US20140039558A1 - Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use - Google Patents
Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20140039558A1 US20140039558A1 US13/962,847 US201313962847A US2014039558A1 US 20140039558 A1 US20140039558 A1 US 20140039558A1 US 201313962847 A US201313962847 A US 201313962847A US 2014039558 A1 US2014039558 A1 US 2014039558A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- constraint device
- implanting
- spinous process
- spinal
- fusion
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7062—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral processes, vertebral facets or ribs ; Tools for such devices
- A61B17/7067—Devices bearing against one or more spinous processes and also attached to another part of the spine; Tools therefor
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7062—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral processes, vertebral facets or ribs ; Tools for such devices
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7055—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant connected to sacrum, pelvis or skull
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7097—Stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant, e.g. balloon; devices for inserting or filling such implants
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2/44—Joints for the spine, e.g. vertebrae, spinal discs
- A61F2/442—Intervertebral or spinal discs, e.g. resilient
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2/44—Joints for the spine, e.g. vertebrae, spinal discs
- A61F2/4455—Joints for the spine, e.g. vertebrae, spinal discs for the fusion of spinal bodies, e.g. intervertebral fusion of adjacent spinal bodies, e.g. fusion cages
Definitions
- the present invention generally relates to medical methods and apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus used to restrict flexion of a fused spinal segment.
- the methods and apparatus disclosed herein may be used alone or in combination with fusion or other orthopedic procedures intended to treat patients with spinal disorders such as back pain.
- discogenic pain also known as internal disc disruption.
- Discogenic pain can be quite disabling, and for some patients, can dramatically affect their ability to work and otherwise enjoy their lives. Patients suffering from discogenic pain tend to be young, otherwise healthy individuals who present with pain localized to the back. Discogenic pain usually occurs at the discs located at the L4-L5 or L5-S 1 junctions of the spine. Pain tends to be exacerbated when patients put their lumbar spines into flexion (i.e. by sitting or bending forward) and relieved when they put their lumbar spines into extension (i.e. by standing or arching backwards).
- the patient may also be required to wear an external back brace for three to six months in order to allow the fusion to heal.
- external braces are not always desirable since such braces can be uncomfortable, expensive, and inconvenient to use, and patient compliance often is low.
- An alternative to the back brace is to instrument the spinal segment with traditional instrumentation. Traditional instrumentation also facilitates fusion and prevents subsequent motion along the fused segment. While this treatment may be effective, it can also have shortcomings. For example, the fusion procedure with traditional instrumentation is more invasive, and when rigid instrumentation is used (e.g.
- the instrumented region of the spinal segment becomes very stiff, and motion is prevented across the fusing segment.
- Loads can be borne by the instrumentation rather than the tissue, and loads and motion at adjacent segments can be increased. This is not always desirable, since a certain amount of motion and loading may actually help the healing process, promote fusion, and prevent excessive wear and tear on adjacent implants and tissue. Also, loading on the instrumentation may result in loosening or other mechanical failure of the instrumentation. Therefore, it would be desirable to have an improved device for instrumenting a fused spinal segment. It would also be desirable if an improved device minimized loads at the device/bone interface to minimize the potential of loosening and other mechanical failure. It would also be desirable if the device diminished the peak loading patterns at the bone/implant interface.
- Patents and published applications of interest include: U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,648,691; 4,643,178; 4,743,260; 4,966,600; 5,011,494; 5,092,866; 5,116,340; 5,180,393; 5,282,863; 5,395,374; 5,415,658; 5,415,661; 5,449,361; 5,456,722; 5,462,542; 5,496,318; 5,540,698; 5,562,737; 5,609,634; 5,628,756; 5,645,599; 5,725,582; 5,902,305; Re.
- the present invention generally relates to medical methods and apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus used to restrict flexion of a spinal segment to be fused.
- the methods and apparatus disclosed herein may be used alone or in combination with fusion or other orthopedic procedures intended to treat patients with spinal disorders such as back pain.
- a method for controlling flexion in a spinal segment of a patient comprises performing a spinal fusion procedure on a pair of adjacent vertebrae in the spinal segment and implanting a constraint device into the patient.
- the step of implanting comprises coupling the constraint device with the spinal segment.
- the method also includes adjusting length or tension in the constraint device so that the constraint device provides a force resistant to flexion of the spinal segment undergoing fusion.
- the constraint device also modulates loads borne by the spinal segment undergoing fusion, including the bone grafting material and tissue adjacent thereto.
- the constraint device may have an upper tether portion, a lower tether portion and a compliance member coupled therebetween.
- An upper portion of the constraint device may be engaged with a superior spinous process and a lower portion of the constraint device may be engaged with an inferior spinous process or a sacrum.
- the length or tension of the constraint device may be adjusted to a desired value. The length or tension may be adjusted to encourage the fusion to form in a position consistent with the natural lordotic curve of the patient.
- the step of performing the spinal fusion procedure may comprise applying bone grafting material to at least one of posterior, lateral, posterolateral or interbody locations on the adjacent vertebrae.
- Bone graft may be placed between or alongside the spinous processes of the vertebrae to be fused, and to which the constraint is coupled.
- Sometimes performing the spinal fusion procedure may comprise intervertebral grafting in a disc space between the pair of adjacent vertebrae or applying bone grafting material to the superior spinous process and the inferior spinous process.
- Performing the spinal fusion procedure may also comprise implanting a first prosthesis into the patient.
- the first prosthesis may be engaged with at least a portion of the spinal segment.
- the constraint device may modulate loads borne by the first prosthesis or tissue adjacent thereto.
- the constraint device may be implanted and coupled with the spinal segment during the same surgical procedure as the fusion procedure. Additionally, the constraint device stabilizes the segment as it fuses together, which may take several months to form following the fusion procedure. After fusion has occurred, the constraint no longer provides any further benefit and it may be removed or left in place. If left in place, the constraint device may last longer than traditional instrumentation. Because of the compliance of the constraint device, it is able to accommodate micromotion in the fused segment and therefore the constraint device experiences lower loading and wear as compared to rigid instrumentation systems which transmit complex segmental loads and are more likely to fail in service.
- implanting the first prosthesis may comprise positioning an intervertebral device between the pair of adjacent vertebrae.
- the intervertebral device may be configured to maintain alignment and distance between the pair of adjacent vertebrae during arthrodesis.
- the intervertebral device may comprise an interbody fusion cage.
- implanting the first prosthesis may comprise positioning bone grafting material between the pair of adjacent vertebrae and the bone grafting material may be selected from the group consisting of an allograft or an autograft of bone tissue, a xenograft and also synthetic bone graft material, or agents such as bone morphogenetic protein designed to stimulate bone growth.
- the step of implanting the first prosthesis may further comprise positioning an interbody fusion cage between the pair of adjacent vertebrae during the development of arthrodesis.
- Implanting the constraint device may comprise engaging the constraint device with the superior spinous process and the inferior spinous process or sacrum without implanting a prosthesis directly in an interspinous region extending between an inferior surface of the superior spinous process and a superior surface of the inferior spinous process or sacrum.
- the step of implanting the constraint device may also comprise piercing an interspinous ligament to form a penetration superior to a superior surface of the superior spinous process and advancing the upper tether portion through the penetration.
- the tether may also be advanced through a gap between the superior spinous process and an adjacent spinous process that has been created by surgical removal of the interspinous ligament therefrom.
- Implanting the constraint device may also comprise piercing an interspinous ligament to form a penetration inferior to an inferior surface of the inferior spinous process and advancing the lower tether portion through the penetration.
- the tether may also be advanced through a gap between the inferior spinous process and an adjacent spinous process or a sacrum that has been created by surgical removal of the interspinous ligament therefrom.
- the constraint device may be advanced through a gap between the spinous processes created by surgical removal of an interspinous ligament.
- Adjusting length or tension in the constraint device may comprise adjusting the length or tension a plurality of times during treatment of the spinal segment and during or after healing of the spinal segment. Adjustment may be performed transcutaneously.
- At least one of the first prosthesis or the constraint device may comprise a therapeutic agent adapted to modify tissue in the spinal segment.
- the therapeutic agent may comprise a bone morphogenetic protein.
- a system for controlling flexion in a spinal segment of a patient comprises a constraint device disposed at least partially around a region of the spinal segment that is to be fused.
- the constraint device has an upper tether portion, a lower tether portion and a compliance member coupled therebetween.
- the upper tether portion is coupled with a superior spinous process along the spinal segment to be fused and the lower tether portion is coupled with an inferior spinous process or sacrum along the spinal segment to be fused.
- Length or tension in the constraint device is adjustable so that the constraint device provides a force resistant to flexion of the spinal segment undergoing fusion.
- the constraint device modulates loads borne by the spinal segment to be fused including the graft material and tissue adjacent thereto.
- the constraint device may be engaged with the superior spinous process and the inferior spinous process or sacrum and an interspinous region extending directly between an inferior surface of the superior spinous process and a superior surface of the inferior spinous process or sacrum may remain free of an implanted prosthesis.
- the system may further comprise a first prosthesis coupled with the region of the spinal segment to be fused.
- the constraint device may modulate loads borne by the first prosthesis or by tissue adjacent thereto.
- the first prosthesis may comprise an intervertebral device disposed between two adjacent vertebrae in the region of the spinal segment to be fused.
- the intervertebral device may be configured to maintain alignment and distance between the two adjacent vertebrae after intervertebral disc material has been disposed between the two adjacent vertebrae during development of arthrodesis.
- the intervertebral device may comprise an interbody fusion cage that is adapted to facilitate fusion of the two adjacent vertebrae in the region of the spinal segment to be fused.
- the first prosthesis may also comprise bone grafting material disposed between two adjacent vertebrae where the bone grafting material is adapted to facilitate fusion of the two adjacent vertebrae in the spinal segment.
- the bone grafting material may be selected from the group consisting of an allograft, an autograft, a xenograft, a synthetic material and combinations thereof combination thereof.
- FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram illustrating the lumbar region of the spine.
- FIG. 1B a schematic illustration showing a portion of the lumbar region of the spine taken along a sagittal plane.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a spinal implant of the type described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0216017A1.
- FIG. 3A illustrates an instrumented region of a fused spinal segment.
- FIG. 3B illustrates the use of a constraint device in a fused region of a spinal segment.
- FIG. 4A illustrates fusion of the transverse processes.
- FIGS. 4B-4C illustrate the use of a constraint device along with fusion of the transverse processes.
- FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram illustrating the lumbar region of the spine including the spinous processes (SP), facet joints (FJ), lamina (L), transverse processes (TP), and sacrum (S).
- FIG. 1B is a schematic illustration showing a portion of the lumbar region of the spine taken along a sagittal plane and is useful for defining the terms “neutral position,” “flexion,” and “extension” that are often used in this disclosure.
- neutral position refers to the position in which the patient's spine rests in a relaxed standing position.
- the “neutral position” will vary from patient to patient. Usually, such a neutral position will be characterized by a slight curvature or lordosis of the lumbar spine where the spine has a slight anterior convexity and slight posterior concavity.
- the presence of the constraint of the present invention may modify the neutral position, e.g. the device may apply an initial force which defines a “new” neutral position having some extension of the untreated spine.
- neutral position of the spinal segment refers to the position of a spinal segment when the spine is in the neutral position.
- flexion refers to the motion between adjacent vertebrae in a spinal segment as the patient bends forward.
- the distance between individual vertebrae L on the anterior side decreases so that the anterior portion of the intervertebral disks D are compressed.
- the individual spinous processes SP on the posterior side move apart in the direction indicated by arrow B. Flexion thus refers to the relative movement between adjacent vertebrae as the patient bends forward from the neutral position illustrated in FIG. 1B .
- extension refers to the motion of the individual vertebrae L as the patient bends backward and the spine extends from the neutral position illustrated in FIG. 1B . As the patient bends backward, the anterior ends of the individual vertebrae will move apart. The individual spinous processes SP on adjacent vertebrae will move closer together in a direction opposite to that indicated by arrow B.
- discogenic pain also known as internal disc disruption. Pain experienced by patients with discogenic low back pain can be thought of as flexion instability, and is related to flexion instability manifested in other conditions such as spondylolisthesis, a spinal condition in which abnormal segmental translation is exacerbated by segmental flexion. Discogenic pain usually occurs at the discs located at the L4-L5 or L5-S 1 junctions of the spine. Pain tends to be exacerbated when patients put their lumbar spines into flexion (i.e. by sitting or bending forward) and relieved when they put their lumbar spines into extension (i.e. by standing or arching backwards).
- Flexion and extension are known to change the mechanical loading pattern of a lumbar segment.
- the segment When the segment is in extension, the axial loads borne by the segment are shared by the disc and facet joints (approximately 30% of the load is borne by the facet joints).
- the segmental load In flexion, the segmental load is borne almost entirely by the disc.
- the nucleus shifts posteriorly, changing the loads on the posterior portion of the annulus (which is innervated), likely causing its fibers to be subject to tension and shear forces.
- Segmental flexion increases both the loads borne by the disc and causes them to be borne in a more painful way.
- Patients with discogenic pain accommodate their syndrome by avoiding positions such as sitting, which cause their painful segment to go into flexion, preferring positions such as standing, which maintain their painful segment in extension.
- Discogenic pain may be treated in a number of ways ranging from conservative treatments to surgery and implantation of prostheses.
- Conservative treatments include physical therapy, massage, anti-inflammatory and analgesic medications, muscle relaxants, and epidural steroid injections. These treatments have varying degrees of success and often patients typically continue to suffer with a significant degree of pain.
- Other patients elect to undergo spinal fusion surgery, which sometimes requires discectomy (removal of the disk) together with fusion of adjacent vertebra. Fusion may or may not also include instrumentation of the affected spinal segment including, for example, pedicle screws and stabilization rods, and/or intervertebral devices. Fusion is not lightly recommended for discogenic pain because it is irreversible, costly, associated with high morbidity, and has questionable effectiveness.
- Fusion is, however, still used for discogenic pain despite these drawbacks, and fusion is also used for many other spinal disorders related to pain and instability. While fusion with traditional instrumentation is promising, in some circumstances it may have drawbacks. Because most instrumentation is rigid or only provides limited motion, motion around the fused segment is prevented and loads can be fully borne by the instrumentation rather than the tissue. While prevention of significant motion is important during the fusion healing process, a certain amount of micromotion and loading of the tissue is desirable as this can promote fusion. Furthermore, allowing such motion and loading may enable the segment to fuse in a natural position, enabling maintenance of the lordotic curve in the treated region of the spine and avoiding the creation of kyphosis or “flat back” with fusion instrumentation.
- FIG. 2 shows a spinal implant of the type described in related U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/02161017 A1, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,458,981 the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- the constraint device of FIG. 2 may be used alone or in combination with other spinal treatments to allow micromotion in a spinal segment that is fused or that is undergoing fusion, and to reduce loads borne by the region undergoing fusion or devices implanted into the patient as well as loads borne by adjacent tissue, thereby facilitating healing and reducing tissue damage and wear and tear.
- the constraint device may be used to provide greater stability to the spinal segment and to encourage the healing of the fusion at an intervertebral angle consistent with the lordotic curve of the patient.
- an implant 10 typically comprises a tether structure having an upper strap component 12 and a lower strap component 14 joined by a pair of compliance elements 16 .
- a small aperture is pierced through the interspinous ligament (not illustrated) and the upper strap is passed through the aperture.
- the upper strap 12 may then be disposed over the top of the spinous process SP4 of L4.
- a similar lower aperture is pierced through the interspinous ligament allowing the lower strap 14 to extend over the bottom of the spinous process SP5 of L5.
- the compliance element 16 will typically include an internal element, such as a spring or rubber block, which is attached to the straps 12 and 14 in such a way that the straps may be “elastically” or “compliantly” pulled apart as the spinous processes SP4 and SP5 move apart during flexion. In this way, the implant provides an elastic tension on the spinous processes which is a force that resists flexion. The force increases as the processes move further apart. Usually, the straps themselves will be essentially non-compliant so that the degree of elasticity or compliance may be controlled and provided solely by the compliance elements 16 . Additional details on implant 10 and the methods of use are disclosed in International PCT Applications Nos. PCT/US2009/055914 (Attorney Docket No.
- FIG. 3A illustrates traditional fusion and instrumentation of a spinal segment.
- the intervertebral disc D between adjacent vertebrae V has been removed and bone graft material 304 has been implanted therebetween.
- a spinal fusion cage 304 is also implanted between the adjacent vertebrae in order to facilitate fusion between the vertebrae.
- the bone graft material may be an allograft or an autograft of bone material. Xenografts and synthetic graft material may also be used.
- Spinal fusion between the vertebral bodies (within the disc space) as described above is known as interbody fusion.
- FIG. 3A illustrates an alternative embodiment of fusing a spinal segment using a constraint device such as the one illustrated in FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 3B the spinal segment is fused in a similar fashion as previously described with respect to FIG. 3A above.
- An intervertebral disc D is removed from between adjacent vertebrae V and bone grafting material 304 is implanted along with an optional fusion cage 302 .
- a constraint device is attached to the fused region of the spinal segment.
- constraint device 310 generally takes the same form as the constraint device of FIG. 2 above, although any of the constraint devices disclosed herein may also be used.
- the constraint device 310 has an upper tether portion 310 , a lower tether portion 314 and a compliance member 316 coupled therebetween.
- the upper tether portion 310 is disposed around a superior surface of a superior spinous process and the lower tether portion 314 is disposed around an inferior surface of an inferior spinous process.
- the constraint device may be implanted and coupled with the spinal segment such that the interspinous region extending from an inferior surface of the superior spinous process and a superior surface of the inferior spinous process remains free of any implants such as spacers or other prostheses (although in some embodiments, bone graft may be implanted in this space).
- the length or tension of the constraint device may be adjusted in order to tighten the resulting loop in order to control how much force compliance member 316 provides against flexion of the spinal segment. Additionally, the spring constant of the compliance member may be selected based on desired operating characteristics.
- the constraint device 310 may be adjusted so that is provides enough resistance to flexion so that fusion can occur, while at the same time allowing some micromotion between the adjacent fused vertebrae in order to further promote fusion and the rate of fusion and to enable healing of the fusion at an intervertebral angle that preserves the patient's lordotic curve.
- the constraint device also allows dynamic loading of the bone grafting material and/or the bone-cage interface, further promoting fusion and the rate of fusion. It should also be appreciated that the same benefits may be derived when the graft is applied to the transverse processes (as in postero-lateral fusion), or the posterior elements of the fused vertebrae. Unlike traditional instrumentation where screws and rods unload the spine directly, using constraint device 310 helps unload the spine indirectly.
- FIG. 4A illustrates bone graft 402 applied to the transverse processes TP, without any stabilizing instrumentation. This is known as an uninstrumented fusion. When the patient bends forward, the transverse processes move apart. This may disrupt the healing of the graft and result in non-union (pseudoarthrosis), or the fusion may heal in a flexed position (kyphosis).
- FIG. 4B illustrates use of a constraint device 404 engaged with the spinous processes SP, for resisting segmental flexion, so that the graft will heal and fusion will develop in a more natural lordosis posture.
- FIG. 4C is a posterior view of FIG. 4B that more clearly shows the fused regions and attachment of the constraint device.
- the constraint device 402 generally takes the same form as those described herein.
- the present devices and methods are also advantageous over traditional instrumentation with screws and rods since the constraint device directly controls flexion and involves engagement of the facets more than pedicle screws and rods. This results in some indirect restriction of both axial rotation and sagittal translation, which may further help with the fusion and provide additional spinal segment stability.
- Another advantage of using the present devices and methods is that loading, other than tensile loading, is not transferred to the constraint device, and thus the constraint device is likely to experience fewer failure modes than traditional instrumentation in which all loading is transferred to the screws and rods.
- the present constraint device therefore, not only attempts to maximize therapeutic effectiveness, but also attempts to minimize failure, unlike most existing instrumentation devices which only attempt to maximize the therapy.
- the present device disclosed herein intentionally allows backward motion (extension) which helps avoid issues with extension loading and may help with balancing of the patient's vertebral column. Most other instrumentation devices or systems do not permit backward motion of the spinal segment.
- a constraint device may be applied using minimally invasive techniques and does not require that screws be threaded into the pedicles.
- the constraint device is delivered through small incisions in the patient's back and the tether portions of the constraint device are passed through a small hole pierced in the interspinous ligament. Therefore, the procedure may be performed faster and with less blood loss and may require less operating room time than traditional instrumentation, resulting in a safer and more cost-effective procedure.
- traditional instrumentation requires that tissue be resected, unlike the present method for implanting a constraint device which requires no resection at the affected level, e.g.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Neurology (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Prostheses (AREA)
- Surgical Instruments (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present application is continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/721,238 (Attorney Docket No. 41564-714.201) filed on Mar. 10, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. ______, which is a non-provisional of, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/158,886 (Attorney Docket No. 41564-714.101) filed Mar. 10, 2009, now expired; the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- The present application is also related to the U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/158,892 (Attorney Docket No. 41564-713.101) filed Mar. 10, 2009, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention generally relates to medical methods and apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus used to restrict flexion of a fused spinal segment. The methods and apparatus disclosed herein may be used alone or in combination with fusion or other orthopedic procedures intended to treat patients with spinal disorders such as back pain.
- A host of spinal conditions exist which often result in instability issues and/or back pain. A major source of chronic low back pain is discogenic pain, also known as internal disc disruption. Discogenic pain can be quite disabling, and for some patients, can dramatically affect their ability to work and otherwise enjoy their lives. Patients suffering from discogenic pain tend to be young, otherwise healthy individuals who present with pain localized to the back. Discogenic pain usually occurs at the discs located at the L4-L5 or L5-S 1 junctions of the spine. Pain tends to be exacerbated when patients put their lumbar spines into flexion (i.e. by sitting or bending forward) and relieved when they put their lumbar spines into extension (i.e. by standing or arching backwards). Flexion and extension are known to change the mechanical loading pattern of a lumbar segment. When the segment is in extension, the axial loads borne by the segment are shared by the disc and facet joints (approximately 30% of the load is borne by the facet joints). In flexion, the segmental load is borne almost entirely by the disc. Furthermore, the nucleus shifts posteriorly, changing the loads on the posterior portion of the annulus (which is innervated), likely causing its fibers to be subject to tension and shear forces. Segmental flexion, then, increases both the loads borne by the disc and causes them to be borne in a more painful way. It would therefore be desirable to provide methods and apparatus that can be used alone or in combination with other spinal treatments to reduce loading in the area of the disc and adjacent tissue.
- A number of treatments exist for addressing back pain and spinal instability. Some of these include, but are not limited to, fusion of the affected spinal segment. The patient may also be required to wear an external back brace for three to six months in order to allow the fusion to heal. Unfortunately, external braces are not always desirable since such braces can be uncomfortable, expensive, and inconvenient to use, and patient compliance often is low. An alternative to the back brace is to instrument the spinal segment with traditional instrumentation. Traditional instrumentation also facilitates fusion and prevents subsequent motion along the fused segment. While this treatment may be effective, it can also have shortcomings. For example, the fusion procedure with traditional instrumentation is more invasive, and when rigid instrumentation is used (e.g. pedicle screws and spinal stabilization rods), the instrumented region of the spinal segment becomes very stiff, and motion is prevented across the fusing segment. Loads can be borne by the instrumentation rather than the tissue, and loads and motion at adjacent segments can be increased. This is not always desirable, since a certain amount of motion and loading may actually help the healing process, promote fusion, and prevent excessive wear and tear on adjacent implants and tissue. Also, loading on the instrumentation may result in loosening or other mechanical failure of the instrumentation. Therefore, it would be desirable to have an improved device for instrumenting a fused spinal segment. It would also be desirable if an improved device minimized loads at the device/bone interface to minimize the potential of loosening and other mechanical failure. It would also be desirable if the device diminished the peak loading patterns at the bone/implant interface.
- For the aforementioned reasons, it would therefore be advantageous to provide methods and apparatus that can be used with spinal fusion to help facilitate fusion of the vertebrae while still allowing some motion and loading of the fusion graft. It would be further desirable to provide methods and apparatus that are minimally invasive to the patient, cost effective and easy to use.
- 2. Description of the Background Art
- Patents and published applications of interest include: U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,648,691; 4,643,178; 4,743,260; 4,966,600; 5,011,494; 5,092,866; 5,116,340; 5,180,393; 5,282,863; 5,395,374; 5,415,658; 5,415,661; 5,449,361; 5,456,722; 5,462,542; 5,496,318; 5,540,698; 5,562,737; 5,609,634; 5,628,756; 5,645,599; 5,725,582; 5,902,305; Re. 36,221; 5,928,232; 5,935,133; 5,964,769; 5,989,256; 6,053,921; 6,248,106; 6,312,431; 6,364,883; 6,378,289; 6,391,030; 6,468,309; 6,436,099; 6,451,019; 6,582,433; 6,605,091; 6,626,944; 6,629,975; 6,652,527; 6,652,585; 6,656,185; 6,669,729; 6,682,533; 6,689,140; 6,712,819; 6,689,168; 6,695,852; 6,716,245; 6,761,720; 6,835,205; 7,029,475; 7,163,558; Published U.S. Patent Application Nos. US 2002/0151978; US 2004/0024458; US 2004/0106995; US 2004/0116927; US 2004/0117017; US 2004/0127989; US 2004/0172132; US 2004/0243239; US 2005/0033435; US 2005/0049708; 2005/0192581; 2005/0216017; US 2006/0069447; US 2006/0136060; US 2006/0240533; US 2007/0213829; US 2007/0233096; 2008/0009866; 2008/0108993; Published PCT Application Nos. WO 01/28442 A1; WO 02/03882 A2; WO 02/051326 A1; WO 02/071960 A1; WO 03/045262 A1; WO2004/052246 A1; WO 2004/073532 A1; WO2008/051806; WO2008/051423; WO2008/051801; WO2008/051802; and Published Foreign Application Nos. EP0322334 A1; and FR 2 681 525 A1. The mechanical properties of flexible constraints applied to spinal segments are described in Papp et al. (1997) Spine 22:151-155; Dickman et al. (1997) Spine 22:596-604; and Garner et al. (2002) Eur. Spine J. S186-S191; Al Baz et al. (1995) Spine 20, No. 11, 1241-1244; Heller, (1997) Arch. Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, 117, No. 1-2:96-99; Leahy et al. (2000) Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H: J. Eng. Med. 214, No. 5: 489-495; Minns et al., (1997) Spine 22 No. 16:1819-1825; Miyasaka et al. (2000) Spine 25, No. 6: 732-737; Shepherd et al. (2000) Spine 25, No. 3: 319-323; Shepherd (2001) Medical Eng. Phys. 23, No. 2: 135-141; and Voydeville et al (1992) Orthop Traumatol 2:259-264.
- The present invention generally relates to medical methods and apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus used to restrict flexion of a spinal segment to be fused. The methods and apparatus disclosed herein may be used alone or in combination with fusion or other orthopedic procedures intended to treat patients with spinal disorders such as back pain.
- In a first aspect of the present invention, a method for controlling flexion in a spinal segment of a patient comprises performing a spinal fusion procedure on a pair of adjacent vertebrae in the spinal segment and implanting a constraint device into the patient. The step of implanting comprises coupling the constraint device with the spinal segment. The method also includes adjusting length or tension in the constraint device so that the constraint device provides a force resistant to flexion of the spinal segment undergoing fusion. The constraint device also modulates loads borne by the spinal segment undergoing fusion, including the bone grafting material and tissue adjacent thereto. In some embodiments, the constraint device may have an upper tether portion, a lower tether portion and a compliance member coupled therebetween. An upper portion of the constraint device may be engaged with a superior spinous process and a lower portion of the constraint device may be engaged with an inferior spinous process or a sacrum. The length or tension of the constraint device may be adjusted to a desired value. The length or tension may be adjusted to encourage the fusion to form in a position consistent with the natural lordotic curve of the patient.
- The step of performing the spinal fusion procedure may comprise applying bone grafting material to at least one of posterior, lateral, posterolateral or interbody locations on the adjacent vertebrae. Bone graft may be placed between or alongside the spinous processes of the vertebrae to be fused, and to which the constraint is coupled. Sometimes performing the spinal fusion procedure may comprise intervertebral grafting in a disc space between the pair of adjacent vertebrae or applying bone grafting material to the superior spinous process and the inferior spinous process. Performing the spinal fusion procedure may also comprise implanting a first prosthesis into the patient. The first prosthesis may be engaged with at least a portion of the spinal segment. The constraint device may modulate loads borne by the first prosthesis or tissue adjacent thereto. The constraint device may be implanted and coupled with the spinal segment during the same surgical procedure as the fusion procedure. Additionally, the constraint device stabilizes the segment as it fuses together, which may take several months to form following the fusion procedure. After fusion has occurred, the constraint no longer provides any further benefit and it may be removed or left in place. If left in place, the constraint device may last longer than traditional instrumentation. Because of the compliance of the constraint device, it is able to accommodate micromotion in the fused segment and therefore the constraint device experiences lower loading and wear as compared to rigid instrumentation systems which transmit complex segmental loads and are more likely to fail in service.
- In some embodiments, implanting the first prosthesis may comprise positioning an intervertebral device between the pair of adjacent vertebrae. The intervertebral device may be configured to maintain alignment and distance between the pair of adjacent vertebrae during arthrodesis. The intervertebral device may comprise an interbody fusion cage. In other embodiments, implanting the first prosthesis may comprise positioning bone grafting material between the pair of adjacent vertebrae and the bone grafting material may be selected from the group consisting of an allograft or an autograft of bone tissue, a xenograft and also synthetic bone graft material, or agents such as bone morphogenetic protein designed to stimulate bone growth. In addition to positioning bone grafting material, the step of implanting the first prosthesis may further comprise positioning an interbody fusion cage between the pair of adjacent vertebrae during the development of arthrodesis.
- Implanting the constraint device may comprise engaging the constraint device with the superior spinous process and the inferior spinous process or sacrum without implanting a prosthesis directly in an interspinous region extending between an inferior surface of the superior spinous process and a superior surface of the inferior spinous process or sacrum. The step of implanting the constraint device may also comprise piercing an interspinous ligament to form a penetration superior to a superior surface of the superior spinous process and advancing the upper tether portion through the penetration. The tether may also be advanced through a gap between the superior spinous process and an adjacent spinous process that has been created by surgical removal of the interspinous ligament therefrom. Implanting the constraint device may also comprise piercing an interspinous ligament to form a penetration inferior to an inferior surface of the inferior spinous process and advancing the lower tether portion through the penetration. The tether may also be advanced through a gap between the inferior spinous process and an adjacent spinous process or a sacrum that has been created by surgical removal of the interspinous ligament therefrom. Alternatively, the constraint device may be advanced through a gap between the spinous processes created by surgical removal of an interspinous ligament.
- Adjusting length or tension in the constraint device may comprise adjusting the length or tension a plurality of times during treatment of the spinal segment and during or after healing of the spinal segment. Adjustment may be performed transcutaneously.
- Sometimes, at least one of the first prosthesis or the constraint device may comprise a therapeutic agent adapted to modify tissue in the spinal segment. The therapeutic agent may comprise a bone morphogenetic protein.
- In another aspect of the present invention, a system for controlling flexion in a spinal segment of a patient comprises a constraint device disposed at least partially around a region of the spinal segment that is to be fused. The constraint device has an upper tether portion, a lower tether portion and a compliance member coupled therebetween. The upper tether portion is coupled with a superior spinous process along the spinal segment to be fused and the lower tether portion is coupled with an inferior spinous process or sacrum along the spinal segment to be fused. Length or tension in the constraint device is adjustable so that the constraint device provides a force resistant to flexion of the spinal segment undergoing fusion. Also, the constraint device modulates loads borne by the spinal segment to be fused including the graft material and tissue adjacent thereto.
- The constraint device may be engaged with the superior spinous process and the inferior spinous process or sacrum and an interspinous region extending directly between an inferior surface of the superior spinous process and a superior surface of the inferior spinous process or sacrum may remain free of an implanted prosthesis.
- The system may further comprise a first prosthesis coupled with the region of the spinal segment to be fused. The constraint device may modulate loads borne by the first prosthesis or by tissue adjacent thereto. Sometimes, the first prosthesis may comprise an intervertebral device disposed between two adjacent vertebrae in the region of the spinal segment to be fused. The intervertebral device may be configured to maintain alignment and distance between the two adjacent vertebrae after intervertebral disc material has been disposed between the two adjacent vertebrae during development of arthrodesis. The intervertebral device may comprise an interbody fusion cage that is adapted to facilitate fusion of the two adjacent vertebrae in the region of the spinal segment to be fused. The first prosthesis may also comprise bone grafting material disposed between two adjacent vertebrae where the bone grafting material is adapted to facilitate fusion of the two adjacent vertebrae in the spinal segment. The bone grafting material may be selected from the group consisting of an allograft, an autograft, a xenograft, a synthetic material and combinations thereof combination thereof.
- These and other embodiments are described in further detail in the following description related to the appended drawing figures.
-
FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram illustrating the lumbar region of the spine. -
FIG. 1B a schematic illustration showing a portion of the lumbar region of the spine taken along a sagittal plane. -
FIG. 2 illustrates a spinal implant of the type described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0216017A1. -
FIG. 3A illustrates an instrumented region of a fused spinal segment. -
FIG. 3B illustrates the use of a constraint device in a fused region of a spinal segment. -
FIG. 4A illustrates fusion of the transverse processes. -
FIGS. 4B-4C illustrate the use of a constraint device along with fusion of the transverse processes. -
FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram illustrating the lumbar region of the spine including the spinous processes (SP), facet joints (FJ), lamina (L), transverse processes (TP), and sacrum (S).FIG. 1B is a schematic illustration showing a portion of the lumbar region of the spine taken along a sagittal plane and is useful for defining the terms “neutral position,” “flexion,” and “extension” that are often used in this disclosure. - As used herein, “neutral position” refers to the position in which the patient's spine rests in a relaxed standing position. The “neutral position” will vary from patient to patient. Usually, such a neutral position will be characterized by a slight curvature or lordosis of the lumbar spine where the spine has a slight anterior convexity and slight posterior concavity. In some cases, the presence of the constraint of the present invention may modify the neutral position, e.g. the device may apply an initial force which defines a “new” neutral position having some extension of the untreated spine. As such, the use of the term “neutral position” is to be taken in context of the presence or absence of the device. As used herein, “neutral position of the spinal segment” refers to the position of a spinal segment when the spine is in the neutral position.
- Furthermore, as used herein, “flexion” refers to the motion between adjacent vertebrae in a spinal segment as the patient bends forward. Referring to
FIG. 1B , as a patient bends forward from the neutral position of the spine, i.e. to the right relative to a curved axis A, the distance between individual vertebrae L on the anterior side decreases so that the anterior portion of the intervertebral disks D are compressed. In contrast, the individual spinous processes SP on the posterior side move apart in the direction indicated by arrow B. Flexion thus refers to the relative movement between adjacent vertebrae as the patient bends forward from the neutral position illustrated inFIG. 1B . - Additionally, as used herein, “extension” refers to the motion of the individual vertebrae L as the patient bends backward and the spine extends from the neutral position illustrated in
FIG. 1B . As the patient bends backward, the anterior ends of the individual vertebrae will move apart. The individual spinous processes SP on adjacent vertebrae will move closer together in a direction opposite to that indicated by arrow B. - A major source of chronic low back pain is discogenic pain, also known as internal disc disruption. Pain experienced by patients with discogenic low back pain can be thought of as flexion instability, and is related to flexion instability manifested in other conditions such as spondylolisthesis, a spinal condition in which abnormal segmental translation is exacerbated by segmental flexion. Discogenic pain usually occurs at the discs located at the L4-L5 or L5-S 1 junctions of the spine. Pain tends to be exacerbated when patients put their lumbar spines into flexion (i.e. by sitting or bending forward) and relieved when they put their lumbar spines into extension (i.e. by standing or arching backwards). Flexion and extension are known to change the mechanical loading pattern of a lumbar segment. When the segment is in extension, the axial loads borne by the segment are shared by the disc and facet joints (approximately 30% of the load is borne by the facet joints). In flexion, the segmental load is borne almost entirely by the disc. Furthermore, the nucleus shifts posteriorly, changing the loads on the posterior portion of the annulus (which is innervated), likely causing its fibers to be subject to tension and shear forces. Segmental flexion, then, increases both the loads borne by the disc and causes them to be borne in a more painful way. Patients with discogenic pain accommodate their syndrome by avoiding positions such as sitting, which cause their painful segment to go into flexion, preferring positions such as standing, which maintain their painful segment in extension.
- Discogenic pain may be treated in a number of ways ranging from conservative treatments to surgery and implantation of prostheses. Conservative treatments include physical therapy, massage, anti-inflammatory and analgesic medications, muscle relaxants, and epidural steroid injections. These treatments have varying degrees of success and often patients typically continue to suffer with a significant degree of pain. Other patients elect to undergo spinal fusion surgery, which sometimes requires discectomy (removal of the disk) together with fusion of adjacent vertebra. Fusion may or may not also include instrumentation of the affected spinal segment including, for example, pedicle screws and stabilization rods, and/or intervertebral devices. Fusion is not lightly recommended for discogenic pain because it is irreversible, costly, associated with high morbidity, and has questionable effectiveness. Fusion is, however, still used for discogenic pain despite these drawbacks, and fusion is also used for many other spinal disorders related to pain and instability. While fusion with traditional instrumentation is promising, in some circumstances it may have drawbacks. Because most instrumentation is rigid or only provides limited motion, motion around the fused segment is prevented and loads can be fully borne by the instrumentation rather than the tissue. While prevention of significant motion is important during the fusion healing process, a certain amount of micromotion and loading of the tissue is desirable as this can promote fusion. Furthermore, allowing such motion and loading may enable the segment to fuse in a natural position, enabling maintenance of the lordotic curve in the treated region of the spine and avoiding the creation of kyphosis or “flat back” with fusion instrumentation. Therefore it would be desirable to provide a device that can stabilize a fused region like traditional instrumentation while still allowing some micromotion and loading in the fused region. Furthermore, loading along the spinal column may be modified due to the fusion and this may result in excessive loading on the fused region, adjacent tissue or devices used. It would therefore be desirable to provide methods and apparatus that can be used alone or in conjunction with spinal fusion or other spinal treatments that allow micromotion at the level of the fusion and that help to reduce the excessive loading and provide additional flexion stability.
-
FIG. 2 shows a spinal implant of the type described in related U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/02161017 A1, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,458,981 the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. The constraint device ofFIG. 2 may be used alone or in combination with other spinal treatments to allow micromotion in a spinal segment that is fused or that is undergoing fusion, and to reduce loads borne by the region undergoing fusion or devices implanted into the patient as well as loads borne by adjacent tissue, thereby facilitating healing and reducing tissue damage and wear and tear. Furthermore, the constraint device may be used to provide greater stability to the spinal segment and to encourage the healing of the fusion at an intervertebral angle consistent with the lordotic curve of the patient. - As illustrated in
FIG. 2 , animplant 10 typically comprises a tether structure having anupper strap component 12 and alower strap component 14 joined by a pair ofcompliance elements 16. A small aperture is pierced through the interspinous ligament (not illustrated) and the upper strap is passed through the aperture. Theupper strap 12 may then be disposed over the top of the spinous process SP4 of L4. A similar lower aperture is pierced through the interspinous ligament allowing thelower strap 14 to extend over the bottom of the spinous process SP5 of L5. Thecompliance element 16 will typically include an internal element, such as a spring or rubber block, which is attached to thestraps compliance elements 16. Additional details onimplant 10 and the methods of use are disclosed in International PCT Applications Nos. PCT/US2009/055914 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000910PC); PCT/US2009/046492 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000810PC); U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/093,922 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000900US); 61/059,543 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000800US); 61/059,538 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000700US); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/106,103 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000410US); U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2010/0023060 (Attorney Docket No. 02398-000710US); 2008/0262549 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000151US); and U.S. Pat. No. 7,458,981 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000210US); the entire contents, each of which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference. The constraint device ofFIG. 2 may be used along with fusion to provide better clinical outcomes than traditionally instrumented fusion procedures. Additionally, in some situations, it may be desirable to couple the constraint device with the sacrum rather than an inferior spinous process. Additional disclosure on sacral attachment may be found in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/149,224 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-001200US); International PCT Application PCT/US2010/022767 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-001210PC); and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/827,980 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000120US), the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. -
FIG. 3A illustrates traditional fusion and instrumentation of a spinal segment. InFIG. 3A , the intervertebral disc D between adjacent vertebrae V has been removed andbone graft material 304 has been implanted therebetween. Optionally, aspinal fusion cage 304 is also implanted between the adjacent vertebrae in order to facilitate fusion between the vertebrae. The bone graft material may be an allograft or an autograft of bone material. Xenografts and synthetic graft material may also be used. Spinal fusion between the vertebral bodies (within the disc space) as described above is known as interbody fusion. Another common spinal fusion technique is posterolateral fusion, where the bone graft is applied between the transverse processes of the motion segment to be fused. The methods and systems described here are applicable to both fusion techniques. Once the bone grafting material and/or fusion cage have been implanted, the spinal segment is often instrumented withpedicle screws 306 andstabilization rods 308 in order to prevent motion around the fused region thereby promoting fusion. Often four pedicle screws (two on either side of the spinal segment midline) and two stabilization rods (one on either side of the midline) are used, althoughFIG. 3A only illustrates two pedicle screws and one spinal rod since it is a lateral view. Some of the problems and challenges of an instrumented fusion have been previously discussed above.FIG. 3B illustrates an alternative embodiment of fusing a spinal segment using a constraint device such as the one illustrated inFIG. 2 . - In
FIG. 3B , the spinal segment is fused in a similar fashion as previously described with respect toFIG. 3A above. An intervertebral disc D is removed from between adjacent vertebrae V andbone grafting material 304 is implanted along with anoptional fusion cage 302. Instead of instrumenting the fused segment with pedicle screws and rigid spinal rods, a constraint device is attached to the fused region of the spinal segment. Here,constraint device 310 generally takes the same form as the constraint device ofFIG. 2 above, although any of the constraint devices disclosed herein may also be used. Theconstraint device 310 has anupper tether portion 310, alower tether portion 314 and acompliance member 316 coupled therebetween. Theupper tether portion 310 is disposed around a superior surface of a superior spinous process and thelower tether portion 314 is disposed around an inferior surface of an inferior spinous process. The constraint device may be implanted and coupled with the spinal segment such that the interspinous region extending from an inferior surface of the superior spinous process and a superior surface of the inferior spinous process remains free of any implants such as spacers or other prostheses (although in some embodiments, bone graft may be implanted in this space). The length or tension of the constraint device may be adjusted in order to tighten the resulting loop in order to control how muchforce compliance member 316 provides against flexion of the spinal segment. Additionally, the spring constant of the compliance member may be selected based on desired operating characteristics. Thus, theconstraint device 310 may be adjusted so that is provides enough resistance to flexion so that fusion can occur, while at the same time allowing some micromotion between the adjacent fused vertebrae in order to further promote fusion and the rate of fusion and to enable healing of the fusion at an intervertebral angle that preserves the patient's lordotic curve. The constraint device also allows dynamic loading of the bone grafting material and/or the bone-cage interface, further promoting fusion and the rate of fusion. It should also be appreciated that the same benefits may be derived when the graft is applied to the transverse processes (as in postero-lateral fusion), or the posterior elements of the fused vertebrae. Unlike traditional instrumentation where screws and rods unload the spine directly, usingconstraint device 310 helps unload the spine indirectly. - Spinal segment fusion may also be accomplished by fusing adjacent transverse processes.
FIG. 4A illustratesbone graft 402 applied to the transverse processes TP, without any stabilizing instrumentation. This is known as an uninstrumented fusion. When the patient bends forward, the transverse processes move apart. This may disrupt the healing of the graft and result in non-union (pseudoarthrosis), or the fusion may heal in a flexed position (kyphosis).FIG. 4B illustrates use of aconstraint device 404 engaged with the spinous processes SP, for resisting segmental flexion, so that the graft will heal and fusion will develop in a more natural lordosis posture.FIG. 4C is a posterior view ofFIG. 4B that more clearly shows the fused regions and attachment of the constraint device. Theconstraint device 402 generally takes the same form as those described herein. - The present devices and methods are also advantageous over traditional instrumentation with screws and rods since the constraint device directly controls flexion and involves engagement of the facets more than pedicle screws and rods. This results in some indirect restriction of both axial rotation and sagittal translation, which may further help with the fusion and provide additional spinal segment stability. Another advantage of using the present devices and methods is that loading, other than tensile loading, is not transferred to the constraint device, and thus the constraint device is likely to experience fewer failure modes than traditional instrumentation in which all loading is transferred to the screws and rods. The present constraint device therefore, not only attempts to maximize therapeutic effectiveness, but also attempts to minimize failure, unlike most existing instrumentation devices which only attempt to maximize the therapy. The present device disclosed herein intentionally allows backward motion (extension) which helps avoid issues with extension loading and may help with balancing of the patient's vertebral column. Most other instrumentation devices or systems do not permit backward motion of the spinal segment.
- Applying the constraint device as opposed to using traditional instrumentation techniques is also less invasive. A constraint device may be applied using minimally invasive techniques and does not require that screws be threaded into the pedicles. The constraint device is delivered through small incisions in the patient's back and the tether portions of the constraint device are passed through a small hole pierced in the interspinous ligament. Therefore, the procedure may be performed faster and with less blood loss and may require less operating room time than traditional instrumentation, resulting in a safer and more cost-effective procedure. Moreover, traditional instrumentation requires that tissue be resected, unlike the present method for implanting a constraint device which requires no resection at the affected level, e.g. no bone is required to be resected from the affected vertebral body or its posterior elements. Traditional instrumentation therefore may have more complications and safety concerns than a minimally invasive constraint device. The absence of screws and rods also frees up space in the patient's back, permitting easier access in case additional back surgery is required and also allowing other devices to be implanted in the area without the need to avoid interfering with screws and rods.
- Additional disclosure on the methods and tools for implanting the constraint device are disclosed in greater detail in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0262549 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000151US); U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/093,922 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000900US); and International PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/055914 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000910PC); the entire contents of which were previously incorporated herein by reference. Additionally, several other length and tensioning adjustment mechanisms for a constraint device are disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/059,543 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000800US); 61/059,538 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000700US); U.S. Patent Publication No. 2010/0023060 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000710US); International PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/046492 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000810PC); the entire contents of which were previously incorporated by reference. Additional embodiments of constraint devices are also disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/106,103 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000410US) and U.S. Pat. No. 7,458,981 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000210US); the entire contents of which were previously incorporate herein by reference.
- While the exemplary embodiments have been described in some detail for clarity of understanding and by way of example, a number of modifications, changes, and adaptations may be implemented and/or will be obvious to those skilled in the art. Hence, the scope of the present invention is limited solely by the independent claims.
Claims (22)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/962,847 US20140039558A1 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2013-08-08 | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15888609P | 2009-03-10 | 2009-03-10 | |
US12/721,238 US8529606B2 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2010-03-10 | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
US13/962,847 US20140039558A1 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2013-08-08 | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/721,238 Continuation US8529606B2 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2010-03-10 | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20140039558A1 true US20140039558A1 (en) | 2014-02-06 |
Family
ID=42728738
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/721,238 Active 2030-06-30 US8529606B2 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2010-03-10 | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
US13/962,847 Abandoned US20140039558A1 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2013-08-08 | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/721,238 Active 2030-06-30 US8529606B2 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2010-03-10 | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8529606B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2405839A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2012520131A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010104935A1 (en) |
Cited By (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20170147669A1 (en) * | 2015-11-24 | 2017-05-25 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Cursor-based state-collapse scheme for shared databases |
US9931143B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2018-04-03 | New South Innovations Pty Limited | Bone stabilization device and methods of use |
US10016220B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2018-07-10 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable magnetic devices and methods of using same |
US10238427B2 (en) | 2015-02-19 | 2019-03-26 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Systems and methods for vertebral adjustment |
US10271885B2 (en) | 2014-12-26 | 2019-04-30 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Systems and methods for distraction |
US10349995B2 (en) | 2007-10-30 | 2019-07-16 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Skeletal manipulation method |
US10405891B2 (en) | 2010-08-09 | 2019-09-10 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Maintenance feature in magnetic implant |
US10441323B2 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2019-10-15 | New South Innovations Pty Limited | Spine stabilization device |
US10478232B2 (en) | 2009-04-29 | 2019-11-19 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Interspinous process device and method |
US10517643B2 (en) | 2009-02-23 | 2019-12-31 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Non-invasive adjustable distraction system |
US10617453B2 (en) | 2015-10-16 | 2020-04-14 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable devices for treating arthritis of the knee |
US10646262B2 (en) | 2011-02-14 | 2020-05-12 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | System and method for altering rotational alignment of bone sections |
US10660675B2 (en) | 2010-06-30 | 2020-05-26 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | External adjustment device for distraction device |
US10729470B2 (en) | 2008-11-10 | 2020-08-04 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | External adjustment device for distraction device |
US10743794B2 (en) | 2011-10-04 | 2020-08-18 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Devices and methods for non-invasive implant length sensing |
US10751094B2 (en) | 2013-10-10 | 2020-08-25 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable spinal implant |
US10835290B2 (en) | 2015-12-10 | 2020-11-17 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | External adjustment device for distraction device |
US10918425B2 (en) | 2016-01-28 | 2021-02-16 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | System and methods for bone transport |
US11191579B2 (en) | 2012-10-29 | 2021-12-07 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable devices for treating arthritis of the knee |
US11202707B2 (en) | 2008-03-25 | 2021-12-21 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable implant system |
US11234849B2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2022-02-01 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable implant and method of use |
US11246694B2 (en) | 2014-04-28 | 2022-02-15 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | System for informational magnetic feedback in adjustable implants |
US11357549B2 (en) | 2004-07-02 | 2022-06-14 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Expandable rod system to treat scoliosis and method of using the same |
Families Citing this family (49)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7846183B2 (en) | 2004-02-06 | 2010-12-07 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Vertebral facet joint prosthesis and method of fixation |
US8523904B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2013-09-03 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Methods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment |
US7458981B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2008-12-02 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Spinal implant and method for restricting spinal flexion |
US9504583B2 (en) | 2004-06-10 | 2016-11-29 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Implant and method for facet immobilization |
US7901437B2 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2011-03-08 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization member with molded connection |
US8162982B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2012-04-24 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for constraint of multiple spine segments |
US8029541B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2011-10-04 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
US8187307B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2012-05-29 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector |
US8992533B2 (en) | 2007-02-22 | 2015-03-31 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Vertebral facet joint drill and method of use |
EP2129304B1 (en) | 2007-02-22 | 2014-09-03 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Vertebral articular process drill |
US20100036424A1 (en) | 2007-06-22 | 2010-02-11 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for increasing the bending stiffness and constraining the spreading of a spinal segment |
US8403961B2 (en) * | 2007-06-22 | 2013-03-26 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and devices for controlled flexion restriction of spinal segments |
EP2326267B1 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2018-04-25 | Empirical Spine, Inc. | Apparatus for locking an implantable band |
US8187305B2 (en) * | 2008-06-06 | 2012-05-29 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for deploying spinous process constraints |
US11241257B2 (en) | 2008-10-13 | 2022-02-08 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Spinal distraction system |
WO2010104975A1 (en) * | 2009-03-10 | 2010-09-16 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
JP5681122B2 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2015-03-04 | シンピライカ スパイン, インコーポレイテッド | Surgical tether device and method of use |
US8668719B2 (en) * | 2009-03-30 | 2014-03-11 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for improving shear loading capacity of a spinal segment |
US9668771B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2017-06-06 | Roger P Jackson | Soft stabilization assemblies with off-set connector |
US8449543B2 (en) | 2009-09-04 | 2013-05-28 | Ellipse Technologies, Inc. | Bone growth device and method |
US8740949B2 (en) | 2011-02-24 | 2014-06-03 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for stabilizing bone |
USD724733S1 (en) | 2011-02-24 | 2015-03-17 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Interbody bone implant |
US9271765B2 (en) | 2011-02-24 | 2016-03-01 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Vertebral facet joint fusion implant and method for fusion |
USD739935S1 (en) | 2011-10-26 | 2015-09-29 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Interbody bone implant |
US9078711B2 (en) | 2012-06-06 | 2015-07-14 | Ellipse Technologies, Inc. | Devices and methods for detection of slippage of magnetic coupling in implantable medical devices |
US20130338714A1 (en) | 2012-06-15 | 2013-12-19 | Arvin Chang | Magnetic implants with improved anatomical compatibility |
US9044281B2 (en) | 2012-10-18 | 2015-06-02 | Ellipse Technologies, Inc. | Intramedullary implants for replacing lost bone |
US9179938B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2015-11-10 | Ellipse Technologies, Inc. | Distraction devices and method of assembling the same |
US9421044B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2016-08-23 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Apparatus for bone stabilization and distraction and methods of use |
US9820784B2 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2017-11-21 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Apparatus for spinal fixation and methods of use |
USD765853S1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2016-09-06 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Flexible elongate member with a portion configured to receive a bone anchor |
US10226242B2 (en) | 2013-07-31 | 2019-03-12 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Noninvasively adjustable suture anchors |
US9801734B1 (en) | 2013-08-09 | 2017-10-31 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Lordotic expandable interbody implant |
US9456855B2 (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2016-10-04 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Method of placing an implant between bone portions |
US9839450B2 (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2017-12-12 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Device and method for reinforcement of a facet |
US11478275B2 (en) | 2014-09-17 | 2022-10-25 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Flexible fastening band connector |
WO2016065205A1 (en) | 2014-10-23 | 2016-04-28 | Ellipse Technologies, Inc. | Remotely adjustable interactive bone reshaping implant |
CA2972788A1 (en) | 2015-01-27 | 2016-08-04 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Facet joint implant |
WO2017139548A1 (en) | 2016-02-10 | 2017-08-17 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Systems and methods for controlling multiple surgical variables |
US10034693B2 (en) | 2016-07-07 | 2018-07-31 | Mark S. Stern | Spinous laminar clamp assembly |
US11577097B2 (en) | 2019-02-07 | 2023-02-14 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Ultrasonic communication in medical devices |
US11589901B2 (en) | 2019-02-08 | 2023-02-28 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | External adjustment device |
US11457959B2 (en) | 2019-05-22 | 2022-10-04 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Bone tie and bone tie inserter |
WO2020236229A1 (en) | 2019-05-22 | 2020-11-26 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Bone tie and bone tie inserter |
US11304733B2 (en) | 2020-02-14 | 2022-04-19 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Bone tie methods |
US20220265324A1 (en) | 2021-02-23 | 2022-08-25 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable implant, system and methods |
US11737787B1 (en) | 2021-05-27 | 2023-08-29 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Bone elongating devices and methods of use |
WO2023014564A1 (en) | 2021-08-03 | 2023-02-09 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable implant |
US11883080B1 (en) * | 2022-07-13 | 2024-01-30 | Globus Medical, Inc | Reverse dynamization implants |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5645599A (en) * | 1994-07-26 | 1997-07-08 | Fixano | Interspinal vertebral implant |
US6312431B1 (en) * | 2000-04-24 | 2001-11-06 | Wilson T. Asfora | Vertebrae linking system |
US20020032483A1 (en) * | 1998-05-06 | 2002-03-14 | Nicholson James E. | Apparatus and method for spinal fusion using implanted devices |
US20080262549A1 (en) * | 2006-10-19 | 2008-10-23 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for deploying spinous process constraints |
US7452351B2 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2008-11-18 | Kyphon Sarl | Spinal diagnostic methods and apparatus |
US20100049251A1 (en) * | 2008-03-28 | 2010-02-25 | Kuslich Stephen D | Method and device for interspinous process fusion |
Family Cites Families (164)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5021A (en) * | 1847-03-20 | Jambs haworth | ||
US3648691A (en) | 1970-02-24 | 1972-03-14 | Univ Colorado State Res Found | Method of applying vertebral appliance |
US4246660A (en) | 1978-12-26 | 1981-01-27 | Queen's University At Kingston | Artificial ligament |
US4643178A (en) | 1984-04-23 | 1987-02-17 | Fabco Medical Products, Inc. | Surgical wire and method for the use thereof |
US4743260A (en) | 1985-06-10 | 1988-05-10 | Burton Charles V | Method for a flexible stabilization system for a vertebral column |
US4708132A (en) | 1986-01-24 | 1987-11-24 | Pfizer-Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Fixation device for a ligament or tendon prosthesis |
ZA875425B (en) | 1986-07-23 | 1988-04-27 | Gore & Ass | Mechanical ligament |
US4794916A (en) | 1986-11-20 | 1989-01-03 | Porterfield James A | Lumbar stabilizer |
US4772286A (en) | 1987-02-17 | 1988-09-20 | E. Marlowe Goble | Ligament attachment method and apparatus |
FR2623085B1 (en) | 1987-11-16 | 1992-08-14 | Breard Francis | SURGICAL IMPLANT TO LIMIT THE RELATIVE MOVEMENT OF VERTEBRES |
FR2625097B1 (en) | 1987-12-23 | 1990-05-18 | Cote Sarl | INTER-SPINOUS PROSTHESIS COMPOSED OF SEMI-ELASTIC MATERIAL COMPRISING A TRANSFILING EYE AT ITS END AND INTER-SPINOUS PADS |
US4870957A (en) | 1988-12-27 | 1989-10-03 | Marlowe Goble E | Ligament anchor system |
US5116340A (en) | 1989-01-26 | 1992-05-26 | Songer Robert J | Surgical securance apparatus |
US4966600A (en) | 1989-01-26 | 1990-10-30 | Songer Robert J | Surgical securance method |
FR2642645B1 (en) | 1989-02-03 | 1992-08-14 | Breard Francis | FLEXIBLE INTERVERTEBRAL STABILIZER AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING ITS VOLTAGE BEFORE PLACEMENT ON THE RACHIS |
USRE36221E (en) | 1989-02-03 | 1999-06-01 | Breard; Francis Henri | Flexible inter-vertebral stabilizer as well as process and apparatus for determining or verifying its tension before installation on the spinal column |
US4955910A (en) | 1989-07-17 | 1990-09-11 | Boehringer Mannheim Corporation | Fixation system for an elongated prosthesis |
US5108433A (en) | 1989-08-18 | 1992-04-28 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Tensioning means for prosthetic devices |
US5002574A (en) | 1989-08-18 | 1991-03-26 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Co. | Tensioning means for prosthetic devices |
DE59100448D1 (en) | 1990-04-20 | 1993-11-11 | Sulzer Ag | Implant, in particular intervertebral prosthesis. |
FR2666981B1 (en) | 1990-09-21 | 1993-06-25 | Commarmond Jacques | SYNTHETIC LIGAMENT VERTEBRAL. |
FR2681525A1 (en) | 1991-09-19 | 1993-03-26 | Medical Op | Device for flexible or semi-rigid stabilisation of the spine, in particular of the human spine, by a posterior route |
FR2693364B1 (en) | 1992-07-07 | 1995-06-30 | Erpios Snc | INTERVERTEBRAL PROSTHESIS FOR STABILIZING ROTATORY AND FLEXIBLE-EXTENSION CONSTRAINTS. |
GB9217578D0 (en) | 1992-08-19 | 1992-09-30 | Surgicarft Ltd | Surgical implants,etc |
US5540703A (en) | 1993-01-06 | 1996-07-30 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Knotted cable attachment apparatus formed of braided polymeric fibers |
US5456722A (en) | 1993-01-06 | 1995-10-10 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Load bearing polymeric cable |
US5496318A (en) | 1993-01-08 | 1996-03-05 | Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc. | Interspinous segmental spine fixation device |
US5415661A (en) | 1993-03-24 | 1995-05-16 | University Of Miami | Implantable spinal assist device |
US5540698A (en) | 1993-04-21 | 1996-07-30 | Amei Technologies Inc. | System and method for securing a medical cable |
US5449361A (en) | 1993-04-21 | 1995-09-12 | Amei Technologies Inc. | Orthopedic cable tensioner |
FR2709246B1 (en) | 1993-08-27 | 1995-09-29 | Martin Jean Raymond | Dynamic implanted spinal orthosis. |
US5395374A (en) | 1993-09-02 | 1995-03-07 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Orthopedic cabling method and apparatus |
US5354917A (en) | 1993-11-12 | 1994-10-11 | Texaco Chemical Company | Use of supported rhodium catalysts in the preparation of tertiary butyl alcohol from tertiary butyl hydroperoxide |
FR2712481B1 (en) | 1993-11-18 | 1996-01-12 | Graf Henry | Improvements to flexible inter-vertebral stabilizers. |
US5415658A (en) | 1993-12-14 | 1995-05-16 | Pioneer Laboratories, Inc. | Surgical cable loop connector |
FR2714591B1 (en) | 1994-01-06 | 1996-03-01 | Euros Sa | Prosthetic element for the lumbosacral joint. |
US5462542A (en) | 1994-01-24 | 1995-10-31 | United States Surgical Corporation | Sternum buckle with serrated strap |
CA2141911C (en) | 1994-02-24 | 2002-04-23 | Jude S. Sauer | Surgical crimping device and method of use |
FR2717675B1 (en) | 1994-03-24 | 1996-05-03 | Jean Taylor | Interspinous wedge. |
US5458601A (en) | 1994-03-28 | 1995-10-17 | Medical University Of South Carolina | Adjustable ligament anchor |
DE69526113D1 (en) | 1994-11-16 | 2002-05-02 | Advanced Spine Fixation Syst | GRAPPING HOOKS FOR FIXING THE SPINE SEGMENTS |
US5645084A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1997-07-08 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Method for spinal fusion without decortication |
EP0873718A3 (en) | 1995-04-28 | 1998-11-04 | Gazzani, Romolo Igino | Devices for osteosynthesis |
US5707379A (en) | 1995-10-20 | 1998-01-13 | Coral Medical | Method and apparatus for intracorporeal suturing |
US5797915A (en) * | 1996-04-17 | 1998-08-25 | Pierson, Iii; Raymond H. | Cerclage system |
DE19627864C2 (en) | 1996-07-11 | 2003-05-08 | Aesculap Ag & Co Kg | Surgical jig |
US6835207B2 (en) | 1996-07-22 | 2004-12-28 | Fred Zacouto | Skeletal implant |
KR100189371B1 (en) | 1996-08-23 | 1999-06-01 | 전주범 | An interpolator of digital decoder |
AU4480097A (en) | 1996-09-20 | 1998-04-14 | Medicinelodge, Inc. | Adjustable length strap and footing for ligament mounting and method for its use |
US6068630A (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2000-05-30 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US7201751B2 (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2007-04-10 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Supplemental spine fixation device |
US6451019B1 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2002-09-17 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Supplemental spine fixation device and method |
US6712819B2 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2004-03-30 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Mating insertion instruments for spinal implants and methods of use |
DE69842242D1 (en) | 1997-02-11 | 2011-06-09 | Zimmer Spine Inc | Plate for the anterior cervical spine with fixation system for screws |
US6828357B1 (en) | 1997-07-31 | 2004-12-07 | Metabolix, Inc. | Polyhydroxyalkanoate compositions having controlled degradation rates |
US6053921A (en) | 1997-08-26 | 2000-04-25 | Spinal Concepts, Inc. | Surgical cable system and method |
US5964769A (en) | 1997-08-26 | 1999-10-12 | Spinal Concepts, Inc. | Surgical cable system and method |
US6322279B1 (en) | 1997-11-04 | 2001-11-27 | Sports Carriers, Inc. | Adjustable attachment device |
US6395018B1 (en) | 1998-02-09 | 2002-05-28 | Wilfrido R. Castaneda | Endovascular graft and process for bridging a defect in a main vessel near one of more branch vessels |
FR2775183B1 (en) | 1998-02-20 | 2000-08-04 | Jean Taylor | INTER-SPINOUS PROSTHESIS |
US6224630B1 (en) | 1998-05-29 | 2001-05-01 | Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc. | Implantable tissue repair device |
US6652527B2 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2003-11-25 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Supplemental spine fixation device and method |
US5989256A (en) | 1999-01-19 | 1999-11-23 | Spineology, Inc. | Bone fixation cable ferrule |
US6296643B1 (en) | 1999-04-23 | 2001-10-02 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Device for the correction of spinal deformities through vertebral body tethering without fusion |
US6299613B1 (en) | 1999-04-23 | 2001-10-09 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Method for the correction of spinal deformities through vertebral body tethering without fusion |
US6436099B1 (en) | 1999-04-23 | 2002-08-20 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Adjustable spinal tether |
FR2799640B1 (en) | 1999-10-15 | 2002-01-25 | Spine Next Sa | IMPLANT INTERVETEBRAL |
US6378289B1 (en) | 1999-11-19 | 2002-04-30 | Pioneer Surgical Technology | Methods and apparatus for clamping surgical wires or cables |
US6558389B2 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2003-05-06 | Ron Clark | Endosteal tibial ligament fixation with adjustable tensioning |
GB9929599D0 (en) | 1999-12-15 | 2000-02-09 | Atlantech Medical Devices Limi | A graft suspension device |
US6629975B1 (en) | 1999-12-20 | 2003-10-07 | Pioneer Laboratories, Icn. | Multiple lumen crimp |
US6899716B2 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2005-05-31 | Trans1, Inc. | Method and apparatus for spinal augmentation |
US6248106B1 (en) | 2000-02-25 | 2001-06-19 | Bret Ferree | Cross-coupled vertebral stabilizers |
US6402750B1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2002-06-11 | Spinlabs, Llc | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US6605091B1 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2003-08-12 | Pioneer Laboratories, Inc. | Surgical cable assembly and method |
FR2811543B1 (en) | 2000-07-12 | 2003-07-04 | Spine Next Sa | INTERSOMATIC IMPLANT |
FR2811540B1 (en) | 2000-07-12 | 2003-04-25 | Spine Next Sa | IMPORTING INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
EP1192908A3 (en) | 2000-10-02 | 2004-05-26 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | System and method for spinal reconstruction |
US6468309B1 (en) | 2000-10-05 | 2002-10-22 | Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Method and apparatus for stabilizing adjacent bones |
KR20030038556A (en) | 2000-10-24 | 2003-05-16 | 스파인올로지 그룹, 엘엘씨 | Tension band clip |
FR2817461B1 (en) | 2000-12-01 | 2003-08-15 | Henry Graf | INTERVERTEBRAL STABILIZATION DEVICE |
US6752831B2 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2004-06-22 | Osteotech, Inc. | Biocompatible osteogenic band for repair of spinal disorders |
FR2818530B1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2003-10-31 | Spine Next Sa | INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT WITH DEFORMABLE SHIM |
US6364883B1 (en) | 2001-02-23 | 2002-04-02 | Albert N. Santilli | Spinous process clamp for spinal fusion and method of operation |
US6652585B2 (en) | 2001-02-28 | 2003-11-25 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Flexible spine stabilization system |
FR2822051B1 (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2004-02-27 | Spine Next Sa | INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT WITH SELF-LOCKING ATTACHMENT |
US6582433B2 (en) | 2001-04-09 | 2003-06-24 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine fixation device and method |
GB0114783D0 (en) | 2001-06-16 | 2001-08-08 | Sengupta Dilip K | A assembly for the stabilisation of vertebral bodies of the spine |
FR2828398B1 (en) * | 2001-08-08 | 2003-09-19 | Jean Taylor | VERTEBRA STABILIZATION ASSEMBLY |
US6736815B2 (en) | 2001-09-06 | 2004-05-18 | Core Medical, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for treating spinal discs |
US6695852B2 (en) | 2001-10-31 | 2004-02-24 | Spineology, Inc. | Tension tools for tension band clip |
US7285121B2 (en) | 2001-11-05 | 2007-10-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Devices and methods for the correction and treatment of spinal deformities |
FR2832917B1 (en) | 2001-11-30 | 2004-09-24 | Spine Next Sa | ELASTICALLY DEFORMABLE INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
US6669729B2 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2003-12-30 | Kingsley Richard Chin | Apparatus and method for the replacement of posterior vertebral elements |
FR2844179B1 (en) | 2002-09-10 | 2004-12-03 | Jean Taylor | POSTERIOR VERTEBRAL SUPPORT KIT |
US7608094B2 (en) | 2002-10-10 | 2009-10-27 | U.S. Spinal Technologies, Llc | Percutaneous facet fixation system |
US7909853B2 (en) | 2004-09-23 | 2011-03-22 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant including a binder and method of implantation |
US20040210310A1 (en) | 2002-12-10 | 2004-10-21 | Trieu Hai H. | Implant system and method for intervertebral disc augmentation |
US7101398B2 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2006-09-05 | Depuy Acromed, Inc. | Prosthetic facet joint ligament |
FR2850009B1 (en) | 2003-01-20 | 2005-12-23 | Spine Next Sa | TREATMENT ASSEMBLY FOR THE DEGENERATION OF AN INTERVERTEBRAL DISC |
US8172876B2 (en) | 2003-02-05 | 2012-05-08 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Spinal fixation systems |
FR2851154B1 (en) | 2003-02-19 | 2006-07-07 | Sdgi Holding Inc | INTER-SPINOUS DEVICE FOR BRAKING THE MOVEMENTS OF TWO SUCCESSIVE VERTEBRATES, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME THEREOF |
US7029475B2 (en) | 2003-05-02 | 2006-04-18 | Yale University | Spinal stabilization method |
WO2004105577A2 (en) | 2003-05-23 | 2004-12-09 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Spine stabilization system |
FR2858546B1 (en) | 2003-08-04 | 2006-04-28 | Spine Next Sa | INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS |
WO2005037150A1 (en) | 2003-10-16 | 2005-04-28 | Osteotech, Inc. | System and method for flexible correction of bony motion segment |
US7591837B2 (en) | 2003-10-28 | 2009-09-22 | Pyramid Spine, Llc | Facet triangle spinal fixation device and method of use |
US8632570B2 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2014-01-21 | Biedermann Technologies Gmbh & Co. Kg | Stabilization device for bones comprising a spring element and manufacturing method for said spring element |
US8133500B2 (en) | 2003-12-04 | 2012-03-13 | Kensey Nash Bvf Technology, Llc | Compressed high density fibrous polymers suitable for implant |
US7553320B2 (en) | 2003-12-10 | 2009-06-30 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Method and apparatus for replacing the function of facet joints |
US20050192581A1 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2005-09-01 | Molz Fred J. | Radiopaque, coaxial orthopedic tether design and method |
US7458981B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2008-12-02 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Spinal implant and method for restricting spinal flexion |
US8523904B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2013-09-03 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Methods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment |
US20050267518A1 (en) | 2004-04-07 | 2005-12-01 | Tiax, Llc | Tourniquet and method of using same |
US7524324B2 (en) | 2004-04-28 | 2009-04-28 | Kyphon Sarl | System and method for an interspinous process implant as a supplement to a spine stabilization implant |
US20050267470A1 (en) | 2004-05-13 | 2005-12-01 | Mcbride Duncan Q | Spinal stabilization system to flexibly connect vertebrae |
JP4382092B2 (en) | 2004-05-17 | 2009-12-09 | ウリドル スパイン ヘルス インスティチュート シーオー. | Intervertebral insert |
US20060036324A1 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2006-02-16 | Dan Sachs | Adjustable spinal implant device and method |
FR2874167B1 (en) | 2004-08-12 | 2006-11-10 | Philippe Mengus | INTER SPINE DAMPER |
US20060084976A1 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2006-04-20 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Posterior stabilization systems and methods |
US7559951B2 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2009-07-14 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Adjustable, remote-controllable orthopaedic prosthesis and associated method |
US7766940B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2010-08-03 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Posterior stabilization system |
US7918875B2 (en) | 2004-10-25 | 2011-04-05 | Lanx, Inc. | Interspinous distraction devices and associated methods of insertion |
US20060106381A1 (en) | 2004-11-18 | 2006-05-18 | Ferree Bret A | Methods and apparatus for treating spinal stenosis |
WO2006066053A1 (en) | 2004-12-15 | 2006-06-22 | Stryker Spine | Spinal rods having segments of different elastic properties and methods of using them |
US20060195102A1 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2006-08-31 | Malandain Hugues F | Apparatus and method for treatment of spinal conditions |
US7862590B2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2011-01-04 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process spacer |
FR2884136B1 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2008-02-22 | Spinevision Sa | INTERVERTEBRAL SURGICAL IMPLANT FORMING BALL |
US7780709B2 (en) | 2005-04-12 | 2010-08-24 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Implants and methods for inter-transverse process dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment |
US20060271055A1 (en) | 2005-05-12 | 2006-11-30 | Jeffery Thramann | Spinal stabilization |
WO2006138690A2 (en) | 2005-06-17 | 2006-12-28 | Abbott Laboratories | Improved method of treating degenerative spinal disorders |
US8273088B2 (en) | 2005-07-08 | 2012-09-25 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Bone removal tool |
GB0516034D0 (en) * | 2005-08-04 | 2005-09-14 | Blacklock T | Orthopaedic medical device |
US20080183209A1 (en) | 2005-09-23 | 2008-07-31 | Spinal Kinetics, Inc. | Spinal Stabilization Device |
US20070083200A1 (en) | 2005-09-23 | 2007-04-12 | Gittings Darin C | Spinal stabilization systems and methods |
US7837711B2 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2010-11-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Artificial spinous process for the sacrum and methods of use |
US20070233096A1 (en) | 2006-02-13 | 2007-10-04 | Javier Garcia-Bengochea | Dynamic inter-spinous device |
US7806911B2 (en) * | 2006-04-14 | 2010-10-05 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Fixation plate and method of use |
US8105357B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2012-01-31 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process brace |
US20070299445A1 (en) | 2006-06-22 | 2007-12-27 | Shadduck John H | Spine treatment devices and methods |
US7862569B2 (en) | 2006-06-22 | 2011-01-04 | Kyphon Sarl | System and method for strengthening a spinous process |
US20080021466A1 (en) | 2006-07-20 | 2008-01-24 | Shadduck John H | Spine treatment devices and methods |
US20080051784A1 (en) | 2006-08-03 | 2008-02-28 | Sohrab Gollogly | Bone repositioning apparatus and methodology |
US20080097431A1 (en) | 2006-09-22 | 2008-04-24 | Paul Peter Vessa | Flexible spinal stabilization |
US8029541B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2011-10-04 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
US8187307B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2012-05-29 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector |
US8162982B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2012-04-24 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for constraint of multiple spine segments |
EP2083701A4 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2013-06-12 | Simpirica Spine Inc | Methods and systems for constraint of multiple spine segments |
US20080177298A1 (en) | 2006-10-24 | 2008-07-24 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Tensioner Tool and Method for Implanting an Interspinous Process Implant Including a Binder |
US20080114357A1 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2008-05-15 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Inter-transverse process spacer device and method for use in correcting a spinal deformity |
US8109978B2 (en) | 2006-11-28 | 2012-02-07 | Anova Corporation | Methods of posterior fixation and stabilization of a spinal segment |
MX2009005843A (en) | 2006-12-10 | 2009-06-16 | Paradigm Spine Llc | Posterior functionally dynamic stabilization system. |
US9173686B2 (en) | 2007-05-09 | 2015-11-03 | Ebi, Llc | Interspinous implant |
EP1994901A1 (en) | 2007-05-24 | 2008-11-26 | Bio Medical S.r.L. | Intervertebral support device |
US20100036424A1 (en) | 2007-06-22 | 2010-02-11 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for increasing the bending stiffness and constraining the spreading of a spinal segment |
US8403961B2 (en) | 2007-06-22 | 2013-03-26 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and devices for controlled flexion restriction of spinal segments |
US8696714B2 (en) | 2007-11-02 | 2014-04-15 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Intervertebral stabilization devices |
EP2326267B1 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2018-04-25 | Empirical Spine, Inc. | Apparatus for locking an implantable band |
US8187305B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2012-05-29 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for deploying spinous process constraints |
WO2009149407A1 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2009-12-10 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for locking a band |
ES2523801T3 (en) | 2008-09-03 | 2014-12-01 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Apparatus for coupling a prosthesis to a segment of the spine |
WO2010088621A1 (en) | 2009-02-02 | 2010-08-05 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Sacral tether anchor and methods of use |
WO2010104975A1 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2010-09-16 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
US8668719B2 (en) | 2009-03-30 | 2014-03-11 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for improving shear loading capacity of a spinal segment |
-
2010
- 2010-03-10 WO PCT/US2010/026799 patent/WO2010104935A1/en active Application Filing
- 2010-03-10 US US12/721,238 patent/US8529606B2/en active Active
- 2010-03-10 JP JP2011554143A patent/JP2012520131A/en active Pending
- 2010-03-10 EP EP10751344.2A patent/EP2405839A4/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2013
- 2013-08-08 US US13/962,847 patent/US20140039558A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5645599A (en) * | 1994-07-26 | 1997-07-08 | Fixano | Interspinal vertebral implant |
US20020032483A1 (en) * | 1998-05-06 | 2002-03-14 | Nicholson James E. | Apparatus and method for spinal fusion using implanted devices |
US6312431B1 (en) * | 2000-04-24 | 2001-11-06 | Wilson T. Asfora | Vertebrae linking system |
US7452351B2 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2008-11-18 | Kyphon Sarl | Spinal diagnostic methods and apparatus |
US20080262549A1 (en) * | 2006-10-19 | 2008-10-23 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for deploying spinous process constraints |
US20100049251A1 (en) * | 2008-03-28 | 2010-02-25 | Kuslich Stephen D | Method and device for interspinous process fusion |
Cited By (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11357549B2 (en) | 2004-07-02 | 2022-06-14 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Expandable rod system to treat scoliosis and method of using the same |
US11234849B2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2022-02-01 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable implant and method of use |
US11672684B2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2023-06-13 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable implant and method of use |
US10349995B2 (en) | 2007-10-30 | 2019-07-16 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Skeletal manipulation method |
US11172972B2 (en) | 2007-10-30 | 2021-11-16 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Skeletal manipulation method |
US11202707B2 (en) | 2008-03-25 | 2021-12-21 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable implant system |
US10729470B2 (en) | 2008-11-10 | 2020-08-04 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | External adjustment device for distraction device |
US10517643B2 (en) | 2009-02-23 | 2019-12-31 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Non-invasive adjustable distraction system |
US10478232B2 (en) | 2009-04-29 | 2019-11-19 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Interspinous process device and method |
US10660675B2 (en) | 2010-06-30 | 2020-05-26 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | External adjustment device for distraction device |
US10405891B2 (en) | 2010-08-09 | 2019-09-10 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Maintenance feature in magnetic implant |
US10646262B2 (en) | 2011-02-14 | 2020-05-12 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | System and method for altering rotational alignment of bone sections |
US10743794B2 (en) | 2011-10-04 | 2020-08-18 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Devices and methods for non-invasive implant length sensing |
US10016220B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2018-07-10 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable magnetic devices and methods of using same |
US10349982B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2019-07-16 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable magnetic devices and methods of using same |
US11123107B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2021-09-21 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable magnetic devices and methods of using same |
US9931143B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2018-04-03 | New South Innovations Pty Limited | Bone stabilization device and methods of use |
US11213330B2 (en) | 2012-10-29 | 2022-01-04 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable devices for treating arthritis of the knee |
US11191579B2 (en) | 2012-10-29 | 2021-12-07 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable devices for treating arthritis of the knee |
US11413075B2 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2022-08-16 | New South Innovations Pty Limited | Spine stabilization device |
US10441323B2 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2019-10-15 | New South Innovations Pty Limited | Spine stabilization device |
US11576702B2 (en) | 2013-10-10 | 2023-02-14 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable spinal implant |
US10751094B2 (en) | 2013-10-10 | 2020-08-25 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable spinal implant |
US11246694B2 (en) | 2014-04-28 | 2022-02-15 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | System for informational magnetic feedback in adjustable implants |
US10271885B2 (en) | 2014-12-26 | 2019-04-30 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Systems and methods for distraction |
US11439449B2 (en) | 2014-12-26 | 2022-09-13 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Systems and methods for distraction |
US11612416B2 (en) | 2015-02-19 | 2023-03-28 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Systems and methods for vertebral adjustment |
US10238427B2 (en) | 2015-02-19 | 2019-03-26 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Systems and methods for vertebral adjustment |
US12076051B2 (en) | 2015-02-19 | 2024-09-03 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Systems and methods for vertebral adjustment |
US10617453B2 (en) | 2015-10-16 | 2020-04-14 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Adjustable devices for treating arthritis of the knee |
US10599672B2 (en) * | 2015-11-24 | 2020-03-24 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Cursor-based state-collapse scheme for shared databases |
US20170147669A1 (en) * | 2015-11-24 | 2017-05-25 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Cursor-based state-collapse scheme for shared databases |
US10835290B2 (en) | 2015-12-10 | 2020-11-17 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | External adjustment device for distraction device |
US10918425B2 (en) | 2016-01-28 | 2021-02-16 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | System and methods for bone transport |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20100234894A1 (en) | 2010-09-16 |
EP2405839A4 (en) | 2013-12-11 |
EP2405839A1 (en) | 2012-01-18 |
JP2012520131A (en) | 2012-09-06 |
WO2010104935A1 (en) | 2010-09-16 |
US8529606B2 (en) | 2013-09-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8529606B2 (en) | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use | |
US20220323120A1 (en) | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use | |
US8562653B2 (en) | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use | |
US8668719B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for improving shear loading capacity of a spinal segment | |
US20080021466A1 (en) | Spine treatment devices and methods | |
US8114158B2 (en) | Facet device and method | |
US8241329B2 (en) | Device and method for the prevention of multi-level vertebral extension | |
EP1865891B1 (en) | Minimally invasive spine restoration devices | |
US20070299445A1 (en) | Spine treatment devices and methods | |
US8021394B2 (en) | Stenotic device | |
JP5416217B2 (en) | Viscoelastic facet joint implant | |
US20070288014A1 (en) | Spine treatment devices and methods | |
US20090118833A1 (en) | In-situ curable interspinous process spacer | |
US20140303671A1 (en) | Angled Washer Polyaxial Connection for Dynamic Spine Prosthesis | |
US20120109200A1 (en) | Methods and devices for restricting flexion and extension of a spinal segment | |
US11457960B2 (en) | Lateral spine stabilization devices and methods | |
Sengupta et al. | Percutaneous Posterior “Dynamic” Stabilization of the Lumbar Spine |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SIMPIRICA SPINE, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ALAMIN, TODD;CAHILL, COLIN;FIELDING, LOUIS;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20100407 TO 20100408;REEL/FRAME:032712/0713 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SIMPIRICA (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SIMPIRICA SPINE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:035974/0429 Effective date: 20141119 Owner name: EMPIRICAL SPINE, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SIMPIRICA (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC;REEL/FRAME:035974/0812 Effective date: 20150408 |