US20130309268A1 - Compositions including transfer factor derived from eggs - Google Patents
Compositions including transfer factor derived from eggs Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20130309268A1 US20130309268A1 US10/081,799 US8179902A US2013309268A1 US 20130309268 A1 US20130309268 A1 US 20130309268A1 US 8179902 A US8179902 A US 8179902A US 2013309268 A1 US2013309268 A1 US 2013309268A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- transfer factor
- mammalian
- mouse
- orally administrable
- test
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 108010074506 Transfer Factor Proteins 0.000 title claims abstract description 195
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 37
- 235000013601 eggs Nutrition 0.000 title description 35
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 80
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 80
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 80
- 230000001717 pathogenic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 41
- 241000124008 Mammalia Species 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- 241000271566 Aves Species 0.000 claims description 86
- 244000052769 pathogen Species 0.000 claims description 74
- 230000028993 immune response Effects 0.000 claims description 50
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 claims description 37
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 claims description 36
- 230000000890 antigenic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 26
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 claims description 25
- 229960005486 vaccine Drugs 0.000 claims description 17
- 210000001744 T-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 claims description 15
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 claims description 10
- 241000700721 Hepatitis B virus Species 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 241000287828 Gallus gallus Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000007969 cellular immunity Effects 0.000 claims 5
- 229940111782 egg extract Drugs 0.000 claims 4
- 230000021633 leukocyte mediated immunity Effects 0.000 claims 4
- 241000712079 Measles morbillivirus Species 0.000 claims 3
- 241000711386 Mumps virus Species 0.000 claims 3
- 241000710799 Rubella virus Species 0.000 claims 3
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 claims 3
- 238000007911 parenteral administration Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 abstract description 35
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 abstract description 13
- 210000002683 foot Anatomy 0.000 description 267
- 241000699666 Mus <mouse, genus> Species 0.000 description 207
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 155
- 241000699670 Mus sp. Species 0.000 description 107
- 230000008961 swelling Effects 0.000 description 57
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 54
- 210000000548 hind-foot Anatomy 0.000 description 33
- 210000000987 immune system Anatomy 0.000 description 33
- 239000013641 positive control Substances 0.000 description 31
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 29
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 29
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 22
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 22
- 208000027930 type IV hypersensitivity disease Diseases 0.000 description 21
- 108010031111 EBV-encoded nuclear antigen 1 Proteins 0.000 description 19
- 206010053613 Type IV hypersensitivity reaction Diseases 0.000 description 19
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 19
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 19
- 230000005951 type IV hypersensitivity Effects 0.000 description 19
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 15
- SPSXSWRZQFPVTJ-ZQQKUFEYSA-N hepatitis b vaccine Chemical compound C([C@H](NC(=O)[C@H]([C@@H](C)O)NC(=O)[C@H]([C@@H](C)O)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCSC)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC1N=CN=C1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N1[C@@H](CCC1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](C(C)C)C(=O)OC(=O)CNC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H]1N(CCC1)C(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC=CC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCCNC(N)=N)C1=CC=CC=C1 SPSXSWRZQFPVTJ-ZQQKUFEYSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 229940124736 hepatitis-B vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 14
- 210000002969 egg yolk Anatomy 0.000 description 13
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 12
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 12
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 9
- 241000701044 Human gammaherpesvirus 4 Species 0.000 description 8
- 210000003022 colostrum Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- 235000021277 colostrum Nutrition 0.000 description 8
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 8
- 210000000265 leukocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- PIWKPBJCKXDKJR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Isoflurane Chemical compound FC(F)OC(Cl)C(F)(F)F PIWKPBJCKXDKJR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 7
- 239000003085 diluting agent Substances 0.000 description 7
- 229960002725 isoflurane Drugs 0.000 description 7
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 7
- 210000003719 b-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 235000013345 egg yolk Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 230000036039 immunity Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000011725 BALB/c mouse Methods 0.000 description 5
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 description 5
- 235000019441 ethanol Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 4
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 241000251539 Vertebrata <Metazoa> Species 0.000 description 4
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 206010006451 bronchitis Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 239000000411 inducer Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000013336 milk Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 239000008267 milk Substances 0.000 description 4
- 210000004080 milk Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 4
- 102000002322 Egg Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010000912 Egg Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 3
- 201000005505 Measles Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 208000005647 Mumps Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 150000002632 lipids Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 210000004698 lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 208000010805 mumps infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 3
- 201000005404 rubella Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 238000010254 subcutaneous injection Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007929 subcutaneous injection Substances 0.000 description 3
- 208000030507 AIDS Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 241000938605 Crocodylia Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000233866 Fungi Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000725303 Human immunodeficiency virus Species 0.000 description 2
- 206010020751 Hypersensitivity Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 229920001410 Microfiber Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 241000283973 Oryctolagus cuniculus Species 0.000 description 2
- 206010039509 Scab Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 241000282887 Suidae Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000002671 adjuvant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000000628 antibody-producing cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000002498 deadly effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000001035 gastrointestinal tract Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 2
- 208000002672 hepatitis B Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 235000020256 human milk Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 210000004251 human milk Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002458 infectious effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000028774 intestinal disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 239000003658 microfiber Substances 0.000 description 2
- 201000009240 nasopharyngitis Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 239000002777 nucleoside Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000003833 nucleoside derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 244000045947 parasite Species 0.000 description 2
- 210000001539 phagocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000284 resting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 2
- QCVGEOXPDFCNHA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 5,5-dimethyl-2,4-dioxo-1,3-oxazolidine-3-carboxamide Chemical compound CC1(C)OC(=O)N(C(N)=O)C1=O QCVGEOXPDFCNHA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000272517 Anseriformes Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001260012 Bursa Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000282693 Cercopithecidae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000282994 Cervidae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000288673 Chiroptera Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001115402 Ebolavirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000709661 Enterovirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000893570 Hendra henipavirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010061218 Inflammation Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000712431 Influenza A virus Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000005909 Kieselgur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 102000004895 Lipoproteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090001030 Lipoproteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000016604 Lyme disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241001529936 Murinae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000526636 Nipah henipavirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010051791 Nuclear Antigens Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000019040 Nuclear Antigens Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000150452 Orthohantavirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000700159 Rattus Species 0.000 description 1
- 101000874347 Streptococcus agalactiae IgA FC receptor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010008038 Synthetic Vaccines Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108091008874 T cell receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000016266 T-Cell Antigen Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000700647 Variola virus Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000443 aerosol Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001042 affinity chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000027455 binding Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001815 biotherapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000309466 calf Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000022534 cell killing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013330 chicken meat Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000001143 conditioned effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003750 conditioning effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000433 cytotoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 210000001151 cytotoxic T lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001472 cytotoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008367 deionised water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910021641 deionized water Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000012636 effector Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000014103 egg white Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 210000000969 egg white Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000706 filtrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005227 gel permeation chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002443 helper t lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004408 hybridoma Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000002865 immune cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008105 immune reaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012678 infectious agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004054 inflammatory process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000011140 intestinal infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000007927 intramuscular injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010255 intramuscular injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004072 lung Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000001161 mammalian embryo Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000005871 monkeypox Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000017448 oviposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052573 porcelain Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108020003175 receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000005962 receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004043 responsiveness Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000813 small intestine Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000009870 specific binding Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004989 spleen cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000002784 stomach Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 208000011580 syndromic disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- -1 test Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000712461 unidentified influenza virus Species 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P31/00—Antiinfectives, i.e. antibiotics, antiseptics, chemotherapeutics
- A61P31/12—Antivirals
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K39/12—Viral antigens
- A61K39/29—Hepatitis virus
- A61K39/292—Serum hepatitis virus, hepatitis B virus, e.g. Australia antigen
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K39/12—Viral antigens
- A61K39/155—Paramyxoviridae, e.g. parainfluenza virus
- A61K39/165—Mumps or measles virus
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K39/12—Viral antigens
- A61K39/245—Herpetoviridae, e.g. herpes simplex virus
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P37/00—Drugs for immunological or allergic disorders
- A61P37/02—Immunomodulators
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/435—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
- C07K14/46—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from vertebrates
- C07K14/465—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from vertebrates from birds
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/435—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
- C07K14/52—Cytokines; Lymphokines; Interferons
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K38/00—Medicinal preparations containing peptides
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to methods for generating antigen-specific transfer factor, compositions including such antigen-specific transfer factor, and uses of these compositions.
- the present invention relates to methods for generating antigen-specific transfer factor in an avian host and obtaining the antigen-specific transfer factor from eggs.
- monkeys are the sources of the type I human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-I), which causes acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and monkeypox, which is similar to smallpox; ground-dwelling mammals are believed to be the source of the Ebola virus; fruit bats and pigs are the source of the Nipah virus; the Hendra virus comes from horses; the “Hong Kong Flu” originated in chickens; and wild birds, especially ducks, are the sources of many of the deadly influenza viruses.
- HIV-I human immunodeficiency virus
- AIDS acquired immune deficiency syndrome
- monkeypox which is similar to smallpox
- ground-dwelling mammals are believed to be the source of the Ebola virus
- fruit bats and pigs are the source of the Nipah virus
- the Hendra virus comes from horses
- the “Hong Kong Flu” originated in chickens
- wild birds, especially ducks are the sources of many of the deadly influenza viruses.
- Many diseases also have animal reservoirs.
- Vertebrate immune systems typically include a cellular component and a noncellular component.
- the cellular component of an immune system includes the so-called lymphocytes, or white blood cells, of which there are several types. It is the cellular component of a mature immune system that typically mounts a primary, nonspecific response to invading pathogens, as well as being involved in a secondary, specific response to pathogens.
- white blood cells that are known as phagocytes locate and attack the invading pathogens.
- a phagocyte will internalize, or “eat” a pathogen, then digest the pathogen.
- white blood cells produce and excrete chemicals in response to pathogenic infections that are intended to attack the pathogens or assist in directing the attack on pathogens.
- B lymphocytes white blood cells
- T lymphocytes T lymphocytes
- antibodies proteins
- the T-cells are primarily responsible for the secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune response to a pathogen or antigenic agent.
- T-cells There are three types of T-cells: T-helper cells, T-suppressor cells, and antigen-specific T-cells, which are also referred to as cytotoxic (meaning “cell-killing”) T-lymphocytes (“CTLs”), or T-killer cells.
- CTLs T-lymphocytes
- T-killer cells while not specific for certain antigens, perform conditioning functions (e.g., the inflammation that typically accompanies an infection) that assist in the removal of pathogens or antigenic agents from an infected host.
- Antibodies which make up only a part of the noncellular component of an immune system, recognize specific antigens and, thus, are said to be “antigen-specific”.
- the generated antibodies then basically assist the white blood cells in locating and eliminating the pathogen from the body.
- the white blood cell and all of its progenitors continue to produce the antibody.
- a small number of T-cells and B-cells that correspond to the recognized antigens are retained in a “resting” state.
- the “resting” T-cells and B-cells activate and, within about forty-eight (48) hours, induce a rapid immune response.
- the immune system mounts a secondary immune response to a pathogen, the immune system is said to have a “memory” for that pathogen.
- Transfer factors are another noncellular part of a mammalian immune system.
- Antigen-specific transfer factors are believed to be structurally analogous to antibodies, but on a much smaller molecular scale. Both antigen-specific transfer factors and antibodies include antigen-specific cites and both include highly conserved regions that interact with receptor sites on their respective effector cells. In transfer factor and antibody molecules, a third, “linker”, region connects the antigen-specific cites and the highly conserved regions.
- Transfer factor is a low molecular weight isolate of lymphocytes. Narrowly, transfer factors may have specificity for single antigens.
- U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,840,700 and 5,470,835, both of which issued to Kirkpatrick et al. disclose the isolation of transfer factors that are specific for certain antigens. More broadly, “specific” transfer factors have been generated from cell cultures of monoclonal lymphocytes. Even if these transfer factors are generated against a single pathogen, they have specificity for a variety of antigenic sites of that pathogen. Thus, these transfer factors are said to be “pathogen-specific” rather than antigen-specific.
- transfer factors that are obtained from a host that has been infected with a certain pathogen are pathogen-specific.
- transfer factors that are obtained from a host that has been infected with a certain pathogen are pathogen-specific.
- transfer factors having different specificities may also be present.
- pathogen-specific transfer factor preparations may be specific for a variety of antigens.
- antigen-specific and pathogen-specific transfer factors may cause a host to elicit a delayed-type hypersensitivity immune response to pathogens or antigens for which such transfer factor molecules are not specific.
- Transfer factor “draws” at least the non-specific T-cells, the T-inducer and T-suppressor cells, to an infecting pathogen or antigenic agent to facilitate a secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune response to the infecting pathogen or antigenic agent.
- transfer factor typically includes an isolate of proteins obtained from immunologically active mammalian sources and having molecular weights of less than about 10,000 daltons (D). It is known that transfer factor, when added either in vitro or in vivo to mammalian immune cell systems, improves or normalizes the response of the recipient mammalian immune system.
- the immune systems of newborns have typically not developed, or “matured”, enough to effectively defend the newborn from invading pathogens.
- many mammals are protected from a wide range of pathogens by their mothers.
- many newborn mammals cannot immediately elicit a secondary response to a variety of pathogens.
- newborn mammals are typically given secondary immunity to pathogens by their mothers.
- One way in which mothers are known to boost the immune systems of newborns is by providing the newborn with a set of transfer factors.
- transfer factor is provided by a mother to a newborn in colostrum, which is typically replaced by the mother's milk after a day or two. Transfer factor basically transfers the mother's acquired, specific (i.e., delayed-type hypersensitive) immunity to the newborn.
- This transferred immunity typically conditions the cells of the newborn's immune system to react against pathogens in an antigen-specific manner, as well as in an antigen- or pathogen-nonspecific fashion, until the newborn's immune system is able on its own to defend the newborn from pathogens.
- transfer factor when transfer factor is present, the immune system of the newborn is conditioned to react to pathogens with a hypersensitive response, such as that which occurs with a typical delayed-type hypersensitivity response. Accordingly, transfer factor is said to “jump start” the responsiveness of immune systems to pathogens.
- transfer factor is a protein with a length of about forty-four (44) amino acids. Transfer factor is believed to have a molecular weight in the range of about 4,000 to about 5,000 Daltons (D), or about 4 kD to about 5 kD. Transfer factor is also believed to include three functional fractions: an inducer fraction; an immune suppressor fraction; and an antigen-specific fraction. Many in the art believe that transfer factor also includes a nucleoside portion, which could be connected to the protein molecule or separate therefrom, that may enhance the ability of transfer factor to cause a mammalian immune system to elicit a secondary immune response. The nucleoside portion may be part of the inducer or suppressor fractions of transfer factor.
- the antigen-specific region of the antigen-specific transfer factors is believed to comprise about eight (8) to about twelve (12) amino acids.
- a second highly-conserved region of about ten (10) amino acids is thought to be a very high-affinity T-cell receptor binding region.
- the remaining amino acids may serve to link the two active regions or may have additional, as yet undiscovered properties.
- the antigen-specific region of a transfer factor molecule which is analogous to the known antigen-specific structure of antibodies, but on a much smaller molecular weight scale, appears to be hyper-variable and is adapted to recognize a characteristic protein on one or more pathogens.
- the inducer and immune suppressor fractions are believed to impart transfer factor with its ability to condition the various cells of the immune system so that the cells are more fully responsive to the pathogenic stimuli in their environment.
- transfer factor has been obtained from the colostrum of milk cows. While milk cows typically produce large amounts of colostrum and, thus, large amounts of transfer factor over a relatively short period of time, milk cows only produce colostrum for about a day or a day-and-a-half every year. Thus, milk cows are neither a constant source of transfer factor nor an efficient source of transfer factor.
- Transfer factor has also been obtained from a wide variety of other mammalian sources. For example, in researching transfer factor, mice have been used as a source for transfer factor. Antigens are typically introduced subcutaneously into mice, which are then sacrificed following a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to the antigens. Transfer factor is then obtained from spleen cells of the mice.
- the original source for antibodies may also be mammalian.
- monoclonal antibodies may be obtained by injecting a mouse, rabbit, or other mammal with an antigen, obtaining antibody-producing cells from the mammal, then fusing the antibody-producing cells with immortalized cells to produce a hybridoma cell line, which will continue to produce the monoclonal antibodies throughout several generations of cells and, thus, for long periods of time.
- Antibodies against mammalian pathogens have been obtained from a wide variety of sources, including mice, rabbits, pigs, cows, and other mammals.
- pathogens that cause some human diseases, such as the common cold are known to originate in birds.
- avian (i.e., bird) immune systems and mammalian immune systems are very similar, some researchers have turned to birds as a source for generating antibodies.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,080,895, issued to Tokoro on Jan. 14, 1992 discloses a method that includes injecting hens with pathogens that cause intestinal infectious diseases in neonatal mammals. The hens then produce antibodies that are specific for these pathogens, which are present in eggs laid by the hens.
- the '895 patent discloses compositions that include these pathogen-specific antibodies and use thereof to treat and prevent intestinal diseases in neonatal piglets and calves.
- the '895 patent assumes that a pathogen-specific transfer factor-like substance is passed from a hen to her eggs.
- the '895 patent does not disclose that such a transfer factor-like substance was in fact present in the eggs, or that an antibody-free composition derived from eggs that were assumed to contain this transfer factor-like substance actually treated or prevented intestinal diseases in neonatal mammals.
- the '895 patent discloses the use of a filter with about 0.45 ⁇ m diameter holes to isolate transfer factor from antibodies.
- a filter with about 0.45 ⁇ m diameter holes to isolate transfer factor from antibodies.
- antibodies, larger molecules, viruses, and even some bacteria will pass through the pores of a 0.45 ⁇ m filter.
- Avian antibodies that are specific for mammalian pathogens have also been obtained by introducing antigens into eggs.
- avian antibodies Treatment of pathogenic infections in mammals with avian antibodies is typically not desirable, however, since the immune systems of mammals are likely to respond negatively to the large avian antibody molecules by eliciting an immune response to the antibodies themselves. Moreover, as mammalian immune systems do not recognize avian antibodies as useful for their abilities to recognize certain pathogens, or the specificities of avian antibodies for antigens of such pathogens, avian antibodies do not even elicit the desired immune responses in mammals.
- the inventors are not aware of any art that teaches a method for generating transfer factor in a non-mammalian source, an efficient method for obtaining transfer factor from such a non-mammalian source, such as an avian source, or a method for using such transfer factor in treating or preventing infections by pathogens.
- the present invention includes a method for generating the production of transfer factor in a non-mammalian source and obtaining transfer factor from a non-mammalian source.
- compositions including non-mammalian transfer factor are also within the scope of the present invention, as are methods of using these compositions.
- the non-mammalian transfer factor generated, obtained, and used in accordance with the present invention may either be antigen non-specific or antigen-specific (i.e., configured to bind or recognize one or more antigens).
- transfer factor includes the previously discussed broad definition, which includes each of the various types of transfer factors, including pathogen-specific, antigen-specific, and transfer factors that are not specific for particular pathogens or antigenic agents.
- non-specific when used herein with respect to transfer factors, refers to both transfer factors that are not specific for particular antigens and to mixtures that include transfer factors with different antigen specificities.
- Non-specific transfer factor includes transfer factor that the non-mammalian source animal already produces. Individual non-specific transfer factor molecules that are produced by the source animal may have specificity for various antigenic agents, including pathogens, that are present in the source animal's environment. Nonetheless, for purposes of the present invention, transfer factor that is generated merely by a source animal's reaction to its environment is referred to as “non-specific”.
- antigen-specific transfer factor is generated by exposing a non-mammalian source animal to one or more antigens.
- the antigens of various types of pathogens including, but not limited to, bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites, have been found by the inventors to induce the production of non-specific transfer factor in non-mammalian sources.
- Antigen-specific transfer factor has been generated by non-mammalian source animals by both natural antigens (including from live, inactivated, and attenuated sources) and synthetic antigens.
- the production of transfer factor in a non-mammalian source may be induced by introducing an antigen characteristic of a certain pathogen into a female non-mammalian source animal.
- exemplary types of source animals that may be used include, without limiting the scope of the present invention, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish.
- the non-mammalian source animal produces eggs on a frequent basis.
- hens are particularly useful as the non-mammalian source animal.
- These non-mammalian source animals produce transfer factor, which then appears in the eggs of these source animals.
- an egg of a non-mammalian source animal may be exposed to the antigenic agent (e.g., by injection of the antigenic agent into the egg) to induce production of transfer factor by the egg itself.
- the transfer factor generated by a non-mammalian source animal or by the egg of a non-mammalian source animal may be recovered from the egg and separated from other constituents of the egg, including proteins of larger molecular weight, such as antibodies.
- transfer factor may be purified from one or more eggs of a non-mammalian source animal.
- the non-mammalian transfer factor may then be incorporated into a composition or apparatus for administration to a mammalian or non-mammalian subject or administered directly to the subject.
- the non-mammalian transfer factor or compositions including the non-mammalian transfer factor may be administered enterally (i.e., orally), or parenterally (i.e., by a non-oral route, such as by injection, through the skin, etc.).
- Administration of both non-specific and specific non-mammalian transfer factors have been found to initiate an early, specific (i.e., secondary) immune response in mammals to various invading pathogens.
- non-mammalian transfer factor has been found to be useful in treating and preventing diseases that may be caused by these various pathogens.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an exemplary method for generating non-mammalian transfer factor in a non-mammalian source animal
- FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of an exemplary method for generating non-mammalian transfer factor directly in the eggs of a non-mammalian source animal;
- FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of an exemplary method for obtaining non-mammalian transfer factor from eggs.
- FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of an exemplary method for testing for the presence of transfer factor in a solution and for using transfer factor to prevent infection by pathogens or to treat pathogenic infections.
- mammalian mothers pass transfer factor to their newborn children in the colostrum, which is replaced by mother's milk after about a day or two.
- the transfer factor present in colostrum transfers delayed-type hypersensitivity for certain antigens to the child, thus “jump-starting” the ability of the immune system of the newborn child to respond to certain pathogens, if the child becomes infected with these pathogens.
- avian i.e., bird
- immune systems are very similar to those of mammals.
- early studies of the components of immune systems were performed on birds.
- B-cells one of the types of white blood cells discussed previously herein, was so named due to its origin in the bursa of birds.
- various infectious agents including some viruses that cause the common cold and influenza A virus, originate in birds and are passed onto humans.
- transfer factor is also a component of avian immune systems, as well as of the immune systems of other non-mammalian vertebrates.
- transfer factor is also a component of avian immune systems, as well as of the immune systems of other non-mammalian vertebrates.
- transfer factor could still transfer immunity to their children by way of transfer factor.
- the mother's primary opportunity to provide transfer factor to her children is in the egg-yolk, which supplies the growing embryo with the necessary nutrients during growth.
- antigen non-specific and antigen-specific transfer factor could be obtained from eggs.
- FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a method for obtaining desired transfer factor from a non-mammalian source 10 of transfer factor, in this case a hen.
- Non-mammalian source 10 may be exposed to environmental antigenic agents 12 a or exposed to specific antigenic agents 12 b .
- Non-mammalian source 10 may be exposed to specific antigenic agents 12 b by injection, orally, or otherwise, as known in the art.
- Non-mammalian source 10 may be exposed to antigenic agents 12 b either with or without an adjuvant present. Such exposure to specific antigenic agents 12 b may occur once or be repeated.
- antigenic agents 12 a and 12 b are also referred to herein as antigenic agents 12 or simply as antigens.
- an egg 14 ′ of a non-mammalian animal may be directly exposed to one or more antigenic agents 12 , such as by injection or otherwise, as known in the art.
- eggs 14 are collected.
- the yolks 16 and whites 18 of eggs 14 are then separated from one another, and various filtration processes are conducted on yolks 16 to obtain a water soluble fraction 20 thereof that includes transfer factor.
- the yolks 16 and whites 18 need not be separated.
- antigen-specific non-mammalian transfer factor present in water soluble fraction 20 of yolks 16 or in or in solution 22 may be substantially purified from other constituents of water soluble fraction 20 or solution 22 by known techniques, such as by use of the gel permeation and affinity chromatography techniques disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,840,700 and 5,470,835, both of which issued to Kirkpatrick et al. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Kirkpatrick Patents”), the disclosures of both of which are hereby incorporated by this reference in their entireties.
- the technique disclosed in the Kirkpatrick Patents is used to isolate biomolecules, such as transfer factor and antibodies, from the other constituents of a solution on the basis of the specificity of these biomolecules for one or more antigens or other specific binding agents.
- biomolecules such as transfer factor and antibodies
- both transfer factor and antibody may be isolated from the remainder of water soluble fraction 20 with the resulting solution 24 including both antibody and transfer factor.
- the technique disclosed in the Kirkpatrick Patents is conducted on a substantially antibody-free, transfer factor-containing solution 22 , the product will be a substantially pure solution 26 of transfer factor specific for one or more antigens.
- other methods for obtaining transfer factor from eggs are also within the scope of the present invention, including methods for obtaining transfer factor from various egg preparations, including powdered or freeze-dried whole eggs or egg yolks.
- FIG. 4 an exemplary method for testing for the presence of non-mammalian transfer factor specific for one or more antigens in a solution, known as a mouse footpad assay, is schematically depicted.
- mice of the positive control population are prepared. Each mouse 30 of the positive control population, having ages of about nine (9) weeks to about ten (10) weeks, is anesthetized with isoflurane. About 0.02 ml of a 50/50 (wt/wt) mixture of Freund's adjuvant and the particular antigen 36 against which the avian transfer factor to be tested is specific is administered to each mouse 30 by way of two intramuscular injections, one injection at each side of the base 39 of the tail 38 . As these injections are conducted about seven (7) days prior to conducting the mouse footpad assay, the mice of the positive control population are permitted to generate their own secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity response to antigen 36 .
- mice of a first test population which also includes six female BALB/c mice that are about nine (9) to about ten (10) weeks old (i.e., about the same age as the mice of the positive control population), are also anesthetized with isoflurane.
- mice of a second test population that had been treated with a substantially antibody-free preparation By comparing the results obtained from these mice with the results obtained from mice of a second test population that had been treated with a substantially antibody-free preparation, the relative contributions of transfer factor and antibody to the swelling could be determined. As antibodies do not elicit a secondary immune response, it was believed prior to conducting the experiments described herein that the measure of the secondary immune response in the first and second test populations of mice would be very similar.
- Each mouse of the second test population that includes six female BALB/c mice, having ages of about nine (9) to about ten (10) weeks old (i.e., about the same age as the mice of the positive control and first test populations), are also anesthetized with isoflurane.
- Each of the six mice 30 is given, by subcutaneous injection in the back of the neck 40 , about 0.5 ml of a solution 22 , 26 including, reconstituted in distilled water, a lyophilized antigen-specific avian transfer factor preparation with substantially no antibodies.
- a negative control population also includes six female BALB/c mice of about nine (9) to about ten (10) weeks in age (i.e., about the same ages as the other three populations of mice).
- mice of each of the four populations are anesthetized and the distances across each of the largest right hind footpad 32 and the largest left hind footpad 34 of each mouse 30 are measured, such as with a Starrett gauge.
- Right hind footpad 32 is then subcutaneously injected with an antigen 36 -containing solution.
- Left hind footpad 34 which is used as a control, is injected with about the same volume of a control solution 37 , such as a sterile saline diluent, as the volume of solution that is injected into right hind footpad 32 .
- each mouse 30 is again anesthetized and the distances across right and left hind footpads 32 , 34 are again measured.
- a significant amount of swelling, determined by an increase in the distances across a right hind footpad 32 of mouse 30 is indicative of the occurrence of a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in that footpad 32 .
- Transfer factor specific for Newcastle Virus was generated by exposing day-old chicks to a coarse spray of infectious bronchitis/Newcastle virus (IBNC) vaccine, as known in the art, at zero (0) days, forty-two (42) days, and eighty-four (84) days. Eggs laid by these five hens at about one-hundred seventy-five (175) days following the first IBNC vaccine injection were collected.
- IBNC infectious bronchitis/Newcastle virus
- the yolks from a first sampling of the antigen specific transfer factor-containing eggs generated in EXAMPLE 1 were separated from the whites, diluted about six (6) to about nine (9) times, by volume, in deionized water (i.e., about one (1) part egg white mixed with about five (5) parts water to about eight (8) parts water) and frozen.
- deionized water i.e., about one (1) part egg white mixed with about five (5) parts water to about eight (8) parts water
- the lipid layer from these frozen egg yolks was mechanically separated from the water-soluble fraction of the egg yolks. This water-soluble fraction was then permitted to thaw to a temperature of about 4° C. to about 6° C. and vacuum filtered by use of Whatman qualitative filter paper using a 55 mm diameter porcelain Büchner funnel.
- the filtrate was then vacuum filtered through a glass microfiber filter, again using a 55 mm diameter Büchner funnel.
- a third filtration was then conducted to collect proteins and to remove lipids and lipoproteins from the solution.
- the third filtration was effected by way of a DURAPORE hydrophilic membrane.
- the protein-containing fraction which included both transfer factor and antibody specific for the infectious bronchitis pathogen and Newcastle Virus was collected, frozen, and lyophilized, or freeze-dried, as known in the art.
- the larger molecular weight protein-containing precipitate was then removed from the solution by filtering the solution through a Whatman glass microfiber filter in a 55 mm diameter Büchner funnel.
- CELITE® a diatomite, or diatomaceous earth, filtration aid available from Celite Corporation of Lompoc, Calif., was used to prevent the precipitate from clogging the filter during filtration of the solution.
- This substantially precipitate-free solution was then collected, frozen, and lyophilized, as known in the art.
- mice of a test population that included three BALB/c mice, each having an age in the range of about nine (9) to about ten (10) weeks was tested to determine whether the IBNV-specific avian transfer factor would impart an early secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune response to the mice.
- Each mouse was anesthetized with isoflurane. The distances across the largest footpads of both the left and right hind feet of each mouse were then measured with a Starrett gauge.
- Each mouse was then given a subcutaneous injection in the back of the neck of about 0.5 ml of a solution that included about 16%, by weight, of the IBNV-specific avian transfer factor reconstituted in distilled water.
- mice After about twenty-four (24) hours, each of the mice was again anesthetized with isoflurane. About 0.01 ml of a sterile saline diluent was then injected into the largest footpad of the left hind foot of each mouse, which footpad served as a control, while the largest footpad of the right hind foot of each mouse was injected with about 0.01 ml of a solution including about 10,000 doses of Newcastle-Bronchitis vaccine reconstituted in about 250 ml of distilled water.
- mice #1 Before another twenty-four (24) hours had elapsed, one of the mice (Mouse #1) died. The two remaining mice were again anesthetized with isoflurane and the largest footpads on their hind feet were again measured. The results follow:
- the greater increase in size, or swelling, of the right footpad (increases of 85 ⁇ m and 90 ⁇ m) over that of the left footpad (increases of 50 ⁇ m and 15 ⁇ m, respectively) indicates that the IBNV-specific avian transfer factor-containing solution induced a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in the right feet of Mouse #2 and Mouse #3 within about twenty-four hours following the introduction of the Newcastle-Bronchitis vaccine.
- mice The effectiveness of each of these various types of antigen-specific avian transfer factors in inducing early secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune responses in mammals was then tested by way of mouse footpad assays.
- Each type of antigen-specific avian transfer factor was tested using four different populations of mice, including a positive control population, a first test population, a second test population, and a negative control population, which were prepared as described previously herein with reference to FIG. 4 .
- the mouse footpad assay for each type of antigen-specific transfer factor was conducted in accordance with the teachings of Petersen E A, Greenberg L E, Manzara T, and Kirkpatrick C H, “Murine transfer factor,” I. Description of the model and evidence for specificity, J. Immunol., 126: 2480-84 (1981), the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by this reference in its entirety.
- mice were prepared in the manner described in reference to FIG. 4 .
- each mouse was anesthetized with isofluorane, the largest footpad of the left hind footpad of each mouse, which served as a control, was injected with about 0.01 ml of sterile saline diluent, and the largest footpad of the right hind foot of each mouse was injected with about 0.01 ml of a solution including the antigen or pathogen for which the avian transfer factor was specific.
- mice of the positive control, test, and negative control populations were again anesthetized with isoflurane and the sizes of the left and right hind footpads of each of the mice were again measured, for example, with a Starrett Gauge.
- avian transfer factor and avian antibodies specific for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine were generated in hens.
- Each hen received one dose of Merck MMR II vaccine, as described in EXAMPLE 1, at 150 days, 163 days, 190 days, 221 days, and 249 days.
- Eggs were collected from these hens just after the third innoculation—sometime in the period of about day 192 to about day 223 and prepared as described in EXAMPLE 1. This was done in this EXAMPLE and in the following EXAMPLES to ensure that a high level of transfer factor was present in the eggs. It is believed that transfer factor will be present in eggs about seven (7) days following the first innoculation.
- a positive control population of mice was prepared about seven (7) days prior to the beginning of the mouse footpad assay by injecting each mouse of the positive control population with Merck MMR II vaccine, as described previously herein in reference to FIG. 4 .
- a solution containing both avian antibody and avian transfer factor specific for MMR vaccine was made by reconstituting in distilled water a lyophylized preparation similar to that described in EXAMPLE 2 to a concentration of about 8%, by weight. This transfer factor- and antibody-containing solution was administered to the first test population of mice in the manner described in reference to FIG. 4 .
- Lyophilized avian transfer factor specific for measles, mumps, and rubella prepared by a method similar to that described in EXAMPLE 3, was reconstituted in distilled water to a concentration of about 8%, by weight. This reconstituted MMR-specific avian transfer factor was then administered to a second test population of mice in the manner described previously herein in reference to FIG. 4 .
- mice About sixteen (16) to about twenty-four (24) hours later, the mice were again anesthetized and the sizes of the largest footpads of both hind feet of each mouse measured, as previously described. The results follow:
- Mouse #6 The data for Mouse #6 may have been inaccurate since the scabs from bite marks were present on one or both hind footpads of this mouse at the time the second measurements were taken (i.e., at about sixteen (16) to about twenty-four (24) hours). Nonetheless, with the exception of Mouse #4, each of the remaining mice of the first test population exhibited greater swelling at the time the second footpad measurements were taken in the footpads that were injected with the MMR II vaccine than in the footpads that were injected with the control solution. In Mouse #4, the amount of swelling was about the same in both the left and right footpads.
- mice While Mouse #2 and Mouse #3 of the positive control population both exhibited substantially the same amount of swelling in the largest footpads of both the left and right hind feet, each of the other mice had a greater amount of swelling in the largest footpads of their right hind feet and, thus, displayed a secondary immune response to the MMR vaccine that was introduced into the largest footpads of their right hind feet, than the amount of swelling in the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice, which were much less swollen.
- mice, Mouse #3 and Mouse #5 Two of the mice, Mouse #3 and Mouse #5, of the negative control population exhibited no swelling in the largest footpad of either hind foot.
- the largest footpads on both hind feet of Mouse #6 were swollen by about the same amount. While the largest footpads on the left hind feet of Mouse #1 and Mouse #4 were not swollen and the footpads on the right hind feet of these two mice were slightly swollen, the largest footpad on the right hind foot of Mouse #4 was not swollen and the largest left hind footpad was only slightly swollen.
- mice of the negative control population did not elicit a secondary immune response to the MMR vaccine.
- TABLES 2-5 indicate that a secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune response occurred in the majority of mice in each of the first test population, the second test population, and the positive control population, while no such secondary immune response appeared to be present in the negative control population. Accordingly, the data in TABLES 2 and 3 indicate that avian transfer factor specific for MMR vaccine, as well as avian antibody specific for MMR vaccine, are capable of inducing an early secondary immune response in mammals.
- avian transfer factor and avian antibodies specific for the Hepatitis B virus were generated by use of a synthetic Hepatitis B antigen vaccine sold under the tradename ENGERIX-B.
- Each hen received one dose of the Hepatitis B vaccine, as described in EXAMPLE 1, at 150 days, 163 days, 190 days, 221 days, and 249 days.
- Eggs were collected from these hens sometime in the period of about day 193 and about day 223, as described in EXAMPLE 1 above, and prepared as described in EXAMPLE 1.
- a positive control population of mice was prepared about seven (7) days prior to conducting the mouse footpad assay by injecting each mouse of the positive control population with the synthetic Hepatitis B vaccine, ENGERIX-B in the manner described in reference to FIG. 4 .
- a first solution which included both avian antibody and avian transfer factor that were specific for Hepatitis B vaccine, was made by reconstituting in distilled water a lyophilized preparation similar to that described in EXAMPLE 2 to a concentration of about 16%, by weight. This transfer factor- and antibody-containing solution was administered to a first test population of mice in the manner described in reference to FIG. 4 .
- lyophilized avian transfer factor specific for Hepatitis B vaccine which was prepared in a similar manner to that described in EXAMPLE 3, was reconstituted in distilled water to a concentration of about 16%, by weight. The reconstituted transfer factor-containing solution was then administered to each of the mice of a second test population, as explained previously herein in reference to FIG. 4 .
- the synthetic Hepatitis B vaccine was administered to the largest footpad of the right foot of each mouse of each of the positive control, first test, second test, and negative control populations, as described previously herein in reference to FIG. 4 .
- the largest footpad of the left foot of each mouse of the four populations was substantially concurrently injected with the same amount of sterile saline diluent, also as described previously herein.
- mice of the four populations were again anesthetized and the sizes of the largest footpads of both hind feet of each mouse were again measured, as described previously herein. The results follow:
- mice of the first test population exhibited greater swelling in the largest footpad of the right hind foot.
- the largest footpads of the right hind feet of the mice of the first test population were about 42.17 ⁇ m more swollen than the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice.
- mice On average the largest footpads on the right hind feet of the second test population of mice were about 38.10 ⁇ m more swollen than the largest footpads on the left hind feet of these mice.
- Mouse #4 the data of TABLE 7 illustrate that the administration of avian transfer factor specific for Hepatitis B vaccine induced an early secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune response in the largest footpad of the right hind foot of each mouse.
- mice In the positive control population of mice, only Mouse #5 failed to elicit a secondary immune response to the synthetic Hepatitis B vaccine.
- the largest footpads on the right hind feet of each of the other mice of the positive control population exhibited an average of about 42.33 ⁇ m increased swelling over that of the largest footpads on the left hind feet of these mice.
- mice of the negative control population exhibited substantially the same amount of swelling in the largest footpads of both the left and right hind feet. Of the remaining three mice, only mouse #3 exhibited a significantly greater amount of swelling in the largest food pad of her right hind foot than in her left hind foot. On average, the difference in swelling between the largest footpads on the right and left hind feet of the mice of the negative control population was only about 16.33 ⁇ m.
- avian transfer factor and avian antibody specific for the H. pylori bacteria were generated in hens.
- Each of the hens was infected with the H. pylori EIA antigen, in a manner similar to that described in EXAMPLE 1, at day 150, day 163, day 190, day 221, and day 249.
- Eggs were collected from these hens during the period of about day 193 to about day 223, as described in EXAMPLE 1, and prepared, as described in EXAMPLE 1.
- mice As in the previous EXAMPLES, a positive control population of mice was prepared about seven (7) days prior to conducting the mouse footpad assay by injecting each of the mice of the positive control population with the recombinant, or synthetic, H. pylori EIA antigen, as described in reference to FIG. 4 .
- a solution including both avian antibody and avian transfer factor specific for the H. pylori EIA antigen was made by reconstituting in distilled water a lyophilized preparation including such avian antibody and avian transfer factor, similar to the preparation described above in EXAMPLE 2, to a concentration of about 16%, by weight. This solution was administered to a first test population of mice, as described previously herein in reference to FIG. 4 .
- a substantially antibody-free solution including avian transfer factor specific for H. pylori was prepared by reconstituting a lyophilized preparation, obtained in a manner similar to that described in EXAMPLE 3, in distilled water to a concentration of about 16%, by weight. This substantially antibody-free avian transfer factor-containing solution was then administered to each of the mice of a second test population, as described previously herein in reference to FIG. 4 .
- mice were again anesthetized and the sizes of the largest footpads of both hind feet of each mouse was measured, as described previously herein. The results follow:
- mice of the first test population were administered with both avian antibody and avian transfer factor specific for H. pylori induced an early secondary immune response in the mice of the first test population.
- Mouse #1 exhibited substantially equal amounts of swelling in the largest footpads of both her left and right hind feet
- Mouse #3 exhibited slightly greater swelling in the largest footpad of her right hind foot than in that of her left hind foot
- Mouse #5 exhibited a slightly greater amount of swelling in the largest footpad of her left hind foot than in the largest footpad of her right hind foot.
- the largest footpads of the right hind feet of the mice of the first test population were about 59.27 ⁇ m more swollen than the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice.
- mice Two of the mice, Mouse #5 and Mouse #6, exhibited much more swelling in the largest footpads of their right hind feet than in the largest footpads of their left hind feet. While the amount of swelling in the largest footpads of the right hind feet of Mouse #1, Mouse #2, and Mouse #4 was greater than that of the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice, the difference was only slight. Mouse #3 actually exhibited a slightly greater amount of swelling in the largest footpad of her left hind foot than in the largest footpad of her right hind foot.
- mice of the positive control population in EXAMPLE 7 elicited at delayed-type hypersensitivity immune response to H. pylori , as indicated by the significant differences in the amount of swelling in the largest footpads of the right hind feet of these mice relative to that in the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice. On average, the difference in swelling was about 110.07 ⁇ m.
- the amount of swelling in the largest footpads of both the left and right hind feet of Mouse #3, Mouse #5, and Mouse #6, were substantially the same. While the amount of swelling in the largest footpad of the right hind foot of Mouse #2 was greater than the amount of swelling in the largest footpad of the left hind foot of that mouse, the largest footpad of the left hind foot of Mouse #1 was significantly more swollen than the largest footpad of the right hind foot of Mouse #1. The largest footpad of the right hind foot of Mouse #4 was only slightly more swollen than the largest footpad of the left hind foot of Mouse #4. The average difference in swelling of the largest footpads of the right and left hind feet of the mice of the negative control population was only about 4.23 ⁇ m.
- TABLES 10-13 indicate that avian transfer factor specific for H. pylori facilitates an early secondary immune response in mammals.
- avian transfer factor and avian antibody specific for the EBNA-1 antigen, a recombinant nuclear antigen of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), were generated in hens.
- Eggs were collected from these hens during the period of about day 193 to about day 223, as described above in EXAMPLE 1, and prepared as described above in EXAMPLE 1.
- a solution with both avian antibody and avian transfer factor specific for EBNA-1 was formed by reconstituting in distilled water a lyophilized preparation similar to that described in EXAMPLE 2.
- the lyophilized preparation including both avian antibody and avian transfer factor specific for EBNA-1 antigen was diluted to a concentration of about 16%, by weight. This solution was then administered to a first test population of mice in the manner described in reference to FIG. 4 .
- mice with EBNA-1 A positive control population of mice was prepared by injecting mice with EBNA-1 about seven (7) days before conducting the mouse footpad assay.
- Recombinant EBNA-1 antigen was then administered to the largest footpad of the right hind foot of each mouse of each of four populations, including a first test population, a second test population, a positive control population, and a negative control population. Substantially the same amount of sterile saline diluent was administered to the largest footpad of the left hind foot of each mouse. The method of administration was conducted in the same manner as that described previously herein.
- mice About sixteen (16) to about twenty-four (24) hours later, the mice were again anesthetized and the sizes of the largest footpads of both hind feet of each mouse measured, as previously described. The results follow:
- mice exhibited significantly greater swelling in the largest footpads of their right hind feet than in the largest footpads of their left hind feet. While Mouse #2 also had a greater amount of swelling in the largest footpad of her right hind foot than that in the largest footpad of her left hind foot, the difference was only slight. Two of the mice, Mouse #1 and Mouse #6, had substantially the same amount of swelling in the largest footpads of both their left and right hind feet.
- mice of the second test population which were treated with the avian transfer factor-containing solution also exhibited an early secondary immune response to recombinant EBNA-1. This result was particularly evident in Mouse #3 and Mouse #5, which exhibited significantly greater swelling in the largest footpads of their right hind feet than that measured in the largest footpads of their left hind feet. While the amount of swelling in the largest footpad of the right hind foot of Mouse #1 was also greater than the amount of swelling in the largest footpad of the left hind foot of Mouse #1, the difference appears to be slight.
- Mouse #2 and Mouse #4 displayed a greater amount of swelling in the largest footpads of their left hind feet, the amounts of swelling measured therein were only slightly greater than that measured in the largest footpads of the right hind feet of these mice.
- the largest footpads of the right hand feet of these mice was about 16.93 ⁇ m greater than that measured in the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice.
- transfer factor specific for EBNA-1 may have become unstable when isolated from the corresponding antibody, resulting in the lower measured secondary immune response in the second test population relative to the overall secondary immune response measured in the first test population of mice.
- mice of the positive control population As indicated by the greater amounts of swelling in the largest footpads of the right hind feet of each mouse of the positive control population than that of the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice, all six of the mice of the positive control population exhibited a delayed-type hypersensitivity immune response to the recombinant EBNA-1 antigen.
- the measured amount of swelling in the largest footpads of the right hind feet of each of these mice was, on average, about 93.13 ⁇ m greater than the measured amount of swelling in the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice.
- mice In the negative control population, only two of the mice, Mouse #2 and Mouse #4, exhibited different amounts of swelling in the largest footpads of their hind feet. While the amount of swelling in the largest footpad of the right hind foot of Mouse #2 was greater than that exhibited in the largest footpad of the left hind foot, the largest footpad of the left hind foot of Mouse #4 was more swollen than the largest footpad of the right hind foot of Mouse #4. In fact, on average, the largest footpads of the right hind feet of the mice of the negative control population were about 4.23 ⁇ m less swollen than the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice.
- TABLES 14-17 illustrate that avian transfer factor specific for EBNA-1 cause mammals to elicit an early secondary immune response (i.e., within about twenty-four (24) hours as compared to the typical seven (7) to fourteen (14) day time period it takes a mammal to elicit a secondary immune response on its own) to EBNA-1 and viruses and other pathogens that present this antigen.
- EXAMPLES illustrate that, by way of contrast with the seven (7) to fourteen (14) day time period that it typically takes a mammalian host to elicit a secondary immune response to a pathogen or antigenic agent on its own, when an avian transfer factor incorporating teachings of the present invention has been administered, the mammalian host may elicit a secondary immune response within about twenty-four (24) hours.
- avian transfer factor has the ability to generate an early secondary immune response in mammals. As one of skill in the art would readily recognize, avian transfer factor would also generate an early secondary immune response in various types of birds, as well as in reptiles, amphibians, and other non-mammalian species of animals.
- transfer factor initiates an early delayed-type hypersensitivity immune reaction in mice, it is reasonable for those of ordinary skill in the art to assume that transfer factor has the same effect in other mammals, including humans.
- transfer factor was administered to mice in the preceding EXAMPLES by way of injection, it is also within the scope of the present invention to administer avian transfer factor to mammals by other routes.
- avian transfer factor could be administered orally, by parenteral injection, or by parenteral methods other than injection, such as transdermally, or through the skin, by aerosol via the lungs, or by other methods known in the art.
- Oral administration of avian transfer factor to mammals is supported by the fact that mammalian mothers supply transfer factor to their newborn children by way of colostrum, which the newborns ingest orally. Transfer factor survives the conditions of both the stomach and the small intestine, where transfer factor is absorbed into the bloodstream of the mammalian newborn.
- transfer factor is known to survive the intestinal tracts of mammals.
- the ability of transfer factor to withstand the conditions of the digestive tracts of mammals was demonstrated in Kirkpatrick C H, “Activities and characteristics of transfer factors,” Biotherapy, 9: 13-16 (1996), the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by this reference in its entirety.
Abstract
Description
- This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/667,147, filed Sep. 21, 2000, pending.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates generally to methods for generating antigen-specific transfer factor, compositions including such antigen-specific transfer factor, and uses of these compositions. In particular, the present invention relates to methods for generating antigen-specific transfer factor in an avian host and obtaining the antigen-specific transfer factor from eggs.
- 2. Background of Related Art
- Many deadly pathogens are passed to humans from the animal kingdom. For example, monkeys are the sources of the type I human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-I), which causes acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and monkeypox, which is similar to smallpox; ground-dwelling mammals are believed to be the source of the Ebola virus; fruit bats and pigs are the source of the Nipah virus; the Hendra virus comes from horses; the “Hong Kong Flu” originated in chickens; and wild birds, especially ducks, are the sources of many of the deadly influenza viruses. Many diseases also have animal reservoirs. By way of example, mice carry Hanta virus, rats carry the Black Plague, and deer carry Lyme disease.
- The immune systems of vertebrates are equipped to recognize and defend the body from invading pathogenic organisms, such as parasites, bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Vertebrate immune systems typically include a cellular component and a noncellular component.
- The cellular component of an immune system includes the so-called lymphocytes, or white blood cells, of which there are several types. It is the cellular component of a mature immune system that typically mounts a primary, nonspecific response to invading pathogens, as well as being involved in a secondary, specific response to pathogens.
- In the primary, or initial, response to an infection by a pathogen, white blood cells that are known as phagocytes locate and attack the invading pathogens. Typically, a phagocyte will internalize, or “eat” a pathogen, then digest the pathogen. In addition, white blood cells produce and excrete chemicals in response to pathogenic infections that are intended to attack the pathogens or assist in directing the attack on pathogens.
- Only if an infection by invading pathogens continues to elude the primary immune response is a specific, secondary immune response to the pathogen needed. As this secondary immune response is typically delayed, it is also known as “delayed-type hypersensitivity”. A mammal, on its own, will typically not elicit a secondary immune response to a pathogen until about seven (7) to about fourteen (14) days after becoming infected with the pathogen. The secondary immune response is also referred to as an acquired immunity to specific pathogens. Pathogens have one or more characteristic proteins, which are referred to as “antigens”. In a secondary immune response, white blood cells known as B lymphocytes, or “B-cells”, and T lymphocytes, or “T-cells”, “learn” to recognize one or more of the antigens of a pathogen. The B-cells and T-cells work together to generate proteins called “antibodies”, which are specific for one or more certain antigens on a pathogen.
- The T-cells are primarily responsible for the secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune response to a pathogen or antigenic agent. There are three types of T-cells: T-helper cells, T-suppressor cells, and antigen-specific T-cells, which are also referred to as cytotoxic (meaning “cell-killing”) T-lymphocytes (“CTLs”), or T-killer cells. The T-helper and T-suppressor cells, while not specific for certain antigens, perform conditioning functions (e.g., the inflammation that typically accompanies an infection) that assist in the removal of pathogens or antigenic agents from an infected host.
- Antibodies, which make up only a part of the noncellular component of an immune system, recognize specific antigens and, thus, are said to be “antigen-specific”. The generated antibodies then basically assist the white blood cells in locating and eliminating the pathogen from the body. Typically, once a white blood cell has generated an antibody against a pathogen, the white blood cell and all of its progenitors continue to produce the antibody. After an infection is eliminated, a small number of T-cells and B-cells that correspond to the recognized antigens are retained in a “resting” state. When the corresponding pathogenic or antigenic agents again infect the host, the “resting” T-cells and B-cells activate and, within about forty-eight (48) hours, induce a rapid immune response. By responding in this manner, the immune system mounts a secondary immune response to a pathogen, the immune system is said to have a “memory” for that pathogen.
- Mammalian immune systems are also known to produce smaller proteins, known as “transfer factors,” as part of a secondary immune response to infecting pathogens. Transfer factors are another noncellular part of a mammalian immune system. Antigen-specific transfer factors are believed to be structurally analogous to antibodies, but on a much smaller molecular scale. Both antigen-specific transfer factors and antibodies include antigen-specific cites and both include highly conserved regions that interact with receptor sites on their respective effector cells. In transfer factor and antibody molecules, a third, “linker”, region connects the antigen-specific cites and the highly conserved regions.
- Transfer factor is a low molecular weight isolate of lymphocytes. Narrowly, transfer factors may have specificity for single antigens. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,840,700 and 5,470,835, both of which issued to Kirkpatrick et al. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Kirkpatrick Patents”), disclose the isolation of transfer factors that are specific for certain antigens. More broadly, “specific” transfer factors have been generated from cell cultures of monoclonal lymphocytes. Even if these transfer factors are generated against a single pathogen, they have specificity for a variety of antigenic sites of that pathogen. Thus, these transfer factors are said to be “pathogen-specific” rather than antigen-specific. Similarly, transfer factors that are obtained from a host that has been infected with a certain pathogen are pathogen-specific. Although such preparations are often referred to in the art as being “antigen-specific” due to their ability to elicit a secondary immune response when a particular antigen is present, transfer factors having different specificities may also be present. Thus, even the so-called “antigen-specific”, pathogen-specific transfer factor preparations may be specific for a variety of antigens.
- Additionally, it is believed that antigen-specific and pathogen-specific transfer factors may cause a host to elicit a delayed-type hypersensitivity immune response to pathogens or antigens for which such transfer factor molecules are not specific. Transfer factor “draws” at least the non-specific T-cells, the T-inducer and T-suppressor cells, to an infecting pathogen or antigenic agent to facilitate a secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune response to the infecting pathogen or antigenic agent.
- Typically, transfer factor includes an isolate of proteins obtained from immunologically active mammalian sources and having molecular weights of less than about 10,000 daltons (D). It is known that transfer factor, when added either in vitro or in vivo to mammalian immune cell systems, improves or normalizes the response of the recipient mammalian immune system.
- The immune systems of newborns have typically not developed, or “matured”, enough to effectively defend the newborn from invading pathogens. Moreover, prior to birth, many mammals are protected from a wide range of pathogens by their mothers. Thus, many newborn mammals cannot immediately elicit a secondary response to a variety of pathogens. Rather, newborn mammals are typically given secondary immunity to pathogens by their mothers. One way in which mothers are known to boost the immune systems of newborns is by providing the newborn with a set of transfer factors. In mammals, transfer factor is provided by a mother to a newborn in colostrum, which is typically replaced by the mother's milk after a day or two. Transfer factor basically transfers the mother's acquired, specific (i.e., delayed-type hypersensitive) immunity to the newborn. This transferred immunity typically conditions the cells of the newborn's immune system to react against pathogens in an antigen-specific manner, as well as in an antigen- or pathogen-nonspecific fashion, until the newborn's immune system is able on its own to defend the newborn from pathogens. Thus, when transfer factor is present, the immune system of the newborn is conditioned to react to pathogens with a hypersensitive response, such as that which occurs with a typical delayed-type hypersensitivity response. Accordingly, transfer factor is said to “jump start” the responsiveness of immune systems to pathogens.
- Much of the research involving transfer factor has been conducted in recent years. Currently, it is believed that transfer factor is a protein with a length of about forty-four (44) amino acids. Transfer factor is believed to have a molecular weight in the range of about 4,000 to about 5,000 Daltons (D), or about 4 kD to about 5 kD. Transfer factor is also believed to include three functional fractions: an inducer fraction; an immune suppressor fraction; and an antigen-specific fraction. Many in the art believe that transfer factor also includes a nucleoside portion, which could be connected to the protein molecule or separate therefrom, that may enhance the ability of transfer factor to cause a mammalian immune system to elicit a secondary immune response. The nucleoside portion may be part of the inducer or suppressor fractions of transfer factor.
- The antigen-specific region of the antigen-specific transfer factors is believed to comprise about eight (8) to about twelve (12) amino acids. A second highly-conserved region of about ten (10) amino acids is thought to be a very high-affinity T-cell receptor binding region. The remaining amino acids may serve to link the two active regions or may have additional, as yet undiscovered properties. The antigen-specific region of a transfer factor molecule, which is analogous to the known antigen-specific structure of antibodies, but on a much smaller molecular weight scale, appears to be hyper-variable and is adapted to recognize a characteristic protein on one or more pathogens. The inducer and immune suppressor fractions are believed to impart transfer factor with its ability to condition the various cells of the immune system so that the cells are more fully responsive to the pathogenic stimuli in their environment.
- Conventionally, transfer factor has been obtained from the colostrum of milk cows. While milk cows typically produce large amounts of colostrum and, thus, large amounts of transfer factor over a relatively short period of time, milk cows only produce colostrum for about a day or a day-and-a-half every year. Thus, milk cows are neither a constant source of transfer factor nor an efficient source of transfer factor.
- Transfer factor has also been obtained from a wide variety of other mammalian sources. For example, in researching transfer factor, mice have been used as a source for transfer factor. Antigens are typically introduced subcutaneously into mice, which are then sacrificed following a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to the antigens. Transfer factor is then obtained from spleen cells of the mice.
- While different mechanisms are typically used to generate the production of antibodies, the original source for antibodies may also be mammalian. For example, monoclonal antibodies may be obtained by injecting a mouse, rabbit, or other mammal with an antigen, obtaining antibody-producing cells from the mammal, then fusing the antibody-producing cells with immortalized cells to produce a hybridoma cell line, which will continue to produce the monoclonal antibodies throughout several generations of cells and, thus, for long periods of time.
- Antibodies against mammalian pathogens have been obtained from a wide variety of sources, including mice, rabbits, pigs, cows, and other mammals. In addition, the pathogens that cause some human diseases, such as the common cold, are known to originate in birds. As it has become recognized that avian (i.e., bird) immune systems and mammalian immune systems are very similar, some researchers have turned to birds as a source for generating antibodies.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,080,895, issued to Tokoro on Jan. 14, 1992 (hereinafter “the '895 patent”), discloses a method that includes injecting hens with pathogens that cause intestinal infectious diseases in neonatal mammals. The hens then produce antibodies that are specific for these pathogens, which are present in eggs laid by the hens. The '895 patent discloses compositions that include these pathogen-specific antibodies and use thereof to treat and prevent intestinal diseases in neonatal piglets and calves. In addition, the '895 patent assumes that a pathogen-specific transfer factor-like substance is passed from a hen to her eggs. Nonetheless, the '895 patent does not disclose that such a transfer factor-like substance was in fact present in the eggs, or that an antibody-free composition derived from eggs that were assumed to contain this transfer factor-like substance actually treated or prevented intestinal diseases in neonatal mammals. In fact, the '895 patent discloses the use of a filter with about 0.45 μm diameter holes to isolate transfer factor from antibodies. As those of skill in the art are aware, however, antibodies, larger molecules, viruses, and even some bacteria will pass through the pores of a 0.45 μm filter. In reality, it is not likely that any individual protein molecules having molecular weights of less than about 12,000 D were separated by such a filter. Based on the pore size of the filter used, however, it is more likely that no individual protein molecules, including antibodies, were removed by the filter.
- Avian antibodies that are specific for mammalian pathogens have also been obtained by introducing antigens into eggs.
- Treatment of pathogenic infections in mammals with avian antibodies is typically not desirable, however, since the immune systems of mammals are likely to respond negatively to the large avian antibody molecules by eliciting an immune response to the antibodies themselves. Moreover, as mammalian immune systems do not recognize avian antibodies as useful for their abilities to recognize certain pathogens, or the specificities of avian antibodies for antigens of such pathogens, avian antibodies do not even elicit the desired immune responses in mammals.
- The inventors are not aware of any art that teaches a method for generating transfer factor in a non-mammalian source, an efficient method for obtaining transfer factor from such a non-mammalian source, such as an avian source, or a method for using such transfer factor in treating or preventing infections by pathogens.
- The present invention includes a method for generating the production of transfer factor in a non-mammalian source and obtaining transfer factor from a non-mammalian source. In addition, compositions including non-mammalian transfer factor are also within the scope of the present invention, as are methods of using these compositions.
- The non-mammalian transfer factor generated, obtained, and used in accordance with the present invention may either be antigen non-specific or antigen-specific (i.e., configured to bind or recognize one or more antigens). Unless otherwise indicated, the term “transfer factor”, as used herein, includes the previously discussed broad definition, which includes each of the various types of transfer factors, including pathogen-specific, antigen-specific, and transfer factors that are not specific for particular pathogens or antigenic agents. The term “non-specific”, when used herein with respect to transfer factors, refers to both transfer factors that are not specific for particular antigens and to mixtures that include transfer factors with different antigen specificities.
- Non-specific transfer factor includes transfer factor that the non-mammalian source animal already produces. Individual non-specific transfer factor molecules that are produced by the source animal may have specificity for various antigenic agents, including pathogens, that are present in the source animal's environment. Nonetheless, for purposes of the present invention, transfer factor that is generated merely by a source animal's reaction to its environment is referred to as “non-specific”.
- On the other hand, antigen-specific transfer factor is generated by exposing a non-mammalian source animal to one or more antigens. The antigens of various types of pathogens, including, but not limited to, bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites, have been found by the inventors to induce the production of non-specific transfer factor in non-mammalian sources. Antigen-specific transfer factor has been generated by non-mammalian source animals by both natural antigens (including from live, inactivated, and attenuated sources) and synthetic antigens.
- The production of transfer factor in a non-mammalian source may be induced by introducing an antigen characteristic of a certain pathogen into a female non-mammalian source animal. Exemplary types of source animals that may be used include, without limiting the scope of the present invention, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish. Preferably, the non-mammalian source animal produces eggs on a frequent basis. Thus, for purposes of the present invention, hens are particularly useful as the non-mammalian source animal. These non-mammalian source animals produce transfer factor, which then appears in the eggs of these source animals. Alternatively, an egg of a non-mammalian source animal may be exposed to the antigenic agent (e.g., by injection of the antigenic agent into the egg) to induce production of transfer factor by the egg itself.
- The transfer factor generated by a non-mammalian source animal or by the egg of a non-mammalian source animal may be recovered from the egg and separated from other constituents of the egg, including proteins of larger molecular weight, such as antibodies. Alternatively, transfer factor may be purified from one or more eggs of a non-mammalian source animal.
- The non-mammalian transfer factor may then be incorporated into a composition or apparatus for administration to a mammalian or non-mammalian subject or administered directly to the subject. The non-mammalian transfer factor or compositions including the non-mammalian transfer factor may be administered enterally (i.e., orally), or parenterally (i.e., by a non-oral route, such as by injection, through the skin, etc.). Administration of both non-specific and specific non-mammalian transfer factors have been found to initiate an early, specific (i.e., secondary) immune response in mammals to various invading pathogens. Thus, non-mammalian transfer factor has been found to be useful in treating and preventing diseases that may be caused by these various pathogens.
- Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those of skill in the art through consideration of the ensuing description, the accompanying drawings, and the appended claims.
- In the drawings, which illustrate exemplary embodiments of the present invention:
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an exemplary method for generating non-mammalian transfer factor in a non-mammalian source animal; -
FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of an exemplary method for generating non-mammalian transfer factor directly in the eggs of a non-mammalian source animal; -
FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of an exemplary method for obtaining non-mammalian transfer factor from eggs; and -
FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of an exemplary method for testing for the presence of transfer factor in a solution and for using transfer factor to prevent infection by pathogens or to treat pathogenic infections. - As explained previously herein, mammalian mothers pass transfer factor to their newborn children in the colostrum, which is replaced by mother's milk after about a day or two. The transfer factor present in colostrum transfers delayed-type hypersensitivity for certain antigens to the child, thus “jump-starting” the ability of the immune system of the newborn child to respond to certain pathogens, if the child becomes infected with these pathogens.
- Over recent years, it has been discovered that avian (i.e., bird) immune systems are very similar to those of mammals. In fact, early studies of the components of immune systems were performed on birds. As a result of these early studies of immune systems, B-cells, one of the types of white blood cells discussed previously herein, was so named due to its origin in the bursa of birds. In addition, it is known that various infectious agents, including some viruses that cause the common cold and influenza A virus, originate in birds and are passed onto humans.
- As avian immune systems bear some resemblances to the immune systems of mammals, the inventors believe that transfer factor is also a component of avian immune systems, as well as of the immune systems of other non-mammalian vertebrates. In addition, the inventors believe that although non-mammalian mothers do not provide colostrum to their newborn children, these animals could still transfer immunity to their children by way of transfer factor. In birds and other egg-laying vertebrates, the mother's primary opportunity to provide transfer factor to her children is in the egg-yolk, which supplies the growing embryo with the necessary nutrients during growth. Thus, the inventors have long believed that antigen non-specific and antigen-specific transfer factor could be obtained from eggs.
-
FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a method for obtaining desired transfer factor from anon-mammalian source 10 of transfer factor, in this case a hen.Non-mammalian source 10 may be exposed to environmentalantigenic agents 12 a or exposed to specificantigenic agents 12 b.Non-mammalian source 10 may be exposed to specificantigenic agents 12 b by injection, orally, or otherwise, as known in the art.Non-mammalian source 10 may be exposed toantigenic agents 12 b either with or without an adjuvant present. Such exposure to specificantigenic agents 12 b may occur once or be repeated. For simplicity,antigenic agents antigenic agents 12 or simply as antigens. - Alternatively, with reference to
FIG. 2 , anegg 14′ of a non-mammalian animal may be directly exposed to one or moreantigenic agents 12, such as by injection or otherwise, as known in the art. - With reference to
FIG. 3 , afternon-mammalian source 10 ornon-mammalian eggs 14′ that were directly exposed to one or moreantigenic agents 12 have been given an adequate opportunity to elicit a secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune response toantigenic agents 12,eggs 14 are collected. Theyolks 16 andwhites 18 ofeggs 14 are then separated from one another, and various filtration processes are conducted onyolks 16 to obtain a watersoluble fraction 20 thereof that includes transfer factor. Larger molecular weight proteins, such as antibodies, may also be removed from watersoluble fraction 20 ofyolks 16 by known processes, such as by filtering on the basis of molecular weight or by causing these larger molecular weight proteins to precipitate out of solution (e.g., in cold ethyl alcohol), then removing the precipitate 21 from water soluble fraction 20 (e.g., by filtration) to provide a substantially antibody-free, transfer factor-containingsolution 22. Alternatively, theyolks 16 andwhites 18 need not be separated. - In addition, antigen-specific non-mammalian transfer factor present in water
soluble fraction 20 ofyolks 16 or in or insolution 22 may be substantially purified from other constituents of watersoluble fraction 20 orsolution 22 by known techniques, such as by use of the gel permeation and affinity chromatography techniques disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,840,700 and 5,470,835, both of which issued to Kirkpatrick et al. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Kirkpatrick Patents”), the disclosures of both of which are hereby incorporated by this reference in their entireties. The technique disclosed in the Kirkpatrick Patents is used to isolate biomolecules, such as transfer factor and antibodies, from the other constituents of a solution on the basis of the specificity of these biomolecules for one or more antigens or other specific binding agents. Thus, when the technique disclosed in the Kirkpatrick Patents is used on the antibody- and transfer factor-containing watersoluble fraction 20 ofegg yolk 16, both transfer factor and antibody may be isolated from the remainder of watersoluble fraction 20 with the resultingsolution 24 including both antibody and transfer factor. If, on the other hand, the technique disclosed in the Kirkpatrick Patents is conducted on a substantially antibody-free, transfer factor-containingsolution 22, the product will be a substantiallypure solution 26 of transfer factor specific for one or more antigens. Of course, other methods for obtaining transfer factor from eggs are also within the scope of the present invention, including methods for obtaining transfer factor from various egg preparations, including powdered or freeze-dried whole eggs or egg yolks. - Referring now to
FIG. 4 , an exemplary method for testing for the presence of non-mammalian transfer factor specific for one or more antigens in a solution, known as a mouse footpad assay, is schematically depicted. - About seven (7) days prior to testing the effectiveness of avian transfer factor in causing mice to elicit a secondary immune response to a particular antigen or pathogen for which the avian transfer factor was specific, a positive control population of six female BALB/c mice is prepared. Each
mouse 30 of the positive control population, having ages of about nine (9) weeks to about ten (10) weeks, is anesthetized with isoflurane. About 0.02 ml of a 50/50 (wt/wt) mixture of Freund's adjuvant and theparticular antigen 36 against which the avian transfer factor to be tested is specific is administered to eachmouse 30 by way of two intramuscular injections, one injection at each side of thebase 39 of thetail 38. As these injections are conducted about seven (7) days prior to conducting the mouse footpad assay, the mice of the positive control population are permitted to generate their own secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity response toantigen 36. - About twenty-four (24) hours prior to the mouse footpad test, the mice of a first test population, which also includes six female BALB/c mice that are about nine (9) to about ten (10) weeks old (i.e., about the same age as the mice of the positive control population), are also anesthetized with isoflurane. About 0.5 ml of a
solution neck 40 of eachmouse 30 of the first test population. By comparing the results obtained from these mice with the results obtained from mice of a second test population that had been treated with a substantially antibody-free preparation, the relative contributions of transfer factor and antibody to the swelling could be determined. As antibodies do not elicit a secondary immune response, it was believed prior to conducting the experiments described herein that the measure of the secondary immune response in the first and second test populations of mice would be very similar. - Each mouse of the second test population that includes six female BALB/c mice, having ages of about nine (9) to about ten (10) weeks old (i.e., about the same age as the mice of the positive control and first test populations), are also anesthetized with isoflurane. Each of the six
mice 30 is given, by subcutaneous injection in the back of theneck 40, about 0.5 ml of asolution - A negative control population also includes six female BALB/c mice of about nine (9) to about ten (10) weeks in age (i.e., about the same ages as the other three populations of mice).
- In order to conduct the mouse footpad assay, the mice of each of the four populations are anesthetized and the distances across each of the largest
right hind footpad 32 and the largestleft hind footpad 34 of eachmouse 30 are measured, such as with a Starrett gauge.Right hind footpad 32 is then subcutaneously injected with an antigen 36-containing solution.Left hind footpad 34, which is used as a control, is injected with about the same volume of acontrol solution 37, such as a sterile saline diluent, as the volume of solution that is injected intoright hind footpad 32. - After a sufficient amount of time (e.g., about sixteen (16) to about twenty-four (24) hours) has elapsed, each
mouse 30 is again anesthetized and the distances across right and lefthind footpads right hind footpad 32 ofmouse 30, is indicative of the occurrence of a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in thatfootpad 32. - Of course,
different solutions mice 30. If significant swelling occurs in theright hind footpads 34 ofmice 30 to which a substantially antibody-free solution, such assolution 22 orsolution 26 ofFIG. 3 , was administered, the delayed-type hypersensitivity that causes such swelling is attributed to the administered transfer factor. - The following examples are merely illustrative of embodiments of methods for generating, obtaining, and using transfer factor that incorporate teachings of the present invention:
- Transfer factor specific for Newcastle Virus was generated by exposing day-old chicks to a coarse spray of infectious bronchitis/Newcastle virus (IBNC) vaccine, as known in the art, at zero (0) days, forty-two (42) days, and eighty-four (84) days. Eggs laid by these five hens at about one-hundred seventy-five (175) days following the first IBNC vaccine injection were collected.
- The yolks from a first sampling of the antigen specific transfer factor-containing eggs generated in EXAMPLE 1 were separated from the whites, diluted about six (6) to about nine (9) times, by volume, in deionized water (i.e., about one (1) part egg white mixed with about five (5) parts water to about eight (8) parts water) and frozen. The lipid layer from these frozen egg yolks was mechanically separated from the water-soluble fraction of the egg yolks. This water-soluble fraction was then permitted to thaw to a temperature of about 4° C. to about 6° C. and vacuum filtered by use of Whatman qualitative filter paper using a 55 mm diameter porcelain Büchner funnel. The filtrate was then vacuum filtered through a glass microfiber filter, again using a 55 mm diameter Büchner funnel.
- A third filtration was then conducted to collect proteins and to remove lipids and lipoproteins from the solution. The third filtration was effected by way of a DURAPORE hydrophilic membrane. The protein-containing fraction, which included both transfer factor and antibody specific for the infectious bronchitis pathogen and Newcastle Virus was collected, frozen, and lyophilized, or freeze-dried, as known in the art.
- The water-soluble fractions of diluted yolk preparations from a second sampling of the eggs collected in EXAMPLE 1 were again mechanically separated from the lipid portions thereof and filtered, as explained previously herein in EXAMPLE 2.
- In accordance with the method disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,180,627, which issued to Klesius et al., the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by this reference in its entirety, an adequate volume of ethyl alcohol (EtOH), or ethanol, was added to the protein-containing fraction to dilute the ethyl alcohol to a concentration of about 60% of the total volume of the alcohol-protein fraction solution. This solution was then cooled to a temperature of about 4 to about 6° C. for a long enough period of time (e.g., overnight, or for about 10-12 hours) for larger molecular weight proteins, including antibodies, present in the solution to precipitate from the solution. Smaller molecular weight proteins (e.g., proteins having molecular weights of about 8,000 D or less), including any transfer factor from the egg yolks, remained in solution.
- The larger molecular weight protein-containing precipitate was then removed from the solution by filtering the solution through a Whatman glass microfiber filter in a 55 mm diameter Büchner funnel. CELITE®, a diatomite, or diatomaceous earth, filtration aid available from Celite Corporation of Lompoc, Calif., was used to prevent the precipitate from clogging the filter during filtration of the solution. This substantially precipitate-free solution was then collected, frozen, and lyophilized, as known in the art.
- Each mouse of a test population that included three BALB/c mice, each having an age in the range of about nine (9) to about ten (10) weeks, was tested to determine whether the IBNV-specific avian transfer factor would impart an early secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune response to the mice. Each mouse was anesthetized with isoflurane. The distances across the largest footpads of both the left and right hind feet of each mouse were then measured with a Starrett gauge. Each mouse was then given a subcutaneous injection in the back of the neck of about 0.5 ml of a solution that included about 16%, by weight, of the IBNV-specific avian transfer factor reconstituted in distilled water.
- After about twenty-four (24) hours, each of the mice was again anesthetized with isoflurane. About 0.01 ml of a sterile saline diluent was then injected into the largest footpad of the left hind foot of each mouse, which footpad served as a control, while the largest footpad of the right hind foot of each mouse was injected with about 0.01 ml of a solution including about 10,000 doses of Newcastle-Bronchitis vaccine reconstituted in about 250 ml of distilled water.
- Before another twenty-four (24) hours had elapsed, one of the mice (Mouse #1) died. The two remaining mice were again anesthetized with isoflurane and the largest footpads on their hind feet were again measured. The results follow:
-
TABLE 1 Newcastle Virus-Test Population Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2150 Right Foot (Test) 2151 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2180 2350 50 Right Foot (Test) 2165 2440 85 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2145 2160 15 Right Foot (Test) 2110 2200 90 - The greater increase in size, or swelling, of the right footpad (increases of 85 μm and 90 μm) over that of the left footpad (increases of 50 μm and 15 μm, respectively) indicates that the IBNV-specific avian transfer factor-containing solution induced a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in the right feet of Mouse #2 and Mouse #3 within about twenty-four hours following the introduction of the Newcastle-Bronchitis vaccine.
- In the remaining examples, substantially the same methods as those disclosed in EXAMPLES 1-3 were used to generate avian transfer factors specific for different types of antigens, including measles, mumps, rubella, Hepatitis B, Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), and H. pylori.
- The effectiveness of each of these various types of antigen-specific avian transfer factors in inducing early secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune responses in mammals was then tested by way of mouse footpad assays. Each type of antigen-specific avian transfer factor was tested using four different populations of mice, including a positive control population, a first test population, a second test population, and a negative control population, which were prepared as described previously herein with reference to
FIG. 4 . The mouse footpad assay for each type of antigen-specific transfer factor was conducted in accordance with the teachings of Petersen E A, Greenberg L E, Manzara T, and Kirkpatrick C H, “Murine transfer factor,” I. Description of the model and evidence for specificity, J. Immunol., 126: 2480-84 (1981), the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by this reference in its entirety. - In each mouse footpad assay, four populations of mice were prepared in the manner described in reference to
FIG. 4 . - In conducting the various mouse footpad assays on each of a positive control, a first and a second test, and a negative control populations, each mouse was anesthetized with isofluorane, the largest footpad of the left hind footpad of each mouse, which served as a control, was injected with about 0.01 ml of sterile saline diluent, and the largest footpad of the right hind foot of each mouse was injected with about 0.01 ml of a solution including the antigen or pathogen for which the avian transfer factor was specific.
- About sixteen (16) to about twenty-four (24) hours following the hind footpad injections, each of the mice of the positive control, test, and negative control populations was again anesthetized with isoflurane and the sizes of the left and right hind footpads of each of the mice were again measured, for example, with a Starrett Gauge.
- Using the same procedures described in EXAMPLES 1-3, avian transfer factor and avian antibodies specific for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine were generated in hens. Each hen received one dose of Merck MMR II vaccine, as described in EXAMPLE 1, at 150 days, 163 days, 190 days, 221 days, and 249 days. Eggs were collected from these hens just after the third innoculation—sometime in the period of about day 192 to about day 223 and prepared as described in EXAMPLE 1. This was done in this EXAMPLE and in the following EXAMPLES to ensure that a high level of transfer factor was present in the eggs. It is believed that transfer factor will be present in eggs about seven (7) days following the first innoculation.
- A positive control population of mice was prepared about seven (7) days prior to the beginning of the mouse footpad assay by injecting each mouse of the positive control population with Merck MMR II vaccine, as described previously herein in reference to
FIG. 4 . - A solution containing both avian antibody and avian transfer factor specific for MMR vaccine was made by reconstituting in distilled water a lyophylized preparation similar to that described in EXAMPLE 2 to a concentration of about 8%, by weight. This transfer factor- and antibody-containing solution was administered to the first test population of mice in the manner described in reference to
FIG. 4 . - Lyophilized avian transfer factor specific for measles, mumps, and rubella, prepared by a method similar to that described in EXAMPLE 3, was reconstituted in distilled water to a concentration of about 8%, by weight. This reconstituted MMR-specific avian transfer factor was then administered to a second test population of mice in the manner described previously herein in reference to
FIG. 4 . - About 0.1 ml of a dose of Merck MMR II Vaccine was then administered to the largest footpad of the right hind foot of each mouse of each of positive control, first test, second test, and negative control populations, while substantially the same amount of sterile saline diluent was administered to the largest footpad of the left hind foot of each mouse, as described in reference to
FIG. 4 . - About sixteen (16) to about twenty-four (24) hours later, the mice were again anesthetized and the sizes of the largest footpads of both hind feet of each mouse measured, as previously described. The results follow:
-
TABLE 2 MMR Vaccine - First Test Population (Antibody and Transfer Factor Administered) Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2159.00 2235.20 76.20 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2387.60 254.00 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2159.00 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2184.40 50.80 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2159.00 2159.00 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2159.00 2184.40 25.40 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 2209.80 2235.20 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2286.00 2311.40 25.40 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 2184.40 2184.40 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2209.80 2260.60 50.80 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 2260.60 2336.80 76.20 Right Foot (Test) 2235.20 2438.40 203.20 - The data for Mouse #6 may have been inaccurate since the scabs from bite marks were present on one or both hind footpads of this mouse at the time the second measurements were taken (i.e., at about sixteen (16) to about twenty-four (24) hours). Nonetheless, with the exception of Mouse #4, each of the remaining mice of the first test population exhibited greater swelling at the time the second footpad measurements were taken in the footpads that were injected with the MMR II vaccine than in the footpads that were injected with the control solution. In Mouse #4, the amount of swelling was about the same in both the left and right footpads.
- Overall, as can be seen from the data of TABLE 2, the largest footpads of the right feet of the first test population of mice represented exhibited an average of about 67.73 μm more swelling than the amount of swelling of the largest footpad of the left feet of these mice.
-
TABLE 3 MMR Vaccine-Second Test Population (Only Transfer Factor Administered) Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2082.80 2133.60 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 2108.20 2235.20 127.00 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2336.80 2387.60 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 2387.60 2641.60 254.00 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2184.40 2184.40 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2184.40 2311.40 127.00 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 2082.80 2540.00 457.20 Right Foot (Test) 2108.20 2235.20 127.00 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 2260.60 2286.00 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2286.00 2362.20 76.20 - As scabs from bite marks were visible on the footpads of Mouse #2 and Mouse #5 at about twenty-four hours following the injection of antigen and sample, the data form these mice may have been inaccurate. In addition, the largest footpad on the left foot of Mouse #5 was swollen more than three times as much as the corresponding footpad on the left foot of Mouse #5 and several times more than the swelling that occurred in any of the footpads of the other tested mice. Accordingly, the swelling data obtained from Mouse #5 were also omitted as this swelling in the footpad of the left foot was excessive. No increase in swelling in either footpad was measured in Mouse #4. Nonetheless, each of Mouse #1, Mouse #3, and Mouse #6 exhibited greater swelling in the (right) footpad that was injected with the second, substantially antibody-free, transfer factor-containing solution than in the (left) footpad that was injected with the control solution.
- Based on the data presented in TABLE 3, on average, the largest footpads on the right feet of Mice ##1, 3, and 6 were swollen about 91.4 μm more than the largest footpads on the left feet of these mice.
-
TABLE 4 MMR Vaccine-Positive Control Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2184.40 2235.20 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 2184.40 2260.60 76.20 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2184.40 2209.80 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2184.40 2209.80 25.40 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2006.60 2133.60 127.00 Right Foot (Test) 1981.20 2108.20 127.00 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2184.40 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2260.60 127.00 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 2108.20 2133.60 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2108.20 2286.00 177.80 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 2082.80 2133.60 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 2057.40 2209.80 152.40 - While Mouse #2 and Mouse #3 of the positive control population both exhibited substantially the same amount of swelling in the largest footpads of both the left and right hind feet, each of the other mice had a greater amount of swelling in the largest footpads of their right hind feet and, thus, displayed a secondary immune response to the MMR vaccine that was introduced into the largest footpads of their right hind feet, than the amount of swelling in the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice, which were much less swollen.
- Based on the data in TABLE 4, it is apparent that the average amount of swelling in the largest footpads of the right hind feet of these mice was about 59.27 μm greater than the swelling of the largest footpads on the left hind feet of these mice.
-
TABLE 5 MMR Vaccine-Negative Control Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2159.00 2159.00 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2159.00 2209.80 50.80 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2159.00 2159.00 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2108.20 2133.60 25.40 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 2108.20 2133.60 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2108.20 2108.20 0.00 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 2057.40 2057.40 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2032.00 2032.00 0.00 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 2082.80 2133.60 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 2032.00 2082.80 50.80 - Two of the mice, Mouse #3 and Mouse #5, of the negative control population exhibited no swelling in the largest footpad of either hind foot. The largest footpads on both hind feet of Mouse #6 were swollen by about the same amount. While the largest footpads on the left hind feet of Mouse #1 and Mouse #4 were not swollen and the footpads on the right hind feet of these two mice were slightly swollen, the largest footpad on the right hind foot of Mouse #4 was not swollen and the largest left hind footpad was only slightly swollen. In fact, the average amount of swelling in the largest footpads of the right hind feet of these mice was only about 8.47 μm greater than the amount of swelling measured in the largest footpads of the left hind feet of the negative control population of mice. Consequently, the data in TABLE 5 indicate that the mice of the negative control population did not elicit a secondary immune response to the MMR vaccine.
- Collectively, the data of TABLES 2-5 indicate that a secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune response occurred in the majority of mice in each of the first test population, the second test population, and the positive control population, while no such secondary immune response appeared to be present in the negative control population. Accordingly, the data in TABLES 2 and 3 indicate that avian transfer factor specific for MMR vaccine, as well as avian antibody specific for MMR vaccine, are capable of inducing an early secondary immune response in mammals.
- Repeating the procedures described previously herein in EXAMPLES 1-3, avian transfer factor and avian antibodies specific for the Hepatitis B virus were generated by use of a synthetic Hepatitis B antigen vaccine sold under the tradename ENGERIX-B. Each hen received one dose of the Hepatitis B vaccine, as described in EXAMPLE 1, at 150 days, 163 days, 190 days, 221 days, and 249 days. Eggs were collected from these hens sometime in the period of about day 193 and about day 223, as described in EXAMPLE 1 above, and prepared as described in EXAMPLE 1.
- A positive control population of mice was prepared about seven (7) days prior to conducting the mouse footpad assay by injecting each mouse of the positive control population with the synthetic Hepatitis B vaccine, ENGERIX-B in the manner described in reference to
FIG. 4 . - A first solution, which included both avian antibody and avian transfer factor that were specific for Hepatitis B vaccine, was made by reconstituting in distilled water a lyophilized preparation similar to that described in EXAMPLE 2 to a concentration of about 16%, by weight. This transfer factor- and antibody-containing solution was administered to a first test population of mice in the manner described in reference to
FIG. 4 . - In addition, lyophilized avian transfer factor specific for Hepatitis B vaccine, which was prepared in a similar manner to that described in EXAMPLE 3, was reconstituted in distilled water to a concentration of about 16%, by weight. The reconstituted transfer factor-containing solution was then administered to each of the mice of a second test population, as explained previously herein in reference to
FIG. 4 . - At the appropriate time, the synthetic Hepatitis B vaccine was administered to the largest footpad of the right foot of each mouse of each of the positive control, first test, second test, and negative control populations, as described previously herein in reference to
FIG. 4 . The largest footpad of the left foot of each mouse of the four populations was substantially concurrently injected with the same amount of sterile saline diluent, also as described previously herein. - About sixteen (16) to about twenty-four (24) hours later, each of the mice of the four populations was again anesthetized and the sizes of the largest footpads of both hind feet of each mouse were again measured, as described previously herein. The results follow:
-
TABLE 6 Hepatitis B Vaccine - First Test Population (Antibody and Transfer Factor Administered) Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2032.00 2108.20 76.20 Right Foot (Test) 2032.00 2082.80 50.80 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2260.60 2362.20 101.60 Right Foot (Test) 2209.80 2336.80 127.00 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2159.00 2184.40 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2159.00 2235.20 76.20 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 2108.20 2184.40 76.20 Right Foot (Test) 2108.20 2260.60 152.40 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 1930.40 2032.00 101.60 Right Foot (Test) 1930.40 2108.20 177.80 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 2184.40 2184.40 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2184.40 2235.20 50.80 - Each of the mice of the first test population, with the exception of Mouse #1, exhibited greater swelling in the largest footpad of the right hind foot. On average, the largest footpads of the right hind feet of the mice of the first test population were about 42.17 μm more swollen than the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice. Thus, the data of TABLE 6 indicate that the avian transfer factor in the preparation that included transfer factor and antibody specific for the synthetic Hepatitis B vaccine induced an early secondary immune response in each of these mice.
-
TABLE 7 Hepatitis B Vaccine - Second Test Population (Only Transfer Factor Administered) Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 1981.20 2032.00 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 2006.60 2159.00 152.40 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 1981.20 1981.20 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 1981.20 2006.60 25.40 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2006.60 2032.00 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2032.00 2082.80 50.80 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 1955.80 2133.60 177.80 Right Foot (Test) 1981.20 2108.20 127.00 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 1930.40 2006.60 76.20 Right Foot (Test) 1930.40 2057.40 127.00 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 2032.00 2057.40 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2006.60 2108.20 101.60 - On average the largest footpads on the right hind feet of the second test population of mice were about 38.10 μm more swollen than the largest footpads on the left hind feet of these mice. With the exception of Mouse #4, the data of TABLE 7 illustrate that the administration of avian transfer factor specific for Hepatitis B vaccine induced an early secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune response in the largest footpad of the right hind foot of each mouse.
-
TABLE 8 Hepatitis B Vaccine - Positive Control Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2108.20 2133.60 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2108.20 2159.00 50.80 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2032.00 2082.80 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 2006.60 2108.20 101.60 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 1854.20 1930.40 76.20 Right Foot (Test) 1879.60 2032.00 152.40 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 2006.60 2108.20 101.60 Right Foot (Test) 2057.40 2209.80 152.40 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2159.00 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2159.00 25.40 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 2006.60 2133.60 127.00 Right Foot (Test) 2006.60 2184.40 177.80 - In the positive control population of mice, only Mouse #5 failed to elicit a secondary immune response to the synthetic Hepatitis B vaccine. The largest footpads on the right hind feet of each of the other mice of the positive control population exhibited an average of about 42.33 μm increased swelling over that of the largest footpads on the left hind feet of these mice.
-
TABLE 9 Hepatitis B Vaccine - Negative Control Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2159.00 2159.00 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2057.40 2057.40 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2082.80 2082.80 0.00 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2006.60 2032.00 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 1955.80 2032.00 72.60 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 2057.40 2082.80 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2057.40 2108.20 50.80 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2159.00 25.40 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 2082.80 2133.60 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 2082.80 2133.60 50.80 - Three mice of the negative control population exhibited substantially the same amount of swelling in the largest footpads of both the left and right hind feet. Of the remaining three mice, only mouse #3 exhibited a significantly greater amount of swelling in the largest food pad of her right hind foot than in her left hind foot. On average, the difference in swelling between the largest footpads on the right and left hind feet of the mice of the negative control population was only about 16.33 μm.
- Collectively, the data presented in TABLES 6-9 indicate the result of EXAMPLE 6 to be that both avian antibody and avian transfer factor specific for synthetic Hepatitis B vaccine cause mammals to elicit an early secondary immune response to the antigen of the synthetic Hepatitis B vaccine, which is also presented by the Hepatitis B virus.
- Again employing substantially the same procedures outlined above in EXAMPLES 1-3, avian transfer factor and avian antibody specific for the H. pylori bacteria were generated in hens. Each of the hens was infected with the H. pylori EIA antigen, in a manner similar to that described in EXAMPLE 1, at day 150, day 163, day 190, day 221, and day 249. Eggs were collected from these hens during the period of about day 193 to about day 223, as described in EXAMPLE 1, and prepared, as described in EXAMPLE 1.
- As in the previous EXAMPLES, a positive control population of mice was prepared about seven (7) days prior to conducting the mouse footpad assay by injecting each of the mice of the positive control population with the recombinant, or synthetic, H. pylori EIA antigen, as described in reference to
FIG. 4 . - A solution including both avian antibody and avian transfer factor specific for the H. pylori EIA antigen was made by reconstituting in distilled water a lyophilized preparation including such avian antibody and avian transfer factor, similar to the preparation described above in EXAMPLE 2, to a concentration of about 16%, by weight. This solution was administered to a first test population of mice, as described previously herein in reference to
FIG. 4 . - A substantially antibody-free solution including avian transfer factor specific for H. pylori was prepared by reconstituting a lyophilized preparation, obtained in a manner similar to that described in EXAMPLE 3, in distilled water to a concentration of about 16%, by weight. This substantially antibody-free avian transfer factor-containing solution was then administered to each of the mice of a second test population, as described previously herein in reference to
FIG. 4 . - The largest footpad of the right foot of each mouse of each of the positive control, first test, second test, and negative control populations, was infected with H. pylori EIA antigen, while the same amount of sterile saline diluent was administered to the largest footpad of the left foot of each of these mice in the manner detailed previously herein in reference to
FIG. 4 . - At the appropriate time, about sixteen (16) to about twenty-four (24) hours following the infection of the largest footpads of the right feet of the mice with H. pylori, the mice were again anesthetized and the sizes of the largest footpads of both hind feet of each mouse was measured, as described previously herein. The results follow:
-
TABLE 10 H. Pylori - First Test Population (Antibody and Transfer Factor Administered) Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 1955.80 1981.20 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 1930.40 1955.80 25.40 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2108.20 2260.60 152.40 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2082.80 2082.80 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2108.20 2133.60 25.40 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 2082.80 2184.40 101.60 Right Foot (Test) 2082.80 2286.00 203.20 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 2108.20 2133.60 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 1955.80 2032.00 76.20 Right Foot (Test) 1930.40 2108.20 177.80 - The data of TABLE 10 and, particularly those of Mouse #2, Mouse #4, and Mouse #6, indicate that administration of the solution containing both avian antibody and avian transfer factor specific for H. pylori induced an early secondary immune response in the mice of the first test population. While Mouse #1 exhibited substantially equal amounts of swelling in the largest footpads of both her left and right hind feet, Mouse #3 exhibited slightly greater swelling in the largest footpad of her right hind foot than in that of her left hind foot and Mouse #5 exhibited a slightly greater amount of swelling in the largest footpad of her left hind foot than in the largest footpad of her right hind foot. On average, the largest footpads of the right hind feet of the mice of the first test population were about 59.27 μm more swollen than the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice.
-
TABLE 11 H. Pylori - Second Test Population (Only Transfer Factor Administered) Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2235.20 2235.20 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2184.40 2209.80 25.40 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2006.60 2006.60 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2006.60 2032.00 25.40 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2082.80 2184.40 101.60 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2209.80 76.20 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2159.00 25.40 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 2159.00 2184.40 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2159.00 2235.20 76.20 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 2057.40 2082.80 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2032.00 2260.60 228.60 - The results shown in TABLE 11 were similar to those in TABLE 10. Two of the mice, Mouse #5 and Mouse #6, exhibited much more swelling in the largest footpads of their right hind feet than in the largest footpads of their left hind feet. While the amount of swelling in the largest footpads of the right hind feet of Mouse #1, Mouse #2, and Mouse #4 was greater than that of the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice, the difference was only slight. Mouse #3 actually exhibited a slightly greater amount of swelling in the largest footpad of her left hind foot than in the largest footpad of her right hind foot. Nonetheless, as the average swelling in the largest footpads of the right hind feet of these mice is, on average, about 50.80 μm greater than that of the largest footpads on the left hind feet of these mice, the data of TABLE 11 indicate that avian transfer factor specific for H. pylori caused the increased swelling.
-
TABLE 12 H. Pylori - Positive Control Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2108.20 2184.40 76.20 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2209.80 76.20 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2032.00 2108.20 76.20 Right Foot (Test) 2082.80 2209.80 127.00 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 1981.20 2082.80 101.60 Right Foot (Test) 1879.60 2133.60 254.00 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2159.00 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2184.40 2336.80 152.40 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2082.80 2260.60 177.80 - Each of the mice of the positive control population in EXAMPLE 7 elicited at delayed-type hypersensitivity immune response to H. pylori, as indicated by the significant differences in the amount of swelling in the largest footpads of the right hind feet of these mice relative to that in the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice. On average, the difference in swelling was about 110.07 μm.
-
TABLE 13 H. Pylori - Negative Control Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2006.60 2082.80 76.20 Right Foot (Test) 2514.60 2514.60 0.00 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2032.00 2082.80 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 2032.00 2133.60 101.60 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2082.80 2108.20 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2082.80 2108.20 25.40 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 2006.60 2032.00 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 1955.80 2032.00 76.20 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 1930.40 1981.20 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 1955.80 2006.60 50.80 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2159.00 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2159.00 25.40 - As indicated by the data of TABLE 13, the amount of swelling in the largest footpads of both the left and right hind feet of Mouse #3, Mouse #5, and Mouse #6, were substantially the same. While the amount of swelling in the largest footpad of the right hind foot of Mouse #2 was greater than the amount of swelling in the largest footpad of the left hind foot of that mouse, the largest footpad of the left hind foot of Mouse #1 was significantly more swollen than the largest footpad of the right hind foot of Mouse #1. The largest footpad of the right hind foot of Mouse #4 was only slightly more swollen than the largest footpad of the left hind foot of Mouse #4. The average difference in swelling of the largest footpads of the right and left hind feet of the mice of the negative control population was only about 4.23 μm.
- The data of TABLES 10-13 indicate that avian transfer factor specific for H. pylori facilitates an early secondary immune response in mammals.
- Again, employing substantially the same procedures described previously herein in EXAMPLES 1-3, avian transfer factor and avian antibody specific for the EBNA-1 antigen, a recombinant nuclear antigen of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), were generated in hens. Each hen received one dose of EBNA-1, such as described in EXAMPLE 1, at 150 days, 163 days, 190 days, and 249 days. Eggs were collected from these hens during the period of about day 193 to about day 223, as described above in EXAMPLE 1, and prepared as described above in EXAMPLE 1.
- A solution with both avian antibody and avian transfer factor specific for EBNA-1 was formed by reconstituting in distilled water a lyophilized preparation similar to that described in EXAMPLE 2. The lyophilized preparation including both avian antibody and avian transfer factor specific for EBNA-1 antigen was diluted to a concentration of about 16%, by weight. This solution was then administered to a first test population of mice in the manner described in reference to
FIG. 4 . - In addition, a solution containing avian transfer factor specific for EBNA-1, with substantially no avian antibody specific for EBNA-1, was also reconstituted in distilled water to a concentration of about 16%, by weight. This solution was administered to the mice of a second test population in the manner described previously herein in reference to
FIG. 4 . - A positive control population of mice was prepared by injecting mice with EBNA-1 about seven (7) days before conducting the mouse footpad assay.
- Recombinant EBNA-1 antigen was then administered to the largest footpad of the right hind foot of each mouse of each of four populations, including a first test population, a second test population, a positive control population, and a negative control population. Substantially the same amount of sterile saline diluent was administered to the largest footpad of the left hind foot of each mouse. The method of administration was conducted in the same manner as that described previously herein.
- About sixteen (16) to about twenty-four (24) hours later, the mice were again anesthetized and the sizes of the largest footpads of both hind feet of each mouse measured, as previously described. The results follow:
-
TABLE 14 EBV EBNA-1 - First Test Population (Antibody and Transfer Factor Administered) Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2032.00 2057.40 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2032.00 2057.40 25.40 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2159.00 2159.00 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2159.00 2184.40 25.40 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2159.00 2159.00 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2286.00 152.40 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 2108.20 2108.20 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2108.20 2209.80 101.60 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 2108.20 2235.20 127.00 Right Foot (Test) 2082.80 2260.60 177.80 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 1981.20 2032.00 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 1981.20 2032.00 50.80 - In TABLE 14, it is seen that three of the mice exhibited significantly greater swelling in the largest footpads of their right hind feet than in the largest footpads of their left hind feet. While Mouse #2 also had a greater amount of swelling in the largest footpad of her right hind foot than that in the largest footpad of her left hind foot, the difference was only slight. Two of the mice, Mouse #1 and Mouse #6, had substantially the same amount of swelling in the largest footpads of both their left and right hind feet. Nonetheless, as the amount of swelling in the largest footpads of the right hind feet of the mice of the first test population exceeded that of the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice by an average of about 55.03 μm, the data presented in TABLE 14 tend to show that the avian transfer factor in the solution containing both avian antibody and transfer factor specific for EBNA-1 caused the mice of the first test population to elicit an early secondary immune response to the recombinant EBNA-1. As is known in the art, antibodies are passive with respect to secondary immune responses and typically contribute very little to swelling.
-
TABLE 15 EBV EBNA-1 - Second Test Population (Only Transfer Factor Administered) Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2159.00 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2108.20 2159.00 50.80 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2006.60 2032.00 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 1955.80 1955.80 0.00 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2032.00 2133.60 101.60 Right Foot (Test) 2006.60 2159.00 152.40 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 2108.20 2133.60 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2159.00 2159.00 0.00 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 2184.40 2209.80 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2159.00 2260.60 101.60 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 2057.40 2108.20 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 2082.80 2133.60 50.80 - The mice of the second test population, which were treated with the avian transfer factor-containing solution also exhibited an early secondary immune response to recombinant EBNA-1. This result was particularly evident in Mouse #3 and Mouse #5, which exhibited significantly greater swelling in the largest footpads of their right hind feet than that measured in the largest footpads of their left hind feet. While the amount of swelling in the largest footpad of the right hind foot of Mouse #1 was also greater than the amount of swelling in the largest footpad of the left hind foot of Mouse #1, the difference appears to be slight. Moreover, while Mouse #2 and Mouse #4 displayed a greater amount of swelling in the largest footpads of their left hind feet, the amounts of swelling measured therein were only slightly greater than that measured in the largest footpads of the right hind feet of these mice. On average, the largest footpads of the right hand feet of these mice was about 16.93 μm greater than that measured in the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice.
- It is believed that transfer factor specific for EBNA-1 may have become unstable when isolated from the corresponding antibody, resulting in the lower measured secondary immune response in the second test population relative to the overall secondary immune response measured in the first test population of mice.
-
TABLE 16 EBV EBNA-1 - Positive Control Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2209.80 2209.80 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2235.20 2286.00 50.80 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2184.40 2184.40 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2209.80 2260.60 50.80 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2159.00 2159.00 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2209.80 76.20 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 2159.00 2336.80 177.80 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2362.20 228.60 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2082.80 2260.60 177.80 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 2082.80 2082.80 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2057.40 2209.80 152.40 - As indicated by the greater amounts of swelling in the largest footpads of the right hind feet of each mouse of the positive control population than that of the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice, all six of the mice of the positive control population exhibited a delayed-type hypersensitivity immune response to the recombinant EBNA-1 antigen. The measured amount of swelling in the largest footpads of the right hind feet of each of these mice was, on average, about 93.13 μm greater than the measured amount of swelling in the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice.
-
TABLE 17 EBV EBNA-1 - Negative Control Footpad size (μm): Before Sample Injection Final (0 hrs.) (24 hrs.) Difference Mouse #1 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2184.40 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 2082.80 2133.60 50.80 Mouse #2 Left Foot (Control) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2159.00 2184.40 25.40 Mouse #3 Left Foot (Control) 2108.20 2108.20 0.00 Right Foot (Test) 2133.60 2133.60 0.00 Mouse #4 Left Foot (Control) 2082.80 2133.60 50.80 Right Foot (Test) 2159.00 2159.00 0.00 Mouse #5 Left Foot (Control) 2057.40 2082.80 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 1955.80 1981.20 25.40 Mouse #6 Left Foot (Control) 2108.20 2133.60 25.40 Right Foot (Test) 2108.20 2133.60 25.40 - In the negative control population, only two of the mice, Mouse #2 and Mouse #4, exhibited different amounts of swelling in the largest footpads of their hind feet. While the amount of swelling in the largest footpad of the right hind foot of Mouse #2 was greater than that exhibited in the largest footpad of the left hind foot, the largest footpad of the left hind foot of Mouse #4 was more swollen than the largest footpad of the right hind foot of Mouse #4. In fact, on average, the largest footpads of the right hind feet of the mice of the negative control population were about 4.23 μm less swollen than the largest footpads of the left hind feet of these mice.
- Again, the data of TABLES 14-17 illustrate that avian transfer factor specific for EBNA-1 cause mammals to elicit an early secondary immune response (i.e., within about twenty-four (24) hours as compared to the typical seven (7) to fourteen (14) day time period it takes a mammal to elicit a secondary immune response on its own) to EBNA-1 and viruses and other pathogens that present this antigen.
- The foregoing EXAMPLES illustrate that, by way of contrast with the seven (7) to fourteen (14) day time period that it typically takes a mammalian host to elicit a secondary immune response to a pathogen or antigenic agent on its own, when an avian transfer factor incorporating teachings of the present invention has been administered, the mammalian host may elicit a secondary immune response within about twenty-four (24) hours.
- The similarities of the differences between the measurements taken at the test and control footpads of each mouse in first and second test groups of each assay indicate that the secondary, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune response, was elicited primarily by the transfer factor, not the antibody, which is passive with respect to secondary immune responses and which typically contributes very little to swelling.
- It is apparent from EXAMPLES 1-8 and the data generated thereby that avian transfer factor has the ability to generate an early secondary immune response in mammals. As one of skill in the art would readily recognize, avian transfer factor would also generate an early secondary immune response in various types of birds, as well as in reptiles, amphibians, and other non-mammalian species of animals.
- As avian transfer factor initiates an early delayed-type hypersensitivity immune reaction in mice, it is reasonable for those of ordinary skill in the art to assume that transfer factor has the same effect in other mammals, including humans.
- Although transfer factor was administered to mice in the preceding EXAMPLES by way of injection, it is also within the scope of the present invention to administer avian transfer factor to mammals by other routes. For example, avian transfer factor could be administered orally, by parenteral injection, or by parenteral methods other than injection, such as transdermally, or through the skin, by aerosol via the lungs, or by other methods known in the art. Oral administration of avian transfer factor to mammals is supported by the fact that mammalian mothers supply transfer factor to their newborn children by way of colostrum, which the newborns ingest orally. Transfer factor survives the conditions of both the stomach and the small intestine, where transfer factor is absorbed into the bloodstream of the mammalian newborn. Thus, transfer factor is known to survive the intestinal tracts of mammals. The ability of transfer factor to withstand the conditions of the digestive tracts of mammals was demonstrated in Kirkpatrick C H, “Activities and characteristics of transfer factors,” Biotherapy, 9: 13-16 (1996), the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by this reference in its entirety.
- Although the foregoing description contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention, but merely as providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments. Similarly, other embodiments of the invention may be devised which do not depart from the spirit or scope of the present invention. Features from different embodiments may be employed in combination. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated and limited only by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the foregoing description. All additions, deletions and modifications to the invention as disclosed herein which fall within the meaning and scope of the claims are to be embraced thereby.
Claims (24)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/081,799 US20130309268A1 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2002-02-22 | Compositions including transfer factor derived from eggs |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/667,147 US6468534B1 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2000-09-21 | Methods for obtaining transfer factor from avian sources, compositions including avian-generated transfer factor, and methods of use |
US10/081,799 US20130309268A1 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2002-02-22 | Compositions including transfer factor derived from eggs |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/667,147 Division US6468534B1 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2000-09-21 | Methods for obtaining transfer factor from avian sources, compositions including avian-generated transfer factor, and methods of use |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20130309268A1 true US20130309268A1 (en) | 2013-11-21 |
Family
ID=24676991
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/667,147 Expired - Lifetime US6468534B1 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2000-09-21 | Methods for obtaining transfer factor from avian sources, compositions including avian-generated transfer factor, and methods of use |
US10/081,799 Abandoned US20130309268A1 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2002-02-22 | Compositions including transfer factor derived from eggs |
US10/081,953 Abandoned US20020182216A1 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2002-02-22 | Methods for obtaining transfer factor from avian sources, compositions including avian-generated transfer factor, and methods of use |
US10/103,671 Abandoned US20030031686A1 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2002-03-21 | Methods for obtaining transfer factor from eggs, compositions including egg-derived transfer factor, and methods of use |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/667,147 Expired - Lifetime US6468534B1 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2000-09-21 | Methods for obtaining transfer factor from avian sources, compositions including avian-generated transfer factor, and methods of use |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/081,953 Abandoned US20020182216A1 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2002-02-22 | Methods for obtaining transfer factor from avian sources, compositions including avian-generated transfer factor, and methods of use |
US10/103,671 Abandoned US20030031686A1 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2002-03-21 | Methods for obtaining transfer factor from eggs, compositions including egg-derived transfer factor, and methods of use |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US6468534B1 (en) |
EP (2) | EP1320547B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4176464B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR100839807B1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2001292934A1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2592261T3 (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA03002541A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002024746A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6468534B1 (en) * | 2000-09-21 | 2002-10-22 | 4Life Research, Lc | Methods for obtaining transfer factor from avian sources, compositions including avian-generated transfer factor, and methods of use |
US6995246B1 (en) * | 2000-10-19 | 2006-02-07 | Akzo Nobel N.V. | Methods for removing suspended particles from soluble protein solutions |
US20070128253A1 (en) * | 2005-04-13 | 2007-06-07 | Ramaekers Joseph C | Encapsulated transfer factor compositions and methods of use |
US6506413B1 (en) * | 2001-04-30 | 2003-01-14 | Joseph C. Ramaekers | Compositions for treating animal diseases and syndromes |
US20060073197A1 (en) * | 2004-05-20 | 2006-04-06 | Ramaekers Joseph C | Encapsulated transfer factor compositions and methods of use |
WO2004017916A2 (en) * | 2002-08-22 | 2004-03-04 | 4Life Research, Lc | Cardiovascular therapy composition including transfer factor and therapeutic methods including use of the composition |
WO2004041071A2 (en) * | 2002-11-04 | 2004-05-21 | 4Life Research, Lc | Compositions, systems, and methods for focusing a cell-mediated immune response |
US6866868B1 (en) * | 2003-09-15 | 2005-03-15 | 4Life Research, Lc | Compositions including different types of transfer factor, methods for making the compositions, and methods of treatment using the compositions |
US9028882B2 (en) * | 2005-05-02 | 2015-05-12 | 4Life Patents, Llc | Nutraceutical gels |
US10471100B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2019-11-12 | 4Life Patents, Llc | Nanofraction immune modulators, preparations and compositions including the same, and associated methods |
TWI380821B (en) | 2005-05-02 | 2013-01-01 | 4Life Patents Llc | Transfer factor preparations and associated methods |
US20070264264A1 (en) * | 2005-08-30 | 2007-11-15 | La Belle Associates, Inc. | Method and composition for conferring immunity in mammals |
US20090053197A1 (en) * | 2006-06-14 | 2009-02-26 | Ramaekers Joseph C | Transfer Factor Compositions and Methods |
US9125874B2 (en) | 2007-11-30 | 2015-09-08 | The Ramaekers Family Trust | Administration of transfer factor for improving reproductive health |
WO2009039256A1 (en) * | 2007-09-18 | 2009-03-26 | Ramaekers Nutrition, Llc | Growth factor fraction compositions and methods |
EP2278984A4 (en) * | 2007-11-30 | 2013-02-27 | Ramaekers Family Trust | Compositions and methods for enhancing fertility |
EA034057B1 (en) | 2010-11-23 | 2019-12-23 | Пантерикс, Инк. | Method of reducing duration of diarrhea caused by enteric infection |
MX338863B (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2016-05-01 | Inst Politecnico Nacional | Method for obtaining a dialyzable leukocyte extract. |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4357272A (en) * | 1978-03-22 | 1982-11-02 | The South African Inventions Development Corporation | Recovering purified antibodies from egg yolk |
US4180627A (en) | 1978-08-17 | 1979-12-25 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Process for in vivo transfer of cell-mediated immunity in mammals with alcoholic precipitates of Bovine Transfer factor |
US4402938A (en) | 1980-05-29 | 1983-09-06 | Impro Products, Inc. | Food and the method of extracting the same from colostrum and milk |
US5753268A (en) | 1982-06-03 | 1998-05-19 | Dcv Biologics, L.P. | Anti-cholesterolemic egg, vaccine and method for production, and use |
US5849349A (en) | 1982-06-03 | 1998-12-15 | Dcv, Inc. | Anti-cholesterolemic egg, vaccine and method for production, and use |
US5853765A (en) | 1982-06-03 | 1998-12-29 | Dcv, Inc. | Anti-cholesterolemic egg, vaccine and method for production, and use |
US4956349A (en) * | 1983-10-27 | 1990-09-11 | Stolle Research & Development Corporation | Anti-inflammatory factor, method of isolation, and use |
US4816563A (en) | 1983-11-25 | 1989-03-28 | Amtron, Inc. | Process for obtaining transfer factor from colostrum, transfer factor so obtained and use thereof |
CH0225254H1 (en) * | 1985-11-25 | 1998-09-15 | Ghen Corp | Specific antibody-containing substance from eggs and method of production and use thereof |
US5001225A (en) * | 1986-12-08 | 1991-03-19 | Georgetown University | Monoclonal antibodies to a pan-malarial antigen |
AU657915B2 (en) | 1990-07-02 | 1995-03-30 | National Jewish Center For Immunology And Respiratory Medicine | Transfer factor and methods of use |
US5753228A (en) | 1992-08-25 | 1998-05-19 | Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of The University Of Arizona | Method of treating parasitosis by the enteral administration of hyperimmune hen egg yolk antibodies |
US5367054A (en) * | 1993-04-12 | 1994-11-22 | Stolle Research & Development Corp. | Large-scale purification of egg immunoglobulin |
US6217865B1 (en) * | 1998-04-08 | 2001-04-17 | Dcv, Inc. | Method of antibody blending for increased efficacy |
US20020044942A1 (en) * | 2000-09-18 | 2002-04-18 | Chisolm Biological Laboratory, Llc | Transfer factor composition and process for producing same |
US6468534B1 (en) * | 2000-09-21 | 2002-10-22 | 4Life Research, Lc | Methods for obtaining transfer factor from avian sources, compositions including avian-generated transfer factor, and methods of use |
-
2000
- 2000-09-21 US US09/667,147 patent/US6468534B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2001
- 2001-09-21 WO PCT/US2001/029620 patent/WO2002024746A1/en active Application Filing
- 2001-09-21 ES ES01973344.3T patent/ES2592261T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-09-21 EP EP01973344.3A patent/EP1320547B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-09-21 KR KR1020037004161A patent/KR100839807B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2001-09-21 EP EP10182397.9A patent/EP2284190B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-09-21 JP JP2002529154A patent/JP4176464B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2001-09-21 MX MXPA03002541A patent/MXPA03002541A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2001-09-21 AU AU2001292934A patent/AU2001292934A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2002
- 2002-02-22 US US10/081,799 patent/US20130309268A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-02-22 US US10/081,953 patent/US20020182216A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-03-21 US US10/103,671 patent/US20030031686A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1320547B1 (en) | 2016-06-15 |
US6468534B1 (en) | 2002-10-22 |
US20030031686A1 (en) | 2003-02-13 |
KR100839807B1 (en) | 2008-06-19 |
MXPA03002541A (en) | 2005-02-25 |
JP4176464B2 (en) | 2008-11-05 |
EP2284190B1 (en) | 2017-03-15 |
EP2284190A2 (en) | 2011-02-16 |
WO2002024746A1 (en) | 2002-03-28 |
AU2001292934A1 (en) | 2002-04-02 |
EP1320547A1 (en) | 2003-06-25 |
ES2592261T3 (en) | 2016-11-29 |
US20020182216A1 (en) | 2002-12-05 |
EP2284190A3 (en) | 2011-08-10 |
JP2004510713A (en) | 2004-04-08 |
KR20030094211A (en) | 2003-12-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6468534B1 (en) | Methods for obtaining transfer factor from avian sources, compositions including avian-generated transfer factor, and methods of use | |
Ebina et al. | Gastroenteritis in suckling mice caused by human rotavirus can be prevented with egg yolk immunoglobulin (IgY) and treated with a protein‐bound polysaccharide preparation (PSK) | |
Theilen et al. | Biological studies with RE virus (strain T) that induces reticuloendotheliosis in turkeys, chickens, and Japanese quail | |
CA1306946C (en) | Specific antibody-containing substance from eggs and method of production and use thereof | |
UA98099C2 (en) | Vaccine comprising c perfringens type alpha toxoid | |
US6299874B1 (en) | Method of treatment | |
WO2008148149A1 (en) | Method of treatment or inhibition of enterovirus 71 infection | |
JPH0657663B2 (en) | Method for producing multifunctional specific antibody | |
Higgins et al. | Bile immunoglobulin of the duck (Anas platyrhynchos). II. Antibody response in influenza A virus infections. | |
Ellis et al. | Bovine respiratory syncytial virus-specific immune responses in calves after inoculation with commercially available vaccines | |
US20030103962A1 (en) | Methods and compositions for modulating the immune system of animals | |
MXPA03006818A (en) | Methods and compositions for modulating the immune system of animals. | |
Tsukamoto et al. | Protection against infectious bronchitis virus, a corona virus infection, using ostrich antibodies | |
Wood et al. | Experimental infection of broiler chickens with an avian reovirus | |
Johnson et al. | Field studies with convalescent serum and infectious bursal disease vaccine to control turkey coryza | |
JP3078013B2 (en) | Uses of vaccine conjugates, vaccine preparations and articles of manufacture | |
Sajid et al. | IgY: A Key Isotype and Promising Antibody for the Immunoprophylaxis Therapy of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Infections | |
Skrobarczyk et al. | Identification of 3 neutralizing linear epitopes on the VP8 outer capsid protein of group A equine rotavirus | |
ROESSLER | STUDIES ON THE PATHOGENICITY AND PERSISTENCE OF AVIAN REOVIRUS PATHOTYPES IN RELATION TO AGE RESISTANCE AND IMMUNOSUPPRESSION (CHICKENS, VIRULENCE) | |
JPH05255113A (en) | Specific antibody and shrimp infectious disease-controlling composition compounded with the same | |
US20020004045A1 (en) | Reduction of adipocyte number and adipose tissue depots in animals | |
CN116284357A (en) | Bovine coronavirus, bovine rotavirus and K99-F41 facultative escherichia coli triple high-immunity egg yolk antibody and preparation method thereof | |
Cole | The lymphatic system and the immune response in the lamb | |
Aghakhan | Studies on selected avian adenoviruses | |
Bashir | Maternal immunity to Newcastle disease in egg yolk of layers |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CHASE CAPITAL CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:4LIFE RESEARCH, LLC;REEL/FRAME:021805/0867 Effective date: 20081031 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CHASE CAPITAL CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR TO ALSO INCLUDE 4LIFE PATENTS, LLC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 021805 FRAME 867. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST FROM 4LIFE RESEARCH, LLC AND 4LIFE PATENTS, LLC TO CHASE CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;ASSIGNORS:4LIFE RESEARCH, LLC;4LIFE PATENTS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:021824/0333 Effective date: 20081031 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION |