US20130148577A1 - Transport block set segmentation - Google Patents

Transport block set segmentation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130148577A1
US20130148577A1 US13/526,059 US201213526059A US2013148577A1 US 20130148577 A1 US20130148577 A1 US 20130148577A1 US 201213526059 A US201213526059 A US 201213526059A US 2013148577 A1 US2013148577 A1 US 2013148577A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
data
segments
segmentation information
modulation
block
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/526,059
Inventor
Stephen E. Terry
Ariela Zeira
Nader Bolourchi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
InterDigital Technology Corp
Original Assignee
InterDigital Technology Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US10/279,365 external-priority patent/US6975650B2/en
Application filed by InterDigital Technology Corp filed Critical InterDigital Technology Corp
Priority to US13/526,059 priority Critical patent/US20130148577A1/en
Publication of US20130148577A1 publication Critical patent/US20130148577A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0002Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff by adapting the transmission rate
    • H04L1/0003Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff by adapting the transmission rate by switching between different modulation schemes
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0006Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff by adapting the transmission format
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0009Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff by adapting the channel coding
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/12Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
    • H04L1/16Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
    • H04L1/18Automatic repetition systems, e.g. Van Duuren systems
    • H04L1/1812Hybrid protocols; Hybrid automatic repeat request [HARQ]
    • H04L1/1819Hybrid protocols; Hybrid automatic repeat request [HARQ] with retransmission of additional or different redundancy
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/12Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
    • H04L1/16Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
    • H04L1/18Automatic repetition systems, e.g. Van Duuren systems
    • H04L1/1829Arrangements specially adapted for the receiver end
    • H04L1/1835Buffer management
    • H04L1/1845Combining techniques, e.g. code combining
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/12Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
    • H04L1/16Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
    • H04L1/18Automatic repetition systems, e.g. Van Duuren systems
    • H04L1/1867Arrangements specially adapted for the transmitter end
    • H04L1/1874Buffer management

Definitions

  • This invention generally relates to wireless communication systems.
  • the invention relates to transmission of data in such systems where adaptive modulation and coding (AMC) and hybrid automatic repeat request (H-ARQ) techniques are applied.
  • AMC adaptive modulation and coding
  • H-ARQ hybrid automatic repeat request
  • AMC In wireless communication systems, such as the third generation partnership project (3GPP) time division duplex (TDD) or frequency division duplex (FDD) communication systems using code division multiple access (CDMA) or orthogonal frequency division multiplex (OFDM) systems, AMC is used to optimize the use of air resources.
  • 3GPP third generation partnership project
  • TDD time division duplex
  • FDD frequency division duplex
  • CDMA code division multiple access
  • OFDM orthogonal frequency division multiplex
  • the modulation and coding schemes (sets) used to transmit data are varied based on wireless channel conditions.
  • a type of data encoding such as turbo versus convolutional coding
  • coding rate such as turbo versus convolutional coding
  • spreading factor for CDMA system such as CDMA
  • modulation type such as quadrature phase shift keying, M-ary phase shift keying versus M-ary quadrature amplitude modulation
  • a number of sub-carriers for an OFDM system may change. If channel characteristics improve, a lower data redundancy and/or “less robust” modulation and coding set is used to transfer data. As a result, for a given allocation of radio resources, more user data is transferred resulting in a higher effective data rate. Conversely, if channel characteristics degrade, a higher data redundancy and/or “more robust” modulation and coding set is used, transferring less user data.
  • QOS quality of service
  • TTIs transmission time intervals
  • TTIs transmission time intervals
  • TTIs transmission time intervals
  • TTIs transmission time intervals
  • TTIs transmission time intervals
  • TTIs transmission time intervals
  • TTIs transmission time intervals
  • TTIs transmission time intervals
  • TTIs transmission time intervals
  • TBS transport block set
  • a less robust modulation and coding set allows for larger TBS sizes and a more robust modulation and coding set only allows for smaller TBS sizes.
  • the modulation and coding set for a given radio resource allocation dictates the maximum size of the TBS that can be supported in a given TTI.
  • a hybrid automatic repeat (H-ARQ) request mechanism may be used to maintain QOS and improve radio resource efficiency.
  • a system using H-ARQ is shown in FIG. 1 .
  • a transmitter 20 transmits a TBS over the air interface using a particular modulation and coding set.
  • the TBS is received by a receiver 26 .
  • a H-ARQ decoder 31 decodes the received TBS. If the quality of the received data is unacceptable, an ARQ transmitter 28 requests a retransmission of the TBS.
  • One approach to check the quality of the received TBS is a cyclic redundancy check (CRC).
  • An ARQ receiver 22 receives the request and a retransmission of the TBS is made by the transmitter 20 .
  • CRC cyclic redundancy check
  • the H-ARQ decoder 31 combines, the received TBS versions. A requirement for combining is that combined TBS sizes are identical. If the resulting quality is still insufficient, another retransmission is requested. If the resulting quality is sufficient, such that the combined TBS passes the CRC check, the received TBS is released for further processing.
  • the H-ARQ mechanism allows for data received with unacceptable quality to be retransmitted possibly at a more robust MCS to ensure successful delivery and maintain the desired QOS.
  • Another approach is to retransmit the TBS using the old modulation and coding set.
  • the channel conditions dictate that a more robust modulation and coding set be used or the initial transmission was severally corrupted, the combining of the retransmitted TBSs may never pass, resulting in a transmission failure.
  • a change in modulation and coding set may be determined necessary to achieve successful delivery of a requested TBS retransmission.
  • the maximum amount of physical data bits allowed within the TTI varies with the modulation and coding set.
  • the effective user data rate corresponds to the TBS size applied to each TTI.
  • the largest TBS size is applied to the least robust modulation and coding set within the TTI.
  • wireless channel conditions require more a robust modulation and coding set for successful transmission, such a TBS size can not be supported within the TTI. Therefore, each time a more robust modulation and coding requirement is realized, all outstanding transmissions in H-ARQ processes with TBS sizes not supported by this MCS and have not been successfully acknowledged are discarded.
  • RLC radio link control
  • Data of a transport block set is to be transmitted in a wireless communication system.
  • the wireless communication system uses adaptive modulation and coding and has a hybrid automatic repeat request mechanism. Segmentation information for potential segmentation of the transport block set is provided.
  • the transport block set is transmitted with a first specified modulation and coding scheme.
  • the transport block set is received and the received transport block set is determined to meet a specified quality.
  • a repeat request is transmitted.
  • the first specified modulation and coding set is changed to a second specified modulation and coding set.
  • the transmit block set is segmented into a plurality of segments supported by the second specific modulation and coding set in accordance with the provided segmentation information.
  • the segments are transmitted and at least two of the segments are transmitted separately.
  • the transmitted segments are received.
  • the segmentation process may be applied more than once for a particular TBS transmission.
  • FIG. 1 is an embodiment of a wireless H-ARQ communication system.
  • FIG. 2 is an illustration of a segmented TBS.
  • FIG. 3A is an illustration of a segmented TBS with a control message sent out-of band.
  • FIG. 3B is an illustration of a segmented TBS having segment identifiers.
  • FIG. 3C is an illustration of a segmented TBS with segment identifiers sent out-of band.
  • FIG. 4 is an illustration of a segmented TBS having transport sequence numbers.
  • FIG. 5 is an embodiment of a segmented TBS wireless communication system.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart of segmenting a TBS.
  • FIG. 7 is an illustration of segmenting a TBS into three segments.
  • Transport block set segmentation can be used in a variety of wireless communication systems, such as FDD/CDMA, TDD/CDMA and OFDM communication systems.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a TBS with segmentation information (SI) in a TTI.
  • the data within the illustrated TBS is segmented into multiple segments, segment 1 to segment N.
  • Each segment is sized to have a data size that can be supported by a more robust modulation and coding set.
  • Segmentation information (SI) is multiplexed with the TBS data.
  • the segmentation information is shown as a header in FIG. 2 , the segmentation information may be located anywhere within the structure of the TBS transmission (in-band). The segmentation information can be used for segmentation of the TBS.
  • FIG. 3A illustrates using control signaling to send segmentation information.
  • the control signal is sent on a separate channel (out-of-band) from the segment data, segment 1 to segment N, (in-band).
  • the segmentation information indicates the manner that the TBS was segmented for use in reconstructing the original TBS in the receiver.
  • FIG. 3B illustrates using a segmentation identifier (SID) as in-band segmentation information.
  • SID segmentation identifier
  • FIG. 3C illustrates using a SID as out-of-band segmentation information.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a preferred segmentation identifier for a segmented TBS.
  • the medium access controller assigns a transmission sequence number (TSN) to each potential segment. If the TBS is segmented, each segment's data is associated with that segment's TSN. As shown in FIG. 4 , each segment has its own TSN, TSN 1 to TSN N.
  • TSNs are assigned to each TBS to allow for sequential processing. Using the TSN as a segment identifier reduces modifications required and minimizes additional complexity of the system to accommodate segmentation.
  • FIG. 5 is a simplified diagram of a transmitter 44 and a receiver 46 for retransmitting a TBS in segments.
  • the transmitting entity 44 may be located at either a user equipment or a base station/node-B.
  • the receiving entity 46 may be located at either a base station/node-B or a user equipment.
  • AMC is typically only used in the downlink. Accordingly, the preferred implementation of transport block segmentation is for use in the supporting AMC for the downlink. For other systems using AMC in the uplink, transport block segmentation can be applied to the uplink.
  • a transmitter 30 transmits a TBS over the air interface 36 .
  • a receiver 38 receives the transmitted TBS.
  • a H-ARQ decoder 42 decodes each received TBS. If the TBS fails the quality test, a request for retransmission is made by the ARQ transmitter 40 .
  • An ARQ receiver 32 receives the request and directs the TBS to be retransmitted. The retransmitted TBS is combined by the H-ARQ decoder 42 and another quality test is performed. Once the TBS passes the quality test, it is released for further processing.
  • FIG. 5 An AMC controller 34 is also shown in FIG. 5 . If the channel conditions change, the AMC controller may initiate a change in the modulation and code set used to transfer data.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating such a change occurring in AMC between H-ARQ retransmissions.
  • a transmitted TBS fails the quality test and a retransmission is requested, (step 50 ).
  • a TBS is transmitted and the received transmission fails the quality test, as indicated by an “X”. It is determined that a change to a more robust modulation and coding set is required for successful transmission, (step 52 ). Since a more robust modulation and coding set is needed, retransmission of the same size TBS may not be possible.
  • the H-ARQ process is reset and the TBS is segmented using the TBS segmentation device 46 , (step 54 ). Typically, with physical layer segmentation, resetting the H-ARQ process is not necessary for proper operation.
  • Each segment or subset of segments of the original TBS is at a size compatible with the new modulation and coding set. To illustrate using FIG. 7 , the original TBS is segmented into three segments, SEG 1 , SEG 2 and SEG 3 . The segments are retransmitted at the more robust modulation and coding set, (step 56 ).
  • Each segment or subset of segments is individually transmitted using the new modulation and coding set. As illustrated in FIG. 7 , SEG 1 , SEG 2 and SEG 3 are separately transmitted and received. It is also possible depending on the choice of modulation and coding that any subset may be separately transmitted and received (SEG 1 & SEG 3 , or SEG 2 &SEG 3 , etc.). If a transmission of a segment or subset of segments fails, the ARQ transmitter 40 requests a retransmission of that segment or subset of segments. The transmission of the segment or subset of segments and the retransmission(s) are combined until the segment or subset of segments passes the quality test.
  • the transmitter selectively dictates when the segmentation option is to be utilized.
  • the segmentation option may be utilized. This determination may be based on channel quality measurements, previous transmission success/failure rates for particular modulation and coding sets, or other criteria.
  • a segmentation controller 48 preferably in the transmitter, as shown in FIG. 5 , decides whether segmentation is to be supported. The segmentation controller coordinates operation with the MAC to add the segmentation information to the TBS. The segmentation decision may be based on various factors, such as cell loading, added users, number of prior retransmissions and measured channel quality. The availability of some of this information (e.g. cell loading and added users) to the transmitter depends on whether the transmitter is at the node-B or user equipment.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Detection And Prevention Of Errors In Transmission (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

Data of a transport block set is to be transmitted in a wireless communication system. Segmentation information for potential segmentation of the data is provided. The data is transmitted with a first specified modulation and coding scheme. The data is received and it is determined whether the received data meets a specified quality. When the specified quality is not met, a repeat request is transmitted. The first specified modulation and coding set is changed to a second specified modulation and coding set. In response to the repeat request, the data is segmented into a plurality of segments supported by the second specified modulation and coding set in accordance with the provided segmentation information. The segments are transmitted and at least two of the segments are transmitted separately.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/841,289, filed May 7, 2004; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/279,365, filed Oct. 24, 2002, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 60/357,198 filed on Feb. 13, 2002, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
  • BACKGROUND
  • This invention generally relates to wireless communication systems. In particular, the invention relates to transmission of data in such systems where adaptive modulation and coding (AMC) and hybrid automatic repeat request (H-ARQ) techniques are applied.
  • In wireless communication systems, such as the third generation partnership project (3GPP) time division duplex (TDD) or frequency division duplex (FDD) communication systems using code division multiple access (CDMA) or orthogonal frequency division multiplex (OFDM) systems, AMC is used to optimize the use of air resources.
  • The modulation and coding schemes (sets) used to transmit data are varied based on wireless channel conditions. To illustrate, a type of data encoding (such as turbo versus convolutional coding), coding rate, spreading factor for CDMA system, modulation type (such as quadrature phase shift keying, M-ary phase shift keying versus M-ary quadrature amplitude modulation), and/or a number of sub-carriers for an OFDM system may change. If channel characteristics improve, a lower data redundancy and/or “less robust” modulation and coding set is used to transfer data. As a result, for a given allocation of radio resources, more user data is transferred resulting in a higher effective data rate. Conversely, if channel characteristics degrade, a higher data redundancy and/or “more robust” modulation and coding set is used, transferring less user data. Using AMC, an optimization between air resource utilization and quality of service (QOS) can be better maintained.
  • Data in such systems is received for transfer over the air interface in transmission time intervals (TTIs). Data within a TTI transferred to a particular user equipment is referred to as a transport block set (TBS). For a particular allocation of air resources, a less robust modulation and coding set allows for larger TBS sizes and a more robust modulation and coding set only allows for smaller TBS sizes. As a result, the modulation and coding set for a given radio resource allocation dictates the maximum size of the TBS that can be supported in a given TTI.
  • In such systems, a hybrid automatic repeat (H-ARQ) request mechanism may be used to maintain QOS and improve radio resource efficiency. A system using H-ARQ is shown in FIG. 1. A transmitter 20 transmits a TBS over the air interface using a particular modulation and coding set. The TBS is received by a receiver 26. A H-ARQ decoder 31 decodes the received TBS. If the quality of the received data is unacceptable, an ARQ transmitter 28 requests a retransmission of the TBS. One approach to check the quality of the received TBS is a cyclic redundancy check (CRC). An ARQ receiver 22 receives the request and a retransmission of the TBS is made by the transmitter 20. To increase the probability of successful delivery, retransmissions may apply a more robust modulation and coding set. The H-ARQ decoder 31 combines, the received TBS versions. A requirement for combining is that combined TBS sizes are identical. If the resulting quality is still insufficient, another retransmission is requested. If the resulting quality is sufficient, such that the combined TBS passes the CRC check, the received TBS is released for further processing. The H-ARQ mechanism allows for data received with unacceptable quality to be retransmitted possibly at a more robust MCS to ensure successful delivery and maintain the desired QOS.
  • Another approach is to retransmit the TBS using the old modulation and coding set. However, if the channel conditions dictate that a more robust modulation and coding set be used or the initial transmission was severally corrupted, the combining of the retransmitted TBSs may never pass, resulting in a transmission failure.
  • In a system using both H-ARQ and AMC, a change in modulation and coding set may be determined necessary to achieve successful delivery of a requested TBS retransmission. In this situation, the maximum amount of physical data bits allowed within the TTI varies with the modulation and coding set.
  • Since only one TBS exists per TTI, the effective user data rate corresponds to the TBS size applied to each TTI. To achieve maximum data rates the largest TBS size is applied to the least robust modulation and coding set within the TTI. When wireless channel conditions require more a robust modulation and coding set for successful transmission, such a TBS size can not be supported within the TTI. Therefore, each time a more robust modulation and coding requirement is realized, all outstanding transmissions in H-ARQ processes with TBS sizes not supported by this MCS and have not been successfully acknowledged are discarded.
  • In current implementations, when a TBS cannot be successfully transmitted utilizing AMC and H-ARQ mechanisms, recovery is handled by the radio link control (RLC) protocol (at layer two). Unlike a H-ARQ recovery of failed transmissions, the RLC error detection, data recovery and buffering of a TBS queued in the transmitter (which may be at the node-B or user equipment as mentioned below) results in increased transport channel block error rates and transmission latency, potentially resulting in a failure to meet QOS requirements.
  • Accordingly, it is desirable to have alternate approaches to recover unsuccessful transmissions in such systems to allow for support of high data rates when AMC and H-ARQ techniques are applied.
  • SUMMARY
  • Data of a transport block set is to be transmitted in a wireless communication system. The wireless communication system uses adaptive modulation and coding and has a hybrid automatic repeat request mechanism. Segmentation information for potential segmentation of the transport block set is provided. The transport block set is transmitted with a first specified modulation and coding scheme. The transport block set is received and the received transport block set is determined to meet a specified quality. When the specified quality is not met, a repeat request is transmitted. The first specified modulation and coding set is changed to a second specified modulation and coding set. In response to the repeat request, the transmit block set is segmented into a plurality of segments supported by the second specific modulation and coding set in accordance with the provided segmentation information. The segments are transmitted and at least two of the segments are transmitted separately. The transmitted segments are received. The segmentation process may be applied more than once for a particular TBS transmission.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING(S)
  • FIG. 1 is an embodiment of a wireless H-ARQ communication system.
  • FIG. 2 is an illustration of a segmented TBS.
  • FIG. 3A is an illustration of a segmented TBS with a control message sent out-of band.
  • FIG. 3B is an illustration of a segmented TBS having segment identifiers.
  • FIG. 3C is an illustration of a segmented TBS with segment identifiers sent out-of band.
  • FIG. 4 is an illustration of a segmented TBS having transport sequence numbers.
  • FIG. 5 is an embodiment of a segmented TBS wireless communication system.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart of segmenting a TBS.
  • FIG. 7 is an illustration of segmenting a TBS into three segments.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Transport block set segmentation can be used in a variety of wireless communication systems, such as FDD/CDMA, TDD/CDMA and OFDM communication systems.
  • To support high data rates, large TBS sizes are applied to each TTI. To allow for retransmission of large TBS sizes, at more robust modulation and coding sets to ensure successful delivery, segmentation information is provided with the TBS transmission. FIG. 2 illustrates a TBS with segmentation information (SI) in a TTI. The data within the illustrated TBS is segmented into multiple segments, segment 1 to segment N. Each segment is sized to have a data size that can be supported by a more robust modulation and coding set. Segmentation information (SI) is multiplexed with the TBS data. Although the segmentation information is shown as a header in FIG. 2, the segmentation information may be located anywhere within the structure of the TBS transmission (in-band). The segmentation information can be used for segmentation of the TBS.
  • Alternatively, FIG. 3A illustrates using control signaling to send segmentation information. The control signal is sent on a separate channel (out-of-band) from the segment data, segment 1 to segment N, (in-band). The segmentation information indicates the manner that the TBS was segmented for use in reconstructing the original TBS in the receiver.
  • FIG. 3B illustrates using a segmentation identifier (SID) as in-band segmentation information. Each segment, segment 1 to segment N, has a corresponding segment identifier, SID 1 to SID 2, multiplexed with that segment's data (in-band). FIG. 3C illustrates using a SID as out-of-band segmentation information.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a preferred segmentation identifier for a segmented TBS. The medium access controller (MAC) assigns a transmission sequence number (TSN) to each potential segment. If the TBS is segmented, each segment's data is associated with that segment's TSN. As shown in FIG. 4, each segment has its own TSN, TSN 1 to TSN N. In a wireless communication system employing H-ARQ, TSNs are assigned to each TBS to allow for sequential processing. Using the TSN as a segment identifier reduces modifications required and minimizes additional complexity of the system to accommodate segmentation.
  • FIG. 5 is a simplified diagram of a transmitter 44 and a receiver 46 for retransmitting a TBS in segments. The transmitting entity 44 may be located at either a user equipment or a base station/node-B. The receiving entity 46 may be located at either a base station/node-B or a user equipment. In current system implementations, AMC is typically only used in the downlink. Accordingly, the preferred implementation of transport block segmentation is for use in the supporting AMC for the downlink. For other systems using AMC in the uplink, transport block segmentation can be applied to the uplink.
  • A transmitter 30 transmits a TBS over the air interface 36. A receiver 38 receives the transmitted TBS. A H-ARQ decoder 42 decodes each received TBS. If the TBS fails the quality test, a request for retransmission is made by the ARQ transmitter 40. An ARQ receiver 32 receives the request and directs the TBS to be retransmitted. The retransmitted TBS is combined by the H-ARQ decoder 42 and another quality test is performed. Once the TBS passes the quality test, it is released for further processing.
  • An AMC controller 34 is also shown in FIG. 5. If the channel conditions change, the AMC controller may initiate a change in the modulation and code set used to transfer data. FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating such a change occurring in AMC between H-ARQ retransmissions. A transmitted TBS fails the quality test and a retransmission is requested, (step 50). To illustrate using FIG. 7, a TBS is transmitted and the received transmission fails the quality test, as indicated by an “X”. It is determined that a change to a more robust modulation and coding set is required for successful transmission, (step 52). Since a more robust modulation and coding set is needed, retransmission of the same size TBS may not be possible. The H-ARQ process is reset and the TBS is segmented using the TBS segmentation device 46, (step 54). Typically, with physical layer segmentation, resetting the H-ARQ process is not necessary for proper operation. Each segment or subset of segments of the original TBS is at a size compatible with the new modulation and coding set. To illustrate using FIG. 7, the original TBS is segmented into three segments, SEG1, SEG2 and SEG3. The segments are retransmitted at the more robust modulation and coding set, (step 56).
  • Each segment or subset of segments is individually transmitted using the new modulation and coding set. As illustrated in FIG. 7, SEG1, SEG2 and SEG3 are separately transmitted and received. It is also possible depending on the choice of modulation and coding that any subset may be separately transmitted and received (SEG1 & SEG3, or SEG2 &SEG3, etc.). If a transmission of a segment or subset of segments fails, the ARQ transmitter 40 requests a retransmission of that segment or subset of segments. The transmission of the segment or subset of segments and the retransmission(s) are combined until the segment or subset of segments passes the quality test.
  • To reduce the added overhead required by the segmentation information, preferably, the transmitter selectively dictates when the segmentation option is to be utilized. To illustrate, if channel conditions are degrading or are predicted to degrade, the segmentation option may be utilized. This determination may be based on channel quality measurements, previous transmission success/failure rates for particular modulation and coding sets, or other criteria. A segmentation controller 48, preferably in the transmitter, as shown in FIG. 5, decides whether segmentation is to be supported. The segmentation controller coordinates operation with the MAC to add the segmentation information to the TBS. The segmentation decision may be based on various factors, such as cell loading, added users, number of prior retransmissions and measured channel quality. The availability of some of this information (e.g. cell loading and added users) to the transmitter depends on whether the transmitter is at the node-B or user equipment.

Claims (20)

What is claimed:
1. A method, comprising:
receiving a repeat request message requesting retransmission of a block of data;
segmenting the block into a plurality of segments subsequent to receiving the repeat request message;
determining, for each of the plurality of segments, segmentation information; and
transmitting the plurality of segments and the segmentation information.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the segmentation information indicates a relative position within the data block.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the segmentation information is determined subsequent to the receiving of the repeat request message.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising transmitting the block of data with a first specified modulation and coding scheme and a specified sequence number
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising changing the specified modulation and coding scheme to a second specified modulation and coding scheme, subsequent to the receiving of the repeat request message.
6. The method of claim 5, further comprising transmitting the plurality of segments according to the second specified modulation and coding scheme.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the transmitting the block of data uses a first plurality of subcarriers in a first transmission time interval (TTI).
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the transmitting the plurality of segments occurs in a second TTI.
9. The method of claim 7, wherein the transmitting the plurality of segments uses a different number of subcarriers than the transmitting the block of data.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining segmentation information comprises determining, for each of the plurality of segments, respective segmentation information.
11. The method of claim 10, further comprising appending the respective segmentation information to each of the plurality of data segments.
12. The method of claim 10, further comprising appending the respective segmentation information to a respective header of each of the plurality of data segments.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of data segments includes a sequence number and respective segmentation information.
14. The method of claim 1, further comprising, retransmitting a failed segment if a segment transmission fails.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein the repeat request message indicates that the block of data failed a quality test.
16. A device, comprising:
a segmentation device configured to segment a first data block into a plurality of data segments subsequent to receiving the repeat request message, and to append, to each of the plurality of data segments, segmentation information.
17. The device of claim 16, wherein the segmentation information indicates a relative position within the first data block.
18. The device of claim 16, wherein the segmentation device is configured to determine the additional segmentation information subsequent to the Hybrid Automatic Repeat reQuest (HARQ) message requesting retransmission of the first data block.
19. A transmitter device comprising a processor configured to:
receive a repeat request message requesting retransmission of a block of data;
segment the block into a plurality of segments subsequent to receiving the repeat request message;
append, to each of the plurality of segments, segmentation information; and
transmit the plurality of segments.
20. A method implemented in a user equipment or a base station, the method comprising:
transmitting a first data block having a sequence number using a first modulation and coding scheme utilizing a first plurality of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) subcarriers, the first modulation and coding scheme comprising a first modulation type and a first coding rate;
segmenting the first data block into a plurality of data segments;
appending additional segmentation information that comprises a plurality of segment identifiers (SIDs) that indicate a manner of segmentation of the first data block, wherein an SID is assigned to each of the plurality of data segments, wherein the additional segmentation information is determined subsequent to a Hybrid Automatic Repeat reQuest (HARQ) message requesting retransmission of data in the first data block; and
transmitting the segments with the plurality of SIDs using the second modulation and coding scheme utilizing a second plurality of OFDM subcarriers, the second modulation and coding scheme comprising a second modulation type and a second coding rate, wherein the first plurality of OFDM subcarriers is different than the second plurality of OFDM subcarriers, the first modulation type is different than the second modulation type, and the first coding rate is different than the second coding rate.
US13/526,059 2002-02-13 2012-06-18 Transport block set segmentation Abandoned US20130148577A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/526,059 US20130148577A1 (en) 2002-02-13 2012-06-18 Transport block set segmentation

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US35719802P 2002-02-13 2002-02-13
US10/279,365 US6975650B2 (en) 2002-02-13 2002-10-24 Transport block set segmentation
US10/841,289 US8233501B2 (en) 2002-02-13 2004-05-07 Transport block set segmentation
US13/526,059 US20130148577A1 (en) 2002-02-13 2012-06-18 Transport block set segmentation

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/841,289 Continuation US8233501B2 (en) 2002-02-13 2004-05-07 Transport block set segmentation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130148577A1 true US20130148577A1 (en) 2013-06-13

Family

ID=46150408

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/841,289 Active 2024-12-02 US8233501B2 (en) 2002-02-13 2004-05-07 Transport block set segmentation
US13/526,059 Abandoned US20130148577A1 (en) 2002-02-13 2012-06-18 Transport block set segmentation

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/841,289 Active 2024-12-02 US8233501B2 (en) 2002-02-13 2004-05-07 Transport block set segmentation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US8233501B2 (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107733560A (en) * 2016-08-12 2018-02-23 中兴通讯股份有限公司 data dividing method, device and terminal
US11439390B2 (en) 2018-02-26 2022-09-13 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instrument with lockout mechanism
US11504124B2 (en) 2017-11-29 2022-11-22 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instrument with lockout mechanism
US11517312B2 (en) 2018-02-12 2022-12-06 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instrument with lockout mechanism
US11642129B2 (en) 2020-01-15 2023-05-09 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Staple cartridge and drive member for surgical instrument
US11723661B2 (en) 2018-12-21 2023-08-15 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instruments with switches for deactivating and/or identifying stapler cartridges
US11786325B2 (en) 2019-07-02 2023-10-17 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Remotely controlling a system using video
US11857188B2 (en) 2018-12-21 2024-01-02 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Articulation assemblies for surgical instruments
US11896224B2 (en) 2019-05-31 2024-02-13 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Staple cartridge for a surgical instrument
US11944301B2 (en) 2018-12-21 2024-04-02 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instruments having a reinforced staple cartridge
US11944302B2 (en) 2019-04-15 2024-04-02 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Staple cartridge for a surgical instrument
US12011168B2 (en) 2019-04-17 2024-06-18 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical stapling instrument
US12029473B2 (en) 2019-05-31 2024-07-09 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instruments having a jaw locking mechanism

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100571806B1 (en) * 2003-02-11 2006-04-17 삼성전자주식회사 Method for reducing feedback channel state information within adaptive OFDMA system and OFDMA system using the same
JP4596958B2 (en) * 2005-04-01 2010-12-15 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ Wireless communication apparatus and wireless communication method
EP1875646A1 (en) * 2005-04-29 2008-01-09 Nokia Corporation Method, apparatus and computer program to dynamically adjust segmentation at a protocol layer, such as at the medium access control (mac) layer
US10608785B2 (en) * 2017-01-19 2020-03-31 Qualcomm Incorporated Resource-based code block segmentation
CN109728874B (en) * 2017-10-31 2021-08-31 华为技术有限公司 Bit block processing method and node

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5805822A (en) * 1994-06-01 1998-09-08 International Business Machine Corp. Channel interface with data segmentation and re-segementation
US6359877B1 (en) * 1998-07-21 2002-03-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and apparatus for minimizing overhead in a communication system
US6400699B1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2002-06-04 Iospan Wireless, Inc. Transmission scheduler for a multiple antenna wireless cellular network
US20030036399A1 (en) * 2001-08-16 2003-02-20 Lorenzo Casaccia Method and apparatus for time-based reception of transmissions in a wireless communication system
US20030185201A1 (en) * 2002-03-29 2003-10-02 Dorgan John D. System and method for 1 + 1 flow protected transmission of time-sensitive data in packet-based communication networks

Family Cites Families (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US217059A (en) * 1879-07-01 Petefls
JPH04111554A (en) 1990-08-30 1992-04-13 Shimadzu Corp Arq communication system
US5224098A (en) * 1991-07-17 1993-06-29 International Business Machines Corporation Compensation for mismatched transport protocols in a data communications network
SE505915C2 (en) 1994-08-18 1997-10-20 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Cellular mobile communication system
JPH0993296A (en) 1995-07-14 1997-04-04 Toshiba Corp Multi-carrier transmission system and its transmitter
JPH09307569A (en) * 1996-05-17 1997-11-28 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Atm radio transmitter
US5751970A (en) * 1996-08-08 1998-05-12 International Business Machines Corp. Method for determining an optimal segmentation size for file transmission in a communications system
US6175550B1 (en) 1997-04-01 2001-01-16 Lucent Technologies, Inc. Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing system with dynamically scalable operating parameters and method thereof
US6208663B1 (en) 1997-08-29 2001-03-27 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and system for block ARQ with reselection of FEC coding and/or modulation
US6363058B1 (en) * 1997-09-24 2002-03-26 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Multi-service handling by a single mobile station
JPH11215192A (en) 1998-01-29 1999-08-06 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Variable length packet communication method and packet communication device
US6122293A (en) 1998-02-13 2000-09-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Method and system for link adaptation having a variable update interval
US6226301B1 (en) * 1998-02-19 2001-05-01 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd Method and apparatus for segmentation and assembly of data frames for retransmission in a telecommunications system
US6213799B1 (en) * 1998-05-27 2001-04-10 Hubbell Incorporated Anti-flashover ring for a bushing insert
US6553003B1 (en) * 1998-06-13 2003-04-22 Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. Device and method processing a radio link protocol in a mobile communication system
CA2338696A1 (en) 1998-08-07 2000-02-17 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Group addressing in a packet communication system
JP2000078117A (en) 1998-09-01 2000-03-14 Toyota Autom Loom Works Ltd Radio communication method and radio communication system
EP0991237A1 (en) 1998-09-30 2000-04-05 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON (publ) Multicarrier communication method with time-frequency differential encoding
AU2012500A (en) 1998-11-27 2000-06-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Bandwidth efficient acknowledgement/negative acknowledegment
JP3450729B2 (en) 1998-12-21 2003-09-29 日本電信電話株式会社 Packet communication device
US6865233B1 (en) 1999-02-19 2005-03-08 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and system for control signalling enabling flexible link adaptation in a radiocommunication system
KR100516671B1 (en) * 1999-05-24 2005-09-22 삼성전자주식회사 Variable-length Data Transmitting and Receiving Apparatus and Method in accordance with Radio Link Protocol for Mobile Telecommunication System
US6507582B1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2003-01-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Radio link protocol enhancements for dynamic capacity wireless data channels
US6570849B1 (en) * 1999-10-15 2003-05-27 Tropic Networks Inc. TDM-quality voice over packet
US6308294B1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2001-10-23 Motorola, Inc. Adaptive hybrid ARQ using turbo code structure
US7082467B2 (en) * 2000-02-10 2006-07-25 Hughes Network Systems Method and device for selective transport level spoofing based on information in transport level packet
FR2805418B1 (en) 2000-02-23 2003-05-30 Mitsubishi Electric Inf Tech METHOD OF DIGITAL TRANSMISSION OF TYPE WITH ERROR CORRECTING CODING
US7397859B2 (en) * 2000-04-22 2008-07-08 Atheros Communications, Inc. Multi-carrier communication systems employing variable symbol rates and number of carriers
EP2375612B1 (en) * 2000-05-17 2013-01-23 Panasonic Corporation Hybrid ARQ transmission apparatus and method for packet data transmission
KR100516686B1 (en) * 2000-07-08 2005-09-22 삼성전자주식회사 Hybrid automatic repeat request method for cdma mobile system
US6647477B2 (en) * 2000-10-06 2003-11-11 Pmc-Sierra Ltd. Transporting data transmission units of different sizes using segments of fixed sizes
CN1160918C (en) * 2000-10-21 2004-08-04 三星电子株式会社 Transmitting packet data in mobile communication systems
US20020080719A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2002-06-27 Stefan Parkvall Scheduling transmission of data over a transmission channel based on signal quality of a receive channel
US7184710B2 (en) * 2001-02-13 2007-02-27 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Transmission of filtering/filtered information over the lur interface
EP1271834B1 (en) * 2001-05-14 2007-08-08 LG Electronics, Inc. Method for controlling data transmission in a radio communications system
JP2003008553A (en) * 2001-06-22 2003-01-10 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Transmitter, receiver, transmitter-receiver and communication system
US7542482B2 (en) * 2001-08-16 2009-06-02 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for message segmentation in a wireless communication system
US6738370B2 (en) * 2001-08-22 2004-05-18 Nokia Corporation Method and apparatus implementing retransmission in a communication system providing H-ARQ
US6975650B2 (en) 2002-02-13 2005-12-13 Interdigital Technology Corporation Transport block set segmentation
JP2005273772A (en) 2004-03-24 2005-10-06 Technoflex & Tola Inc Bellow type sleeve joint

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5805822A (en) * 1994-06-01 1998-09-08 International Business Machine Corp. Channel interface with data segmentation and re-segementation
US6359877B1 (en) * 1998-07-21 2002-03-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and apparatus for minimizing overhead in a communication system
US6400699B1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2002-06-04 Iospan Wireless, Inc. Transmission scheduler for a multiple antenna wireless cellular network
US20030036399A1 (en) * 2001-08-16 2003-02-20 Lorenzo Casaccia Method and apparatus for time-based reception of transmissions in a wireless communication system
US20030185201A1 (en) * 2002-03-29 2003-10-02 Dorgan John D. System and method for 1 + 1 flow protected transmission of time-sensitive data in packet-based communication networks

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107733560A (en) * 2016-08-12 2018-02-23 中兴通讯股份有限公司 data dividing method, device and terminal
US11444721B2 (en) 2016-08-12 2022-09-13 Zte Corporation Data segmentation method, apparatus, and terminal
US11504124B2 (en) 2017-11-29 2022-11-22 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instrument with lockout mechanism
US11986184B2 (en) 2017-11-29 2024-05-21 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instrument with lockout mechanism
US11517312B2 (en) 2018-02-12 2022-12-06 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instrument with lockout mechanism
US11864762B2 (en) 2018-02-12 2024-01-09 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instrument with lockout mechanism
US11439390B2 (en) 2018-02-26 2022-09-13 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instrument with lockout mechanism
US11806015B2 (en) 2018-12-21 2023-11-07 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instruments having mechanisms for identifying and/or deactivating stapler cartridges
US11857188B2 (en) 2018-12-21 2024-01-02 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Articulation assemblies for surgical instruments
US11723661B2 (en) 2018-12-21 2023-08-15 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instruments with switches for deactivating and/or identifying stapler cartridges
US11944301B2 (en) 2018-12-21 2024-04-02 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instruments having a reinforced staple cartridge
US11944302B2 (en) 2019-04-15 2024-04-02 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Staple cartridge for a surgical instrument
US12011168B2 (en) 2019-04-17 2024-06-18 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical stapling instrument
US11896224B2 (en) 2019-05-31 2024-02-13 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Staple cartridge for a surgical instrument
US12029473B2 (en) 2019-05-31 2024-07-09 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Surgical instruments having a jaw locking mechanism
US11786325B2 (en) 2019-07-02 2023-10-17 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Remotely controlling a system using video
US12029426B2 (en) 2019-10-18 2024-07-09 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Endoscopic purse string suture surgical device
US11642129B2 (en) 2020-01-15 2023-05-09 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Staple cartridge and drive member for surgical instrument

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8233501B2 (en) 2012-07-31
US20050047346A1 (en) 2005-03-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6975650B2 (en) Transport block set segmentation
US10230488B2 (en) User equipment using hybrid automatic repeat request
US20130148577A1 (en) Transport block set segmentation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION