US20140000881A1 - Process for extracting dissolved methane from hydropressured aquifers - Google Patents

Process for extracting dissolved methane from hydropressured aquifers Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140000881A1
US20140000881A1 US13/694,411 US201213694411A US2014000881A1 US 20140000881 A1 US20140000881 A1 US 20140000881A1 US 201213694411 A US201213694411 A US 201213694411A US 2014000881 A1 US2014000881 A1 US 2014000881A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
gas
water
dissolved
methane
production
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/694,411
Inventor
Gary Farnsworth Player
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from CA2756756A external-priority patent/CA2756756A1/en
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US13/694,411 priority Critical patent/US20140000881A1/en
Publication of US20140000881A1 publication Critical patent/US20140000881A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/34Arrangements for separating materials produced by the well
    • E21B43/40Separation associated with re-injection of separated materials

Definitions

  • Natural gas prices are subject to market spikes far beyond the control of the largest company or agency. Energy costs in the United States can be freed from the demands of the world petroleum marketplace.
  • One undeveloped replacement fuel is methane dissolved in ground water. This gas is present throughout the sedimentary basins of the world, just a few hundred meters below the surface of the ground. Dissolved methane resources in the United States are sufficient to replace the use of other fossil fuels for hundreds of years.
  • the apparatus includes:
  • Figure One is a conceptual drawing showing the process developed to separate dissolved methane from hydropressured ground water showing each step in the extraction of methane.
  • Figure Two is a chart plotting the likely range of gas/water ratios (GWR) for gas dissolved in 0.9 molar Na Cl ground water, versus the depth below ground level.
  • Dissolved methane is present in virtually every basin now known to produce oil and dry gas.
  • a typical example is the Great Valley of California. About 10 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of gas have been produced from the basin to date. Potential dissolved methane resources are much greater.
  • the Great Valley has an area of at least 20,000 square miles, or 12,800,000 acres. Thousands of drilled wells have shown that at least 2,000 feet of permeable, hydropressured sandstones are present from 3,000 to 8,000 feet below ground level. That thickness of sandstone throughout the basin with a known average porosity of 30 percent, and an average gas/water ratio of just 20 cubic feet per barrel, would provide an undeveloped dissolved methane resource of about 1,200 TCF in one basin in just one state.
  • That volume of undeveloped dissolved methane is 120 times the cumulative California gas production in the last 150 years Similar quantities of dissolved methane occur in petroliferous basins across the United States, awaiting development.
  • One or more wells will be needed to produce 500 gallons or more per minute of deep, methane-saturated ground water into the separators.
  • the number and capacity of the well(s) will be based on the production rate needed for available markets.
  • Ground water will be pumped to the surface into oilfield style atmospheric pressure gas/water separators. Methane will be piped out the top, and water will be drawn out the bottom and returned to the ground through injection wells.
  • Methane will be recovered from the separators at or near atmospheric pressure. The gas must then be compressed for transport. Likely gathering line pressures will be about five (5) atmospheres so that the lines can be built with low strength materials. Gathering lines may be constructed of ABS or PVC plastics. The lines should be at least six (6)inches interior diameter, so that large quantities of gas can be stored per given distance.
  • trunk lines receive gas at about 750 to 1,000 pounds per square inch (more than 60 atmospheres). Gas delivered in low pressure gathering lines will be compressed as needed for injection into the high pressure trunk line(s) for shipment to market.
  • the vertical scale of Figure Two is depth below ground, with the depth in feet shown on the left-hand vertical axis, and depth in meters shown on the right-hand vertical axis.
  • the horizontal axis shows the quantity of dissolved methane gas in cubic feet per barrel of produced water (42 gallons per barrel).
  • Two sloping diagonal lines present predicted and observed values of dissolved natural gas in saline ground water.
  • the sloping diagonal line on the left shows estimated concentrations of gas in ground water published by Culbertson and McKetta in 1951.
  • the sloping diagonal line on the right shows measured concentrations of gas in ground water containing Na Cl published by Duan and others in 1992.
  • a circle below 3,000 feet shows the observed concentration of dissolved gas reported by Paul Jones in 1978 from a well with hydropressured aquifers along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)

Abstract

One undeveloped alternative fuel is methane dissolved in ground water. Equipment for extracting methane from ground water is readily available. This Application presents a process to produce and use dissolved natural gas in the United States. The process includes the use of production wells, pumps, gas/water separators, compressors, low pressure gathering lines, and water disposal wells. Dissolved methane is present in virtually every basin now known to produce oil and dry gas. The Great Valley of California alone contains undeveloped dissolved methane resources of about 1,200 trillion cubic feet (TCF). Dry gas production in 150 years was about 10 TCF. The first full scale test of the extraction process was completed on Jul. 7-8, 2010 in California. Laboratory analyses of the gas produced showed that it was equal in heat value (about 940 to 975 BTU per cubic foot) to dry gas produced from the same field.

Description

    NAMES OF PARTIES TO A JOINT RESEARCH AGREEMENT
  • There are no parties associated with Gary F. Player or any other entity that have a joint research agreement with Gary F. Player.
  • INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF MATERIAL SUBMITTED ON A COMPACT DISC
  • No sequence listings, tables, or computer programs have been submitted on compact discs. There are zero (0) compact discs submitted with this Patent Application.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Technical Field
  • Natural gas production from porous and permeable sedimentary rocks.
  • 2. Background Art
  • Natural gas prices are subject to market spikes far beyond the control of the largest company or agency. Energy costs in the United States can be freed from the demands of the world petroleum marketplace. One undeveloped replacement fuel is methane dissolved in ground water. This gas is present throughout the sedimentary basins of the world, just a few hundred meters below the surface of the ground. Dissolved methane resources in the United States are sufficient to replace the use of other fossil fuels for hundreds of years.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • All necessary equipment for extracting methane from ground water is readily available. However, until this Patent Application, no one had devised an economical method for combining modern technologies to harvest, store, and use dissolved gas in the United States. The apparatus includes:
  • 1. Wells that will be drilled to depths of 1,000 to 5,000 meters below ground level in “hydropressured” sedimentary basins.
  • 2. Low pressure, high capacity, pumps for lifting ground water from the wells and transporting it through pipes to treatment facilities.
  • 3. Conventional, oilfield style gas/water separators for removing methane from the produced water at surface temperatures and pressures.
  • 4. Low pressure, high capacity gas compressors.
  • 5. Low pressure gathering lines to move the compressed methane to existing natural gas pipelines.
  • 6. High pressure compressors for injecting methane into existing natural gas pipelines.
  • 7. Injection wells for accepting injected waste water from the separators, constructed into the same highly permeable saline aquifers.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURE ONE
  • Figure One is a conceptual drawing showing the process developed to separate dissolved methane from hydropressured ground water showing each step in the extraction of methane.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURE TWO
  • Figure Two is a chart plotting the likely range of gas/water ratios (GWR) for gas dissolved in 0.9 molar Na Cl ground water, versus the depth below ground level.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Rates of Methane Extraction
  • With an assumed dissolved methane concentration of about 15 cubic feet per barrel at 1,000 meters (a little more than 3,000 feet) below ground level, a water production rate of 500 gallons per minute from one well would provide 257 thousand cubic feet (MCF) of gas per day.
  • Production of 20,000 gallons of water per minute from a field of 40 wells would provide about 10.3 million cubic feet (mmcf) of gas per day. A field of 100 wells could produce 25.7 million cubic feet per day. Gas water ratios in excess of 23 cubic feet per barrel are common below 2,000 meters (about 6,700 feet) below ground. Gas production from 100 wells drilled to 2,000 meters and produced at the given water rates would be 39.4 million cubic feet per day.
  • Dissolved Methane Resources
  • Dissolved methane is present in virtually every basin now known to produce oil and dry gas. A typical example is the Great Valley of California. About 10 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of gas have been produced from the basin to date. Potential dissolved methane resources are much greater. The Great Valley has an area of at least 20,000 square miles, or 12,800,000 acres. Thousands of drilled wells have shown that at least 2,000 feet of permeable, hydropressured sandstones are present from 3,000 to 8,000 feet below ground level. That thickness of sandstone throughout the basin with a known average porosity of 30 percent, and an average gas/water ratio of just 20 cubic feet per barrel, would provide an undeveloped dissolved methane resource of about 1,200 TCF in one basin in just one state.
  • That volume of undeveloped dissolved methane is 120 times the cumulative California gas production in the last 150 years Similar quantities of dissolved methane occur in petroliferous basins across the United States, awaiting development.
  • The first full scale test of the extraction process was completed on Jul. 7-8, 2010 at the Gill Ranch Gas Field in Madera County, California. Dissolved gas and water were produced from hydropressured sands in the Santa Margarita and Zilch formations through perforated casing from about 3,140′ to 3,170′ feet below ground level (BGL). Due to open hole behind the casing wall, water from that interval was diluted by water from sands as shallow as 690 feet BGL, but gas was successfully separated from the water and burned in a flare for 16 hours. Laboratory analyses of the gas showed that it was equal in heat value (about 940 to 975 BTU per cubic foot) to dry gas produced from deeper zones at Gill Ranch.
  • Numbers on Figure One are defined as follows:
  • (1) Production Wells(s)
  • One or more wells will be needed to produce 500 gallons or more per minute of deep, methane-saturated ground water into the separators. The number and capacity of the well(s) will be based on the production rate needed for available markets.
  • (2) Separator(s)
  • Ground water will be pumped to the surface into oilfield style atmospheric pressure gas/water separators. Methane will be piped out the top, and water will be drawn out the bottom and returned to the ground through injection wells.
  • (3) Spent Water Injection Well(s)
  • Once dissolved methane has been recovered from ground water, the “spent” produced water will be injected back into the same aquifer. This step is necessary for three reasons:
  • I. The water will be saline and disposal will be carefully regulated by Federal, state, and local agencies;
  • ii. Local hydrostatic pressures in the aquifer will be reduced by nearby dissolved gas production wells, thereby reducing the energy required to pump the water back into the ground; and
  • iii. Replacement of the water will minimize permeability reduction in the aquifer that could be caused by lowering water pressures and allowing individual loose sand grains to settle and compact more closely together.
  • (4) Low Pressure Gas Compressor(s)
  • Methane will be recovered from the separators at or near atmospheric pressure. The gas must then be compressed for transport. Likely gathering line pressures will be about five (5) atmospheres so that the lines can be built with low strength materials. Gathering lines may be constructed of ABS or PVC plastics. The lines should be at least six (6)inches interior diameter, so that large quantities of gas can be stored per given distance.
  • (5) High Pressure Compressors(s)
  • Most regional trunk lines receive gas at about 750 to 1,000 pounds per square inch (more than 60 atmospheres). Gas delivered in low pressure gathering lines will be compressed as needed for injection into the high pressure trunk line(s) for shipment to market.
  • The vertical scale of Figure Two is depth below ground, with the depth in feet shown on the left-hand vertical axis, and depth in meters shown on the right-hand vertical axis. The horizontal axis shows the quantity of dissolved methane gas in cubic feet per barrel of produced water (42 gallons per barrel). Two sloping diagonal lines present predicted and observed values of dissolved natural gas in saline ground water. The sloping diagonal line on the left shows estimated concentrations of gas in ground water published by Culbertson and McKetta in 1951. The sloping diagonal line on the right shows measured concentrations of gas in ground water containing Na Cl published by Duan and others in 1992. A circle below 3,000 feet shows the observed concentration of dissolved gas reported by Paul Jones in 1978 from a well with hydropressured aquifers along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico.

Claims (5)

I claim:
1. A method of dissolved natural gas production from wells having a well-bore, casing, tubing, and wellhead, which are drilled into hydropressured, gas-saturated saline aquifers, comprising the steps of:
(a) pumping hydropressured water and associated dissolved gas to the surface;
(b) separating dissolved gas from produced water with a conventional gas/water separator;
(c) capturing the separated natural gas and compressing it for transport in pipelines;
(d) injecting produced water back into the aquifer from which it was extracted.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein step (a) further comprises:
(I) completing production wells with slotted casing and gravel filter packs across thick (300 feet to 500 feet) net aquifer sand intervals;
(ii) pumping dissolved gas and water to the surface with positive displacement, rod driven, “top-drive” submersible pumps, or
(iii) utilizing high pressure gas flowing in small diameter “tremie” pipes to lift dissolved gas and water to the surface.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein step (d) further comprises:
(I) reinjecting produced water into the same hydropressured aquifer to maintain reservoir properties, including porosity and high permeability (1,000 to 3,000 millidarcies) in the aquifer sands or sandstones.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein step (I), by preserving reservoir properties, will allow each production well to produce dissolved natural gas for 30 years or more with no decline in the ratio of gas production to water production.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein dissolved gas concentrations in partially depleted aquifer sands will be replenished within hydropressured aquifers naturally by diffusion, thereby assuring long-term productivity of each dissolved gas production well. Inventor: Gary Farnsworth Player
US13/694,411 2010-10-19 2012-11-30 Process for extracting dissolved methane from hydropressured aquifers Abandoned US20140000881A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/694,411 US20140000881A1 (en) 2010-10-19 2012-11-30 Process for extracting dissolved methane from hydropressured aquifers

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US80652810A 2010-10-19 2010-10-19
CA2756756 2011-11-01
CA2756756A CA2756756A1 (en) 2011-11-01 2011-11-01 An apparatus for extracting dissolved methane from ground water aquifers
US13/694,411 US20140000881A1 (en) 2010-10-19 2012-11-30 Process for extracting dissolved methane from hydropressured aquifers

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US80652810A Continuation-In-Part 2010-10-19 2010-10-19

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140000881A1 true US20140000881A1 (en) 2014-01-02

Family

ID=49776936

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/694,411 Abandoned US20140000881A1 (en) 2010-10-19 2012-11-30 Process for extracting dissolved methane from hydropressured aquifers

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20140000881A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9732671B2 (en) 2014-06-04 2017-08-15 Harper Biotech LLC Method for safe, efficient, economically productive, environmentally responsible, extraction and utilization of dissolved gases in deep waters of a lake susceptible to limnic eruptions, in which methane is accompanied by abundant carbon dioxide
US20170250153A1 (en) * 2016-02-26 2017-08-31 Fujitsu Limited Electronic part, electronic device, and electronic apparatus
CN111042772A (en) * 2019-11-22 2020-04-21 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Inter-well series connection drainage gas recovery device and drainage gas recovery method
WO2022212344A1 (en) * 2021-03-29 2022-10-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Processes and systems for monitoring one or more gases dissolved in a liquid

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4359092A (en) * 1978-11-14 1982-11-16 Jones Paul H Method and apparatus for natural gas and thermal energy production from aquifers
US4376462A (en) * 1981-02-19 1983-03-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Substantially self-powered method and apparatus for recovering hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon-containing solid hydrates
US4597950A (en) * 1983-05-05 1986-07-01 Bechtel International Corporation Gas separating-crystallizer
US5261791A (en) * 1992-03-09 1993-11-16 Advanced Remediation Technologies Method and apparatus for recovering pollutants from an aquifer
US5497950A (en) * 1993-07-12 1996-03-12 Schroedl; Hermann Rotor for a disintegrating machine
USH1568H (en) * 1994-05-26 1996-08-06 Exxon Production Research Company Acoustic separation of liquid hydrocarbons from wastewater
US20120038174A1 (en) * 2010-08-13 2012-02-16 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Storing Carbon Dioxide and Producing Methane and Geothermal Energy from Deep Saline Aquifers

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4359092A (en) * 1978-11-14 1982-11-16 Jones Paul H Method and apparatus for natural gas and thermal energy production from aquifers
US4376462A (en) * 1981-02-19 1983-03-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Substantially self-powered method and apparatus for recovering hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon-containing solid hydrates
US4597950A (en) * 1983-05-05 1986-07-01 Bechtel International Corporation Gas separating-crystallizer
US5261791A (en) * 1992-03-09 1993-11-16 Advanced Remediation Technologies Method and apparatus for recovering pollutants from an aquifer
US5497950A (en) * 1993-07-12 1996-03-12 Schroedl; Hermann Rotor for a disintegrating machine
USH1568H (en) * 1994-05-26 1996-08-06 Exxon Production Research Company Acoustic separation of liquid hydrocarbons from wastewater
US20120038174A1 (en) * 2010-08-13 2012-02-16 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Storing Carbon Dioxide and Producing Methane and Geothermal Energy from Deep Saline Aquifers

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Artesian water and artesian wells," The USGS Water Science School, 2015, http://water.usgs.gov/edu/gwartesian.html (last visited Nov. 12, 2015). *
Dickinson et al., "Geological Aspects of Abnormal Reservoir Pressures in Gulf Coast Louisiana," Bulletin of the American Associate of Petroleum Geologists, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 410-432, February 1953 (Dickinson). *
Jones, "Hydrodynamics of Geopressure in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Basin," Journal of Petroleum Technology, pp. 803-810, July 1969 (Jones USGS). *
L.H. Gevantman, "Solubility of Selected Gases in Water" (Gevantman). *
Lohman, "Definitions of Selected Ground-Water Terms-Revisions and Conceptual Refinements," Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper "1988", pp. 2-3 (Lohman). *
The USGS Water Science School, 2015, http://water.usgs.gov/edu/gwartesian.html, (USGS Article). *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9732671B2 (en) 2014-06-04 2017-08-15 Harper Biotech LLC Method for safe, efficient, economically productive, environmentally responsible, extraction and utilization of dissolved gases in deep waters of a lake susceptible to limnic eruptions, in which methane is accompanied by abundant carbon dioxide
US20170250153A1 (en) * 2016-02-26 2017-08-31 Fujitsu Limited Electronic part, electronic device, and electronic apparatus
CN111042772A (en) * 2019-11-22 2020-04-21 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Inter-well series connection drainage gas recovery device and drainage gas recovery method
WO2022212344A1 (en) * 2021-03-29 2022-10-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Processes and systems for monitoring one or more gases dissolved in a liquid

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Speight Shale gas production processes
Carter et al. Unconventional natural gas resources in Pennsylvania: The backstory of the modern Marcellus Shale play
Schmidt et al. Innovative Unconventional2 EOR-a light EOR an unconventional tertiary recovery approach to an unconventional bakken reservoir in southeast saskatchewan
Turcotte et al. Super fracking
CN103206207A (en) Favorable oil reservoir region identification method based on hydrocarbon generation period ancient structure
CN104481520A (en) Early evaluation method of recoverable reserves of shale gas wells
US20140000881A1 (en) Process for extracting dissolved methane from hydropressured aquifers
Hwang et al. Evaluation of CO 2 storage capacity and injectivity using a relief well in a saline aquifer in Pohang basin, offshore South Korea
Suárez The expansion of unconventional production of natural gas (tight gas, gas shale and coal bed methane)
Schraufnagel Coalbed Methane Production: Chapter 15
Al-Obaidi et al. A New approach for enhancing oil and gas recovery of the hydrocarbon fields with low permeability reservoirs
Stupakova et al. On the estimation of shale-oil resources and reserves
Alcoser et al. The Bakken: utilizing a petroleum system based analysis to optimally exploit one of the world's largest oil deposits
Schumann et al. Unconventional gas resources in the USA
Bajus SHALE GAS AND TIGHT OIL, UNCONVENTIONAL FOSSIL FUELS.
US20180230791A1 (en) Processes for economically recovering dissolved gas from deep aquifers and treating saline waters for culinary and/or irrigation.
CN110067555A (en) The determination method and apparatus of the minimum dynamic holdup of carbonate rock oil well
Al Tammar Production performance evaluation of energized fracturing fluids in unconventional formations
Kudapa Shale Gas Resources across the World: A Future Source of Energy
Sonnenberg The Relatively Recent Development of Resource Plays in the Rocky Mountain Region
CA2756756A1 (en) An apparatus for extracting dissolved methane from ground water aquifers
RU2494237C1 (en) Development method of oil deposit by water-flooding
Liao et al. Technical feasibility and application effect of coupled CO2 sequestration and EOR in tight sandstone oil reservoir
Bonham The Future of Unconventional Natural Gas© as an Alternative Energy Resource
Gachuz-Muro et al. Analogous reservoirs to Chicontepec, alternatives of exploitation for this Mexican oil field

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION