US20130218320A1 - Method and apparatus for maintaining cutting quality - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for maintaining cutting quality Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20130218320A1 US20130218320A1 US13/877,584 US201113877584A US2013218320A1 US 20130218320 A1 US20130218320 A1 US 20130218320A1 US 201113877584 A US201113877584 A US 201113877584A US 2013218320 A1 US2013218320 A1 US 2013218320A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- cutting
- cutting resistance
- resistance
- hardness
- tool
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/18—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
- G05B19/182—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form characterised by the machine tool function, e.g. thread cutting, cam making, tool direction control
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/18—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
- G05B19/416—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form characterised by control of velocity, acceleration or deceleration
- G05B19/4163—Adaptive control of feed or cutting velocity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
- G05B2219/49—Nc machine tool, till multiple
- G05B2219/49061—Calculate optimum operating, machining conditions and adjust, adapt them
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
- G05B2219/49—Nc machine tool, till multiple
- G05B2219/49075—Control depth of cut
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
- G05B2219/49—Nc machine tool, till multiple
- G05B2219/49077—Control of feed and spindle, cutting speed
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
- G05B2219/49—Nc machine tool, till multiple
- G05B2219/49099—Cutting force, torque
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
- G05B2219/49—Nc machine tool, till multiple
- G05B2219/49225—Adapt machining conditions as function of workpiece cutting resistance
Definitions
- the present invention relates to methods and apparatuses for maintaining cutting quality.
- austenitic stainless steel In nuclear power plants, austenitic stainless steel is typically used as a material for equipment, piping, etc. Austenitic stainless steel is known to develop a surface hardened layer when subjected to common cold machining such as cutting or grinding (see, for example, PTLs 1 and 2).
- a hardened layer having a Vickers hardness of 300 HV or more could result in stress corrosion cracking (SCC), and this is also believed to be true for equipment and piping through which water circulates in pressurized-water nuclear power plants.
- One attempt to solve this is to perform machining only by cutting so as not to cause any surface hardened layer by adjusting the machining conditions, including tool conditions such as the shape of the tool and cutting conditions such as the cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed of the tool.
- the machining conditions including tool conditions such as the shape of the tool and cutting conditions such as the cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed of the tool, are used as preset values, the machining conditions may vary with variations in the cutting state due to disturbances during cutting. Such variations in machining conditions might, in some cases, prevent machining within a predetermined hardness.
- the present invention employs the following solutions.
- a first aspect of the present invention is a method for maintaining cutting quality, including a data-acquiring step of acquiring, as a target cutting resistance in advance, the cutting resistance of a tool during cutting performed such that the hardness of a surface layer is lower than a predetermined hardness by adjusting machining conditions; and a cutting step of performing cutting while detecting the cutting resistance of the tool during cutting and performing control such that the detected cutting resistance is lower than the target cutting resistance.
- a cutting resistance exerted on a workpiece by a tool plastically strains the surface of the workpiece, thus hardening the cut surface layer, and that a lower cutting resistance results in a smaller amount of plastic strain in the workpiece and therefore a lower surface hardness.
- the surface layer of the workpiece can be maintained at a predetermined hardness or less, for example, to a hardness that allows stress corrosion cracking to be inhibited or less, during cutting by setting the machining conditions, including tool conditions such as the shape of the tool and cutting conditions such as the cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed of the tool, so that the cutting resistance is low, and cutting the workpiece under the set machining conditions.
- the data-acquiring step involves acquiring the cutting resistance of a tool during cutting performed such that the hardness of a surface layer is lower than a predetermined hardness by adjusting machining conditions, and setting the acquired cutting resistance as a target cutting resistance. Since a lower cutting resistance results in a lower surface hardness, as discussed above, controlling the cutting resistance of the tool to the target cutting resistance or less allows the surface layer of the machined workpiece to have a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness.
- the cutting step in which cutting is actually performed, involves performing cutting while detecting the cutting resistance of the tool during cutting and performing control such that the detected cutting resistance is lower than the target cutting resistance.
- the cutting step which involves performing control such that the cutting resistance is lower than the target cutting resistance, can prevent the cutting resistance from exceeding the target cutting resistance regardless of a disturbance. This allows the surface layer of the cut workpiece to be reliably maintained at a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness.
- control encompasses changing the machining conditions, for example, cutting conditions such as cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed, or notifying the operator if the cutting state is determined to be defective to allow him or her to manually change the machining conditions etc. (e.g., replace the tool).
- a thrust force is preferably used as the cutting resistance.
- the thrust force which is a force acting in the direction in which the tool is pressed against the workpiece, directly affects the amount of plastic strain in the work surface of the workpiece.
- the surface layer of the workpiece can be more reliably maintained at a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness.
- a principal force may be used as the cutting resistance.
- the principal force which is a force acting in the direction in which the tool cuts the workpiece, may be controlled because the principal force is known to have a certain relationship with the thrust force.
- the detection accuracy can be improved as compared with using the thrust force, which is small, i.e., 50 N or less.
- Both the principal force and the thrust force are preferably controlled to utilize the respective advantages thereof.
- a second aspect of the present invention is a method for maintaining cutting quality, including a data-acquiring unit that acquires, as a target cutting resistance in advance, the cutting resistance of a tool during cutting performed such that the hardness of a surface layer is lower than a predetermined hardness by adjusting machining conditions; a detecting unit that detects the cutting resistance of the tool during cutting; and a control unit that performs control such that the cutting resistance detected by the detecting unit is lower than the target cutting resistance.
- a cutting resistance exerted on a workpiece by a tool plastically strains the surface of the workpiece, thus hardening the cut surface layer, and that a lower cutting resistance results in a smaller amount of plastic strain in the workpiece and therefore a lower surface hardness.
- the surface layer of the workpiece can be maintained at a predetermined hardness or less, for example, to a hardness that allows stress corrosion cracking to be inhibited or less, during cutting by setting the machining conditions, including tool conditions such as the shape of the tool and cutting conditions such as the cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed of the tool, so that the cutting resistance is low, and cutting the workpiece under the set machining conditions.
- the data-acquiring unit acquires the cutting resistance of a tool during cutting performed such that the hardness of a surface layer is lower than a predetermined hardness by adjusting machining conditions, and sets the acquired cutting resistance as a target cutting resistance. Because a lower cutting resistance results in a lower surface hardness, as discussed above, controlling the cutting resistance of the tool to the target cutting resistance or less allows the surface layer of the machined workpiece to have a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness.
- the detecting unit detects the cutting resistance of the tool during cutting, and the control unit performs control such that the detected cutting resistance is lower than the target cutting resistance.
- the cutting step which involves performing control such that the cutting resistance is lower than the target cutting resistance, can prevent the cutting resistance from exceeding the target cutting resistance regardless of a disturbance. This allows the surface layer of the cut workpiece to be reliably maintained at a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness.
- control encompasses changing the machining conditions, for example, cutting conditions such as cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed, or notifying the operator if the cutting state is determined to be defective to allow him or her to manually change the machining conditions etc. (e.g., replace the tool).
- a thrust force is preferably used as the cutting resistance.
- the thrust force which is a force acting in the direction in which the tool is pressed against the workpiece, directly affects the amount of plastic strain in the work surface of the workpiece.
- the surface layer of the workpiece can be more reliably maintained at a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness.
- a principal force may be used as the cutting resistance.
- the principal force which is a force acting in the direction in which the tool cuts the workpiece, may be controlled because the principal force is known to have a certain relationship with the thrust force.
- the detection accuracy can be improved as compared with using the thrust force, which is small, i.e., 50 N or less.
- Both the principal force and the thrust force are preferably controlled to utilize the respective advantages thereof.
- the present invention acquires, in advance, the cutting resistance of a tool during cutting performed such that the hardness of a surface layer is lower than a predetermined hardness by adjusting machining conditions, sets the acquired cutting resistance as a target cutting resistance, and performs cutting while detecting the cutting resistance of the tool during cutting and performing control such that the detected cutting resistance is lower than the target cutting resistance; therefore, the surface layer of the cut workpiece can be reliably maintained at a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness regardless of a disturbance.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating, in outline, the structure of a cutting-quality maintaining apparatus for practicing a method for maintaining cutting quality according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a graph showing the relationship between rake angle, which is one of the machining conditions, and the hardness of a machined surface layer.
- FIG. 3 is a graph showing the relationship between the rake angle of a machining tool and thrust force.
- FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the thrust force and the hardness of the machined surface layer.
- FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between the thrust force and principal force and the hardness of the surface layer.
- FIGS. 1 to 5 A method for maintaining cutting quality according to an embodiment of the present invention will hereinafter be described with reference to FIGS. 1 to 5 .
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating, in outline, the structure of a cutting-quality maintaining apparatus 1 for practicing the method for maintaining cutting quality according to the embodiment of the present invention.
- a cutting system performs cutting by rotating a workpiece 3 about the axis thereof while feeding a machining tool (tool) 7 secured to the end of a tool holder 5 in the axial direction of the workpiece 3 .
- the tool holder 5 has a substantially rectangular shape and is disposed so as to extend in a substantially horizontal direction, with the base thereof securely attached to a mount (not shown).
- the machining tool 7 is securely attached to the end of the top surface of the tool holder 5 .
- the machining tool 7 exerts a cutting force on the workpiece 3 , and as its reaction, the workpiece 3 exerts a cutting resistance on the machining tool.
- the cutting resistance is composed of a thrust force Fcn, which is a force acting in the direction in which the machining tool 7 is pressed against the workpiece 3 , a principal force Fc, which is a force acting in the direction in which the machining tool 7 cuts the workpiece 3 , and a feed force Fp, which is a force acting in the direction in which the machining tool 7 is fed, i.e., the axial direction.
- the tool holder 5 is bent under the thrust force Fcn and principal force Fc acting on the machining tool 7 .
- the principal force Fc is considerably larger than the thrust force Fcn and the feed force Fp.
- the cutting-quality maintaining apparatus 1 includes two strain gauges 9 and 11 bonded to the top and side surfaces, respectively, of the tool holder 5 , a signal converter 13 that amplifies and outputs measurement signals from the strain gauges 9 and 11 , and a controller 15 that performs quality determination upon receipt of the signals output from the signal converter 13 and that issues a notification of any defective state.
- the bonded strain gauges 9 and 11 are calibrated in advance with acquired data about the relationship between the principal force Fc and thrust force Fcn and the amount of strain.
- the notification from the controller 15 is given by generating an alarm and displaying the defective state. With this notification, the operator will find that the cutting state is defective and take a measure such as changing the machining conditions or replacing the tool.
- the controller 15 may send a control signal to a control unit (not shown) of the cutting system to change the machining conditions, for example, the cutting conditions such as cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed.
- the quality determination performed by the controller 15 will be described next.
- the workpiece 3 is, for example, a common pipe formed of austenitic stainless steel such as SUS316 or SUS304 in a boiling-water nuclear power plant.
- the inner surface of an end of the common pipe is subjected to thinning (cutting).
- the surface layer of the workpiece 3 can be maintained at a predetermined hardness or less, for example, to a hardness TH that allows stress corrosion cracking (SCC) to be inhibited or less, by setting the machining conditions, including tool conditions such as the shape of the machining tool 7 and cutting conditions such as the cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed of the tool, so that the cutting resistance is low, and cutting the workpiece 3 under the set machining conditions.
- SCC stress corrosion cracking
- FIG. 2 is a graph showing the relationship between rake angle, which is one of the machining conditions, and the hardness of the machined surface layer, where the graph is obtained by performing cutting using the cutting system shown in FIG. 1 with varying rake angles of the machining tool 7 and measuring and plotting the hardness of the surface layer during the cutting.
- a larger rake angle results in a smaller chip thickness and a larger chip shear angle, and therefore a smaller cutting force (cutting resistance) required for cutting. This reduces the cutting resistance exerted on the workpiece 3 , thus inhibiting hardening of the cut surface.
- a rake angle of a or more allows machining such that the hardness of the surface layer is lower than the hardness TH.
- FIG. 3 is a graph showing the relationship between the rake angle of the machining tool 7 and the thrust force Fcn, where the graph is obtained by performing cutting using the cutting system shown in FIG. 1 with varying rake angles of the machining tool 7 and measuring and plotting the thrust force Fcn during the cutting.
- a larger rake angle results in a lower cutting resistance.
- the magnitude Ft of the thrust force Fcn at a rake angle of a is then determined.
- a thrust force Fcn smaller than the magnitude Ft allows the hardness of the cut surface to be lower than the hardness TH.
- FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the thrust force and the hardness of the machined surface layer, where the graph is obtained by combining the relationship between the rake angle and the hardness of the machined surface layer in FIG. 2 with the relationship between the rake angle and the thrust force in FIG. 3 .
- the controller 15 sets and stores the magnitude Ft as the target cutting resistance.
- the foregoing is a data-acquiring step in the present invention.
- the workpiece 3 is then actually cut into a final product using the cutting system shown in FIG. 1 (cutting step).
- the machining tool 7 secured to the end of the tool holder 5 is fed in the axial direction of the workpiece 3 to perform cutting.
- the machining tool 7 then exerts a cutting force on the workpiece 3 , and as its reaction, the workpiece 3 exerts a cutting resistance on the machining tool, thus bending the tool holder 5 .
- the bending of the tool holder 5 is detected by the strain gauges 9 and 11 , which send measurement signals.
- the measurement signals are amplified by the signal converter 13 and are fed to the controller 15 .
- the cutting resistance varies accordingly. For example, the cutting resistance increases as the machining tool 7 wears.
- the controller 15 calculates the cutting resistance corresponding to the measurement signals and compares it with the target cutting resistance. If the cutting resistance corresponding to the measurement signals is lower than the target cutting resistance, the controller 15 determines that the cutting state is good. Conversely, if the cutting resistance corresponding to the measurement signals is higher than the target cutting resistance, the controller 15 determines that the cutting state is defective and notifies the operator by sounding an alarm. At the same time, the controller 15 displays the defective cutting state on a display unit.
- the operator will take a measure such as changing the machining conditions or replacing the tool, depending on the state.
- the controller 15 can determine the disturbance state by detecting the cutting resistance and can maintain the cutting resistance below the target cutting resistance, thus preventing the cutting resistance from exceeding the target cutting resistance regardless of a disturbance.
- the thrust force Fcn is preferably used as the cutting resistance controlled by the controller 15 .
- the thrust force Fcn which is a force acting in the direction in which the machining tool 7 is pressed against the workpiece 3 , directly affects the amount of plastic strain in the work surface of the workpiece 3 .
- the surface layer of the workpiece 3 can be more reliably maintained at a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness.
- the principal force Fc may also be used as the cutting resistance controlled by the controller 15 .
- FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between the thrust force Fcn and principal force Fc and the hardness of the surface layer, where the graph is obtained in the same manner as FIG. 4 .
- the principal force Fc which is a force acting in the direction in which the machining tool 7 cuts the workpiece 3 , may be controlled so long as the principal force Fc has a certain relationship with the thrust force Fcn, as shown in FIG. 5 .
- the magnitude of the target principal force Fc is larger than that of the target thrust force Fcn.
- the magnitude of the target principal force Fc is 100 N. This is twice the magnitude of the target thrust force Fcn, i.e., 50 N, thus improving the detection accuracy of the cutting resistance.
- Both the principal force Fc and the thrust force Fcn may be controlled to utilize the respective advantages thereof.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Machine Tool Sensing Apparatuses (AREA)
Abstract
Provided is a method for maintaining cutting quality in which a work surface can be reliably maintained at a predetermined hardness or less regardless of a disturbance during cutting. The method includes a data-acquiring step of acquiring, as a target cutting resistance, the cutting resistance of a machining tool (7) during cutting performed such that the hardness of a surface layer is lower than a predetermined hardness by adjusting machining conditions; and a cutting step of performing cutting while detecting the cutting resistance of the machining tool (7) during cutting and performing control such that the detected cutting resistance is lower than the target cutting resistance.
Description
- The present invention relates to methods and apparatuses for maintaining cutting quality.
- In nuclear power plants, austenitic stainless steel is typically used as a material for equipment, piping, etc. Austenitic stainless steel is known to develop a surface hardened layer when subjected to common cold machining such as cutting or grinding (see, for example, PTLs 1 and 2).
- For recirculation piping in boiling-water nuclear power plants, for example, it is generally considered that a hardened layer having a Vickers hardness of 300 HV or more could result in stress corrosion cracking (SCC), and this is also believed to be true for equipment and piping through which water circulates in pressurized-water nuclear power plants.
- To inhibit SCC, some measures have been taken for piping in the related art, including removing a surface hardened layer formed during cutting by buffing the work surface after cutting, and inhibiting SCC by applying a compressive stress to the work surface.
- These measures require post-treatment such as removing the hardened layer and/or applying a compressive stress after cutting, which results in extended working time and increased costs.
- One attempt to solve this is to perform machining only by cutting so as not to cause any surface hardened layer by adjusting the machining conditions, including tool conditions such as the shape of the tool and cutting conditions such as the cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed of the tool.
- Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, Publication No. 2005-257589
- Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, Publication No. 2008-96174
- The machining conditions, including tool conditions such as the shape of the tool and cutting conditions such as the cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed of the tool, are used as preset values, the machining conditions may vary with variations in the cutting state due to disturbances during cutting. Such variations in machining conditions might, in some cases, prevent machining within a predetermined hardness.
- In view of the foregoing, it is an object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for maintaining cutting quality, in which a work surface can be reliably maintained at a predetermined hardness or less regardless of a disturbance during cutting.
- To solve the above problem, the present invention employs the following solutions.
- Specifically, a first aspect of the present invention is a method for maintaining cutting quality, including a data-acquiring step of acquiring, as a target cutting resistance in advance, the cutting resistance of a tool during cutting performed such that the hardness of a surface layer is lower than a predetermined hardness by adjusting machining conditions; and a cutting step of performing cutting while detecting the cutting resistance of the tool during cutting and performing control such that the detected cutting resistance is lower than the target cutting resistance.
- For cutting, it is known that a cutting resistance exerted on a workpiece by a tool plastically strains the surface of the workpiece, thus hardening the cut surface layer, and that a lower cutting resistance results in a smaller amount of plastic strain in the workpiece and therefore a lower surface hardness. The surface layer of the workpiece can be maintained at a predetermined hardness or less, for example, to a hardness that allows stress corrosion cracking to be inhibited or less, during cutting by setting the machining conditions, including tool conditions such as the shape of the tool and cutting conditions such as the cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed of the tool, so that the cutting resistance is low, and cutting the workpiece under the set machining conditions.
- In the method for maintaining cutting quality according to this aspect, the data-acquiring step involves acquiring the cutting resistance of a tool during cutting performed such that the hardness of a surface layer is lower than a predetermined hardness by adjusting machining conditions, and setting the acquired cutting resistance as a target cutting resistance. Since a lower cutting resistance results in a lower surface hardness, as discussed above, controlling the cutting resistance of the tool to the target cutting resistance or less allows the surface layer of the machined workpiece to have a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness.
- Next, the cutting step, in which cutting is actually performed, involves performing cutting while detecting the cutting resistance of the tool during cutting and performing control such that the detected cutting resistance is lower than the target cutting resistance.
- When the machining conditions for cutting vary due to a certain disturbance, the cutting resistance varies accordingly; therefore, the disturbance state can be determined by detecting the cutting resistance. The cutting step, which involves performing control such that the cutting resistance is lower than the target cutting resistance, can prevent the cutting resistance from exceeding the target cutting resistance regardless of a disturbance. This allows the surface layer of the cut workpiece to be reliably maintained at a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness.
- As used herein, the term “control” encompasses changing the machining conditions, for example, cutting conditions such as cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed, or notifying the operator if the cutting state is determined to be defective to allow him or her to manually change the machining conditions etc. (e.g., replace the tool).
- In the above aspect, a thrust force is preferably used as the cutting resistance.
- The thrust force, which is a force acting in the direction in which the tool is pressed against the workpiece, directly affects the amount of plastic strain in the work surface of the workpiece. Thus, by controlling the thrust force, the surface layer of the workpiece can be more reliably maintained at a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness.
- In the above aspect, a principal force may be used as the cutting resistance.
- The principal force, which is a force acting in the direction in which the tool cuts the workpiece, may be controlled because the principal force is known to have a certain relationship with the thrust force.
- In this case, because the principal force is larger than the thrust force, the detection accuracy can be improved as compared with using the thrust force, which is small, i.e., 50 N or less.
- Both the principal force and the thrust force are preferably controlled to utilize the respective advantages thereof.
- A second aspect of the present invention is a method for maintaining cutting quality, including a data-acquiring unit that acquires, as a target cutting resistance in advance, the cutting resistance of a tool during cutting performed such that the hardness of a surface layer is lower than a predetermined hardness by adjusting machining conditions; a detecting unit that detects the cutting resistance of the tool during cutting; and a control unit that performs control such that the cutting resistance detected by the detecting unit is lower than the target cutting resistance.
- For cutting, it is known that a cutting resistance exerted on a workpiece by a tool plastically strains the surface of the workpiece, thus hardening the cut surface layer, and that a lower cutting resistance results in a smaller amount of plastic strain in the workpiece and therefore a lower surface hardness. The surface layer of the workpiece can be maintained at a predetermined hardness or less, for example, to a hardness that allows stress corrosion cracking to be inhibited or less, during cutting by setting the machining conditions, including tool conditions such as the shape of the tool and cutting conditions such as the cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed of the tool, so that the cutting resistance is low, and cutting the workpiece under the set machining conditions.
- In the apparatus for maintaining cutting quality according to this aspect, the data-acquiring unit acquires the cutting resistance of a tool during cutting performed such that the hardness of a surface layer is lower than a predetermined hardness by adjusting machining conditions, and sets the acquired cutting resistance as a target cutting resistance. Because a lower cutting resistance results in a lower surface hardness, as discussed above, controlling the cutting resistance of the tool to the target cutting resistance or less allows the surface layer of the machined workpiece to have a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness.
- Next, the detecting unit detects the cutting resistance of the tool during cutting, and the control unit performs control such that the detected cutting resistance is lower than the target cutting resistance.
- When the machining conditions for cutting vary due to a certain disturbance, the cutting resistance varies accordingly; therefore, the disturbance state can be determined by detecting the cutting resistance. The cutting step, which involves performing control such that the cutting resistance is lower than the target cutting resistance, can prevent the cutting resistance from exceeding the target cutting resistance regardless of a disturbance. This allows the surface layer of the cut workpiece to be reliably maintained at a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness.
- As used herein, the term “control” encompasses changing the machining conditions, for example, cutting conditions such as cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed, or notifying the operator if the cutting state is determined to be defective to allow him or her to manually change the machining conditions etc. (e.g., replace the tool).
- In the above aspect, a thrust force is preferably used as the cutting resistance.
- The thrust force, which is a force acting in the direction in which the tool is pressed against the workpiece, directly affects the amount of plastic strain in the work surface of the workpiece. Thus, by controlling the thrust force, the surface layer of the workpiece can be more reliably maintained at a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness.
- In the above aspect, a principal force may be used as the cutting resistance.
- The principal force, which is a force acting in the direction in which the tool cuts the workpiece, may be controlled because the principal force is known to have a certain relationship with the thrust force.
- In this case, because the principal force is larger than the thrust force, the detection accuracy can be improved as compared with using the thrust force, which is small, i.e., 50 N or less.
- Both the principal force and the thrust force are preferably controlled to utilize the respective advantages thereof.
- The present invention acquires, in advance, the cutting resistance of a tool during cutting performed such that the hardness of a surface layer is lower than a predetermined hardness by adjusting machining conditions, sets the acquired cutting resistance as a target cutting resistance, and performs cutting while detecting the cutting resistance of the tool during cutting and performing control such that the detected cutting resistance is lower than the target cutting resistance; therefore, the surface layer of the cut workpiece can be reliably maintained at a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness regardless of a disturbance.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating, in outline, the structure of a cutting-quality maintaining apparatus for practicing a method for maintaining cutting quality according to an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 2 is a graph showing the relationship between rake angle, which is one of the machining conditions, and the hardness of a machined surface layer. -
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the relationship between the rake angle of a machining tool and thrust force. -
FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the thrust force and the hardness of the machined surface layer. -
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between the thrust force and principal force and the hardness of the surface layer. - A method for maintaining cutting quality according to an embodiment of the present invention will hereinafter be described with reference to
FIGS. 1 to 5 . -
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating, in outline, the structure of a cutting-quality maintaining apparatus 1 for practicing the method for maintaining cutting quality according to the embodiment of the present invention. - A cutting system performs cutting by rotating a
workpiece 3 about the axis thereof while feeding a machining tool (tool) 7 secured to the end of atool holder 5 in the axial direction of theworkpiece 3. Thetool holder 5 has a substantially rectangular shape and is disposed so as to extend in a substantially horizontal direction, with the base thereof securely attached to a mount (not shown). Themachining tool 7 is securely attached to the end of the top surface of thetool holder 5. - During cutting, the
machining tool 7 exerts a cutting force on theworkpiece 3, and as its reaction, theworkpiece 3 exerts a cutting resistance on the machining tool. The cutting resistance is composed of a thrust force Fcn, which is a force acting in the direction in which themachining tool 7 is pressed against theworkpiece 3, a principal force Fc, which is a force acting in the direction in which themachining tool 7 cuts theworkpiece 3, and a feed force Fp, which is a force acting in the direction in which themachining tool 7 is fed, i.e., the axial direction. - The
tool holder 5 is bent under the thrust force Fcn and principal force Fc acting on themachining tool 7. The principal force Fc is considerably larger than the thrust force Fcn and the feed force Fp. - The cutting-quality maintaining apparatus 1 includes two
strain gauges tool holder 5, asignal converter 13 that amplifies and outputs measurement signals from thestrain gauges controller 15 that performs quality determination upon receipt of the signals output from thesignal converter 13 and that issues a notification of any defective state. - The bonded
strain gauges - The notification from the
controller 15 is given by generating an alarm and displaying the defective state. With this notification, the operator will find that the cutting state is defective and take a measure such as changing the machining conditions or replacing the tool. - Along with the notification, the
controller 15 may send a control signal to a control unit (not shown) of the cutting system to change the machining conditions, for example, the cutting conditions such as cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed. - The quality determination performed by the
controller 15 will be described next. - The
workpiece 3 is, for example, a common pipe formed of austenitic stainless steel such as SUS316 or SUS304 in a boiling-water nuclear power plant. The inner surface of an end of the common pipe is subjected to thinning (cutting). - For a common pipe formed of austenitic stainless steel, it is generally considered that a hardened layer having a Vickers hardness of 300 HV or more could result in stress corrosion cracking (SCC), and machining within that hardness is required.
- During cutting, the surface layer of the
workpiece 3 can be maintained at a predetermined hardness or less, for example, to a hardness TH that allows stress corrosion cracking (SCC) to be inhibited or less, by setting the machining conditions, including tool conditions such as the shape of themachining tool 7 and cutting conditions such as the cutting depth, feed rate, and cutting speed of the tool, so that the cutting resistance is low, and cutting theworkpiece 3 under the set machining conditions. -
FIG. 2 is a graph showing the relationship between rake angle, which is one of the machining conditions, and the hardness of the machined surface layer, where the graph is obtained by performing cutting using the cutting system shown inFIG. 1 with varying rake angles of themachining tool 7 and measuring and plotting the hardness of the surface layer during the cutting. - A larger rake angle results in a smaller chip thickness and a larger chip shear angle, and therefore a smaller cutting force (cutting resistance) required for cutting. This reduces the cutting resistance exerted on the
workpiece 3, thus inhibiting hardening of the cut surface. As shown inFIG. 2 , a rake angle of a or more allows machining such that the hardness of the surface layer is lower than the hardness TH. -
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the relationship between the rake angle of themachining tool 7 and the thrust force Fcn, where the graph is obtained by performing cutting using the cutting system shown inFIG. 1 with varying rake angles of themachining tool 7 and measuring and plotting the thrust force Fcn during the cutting. - As discussed above, a larger rake angle results in a lower cutting resistance. The magnitude Ft of the thrust force Fcn at a rake angle of a is then determined. Thus, a thrust force Fcn smaller than the magnitude Ft allows the hardness of the cut surface to be lower than the hardness TH.
- This is also true for the principal force.
-
FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the thrust force and the hardness of the machined surface layer, where the graph is obtained by combining the relationship between the rake angle and the hardness of the machined surface layer inFIG. 2 with the relationship between the rake angle and the thrust force inFIG. 3 . - This shows that if cutting is performed such that the thrust force Fcn of the cutting resistance is lower than the magnitude Ft, the hardness of the cut surface is lower than the hardness TH, which allows corrosion cracking to be inhibited.
- The
controller 15 sets and stores the magnitude Ft as the target cutting resistance. The foregoing is a data-acquiring step in the present invention. - The
workpiece 3 is then actually cut into a final product using the cutting system shown inFIG. 1 (cutting step). - While the
workpiece 3 is rotated about the axis thereof, themachining tool 7 secured to the end of thetool holder 5 is fed in the axial direction of theworkpiece 3 to perform cutting. - The
machining tool 7 then exerts a cutting force on theworkpiece 3, and as its reaction, theworkpiece 3 exerts a cutting resistance on the machining tool, thus bending thetool holder 5. - The bending of the
tool holder 5 is detected by thestrain gauges signal converter 13 and are fed to thecontroller 15. - When the machining conditions for cutting vary due to a certain disturbance, the cutting resistance varies accordingly. For example, the cutting resistance increases as the
machining tool 7 wears. - The
controller 15 calculates the cutting resistance corresponding to the measurement signals and compares it with the target cutting resistance. If the cutting resistance corresponding to the measurement signals is lower than the target cutting resistance, thecontroller 15 determines that the cutting state is good. Conversely, if the cutting resistance corresponding to the measurement signals is higher than the target cutting resistance, thecontroller 15 determines that the cutting state is defective and notifies the operator by sounding an alarm. At the same time, thecontroller 15 displays the defective cutting state on a display unit. - In response to this notification, the operator will take a measure such as changing the machining conditions or replacing the tool, depending on the state.
- Thus, the
controller 15 can determine the disturbance state by detecting the cutting resistance and can maintain the cutting resistance below the target cutting resistance, thus preventing the cutting resistance from exceeding the target cutting resistance regardless of a disturbance. - This allows the surface layer of the cut workpiece to be reliably maintained at a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness.
- The thrust force Fcn is preferably used as the cutting resistance controlled by the
controller 15. - The thrust force Fcn, which is a force acting in the direction in which the
machining tool 7 is pressed against theworkpiece 3, directly affects the amount of plastic strain in the work surface of theworkpiece 3. Thus, by controlling the thrust force Fcn, the surface layer of theworkpiece 3 can be more reliably maintained at a hardness lower than the predetermined hardness. - The principal force Fc may also be used as the cutting resistance controlled by the
controller 15. -
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between the thrust force Fcn and principal force Fc and the hardness of the surface layer, where the graph is obtained in the same manner asFIG. 4 . - The principal force Fc, which is a force acting in the direction in which the
machining tool 7 cuts theworkpiece 3, may be controlled so long as the principal force Fc has a certain relationship with the thrust force Fcn, as shown inFIG. 5 . - Because the principal force Fc is larger than the thrust force Fcn, the magnitude of the target principal force Fc is larger than that of the target thrust force Fcn. For example, as shown in
FIG. 5 , the magnitude of the target principal force Fc is 100 N. This is twice the magnitude of the target thrust force Fcn, i.e., 50 N, thus improving the detection accuracy of the cutting resistance. - Both the principal force Fc and the thrust force Fcn may be controlled to utilize the respective advantages thereof.
- The present invention is not limited to the embodiments discussed above; various modifications are possible without departing from the spirit of the present invention.
-
- 1 cutting-quality maintaining apparatus
- 7 machining tool
- Fc principal force
- Fcn thrust force
Claims (8)
1. A method for maintaining cutting quality, comprising:
a data-acquiring step of acquiring, as a target cutting resistance in advance, the cutting resistance of a tool during cutting performed such that the hardness of a surface layer is lower than a predetermined hardness by adjusting machining conditions; and
a cutting step of performing cutting while detecting the cutting resistance of the tool during cutting and performing control such that the detected cutting resistance is lower than the target cutting resistance.
2. The method for maintaining cutting quality according to claim 1 , where in a thrust force is used as the cutting resistance.
3. The method for maintaining cutting quality according to claim 1 , wherein a principal force is used as the cutting resistance.
4. An apparatus for maintaining cutting quality comprising:
a data-acquiring unit that acquires, as a target cutting resistance in advance, the cutting resistance of a tool during cutting performed such that the hardness of a surface layer is lower than a predetermined hardness by adjusting machining conditions;
a detecting unit that detects the cutting resistance of the tool during cutting; and
a control unit that performs control such that the cutting resistance detected by the detecting unit is lower than the target cutting resistance acquired by the data-acquiring unit.
5. The apparatus for maintaining cutting quality according to claim 4 , wherein a thrust force is used as the cutting resistance.
6. The apparatus for maintaining cutting quality according to claim 4 , wherein a principal force is used as the cutting resistance.
7. The method for maintaining cutting quality according to claim 2 , wherein a principal force is used as the cutting resistance.
8. The apparatus for maintaining cutting quality according to claim 5 , wherein a principal force is used as the cutting resistance.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2010-240850 | 2010-10-27 | ||
JP2010240850A JP2012091277A (en) | 2010-10-27 | 2010-10-27 | Method for maintaining cutting quality |
PCT/JP2011/074677 WO2012057207A1 (en) | 2010-10-27 | 2011-10-26 | Method for maintaining cutting quality, and device for maintaining cutting quality |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20130218320A1 true US20130218320A1 (en) | 2013-08-22 |
Family
ID=45993913
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/877,584 Abandoned US20130218320A1 (en) | 2010-10-27 | 2011-10-26 | Method and apparatus for maintaining cutting quality |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20130218320A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2633949A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2012091277A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2012057207A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9873174B2 (en) | 2014-07-16 | 2018-01-23 | Yamazaki Mazak Corporation | Turning controller |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP6111638B2 (en) * | 2012-12-12 | 2017-04-12 | マツダ株式会社 | Connecting rod breakage monitoring device and monitoring method thereof |
JP2016209977A (en) * | 2015-05-13 | 2016-12-15 | 株式会社デンソー | Cutting device and manufacturing method of cylindrical member |
EP3292930B1 (en) * | 2016-09-09 | 2023-03-01 | Sandvik Intellectual Property AB | Cutting tool and method for estimation of deflection of the cutting edge |
WO2018047834A1 (en) * | 2016-09-09 | 2018-03-15 | 株式会社NejiLaw | Cutting head, cutting bite, and cutting system |
CN108177024B (en) * | 2018-03-21 | 2023-10-24 | 吉林大学 | Tool rest positioning precision and repeated positioning precision detection device and use method |
JP7032244B2 (en) * | 2018-06-04 | 2022-03-08 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Cutting system and information processing equipment |
CN108788928B (en) * | 2018-06-29 | 2020-06-16 | 吉林工程技术师范学院 | High-speed milling cutting force testing device for multi-hardness material |
JP7424711B1 (en) | 2023-11-24 | 2024-01-30 | 国立大学法人島根大学 | Measuring equipment and tool holders |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3571834A (en) * | 1968-04-15 | 1971-03-23 | Cincinnati Milacron Inc | Machine tool adaptive control |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2815533B2 (en) * | 1993-11-15 | 1998-10-27 | 京セラ株式会社 | Cutting equipment for milling |
US7175376B2 (en) * | 2001-04-27 | 2007-02-13 | Thk Co., Ltd. | Method of cutting long-sized hardened steel material and cutting device |
JP2005018315A (en) * | 2003-06-25 | 2005-01-20 | Toshiba Corp | Apparatus and method for evaluating integrity of structure |
JP2006102843A (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2006-04-20 | Toshiba Corp | Optimum machining apparatus and optimum machining method |
-
2010
- 2010-10-27 JP JP2010240850A patent/JP2012091277A/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2011
- 2011-10-26 EP EP11836340.7A patent/EP2633949A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2011-10-26 US US13/877,584 patent/US20130218320A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-10-26 WO PCT/JP2011/074677 patent/WO2012057207A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3571834A (en) * | 1968-04-15 | 1971-03-23 | Cincinnati Milacron Inc | Machine tool adaptive control |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9873174B2 (en) | 2014-07-16 | 2018-01-23 | Yamazaki Mazak Corporation | Turning controller |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2012057207A1 (en) | 2012-05-03 |
JP2012091277A (en) | 2012-05-17 |
EP2633949A1 (en) | 2013-09-04 |
EP2633949A4 (en) | 2014-05-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20130218320A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for maintaining cutting quality | |
JP7049978B2 (en) | Cutting system, machining error measuring method, and machining error measuring device | |
Axinte et al. | An integrated monitoring method to supervise waterjet machining | |
CN102590249A (en) | Method for nondestructively testing micro hardness of shot-blasted layer of metal material | |
JP2007098523A (en) | Method for judging service life of broach, broach quality control device, and broaching device | |
CN104190963A (en) | Device and method of tool setting of digital controlled lathe based on machine vision | |
JPH05340858A (en) | Corrosion environment sensor and corrosion environment controller | |
EP3129184A2 (en) | Method and device for detecting the mechanical forces at the welding pin tip during friction stir welding | |
CN102059649A (en) | Method for monitoring radial grinding force of grinder and realizing constant-force feeding | |
CN104931175A (en) | Method for measuring bolt axial fastening force through bolt axial strain | |
Baral et al. | Acoustic emission monitoring for necking in sheet metal forming | |
JP2010008189A (en) | Method for diagnosing internal defect in large cast structure and method for extending useful life of large cast structure using same | |
Park et al. | Evaluation of two low-constraint toughness test methods in a single specimen | |
Tangjitsitcharoen et al. | Hybrid monitoring of chip formation and straightness in CNC turning by utilizing daubechies wavelet transform | |
US20180354149A1 (en) | Rotary cutting apparatus with an embedded monitoring unit | |
Filip et al. | Research on the Surface Roughness of Hardox Steel Parts Machined with an Abrasive Waterjet. | |
JP6314885B2 (en) | Damage prevention system, grinding wheel | |
Fata et al. | The effect of the tool geometry and cutting conditions on the tool deflection and cutting forces | |
Reddy et al. | On-line monitoring of tool wear and surface roughness by acoustic emissions in CNC turning | |
CN102632371A (en) | Processing technology of engine valve | |
CN106679852B (en) | A kind of surface layer internal stress measuring method based on microhardness impression distance change | |
Zeiler et al. | Lateral forces in rolling-cut shearing and their consequences on common edge defects | |
Ren et al. | Experimental investigation of the cutting force measurements in machinability evaluations of metals | |
WO2012060380A1 (en) | Machining condition setting system, machining condition setting method, and machined object which is machined using same | |
CN110082233A (en) | A kind of pre-detection method for 18Cr2Ni4WA steel processing fastener Brinell hardness |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD., JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MICHISHITA, YUKIO;MATSUBARA, NARIYASU;REEL/FRAME:030145/0900 Effective date: 20130227 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |