US20140204787A1

US20140204787A1 - Method and arrangement in a telecommunication system

Info

Publication number: US20140204787A1
Application number: US14/219,263
Authority: US
Inventors: Walter Müller
Original assignee: Unwired Planet LLC
Current assignee: Unwired Planet LLC
Priority date: 2007-10-25
Filing date: 2014-03-19
Publication date: 2014-07-24
Also published as: EP2206251A1; WO2009054761A1; EP2206251A4; US8681745B2; US20100246519A1

Abstract

In a cell of a cellular wireless telecommunication system, a low interference time period is predefined for transmissions from the cell. For at least one user equipment served by the first cell, it is determined whether the user equipment should be scheduled for the low interference time period. This determination may be based on a determination as to whether the user equipment is located in the interior or exterior parts of the cell. The low interference time period may be determined based on a timing of transmissions from at least one neighbouring cell. In the case of a synchronized system, a low interference time period may be defined for each cell, such that a reuse distance between low interference time periods is maximized. In the case of an unsynchronized system, a user equipment that is close to a particular neighbour cell may be scheduled to avoid the low interference time period defined for that neighbour cell.

Description

PRIORITY APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application claiming priority from U.S. application Ser. No. 12/739,322, filed Apr. 22, 2010, which is the U.S. national phase of International
Application No. PCT/SE2007/050777, filed 25 Oct. 2007, which designated the U.S., the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The technology relates to wireless telecommunication systems, and in particular to resource allocation in wireless telecommunication systems.

BACKGROUND

Many wireless telecommunication systems are cellular. That is, the coverage area is divided into cells, and each mobile device, or other user equipment, communicates with a base station in the cell in which it is located. In order to achieve such communication, a communication resource must be allocated to the mobile device. The available communication resources include the available communication bandwidth and the available time. Thus, in a TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access) system, the available communications channel is allocated to different users at different times, while, in a FDMA (Frequency Division Multiple Access) system, different communications frequencies are allocated to different users.
Many cellular wireless telecommunication systems use a combination of TDMA and FDMA, in that the communication resource allocated to a user comprises a particular bandwidth allocation during a specified time period.
One issue in cellular wireless telecommunication systems concerns interference. That is, where for example a mobile device is located between a base station to which it is transmitting and another base station that is also receiving signals transmitted on the same frequency, there is a danger that the signals transmitted from that mobile device will erroneously be received, and/or will cause interference at the other base station.
One way to solve this issue is to allocate the available transmission frequencies to different cells, in such a way as to reduce the probability of such interference. For example, if a transmission frequency is allocated for use by mobile devices within a particular cell of the system, then it may advantageously not be allocated for use by mobile devices within any other cell that neighbours that particular cell. This step reduces the probability that the signals transmitted from that mobile device will erroneously be received, or will cause interference at any other base station that is receiving signals on that transmission frequency.

SUMMARY

In example aspects, transmission times in different cells are controlled in such a way as to reduce the probability of interference with transmissions in neighbouring cells.
More specifically, one example embodiment provides a method of controlling a cellular wireless telecommunication system, in which data is transmitted in frames, and wherein, for a first cell of said system, there is semi-statically defined at the same time position in a plurality of consecutive time intervals a low interference time period for transmissions in the first cell, each of said time intervals comprising an equal number of frames, and the low interference time period being a time period during which neighbouring cells are configured to minimize interference in the first cell;

- the method comprising, for at least one user equipment served by the first cell:
- receiving signal strength measurements; and
- based on the signal strength measurements, determining whether the user equipment should be scheduled for the low interference time period.

This has the advantage that the probability of interference may be reduced, and hence that the overall capacity of the cell can be used with high efficiency.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a wireless communication network according to an aspect.

FIG. 2 illustrates a division of a network coverage area into cells in the network.

FIG. 3 is a flow chart, illustrating a method according to an aspect.

FIG. 4 is a flow chart, illustrating a second method according to an aspect.

FIG. 5 is a timing diagram, illustrating operation of a first network in accordance with the method of FIG. 4.

FIG. 6 is a timing diagram, illustrating operation of a second network in accordance with the method of FIG. 4.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 shows a wireless communication network, in which there are a number of base stations 10, 12, 14, located within a coverage area of the network such that they can provide mobile communication services to user equipments active within the coverage area. FIG. 2 shows four such user equipments, in the form of mobile phones 20, 22, 24, 26, but it will be appreciated that any suitable type of user equipment can be used in the network.
As is conventional, the base stations 10, 12, 14 have connections to a core network (not shown) of the wireless communication network, and each have radio transceiver circuitry for communicating with the user equipments. The coverage area of the network is divided into cells, as described in more detail below, with each base station providing service to the user equipments located within the corresponding cell.
The user equipments are similarly conventional, and also have radio transceiver circuitry, for communicating with the base stations.
The description is provided with reference to an example wireless communication network operating on the OFDMA (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access) principle, in which the whole of the available frequency bandwidth is used in each of the cells. This available bandwidth is divided into sub-channels, and one or more of these sub-channels can be allocated for communications with any particular user equipment.
Although FIG. 1 shows only a small number of base stations and user equipments, it will be appreciated that a practical network is likely to include large numbers of base stations and user equipments.
FIG. 2 illustrates schematically the division of the coverage area into cells. More specifically, FIG. 2 shows a part of the network coverage area being divided into three cells 100, 120, 140, served respectively by the base stations 10, 12, 14. The base stations are not shown in FIG. 2 although it will be recognized that one common arrangement involves the definition of each cell in the area surrounding the respective base station. It will also be recognized that the division shown in FIG. 2 is purely illustrative, and that the shape of cells is not regular as shown in FIG. 2, but rather is defined by the radio frequency properties of the environment, and the signal strengths employed by the base stations, as well as by the positions of other surrounding base stations.
Each user equipment can be instructed by its serving base station to make measurements relating to the signals transmitted by that serving base station and by other base stations. One of the purposes of such measurements is to allow the network to determine the nearby cells that should be considered to be neighbouring cells, it being recognized that the arrangement of base stations and cells will likely be less regular in practice than that shown in FIG. 2.
As is conventional, the cells 100, 120, 140 define the areas served respectively by the base stations 10, 12, 14. That is, a mobile device within the cell 100 will have a connection to the base station 10, etc. In preferred example embodiments, the cells are subdivided, and the service provided to a user equipment depends on the part of the cell in which it is located.
FIG. 3 is a flow chart, illustrating a method for determining a part of the serving cell in which a user equipment is located.
In step 160, the user equipment measures the strength of signals received from its serving cell. Techniques for measuring signal strength are well known to the person skilled in the art, and will not be described further. An illustrative example refers to a user equipment that is located within the cell 100, and so in step 160 the user equipment measures the strength of signals received from the cell 100.
In step 162, the user equipment measures the strength of signals received from the neighbouring cells. Again, techniques for determining the neighbour cell list, and for making the signal strength measurements, are well known to the person skilled in the art, and will not be described further. In the case of the user equipment that is located within the cell 100, in step 160 the user equipment measures the strength of signals received from the cells 120 and 140, as well as other neighbouring cells not shown in detail in FIG. 2.
In step 164, a comparison is made, for example within the base station 10 or elsewhere in the network, between the signal strength measurements made in steps 160 and 162. Based on these comparison results, the cell 100 is logically subdivided into regions, and the location of the user equipment within one of those regions is determined
FIG. 2 shows a part of the logical subdivision of the cell 100, based on the comparison of the signal strength measurements.
Where the signal strength measured in step 160, i.e. the signal strength from the serving cell 100, is greater than any of the signal strengths measured in step 162, i.e. the signal strengths from the neighbouring cells, by a margin that exceeds some threshold value, such as 3 dB, then the user equipment is determined to be in an interior region 101 of the cell 100, and the user equipment (UE) is referred to as an interior UE.
By contrast, where the signal strength from the serving cell 100 does not exceed all of the signal strengths from the neighbouring cells by a margin that exceeds the threshold value, such as 3 dB, then the user equipment is determined to be in an exterior region of the cell 100, and the user equipment is referred to as an exterior UE.
More specifically, where the signal strength from the serving cell 100 does not exceed the signal strength from the neighbouring cell 120 by a margin that exceeds the threshold value, but where the signal strength from the serving cell 100 does exceed the signal strength from all of the other neighbouring cells by a margin that exceeds the threshold value, then the exterior UE is determined to be in the exterior region 102 that borders the neighbouring cell 120.
Similarly, where the signal strength from the serving cell 100 does not exceed the signal strength from the neighbouring cell 140 by a margin that exceeds the threshold value, but where the signal strength from the serving cell 100 does exceed the signal strength from all of the other neighbouring cells by a margin that exceeds the threshold value, then the exterior UE is determined to be in the exterior region 104 that borders the neighbouring cell 140.
Where the signal strength from the serving cell 100 does not exceed the signal strength from the neighbouring cell 120 by a margin that exceeds the threshold value, and also does not exceed the signal strength from the neighbouring cell 140 by a margin that exceeds the threshold value, but where the signal strength from the serving cell 100 does exceed the signal strength from all of the other neighbouring cells by a margin that exceeds the threshold value, then the exterior UE is determined to be in the exterior region 103 that borders both of the neighbouring cells 120, 140.
Similar exterior regions 106, 107 are defined, with the exterior region 106 bordering the neighbouring cell 120 and one other neighbouring cell not shown in detail in FIG. 2, and the exterior region 107 bordering the neighbouring cell 140 and a different neighbouring cell not shown in detail in FIG. 2. Other exterior regions are also defined, bordering other neighbouring cells, but are not shown in FIG. 2.
Thus, any user equipment in the interior region 101 can be regarded as an interior device, while other user equipments can be regarded as exterior devices. Then, exterior devices in the regions 106, 102 and 103 that border the first neighbouring cell 120 can be regarded as having a higher risk of interference with that first neighbouring cell, while exterior devices in the regions 103, 104 and 107 that border the second neighbouring cell 140 can be regarded as having a higher risk of interference with that second neighbouring cell, it being noted of course that exterior devices in the region 103 that borders the first and second neighbouring cells 120, 140 can be regarded as having a higher risk of interference both with the first and with the second neighbouring cell.
FIG. 4 is a further flow chart, illustrating a further method whereby a degree of coordination is achieved between the cells.
In step 180, the timing of the transmissions from one or more neighbouring cells is determined, relative to the timing of the transmissions from the cell under consideration. This determination may be made in the base station serving that cell, or may be made elsewhere in the network and communicated explicitly or implicitly to the cell, as required.
The methods described herein can be applied either to synchronized networks or to unsynchronized networks. In the case of synchronized networks, each of the base stations starts the transmission of a new frame of data simultaneously. Therefore, in this case, it can readily be determined that there is no time difference between the transmissions from each base station.
In the case of an unsynchronized network, the frames transmitted by the different base stations begin at times that are effectively random. Therefore, in this case, each base station instructs the devices within its cell to make measurements relating to the timing of the transmissions from the neighbouring cells, relative to the timing of its own transmissions. For example, the relative timings can be determined with reference to the system frame numbers of the respective transmissions.
These measurements can be made at regular periodic intervals, or when initiated by the network or the base station in response to a specified condition occurring.
In step 182, there is defined for the cell a first time period, which is advantageously a time period during which there is a lower probability of interference from neighbouring cells. This will be discussed in more detail below.
In step 184, there is defined for that cell one or more second time periods, which correspond to the first time periods defined in neighbouring cells, and during which there may be a higher probability of interference from neighbouring cells. Again, this will be discussed in more detail below.
The operation of the method is illustrated, firstly with reference to its application in a synchronized network, in FIG. 5. As is well known, communications networks that use time division duplexing (TDD) are usually synchronized, to allow for the possibility that a device will handover from one cell to another and retain the same timings.
Similarly, systems that use frequency division duplexing (FDD) need to be synchronized if they are to allow the transmission of multicast messages. Thus, the system illustrated in FIG. 5 may arise in such networks but will not arise exclusively in such networks.
In FIG. 5, there are shown the timings of transmissions from the three cells 100, 120, 140 described above. As mentioned previously, the transmissions from the three cells are divided into frames, as specified by the relevant OFDMA communication system. The available communication resources are then the available sub-channels into which the bandwidth is divided, and the available fractions of each frame. In one example embodiment, each active user equipment may be allocated all of the available sub-channels for some fraction of each frame. In other embodiments, an active user equipment may be allocated only a fraction of the available sub-channels for some fraction of each frame.
Aspects relate primarily to the way in which the fraction of the frame is allocated to a particular user equipment.
In this example embodiment, each frame is divided into three sections, each of equal length. Thus, a first frame transmitted from the cell 100 is divided into sections t_A0-t_A1, t_A1-t_A2, t_A2-t_A3, while a second frame is divided into sections t_A3-t_A4, etc. Similarly, a first frame transmitted from the cell 120 is divided into sections t_B0-t_B1, t_B1-t_B2, t_B2-t_B3, while a second frame is divided into sections t_B1-t_B4, etc, and a first frame transmitted from the cell 140 is divided into sections t_C0-t_C1, t_C1-t_C2, t_C2-t_C3, while a second frame is divided into sections t_C3-t_C4, etc.
Within each of the cells 100, 120, 140, a time period is defined, during which there is a lower probability of interference from neighbouring cells. In one example embodiment, these time periods may be determined by network planning and the relevant base station may be informed which time period to adopt. In another embodiment, the time period may be determined by the base station on the basis of measurements made by user equipments within the cell. The time differences between the serving cell and the neighbouring cells may be determined by knowledge of the network planning in the case of synchronized cells, or may be determined by the base station on the basis of measurements made by user equipments within the cell or by the base station itself.
In either case, the time period is defined at least semi-statically, i.e. on a static or semi-static basis. That is, after the time period has been defined for a cell, it occurs at the same time position for a significant period of time, and in particular for the duration of a large number of frames, for example until measurements suggest that the radio environment has changed, or the timing relations between cells have changed. Again, the radio environment or the timing relations can be monitored using UE measurements or measurements made by the base station itself.
For example, as shown in FIG. 5, and referring to FIG. 2, the cell 100 may adopt the time period t_Afrom t_A0-t_A1as its less interfered time period, the cell 120 may adopt the time period t_Bfrom t_B1-t_B2as its less interfered time period, and the cell 140 may adopt the time period t_Cfrom t_C2-t_C3as its less interfered time period. In this embodiment, there are only three time periods that are available for selection by each of the cells in the system. Preferably, these time periods are selected by the different cells such that no time period is adopted as the less interfered time period by any two adjacent cells. Even if this is not possible then, in any event, steps are preferably taken to ensure the maximum average reuse distance between cells that share a time period as the less interfered time period.
Although the description makes reference to a situation where there is a less interfered time period during each frame, it is also possible to define a time interval that is equal to a plurality of frames, with the less interfered time period then occurring at the same time position in each time interval.
Further, although an example in which each frame is divided into three sections is described with the less interfered time period being equal to one third of one frame, it is also possible to divide each frame or other time interval into a different number of sections, such that the less interfered time period is equal to some different fraction of one frame or time interval.
When a first, less interfered, time period has been defined in each cell, one or more second time periods are also defined, in which there is a specific risk of interference from one or more respective other cell.
Thus, in this case, exterior user equipments in each cell, which would tend to have a greater risk of interference with other cells because they are closer to the cell boundaries, are preferably allocated resources during the less interfered time periods. Specifically, in this example, exterior user equipments in the cell 100 are preferably allocated resources during the time period t_A, exterior user equipments in the cell 120 are preferably allocated resources during the time period t_B, and exterior user equipments in the cell 140 are preferably allocated resources during the time period t_C.
However, if no such resources are available, an exterior user equipment may instead be allocated resources outside the less interfered time period of that cell, provided that it avoids the use of a second time period during which there is a particular risk of interference with a specific neighbouring cell.
Thus, considering cell 100, the time period t_Bmay be regarded as such a second time period concerning interference from the cell 120, since exterior user equipments in that cell will preferentially be transmitting during that time period, while the time period t_Cmay be regarded as such a second time period concerning interference from the cell 140, since exterior user equipments in that cell will preferentially be transmitting during that time period.
Therefore, for an exterior user equipment in the cell 100 that is in the region 102 bordering the cell 120, if that user equipment cannot be allocated resources in the less interfered time period t_A, it can instead be allocated resources during the time period t_C, in preference to the time period t_B. Similarly, for an exterior user equipment in the cell 100 that is in the region 104 bordering the cell 140, if that user equipment cannot be allocated resources in the less interfered time period t_A, it can instead be allocated resources during the time period t_B, in preference to the time period t_C.
As described above, it is exterior user equipments in a cell that are preferentially allocated resources in the less interfered time period defined for that cell. However, alternatively or additionally, other user equipments that require low interference conditions may be preferentially allocated resources in the less interfered time period.
The operation of the method is further illustrated with reference to its application in an unsynchronized network, in FIG. 6.
In FIG. 6, there are again shown the timings of transmissions from the three cells 100, 120, 140 described above. As mentioned previously, the transmissions from the three cells are divided into frames, as specified by the relevant OFDMA communication system. The available communication resources are then the available sub-channels into which the bandwidth is divided, and the available fractions of each frame. In one example embodiment, each active user equipment may be allocated all of the available sub-channels for some fraction of each frame. In other embodiments, an active user equipment may be allocated only a fraction of the available sub-channels for some fraction of each frame.
Again, in this example embodiment, each frame is divided into three sections, each of equal length, although the frames may be divided in any convenient way. Thus, a first frame transmitted from the cell 100 is divided into sections t_A5-t_A6, t_A6-t_A7, t_A7-t_A8, while a second frame is divided into sections t_A8-t_A9, etc. Similarly, a first frame transmitted from the cell 120 is divided into sections t_B5-t_B6, t_B6-t_B7, t_B7-t_B8, while a second frame is divided into sections t_B8-t_B9, etc, and a first frame transmitted from the cell 140 is divided into sections t_C5-t_C6, t_C6-t_C7, t_C7-t_C8, while a second frame is divided into sections t_C8-t_C9, etc.
Within each of the cells 100, 120, 140, a time period is defined, during which there is a lower probability of interference from neighbouring cells. In some situations, these time periods may be determined by the cell itself to be the first section of each frame. In other situations, the time period in one cell may be adjusted, based on reported timing measurements relating to other cells, such that the time periods become the same in all cells. This will tend to reduce the number of timing reports that are needed in the network.
In an unsynchronized system, the relative timings of the frames in the different cells are arbitrary, as shown in FIG. 6 and, furthermore, these relative timings may change. In any event, the time period is defined on a static or semi-static basis. That is, after the time period has been defined, it occurs at the same time position for a significant period of time, and in particular for the duration of a large number of frames, for example until measurements suggest that the radio environment has changed. However, the cell may set its own first time period based on the present conditions, and in particular based on the measurements of the timings in other cells. The cell can monitor the timing relations with the neighbouring cells on the basis of measurements made by the user equipments in the cell, or measurements made by the base station itself
For example, as shown in FIG. 6, the cell 100 may adopt the time period t_Afrom t_A5t_A6as its less interfered time period, the cell 120 may adopt the time period t_Bfrom t_B5-t_B6as its less interfered time period, and the cell 140 may adopt the time period t_Cfrom t_C5-t_C6as its less interfered time period.
As before, although the description refers to a situation where there is a less interfered time period during each frame, it is also possible to define a time interval that is equal to a plurality of frames, with the less interfered time period then occurring at the same time position in each time interval.
Further, although the description refers to an example in which each frame is divided into three sections, and the less interfered time period is equal to one third of one frame, it is also possible to divide each frame or other time interval into a different number of sections, such that the less interfered time period is equal to some different fraction of one frame or time interval.
When a first, less interfered, time period has been defined in each cell, one or more second time periods are also defined, in which there is a specific risk of interference from one or more respective other cell.
Thus, in this case, exterior user equipments in each cell, which would tend to have a greater risk of interference with other cells because they are closer to the cell boundaries, are preferably allocated resources during the less interfered time periods. Incidentally, although specific reference is made to the allocation of resources for exterior user equipments, which are likely to cause interference with user equipments in neighbouring cells as well as being more vulnerable to interference from user equipments in neighbouring cells, the methods described are applicable to any user equipments that require lower interference, such as interior user equipments having coverage problems or user equipments requiring particularly high data rates.
Specifically, in this example, exterior user equipments in the cell 100 are preferably allocated resources during the time period t_A, exterior user equipments in the cell 120 are preferably allocated resources during the time period t_B, and exterior user equipments in the cell 140 are preferably allocated resources during the time period t_C.
However, this is also subject to the condition that an exterior user equipment in a region bordering one or more particular neighbouring cell should preferably not be allocated resources during respective second time periods corresponding to the less interfered time periods of that one or more neighbouring cell.
Thus, considering cell 100, the time period t_Bmay be regarded as such a second time period concerning interference from the cell 120, since exterior user equipments in that cell will preferentially be transmitting during that time period, while the time period t_cmay be regarded as such a second time period concerning interference from the cell 140, since exterior user equipments in that cell will preferentially be transmitting during that time period.
Therefore, for an exterior user equipment in the cell 100 that is in the region 102 bordering the cell 120, that user equipment can be allocated resources at any time during the less interfered time period t_A, because there is no overlap with the time period t_B. However, for an exterior user equipment in the cell 100 that is in the region 104 bordering the cell 140, that user equipment should preferentially be allocated resources in that part of the less interfered time period t_Athat does not overlap with the time period t_C.
There is thus disclosed a system for minimizing interference, based on the allocation of resources to user equipments, at times when there is a reduced possibility of such interference, as a result of some predetermined definition of a less interfered time period.

Claims

1. A method of controlling a wireless communication network, the method comprising:

receiving, from at least one user equipment, data relating to a signal strength of a signal from a first node and a signal strength of a signal from at least one neighboring node of the first node; and

determining based on the received data whether the at least one user equipment should be scheduled for a low interference time period during which interference in relation to the at least one neighboring node is reduced.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one neighboring node is configured to reduce interference in relation to the first node during the low interference time period.

3. The method of claim 1, comprising comparing the signal strengths.

4. The method of claim 1, comprising transmitting an instruction to the at least one user equipment to perform signal strength measurement.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said determining depends on the signal strength of the signal from the first node relative to the signal strength of the signal from the at least one neighboring node.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein said determining depends on whether the signal strength of the signal from the first node exceeds the signal strength of the signal from the at least one neighboring node by a threshold value.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the threshold value is 3 dB.

8. The method of claim 1, comprising scheduling the at least one user equipment for the low interference time period if the signal strength of the signal from the first node does not exceed the signal strength of the signal from the at least one neighboring node by a threshold value.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the data relates to the signal strength of the signal from the first node and the signal strengths of signals from a plurality of neighboring nodes of the first nodes, and wherein said determining comprises determining whether the at least one user equipment should be scheduled for a low interference time period during which interference in relation to a particular neighboring node of the plurality of neighboring nodes is reduced depending on the signal strength of the signal from the first node relative to the signal strength of the signal from the particular neighboring node.

10. The method of claim 1, comprising performing resource allocation for the at least one user equipment based on a result of said determining.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the data comprises the signal strength of the signal from the first node and the signal strength of the signal from the at least one neighboring node.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the first node is a serving node of the at least one user equipment.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the network comprises an unsynchronized network.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the network comprises a synchronized network.

15. The method of claim 1, comprising determining a timing of transmissions from the at least one neighboring node relative to a timing of transmissions from the first node.

16. A network node configured to determine whether at least one user equipment should be scheduled for a low interference time period during which interference in relation to least one neighboring node of a first node is reduced based on data received from the at least one user equipment, the data relating to a signal strength of a signal from a first node and a signal strength of a signal from at least one neighboring node of the first node.

17. A network node configured to:

allocate resources for at least one user equipment during a low interference time period in relation to at least one neighbor cell of a first cell based at least in part on data received from the at least one user equipment, the data relating to a signal strength for the first cell and a signal strength for the at least one neighbor cell.