US20120225489A1 - Measuring coking propensity - Google Patents
Measuring coking propensity Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20120225489A1 US20120225489A1 US13/408,626 US201213408626A US2012225489A1 US 20120225489 A1 US20120225489 A1 US 20120225489A1 US 201213408626 A US201213408626 A US 201213408626A US 2012225489 A1 US2012225489 A1 US 2012225489A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- coking
- metal powder
- carbon content
- powder
- temperature
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000004939 coking Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 82
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 63
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 58
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 46
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 38
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 239000003112 inhibitor Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 239000012265 solid product Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 claims description 51
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 41
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 41
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 claims description 36
- 239000010779 crude oil Substances 0.000 claims description 35
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 claims description 31
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 claims description 31
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 claims description 30
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims description 23
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000000921 elemental analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000009838 combustion analysis Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 239000002803 fossil fuel Substances 0.000 abstract description 11
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 abstract description 5
- 239000000571 coke Substances 0.000 description 23
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 15
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 15
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 14
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 13
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 13
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 12
- 239000003208 petroleum Substances 0.000 description 9
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 8
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 8
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 7
- 235000019198 oils Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 238000000197 pyrolysis Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000010426 asphalt Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 5
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 4
- NUJOXMJBOLGQSY-UHFFFAOYSA-N manganese dioxide Chemical compound O=[Mn]=O NUJOXMJBOLGQSY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000002834 transmittance Methods 0.000 description 4
- HNNQYHFROJDYHQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-(4-ethylcyclohexyl)propanoic acid 3-(3-ethylcyclopentyl)propanoic acid Chemical compound CCC1CCC(CCC(O)=O)C1.CCC1CCC(CCC(O)=O)CC1 HNNQYHFROJDYHQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 description 3
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000012620 biological material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 3
- 150000002431 hydrogen Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002006 petroleum coke Substances 0.000 description 3
- 125000005575 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon group Chemical group 0.000 description 3
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000007858 starting material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910000851 Alloy steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000195493 Cryptophyta Species 0.000 description 2
- YTPLMLYBLZKORZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Thiophene Chemical compound C=1C=CSC=1 YTPLMLYBLZKORZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002154 agricultural waste Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- IOJUPLGTWVMSFF-UHFFFAOYSA-N benzothiazole Chemical compound C1=CC=C2SC=NC2=C1 IOJUPLGTWVMSFF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002802 bituminous coal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000001722 carbon compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000003575 carbonaceous material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 235000009508 confectionery Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000295 fuel oil Substances 0.000 description 2
- 125000005842 heteroatom Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 2
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N nickel Substances [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000005580 one pot reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035484 reaction time Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000208140 Acer Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000219310 Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910001369 Brass Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 244000056139 Brassica cretica Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000003351 Brassica cretica Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000002791 Brassica napus Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000003343 Brassica rupestris Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000004977 Brassica sinapistrum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910000906 Bronze Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000012766 Cannabis sativa ssp. sativa var. sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000012765 Cannabis sativa ssp. sativa var. spontanea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910001018 Cast iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052684 Cerium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dihydrogen sulfide Chemical compound S RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052692 Dysprosium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000001950 Elaeis guineensis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000127993 Elaeis melanococca Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910052691 Erbium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 244000004281 Eucalyptus maculata Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910052693 Europium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910001111 Fine metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052688 Gadolinium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 244000068988 Glycine max Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000010469 Glycine max Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000020551 Helianthus annuus Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000003222 Helianthus annuus Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052689 Holmium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000004431 Linum usitatissimum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000006240 Linum usitatissimum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005058 Madhuca longifolia Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000004212 Madhuca longifolia Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000003183 Manihot esculenta Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000016735 Manihot esculenta subsp esculenta Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000003433 Miscanthus floridulus Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910052779 Neodymium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000019482 Palm oil Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241001520808 Panicum virgatum Species 0.000 description 1
- ABLZXFCXXLZCGV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorous acid Chemical class OP(O)=O ABLZXFCXXLZCGV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000008331 Pinus X rigitaeda Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000018646 Pinus brutia Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000011613 Pinus brutia Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000037433 Pongamia pinnata Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000004599 Pongamia pinnata Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000219000 Populus Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910052777 Praseodymium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 241000219492 Quercus Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000000111 Saccharum officinarum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007201 Saccharum officinarum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000201895 Salicornia Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000124033 Salix Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910052772 Samarium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 240000006394 Sorghum bicolor Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000011684 Sorghum saccharatum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000021536 Sugar beet Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052771 Terbium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 240000008488 Thlaspi arvense Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000008214 Thlaspi arvense Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052775 Thulium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000021307 Triticum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000098338 Triticum aestivum Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910052769 Ytterbium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005824 Zea mays ssp. parviglumis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 125000003118 aryl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 239000003225 biodiesel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002551 biofuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- QKSKPIVNLNLAAV-UHFFFAOYSA-N bis(2-chloroethyl) sulfide Chemical compound ClCCSCCCl QKSKPIVNLNLAAV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000010951 brass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010974 bronze Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000009120 camo Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- QGJOPFRUJISHPQ-NJFSPNSNSA-N carbon disulfide-14c Chemical compound S=[14C]=S QGJOPFRUJISHPQ-NJFSPNSNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000003054 catalyst Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003197 catalytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013339 cereals Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000005607 chanvre indien Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000003610 charcoal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007795 chemical reaction product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 description 1
- KUNSUQLRTQLHQQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N copper tin Chemical compound [Cu].[Sn] KUNSUQLRTQLHQQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 1
- DMSZORWOGDLWGN-UHFFFAOYSA-N ctk1a3526 Chemical class NP(N)(N)=O DMSZORWOGDLWGN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003292 diminished effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003608 fece Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004231 fluid catalytic cracking Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004508 fractional distillation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003502 gasoline Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052737 gold Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052735 hafnium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910021385 hard carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001307 helium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052734 helium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N helium atom Chemical compound [He] SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- CPBQJMYROZQQJC-UHFFFAOYSA-N helium neon Chemical compound [He].[Ne] CPBQJMYROZQQJC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000011487 hemp Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000037 hydrogen sulfide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052741 iridium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000009533 lab test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011005 laboratory method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010871 livestock manure Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010687 lubricating oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052748 manganese Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011572 manganese Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002480 mineral oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010446 mineral oil Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052750 molybdenum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000010460 mustard Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- HLXZNVUGXRDIFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N nickel titanium Chemical compound [Ti].[Ti].[Ti].[Ti].[Ti].[Ti].[Ti].[Ti].[Ti].[Ti].[Ti].[Ni].[Ni].[Ni].[Ni].[Ni].[Ni].[Ni].[Ni].[Ni].[Ni].[Ni].[Ni].[Ni].[Ni] HLXZNVUGXRDIFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910001000 nickel titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052758 niobium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002894 organic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000007800 oxidant agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052763 palladium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002540 palm oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000123 paper Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010893 paper waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052697 platinum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002574 poison Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100000614 poison Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 229910052761 rare earth metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000002910 rare earth metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000011541 reaction mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052702 rhenium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052703 rhodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052707 ruthenium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052706 scandium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006104 solid solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052715 tantalum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229930192474 thiophene Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910021654 trace metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052723 transition metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000003624 transition metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052721 tungsten Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052720 vanadium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000013311 vegetables Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002916 wood waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052727 yttrium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052726 zirconium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/26—Oils; Viscous liquids; Paints; Inks
- G01N33/28—Oils, i.e. hydrocarbon liquids
- G01N33/2805—Oils, i.e. hydrocarbon liquids investigating the resistance to heat or oxidation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/24—Earth materials
- G01N33/241—Earth materials for hydrocarbon content
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/26—Oils; Viscous liquids; Paints; Inks
- G01N33/28—Oils, i.e. hydrocarbon liquids
- G01N33/2835—Specific substances contained in the oils or fuels
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/26—Oils; Viscous liquids; Paints; Inks
- G01N33/28—Oils, i.e. hydrocarbon liquids
- G01N33/2888—Lubricating oil characteristics, e.g. deterioration
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V9/00—Prospecting or detecting by methods not provided for in groups G01V1/00 - G01V8/00
- G01V9/007—Prospecting or detecting by methods not provided for in groups G01V1/00 - G01V8/00 by detecting gases or particles representative of underground layers at or near the surface
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T436/00—Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
- Y10T436/21—Hydrocarbon
Definitions
- the invention relates to measuring chemical properties of hydrocarbon fuels, more particularly to measuring coking propensity of and effectiveness of coking inhibitor additives in a hydrocarbon fuel.
- Coke is the solid carbonaceous material that can be made in many ways, including the destructive distillation of low-ash, low-sulfur bituminous coal, from cracking petroleum or from pyrolysis of biomass. Coke has many commercial uses and applications, the largest of which is as a fuel. However, it can also be undesired, fouling lines and clogging systems.
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,294,387 describes a method for determining corrosiveness of naphthenic acid in a fluid, including providing a fluid containing naphthenic acid; providing iron powder having a surface area of at least about 0.01 m 2 /g; contacting the fluid and the powder for a period of time so as to provide a portion of the iron dissolved in the fluid; and measuring iron concentration of the fluid containing the dissolved iron, so to measure corrosion potential for the naphthenic acid over time.
- iron powder has never been used to assess coking potential before.
- the present invention provides a simple and easy method of assessing the coking potential of any hydrocarbon based fuel, by reacting said fuel with very fine metal powder, such as iron powder, under typical conditions of use, and measuring the weight of the iron powder before and after said reactions. If the fuel has coked, some amount of carbon will deposit on the finely divided iron particles, thus increasing its weight.
- the method can also be applied to assessing the efficacy of various coking inhibitors, since the method can be applied to fuel with and without inhibitors and percent inhibition assessed.
- This invention overcomes the limitations of prior methods for predicting coking behavior by directly measuring carbon accumulation of the reaction product, using a one-pot method for the coking propensity of a fossil fuel, particularly for crude oil.
- the large ratios of metal surface area to hydrocarbon in the method optionally coupled with increased reaction temperatures and long exposure times, can promote coking, making the determination of coking behavior much easier to measure.
- the amount of carbon deposited on a metal powder, such as iron powder, after reaction with crude oil indicates coking propensity of a crude oil.
- iron powder and crude oil can be placed in an autoclave at temperatures of about 140° C. to about 340° C. for between about 1 hour and about 18 hours.
- the iron powder is separated from oil and analyzed for carbon content.
- a coking inhibitor is mixed with the reaction oil, the effectiveness of additives can be measured by the reduction in coke make; that is, in a reduction of carbon content on the analyzed metal.
- a map can be drawn of the coking potential under different processing scenarios.
- the present application provides a method for measuring coking propensity of a hydrocarbon fuel, comprising:
- the metal powder can easily be separated from the hydrocarbon by filtration or centrifugation, washed with a solvent and rinsed e.g., with a volatile solvent and dried.
- the carbon content can be easily determined by weighing the metal powder before and after coking and the increase in weight reflects the carbon content. Carbon content can also be measured using well-established methods in the art. Combustion Elemental Analysis can be used to determine the percent carbon on the product solid (carbon content), as well as the values of other elements such as hydrogen, nitrogen and sulfur. Carbon content can also be measured using, for example, thermal-optical reflectance (TOR) or thermo-optical transmittance (TOT) analysis.
- TOR thermal-optical reflectance
- TOT thermo-optical transmittance
- the method can be applied to any hydrocarbon, fuel or chemical that has a tendency to coke, including fossil fuels, biomass, jet fuels, lubricating oils, etc.
- the method has particular applicability to crude oil and other fuels with a tendency to produce coke.
- the metal powder is any metal powder that will not otherwise interfere with the fuel use and allows deposition of coke onto its surface. Iron powder may be preferred as inexpensive and readily available.
- the powder has an average particle size of ⁇ 100 ⁇ m, and preferably is even finer.
- the powder can have an average particle size, for example, from 1 ⁇ m to 50 ⁇ m, or from 1 ⁇ m to 10 ⁇ m. In some cases, the powder can be even finer, about 0.1 ⁇ m, however, there may be a lower limit on size because it should still be easy and efficient to separate the solid powder from the fluid after the coking is complete.
- the temperature, pressure and length of the reaction should be about the same conditions at which a particular fuel is used, and in many cases that will be sufficient to produce some amount of coking Generally, the temperature is from 100° C. to 400° C., 140° C. to 350° C., or 300° C. to 340° C.
- the pressure can be from 1 kPa to 650 kPa, or 10 kPa to 400 kPa.
- the period of time can be from 1 hour to 18 hours, for example from 2 hours to 15 hours. If desired, the temperature and/or pressure can be increased to speed up the reaction, and then corrected for in determining coking at a particular temperature.
- the present application also provides a method for measuring effectiveness of a coking inhibitor, comprising:
- the step of obtaining a second carbon content y can be essentially the same steps, only performed without the coking inhibitor. It is also possible to conduct the tests over a range of temperatures and/or pressures, and thus obtains curves of coking behavior.
- Biomass refers to any biological material from living, or recently living organisms, such as wood, paper, agricultural waste, consumer waste, wood and paper waste, cereal and grass crops, vegetable and tree oils, algae, and the like.
- Biomass fuel or “biofuel” refers to a fuel derived from biological material of living or recently living organisms.
- biomass fuel include wood, charcoal, hydrogen gas, alcohol (e.g., ethanol), organic oils (e.g., palm oil, rapseed, jathorpa), manure, grass cuttings, and biodiesel.
- Sources of biological materials used in biomass fuel include, but are not limited to trees (e.g., poplar, pine, willow, oak, maple, eucalyptus, oil palm), miscanthus, switchgrass, hemp, corn, cassava, sorghum, sugarcane, sugar beet, soybean, sunflower, wheat, rapeseed, jathorpa, salicornia, mahua, mustard, flax, field pennycress, pongamia pinnata , agricultural waste and algae.
- trees e.g., poplar, pine, willow, oak, maple, eucalyptus, oil palm
- miscanthus switchgrass
- hemp corn
- cassava sorghum
- sugarcane sugar beet
- soybean sunflower
- wheat rapeseed
- jathorpa salicornia
- mahua mustard, flax, field pennycress, pongamia pinnata
- agricultural waste and algae e.g., pop
- Bitumen or “asphalt” refers to a mixture of organic liquids that is highly viscous, black, sticky, entirely soluble in carbon disulfide, and composed primarily of highly condensed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).
- PAHs polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
- bitumen is a tar-like form of petroleum so thick and dense that it must be heated or diluted before it can flow.
- Refined bitumen is the residual (bottom) fraction obtained by fractional distillation of crude oil.
- Crude oil refers to a type of fossil fuel in the form of a mineral oil consisting of a mixture of hydrocarbons of natural origin, yellow to black in color, of variable specific gravity and viscosity. Crude oil is often referred to simply as “crude” or generally as “petroleum”. Crude oil is typically its geography of origin, American Petroleum Institute (API) gravity, and sulfur content. Crude oil is “light” if it has low density or “heavy” if it has high density; “sweet” if it contains relatively little sulfur or “sour” if it contains substantial amounts of sulfur. Light crude oil is more desirable than heavy oil because it produces a higher yield of gasoline. Sweet crude oil commands a higher price than sour crude oil because it has fewer environmental problems and requires less refining to meet sulfur standards imposed on fuels in consuming countries. Each crude oil its own molecular characteristics. See Table 1 for examples of crude oil.
- Coke refers to solid carbonaceous material derived from hydrocarbon fuels. Coal, for example, produces coke from destructive distillation of low-ash, low-sulfur bituminous coal. Coke derived from petroleum is referred to as “petroleum coke” or “pet coke” or “petcoke”, for example carbonaceous solid derived from oil refinery coker units or other cracking processes, or hard carbon and other crude oil impurities formed on the inside furnace tubes. Coke has several industrial uses, including, but not limited to, making electrodes for aluminum manufacturing, fuel, and steel manufacture.
- Coking refers to a process of forming coke from a hydrocarbon-containing starting material.
- a starting material can be heated from about 100° C. to about 450° C., wherein lower molecular weight chemicals are distilled off and coke is left behind. Coking can be used to improve hydrocarbon liquids for further upgrading by catalytic processing because many chemicals that poison catalysts have been removed. Removal of heteroatoms from the starting material is counterbalanced by increased hydrogen content in the supernatant, because most polynuclear aromatic building blocks in the petroleum contain heteroatoms that reactively separate into the coke.
- Coking inhibitor refers to a chemical that reduces the rate of coke formation.
- coking inhibitors include, but are not limited to, benzothiazole, hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide, phosphonates, thiophosphonates, phosphoric triamides, and thiophene.
- Conradson carbon or “Conradson carbon residue (CCR)” refers to an industrial coking test for characterizing the coke-forming tendency of petroleum liquids. Though widely used in the petroleum industry, CCR is time-consuming, requiring complete evaporation and pyrolysis of the fossil fuel under analysis. CCR is linear with respect to hydrogen content, as can be independently verified by directly measuring the hydrogen content of the coke in the microcarbon test and converting independent hydrogen content of distillable supernatant. CCR is conserved for physical separations (hydrogen is conserved), increases for thermal conversion (hydrogen escapes as part of hydrocarbon gas byproduct), and decreases for hydroconversion (hydrogen is added).
- Hydrocarbon fuel refers to any fuel, including fossil fuels, biomass fuels, and the like.
- Fossil fuel refers to fuel formed from natural resources, such as anaerobic decomposition of organisms, for example phytoplankton, zooplankton, and plant matter. Fossil fuels can include coal, crude oil, and natural gas.
- Metal powder refers to a metal or alloy in powdered, pulverized, comminuted, or particulate form.
- the metal can be a transition metal, such as Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, La, Hf, Ta, W, Re, Ir, Pt, and Au, or a rare earth metal, such as Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, or Lu.
- An alloy is a partial or complete solid solution of one or more elements in a metallic matrix.
- Suitable alloys include, but are not limited to, steel, cast iron, bronze, brass, cast copper, cast aluminum, and nitinol.
- the alloy can be a steel alloy with various trace metal content. Use of such steel alloys would allow determination and selection of a steel with diminished coking potential.
- the metal powder is iron powder.
- Iron powder refers to material consisting essentially of elemental iron (Fe0) in powdered, pulverized, comminuted, or particulate form.
- Iron powder can have an average particle size from about 100 ⁇ m to about 0.1 ⁇ m, such as from about 50 ⁇ m to about 1 ⁇ m, for example from about 10 ⁇ m to about 5 ⁇ m, from about 50 ⁇ m to about 5 ⁇ m, or from about 10 ⁇ m to about 1 ⁇ m. Most preferably, the iron powder has an average particle size of about 6 ⁇ m.
- Particles sizes can also be described using a mesh scale, wherein a 400 mesh powder has an average particle size of about 38 ⁇ m, 500 mesh of about 25 ⁇ m, 635 mesh of about 20 ⁇ m, 1200 mesh of about 12 ⁇ m, and 2400 mesh of about 6 ⁇ m.
- Average particle size or “average equivalent diameter” refers to the diameter where 50 mass % of particles in a powder have a larger equivalent diameter, and the other 50 mass% have a smaller equivalent diameter.
- average particle size can be denoted as equivalent D50, which can be read from a cumulative particle size distribution (PSD) graph. From the point where the 50% horizontal line intersects the PSD curve, a line can be drawn perpendicular to the x-axis. The numerical value of D50 can be interpolated from the intersection of the perpendicular with the x-axis.
- D10 refers to an equivalent diameter where 10 mass % of the particles in a powder have a smaller diameter, hence the remaining 90 mass % are coarser (i.e., have a larger diameter).
- D90 refers to an equivalent diameter where 90 mass % of particles in a powder have a smaller diameter and only 10 mass % are coarser.
- the surface area of a powder is inversely proportional to the particle size of that powder. That is, the smaller that the particles are in the powder, the larger the surface area of that powder. Conversely, the larger that the particles are in the powder, the smaller the surface area of that powder.
- a high surface area material has a high surface area to volume ratio, which can typically be about greater than about 200 m2/g, such as from 300 m2/g to about 2000 m2/g. High surface area is desirable as it drives the reaction.
- a high surface area metal powder and a test crude oil are placed in a batch reactor under temperatures of about 100° C. to about 450° C., such as about 140° C. to about 400° C., for example 260° C. to about 340° C. Coking can occur at pressures of, for example, about 1 kPa, about 5 kPa, about 10 kPa, about 20 kPa, about 30 kPa, about 100 kPa, or about 200 kPa, about 400 kPa, or about 650 kPa.
- the reaction mixture is stirred for about 1 hour to about 72 hours, such as for about 2 hours to about 48 hours, for example about 5 hours to about 18 hours.
- Standard test conditions can also be set by a standards body, thus making the test directly comparable across industries or uses.
- the fluid (or supernatant) remaining after coking is filtered and the resulting solids are analyzed for carbon.
- the difference in weight between the iron powder and the solid product is the amount of new carbon content that resulted in coking from the fossil fuel.
- the carbon content can also be determined using other methods established in the art, including, thermal-optical analysis.
- organic compounds can be volatilized from the sample in a helium atmosphere at lower temperatures than elemental carbon can be oxidized or removed.
- the analyzer liberates carbon compounds under different temperature and oxidation environments from a sample; converts these compounds to carbon dioxide by passing the volatilized compounds through an oxidizer, for example heated manganese dioxide (MnO2); reduces CO2 to methane by passing the flow through a methanator, for example hydrogen-enriched nickel catalyst; and quantifies methanol equivalents using a detector, for example a flame ionization detector (FID).
- MnO2 heated manganese dioxide
- methanator for example hydrogen-enriched nickel catalyst
- FID flame ionization detector
- the principal function of the optical component is to correct for pyrolysis of organic carbon compounds to elemental carbon. Without this correction, the organic carbon fraction is underestimated and the elemental carbon fraction is overestimated, because some pyrolyzed organic carbon is included.
- Filter reflectance or transmittance
- Reflectance largely dominated by the presence of light-absorbing elemental carbon, decreases as pyrolysis occurs and increases as light-absorbing carbon is liberated during the latter part of the analysis.
- the present invention is exemplified with respect to a novel method for measuring coking propensity of a hydrocarbon fuel and effectiveness of a coking inhibitor.
- this method is exemplary only, and the invention can be broadly applied to, for example, measurements of carbon content.
- the following examples are intended to be illustrative only, and not unduly limit the scope of the appended claims.
- Iron powder with an average particle size of about 6 ⁇ m was placed into a batch reactor with a test crude oil. The mixture was stirred for about 1 hour to about 18 hours at temperatures from about 140° C. to about 340° C. and at a pressure where coking typically does occur.
- the pressure can be 0 pounds per square inch (psig) to 500 psig (3.44 MPa), for example, 100 psig to 400 psig (0.689 MPa to 2.76 MPa), or 150 to 250 psig (1.03 MPa to 1.72 MPa). In a particular, a pressure of 200 psig (1.38 MPa) can be used. Hydrogen is present in system gases, so increased pressure of the system gas necessarily increases hydrogen pressure which, in turn, can inhibit coking Hydrogen pressure can also be used to test coking propensity in the lab under conditions found in the field.
- Tables 2-5 provide the data from tests on four crude oils. Fresh iron powder contained 0.65% carbon before the experiment, as assessed by combustion elemental analysis on Perkin Elmer 2400 Series II CHNS/O Elemental Analyzer. Values obtained after coking were thus corrected by subtraction of 0.65. Table 6 contains a summary of the corrected data at 300° C. and at 340° C.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is a non-provisional application which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/448,851 filed Mar. 3, 2011, entitled “Measuring Coking Propensity,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- The invention relates to measuring chemical properties of hydrocarbon fuels, more particularly to measuring coking propensity of and effectiveness of coking inhibitor additives in a hydrocarbon fuel.
- Coke is the solid carbonaceous material that can be made in many ways, including the destructive distillation of low-ash, low-sulfur bituminous coal, from cracking petroleum or from pyrolysis of biomass. Coke has many commercial uses and applications, the largest of which is as a fuel. However, it can also be undesired, fouling lines and clogging systems.
- The coking behavior of a refinery hydrocarbon stream can be difficult to predict. First of all, coking is a subtle process, occurring very slowly after large amounts of hydrocarbon are exposed to heated metal. It is difficult to achieve a laboratory method to simply and accurately predict the coking reaction that will occur. Secondly, there are few good ways to rank the effectiveness of coking inhibitors. The reactions are slow, chemical amounts are low, and the affected metal surface areas are small. For example, Conradson carbon residue (CCR) measurements can indicate coking potential, but is time-consuming. Other instrumental monitoring methods for the coke lay-down reaction can also be used, but these tend to be expensive. To overcome the inherent limitations of prior techniques, either the reaction times or the sample sizes have to be large, thereby compensating for the relatively small reaction zone.
- Although difficult, predicting coking behavior and inhibition are growing more important. The lighter grades of crude oil produce the best yields of fuel products, but as the world's reserves of light and medium oil are depleted, oil refineries increasingly need to process heavy oil and bitumen, using more complex and expensive methods to produce the products required. Because heavier crude oils have too much carbon and not enough hydrogen, coking is a more serious issue for heavy crude oils than it is for light crude oils. Refining generally involves removing carbon from or adding hydrogen to the molecules, and using fluid catalytic cracking to convert longer, more complex molecules to shorter, simpler ones for fuels.
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,294,387 describes a method for determining corrosiveness of naphthenic acid in a fluid, including providing a fluid containing naphthenic acid; providing iron powder having a surface area of at least about 0.01 m2/g; contacting the fluid and the powder for a period of time so as to provide a portion of the iron dissolved in the fluid; and measuring iron concentration of the fluid containing the dissolved iron, so to measure corrosion potential for the naphthenic acid over time. However, to our knowledge iron powder has never been used to assess coking potential before.
- What is needed in the art is a one pot, simple, inexpensive and reliable method of predicting coking behavior or assessing coke inhibitors.
- The present invention provides a simple and easy method of assessing the coking potential of any hydrocarbon based fuel, by reacting said fuel with very fine metal powder, such as iron powder, under typical conditions of use, and measuring the weight of the iron powder before and after said reactions. If the fuel has coked, some amount of carbon will deposit on the finely divided iron particles, thus increasing its weight. The method can also be applied to assessing the efficacy of various coking inhibitors, since the method can be applied to fuel with and without inhibitors and percent inhibition assessed.
- This invention overcomes the limitations of prior methods for predicting coking behavior by directly measuring carbon accumulation of the reaction product, using a one-pot method for the coking propensity of a fossil fuel, particularly for crude oil. The large ratios of metal surface area to hydrocarbon in the method, optionally coupled with increased reaction temperatures and long exposure times, can promote coking, making the determination of coking behavior much easier to measure. The amount of carbon deposited on a metal powder, such as iron powder, after reaction with crude oil indicates coking propensity of a crude oil.
- For example, iron powder and crude oil can be placed in an autoclave at temperatures of about 140° C. to about 340° C. for between about 1 hour and about 18 hours. The iron powder is separated from oil and analyzed for carbon content. When a coking inhibitor is mixed with the reaction oil, the effectiveness of additives can be measured by the reduction in coke make; that is, in a reduction of carbon content on the analyzed metal. By judiciously selecting test conditions, a map can be drawn of the coking potential under different processing scenarios.
- In more detail, the present application provides a method for measuring coking propensity of a hydrocarbon fuel, comprising:
- mixing a metal powder with a fluid hydrocarbon fuel, wherein the metal powder has an average particle size of less than or equal to 100 μm;
- reacting the metal powder with the fluid hydrocarbon fuel at a temperature and a pressure sufficient to allow coking for a period of time;
- separating the metal powder from any fluid remaining after said coking; and
- analyzing the metal powder for carbon content, wherein the carbon content is proportional to the coking propensity.
- The metal powder can easily be separated from the hydrocarbon by filtration or centrifugation, washed with a solvent and rinsed e.g., with a volatile solvent and dried.
- The carbon content can be easily determined by weighing the metal powder before and after coking and the increase in weight reflects the carbon content. Carbon content can also be measured using well-established methods in the art. Combustion Elemental Analysis can be used to determine the percent carbon on the product solid (carbon content), as well as the values of other elements such as hydrogen, nitrogen and sulfur. Carbon content can also be measured using, for example, thermal-optical reflectance (TOR) or thermo-optical transmittance (TOT) analysis.
- The method can be applied to any hydrocarbon, fuel or chemical that has a tendency to coke, including fossil fuels, biomass, jet fuels, lubricating oils, etc. The method has particular applicability to crude oil and other fuels with a tendency to produce coke.
- Preferably, the metal powder is any metal powder that will not otherwise interfere with the fuel use and allows deposition of coke onto its surface. Iron powder may be preferred as inexpensive and readily available. Preferably, the powder has an average particle size of ≦100 μm, and preferably is even finer. Thus, the powder can have an average particle size, for example, from 1 μm to 50 μm, or from 1 μm to 10 μm. In some cases, the powder can be even finer, about 0.1 μm, however, there may be a lower limit on size because it should still be easy and efficient to separate the solid powder from the fluid after the coking is complete.
- The temperature, pressure and length of the reaction should be about the same conditions at which a particular fuel is used, and in many cases that will be sufficient to produce some amount of coking Generally, the temperature is from 100° C. to 400° C., 140° C. to 350° C., or 300° C. to 340° C. The pressure can be from 1 kPa to 650 kPa, or 10 kPa to 400 kPa. The period of time can be from 1 hour to 18 hours, for example from 2 hours to 15 hours. If desired, the temperature and/or pressure can be increased to speed up the reaction, and then corrected for in determining coking at a particular temperature.
- The present application also provides a method for measuring effectiveness of a coking inhibitor, comprising:
- mixing a metal powder with a fluid hydrocarbon fuel and a coking inhibitor, wherein the metal powder has an average particle size less than 100 μm;
- treating the metal powder with the hydrocarbon fuel and coking inhibitor at a temperature and a pressure for a period of time sufficient to allow coking;
- separating said metal powder and any remaining fluid after said treating step;
- analyzing the solid product for a first carbon content x;
- obtaining a second carbon content y for the hydrocarbon fuel without coking inhibitor;
- calculating percent inhibition of the coking inhibitor using the following equation: 100−100x/y=percent inhibition. The step of obtaining a second carbon content y can be essentially the same steps, only performed without the coking inhibitor. It is also possible to conduct the tests over a range of temperatures and/or pressures, and thus obtains curves of coking behavior.
- The following abbreviations are used herein:
-
API American Petroleum Institute CCR Conradson carbon residue PAH Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PSD Particle size distribution TOR Thermal-optical reflectance TOT Thermal-optical transmittance - “Biomass” refers to any biological material from living, or recently living organisms, such as wood, paper, agricultural waste, consumer waste, wood and paper waste, cereal and grass crops, vegetable and tree oils, algae, and the like.
- “Biomass fuel” or “biofuel” refers to a fuel derived from biological material of living or recently living organisms. Examples of biomass fuel include wood, charcoal, hydrogen gas, alcohol (e.g., ethanol), organic oils (e.g., palm oil, rapseed, jathorpa), manure, grass cuttings, and biodiesel. Sources of biological materials used in biomass fuel include, but are not limited to trees (e.g., poplar, pine, willow, oak, maple, eucalyptus, oil palm), miscanthus, switchgrass, hemp, corn, cassava, sorghum, sugarcane, sugar beet, soybean, sunflower, wheat, rapeseed, jathorpa, salicornia, mahua, mustard, flax, field pennycress, pongamia pinnata, agricultural waste and algae.
- “Bitumen” or “asphalt” refers to a mixture of organic liquids that is highly viscous, black, sticky, entirely soluble in carbon disulfide, and composed primarily of highly condensed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Naturally occurring, crude bitumen is a tar-like form of petroleum so thick and dense that it must be heated or diluted before it can flow. Refined bitumen is the residual (bottom) fraction obtained by fractional distillation of crude oil.
- “Crude oil” refers to a type of fossil fuel in the form of a mineral oil consisting of a mixture of hydrocarbons of natural origin, yellow to black in color, of variable specific gravity and viscosity. Crude oil is often referred to simply as “crude” or generally as “petroleum”. Crude oil is typically its geography of origin, American Petroleum Institute (API) gravity, and sulfur content. Crude oil is “light” if it has low density or “heavy” if it has high density; “sweet” if it contains relatively little sulfur or “sour” if it contains substantial amounts of sulfur. Light crude oil is more desirable than heavy oil because it produces a higher yield of gasoline. Sweet crude oil commands a higher price than sour crude oil because it has fewer environmental problems and requires less refining to meet sulfur standards imposed on fuels in consuming countries. Each crude oil its own molecular characteristics. See Table 1 for examples of crude oil.
-
TABLE 1 Examples of crude oil Sulfur content Name API gravity (% mass) Location of field Arab Extra Light 39.4° 1.09% Saudi Arabia Arab Heavy 27.7° 2.87% Saudi Arabia Arab Light 32.8° 1.97% Saudi Arabia Arab Medium 30.2° 2.59% Saudi Arabia Brent Blend 38.3° 0.37% United Kingdom Dubai 31° 2.0% Dubai Merey Venezuela West Texas 39.6° 0.24% United States Intermediate (WTI) West Texas Sour 31.7° 1.28% United States (WTS) - “Coke” refers to solid carbonaceous material derived from hydrocarbon fuels. Coal, for example, produces coke from destructive distillation of low-ash, low-sulfur bituminous coal. Coke derived from petroleum is referred to as “petroleum coke” or “pet coke” or “petcoke”, for example carbonaceous solid derived from oil refinery coker units or other cracking processes, or hard carbon and other crude oil impurities formed on the inside furnace tubes. Coke has several industrial uses, including, but not limited to, making electrodes for aluminum manufacturing, fuel, and steel manufacture.
- “Coking” refers to a process of forming coke from a hydrocarbon-containing starting material. For example, a starting material can be heated from about 100° C. to about 450° C., wherein lower molecular weight chemicals are distilled off and coke is left behind. Coking can be used to improve hydrocarbon liquids for further upgrading by catalytic processing because many chemicals that poison catalysts have been removed. Removal of heteroatoms from the starting material is counterbalanced by increased hydrogen content in the supernatant, because most polynuclear aromatic building blocks in the petroleum contain heteroatoms that reactively separate into the coke.
- “Coking inhibitor” refers to a chemical that reduces the rate of coke formation. Examples of coking inhibitors include, but are not limited to, benzothiazole, hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide, phosphonates, thiophosphonates, phosphoric triamides, and thiophene.
- “Conradson carbon” or “Conradson carbon residue (CCR)” refers to an industrial coking test for characterizing the coke-forming tendency of petroleum liquids. Though widely used in the petroleum industry, CCR is time-consuming, requiring complete evaporation and pyrolysis of the fossil fuel under analysis. CCR is linear with respect to hydrogen content, as can be independently verified by directly measuring the hydrogen content of the coke in the microcarbon test and converting independent hydrogen content of distillable supernatant. CCR is conserved for physical separations (hydrogen is conserved), increases for thermal conversion (hydrogen escapes as part of hydrocarbon gas byproduct), and decreases for hydroconversion (hydrogen is added).
- “Hydrocarbon fuel” refers to any fuel, including fossil fuels, biomass fuels, and the like. “Fossil fuel” refers to fuel formed from natural resources, such as anaerobic decomposition of organisms, for example phytoplankton, zooplankton, and plant matter. Fossil fuels can include coal, crude oil, and natural gas.
- “Metal powder” refers to a metal or alloy in powdered, pulverized, comminuted, or particulate form. The metal can be a transition metal, such as Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, La, Hf, Ta, W, Re, Ir, Pt, and Au, or a rare earth metal, such as Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, or Lu. An alloy is a partial or complete solid solution of one or more elements in a metallic matrix. Suitable alloys include, but are not limited to, steel, cast iron, bronze, brass, cast copper, cast aluminum, and nitinol. In particular, the alloy can be a steel alloy with various trace metal content. Use of such steel alloys would allow determination and selection of a steel with diminished coking potential. In some embodiments, the metal powder is iron powder.
- “Iron powder” refers to material consisting essentially of elemental iron (Fe0) in powdered, pulverized, comminuted, or particulate form. Iron powder can have an average particle size from about 100 μm to about 0.1 μm, such as from about 50 μm to about 1 μm, for example from about 10 μm to about 5 μm, from about 50 μm to about 5 μm, or from about 10 μm to about 1 μm. Most preferably, the iron powder has an average particle size of about 6 μm. Particles sizes can also be described using a mesh scale, wherein a 400 mesh powder has an average particle size of about 38 μm, 500 mesh of about 25 μm, 635 mesh of about 20 μm, 1200 mesh of about 12 μm, and 2400 mesh of about 6 μm.
- “Average particle size” or “average equivalent diameter” refers to the diameter where 50 mass % of particles in a powder have a larger equivalent diameter, and the other 50 mass% have a smaller equivalent diameter. For example, average particle size can be denoted as equivalent D50, which can be read from a cumulative particle size distribution (PSD) graph. From the point where the 50% horizontal line intersects the PSD curve, a line can be drawn perpendicular to the x-axis. The numerical value of D50 can be interpolated from the intersection of the perpendicular with the x-axis. D10 refers to an equivalent diameter where 10 mass % of the particles in a powder have a smaller diameter, hence the remaining 90 mass % are coarser (i.e., have a larger diameter). D90 refers to an equivalent diameter where 90 mass % of particles in a powder have a smaller diameter and only 10 mass % are coarser.
- The surface area of a powder is inversely proportional to the particle size of that powder. That is, the smaller that the particles are in the powder, the larger the surface area of that powder. Conversely, the larger that the particles are in the powder, the smaller the surface area of that powder. A high surface area material has a high surface area to volume ratio, which can typically be about greater than about 200 m2/g, such as from 300 m2/g to about 2000 m2/g. High surface area is desirable as it drives the reaction.
- In some embodiments, a high surface area metal powder and a test crude oil are placed in a batch reactor under temperatures of about 100° C. to about 450° C., such as about 140° C. to about 400° C., for example 260° C. to about 340° C. Coking can occur at pressures of, for example, about 1 kPa, about 5 kPa, about 10 kPa, about 20 kPa, about 30 kPa, about 100 kPa, or about 200 kPa, about 400 kPa, or about 650 kPa. The reaction mixture is stirred for about 1 hour to about 72 hours, such as for about 2 hours to about 48 hours, for example about 5 hours to about 18 hours. Standard test conditions can also be set by a standards body, thus making the test directly comparable across industries or uses.
- Once the coking reaction is sufficiently complete, the fluid (or supernatant) remaining after coking is filtered and the resulting solids are analyzed for carbon. For example, the difference in weight between the iron powder and the solid product is the amount of new carbon content that resulted in coking from the fossil fuel. The carbon content can also be determined using other methods established in the art, including, thermal-optical analysis.
- In thermal-optical analysis, organic compounds can be volatilized from the sample in a helium atmosphere at lower temperatures than elemental carbon can be oxidized or removed. The analyzer liberates carbon compounds under different temperature and oxidation environments from a sample; converts these compounds to carbon dioxide by passing the volatilized compounds through an oxidizer, for example heated manganese dioxide (MnO2); reduces CO2 to methane by passing the flow through a methanator, for example hydrogen-enriched nickel catalyst; and quantifies methanol equivalents using a detector, for example a flame ionization detector (FID).
- The principal function of the optical component, typically a laser reflectance or laser absorption device, is to correct for pyrolysis of organic carbon compounds to elemental carbon. Without this correction, the organic carbon fraction is underestimated and the elemental carbon fraction is overestimated, because some pyrolyzed organic carbon is included. Filter reflectance (or transmittance) is continuously monitored throughout an analysis cycle, for example, using a helium-neon laser and a photodetector throughout an analysis cycle. Reflectance, largely dominated by the presence of light-absorbing elemental carbon, decreases as pyrolysis occurs and increases as light-absorbing carbon is liberated during the latter part of the analysis. By monitoring the reflectance or transmittance, the portion of the elemental carbon peak corresponding to pyrolyzed organic carbon can be accurately assigned to the organic fraction.
- The present invention is exemplified with respect to a novel method for measuring coking propensity of a hydrocarbon fuel and effectiveness of a coking inhibitor. However, this method is exemplary only, and the invention can be broadly applied to, for example, measurements of carbon content. The following examples are intended to be illustrative only, and not unduly limit the scope of the appended claims.
- Iron powder with an average particle size of about 6 μm was placed into a batch reactor with a test crude oil. The mixture was stirred for about 1 hour to about 18 hours at temperatures from about 140° C. to about 340° C. and at a pressure where coking typically does occur. The pressure can be 0 pounds per square inch (psig) to 500 psig (3.44 MPa), for example, 100 psig to 400 psig (0.689 MPa to 2.76 MPa), or 150 to 250 psig (1.03 MPa to 1.72 MPa). In a particular, a pressure of 200 psig (1.38 MPa) can be used. Hydrogen is present in system gases, so increased pressure of the system gas necessarily increases hydrogen pressure which, in turn, can inhibit coking Hydrogen pressure can also be used to test coking propensity in the lab under conditions found in the field.
- After a designated time passed, supernatant was filtered and the resulting solids were analyzed for carbon content. Tables 2-5 provide the data from tests on four crude oils. Fresh iron powder contained 0.65% carbon before the experiment, as assessed by combustion elemental analysis on Perkin Elmer 2400 Series II CHNS/O Elemental Analyzer. Values obtained after coking were thus corrected by subtraction of 0.65. Table 6 contains a summary of the corrected data at 300° C. and at 340° C.
-
TABLE 2 Post Run Solids Carbon Content Data from Oklahoma Sour (OKS) crude oil Temperature % C corrected % C 140° C. 0.90 0.25 180° C. 0.86 0.21 220° C. 0.75 0.10 260° C. 0.80 0.15 300° C. 0.79 0.14 340° C. 1.65 1.00 -
TABLE 3 Post Run Solids Carbon Content Data from Peck crude oil Temperature % C corrected % C 140° C. 0.75 0.10 180° C. 0.86 0.21 220° C. 0.76 0.11 260° C. 0.80 0.15 300° C. 0.80 0.15 340° C. 1.00 0.35 -
TABLE 4 Post Run Solids Carbon Content Data for Western Texas Sour (WTS) Temperature % C corrected % C 140° C. 3.04 2.39 180° C. 2.26 1.61 220° C. 1.74 1.09 260° C. 1.37 0.72 300° C. 1.09 0.44 -
TABLE 5 Post Run Solids Carbon Content Data for Merey crude oil Temperature % C corrected % C 140° C. 1.15 0.50 180° C. 1.00 0.35 220° C. 0.83 0.18 260° C. 0.96 0.31 300° C. 0.38 0.18 -
TABLE 6 Corrected % Carbon Crude Oil Product @ 300° C. @ 340° C. Merey 0.18 OKS 0.14 1.00 WTS 0.44 Peck 0.15 0.35 - The experimental results show that at 300° C., the four crudes have different amounts of coke deposited on the filtered post-reaction solids. This difference is a measure of the tested materials' potential to form coke. The difference is starker at 340° C., as can be seen in the difference between OKS and Peck crudes. At 300° C., the difference between corrected % C was only 0.01, but at 340° C., the difference was 0.65. Also, at 300° C., WTS produced roughly 2-3 times the amount of coke as the other samples of crude. At 340° C., the amount of coke overwhelmed the scoping test.
- In conclusion, this test told us the temperature dependence of coking propensity. At a temperature of 300° C., Oklahoma Sour (OKS) and Peck crudes had similar coking propensities. But at higher temperatures, in this example 340° C., the Oklahoma Sour crude produced three times as much coke as Peck crude in this lab test.
- Longer reaction times and high surface area of the iron powder favors coke formation. Carbon accumulation is a direct measure of a crude oil's coking propensity, providing significant advantages in time, cost savings and efficiency over prior indirect coking measurements, such as the Conradson carbon residue test. Further, these iron powder experiments are an effective way to evaluate and rank coking inhibitor additives.
- The following reference is incorporated by reference in its entirety: U.S. Pat. No. 6,294,387.
- The use of the word “a” or “an” when used in conjunction with the term “comprising” in the claims or the specification means one or more than one, unless the context dictates otherwise.
- The term “about” means the stated value plus or minus the margin of error of measurement or plus or minus 10% if no method of measurement is indicated.
- The use of the term “or” in the claims is used to mean “and/or” unless explicitly indicated to refer to alternatives only or if the alternatives are mutually exclusive.
- The terms “comprise”, “have”, “include” and “contain” (and their variants) are open-ended linking verbs and allow the addition of other elements when used in a claim.
Claims (20)
100−100x/y=percent inhibition.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/408,626 US9188577B2 (en) | 2011-03-03 | 2012-02-29 | Measuring coking propensity |
PCT/US2012/027223 WO2012118936A1 (en) | 2011-03-03 | 2012-03-01 | Measuring coking propensity |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201161448851P | 2011-03-03 | 2011-03-03 | |
US13/408,626 US9188577B2 (en) | 2011-03-03 | 2012-02-29 | Measuring coking propensity |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20120225489A1 true US20120225489A1 (en) | 2012-09-06 |
US9188577B2 US9188577B2 (en) | 2015-11-17 |
Family
ID=46753567
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/408,626 Active 2032-05-31 US9188577B2 (en) | 2011-03-03 | 2012-02-29 | Measuring coking propensity |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9188577B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2012118936A1 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105319339A (en) * | 2015-10-14 | 2016-02-10 | 辽宁石油化工大学 | Method for simulating coking process for blending of ethylene pyrolysis fuel oil as delay coking raw material through thermogravimetric analyzer |
CN109991675A (en) * | 2019-03-26 | 2019-07-09 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Utilize the method that terpane absolute content determines crude maturity in crude oil |
US20210388711A1 (en) * | 2020-06-16 | 2021-12-16 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Photoacoustic techniques for borehole analysis |
US11415267B2 (en) * | 2019-06-12 | 2022-08-16 | Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. | System and method for diagnosing a condition of an engine |
US11680899B2 (en) | 2020-06-16 | 2023-06-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Laser dispersion spectroscopy for borehole analysis |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5547876A (en) * | 1994-09-27 | 1996-08-20 | Leco Corporation | Combustion accelerators, processes for their production and processes for their use in elemental analysis |
US6482311B1 (en) * | 2000-08-01 | 2002-11-19 | Tda Research, Inc. | Methods for suppression of filamentous coke formation |
US6773921B1 (en) * | 1999-06-10 | 2004-08-10 | The University Of Wyoming Research Corporation | Predicting proximity to coke formation |
US20090117659A1 (en) * | 2005-06-23 | 2009-05-07 | Bp Oil International Limited | Process for Evaluating Quality of Coke and Bitumen of Refinery Feedstocks |
US20090305428A1 (en) * | 2008-06-06 | 2009-12-10 | Rolls-Royce Plc | Apparatus and method for evaluating a hydrocarbon to determine the propensity for coke formation |
US20120160738A1 (en) * | 2009-07-09 | 2012-06-28 | Jx Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation | Process for producing regenerated hydrotreating catalyst and process for producing petrochemical product |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3121677A (en) * | 1960-10-28 | 1964-02-18 | Gulf Research Development Co | Process for controlling carbon residue content of oil |
NL302918A (en) * | 1963-12-31 | |||
CA1141320A (en) * | 1979-12-28 | 1983-02-15 | Harvey E. Alford | Coking technique and means for making methane |
US6294387B1 (en) | 1999-03-24 | 2001-09-25 | Intevep, S.A. | Method of determining the corrosiveness of naphthenic acid in crude oil refinery streams |
-
2012
- 2012-02-29 US US13/408,626 patent/US9188577B2/en active Active
- 2012-03-01 WO PCT/US2012/027223 patent/WO2012118936A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5547876A (en) * | 1994-09-27 | 1996-08-20 | Leco Corporation | Combustion accelerators, processes for their production and processes for their use in elemental analysis |
US6773921B1 (en) * | 1999-06-10 | 2004-08-10 | The University Of Wyoming Research Corporation | Predicting proximity to coke formation |
US6482311B1 (en) * | 2000-08-01 | 2002-11-19 | Tda Research, Inc. | Methods for suppression of filamentous coke formation |
US20090117659A1 (en) * | 2005-06-23 | 2009-05-07 | Bp Oil International Limited | Process for Evaluating Quality of Coke and Bitumen of Refinery Feedstocks |
US20090305428A1 (en) * | 2008-06-06 | 2009-12-10 | Rolls-Royce Plc | Apparatus and method for evaluating a hydrocarbon to determine the propensity for coke formation |
US20120160738A1 (en) * | 2009-07-09 | 2012-06-28 | Jx Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation | Process for producing regenerated hydrotreating catalyst and process for producing petrochemical product |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
The Accelerating and Retarding Effects of Hydrogen on Carbon Deposition on Metal Surfaces K.L. Yang and R.T. Yang Carbon Vol. 24, No. 6, pages 687-693 * |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105319339A (en) * | 2015-10-14 | 2016-02-10 | 辽宁石油化工大学 | Method for simulating coking process for blending of ethylene pyrolysis fuel oil as delay coking raw material through thermogravimetric analyzer |
CN109991675A (en) * | 2019-03-26 | 2019-07-09 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Utilize the method that terpane absolute content determines crude maturity in crude oil |
US11415267B2 (en) * | 2019-06-12 | 2022-08-16 | Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. | System and method for diagnosing a condition of an engine |
US20210388711A1 (en) * | 2020-06-16 | 2021-12-16 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Photoacoustic techniques for borehole analysis |
US11655703B2 (en) * | 2020-06-16 | 2023-05-23 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Photoacoustic techniques for borehole analysis |
US11680899B2 (en) | 2020-06-16 | 2023-06-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Laser dispersion spectroscopy for borehole analysis |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2012118936A1 (en) | 2012-09-07 |
US9188577B2 (en) | 2015-11-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Kass et al. | Stability, combustion, and compatibility of high-viscosity heavy fuel oil blends with a fast pyrolysis bio-oil | |
Hauser et al. | Study on thermal cracking of Kuwaiti heavy oil (vacuum residue) and its SARA fractions by NMR spectroscopy | |
US9188577B2 (en) | Measuring coking propensity | |
Speight | Handbook of petroleum product analysis | |
Gupta | Advanced coal characterization: a review | |
US9921203B2 (en) | Method for predicting sediment content of a hydroprocessed hydrocarbon product | |
Rogel et al. | Sediment formation in residue hydroconversion processes and its correlation to asphaltene behavior | |
US20110066441A1 (en) | Method for predicting reactivity of a hydrocarbon-containing feedstock for hydroprocessing | |
US20130124106A1 (en) | Method for estimating sediment content of a hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock | |
SG190149A1 (en) | Processes and systems for characterizing and blending refinery feedstocks | |
WO2003096011A1 (en) | Continuous on-line process control of residua distillation | |
Stratiev et al. | Colloidal stability and hot filtration test of residual fuel oils based on visbreaking and ebullated bed residue H-Oil hydrocracking | |
Derakhshesh et al. | Effect of asphaltene stability on fouling at delayed coking process furnace conditions | |
JP2013525594A (en) | Improvement of diesel engine injector fouling using highly paraffinic distilled fuel | |
Rogel et al. | Investigation on crude oil fouling behavior | |
Tirado et al. | Properties of Heavy and Extra‐Heavy Crude Oils | |
CA2957249A1 (en) | Methode de determination de la stabilite d'un produit petrolier contenant des asphaltenes | |
Russell et al. | Observations from heavy residue pyrolysis: a novel method to characterize fouling potential and assess antifoulant additive performance | |
EP3514217A1 (en) | A process for conversion of high acidic crude oils | |
US8956874B2 (en) | Methods for evaluating corrosivity of crude oil feedstocks | |
Larachi et al. | X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Photoelectron Energy Loss Spectroscopy, X-ray Excited Auger Electron Spectroscopy, and Time-of-Flight− Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy Studies of Asphaltenes from Doba− Chad Heavy Crude Hydrovisbreaking | |
El-Naggar et al. | Petroleum in view of its classification, assay and analysis | |
Karim et al. | A comparative elemental analysis of the different Kurdistan crude oil fields | |
Sohani | Production and characterization of bio-oil from catalytic fast pyrolysis in a fluidized bed reactor | |
Schlehöfer et al. | Evaluation of High-Viscosity Residual Fractions by Hot Filtration |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:YEPEZ, OMAR JESUS;SNELLING, RICKY EUGENE;REEL/FRAME:027785/0128 Effective date: 20120229 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:028213/0824 Effective date: 20120426 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |