US20130210119A1 - Method for producing cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes - Google Patents

Method for producing cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130210119A1
US20130210119A1 US13/809,734 US201113809734A US2013210119A1 US 20130210119 A1 US20130210119 A1 US 20130210119A1 US 201113809734 A US201113809734 A US 201113809734A US 2013210119 A1 US2013210119 A1 US 2013210119A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
glucose
weight
hydrolysates
production
lactose
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/809,734
Inventor
Fadhel BEN CHAABANE
Frederic Monot
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique INRA
Agro Industrie Recherches et Developpements ARD
Original Assignee
IFP Energies Nouvelles IFPEN
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by IFP Energies Nouvelles IFPEN filed Critical IFP Energies Nouvelles IFPEN
Assigned to IFP Energies Nouvelles reassignment IFP Energies Nouvelles ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CHAABANE, FADHEL BEN, MONOT, FREDERIC
Publication of US20130210119A1 publication Critical patent/US20130210119A1/en
Assigned to AGRO INDUSTRIE RECHERCHES ET DEVELOPPEMENTS, L'INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE AGRONOMIQUE reassignment AGRO INDUSTRIE RECHERCHES ET DEVELOPPEMENTS ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: IFP Energies Nouvelles
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C12N9/42
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/24Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2)
    • C12N9/2402Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2) hydrolysing O- and S- glycosyl compounds (3.2.1)
    • C12N9/2405Glucanases
    • C12N9/2434Glucanases acting on beta-1,4-glucosidic bonds
    • C12N9/2437Cellulases (3.2.1.4; 3.2.1.74; 3.2.1.91; 3.2.1.150)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/14Fungi; Culture media therefor
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/24Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2)
    • C12N9/2402Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2) hydrolysing O- and S- glycosyl compounds (3.2.1)
    • C12N9/2405Glucanases
    • C12N9/2434Glucanases acting on beta-1,4-glucosidic bonds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/24Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2)
    • C12N9/2402Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2) hydrolysing O- and S- glycosyl compounds (3.2.1)
    • C12N9/2477Hemicellulases not provided in a preceding group
    • C12N9/248Xylanases
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12PFERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P21/00Preparation of peptides or proteins
    • C12P21/02Preparation of peptides or proteins having a known sequence of two or more amino acids, e.g. glutathione
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E50/00Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
    • Y02E50/10Biofuels, e.g. bio-diesel

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a process for the production of enzymes for the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass.
  • Lignocellulosic biomass is characterized by a complex structure constituted by three principal polymers: cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin.
  • the process for the transformation of biomass into ethanol comprises a number of steps.
  • a pre-treatment can render cellulose and possibly hemicelluloses, which are the targets for enzymatic hydrolysis, accessible to enzymes.
  • the pre-treatment is aimed at modifying the physical and physico-chemical properties of the lignocellulosic material with a view to improving accessibility to the cellulose trapped in the matrix of lignin and hemicellulose.
  • the enzymatic hydrolysis step can be used to transform cellulose and hemicelluloses into sugars using cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes.
  • the sugars obtained by hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass are pentoses (principally xylose and arabinose), disaccharides (cellobiose) and glucose, which can be fermented by microorganisms.
  • pentoses principally xylose and arabinose
  • disaccharides cellobiose
  • glucose which can be fermented by microorganisms.
  • Glucose may, for example, be readily transformed into ethanol by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae during the alcoholic fermentation step.
  • a distillation step can separate and recover the product obtained from the fermentation, i.e. ethanol in the above case, from the fermentation must.
  • One of the ways of reducing costs consists of optimizing the operating conditions for the cellulase production process in order to increase its productivity or to obtain an enzymatic cocktail with an improved specific activity.
  • Trichoderma reesei In the presence of an inducing substrate, wild type strains of Trichoderma reesei have the ability to secrete an enzymatic complex which is well suited to cellulose hydrolysis.
  • the enzymes of the enzymatic complex contain three major types of activity: endoglucanases, exoglucanases and cellobiases.
  • Other proteins, such as xylanases, which are necessary for hydrolysis of the lignocellulosic biomass, are also produced by Trichoderma reesei.
  • the presence of an inducing substrate is indispensable to the expression of cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes.
  • Glucose exerts a catabolic repression effect on the production of cellulases. This is induced in the presence of cellulose, its hydrolysis products such as cellobiose or certain oligosaccharides, in particular disaccharides such as lactose or sophorose (Ilmén et al. 1997, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol 63, p 1298-1306).
  • the nature of the carbonaceous substrate has a major influence on the composition of the enzymatic complex.
  • xylose associated with a carbonaceous inducing substrate such as cellulose or lactose
  • a carbonaceous inducing substrate such as cellulose or lactose
  • Dissolving residual hemicelluloses (xylanes) with xylanases could promote enzymatic hydrolysis (Vàrnai et al., 2010 Enzyme and Microbial Technology Vol 46 p 185-193).
  • Patent FR-B-2 555 603 in the name of the Applicant proposes the continuous supply of carbonaceous substrates in order to lift the catabolic repression by limiting the residual concentration in the cultures and by optimizing the quantity of sugars in order to obtain a better yield and better enzymatic productivity.
  • the process described in this patent proposes starting to supply the substrate using soluble sugars as the source of carbon, optionally in the form of a mixture.
  • a continuous supply limiting glucose or xylose not associated with lactose or with another cellulase inducer sophorose, cellobiose, etc
  • lactose remains one of the most suitable substrates.
  • its price fluctuates a great deal and represents approximately one third of the cost price of the enzymes.
  • Patent application WO 2009/026716 describes a process for the production of cellulases in which the hemicellulolytic derivatives represent more than 40% of the carbon source and the sugars inducing cellulase production represent in the range 3% to 20% of this mixture. That process can be used to produce at least twice the quantity of cellulases compared with a process using only sugars obtained from hemicelluloses. However, the cellulase production performance is still lower than a process using only lactose.
  • the present invention describes a process for the production of cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes in which the inducing substrate is a mixture of glucose, lactose and xylose.
  • the process for the production of cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes by a cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic microorganism comprises at least one phase for growth in the presence of a source of carbon and at least one phase for production in the presence of an inducing substrate, in which said inducing substrate is a mixture of glucose or cellulosic hydrolysates, lactose and xylose or a solution of hemicellulolytic hydrolysates, the quantities of each of the constituents of the mixture being defined by the following limits:
  • the inducing substrate is free of any sugar other than the constituents listed above.
  • the relative proportions of each of the constituents are selected such that the sum of the quantities by weight is equal to 100%.
  • the final concentrations of proteins obtained are 50% to 60% higher than those obtained with lactose used as the sole production substrate. They are also approximately 3 times higher than that obtained with improved mixtures which are rich in xyloses as described in the prior art document WO 2009/026716.
  • the process of the present invention uses a mixture based on glucose. More than 60% of lactose, an inducer of cellulase production, can be replaced by glucose which, however, is known to be a repressor of cellulase production, with improved final performance of the inducing mixture. Glucose is much cheaper than lactose and its solubility in water is approximately 3 times higher. Thus, it is possible to reduce the volumes employed. Thus, in this process, glucose is not only used in the growth phase, but also in the production phase in an amount of 60% of the mixture constituting the inducing substrate.
  • the glucose used in the mixture of sugars may also be replaced by glucose obtained from the cellulose enzymatic hydrolysis step, i.e. obtained directly from the process for the transformation of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol. This contributes to reducing the cost of enzyme production by using co-products from the process. Thus, they are termed cellulosic hydrolysates.
  • the xylose used in the mixture constituting the inducing sugar may be replaced by a solution of hemicellulolytic hydrolysates obtained from the process for the transformation of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol, and in particular obtained from pre-treatment of the biomass.
  • xylose is added to the mixture constituting the inducing substrate means that the xylanase activity of the final enzymatic cocktail is greatly increased.
  • the xylose may advantageously be replaced by a hemicellulosic hydrolysate solution obtained from the hydrolysis of hemicelluloses during pre-treatment of the lignocellulosic biomass in second generation biofuel production processes; it may be concentrated if necessary.
  • the mixture constituting the inducing substrate comprises 50% to 65% by weight of glucose or cellulosic hydrolysates, 22% to 24% by weight of lactose and 15% to 25% by weight of xylose or a solution of hemicellulosic hydrolysates, optionally obtained from a pre-treatment of the lignocellulosic biomass, the sum of the constituents being equal to 100%.
  • the inducing substrate is a mixture constituted by 60% by weight of glucose or cellulosic hydrolysates, 23% by weight of lactose and 17% by weight of xylose or hemicellulosic hydrolysates.
  • the carbonaceous substrate used during the growth phase is selected from glucose, xylose, lactose, residues obtained after ethanolic fermentation of monomeric sugars of the enzymatic hydrolysates of cellulosic biomass and/or an unrefined extract of hydrosoluble pentoses possibly deriving from the pre-treatment of a cellulosic biomass.
  • the growth substrate is glucose
  • the industrial strains used belong to the species Trichoderma reesei, modified in order to improve the cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes by mutation-selection processes.
  • An example which can be cited is the strain IFP CL847.
  • Strains improved by genetic recombination techniques may also be used. They have to be deleted for catabolic repression by glucose ( ⁇ CRE1); an example is CL847.
  • strains are cultivated in agitated, aerated bioreactors under conditions which are compatible with their growth and the production of enzymes.
  • the conditions are such that the pH is adjusted to between 3.5 and 6 and the temperature is in the range 20° C. to 35° C.
  • a pH of 4.8 and a temperature of 27° C. are selected during the growth phase and a pH of 4 and a temperature of 25° C. are selected during the production phase.
  • the degree of aeration, expressed as the volume of air per volume of reaction medium per minute, or vvm, applied during the process is in the range 0.3 to 1.5 min ⁇ 1 , and the rate of rotation, rpm, must allow the O 2 pressure to be adjusted to between 20% and 60%.
  • an aeration of 0.5 vvm and agitation to allow the O 2 pressure to be adjusted to 30% are selected.
  • the carbonaceous substrate selected to obtain the biomass is introduced into the bioreactor before sterilization, or is sterilized separately and introduced into the bioreactor after sterilization thereof in order to produce an initial sugar concentration of 15 to 60 g/L.
  • an aqueous solution containing the inducing substrate constituted by a glucose/lactose/xylose mixture or hemicellulose hydrolysate solution selected for the enzyme production phase is prepared in a concentration of 350 to 600 g/L in the feed solution used.
  • the concentration is in the range 450 to 550 g/L.
  • the aqueous solution is injected after the initial substrate has been exhausted in order to provide an optimized quantity.
  • the flow rate at which the solution is supplied is 30 to 45 mg per gram of cells per hour.
  • the residual sugar concentration in the culture medium is less than 1 g/L during the production phase (fed-batch) in order to limit the production of biomass.
  • this concentration is less than 0.5 g/L, still more preferably less than 0.1 g/L.
  • Example 1 presents a culture using glucose as the carbonaceous substrate during the growth phase and the production phase. This example demonstrates the low production of proteins obtained when this sugar is used as the sole carbonaceous substrate even if the flow is limiting during the fed-batch phase (residual concentration of glucose close to 0).
  • the second example represents the reference fermentation using lactose as the carbonaceous substrate during the growth phase and the production phase which allows high protein production.
  • Example 3 reproduces an experiment using a mixture in the production phase as described in patent application WO 2009/026716 containing a high proportion of xylose allowing, according to the authors, the cellulase production to be greatly increased compared with an experiment in which xylose or hemicellulosic derivatives are used as the sole carbonaceous substrates.
  • Examples 4 to 6 are those of the patent, in accordance with the process of the present invention.
  • the production of cellulases was carried out in a mechanically stirred bioreactor.
  • the mineral medium had the following composition: KOH 1.66 g./L, H 3 PO 4 85% 2 mL/L, (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 2.8 g/L, MgSO 4 .7 H 2 O 0.6 g/L, CaCl 2 0.6 g/L, MnSO 4 3.2 mg/L, ZnSO 4. 7 H 2 O 2.8 mg/L, CoCl 2. 10H 2 O 4.0 mg/L, FeSO 4. 7 H 2 O 10 mg/L, Corn Steep 1.2 g/L, anti-foaming agent 0.5 mL/L.
  • the bioreactor containing the mineral medium was sterilized at 120° C. for 20 minutes; the glucose carbonaceous source was sterilized from 120° C. for 20 minutes then added to the bioreactor under sterile conditions in order to produce a final concentration of 30 g/L.
  • the bioreactor was primed to 10% (v/v) with the liquid pre-culture of the CL847 strain of Trichoderma reesei.
  • the mineral medium of the pre-culture was identical to that of the bioreactor apart from adding potassium phthalate in a concentration of 5 g/L to buffer the pH. Growth of the fungus in pre-culture was carried out using glucose as the carbonaceous substrate at a concentration of 30 g/L. Growth of the inoculum lasted 2 to 3 days and was carried out at 28° C. in a shaker incubator. Transfer to the bioreactor was carried out if the residual concentration of glucose was less than 15 g/L.
  • Enzyme production was followed by assaying the extracellular proteins using the Lowry method and BSA standard, after separation from the mycelium by filtering or centrifuging.
  • the cellulolytic activities which were determined were:
  • the FPU activity was measured on Whatman No 1 paper (procedure recommended by the IUPAC Biotechnology Commission) at an initial concentration of 50 g/L; the test sample from the enzymatic solution to be analysed which liberated the equivalent of 2 g/L of glucose (colorimetric assay) in 60 minutes was determined.
  • the principle of filter paper activity is to determine, by DNS (dinitrosalicylic acid) assay, the quantity of reduced sugars obtained from a Whatman No 1 paper (procedure recommended by the IUPAC Biotechnology Commission).
  • the substrate used to determine the aryl ⁇ -glucosidase activity was p-nitrophenyl- ⁇ -D-glucopyranoside (PNPG). It is cleaved by ⁇ -glucosidase to liberate p-nitrophenol.
  • PNPG p-nitrophenyl- ⁇ -D-glucopyranoside
  • One aryl ⁇ -glucosidase activity unit is defined as the quantity of enzyme necessary to produce 1 ⁇ mole of p-nitrophenol from PNPG per minute and is expressed in IU/ml.
  • the principal of xylanase activity assay resides in determining, by DNS assay, the quantity of reduced sugars obtained from the hydrolysed xylanase solution. This assay method uses the reducing properties of the sugars, principally xylose. The xylanase activity is expressed in IU/ml, and corresponds to the quantity of enzyme necessary to produce 1 ⁇ mole of xylose per minute.
  • the specific activities were obtained by dividing the activities expressed in IU/ml by the concentration of proteins. They are expressed in IU/mg.
  • the CL847 strain was presented as being derepressed to the catabolic repression exerted by glucose on the production of cellulase (it is deleted from the CRE1 gene). It appears that even for a fed-batch reaction carried out under glucose limitation conditions, the final production of proteins is very low.
  • Enzyme production was carried out under the same conditions as in Example 1.
  • the carbonaceous substrate during the growth and production phases was pure lactose. Lactose is an important inducer in cellulase production. It is this substrate which is the most widely used for the production of cellulases on an industrial scale.
  • the 250 g/L fed-batch solution was injected continuously at a flow rate of 35 mg per gram of cells per hour up to 164 hours.
  • CICs sucrose inducing the production of cellulases
  • Its composition was as follows: 56% gentiobiose, 14% sophorose, 10% trehalose, 6% cellobiose, 6% maltotriose, 8% glucose.
  • the 360 g/L 97% xylose/3% CIC mixture was injected, following the recommendations described, at a flow rate of 0.4 g of carbon/L/h.
  • the final protein production was close to that presented in WO 2009/026716 A1 where the authors obtained a final concentration of proteins of 25 g/L with the P59G strain.
  • the FPase specific activity (0.34 IU/mg) was low, while the xylanase activity was very high.
  • Example 4 The experiment of Example 4 was carried out under the same conditions as in Example 1 with glucose as the carbonaceous substrate for growth in an amount of 60 g/L. During the fed-batch production phase, we then used a solution in which three carbonaceous substrates were mixed in the following proportions: lactose (23%)/glucose (60%)/xylose (17%), at a concentration of 500 g/L. This mixture was injected at 45 mg/g/h. The analytical determinations of the final must produced the following results:
  • the final protein production was more than 3 times higher than that of Example 3.
  • the filter paper activity which is an indicator of cellulase activity, was approximately 5 times higher.
  • the xylanase activity was 10 times higher than that of Example 2 carried out with lactose as the sole growth and production carbonaceous substrate, but approximately 50% lower than that of Example 3.
  • Example 5 was carried out under the same conditions as Example 4.
  • the glucose was used during the growth phase, at a concentration of 15 g/L.
  • the xylose of the fed-batch solution was replaced by a solution of soluble hemicellulosic solution or C5 sugar solution obtained from a wheat straw impregnated with 0.08 N sulphuric acid and pre-treated by steam explosion (19 bar, 5 minutes).
  • the mixture was injected at 30 mg/g/h for 170 h.
  • Example 6 was carried out under the same conditions as Example 4.
  • the glucose was used during the growth phase, at a concentration of 15 g/L.
  • the glucose of the fed-batch solution was replaced by a solution of hydrolysate obtained from the enzymatic hydrolysis of a wheat straw impregnated with 0.08 N of sulphuric acid and pre-treated by steam explosion (19 bar, 5 minutes).
  • the enzymatic hydrolysis of the wheat straw was carried out at 50° C. and at a pH of 4.8. It resulted in hydrolysis of 95% of the cellulose into glucose.
  • Lactose and xylose were dissolved in this solution so as to result in a mixture:
  • the mixture was injected at 30 mg/g/h for 170 h during the fed-batch phase.
  • the enzymatic cocktail obtained was very high quality, since the final FPase activity was close to the activity obtained in Example 4 even if the protein concentration was lower.
  • the final FPase activity was approximately 5 times higher than that obtained with Example 3 and approximately 50% higher than that obtained during Example 2 where lactose was used as the sole carbonaceous substrate during the fed-batch phase.

Abstract

The process for the production of cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes by a cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic microorganism according to the present invention comprises at least one phase for growth in the presence of a source of carbon and at least one phase for production in the presence of an inducing substrate, in which said inducing substrate is a mixture comprising 40% to 65% by weight of glucose or cellulosic hydrolysates, 21% to 25% by weight of lactose and 10% to 39% by weight of xylose or a solution of a lignocellulosic hemicellulosic hydrolysate, the sum of these three constituents being equal to 100%.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to a process for the production of enzymes for the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass.
  • PRIOR ART
  • The increase in bioethanol production capacity for its qualities for in biofuels is a current “hot topic”. Incorporation targets are under discussion within the European Union, based on an initial proposition of 20% use of renewable energy by 2020 with an incorporation of 10% of biofuels, subject to sustainability criteria which should favour second generation biofuels produced from lignocellulosic biomass.
  • Lignocellulosic biomass is characterized by a complex structure constituted by three principal polymers: cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin.
  • Conventionally, the process for the transformation of biomass into ethanol comprises a number of steps. A pre-treatment can render cellulose and possibly hemicelluloses, which are the targets for enzymatic hydrolysis, accessible to enzymes. The pre-treatment is aimed at modifying the physical and physico-chemical properties of the lignocellulosic material with a view to improving accessibility to the cellulose trapped in the matrix of lignin and hemicellulose. The enzymatic hydrolysis step can be used to transform cellulose and hemicelluloses into sugars using cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes.
  • The sugars obtained by hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass are pentoses (principally xylose and arabinose), disaccharides (cellobiose) and glucose, which can be fermented by microorganisms. Glucose may, for example, be readily transformed into ethanol by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae during the alcoholic fermentation step.
  • Finally, a distillation step can separate and recover the product obtained from the fermentation, i.e. ethanol in the above case, from the fermentation must.
  • Various technico-economic studies have demonstrated the necessity of reducing the costs linked to the enzymatic hydrolysis step in order to bring the cost of the ethanol produced to values close to that for the ethanol obtained from starch.
  • Currently, industrial cellulases are principally produced by a filamentous fungus, Trichoderma reesei, because of its high cellulase-secreting power.
  • One of the ways of reducing costs consists of optimizing the operating conditions for the cellulase production process in order to increase its productivity or to obtain an enzymatic cocktail with an improved specific activity.
  • In the presence of an inducing substrate, wild type strains of Trichoderma reesei have the ability to secrete an enzymatic complex which is well suited to cellulose hydrolysis. The enzymes of the enzymatic complex contain three major types of activity: endoglucanases, exoglucanases and cellobiases. Other proteins, such as xylanases, which are necessary for hydrolysis of the lignocellulosic biomass, are also produced by Trichoderma reesei. The presence of an inducing substrate is indispensable to the expression of cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes.
  • Regulation of the genes for cellulases on various carbon sources has been studied in detail. Glucose exerts a catabolic repression effect on the production of cellulases. This is induced in the presence of cellulose, its hydrolysis products such as cellobiose or certain oligosaccharides, in particular disaccharides such as lactose or sophorose (Ilmén et al. 1997, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol 63, p 1298-1306). The nature of the carbonaceous substrate has a major influence on the composition of the enzymatic complex. Thus, xylose, associated with a carbonaceous inducing substrate such as cellulose or lactose, can be used to significantly improve the “xylanase activity” when it is present in limiting concentrations of the order of 0.5 to 1 mM (Mach-Aigner et al., 2010 Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol 76 N °6, p 1770-1776). Dissolving residual hemicelluloses (xylanes) with xylanases could promote enzymatic hydrolysis (Vàrnai et al., 2010 Enzyme and Microbial Technology Vol 46 p 185-193).
  • In order to obtain good enzyme productivities, it is necessary to provide a source of carbon that can be rapidly assimilated in order to allow rapid growth of Trichoderma reesei, and an inducing substrate that can allow the expression of cellulases and secretion into the culture medium. Cellulose can play a dual role. However, it is difficult to use on an industrial scale and it has been replaced by soluble carbon sources, such as lactose, which also act as an inducing substrate.
  • Other sugars such as cellobiose or sophorose have also been described as inducers (Ilmen et al. (1997), Foreman et al. (2003) Biol Chem 278, p 31988-31997, Pakula et al. (2005) Microbiology, 151, p 135-143), but are too expensive to be used on an industrial scale.
  • In general, it has been observed that the production of cellulases by Trichoderma reesei with soluble substrates is much lower than that obtained on cellulose in a batch mode (i.e. in a sealed medium) because of the repressor effect of sugars that are readily assimilated at high concentrations.
  • Patent FR-B-2 555 603 in the name of the Applicant proposes the continuous supply of carbonaceous substrates in order to lift the catabolic repression by limiting the residual concentration in the cultures and by optimizing the quantity of sugars in order to obtain a better yield and better enzymatic productivity. The process described in this patent proposes starting to supply the substrate using soluble sugars as the source of carbon, optionally in the form of a mixture. However, a continuous supply limiting glucose or xylose not associated with lactose or with another cellulase inducer (sophorose, cellobiose, etc) cannot be used to obtain high enzyme productivity.
  • In industrial cellulolytic enzyme production processes, lactose remains one of the most suitable substrates. In addition to being high, its price fluctuates a great deal and represents approximately one third of the cost price of the enzymes.
  • One of the solutions envisaged and presented in patent EP-B-0 448 430 consists of using carbonaceous substrates obtained from a die, for example hydrolysed hemicelluloses, as a source of inducing carbon. However, the productivity remains low, at about 50% compared with the process using lactose alone as an inducing substrate.
  • Patent application WO 2009/026716 describes a process for the production of cellulases in which the hemicellulolytic derivatives represent more than 40% of the carbon source and the sugars inducing cellulase production represent in the range 3% to 20% of this mixture. That process can be used to produce at least twice the quantity of cellulases compared with a process using only sugars obtained from hemicelluloses. However, the cellulase production performance is still lower than a process using only lactose.
  • Current research shows that, in order to improve cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzyme production processes, it is necessary to develop novel inducing substrates which perform at least as well as those using lactose, and which cost less.
  • This constitutes the context of the present invention.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention describes a process for the production of cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes in which the inducing substrate is a mixture of glucose, lactose and xylose.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The process for the production of cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes by a cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic microorganism according to the present invention comprises at least one phase for growth in the presence of a source of carbon and at least one phase for production in the presence of an inducing substrate, in which said inducing substrate is a mixture of glucose or cellulosic hydrolysates, lactose and xylose or a solution of hemicellulolytic hydrolysates, the quantities of each of the constituents of the mixture being defined by the following limits:
      • 40% to 65% by weight of glucose or cellulosic hydrolysates;
      • 21% to 25% by weight of lactose; and
      • 10% to 39% by weight of xylose or a solution of hemicellulosic hydrolysates;
        the sum of these three constituents being equal to 100%.
  • The inducing substrate is free of any sugar other than the constituents listed above. Thus, the relative proportions of each of the constituents are selected such that the sum of the quantities by weight is equal to 100%.
  • Thanks to the process of the invention using a mixture of particular sugars as an inducing substrate, the final concentrations of proteins obtained are 50% to 60% higher than those obtained with lactose used as the sole production substrate. They are also approximately 3 times higher than that obtained with improved mixtures which are rich in xyloses as described in the prior art document WO 2009/026716.
  • The process of the present invention uses a mixture based on glucose. More than 60% of lactose, an inducer of cellulase production, can be replaced by glucose which, however, is known to be a repressor of cellulase production, with improved final performance of the inducing mixture. Glucose is much cheaper than lactose and its solubility in water is approximately 3 times higher. Thus, it is possible to reduce the volumes employed. Thus, in this process, glucose is not only used in the growth phase, but also in the production phase in an amount of 60% of the mixture constituting the inducing substrate.
  • The glucose used in the mixture of sugars may also be replaced by glucose obtained from the cellulose enzymatic hydrolysis step, i.e. obtained directly from the process for the transformation of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol. This contributes to reducing the cost of enzyme production by using co-products from the process. Thus, they are termed cellulosic hydrolysates.
  • The xylose used in the mixture constituting the inducing sugar may be replaced by a solution of hemicellulolytic hydrolysates obtained from the process for the transformation of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol, and in particular obtained from pre-treatment of the biomass.
  • Furthermore, the possibility of using a very highly concentrated mixture of sugars can advantageously limit the risk of contamination.
  • The fact that xylose is added to the mixture constituting the inducing substrate means that the xylanase activity of the final enzymatic cocktail is greatly increased. The xylose may advantageously be replaced by a hemicellulosic hydrolysate solution obtained from the hydrolysis of hemicelluloses during pre-treatment of the lignocellulosic biomass in second generation biofuel production processes; it may be concentrated if necessary.
  • Preferably, the mixture constituting the inducing substrate comprises 50% to 65% by weight of glucose or cellulosic hydrolysates, 22% to 24% by weight of lactose and 15% to 25% by weight of xylose or a solution of hemicellulosic hydrolysates, optionally obtained from a pre-treatment of the lignocellulosic biomass, the sum of the constituents being equal to 100%.
  • Highly preferably, the inducing substrate is a mixture constituted by 60% by weight of glucose or cellulosic hydrolysates, 23% by weight of lactose and 17% by weight of xylose or hemicellulosic hydrolysates.
  • The carbonaceous substrate used during the growth phase is selected from glucose, xylose, lactose, residues obtained after ethanolic fermentation of monomeric sugars of the enzymatic hydrolysates of cellulosic biomass and/or an unrefined extract of hydrosoluble pentoses possibly deriving from the pre-treatment of a cellulosic biomass.
  • Highly preferably, the growth substrate is glucose.
  • The industrial strains used belong to the species Trichoderma reesei, modified in order to improve the cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes by mutation-selection processes. An example which can be cited is the strain IFP CL847. Strains improved by genetic recombination techniques may also be used. They have to be deleted for catabolic repression by glucose (Δ CRE1); an example is CL847.
  • These strains are cultivated in agitated, aerated bioreactors under conditions which are compatible with their growth and the production of enzymes. The conditions are such that the pH is adjusted to between 3.5 and 6 and the temperature is in the range 20° C. to 35° C. Preferably, a pH of 4.8 and a temperature of 27° C. are selected during the growth phase and a pH of 4 and a temperature of 25° C. are selected during the production phase. The degree of aeration, expressed as the volume of air per volume of reaction medium per minute, or vvm, applied during the process is in the range 0.3 to 1.5 min−1, and the rate of rotation, rpm, must allow the O2 pressure to be adjusted to between 20% and 60%. Preferably, an aeration of 0.5 vvm and agitation to allow the O2 pressure to be adjusted to 30% are selected.
  • Depending on its nature, the carbonaceous substrate selected to obtain the biomass is introduced into the bioreactor before sterilization, or is sterilized separately and introduced into the bioreactor after sterilization thereof in order to produce an initial sugar concentration of 15 to 60 g/L.
  • In view of the production phase, an aqueous solution containing the inducing substrate constituted by a glucose/lactose/xylose mixture or hemicellulose hydrolysate solution selected for the enzyme production phase is prepared in a concentration of 350 to 600 g/L in the feed solution used.
  • Preferably, the concentration is in the range 450 to 550 g/L.
  • The aqueous solution is injected after the initial substrate has been exhausted in order to provide an optimized quantity. The flow rate at which the solution is supplied is 30 to 45 mg per gram of cells per hour.
  • The residual sugar concentration in the culture medium is less than 1 g/L during the production phase (fed-batch) in order to limit the production of biomass. Preferably, this concentration is less than 0.5 g/L, still more preferably less than 0.1 g/L.
  • EXAMPLES
  • In the examples which follow, Example 1 presents a culture using glucose as the carbonaceous substrate during the growth phase and the production phase. This example demonstrates the low production of proteins obtained when this sugar is used as the sole carbonaceous substrate even if the flow is limiting during the fed-batch phase (residual concentration of glucose close to 0). The second example represents the reference fermentation using lactose as the carbonaceous substrate during the growth phase and the production phase which allows high protein production. Example 3 reproduces an experiment using a mixture in the production phase as described in patent application WO 2009/026716 containing a high proportion of xylose allowing, according to the authors, the cellulase production to be greatly increased compared with an experiment in which xylose or hemicellulosic derivatives are used as the sole carbonaceous substrates. Examples 4 to 6 are those of the patent, in accordance with the process of the present invention.
  • Example 1 Production of Enzymes on Glucose (Not in Accordance with the Invention)
  • The production of cellulases was carried out in a mechanically stirred bioreactor. The mineral medium had the following composition: KOH 1.66 g./L, H3PO4 85% 2 mL/L, (NH4)2SO4 2.8 g/L, MgSO4.7 H2O 0.6 g/L, CaCl2 0.6 g/L, MnSO4 3.2 mg/L, ZnSO4.7 H2O 2.8 mg/L, CoCl2.10H2O 4.0 mg/L, FeSO4.7 H2O 10 mg/L, Corn Steep 1.2 g/L, anti-foaming agent 0.5 mL/L.
  • The bioreactor containing the mineral medium was sterilized at 120° C. for 20 minutes; the glucose carbonaceous source was sterilized from 120° C. for 20 minutes then added to the bioreactor under sterile conditions in order to produce a final concentration of 30 g/L. The bioreactor was primed to 10% (v/v) with the liquid pre-culture of the CL847 strain of Trichoderma reesei. The mineral medium of the pre-culture was identical to that of the bioreactor apart from adding potassium phthalate in a concentration of 5 g/L to buffer the pH. Growth of the fungus in pre-culture was carried out using glucose as the carbonaceous substrate at a concentration of 30 g/L. Growth of the inoculum lasted 2 to 3 days and was carried out at 28° C. in a shaker incubator. Transfer to the bioreactor was carried out if the residual concentration of glucose was less than 15 g/L.
  • The experiment carried out in the bioreactor comprised two phases:
      • a phase for growth on a glucose carbonaceous substrate (initial concentration=30 g/L) at a temperature of 27° C. and a pH of 4.8 (regulated with 5.5 M ammonia). Aeration was at 0.5 vvm and agitation was increased between 200 and 800 rpm as a function of the pO2 (dissolved oxygen pressure), which was kept above 30%;
      • an enzyme production phase. When the initial substrate of the fermenter was exhausted, the 250 g/L glucose solution was injected continuously at a flow rate of 30 to 40 mg per gram of cells per hour up to 164 hours. The temperature was reduced to 25° C. and the pH to 4 until the end of culture. The pH was adjusted by adding a 5.5 N ammonium solution which provided the nitrogen necessary for synthesis of the excreted proteins. The dissolved oxygen content was kept above 15% to 20% by adjusting the aeration and agitation.
  • Enzyme production was followed by assaying the extracellular proteins using the Lowry method and BSA standard, after separation from the mycelium by filtering or centrifuging. The cellulolytic activities which were determined were:
      • the filter paper activity (FPU=filter paper unit), which meant that the overall activity of the endoglucanase and exoglucanase enzymatic pool could be assayed;
      • the aryl β-glucosidase and xylanase activities for the specific activities.
  • The FPU activity was measured on Whatman No 1 paper (procedure recommended by the IUPAC Biotechnology Commission) at an initial concentration of 50 g/L; the test sample from the enzymatic solution to be analysed which liberated the equivalent of 2 g/L of glucose (colorimetric assay) in 60 minutes was determined. The principle of filter paper activity is to determine, by DNS (dinitrosalicylic acid) assay, the quantity of reduced sugars obtained from a Whatman No 1 paper (procedure recommended by the IUPAC Biotechnology Commission).
  • The substrate used to determine the aryl β-glucosidase activity was p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (PNPG). It is cleaved by β-glucosidase to liberate p-nitrophenol.
  • One aryl β-glucosidase activity unit is defined as the quantity of enzyme necessary to produce 1 μmole of p-nitrophenol from PNPG per minute and is expressed in IU/ml. The principal of xylanase activity assay resides in determining, by DNS assay, the quantity of reduced sugars obtained from the hydrolysed xylanase solution. This assay method uses the reducing properties of the sugars, principally xylose. The xylanase activity is expressed in IU/ml, and corresponds to the quantity of enzyme necessary to produce 1 μmole of xylose per minute.
  • The specific activities were obtained by dividing the activities expressed in IU/ml by the concentration of proteins. They are expressed in IU/mg.
  • The analytical determinations on the final must of Example 1 produced the following results:
  • The analytical determinations of the final must produced the following results:
  • Biomass 15.2 g/L
  • Proteins 2.9 g/L
  • FPU 1.4 IU/mL
  • Xylanase 29.1 IU/mg
  • Specific β-glucosidase 0.35 IU/mg
  • The CL847 strain was presented as being derepressed to the catabolic repression exerted by glucose on the production of cellulase (it is deleted from the CRE1 gene). It appears that even for a fed-batch reaction carried out under glucose limitation conditions, the final production of proteins is very low.
  • Example 2 Production of Enzymes on Lactose (Not in Accordance with the Invention)
  • Enzyme production was carried out under the same conditions as in Example 1. The carbonaceous substrate during the growth and production phases was pure lactose. Lactose is an important inducer in cellulase production. It is this substrate which is the most widely used for the production of cellulases on an industrial scale.
  • After 30 hours of growth, after exhausting the initial substrate, the 250 g/L fed-batch solution was injected continuously at a flow rate of 35 mg per gram of cells per hour up to 164 hours.
  • The analytical determinations of the final must produced the following results: Biomass 13.5 g/L
  • Proteins 37.8 g/L
  • FPU 22.1 IU/mL
  • Xylanase 408.5 IU/mg
  • Specific β-glucosidase 0.96 IU/mg
  • Example 3 Production with Mixture of 97% Xylose/3% Sugars Inducing the Production of Cellulases CIC (Not in Accordance with the Invention)
  • The experiment was carried out under the same conditions as in Example 1, using pure xylose as the sole carbonaceous substrate during the growth phase, and in the production phase the 97% xylose/3% CIC mixture presented in patent application WO 2009/026716 A1. CICs (sugars inducing the production of cellulases) are a mixture of sugars allowing the induction of cellulase production. Its composition was as follows: 56% gentiobiose, 14% sophorose, 10% trehalose, 6% cellobiose, 6% maltotriose, 8% glucose.
  • After exhausting the initial substrate, the 360 g/L 97% xylose/3% CIC mixture was injected, following the recommendations described, at a flow rate of 0.4 g of carbon/L/h.
  • The analytical determinations of the final must produced the following results:
  • Biomass 14.3 g/L
  • Proteins 18.7 g/L
  • FPU 6.4 IU/ml
  • Xylanase 6000.1 IU/mg
  • Specific FPU 0.34 IU/mg
  • Specific β-glucosidase 1.15 IU/mg
  • The final protein production was close to that presented in WO 2009/026716 A1 where the authors obtained a final concentration of proteins of 25 g/L with the P59G strain. The FPase specific activity (0.34 IU/mg) was low, while the xylanase activity was very high.
  • Example 4 Production with Lactose (23%)/Glucose (60%)/Xylose (17%) Mixture at 500 g/L (in Accordance with the Invention)
  • The experiment of Example 4 was carried out under the same conditions as in Example 1 with glucose as the carbonaceous substrate for growth in an amount of 60 g/L. During the fed-batch production phase, we then used a solution in which three carbonaceous substrates were mixed in the following proportions: lactose (23%)/glucose (60%)/xylose (17%), at a concentration of 500 g/L. This mixture was injected at 45 mg/g/h. The analytical determinations of the final must produced the following results:
  • Biomass 26.1 g/L
  • Proteins 61.8 g/L
  • FPU 33.7 IU/ml
  • Xylanase 4017 IU/mg
  • Specific FPU 0.55 IU/mg
  • Specific β-glucosidase 1.2 IU/mg
  • The final protein production was more than 3 times higher than that of Example 3. The filter paper activity, which is an indicator of cellulase activity, was approximately 5 times higher.
  • The xylanase activity was 10 times higher than that of Example 2 carried out with lactose as the sole growth and production carbonaceous substrate, but approximately 50% lower than that of Example 3.
  • Example 5 Use of Lactose (23%)/Glucose (60%)/C5 Sugar Solution (17%) Mixture, at 500 g/L (in Accordance with the Invention)
  • Example 5 was carried out under the same conditions as Example 4. The glucose was used during the growth phase, at a concentration of 15 g/L. The xylose of the fed-batch solution was replaced by a solution of soluble hemicellulosic solution or C5 sugar solution obtained from a wheat straw impregnated with 0.08 N sulphuric acid and pre-treated by steam explosion (19 bar, 5 minutes). The mixture was injected at 30 mg/g/h for 170 h.
  • The analytical determinations of the final must produced the following results:
  • Biomass 19.1 g/L
  • Proteins 57.3 g/L
  • FPU 25.1 IU/ml
  • Xylanase 1151 IU/mg
  • Specific FPU 0.44 IU/mg
  • Specific β-Glucosidase 1.4 IU/mg
  • This experiment allowed the protein production to be increased by more than 50% compared with Example 2 and the xylanase activity was almost 3 times better. The majority of lactose was replaced by glucose and C5 sugar solution during the growth phase and production phase. The concentration of glucose during the growth phase was reduced compared with Example 4, by 60 to 15 g/L. The concentration of biomass was reduced from 26 to 19 g/L but this had little impact on the final concentration of proteins (7% lower). Thus, use of the sugars was optimized and the cost of the carbon source was considerably reduced.
  • Example 6 Use of Lactose (23%)/C6 Hydrolysates (56%)/Xylose (21%) Mixture, 500 g/L (in Accordance with the Invention)
  • Example 6 was carried out under the same conditions as Example 4. The glucose was used during the growth phase, at a concentration of 15 g/L. The glucose of the fed-batch solution was replaced by a solution of hydrolysate obtained from the enzymatic hydrolysis of a wheat straw impregnated with 0.08 N of sulphuric acid and pre-treated by steam explosion (19 bar, 5 minutes). The enzymatic hydrolysis of the wheat straw was carried out at 50° C. and at a pH of 4.8. It resulted in hydrolysis of 95% of the cellulose into glucose.
  • Lactose and xylose were dissolved in this solution so as to result in a mixture:
  • Lactose (23%)/C6 hydrolysates (56%)/xylose (21%), at 500 g/L.
  • The mixture was injected at 30 mg/g/h for 170 h during the fed-batch phase.
  • The analytical determinations of the final must produced the following results:
  • Biomass 16.1 g/L
  • Proteins 43.1 g/L
  • FPU 31.4 IU/ml
  • Xylanase 6595.1 IU/mg
  • Specific FPU 0.73 IU/mg
  • Specific β-glucosidase 1.2 IU/mg
  • The enzymatic cocktail obtained was very high quality, since the final FPase activity was close to the activity obtained in Example 4 even if the protein concentration was lower. The final FPase activity was approximately 5 times higher than that obtained with Example 3 and approximately 50% higher than that obtained during Example 2 where lactose was used as the sole carbonaceous substrate during the fed-batch phase.

Claims (10)

1. A process for the production of cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes by a cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic microorganism, comprising at least one phase for growth in the presence of a source of carbon and at least one phase for production in the presence of an inducing substrate, in which said inducing substrate is a mixture of glucose or cellulosic hydrolysates, lactose and xylose or a solution of hemicellulolytic hydrolysates, the quantities of each of the constituents of the mixture being defined by the following limits:
40% to 65% by weight of glucose or cellulosic hydrolysates;
21% to 25% by weight of lactose; and
10% to 39% by weight of xylose or a solution of hemicellulosic hydrolysates;
the sum of these three constituents being equal to 100%.
2. A process according to claim 1, in which the microorganism belongs to the species Trichoderma reesei and is deleted for catabolic repression by glucose.
3. A process according to claim 1, in which the inducing substrate is supplied in solution, the concentration of inducing substrate in the supply solution used during the production phase being 350 to 600 g/L.
4. A process according to claim 3, in which the concentration is in the range 450 to 550 g/L.
5. A process according to claim 1, in which the mixture constituting the inducing substrate comprises 50% to 65% by weight of glucose or cellulosic hydrolysates, 22% to 24% by weight of lactose and 15% to 25% by weight of xylose or a solution of hemicellulosic hydrolysates, the sum of the constituents being equal to 100%.
6. A process according to claim 5, in which the inducing substrate is a mixture constituted by 60% by weight of glucose or cellulosic hydrolysates, 23% by weight of lactose and 17% by weight of xylose or hemicellulosic hydrolysates.
7. A process according to claim 1, in which the carbonaceous substrate used during the growth phase is selected from glucose, xylose, lactose, residues obtained after ethanolic fermentation of monomeric sugars of the enzymatic hydrolysates of cellulosic biomass and/or an unrefined extract of hydrosoluble pentoses possibly derived from the pre-treatment of a cellulosic biomass.
8. A process according to claim 1, in which the pH is adjusted to between 3.5 and 6 and the temperature is in the range 20° C. to 35° C.
9. A process according to claim 1, in which the flow rate for introduction of the supply solution is 30 to 45 mg per gram of cells per hour.
10. A process according to claim 1, in which the residual concentration of sugar in the culture medium during the production phase is less than 1 g/L, preferably less than 0.5 g/L and highly preferably less than 0.1 g/L.
US13/809,734 2010-07-12 2011-06-16 Method for producing cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes Abandoned US20130210119A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR1002923 2010-07-12
FR1002923A FR2962444B1 (en) 2010-07-12 2010-07-12 PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ENHANCED CELLULOLYTIC AND / OR HEMICELLULOLYTIC ENZYMES
PCT/FR2011/000350 WO2012007650A1 (en) 2010-07-12 2011-06-16 Improved method for producing cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/FR2011/000350 A-371-Of-International WO2012007650A1 (en) 2010-07-12 2011-06-16 Improved method for producing cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/684,633 Continuation US10457925B2 (en) 2010-07-12 2017-08-23 Process for the production of cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130210119A1 true US20130210119A1 (en) 2013-08-15

Family

ID=43031261

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/809,734 Abandoned US20130210119A1 (en) 2010-07-12 2011-06-16 Method for producing cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes
US15/684,633 Active US10457925B2 (en) 2010-07-12 2017-08-23 Process for the production of cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/684,633 Active US10457925B2 (en) 2010-07-12 2017-08-23 Process for the production of cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes

Country Status (14)

Country Link
US (2) US20130210119A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2593543B1 (en)
CN (2) CN107603964A (en)
BR (1) BR112013000791B1 (en)
CA (1) CA2805605C (en)
ES (1) ES2625501T3 (en)
FR (1) FR2962444B1 (en)
HR (1) HRP20170749T1 (en)
HU (1) HUE034274T2 (en)
PL (1) PL2593543T3 (en)
RU (1) RU2565560C2 (en)
UA (1) UA111473C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2012007650A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA201300164B (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9249402B2 (en) 2011-10-14 2016-02-02 IFP Energies Nouvelles Process for the continuous production of cellulases by a filamentous fungus using a carbon substrate obtained from an acid pretreatment
US10030236B2 (en) 2012-06-18 2018-07-24 L'institut National De La Recherche Agronomique Process for the production of an enzymatic cocktail using liquid residues from a process for the biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic materials
US10407699B2 (en) 2015-04-23 2019-09-10 IFP Energies Nouvelles Modified strains of Trichoderma reesei having cellulase promoters with xylase gene promoting sequences

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2984353B1 (en) * 2011-12-14 2014-11-21 IFP Energies Nouvelles PROCESS FOR PRODUCING AN ENZYMATIC COCKTAIL USING THE SOLID RESIDUES OF A PROCESS FOR BIOCHEMICAL CONVERSION OF LIGNOCELLULOSIC MATERIALS
FR3088934A1 (en) * 2018-11-26 2020-05-29 IFP Energies Nouvelles PROCESS FOR PRODUCING ENZYMES BY A STRAIN BELONGING TO A FILAMENTOUS MUSHROOM

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060177917A1 (en) * 2005-02-09 2006-08-10 Michel Warzywoda Process for the production of cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes using distillation residues from the ethanolic fermentation of enzymatic hydrolyzates of (ligno)cellulosic materials

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4275163A (en) * 1978-11-20 1981-06-23 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Cellulase-producing microorganism
FR2555603B1 (en) 1983-11-29 1986-10-03 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR PRODUCING CELLULOLYTIC ENZYMES
FR2659664B1 (en) 1990-03-19 1994-08-05 Inst Francais Du Petrole COMPOSITION OF ENZYMES SUITABLE FOR HYDROLYSIS OF POLYSACCHARIDES OF A LIGNOCELLULOSIC SUBSTRATE, ITS PREPARATION AND ITS USE.
WO2009026716A1 (en) 2007-08-30 2009-03-05 Iogen Energy Corporation Method for cellulase production
JP5038181B2 (en) * 2008-02-14 2012-10-03 旭化成ケミカルズ株式会社 Method for producing cellulase and cellooligosaccharide

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060177917A1 (en) * 2005-02-09 2006-08-10 Michel Warzywoda Process for the production of cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes using distillation residues from the ethanolic fermentation of enzymatic hydrolyzates of (ligno)cellulosic materials

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Pourquie et al. Scale up of cellulase production and utilization. Biochemistry and Genetics of Cellulose Degradation. 1988;71-86. *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9249402B2 (en) 2011-10-14 2016-02-02 IFP Energies Nouvelles Process for the continuous production of cellulases by a filamentous fungus using a carbon substrate obtained from an acid pretreatment
US10030236B2 (en) 2012-06-18 2018-07-24 L'institut National De La Recherche Agronomique Process for the production of an enzymatic cocktail using liquid residues from a process for the biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic materials
US10407699B2 (en) 2015-04-23 2019-09-10 IFP Energies Nouvelles Modified strains of Trichoderma reesei having cellulase promoters with xylase gene promoting sequences

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2805605C (en) 2018-09-11
BR112013000791B1 (en) 2020-10-27
RU2565560C2 (en) 2015-10-20
ZA201300164B (en) 2013-09-25
ES2625501T3 (en) 2017-07-19
HRP20170749T1 (en) 2017-07-28
CA2805605A1 (en) 2012-01-19
FR2962444B1 (en) 2012-08-31
US10457925B2 (en) 2019-10-29
CN102971418A (en) 2013-03-13
RU2013105723A (en) 2014-08-20
BR112013000791A2 (en) 2019-10-01
US20170349888A1 (en) 2017-12-07
CN107603964A (en) 2018-01-19
HUE034274T2 (en) 2018-02-28
EP2593543A1 (en) 2013-05-22
EP2593543B1 (en) 2017-02-22
WO2012007650A1 (en) 2012-01-19
PL2593543T3 (en) 2017-08-31
UA111473C2 (en) 2016-05-10
FR2962444A1 (en) 2012-01-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7494792B2 (en) Process for the production of cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes using distillation residues from the ethanolic fermentation of enzymatic hydrolyzates of (ligno)cellulosic materials
US10457925B2 (en) Process for the production of cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes
JP6169077B2 (en) Cellulase production method using filamentous fungus suitable for fermenter having low oxygen transfer capacity coefficient KLa
Ahamed et al. Culture-based strategies to enhance cellulase enzyme production from Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 in bioreactor culture conditions
US8093019B2 (en) Method for cellulase production
US8956846B2 (en) Cellulase production method based on the regulation of the dissolved oxygen pressure oscillation in the culture medium
RU2508403C2 (en) Method for obtaining alcohol in biorefining context
US20110262988A1 (en) Methods and compositions for enhanced bacterial hydrolysis of cellulosic feedstocks
WO2017177289A1 (en) Process for conversion of biomass into fermentable sugars with integrated enzyme
Kovacs et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreated spruce using crude Trichoderma reesei and Trichoderma atroviride enzymes
US10030236B2 (en) Process for the production of an enzymatic cocktail using liquid residues from a process for the biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic materials
US9249402B2 (en) Process for the continuous production of cellulases by a filamentous fungus using a carbon substrate obtained from an acid pretreatment
US20190085310A1 (en) Method for producing cellulases with pretreated lignocellulosic pomace
US20230303991A1 (en) Method of Producing Proteins Using a Trichoderma Fungus Strain in Which the CEL1A Gene is Invalidated

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES, FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHAABANE, FADHEL BEN;MONOT, FREDERIC;REEL/FRAME:030083/0637

Effective date: 20130218

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION

AS Assignment

Owner name: L'INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE AGRONOMIQUE, FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES;REEL/FRAME:045159/0537

Effective date: 20171214

Owner name: AGRO INDUSTRIE RECHERCHES ET DEVELOPPEMENTS, FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES;REEL/FRAME:045159/0537

Effective date: 20171214

Owner name: L'INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE AGRONOMIQUE, F

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES;REEL/FRAME:045159/0537

Effective date: 20171214

Owner name: AGRO INDUSTRIE RECHERCHES ET DEVELOPPEMENTS, FRANC

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES;REEL/FRAME:045159/0537

Effective date: 20171214