US20140262285A1 - Methods for fraccing oil and gas wells - Google Patents
Methods for fraccing oil and gas wells Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20140262285A1 US20140262285A1 US14/203,710 US201414203710A US2014262285A1 US 20140262285 A1 US20140262285 A1 US 20140262285A1 US 201414203710 A US201414203710 A US 201414203710A US 2014262285 A1 US2014262285 A1 US 2014262285A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- well
- natural gas
- gas
- liquefied
- diluent
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 39
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 56
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 47
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 239000003915 liquefied petroleum gas Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 239000003085 diluting agent Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 239000003949 liquefied natural gas Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 239000002343 natural gas well Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 58
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims description 30
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 claims description 26
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 25
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000003129 oil well Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 36
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 13
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 9
- ATUOYWHBWRKTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Propane Chemical compound CCC ATUOYWHBWRKTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000011261 inert gas Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000001294 propane Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004880 explosion Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003349 gelling agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005380 natural gas recovery Methods 0.000 description 2
- JCXJVPUVTGWSNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N nitrogen dioxide Inorganic materials O=[N]=O JCXJVPUVTGWSNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000008961 swelling Effects 0.000 description 2
- OTMSDBZUPAUEDD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethane Chemical compound CC OTMSDBZUPAUEDD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000007513 acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000003463 adsorbent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003416 augmentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007865 diluting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001873 dinitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003912 environmental pollution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013505 freshwater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010808 liquid waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013022 venting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002351 wastewater Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/25—Methods for stimulating production
- E21B43/255—Methods for stimulating production including the injection of a gaseous medium as treatment fluid into the formation
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/25—Methods for stimulating production
- E21B43/26—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
- E21B43/267—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures reinforcing fractures by propping
Definitions
- hydraulic fracturing In the production of natural gas from shale or other “tight-gas” formations, hydraulic fracturing (or “frac” or “fraccing”) is used to break up the rock around the well bore and reduce the resistance to gas flow.
- the frac technique generally requires injecting into the well large amounts of fluids that are compressible like nitrogen or carbon dioxide or incompressible such as water or liquefied petroleum gas. The fluids are pumped to high pressure to create large compressive forces around the well bore. These forces break the rock and create tiny fissures for gas flow.
- LPG liquid petroleum gas
- propane content and lowers the amount of frac fluid necessary as well as being easier to separate from the gas that results from drilling.
- the LPG is readily recoverable and can be reused at later stages in the overall process.
- injection of LPG at high pressures carries some risk involving explosions.
- the use of other liquid hydrocarbons such as gelled hydrocarbons is also possible and would facilitate the complete use of the resulting well gas; however flammability concerns could limit its use.
- Hydraulic fracturing is used to produce gas and oil from low permeability formations, such as for example, unconventional natural gas reservoirs. Most fracturing treatments use water and polymers with a gelling agent as a fracturing fluid.
- a hydraulic fracturing process can be energized by the addition of a compressible, sometimes soluble, gas phase into the treatment fluid.
- the energized fluid expands and gas comes out of solution. Energizing the fluid creates high gas saturation in the invaded zone, thereby facilitating gas flowback.
- a mixture of gas is used as the energized solution (e.g., N 2 and/or CO 2 ) and natural gas comes out.
- the concentration of energizing gas needs to be dropped to acceptable levels dictated by the pipeline operator (usually 2 to 3%). Although the concentration of energizing gas decreases quite rapidly in the beginning of the process, achieving the required levels may take considerable time (up to 30 to 45 days).
- Such techniques may include N 2 and/or CO 2 separation by using membrane and/or adsorbent (PSA/VSA) technologies, which involves the deployment and operation of relevant equipment, which in turn adds cost to the natural gas production process.
- PSA/VSA membrane and/or adsorbent
- LPG liquefied petroleum gas
- LPG fracturing has the potential to increase well production. While there are a variety of potential benefits to using LPG fracturing for shale energy development, there may be some potential disadvantages, such as increased costs for conducting the fracturing treatment, increased explosion hazards, and limited capacity to utilize this technology on a wide commercial basis.
- One advantage water-based fracturing technologies have though is that water is virtually incompressible, therefore the pressure is transferred more directly to fracture the shale more effectively, whereas LPG may require more surface pressure to exert the necessary downhole pressure.
- LPG fracturing is a promising technology that may become more common as advancements in its use occur and has the potential to reduce water use and increase well yields.
- the proposed invention offers safer and a potentially more economical solution to conventional and/or energized hydraulic fracturing by utilizing a combination of high-efficiency fracturing fluids (e.g., water, LPG, etc.) with environmentally safe and inert gases, like nitrogen.
- high-efficiency fracturing fluids e.g., water, LPG, etc.
- environmentally safe and inert gases like nitrogen.
- a method for stimulating an oil or a natural gas well comprising adding to the well a combination of a liquefied hydrocarbon selected from the group consisting of liquid petroleum gas and liquefied natural gas, a proppant and a diluent selected from the group consisting of carbon dioxide, nitrogen and a mixture of carbon dioxide and nitrogen.
- the stimulating of the oil or natural gas well will lead to a fracturing of the fissures in the well thereby leading to an increased yield of oil or natural gas.
- the invention may also be employed in fraccing operations of shale gas formations. These methods allow for the recovery of natural gas and natural gas liquids from frac gas.
- the well can also be a horizontal well.
- the diluent is fed to the well before the liquefied hydrocarbon.
- the liquefied hydrocarbon and the diluent are not fed to the well sequentially but are mixed together before being fed to the well simultaneously.
- the liquefied hydrocarbons whether liquefied petroleum gas or liquefied natural gas are typically fed to the well at higher pressures in the range of 5000 to 10,000 prig (345 to 690 bar).
- Liquefied hydrocarbons can be effectively used in the stimulation of gas wells.
- Liquid petroleum gas which has higher propane content can be employed advantageously because of its higher density and higher temperature.
- Rich liquefied natural gas which has a higher ethane and C3+ content and which is more readily available and economical being derived from peak shavers will remain a liquid at high pressures even at elevated temperatures as noted in FIG. 4 .
- the proppants are typically selected from the group consisting of silica sand, resin-coated sand and man-made ceramics.
- FIG. 1 is a graph showing the effect of carbon dioxide concentration on methane flammability.
- FIG. 2 is a graph showing the effect of carbon dioxide feed concentration versus ignition response.
- FIG. 3 is a graph showing carbon dioxide feed concentration versus flame propagation.
- FIG. 4 is a chart of vapor liquid equilibriums at various temperatures and pressures for rich liquefied natural gas.
- the fluid introduced first could be water or a liquid hydrocarbon, which are easy to separate.
- This step is followed by the addition of a high pressure energized fluid like N 2 and/or CO 2 , or natural gas, or even LPG.
- a high pressure energized fluid like N 2 and/or CO 2 , or natural gas, or even LPG.
- multiple fracturing fluid combinations for example: water/LPG, followed by natural gas, followed by N 2 .
- the top fluid serves to boost the pressure and ideally to provide a non-flammable blanket.
- the methods of the present invention will yield beneficial results.
- the invention will improve flowback fluid cleanup. A better recovery of fracturing fluids can be achieved.
- the inventive methods are also advantageous in water sensitive formations that suffer from water saturation and clay swelling issues.
- the inventive methods will work to enhance production of oil in low-permeability and low porosity well formations as well as shallow formation and those nearly depleted gas reservoirs. Additionally, in those geographical regions where water shortages are prevalent or those with stricter water regulations, the present invention will provide for enhanced gas or oil recovery without using more water as well as limiting the amount of chemical employed.
- the reduced water consumption is beneficial when water is the main fracturing fluid due to its replacement with inert gas (e.g., nitrogen) in the vertical portion of the well.
- inert gas e.g., nitrogen
- the fracturing operation can be safer even when using more risky but more formation friendly fracturing fluids (e.g., LPG) due to the compression taking place below the ground under a blanket of a more environmentally safe inert gas such as nitrogen. This may also result in partial or almost complete elimination of gelling agents, which otherwise must be added to LPG to reduce the chance of explosion.
- more risky but more formation friendly fracturing fluids e.g., LPG
- the components of the fracturing fluid are introduced gradually in stages.
- the first component water or liquid hydrocarbons
- a high pressure energized fluid like N 2 and/or CO 2 serving to boost the pressure and ideally provide a non-flammable blanket.
- N 2 and/or CO 2 will flow out first and their concentration in the flowback mixture will decrease much more rapidly as schematically depicted below. It should be noted that some diffusion/mixing of the fluids is inevitable, which would prevent an operator from obtaining a perfect square-shaped drop in N 2 and/or CO 2 concentration profile.
- the liquefied hydrocarbon mixture is pumped up to pressures of about 5000 to 10,000 psig before their subsequent use for fraccing.
- gelled liquid petroleum gas or gelled liquefied natural gas are the preferred hydrocarbons and can be employed individually or as a mixture of the two.
- Proppants such as silica sand, resin-coated sand and man-made ceramics are added to the hydrocarbon mixture and will act in the oil or gas well formation to keep fissures open and enhance gas recovery.
- a high pressure intermediate gas which is typically carbon dioxide or nitrogen can be added either simultaneously with the pressurized hydrocarbon or separately and will serve as a blanket. The resulting frac mixture becomes less flammable as a result.
- the liquefied hydrocarbon can be pumped at a lower pressure for fraccing and its pressure can be subsequently boosted with the addition of higher pressure carbon dioxide or nitrogen.
- This pressure boosting by the carbon dioxide and/or nitrogen diluent will provide benefits of both using the liquefied natural gas or liquid petroleum gas in gel form with the properties of the diluent in fraccing operations while minimizing the risks associated with the high pressure pumping of hydrocarbons.
- Carbon dioxide or nitrogen when used alone in well stimulation and fraccing operations can be effective. However, separation of these components after a few days time after the well has been drilled becomes more difficult. For example, carbon dioxide fraccing may yield an initial gas content that is lean in methane which can only be enriched via cleanup once the carbon dioxide content is lowered to 50%. Nitrogen fraccing faces the same limitation. The use of hydrocarbons with either of carbon dioxide or nitrogen facilitates natural gas recovery by limiting the initial amount of carbon dioxide or nitrogen introduced into the well to a more manageable level.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
Abstract
A method for stimulating or fraccing an oil or a natural gas well by adding a liquefied hydrocarbon such as liquid petroleum gas and liquefied natural gas, a proppant and a diluent such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen or mixtures thereof to the well. The order of addition is typically liquefied hydrocarbon then diluent but this order can be reversed and in other circumstances the liquefied hydrocarbon and diluent can be mixed together and fed to the well as a mixture.
Description
- The present application claims priority from provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/776,956 filed Mar. 12, 2013.
- In the production of natural gas from shale or other “tight-gas” formations, hydraulic fracturing (or “frac” or “fraccing”) is used to break up the rock around the well bore and reduce the resistance to gas flow. The frac technique generally requires injecting into the well large amounts of fluids that are compressible like nitrogen or carbon dioxide or incompressible such as water or liquefied petroleum gas. The fluids are pumped to high pressure to create large compressive forces around the well bore. These forces break the rock and create tiny fissures for gas flow.
- The stimulation of natural gas containing formations, such as shale gas has been the subject of intensive study. Several methods of fracturing these deposits are known and incompressible fluids such as water with other chemicals and solids; e.g., mineral acids and proppants are employed on the order of 1 to 2% by volume to the injected fluid. The use of water results in the generation of a large amount of waste that is laden with chemicals and creates an expensive disposal issue. Thousands of tons of fluid may be injected during each frac job and much of this fluid is returned to the surface when the flow is reversed (hereafter called “produced fluids”) and natural gas is produced from the well. Alternatively, high pressure frac fluid sources including carbon dioxide and nitrogen help overcome the liquid waste disposal cost associated with hydraulic fracturing. However, the frac gas generated upon drilling has a high initial content of carbon dioxide and nitrogen. This mixture can be difficult and expensive to separate and inevitably leads to natural gas losses and even venting of the initial diluted natural gas to the atmosphere because it cannot be readily flared.
- Recently GASFRAC has tested the use of liquid petroleum gas (LPG) which has high propane content and lowers the amount of frac fluid necessary as well as being easier to separate from the gas that results from drilling. The LPG is readily recoverable and can be reused at later stages in the overall process. However, injection of LPG at high pressures carries some risk involving explosions. The use of other liquid hydrocarbons such as gelled hydrocarbons is also possible and would facilitate the complete use of the resulting well gas; however flammability concerns could limit its use.
- Hydraulic fracturing is used to produce gas and oil from low permeability formations, such as for example, unconventional natural gas reservoirs. Most fracturing treatments use water and polymers with a gelling agent as a fracturing fluid.
- A hydraulic fracturing process can be energized by the addition of a compressible, sometimes soluble, gas phase into the treatment fluid. When the well is produced, the energized fluid expands and gas comes out of solution. Energizing the fluid creates high gas saturation in the invaded zone, thereby facilitating gas flowback.
- During a flowback period, a mixture of gas is used as the energized solution (e.g., N2 and/or CO2) and natural gas comes out. Before selling the natural gas to a pipeline operator, the concentration of energizing gas needs to be dropped to acceptable levels dictated by the pipeline operator (usually 2 to 3%). Although the concentration of energizing gas decreases quite rapidly in the beginning of the process, achieving the required levels may take considerable time (up to 30 to 45 days).
- In order to address the issue of environmental pollution from flaring during a flowback period, various techniques have to be employed to facilitate natural gas clean-up by separating it from the energizing gas. Such techniques may include N2 and/or CO2 separation by using membrane and/or adsorbent (PSA/VSA) technologies, which involves the deployment and operation of relevant equipment, which in turn adds cost to the natural gas production process.
- Alternative technologies for shale gas development utilize, for example, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in place of conventional fracturing fluids, and specifically, in place of high volume, high pressure slick water-based fracturing fluids. The unique properties of the LPG fracturing process result in significant savings on material expenses, increased well productivity and fracture as well as flow-back mixture clean up.
- The gelled LPG used in the fracturing process has the ability to generate the necessary fracture system, carry the proppant through the wellbore and place into the oil and gas reservoir being stimulated. The LPG used in the process is highly soluble in well formation hydrocarbons. As a result, the LPG process results in less damage to formations than conventional hydraulic fracturing processes. Unlike conventional treatments where as much as 50% of the carrier remains in the reservoir and hinders well performance, virtually 100% of the LPG can be recovered, The obvious advantage of LPG fracturing is that gelled propane would replace the use of water, thereby reducing the amount of fresh water used and the associated environmental concerns. In addition, propane that is injected into the formation can be recovered and reused, therefore eliminating the need to treat or dispose of large volumes of wastewater that may have high concentrations of naturally occurring salts, metals, radionuclides and other constituents commonly found in shale reservoirs.
- Additionally the injection of a hydrocarbon into the shale creates less “damage” due to “swelling” as compared to water, which may impede hydrocarbon flow; therefore LPG fracturing has the potential to increase well production. While there are a variety of potential benefits to using LPG fracturing for shale energy development, there may be some potential disadvantages, such as increased costs for conducting the fracturing treatment, increased explosion hazards, and limited capacity to utilize this technology on a wide commercial basis. One advantage water-based fracturing technologies have though is that water is virtually incompressible, therefore the pressure is transferred more directly to fracture the shale more effectively, whereas LPG may require more surface pressure to exert the necessary downhole pressure.
- LPG fracturing is a promising technology that may become more common as advancements in its use occur and has the potential to reduce water use and increase well yields.
- The proposed invention offers safer and a potentially more economical solution to conventional and/or energized hydraulic fracturing by utilizing a combination of high-efficiency fracturing fluids (e.g., water, LPG, etc.) with environmentally safe and inert gases, like nitrogen.
- These methods improve natural gas and natural gas liquids recovery from fraccing operations; reduced flammability of the overall combination makes for a safer operation; reduced use of diluents such as carbon dioxide or nitrogen allows for better natural gas recovery; cost reduction improvements over the use of liquid petroleum gas by itself; and augmentation of the hydrocarbon pressure by using nitrogen or carbon dioxide so that high pressure equipment does not need to be employed.
- A method for stimulating an oil or a natural gas well comprising adding to the well a combination of a liquefied hydrocarbon selected from the group consisting of liquid petroleum gas and liquefied natural gas, a proppant and a diluent selected from the group consisting of carbon dioxide, nitrogen and a mixture of carbon dioxide and nitrogen.
- The stimulating of the oil or natural gas well will lead to a fracturing of the fissures in the well thereby leading to an increased yield of oil or natural gas.
- The invention may also be employed in fraccing operations of shale gas formations. These methods allow for the recovery of natural gas and natural gas liquids from frac gas. The well can also be a horizontal well.
- The methods of the invention will provide for the recovery of natural gas and natural gas liquids from the oil or natural gas well.
- In the methods of the invention, the combination is added to the well sequentially. The liquefied hydrocarbons are typically added first followed by addition of the diluent to the well. Sufficient time is typically allowed for between feeding the liquefied hydrocarbon to the well before feeding the diluent to the well. The liquefied hydrocarbons are fed to the well at a first pressure and their pressure is increased by the addition of the diluent at a higher pressure. In preferred embodiments, the liquefied hydrocarbon is in gel form.
- In an alternative embodiment, the diluent is fed to the well before the liquefied hydrocarbon.
- Water may be fed to the well along with the liquefied hydrocarbons in certain circumstances. In one embodiment, the water and liquefied petroleum gas is first added to the well, followed by natural gas and then followed by a feed stream of nitrogen.
- In a further alternative embodiment, the liquefied hydrocarbon and the diluent are not fed to the well sequentially but are mixed together before being fed to the well simultaneously.
- The liquefied hydrocarbons, whether liquefied petroleum gas or liquefied natural gas are typically fed to the well at higher pressures in the range of 5000 to 10,000 prig (345 to 690 bar).
- The proppant when present is selected from the group consisting of silica sand, resin-coated sand and man-made ceramics.
- The use of the diluents alters the flammability of the hydrocarbon combination and will allow for easier separation from the well gas that is derived from drilling operations as described in
FIGS. 1 , 2 and 3. Carbon dioxide is preferably used because of its higher density, higher heat capacity and easier separation from methane and other hydrocarbons. - Liquefied hydrocarbons can be effectively used in the stimulation of gas wells. Liquid petroleum gas which has higher propane content can be employed advantageously because of its higher density and higher temperature. Rich liquefied natural gas which has a higher ethane and C3+ content and which is more readily available and economical being derived from peak shavers will remain a liquid at high pressures even at elevated temperatures as noted in
FIG. 4 . - The proppants are typically selected from the group consisting of silica sand, resin-coated sand and man-made ceramics.
-
FIG. 1 is a graph showing the effect of carbon dioxide concentration on methane flammability. -
FIG. 2 is a graph showing the effect of carbon dioxide feed concentration versus ignition response. -
FIG. 3 is a graph showing carbon dioxide feed concentration versus flame propagation. -
FIG. 4 is a chart of vapor liquid equilibriums at various temperatures and pressures for rich liquefied natural gas. - The invention is applicable to horizontal wells utilized in unconventional gas production and consists in the gradual introduction of the fracturing fluid of choice into the well under moderate pressure, followed by introduction of the inert gas under high pressure, sufficient to increase the overall pressure of the fracturing fluid to required levels.
- The fluid introduced first could be water or a liquid hydrocarbon, which are easy to separate. This step is followed by the addition of a high pressure energized fluid like N2 and/or CO2, or natural gas, or even LPG. It is also possible to have multiple fracturing fluid combinations, for example: water/LPG, followed by natural gas, followed by N2. The top fluid serves to boost the pressure and ideally to provide a non-flammable blanket. By changing the N2 and/or CO2 concentration profile in the flowback mixture from exponential decay to a more rapid, near-square shaped decay, this will allow for easier separation of the fracturing fluid from the recovered hydrocarbons. It should be noted that some diffusion/mixing of the fluids is inevitable, which would prevent a user from obtaining a perfect square-shaped drop in N2 and/or CO2 concentration profile. The methods of the present invention will yield beneficial results. The invention will improve flowback fluid cleanup. A better recovery of fracturing fluids can be achieved. The inventive methods are also advantageous in water sensitive formations that suffer from water saturation and clay swelling issues. The inventive methods will work to enhance production of oil in low-permeability and low porosity well formations as well as shallow formation and those nearly depleted gas reservoirs. Additionally, in those geographical regions where water shortages are prevalent or those with stricter water regulations, the present invention will provide for enhanced gas or oil recovery without using more water as well as limiting the amount of chemical employed.
- The reduced water consumption is beneficial when water is the main fracturing fluid due to its replacement with inert gas (e.g., nitrogen) in the vertical portion of the well.
- The fracturing operation can be safer even when using more risky but more formation friendly fracturing fluids (e.g., LPG) due to the compression taking place below the ground under a blanket of a more environmentally safe inert gas such as nitrogen. This may also result in partial or almost complete elimination of gelling agents, which otherwise must be added to LPG to reduce the chance of explosion.
- The invention further reduces the flowback period and subsequent elimination of the need for natural gas clean-up due to reduced content of CO2 and/or N2 in the flowback mixture.
- This latter benefit can be appreciated because the nitrogen for example is only present in the portion of the well and is not used in actually fracturing the rock formation. Although some mixing and diffusion is unavoidable, the nitrogen is not mixed with the natural gas when used as the energized solution. This means that once the fracturing is complete and the flowback is started, nitrogen gas will flow out first, relatively quickly and at a relatively constant concentration as opposed to traditional flowback scenario.
- The invention is further explained by way of non-limiting examples, provided below.
- Using homogeneous energized fluid in the entire wellbore (baseline—longest flowback period).
- In this case, a fracturing fluid containing energizing component(s), CO2 and/or N2, is prepared at the surface and pumped down hole at a selected pressure that exceeds the reservoir pressure. In the typical fracturing application, the first and the last step of the process are done without proppant (first is to pump-in the fracturing fluid without the proppant (pad stage) to create fractures, and the last is to clean-up remaining proppant from the wellbore (flush stage). During intermediate stages, the proppant is introduced into the fracturing fluid and its load is gradually increased. This results in quite a lengthy flowback period, required to bring the concentration of the energizing components down to the required level which is usually 2 to 3%.
- Gradual introduction of the fracturing fluid components (shortest flowback period).
- In this case, the components of the fracturing fluid are introduced gradually in stages. The first component (water or liquid hydrocarbons) is followed by a high pressure energized fluid like N2 and/or CO2 serving to boost the pressure and ideally provide a non-flammable blanket. In this case, during flowback, N2 and/or CO2 will flow out first and their concentration in the flowback mixture will decrease much more rapidly as schematically depicted below. It should be noted that some diffusion/mixing of the fluids is inevitable, which would prevent an operator from obtaining a perfect square-shaped drop in N2 and/or CO2 concentration profile.
- Using a mixture of hydrocarbon(s) and energizing components to pump down hole (intermediate flowback period).
- In this case, by using the energizing or diluent component (N2 and/or CO2), it becomes possible to safely pump the potentially flammable hydrocarbons (for example, natural gas) down hole at required pressures due to diluting them below their flammability limits. Although this will not result in the shortest flowback period, it does still reduce the concentration of the energizing component (N2 and/or CO2) and therefore, minimizes the cleanup effort.
- In general during the practice of the invention, the liquefied hydrocarbon mixture is pumped up to pressures of about 5000 to 10,000 psig before their subsequent use for fraccing. In the methods of the invention, gelled liquid petroleum gas or gelled liquefied natural gas are the preferred hydrocarbons and can be employed individually or as a mixture of the two. Proppants such as silica sand, resin-coated sand and man-made ceramics are added to the hydrocarbon mixture and will act in the oil or gas well formation to keep fissures open and enhance gas recovery. A high pressure intermediate gas which is typically carbon dioxide or nitrogen can be added either simultaneously with the pressurized hydrocarbon or separately and will serve as a blanket. The resulting frac mixture becomes less flammable as a result.
- Moreover, in a different embodiment, the liquefied hydrocarbon can be pumped at a lower pressure for fraccing and its pressure can be subsequently boosted with the addition of higher pressure carbon dioxide or nitrogen. This pressure boosting by the carbon dioxide and/or nitrogen diluent will provide benefits of both using the liquefied natural gas or liquid petroleum gas in gel form with the properties of the diluent in fraccing operations while minimizing the risks associated with the high pressure pumping of hydrocarbons.
- Carbon dioxide or nitrogen when used alone in well stimulation and fraccing operations can be effective. However, separation of these components after a few days time after the well has been drilled becomes more difficult. For example, carbon dioxide fraccing may yield an initial gas content that is lean in methane which can only be enriched via cleanup once the carbon dioxide content is lowered to 50%. Nitrogen fraccing faces the same limitation. The use of hydrocarbons with either of carbon dioxide or nitrogen facilitates natural gas recovery by limiting the initial amount of carbon dioxide or nitrogen introduced into the well to a more manageable level.
- While this invention has been described with respect to particular embodiments thereof, it is apparent that numerous other forms and modifications of the invention will be obvious to those skilled in the art. The appended claims in this invention generally should be construed to cover all such obvious forms and modifications which are within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.
Claims (15)
1. A method for stimulating an oil or a natural gas well comprising adding to the well a combination comprising a liquefied hydrocarbon selected from the group consisting of liquid petroleum gas and liquefied natural gas, a proppant and a diluent selected from the group consisting of carbon dioxide, nitrogen and a mixture of carbon dioxide and nitrogen.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the oil or natural gas well is in a shale gas formation.
3. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein natural gas and natural gas liquids are recovered from the oil or natural gas well.
4. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the well is a horizontal well.
5. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the combination is added to the well sequentially.
6. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the liquefied hydrocarbon is added to the well first, followed by the diluent.
7. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising adding water to the well along with the liquefied hydrocarbon.
8. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the water and liquefied petroleum gas is first added to the well, followed by natural gas, followed by nitrogen.
9. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein sufficient time is allowed for between feeding the liquefied hydrocarbon to the well before feeding the diluent to the well.
10. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the liquefied hydrocarbon and the diluent are fed to the well together.
11. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the diluent is added to the well before the liquefied hydrocarbon.
12. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the liquefied hydrocarbon is fed to the well at a pressure of 5000 to 10,000 psig.
13. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the liquefied hydrocarbons are fed to the well at a first pressure and increased in pressure by the addition of a higher pressure diluent.
14. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the liquefied hydrocarbon is in gel form.
15. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the proppant is selected from the group consisting of silica sand, resin-coated sand and man-made ceramics.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/203,710 US20140262285A1 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2014-03-11 | Methods for fraccing oil and gas wells |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201361776956P | 2013-03-12 | 2013-03-12 | |
US14/203,710 US20140262285A1 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2014-03-11 | Methods for fraccing oil and gas wells |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20140262285A1 true US20140262285A1 (en) | 2014-09-18 |
Family
ID=51522299
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/203,710 Abandoned US20140262285A1 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2014-03-11 | Methods for fraccing oil and gas wells |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20140262285A1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20150210936A1 (en) * | 2014-01-28 | 2015-07-30 | Kenneth L. Burgers | Method and system for treating a flow back fluid exiting a well site |
WO2017058485A1 (en) * | 2015-09-30 | 2017-04-06 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Use of natural gas as a vaporizing gas in a well intervention operation |
US9719340B2 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2017-08-01 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Method of controlling a proppant concentration in a fracturing fluid utilized in stimulation of an underground formation |
CN108204937A (en) * | 2016-12-19 | 2018-06-26 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Measure the water-sensitive method of tight gas reservoir rock core |
US10436001B2 (en) | 2014-06-02 | 2019-10-08 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Process for continuously supplying a fracturing fluid |
US10760390B2 (en) | 2015-09-30 | 2020-09-01 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Use of gaseous phase natural gas as a carrier fluid during a well intervention operation |
Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3766986A (en) * | 1972-08-18 | 1973-10-23 | Exxon Production Research Co | Method of treating a well using a volatile hydrocarbon liquid |
US20050189112A1 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2005-09-01 | Taylor Robert S. | Compositions and methods for treating subterranean formations with liquefied petroleum gas |
US20060065400A1 (en) * | 2004-09-30 | 2006-03-30 | Smith David R | Method and apparatus for stimulating a subterranean formation using liquefied natural gas |
US20070204991A1 (en) * | 2006-03-03 | 2007-09-06 | Loree Dwight N | Liquified petroleum gas fracturing system |
US20090301719A1 (en) * | 2008-06-06 | 2009-12-10 | Bull Brad R | Methods of Treating Subterranean Formations Utilizing Servicing Fluids Comprising Liquefied Petroleum Gas and Apparatus Thereof |
US20100051272A1 (en) * | 2008-09-02 | 2010-03-04 | Gas-Frac Energy Services Inc. | Liquified petroleum gas fracturing methods |
US20130299167A1 (en) * | 2012-05-14 | 2013-11-14 | Gasfrac Energy Services Inc. | Hybrid lpg frac |
US20130312976A1 (en) * | 2012-05-23 | 2013-11-28 | Arthur I. Shirley | Methods for using liquefied natural gas for well stimulation |
US20140000899A1 (en) * | 2011-01-17 | 2014-01-02 | Enfrac Inc. | Fracturing System and Method for an Underground Formation Using Natural Gas and an Inert Purging Fluid |
US20140262292A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Stimulation with Natural Gas |
US20140374094A1 (en) * | 2013-06-21 | 2014-12-25 | Richard M. Kelly | Fracturing fluid composition and method of using same in geological formations |
US20150101807A1 (en) * | 2012-05-08 | 2015-04-16 | Kenda Capital B.V. | Fracturing fluid for secondary gas production |
-
2014
- 2014-03-11 US US14/203,710 patent/US20140262285A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3766986A (en) * | 1972-08-18 | 1973-10-23 | Exxon Production Research Co | Method of treating a well using a volatile hydrocarbon liquid |
US20050189112A1 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2005-09-01 | Taylor Robert S. | Compositions and methods for treating subterranean formations with liquefied petroleum gas |
US7341103B2 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2008-03-11 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Compositions and methods for treating subterranean formations with liquefied petroleum gas |
US20060065400A1 (en) * | 2004-09-30 | 2006-03-30 | Smith David R | Method and apparatus for stimulating a subterranean formation using liquefied natural gas |
US8408289B2 (en) * | 2006-03-03 | 2013-04-02 | Gasfrac Energy Services Inc. | Liquified petroleum gas fracturing system |
US20070204991A1 (en) * | 2006-03-03 | 2007-09-06 | Loree Dwight N | Liquified petroleum gas fracturing system |
US8689876B2 (en) * | 2006-03-03 | 2014-04-08 | Gasfrac Energy Services Inc. | Liquified petroleum gas fracturing system |
US8727004B2 (en) * | 2008-06-06 | 2014-05-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of treating subterranean formations utilizing servicing fluids comprising liquefied petroleum gas and apparatus thereof |
US20090301719A1 (en) * | 2008-06-06 | 2009-12-10 | Bull Brad R | Methods of Treating Subterranean Formations Utilizing Servicing Fluids Comprising Liquefied Petroleum Gas and Apparatus Thereof |
US20100051272A1 (en) * | 2008-09-02 | 2010-03-04 | Gas-Frac Energy Services Inc. | Liquified petroleum gas fracturing methods |
US20140000899A1 (en) * | 2011-01-17 | 2014-01-02 | Enfrac Inc. | Fracturing System and Method for an Underground Formation Using Natural Gas and an Inert Purging Fluid |
US9181789B2 (en) * | 2011-01-17 | 2015-11-10 | Millennium Stimulation Servicesltd. | Fracturing system and method for an underground formation using natural gas and an inert purging fluid |
US20150101807A1 (en) * | 2012-05-08 | 2015-04-16 | Kenda Capital B.V. | Fracturing fluid for secondary gas production |
US20130299167A1 (en) * | 2012-05-14 | 2013-11-14 | Gasfrac Energy Services Inc. | Hybrid lpg frac |
US20130312976A1 (en) * | 2012-05-23 | 2013-11-28 | Arthur I. Shirley | Methods for using liquefied natural gas for well stimulation |
US20140262292A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Stimulation with Natural Gas |
US20140374094A1 (en) * | 2013-06-21 | 2014-12-25 | Richard M. Kelly | Fracturing fluid composition and method of using same in geological formations |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9719340B2 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2017-08-01 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Method of controlling a proppant concentration in a fracturing fluid utilized in stimulation of an underground formation |
US20150210936A1 (en) * | 2014-01-28 | 2015-07-30 | Kenneth L. Burgers | Method and system for treating a flow back fluid exiting a well site |
US10787615B2 (en) * | 2014-01-28 | 2020-09-29 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Method and system for treating a flow back fluid exiting a well site |
US10436001B2 (en) | 2014-06-02 | 2019-10-08 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Process for continuously supplying a fracturing fluid |
WO2017058485A1 (en) * | 2015-09-30 | 2017-04-06 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Use of natural gas as a vaporizing gas in a well intervention operation |
US10760390B2 (en) | 2015-09-30 | 2020-09-01 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Use of gaseous phase natural gas as a carrier fluid during a well intervention operation |
US10907088B2 (en) | 2015-09-30 | 2021-02-02 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Use of natural gas as a vaporizing gas in a well intervention operation |
CN108204937A (en) * | 2016-12-19 | 2018-06-26 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Measure the water-sensitive method of tight gas reservoir rock core |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20140262285A1 (en) | Methods for fraccing oil and gas wells | |
EP1999340B1 (en) | Method of fracturing a coalbed gas reservoir | |
US9187996B1 (en) | Reduced emissions method for recovering product from a hydraulic fracturing operation | |
US7726404B2 (en) | Use of carbon-dioxide-based fracturing fluids | |
US20100051272A1 (en) | Liquified petroleum gas fracturing methods | |
US20210024808A1 (en) | Oxidizing gasses for carbon dioxide-based fracturing fluids | |
EP0566394A1 (en) | Gas well treatment compositions and methods | |
US11008842B2 (en) | Methods for hydraulic fracturing | |
US20190093463A1 (en) | Hydraulic Fracturing with Nanobubbles | |
US9328600B2 (en) | Double hydraulic fracturing methods | |
WO2010025540A1 (en) | Liquified petroleum gas fracturing methods | |
US7833948B1 (en) | CO2 foamed well treatments | |
US20060162924A1 (en) | Mobile gas separation unit | |
US20130312976A1 (en) | Methods for using liquefied natural gas for well stimulation | |
WO2012122636A1 (en) | Method and apparatus of hydraulic fracturing | |
US10047275B2 (en) | Hydrocarbon recovery using complex water and carbon dioxide emulsions | |
RU2391377C2 (en) | Optimised hydrocarbon mixtures miscible with co2 and methods of using optimised hydrocarbon mixtures miscible with co2 | |
US20140318773A1 (en) | Methane enhanced liquid products recovery from wet natural gas | |
Gruber et al. | Carbonated hydrocarbons for improved gas well fracturing results | |
CA2639539A1 (en) | Liquified petroleum gas fracturing methods | |
CA2716446A1 (en) | Effective horizontal drilling through a hydrocarbon reservoir | |
Gao | EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH AND FIELD IMPLEMENTATION OF CARBONATED WATER INJECTION TO ENHANCE OIL RECOVERY. | |
US20170218260A1 (en) | DME Fracing | |
Smith et al. | Targeted Acid Stimulation Technique for Production Enhancement–A Montney Case Study | |
Eshiet | Production from Unconventional Petroleum Reservoirs: Précis of Stimulation Techniques and Fluid Systems |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LINDE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, GERMANY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SETHNA, RUSTAM H.;WEXLER, EUGENE;REEL/FRAME:032436/0776 Effective date: 20140313 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |