US20130209260A1 - Gas turbine engine rotor balancing - Google Patents

Gas turbine engine rotor balancing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130209260A1
US20130209260A1 US13/369,684 US201213369684A US2013209260A1 US 20130209260 A1 US20130209260 A1 US 20130209260A1 US 201213369684 A US201213369684 A US 201213369684A US 2013209260 A1 US2013209260 A1 US 2013209260A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
tabs
rotor
disc
scallops
rim
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US13/369,684
Other versions
US9511457B2 (en
Inventor
Paul Stone
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Pratt and Whitney Canada Corp
Original Assignee
Pratt and Whitney Canada Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Pratt and Whitney Canada Corp filed Critical Pratt and Whitney Canada Corp
Priority to US13/369,684 priority Critical patent/US9511457B2/en
Assigned to PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP. reassignment PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: STONE, PAUL
Priority to CA2803367A priority patent/CA2803367C/en
Publication of US20130209260A1 publication Critical patent/US20130209260A1/en
Priority to US15/341,331 priority patent/US10598018B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US9511457B2 publication Critical patent/US9511457B2/en
Priority to US16/789,959 priority patent/US11215055B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D5/00Blades; Blade-carrying members; Heating, heat-insulating, cooling or antivibration means on the blades or the members
    • F01D5/02Blade-carrying members, e.g. rotors
    • F01D5/027Arrangements for balancing
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23PMETAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; COMBINED OPERATIONS; UNIVERSAL MACHINE TOOLS
    • B23P15/00Making specific metal objects by operations not covered by a single other subclass or a group in this subclass
    • B23P15/02Making specific metal objects by operations not covered by a single other subclass or a group in this subclass turbine or like blades from one piece
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16FSPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; MEANS FOR DAMPING VIBRATION
    • F16F15/00Suppression of vibrations in systems; Means or arrangements for avoiding or reducing out-of-balance forces, e.g. due to motion
    • F16F15/32Correcting- or balancing-weights or equivalent means for balancing rotating bodies, e.g. vehicle wheels
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05DINDEXING SCHEME FOR ASPECTS RELATING TO NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, GAS-TURBINES OR JET-PROPULSION PLANTS
    • F05D2220/00Application
    • F05D2220/30Application in turbines
    • F05D2220/32Application in turbines in gas turbines
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05DINDEXING SCHEME FOR ASPECTS RELATING TO NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, GAS-TURBINES OR JET-PROPULSION PLANTS
    • F05D2230/00Manufacture
    • F05D2230/10Manufacture by removing material
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05DINDEXING SCHEME FOR ASPECTS RELATING TO NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, GAS-TURBINES OR JET-PROPULSION PLANTS
    • F05D2260/00Function
    • F05D2260/15Load balancing
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/49Method of mechanical manufacture
    • Y10T29/49316Impeller making
    • Y10T29/49336Blade making

Definitions

  • the application relates generally to gas turbine engines and, more particularly, to balancing of rotors.
  • Gas turbine engine rotors such as fan, compressor and turbine rotors
  • the material removal process usually involves milling at least one groove or notch into a surface of the rotor, checking the unbalance and then further removing a small amount of material from the notch(es) (typically with a hand held tool) to perfect the balance.
  • These notches may create high stress areas in the rotor.
  • a minimum radius is required at the ends of the balancing notches to keep stresses to an acceptable level.
  • the final manual material removal process is not controlled as well as milling and may possibly result in the creation of further stress concentration zones in the form of small undulations at the surface of the notches or in the form of an undercut at the ends of the radius.
  • a polishing operation may then be conducted. However, it is known that polishing will remove beneficial compressive stresses on the surface that are usually present from milling or turning operations.
  • a method of balancing a gas turbine engine rotor comprising: a) obtaining a rotor disc with a circumferential array of tabs projecting from a peripheral rim of the disc and with stress shielding scallops between the tabs, the tabs having a predetermined initial weight; b) measuring a rotational imbalance of the rotor; and then c) correcting at least a part of the measured imbalance by removing material from at least one of the tabs to reduce the predetermined initial weight thereof to a reduced weight.
  • a manufacturing process for a gas turbine engine rotor having an axis comprising a) machining a circumferential array of stress shielding scallops in a surface of the rotor about the axis thereof, the stress shielding scallops creating a circumferential array of initial balance tabs projecting from said surface of the rotor; b) observing a rotor imbalance about the axis; and c) substantially correcting the measured imbalance by removing material from at least a selected one of said initial balance tabs.
  • a gas turbine engine rotor comprising a disc adapted to be mounted for rotation about an axis, a circumferentially extending rim at a periphery of the disc, a circumferential array of blades extending radially outwardly from a radially outer surface of the rim, a circumferential array of selectively machinable balance tabs projecting from the rim about the axis of rotation of the disc, wherein circumferentially adjacent balance tabs are spaced by stress shielding scallops defined in the rim, and wherein the balance tabs, prior to balancing, have a pre-established initial weight, and wherein the tabs are selectably machined to a reduced weight in order to balance the gas turbine engine rotor.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a turbofan gas turbine engine
  • FIG. 2 is a rear isometric view of a portion of a fan rotor with balance tabs machined in the underside of the rear of the rim of the rotor disc, three of the balance tabs have been machined off to their minimum material condition and the other tabs have been left untouched in their as-machined condition;
  • FIG. 3 is an axial cross-sectional view of the fan rotor shown in FIG. 2 ;
  • FIG. 4 is an enlarged rear isometric view of a sector of the fan rotor illustrating a pair of stress shielding scallops with a balance tab therebetween as initially machined in the undersurface of the peripheral rim of the rotor disc prior to balancing the rotor, the scallops and tabs forming part of the drawing definition of the rotor;
  • FIG. 5 is an enlarged rear isometric view similar to FIG. 3 but illustrating the balance tab after balancing.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a turbofan gas turbine engine 10 of a type preferably provided for use in subsonic flight, generally comprising in serial flow communication a fan 12 through which ambient air is propelled, a multistage compressor 14 for pressurizing the air, a combustor 16 in which the compressed air is mixed with fuel and ignited for generating an annular stream of hot combustion gases, and a turbine section 18 for extracting energy from the combustion gases.
  • a turbofan gas turbine engine 10 of a type preferably provided for use in subsonic flight, generally comprising in serial flow communication a fan 12 through which ambient air is propelled, a multistage compressor 14 for pressurizing the air, a combustor 16 in which the compressed air is mixed with fuel and ignited for generating an annular stream of hot combustion gases, and a turbine section 18 for extracting energy from the combustion gases.
  • the fan 12 , the compressor 14 and the turbine 18 each have rotary components, which need to be balanced.
  • the rotary components may, for instance, be provided in the form of an integrally bladed rotor commonly referred to as an IBR or a Blisk, or in the form of a bladed rotor assembly comprising a set of individual blades detachably mounted in slots defined in a rim of the rotor disc. While the present balancing method will be hereinafter described in connection with an integrally bladed fan rotor, it is understood that the present balancing approach is also applicable to compressor and turbine rotors. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the balancing method is not limited to IBRs but could also be used for balancing separately bladed rotors.
  • FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate an integrally bladed fan rotor 20 generally comprising a disc 22 having an axisymetric peripheral annular rim 24 , and a set of circumferentially spaced-apart blades 26 projecting radially outwardly from a radially outer surface 28 of the rim 24 .
  • the blades 26 and the disc 22 are integrally connected to form a one-piece component.
  • the integrally bladed rotor is typically manufactured from a forged blank of high strength material, such as titanium, and is then suitably machined (or other material removal process) to its final dimensions by appropriate means, such as a high precision multi-axis milling machine. Alternatively, the blades may be welded to the disc.
  • the disc 22 has a web 30 extending radially inwardly from the rim 24 to an inner hub 32 defining a central bore 34 for receiving a shaft in order to mount the disc 22 for rotation about the centerline axis of the engine 10 .
  • the rim 24 extends axially from a leading edge 36 to a trailing edge 38 .
  • the axial length of the rim 24 between edges 36 and 38 is selected to offer support to the blades 26 from the leading to the trailing edges 40 and 42 thereof.
  • the rim 24 has a forward overhang portion 44 and an aft overhang portion 46 extending in a cantilever fashion on axially opposite sides of the disc web 30 .
  • a circumferential array of stress shielding scallops 50 may be defined in the radially inner surface of at least one of the overhangs 44 and 46 of the rim 24 (the aft overhang 46 in the illustrated example) so as to define a row of circumferentially spaced-apart balance tabs 52 around the rotation axis of the rotor.
  • the tabs 52 project radially inwardly from the radially inner surface of the disc rim 24 concentrically relative to the rotation axis of the rotor.
  • the stress shielding scallops 50 and the resulting balance tabs 52 are part of the drawing definition of the rotor 20 and are thus machined during the initial manufacturing operations of the rotor (i.e. prior to the balancing operations).
  • the scallops 50 may be precisely milled or otherwise suitably machined in the rim surface of the disc 22 as per the original specifications of the rotor.
  • the geometry of stress shielding scallops 50 and of the balance tabs 52 may be pre-established and pre-analysed by numerical models at the design stage of the rotor part (i.e. prior to manufacturing).
  • the tabs 52 provide relatively low stress areas from which material may be removed from the disc to offset an imbalance measured on the rotor after the initial manufacturing thereof.
  • the provision of the tabs 52 allows correcting an imbalance by removing material from the disc 22 without inducing high stress concentration notches or grooves as it might be the case with conventional material removal balancing methods.
  • one balance tab 52 is provided underneath each blade 26 in general alignment with the trailing edge 42 of the blade. That is each tab 52 is radially aligned with a corresponding blade 26 .
  • the tabs 52 are sized (radial height and axial depth) to permit removal of a predetermined weight of material which is sufficient to compensate for rotor imbalances typically encountered during manufacturing of rotors.
  • the tabs 52 may have a tapering profile (i.e. the section of the tab is greater at the base than at the tip thereof).
  • a fillet is defined between each tab 52 and the neighbouring scallops 50 . The radius of the fillet at each end of a scallop 50 is selected to maintain the stress in the scallops to an acceptable level.
  • the rotor 20 may be subject to a surface inspection and to a surface treatment operation.
  • the rotor 20 including the scallops 50 , may be blue etch inspected and peened.
  • the provision of the tabs 52 allows to perform the surface inspection and the surface treatment steps prior to balancing, thereby avoiding any risk of residual imbalance that could be induced by these surface inspection and treatment operations.
  • the tabs 52 are much lower stress areas than the scallops and, thus, any subsequent machining thereof to correct a measured rotor imbalance does not need to be necessarily followed by etching and peening operations.
  • the rotor 20 may be tested to detect a rotor imbalance. If a rotor imbalance is measured, a selected tab or selected tabs may be machined away to offset the measured imbalance. For instance, as shown in FIG. 3 , three tabs 52 ′ may be machined away to a reduced height. A straight cut may be made through each tab 52 ′ to remove the desired amount of material therefrom. Accordingly, the material may be removed without introducing a high stress concentration zone, such as a notch or groove, in the disc.
  • the other tabs 50 are shown in their initial as-machined conditions. The amount of material removed from the tabs, the number of tabs to be machined and the location thereof is function of the imbalance to be corrected. FIG.
  • FIG. 4 shows a tab 52 in its initial as-machined condition.
  • FIG. 5 shows the same balance tab 52 ′ after it has been machined off to its minimal material condition.
  • the minimal material condition of the tabs is limited by the minimum allowable tab height. If the balance tab was removed completely so that the tab height was zero (the tab is flush with the bottom of the stress shielding scallops) then the stresses in the area where material was removed would be higher than ideal. So a minimum height of tab needs to be maintained so that the stresses in the area where material is removed is low enough. If the neighbouring scallop was deeper then the amount of material that could be removed from the tab would be greater (such that the minimum tab height is maintained).
  • the manufacturing process involves the milling of multiple circumferentially spaced-apart stress shielding scallops around an axis of the rotor during the initial machining operations. These scallops are part of the drawing definition and therefore there is virtually no geometry variation from scallop to scallop and they are easily analyzed. Coolant may be used during the machining of the scallops and the surface finish may be well controlled with no need to perform a polishing operation. The scallops may then be properly blue etch inspected and peened. Any required balance correction may be achieved by material removal at the projecting tabs that are between the stress shielding scallops.
  • the material removal balancing operation may be performed on much lower stress areas, which are less critical from a fatigue point of view, as compared to conventional material removal methods in which balancing notched are milled into a surface of the rotor.
  • Removing material on the tabs actually reduces the stress in the neighbouring scallops. Since the stresses in these tabs is significantly lower than the stresses in conventional material removal areas, the material can be removed without the same durability concerns that are present when using traditional material removal balancing.
  • the geometry of the material removal is also much less complicated than the conventional material removal. The stresses are low enough at the tabs that it may be possible to move the balancing operation to after the blue etch inspection and peening operations. All this may provide for a rotor part with a lower residual unbalance.
  • the balance tabs could be provided at the front of disc in the undersurface of the forward overhang 44 .
  • the tabs could project axially from the rim or another surface of the rotor. Still other modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the appended claims.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Turbine Rotor Nozzle Sealing (AREA)

Abstract

A method of balancing a gas turbine engine rotor comprises the step of obtaining a rotor disc with a circumferential array of balance tabs projecting from a peripheral rim of the disc. Stress shielding scallops are defined in the rotor disc between the tabs. The balancing is achieved by removing material from at least one of the tabs.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The application relates generally to gas turbine engines and, more particularly, to balancing of rotors.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE ART
  • Gas turbine engine rotors, such as fan, compressor and turbine rotors, can be balanced by removal of material. The material removal process usually involves milling at least one groove or notch into a surface of the rotor, checking the unbalance and then further removing a small amount of material from the notch(es) (typically with a hand held tool) to perfect the balance. These notches may create high stress areas in the rotor. Typically a minimum radius is required at the ends of the balancing notches to keep stresses to an acceptable level. However, the final manual material removal process is not controlled as well as milling and may possibly result in the creation of further stress concentration zones in the form of small undulations at the surface of the notches or in the form of an undercut at the ends of the radius. To control the surface finish and minimize or attempt to correct these surface defects, a polishing operation may then be conducted. However, it is known that polishing will remove beneficial compressive stresses on the surface that are usually present from milling or turning operations.
  • Accordingly, there is a need for improvements.
  • SUMMARY
  • In one aspect, there is provided a method of balancing a gas turbine engine rotor, the method comprising: a) obtaining a rotor disc with a circumferential array of tabs projecting from a peripheral rim of the disc and with stress shielding scallops between the tabs, the tabs having a predetermined initial weight; b) measuring a rotational imbalance of the rotor; and then c) correcting at least a part of the measured imbalance by removing material from at least one of the tabs to reduce the predetermined initial weight thereof to a reduced weight.
  • In a second aspect, there is provided a manufacturing process for a gas turbine engine rotor having an axis, comprising a) machining a circumferential array of stress shielding scallops in a surface of the rotor about the axis thereof, the stress shielding scallops creating a circumferential array of initial balance tabs projecting from said surface of the rotor; b) observing a rotor imbalance about the axis; and c) substantially correcting the measured imbalance by removing material from at least a selected one of said initial balance tabs.
  • In a third aspect, there is provided a gas turbine engine rotor comprising a disc adapted to be mounted for rotation about an axis, a circumferentially extending rim at a periphery of the disc, a circumferential array of blades extending radially outwardly from a radially outer surface of the rim, a circumferential array of selectively machinable balance tabs projecting from the rim about the axis of rotation of the disc, wherein circumferentially adjacent balance tabs are spaced by stress shielding scallops defined in the rim, and wherein the balance tabs, prior to balancing, have a pre-established initial weight, and wherein the tabs are selectably machined to a reduced weight in order to balance the gas turbine engine rotor.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Reference is now made to the accompanying figures, in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a turbofan gas turbine engine;
  • FIG. 2 is a rear isometric view of a portion of a fan rotor with balance tabs machined in the underside of the rear of the rim of the rotor disc, three of the balance tabs have been machined off to their minimum material condition and the other tabs have been left untouched in their as-machined condition;
  • FIG. 3 is an axial cross-sectional view of the fan rotor shown in FIG. 2;
  • FIG. 4 is an enlarged rear isometric view of a sector of the fan rotor illustrating a pair of stress shielding scallops with a balance tab therebetween as initially machined in the undersurface of the peripheral rim of the rotor disc prior to balancing the rotor, the scallops and tabs forming part of the drawing definition of the rotor; and
  • FIG. 5 is an enlarged rear isometric view similar to FIG. 3 but illustrating the balance tab after balancing.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a turbofan gas turbine engine 10 of a type preferably provided for use in subsonic flight, generally comprising in serial flow communication a fan 12 through which ambient air is propelled, a multistage compressor 14 for pressurizing the air, a combustor 16 in which the compressed air is mixed with fuel and ignited for generating an annular stream of hot combustion gases, and a turbine section 18 for extracting energy from the combustion gases.
  • The fan 12, the compressor 14 and the turbine 18 each have rotary components, which need to be balanced. The rotary components may, for instance, be provided in the form of an integrally bladed rotor commonly referred to as an IBR or a Blisk, or in the form of a bladed rotor assembly comprising a set of individual blades detachably mounted in slots defined in a rim of the rotor disc. While the present balancing method will be hereinafter described in connection with an integrally bladed fan rotor, it is understood that the present balancing approach is also applicable to compressor and turbine rotors. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the balancing method is not limited to IBRs but could also be used for balancing separately bladed rotors.
  • FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate an integrally bladed fan rotor 20 generally comprising a disc 22 having an axisymetric peripheral annular rim 24, and a set of circumferentially spaced-apart blades 26 projecting radially outwardly from a radially outer surface 28 of the rim 24. According to the illustrated embodiment, the blades 26 and the disc 22 are integrally connected to form a one-piece component. The integrally bladed rotor is typically manufactured from a forged blank of high strength material, such as titanium, and is then suitably machined (or other material removal process) to its final dimensions by appropriate means, such as a high precision multi-axis milling machine. Alternatively, the blades may be welded to the disc.
  • The disc 22 has a web 30 extending radially inwardly from the rim 24 to an inner hub 32 defining a central bore 34 for receiving a shaft in order to mount the disc 22 for rotation about the centerline axis of the engine 10. As shown in FIG. 3, the rim 24 extends axially from a leading edge 36 to a trailing edge 38. The axial length of the rim 24 between edges 36 and 38 is selected to offer support to the blades 26 from the leading to the trailing edges 40 and 42 thereof. It can also be appreciated from FIG. 3, that the rim 24 has a forward overhang portion 44 and an aft overhang portion 46 extending in a cantilever fashion on axially opposite sides of the disc web 30.
  • Referring concurrently to FIGS. 2, 4 and 5, it can be appreciated that a circumferential array of stress shielding scallops 50 may be defined in the radially inner surface of at least one of the overhangs 44 and 46 of the rim 24 (the aft overhang 46 in the illustrated example) so as to define a row of circumferentially spaced-apart balance tabs 52 around the rotation axis of the rotor. The tabs 52 project radially inwardly from the radially inner surface of the disc rim 24 concentrically relative to the rotation axis of the rotor. The stress shielding scallops 50 and the resulting balance tabs 52 are part of the drawing definition of the rotor 20 and are thus machined during the initial manufacturing operations of the rotor (i.e. prior to the balancing operations). The scallops 50 may be precisely milled or otherwise suitably machined in the rim surface of the disc 22 as per the original specifications of the rotor. Accordingly, the geometry of stress shielding scallops 50 and of the balance tabs 52 may be pre-established and pre-analysed by numerical models at the design stage of the rotor part (i.e. prior to manufacturing). As will be seen hereinafter, the tabs 52 provide relatively low stress areas from which material may be removed from the disc to offset an imbalance measured on the rotor after the initial manufacturing thereof. The provision of the tabs 52 allows correcting an imbalance by removing material from the disc 22 without inducing high stress concentration notches or grooves as it might be the case with conventional material removal balancing methods.
  • According to the illustrated embodiment, one balance tab 52 is provided underneath each blade 26 in general alignment with the trailing edge 42 of the blade. That is each tab 52 is radially aligned with a corresponding blade 26. However, it is understood that the number of balance tabs 52 could differ from the number of blades 26 and also that the tabs 52 and the blades 26 could be angularly or circumferentially offset with respect to one another. The tabs 52 are sized (radial height and axial depth) to permit removal of a predetermined weight of material which is sufficient to compensate for rotor imbalances typically encountered during manufacturing of rotors. As can be appreciated from FIG. 4, the tabs 52 may have a tapering profile (i.e. the section of the tab is greater at the base than at the tip thereof). A fillet is defined between each tab 52 and the neighbouring scallops 50. The radius of the fillet at each end of a scallop 50 is selected to maintain the stress in the scallops to an acceptable level.
  • After having been machined to its final dimensions, the rotor 20 may be subject to a surface inspection and to a surface treatment operation. For instance, the rotor 20, including the scallops 50, may be blue etch inspected and peened. The provision of the tabs 52 allows to perform the surface inspection and the surface treatment steps prior to balancing, thereby avoiding any risk of residual imbalance that could be induced by these surface inspection and treatment operations. Indeed, the tabs 52 are much lower stress areas than the scallops and, thus, any subsequent machining thereof to correct a measured rotor imbalance does not need to be necessarily followed by etching and peening operations.
  • Once the etching and peening operations have been completed, the rotor 20 may be tested to detect a rotor imbalance. If a rotor imbalance is measured, a selected tab or selected tabs may be machined away to offset the measured imbalance. For instance, as shown in FIG. 3, three tabs 52′ may be machined away to a reduced height. A straight cut may be made through each tab 52′ to remove the desired amount of material therefrom. Accordingly, the material may be removed without introducing a high stress concentration zone, such as a notch or groove, in the disc. The other tabs 50 are shown in their initial as-machined conditions. The amount of material removed from the tabs, the number of tabs to be machined and the location thereof is function of the imbalance to be corrected. FIG. 4 shows a tab 52 in its initial as-machined condition. FIG. 5 shows the same balance tab 52′ after it has been machined off to its minimal material condition. The minimal material condition of the tabs is limited by the minimum allowable tab height. If the balance tab was removed completely so that the tab height was zero (the tab is flush with the bottom of the stress shielding scallops) then the stresses in the area where material was removed would be higher than ideal. So a minimum height of tab needs to be maintained so that the stresses in the area where material is removed is low enough. If the neighbouring scallop was deeper then the amount of material that could be removed from the tab would be greater (such that the minimum tab height is maintained).
  • According to one embodiment, the manufacturing process involves the milling of multiple circumferentially spaced-apart stress shielding scallops around an axis of the rotor during the initial machining operations. These scallops are part of the drawing definition and therefore there is virtually no geometry variation from scallop to scallop and they are easily analyzed. Coolant may be used during the machining of the scallops and the surface finish may be well controlled with no need to perform a polishing operation. The scallops may then be properly blue etch inspected and peened. Any required balance correction may be achieved by material removal at the projecting tabs that are between the stress shielding scallops. In this way, the material removal balancing operation may be performed on much lower stress areas, which are less critical from a fatigue point of view, as compared to conventional material removal methods in which balancing notched are milled into a surface of the rotor. Removing material on the tabs actually reduces the stress in the neighbouring scallops. Since the stresses in these tabs is significantly lower than the stresses in conventional material removal areas, the material can be removed without the same durability concerns that are present when using traditional material removal balancing. The geometry of the material removal is also much less complicated than the conventional material removal. The stresses are low enough at the tabs that it may be possible to move the balancing operation to after the blue etch inspection and peening operations. All this may provide for a rotor part with a lower residual unbalance.
  • The simpler material removal geometry (i.e. straight cut through selected tabs) enable that the material is removed using a manual milling machine rather than using a numerically controlled machine. Having the flexibility to use other machines could streamline the process workflow and result in cost savings.
  • The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. For example, the balance tabs could be provided at the front of disc in the undersurface of the forward overhang 44. Also, in some applications, the tabs could project axially from the rim or another surface of the rotor. Still other modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the appended claims.

Claims (15)

What is claimed is:
1. A method of balancing a gas turbine engine rotor, the method comprising: a) obtaining a rotor disc with a circumferential array of tabs projecting from a peripheral rim of the disc and with stress shielding scallops between the tabs, the tabs having a predetermined initial weight; b) measuring a rotational imbalance of the rotor; and then c) correcting at least a part of the measured imbalance by removing material from at least one of the tabs to reduce the predetermined initial weight thereof to a reduced weight.
2. The method defined in claim 1, wherein a) comprises manufacturing the rotor disc initially with the stress shielding scallops and the tabs in the peripheral rim of the rotor disc.
3. The method defined in claim 1, wherein c) comprises machining off at least a portion of said at least one of said tabs.
4. The method defined in claim 1, wherein a circumferential array of blades extend radially outwardly from a radially outer surface of the peripheral rim of the rotor disc, and wherein a) comprises providing the tabs at circumferential locations generally corresponding to the blades.
5. The method defined in claim 1, wherein the tabs are created by machining the stress shielding scallops in a radially inner surface of the peripheral rim of the disc, the tabs projecting radially inwardly from the peripheral rim.
6. The method defined in claim 1, wherein c) comprises performing a straight cut in the at least one of the tabs.
7. The method defined in claim 3, wherein the tabs are substantially aligned with a trailing edge of the blades.
8. A manufacturing process for a gas turbine engine rotor having an axis, comprising a) machining a circumferential array of stress shielding scallops in a surface of the rotor about the axis thereof, the stress shielding scallops creating a circumferential array of initial balance tabs projecting from said surface of the rotor; b) observing a rotor imbalance about the axis; and c) substantially correcting the measured imbalance by removing material from at least a selected one of said initial balance tabs.
9. The manufacturing method defined in claim 8, wherein prior or after step c) the method further comprises: performing a surface inspection and a surface treatment operation on said rotor including on said stress shielding scallops thereof.
10. The manufacturing method defined in claim 9, wherein the surface inspection and the surface treatment operation are performed prior to step c).
11. The manufacturing method defined in claim 8, wherein step a) comprises machining the stress shielding scallops in a radially inner surface of a peripheral rim of the disc.
12. The manufacturing method defined in claim 11, wherein the stress shielding scallops are defined in an aft end portion of the peripheral rim.
13. A gas turbine engine rotor comprising a disc adapted to be mounted for rotation about an axis, a circumferentially extending rim at a periphery of the disc, a circumferential array of blades extending radially outwardly from a radially outer surface of the rim, a circumferential array of selectively machineable balance tabs projecting from the rim about the axis of rotation of the disc, wherein circumferentially adjacent balance tabs are spaced by stress shielding scallops defined in the rim, and wherein the balance tabs, prior to balancing, have a pre-established initial weight, and wherein the tabs are selectably machined off from said pre-established initial weight to a reduced weight in order to balance the gas turbine engine rotor.
14. The rotor defined in claim 13, wherein the selectively machinable balance tabs project radially inwardly from the rim.
15. The rotor defined in claim 14, wherein the selectively machinable balance tabs have a tapering profile.
US13/369,684 2012-02-09 2012-02-09 Gas turbine engine rotor balancing Active 2035-10-09 US9511457B2 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/369,684 US9511457B2 (en) 2012-02-09 2012-02-09 Gas turbine engine rotor balancing
CA2803367A CA2803367C (en) 2012-02-09 2013-01-24 Gas turbine engine rotor balancing
US15/341,331 US10598018B2 (en) 2012-02-09 2016-11-02 Gas turbine engine rotor balancing
US16/789,959 US11215055B2 (en) 2012-02-09 2020-02-13 Gas turbine engine rotor balancing

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/369,684 US9511457B2 (en) 2012-02-09 2012-02-09 Gas turbine engine rotor balancing

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/341,331 Division US10598018B2 (en) 2012-02-09 2016-11-02 Gas turbine engine rotor balancing

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130209260A1 true US20130209260A1 (en) 2013-08-15
US9511457B2 US9511457B2 (en) 2016-12-06

Family

ID=48918176

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/369,684 Active 2035-10-09 US9511457B2 (en) 2012-02-09 2012-02-09 Gas turbine engine rotor balancing
US15/341,331 Active 2033-08-20 US10598018B2 (en) 2012-02-09 2016-11-02 Gas turbine engine rotor balancing
US16/789,959 Active US11215055B2 (en) 2012-02-09 2020-02-13 Gas turbine engine rotor balancing

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/341,331 Active 2033-08-20 US10598018B2 (en) 2012-02-09 2016-11-02 Gas turbine engine rotor balancing
US16/789,959 Active US11215055B2 (en) 2012-02-09 2020-02-13 Gas turbine engine rotor balancing

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (3) US9511457B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2803367C (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR3021064A1 (en) * 2014-05-16 2015-11-20 Snecma DISK AND METHOD FOR BALANCING
GB2527667A (en) * 2014-05-19 2015-12-30 Snecma Balanced rotor disc, and balancing method
US20160017713A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2016-01-21 United Technologies Corporation Turbine Engine Hybrid Rotor
US20160115821A1 (en) * 2014-10-22 2016-04-28 United Technologies Corporation Bladed rotor disk including anti-vibratory feature
EP3054088A1 (en) * 2015-02-04 2016-08-10 United Technologies Corporation Gas turbine engine rotor disk balancing
US9638037B2 (en) 2014-11-03 2017-05-02 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Method of balancing a gas turbine engine rotor
DE102016120346A1 (en) * 2016-10-25 2018-04-26 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co Kg Compressor rotor of a turbomachine
US20180320522A1 (en) * 2017-05-04 2018-11-08 Rolls-Royce Corporation Turbine assembly with auxiliary wheel
US10415391B2 (en) 2014-05-15 2019-09-17 United Technologies Corporation Rotor and gas turbine engine including a rotor
US20190284936A1 (en) * 2018-03-15 2019-09-19 United Technologies Corporation Gas turbine engine rotor disk
US10774678B2 (en) 2017-05-04 2020-09-15 Rolls-Royce Corporation Turbine assembly with auxiliary wheel
US10865646B2 (en) 2017-05-04 2020-12-15 Rolls-Royce Corporation Turbine assembly with auxiliary wheel
US10968744B2 (en) 2017-05-04 2021-04-06 Rolls-Royce Corporation Turbine rotor assembly having a retaining collar for a bayonet mount
US20220235662A1 (en) * 2021-01-28 2022-07-28 General Electric Company Trapped rotatable weights to improve rotor balance

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20180320601A1 (en) * 2017-05-04 2018-11-08 Rolls-Royce Corporation Turbine assembly with auxiliary wheel
US11994444B2 (en) * 2020-09-29 2024-05-28 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Part balancing
US11578599B2 (en) * 2021-02-02 2023-02-14 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Rotor balance assembly
FR3120907B1 (en) * 2021-03-17 2023-12-22 Safran Aircraft Engines FAN ROTOR ASSEMBLY
US11976564B1 (en) 2023-03-30 2024-05-07 Rolls-Royce North American Technologies Inc. Splined balance weight for rotating components in gas turbine engines
US12018579B1 (en) 2023-08-08 2024-06-25 Rolls-Royce North American Technologies Inc. Clocking balance weight rotor assembly for gas turbine engines
US12018580B1 (en) 2023-08-08 2024-06-25 Rolls-Royce North American Technologies Inc. Rotor assembly for gas turbine engines with replaceable balance weight pins

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100080705A1 (en) * 2008-09-30 2010-04-01 Christian Pronovost Rotor disc and method of balancing

Family Cites Families (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4043147A (en) 1976-06-15 1977-08-23 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Intershaft balance weight
US4926710A (en) 1987-09-08 1990-05-22 United Technologies Corporation Method of balancing bladed gas turbine engine rotor
US5011374A (en) 1987-11-17 1991-04-30 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for balancing turbine rotors
US6128820A (en) * 1998-10-20 2000-10-10 General Electric Co. Method of repairing damaged turbine rotor wheels using differentially controlled temperatures
US6234912B1 (en) 1999-09-07 2001-05-22 General Electric Company High-stiffness composite shaft
US6354780B1 (en) 2000-09-15 2002-03-12 General Electric Company Eccentric balanced blisk
GB2398882B (en) 2003-02-27 2007-09-05 Rolls Royce Plc Rotor balancing
GB2411441B (en) 2004-02-24 2006-04-19 Rolls Royce Plc Fan or compressor blisk
US7303377B2 (en) 2004-04-14 2007-12-04 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Apparatus and method of balancing a shaft
JP4333616B2 (en) 2005-03-28 2009-09-16 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Rotating body balance correcting member and rotating body balance correcting method
DE102006027723A1 (en) 2005-07-11 2007-01-18 Ebm-Papst St. Georgen Gmbh & Co. Kg Method and device for balancing a fan having a rotor in a housing using a laser beam determines unbalancing region and removes excess material with the laser
GB2438642B (en) 2006-06-01 2008-04-09 Rolls Royce Plc Rotor unbalance correction
FR2920187B1 (en) 2007-08-24 2014-07-04 Snecma BLOWER FOR AIRCRAFT TURBOMACHINE COMPRISING A BALANCING FLANGE MASQUERED BY THE INLET CONE.
US8328519B2 (en) * 2008-09-24 2012-12-11 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Rotor with improved balancing features
US8186961B2 (en) 2009-01-23 2012-05-29 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Blade preloading system
US8322991B2 (en) 2009-04-10 2012-12-04 Rolls-Royce Corporation Balance weight
US8348616B2 (en) 2009-06-16 2013-01-08 General Electric Company Trapped spring balance weight and rotor assembly
US9297258B2 (en) 2009-06-16 2016-03-29 General Electric Company Trapped spring balance weight and rotor assembly
US8353670B2 (en) 2009-07-30 2013-01-15 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Axial balancing clip weight for rotor assembly and method for balancing a rotor assembly
US8506253B2 (en) 2009-08-19 2013-08-13 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Balancing apparatus for rotor assembly
US8631578B2 (en) 2009-10-01 2014-01-21 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Radial balancing clip weight for rotor assembly
GB201009216D0 (en) 2010-06-02 2010-07-21 Rolls Royce Plc Rotationally balancing a rotating part

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100080705A1 (en) * 2008-09-30 2010-04-01 Christian Pronovost Rotor disc and method of balancing

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10364677B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2019-07-30 United Technologies Corporation Turbine engine hybrid rotor
US20160017713A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2016-01-21 United Technologies Corporation Turbine Engine Hybrid Rotor
US10415391B2 (en) 2014-05-15 2019-09-17 United Technologies Corporation Rotor and gas turbine engine including a rotor
FR3021064A1 (en) * 2014-05-16 2015-11-20 Snecma DISK AND METHOD FOR BALANCING
GB2527667B (en) * 2014-05-19 2020-07-15 Snecma Balanced rotor disc, and balancing method
GB2527667A (en) * 2014-05-19 2015-12-30 Snecma Balanced rotor disc, and balancing method
US10066502B2 (en) * 2014-10-22 2018-09-04 United Technologies Corporation Bladed rotor disk including anti-vibratory feature
US20160115821A1 (en) * 2014-10-22 2016-04-28 United Technologies Corporation Bladed rotor disk including anti-vibratory feature
US9638037B2 (en) 2014-11-03 2017-05-02 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Method of balancing a gas turbine engine rotor
US10570741B2 (en) 2014-11-03 2020-02-25 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Method of balancing a gas turbine engine rotor
EP3054088A1 (en) * 2015-02-04 2016-08-10 United Technologies Corporation Gas turbine engine rotor disk balancing
US10544678B2 (en) 2015-02-04 2020-01-28 United Technologies Corporation Gas turbine engine rotor disk balancing
DE102016120346A1 (en) * 2016-10-25 2018-04-26 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co Kg Compressor rotor of a turbomachine
US20180112674A1 (en) * 2016-10-25 2018-04-26 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co Kg Compressor rotor of a fluid flow machine
US10995768B2 (en) * 2016-10-25 2021-05-04 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co Kg Compressor rotor of a fluid flow machine
US20180320522A1 (en) * 2017-05-04 2018-11-08 Rolls-Royce Corporation Turbine assembly with auxiliary wheel
US10774678B2 (en) 2017-05-04 2020-09-15 Rolls-Royce Corporation Turbine assembly with auxiliary wheel
US10865646B2 (en) 2017-05-04 2020-12-15 Rolls-Royce Corporation Turbine assembly with auxiliary wheel
US10968744B2 (en) 2017-05-04 2021-04-06 Rolls-Royce Corporation Turbine rotor assembly having a retaining collar for a bayonet mount
US20190284936A1 (en) * 2018-03-15 2019-09-19 United Technologies Corporation Gas turbine engine rotor disk
US20220235662A1 (en) * 2021-01-28 2022-07-28 General Electric Company Trapped rotatable weights to improve rotor balance
US11732585B2 (en) * 2021-01-28 2023-08-22 General Electric Company Trapped rotatable weights to improve rotor balance

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US11215055B2 (en) 2022-01-04
US10598018B2 (en) 2020-03-24
CA2803367A1 (en) 2013-08-09
US20200200013A1 (en) 2020-06-25
CA2803367C (en) 2020-06-30
US20170074104A1 (en) 2017-03-16
US9511457B2 (en) 2016-12-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11215055B2 (en) Gas turbine engine rotor balancing
US6354780B1 (en) Eccentric balanced blisk
CA2709139C (en) Process for providing firtree slots in rotor discs
US6893222B2 (en) Turbine balancing
US10570741B2 (en) Method of balancing a gas turbine engine rotor
US7637010B2 (en) Methods for machining turbine engine components
US8556584B2 (en) Rotating component of a turbine engine
US8959738B2 (en) Process of repairing a component, a repair tool for a component, and a component
US20180281134A1 (en) Method for Redistributing Residual Stress in an Engine Component
US20150098802A1 (en) Shrouded turbine blisk and method of manufacturing same
US10384302B2 (en) Weld stub arrangement and a method of using the arrangement to make an article
US11066942B2 (en) Systems and method for determining turbine assembly flow characteristics
US8974185B2 (en) Balancing of rotatable components
GB2428396A (en) A method of manufacturing an article with a reference datum feature
EP2960008B1 (en) Rotor blade manufacture

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP., CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:STONE, PAUL;REEL/FRAME:027679/0282

Effective date: 20120131

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8