US20140297330A1 - Distributed healthcare database system and method - Google Patents

Distributed healthcare database system and method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140297330A1
US20140297330A1 US14/224,762 US201414224762A US2014297330A1 US 20140297330 A1 US20140297330 A1 US 20140297330A1 US 201414224762 A US201414224762 A US 201414224762A US 2014297330 A1 US2014297330 A1 US 2014297330A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
data
dam
healthcare
drs
dss
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US14/224,762
Other versions
US9582641B2 (en
Inventor
Eric Rock
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Vivify Health Inc
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US14/223,815 external-priority patent/US10817965B2/en
Priority claimed from US14/223,652 external-priority patent/US9357238B2/en
Priority claimed from US14/223,747 external-priority patent/US20140297329A1/en
Priority claimed from US14/223,537 external-priority patent/US9619849B2/en
Priority claimed from US14/224,666 external-priority patent/US10296722B2/en
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US14/224,762 priority Critical patent/US9582641B2/en
Priority to PCT/US2014/031864 priority patent/WO2014160777A1/en
Publication of US20140297330A1 publication Critical patent/US20140297330A1/en
Publication of US9582641B2 publication Critical patent/US9582641B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Assigned to WESTERN ALLIANCE BANK reassignment WESTERN ALLIANCE BANK SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: VIVIFY HEALTH, INC.
Assigned to VIVIFY HEALTH, INC. reassignment VIVIFY HEALTH, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ROCK, ERIC LEE
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G06F19/322
    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H10/00ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of patient-related medical or healthcare data
    • G16H10/60ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of patient-related medical or healthcare data for patient-specific data, e.g. for electronic patient records

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to systems and methods that permit cross-database data access from a variety of hardware/software platforms, and specifically to applications in which disparate hardware/software systems must coordinate database access to patient healthcare information stored in electronic medical records.
  • the present invention may be advantageously applied to the following U.S. Patent Classifications: 707/796; 707/804; 705/2; 705/3; 713/193; 707/999.001; 707/999.003; and 707/999.01.
  • the objectives of the present invention are (among others) to circumvent the deficiencies in the prior art and affect the following objectives in the context of a distributed healthcare database system and method:
  • the present invention covers a system and method directed to the coordination of information flow among various healthcare providers using a data access matrix (DAM) that coordinates the database updates between a data request user server (DRS) and data service user server (DSS).
  • DAM data access matrix
  • DSS data request user server
  • DSS data service user server
  • the DAM provides for granular access to individual data items (IDI) provided from a variety of DSS sources and permits the data providers to control the access to these IDI on a per-DRS basis.
  • IDI/DRS pair is associated with DRS/DSS read/write control processes (RWP) and include read data (RDD) and write data (WRD) processes that permit data access across disparate (and typically incompatible) database boundaries.
  • RWP DRS/DSS read/write control processes
  • RWD read data
  • WPD write data
  • the system permits healthcare providers using different database providers (and across disparate database network boundaries) to operate in a coordinated fashion with full access control maintained by the DRS/DSS pairs
  • the present invention in some preferred system embodiments may be described as a distributed healthcare database system comprising:
  • a corresponding preferred invention method embodiment allows data to be transferred between the DRS and DSS using processes located in the DAM and executed by the DMS and/or DRS/DSS systems to form a data bridge between disparate computer systems and database architectures.
  • the present invention method permits activation of healthcare related processes that are triggered by specific data movement among the DRS/DSS databases to allow rapid intervention of healthcare personnel in response to changing information relating to a patient medical condition or status.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an overview block diagram of a presently preferred exemplary system embodiment
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a detail block diagram of a presently preferred exemplary system embodiment depicting data flows between a method and a data service user server (DSS);
  • DSS data service user server
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary multi-dimensional data access matrix (DAM) data structure depicting both data mapping processes as well as provisions for healthcare activity mapping (HAP) processes;
  • DAM multi-dimensional data access matrix
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary multi-dimensional data access matrix (DAM) data structure depicting both data mapping processes as well as provisions for healthcare activity mapping (HAP) processes combined with multiple DAM mapping operations;
  • DAM multi-dimensional data access matrix
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary multi-dimensional data access matrix (DAM) data structure depicting both data mapping processes as well as provisions for healthcare activity mapping (HAP) processes combined with multiple DTM processing options;
  • DAM multi-dimensional data access matrix
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary DAM data structure overview
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary DAM data structure detail view
  • FIG. 8 illustrates a flowchart depicting an exemplary distributed healthcare database method.
  • the present invention anticipates a wide variety of data access modes to be supported by the distributed healthcare database system and method described herein. While read, write, and update (interlocked read/modify/write) modes are anticipated within this context, the present invention is not necessarily limited to these data access modes.
  • a hospital 0110 ) incorporating a hospital information system (HIS) ( 0111 ) contains a variety of internal data sources ( 0112 ) that relate to a patient. These data sources may contain a wide variety of information relating to lab results, patient charts, procedures, etc. and may occur and be updated in real-time. This information is typically stored in a patient history database (PHD) (often referred to as an electronic medical record (EMR)) ( 0113 ).
  • PLD patient history database
  • EMR electronic medical record
  • This PHD ( 0113 ) data may be used by a real-time data extraction/patient risk stratification process ( 0114 ) (as described in the HEALTHCARE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application) executed from machine instructions read from a computer readable medium ( 0115 ) to provide a real-time risk stratification dashboard ( 0116 ) that enables healthcare providers to prioritize healthcare to patients that have critical medical conditions.
  • This data processing system ( 0140 ) comprises a computer system ( 0141 ) (also termed a host computer system (HCS) or healthcare web server (HWS) in this document) operating under control of machine instructions read from a computer readable medium ( 0142 ).
  • HWS host computer system
  • HWS healthcare web server
  • the HWS ( 0141 ) allows a patient healthcare plan (PHP) ( 0150 ) to be defined to coordinate healthcare delivery to the patient among the various healthcare provider contexts ( 0110 , 0120 , 0130 ).
  • This PHP ( 0150 ) is synchronized with the MUD ( 0120 ) context to allow the MUD ( 0121 ) to operate asynchronously of the other systems in the diagram.
  • Execution of the PHP ( 0150 ) in the MUD context ( 0120 ) or the caregiver context ( 0130 ) may result in patient information that must be integrated into the PHD ( 0113 ) in one or more hospital ( 0110 ) or healthcare facility settings.
  • a data mapping process (DMP) ( 0160 ) is enabled in the HWS ( 0130 ) context to act as an interface between the various computer system contexts ( 0110 , 0120 , 0130 ).
  • the DMP ( 0160 ) may operate under control of the HWS ( 0141 ) or in some circumstances be deployed in a separate data mapping server (DMS) specifically designed to implement the database interfacing function described herein.
  • DMS data mapping server
  • DMS data mapping server
  • FIG. 2 Additional system detail for a preferred invention embodiment is generally illustrated in FIG. 2 ( 0200 ).
  • the DMS ( 0210 ) interfaces with two generalized healthcare computer systems comprising a data request user server (DRS) ( 0220 ) and a data service user server (DSS) ( 0230 ).
  • DRS data request user server
  • DSS data service user server
  • the DRS ( 0220 ) and DSS ( 0230 ) generically represent any two healthcare computer systems that may wish to coordinate PHD information to unify their patient healthcare views.
  • An exemplary data access request from the DRS ( 0220 ) to the DSS ( 0230 ) involves sending the read/write/update request from the DRS ( 0220 ) through a computer communication network ( 0290 ) (typically the Internet) to the DMS ( 0210 ).
  • the DMS ( 0210 ) executes machine instructions read from a computer readable medium ( 0211 ) that then performs a lookup of the datum in a data access matrix (DAM) ( 0212 ).
  • the DAM ( 0212 ) comprises a matrix relating individual data items (IDIs) in a DRS database ( 0221 ) to those contained in a corresponding DSS database ( 0231 ).
  • a data request from the DRS ( 0220 ) to the DSS ( 0230 ) performs a row/column lookup in the DAM ( 0212 ) which retrieves access control information to validate the authority of the DRS ( 0220 ) to access the IDI within the DSS ( 0230 ). If this access validation passes, the DAM ( 0212 ) activates a data mapping process ( 0213 ) that links a DRS database interface access module ( 0222 ) with a corresponding DSS database interface access module ( 0232 ) to perform the database transfer between the DRS ( 0220 ) and the DSS ( 0230 ).
  • the DRS/DSS database interface access modules ( 0222 , 0232 ) are responsible for actual interfacing to the respective DRS/DSS databases ( 0221 , 0231 ) and for proper data formatting and data translation necessary to ensure that data contained in each database ( 0221 , 0231 ) is maintained in a consistent state.
  • the DMP ( 0213 ) operating in the context of the DMS ( 0210 ) may incorporate differential encryption between each of the DRS/DSS interface modules ( 0222 , 0232 ) so that the security measures associated with each of the DRS ( 0220 ) and DSS ( 0230 ) can be maintained.
  • the system as depicted permits both data transparency between the DRS ( 0220 ) and DSS ( 0230 ) but also transparently handles differences in security protocols between the systems.
  • DRS data mapping server
  • HAP healthcare activity processes
  • the data access matrix (DAM) may be in some preferred embodiments viewed as a two-dimensional, three-dimensional, or multi-dimensional data structure.
  • the DRS ( 0311 ) and DSS ( 0312 ) row/column intersection ( 0320 ) will correspond to processes that define how a read/write/update operation may be processed between the DRS/DSS in either direction (typically this will involve six processes—one for each of read/write/update in either direction ( 0321 , 0322 )).
  • the data mapping process (DMP) ( 0330 ) logical layer of the DAM may also be associated with any number of healthcare activity processes ( 0331 , 0339 ) that are associated with data accesses between the DRS/DSS.
  • the DAM may incorporate multiple mapping of DRS/DSS data items so that within a given database a given data item (datum) may be accessed in parallel using parallel threads ( 0440 ).
  • this type of mapping may be useful in a distributed healthcare database system:
  • the present invention anticipates that a wide variety of data transfer modes (DTM) may exist between the DRS and DSS. For example: READ, WRITE, and UPDATE (interlocked read/modify/write) operations are anticipated in a typical healthcare application context.
  • DTM data transfer modes
  • the present invention anticipates that the data mapping process (DMP) ( 0520 ) for each DRS ( 0521 )/DSS ( 0522 ) data transfer may have associated with them DTM-specific processes ( 0541 , 0542 ) that are activated based on specific types of DTM for each DMP. For example, a special process may be activated for DRS READ access versus UPDATE access.
  • DRS/DSS database hosting systems
  • each of the database hosting systems (DRS/DSS) may have their own specific DTM-specific access processes ( 0541 , 0542 ) defined in this context.
  • the DTM-specific processing for each of the database hosting systems may take the form of a software process module ( 0541 , 0542 ) that executes in the context of the DMS but may also be configured as a software module that is executed native to the DRS or DSS.
  • the software process module ( 0541 , 0542 ) is transferred from the DMS to either the DRS or DRS for local execution to support the specific DTM ( 0540 ) invoked by the DAM ( 0510 ) indexed entry.
  • each DMP there may also be an access control list (ACL) ( 0550 ) that defines the authorization of each type of data transfer mode (DTM) to occur between the DRS/DSS in each direction.
  • ACL access control list
  • DTM data transfer mode
  • a given type of transfer may be restricted based on healthcare provider privileges that are associated with the database, healthcare information system, or healthcare provider.
  • a HIS system may be authorized to READ patient information for the purposes of updating their own database records, but may be restricted to WRITE or UPDATE information in another database only in a restricted portion of the database reserved for patient information related to their practice.
  • the DAM may incorporate a separate processing layer to provide the needed access control information necessary for the ACL ( 0550 ) to properly authorize the DTM between the DRS/DSS.
  • FIG. 6 0600
  • FIG. 7 0700
  • DAM data structures utilizes a DAM header pointer ( 0601 ) that links together one or more DAM mappings ( 0610 , 0690 ) in a linked list.
  • Each of the DAM mappings ( 0610 , 0690 ) represents a data transfer relationship between disparate databases that may be controlled by incompatible computer systems.
  • Each of these DAM maps ( 0610 , 0690 ) may partially or fully describe the migration of data through the various incompatible computer systems as data transfers are performed.
  • this structure permits cascading data transfers to occur in situations where data modified in a first DAM ( 0610 ) relates to data contained in another DAM ( 0690 ).
  • the first DAM ( 0610 ) will coordinate a database transfer.
  • This first database transfer may then trigger another database transfer in another DAM ( 0690 ) that is either further down the linked list or in some circumstanced placed prior to the initially modified DAM database.
  • Sequence indicators placed in each DAM can be used in these cascading updates to limit the execution of recursive or infinite loops in the cascading update process.
  • FIG. 7 More detail of an exemplary DAM data structure is provided in FIG. 7 ( 0700 ) wherein the DAM linked list pointer ( 0710 ) links to a pairing list of DRS/DSS pairs ( 0720 ) and a linked list of DAM process mapping layers ( 0730 ).
  • the DRS/DSS pairing list ( 0720 ) generally controls the association of database keys ( 0721 , 0722 ) with the DRS/DSS data referenced in the process maps ( 0730 ) and allows a shorthand representation of the transfers to be depicted in the data transformation maps ( 0730 ).
  • Each process layer ( 0730 ) in the DAM mapping system may represent a data translation/transform/movement from one disparate database to another and/or may include HAP processing associated with the database activity. While only one DAM process map ( 0730 ) is illustrated in this example, a plethora of individual process maps may be included in this chain and may be configured to operate synchronously (layer to layer) or asynchronously (layers simultaneously processed
  • the DRS/DSS pairing list ( 0720 ) references database keys ( 0723 ) that are linked to database names ( 0724 ) referencing a specific database ( 0725 ) for DRS/DSS activity. Each of these referenced databases ( 0725 ) may have associated with it file/field references ( 0726 ) that are identified by datum key ( 0727 ) and associated dataum name ( 0728 ). The datum keys may be referenced within the DAM process map ( 0730 ) as a data pair ( 0733 , 0734 ) indicating which data is associated with which DMP control structure ( 0729 ).
  • the data mapping process (DMP) control structure ( 0729 ) dictates access control list (ACL) restrictions on the database file/field data ( 0726 ) and determines based on the data transfer direction (DRS-to-DSS or DSS-to-DRS) what data transfer mode (DTM) processes to utilize to affect the data transfer operation. These individual DTM processes may also incorporate necessary formatting changes to the data to ensure consistency of data across the data platforms (as in the case of date formats (i.e. MM/DD/YYYY vs DD/MM/YYYY) and similar data transforms that may be required).
  • DMP data mapping process
  • ACL access control list
  • DTM data transfer mode
  • FIG. 1 0100
  • FIG. 2 0200
  • FIG. 8 0800
  • Modifications to this basic methodology may include looping from step (8) to step (1) to allow the data access between the DRS and DSS to trigger another data transfer associated with other databases that are not directly controlled by the DRS/DSS servers.
  • This cascading data transfer may span a plethora of healthcare databases and permits one data transfer to propagate through a system of interconnected datasets to allow these disparate datasets to become coherent without the need for individual computer systems controlling these datasets to directly cooperate with each other.
  • the HAP processes described herein may incorporate the generation of data and/or alerts that are fed into an overall patient healthcare plan (PHP) in the form of synchronous or asynchronous events, patient interaction, healthcare provider interaction, and/or patient healthcare alerts.
  • PPP patient healthcare plan
  • These features of the PHP are further described in the HEALTHCARE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application.
  • a database transfer of a BLOOD PRESSURE reading into a particular database field might trigger an asynchronous patient query/response dialog or video presentation to the patient with questions as to their overall health condition and may be associated with a healthcare provider alert if the patient responses are considered indicative of declining health status.
  • Video scripting and/or diverse user interaction contexts may be implemented within this PHP framework as described in the VIDEO DATA EXTENSION SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application and the DYNAMIC VIDEO SCRIPTING SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application.
  • This type of asynchronous triggering may also occur for the HAP in situations where patient medical data is collected in real-time and stored in a patient history database (PHD).
  • PLD patient history database
  • This collected data may be from a mobile user device (MUD) and/or a medical instrumentation device (MID) that is selected from (among others) a group consisting of: weight scale; pulse oximeter; blood pressure meter; and blood glucose meter.
  • MUD mobile user device
  • MID medical instrumentation device
  • This type of asynchronous triggering may also occur for the HAP in situations where patient medical data is accessed from a patient history database (PHD).
  • PLD patient history database
  • the mere accessing of this data may trigger activity directed towards other healthcare providers to ensure that data presented to one healthcare provider is presented to other patient physicians to ensure that all of the healthcare professionals are apprised of related patient statistics.
  • the present invention preferred exemplary system embodiment anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic theme of construction, but can be generalized as a distributed healthcare database system comprising:
  • the present invention preferred exemplary method embodiment anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic theme of implementation, but can be generalized as a distributed healthcare database method comprising:
  • the present invention anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic theme of construction.
  • the examples presented previously do not represent the entire scope of possible usages. They are meant to cite a few of the almost limitless possibilities.
  • This basic system and method may be augmented with a variety of ancillary embodiments, including but not limited to:
  • the present invention may be implemented as a computer program product for use with a computerized computing system.
  • programs defining the functions defined by the present invention can be written in any appropriate programming language and delivered to a computer in many forms, including but not limited to: (a) information permanently stored on non-writeable storage media (e.g., read-only memory devices such as ROMs or CD-ROM disks); (b) information alterably stored on writeable storage media (e.g., floppy disks and hard drives); and/or (c) information conveyed to a computer through communication media, such as a local area network, a telephone network, or a public network such as the Internet.
  • non-writeable storage media e.g., read-only memory devices such as ROMs or CD-ROM disks
  • writeable storage media e.g., floppy disks and hard drives
  • information conveyed to a computer through communication media such as a local area network, a telephone network, or a public network such as the Internet.
  • the present invention system embodiments can incorporate a variety of computer readable media that comprise computer usable medium having computer readable code means embodied therein.
  • One skilled in the art will recognize that the software associated with the various processes described herein can be embodied in a wide variety of computer accessible media from which the software is loaded and activated.
  • the present invention anticipates and includes this type of computer readable media within the scope of the invention.
  • Pursuant to In re Nuijten, 500 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/211,928)
  • the present invention scope is limited to computer readable media wherein the media is both tangible and non-transitory.
  • a system and method distributing healthcare database access has been disclosed.
  • the system and method interpose a data mapping server (DMS) between a data request user (DRS) and data service user server (DSS) to manage data transfers between the DSS and the DRS such that disparate database characteristics of the DRS/DSS are accommodated in real-time and permit asynchronous healthcare activity to be triggered.
  • the DMS operates with a data access matrix (DAM) having each referenced DRS/DSS intersection pair associated with read/write control processes (RWP) that include read data (RDD) and write data (WRD) processes to permit data access across the disparate DRS/DSS database boundaries.
  • the DAM may have multiple dimensions to accommodate asynchronously activated process threads within an overall patient healthcare plan (PHP) that operate to trigger healthcare provider alarms and other activity associated with the transfer/update of data between the DSS and the DRS.
  • PGP patient healthcare plan

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Medical Treatment And Welfare Office Work (AREA)
  • Measuring And Recording Apparatus For Diagnosis (AREA)

Abstract

A system and method distributing healthcare database access is disclosed. The system and method interpose a data mapping server (DMS) between a data request user server (DRS) and data service user server (DSS) to manage data transfers between the DSS and the DRS such that disparate database characteristics of the DRS/DSS are accommodated in real-time and permit asynchronous healthcare activity to be triggered. The DMS operates with a data access matrix (DAM) having each referenced DRS/DSS intersection pair associated with read/write control processes (RWP) that include read data (RDD) and write data (WRD) processes to permit data access across the disparate DRS/DSS database boundaries. The DAM may have multiple dimensions to accommodate asynchronously activated process threads within an overall patient healthcare plan (PHP) that operate to trigger healthcare provider alarms and other activity associated with the transfer/update of data between the DSS and the DRS.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS U.S. Provisional Patent Applications
  • This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 and incorporates by reference United States Provisional Patent Application for HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventor Eric Rock, filed electronically with the USPTO on Mar. 26, 2013, with Ser. No. 61/805,355, EFS ID 15358332, confirmation number 6386, docket AINTU.0101P.
  • U.S. Utility Patent Applications
  • This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for HEALTHCARE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventor Eric Rock, filed electronically with the USPTO on Mar. 24, 2014, with Ser. No. 14/223,537, EFS ID 18566745, confirmation number 2107, docket AVIVI.0102. This patent application will be referred to herein as the HEALTHCARE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application.
  • This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for VIDEO DATA EXTENSION SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventor Eric Rock, filed electronically with the USPTO on Mar. 24, 2014, with Ser. No. 14/223,652, EFS ID 18567689, confirmation number 1380, docket AVIVI.0103. This patent application will be referred to herein as the VIDEO DATA EXTENSION SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application.
  • This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for DYNAMIC VIDEO SCRIPTING SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventor Eric Rock, filed electronically with the USPTO on Mar. 25, 2014, with Ser. No. 14/223,815, EFS ID 18568932, confirmation number 2060, docket AVIVI.0104. This patent application will be referred to herein as the DYNAMIC VIDEO SCRIPTING SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application.
  • This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for MEDICATION RECONCILIATION SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventor Eric Rock, filed electronically with the USPTO on Mar. 24, 2014, with Ser. No. 14/223,747, EFS ID 18568406, confirmation number 1061, docket AVIVI.0105. This patent application will be referred to herein as the MEDICATION RECONCILIATION SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application.
  • This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for VIRTUAL REHABILITATION SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventor Eric Rock, filed electronically with the USPTO on Mar. 25, 2014, with Ser. No. 14/224,666, EFS ID 18577154, confirmation number 5019, docket AVIVI.0106. This patent application will be referred to herein as the VIRTUAL REHABILITATION SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application.
  • U.S. Continuation-In-Part (CIP) Patent Application
  • This application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) patent application of and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for HEALTHCARE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventor Eric Rock, filed electronically with the USPTO on Mar. 24, 2014, with Ser. No. 14/223,537, EFS ID 18566745, confirmation number 2107, docket AVIVI.0102. This patent application will be referred to herein as the HEALTHCARE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application.
  • This application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) patent application of and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for VIDEO DATA EXTENSION SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventor Eric Rock, filed electronically with the USPTO on Mar. 24, 2014, with Ser. No. 14/223,652, EFS ID 18567689, confirmation number 1380, docket AVIVI.0103. This patent application will be referred to herein as the VIDEO DATA EXTENSION SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application.
  • This application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) patent application of and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for DYNAMIC VIDEO SCRIPTING SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventor Eric Rock, filed electronically with the USPTO on Mar. 24, 2014, with Ser. No. 14/223,815, EFS ID 18568932, confirmation number 2060, docket AVIVI.0104. This patent application will be referred to herein as the DYNAMIC VIDEO SCRIPTING SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application.
  • This application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) patent application of and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for MEDICATION RECONCILIATION SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventor Eric Rock, filed electronically with the USPTO on Mar. 24, 2014, with Ser. No. 14/223,747, EFS ID 18568406, confirmation number 1061, docket AVIVI.0105. This patent application will be referred to herein as the DYNAMIC VIDEO SCRIPTING SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application.
  • This application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) patent application of and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for VIRTUAL REHABILITATION SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventor Eric Rock, filed electronically with the USPTO on Mar. 25, 2014, with Ser. No. 14/224,666, EFS ID 18577154, confirmation number 5019, docket AVIVI.0106. This patent application will be referred to herein as the DYNAMIC VIDEO SCRIPTING SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application.
  • PARTIAL WAIVER OF COPYRIGHT
  • All of the material in this patent application is subject to copyright protection under the copyright laws of the United States and of other countries. As of the first effective filing date of the present application, this material is protected as unpublished material.
  • However, permission to copy this material is hereby granted to the extent that the copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent documentation or patent disclosure, as it appears in the United States Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
  • STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
  • Not Applicable
  • REFERENCE TO A MICROFICHE APPENDIX
  • Not Applicable
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention generally relates to systems and methods that permit cross-database data access from a variety of hardware/software platforms, and specifically to applications in which disparate hardware/software systems must coordinate database access to patient healthcare information stored in electronic medical records. Without limiting the scope of the present invention, the present invention may be advantageously applied to the following U.S. Patent Classifications: 707/796; 707/804; 705/2; 705/3; 713/193; 707/999.001; 707/999.003; and 707/999.01.
  • PRIOR ART AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Prior Art System Context
  • Within the context of automated healthcare delivery systems there is often a need for healthcare professionals to access electronic medical records that span multiple hardware/software systems. These hardware/software systems often are spatially diverse and incorporate incompatible operating systems, data structures, and processing flows. Generally speaking, these disparate hardware/software healthcare systems transfer information between the different system using batch translation and update procedures in which modified records in a source system/database are extracted, transmitted to a target computer system, and there translated into native target database formats and integrated within the native target database. In this manner, healthcare systems having differing formats can cross-communicate information relating to patient updates to permit each system to have a complete patient history/electronic medical record.
  • Deficiencies in the Prior Art
  • The prior art as detailed above suffers from the following deficiencies:
      • Prior art distributed healthcare database systems and methods do not permit real-time updating of EMR data among a variety of healthcare computer systems.
      • Prior art distributed healthcare database systems and methods do not permit real-time updating of EMR data using remote patient monitoring equipment.
      • Prior art distributed healthcare database systems and methods do not permit healthcare professionals to be activated in the event of critical patient medical updates.
      • Prior art distributed healthcare database systems and methods do not permit data migration to occur under control of a centrally defined patient healthcare plan (PHP).
      • Prior art distributed healthcare database systems and methods do not utilize patient medical readings as a basis for automated intervention of healthcare personnel to address critical patient medical needs.
      • Prior art distributed healthcare database systems and methods do not integrate distributed healthcare database information with patient history information.
      • Prior art distributed healthcare database systems and methods do not integrate distributed healthcare database information into the decision process of an automated autonomous patient healthcare plan (PHP).
  • While some of the prior art may teach some solutions to several of these problems, the core issue of disseminating patient medical information across a variety of disparate healthcare information systems in conjunction with a unified patient healthcare plan (PHP) has not been solved by the prior art.
  • OBJECTIVES OF THE INVENTION
  • Accordingly, the objectives of the present invention are (among others) to circumvent the deficiencies in the prior art and affect the following objectives in the context of a distributed healthcare database system and method:
      • (1) Provide for a distributed healthcare database system and method that permits real-time updating of EMR data among a variety of healthcare computer systems.
      • (2) Provide for a distributed healthcare database system and method that permits real-time updating of EMR data using remote patient monitoring equipment.
      • (3) Provide for a distributed healthcare database system and method that permits healthcare professionals to be activated in the event of critical patient medical updates.
      • (4) Provide for a distributed healthcare database system and method that permits data migration to occur under control of a centrally defined patient healthcare plan (PHP).
      • (5) Provide for a distributed healthcare database system and method that utilizes patient medical readings as a basis for automated intervention of healthcare personnel to address critical patient medical needs.
      • (6) Provide for a distributed healthcare database system and method that integrates distributed healthcare database information with patient history information.
      • (7) Provide for a distributed healthcare database system and method that integrates distributed healthcare database information into the decision process of an automated autonomous patient healthcare plan (PHP).
  • While these objectives should not be understood to limit the teachings of the present invention, in general these objectives are achieved in part or in whole by the disclosed invention that is discussed in the following sections. One skilled in the art will no doubt be able to select aspects of the present invention as disclosed to affect any combination of the objectives described above.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention covers a system and method directed to the coordination of information flow among various healthcare providers using a data access matrix (DAM) that coordinates the database updates between a data request user server (DRS) and data service user server (DSS). The DAM provides for granular access to individual data items (IDI) provided from a variety of DSS sources and permits the data providers to control the access to these IDI on a per-DRS basis. Each IDI/DRS pair is associated with DRS/DSS read/write control processes (RWP) and include read data (RDD) and write data (WRD) processes that permit data access across disparate (and typically incompatible) database boundaries. Thus, the system permits healthcare providers using different database providers (and across disparate database network boundaries) to operate in a coordinated fashion with full access control maintained by the DRS/DSS pairs.
  • Structurally, the present invention in some preferred system embodiments may be described as a distributed healthcare database system comprising:
      • (a) data mapping server (DMS);
      • (b) data access user server (DRS);
      • (c) data information provider server (DSS); and
      • (d) data access matrix (DAM);
      • wherein
      • the DMS is configured to communicate with the DRS and the DSS through a communication network;
      • the DAM is configured by the DMS to indicate columns corresponding to individual data items (IDI) provided by the DSS and individual rows corresponding to data access requests by the DRS;
      • the DMS is configured to maintain data at the intersection of the rows and the columns corresponding to access control permissions provided by the DSS for the IDI with respect to the corresponding DRS row request;
      • the DMS is configured to maintain data at the intersection of the rows and the columns corresponding to database access control procedures resident on the DRS;
      • the DMS is configured to maintain data at the intersection of the rows and the columns corresponding to database access control procedures resident on the DSS;
      • the DMS is configured to activate the DRS database access control procedures in response to a DRS data request and subsequently activates the DSS databases access control procedure associated with the DAM row/column associated with the DRS request; and
      • the DMS is configured to transfer data between the DRS database access control procedure and the DSS database access control procedure based on the DSS access control permissions provided by the DSS for the IDI.
  • A corresponding preferred invention method embodiment allows data to be transferred between the DRS and DSS using processes located in the DAM and executed by the DMS and/or DRS/DSS systems to form a data bridge between disparate computer systems and database architectures. In conjunction with this data transfer capability the present invention method permits activation of healthcare related processes that are triggered by specific data movement among the DRS/DSS databases to allow rapid intervention of healthcare personnel in response to changing information relating to a patient medical condition or status.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For a fuller understanding of the advantages provided by the invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description together with the accompanying drawings wherein:
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an overview block diagram of a presently preferred exemplary system embodiment;
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a detail block diagram of a presently preferred exemplary system embodiment depicting data flows between a method and a data service user server (DSS);
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary multi-dimensional data access matrix (DAM) data structure depicting both data mapping processes as well as provisions for healthcare activity mapping (HAP) processes;
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary multi-dimensional data access matrix (DAM) data structure depicting both data mapping processes as well as provisions for healthcare activity mapping (HAP) processes combined with multiple DAM mapping operations;
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary multi-dimensional data access matrix (DAM) data structure depicting both data mapping processes as well as provisions for healthcare activity mapping (HAP) processes combined with multiple DTM processing options;
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary DAM data structure overview;
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary DAM data structure detail view; and
  • FIG. 8 illustrates a flowchart depicting an exemplary distributed healthcare database method.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENTLY PREFERRED EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
  • While this invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detailed preferred embodiment of the invention with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the broad aspect of the invention to the embodiment illustrated.
  • The numerous innovative teachings of the present application will be described with particular reference to the presently preferred embodiment, wherein these innovative teachings are advantageously applied to the particular problems of a DISTRIBUTED HEALTHCARE DATABASE SYSTEM AND METHOD. However, it should be understood that this embodiment is only one example of the many advantageous uses of the innovative teachings herein. In general, statements made in the specification of the present application do not necessarily limit any of the various claimed inventions. Moreover, some statements may apply to some inventive features but not to others.
  • Data Access Modes Not Limitive
  • The present invention anticipates a wide variety of data access modes to be supported by the distributed healthcare database system and method described herein. While read, write, and update (interlocked read/modify/write) modes are anticipated within this context, the present invention is not necessarily limited to these data access modes.
  • System Overview (0100)
  • The present invention may be summarized as depicted in the system block diagram of FIG. 1 (0100) and applied to a distributed healthcare delivery information system. In this example, a hospital (0110) incorporating a hospital information system (HIS) (0111) contains a variety of internal data sources (0112) that relate to a patient. These data sources may contain a wide variety of information relating to lab results, patient charts, procedures, etc. and may occur and be updated in real-time. This information is typically stored in a patient history database (PHD) (often referred to as an electronic medical record (EMR)) (0113). This PHD (0113) data may be used by a real-time data extraction/patient risk stratification process (0114) (as described in the HEALTHCARE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application) executed from machine instructions read from a computer readable medium (0115) to provide a real-time risk stratification dashboard (0116) that enables healthcare providers to prioritize healthcare to patients that have critical medical conditions.
  • Traditionally, access to the PHD (0113) has been limited to healthcare professionals having direct access to the HIS (0111) system due to the disparate hardware/software used by healthcare systems outside of a particular hospital (0110) context. As each hospital (0110) or healthcare facility may have different hardware/software implemented to support their operation, the interfacing of these different systems is generally not possible. Thus, updates to patient medical information that might be obtained via a mobile user device (MUD) (0120) would not normally be incorporated within the PHD (0113), nor would information provided by a caregiver (0132) operating outside the context of the hospital (0110) setting.
  • The present invention addresses this problem by incorporating a data processor (0140) to act as an information interchange hub between the hospital (0110) (or other healthcare facility), a MUD (0120), and caregiver systems (0130). This data processing system (0140) comprises a computer system (0141) (also termed a host computer system (HCS) or healthcare web server (HWS) in this document) operating under control of machine instructions read from a computer readable medium (0142). The HWS (0141) allows a patient healthcare plan (PHP) (0150) to be defined to coordinate healthcare delivery to the patient among the various healthcare provider contexts (0110, 0120, 0130). This PHP (0150) is synchronized with the MUD (0120) context to allow the MUD (0121) to operate asynchronously of the other systems in the diagram.
  • Execution of the PHP (0150) in the MUD context (0120) or the caregiver context (0130) may result in patient information that must be integrated into the PHD (0113) in one or more hospital (0110) or healthcare facility settings. To enable this data migration, a data mapping process (DMP) (0160) is enabled in the HWS (0130) context to act as an interface between the various computer system contexts (0110, 0120, 0130). The DMP (0160) may operate under control of the HWS (0141) or in some circumstances be deployed in a separate data mapping server (DMS) specifically designed to implement the database interfacing function described herein. Within the context of the discussion of the present invention, the term data mapping server (DMS) will be used to describe the hardware system specifically designed to implement this functionality. Note in this healthcare integration context the DMS may reside as a separate component external to the hospital computer infrastructure (0110) or in some cases be incorporated within the HIS (0111) system.
  • System Detail (0200)
  • Additional system detail for a preferred invention embodiment is generally illustrated in FIG. 2 (0200). In this exemplary embodiment the DMS (0210) interfaces with two generalized healthcare computer systems comprising a data request user server (DRS) (0220) and a data service user server (DSS) (0230). The DRS (0220) and DSS (0230) generically represent any two healthcare computer systems that may wish to coordinate PHD information to unify their patient healthcare views.
  • An exemplary data access request from the DRS (0220) to the DSS (0230) involves sending the read/write/update request from the DRS (0220) through a computer communication network (0290) (typically the Internet) to the DMS (0210). The DMS (0210) executes machine instructions read from a computer readable medium (0211) that then performs a lookup of the datum in a data access matrix (DAM) (0212). The DAM (0212) comprises a matrix relating individual data items (IDIs) in a DRS database (0221) to those contained in a corresponding DSS database (0231). A data request from the DRS (0220) to the DSS (0230) performs a row/column lookup in the DAM (0212) which retrieves access control information to validate the authority of the DRS (0220) to access the IDI within the DSS (0230). If this access validation passes, the DAM (0212) activates a data mapping process (0213) that links a DRS database interface access module (0222) with a corresponding DSS database interface access module (0232) to perform the database transfer between the DRS (0220) and the DSS (0230). The DRS/DSS database interface access modules (0222, 0232) are responsible for actual interfacing to the respective DRS/DSS databases (0221, 0231) and for proper data formatting and data translation necessary to ensure that data contained in each database (0221, 0231) is maintained in a consistent state.
  • Note that the DMP (0213) operating in the context of the DMS (0210) may incorporate differential encryption between each of the DRS/DSS interface modules (0222, 0232) so that the security measures associated with each of the DRS (0220) and DSS (0230) can be maintained. Thus, the system as depicted permits both data transparency between the DRS (0220) and DSS (0230) but also transparently handles differences in security protocols between the systems.
  • DAM Data Mapping/Healthcare Activity Processes (0300)
  • A significant feature of the functionality incorporated within the data mapping server (DMS) is the ability to support both data mapping processes (DMP) as well as healthcare activity processes (HAP). As detailed in FIG. 3 (0300), the data access matrix (DAM) (0310) may be in some preferred embodiments viewed as a two-dimensional, three-dimensional, or multi-dimensional data structure. In the case of a two-dimensional structure, the DRS (0311) and DSS (0312) row/column intersection (0320) will correspond to processes that define how a read/write/update operation may be processed between the DRS/DSS in either direction (typically this will involve six processes—one for each of read/write/update in either direction (0321, 0322)).
  • As depicted in the diagram, the data mapping process (DMP) (0330) logical layer of the DAM may also be associated with any number of healthcare activity processes (0331, 0339) that are associated with data accesses between the DRS/DSS. This permits a data access between the DRS/DSS to trigger a healthcare activity process (HAP) that may include intervention of a healthcare professional into the healthcare delivery of the patient. Examples of this might include the following types of activity:
      • Triggering healthcare provider intervention when a BLOOD PRESSURE reading is logged for the patient.
      • Triggering healthcare provider intervention when a patient complains of CHEST PAINS in a query/response dialog as this information is logged in the patient history file.
      • Triggering healthcare provider intervention when medications prescribed for a patient by different physicians are contraindicated or pose a risk to the patient.
      • Triggering healthcare provider review of a patient history if critical patient information has not been entered or updated in the patient history file.
        One skilled in the art will recognize that these HAP examples are only illustrative and not limitive of the present invention. This ability to associate HAP activity with the transfer or access of data within disparate healthcare databases permits unrelated activity associated with a particular patient to trigger healthcare provider intervention in a customized fashion for each patient.
    Multiple DAM Mapping (0400)
  • As depicted in FIG. 4 (0400), the DAM may incorporate multiple mapping of DRS/DSS data items so that within a given database a given data item (datum) may be accessed in parallel using parallel threads (0440). There are several reasons why this type of mapping may be useful in a distributed healthcare database system:
      • A datum may be replicated within one of the databases and thus require simultaneous updating when written. For example, a patient record indicating the most recent activity date and a patient record indicating the actual procedure associated with the activity. In this example, both dates should be updated simultaneously and thus two entries in the DAM (with associated access processes) are required to perform the update.
      • A datum may be related to another datum in the database. For example, a patient record indicating a master list of physicians treating a patient may need to be updated to include a new physician referral or medical record update that includes a physician not previously a part of the patient history.
      • A datum may require cascading of data transfers between the DRS/DSS based on data relationships between the various DAM entries. For example, updating the patient BLOOD PRESSURE reading may require triggering of healthcare provider activity that spans HEART DISEASE and DIABETES healthcare intervention. Each of these diseases may be processed by different healthcare professionals spanning the DRS/DSS boundary, and may require triggering healthcare activity or database activity that involves neither the DRS nor the DSS, as in the case of a third database that must be updated when a transfer from the DRS to the DSS occurs (here the DSS may be related to yet another database that must also be updated when the DSS is updated).
        One skilled in the art will recognize that this list is illustrative and not limitive of the present invention scope.
    Data Transfer Mode (DTM) Based Processing (0500)
  • The present invention anticipates that a wide variety of data transfer modes (DTM) may exist between the DRS and DSS. For example: READ, WRITE, and UPDATE (interlocked read/modify/write) operations are anticipated in a typical healthcare application context. As depicted in FIG. 5 (0500), the present invention anticipates that the data mapping process (DMP) (0520) for each DRS (0521)/DSS (0522) data transfer may have associated with them DTM-specific processes (0541, 0542) that are activated based on specific types of DTM for each DMP. For example, a special process may be activated for DRS READ access versus UPDATE access. Note that each of the database hosting systems (DRS/DSS) may have their own specific DTM-specific access processes (0541, 0542) defined in this context.
  • The DTM-specific processing for each of the database hosting systems (DRS/DSS) may take the form of a software process module (0541, 0542) that executes in the context of the DMS but may also be configured as a software module that is executed native to the DRS or DSS. In this alternate situation, the software process module (0541, 0542) is transferred from the DMS to either the DRS or DRS for local execution to support the specific DTM (0540) invoked by the DAM (0510) indexed entry.
  • Associated with each DMP there may also be an access control list (ACL) (0550) that defines the authorization of each type of data transfer mode (DTM) to occur between the DRS/DSS in each direction. Thus, a given type of transfer may be restricted based on healthcare provider privileges that are associated with the database, healthcare information system, or healthcare provider. For example, a HIS system may be authorized to READ patient information for the purposes of updating their own database records, but may be restricted to WRITE or UPDATE information in another database only in a restricted portion of the database reserved for patient information related to their practice. The DAM may incorporate a separate processing layer to provide the needed access control information necessary for the ACL (0550) to properly authorize the DTM between the DRS/DSS.
  • Exemplary DAM Data Structure Format (0600)-(0700) Linked DAM Man
  • While many different data structures may be utilized to implement the DAM, a preferred exemplary DAM data structure is depicted in FIG. 6 (0600) with additional detail provided in FIG. 7 (0700). These exemplary DAM data structures utilizes a DAM header pointer (0601) that links together one or more DAM mappings (0610, 0690) in a linked list. Each of the DAM mappings (0610, 0690) represents a data transfer relationship between disparate databases that may be controlled by incompatible computer systems. Each of these DAM maps (0610, 0690) may partially or fully describe the migration of data through the various incompatible computer systems as data transfers are performed.
  • Cascadin Data Transfers
  • Note that this structure permits cascading data transfers to occur in situations where data modified in a first DAM (0610) relates to data contained in another DAM (0690). In this circumstance the first DAM (0610) will coordinate a database transfer. This first database transfer may then trigger another database transfer in another DAM (0690) that is either further down the linked list or in some circumstanced placed prior to the initially modified DAM database. Sequence indicators placed in each DAM can be used in these cascading updates to limit the execution of recursive or infinite loops in the cascading update process.
  • DAM Internal Structure
  • More detail of an exemplary DAM data structure is provided in FIG. 7 (0700) wherein the DAM linked list pointer (0710) links to a pairing list of DRS/DSS pairs (0720) and a linked list of DAM process mapping layers (0730). The DRS/DSS pairing list (0720) generally controls the association of database keys (0721, 0722) with the DRS/DSS data referenced in the process maps (0730) and allows a shorthand representation of the transfers to be depicted in the data transformation maps (0730). Each process layer (0730) in the DAM mapping system may represent a data translation/transform/movement from one disparate database to another and/or may include HAP processing associated with the database activity. While only one DAM process map (0730) is illustrated in this example, a plethora of individual process maps may be included in this chain and may be configured to operate synchronously (layer to layer) or asynchronously (layers simultaneously processed).
  • The DRS/DSS pairing list (0720) references database keys (0723) that are linked to database names (0724) referencing a specific database (0725) for DRS/DSS activity. Each of these referenced databases (0725) may have associated with it file/field references (0726) that are identified by datum key (0727) and associated dataum name (0728). The datum keys may be referenced within the DAM process map (0730) as a data pair (0733, 0734) indicating which data is associated with which DMP control structure (0729). The data mapping process (DMP) control structure (0729) dictates access control list (ACL) restrictions on the database file/field data (0726) and determines based on the data transfer direction (DRS-to-DSS or DSS-to-DRS) what data transfer mode (DTM) processes to utilize to affect the data transfer operation. These individual DTM processes may also incorporate necessary formatting changes to the data to ensure consistency of data across the data platforms (as in the case of date formats (i.e. MM/DD/YYYY vs DD/MM/YYYY) and similar data transforms that may be required).
  • Method Overview (0800)
  • The system context as depicted in FIG. 1 (0100) and FIG. 2 (0200) is typically associated with a methodology as depicted in FIG. 8 (0800) and involves the following steps:
      • (1) with a data mapping server (DMS), establishing communication with a data request server (DRS) via a computer communication network (CCN) (0801);
      • (2) with the DMS, establishing communication with a data service server (DSS) via the CCN (0802);
      • (3) with the DMS, associating a data access matrix (DAM) with the transfer of data between a database (DRD) controlled by the DRS and a database (DSD) controlled by the DSS (0803);
      • (4) with the DMS, configuring the DAM to be accessed by indexes associated with individual data item (IDI) datums associated with the DRS and the DSS (0804);
      • (5) with the DMS, configuring the DAM to associate an access control list (ACL) between the DRS and the DSS that is stored within the DAM and located by the DAM indexes (0805);
      • (6) with the DMS, configuring the DAM to associate a data transfer between the DRS and the DSS via a data mapping process (DMP) reference stored within the DAM and located by the DAM indexes (0806);
      • (7) with the DMS, transferring data between the DRS and the DSS by activating the DMP referenced within the DAM (0807); and
      • (8) with the DMS, executing the DMP to transfer data between the DRS and the DSS using a predefined data transfer mode (DTM) limited by the ACL (0808).
        Note that data transferred between the DRS and DSS may be collected and updated in real-time from a medical instrumentation device (MID) communicating with a mobile user device (MUD).
  • Modifications to this basic methodology may include looping from step (8) to step (1) to allow the data access between the DRS and DSS to trigger another data transfer associated with other databases that are not directly controlled by the DRS/DSS servers. This cascading data transfer may span a plethora of healthcare databases and permits one data transfer to propagate through a system of interconnected datasets to allow these disparate datasets to become coherent without the need for individual computer systems controlling these datasets to directly cooperate with each other.
  • Patient Healthcare Plan (PHP) Asynchronous Triggers
  • The HAP processes described herein may incorporate the generation of data and/or alerts that are fed into an overall patient healthcare plan (PHP) in the form of synchronous or asynchronous events, patient interaction, healthcare provider interaction, and/or patient healthcare alerts. These features of the PHP are further described in the HEALTHCARE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application. For example, a database transfer of a BLOOD PRESSURE reading into a particular database field might trigger an asynchronous patient query/response dialog or video presentation to the patient with questions as to their overall health condition and may be associated with a healthcare provider alert if the patient responses are considered indicative of declining health status. Video scripting and/or diverse user interaction contexts (UICs) may be implemented within this PHP framework as described in the VIDEO DATA EXTENSION SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application and the DYNAMIC VIDEO SCRIPTING SYSTEM AND METHOD patent application.
  • This type of asynchronous triggering may also occur for the HAP in situations where patient medical data is collected in real-time and stored in a patient history database (PHD). This collected data may be from a mobile user device (MUD) and/or a medical instrumentation device (MID) that is selected from (among others) a group consisting of: weight scale; pulse oximeter; blood pressure meter; and blood glucose meter.
  • This type of asynchronous triggering may also occur for the HAP in situations where patient medical data is accessed from a patient history database (PHD). The mere accessing of this data may trigger activity directed towards other healthcare providers to ensure that data presented to one healthcare provider is presented to other patient physicians to ensure that all of the healthcare professionals are apprised of related patient statistics.
  • Preferred Embodiment System Summary
  • The present invention preferred exemplary system embodiment anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic theme of construction, but can be generalized as a distributed healthcare database system comprising:
      • (a) data mapping server (DMS);
      • (b) data request server (DRS);
      • (c) data service server (DSS); and
      • (d) computer communication network (CCN);
      • wherein
      • the DMS is configured to establish communication with the DRS via the CCN;
      • the DMS is configured to establish communication with the DSS via the CCN;
      • the DMS is configured to associate a data access matrix (DAM) with the transfer of data between a database (DRD) controlled by the DRS and a database (DSD) controlled by the DSS;
      • the DAM is configured to be accessed by indexes associated with individual data item (IDI) datums associated with the DRS and the DSS;
      • the DAM is configured to associate an access control list (ACL) between the DRS and the DSS that is stored within the DAM and located by the DAM indexes;
      • the DAM is configured to associate a data transfer between the DRS and the DSS via a data mapping process (DMP) reference stored within the DAM and located by the DAM indexes;
      • the DMS is configured to transfer data between the DRS and the DSS by activating the DMP referenced within the DAM; and
      • the DMP when activated by the DMS transfers data between the DRS and the DSS using a predefined data transfer mode (DTM) limited by the ACL.
  • This general system summary may be augmented by the various elements described herein to produce a wide variety of invention embodiments consistent with this overall design description.
  • Preferred Embodiment Method Summary
  • The present invention preferred exemplary method embodiment anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic theme of implementation, but can be generalized as a distributed healthcare database method comprising:
      • (1) with a data mapping server (DMS), establishing communication with a data request server (DRS) via a computer communication network (CCN);
      • (2) with the DMS, establishing communication with a data service server (DSS) via the CCN;
      • (3) with the DMS, associating a data access matrix (DAM) with the transfer of data between a database (DRD) controlled by the DRS and a database (DSD) controlled by the DSS;
      • (4) with the DMS, configuring the DAM to be accessed by indexes associated with individual data item (IDI) datums associated with the DRS and the DSS;
      • (5) with the DMS, configuring the DAM to associate an access control list (ACL) between the DRS and the DSS that is stored within the DAM and located by the DAM indexes;
      • (6) with the DMS, configuring the DAM to associate a data transfer between the DRS and the DSS via a data mapping process (DMP) reference stored within the DAM and located by the DAM indexes;
      • (7) with the DMS, transferring data between the DRS and the DSS by activating the DMP referenced within the DAM; and
      • (8) with the DMS, executing the DMP to transfer data between the DRS and the DSS using a predefined data transfer mode (DTM) limited by the ACL.
        One skilled in the art will recognize that these method steps may be augmented or rearranged without limiting the teachings of the present invention. This general method summary may be augmented by the various elements described herein to produce a wide variety of invention embodiments consistent with this overall design description.
    System/Method Variations
  • The present invention anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic theme of construction. The examples presented previously do not represent the entire scope of possible usages. They are meant to cite a few of the almost limitless possibilities.
  • This basic system and method may be augmented with a variety of ancillary embodiments, including but not limited to:
      • An embodiment wherein the CCN comprises the Internet.
      • An embodiment wherein the DTM is selected from a group consisting of: read; write; and update.
      • An embodiment wherein the DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered based on the DTM.
      • An embodiment wherein the DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered based on the DTM with the DTM selected from a group consisting of: read; write; and update.
      • An embodiment wherein the DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered on activation of patient data collected from a mobile user device (MUD).
      • An embodiment wherein the DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered on activation of the DMP when processing data from a medical instrumentation device (MID) that is selected from a group consisting of: weight scale; pulse oximeter; blood pressure meter; and blood glucose meter.
      • An embodiment wherein the DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered based on the access to data within a patient history database (PHD).
      • An embodiment wherein the DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered on activation of a data mapping process (DMP) referenced within the DAM, the HAP comprising an asynchronous processing thread within a patient healthcare plan (PHP).
      • An embodiment wherein the DMS is configured to scan the DAM for alternate data transfers related to servers other than the DRS and the DSS and trigger DMPs associated with the alternate data transfers.
      • An embodiment wherein the DAM is configured to trigger an alert within a patient healthcare plan (PHP) when the DMP is activated.
  • One skilled in the art will recognize that other embodiments are possible based on combinations of elements taught within the above invention description.
  • Generalized Computer Usable Medium
  • In various alternate embodiments, the present invention may be implemented as a computer program product for use with a computerized computing system. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that programs defining the functions defined by the present invention can be written in any appropriate programming language and delivered to a computer in many forms, including but not limited to: (a) information permanently stored on non-writeable storage media (e.g., read-only memory devices such as ROMs or CD-ROM disks); (b) information alterably stored on writeable storage media (e.g., floppy disks and hard drives); and/or (c) information conveyed to a computer through communication media, such as a local area network, a telephone network, or a public network such as the Internet. When carrying computer readable instructions that implement the present invention methods, such computer readable media represent alternate embodiments of the present invention.
  • As generally illustrated herein, the present invention system embodiments can incorporate a variety of computer readable media that comprise computer usable medium having computer readable code means embodied therein. One skilled in the art will recognize that the software associated with the various processes described herein can be embodied in a wide variety of computer accessible media from which the software is loaded and activated. Pursuant to In re Beauregard, 35 USPQ2d 1383 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,710,578), the present invention anticipates and includes this type of computer readable media within the scope of the invention. Pursuant to In re Nuijten, 500 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/211,928), the present invention scope is limited to computer readable media wherein the media is both tangible and non-transitory.
  • CONCLUSION
  • A system and method distributing healthcare database access has been disclosed. The system and method interpose a data mapping server (DMS) between a data request user (DRS) and data service user server (DSS) to manage data transfers between the DSS and the DRS such that disparate database characteristics of the DRS/DSS are accommodated in real-time and permit asynchronous healthcare activity to be triggered. The DMS operates with a data access matrix (DAM) having each referenced DRS/DSS intersection pair associated with read/write control processes (RWP) that include read data (RDD) and write data (WRD) processes to permit data access across the disparate DRS/DSS database boundaries. The DAM may have multiple dimensions to accommodate asynchronously activated process threads within an overall patient healthcare plan (PHP) that operate to trigger healthcare provider alarms and other activity associated with the transfer/update of data between the DSS and the DRS.
  • Although a preferred embodiment of the present invention has been illustrated in the accompanying drawings and described in the foregoing Detailed Description, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions without departing from the spirit of the invention as set forth and defined by the following claims.
  • Within the context of the following CLAIMS, the CLAIM PREAMBLE should be considered as limiting the scope of the claimed invention. Within the context of the following CLAIMS, “wherein” clauses should be considered as limiting the scope of the claimed invention. The phrase “and/or” in the context of an expression “X and/or Y” should be interpreted to mean the set of “(X and Y)” in union with the set “(X or Y).”

Claims (30)

What is claimed is:
1. A distributed healthcare database system comprising:
(a) data mapping server (DMS);
(b) data request server (DRS);
(c) data service server (DSS); and
(d) computer communication network (CCN);
wherein
said DMS is configured to establish communication with said DRS via said CCN;
said DMS is configured to establish communication with said DSS via said CCN;
said DMS is configured to associate a data access matrix (DAM) with the transfer of data between a database (DRD) controlled by said DRS and a database (DSD) controlled by said DSS;
said DAM is configured to be accessed by indexes associated with individual data item (IDI) datums associated with said DRS and said DSS;
said DAM is configured to associate an access control list (ACL) between said DRS and said DSS that is stored within said DAM and located by said DAM indexes;
said DAM is configured to associate a data transfer between said DRS and said DSS via a data mapping process (DMP) reference stored within said DAM and located by said DAM indexes;
said DMS is configured to transfer data between said DRS and said DSS by activating said DMP referenced within said DAM; and
said DMP when activated by said DMS transfers data between said DRS and said DSS using a predefined data transfer mode (DTM) limited by said ACL.
2. The distributed healthcare database system of claim 1 wherein said DTM is selected from a group consisting of: read; write; and update.
3. The distributed healthcare database system of claim 1 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered based on said DTM.
4. The distributed healthcare database system of claim 1 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered based on said DTM with said DTM selected from a group consisting of: read; write; and update.
5. The distributed healthcare database system of claim 1 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered on activation of patient data collected from a mobile user device (MUD).
6. The distributed healthcare database system of claim 1 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered on activation of said DMP when processing data from a medical instrumentation device (MID) that is selected from a group consisting of: weight scale; pulse oximeter; blood pressure meter; and blood glucose meter.
7. The distributed healthcare database system of claim 1 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered based on the access to data within a patient history database (PHD).
8. The distributed healthcare database system of claim 1 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered on activation of a data mapping process (DMP) referenced within said DAM, said HAP comprising an asynchronous processing thread within a patient healthcare plan (PHP).
9. The distributed healthcare database system of claim 1 wherein said DMS is configured to scan said DAM for alternate data transfers related to servers other than said DRS and said DSS and trigger DMPs associated with said alternate data transfers.
10. The distributed healthcare database system of claim 1 wherein said DAM is configured to trigger an alert within a patient healthcare plan (PHP) when said DMP is activated.
11. A distributed healthcare database method comprising:
(1) with a data mapping server (DMS), establishing communication with a data request server (DRS) via a computer communication network (CCN);
(2) with said DMS, establishing communication with a data service server (DSS) via said CCN;
(3) with said DMS, associating a data access matrix (DAM) with the transfer of data between a database (DRD) controlled by said DRS and a database (DSD) controlled by said DSS;
(4) with said DMS, configuring said DAM to be accessed by indexes associated with individual data item (IDI) datums associated with said DRS and said DSS;
(5) with said DMS, configuring said DAM to associate an access control list (ACL) between said DRS and said DSS that is stored within said DAM and located by said DAM indexes;
(6) with said DMS, configuring said DAM to associate a data transfer between said DRS and said DSS via a data mapping process (DMP) reference stored within said DAM and located by said DAM indexes;
(7) with said DMS, transferring data between said DRS and said DSS by activating said DMP referenced within said DAM; and
(8) with said DMS, executing said DMP to transfer data between said DRS and said DSS using a predefined data transfer mode (DTM) limited by said ACL.
12. The distributed healthcare database method of claim 11 wherein said DTM is selected from a group consisting of: read; write; and update.
13. The distributed healthcare database method of claim 11 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered based on said DTM.
14. The distributed healthcare database method of claim 11 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered based on said DTM with said DTM selected from a group consisting of: read; write; and update.
15. The distributed healthcare database method of claim 11 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered on activation of patient data collected from a mobile user device (MUD).
16. The distributed healthcare database method of claim 11 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered on activation of said DMP when processing data from a medical instrumentation device (MID) that is selected from a group consisting of: weight scale; pulse oximeter; blood pressure meter; and blood glucose meter.
17. The distributed healthcare database method of claim 11 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered based on the access to data within a patient history database (PHD).
18. The distributed healthcare database method of claim 11 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered on activation of a data mapping process (DMP) referenced within said DAM, said HAP comprising an asynchronous processing thread within a patient healthcare plan (PHP).
19. The distributed healthcare database method of claim 11 wherein said DMS is configured to scan said DAM for alternate data transfers related to servers other than said DRS and said DSS and trigger DMPs associated with said alternate data transfers.
20. The distributed healthcare database method of claim 11 wherein said DAM is configured to trigger an alert within a patient healthcare plan (PHP) when said DMP is activated.
21. A tangible non-transitory computer usable medium having computer-readable program code means embodied thereon comprising a distributed healthcare database method comprising:
(1) with a data mapping server (DMS), establishing communication with a data request server (DRS) via a computer communication network (CCN);
(2) with said DMS, establishing communication with a data service server (DSS) via said CCN;
(3) with said DMS, associating a data access matrix (DAM) with the transfer of data between a database (DRD) controlled by said DRS and a database (DSD) controlled by said DSS;
(4) with said DMS, configuring said DAM to be accessed by indexes associated with individual data item (IDI) datums associated with said DRS and said DSS;
(5) with said DMS, configuring said DAM to associate an access control list (ACL) between said DRS and said DSS that is stored within said DAM and located by said DAM indexes;
(6) with said DMS, configuring said DAM to associate a data transfer between said DRS and said DSS via a data mapping process (DMP) reference stored within said DAM and located by said DAM indexes;
(7) with said DMS, transferring data between said DRS and said DSS by activating said DMP referenced within said DAM; and
(8) with said DMS, executing said DMP to transfer data between said DRS and said DSS using a predefined data transfer mode (DTM) limited by said ACL.
22. The computer usable medium of claim 21 wherein said DTM is selected from a group consisting of: read; write; and update.
23. The computer usable medium of claim 21 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered based on said DTM.
24. The computer usable medium of claim 21 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered based on said DTM with said DTM selected from a group consisting of: read; write; and update.
25. The computer usable medium of claim 21 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered on activation of patient data collected from a mobile user device (MUD).
26. The computer usable medium of claim 21 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered on activation of said DMP when processing data from a medical instrumentation device (MID) that is selected from a group consisting of: weight scale; pulse oximeter; blood pressure meter; and blood glucose meter.
27. The computer usable medium of claim 21 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered based on the access to data within a patient history database (PHD).
28. The computer usable medium of claim 21 wherein said DAM comprises a healthcare activity process (HAP) that is triggered on activation of a data mapping process (DMP) referenced within said DAM, said HAP comprising an asynchronous processing thread within a patient healthcare plan (PHP).
29. The computer usable medium of claim 21 wherein said DMS is configured to scan said DAM for alternate data transfers related to servers other than said DRS and said DSS and trigger DMPs associated with said alternate data transfers.
30. The computer usable medium of claim 21 wherein said DAM is configured to trigger an alert within a patient healthcare plan (PHP) when said DMP is activated.
US14/224,762 2013-03-26 2014-03-25 Distributed healthcare database system and method Active US9582641B2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/224,762 US9582641B2 (en) 2013-03-26 2014-03-25 Distributed healthcare database system and method
PCT/US2014/031864 WO2014160777A1 (en) 2013-03-26 2014-03-26 Healthcare delivery system and method

Applications Claiming Priority (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201361805355P 2013-03-26 2013-03-26
US14/223,537 US9619849B2 (en) 2013-03-26 2014-03-24 Healthcare delivery system and method
US14/223,747 US20140297329A1 (en) 2013-03-26 2014-03-24 Medication reconciliation system and method
US14/223,652 US9357238B2 (en) 2013-03-26 2014-03-24 Video data extension system and method
US14/223,815 US10817965B2 (en) 2013-03-26 2014-03-24 Dynamic video scripting system and method
US14/224,666 US10296722B2 (en) 2013-03-26 2014-03-25 Virtual rehabilitation system and method
US14/224,762 US9582641B2 (en) 2013-03-26 2014-03-25 Distributed healthcare database system and method

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/223,815 Continuation-In-Part US10817965B2 (en) 2013-03-26 2014-03-24 Dynamic video scripting system and method
US14/224,666 Continuation-In-Part US10296722B2 (en) 2013-03-26 2014-03-25 Virtual rehabilitation system and method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140297330A1 true US20140297330A1 (en) 2014-10-02
US9582641B2 US9582641B2 (en) 2017-02-28

Family

ID=51621721

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/224,762 Active US9582641B2 (en) 2013-03-26 2014-03-25 Distributed healthcare database system and method

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US9582641B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2014160777A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160306999A1 (en) * 2015-04-17 2016-10-20 Auronexus Llc Systems, methods, and computer-readable media for de-identifying information
US20170223003A1 (en) * 2015-01-19 2017-08-03 Sas Institute Inc. Integrated data extraction and retrieval system
US9971779B2 (en) 2015-01-19 2018-05-15 Sas Institute Inc. Automated data intake system
US20220101968A1 (en) * 2014-09-23 2022-03-31 Airstrip Ip Holdings, Llc Near-real-time transmission of serial patient data to third-party systems

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9144381B2 (en) 2005-12-30 2015-09-29 LifeWIRE Corporation Mobile self-management compliance and notification method, system and computer program product
MX2017012732A (en) 2015-04-08 2017-11-30 Koninklijke Philips Nv System for laboratory values automated analysis and risk notification in intensive care unit.
WO2020150228A1 (en) 2019-01-15 2020-07-23 Youngblood Ip Holdings, Llc Health data exchange platform

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070006322A1 (en) * 2005-07-01 2007-01-04 Privamed, Inc. Method and system for providing a secure multi-user portable database
US20090150416A1 (en) * 2007-12-07 2009-06-11 Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. Method and system for enhanced data transfer

Family Cites Families (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6330426B2 (en) 1994-05-23 2001-12-11 Stephen J. Brown System and method for remote education using a memory card
US6169789B1 (en) 1996-12-16 2001-01-02 Sanjay K. Rao Intelligent keyboard system
US8183998B2 (en) 1996-12-16 2012-05-22 Ip Holdings, Inc. System for seamless and secure networking of implantable medical devices, electronic patch devices and wearable devices
US20020184055A1 (en) 2001-05-29 2002-12-05 Morteza Naghavi System and method for healthcare specific operating system
US20110295621A1 (en) 2001-11-02 2011-12-01 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. Healthcare Information Technology System for Predicting and Preventing Adverse Events
US7034691B1 (en) 2002-01-25 2006-04-25 Solvetech Corporation Adaptive communication methods and systems for facilitating the gathering, distribution and delivery of information related to medical care
US7739126B1 (en) 2004-03-02 2010-06-15 Cave Consulting Group Method, system, and computer program product for physician efficiency measurement and patient health risk stratification
US20060122469A1 (en) * 2004-11-16 2006-06-08 Martel Normand M Remote medical monitoring system
EP1931239B1 (en) 2005-08-09 2012-08-08 Flore, Ingo Medical measuring device
US20070255345A1 (en) 2006-04-26 2007-11-01 Krause Paul G Method and System for Triggering an Implantable Medical Device for Risk Stratification Measurements
US8396804B1 (en) 2006-07-19 2013-03-12 Mvisum, Inc. System for remote review of clinical data
WO2008070145A2 (en) 2006-12-06 2008-06-12 Medtronic, Inc. User interface with toolbar for programming electrical stimulation therapy
US20080242947A1 (en) 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Configuring software for effective health monitoring or the like
US20090146822A1 (en) 2007-11-13 2009-06-11 Elevate Technologies Pty Ltd. Telemedicine Application for Remote Monitoring, Viewing and Updating of Patient Records
US8301233B2 (en) 2009-03-31 2012-10-30 Medtronic, Inc. Detecting a condition of a patient using a probability-correlation based model
US20100305971A1 (en) 2009-05-29 2010-12-02 Medaxion, LLC Managing Medical Case Chronology Data
US20110029327A1 (en) 2009-07-29 2011-02-03 Gentry Dunlop Medication Reconciliation System and Methods of Use
US20110166884A1 (en) 2009-12-04 2011-07-07 Dept. Of Veterans Affairs System and method for automated patient history intake
US20120041771A1 (en) 2010-08-11 2012-02-16 Cosentino Daniel L Systems, methods, and computer program products for patient monitoring
US20130035955A1 (en) 2011-08-01 2013-02-07 Adam Torres Method and System to deliver state of the art concierge medical services to healh care consumers via a control center and a network of mobile medical platforms
CA2846501A1 (en) 2011-08-31 2013-03-07 Martin CARTY Health management system
US9111357B2 (en) 2012-06-07 2015-08-18 Medsnap, Llc System and method of pill identification

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070006322A1 (en) * 2005-07-01 2007-01-04 Privamed, Inc. Method and system for providing a secure multi-user portable database
US20090150416A1 (en) * 2007-12-07 2009-06-11 Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. Method and system for enhanced data transfer

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20220101968A1 (en) * 2014-09-23 2022-03-31 Airstrip Ip Holdings, Llc Near-real-time transmission of serial patient data to third-party systems
US20170223003A1 (en) * 2015-01-19 2017-08-03 Sas Institute Inc. Integrated data extraction and retrieval system
US9860229B2 (en) * 2015-01-19 2018-01-02 Sas Institute Inc. Integrated data extraction and retrieval system
US9971779B2 (en) 2015-01-19 2018-05-15 Sas Institute Inc. Automated data intake system
US20160306999A1 (en) * 2015-04-17 2016-10-20 Auronexus Llc Systems, methods, and computer-readable media for de-identifying information

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9582641B2 (en) 2017-02-28
WO2014160777A1 (en) 2014-10-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9582641B2 (en) Distributed healthcare database system and method
US20180218784A1 (en) Methods and systems for managing patient treatment compliance
US11075754B2 (en) Universal personal medical database access control
Marceglia et al. A standards-based architecture proposal for integrating patient mHealth apps to electronic health record systems
KR20040107894A (en) Method For Management Of Medical Information For Doctor In On-line
CN106919608A (en) Medical data processing method, device and platform
Schilling et al. Scalable Architecture for Federated Translational Inquiries Network (SAFTINet) technology infrastructure for a distributed data network
US20140297320A1 (en) Systems and methods for operating a personal healthcare management portal
CN110709939A (en) Apparatus, system and method for operational personal health record
JP5777666B2 (en) Integrated information processing system for medical data
Kung et al. Personal health record in FHIR format based on blockchain architecture
Liu et al. A mobile agent approach for secure integrated medical information systems
US20160070860A1 (en) Structuring multi-sourced medical information into a collaborative health record
Dubey et al. Effective Remote Healthcare and Telemedicine Approaches for Improving Digital Healthcare Systems
Lavigne et al. A real time healthcare tracking system based on blockchain application
Saifee et al. Leveraging dual blockchain to solve security issues in electronic health records
JP2015090627A (en) Medical information service system and method
Collen et al. Medical informatics: past and future
US20160357912A1 (en) System for unitary display of patient data from mulitple care providers
Tuppad et al. Super-Smart Healthcare System in Society 5.0
De la Rosa Algarín et al. Securing XML with role-based access control: Case study in health care
Jamil et al. Empowering patients with hipaa aware personal health libraries
Patel Blockchain approach for smart health wallet
US11862306B1 (en) Customer health activity based system for secure communication and presentation of health information
Shelke et al. Electronic Health Records: Need, Challenges, and Future Scope

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: WESTERN ALLIANCE BANK, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:VIVIFY HEALTH, INC.;REEL/FRAME:045044/0078

Effective date: 20180220

AS Assignment

Owner name: VIVIFY HEALTH, INC., TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ROCK, ERIC LEE;REEL/FRAME:048706/0283

Effective date: 20190325

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4