US20150071328A1 - Peak detection method using blind source separation - Google Patents
Peak detection method using blind source separation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20150071328A1 US20150071328A1 US14/025,763 US201314025763A US2015071328A1 US 20150071328 A1 US20150071328 A1 US 20150071328A1 US 201314025763 A US201314025763 A US 201314025763A US 2015071328 A1 US2015071328 A1 US 2015071328A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- processor
- signal
- instructions
- relation
- sequence
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W16/00—Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
- H04W16/14—Spectrum sharing arrangements between different networks
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B1/00—Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
- H04B1/06—Receivers
- H04B1/10—Means associated with receiver for limiting or suppressing noise or interference
- H04B1/1027—Means associated with receiver for limiting or suppressing noise or interference assessing signal quality or detecting noise/interference for the received signal
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B1/00—Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
- H04B1/69—Spread spectrum techniques
- H04B1/7163—Spread spectrum techniques using impulse radio
- H04B1/719—Interference-related aspects
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L27/00—Modulated-carrier systems
- H04L27/0004—Modulated-carrier systems using wavelets
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L27/00—Modulated-carrier systems
- H04L27/0006—Assessment of spectral gaps suitable for allocating digitally modulated signals, e.g. for carrier allocation in cognitive radio
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2218/00—Aspects of pattern recognition specially adapted for signal processing
- G06F2218/02—Preprocessing
- G06F2218/04—Denoising
- G06F2218/06—Denoising by applying a scale-space analysis, e.g. using wavelet analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2218/00—Aspects of pattern recognition specially adapted for signal processing
- G06F2218/08—Feature extraction
- G06F2218/10—Feature extraction by analysing the shape of a waveform, e.g. extracting parameters relating to peaks
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2218/00—Aspects of pattern recognition specially adapted for signal processing
- G06F2218/22—Source localisation; Inverse modelling
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B1/00—Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
- H04B1/06—Receivers
- H04B1/10—Means associated with receiver for limiting or suppressing noise or interference
- H04B1/1027—Means associated with receiver for limiting or suppressing noise or interference assessing signal quality or detecting noise/interference for the received signal
- H04B2001/1045—Adjacent-channel interference
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B2201/00—Indexing scheme relating to details of transmission systems not covered by a single group of H04B3/00 - H04B13/00
- H04B2201/69—Orthogonal indexing scheme relating to spread spectrum techniques in general
- H04B2201/692—Cognitive radio
Definitions
- the present invention relates to ultra-wideband signal processing, and particularly to a peak detection method using blind source separation.
- CR Cognitive radio
- CRs front end architecture is dependent on spectrum utilization. For spectrum utilization under 20%, a wideband architecture for the CR front end is suggested. The observed spectrum consists of numerous frequency bands. Power spectral density (PSD) within each frequency band is smooth. Transition of PSD from one band to another band is considered as irregularities in PSD. Such irregularities can be studied using wavelet transforms, which are capable of characterizing local regularity of a signal.
- PSD Power spectral density
- a wavelet transform on an incoming signal results in peaks at locations where signal PSD is irregular. Irregularity could be a jump or a fall in PSD, depicting the change of frequency band. Jump depicts that the next user has higher PSD than the current one, whereas fall shows that the next user has lower PSD than the current one, or it could also be a vacant band. When the incoming signal is noisy, these peaks are accompanied by noisy peaks. In some known methods, multiscale wavelet products are used to extract true peak information. This technique requires multiplication of various wavelet transform gradients (for the same signal).
- the peak detection method using blind source separation extracts true peaks from noisy peaks in a more robust way that does not require any a priori information.
- Information regarding true peak location is obtained by thresholding the output of a wavelet transform. The value of the threshold is dependent on noise variance. While noise variance is normally unknown, the method implements a blind source separation technique to calculate the noise variance.
- the blind source separation technique does not require information of the incoming signal or the channel noise, and hence is suitable for CR peak detection.
- FIG. 1 is a chart showing PSD (power spectral density) of an incoming signal.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating the peak detection method using blind source separation according to the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a plot showing success ratio versus SNR for the peak detection method using blind source separation according to the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a plot showing probability of detection versus SNR for the peak detection method using blind source separation according to the present invention.
- embodiments of the present method can comprise software or firmware code executing on a computer, a microcontroller, a microprocessor, or a DSP processor; state machines implemented in application specific or programmable logic; or numerous other forms without departing from the spirit and scope of the method described herein.
- the present method can be provided as a computer program, which includes a non-transitory machine-readable medium having stored thereon instructions that can be used to program a computer (or other electronic devices) to perform a process according to the method.
- the machine-readable medium can include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, flash memory, or other type of media or machine-readable medium suitable for storing electronic instructions.
- the peak detection method using blind source separation extracts true peaks from noisy peaks in a more robust way that does not require any a priori information.
- Performing spectrum sensing using a wavelet edge detection technique provides edges (peaks) that contain information regarding the start and end locations of a frequency band. In the presence of noise, there is a mixture of true peaks and noisy peaks. Knowledge of noise variance is required to extract true peaks efficiently from the mixture. Information regarding true peak location is obtained by thresholding the output of the wavelet transform. The value of the threshold is dependent on noise variance. Noise variance is also normally unknown.
- a blind source separation technique is implemented to calculate the noise variance. Blind source separation does not require information of the incoming signal or the channel noise, and hence is suitable for CR peak detection.
- PSD power spectral density
- ⁇ s (f) is the dilated wavelet smoothing function and “*” defines the convolution operator.
- the variable ‘s’ depicts the dilation factor of the wavelet smoothing function, and it takes values in terms of power of 2.
- a common example of a wavelet smoothing function is Gaussian function.
- the first derivative of the wavelet transform can be used, which is given as:
- Local maxima of the first derivative provide information of edges, which corresponds to the start and end locations of a frequency band.
- the next step is to calculate the PSD within each band and decide about the presence or absence of a primary user. Calculation of the PSD is given as follows:
- ⁇ n 1 f n - f n - 1 ⁇ ⁇ f n - 1 f n ⁇ S r ⁇ ( f ) ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ f ( 3 )
- Blind source separation has found very useful applications in the area of signal processing and neural networks. Blind source separation does not require knowledge of the channel and the transmitted signal. In fact, its goal is to recover the unobserved signals, i.e., ‘source signals’, from a set of observed signals.
- source signals i.e., ‘source signals’
- the term ‘Blind’ refers to the fact that the source signals are not observed, and the fact that there is no a priori knowledge available about the mixing system.
- the maximum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) can be achieved when sources are separated completely.
- the cost function of this algorithm is based on the SNR definition.
- This algorithm achieves a low computational complexity solution based on an instantaneous mixing method. The assumption is that source signals come from different sources and could be considered as statistically independent.
- the received signal can be written as:
- x(t) is a vector of mixed signals.
- the SNR may be defined as:
- the received signal can be written in terms of its sample covariance matrix, i.e.:
- ⁇ 2 is the noise variance
- the blind source separation algorithm can calculate the un-mixing matrix for the received signal. Using un-mixing matrix and received signal, we can estimate the transmitted signal as shown in equation (6) and its corresponding sample covariance matrix. Noise variance can be calculated as:
- signal x is the output of the wavelet edge detection technique. Noise variance is not sufficient to threshold one such signal.
- the threshold value can be written as:
- the present peak detection method 200 is illustrated in FIG. 2 and summarized in Table 1.
- Peak Detection Method Step Action 202 Calculate the sample mean of received signal. 204 Apply edge detection technique to the received wideband signal to get the peak signal that contains information regarding frequency band boundaries. 206 Apply blind source separation technique on peak signal to calculate W. 208 Calculate noise variance using equation (10). 210 Calculate threshold value T using equation (11). 212 Threshold the output of edge detection technique using T. 214 Compute the frequency band boundary locations (i.e., start and end) iteratively from the output of previous step. 216 Compute PSD within these frequency band boundaries.
- the success ratio is defined as the probability of accurately detecting the frequency boundaries (i.e., the start and end of a frequency band) using the thresholding method, as described earlier.
- the probability of detection is based on the PSD value calculation within each band.
- Plot 300 of FIG. 3 shows the calculated success ratio for different SNR values and its comparison with related art multiscale wavelet product techniques. The present method showed improvement of 4 dB over the related techniques for a success ratio greater than 90%.
- Plot 400 of FIG. 4 shows the probability of detection versus SNR curve. The result shows that the present method gained 8 dB compared to the related techniques for a probability of detection greater than 90%.
- noisy peaks are suppressed by thresholding the signal.
- This process directly affects the probability of detection of a primary user when performing spectrum sensing.
- the present method gained 4 dB in term of success ratio, and 8 dB in the probability of detection compared to the multiscale wavelet products technique, hence allowing cognitive radio devices to work efficiently on low power in a wideband regime.
- the present method will capture the interest of telecommunication equipment vendors, mobile phone manufacturers, and research institutes who are interested in bringing new era of wireless communication devices.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
- Noise Elimination (AREA)
- Monitoring And Testing Of Transmission In General (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates to ultra-wideband signal processing, and particularly to a peak detection method using blind source separation.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- Efficient utilization of radio spectrum has gained recent attention. It has been observed that utilization of spectrum by licensed wireless systems, for instance TV broadcasting, is quite low. Transition from voice only data services to multimedia services requires high data rates. Current static frequency allocation schemes cannot cope forever with increasing data rates. Some frequency bands are overcrowded, and some are barely used. A spectrum occupancy measurement project concluded that the average spectrum occupancy over multiple locations is 5.2%, with a maximum of 13.1%.
- Cognitive radio (CR) seems a tempting solution to resolve the perceived bandwidth scarcity versus under-utilization dilemma. CR uses opportunistic usage of bands that are not crowded by licensed users. They use spectrum sensing to sense the frequency bands that are unoccupied by licensed users and transmit on these bands to avoid harmful interference to licensed users.
- CRs front end architecture is dependent on spectrum utilization. For spectrum utilization under 20%, a wideband architecture for the CR front end is suggested. The observed spectrum consists of numerous frequency bands. Power spectral density (PSD) within each frequency band is smooth. Transition of PSD from one band to another band is considered as irregularities in PSD. Such irregularities can be studied using wavelet transforms, which are capable of characterizing local regularity of a signal.
- Applying a wavelet transform on an incoming signal results in peaks at locations where signal PSD is irregular. Irregularity could be a jump or a fall in PSD, depicting the change of frequency band. Jump depicts that the next user has higher PSD than the current one, whereas fall shows that the next user has lower PSD than the current one, or it could also be a vacant band. When the incoming signal is noisy, these peaks are accompanied by noisy peaks. In some known methods, multiscale wavelet products are used to extract true peak information. This technique requires multiplication of various wavelet transform gradients (for the same signal).
- As a result of this, true peaks will be enhanced, whereas random noisy peaks will be suppressed. However this technique requires a priori knowledge regarding the total number of occupied bands in a spectrum at a given instance. This information is normally unknown to CR.
- Thus, a peak detection method using blind source separation solving the aforementioned problems is desired.
- The peak detection method using blind source separation extracts true peaks from noisy peaks in a more robust way that does not require any a priori information. Information regarding true peak location is obtained by thresholding the output of a wavelet transform. The value of the threshold is dependent on noise variance. While noise variance is normally unknown, the method implements a blind source separation technique to calculate the noise variance. The blind source separation technique does not require information of the incoming signal or the channel noise, and hence is suitable for CR peak detection.
- These and other features of the present invention will become readily apparent upon further review of the following specification and drawings.
-
FIG. 1 is a chart showing PSD (power spectral density) of an incoming signal. -
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating the peak detection method using blind source separation according to the present invention. -
FIG. 3 is a plot showing success ratio versus SNR for the peak detection method using blind source separation according to the present invention. -
FIG. 4 is a plot showing probability of detection versus SNR for the peak detection method using blind source separation according to the present invention. - Similar reference characters denote corresponding features consistently throughout the attached drawings.
- At the outset, it should be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that embodiments of the present method can comprise software or firmware code executing on a computer, a microcontroller, a microprocessor, or a DSP processor; state machines implemented in application specific or programmable logic; or numerous other forms without departing from the spirit and scope of the method described herein. The present method can be provided as a computer program, which includes a non-transitory machine-readable medium having stored thereon instructions that can be used to program a computer (or other electronic devices) to perform a process according to the method. The machine-readable medium can include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, flash memory, or other type of media or machine-readable medium suitable for storing electronic instructions.
- The peak detection method using blind source separation extracts true peaks from noisy peaks in a more robust way that does not require any a priori information. Performing spectrum sensing using a wavelet edge detection technique provides edges (peaks) that contain information regarding the start and end locations of a frequency band. In the presence of noise, there is a mixture of true peaks and noisy peaks. Knowledge of noise variance is required to extract true peaks efficiently from the mixture. Information regarding true peak location is obtained by thresholding the output of the wavelet transform. The value of the threshold is dependent on noise variance. Noise variance is also normally unknown. Here, a blind source separation technique is implemented to calculate the noise variance. Blind source separation does not require information of the incoming signal or the channel noise, and hence is suitable for CR peak detection.
- The PSD (power spectral density) of an incoming signal is flat within each band, and transition occurs at the beginning of a new band.
Plot 100 ofFIG. 1 illustrates the PSD structure of an incoming signal. Hence, spectrum sensing can be considered as an edge detection problem. These edges provide the information of the start and end locations of a frequency band. - The continuous wavelet transform of an incoming signal is given as follows:
-
W s S r(f)=S r(f)*φS(f), (1) - where φs(f) is the dilated wavelet smoothing function and “*” defines the convolution operator. The variable ‘s’ depicts the dilation factor of the wavelet smoothing function, and it takes values in terms of power of 2. A common example of a wavelet smoothing function is Gaussian function. For detection of edges, the first derivative of the wavelet transform can be used, which is given as:
-
- Local maxima of the first derivative provide information of edges, which corresponds to the start and end locations of a frequency band. We can take a second derivative of equation (2), and we can detect these edges. But with the second derivative, we have to look for zero crossings, not the local maxima. Once the frequency boundaries, i.e., {fn}n=0 N−1, are detected, then the next step is to calculate the PSD within each band and decide about the presence or absence of a primary user. Calculation of the PSD is given as follows:
-
- Blind source separation has found very useful applications in the area of signal processing and neural networks. Blind source separation does not require knowledge of the channel and the transmitted signal. In fact, its goal is to recover the unobserved signals, i.e., ‘source signals’, from a set of observed signals. The term ‘Blind’ refers to the fact that the source signals are not observed, and the fact that there is no a priori knowledge available about the mixing system.
- Since the development of the blind source separation technique, many new algorithms have been formulated for various problems. Some of these techniques depend on exploiting the second-order statistics and stationary or non-stationary conditions of the received signal, while others need higher order statistics and some exploitations of the time-frequency diversities. All these algorithms obtain a cost function through some optimization process, which normally is computationally complex.
- In a known blind source separation algorithm, the maximum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) can be achieved when sources are separated completely. The cost function of this algorithm is based on the SNR definition. This algorithm achieves a low computational complexity solution based on an instantaneous mixing method. The assumption is that source signals come from different sources and could be considered as statistically independent. The received signal can be written as:
-
x i(t)=Σj=1 n a ij s j(t) (4) - where aij represents the instantaneous mixing matrix (i, j) element. In vector form, we can write (4) as:
-
x(t)=As(t), (5) - where x(t) is a vector of mixed signals.
- BSS algorithms have information of mixed signals and the statistical independence property of the source signals. Assuming W is an un-mixing matrix for the aforementioned problem, the BSS problem can be stated as follows:
-
y(t)=Wx(t)=WAs(t), (6) - where y(t) is the estimate of the source signals, i.e., s(t). The difference between the original signal and the estimated signal is the noise signal. Thus, the SNR may be defined as:
-
- Optimized processing of equation (7) results in an Eigenvalue problem. The resultant Eigenvalue matrix corresponds to the un-mixing matrix W. Once the un-mixing matrix is calculated, the source signals can be obtained using equation (6). The un-mixing matrix calculation is given as follows:
-
(xx)×W=(({circumflex over (x)}−x)({circumflex over (x)}−x)T)×W×D, (8) - where {circumflex over (x)} is the moving average estimate of x. For energy detection, the received signal can be written in terms of its sample covariance matrix, i.e.:
-
R x(N)=R s(N)+σ2 I, (9) - where
-
- are the received and transmitted signal sample covariance matrices, respectively. Also, σ2 is the noise variance.
- Since we do not have information regarding the transmitted (or source) signal, we cannot calculate the transmitted signal sample covariance matrix. The blind source separation algorithm can calculate the un-mixing matrix for the received signal. Using un-mixing matrix and received signal, we can estimate the transmitted signal as shown in equation (6) and its corresponding sample covariance matrix. Noise variance can be calculated as:
-
- In our case, signal x is the output of the wavelet edge detection technique. Noise variance is not sufficient to threshold one such signal. In order to calculate exact threshold values, we have to normalize noise variance with the sample mean of the received signal. Hence, the threshold value can be written as:
-
- where r represents the received signal. Using T, we can threshold the output of the edge detection technique, and hence can calculate the frequency edge locations. The present
peak detection method 200 is illustrated inFIG. 2 and summarized in Table 1. -
TABLE 1 Peak Detection Method Step Action 202 Calculate the sample mean of received signal. 204 Apply edge detection technique to the received wideband signal to get the peak signal that contains information regarding frequency band boundaries. 206 Apply blind source separation technique on peak signal to calculate W. 208 Calculate noise variance using equation (10). 210 Calculate threshold value T using equation (11). 212 Threshold the output of edge detection technique using T. 214 Compute the frequency band boundary locations (i.e., start and end) iteratively from the output of previous step. 216 Compute PSD within these frequency band boundaries. - Here we assume that our wideband signal of interest lies in the range of [0, 1000]Δ Hz, where Δ is frequency resolution. We also assume that during the transmission there are total of N=11 bands in the wideband signal with frequency boundaries {fn}n=0 10=[0, 100, 119, 300, 319, 500, 519, 700, 719, 900, 919, 1000]. Out of these eleven bands, only five bands are carrying primary user transmission and the remaining six bands are available for secondary users, i.e., they are spectrum holes. In the simulation, we used a Gaussian wavelet for the edge detection technique.
- We studied the effect of noise on spectrum sensing performance. We calculated the success ratio and the probability of detection for each SNR value over 1000 realizations. The success ratio is defined as the probability of accurately detecting the frequency boundaries (i.e., the start and end of a frequency band) using the thresholding method, as described earlier. The probability of detection is based on the PSD value calculation within each band. Plot 300 of
FIG. 3 shows the calculated success ratio for different SNR values and its comparison with related art multiscale wavelet product techniques. The present method showed improvement of 4 dB over the related techniques for a success ratio greater than 90%. Plot 400 ofFIG. 4 shows the probability of detection versus SNR curve. The result shows that the present method gained 8 dB compared to the related techniques for a probability of detection greater than 90%. - In the present method, we proposed calculation of noise variance for detecting true peaks using the blind source separation method. This noise variance information is useful when the output of the edge detection technique contains noisy peaks along with true peaks. Noisy peaks are suppressed by thresholding the signal. This process directly affects the probability of detection of a primary user when performing spectrum sensing. The present method gained 4 dB in term of success ratio, and 8 dB in the probability of detection compared to the multiscale wavelet products technique, hence allowing cognitive radio devices to work efficiently on low power in a wideband regime. The present method will capture the interest of telecommunication equipment vendors, mobile phone manufacturers, and research institutes who are interested in bringing new era of wireless communication devices.
- It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments within the scope of the following claims.
Claims (10)
W s S r(f)=S r(f)*φs(f),
x i(t)=Σj=1 n a ij s j(t),
x(t)=As(t),
y(t)=Wx(t)=WAs(t),
(xx T)×W=(({circumflex over (x)}−x)({circumflex over (x)}−x)T)×W×D,
R x(N)=R s(N)+σ2 I,
W s S r(f)=S r(f)*φs(f),
x i(t)=Σj=1 n a ij s j(t),
x(t)=As(t),
y(t)=Wx(t)=WAs(t),
(xx T)×W=(({circumflex over (x)}−x)({circumflex over (x)}−x)T)×W×D
R x(N)=R s(N)+σ2 I,
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/025,763 US8958750B1 (en) | 2013-09-12 | 2013-09-12 | Peak detection method using blind source separation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/025,763 US8958750B1 (en) | 2013-09-12 | 2013-09-12 | Peak detection method using blind source separation |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US8958750B1 US8958750B1 (en) | 2015-02-17 |
US20150071328A1 true US20150071328A1 (en) | 2015-03-12 |
Family
ID=52463685
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/025,763 Expired - Fee Related US8958750B1 (en) | 2013-09-12 | 2013-09-12 | Peak detection method using blind source separation |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8958750B1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105869189A (en) * | 2016-04-22 | 2016-08-17 | 西安电子科技大学 | Radar target blind source separation method based on FFDIAG algorithm |
CN108092736A (en) * | 2017-12-26 | 2018-05-29 | 广州海格通信集团股份有限公司 | A kind of low detection probability waveform display method based on wavelet transformation |
CN109633269A (en) * | 2019-01-02 | 2019-04-16 | 江苏科技大学 | Based on the wavelet decomposition scales determination of time-frequency power spectral density maximum and fault signature Enhancement Method |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2015139260A1 (en) * | 2014-03-20 | 2015-09-24 | 华为技术有限公司 | Compressive sensing-based signal processing method and device |
US11152014B2 (en) | 2016-04-08 | 2021-10-19 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Audio source parameterization |
US10429491B2 (en) * | 2016-09-12 | 2019-10-01 | The Boeing Company | Systems and methods for pulse descriptor word generation using blind source separation |
US10324168B2 (en) | 2016-09-12 | 2019-06-18 | The Boeing Company | Systems and methods for spatial filtering using data with widely different error magnitudes |
US10324167B2 (en) | 2016-09-12 | 2019-06-18 | The Boeing Company | Systems and methods for adding functional grid elements to stochastic sparse tree grids for spatial filtering |
CN108108666B (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2020-09-04 | 电子信息系统复杂电磁环境效应国家重点实验室 | Hybrid matrix estimation method based on wavelet analysis and time-frequency single-source detection |
CN108875681B (en) * | 2018-06-29 | 2020-11-03 | 上海仁童电子科技有限公司 | Peak point detection method and device and server |
CN109243483B (en) * | 2018-10-17 | 2022-03-08 | 西安交通大学 | Method for separating convolution blind source of noisy frequency domain |
WO2021226999A1 (en) * | 2020-05-15 | 2021-11-18 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | Efficient blind source separation using topological approach |
CN111865452B (en) * | 2020-06-29 | 2022-04-05 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Single-channel blind source separation method based on adaptive bacterial foraging |
CN113794489B (en) * | 2021-09-07 | 2022-12-20 | 中国人民解放军陆军工程大学 | Method for resisting strong correlation interference in communication |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090268962A1 (en) * | 2005-09-01 | 2009-10-29 | Conor Fearon | Method and apparatus for blind source separation |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2002059772A2 (en) | 2000-11-09 | 2002-08-01 | Hrl Laboratories, Llc | Blind decomposition using fourier and wavelet transforms |
WO2010058230A2 (en) | 2008-11-24 | 2010-05-27 | Institut Rudjer Boskovic | Method of and system for blind extraction of more than two pure components out of spectroscopic or spectrometric measurements of only two mixtures by means of sparse component analysis |
CN101951619B (en) | 2010-09-03 | 2013-01-02 | 电子科技大学 | Compressive sensing-based broadband signal separation method in cognitive network |
-
2013
- 2013-09-12 US US14/025,763 patent/US8958750B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090268962A1 (en) * | 2005-09-01 | 2009-10-29 | Conor Fearon | Method and apparatus for blind source separation |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105869189A (en) * | 2016-04-22 | 2016-08-17 | 西安电子科技大学 | Radar target blind source separation method based on FFDIAG algorithm |
CN108092736A (en) * | 2017-12-26 | 2018-05-29 | 广州海格通信集团股份有限公司 | A kind of low detection probability waveform display method based on wavelet transformation |
CN109633269A (en) * | 2019-01-02 | 2019-04-16 | 江苏科技大学 | Based on the wavelet decomposition scales determination of time-frequency power spectral density maximum and fault signature Enhancement Method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US8958750B1 (en) | 2015-02-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8958750B1 (en) | Peak detection method using blind source separation | |
US9992048B2 (en) | Systems and methods for detecting unused communication spectrum | |
US8059768B2 (en) | Method and device for removing narrow band interference in spreading frequency system | |
US8923771B2 (en) | Method, apparatus and computer program product for identifying frequency bands, and a method, apparatus and computer program product for evaluating performance | |
US11011182B2 (en) | Audio processing system for speech enhancement | |
Kumar et al. | Wavelet transform based novel edge detection algorithms for wideband spectrum sensing in CRNs | |
Yu et al. | Cognitive radio wideband spectrum sensing using multitap windowing and power detection with threshold adaptation | |
US20150180689A1 (en) | Cognitive radio spectrum sensing with improved edge detection of frequency bands | |
US10304478B2 (en) | Method for detecting audio signal and apparatus | |
Liu et al. | Information theoretic criterion-based spectrum sensing for cognitive radio | |
Roenko et al. | Two approaches to adaptation of sample myriad to characteristics of SαS distribution data | |
CN111246508B (en) | Interference source identification method, related equipment and computer storage medium | |
Liu et al. | A novel signal separation algorithm for wideband spectrum sensing in cognitive networks | |
CN109004996B (en) | Signal detection method based on multi-sine-window power spectrum peak value | |
Alammar et al. | Evaluation of the impact of thresholding and frequency/time resolution on signal area estimation methods | |
Youssef et al. | Efficient cooperative spectrum detection in cognitive radio systems using wavelet fusion | |
Cao et al. | Practical spectrum sensing with frequency-domain processing in cognitive radio | |
CN103051402B (en) | User signal detection method based on direct-current offset self-adapted frequency spectrum energy | |
Imani et al. | Using weighted multilevel wavelet decomposition for wideband spectrum sensing in cognitive radios | |
Nigam et al. | Modified Bayesian algorithm‐based compressive sampling for wideband spectrum sensing in cognitive radio network using wavelet transform | |
Saleem et al. | On the use of blind source separation for peak detection in spectrum sensing | |
Bektas et al. | Energy based spectrum sensing using wavelet transform for fading channels | |
JP2010103650A (en) | Signal detecting method, program, information storage medium, and sensor | |
Miar et al. | Novel spectrum edge detection techniques in wideband spectrum sensing of cognitive radio | |
Pirsiavash et al. | An efficient parameter selection criterion for image denoising |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KING ABDULAZIZ CITY FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, SA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SALEEM, ZAHID, MR.;AL-GHADHBAN, SAMIR, DR.;AL-NAFFOURI, TAREQ Y., DR.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20120821 TO 20130905;REEL/FRAME:031197/0846 Owner name: KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM AND MINERALS, SA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SALEEM, ZAHID, MR.;AL-GHADHBAN, SAMIR, DR.;AL-NAFFOURI, TAREQ Y., DR.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20120821 TO 20130905;REEL/FRAME:031197/0846 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20190217 |