US20140340278A1 - Variable z0 antenna device design system and method - Google Patents
Variable z0 antenna device design system and method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20140340278A1 US20140340278A1 US14/283,850 US201414283850A US2014340278A1 US 20140340278 A1 US20140340278 A1 US 20140340278A1 US 201414283850 A US201414283850 A US 201414283850A US 2014340278 A1 US2014340278 A1 US 2014340278A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- antenna
- feed system
- characteristic impedance
- system characteristic
- performance objectives
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 137
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 115
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 92
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 43
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000005404 monopole Effects 0.000 abstract description 10
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 22
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000005684 electric field Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005291 magnetic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000012846 protein folding Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 102100037732 Neuroendocrine convertase 2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101710151475 Neuroendocrine convertase 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005094 computer simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005670 electromagnetic radiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004215 lattice model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G06F17/5068—
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/30—Circuit design
- G06F30/39—Circuit design at the physical level
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/30—Circuit design
- G06F30/39—Circuit design at the physical level
- G06F30/392—Floor-planning or layout, e.g. partitioning or placement
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q1/00—Details of, or arrangements associated with, antennas
- H01Q1/36—Structural form of radiating elements, e.g. cone, spiral, umbrella; Particular materials used therewith
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q1/00—Details of, or arrangements associated with, antennas
- H01Q1/50—Structural association of antennas with earthing switches, lead-in devices or lightning protectors
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q9/00—Electrically-short antennas having dimensions not more than twice the operating wavelength and consisting of conductive active radiating elements
- H01Q9/04—Resonant antennas
- H01Q9/30—Resonant antennas with feed to end of elongated active element, e.g. unipole
- H01Q9/42—Resonant antennas with feed to end of elongated active element, e.g. unipole with folded element, the folded parts being spaced apart a small fraction of the operating wavelength
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
- G06F17/11—Complex mathematical operations for solving equations, e.g. nonlinear equations, general mathematical optimization problems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
- G06F17/15—Correlation function computation including computation of convolution operations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/13—Architectural design, e.g. computer-aided architectural design [CAAD] related to design of buildings, bridges, landscapes, production plants or roads
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/30—Circuit design
- G06F30/39—Circuit design at the physical level
- G06F30/398—Design verification or optimisation, e.g. using design rule check [DRC], layout versus schematics [LVS] or finite element methods [FEM]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L29/00—Semiconductor devices adapted for rectifying, amplifying, oscillating or switching, or capacitors or resistors with at least one potential-jump barrier or surface barrier, e.g. PN junction depletion layer or carrier concentration layer; Details of semiconductor bodies or of electrodes thereof ; Multistep manufacturing processes therefor
- H01L29/02—Semiconductor bodies ; Multistep manufacturing processes therefor
- H01L29/12—Semiconductor bodies ; Multistep manufacturing processes therefor characterised by the materials of which they are formed
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q1/00—Details of, or arrangements associated with, antennas
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03K—PULSE TECHNIQUE
- H03K17/00—Electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making and –breaking
- H03K17/51—Electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making and –breaking characterised by the components used
- H03K17/92—Electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making and –breaking characterised by the components used by the use, as active elements, of superconductive devices
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/14—Relay systems
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/14—Relay systems
- H04B7/15—Active relay systems
- H04B7/185—Space-based or airborne stations; Stations for satellite systems
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H10—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- H10N—ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- H10N10/00—Thermoelectric devices comprising a junction of dissimilar materials, i.e. devices exhibiting Seebeck or Peltier effects
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S439/00—Electrical connectors
- Y10S439/916—Antenna
Definitions
- the invention relates to a system and method for creating antenna devices by providing parameters of their fabrication.
- antennas the devices that emit (radiate) and receive electromagnetic radiation, have become progressively more important in the modern world. Even though many, if not most, antennas today are “invisible,” literally out-of-sight because they are imbedded in other devices, their numbers are ever increasing in all manner of wireless machines ranging from cell phones, to laptop computers, to M2M (machine-to-machine) devices as representative examples, not an exhaustive list. In many cases antenna performance limits how well its associated device works. Oftentimes the limitation is bandwidth-related, which may constrain data rates or throughput, thereby limiting, for example, how quickly an image might display or a web page takes to load.
- the limitation also may relate to some other antenna performance measure, or combination thereof, such as, for example, radiation pattern or efficiency, sidelobe level, and so on, as representative not exhaustive.
- antenna performance measure such as, for example, radiation pattern or efficiency, sidelobe level, and so on, as representative not exhaustive.
- Industry experts point out that progressively better antennas are required to meet modern communication requirements.
- demand for bandwidth is projected to more than triple year over year, and there is consensus that better antennas are a key element in meeting it. (See “Mobile bandwidth crunch causing concern for innovation, extra pay” by Jim Shakenbach, Mass High Tech Magazine, Wednesday, Jul. 6, 2011, at pp. 8-9 (print edition), published by American City Business Journals.
- D/O Traditional design or optimization
- methods, techniques, algorithms, frameworks, approaches, processes, or procedures view the antenna feed system characteristic impedance or the apparatus internal impedance, denoted herein Z 0 , as a fixed parameter with a constant value specified at the start of the methodology, even if multiple parametric values are employed.
- Z 0 therefore is not a variable quantity whose value is determined by the methodology. This distinction is subtle but extremely important, because traditional methodology automatically excludes from the outset all antenna system configurations that could provide better performance by using some other value of Z 0 .
- IBW impedance bandwidth
- Embodiments include a system and method for designing an antenna system comprising wherein an antenna feed system characteristic impedance or apparatus internal impedance is treated as a variable quantity whose value is determined by a design methodology of the antenna system, instead of its being specified as a fixed design parameter.
- Another embodiment includes a system and method for optimizing an antenna system comprising wherein an antenna feed system characteristic impedance or apparatus internal impedance is treated as a variable quantity whose value is determined by an antenna system optimization methodology, instead of its being specified as a fixed optimization parameter.
- An embodiment is a variable impedance method and system for designing an antenna system comprising varying an input value of the impedance of an antenna feed system of the antenna system to produce a selected value of the impedance; determining the selected value of the impedance by a methodology; wherein the input value of the impedance of the antenna system is not specified as a fixed design parameter; and applying to an antenna system the design of the antenna system that fulfills specified characteristics.
- Another embodiment includes defining electromagnetic characteristics of the antenna system other than the impedance; specifying ranges of the electromagnetic characteristics; and calculating parameter values of the antenna system from the specified electromagnetic characteristics other than the impedance.
- the antenna feed system impedance is an antenna feed system characteristic impedance.
- the antenna feed system impedance comprises an antenna feed system internal impedance.
- the methodology comprises a design methodology.
- the methodology comprises an optimization methodology.
- minimum and maximum values are specified for the variable impedance.
- minimum and maximum values are specified for the electromagnetic characteristics of the antenna system other than the impedance.
- the electromagnetic characteristics comprise design parameters.
- the electromagnetic characteristics comprise optimization parameters.
- the methodology comprises at least one of the group consisting of a deterministic algorithm, Central Force Optimization (CFO), Dominating Cone Line Search (DCLS), extended Wu-King impedance loading, seat of the pants design, experience-based design, and best guess.
- the methodology comprises at least one of the group consisting of a stochastic algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Differential Evolution (DE), and Genetic Algorithm.
- An embodiment is a variable impedance method for designing antenna systems comprising the steps of defining parameters of the antenna system, including a variable antenna feed system impedance; specifying ranges of the parameters, including a minimum value and a maximum value for the antenna feed system impedance; iteratively executing a methodology to calculate antenna system characteristics from the parameters including the variable antenna feed system impedance; selecting values for the antenna system parameters determined from the methodology.
- the parameters of the antenna system comprise design parameters.
- the parameters of the antenna system comprise optimization parameters.
- the methodology includes performance objective iteration, the iteration comprising inputting initial performance objectives; executing a design methodology; determining if performance objectives have been met; modifying the initial performance objectives if the performance objectives have not been met, then re-executing the design methodology with the modified performance objectives; and ending the iteration if performance objectives have been met, selecting antenna system design parameters resulting in meeting the performance objectives.
- the methodology includes optimization iteration, the iteration comprising defining a fitness function; executing an optimization methodology; determining if termination criteria have been met; re-executing the optimization methodology if the termination criteria have not been met; and ending the iteration if the termination criteria have been met, selecting antenna system design parameters resulting in meeting the termination criteria.
- Other embodiments further comprise an external antenna modeling engine interfacing with the optimization methodology.
- An embodiment is one or more computer-readable storage media comprising computer-executable instructions for a variable impedance method for designing antenna systems, the computer-executable instructions directed to steps comprising defining parameters of the antenna system, including a variable antenna feed system impedance; specifying ranges of the parameters, including a minimum value and a maximum value for the antenna feed system impedance; iteratively executing a methodology to calculate antenna system characteristics from the parameters including the variable antenna feed system impedance; and selecting values for the antenna system parameters determined from the methodology.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an antenna system in transmit mode.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a generalized antenna system in transmit mode.
- FIG. 3 is representative antenna system design flowchart showing Variable Z 0 System and Method configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 4 is a representative antenna system optimization flowchart showing Variable Z 0 System and Method configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 5 is Central Force Optimization pseudocode.
- FIG. 6 is a graph of VSWR relative to Z 0 for a 6-element Yagi antenna system configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 7 is a graph of Forward Gain for a 6-element Yagi antenna system configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 8 is a graph of Front-to-Back Ratio for a 6-element Yagi antenna system configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 9 is a graph of VSWR relative to Z 0 for a Meander Monopole antenna system configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 10 is a graph of Maximum Gain for a Meander Monopole antenna system configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 11 is a graph of VSWR relative to Z 0 for a 3-Stub Multi-Stub Matching Network configured in accordance with an embodiment of this invention.
- FIG. 12 is a graph of VSWR relative to Z 0 for a 5-Stub Multi-Stub Matching Network configured in accordance with an embodiment of this invention.
- FIG. 13 is a graph of VSWR relative to Z 0 for a 7-Stub Multi-Stub Matching Network configured in accordance with an embodiment of this invention.
- the Variable Z 0 System and Method disclosed herein mitigates many antenna limitations by departing dramatically from the traditional approach to antenna system design or optimization (“D/O”).
- the Variable Z 0 System and Method (“Variable Z 0 ”) provides that the value of an antenna's feed system characteristic impedance or apparatus internal impedance (impedance of an antenna feed system), herein denoted Z 0, be allowed to change as a true variable quantity during the antenna system design or optimization methodology and whose value be allowed to be determined by the methodology, because different values of Z 0 result in different antenna system performance that often is considerably improved.
- Variable Z 0 removes the limitation of specifying a value for Z 0 in advance, and this invention yields unexpected benefits by doing so.
- the Variable Z 0 System and Method provides many advantages over traditional antenna D/O methodology. It can be applied without limitation to any antenna system design or optimization problem wherein Z 0 is an explicit or implicit parameter against any set of performance goals or, in the case of optimization, against any fitness or objective function. Embodiments are especially useful for improving impedance bandwidth, as illustrated by the examples in this disclosure, but Variable Z 0 is not limited to that application alone.
- Variable Z 0 System and Method “product by process” approach also can be used in conjunction with any design or optimization methodology, deterministic ones like Central Force Optimization (CFO) or Dominating Cone Line Search (DCLS); stochastic algorithms like Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Differential Evolution (DE), or Genetic Algorithm (GA); analytic approaches such as extended Wu-King impedance loading; even “seat of the pants” design or optimization based on experience, intuition, or even a “best guess.”
- CFO Central Force Optimization
- DCLS Dominating Cone Line Search
- PSO Particle Swarm Optimization
- ACO Ant Colony Optimization
- DE Differential Evolution
- GA Genetic Algorithm
- analytic approaches such as extended Wu-King impedance loading; even “seat of the pants” design or optimization based on experience, intuition, or even a “best guess.”
- impedance loading see, as examples without limitation, R. A.
- Variable Z 0 System and Method which treats Z 0 as a design or optimization variable instead of a fixed parameter can be used with any design or optimization methodology, rendering it surprisingly flexible in its breadth of applicability. Because of this unexpected and unrestricted applicability, Variable Z 0 embodiments are especially useful with algorithm-independent approaches in which various design or optimization algorithms can be used singly or in combination with others (see, for example, R. A. Formato, “Dynamic Threshold Optimization—A New Approach?” June 2012, Cornell University Library, which is fully incorporated herein by reference).
- Embodiments disclose a novel and proprietary antenna system design or optimization System and Method called “Variable Z 0 ,” Z 0 being the antenna feed system characteristic impedance or apparatus internal impedance (impedance of an antenna feed system).
- Design refers to the specification of a complete set of parameters that defines an antenna system meeting specific performance objectives.
- Optimization refers to the specification of a complete set of parameters that defines the antenna system best meeting specific performance objectives to the extent possible.
- Variable Z 0 embodiments are particularly useful for improving impedance bandwidth (IBW).
- IBW impedance bandwidth
- Variable Z 0 embodiments are useful for meeting any performance objectives, even ones that do not consider IBW at all, for any antenna system for which Z 0 is a design or optimization parameter.
- Z 0 may be included as a parameter explicitly, for example without limitation, by utilizing one or the other or both of its real and imaginary parts (resistance and reactance, respectively), or implicitly, for example without limitation, as the reference impedance for computing a standing wave ratio.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an antenna system 100 in transmit mode comprising: RF (radio-frequency) apparatus 110 with characteristic impedance or apparatus internal impedance (impedance of an antenna feed system) Z 0 ; antenna feed 120 that conducts RF energy shown as propagating electric field 140 ; antenna input terminals a and b; and antenna 150 .
- the antenna system may function in transmit mode, receive mode (not shown), or both, and in each case antenna feed 120 typically is a transmission line or matching network or combination of the two.
- RF apparatus 110 is a source of RF energy, typically a radio transmitter.
- the sequence of dots 130 denotes repetition of the electric field pattern.
- Antenna 150 is “That part of a transmitting or receiving system that is designed to radiate or to receive electromagnetic waves” as defined in IEEE Std 145-1993 IEEE Standard Definitions of Terms for Antennas, 1993 (definition 2.12 at page 4), published by The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE), 345 East 47 th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017-2394 USA (ISBN 1-55937-317-2), fully incorporated herein by reference. Terminology employed herein is intended to be consistent with this standard to the fullest extent.
- EM radiated electromagnetic
- antenna system In transmit mode, antenna 150 emits into the surrounding space a radiated electromagnetic (EM) wave 160 comprising coupled electric and magnetic fields, which for simplicity is represented schematically only by its electric field 140 .
- EM apparatus 110 typically is a receiver. In many cases RF apparatus 110 comprises a transceiver that functions both as a transmitter and a receiver.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic representation 200 of a generalized antenna system in transmit mode in which RF hardware 210 incorporates elements 110 and 120 in FIG. 1 .
- RF hardware 210 has a generalized complex apparatus internal impedance denoted Z 0 , this nomenclature deriving from the fact that the RF apparatus 110 of FIG. 1 usually is impedance-matched to antenna feed 120 in FIG. 1 which typically is a transmission line with characteristic impedance Z 0 , Hence the Z 0 nomenclature, which has no special significance beyond its being a common notation in the antenna art.
- Z 0 represents the internal impedance of RF hardware 210 in FIG.
- FIGS. 1 and 2 herein are adapted from Balanis FIGS. 1.1 and 2.18(a) in Sections 1.2 and 2.13, respectively, of that textbook; and Z 0 herein corresponds to internal impedance Z g in Balanis FIG. 2.18(a) and to Z T in Balanis FIG.
- RF hardware 210 in FIG. 2 excites antenna 220 at its input terminals a and b, and antenna 220 emits radiated EM wave 230 into the surrounding space.
- Maximum power is absorbed by antenna 220 when impedance Z 0 is conjugated-matched to the antenna input impedance Z in seen between terminals a and b; that is, there is zero reflected power when this condition is met (note that in Balanis' notation Z in is denoted Z A in his equation (2-72) at page 54).
- the antenna input impedance Z in is determined by the antenna's source current distribution.
- IBW is defined as the frequency band or bands within which Z in , the antenna input impedance, is matched within specified limits to Z 0 , the characteristic impedance or apparatus internal impedance of RF hardware 210 in FIG. 2 .
- IBW typically is specified as VSWR//Z 0 ⁇ 2:1 (// denoting “relative to”), which is equivalent to a return loss (scattering parameter S 11 ) approximately less than ⁇ 10 dB.
- Other VSWR thresholds can be used instead, and frequently are.
- Zehforoosh et al. describe the design of an Ultra Wideband (UWB) microstrip antenna and provide a useful summary of Z 0 's significance as a design or optimization parameter in the context of IBW.
- UWB Ultra Wideband
- Zehforoosh's work treats the feed system characteristic impedance Z 0 as a fixed parameter, not a variable quantity as it is in Variable Z 0 .
- IBW is an important consideration in modern wireless device antenna system design, other performance measures often are as well, for example, without limitation, directivity, radiation pattern, sidelobe level, or radiation efficiency, which also can be addressed using the Variable Z 0 System and Method.
- FIG. 3 flowchart 300 is a representative antenna system design methodology illustrating a Variable Z 0 embodiment including steps 390 , 395 .
- Flowchart 300 applies generally to any design methodology 315 .
- design methodology 315 might be based on the essentially graphical methodology formulated in P. B. Viezbicke, “Yagi Antenna Design,” National Bureau of Standards Technical Note 688, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, December, 1976 which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
- design methodology 315 may be based on one of the many computer programs or textbooks available from or recommended by the American Radio Relay League (ARRL), 225 Main Street, Newington, Conn. 06111 USA, on its antenna technology website, or, as an example, not a limitation, the various methods described in The ARRL Antenna Book.
- ARRL American Radio Relay League
- the length, diameter, and spacing of each array element are typical design parameters.
- other parameters may be specified.
- a helical antenna might be defined by its number of turns, wire gauge, helix diameter, and turn pitch.
- P min and P max are the minimum and maximum acceptable values.
- These bounds define the antenna system “design space.”
- the acceptable driven element length might be no shorter than 10 centimeters (minimum) and no longer than 50 centimeters (maximum), while similarly in the helix example, the number of turns might be restricted to no fewer than 5 or more than 20, these examples being provided only for purposes of illustration and not in any way limiting the Variable Z 0 System and Method according to this invention.
- Design methodology 315 processes the design parameters to develop an antenna system design whose performance is evaluated against a set of user-specified performance objectives shown as input data 380 or 360 feeding design methodology 315 .
- Performance objectives 380 or modified performance objectives 360 pass through OR function 350 as shown. If the design objectives are met in decision step 320 then the design methodology 315 is terminated at End step 330 . If, on the other hand, objectives 380 are not met, path 345 , then the objectives may be preserved and another iteration 340 of the design methodology undertaken using the original performance objectives 380 .
- the objectives may be modified by following path 355 to create modified performance objectives 360 , whereupon OR 350 is performed to input new modified performance objectives to design methodology 315 .
- the process outlined in flowchart 300 continues until an acceptable antenna system design has been developed. Modifications to representative flowchart 300 often are made by practitioners skilled in the art of antenna system design, and such modifications are fully anticipated herein.
- Steps 390 and 395 create an entirely new range of possible antenna source current distributions, which, without Variable Z 0 , are forever inaccessible using traditional methodology, and which, with Variable Z 0 , can result in improved antenna system performance.
- These new distributions often result in remarkably better antenna performance, the possible tradeoff then being between working with a “non-standard” value for Z 0 and achieving a much better antenna system, or insisting on a pre-determined “standard” value for Z 0 at the expense of performance.
- This trade-off generally favors the Variable Z 0 design, often by a very wide margin.
- FIG. 4 flowchart 400 is a representative antenna system optimization methodology illustrating a Variable Z 0 embodiment including steps 485 , 490 .
- Flowchart 400 applies generally to any optimization methodology 440 .
- Optimization methodology 440 is completely unrestricted as to type and function, and it may perform maximization or minimization. It may be computer-based, which most often is the case, or analytical in nature, or a combination of these or other approaches, for example without limitation, graphical, approaches.
- Widely used computer search and optimization algorithms include, as examples and not limitations, Central Force Optimization, Dominating Cone Line Search, Particle Swarm Optimization, Genetic Algorithm, Ant Colony Optimization, Differential Evolution, and many others well known in the art.
- Flowchart 400 begins with definition of optimization parameters 410 followed by specification of the “decision space” 420 by bounding these parameters (steps 410 and 420 are analogous to steps 305 and 310 in FIG. 3 ) and by definition of the fitness function to be optimized 430 , which may be maximized or minimized.
- design methodology 315 in flowchart 300 usually comprises a capability to assess antenna system performance
- a general rule optimization methodology 440 does not.
- Most optimization algorithms are “stand alone” computer programs that are useful across a wide range of disparate problems, not only antenna system design.
- Ant Colony Optimization has been used for array antenna synthesis (see, for example, Quevedo-Teruel et al., “Ant Colony Optimization for Array Synthesis,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 23 Oct. 2006, Albuquerque, N. Mex, pp.
- optimization methodology 440 typically does not comprise an antenna system modeling capability
- an optional external antenna modeling engine 495 usually is required (but not necessarily, with the dashed line being used to distinguish blocks 485 and 490 ).
- Many modeling engines are available, and one of the most popular is the Numerical Electromagnetics Code (NEC), which is available in several versions. NEC-2, for example, is freeware downloadable from various websites.
- NEC Numerical Electromagnetics Code
- NEC has been used to compute Yagi array and Meander Monopole antenna system performance using an embodiment of Variable Z 0 System and Method, and the results are described below. Details of NEC theory, implementation, and use may be found in the following publications: G. J. Burke, “Numerical Electromagnetics Code—NEC-4.2 Method of Moments, Part I: User's Manual,” Jul. 15, 2011, LLNL-SM-490875; G. J. Burke, “Numerical Electromagnetics Code—NEC-4, Method of Moments, Part I: User's Manual and Part II: Program Description—Theory,” January 1992, UCRL-MA-109338; G. J. Burke and A. J. Poggio, “Numerical Electromagnetics Code (NEC)—Method of Moments,” Parts I, II and III, January 1981, UCID-19934, all published by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, Calif., USA.
- Optimization methodology 440 continues to operate until user-specified termination criteria 450 are met, whereupon path 460 is followed to termination step 470 . If, however, termination criteria 450 are not met, then path 455 is followed, and optimization methodology 440 continues its operation.
- Typical termination criteria are a certain number of iterations (often referred to as “generations” or “steps”); saturation of a fitness function (changes over some number of steps within a specified tolerance); meeting or exceeding a specific fitness threshold value; or a combination of these and possibly other measures of how “good” the value of the fitness function is. The user is free to define whatever termination criterion or criteria, respectively, is or are appropriate, singly or in combination with others. Modifications to this representative flowchart 400 often are made by practitioners skilled in the art of antenna system design, and such modifications are fully anticipated herein.
- CFO Central Force Optimization
- N t is the number of CFO “time” steps;
- F rep init the starting value for CFO's repositioning factor F rep ;
- ⁇ F rep the increment in F rep ;
- N p the number of CFO probes;
- CFO computes a fitness matrix M j p at each probe's location specified by position vector ⁇ right arrow over (R) ⁇ j p , j being the time step index and p the probe number.
- Pseudocode 500 has been reproduced from R. A. Formato, “Parameter-Free Deterministic Global Search with Simplified Central Force Optimization,” in Advanced Intelligent Computing Theories and Applications (ICIC2010), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (D.-S. Huang, Z. Zhao, V. Bevilacqua and J.
- FIGS. 6 through 13 inclusive, illustrate the improvement in antenna system performance achievable by using the Variable Z 0 System and Method with three quite different example systems: (1) a 6-element Yagi-Uda array antenna system; (2) a Meander Monopole antenna system; and (3) a transmission line Multi-Stub Matching Network.
- a Yagi array usually comprises a single reflector element (REF), a single driven element (DE), and a plurality of director elements (D i ) all arranged parallel to one another along a perpendicular boom. If each element has the same circular cross-section, which often is the case, then the array is completely specified by assigning to each element a length and its spacing from the previous one. For example, a 6-element Yagi is completely specified by 11 geometrical parameters (six lengths for REF, DE, D 1 , D 2 , D 3 , D 4 ; and five spacings for DE-REF, D 1 -DE, D 2 -D 1 , D 3 -D 2 , D 4 -D 3 ). These parameters and others used in specifying an antenna system typically are termed “design” or “optimization” “parameters” or “variables” or “decision variables,” or, depending on context, other like terminology which is common in the art and anticipated herein.
- Z 0 is not assigned any value, and instead is allowed to “float” as a true variable quantity whose ultimate value is determined by the methodology.
- Z 0 is added to the list of design parameters as a twelfth design parameter or decision variable whose value is to be determined by the design or optimization methodology, an improvement that, surprisingly, has been overlooked through many decades of antenna system design or optimization.
- FIGS. 6 , 7 and 8 respectively, plot the Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR), Forward Gain (G fwd ), and Front-to-Back Ratio (FBR) for a 6-element Yagi optimized using traditional methodology, that is keeping Z 0 fixed, and also using the improved Variable Z 0 System and Method according to this invention.
- the traditional methodology assumed a “standard” value of 50 ⁇ for Z 0 and used two different deterministic optimization algorithms: Central Force Optimization (CFO) and Dominating Cone Line Search (DCLS).
- CFO Central Force Optimization
- DCLS Dominating Cone Line Search
- DCLS and the fitness (objective) function that was used for a DCLS-optimized 6-element Yagi are described in A. C. Lisboa, et al., “Monotonically Improving Yagi-Uda Conflicting Specifications Using the Dominating Cone Line Search Method,” IEEE Trans. Magnetics, vol. 45, no. 3, 2009, pp. 1494-1497, which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
- the fitness function coefficients were:
- the fitness increases with increasing forward gain G fwd and decreasing VSWR//Z 0 , VSWR//Z 0 being the voltage standing wave ratio relative to Z 0 (// denotes “relative to”).
- This fitness function optimizes the antenna system both for VSWR and for gain, not just one or the other, and it provides an example, without limitation, of how various antenna system performance measures can be combined. There are no restrictions on how a suitable objective or fitness function may be defined or what performance measures may be included. Yagi system performance in this case was computed using NEC as the modeling engine.
- the fitness is evaluated at three frequencies using the empirically determined coefficients c i and c k shown above.
- FIG. 6 graph 600 shows that the Variable Z 0 6-element Yagi VSWR 610 exhibits considerably better IBW for the usual VSWR threshold of 2:1, and, indeed, surprisingly better performance throughout the VSWR range than the traditional fixed-Z 0 systems 620 , 630 .
- This improvement is a result of allowing the optimization algorithm to determine Z 0 according to this invention, which in this case was found to be a value of 107.91 ⁇ instead of the usual 50 ⁇ that was used for the fixed-Z 0 antenna systems.
- Curve 630 was computed by NEC using the dimension data for the fixed-Z 0 6-element DCLS-optimized “A3” Yagi array described in Lisboa et al.'s paper cited above.
- FIG. 6 also shows IBW for a “perfect antenna” (1:1 impedance match) as the dashed line 640 .
- Additional details describing Variable Z 0 and the CFO algorithm appear in R. A. Formato, “A Novel Methodology for Antenna Design and Optimization: Variable Z 0 (ver. 2),” 2011, Cornell University Library and in R. A. Formato, “UWB Array Design Using Variable Z 0 Technology and Central Force Optimization, ver. 2,” 2011, Cornell University Library, both of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
- FIGS. 9 and 10 graphs 900 and 1000 , respectively, show VSWR and maximum gain for a CFO-optimized Meander Monopole (MM) antenna system using Variable Z 0 (curves 910 , 1010 ) and not using it (curves 920 , 1020 ).
- the MM antenna system like the Yagi example above, was optimized both for VSWR and maximum gain, but a different fitness function was employed, in this case, the weighted gain-VSWR quotient defined as
- ⁇ i 1 N ⁇ ⁇ w g ⁇ ( f i ) ⁇ G max ⁇ ( f i ) w VSWR ⁇ ( f i ) ⁇ VSWR // Z 0 ⁇ ( f i ⁇ )
- an optimum value of Z 0 computed by CFO using the Variable Z 0 System and Method is 263.91 ⁇ , which is quite different from the standard 50 ⁇ value.
- Variable Z 0 eliminates the very large and undesirable spike between 3500 and 4000 MHz on curve 920 .
- FIG. 10 compares the MM antenna system's maximum gains and shows that across the band the Variable Z 0 gain 1010 generally is comparable to or better than the fixed Z 0 gain 1020 .
- curves 910 and 920 show clearly that the CFO-optimized MM antenna system using the Variable Z 0 System and Method according to this invention has accomplished the objective of improved VSWR while maintaining good maximum gain, and that this MM's performance is surprisingly better than that obtained with the traditional D/O approach in which Z 0 is a fixed parameter whose value cannot change.
- Variable Z 0 is effective because it adds another degree of freedom to the design space or, in the case of optimization, to the decision space, thereby leading to unexpected and surprisingly greater flexibility in discovering good solutions to the design or optimization problem, the MM problem described here being only an example.
- FIGS. 11 , 12 and 13 graphs 1100 , 1200 and 1300 , respectively, show VSWR plots for 3, 5 and 7-stub Multi-Stub Matching Networks (MSMN) optimized for a specific VSWR profile (not a “flat” VSWR as in the previous examples) using both traditional D/O methodology in which Z 0 is fixed, and also using the Variable Z 0 System and Method according to this invention in which Z 0 “floats.”
- the network comprises matching stubs on a transmission line whose characteristic impedance is Z 0 .
- Biogeography Based Optimization was used for each case with and without Variable Z 0 , and for comparison the 7-stub MSMN also was optimized using Nelder-Mead Simplex (NM) with fixed-Z 0 only.
- the “standard” value Z 0 50 ⁇ was used for all of the fixed-Z 0 runs.
- FIG. 11 shows results for the 3-stub MSMN.
- the BBO-optimized fixed Z 0 device exhibits especially poor VSWR performance 1120 near the band-center frequency of 1.2 GHz, whereas the BBO-optimized Variable Z 0 MSMN's response 1110 comes quite close to the desired response 1130 .
- FIG. 12 graph 1200 , wherein the fixed Z 0 device's VSWR 1220 is very poor mid-band, whereas in marked contrast the Variable Z 0 device's response 1210 is surprisingly close to the desired response 1230 l throughout the entire band.
- FIG. 13 graph 1300 , compares two fixed-Z 0 7-stub MSMNs optimized with BBO and with NM to the 7-stub network BBO-optimized using the Variable Z 0 System and Method according to this invention.
- Neither of the fixed-Z 0 responses, 1320 and 1340 is close to the desired response 1330 across the band spanning 1.1-1.3 GHz band, although both the BBO and NM devices slightly improve the mid-band response, with BBO 1320 performing better than NM 1340 .
- the overall response of the traditionally-optimized 7-stub device at best is only fair.
- the BBO-optimized Variable Z 0 7-stub MSMN response 1310 is essentially indistinguishable from the desired response 1330 across the entire band.
- the value of Z 0 is determined by the design or optimization methodology, the curves in FIGS. 11 , 12 and 13 are annotated with the different BBO-determined Z 0 values, all of which are within a factor of 3 of “standard” fixed-Z 0 value of 50 ⁇ that was employed in the traditional D/O methodology.
- the optimal value of Z 0 is 128 ⁇ , which happens to be fairly close to the 50 ⁇ value that results in far worse VSWR performance.
- the MSMN problem again illustrates how effective the Variable Z 0 System and Method is for solving difficult antenna system problems that simply cannot be effectively addressed by other methods. Additional details describing the MSMN problem appear in N. I. Dib, A. Sharaqa, and R. A. Formato, “Variable Z 0 Applied to Biogeography Based Optimized Multi-Stub Matching Network and to a Central Force Optimized Meander Monopole,” April, 2012, which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Details Of Aerials (AREA)
Abstract
A variable Z0 impedance method (“Variable Z0”) for designing and/or optimizing antenna systems. The method provides that the value of an antenna's feed system characteristic impedance or apparatus internal impedance (Z0) changes as a true variable quantity during the antenna system design or optimization methodology. The value is allowed to be determined by the methodology, because different values of Z0 result in different antenna system performance. It is applied to any set of performance objectives on any antenna system wherein apparatus internal or transmission line characteristic impedance is an explicit or implicit parameter. Variable Z0 is applied to any design or optimization methodology. Structures include Yagi-Uda arrays, Meander Monopoles, and transmission line Multi-Stub Matching Networks, and can incorporate Central Force Optimization or Biogeography Based Optimization or other optimization algorithms.
Description
- This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/602,513 filed Sep. 4, 2012 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/531,237 filed Sep. 6, 2011, which hereby claims the benefit of and priority thereto under 35 U.S.C. §§119, 120, 363, 365, and 37 C.F.R. §1.55 and §1.78, and each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
- A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in a published Patent and Trademark Office patent file or record, but otherwise reserves all copyrights whatsoever.
- The invention relates to a system and method for creating antenna devices by providing parameters of their fabrication.
- Antennas, the devices that emit (radiate) and receive electromagnetic radiation, have become progressively more important in the modern world. Even though many, if not most, antennas today are “invisible,” literally out-of-sight because they are imbedded in other devices, their numbers are ever increasing in all manner of wireless machines ranging from cell phones, to laptop computers, to M2M (machine-to-machine) devices as representative examples, not an exhaustive list. In many cases antenna performance limits how well its associated device works. Oftentimes the limitation is bandwidth-related, which may constrain data rates or throughput, thereby limiting, for example, how quickly an image might display or a web page takes to load. The limitation also may relate to some other antenna performance measure, or combination thereof, such as, for example, radiation pattern or efficiency, sidelobe level, and so on, as representative not exhaustive. Industry experts point out that progressively better antennas are required to meet modern communication requirements. As an example, demand for bandwidth is projected to more than triple year over year, and there is consensus that better antennas are a key element in meeting it. (See “Mobile bandwidth crunch causing concern for innovation, extra pay” by Jim Shakenbach, Mass High Tech Magazine, Wednesday, Jul. 6, 2011, at pp. 8-9 (print edition), published by American City Business Journals.
- Traditional design or optimization (“D/O”) paradigms, methods, techniques, algorithms, frameworks, approaches, processes, or procedures (collectively and individually hereinafter “methodology”) view the antenna feed system characteristic impedance or the apparatus internal impedance, denoted herein Z0, as a fixed parameter with a constant value specified at the start of the methodology, even if multiple parametric values are employed. Z0 therefore is not a variable quantity whose value is determined by the methodology. This distinction is subtle but extremely important, because traditional methodology automatically excludes from the outset all antenna system configurations that could provide better performance by using some other value of Z0.
- What is needed is a system and method that provides antenna devices with improved performance specifications, including, but not limited to, impedance bandwidth (IBW). Variable Z0 System and Method addresses this need.
- Embodiments include a system and method for designing an antenna system comprising wherein an antenna feed system characteristic impedance or apparatus internal impedance is treated as a variable quantity whose value is determined by a design methodology of the antenna system, instead of its being specified as a fixed design parameter.
- Another embodiment includes a system and method for optimizing an antenna system comprising wherein an antenna feed system characteristic impedance or apparatus internal impedance is treated as a variable quantity whose value is determined by an antenna system optimization methodology, instead of its being specified as a fixed optimization parameter.
- An embodiment is a variable impedance method and system for designing an antenna system comprising varying an input value of the impedance of an antenna feed system of the antenna system to produce a selected value of the impedance; determining the selected value of the impedance by a methodology; wherein the input value of the impedance of the antenna system is not specified as a fixed design parameter; and applying to an antenna system the design of the antenna system that fulfills specified characteristics. Another embodiment includes defining electromagnetic characteristics of the antenna system other than the impedance; specifying ranges of the electromagnetic characteristics; and calculating parameter values of the antenna system from the specified electromagnetic characteristics other than the impedance. In a further embodiment, the antenna feed system impedance is an antenna feed system characteristic impedance. For a yet further embodiment, the antenna feed system impedance comprises an antenna feed system internal impedance. In still further embodiments, the methodology comprises a design methodology. For yet other embodiments, the methodology comprises an optimization methodology. In additional embodiments, minimum and maximum values are specified for the variable impedance. In still other embodiments, minimum and maximum values are specified for the electromagnetic characteristics of the antenna system other than the impedance. Continuing embodiments provide that the electromagnetic characteristics comprise design parameters. In an ongoing embodiment, the electromagnetic characteristics comprise optimization parameters. Subsequent embodiments provide that the methodology comprises at least one of the group consisting of a deterministic algorithm, Central Force Optimization (CFO), Dominating Cone Line Search (DCLS), extended Wu-King impedance loading, seat of the pants design, experience-based design, and best guess. Another following embodiment provides that the methodology comprises at least one of the group consisting of a stochastic algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Differential Evolution (DE), and Genetic Algorithm.
- An embodiment is a variable impedance method for designing antenna systems comprising the steps of defining parameters of the antenna system, including a variable antenna feed system impedance; specifying ranges of the parameters, including a minimum value and a maximum value for the antenna feed system impedance; iteratively executing a methodology to calculate antenna system characteristics from the parameters including the variable antenna feed system impedance; selecting values for the antenna system parameters determined from the methodology. In another embodiment, the parameters of the antenna system comprise design parameters. In a further embodiment, the parameters of the antenna system comprise optimization parameters. For a yet further embodiment, the methodology includes performance objective iteration, the iteration comprising inputting initial performance objectives; executing a design methodology; determining if performance objectives have been met; modifying the initial performance objectives if the performance objectives have not been met, then re-executing the design methodology with the modified performance objectives; and ending the iteration if performance objectives have been met, selecting antenna system design parameters resulting in meeting the performance objectives. In still further embodiments, the methodology includes optimization iteration, the iteration comprising defining a fitness function; executing an optimization methodology; determining if termination criteria have been met; re-executing the optimization methodology if the termination criteria have not been met; and ending the iteration if the termination criteria have been met, selecting antenna system design parameters resulting in meeting the termination criteria. Other embodiments further comprise an external antenna modeling engine interfacing with the optimization methodology. Yet other embodiments, further comprise applying to an antenna system the design of the antenna system that fulfills specified characteristics including a determined value of the variable antenna feed system impedance.
- An embodiment is one or more computer-readable storage media comprising computer-executable instructions for a variable impedance method for designing antenna systems, the computer-executable instructions directed to steps comprising defining parameters of the antenna system, including a variable antenna feed system impedance; specifying ranges of the parameters, including a minimum value and a maximum value for the antenna feed system impedance; iteratively executing a methodology to calculate antenna system characteristics from the parameters including the variable antenna feed system impedance; and selecting values for the antenna system parameters determined from the methodology.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an antenna system in transmit mode. -
FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a generalized antenna system in transmit mode. -
FIG. 3 is representative antenna system design flowchart showing Variable Z0 System and Method configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 4 is a representative antenna system optimization flowchart showing Variable Z0 System and Method configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 5 is Central Force Optimization pseudocode. -
FIG. 6 is a graph of VSWR relative to Z0 for a 6-element Yagi antenna system configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 7 is a graph of Forward Gain for a 6-element Yagi antenna system configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 8 is a graph of Front-to-Back Ratio for a 6-element Yagi antenna system configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 9 is a graph of VSWR relative to Z0 for a Meander Monopole antenna system configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 10 is a graph of Maximum Gain for a Meander Monopole antenna system configured in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 11 is a graph of VSWR relative to Z0 for a 3-Stub Multi-Stub Matching Network configured in accordance with an embodiment of this invention. -
FIG. 12 is a graph of VSWR relative to Z0 for a 5-Stub Multi-Stub Matching Network configured in accordance with an embodiment of this invention. -
FIG. 13 is a graph of VSWR relative to Z0 for a 7-Stub Multi-Stub Matching Network configured in accordance with an embodiment of this invention. - The invention is susceptible of many embodiments. What follows is illustrative, but not exhaustive, of the scope of the invention.
- The Variable Z0 System and Method disclosed herein mitigates many antenna limitations by departing dramatically from the traditional approach to antenna system design or optimization (“D/O”). The Variable Z0 System and Method (“Variable Z0”) provides that the value of an antenna's feed system characteristic impedance or apparatus internal impedance (impedance of an antenna feed system), herein denoted Z0, be allowed to change as a true variable quantity during the antenna system design or optimization methodology and whose value be allowed to be determined by the methodology, because different values of Z0 result in different antenna system performance that often is considerably improved. Variable Z0 removes the limitation of specifying a value for Z0 in advance, and this invention yields unexpected benefits by doing so. The term “design” refers to specifying a complete set of antenna system parameters that meets minimum user-specified performance objectives or requirements, such as bandwidth, radiation pattern, and so on, as nonlimiting examples. The term “optimization” refers to specifying a complete set of antenna system parameters that best meets user-specified performance objectives or requirements, often but not necessarily formulated in a mathematical “fitness function” or “objective function” that is optimized using a computer algorithm. In the design setting, Variable Z0 can achieve superior antenna system designs that are unattainable using traditional D/O methodology. This also is true in the optimization setting, in which multiple values of a variable Z0 value, instead of fixed values for Z0, for a “best” design may correspond to a single or to multiple global optima that may be discovered by using an optimization algorithm, which may be stochastic or deterministic, and which also may converge on local instead of global optima.
- The Variable Z0 System and Method provides many advantages over traditional antenna D/O methodology. It can be applied without limitation to any antenna system design or optimization problem wherein Z0 is an explicit or implicit parameter against any set of performance goals or, in the case of optimization, against any fitness or objective function. Embodiments are especially useful for improving impedance bandwidth, as illustrated by the examples in this disclosure, but Variable Z0 is not limited to that application alone. Significantly, the Variable Z0 System and Method “product by process” approach also can be used in conjunction with any design or optimization methodology, deterministic ones like Central Force Optimization (CFO) or Dominating Cone Line Search (DCLS); stochastic algorithms like Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Differential Evolution (DE), or Genetic Algorithm (GA); analytic approaches such as extended Wu-King impedance loading; even “seat of the pants” design or optimization based on experience, intuition, or even a “best guess.” For additional discussion of impedance loading, see, as examples without limitation, R. A. Formato, “New Techniques for Increasing Antenna Bandwidth with Impedance Loading,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 29, 2011, pp. 269-288; and R. A. Formato, “Issues in Antenna Optimization—A Monopole Case Study,” 2011, Cornell Univ. Library, both of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
- The Variable Z0 System and Method, which treats Z0 as a design or optimization variable instead of a fixed parameter can be used with any design or optimization methodology, rendering it surprisingly flexible in its breadth of applicability. Because of this unexpected and unrestricted applicability, Variable Z0 embodiments are especially useful with algorithm-independent approaches in which various design or optimization algorithms can be used singly or in combination with others (see, for example, R. A. Formato, “Dynamic Threshold Optimization—A New Approach?” June 2012, Cornell University Library, which is fully incorporated herein by reference).
- The features and advantages described herein are not all-inclusive and, in particular, many additional features and advantages will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the drawings, specification, and claims. Moreover, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been selected principally for readability and instructional purposes, and not to limit in any way the scope of the inventive subject matter.
- Embodiments disclose a novel and proprietary antenna system design or optimization System and Method called “Variable Z0,” Z0 being the antenna feed system characteristic impedance or apparatus internal impedance (impedance of an antenna feed system). Design refers to the specification of a complete set of parameters that defines an antenna system meeting specific performance objectives. Optimization refers to the specification of a complete set of parameters that defines the antenna system best meeting specific performance objectives to the extent possible. Variable Z0 embodiments are particularly useful for improving impedance bandwidth (IBW). In addition, Variable Z0 embodiments are useful for meeting any performance objectives, even ones that do not consider IBW at all, for any antenna system for which Z0 is a design or optimization parameter. Z0 may be included as a parameter explicitly, for example without limitation, by utilizing one or the other or both of its real and imaginary parts (resistance and reactance, respectively), or implicitly, for example without limitation, as the reference impedance for computing a standing wave ratio.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of anantenna system 100 in transmit mode comprising: RF (radio-frequency)apparatus 110 with characteristic impedance or apparatus internal impedance (impedance of an antenna feed system) Z0;antenna feed 120 that conducts RF energy shown as propagatingelectric field 140; antenna input terminals a and b; andantenna 150. The antenna system may function in transmit mode, receive mode (not shown), or both, and in eachcase antenna feed 120 typically is a transmission line or matching network or combination of the two. In transmit mode,RF apparatus 110 is a source of RF energy, typically a radio transmitter. The sequence ofdots 130 denotes repetition of the electric field pattern.Antenna 150 is “That part of a transmitting or receiving system that is designed to radiate or to receive electromagnetic waves” as defined in IEEE Std 145-1993 IEEE Standard Definitions of Terms for Antennas, 1993 (definition 2.12 at page 4), published by The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE), 345 East 47th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017-2394 USA (ISBN 1-55937-317-2), fully incorporated herein by reference. Terminology employed herein is intended to be consistent with this standard to the fullest extent. In transmit mode,antenna 150 emits into the surrounding space a radiated electromagnetic (EM)wave 160 comprising coupled electric and magnetic fields, which for simplicity is represented schematically only by itselectric field 140. When the antenna system functions in receive mode radiatedEM wave 160 is replaced by an incident EM wave, andRF apparatus 110 typically is a receiver. In manycases RF apparatus 110 comprises a transceiver that functions both as a transmitter and a receiver. -
FIG. 2 is aschematic representation 200 of a generalized antenna system in transmit mode in whichRF hardware 210 incorporateselements FIG. 1 .RF hardware 210 has a generalized complex apparatus internal impedance denoted Z0, this nomenclature deriving from the fact that theRF apparatus 110 ofFIG. 1 usually is impedance-matched to antenna feed 120 inFIG. 1 which typically is a transmission line with characteristic impedance Z0, Hence the Z0 nomenclature, which has no special significance beyond its being a common notation in the antenna art. In the context of this invention, Z0 represents the internal impedance ofRF hardware 210 inFIG. 2 regardless of the hardware's specific configuration or mode of operation (transmit, receive, or both), although, as pointed out above, Z0 typically is a transmission line's characteristic impedance. These concepts are discussed more generally in the textbook “Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design,” by C. A. Balanis, Harper & Row, Publishers, New York, 1982 (“Balanis”) at pages 1-4 and 52-57, which is incorporated herein by reference. In particular,FIGS. 1 and 2 herein are adapted from Balanis FIGS. 1.1 and 2.18(a) in Sections 1.2 and 2.13, respectively, of that textbook; and Z0 herein corresponds to internal impedance Zg in Balanis FIG. 2.18(a) and to ZT in Balanis FIG. 2.19(a). Additional discussion of antenna feed systems in the context of impedance bandwidth appears in Y. Zehforoosh, et al., “Antenna Design for Ultra Wideband Application Using a New Multilayer Structure,” PIERS Online, vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 544-549, 2006, at page 546, which is fully incorporated herein by reference, doi:10.2529/PIERS060531145356, “doi” being the paper's “digital object identifier.” - In transmit mode,
RF hardware 210 inFIG. 2 excitesantenna 220 at its input terminals a and b, andantenna 220 emits radiatedEM wave 230 into the surrounding space. Maximum power is absorbed byantenna 220 when impedance Z0 is conjugated-matched to the antenna input impedance Zin seen between terminals a and b; that is, there is zero reflected power when this condition is met (note that in Balanis' notation Zin is denoted ZA in his equation (2-72) at page 54). The antenna input impedance Zin is determined by the antenna's source current distribution. Constraining this current distribution to yield a value of antenna input impedance, Zin, that is as close as possible to Z0's complex conjugate unnecessarily eliminates all other current distributions that will provide better antenna performance against a specific set of user-specified performance objectives with a different value of Z0. This limitation, which is inherent in all traditional antenna D/O methodology, is removed by using the Variable Z0 System and Method instead of traditional methodology, and the results often are quite surprising. - IBW is defined as the frequency band or bands within which Zin, the antenna input impedance, is matched within specified limits to Z0, the characteristic impedance or apparatus internal impedance of
RF hardware 210 inFIG. 2 . The required degree of matching can be specified in terms of the antenna's actual input impedance [resistance, Rin, and reactance, Xin, where Zin=Rin+jXin, j=(−1)1/2] as a function of frequency, or, as is more often the case, in terms of a maximum voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR). IBW typically is specified as VSWR//Z0≦2:1 (// denoting “relative to”), which is equivalent to a return loss (scattering parameter S11) approximately less than −10 dB. Other VSWR thresholds can be used instead, and frequently are. Zehforoosh et al., cited above, describe the design of an Ultra Wideband (UWB) microstrip antenna and provide a useful summary of Z0's significance as a design or optimization parameter in the context of IBW. Following traditional methodology, Zehforoosh's work treats the feed system characteristic impedance Z0 as a fixed parameter, not a variable quantity as it is in Variable Z0. While IBW is an important consideration in modern wireless device antenna system design, other performance measures often are as well, for example, without limitation, directivity, radiation pattern, sidelobe level, or radiation efficiency, which also can be addressed using the Variable Z0 System and Method. -
FIG. 3 flowchart 300 is a representative antenna system design methodology illustrating a Variable Z0embodiment including steps Flowchart 300 applies generally to anydesign methodology 315. As an example, without limitation, in the case of designing a Yagi-Uda array antenna system (“Yagi”),design methodology 315 might be based on the essentially graphical methodology formulated in P. B. Viezbicke, “Yagi Antenna Design,” National Bureau of Standards Technical Note 688, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, December, 1976 which is fully incorporated herein by reference. Alternatively,design methodology 315 may be based on one of the many computer programs or textbooks available from or recommended by the American Radio Relay League (ARRL), 225 Main Street, Newington, Conn. 06111 USA, on its antenna technology website, or, as an example, not a limitation, the various methods described in The ARRL Antenna Book. - In
flowchart 300,arrows 370 trace the sequence of design steps, which begins with definition ofdesign parameters 305, in which each of N parameters Pi, i=1,N, is defined. In the case of the Yagi array, for example, the length, diameter, and spacing of each array element are typical design parameters. For other types of antennas, other parameters may be specified. For example, a helical antenna might be defined by its number of turns, wire gauge, helix diameter, and turn pitch. These typical antenna types and parameters are provided for illustrative purposes only, in no way limiting the types of antennas or the range of antenna system parameters that may be designed or determined using the Variable Z0 System and Method according to this invention. - In
step 310, each antenna system design parameter typically is bounded by minimum and maximum acceptable values, that is, Pmin≦Pi≦Pmax, i=1, N, where Pmin and Pmax, respectively, are the minimum and maximum acceptable values. These bounds define the antenna system “design space.” For example, in the case of the Yagi array, the acceptable driven element length might be no shorter than 10 centimeters (minimum) and no longer than 50 centimeters (maximum), while similarly in the helix example, the number of turns might be restricted to no fewer than 5 or more than 20, these examples being provided only for purposes of illustration and not in any way limiting the Variable Z0 System and Method according to this invention. -
Design methodology 315 processes the design parameters to develop an antenna system design whose performance is evaluated against a set of user-specified performance objectives shown asinput data feeding design methodology 315.Performance objectives 380 or modifiedperformance objectives 360 pass through OR function 350 as shown. If the design objectives are met indecision step 320 then thedesign methodology 315 is terminated atEnd step 330. If, on the other hand,objectives 380 are not met,path 345, then the objectives may be preserved and anotheriteration 340 of the design methodology undertaken using theoriginal performance objectives 380. Alternatively, as shown in OR step 350, the objectives may be modified by followingpath 355 to create modifiedperformance objectives 360, whereupon OR 350 is performed to input new modified performance objectives to designmethodology 315. The process outlined inflowchart 300 continues until an acceptable antenna system design has been developed. Modifications torepresentative flowchart 300 often are made by practitioners skilled in the art of antenna system design, and such modifications are fully anticipated herein. - Introducing Z0 as a new design parameter results in better antenna system designs because the design space has been expanded by introducing into it another degree of freedom, namely, the variable instead of fixed value of Z0.
Steps -
FIG. 4 flowchart 400 is a representative antenna system optimization methodology illustrating a Variable Z0embodiment including steps Flowchart 400 applies generally to anyoptimization methodology 440.Optimization methodology 440 is completely unrestricted as to type and function, and it may perform maximization or minimization. It may be computer-based, which most often is the case, or analytical in nature, or a combination of these or other approaches, for example without limitation, graphical, approaches. Widely used computer search and optimization algorithms include, as examples and not limitations, Central Force Optimization, Dominating Cone Line Search, Particle Swarm Optimization, Genetic Algorithm, Ant Colony Optimization, Differential Evolution, and many others well known in the art. For additional discussion of antenna system optimization algorithms, see, for example, without limitation, E. A. Jones et al., “Design of Yagi-Uda Antennas Using Genetic Algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation, vol. 45, no. 9, 1997, pp. 1386-1392; R. A. Formato, “Improved CFO Algorithm for Antenna Optimization,” Prog. Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 19, 2010, pp. 405-425; R. A. Formato, “Central Force Optimization Applied to the PBM Suite of Antenna Benchmarks,” 2010, each of which is fully incorporated herein by reference. -
Flowchart 400 begins with definition ofoptimization parameters 410 followed by specification of the “decision space” 420 by bounding these parameters (steps steps FIG. 3 ) and by definition of the fitness function to be optimized 430, which may be maximized or minimized. - Whereas
design methodology 315 inflowchart 300 usually comprises a capability to assess antenna system performance, as a generalrule optimization methodology 440 does not. Most optimization algorithms are “stand alone” computer programs that are useful across a wide range of disparate problems, not only antenna system design. As an example, Ant Colony Optimization has been used for array antenna synthesis (see, for example, Quevedo-Teruel et al., “Ant Colony Optimization for Array Synthesis,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 23 Oct. 2006, Albuquerque, N. Mex, pp. 3301-3304, doi: 10.1109/APS.2006.1711318, which is fully incorporated herein by reference), and also for solving protein folding problems, which is a quite different discipline (see, for example, Hu et al., “Protein Folding in Hydrophobic-Polar Lattice Model: A Flexible Ant-Colony Optimization Approach,” Protein & Peptide Letters, 2008, 15, 469-477, which is fully incorporated herein by reference). - Because
optimization methodology 440 typically does not comprise an antenna system modeling capability, an optional externalantenna modeling engine 495 usually is required (but not necessarily, with the dashed line being used to distinguishblocks 485 and 490). Many modeling engines are available, and one of the most popular is the Numerical Electromagnetics Code (NEC), which is available in several versions. NEC-2, for example, is freeware downloadable from various websites. - NEC has been used to compute Yagi array and Meander Monopole antenna system performance using an embodiment of Variable Z0 System and Method, and the results are described below. Details of NEC theory, implementation, and use may be found in the following publications: G. J. Burke, “Numerical Electromagnetics Code—NEC-4.2 Method of Moments, Part I: User's Manual,” Jul. 15, 2011, LLNL-SM-490875; G. J. Burke, “Numerical Electromagnetics Code—NEC-4, Method of Moments, Part I: User's Manual and Part II: Program Description—Theory,” January 1992, UCRL-MA-109338; G. J. Burke and A. J. Poggio, “Numerical Electromagnetics Code (NEC)—Method of Moments,” Parts I, II and III, January 1981, UCID-19934, all published by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, Calif., USA.
-
Optimization methodology 440 continues to operate until user-specifiedtermination criteria 450 are met, whereuponpath 460 is followed totermination step 470. If, however,termination criteria 450 are not met, thenpath 455 is followed, andoptimization methodology 440 continues its operation. Typical termination criteria are a certain number of iterations (often referred to as “generations” or “steps”); saturation of a fitness function (changes over some number of steps within a specified tolerance); meeting or exceeding a specific fitness threshold value; or a combination of these and possibly other measures of how “good” the value of the fitness function is. The user is free to define whatever termination criterion or criteria, respectively, is or are appropriate, singly or in combination with others. Modifications to thisrepresentative flowchart 400 often are made by practitioners skilled in the art of antenna system design, and such modifications are fully anticipated herein. - In some example embodiments of the Variable Z0 System and Method, the Central Force Optimization (CFO) algorithm has been used as
optimization methodology 440, andFIG. 5 providesCFO pseudocode 500. Procedure CFO [ƒ({right arrow over (x)}), Nd, Ω] optimizes (maximization, not minimization) a scalar-valued function ƒ({right arrow over (x)}) of Nd-dimensional decision vector -
- where êi is the ith unit vector in the decision space defined by
-
- i=1, . . . , Nd}. Nt is the number of CFO “time” steps; Frep init the starting value for CFO's repositioning factor Frep ; ΔFrep the increment in Frep; Frep min its minimum value; Np the number of CFO probes;
-
- the maximum number of CFO probes per dimension; and γstart, γstop, Δγ, respectively, CFO's γ-parameter starting, stopping, and increment values for CFO's probe line distribution. As an optimization run progresses, CFO computes a fitness matrix Mj p at each probe's location specified by position vector {right arrow over (R)}j p, j being the time step index and p the probe number.
Pseudocode 500 has been reproduced from R. A. Formato, “Parameter-Free Deterministic Global Search with Simplified Central Force Optimization,” in Advanced Intelligent Computing Theories and Applications (ICIC2010), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (D.-S. Huang, Z. Zhao, V. Bevilacqua and J. C. Figueroa, Eds.), LNCS 6215, pp. 309-318, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, which contains a detailed explanation of the CFO algorithm and which is fully incorporated herein by reference. Additional explanation of CFO theory and operation appears in R. A. Formato, “Central Force Optimization with Variable Initial Probes and Adaptive Decision Space,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 217,2011, pp. 8866-8872, and in R. A. Formato, “Central Force Optimization: A New Metaheuristic with Applications in Applied Electromagnetics,” Prog. Electromagnetics Research, PIER 77, 2007, pp. 425-491, both of these publications being fully incorporated herein by reference. -
FIGS. 6 through 13 , inclusive, illustrate the improvement in antenna system performance achievable by using the Variable Z0 System and Method with three quite different example systems: (1) a 6-element Yagi-Uda array antenna system; (2) a Meander Monopole antenna system; and (3) a transmission line Multi-Stub Matching Network. - A Yagi array usually comprises a single reflector element (REF), a single driven element (DE), and a plurality of director elements (Di) all arranged parallel to one another along a perpendicular boom. If each element has the same circular cross-section, which often is the case, then the array is completely specified by assigning to each element a length and its spacing from the previous one. For example, a 6-element Yagi is completely specified by 11 geometrical parameters (six lengths for REF, DE, D1, D2, D3, D4; and five spacings for DE-REF, D1-DE, D2-D1, D3-D2, D4-D3). These parameters and others used in specifying an antenna system typically are termed “design” or “optimization” “parameters” or “variables” or “decision variables,” or, depending on context, other like terminology which is common in the art and anticipated herein.
- In traditional antenna system D/O methodology the impedance Z0 is assigned a fixed value at the beginning of the methodology, typically Z0=50Ω because this is a “standard” value. By contrast, using Variable Z0 Method and System according to this invention, Z0 is not assigned any value, and instead is allowed to “float” as a true variable quantity whose ultimate value is determined by the methodology. Thus, in applying a design or optimization methodology to the Variable Z0 6-element Yagi array antenna system, Z0 is added to the list of design parameters as a twelfth design parameter or decision variable whose value is to be determined by the design or optimization methodology, an improvement that, surprisingly, has been overlooked through many decades of antenna system design or optimization.
-
FIGS. 6 , 7 and 8, respectively, plot the Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR), Forward Gain (Gfwd), and Front-to-Back Ratio (FBR) for a 6-element Yagi optimized using traditional methodology, that is keeping Z0 fixed, and also using the improved Variable Z0 System and Method according to this invention. The traditional methodology assumed a “standard” value of 50Ω for Z0 and used two different deterministic optimization algorithms: Central Force Optimization (CFO) and Dominating Cone Line Search (DCLS). For the Variable Z0 case, Z0 was treated as a true variable quantity according to this invention whose value is determined by the optimization algorithm (CFO), instead of being specified as a fixed value input to the algorithm. - DCLS and the fitness (objective) function that was used for a DCLS-optimized 6-element Yagi are described in A. C. Lisboa, et al., “Monotonically Improving Yagi-Uda Conflicting Specifications Using the Dominating Cone Line Search Method,” IEEE Trans. Magnetics, vol. 45, no. 3, 2009, pp. 1494-1497, which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
- For the CFO runs, the Yagi array antenna system was optimized against the fitness function
-
- where ƒ is the antenna operating frequency and {right arrow over (x)} the decision vector defined as {right arrow over (x)}=(Z0, LREF, LDE, LD
1 , LD2 , LD3 , LD4 , XDE, XD1 , XD2 , XD3 , XD4 ). The fitness function coefficients were: -
i ci k ck fi, k (MHz) 1 5.0 1 0.2 239.8 2 8.0 2 0.8 299.8 3 0.9 3 1.0 359.8 - The fitness (to be maximized in this case) increases with increasing forward gain Gfwd and decreasing VSWR//Z0, VSWR//Z0 being the voltage standing wave ratio relative to Z0 (// denotes “relative to”). This fitness function optimizes the antenna system both for VSWR and for gain, not just one or the other, and it provides an example, without limitation, of how various antenna system performance measures can be combined. There are no restrictions on how a suitable objective or fitness function may be defined or what performance measures may be included. Yagi system performance in this case was computed using NEC as the modeling engine.
- The 6-element Yagi antenna system optimization problem is 12-dimensional with the following decision variables: Z0, the feed system characteristic impedance (or apparatus internal impedance if there is no feed line) according to this invention; and the eleven geometric variables corresponding to the Yagi element lengths (“L”) and boom coordinates (“X”), each subscripted with the corresponding element name (note that REF is placed symmetrically on the Y-axis, that is, at X=0, in a rectangular Cartesian coordinate system). The fitness is evaluated at three frequencies using the empirically determined coefficients ci and ck shown above. Gfwd is evaluated in the direction of the +X-axis (θ=90°, φ=0° in NEC's right-handed spherical polar coordinate system). Additional details and discussion of this optimization example appear in R. A. Formato, “Improving Bandwidth of Yagi-Uda Arrays,” Wireless Engineering and Technology, January 2012, 3, pp. 18-24 (doi:10.4236/wet.2012.31003), which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
-
FIG. 6 graph 600 shows that the Variable Z0 6-element Yagi VSWR 610 exhibits considerably better IBW for the usual VSWR threshold of 2:1, and, indeed, surprisingly better performance throughout the VSWR range than the traditional fixed-Z0 systems 620, 630. This improvement is a result of allowing the optimization algorithm to determine Z0 according to this invention, which in this case was found to be a value of 107.91Ω instead of the usual 50Ω that was used for the fixed-Z0 antenna systems.Curve 630 was computed by NEC using the dimension data for the fixed-Z0 6-element DCLS-optimized “A3” Yagi array described in Lisboa et al.'s paper cited above. For comparative purposes,FIG. 6 also shows IBW for a “perfect antenna” (1:1 impedance match) as the dashedline 640. -
FIGS. 7 and 8 ,graphs 50Ω antenna systems - As a further example of Variable Z0's effectiveness,
FIGS. 9 and 10 ,graphs curves 910, 1010) and not using it (curves 920, 1020). The MM antenna system, like the Yagi example above, was optimized both for VSWR and maximum gain, but a different fitness function was employed, in this case, the weighted gain-VSWR quotient defined as -
- wherein functions
-
- are weighting functions, and ƒi,ƒL and ƒU are the calculation frequencies and operating band lower and upper frequencies, respectively. A detailed discussion of this Meander Monopole optimization example appears in R. A. Formato, “Variable Z0—A New Antenna Design Paradigm,” VHF Communications (U.K.), 1/2012, March, 2012, pp. 18-23, which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
- It is seen from the curves in
FIG. 9 that using the traditional methodology in which Z0 is set to a fixed value (50Ω in this case) results in a higher and much more variable VSWR, 920, than does Variable Z0 according to this invention, 910, in which the CFO optimization algorithm determines Z0's value. The difference in these curves is unexpectedly dramatic, especially when they are compared to the perfect 1:1match curve 930. - As shown in the annotation of
curve 910, an optimum value of Z0 computed by CFO using the Variable Z0 System and Method is 263.91Ω, which is quite different from the standard 50Ω value. Besides resulting in aVSWR curve 910 that is surprisingly flatter and closer to the ideal 1:1 curve, Variable Z0 eliminates the very large and undesirable spike between 3500 and 4000 MHz oncurve 920. Forcing the MM antenna system current distribution to impedance-match Z0=50Ω to the greatest degree possible, which is what traditional antenna system D/O does, automatically excludes the far better current distribution discovered by CFO using Variable Z0 which results in Z0=263.91Ω. -
FIG. 10 compares the MM antenna system's maximum gains and shows that across the band the Variable Z0 gain 1010 generally is comparable to or better than the fixed Z0 gain 1020. These data combined withcurves - As a further example of Variable Z0's effectiveness,
FIGS. 11 , 12 and 13,graphs graphs -
FIG. 11 shows results for the 3-stub MSMN. The BBO-optimized fixed Z0 device exhibits especiallypoor VSWR performance 1120 near the band-center frequency of 1.2 GHz, whereas the BBO-optimized Variable Z0 MSMN'sresponse 1110 comes quite close to the desiredresponse 1130. A similarly impressive improvement is seen in the 5-stub case,FIG. 12 ,graph 1200, wherein the fixed Z0 device'sVSWR 1220 is very poor mid-band, whereas in marked contrast the Variable Z0 device'sresponse 1210 is surprisingly close to the desired response 1230l throughout the entire band. -
FIG. 13 ,graph 1300, compares two fixed-Z0 7-stub MSMNs optimized with BBO and with NM to the 7-stub network BBO-optimized using the Variable Z0 System and Method according to this invention. Neither of the fixed-Z0 responses, 1320 and 1340, is close to the desiredresponse 1330 across the band spanning 1.1-1.3 GHz band, although both the BBO and NM devices slightly improve the mid-band response, withBBO 1320 performing better thanNM 1340. However, even with this minor mid-band improvement, the overall response of the traditionally-optimized 7-stub device at best is only fair. In marked contrast, and what is nothing less than a truly unexpected and remarkable improvement, the BBO-optimized Variable Z0 7-stub MSMN response 1310 is essentially indistinguishable from the desiredresponse 1330 across the entire band. - Because in the Variable Z0 System and Method according to this invention the value of Z0 is determined by the design or optimization methodology, the curves in
FIGS. 11 , 12 and 13 are annotated with the different BBO-determined Z0 values, all of which are within a factor of 3 of “standard” fixed-Z0 value of 50Ω that was employed in the traditional D/O methodology. For the 7-stub case, the optimal value of Z0 is 128Ω, which happens to be fairly close to the 50Ω value that results in far worse VSWR performance. These results are a compelling example of how much better antenna systems designed using Variable Z0 according to this invention can be, compared to traditionally designed or optimized systems. - The MSMN problem again illustrates how effective the Variable Z0 System and Method is for solving difficult antenna system problems that simply cannot be effectively addressed by other methods. Additional details describing the MSMN problem appear in N. I. Dib, A. Sharaqa, and R. A. Formato, “Variable Z0 Applied to Biogeography Based Optimized Multi-Stub Matching Network and to a Central Force Optimized Meander Monopole,” April, 2012, which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
- The foregoing description of the embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. Each and every page of this submission, and all contents thereon, however characterized, identified, or numbered, is considered a substantive part of this application for all purposes, irrespective of form or placement within the application. This specification is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of this disclosure. Other and various embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, from this description, figures, and the claims that follow. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.
Claims (23)
1. A method of designing an antenna connected to a feed system including a radio frequency source, the method comprising:
using an iterative antenna design algorithm on a computer where one or more antenna design parameters and a feed system characteristic impedance value are variables to achieve one or more antenna performance objectives;
varying said one or more antenna design parameters while varying said feed system characteristic impedance value until said one or more antenna performance objectives are achieved using said iterative antenna design algorithm; and
determining a feed system characteristic impedance value from the varied feed system characteristic impedance values which results in said one or more antenna performance objectives.
2. The method of claim 1 further including:
designing the feed system such that said feed system exhibits said determined feed system characteristic impedance value or an approximation of the determined feed system characteristic impedance value;
determining one or more antenna design parameters which results in said antenna performance objectives; and
designing the antenna according to said one or more determined antenna design parameters to achieve said one or more antenna performance objectives.
3. The method of claim 1 in which said one or more antenna design parameters include one or more of antenna element length, diameter, and/or spacing; and/or helix diameter, turn pitch, wire gauge, and/or the number of turns.
4. The method of claim 1 in which varying the one or more antenna design parameters includes varying the one or more antenna design parameters between maximum and minimum values.
5. The method of claim 1 in which said one or more antenna performance objectives are input into the iterative antenna design algorithm.
6. The method of claim 1 in which said iterative antenna design algorithm includes Central Force Optimization, Dominating Cone Line Search, Particle Swarm Optimization, a Genetic Algorithm, Ant Colony Optimization, and/or Differential Evolution.
7. The method of claim 2 in which the feed system further includes a transmission line and/or a matching network and designing the feed system includes choosing a transmission line and/or matching network such as that the feed system exhibits said determined feed system characteristic impedance value.
8. The method of claim 1 in which said antenna performance objectives include voltage standing wave ratio, gain, and/or Front-to-Back ratio.
9. A method of designing an antenna connected to a feed system including a radio frequency source, the method comprising:
choosing minimum and maximum feed system characteristic impedance values;
using an iterative antenna design algorithm on a computer where one or more antenna design parameters and a feed system characteristic impedance value are variables to achieve one or more antenna performance objectives;
varying said one or more antenna design parameters while varying feed system characteristic impedance values between the minimum and maximum feed system characteristic impedance values until said one or more antenna performance objectives are achieved using said iterative antenna design algorithm; and
determining a feed system characteristic impedance value from the varied feed system characteristic impedance values which results in said one or more antenna performance objectives.
10. The method of claim 9 further including:
designing the feed system such that said feed system exhibits said determined feed system characteristic impedance value or an approximation of the determined feed system characteristic impedance value;
determining which one or more antenna design parameters result in said one or more antenna performance objectives; and
designing the antenna according to said one or more determined antenna design parameters to achieve said one or more antenna performance objectives.
11. The method of claim 9 in which said one or more antenna design parameters include antenna element length, diameter, and/or spacing; and/or helix diameter, turn pitch, wire gauge, and/or the number of turns.
12. The method of claim 9 in which varying the one or more antenna design parameters include varying the antenna design parameters between maximum and minimum values.
13. The method of claim 9 in which said one or more antenna performance objectives are input into the iterative antenna design algorithm.
14. The method of claim 9 in which said iterative antenna design algorithm includes Central Force Optimization, Dominating Cone Line Search, Particle Swarm Optimization, a Genetic Algorithm, Ant Colony Optimization, and/or Differential Evolution.
15. The method of claim 10 in which the feed system further includes a transmission line and/or a matching network and designing the feed system includes choosing a transmission line and/or matching network such as that the feed system exhibits said determined feed system characteristic impedance value.
16. The method of claim 9 in which said antenna performance objectives include voltage standing wave ratio, gain, and/or Front-to-Back ratio.
17. The method of claim 9 in which the determined feed system characteristic impedance value is within a factor of three of a standard fixed antenna feed system characteristic impedance value.
18. A computer program for designing an antenna connected to a feed system including a radio frequency source, the computer program comprising:
an iterative antenna design algorithm configured so one or more antenna design parameters and a feed system characteristic impedance value are variables to achieve one or more antenna performance objectives;
said antenna design parameters are varied in said design algorithm while varying the feed system characteristic impedance value until said one or more antenna performance objectives are achieved; and
a feed system characteristic impedance value determined by said algorithm which results in said one or more antenna performance objectives.
19. The computer program of claim 18 in which said antenna design parameters include antenna element length, diameter, and/or spacing; and/or helix diameter, turn pitch, wire gauge, and/or the number of turns.
20. The computer program of claim 18 in which the interactive design algorithm is configured to accept as inputs minimum and maximum feed system characteristic impedance values and to vary the feed system characteristic impedance value between said minimum and maximum values.
21. The computer program of claim 18 in which said iterative antenna design algorithm includes Central Force Optimization, Dominating Cone Line Search, Particle Swarm Optimization, a Genetic Algorithm, Ant Colony Optimization, and/or Differential Evolution.
22. The computer program of claim 18 in which said antenna performance objectives include voltage standing wave ratio, gain, and/or Front-to-Back ratio.
23. An antenna connected to a feed system designed by a method comprising:
choosing minimum and maximum feed system characteristic impedance values;
using an iterative antenna design algorithm on a computer where antenna design parameters and a feed system characteristic impedance value are variables to achieve one or more antenna performance objectives;
varying said antenna design parameters while varying feed system characteristic impedance values between the minimum and maximum feed system characteristic impedance values until said one or more antenna performance objectives are achieved using said iterative antenna design algorithm;
determining a feed system characteristic impedance value from the varied feed system characteristic impedance values which results in said one or more antenna performance objectives;
designing the feed system such that said feed system exhibits said determined feed system characteristic impedance value or an approximation of the determined feed system characteristic impedance value;
determining which antenna design parameters result in said antenna performance objectives; and
designing the antenna according to said determined antenna design parameters to achieve said one or more antenna performance objectives.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/283,850 US20140340278A1 (en) | 2011-09-06 | 2014-05-21 | Variable z0 antenna device design system and method |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201161531237P | 2011-09-06 | 2011-09-06 | |
US13/602,513 US8776002B2 (en) | 2011-09-06 | 2012-09-04 | Variable Z0 antenna device design system and method |
US14/283,850 US20140340278A1 (en) | 2011-09-06 | 2014-05-21 | Variable z0 antenna device design system and method |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/602,513 Continuation US8776002B2 (en) | 2011-09-06 | 2012-09-04 | Variable Z0 antenna device design system and method |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20140340278A1 true US20140340278A1 (en) | 2014-11-20 |
Family
ID=47363051
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/602,513 Expired - Fee Related US8776002B2 (en) | 2011-09-06 | 2012-09-04 | Variable Z0 antenna device design system and method |
US14/283,850 Abandoned US20140340278A1 (en) | 2011-09-06 | 2014-05-21 | Variable z0 antenna device design system and method |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/602,513 Expired - Fee Related US8776002B2 (en) | 2011-09-06 | 2012-09-04 | Variable Z0 antenna device design system and method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8776002B2 (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105678027A (en) * | 2016-02-29 | 2016-06-15 | 北京航空航天大学 | Relay design method based on biogeography optimization |
CN106650171A (en) * | 2017-01-05 | 2017-05-10 | 重庆大学 | Transformer partial discharge ultrahigh frequency detection Hilbert fractal antenna optimization method |
US9967011B1 (en) | 2017-05-10 | 2018-05-08 | Elwha Llc | Admittance matrix calibration using external antennas for tunable metamaterial systems |
US10063101B2 (en) | 2015-09-04 | 2018-08-28 | Elwha Llc | Wireless power transfer using tunable metamaterial systems and methods |
US10075219B1 (en) | 2017-05-10 | 2018-09-11 | Elwha Llc | Admittance matrix calibration for tunable metamaterial systems |
US10218067B2 (en) * | 2015-09-04 | 2019-02-26 | Elwha Llc | Tunable metamaterial systems and methods |
US10236576B2 (en) | 2015-09-04 | 2019-03-19 | Elwha Llc | Wireless power transfer using tunable metamaterial systems and methods |
US10468776B2 (en) | 2017-05-04 | 2019-11-05 | Elwha Llc | Medical applications using tunable metamaterial systems and methods |
Families Citing this family (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8914258B2 (en) * | 2011-06-28 | 2014-12-16 | Space Systems/Loral, Llc | RF feed element design optimization using secondary pattern |
US8776002B2 (en) * | 2011-09-06 | 2014-07-08 | Variable Z0, Ltd. | Variable Z0 antenna device design system and method |
CN103366062B (en) * | 2013-07-15 | 2015-12-09 | 武汉大学 | Based on the core backbone framework construction method of BBO algorithm and Grid survival |
CN104037757B (en) * | 2014-05-20 | 2016-04-20 | 西安理工大学 | A kind of thermal power plant's economic environment dispatching method based on brainstorming |
CN105608636B (en) * | 2015-12-17 | 2021-08-31 | 国家电网公司 | Method for establishing power grid switching operation rule base based on rule mining |
US10157840B2 (en) * | 2016-12-02 | 2018-12-18 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | Integrated circuit having a high cell density |
CN107742307A (en) * | 2017-10-25 | 2018-02-27 | 哈尔滨理工大学 | Based on the transmission line galloping feature extraction and parameters analysis method for improving frame difference method |
CN108763699B (en) * | 2018-05-18 | 2019-11-01 | 西安电子科技大学 | Band carrier antenna optimization method based on high order MoM Region Decomposition |
CN109241576B (en) * | 2018-08-14 | 2020-06-30 | 西安电子科技大学 | Ant-lion algorithm-based sparse antenna directional diagram comprehensive method |
CN110668276B (en) * | 2019-08-29 | 2021-02-09 | 浙江理工大学 | Method for predicting elevator fault based on BP neural network optimized by PSO |
CN110717141B (en) * | 2019-09-22 | 2023-08-04 | 武汉中海庭数据技术有限公司 | Lane line optimization method, device and storage medium |
CN113010986B (en) * | 2021-03-17 | 2023-02-14 | 西北大学 | Antenna array design method based on reinforcement learning and random optimization algorithm |
CN113361053B (en) * | 2021-06-09 | 2022-11-04 | 中国电子科技集团公司第三十八研究所 | Distributed antenna layout optimization design method and system |
CN114498039B (en) * | 2021-12-18 | 2022-12-02 | 中国电波传播研究所(中国电子科技集团公司第二十二研究所) | Double-end matching method for improving matching effect of monopole antenna |
CN114878963B (en) * | 2022-05-06 | 2023-01-06 | 广西电网有限责任公司 | Multi-source power distribution network short-circuit current extreme value calculation method based on CFO |
CN116956539B (en) * | 2023-05-06 | 2024-04-09 | 中国科学院国家天文台 | Feed source antenna design method for conducting impedance self-adaption on ultra-wideband |
Citations (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3618107A (en) * | 1970-03-09 | 1971-11-02 | Itt | Broadband discone antenna having auxiliary cone |
US3858221A (en) * | 1973-04-12 | 1974-12-31 | Harris Intertype Corp | Limited scan antenna array |
US4207574A (en) * | 1978-09-08 | 1980-06-10 | Toia Michael J | Portable dipole antenna with end loading |
US4259673A (en) * | 1979-06-05 | 1981-03-31 | Harold Guretzky | Stub matched antenna and method of feeding same |
US4518965A (en) * | 1981-02-27 | 1985-05-21 | Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Tuned small loop antenna and method for designing thereof |
US4630064A (en) * | 1983-09-30 | 1986-12-16 | The Boeing Company | Spiral antenna with selectable impedance |
US5572170A (en) * | 1991-06-27 | 1996-11-05 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Electronically tuned matching networks using adjustable inductance elements and resonant tank circuits |
US5719794A (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 1998-02-17 | United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force | Process for the design of antennas using genetic algorithms |
JP2001085931A (en) * | 1999-09-16 | 2001-03-30 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Antenna system and communication terminal using it |
US6346913B1 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2002-02-12 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Patch antenna with embedded impedance transformer and methods for making same |
US20020082812A1 (en) * | 2000-12-26 | 2002-06-27 | Fujitsu Limited | Apparatus and method for simulating the receiving characteristic of radio waves |
US6642903B2 (en) * | 2001-05-15 | 2003-11-04 | Time Domain Corporation | Apparatus for establishing signal coupling between a signal line and an antenna structure |
US20050113952A1 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2005-05-26 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Design method for antenna and antenna using the same |
US20060125706A1 (en) * | 2004-12-14 | 2006-06-15 | Eric Amyotte | High performance multimode horn for communications and tracking |
US20060256027A1 (en) * | 2003-08-27 | 2006-11-16 | Harris Corporation | Shaped ground plane for dynamically reconfigurable aperature coupled antenna |
US20070040758A1 (en) * | 2005-08-19 | 2007-02-22 | Rf Industries Pty Ltd | Dipole antenna |
US20070176834A1 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2007-08-02 | Mohammadian Alireza H | Diverse spectrum antenna for handsets and other devices |
US20080186245A1 (en) * | 2004-08-26 | 2008-08-07 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Rfid Tag Having a Folded Dipole |
JP2008251358A (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2008-10-16 | Mitsui Eng & Shipbuild Co Ltd | Plasma generation device and plasma film-making device |
US20080266191A1 (en) * | 2005-11-10 | 2008-10-30 | Nxp B.V. | Broadband Antenna For a Transponder of a Radio Frequency Identification System |
US20090057302A1 (en) * | 2007-08-30 | 2009-03-05 | Rf Dynamics Ltd. | Dynamic impedance matching in RF resonator cavity |
US20090107216A1 (en) * | 2007-10-30 | 2009-04-30 | National Taiwan University | Dual-band micro-planar inverted f antenna used for biomolecular finger print and its identification method |
US7898493B1 (en) * | 2007-06-13 | 2011-03-01 | The Ohio State University | Implementation of ultra wide band (UWB) electrically small antennas by means of distributed non foster loading |
US20110122043A1 (en) * | 2009-11-24 | 2011-05-26 | Digi International Inc. | Wideband antenna for printed circuit boards |
US20110148723A1 (en) * | 2008-06-23 | 2011-06-23 | Erik Bengtsson | Tunable Antenna Arrangement |
US20110279348A1 (en) * | 2010-05-12 | 2011-11-17 | Fujitsu Limited | Antenna device |
US8111205B1 (en) * | 2009-03-19 | 2012-02-07 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Mast clamp current probe (MCCP) insertion loss determining methods and systems |
US20120295554A1 (en) * | 2011-05-16 | 2012-11-22 | Paratek Microwave, Inc. | Method and apparatus for tuning a communication device |
US20120295555A1 (en) * | 2011-05-16 | 2012-11-22 | Paratek Microwave, Inc. | Method and apparatus for tuning a communication device |
US20140159976A1 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2014-06-12 | L. Pierre de Rochemont | Ceramic antenna module and methods of manufacture thereof |
US8776002B2 (en) * | 2011-09-06 | 2014-07-08 | Variable Z0, Ltd. | Variable Z0 antenna device design system and method |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4370660A (en) | 1978-05-17 | 1983-01-25 | Fahmy Moustafa N I | Broadband elliptic sheet antenna |
US5835067A (en) | 1994-04-28 | 1998-11-10 | Goodman; Edward A. | Short vertical 160 meter band antenna |
KR100285950B1 (en) | 1997-12-26 | 2001-04-16 | 윤종용 | Method for emboding antenna circuit of mobile phone for reducing an influence of human body |
US6697031B2 (en) | 2001-08-01 | 2004-02-24 | Lucent Technologies Inc | Antenna |
US7180467B2 (en) | 2002-02-12 | 2007-02-20 | Kyocera Wireless Corp. | System and method for dual-band antenna matching |
US6693597B2 (en) | 2002-04-23 | 2004-02-17 | The Ohio State University Research Foundation | Layout for automotive window antenna |
WO2008023800A1 (en) | 2006-08-24 | 2008-02-28 | Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc. | Antenna device |
US7714676B2 (en) | 2006-11-08 | 2010-05-11 | Paratek Microwave, Inc. | Adaptive impedance matching apparatus, system and method |
EP1928056A1 (en) | 2006-11-28 | 2008-06-04 | Saab AB | Method for designing array antennas |
JP4129038B2 (en) | 2006-12-12 | 2008-07-30 | 日本アンテナ株式会社 | Multi-frequency antenna |
JP5075661B2 (en) | 2008-02-12 | 2012-11-21 | 株式会社東芝 | ANTENNA DEVICE AND RADIO DEVICE |
-
2012
- 2012-09-04 US US13/602,513 patent/US8776002B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2014
- 2014-05-21 US US14/283,850 patent/US20140340278A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (37)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3618107A (en) * | 1970-03-09 | 1971-11-02 | Itt | Broadband discone antenna having auxiliary cone |
US3858221A (en) * | 1973-04-12 | 1974-12-31 | Harris Intertype Corp | Limited scan antenna array |
US4207574A (en) * | 1978-09-08 | 1980-06-10 | Toia Michael J | Portable dipole antenna with end loading |
US4259673A (en) * | 1979-06-05 | 1981-03-31 | Harold Guretzky | Stub matched antenna and method of feeding same |
US4518965A (en) * | 1981-02-27 | 1985-05-21 | Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Tuned small loop antenna and method for designing thereof |
US4630064A (en) * | 1983-09-30 | 1986-12-16 | The Boeing Company | Spiral antenna with selectable impedance |
US5572170A (en) * | 1991-06-27 | 1996-11-05 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Electronically tuned matching networks using adjustable inductance elements and resonant tank circuits |
US5719794A (en) * | 1995-07-19 | 1998-02-17 | United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force | Process for the design of antennas using genetic algorithms |
JP2001085931A (en) * | 1999-09-16 | 2001-03-30 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Antenna system and communication terminal using it |
US6628241B1 (en) * | 1999-09-16 | 2003-09-30 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Antenna device and communication terminal comprising the same |
US6346913B1 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2002-02-12 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Patch antenna with embedded impedance transformer and methods for making same |
US20020082812A1 (en) * | 2000-12-26 | 2002-06-27 | Fujitsu Limited | Apparatus and method for simulating the receiving characteristic of radio waves |
US6642903B2 (en) * | 2001-05-15 | 2003-11-04 | Time Domain Corporation | Apparatus for establishing signal coupling between a signal line and an antenna structure |
US20060256027A1 (en) * | 2003-08-27 | 2006-11-16 | Harris Corporation | Shaped ground plane for dynamically reconfigurable aperature coupled antenna |
US20050113952A1 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2005-05-26 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Design method for antenna and antenna using the same |
US20080186245A1 (en) * | 2004-08-26 | 2008-08-07 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Rfid Tag Having a Folded Dipole |
US20140159976A1 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2014-06-12 | L. Pierre de Rochemont | Ceramic antenna module and methods of manufacture thereof |
US20060125706A1 (en) * | 2004-12-14 | 2006-06-15 | Eric Amyotte | High performance multimode horn for communications and tracking |
US20070040758A1 (en) * | 2005-08-19 | 2007-02-22 | Rf Industries Pty Ltd | Dipole antenna |
US20080266191A1 (en) * | 2005-11-10 | 2008-10-30 | Nxp B.V. | Broadband Antenna For a Transponder of a Radio Frequency Identification System |
US20070176834A1 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2007-08-02 | Mohammadian Alireza H | Diverse spectrum antenna for handsets and other devices |
JP2008251358A (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2008-10-16 | Mitsui Eng & Shipbuild Co Ltd | Plasma generation device and plasma film-making device |
US7898493B1 (en) * | 2007-06-13 | 2011-03-01 | The Ohio State University | Implementation of ultra wide band (UWB) electrically small antennas by means of distributed non foster loading |
US20090057302A1 (en) * | 2007-08-30 | 2009-03-05 | Rf Dynamics Ltd. | Dynamic impedance matching in RF resonator cavity |
US20090107216A1 (en) * | 2007-10-30 | 2009-04-30 | National Taiwan University | Dual-band micro-planar inverted f antenna used for biomolecular finger print and its identification method |
US20110148723A1 (en) * | 2008-06-23 | 2011-06-23 | Erik Bengtsson | Tunable Antenna Arrangement |
US8674889B2 (en) * | 2008-06-23 | 2014-03-18 | Nokia Corporation | Tunable antenna arrangement |
US8111205B1 (en) * | 2009-03-19 | 2012-02-07 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Mast clamp current probe (MCCP) insertion loss determining methods and systems |
US8599093B2 (en) * | 2009-11-24 | 2013-12-03 | Digi International Inc. | Wideband antenna for printed circuit boards |
US20110122043A1 (en) * | 2009-11-24 | 2011-05-26 | Digi International Inc. | Wideband antenna for printed circuit boards |
US20110279348A1 (en) * | 2010-05-12 | 2011-11-17 | Fujitsu Limited | Antenna device |
US20120295555A1 (en) * | 2011-05-16 | 2012-11-22 | Paratek Microwave, Inc. | Method and apparatus for tuning a communication device |
US8594584B2 (en) * | 2011-05-16 | 2013-11-26 | Blackberry Limited | Method and apparatus for tuning a communication device |
US20120295554A1 (en) * | 2011-05-16 | 2012-11-22 | Paratek Microwave, Inc. | Method and apparatus for tuning a communication device |
US8626083B2 (en) * | 2011-05-16 | 2014-01-07 | Blackberry Limited | Method and apparatus for tuning a communication device |
US20140049434A1 (en) * | 2011-05-16 | 2014-02-20 | Blackberry Limited | Method and apparatus for tuning a communication device |
US8776002B2 (en) * | 2011-09-06 | 2014-07-08 | Variable Z0, Ltd. | Variable Z0 antenna device design system and method |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
Babakhani et al., "Finding Globally Optimum Solutions in Antenna Optimization Problems", 2010 IEEE Antenna andPropagation Society, 11 July 2010, pp. 1-4. * |
NN7208973, "Circular Antenna for Electromagnetic Susceptibility", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1 August 1972, p. 973 (2 pages).. * |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10063101B2 (en) | 2015-09-04 | 2018-08-28 | Elwha Llc | Wireless power transfer using tunable metamaterial systems and methods |
US10218067B2 (en) * | 2015-09-04 | 2019-02-26 | Elwha Llc | Tunable metamaterial systems and methods |
US10236576B2 (en) | 2015-09-04 | 2019-03-19 | Elwha Llc | Wireless power transfer using tunable metamaterial systems and methods |
CN105678027A (en) * | 2016-02-29 | 2016-06-15 | 北京航空航天大学 | Relay design method based on biogeography optimization |
CN106650171A (en) * | 2017-01-05 | 2017-05-10 | 重庆大学 | Transformer partial discharge ultrahigh frequency detection Hilbert fractal antenna optimization method |
US10468776B2 (en) | 2017-05-04 | 2019-11-05 | Elwha Llc | Medical applications using tunable metamaterial systems and methods |
US9967011B1 (en) | 2017-05-10 | 2018-05-08 | Elwha Llc | Admittance matrix calibration using external antennas for tunable metamaterial systems |
US10075219B1 (en) | 2017-05-10 | 2018-09-11 | Elwha Llc | Admittance matrix calibration for tunable metamaterial systems |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US8776002B2 (en) | 2014-07-08 |
US20120331436A1 (en) | 2012-12-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8776002B2 (en) | Variable Z0 antenna device design system and method | |
Banerjee et al. | Compact CPW-fed UWB MIMO antenna with a novel modified Minkowski fractal defected ground structure (DGS) for high isolation and triple band-notch characteristic | |
Lu et al. | Design of high-isolation wideband dual-polarized compact MIMO antennas with multiobjective optimization | |
Enache et al. | Sparse array antenna design based on dolph-chebyshev and genetic algorithms | |
Zaharis et al. | IWO-based synthesis of log-periodic dipole array | |
Papadopoulos et al. | Particle swarm optimization of antenna arrays with efficiency constraints | |
Dejen et al. | Genetically engineered tri-band microstrip antenna with improved directivity for mm-wave wireless application | |
McDonald et al. | A monocone-bicone collinear array | |
Singh et al. | A hybrid approach for antenna optimization using cat swarm based genetic optimization | |
Gao et al. | A Novel Co-planar Waveguide-fed Direct Current Wide Band Printed Dipole Antenna. | |
Casula et al. | Structure-based evolutionary programming design of broadband wire antennas | |
Minasian et al. | Particle swarm antennas for wireless communication systems | |
Capek et al. | Fundamental bounds for multi-port antennas | |
Hemalatha et al. | Design optimization of Yagi-Uda antenna using antenna toolbox | |
Sun | Characteristic mode analysis of half-width leaky-wave antennas | |
Durbhakula et al. | Characteristic mode analysis and optimization of meandering probe fed patch antenna for wide-bandwidth in UHF band | |
Zaharis et al. | Design and optimization of wideband log-periodic dipole arrays under requirements for high gain, high front-to-back ratio, optimal gain flatness and low side lobe level: the application of Invasive Weed optimization | |
Abbasi et al. | A twelve element dual-band MIMO antenna for 5G smartphones | |
Bahreini et al. | Design of a meander-shaped MIMO antenna using IWO algorithm for wireless applications | |
Shen et al. | Optimization of 2.45-GHz pixel rectenna for wireless power transmission using mixed integer linear programming | |
Hamadameen | Analysis, design, and simulation of a log periodic antenna for mobile communication bands | |
Formato | A novel methodology for antenna design and optimization: Variable Zo | |
Kumar et al. | Investigation of circularly polarized fractal antenna At 2.1 GHz for LTE application | |
Liu et al. | Multi-objective design optimization of an inverted-S antenna | |
Henderson | Adaptive Antenna System for Both 4G LTE and 5G Cellular Systems |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |