superposition and calculation of shear relaxation modulus.
  • DMA dynamic mechanical analysis
  • One specific methodology for measuring the shear modulus is described in S. J. Bennison, A. Jagota, and C. A. Smith, “Fracture of glass/poly.vinyl butyral/.Butacite®/laminates in biaxial flexure”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc . 1999; 82(7); 1761-1770.
  • the parameters h and t are not determined at this step; however, they do not have a strong effect on the shear transfer coefficient ⁇ . Therefore, these calculations use 1 ⁇ 3 of the thickness of the target monolithic glass 100 thickness as tentative values for h and t.
  • a desired weight reduction can be selected based on design criteria. Again, the weight reduction is the difference between the areal weight of the laminate 200 and the areal weight of the monolith 100 .
  • a value for thickness ratio s can be selected from the graphs in FIGS. 1 and 2 . To maintain deflection performance equal to that of the monolith 100 (deflection matching), use the graph of FIG. 1 . To maintain breakage resistance equal to that of the monolith 100 (stress matching), use the graph of FIG. 2 .
  • the effective thickness h ef of the laminate 200 is determined using Equations (2) and (3).
  • the targeted effective thickness h ef can be used to calculate the exact thickness of outer layer thickness h necessary to achieve target stiffness, using Equations (2′) and (3′).
  • a structure for laminate 200 is selected whose effective thickness is same or larger than that of target monolithic glass.
  • the h and t determined in this approach are not necessarily viable in terms of commercial availability. Therefore, a practical design strategy may require that the layer thicknesses h and t be determined via an iterative process or otherwise fine-tuned.
  • a desired weight reduction can be selected based on design criteria.
  • a value for thickness ratio s can be selected from the graphs in FIGS. 3( a,b ) and 4 ( a,b ).
  • FIG. 4( a ) is used when the load is applied only from the thicker glass side of the laminate 200 .
  • FIG. 4 ( b ) is used when the load is applied only from the thinner glass side. If the load is applied from both sides of the laminate 200 , use the area above the “discriminant line” in FIG. 4( a ), or the area below the “discriminant line” in FIG. 4 ( b ).
  • FIG. 3( a ) is used when the load is applied only from the thicker glass side of the laminate 200 .
  • FIG. 3( a ) is used when the load is applied only from the thicker glass side of the laminate 200 .
  • 3( b ) is used when the load is applied only from the thinner glass side. If the load is applied from both sides of the laminate 200 , use the area above the “discriminant line” in FIG. 3( a ), or the area below the “discriminant line” in FIG. 3( b ).
  • the effective thickness h ef of the laminate 200 is determined using Equations (5) and (6).
  • Equation (5) For deflection matching, use Equation (5).
  • Equation (6) For calculations of the maximum glass bending stress, use Equation (6).
  • a 4 and a 5 may be calculated from Equation (7′):
  • Equation (7) is used when the load is applied only from thicker glass side of the glass.
  • Equation (7′) is used when the load is applied only from the thinner glass side.
  • the targeted effective thickness h ef can be used to calculate the exact thickness of outer layer thickness h necessary to achieve target stiffness, using Equations (5′) and (5′).
  • h h ef ; w a 1 ⁇ s 2 + a 2 ⁇ s + a 3 3 ( 5 ′ )
  • h h ef ; ⁇ ⁇ a 4 ⁇ s + a 5 a 1 ⁇ s 2 + a 2 ⁇ s + a 3 ( 6 ′ )
  • a structure for laminate 200 is selected whose effective thickness is same or larger than that of the targeted glass monolith.
  • a desired weight reduction can be selected based on design criteria.
  • a value for thickness ratio s can be selected from the graphs in FIGS. 5( a,b ) and 6 ( a,b ).
  • FIG. 6( a ) is used when the load is applied only from the thicker glass side of the laminate 200 .
  • FIG. 6( b ) is used when the load is applied only from the thinner glass side. If the load is applied from both sides of the laminate 200 , use the area above the “discriminant line” in FIG. 6( a ), or the area below the “discriminant line” in FIG. 6( b ).
  • FIG. 5( a ) is used when the load is applied only from the thicker glass side of the laminate 200 .
  • FIG. 5( a ) is used when the load is applied only from the thicker glass side of the laminate 200 .
  • 5( b ) is used when the load is applied only from the thinner glass side. If the load is applied from both sides of the laminate 200 , use the area above the “discriminant line” in FIG. 5( a ), or the area below the “discriminant line” in FIG. 5( b ).
  • Equation (7) governs when the load is applied only from the side of the laminate 200 on which the glass layer 21 or 23 is the thicker layer
  • Equation (7′) governs when the load is applied only from the side on which the glass layer 21 or 23 is the thinner layer.
  • Equation (7) applies when employing s in the area above the “discriminant line”, or use the equation (7′) when employing s in the area below the “discriminant line” in FIG. 6( b ).
  • the targeted effective thickness h ef can be used in Equation (5′) or (6′) to calculate the exact thickness of outer layer thickness h necessary to achieve the target stiffness.
  • a structure for laminate 200 is selected whose effective thickness is same or larger than that of the targeted glass monolith. The same provisos set forth above with respect to smaller values of k also apply in this instance.
  • Equation (9) pertains:
  • Equation (8) and (9) a 1 through a 6 are calculated using Equation (7), above.
  • Equation (11) pertains:
  • the discriminant line in stress matching is generated by Equation 12.
  • articles comprising the laminates 200 designed using the methods provided herein.
  • the articles include, but are not limited to, buildings; other architectural structures; building panels; other components of architectural structures; storage tanks; vehicles such as boats, trains, airplanes, automobiles and trucks and components of the vehicles, such as, for example, door panels; and glass laminates for use as windshields, architectural safety glass, photovoltaic modules, and structural glass.
  • Smaller objects such as housings for computer equipment and household appliances such as microwave ovens, may comprise laminates of the invention.
  • handheld objects such as smart phones and tablet computers, in which may the laminates may be touch screens or other components, such as housings or circuit boards.
  • Test specimens of glass laminates shown in Table 1 were prepared. Standard soda-lime float glass was used for the glass plies, and DuPontTM SentryGlas® was used for the interlayer.
  • a four point bending test ( FIG. 8 ) was conducted using a general universal testing machine (Instron 5965). Deflection was measured by a linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) (Instron 2601-093) and stress was measured by strain gauges (Kyowa) located in the sample center of the bottom of the lower glass surface. Maximum principal stress was calculated by the Rosette analysis. Loading arm speed is 1 mm/min.
  • LVDT linear variable differential transformer
  • Comparable weight reduction percentage was calculated by the equations above from thickness ratio s and shear transfer coefficient ⁇ .
  • Shear transfer coefficient, s, and weight reduction percentages of laminate Nos. 1 to 5 in Table 1 fall within the range of FIGS. 1 and 2 , which demonstrates the consistency of the methodology presented herein with the results of actual experiments.
  • 1.1 mm thin glass is commercially available and the interlayer's thickness can be flexibly adjusted or selected from a variety of commercial offerings, 1.1 mm glass/2.1 mm SentryGlas®/1.1 mm glass is selected to be the best structure. About 25% weight reduction from 4 mm monolithic glass is confirmed from the following calculation.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)
  • Joining Of Glass To Other Materials (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
US14/721,372 2014-05-27 2015-05-26 Method of designing a strong lightweight laminate Abandoned US20150347635A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/721,372 US20150347635A1 (en) 2014-05-27 2015-05-26 Method of designing a strong lightweight laminate

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201462003283P 2014-05-27 2014-05-27
US14/721,372 US20150347635A1 (en) 2014-05-27 2015-05-26 Method of designing a strong lightweight laminate

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150347635A1 true US20150347635A1 (en) 2015-12-03

Family

ID=53373629

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/721,372 Abandoned US20150347635A1 (en) 2014-05-27 2015-05-26 Method of designing a strong lightweight laminate

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20150347635A1 (enExample)
JP (1) JP2017522200A (enExample)
KR (1) KR20170012252A (enExample)
DE (1) DE112015002478T5 (enExample)
WO (1) WO2015183868A1 (enExample)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9812111B1 (en) * 2016-10-19 2017-11-07 Solutia Inc. Sound insulation panels having high interlayer thickness factors

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003055007A (ja) * 2001-08-10 2003-02-26 Univ Kanazawa 異厚合わせガラスおよびそれを用いたガラス構造体
FR2936511B1 (fr) * 2008-10-01 2011-06-24 Saint Gobain Procede de fabrication d'un vitrage feuillete
WO2010102282A1 (en) * 2009-03-06 2010-09-10 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Light weight glass laminates
FR2944521B1 (fr) * 2009-04-20 2012-08-24 Saint Gobain Procede de dimensionnement d'un vitrage feuillete et vitrage feuillete
DE102009017805B4 (de) * 2009-04-20 2012-05-16 Saint-Gobain Sekurit Deutschland Gmbh & Co. Kg Transparentes Verbundglas und dessen Verwendung
FR2945765B1 (fr) * 2009-05-19 2011-06-24 Saint Gobain Procede de selection d'un intercalaire pour un amortisseur vibro-acoustique, intercalaire pour un amortisseur vibro-acoustique et vitrage comprenant un tel intercalaire.
FR2947257B1 (fr) * 2009-06-30 2011-06-24 Saint Gobain Procede de fabrication d'un element de vitrage feuillete
US10173396B2 (en) * 2012-03-09 2019-01-08 Solutia Inc. High rigidity interlayers and light weight laminated multiple layer panels

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9812111B1 (en) * 2016-10-19 2017-11-07 Solutia Inc. Sound insulation panels having high interlayer thickness factors
US10016960B2 (en) 2016-10-19 2018-07-10 Solutia Inc. Sound insulation panels having high interlayer thickness factors
US10800145B2 (en) 2016-10-19 2020-10-13 Solutia Inc. Sound insulation panels having high interlayer thickness factors

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE112015002478T5 (de) 2017-03-02
JP2017522200A (ja) 2017-08-10
WO2015183868A1 (en) 2015-12-03
KR20170012252A (ko) 2017-02-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8053079B2 (en) Sheet glass laminate structure and mulitiple glass laminate structure
Liu et al. Interlaminar failure behavior of GLARE laminates under short-beam three-point-bending load
EP2542407B2 (en) Lamination of electrochromic device to glass substrates
Belis et al. Failure mechanisms and residual capacity of annealed glass/SGP laminated beams at room temperature
US20200262184A1 (en) Asymmetric glass laminates
Galuppi et al. Enhanced Effective Thickness for laminated glass beams and plates under torsion
CN104755264A (zh) 薄的叠层玻璃
KR20180038993A (ko) 곡면 접합 유리 및 곡면 접합 유리의 제조 방법
Shim et al. Improvement in ballistic impact resistance of a transparent bulletproof material laminated with strengthened soda-lime silicate glass
Achintha et al. Characterisation of the mechanical behaviour of annealed glass–GFRP hybrid beams
Hänig et al. Experimental investigations and numerical simulations of innovative lightweight glass–plastic-composite panels made of thin glass and PMMA
Vedrtnam et al. Experimental and simulation studies on fracture of laminated glass having polyvinyl butyral and ethyl vinyl acetate interlayers of different critical thicknesses due to impact load
Sable et al. Correlation between numerical and experimental tests of laminated glass panels with visco-elastic interlayer
Sable et al. Influence of EVA, PVB and Ionoplast interlayers on the structural behaviour and fracture pattern of laminated glass
Alsaed et al. Polyvinyl Butyral (PVB) and Ethyl Vinyl Acetate (EVA) as a Binding Material for Laminated Glass.
US20150347635A1 (en) Method of designing a strong lightweight laminate
Fam et al. Structural performance of laminated and unlaminated tempered glass under monotonic transverse loading
Weimar et al. Research on thin glass-polycarbonate composite panels
Vedrtnam et al. Comparative evaluation and regression analysis of PVB, EVA, and SG inter layered laminated glass hardness
Vedrtnam et al. Laminated glass: Classification, characterization, and future perspectives
Udi et al. Analysis of Environmental Stresses on the Mechanical Properties of Laminated Glass Composites: A Review of Experimental Results and Outlook.
Weller et al. Glass-steel beams as structural members of façades
Vedrtnam et al. Ring-on-ring testing of laminated glass with polyvinyl butyral and ethyl vinyl acetate inter-layers of different critical thicknesses
Balan et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of float glass–GFRP hybrid beams
Weimar et al. Development of Thin Glass‐Polycarbonate Composite Panels

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SHITANKOKI, YUKI;BENNISON, STEPHEN J.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20150611 TO 20150903;REEL/FRAME:036542/0465

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

AS Assignment

Owner name: PERFORMANCE MATERIALS NA, INC., MICHIGAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:050149/0728

Effective date: 20190328

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION