US20130130704A1 - Method and apparatus for validating radio resource control messages - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for validating radio resource control messages Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130130704A1
US20130130704A1 US13/686,373 US201213686373A US2013130704A1 US 20130130704 A1 US20130130704 A1 US 20130130704A1 US 201213686373 A US201213686373 A US 201213686373A US 2013130704 A1 US2013130704 A1 US 2013130704A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
wtru
rrc message
message
cell
valid
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/686,373
Inventor
Scott C. Hergenhan
William Francoeur
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
InterDigital Technology Corp
Original Assignee
InterDigital Technology Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by InterDigital Technology Corp filed Critical InterDigital Technology Corp
Priority to US13/686,373 priority Critical patent/US20130130704A1/en
Publication of US20130130704A1 publication Critical patent/US20130130704A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/12—Applying verification of the received information
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00—Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/10—Integrity
    • H04W12/106—Packet or message integrity
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00—Local resource management
    • H04W72/04—Wireless resource allocation
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W76/00—Connection management
    • H04W76/20—Manipulation of established connections
    • H04W76/22—Manipulation of transport tunnels
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W80/00—Wireless network protocols or protocol adaptations to wireless operation
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W76/00—Connection management
    • H04W76/20—Manipulation of established connections
    • H04W76/27—Transitions between radio resource control [RRC] states
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W8/00—Network data management
    • H04W8/22—Processing or transfer of terminal data, e.g. status or physical capabilities
    • H04W8/24—Transfer of terminal data
    • H04W8/245—Transfer of terminal data from a network towards a terminal
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W88/00—Devices specially adapted for wireless communication networks, e.g. terminals, base stations or access point devices
    • H04W88/02—Terminal devices

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to wireless communication systems, and more particularly, to a method and apparatus for validating radio resource control messages.
  • the 3GPP standard 25.331 specifies the radio resource control (RRC) protocol for the radio interface between a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) and a UMTS terrestrial radio access network (UTRAN).
  • RRC radio resource control
  • Section 8.6 of standard 25.331 describes the rules that the WTRU must follow for validating downlink peer messages received from the UTRAN. Included in this section are rules regarding transport channel information elements (IEs).
  • IEs transport channel information elements
  • the standard states in Section 8.6.5.2 that if the IE “Transport format combination set” is not included and either (1) if no transport format combination set is stored in the WTRU; or (2) if transport channels are added or removed in the message; or (3) if any transport channel is reconfigured in the message such that the size of the transport format set is changed, then the WTRU shall set the variable INVALID CONFIGURATION to TRUE.
  • the WTRU should reject the peer message.
  • the rule does not take additional information into account, such as the type of transport channel being modified, the configured RRC state of the WTRU, etc.
  • the two basic operational modes of a WTRU are “Idle” and “Connected” modes.
  • the Connected mode is further divided into several RRC states (i.e., a CELL_DCH state, a CELL_FACH state, a CELL_PCH state, and a URA_PCH state), which define the kind of channels that the WTRU is using.
  • a CELL_DCH state dedicated channels are allocated to the WTRU.
  • the CELL_FACH state no dedicated channel is allocated for the WTRU but the WTRU uses common channels which are shared by all WTRUs.
  • the WTRU may receive (and must retain) certain information regarding dedicated channels. This information may then be used by the WTRU if the WTRU is directed by UTRAN to transition into the CELL_DCH state.
  • a WTRU under test failed several connection attempts. Analysis showed that the WTRU was rejecting the network's RRC connection setup message because it broke the validation rule. Specifically, the message was directing the WTRU to the CELL_FACH state and was adding a dedicated transport channel, but was not including a transport format combination set (TFCS). The problem was that the validation rule was indeed broken as written. Based on this test result, the implementation of the validation rule could benefit from being more flexible.
  • TFCS transport format combination set
  • a UTRAN sends a message to the WTRU directing it to a CELL_FACH state and removing a transport channel, but not including a new TFCS.
  • the WTRU accepts this message because the transport channels will not be used in the CELL_FACH state.
  • a UTRAN sends a message to the WTRU directing it to a CELL_DCH state, including neither new transport channel information nor a new TFCS.
  • the WTRU accepts this message because it does not break the validation rule.
  • the WTRU will not be able to operate in the CELL_DCH state because it lacks the appropriate transport channel information or TFCS.
  • a method for validating radio resource control (RRC) messages includes determining whether an RRC message received by a wireless transmit-receive unit (WTRU) is valid based on: an RRC state for which the WTRU is configured, whether or not the WTRU needs a new transport format combination set, and whether or not the RRC message will configure the WTRU for a CELL_DCH state.
  • RRC radio resource control
  • a WTRU includes a rule application device configured to implement the method.
  • FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method for applying a validation rule to an incoming RRC message
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a device configured to apply a validation rule to an incoming RRC message.
  • wireless transmit/receive unit includes, but is not limited to, a user equipment, a mobile station, a fixed or mobile subscriber unit, a pager, or any other type of device capable of operating in a wireless environment.
  • base station includes, but is not limited to, a Node B, a site controller, an access point, or any other type of interfacing device in a wireless environment.
  • a WTRU wants to allow for a liberal interpretation of the validation rule as defined in the standard (and therefore operate in the most networks possible) and still protect itself against invalid configurations, the WTRU must perform transport channel validation in a manner not described in the standard.
  • FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method 100 for applying the standard validation rule to an incoming message.
  • the method 100 begins by receiving a peer message at a WTRU (step 102 ).
  • the WTRU applies the validation rule to the received message (step 104 ).
  • a determination is made whether the WTRU needs a new TFCS based on the received peer message (step 106 ). If the WTRU needs a new TFCS, then a TFCS indicator (e.g., a TFCS_NEEDED flag) is set to true (step 108 ).
  • the TFCS indicator is maintained in the WTRU. If the WTRU does not need a new TFCS, then the TFCS indicator is left unchanged.
  • the TFCS indicator e.g., the TFCS_NEEDED flag
  • the WTRU Since the WTRU needs a new TFCS and the network has not supplied the new TFCS during configuration for the CELL_DCH state, the message is properly rejected. If the TFCS indicator is set to false, then the message is accepted (step 116 ) and the method terminates (step 118 ). Since the network has supplied the WTRU with a new TFCS prior to or during configuration into the CELL_DCH state, the WTRU correctly accepts the message. In all cases, the WTRU continues operating error-free in the data plane.
  • the present invention allows the WTRU to operate on networks that interpret the validation rule liberally.
  • the present invention also allows the WTRU to still protect itself against invalid configurations and, therefore, continue operating without self-induced errors in the data plane (leading to less retry and/or fallback handling, and ultimately fewer dropped calls).
  • the WTRU may not apply the TFCS validation rule, but the WTRU risks accepting invalid configurations or dropping calls.
  • the WTRU may delay applying the cited TFCS validation rule until the WTRU is configured for the CELL_DCH state. In this case, the WTRU also risks accepting invalid configurations or dropping calls.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a device 200 configured to apply a validation rule to an incoming RRC message.
  • the device 200 is a WTRU.
  • the device 200 includes a receiver 202 , a rule application device 204 in communication with the receiver 202 , a message accepting device 206 in communication with the rule application device 204 , and a message rejecting device 208 in communication with the rule application device 204 .
  • the receiver 202 receives an incoming RRC message for the device 200 .
  • the rule application device 204 applies a message validation rule to the received message and checks the configured state of the WTRU. If the message passes the validation rule or is not configured for the CELL_DCH state, then the message accepting device 206 takes the message and processes it accordingly. If the message fails the validation rule and is configured for the CELL_DCH state, then the message is passed to the message rejecting device 208 and is discarded.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Telephonic Communication Services (AREA)

Abstract

A method for validating radio resource control (RRC) messages includes determining whether an RRC message received by a wireless transmit-receive unit (WTRU) is valid based on: an RRC state for which the WTRU is configured, whether or not the WTRU needs a new transport format combination set, and whether or not the RRC message will configure the WTRU for a CELL_DCH state. A WTRU includes a rule application device configured to implement the method.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/312,006, filed Dec. 20, 2005, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/667,449 filed on Apr. 1, 2005, which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth.
    • FIELD OF INVENTION
  • The present invention generally relates to wireless communication systems, and more particularly, to a method and apparatus for validating radio resource control messages.
    • BACKGROUND
  • The 3GPP standard 25.331 specifies the radio resource control (RRC) protocol for the radio interface between a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) and a UMTS terrestrial radio access network (UTRAN). Section 8.6 of standard 25.331 describes the rules that the WTRU must follow for validating downlink peer messages received from the UTRAN. Included in this section are rules regarding transport channel information elements (IEs).
  • Specifically, the standard states in Section 8.6.5.2 that if the IE “Transport format combination set” is not included and either (1) if no transport format combination set is stored in the WTRU; or (2) if transport channels are added or removed in the message; or (3) if any transport channel is reconfigured in the message such that the size of the transport format set is changed, then the WTRU shall set the variable INVALID CONFIGURATION to TRUE.
  • This means that if the any of the above conditions are met, the WTRU should reject the peer message. The rule does not take additional information into account, such as the type of transport channel being modified, the configured RRC state of the WTRU, etc.
  • The two basic operational modes of a WTRU are “Idle” and “Connected” modes. The Connected mode is further divided into several RRC states (i.e., a CELL_DCH state, a CELL_FACH state, a CELL_PCH state, and a URA_PCH state), which define the kind of channels that the WTRU is using. In the CELL_DCH state, dedicated channels are allocated to the WTRU. In the CELL_FACH state, no dedicated channel is allocated for the WTRU but the WTRU uses common channels which are shared by all WTRUs. While in the CELL_FACH state, the WTRU may receive (and must retain) certain information regarding dedicated channels. This information may then be used by the WTRU if the WTRU is directed by UTRAN to transition into the CELL_DCH state.
  • During an interoperability test session, a WTRU under test failed several connection attempts. Analysis showed that the WTRU was rejecting the network's RRC connection setup message because it broke the validation rule. Specifically, the message was directing the WTRU to the CELL_FACH state and was adding a dedicated transport channel, but was not including a transport format combination set (TFCS). The problem was that the validation rule was indeed broken as written. Based on this test result, the implementation of the validation rule could benefit from being more flexible.
  • Network operators may be tempted to read this rule liberally, thinking that the rule should only apply to transport channel elements that the WTRU will use in its immediately configured RRC state. The temptation (and perhaps confusion) is reinforced by the current ASN.1 message syntax which requires networks to add dedicated transport channels to all WTRUs upon RRC connection setup, even those being configured for the CELL_FACH state. However, simply delaying an application of the rule until such time as the channels will be used (i.e., when the WTRU is configured for CELL_DCH) will not suffice since the rule is transaction-based. By applying the rule as it is written, the WTRU may reject an operable configuration (such as in the case described above). But by delaying the application of the rule, as the following example shows, the WTRU may accept an inoperable configuration, which is arguably worse.
  • For example, consider a WTRU that is operating in a CELL_DCH state. A UTRAN sends a message to the WTRU directing it to a CELL_FACH state and removing a transport channel, but not including a new TFCS. The WTRU accepts this message because the transport channels will not be used in the CELL_FACH state. A UTRAN sends a message to the WTRU directing it to a CELL_DCH state, including neither new transport channel information nor a new TFCS. The WTRU accepts this message because it does not break the validation rule. However, the WTRU will not be able to operate in the CELL_DCH state because it lacks the appropriate transport channel information or TFCS.
    • SUMMARY
  • A method for validating radio resource control (RRC) messages includes determining whether an RRC message received by a wireless transmit-receive unit (WTRU) is valid based on: an RRC state for which the WTRU is configured, whether or not the WTRU needs a new transport format combination set, and whether or not the RRC message will configure the WTRU for a CELL_DCH state.
  • A WTRU includes a rule application device configured to implement the method.
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • A more detailed understanding of the invention may be had from the following description of a preferred embodiment, given by way of example, and to be understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
  • FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method for applying a validation rule to an incoming RRC message; and
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a device configured to apply a validation rule to an incoming RRC message.
    •  DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Hereafter, the term “wireless transmit/receive unit” (WTRU) includes, but is not limited to, a user equipment, a mobile station, a fixed or mobile subscriber unit, a pager, or any other type of device capable of operating in a wireless environment. When referred to hereafter, the term “base station” includes, but is not limited to, a Node B, a site controller, an access point, or any other type of interfacing device in a wireless environment.
  • If a WTRU wants to allow for a liberal interpretation of the validation rule as defined in the standard (and therefore operate in the most networks possible) and still protect itself against invalid configurations, the WTRU must perform transport channel validation in a manner not described in the standard.
  • FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method 100 for applying the standard validation rule to an incoming message. The method 100 begins by receiving a peer message at a WTRU (step 102). The WTRU applies the validation rule to the received message (step 104). A determination is made whether the WTRU needs a new TFCS based on the received peer message (step 106). If the WTRU needs a new TFCS, then a TFCS indicator (e.g., a TFCS_NEEDED flag) is set to true (step 108). The TFCS indicator is maintained in the WTRU. If the WTRU does not need a new TFCS, then the TFCS indicator is left unchanged.
  • Next, a determination is made whether the WTRU received a new TFCS in the received peer message (step 110). If the WTRU received a new TFCS, then the TFCS indicator (e.g., the TFCS_NEEDED flag) is set to false (step 112). If the WTRU did not receive a new TFCS, then the TFCS indicator is left unchanged.
  • A determination is then made whether the WTRU is configuring itself for the CELL_DCH state based on the received peer message (step 114). If the WTRU is not configuring itself for the CELL_DCH state, then the message is accepted (step 116) and the method terminates (step 118). If the WTRU is configuring itself for the CELL_DCH state (step 114), then the TFCS indicator is evaluated to determine if it is set to true or false (step 120). If the TFCS indicator is set to true, then the WTRU rejects the message (step 122) and the method terminates (step 118). Since the WTRU needs a new TFCS and the network has not supplied the new TFCS during configuration for the CELL_DCH state, the message is properly rejected. If the TFCS indicator is set to false, then the message is accepted (step 116) and the method terminates (step 118). Since the network has supplied the WTRU with a new TFCS prior to or during configuration into the CELL_DCH state, the WTRU correctly accepts the message. In all cases, the WTRU continues operating error-free in the data plane.
  • The present invention allows the WTRU to operate on networks that interpret the validation rule liberally. The present invention also allows the WTRU to still protect itself against invalid configurations and, therefore, continue operating without self-induced errors in the data plane (leading to less retry and/or fallback handling, and ultimately fewer dropped calls).
  • Alternatively, the WTRU may not apply the TFCS validation rule, but the WTRU risks accepting invalid configurations or dropping calls. Another alternative is that the WTRU may delay applying the cited TFCS validation rule until the WTRU is configured for the CELL_DCH state. In this case, the WTRU also risks accepting invalid configurations or dropping calls.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a device 200 configured to apply a validation rule to an incoming RRC message. In a preferred embodiment, the device 200 is a WTRU. The device 200 includes a receiver 202, a rule application device 204 in communication with the receiver 202, a message accepting device 206 in communication with the rule application device 204, and a message rejecting device 208 in communication with the rule application device 204. In operation, the receiver 202 receives an incoming RRC message for the device 200. The rule application device 204 applies a message validation rule to the received message and checks the configured state of the WTRU. If the message passes the validation rule or is not configured for the CELL_DCH state, then the message accepting device 206 takes the message and processes it accordingly. If the message fails the validation rule and is configured for the CELL_DCH state, then the message is passed to the message rejecting device 208 and is discarded.
  • Although the features and elements of the present invention are described in the preferred embodiments in particular combinations, each feature or element can be used alone without the other features and elements of the preferred embodiments or in various combinations with or without other features and elements of the present invention.

Claims (11)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for validating radio resource control (RRC) messages, comprising:
determining whether an RRC message received by a wireless transmit-receive unit (WTRU) is valid based on:
an RRC state for which the WTRU is configured;
whether or not the WTRU needs a new transport format combination set (TFCS); and
whether or not the RRC message will configure the WTRU for a CELL_DCH state.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
accepting the RRC message on a condition that the RRC message is valid; and
rejecting the RRC message on a condition that the RRC message is not valid.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the RRC message is valid on a condition that the WTRU receives a new TFCS.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the RRC message is valid on a condition that the RRC message will not configure the WTRU for the CELL_DCH state.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the RRC message is valid on a condition that:
the RRC message will configure the WTRU for the CELL_DCH state; and
the WTRU does not need a new TFCS.
6. A wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU), comprising:
a rule application device, configured to determine whether an RRC message received by the WTRU is valid based on:
an RRC state for which the WTRU is configured;
whether or not the WTRU needs a new transport format combination set (TFCS); and
whether or not the RRC message will configure the WTRU for a CELL_DCH state.
7. The WTRU of claim 6, further comprising:
a message accepting device, configured to accept the RRC message on a condition that the RRC message is valid; and
a message rejecting device, configured to reject the RRC message on a condition that the RRC message is not valid.
8. The WTRU according to claim 6, wherein the rule application device is configured to determine that the RRC message is valid on a condition that the WTRU receives a new TFCS.
9. The WTRU according to claim 6, wherein the rule application device is configured to determine that the RRC message is valid on a condition that the RRC message will not configure the WTRU for the CELL_DCH state.
10. The WTRU according to claim 6, wherein the rule application device is configured to determine that the RRC message is valid on a condition that:
the RRC message will configure the WTRU for the CELL_DCH state; and
the WTRU does not need a new TFCS.
11. The WTRU according to claim 6, wherein the rule application device is further configured to:
determine whether the RRC message will configure the WTRU for a CELL_DCH state; and
determine whether the WTRU needs a new TFCS based on the RRC message.
US13/686,373 2005-04-01 2012-11-27 Method and apparatus for validating radio resource control messages Abandoned US20130130704A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/686,373 US20130130704A1 (en) 2005-04-01 2012-11-27 Method and apparatus for validating radio resource control messages

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US66744905P 2005-04-01 2005-04-01
US11/312,006 US8320923B2 (en) 2005-04-01 2005-12-20 Method and apparatus for validating radio resource control messages
US13/686,373 US20130130704A1 (en) 2005-04-01 2012-11-27 Method and apparatus for validating radio resource control messages

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/312,006 Continuation US8320923B2 (en) 2005-04-01 2005-12-20 Method and apparatus for validating radio resource control messages

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130130704A1 true US20130130704A1 (en) 2013-05-23

Family

ID=37071254

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/312,006 Expired - Fee Related US8320923B2 (en) 2005-04-01 2005-12-20 Method and apparatus for validating radio resource control messages
US13/686,373 Abandoned US20130130704A1 (en) 2005-04-01 2012-11-27 Method and apparatus for validating radio resource control messages

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/312,006 Expired - Fee Related US8320923B2 (en) 2005-04-01 2005-12-20 Method and apparatus for validating radio resource control messages

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (2) US8320923B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1867180A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2008535399A (en)
KR (2) KR20070122226A (en)
CA (1) CA2615985A1 (en)
MX (1) MX2007012138A (en)
NO (1) NO20075401L (en)
TW (3) TWI419523B (en)
WO (1) WO2006107699A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2140631B1 (en) * 2007-05-02 2018-06-20 Nokia Technologies Oy System and method for improving reordering functionality in radio communications
KR101428093B1 (en) * 2008-09-08 2014-08-08 현대자동차주식회사 Validity diagnostic apparatus of data on network for a vehicle

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100602024B1 (en) 1999-11-01 2006-07-20 유티스타콤코리아 유한회사 Method for transmitting radio resource control message in asynchronous mobile communication system
GB2355890B (en) 1999-10-28 2003-10-08 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Data transmission in a telecommunications network
US7046992B2 (en) * 2001-05-11 2006-05-16 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Authentication of termination messages in telecommunications system
CN1173500C (en) * 2001-12-05 2004-10-27 华为技术有限公司 High-speed down data packet accessing system support method to different service quality business
GB2382956B (en) 2001-12-05 2006-03-01 Ipwireless Inc Method and arrangement for power control
US20040266461A1 (en) * 2002-05-24 2004-12-30 Mark Beckmann Method and system for transmitting data
CA2486995A1 (en) 2002-05-29 2003-12-11 Interdigital Technology Corporation Packet switched connections using dedicated channels
WO2004034680A1 (en) 2002-10-07 2004-04-22 Interdigital Technology Corporation System and method for simulation of performance of measurement-based algorithms for slotted wireless communications
US20040224669A1 (en) 2003-05-08 2004-11-11 Pedlar David W. Apparatus and method of handling universal terrestrial radio access network radio resource control connecting messages in universal mobile telecommunications system user equipment
KR100947741B1 (en) 2003-05-09 2010-03-17 엘지전자 주식회사 Rrc connection setup method in a mobile communication system
KR100548344B1 (en) 2003-05-13 2006-02-02 엘지전자 주식회사 Rrc connection method in mobile communication system
WO2004114574A2 (en) 2003-06-17 2004-12-29 Knowmotion, Llc Group network methods and systems
US7406314B2 (en) * 2003-07-11 2008-07-29 Interdigital Technology Corporation Wireless transmit receive unit having a transition state for transitioning from monitoring to duplex connected states and method
TWI268724B (en) * 2003-07-17 2006-12-11 Interdigital Tech Corp Method and system for delivery of assistance data
ATE398875T1 (en) * 2003-09-09 2008-07-15 Interdigital Tech Corp TRANSPORT FORMAT COMBINATION LOOKUP AND RESELECTION
EP1530393B1 (en) * 2003-11-07 2008-07-02 Research in Motion Limited Processing configuration and mobility management messages with missing Ciphering Activation Time for DPCH information in a universal mobile telecommunications system (UMTS)
FI20031671A (en) * 2003-11-17 2005-05-18 Nokia Corp A method and apparatus for correctly reporting received transport blocks on a wireless system
WO2005112500A1 (en) * 2004-05-13 2005-11-24 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Reestablishing wireless communication between a radio access network and a mobile station
US7580388B2 (en) * 2004-06-01 2009-08-25 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for providing enhanced messages on common control channel in wireless communication system
KR101059876B1 (en) 2004-06-16 2011-08-29 엘지전자 주식회사 Data Transmission Volume Selection Method for Guaranteeing Service Quality of Mobile Communication System

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20080031512A (en) 2008-04-08
WO2006107699A3 (en) 2008-01-24
EP1867180A2 (en) 2007-12-19
MX2007012138A (en) 2008-04-04
TW200733766A (en) 2007-09-01
TWI419523B (en) 2013-12-11
WO2006107699A2 (en) 2006-10-12
US20060223551A1 (en) 2006-10-05
TWI300313B (en) 2008-08-21
CA2615985A1 (en) 2006-10-12
TW200640270A (en) 2006-11-16
TW201014373A (en) 2010-04-01
JP2008535399A (en) 2008-08-28
EP1867180A4 (en) 2008-07-23
TWI403189B (en) 2013-07-21
NO20075401L (en) 2007-10-24
US8320923B2 (en) 2012-11-27
KR20070122226A (en) 2007-12-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1969737B1 (en) Method for reading dynamic system information blocks
US8971790B2 (en) Method and apparatus for broadcast services in a communication system
KR20200064135A (en) Data transmission channel processing method, apparatus, and system
US8116282B2 (en) Method and apparatus for mapping 3GPP service primitives to media independent handover event services
EP2422561A1 (en) Access control with partial support for communications
USRE43630E1 (en) Data transmission method with a lower probability of erroneous rejection of data
US11438806B2 (en) Terminal apparatus, base station apparatus, and method
US20200280886A1 (en) Terminal apparatus and method
EP1389400B1 (en) Synchronization of stored service parameters in a communication system
US11115896B2 (en) Handling QoS rules on QoS operation errors
US20130130704A1 (en) Method and apparatus for validating radio resource control messages
US11265771B2 (en) AT commands for supporting session and service continuity modes of 5G protocol data unitsession operations
CN116614172A (en) Satellite communication method, nonvolatile storage medium, and electronic device
US11228943B2 (en) Signaling transmission method and apparatus, base station, and terminal
MXPA06003854A (en) A method and a device for reconfiguration in a wireless system.
US7961655B2 (en) Method and apparatus for performing radio bearer mapping in a wireless communications system
US20120087243A1 (en) Message Processing Method and System
CN116762467A (en) Session management method and apparatus in mobile communication system
WO2023139852A1 (en) Terminal, base station, and communication method
US20230136984A1 (en) Method and apparatus for verifying compliance with ue route selection policy
CN117880794A (en) Communication method and device
CN117413616A (en) Method and apparatus for managing backhaul information-based sessions in a wireless communication system
CN115843029A (en) Network authentication method and device
KR100782591B1 (en) A method and a device for reconfiguration in a wireless system
CN117560737A (en) Communication method and communication device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO PAY ISSUE FEE