US20120258175A1 - Encapsulated bacteriophage formulation - Google Patents

Encapsulated bacteriophage formulation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120258175A1
US20120258175A1 US13/528,215 US201213528215A US2012258175A1 US 20120258175 A1 US20120258175 A1 US 20120258175A1 US 201213528215 A US201213528215 A US 201213528215A US 2012258175 A1 US2012258175 A1 US 2012258175A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
bacteriophage
encapsulated
temperature
immobilized
bacteriophages
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/528,215
Inventor
Kishore Murthy
Rainer Engelhardt
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chr Hansen AS
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US13/528,215 priority Critical patent/US20120258175A1/en
Assigned to GANGAGEN LIFE SCIENCES INC. reassignment GANGAGEN LIFE SCIENCES INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ENGELHARDT, RAINER, MURTHY, KISHORE
Assigned to GANGAGEN INC. reassignment GANGAGEN INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GANGAGEN LIFE SCIENCES, INC.
Assigned to CHR. HANSEN A/S reassignment CHR. HANSEN A/S ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GANGAGEN, INC.
Publication of US20120258175A1 publication Critical patent/US20120258175A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K35/00Medicinal preparations containing materials or reaction products thereof with undetermined constitution
    • A61K35/66Microorganisms or materials therefrom
    • A61K35/76Viruses; Subviral particles; Bacteriophages
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K20/00Accessory food factors for animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K20/10Organic substances
    • A23K20/195Antibiotics
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K50/00Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
    • A23K50/10Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for ruminants
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K50/00Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
    • A23K50/70Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for birds
    • A23K50/75Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for birds for poultry
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K50/00Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
    • A23K50/80Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for aquatic animals, e.g. fish, crustaceans or molluscs
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P17/00Drugs for dermatological disorders
    • A61P17/02Drugs for dermatological disorders for treating wounds, ulcers, burns, scars, keloids, or the like
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P31/00Antiinfectives, i.e. antibiotics, antiseptics, chemotherapeutics
    • A61P31/04Antibacterial agents
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2795/00Bacteriophages
    • C12N2795/00011Details
    • C12N2795/00032Use of virus as therapeutic agent, other than vaccine, e.g. as cytolytic agent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2795/00Bacteriophages
    • C12N2795/00011Details
    • C12N2795/00051Methods of production or purification of viral material
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02ATECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A40/00Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production
    • Y02A40/80Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production in fisheries management
    • Y02A40/81Aquaculture, e.g. of fish
    • Y02A40/818Alternative feeds for fish, e.g. in aquacultures

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation. More particularly, the present invention pertains to an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation and methods for preparing the encapsulated bacteriophage formulation.
  • Bacteriophage therapy has the potential to provide an effective method to control the undesirable multiplication of various strains of bacteria.
  • the bacteriophages themselves must show a certain degree of stability to allow for storage.
  • Prouty (1953, Appl Microbiol, 1:250-351) reported that desiccated bacteriophage of lactic acid Streptococci remained viable at 0° C. for 42 months, at 37° C. for 72 months and at 12° C. and 25° C. for at least 78 months. However, there is no mention of the effect of storing desiccated bacteriophage on the titer of the bacteriophage.
  • Keogh and Pettingill (1966, Appl Microbiol, 14:4421-424) show that bacteriophages for lactic acid Streptococci in the presence of whey protein are resistant to freezing and cold storage. Phage stored at 4° C. and ⁇ 18° C. showed little reduction in the bacteriophage titer; freeze-thaw cycles also showed no significant loss of titer. Warren and Hatch (1969, Appl Microbiol, 17:256-261) report a significant decrease in the titer and viability of a bacteriophage suspension stored (without stabilizers) at 4° C., while storage at ⁇ 20° C. and 20° C. resulted in the greatest survival of phage. They also report that long term storage of bacteriophages at ⁇ 20° C. tends to result in the formation of clumps.
  • Jepson and March disclose that a liquid suspension of bacteriophages (in either SM buffer or a 1/200 dilution of SM buffer in water) was stable for 6 months at 4° C. and ⁇ 70° C., with the phage remaining unaffected by freeze-thawing. Increased temperature, between 20° C. and 42° C., resulted in a significant loss of titre. Lyophilisation and immediate reconstitution of bacteriophages in the presence or absence of stabilizers resulted in a loss of titre of 80-95%. Of the bacteriophages remaining following lyophilization in the presence of dry skim milk powder, storage at temperatures between 20° C. and 42° C.
  • Freezing or lyophilisation of bacteriophage suspensions, or bacteriophage suspensions optionally containing stabilizers, are inconvenient methods that require specialized equipment and add to the cost of a commercial preparation. While it may be in certain circumstances desirable to be able to store bacteriophages in a desiccated state, the process of lyophilization results in a significant loss of titre. Alternative methods for bacteriophage stabilization are required
  • the present invention relates to an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation. More particularly, the present invention pertains to an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation and methods for preparing the encapsulated bacteriophage formulation.
  • the present invention provides a method for producing an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation comprising,
  • a molten coating substance comprising a 50:50 solution of palmitic and stearic acids, at a temperature of between about 20° C. and about 80° C. into a chamber containing bacteriophage immobilized on skim milk powder, the bacteriophage immobilized on skim milk powder agitated by rotation of a base of the chamber and swept by a flow of air at a temperature of between 10° C. and 50° C., the flow of air having a speed such that the chamber temperature is between about 30° C. to about 55° C., to produce an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation.
  • the present invention also pertains to the method described above wherein the speed of rotation of the base of said chamber may be between 50 and 500 rpm.
  • the coating substance may also have a melting point of between 30° C. and 80° C.
  • the present invention also pertains to the above method, wherein the injection temperature may be between 60° C. and 120° C. In the above method, the temperature in the chamber may be between 30° C. and 55° C. Additionally, in the method as described above, the proportion of the injected coating substance may be between 10 and 99% by weight of the encapsulated bacteriophage formulation.
  • the present invention also provides an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation comprising an bacteriophage immobilized on skim milk powder and encapsulated with a coating consisting of stearic acid and palmitic acid present at a ratio of 50:50.
  • the encapsulated bacteriophage formulation of the present invention is resistant to extended periods of exposure to low pH that would otherwise render the bacteriophage non-viable.
  • Encapsulated antibacterial compositions of the present invention may be used for any suitable purpose that requires a bacteriophage preparation, for example, the encapsulated bacteriophage composition may be added to animal feed and fed to an animal. In this case, the encapsulation of the bacteriophages results in protecting the bacteriophages from stomach acids and increasing the duration of bacteriophage release within the gut of the animal.
  • the antibacterial compositions of the present invention may be used for veterinary purposes.
  • FIG. 1 shows the effect of encapsulation on bacteriophage activity. Phage titers before and after encapsulation are shown.
  • FIG. 2A shows the effect of low pH on the stability of encapsulated phages. Encapsulated phage titers were determined before and after grinding. All phage concentrations have been corrected for the weight of encapsulated material.
  • FIG. 2B shows the effect of low pH on the infectivity of phage. The phages were neither immobilized nor encapsulated.
  • the present invention relates to stabilized bacteriophage formulations. More particularly, the present invention pertains to stabilized bacteriophage formulations and methods for preparing stabilized bacteriophage formulations.
  • the present invention provides an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation.
  • the present invention also provides a method for producing an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation comprising encapsulating immobilized bacteriophages.
  • the encapsulated bacteriophage formulation may be used in a variety of ways for the control of bacterial growth, and may be used for a variety of applications.
  • the antibacterial composition may be encapsulated and used as a feed additive or as an oral treatment for the control of bacteria within a human, a mammal, or an avian species.
  • bacteriophage or “phage” is well known in the art and generally indicates a virus-like particle that infects bacteria. Phages are parasites that multiply inside bacterial cells by using some or all of the hosts' biosynthetic machinery, and can either be lytic or non-lytic.
  • the bacteriophages used in accordance with the present invention may be any bacteriophage, lytic or non-lytic, that is effective against a target bacterium of interest.
  • the target bacteria may be any type of bacteria, for example but not limited to species and serotypes of, E.
  • coli Streptococci, Humicola, Salmonella, Campylobacter, Listeria, Staphylococcus, Pasteurella, Mycobacterium, Hemophilius, Helicobacter, Mycobacterium, Mycoplasmi, Nesseria, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Proteus, Bactercides, Pseudomas, Borrelius, Citrobacter, Propionobacter, Treponema, Shigella, Enterococcus, Leptospirex, Bacillii including Bacillus anthracis and other bacteria pathogenic to humans, animal, fish, birds, plants. If desired, one of or a mixture or cocktail of identified differing bacteriophages may be used against a single bacterial target, or multiple bacterial targets.
  • the bacteriophage may be provided in a powder form as an immobilized bacteriophage preparation.
  • the bacteriophage may be adsorbed onto skim milk powder.
  • Immobilized bacteriophage may be obtained from GangaGen Life Sciences Inc. (Ottawa, Canada).
  • the immobilized phages are coated with a substance that increases the phages' resistance to the physico-chemical stresses of its biotic or abiotic environment.
  • the immobilized phages may be coated with a mixture of palmitic and stearic acids, present at a ration of 50:50, in accordance with the method described in US publication 2003/0109025 (Durand et al., which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). In this method, micro-drops of the coating substance are injected into a chamber containing the immobilized bacteriophages and rapidly cooled.
  • the coating layer exhibits a melting point between about 20° C. and about 120° C., for example between about 30° C. and about 80° C., or any temperature therebetween. If the coating substance is to be ingested or used for an oral application, then it is preferred that the substance is a food grade substance.
  • An example of a coating substance comprises a mixture of stearic acid and palmitic acid present at a ratio of 50:50, for example, Stéarine 50/50TM (obtained from Exaflor, Gif sur Yvette, France).
  • Other additive molecules may be added to the coating substance including antioxidants, sugars, or proteins.
  • the proportion of coating material in relation to the quantity of immobilized bacteriophages is between about 10% and about 99% by weight, or any amount therebetween, for example between about 30% and about 80%.
  • the proportion of coating material in relation to the quantity of immobilized bacteriophages may be about 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95 or 99% by weight, or any amount in a range defined by any two percentages just recited. This parameter may be adjusted according to the intended final application, depending on the desired rate of release of the immobilized bacteriophage composition.
  • the coating method uses a granulator (GLATT.TM granulator model CRG200).
  • this device comprises a stainless steel chamber, the base of which is made up of a rotatable disc that is powered by a motor. An airflow is injected via the space between the base and the body of the chamber. The air escapes from the chamber through a filter placed in the upper portion of the chamber. The mass of immobilized bacteriophages is agitated by the rotation of the disc.
  • a nozzle permits injection, by means of a pump, of the coating product kept at a temperature above its melting point in a temperature-controlled receptacle.
  • the coating substance is used in the granulator in a molten form.
  • the temperature of the molten coating substance placed in the temperature-controlled receptacle can be about 30° C. and about 120° C., for example between about 60° C. and about 120° C., or any temperature therebetween; for example, the temperature of the coating substance may be 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 105, 110, 115, or 120° C. or any temperature in a range defined by any two temperatures just recited. In any case, the temperature of the coating substance ought to be greater than the melting point of said coating substance, whether this is a pure product or a mixture.
  • the temperature of the coating substance may be at least about 5° C., or at least about 10° C. above the meting temperature of the coating substance.
  • the temperature of the air sweeping the granulation chamber is between about 10° C. and about 50° C., or any temperature therebetween; for example, the temperature of the, air may be about 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, or 50° C. or any temperature in a range defined by any two temperatures just recited.
  • the temperature of the air sweeping the granulation chamber is strictly controlled, so that at the moment of injecting the molten coating, the rise in temperature experienced by the immobilized bacteriophages does not exceed a few degrees, at maximum about 5 ° C.
  • the speed of rotation of the base plate and the rate of injection of the coating are interdependent parameters, connected to the mass of the products used.
  • the speed of rotation is generally between about 50 and about 500 rpm (rotation per minute), or any speed therebetween; for example, the speed of rotation may be about 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250, 275, 300, 325, 350, 375, 400, 425, 450, 475, or 500 rpm, or any speed in a range therebetween.
  • the injection of the coating can be carried out with the aid of one or more nozzles distributed over the periphery of the chamber.
  • the encapsulated bacteriophage formulation of the present invention exhibits desirable storage properties and may be used in a variety of applications.
  • the antibacterial compositions may be used for human, veterinary, aquacultural, and agricultural applications.
  • the encapsulated bacteriophage formulation may be mixed with the feed of livestock, birds, poultry, domestic animals and fish, to aid in reducing the shedding of target bacteria.
  • Immobilized bacteriophages using skim milk as the matrix were obtained from GangaGen Life Sciences Inc (Ottawa, Canada), and encapsulated generally as described in US publication 2003/0109025 (which is incorporated herein by reference) using a GLATTTM granulator, model CRG200, with some modifications to preserve the activity of the phages. Briefly, 400 g of immobilized phages and 1.2 kg of vegetable fatty acids comprising palmitic and stearic acids and available as Stéarine 50/50TM (obtained from Exaflor, Gif sur Yvette, France) were used for encapsulation. The maximum temperature attained by the encapsulated phage preparation was 39° C.
  • the encapsulated particles were collected and stored in airtight containers.
  • the average particle size was between 100 and 1000 ⁇ m.
  • the effect of encapsulation on the titer of bacteriophages was determined by determining the activity of the immobilized phages before (“Before”, FIG. 1 ) and after (“After”, FIG. 1 ) encapsulation.
  • encapsulated bacteriophages were re-suspended, and ground using a blender.
  • the re-suspended encapsulated bacteriophages were blended in order to disrupt the encapsulated particles and release the bacteriophages.
  • 0.5 g of encapsulated immobilized phage was mixed with 45.5 ml of re-suspension media (LB Broth or RO Water), and 250 ⁇ l of antifoam agent was added to prevent foaming upon grinding. The results of this analysis are shown in FIG. 1 .
  • Phages were encapsulated as described in Example 1. The release of phages upon physical or chemical disruption was tested in the following manner: 0.5 g of encapsulated immobilized phage was mixed with 45.5 ml of re-suspension media (LB Broth or RO Water). 250 ⁇ l of antifoam agent was used to prevent foaming upon grinding. A control sample of encapsulated phages was prepared as described above, but not subjected to grinding, to determine the non-specific leaching of encapsulated bacteriophages within the re-suspension medium.
  • the stability of the encapsulated bacteriophages at low pH was also examined. After re-suspension (as outlined above), the encapsulated phages were incubated for 30 or 60 min at pH 2.15, neutralized to pH 7.0 using NaOH, then ground using a blender; another sample (control) was resuspended and immediately ground. Both the control and test samples were filter sterilized using a 0.45 ⁇ m syringe filter prior to use.
  • FIG. 2A shows the results of these analyses.
  • the data show that resuspension of the encapsulated immobilized phage results in phage concentrations of about 1E+08 pfu/g.
  • incubation of the phages at pH 2.15 alone does not cause significant release of phages (phage concentration of about 3E+07 pfu/g after 30 minutes, or a phage concentration of about 4E+07 pfu/g after 60 minutes).
  • the amount of phage released is about the same amount as was loaded onto the milk powder for immobilization (about 2E+09 pfu/g).
  • Incubation of non encapsulated and non immobilized phages at pH 2.15 for 30 and 60 minutes however resulted in essentially complete loss of phage infectivity ( FIG. 2B ).

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Birds (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Mycology (AREA)
  • Insects & Arthropods (AREA)
  • Marine Sciences & Fisheries (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Communicable Diseases (AREA)
  • Oncology (AREA)
  • Dermatology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Medicinal Preparation (AREA)

Abstract

An encapsulated bacteriophage formulation and a method for preparing encapsulated bacteriophage formulation is provided. The method for producing the encapsulated bacteriophage composition involves injection of a molten coating substance comprising stearic acid and palmitic acid present at a ratio of 50:50, into a granulator chamber containing immobilized bacteriophages. The immobilized bacteriophage are agitated by rotation of a base of the chamber and swept by a flow of air at a temperature of between 10° C. and 50° C.

Description

  • This application is a Continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/666,706, filed May 20, 2008, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/666,706 is a National Stage application of International Application No. PCT/CA2005/001679, filed Nov. 2, 2005, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. International Application No. PCT/CA2005/001679 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/624,576, filed Nov. 2, 2004, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
  • The present invention relates to an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation. More particularly, the present invention pertains to an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation and methods for preparing the encapsulated bacteriophage formulation.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Bacteriophage therapy has the potential to provide an effective method to control the undesirable multiplication of various strains of bacteria. However, to be commercially viable, the bacteriophages themselves must show a certain degree of stability to allow for storage.
  • Various methods have been used to store and protect phage, including freezing at low temperatures, lyophilising, and storing in liquid medium. All methods have shown varying degrees of success at maintaining a high titer of viable bacteriophages.
  • Prouty (1953, Appl Microbiol, 1:250-351) reported that desiccated bacteriophage of lactic acid Streptococci remained viable at 0° C. for 42 months, at 37° C. for 72 months and at 12° C. and 25° C. for at least 78 months. However, there is no mention of the effect of storing desiccated bacteriophage on the titer of the bacteriophage.
  • Keogh and Pettingill (1966, Appl Microbiol, 14:4421-424) show that bacteriophages for lactic acid Streptococci in the presence of whey protein are resistant to freezing and cold storage. Phage stored at 4° C. and −18° C. showed little reduction in the bacteriophage titer; freeze-thaw cycles also showed no significant loss of titer. Warren and Hatch (1969, Appl Microbiol, 17:256-261) report a significant decrease in the titer and viability of a bacteriophage suspension stored (without stabilizers) at 4° C., while storage at −20° C. and 20° C. resulted in the greatest survival of phage. They also report that long term storage of bacteriophages at −20° C. tends to result in the formation of clumps.
  • Jepson and March (2004, Vaccine, 22:2413-2419) disclose that a liquid suspension of bacteriophages (in either SM buffer or a 1/200 dilution of SM buffer in water) was stable for 6 months at 4° C. and −70° C., with the phage remaining unaffected by freeze-thawing. Increased temperature, between 20° C. and 42° C., resulted in a significant loss of titre. Lyophilisation and immediate reconstitution of bacteriophages in the presence or absence of stabilizers resulted in a loss of titre of 80-95%. Of the bacteriophages remaining following lyophilization in the presence of dry skim milk powder, storage at temperatures between 20° C. and 42° C. resulted in a loss of titre similar to that of the liquid suspension. However, lyophilization in the presence of trehalose resulted in an increase in half-life of bacteriophage between 20° C. and 42° C. The effect of pH of the storage medium was also examined. There was no change in bacteriophage titer over a 24 hour period at pH 3-11. However, the titer dropped rapidly when stored for 5 minutes at pH values below 2.4.
  • Freezing or lyophilisation of bacteriophage suspensions, or bacteriophage suspensions optionally containing stabilizers, are inconvenient methods that require specialized equipment and add to the cost of a commercial preparation. While it may be in certain circumstances desirable to be able to store bacteriophages in a desiccated state, the process of lyophilization results in a significant loss of titre. Alternative methods for bacteriophage stabilization are required
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation. More particularly, the present invention pertains to an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation and methods for preparing the encapsulated bacteriophage formulation.
  • It is an object of the present invention to provide an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation.
  • The present invention provides a method for producing an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation comprising,
  • injecting a molten coating substance comprising a 50:50 solution of palmitic and stearic acids, at a temperature of between about 20° C. and about 80° C. into a chamber containing bacteriophage immobilized on skim milk powder, the bacteriophage immobilized on skim milk powder agitated by rotation of a base of the chamber and swept by a flow of air at a temperature of between 10° C. and 50° C., the flow of air having a speed such that the chamber temperature is between about 30° C. to about 55° C., to produce an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation.
  • The present invention also pertains to the method described above wherein the speed of rotation of the base of said chamber may be between 50 and 500 rpm. In the method as described above, the coating substance may also have a melting point of between 30° C. and 80° C. The present invention also pertains to the above method, wherein the injection temperature may be between 60° C. and 120° C. In the above method, the temperature in the chamber may be between 30° C. and 55° C. Additionally, in the method as described above, the proportion of the injected coating substance may be between 10 and 99% by weight of the encapsulated bacteriophage formulation.
  • The present invention also provides an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation comprising an bacteriophage immobilized on skim milk powder and encapsulated with a coating consisting of stearic acid and palmitic acid present at a ratio of 50:50.
  • The encapsulated bacteriophage formulation of the present invention is resistant to extended periods of exposure to low pH that would otherwise render the bacteriophage non-viable. Encapsulated antibacterial compositions of the present invention may be used for any suitable purpose that requires a bacteriophage preparation, for example, the encapsulated bacteriophage composition may be added to animal feed and fed to an animal. In this case, the encapsulation of the bacteriophages results in protecting the bacteriophages from stomach acids and increasing the duration of bacteriophage release within the gut of the animal. The antibacterial compositions of the present invention may be used for veterinary purposes.
  • This summary of the invention does not necessarily describe all necessary features of the invention.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • These and other features of the invention will become more apparent from the following description in which reference is made to the appended drawings wherein:
  • FIG. 1 shows the effect of encapsulation on bacteriophage activity. Phage titers before and after encapsulation are shown.
  • FIG. 2A shows the effect of low pH on the stability of encapsulated phages. Encapsulated phage titers were determined before and after grinding. All phage concentrations have been corrected for the weight of encapsulated material. FIG. 2B shows the effect of low pH on the infectivity of phage. The phages were neither immobilized nor encapsulated.
  • DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • The present invention relates to stabilized bacteriophage formulations. More particularly, the present invention pertains to stabilized bacteriophage formulations and methods for preparing stabilized bacteriophage formulations.
  • The following description is of a preferred embodiment.
  • The present invention provides an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation. The present invention also provides a method for producing an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation comprising encapsulating immobilized bacteriophages.
  • The encapsulated bacteriophage formulation may be used in a variety of ways for the control of bacterial growth, and may be used for a variety of applications. For example, the antibacterial composition may be encapsulated and used as a feed additive or as an oral treatment for the control of bacteria within a human, a mammal, or an avian species.
  • The term “bacteriophage” or “phage” is well known in the art and generally indicates a virus-like particle that infects bacteria. Phages are parasites that multiply inside bacterial cells by using some or all of the hosts' biosynthetic machinery, and can either be lytic or non-lytic. The bacteriophages used in accordance with the present invention may be any bacteriophage, lytic or non-lytic, that is effective against a target bacterium of interest. The target bacteria may be any type of bacteria, for example but not limited to species and serotypes of, E. coli, Streptococci, Humicola, Salmonella, Campylobacter, Listeria, Staphylococcus, Pasteurella, Mycobacterium, Hemophilius, Helicobacter, Mycobacterium, Mycoplasmi, Nesseria, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Proteus, Bactercides, Pseudomas, Borrelius, Citrobacter, Propionobacter, Treponema, Shigella, Enterococcus, Leptospirex, Bacillii including Bacillus anthracis and other bacteria pathogenic to humans, animal, fish, birds, plants. If desired, one of or a mixture or cocktail of identified differing bacteriophages may be used against a single bacterial target, or multiple bacterial targets.
  • The bacteriophage may be provided in a powder form as an immobilized bacteriophage preparation. For example, the bacteriophage may be adsorbed onto skim milk powder. Immobilized bacteriophage may be obtained from GangaGen Life Sciences Inc. (Ottawa, Canada).
  • By the term “encapsulated”, it is meant that the immobilized phages are coated with a substance that increases the phages' resistance to the physico-chemical stresses of its biotic or abiotic environment. The immobilized phages may be coated with a mixture of palmitic and stearic acids, present at a ration of 50:50, in accordance with the method described in US publication 2003/0109025 (Durand et al., which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). In this method, micro-drops of the coating substance are injected into a chamber containing the immobilized bacteriophages and rapidly cooled.
  • The coating layer exhibits a melting point between about 20° C. and about 120° C., for example between about 30° C. and about 80° C., or any temperature therebetween. If the coating substance is to be ingested or used for an oral application, then it is preferred that the substance is a food grade substance. An example of a coating substance comprises a mixture of stearic acid and palmitic acid present at a ratio of 50:50, for example, Stéarine 50/50™ (obtained from Exaflor, Gif sur Yvette, France). Other additive molecules may be added to the coating substance including antioxidants, sugars, or proteins.
  • In the encapsulated bacteriophage formulation of the present invention, the proportion of coating material in relation to the quantity of immobilized bacteriophages is between about 10% and about 99% by weight, or any amount therebetween, for example between about 30% and about 80%. For example, the proportion of coating material in relation to the quantity of immobilized bacteriophages may be about 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95 or 99% by weight, or any amount in a range defined by any two percentages just recited. This parameter may be adjusted according to the intended final application, depending on the desired rate of release of the immobilized bacteriophage composition.
  • The coating method uses a granulator (GLATT.™ granulator model CRG200). As would be known to a person of skill in the art, this device comprises a stainless steel chamber, the base of which is made up of a rotatable disc that is powered by a motor. An airflow is injected via the space between the base and the body of the chamber. The air escapes from the chamber through a filter placed in the upper portion of the chamber. The mass of immobilized bacteriophages is agitated by the rotation of the disc. A nozzle permits injection, by means of a pump, of the coating product kept at a temperature above its melting point in a temperature-controlled receptacle.
  • The coating substance is used in the granulator in a molten form. The temperature of the molten coating substance placed in the temperature-controlled receptacle can be about 30° C. and about 120° C., for example between about 60° C. and about 120° C., or any temperature therebetween; for example, the temperature of the coating substance may be 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 105, 110, 115, or 120° C. or any temperature in a range defined by any two temperatures just recited. In any case, the temperature of the coating substance ought to be greater than the melting point of said coating substance, whether this is a pure product or a mixture. For example, the temperature of the coating substance may be at least about 5° C., or at least about 10° C. above the meting temperature of the coating substance.
  • The temperature of the air sweeping the granulation chamber is between about 10° C. and about 50° C., or any temperature therebetween; for example, the temperature of the, air may be about 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, or 50° C. or any temperature in a range defined by any two temperatures just recited. The temperature of the air sweeping the granulation chamber is strictly controlled, so that at the moment of injecting the molten coating, the rise in temperature experienced by the immobilized bacteriophages does not exceed a few degrees, at maximum about 5° C.
  • The speed of rotation of the base plate and the rate of injection of the coating are interdependent parameters, connected to the mass of the products used. The speed of rotation is generally between about 50 and about 500 rpm (rotation per minute), or any speed therebetween; for example, the speed of rotation may be about 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250, 275, 300, 325, 350, 375, 400, 425, 450, 475, or 500 rpm, or any speed in a range therebetween. The injection of the coating can be carried out with the aid of one or more nozzles distributed over the periphery of the chamber.
  • The encapsulated bacteriophage formulation of the present invention exhibits desirable storage properties and may be used in a variety of applications. For example, which is not to be considered limiting in any manner, the antibacterial compositions may be used for human, veterinary, aquacultural, and agricultural applications. For example, the encapsulated bacteriophage formulation may be mixed with the feed of livestock, birds, poultry, domestic animals and fish, to aid in reducing the shedding of target bacteria.
  • The present invention will be further illustrated in the following examples.
  • EXAMPLES Example 1 Encapsulation of Bacteriophage Compositions
  • Immobilized bacteriophages using skim milk as the matrix, were obtained from GangaGen Life Sciences Inc (Ottawa, Canada), and encapsulated generally as described in US publication 2003/0109025 (which is incorporated herein by reference) using a GLATT™ granulator, model CRG200, with some modifications to preserve the activity of the phages. Briefly, 400 g of immobilized phages and 1.2 kg of vegetable fatty acids comprising palmitic and stearic acids and available as Stéarine 50/50™ (obtained from Exaflor, Gif sur Yvette, France) were used for encapsulation. The maximum temperature attained by the encapsulated phage preparation was 39° C.
  • Once the coating operation was complete, the encapsulated particles were collected and stored in airtight containers. The average particle size was between 100 and 1000 μm.
  • The effect of encapsulation on the titer of bacteriophages was determined by determining the activity of the immobilized phages before (“Before”, FIG. 1) and after (“After”, FIG. 1) encapsulation. For this analysis, encapsulated bacteriophages were re-suspended, and ground using a blender. The re-suspended encapsulated bacteriophages were blended in order to disrupt the encapsulated particles and release the bacteriophages. 0.5 g of encapsulated immobilized phage was mixed with 45.5 ml of re-suspension media (LB Broth or RO Water), and 250 μl of antifoam agent was added to prevent foaming upon grinding. The results of this analysis are shown in FIG. 1.
  • These results demonstrate that bacteriophages can be recovered from an encapsulated bacteriophage composition, and encapsulation does not inactivate the immobilized phage.
  • Example 2 Stability And Release of Encapsulated Bacteriophages
  • Phages were encapsulated as described in Example 1. The release of phages upon physical or chemical disruption was tested in the following manner: 0.5 g of encapsulated immobilized phage was mixed with 45.5 ml of re-suspension media (LB Broth or RO Water). 250 μl of antifoam agent was used to prevent foaming upon grinding. A control sample of encapsulated phages was prepared as described above, but not subjected to grinding, to determine the non-specific leaching of encapsulated bacteriophages within the re-suspension medium.
  • The stability of the encapsulated bacteriophages at low pH was also examined. After re-suspension (as outlined above), the encapsulated phages were incubated for 30 or 60 min at pH 2.15, neutralized to pH 7.0 using NaOH, then ground using a blender; another sample (control) was resuspended and immediately ground. Both the control and test samples were filter sterilized using a 0.45 μm syringe filter prior to use.
  • FIG. 2A shows the results of these analyses. The data show that resuspension of the encapsulated immobilized phage results in phage concentrations of about 1E+08 pfu/g. Similarly, incubation of the phages at pH 2.15 alone does not cause significant release of phages (phage concentration of about 3E+07 pfu/g after 30 minutes, or a phage concentration of about 4E+07 pfu/g after 60 minutes). However, following grinding and disruption of the encapsulated bacteriophage particles, the amount of phage released is about the same amount as was loaded onto the milk powder for immobilization (about 2E+09 pfu/g). Incubation of non encapsulated and non immobilized phages at pH 2.15 for 30 and 60 minutes however resulted in essentially complete loss of phage infectivity (FIG. 2B).
  • These results demonstrate that bacteriophages may be released following disruption of encapsulated bacteriophage particles. Furthermore, these results shows that encapsulated bacteriophage may be exposed to a pH of 2.15 for prolonged period of time, with little or no loss in activity (titer). The results for non-encapsulated and non-immobilized bacteriophages are consistent with the results of Jepson and March (2004, Vaccine, 22:2413-2419), where a dramatic loss of viability of bacteriophages was observed after only 5 minutes at pH below pH 2.2. This loss in activity is obviated by encapsulation of the bacteriophages as described in the present invention.
  • All citations are hereby incorporated by reference.
  • The present invention has been described with regard to one or more embodiments. However, it will be apparent to persons skilled in the art that a number of variations and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims.

Claims (6)

1. A method for producing an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation comprising,
injecting a molten coating substance comprising stearic acid and palmitic acid at a ratio of 50:50 at a temperature of between about 20° C. and about 120° C. into a chamber containing bacteriophage immobilized on skim milk powder, the bacteriophage immobilized on skim milk powder agitated by rotation of a base of the chamber and swept by a flow of air at a temperature of between 10° C. and 50° C., the flow of air having a speed such that the chamber temperature is between about 30° C. to about 55° C., to produce an encapsulated bacteriophage formulation.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the speed of rotation of the base of the chamber is between 50 and 500 rpm.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the coating substance has a melting point of between 30° C. and 100° C.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the injection temperature is between 60° C. and 120° C.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the chamber temperature does not exceed by more than 5° C. a viability temperature of the immobilized bacteriophages.
6. An encapsulated bacteriophage formulation comprising bacteriophage immobilized on skim milk powder and encapsulated with a coating substance comprising stearic acid and palmitic acid present at a ratio of 50:50.
US13/528,215 2004-11-02 2012-06-20 Encapsulated bacteriophage formulation Abandoned US20120258175A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/528,215 US20120258175A1 (en) 2004-11-02 2012-06-20 Encapsulated bacteriophage formulation

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US62457604P 2004-11-02 2004-11-02
PCT/CA2005/001679 WO2006047871A1 (en) 2004-11-02 2005-11-02 Encapsulated bacteriophage formulation
US11/666,706 US20080318311A1 (en) 2004-11-02 2005-11-02 Encapsulated Bacteriophage Formulation
US13/528,215 US20120258175A1 (en) 2004-11-02 2012-06-20 Encapsulated bacteriophage formulation

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CA2005/001679 Continuation WO2006047871A1 (en) 2004-11-02 2005-11-02 Encapsulated bacteriophage formulation
US12/666,706 Continuation US20100189840A1 (en) 2007-06-25 2008-06-24 Sparkling alcoholic beverage, and method for production thereof

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120258175A1 true US20120258175A1 (en) 2012-10-11

Family

ID=36318849

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/666,706 Abandoned US20080318311A1 (en) 2004-11-02 2005-11-02 Encapsulated Bacteriophage Formulation
US11/666,709 Expired - Fee Related US8309077B2 (en) 2004-11-02 2005-11-02 Stabilized bacteriophage formulations
US13/528,215 Abandoned US20120258175A1 (en) 2004-11-02 2012-06-20 Encapsulated bacteriophage formulation

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/666,706 Abandoned US20080318311A1 (en) 2004-11-02 2005-11-02 Encapsulated Bacteriophage Formulation
US11/666,709 Expired - Fee Related US8309077B2 (en) 2004-11-02 2005-11-02 Stabilized bacteriophage formulations

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (3) US20080318311A1 (en)
EP (3) EP1817043A4 (en)
AU (1) AU2005301046B2 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0515825A (en)
CA (2) CA2585926C (en)
DK (1) DK1812025T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2394455T3 (en)
MX (1) MX2007005277A (en)
WO (2) WO2006047870A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017053327A1 (en) 2015-09-24 2017-03-30 San Diego State University (Sdsu) Foundation , Dba San Diego State University Research Foundation Antibacterial and protective bacteriophage formulations and methods for making and using them
US11166889B2 (en) 2017-12-13 2021-11-09 Colgate-Palmolive Company Compositions comprising pH-sensitive microcapsules
US11471028B2 (en) 2009-06-18 2022-10-18 Endochoice, Inc. Circuit board assembly of a multiple viewing elements endoscope

Families Citing this family (32)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DK1812025T3 (en) * 2004-11-02 2012-10-22 Chr Hansen As STABILIZED BACTERIOPHAGIC FORMULATIONS
AU2005301048A1 (en) * 2004-11-02 2006-05-11 Chr. Hansen A/S Bacteriophage compositions
CA2609357A1 (en) * 2005-05-26 2006-11-30 Gangagen Life Sciences Inc. Bacterial management in animal holding systems
DE102007054127A1 (en) * 2007-11-11 2009-05-14 Birgit Riesinger A hygiene or personal care article comprising a proportion of hydroactive polymers and a preparation comprising bacteriophages or at least one component thereof
US9320795B2 (en) * 2007-12-13 2016-04-26 Zoctis Server LLC Bacteriophage preparations and methods of use thereof
US8956628B2 (en) 2007-12-13 2015-02-17 Zoetis Products Llc Bacteriophage preparations and method of use thereof
EP2103308A1 (en) * 2008-03-20 2009-09-23 PhytoLine GmbH Method for producing a mixture of bacteriophages and its use in therapy of antibiotic-resistant staphylococci
US10104903B2 (en) 2009-07-31 2018-10-23 Mars, Incorporated Animal food and its appearance
US20110027417A1 (en) 2009-07-31 2011-02-03 Patrick Joseph Corrigan Process for Dusting Animal Food
JP6058540B2 (en) 2010-09-17 2017-01-11 テクニファー−インダストリア テクニカ ファーマシューティカ,エス.エー. Antibacterial phage, phage peptide, and methods of use thereof
US20140234391A1 (en) * 2011-06-30 2014-08-21 Kishore Murthy Location-specific bacterial management
PT2833899T (en) 2012-03-19 2020-09-15 Technophage Investig E Desenvolvimento Em Biotecnologia Sa Compositions comprising cocktails of antibacterial phages and uses thereof for the treatment of bacterial infections
US20140030382A1 (en) * 2012-07-25 2014-01-30 Robbert H. ter Haar Bacteriophage Treated Food Products
WO2015084938A1 (en) * 2013-12-04 2015-06-11 The Regents Of The University Of California Viral biocontrol formulations
US11252966B2 (en) 2014-01-24 2022-02-22 The Procter & Gamble Company Fibrous structures comprising a surface care composition and methods for making and using same
BR112016022112B1 (en) 2014-03-31 2022-05-10 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc COMPOSITION TO PROTECT A SURFACE FROM PATHOGENIC ORGANISMS
KR101591783B1 (en) * 2014-04-15 2016-02-04 씨제이제일제당(주) Novel bacteriophage and composition comprising the same
KR101591795B1 (en) * 2014-04-15 2016-02-04 씨제이제일제당(주) Novel bacteriophage and composition comprising the same
WO2016081645A1 (en) * 2014-11-19 2016-05-26 San Diego State University (Sdsu) Foundation Antibacterial and protective formulations and methods for making and using them
US11058131B2 (en) 2015-04-16 2021-07-13 Kennesaw State University Research And Service Foundation, Inc. Escherichia coli O157:H7 bacteriophage Φ241
MX2017013715A (en) 2015-04-28 2018-03-02 Mars Inc Process of preparing a sterilized wet pet food product.
US10676723B2 (en) 2015-05-11 2020-06-09 David Gordon Bermudes Chimeric protein toxins for expression by therapeutic bacteria
KR101699245B1 (en) * 2015-12-21 2017-02-13 주식회사 인트론바이오테크놀로지 Novel Pasteurella Multocida bacteriophage Pas-MUP-1 and its use for preventing proliferation of Pasteurella Multocida
JP2019526611A (en) 2016-09-13 2019-09-19 アラーガン、インコーポレイテッドAllergan,Incorporated Non-protein clostridial toxin composition
JP7426953B2 (en) 2018-06-19 2024-02-02 グラクソスミスクライン バイオロジカルズ ソシエテ アノニム immunogenic composition
EP3616730A1 (en) * 2018-08-28 2020-03-04 UPM-Kymmene Corporation Composition or matrix for storage of bacteriophages comprising nanofibrillar cellulose
BR112021019473A2 (en) * 2019-03-29 2021-11-30 Purina Animal Nutrition Llc Bacteriophage-based animal feed preservative
DE102020100725A1 (en) * 2020-01-14 2021-07-15 Justus Gross Bacteriophage supplies and bacteriophage application device
CN112715539B (en) * 2021-01-28 2022-06-17 菲吉乐科(南京)生物科技有限公司 Auxiliary penetrating agent suitable for bacteriophage to penetrate into tuber crops and preparation method and application thereof
WO2023152549A1 (en) * 2022-02-11 2023-08-17 Phagelab Chile Spa Compositions for the treatment of e. coli and salmonella
GB202205833D0 (en) 2022-04-21 2022-06-08 Glaxosmithkline Biologicals Sa Bacteriophage
GB202210434D0 (en) * 2022-07-15 2022-08-31 Carus Animal Health Ltd Agricultural compositions and methods

Family Cites Families (42)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2909462A (en) 1955-12-08 1959-10-20 Bristol Myers Co Acrylic acid polymer laxative compositions
US3042667A (en) 1959-03-10 1962-07-03 Pharmacia Ab Process for producing dextran derivatives and products resulting therefrom
US3033754A (en) 1959-12-21 1962-05-08 Lakeside Lab Inc Tablets containing hydrazine derivatives
SE358894B (en) 1961-10-25 1973-08-13 Pharmacia Ab
US3330729A (en) 1963-10-04 1967-07-11 Goodrich Co B F Sustained release tablet containing medicament admixed in a waterinsoluble acrylic acid cross-linked polymer and selected basic magnesium or calcium diluent
CH415963A (en) 1964-09-04 1966-06-30 Wander Ag Dr A Compound for the production of tablets with protracted action
US3458622A (en) 1967-04-07 1969-07-29 Squibb & Sons Inc Controlled release tablet
US3538214A (en) 1969-04-22 1970-11-03 Merck & Co Inc Controlled release medicinal tablets
US4230687A (en) 1978-05-30 1980-10-28 Griffith Laboratories U.S.A., Inc. Encapsulation of active agents as microdispersions in homogeneous natural polymeric matrices
US4248857A (en) 1979-08-09 1981-02-03 American Home Products Corporation Sustained release pharmaceutical compositions
US4680323A (en) 1983-12-01 1987-07-14 Hans Lowey Method and composition for the preparation of controlled long-acting pharmaceuticals for oral administration
US4601894A (en) 1985-03-29 1986-07-22 Schering Corporation Controlled release dosage form comprising acetaminophen, pseudoephedrine sulfate and dexbrompheniramine maleate
US4687757A (en) 1986-03-24 1987-08-18 Phillips Petroleum Company Hydrofining catalyst composition and process for its preparation
US4994276A (en) 1988-09-19 1991-02-19 Edward Mendell Co., Inc. Directly compressible sustained release excipient
GB8913657D0 (en) * 1989-06-14 1989-08-02 Microbial Dev Ltd Ruminant feedstuff additives
CA2041774C (en) 1990-11-27 1994-04-19 Mircea A. Mateescu Use of cross-linked amylose as a matrix for the slow release of biologically active compounds
US6001387A (en) 1992-05-29 1999-12-14 The Reguents Of The University Of California Spin disk encapsulation apparatus and method of use
US5643594A (en) 1992-05-29 1997-07-01 The Regents Of The University Of California Spin encapsulation apparatus and method of use
US5578314A (en) 1992-05-29 1996-11-26 The Regents Of The University Of California Multiple layer alginate coatings of biological tissue for transplantation
CA2161538A1 (en) 1993-07-22 1995-02-02 S. Shirley Yang Controlled release tacrine drug delivery systems and methods for preparing same
US5736388A (en) * 1994-12-30 1998-04-07 Chada; Sunil Bacteriophage-mediated gene transfer systems capable of transfecting eukaryotic cells
CA2182917C (en) * 1996-03-26 2001-05-08 Alvin B. Segelman Composition and method for treating and preventing helicobactor pylori-associated stomach gastritis, ulcers and cancer
AU3737297A (en) 1996-08-05 1998-02-25 Brigham And Women's Hospital Bacteriophage-mediated gene therapy
US5807575A (en) 1997-02-14 1998-09-15 Rougier Inc. Manufacture of cross-linked amylose useful as a excipient for control release of active compounds
WO2004064732A2 (en) * 2003-01-16 2004-08-05 New Horizons Diagnostics Corporation The use of bacterial phage-associated lysing proteins for preventing and treating bacterial infections in humans, animals and fowl
US6723358B1 (en) 1998-03-23 2004-04-20 General Mills, Inc. Encapsulation of components into edible products
CA2381755A1 (en) * 1999-08-26 2001-03-01 Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Compositions and methods for delivery of an agent using attenuated salmonella containing phage
JP2003519650A (en) * 2000-01-11 2003-06-24 イントラリティックス,インコーポレーテッド Polymer blends as biodegradable matrices for producing biocomposites
US6703040B2 (en) * 2000-01-11 2004-03-09 Intralytix, Inc. Polymer blends as biodegradable matrices for preparing biocomposites
FR2806417B1 (en) 2000-03-16 2003-12-26 Lallemand Sa COATED PARTICLES CONTAINING LIVING MICROORGANISMS, PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION AND APPLICATION OF SAID PARTICLES IN PHARMACEUTICAL, DIETETIC OR FOOD COMPOSITIONS
US6485902B2 (en) 2000-06-06 2002-11-26 Thomas E. Waddell Use of bacteriophages for control of escherichia coli O157
US6620439B1 (en) 2000-10-03 2003-09-16 Atul M. Mehta Chrono delivery formulations and method of use thereof
WO2002045695A2 (en) 2000-12-05 2002-06-13 Alexander Macgregor Hydrostatic delivery system for controlled delivery of agent
WO2002066015A1 (en) 2001-02-16 2002-08-29 Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharma Company Use of polyalkylamine polymers in controlled release devices
US6544729B2 (en) 2001-07-20 2003-04-08 University Of Tennessee Bioluminescent biosensor device
US20030113366A1 (en) 2001-12-14 2003-06-19 Macgregor Alexander Reverse-micellar delivery system for controlled transportation and enhanced absorption of agents
EP1487273B1 (en) 2002-02-13 2009-01-21 Immunology Laboratories, Inc. Compositions and methods for treatment of microbial infections
GB0209680D0 (en) * 2002-04-27 2002-06-05 Univ Strathclyde Immobilisation and stabilisation of bacteriophage
PL199642B1 (en) 2002-11-15 2008-10-31 Inst Immunologii I Terapii Do High stability bacteriophage preparation and application of block copolymer of ethyl oxide and propylene oxide
CA2463827C (en) * 2003-04-17 2013-10-15 Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of Health Methods and compositions for controlled release of bioactive compounds
AU2005301048A1 (en) * 2004-11-02 2006-05-11 Chr. Hansen A/S Bacteriophage compositions
DK1812025T3 (en) 2004-11-02 2012-10-22 Chr Hansen As STABILIZED BACTERIOPHAGIC FORMULATIONS

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11471028B2 (en) 2009-06-18 2022-10-18 Endochoice, Inc. Circuit board assembly of a multiple viewing elements endoscope
WO2017053327A1 (en) 2015-09-24 2017-03-30 San Diego State University (Sdsu) Foundation , Dba San Diego State University Research Foundation Antibacterial and protective bacteriophage formulations and methods for making and using them
US11166889B2 (en) 2017-12-13 2021-11-09 Colgate-Palmolive Company Compositions comprising pH-sensitive microcapsules

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
MX2007005277A (en) 2008-03-11
US8309077B2 (en) 2012-11-13
EP1812025B1 (en) 2012-09-05
EP1812025A1 (en) 2007-08-01
EP2462940A1 (en) 2012-06-13
US20080318311A1 (en) 2008-12-25
CA2585926C (en) 2015-04-14
EP1817043A4 (en) 2010-01-27
AU2005301046A1 (en) 2006-05-11
EP1812025A4 (en) 2009-12-16
WO2006047870A1 (en) 2006-05-11
CA2586611A1 (en) 2006-05-11
AU2005301046B2 (en) 2012-02-23
CA2585926A1 (en) 2006-05-11
US20080038322A1 (en) 2008-02-14
WO2006047871A1 (en) 2006-05-11
BRPI0515825A (en) 2008-08-05
ES2394455T3 (en) 2013-01-31
DK1812025T3 (en) 2012-10-22
EP1817043A1 (en) 2007-08-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20120258175A1 (en) Encapsulated bacteriophage formulation
US11214597B2 (en) Stable dry powder composition comprising biologically active microorganisms and/or bioactive materials and methods of making
US20090130196A1 (en) Bacteriophage composition
US20080260697A1 (en) Bacterial Management in Animal Holding Systems
BR112017022463B1 (en) COMPOSITION, FEED FOR CRUSTACEANS OR FISH AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THEM
WO2019211458A1 (en) Improved recovery of nitrate reductase activity
US20080311082A1 (en) Process for Treating Animal Waste
Ahmadi Thermal stability of encapsulated listeria bacteriophage and its efficacy against Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat meats
Misto et al. Formulation and Storage Stability of Nanoencapsulated Proteus penneri and Bacillus aerophilus
RU2244747C2 (en) Bacteriophage-base biopreparation for prophylaxis and treatment of colibacillosis (eshcerichiosis)in animals

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: GANGAGEN INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GANGAGEN LIFE SCIENCES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:028641/0886

Effective date: 20090120

Owner name: CHR. HANSEN A/S, DENMARK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GANGAGEN, INC.;REEL/FRAME:028641/0955

Effective date: 20090126

Owner name: GANGAGEN LIFE SCIENCES INC., CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MURTHY, KISHORE;ENGELHARDT, RAINER;REEL/FRAME:028641/0879

Effective date: 20050915

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION