US20140294506A1 - Wastewater discharge method and system - Google Patents

Wastewater discharge method and system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140294506A1
US20140294506A1 US14/228,950 US201414228950A US2014294506A1 US 20140294506 A1 US20140294506 A1 US 20140294506A1 US 201414228950 A US201414228950 A US 201414228950A US 2014294506 A1 US2014294506 A1 US 2014294506A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
lateral
orifice
distance
discharge
wastewater
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/228,950
Inventor
James Marr
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Banner Environmental Engineering Consultants Ltd
Original Assignee
Banner Environmental Engineering Consultants Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Banner Environmental Engineering Consultants Ltd filed Critical Banner Environmental Engineering Consultants Ltd
Priority to US14/228,950 priority Critical patent/US20140294506A1/en
Assigned to Banner Environmental Engineering Consultants Ltd. reassignment Banner Environmental Engineering Consultants Ltd. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: Marr, James
Publication of US20140294506A1 publication Critical patent/US20140294506A1/en
Priority to US16/271,763 priority patent/US11035112B2/en
Priority to US17/322,636 priority patent/US12024872B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B13/00Irrigation ditches, i.e. gravity flow, open channel water distribution systems
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E03WATER SUPPLY; SEWERAGE
    • E03FSEWERS; CESSPOOLS
    • E03F1/00Methods, systems, or installations for draining-off sewage or storm water
    • E03F1/002Methods, systems, or installations for draining-off sewage or storm water with disposal into the ground, e.g. via dry wells

Definitions

  • the present application pertains to the field of wastewater treatment and discharge. More particularly, the present application relates to a method and system of disposing wastewater over a terrain, particularly an uneven terrain.
  • wastewater effluent is removed from waste treatment facilities and is often applied or disposed of in drainage field systems called mounds or tile fields.
  • the rate of application is engineered carefully so the consumption rates of the soils in the local environment are not exceeded. Exceeding these rates may result in excessive pooling which can dramatically alter the local ecology of the micro ecosystem.
  • Engineers typically determine the defensive capability of the proposed lands, and wastewater effluent rates are applied such that the local ecology is preserved. In this manner, the wastewater effluent is applied in a net beneficial impact to the local ecology.
  • lines of tubing such as those referred to as laterals, are used to transport the wastewater away from the facility.
  • the laterals are placed on the ground and stretch for distances in the order of hundreds of feet. Openings (orifices) are strategically placed along the laterals to disperse the wastewater and allow the effluent to beneficially percolate into the soil and sub soils.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a wastewater discharge system.
  • a method of disposing wastewater over a drain field comprising the steps of a) providing a wastewater effluent to one or more laterals; b) providing a datum string line over a portion of the drain field, the datum string line extending from a first end of one of the one or more laterals to a second end; c) measuring a first distance between the datum string line and a first of a plurality of points on the one or more laterals therebeneath; d) measuring a second distance between the datum string line and a second of the plurality of points on the lateral therebeneath; e) calculating a difference between the first distance and the second distance to determine a ⁇ D; f) calculating a discharge pressure at an orifice in the lateral at the first distance based on the ⁇ D; g) calculating a size of an orifice at the second of the plurality of points based on the discharge pressure; and h) providing
  • the method comprises the steps of: a) providing a wastewater effluent to one or more laterals; b) providing a datum string line over a portion of the drain field, the datum string line extending from a first end of one of the one or more laterals to a second end; c) measuring a first distance between the datum string line and a first of a plurality of points on the lateral therebeneath; d) measuring a second distance between the datum string line and a second of the plurality of points on the lateral therebeneath; e) calculating a difference between the first distance and the second distance to determine a ⁇ D using the formula:
  • D* is the distance between the datum string line and the lateral at the first end of the lateral and Di is the second distance; f) calculating a discharge pressure at an orifice in the lateral at the first distance using the following formula:
  • P discharge is the discharge pressure at the orifice
  • P int is the initial pressure or, if at a second or subsequent distance, the pressure at the preceding distance
  • ⁇ Pe is the change in pressure due to elevation change (which is the same as ⁇ D, above)
  • ⁇ P fl is the pressure due to friction loss
  • orifice ⁇ ⁇ size discharge ⁇ ⁇ flow ⁇ ⁇ rate 16.37 ⁇ 0.6 ⁇ ( P discharge ) 0.5 ( 3 )
  • discharge flow rate is a desired discharge flow rate in Imperial gallons per minute at a given orifice
  • P discharge is the discharge pressure at the orifice in feet
  • a system for disposing effluent wastewater from a wastewater effluent line comprising one or more laterals connected to said wastewater effluent line, the laterals comprising orifices determined as described according to the method herein.
  • FIG. 1 shows a top view of the drain field with laterals present
  • FIG. 2 shows the placement of a string line and lateral over an exemplary landscape
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary calculation of determining pressures.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary calculation of determining orifice sizes.
  • the present string line technology seeks to optimize the removal of wastewater effluent.
  • the technology takes into account the lay of the landscape and allows for differences in elevation, without the requirement of levelling the terrain. This provides a significant advantage in cost savings and protecting the environment because the need to remove trees and other obstacles in the drain field is reduced. Further, there is no need to level the terrain by digging and otherwise upsetting the natural landscape.
  • the laterals are placed over the terrain and take into account the rises and falls of elevation.
  • Six or more laterals may be used with any given effluent line, and each lateral contains a plurality of orifices sized based on their position in the elevation.
  • the engineering of the orifice sizing, spacing and number of orifices are field determined based on the “datum string line” measurement, as outlined below.
  • a datum string line is installed across the stretch of terrain over the top of the path of a dispersion lateral which the field engineer has strategically placed over the terrain directly on the surface of the area proposed for effluent dispersion.
  • the elevation differences measured along the path of the datum string line (D*) and dispersion lateral, which is typically hundreds of feet or more, are recorded usually at an interval of about every three feet.
  • the measurement locations are marked on the lateral for future reference and for drilling of the dispersion holes.
  • the many measurements collected during the process create “elevation adjustment factors” for every 3 foot interval along the length of the lateral. Generally, for lower elevations, orifice sizes are smaller; for higher elevations, the orifice is larger.
  • the wastewater effluent line sends wastewater to a wastewater effluent valve in a centrally located box from which the laterals emerge. Wastewater flows through the laterals and is dispersed across the drain field through the orifices depending on the pressure, length, etc. Typically, the number of laterals is determined based on the population being served and size of the field.
  • the wastewater system as described herein can be organized in a number of different ways to accommodate different amounts of effluent being processed.
  • Planning This includes an assessment of site conditions, general topography, watershed characterization and sensitivities, ecological considerations, site factors, and camp factors (population, style of camp).
  • Surveying and Soil Sample Collection This includes a detailed investigation to size and select field area; information from planning is used together to develop/finalize design submission for AESRD.
  • the soil collection provides the user with information on how the wastewater will be distributed in the environment. For example, sandy soil absorbs water more than clay soil.
  • Pipes are pre-marked at the required hole intervals in advance or after the pipe lateral is installed.
  • a string line can be used effectively.
  • the string such as a carpenter's string
  • the string can be pulled taut, and a string line level is used to level the string between each section and before the string line is tied off.
  • a string line level is used to level the string between each section and before the string line is tied off.
  • levelling sections can vary from 20 to 50 feet depending upon the way the lateral traverses the landscape.
  • the string line is set, it is ready for measurements. If dramatic drops or increases in elevation are encountered in the field, the string line may need to be dropped or raised to allow for easy levelling or to avoid the string hitting the ground. When this occurs, the string is offset a few feet and an adjustment to the datum elevation is noted at this location for calculation purposes.
  • a builders level and rod or laser level is used to measure the elevation distance between the lateral and datum.
  • the field data collection below is combined into this stage of the process. The measurements allow for the detailed hydraulic or topographical profile of that specific lateral to be generated and used in the hole sizing computations.
  • Critical field data collected includes the elevation variations, usually every 3 feet interval which is the basic design. Measurements are collected from the string line to the lateral and the differentials are used to generate the detailed hydraulic or topographical profile of that specific lateral to be generated and used in the hole sizing computations.
  • Commissioning involves setting the valves at the valve box and the first stage of the lateral to ensure that the correct inlet pressure (in feet of head) can be observed at specific locations in the lateral.
  • the engineering calculations reveal the expected pressure anywhere allow the lateral so the field engineer can confirm performance of the lateral at pre-determined locations based upon the calculations. Usually the field engineer does the calculations as well as drills the holes.
  • FIG. 1 shows a top view of an arrangement of laterals across an exemplary drain field.
  • 6 laterals 10 - 15
  • the laterals extend from a wastewater effluent control box 16 which controls the distribution of effluent from the supply line to each of the laterals.
  • the wastewater is dispersed at periodic intervals to each of the laterals. It is important to control the amount of head pressure for each lateral, based on its elevation and topography. This ensures even distribution of the wastewater effluent through each of the laterals and, ultimately, over the drain field.
  • FIG. 2 shows a side view of the datum string line 20 extending above a lateral 22 , which is positioned along the contour of the terrain 24 .
  • the string line 20 is essentially a string or rope which is attached to a fixed structure (such as to a nail on a post or a tree, for example) at a first end of the lateral. The string is then pulled taut and stretched over the terrain where the lateral lies. The string line thus passes over the length of the lateral from the fixed structure at the first end of the lateral to a fixed structure at the second end of the lateral (not shown). Typically, the distance from the string line to the first end of the lateral is approximately 36 inches; however, other suitable distances above the first end of the lateral may be contemplated.
  • D*( 26 ) The distance between the string line and the lateral at the first end of the lateral is termed D*( 26 ). Then, at each orifice, the distance between the string line and the lateral is measured. The distance from the string line to the lateral at each orifice is termed Di( 28 ). Once all measurements have been made, a value of ⁇ D is calculated as:
  • an initial water pressure is selected at the first end of the lateral.
  • the initial pressure is set at 29′.
  • the discharge pressure is determined by adding the initial pressure (P int ) to the change in pressure due to elevation change ( ⁇ P e )—which is the same as AD above, expressed in feet of pressure—less the pressure due to friction loss ( ⁇ P fl ), calculated using Hazen Williams.
  • orifice ⁇ ⁇ size discharge ⁇ ⁇ flow ⁇ ⁇ rate 16.37 ⁇ 0.6 ⁇ ( P discharge ) 0.5 ( 3 )
  • an orifice size of 0.422′′ is determined. This is then rounded to the nearest drill bit size of 24/64′′ and an orifice of this size is made in the lateral at the 10′ mark.
  • the discharge flow rate is adjusted accordingly depending on the size of the orifice. Further, initial pressure can be adjusted and calculations repeated to bring the target flow rate at the second end of the lateral to zero.
  • Orifice sizes are then calculated for the remaining exemplary orifices as summarized in FIG. 1 .
  • Each subsequent orifice is calculated based on the values of the orifice immediately preceding it.
  • the second orifice is calculated using the difference in elevation between it and the first orifice, and the P int in equation (2) is based on that obtained for the first orifice.
  • these calculations are repeated over and over again using a computer program specially written to allow the calculated hole sizes at each measurement location to vary until the series of hole sizes is optimized.
  • the field engineer selects the optimization parameters by setting the computer program parameters. These include the total dispersion flow rate required, the total number of orifices planned for along the lateral (all equally spaced) the length of the lateral, the diameter of the lateral, and the allowable variation in hole size.
  • the drill bit sizing parameter has been established in the program to match commercially available drill bit sizes.
  • the field engineer enters the “elevation adjustment factors” which was measured from the datum string line installation and operates the computer program until the individual variations in flow from the series of holes along the lateral is minimized.
  • the list is printed off and the holes can be drilled into the lateral with their respective hole sizes.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Sewage (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Measuring Volume Flow (AREA)

Abstract

The present application provides a method and system for disposing wastewater effluent through laterals placed over a drain field without the need to level the terrain. The method provides calculating sizes of one or more orifices in positioned along the length of the laterals.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • The present application claims priority to U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/806,122 filed Mar. 28, 2013, the entire contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present application pertains to the field of wastewater treatment and discharge. More particularly, the present application relates to a method and system of disposing wastewater over a terrain, particularly an uneven terrain.
  • BACKGROUND
  • After processing, wastewater effluent is removed from waste treatment facilities and is often applied or disposed of in drainage field systems called mounds or tile fields. In these systems, the rate of application is engineered carefully so the consumption rates of the soils in the local environment are not exceeded. Exceeding these rates may result in excessive pooling which can dramatically alter the local ecology of the micro ecosystem. Engineers typically determine the defensive capability of the proposed lands, and wastewater effluent rates are applied such that the local ecology is preserved. In this manner, the wastewater effluent is applied in a net beneficial impact to the local ecology.
  • Typically, lines of tubing such as those referred to as laterals, are used to transport the wastewater away from the facility. Typically, the laterals are placed on the ground and stretch for distances in the order of hundreds of feet. Openings (orifices) are strategically placed along the laterals to disperse the wastewater and allow the effluent to beneficially percolate into the soil and sub soils. These types of system designs are very effective at purifying the wastewater effluent and, when applied properly, provide a beneficial uptake by the environment. However, due to environmental and cost limitations, these types of designs are generally limited to small residential dwellings or facilities with relatively low sewage flow conditions.
  • In conventional tile field or mound designs, disposal and avoidance of fluctuations in the released flow of the wastewater from each orifice to ensure the release wastewater is spread evenly over the length of the lateral is facilitated by levelling off the terrain where the laterals are placed. This often requires dramatically altering the local ecology at a significant capital cost and net damage or alteration to the local micro-ecology.
  • Methods of disposing of wastewater are known in the art. Examples include U.S. Pat. No. 8,010,329 to Kallenbach, U.S. Pat. No. 5,360,556 to Ball, U.S. Pat. No. 7,022,235 to Hassett and U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,545 to Burcham.
  • There is a need to dispose of effluent while causing minimal structural damage to the environment using a low cost solution. This includes disposing wastewater in a field having uneven terrain, while still maintaining even flow dispersal of wastewater over large lateral distances.
  • This background information is provided for the purpose of making known information believed by the applicant to be of possible relevance to the present invention. No admission is necessarily intended, nor should be construed, that any of the preceding information constitutes prior art against the present invention.
  • SUMMARY
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a wastewater discharge system.
  • In accordance with one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of disposing wastewater over a drain field comprising the steps of a) providing a wastewater effluent to one or more laterals; b) providing a datum string line over a portion of the drain field, the datum string line extending from a first end of one of the one or more laterals to a second end; c) measuring a first distance between the datum string line and a first of a plurality of points on the one or more laterals therebeneath; d) measuring a second distance between the datum string line and a second of the plurality of points on the lateral therebeneath; e) calculating a difference between the first distance and the second distance to determine a ΔD; f) calculating a discharge pressure at an orifice in the lateral at the first distance based on the ΔD; g) calculating a size of an orifice at the second of the plurality of points based on the discharge pressure; and h) providing an orifice at each of the plurality of distances along the lateral, such that the wastewater is disposed over the drain field through the orifices along the lateral.
  • In one embodiment, the method comprises the steps of: a) providing a wastewater effluent to one or more laterals; b) providing a datum string line over a portion of the drain field, the datum string line extending from a first end of one of the one or more laterals to a second end; c) measuring a first distance between the datum string line and a first of a plurality of points on the lateral therebeneath; d) measuring a second distance between the datum string line and a second of the plurality of points on the lateral therebeneath; e) calculating a difference between the first distance and the second distance to determine a ΔD using the formula:

  • ΔD=D*−Di  (1)
  • where D* is the distance between the datum string line and the lateral at the first end of the lateral and Di is the second distance; f) calculating a discharge pressure at an orifice in the lateral at the first distance using the following formula:

  • P discharge =P int +ΔP e ΔP fl  (2)
  • where Pdischarge is the discharge pressure at the orifice, Pint is the initial pressure or, if at a second or subsequent distance, the pressure at the preceding distance, ΔPe is the change in pressure due to elevation change (which is the same as ΔD, above) and ΔPfl is the pressure due to friction loss; g) calculating a size of an orifice at the second of the plurality of points using the following formula:
  • orifice size = discharge flow rate 16.37 × 0.6 × ( P discharge ) 0.5 ( 3 )
  • where orifice size is in inches, discharge flow rate is a desired discharge flow rate in Imperial gallons per minute at a given orifice, and Pdischarge is the discharge pressure at the orifice in feet; and h) providing an orifice at each of the plurality of distances along the lateral, such that the wastewater is disposed over the drain field through the orifices.
  • In accordance with another aspect of the invention, there is provided a system for disposing effluent wastewater from a wastewater effluent line comprising one or more laterals connected to said wastewater effluent line, the laterals comprising orifices determined as described according to the method herein.
  • This approach has gained general acceptance by regulators, design engineers, installers/contractors and the home owners because of the past inability to otherwise properly control the even volumetric dispersal of the wastewater along the lateral through the lateral orifices due to changes/variations in ground elevation.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • For a better understanding of the present invention, as well as other aspects and further features thereof, reference is made to the following description which is to be used in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, where:
  • FIG. 1 shows a top view of the drain field with laterals present;
  • FIG. 2 shows the placement of a string line and lateral over an exemplary landscape;
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary calculation of determining pressures.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary calculation of determining orifice sizes.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs.
  • As used in the specification and claims, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
  • The term “comprising” as used herein will be understood to mean that the list following is non-exhaustive and may or may not include any other additional suitable items, for example one or more further feature(s), component(s) and/or ingredient(s) as appropriate.
  • The present string line technology seeks to optimize the removal of wastewater effluent. In particular, the technology takes into account the lay of the landscape and allows for differences in elevation, without the requirement of levelling the terrain. This provides a significant advantage in cost savings and protecting the environment because the need to remove trees and other obstacles in the drain field is reduced. Further, there is no need to level the terrain by digging and otherwise upsetting the natural landscape.
  • The laterals are placed over the terrain and take into account the rises and falls of elevation. Six or more laterals may be used with any given effluent line, and each lateral contains a plurality of orifices sized based on their position in the elevation. The engineering of the orifice sizing, spacing and number of orifices are field determined based on the “datum string line” measurement, as outlined below.
  • To determine Di values, measurements are taken along the string line path. A datum string line is installed across the stretch of terrain over the top of the path of a dispersion lateral which the field engineer has strategically placed over the terrain directly on the surface of the area proposed for effluent dispersion. The elevation differences measured along the path of the datum string line (D*) and dispersion lateral, which is typically hundreds of feet or more, are recorded usually at an interval of about every three feet. The measurement locations are marked on the lateral for future reference and for drilling of the dispersion holes. The many measurements collected during the process create “elevation adjustment factors” for every 3 foot interval along the length of the lateral. Generally, for lower elevations, orifice sizes are smaller; for higher elevations, the orifice is larger.
  • In operation, the wastewater effluent line sends wastewater to a wastewater effluent valve in a centrally located box from which the laterals emerge. Wastewater flows through the laterals and is dispersed across the drain field through the orifices depending on the pressure, length, etc. Typically, the number of laterals is determined based on the population being served and size of the field.
  • The wastewater system as described herein can be organized in a number of different ways to accommodate different amounts of effluent being processed.
  • Stages of System Implementation
  • 1) Planning: This includes an assessment of site conditions, general topography, watershed characterization and sensitivities, ecological considerations, site factors, and camp factors (population, style of camp).
  • 2) Surveying and Soil Sample Collection: This includes a detailed investigation to size and select field area; information from planning is used together to develop/finalize design submission for AESRD. The soil collection provides the user with information on how the wastewater will be distributed in the environment. For example, sandy soil absorbs water more than clay soil.
  • 3) Installation of Valve box and Laying of pipes.
  • 4) Physical installation of the system: Pipes are pre-marked at the required hole intervals in advance or after the pipe lateral is installed.
  • 5) Installation of String Line or Survey Set Up: Depending upon site foliage conditions either a string line or survey equipment is used to collect the differential topographical information. Both require the establishment of survey monuments or data for each lateral from which the differential elevation changes are measured at each hole (orifice) location. Hole spacing is dependent upon the detailed design aspects selected/developed from above but is typically about 3 feet.
  • For heavily treed or forested areas, a string line can be used effectively. The string, such as a carpenter's string, can be pulled taut, and a string line level is used to level the string between each section and before the string line is tied off. As the field engineer traverses through the forest he/she attaches the string from tree to tree as the lateral passes through the forest being careful to level the string between each section of string. If high quality carpenter's string is used, levelling sections can vary from 20 to 50 feet depending upon the way the lateral traverses the landscape. Some very minor trimming of tree branches may be required to be sure the string line does not touch any branches.
  • Once the string line is set, it is ready for measurements. If dramatic drops or increases in elevation are encountered in the field, the string line may need to be dropped or raised to allow for easy levelling or to avoid the string hitting the ground. When this occurs, the string is offset a few feet and an adjustment to the datum elevation is noted at this location for calculation purposes.
  • Similarly, for areas such as grasslands or low lying bush, a builders level and rod or laser level is used to measure the elevation distance between the lateral and datum. When the level is used the field data collection below is combined into this stage of the process. The measurements allow for the detailed hydraulic or topographical profile of that specific lateral to be generated and used in the hole sizing computations.
  • 6) Field data Collection: Critical field data collected includes the elevation variations, usually every 3 feet interval which is the basic design. Measurements are collected from the string line to the lateral and the differentials are used to generate the detailed hydraulic or topographical profile of that specific lateral to be generated and used in the hole sizing computations.
  • 7) Drilling of orifices and installation of orifice shields: Once the hole (orifice) sizing is complete, the field engineer goes back to the field and drills each hole as per the computations. Holes size variations can include 3 to 5 different sizes depending upon the topographical changes.
  • 8) Installation of Peat Moss and heat trace: Once all the holes are drilled and orifice shields installed, the heat trace is pulled inside the pipe and the lateral is insulated with peat moss and locally acceptable grass seed. Very specific engineering calculations have allowed for determining the appropriate depth of peat moss to use to ensure the laterals do not freeze during extreme weather conditions and low flow period (low camp population).
  • 9) Commissioning of the system: Commissioning involves setting the valves at the valve box and the first stage of the lateral to ensure that the correct inlet pressure (in feet of head) can be observed at specific locations in the lateral. The engineering calculations reveal the expected pressure anywhere allow the lateral so the field engineer can confirm performance of the lateral at pre-determined locations based upon the calculations. Usually the field engineer does the calculations as well as drills the holes.
  • To gain a better understanding of the invention described herein, the following example is set forth. It should be understood that the example is for illustrative purposes only. Therefore, it should not limit the scope of this invention in any way.
  • EXAMPLE
  • FIG. 1 shows a top view of an arrangement of laterals across an exemplary drain field. In this example, 6 laterals (10-15) are shown. The laterals extend from a wastewater effluent control box 16 which controls the distribution of effluent from the supply line to each of the laterals. Using methods known to the skilled person, the wastewater is dispersed at periodic intervals to each of the laterals. It is important to control the amount of head pressure for each lateral, based on its elevation and topography. This ensures even distribution of the wastewater effluent through each of the laterals and, ultimately, over the drain field.
  • FIG. 2 shows a side view of the datum string line 20 extending above a lateral 22, which is positioned along the contour of the terrain 24. The string line 20 is essentially a string or rope which is attached to a fixed structure (such as to a nail on a post or a tree, for example) at a first end of the lateral. The string is then pulled taut and stretched over the terrain where the lateral lies. The string line thus passes over the length of the lateral from the fixed structure at the first end of the lateral to a fixed structure at the second end of the lateral (not shown). Typically, the distance from the string line to the first end of the lateral is approximately 36 inches; however, other suitable distances above the first end of the lateral may be contemplated.
  • The distance between the string line and the lateral at the first end of the lateral is termed D*(26). Then, at each orifice, the distance between the string line and the lateral is measured. The distance from the string line to the lateral at each orifice is termed Di(28). Once all measurements have been made, a value of ΔD is calculated as:

  • Δd=D*−Di  (1).
  • In the example shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, three measurements of Di are taken at holes (orifices) 0 (corresponding to the first end of the string line), 1, 2 and 3, at distance marks of 0, 10, 20 and 30 feet, respectively, from the first end of the lateral along the length thereof. The Di values at the orifices at 10, 20 and 30 feet are −4′, +4′ and −10′, respectively. These values are then entered in the above equation, (1).
  • Next, an initial water pressure is selected at the first end of the lateral. In the present example, the initial pressure is set at 29′. As water pressure fluctuates along the length of the lateral, and due to the changes in elevation, adjustments are required to compensate for those changes. The discharge pressure is determined by adding the initial pressure (Pint) to the change in pressure due to elevation change (ΔPe)—which is the same as AD above, expressed in feet of pressure—less the pressure due to friction loss (ΔPfl), calculated using Hazen Williams.

  • P discharge =P int +ΔP e −ΔP fl  (2)
  • Thus, at hole #1, the discharge pressure is 29′+4′−0.26′=32.74′.
  • To calculate the orifice size, the following calculation is made:
  • orifice size = discharge flow rate 16.37 × 0.6 × ( P discharge ) 0.5 ( 3 )
  • Using the desired discharge flow rate of 10 ImpGal/min, and the discharge flow rate of 32.74′ as calculated above, an orifice size of 0.422″ is determined. This is then rounded to the nearest drill bit size of 24/64″ and an orifice of this size is made in the lateral at the 10′ mark. The discharge flow rate is adjusted accordingly depending on the size of the orifice. Further, initial pressure can be adjusted and calculations repeated to bring the target flow rate at the second end of the lateral to zero.
  • Orifice sizes are then calculated for the remaining exemplary orifices as summarized in FIG. 1. Each subsequent orifice is calculated based on the values of the orifice immediately preceding it. For example, the second orifice is calculated using the difference in elevation between it and the first orifice, and the Pint in equation (2) is based on that obtained for the first orifice.
  • In particular embodiments, these calculations are repeated over and over again using a computer program specially written to allow the calculated hole sizes at each measurement location to vary until the series of hole sizes is optimized. The field engineer selects the optimization parameters by setting the computer program parameters. These include the total dispersion flow rate required, the total number of orifices planned for along the lateral (all equally spaced) the length of the lateral, the diameter of the lateral, and the allowable variation in hole size. The drill bit sizing parameter has been established in the program to match commercially available drill bit sizes. The field engineer enters the “elevation adjustment factors” which was measured from the datum string line installation and operates the computer program until the individual variations in flow from the series of holes along the lateral is minimized. When the minimum is determined, the list is printed off and the holes can be drilled into the lateral with their respective hole sizes. By this method, the effluent is equally dispersed over the entire length of the lateral despite the natural variations in the elevation of the natural terrain. This eliminates unwanted wastewater effluent pooling, uneven dispersion and allows for longer laterals to be used.
  • All publications, patents and patent applications mentioned in this Specification are indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains and are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent applications was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
  • The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.

Claims (5)

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. A method of disposing wastewater over a drain field comprising the steps of
a) providing a wastewater effluent to one or more laterals;
b) providing a datum string line over a portion of the drain field, the datum string line extending from a first end of one of the one or more laterals to a second end;
c) measuring a first distance between the datum string line and a first of a plurality of points on the one or more laterals therebeneath;
d) measuring a second distance between the datum string line and a second of the plurality of points on the lateral therebeneath;
e) calculating a difference between the first distance and the second distance to determine a ΔD
f) calculating a discharge pressure at an orifice in the lateral at the first distance based on the ΔD;
g) calculating a size of an orifice at the second of the plurality of points based on the discharge pressure; and
h) providing an orifice at each of the plurality of distances along the lateral, such that the wastewater is disposed over the drain field through the orifices along the lateral.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the discharge pressure at the orifice is the sum of an initial pressure through the lateral expressed in ΔD, and a change in pressure due to elevation change, less a pressure due to friction loss.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein a size of an orifice is proportional to a discharge flow rate at said orifice.
4. A method of disposing wastewater over a drain field comprising the steps of:
a) providing a wastewater effluent to one or more laterals;
b) providing a datum string line over a portion of the drain field, the datum string line extending from a first end of one of the one or more laterals to a second end;
c) measuring a first distance between the datum string line and a first of a plurality of points on the lateral therebeneath;
d) measuring a second distance between the datum string line and a second of the plurality of points on the lateral therebeneath;
e) calculating a difference between the first distance and the second distance to determine a AD using the formula:

ΔD=D*−Di  (1)
where D* is the distance between the datum string line and the lateral at the first end of the lateral and
Di is the second distance;
f) calculating a discharge pressure at an orifice in the lateral at the first distance using the following formula:

P discharge =P int +ΔP e −ΔP fl  (2)
where Pdischarge is the discharge pressure at the orifice,
Pint is an initial pressure or, if at a second or subsequent distance, the pressure at the preceding distance,
ΔPe is a change in pressure due to elevation change expressed in ΔD feet of pressure (above), and
ΔPfl is a pressure due to friction loss;
g) calculating a size of an orifice at the second of the plurality of points using the following formula:
orifice size = discharge flow rate 16.37 × 0.6 × ( P discharge ) 0.5 ( 3 )
where discharge flow rate is a desired discharge flow rate at a given orifice and
Pdischarge is the discharge pressure at the orifice; and
h) providing an orifice at each of the plurality of distances along the lateral, such that the wastewater is disposed over the drain field through the orifices along the lateral.
5. A system for disposing effluent wastewater from a wastewater effluent line comprising one or more laterals connected to said wastewater effluent line, the laterals comprising orifices determined by the method defined in claim 1.
US14/228,950 2013-03-28 2014-03-28 Wastewater discharge method and system Abandoned US20140294506A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/228,950 US20140294506A1 (en) 2013-03-28 2014-03-28 Wastewater discharge method and system
US16/271,763 US11035112B2 (en) 2013-03-28 2019-02-08 Wastewater discharge method and system
US17/322,636 US12024872B2 (en) 2013-03-28 2021-05-17 Wastewater discharge method and system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201361806122P 2013-03-28 2013-03-28
US14/228,950 US20140294506A1 (en) 2013-03-28 2014-03-28 Wastewater discharge method and system

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/271,763 Continuation US11035112B2 (en) 2013-03-28 2019-02-08 Wastewater discharge method and system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140294506A1 true US20140294506A1 (en) 2014-10-02

Family

ID=51621005

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/228,950 Abandoned US20140294506A1 (en) 2013-03-28 2014-03-28 Wastewater discharge method and system
US16/271,763 Active US11035112B2 (en) 2013-03-28 2019-02-08 Wastewater discharge method and system
US17/322,636 Active US12024872B2 (en) 2013-03-28 2021-05-17 Wastewater discharge method and system

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/271,763 Active US11035112B2 (en) 2013-03-28 2019-02-08 Wastewater discharge method and system
US17/322,636 Active US12024872B2 (en) 2013-03-28 2021-05-17 Wastewater discharge method and system

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (3) US20140294506A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2847745C (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108316442A (en) * 2018-02-06 2018-07-24 安徽工业大学 The piecewise computational methods of pipeline section sewage quantity between a kind of town sewage pipe network well

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2523255A (en) * 1948-02-02 1950-09-19 Bruce E Bolander Surveying instrument
US4423838A (en) * 1980-02-04 1984-01-03 Naan Mechanical Works Selectable separation and capacity irrigation line
US20050013588A1 (en) * 2003-07-16 2005-01-20 Toshiyuki Murayama Reproducing apparatus and tracking method
US7004677B1 (en) * 2003-01-13 2006-02-28 Orbit Irrigation Products, Inc. Enhanced irrigation valve platform assembly
US20080007325A1 (en) * 2004-10-22 2008-01-10 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Current source circuit
US7337983B1 (en) * 2007-02-13 2008-03-04 Nelson Boice Irrigation method and system using variable orifices
US20100327084A1 (en) * 2009-06-25 2010-12-30 Boice Jr Nelson Drip Irrigation Hose

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2632954A (en) * 1947-02-11 1953-03-31 Morton W Lieberman Precision grade board and accessories
US5360556A (en) 1992-08-07 1994-11-01 Orenco Systems, Inc. Method of feeding wastewater effluent to filter bed through parallel conduits
EP1549590A1 (en) 2002-09-17 2005-07-06 The White Oak Partnership, L.P. Wastewater biological treatment system and method therefor
US20050135880A1 (en) 2003-12-17 2005-06-23 Stark William R. Root zone injection surface irrigation system
US20080073259A1 (en) 2006-09-27 2008-03-27 Potts David A Dosing pipe diffuser
US7857545B2 (en) 2006-12-03 2010-12-28 Innovative Biosystems Engineering Variable volume drain field system
US8010329B2 (en) 2007-10-08 2011-08-30 Kallenbach, Inc. Computer-implemented system and method for designing a pressure-dosed drain field

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2523255A (en) * 1948-02-02 1950-09-19 Bruce E Bolander Surveying instrument
US4423838A (en) * 1980-02-04 1984-01-03 Naan Mechanical Works Selectable separation and capacity irrigation line
US7004677B1 (en) * 2003-01-13 2006-02-28 Orbit Irrigation Products, Inc. Enhanced irrigation valve platform assembly
US20050013588A1 (en) * 2003-07-16 2005-01-20 Toshiyuki Murayama Reproducing apparatus and tracking method
US20080007325A1 (en) * 2004-10-22 2008-01-10 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Current source circuit
US7337983B1 (en) * 2007-02-13 2008-03-04 Nelson Boice Irrigation method and system using variable orifices
US20100327084A1 (en) * 2009-06-25 2010-12-30 Boice Jr Nelson Drip Irrigation Hose

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Orifice Flow Calculations by The Mc Nally Institute, 1986 S. Belcher Rd. Clearwater, Florida 33764; http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/13-html/13-12.htm; July 11, 2000 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108316442A (en) * 2018-02-06 2018-07-24 安徽工业大学 The piecewise computational methods of pipeline section sewage quantity between a kind of town sewage pipe network well

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20210270029A1 (en) 2021-09-02
US20200011045A1 (en) 2020-01-09
US12024872B2 (en) 2024-07-02
US11035112B2 (en) 2021-06-15
CA2847745A1 (en) 2014-09-28
CA2847745C (en) 2022-05-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Heuperman Hydraulic gradient reversal by trees in shallow water table areas and repercussions for the sustainability of tree-growing systems
Singh Salinization of agricultural lands due to poor drainage: A viewpoint
Singh Poor-drainage-induced salinization of agricultural lands: Management through structural measures
Allred et al. Water table management to enhance crop yields in a wetland reservoir subirrigation system
Wayne Skaggs Water table management: Subirrigation and controlled drainage
US12024872B2 (en) Wastewater discharge method and system
Kubota et al. water and salt movement in soils of the Nile Delta
Awad et al. Proper predictions of the water fate in agricultural lands: Indispensable condition for better crop water requirements estimates
Evans et al. Design guidelines for water table management systems on coastal plain soils
Gurovich et al. Modeling agricultural drainage hydraulic nets
Amatya et al. Hydrology of poorly drained coastal watersheds in eastern North Carolina
Lakew Effect of soil and water conservation measures on hydrological processes and sediment yield in the highlands of North-Western Ethiopia
Ritzema et al. A new approach to water management of tropical peatlands: a case study from Malaysia
Ayars et al. Integrated irrigation and drainage water management
Fouss et al. Design of controlled drainage and subirrigation facilities for water table management
Ehiorobo et al. Monitoring gully formation and development for effective remediation and control
Ismail et al. Drip irrigation systems in sandy soil using physical and hydraulic barriers
Sobotková et al. The new volumetric approach for field measurements of rill erosion
Shirmohammadi et al. Drainage-subirrigation design for Pelham loamy sand
Tejawat Large scale reclamation of waterlogged saline soils in Chambal Command area, Rajasthan
Huffman et al. Water table management
El-Haddad et al. Influence of cultural practices on the performance of long level basins in Egypt
Edraki et al. Determination of irrigation efficiency and deep drainage for irrigated maize with a shallow watertable
Thorne Prediction of soil loss due to ephemeral gullies in arable fields
King et al. Drainage systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BANNER ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD.,

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MARR, JAMES;REEL/FRAME:033610/0055

Effective date: 20140818

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION