US20120191877A1 - Method and apparatus for updating a graphical display in a distributed processing environment - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for updating a graphical display in a distributed processing environment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20120191877A1 US20120191877A1 US13/434,502 US201213434502A US2012191877A1 US 20120191877 A1 US20120191877 A1 US 20120191877A1 US 201213434502 A US201213434502 A US 201213434502A US 2012191877 A1 US2012191877 A1 US 2012191877A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- display
- update
- computing device
- buffer
- display update
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/04—Protocols for data compression, e.g. ROHC
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F15/00—Digital computers in general; Data processing equipment in general
- G06F15/16—Combinations of two or more digital computers each having at least an arithmetic unit, a program unit and a register, e.g. for a simultaneous processing of several programs
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/12—Digital output to print unit, e.g. line printer, chain printer
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/131—Protocols for games, networked simulations or virtual reality
Definitions
- Distributed computer systems utilize the technique of distributing application execution. More specifically, an application server locally executes an application program and provides the application output data to clients/network users who then display the results on a display screen that is locally-coupled to their local computer. Distributed systems can make the best use available computing resources, i.e., the more capable server performs compute and memory intensive application processing functions while, the client that may be less capable computationally but potentially more capable with respect to video performance, displays the output.
- a user of the client views application output data on a local display during the execution of the application program and interacts with the application program via keyboard, mouse inputs, or other device inputs. The user's inputs correspond to requests to the application server to perform certain actions that affect the operation of the application program.
- the application server passes these requests to the application for further processing.
- the application server also intercepts application output data generated by the application program, and typically targeted to the operating system of the application server, and transmits all or part of the data to the client for display. From the perspective of the user, the application program seems to be executing locally even though it is actually being executed on a remote server and displayed locally.
- RDP Remote Desktop Protocol
- ITU T.120 ITU T.120 family of protocols.
- RDP is a multiple-channel capable protocol that allows for separate virtual channels carrying device communication and presentation data from the application server, as well as encrypted client mouse and keyboard data.
- RDP uses its own video driver to render display output by constructing the rendering information into network packets using RDP protocol and sending them over the network to the client.
- RDP receives rendering data and interprets the packets into corresponding Microsoft Win32 graphics device interface (GDI) API calls.
- GDI Microsoft Win32 graphics device interface
- ICA Independent Computing Architecture
- the invention features a method of updating a remote display unit.
- the method includes copying display information from a video buffer of a computing device executing an application remotely located from the display unit to generate a display update, calculating a size of the display update, and determining an amount of available bandwidth of a network connecting the computing device and the display unit.
- the method also includes calculating a time period required to communicate the display update from the computing device to the display unit, transmitting the display update to the display, and repeating one or more of the steps after the time period has elapsed.
- the method includes writing display information to the video buffer by the application during at least one of the steps.
- the method can also include generating at least one bounding rectangle indicative of a region of change of the video buffer as part of the display update, and tracking an amount of change to the video buffer to determine if a high update period exists.
- the method includes applying a lossy compression algorithm to the display update during a high update period to create a lossy display update, transmitting the lossy display update to the display, and transmitting a lossless display update to replace the lossy display update after the high update period.
- the invention features a system for updating a display unit remotely located from a computing system.
- the system includes a video buffer, a driver, and a thread.
- the video buffer stores display data representing graphical output of an application program executing on the computer system.
- the driver determines a characteristic of a network between the computing system and the remote display unit and transmits a signal regarding network availability.
- the thread receives the signal and creates a display update for communication to the remote display that is responsive to the data stored in the video buffer.
- the signal regarding network availability includes a dynamically determined time period.
- the system can also have a timer module that communicates with the thread for executing the dynamically determined time period and signaling the thread to copy the local video buffer.
- the system can also include an update region in communication with video buffer for storing bounding rectangle information.
- An accumulator for tracking the amount of change made to the video buffer can also be included.
- the system can include a compressor module that communicates with the driver to compress the display update before transmitting the display update to the remote display unit when the accumulator reaches a predetermined threshold.
- the invention features a system for updating a display unit remotely located from a computing system.
- the system includes buffering means, driving means, and thread means.
- the buffering means stores display data representative of graphical output of an application program executing on the computer system.
- the driving means communicates with a network to determine a characteristic of the network and transmits a signal regarding network availability.
- the thread means receives the signal and creates a display update that is communicated to the remote display unit.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a distributed application processing system constructed according to principles of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating an operational mode of the distributed application processing system of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a computing unit agent of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 4 is a flow chart of a method of operation of the producer thread of FIG. 3 .
- FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a method of operation of the consumer thread of FIG. 3 .
- FIG. 6 is a flow chart of an embodiment of a method providing updates to a remote display according to principles of the invention.
- the present invention features systems and methods of updating a display of a remote display unit.
- the invention uses the current dynamic state of the bandwidth speed and the amount of pending data on the network to identify the next interval to send a display update.
- the interval is determined by the size of the update and the speed of the network.
- the display driver allows the application to update a local video buffer.
- the buffer contains the most up to date representation of the display screen.
- the display driver maintains a list of affected bounding rectangles that result from each update.
- updates can be sent from the list of affected rectangles and the buffer. Double image buffering can be used. That is, the list of affected rectangle is copied and provided to the driver for transmission across the network.
- Copying the list of affected rectangles allows the application to issue many updates to the buffer while the slower process of transmitting the updates to the remote display occurs.
- a lossy image compression can be used on the updates sent to the remote display during periods of frequent updates.
- One advantage of the invention is the decoupling the application from the updates to the remote location.
- the application can make as many updates to the screen without forcing the updates down the slower network path.
- the updates that get sent to the remote location occur only when the network can handle the updates. This allows for many updates to occur by the application, but also allows only the most recent display image to be sent over the network. Thus, there is increased interactivity in the presentation of the display to the end-user.
- a distributed application processing system 100 includes one or more remote display units 110 ′, 110 ′′ (hereinafter each remote display unit or plurality of remote display units is generally referred to as 110 ) in communication with one or more computing devices 150 ′, 150 ′′ (hereinafter each computing device or plurality of computing devices is generally referred to as 150 ) via a communications network 140 .
- the network 140 can be a local-area network (LAN), a medium-area network (MAN), or a wide area network (WAN) such as the Internet or the World Wide Web.
- LAN local-area network
- MAN medium-area network
- WAN wide area network
- Users of the remote display unit 110 can be connected to the network 140 through a variety of connections including standard telephone lines, LAN or WAN links (e.g., T1, T3, 56 kb, X.25), broadband connections (e.g., ISDN, Frame Relay, ATM), and wireless connections (e.g., IEEE 802.11).
- the connections can be established using a variety of communication protocols (e.g., TCP/IP, IPX, SPX, NetBIOS, and direct asynchronous connections).
- the protocol used may be the Independent Computing Architecture protocol manufactured by Citrix Systems, Inc. of Fort Lauderdale, Fla. or the Remote Display Protocol manufactured by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.
- the bandwidth of the network 140 is one factor that affects the performance of the distributed application processing system 100 .
- a network 140 having a larger bandwidth relative a second network typically can support transmission of more display data to the remote display unit 110 .
- the bandwidth of the network 140 fluctuates. As data is transmitted through the network 140 the amount of available bandwidth of the network is reduced. As display data is received by the remote display unit 110 , the available bandwidth of the network 140 increases, assuming no additional data is placed on the network.
- One aspect of the invention monitors the available bandwidth of the network 140 and uses the measurement to dynamically determine when to send a display update frame to the remote display unit 110 .
- the remote display unit 110 typically includes a processor 112 , a volatile memory 114 (e.g., RAM cache), an operating system 116 , a display agent 118 , a persistent storage memory 120 , a network interface 122 (e.g., a network interface card), a display application program 123 , a keyboard 124 , at least one input device 126 (e.g., a mouse, trackball, space ball, light pen and tablet, stylus, and any other input device), and a display 128 .
- a processor 112 e.g., a volatile memory 114 (e.g., RAM cache), an operating system 116 , a display agent 118 , a persistent storage memory 120 , a network interface 122 (e.g., a network interface card), a display application program 123 , a keyboard 124 , at least one input device 126 (e.g., a mouse, trackball, space ball, light pen and tablet, stylus, and any other input device), and
- Operating system 116 can include, without limitation, WINDOWS 3.x, WINDOWS 95, WINDOWS 98, WINDOWS NT 3.51, WINDOWS NT 4.0, WINDOWS 2000, WINDOWS CE, MAC/OS, Java, PALM OS, SYMBIAN OS, LINUX, SMARTPHONE OS, and UNIX.
- the display agent 118 receives commands and data from the computing device 150 and from a user (not shown) of the remote display unit 110 .
- the client agent 118 uses the received information when interacting with other components of the remote display unit 110 (e.g., when directing the operating system 116 to output data onto the display 128 ).
- the display agent 118 also transmits requests and data to the computing device 150 in response to computing device-issued commands or user actions at the remote display unit 110 .
- the remote display unit 110 can be any personal computer (e.g., 286, 386, 486, Pentium, Pentium II, Macintosh computer), Windows-based terminal, Network Computer, wireless device, information appliance, RISC Power PC, X-device, workstation, minicomputer, main frame computer, cellular telephone or other computing device that provides sufficient memory for executing the operating system 116 and the display application program 123 .
- the display application program 123 can be integral with the operating system 116 or a stand-alone application.
- the display presentation program 123 uses commands and data sent to it by the computing device 150 across the network 140 to render a graphical output to the user of the display 128 of the display unit.
- the computing device 150 may include a processor 152 , a volatile memory 154 , an operating system 156 , an application program 158 , a computing device agent 160 , persistent storage memory 162 , and a network interface 164 .
- the computing device agent 160 interfaces with the display agent 118 and other components of the computing device 150 to support the remote display and operability of the application program 158 .
- execution of application programs occurs primarily on a computing device 150 and the user interface produced by application execution is transmitted over the network 140 to the remote display unit 110 .
- the user provides inputs, such as keystrokes and mouse movements, at the display unit 110 which are transmitted over the network 140 to the computing device 150 to instruct the application programs to perform further tasks.
- Each computing device 150 hosts one or more application programs 158 that can be accessed by the remote display units 110 .
- application programs 158 include word processing programs such as MICROSOFT WORD and spreadsheet programs such as MICROSOFT EXCEL, both manufactured by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash., financial reporting programs, customer registration programs, programs providing technical support information, customer database applications, application set managers, or computer-aided design and manufacturing applications, such as AUTOCAD sold by Autodesk of San Rafael, Calif., CATIA sold by Dassault Systemes of Suresnes Cedex, France, and PRO/ENGINEER sold by Parametric Technology Corporation of Needham, Mass.
- AUTOCAD sold by Autodesk of San Rafael, Calif.
- CATIA sold by Dassault Systemes of Suresnes Cedex, France
- PRO/ENGINEER sold by Parametric Technology Corporation of Needham, Mass.
- FIG. 2 provides an operational overview of the distributed application processing system shown in FIG. 1 .
- the application program 158 generates output (step 210 ) responsive to user manipulation of the mouse 126 and keyboard 124 that is interpreted by the operating system 156 , which in turn, issues drawing commands indicative of the graphical output of the application program 158 .
- the drawing commands are written (step 214 ) to a buffer of the computing device 150 .
- the contents of the buffer are communicated (step 218 ) to the remote display unit 110 and processed (step 222 ) by the display agent 118 of the remote display unit 110 to update the display 128 .
- the computing device 150 communicates with the remote display unit 110 over a transport mechanism (part of the computing device agent 160 ).
- the transport mechanism provides multiple virtual channels and one of the virtual channels provides a protocol for transmission of graphical screen data from the computing device 150 to the remote display unit 110 .
- the application program 158 generates output (step 210 ) and issues drawing commands indicative of the graphical output of the application program 158 .
- drawing commands can include, but are not limited to, raster operations, GDI commands provided by WINDOWS-based operating systems, and QUICKDRAW or QUARTZ commands provided by MAC/OS-based operating systems.
- the drawing commands issued by the application program are “hooked,” that is, the drawing commands are intercepted by code not associated with the application program and further processed as described below.
- the drawing commands also may be provided to operating system 116 for processing in addition to being processed as described below.
- For easy of reference drawing command will be referred to as “GDI commands” throughout the remainder of the specification.
- the drawing commands are written (step 214 ) to a buffer provided by the computing device 150 .
- lower-level commands such as interface calls to a device driver associated with the graphical display of the computing device 150 are written to the buffer.
- both drawing commands and lower-level commands are stored in a buffer provided by the computing device 150 . Drawing commands can be stored in the buffer at the same time that stored commands are transmitted to the remote display unit 110 to update the display provided by the remote display unit.
- the computing device 150 communicates with the remote display unit 110 over a transport mechanism (part of the computing device agent 160 ).
- the transport mechanism provides multiple virtual channels and one of the virtual channels provides a protocol for transmission of graphical screen data from the computing device 150 to the remote display unit 110 .
- the display agent 118 of the remote display unit 110 processes the received buffer content (step 222 ) to update the display 128 .
- the display agent issues drawing commands to the operating system 116 of the remote display unit 110 that correspond to the drawing commands issued by the application program 158 of the computing device 150 .
- FIG. 3 is shows a conceptual block diagram of various components of the computing device agent 160 .
- the computing device agent 160 includes a producer thread 300 , a buffer 304 , a consumer thread 308 , and a driver 312 .
- the producer thread 300 is in communication with the buffer 304 .
- the consumer thread 308 is in communication with the buffer 304 and the driver 312 .
- the producer thread 300 includes one or more application threads 314 ′, 314 ′′ (referred to generally as application thread 314 ) that issue drawing commands, such as GDI commands, which are processed and stored in the buffer 304 as graphical images.
- the drawing commands are typically issued to a graphics rendering engine, which in turn, renders the commands into the buffer 304 .
- the output of the graphic rendering engine can be a complex bitmap or similar graphical representation.
- the buffer 304 functions as a “virtual” display for storing display image for later transmission to the remote display unit 110 .
- the producer thread 300 also tracks the changes to the buffer 304 by hooking the GDI commands prior to issuing them to the graphics rendering engine.
- the procedure thread 300 examines the GDI commands and generates one or more bounding rectangles that indicate areas of change in the bitmap of the buffer 304 .
- the bounding rectangles are stored in an update array 316 that is in communication or integral with the buffer 304 .
- the producer thread 300 can continually update the buffer 304 and the update array 316 during the operation of the consumer thread 308 . Said another way, the producer thread 300 operates independently of the consumer thread 308 .
- the buffer 304 is a dedicated and dynamically reconfigurable section of the volatile memory 154 or the persistent storage 162 . As previously stated, a portion of the buffer 304 is reserved as an update array 316 for storing the bounding rectangles.
- the buffer comprises a special-purpose memory, such as dual-port RAM, provided specifically to serve as the buffer.
- various algorithms operate on the bounding rectangles to remove overlapping regions of change to prevent sending multiple updates for a single region in a single update frame. For example, if region X changes during a first write to the buffer 304 , a bounding rectangle indicating the coordinates of the change region is stored in the update array 316 . If a subsequent write to the buffer 304 results in a change to a region includes region X, the bounding rectangle related to region X is removed and replaced with the new bounding rectangle information.
- the consumer thread 308 includes an accumulator module 320 , a copy module 324 , a timer module 328 , and a compressor module 332 .
- the accumulator module 320 is in communication with the buffer 304 and provides a running total of the amount of display data that has changed in the display image of the buffer 304 . The total is used to trigger a mode of operation that included lossy compression, which is described in more detail below.
- the copy module 324 is in communication with the buffer 304 and is capable of accessing the buffer 304 to copy the display image of the buffer and the bounding rectangles in the update array 316 to create a display update frame for transmission to the remote display unit 110 .
- the compressor module 328 is in communication with the copy module 324 and the accumulator module 320 .
- the compressor module 328 provides a means to perform lossy compression on the display update frame to create a lossy display update frame.
- the running total is used to activate and deactivate the compressor module as required.
- the timer 332 module is in communication with the driver 312 and the copy module 324 .
- the function of the timer module 332 is to trigger a copy operation from the buffer 304 after dynamically determined time period.
- the length of the dynamically determined time period of the timer module 332 is dependent on the available bandwidth of the network 140 and the size of a respective display frame update.
- the driver 312 includes a translator module 336 for formatting the display update frame according to the communication protocol of the distributed application processing system 100 .
- the driver 312 also dynamically determines the time period used by the timer module 328 .
- the driver module 312 monitors a round-trip time for the display update frame. Other methods of determining the dynamically determined time period can also be used. For example, the number of drawing operations that were issued by the application thread 314 can be used.
- the producer thread 300 issues (step 400 ) drawing commands; writes (step 410 ) a display image to the buffer 304 ; generates (step 420 ) the bounding rectangles; stores (step 430 ) the bounding rectangles in the update display region 316 ; and converges (step 440 ) the bounding rectangles.
- the application program threads 314 issue (step 400 ) GDI drawing commands to the graphical rendering engine.
- Write commands from the graphical rendering engine generate (step 410 ) a display image that is stored in the buffer 304 . Subsequent writes to the buffer 304 result in changes to the display image.
- the producer thread 300 generates (step 420 ) one or more bounding rectangles that identify an area of the display image that has changed since the last write to the buffer 304 .
- the GDI commands that are issued to the graphics rendering engine are hooked before they are passed through to the graphics rendering engine. Subsequent GDI commands are compared against previously issued commands to determine which areas of the image have changed.
- the update array 316 stores (step 430 ) the bounding rectangles. Prior to writing a new bounding rectangle to the update array 316 , the producer thread 300 determines if any of the existing rectangles in the update array 316 intersect or overlaps with the new bounding rectangle.
- One method know to those of ordinary skill in the art is the use of rectangle collision detection algorithms.
- the bounding rectangles are converged (step 440 ).
- converging refers to replacing, combining, or segmenting, an existing rectangle with the new rectangle.
- the new bounding rectangle is written to the update region 316 and the existing bounding rectangle is removed.
- the consumer thread 308 periodically generates and transmits the display update frame to the remote display unit 110 by copying (step 510 ) the contents of the display buffer 304 and update array 316 ; extracting (step 520 ) the changes to the display; determine (step 530 ) the amount of change to the display; creating (step 540 ) the display update frame; optionally the display update frame is lossy compressed (step 550 ); calculating (step 560 ) the size of the display update frame; communicating (step 570 ) the display update frame to the translator; calculating (step 580 ) the time required to transmit the update to the remote display unit 110 ; and pausing (step 590 ) operation of the consumer thread for a predetermined time.
- the copy module 324 upon the expiration of the dynamically determined time period, copies (step 510 ) the contents of the buffer 304 and the update array 316 .
- the consumer thread 308 takes a “snap shot” of the buffer 304 and the update array 316 .
- the application programming threads 316 continually write to the buffer 304 and display update region 316 to make further changes thereto independent of the operation of the consumer thread 308 . Therefore, the buffer 304 has the most up-to-date display information.
- the consumer thread extracts (step 520 ) the changes in the display from the buffer 304 contents, which is typically a complex bitmap image.
- the bounding rectangles are used to determine which areas of the display have changed.
- the previous update display frame is saved and compared to the present update display frame using a logic operation such as an exclusive or (XOR).
- the amount of change in the display image is determined (step 530 ) using any number of various methods known to those of ordinary skill in the art and communicated to the accumulator module to update the running total. In one embodiment, the size of the affected area is calculated. In one embodiment, the amount of change information is transmitted to the accumulator module 320 , which updates the running total.
- the running count is used to determine if a high update period is occurring. If no updates to the buffer 304 occur, the accumulator module 326 decreases the running count by a predetermined amount. If the running count exceeds a predetermined threshold, each display update frame is subjected to a lossy compression technique before transmission to the remote display. Determining the end of the high update period can be accomplished in various ways. In one embodiment, if no changes to the buffer 304 and update array 316 occur for a predetermined period of time (e.g., 1 second) the consumer thread 308 exits the lossy compression mode and returns to transmitting lossless compression display frame updates to the remote display unit 110 .
- a predetermined period of time e.g. 1 second
- the consumer thread 308 After determining the amount of change in the display, the consumer thread 308 creates the display update frame (step 540 ). If so required, the consumer thread 308 applies (step 550 ) a lossy compression technique to the update display frame to create a lossy update display frame for transmission to the remote display unit 110 .
- a photographic codec is used (e.g., JPEG compression using arithmetic encoding). While this type of encoding is more processor intensive, it can decrease the size of the display update frame by as much as thirty percent relative to other codes (e.g., JPEG compression using optimized Huffman encoding).
- the consumer thread 308 Before applying the lossy compression algorithm, the consumer thread 308 caches the display update frames prior to applying the lossy compression algorithm. The cached display update frames are subsequently forwarded to the remote display unit once the high update period has ended.
- the consumer thread 308 determines (step 560 ) the size of the display update frame.
- the display update frame is communicated (step 570 ) to the translator module 336 of the driver 312 .
- the translator module 336 converts the display update frame according the transmission protocol of the distributed application processing system 100 .
- the size of the display update frame is used to determine the time required to send the display update frame to the remote display unit 110 .
- the driver module 312 calculates (step 580 ) the estimated transmission time by dividing the size of the display update frame by the available bandwidth of the network 140 . This calculation results in the dynamically determined time period used by the timer 332 of the consumer thread 308 .
- the translated display update frame is send to the network interface 164 and transmitted to the remote display unit 110 .
- the consumer thread After transmitting the display update frame, the consumer thread remains inactive (step 590 ) or pauses until the expiration of the dynamically determined time period. After the expiration of the dynamically determined time period, the consumer thread takes another snap shot of the buffer 304 and update array 316 and performs the same process.
- a method 600 for transmitting screen updates to the remote display unit 110 includes copying display information from a video buffer of a computing device executing an application remotely located from the display unit to generate a display update (step 610 ); calculating a size of the display update (step 620 ); determining an amount of available bandwidth of a network connecting the computing device and the display unit (step 630 ); calculating a time period required to communicate the display update from the computing device to the display unit (step 640 ); transmitting the display update to the display (step 650 ); and repeating the method when the calculated time period has elapsed (step 660 ).
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Controls And Circuits For Display Device (AREA)
- Digital Computer Display Output (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- Distributed computer systems utilize the technique of distributing application execution. More specifically, an application server locally executes an application program and provides the application output data to clients/network users who then display the results on a display screen that is locally-coupled to their local computer. Distributed systems can make the best use available computing resources, i.e., the more capable server performs compute and memory intensive application processing functions while, the client that may be less capable computationally but potentially more capable with respect to video performance, displays the output. In one type of distributed computing system, a user of the client views application output data on a local display during the execution of the application program and interacts with the application program via keyboard, mouse inputs, or other device inputs. The user's inputs correspond to requests to the application server to perform certain actions that affect the operation of the application program. The application server passes these requests to the application for further processing. The application server also intercepts application output data generated by the application program, and typically targeted to the operating system of the application server, and transmits all or part of the data to the client for display. From the perspective of the user, the application program seems to be executing locally even though it is actually being executed on a remote server and displayed locally.
- There are various protocols that provide the above-described functionality. One example of such a protocol is the Remote Desktop Protocol (“RDP”) distributed by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash. RDP is based on, and an extension of, the ITU T.120 family of protocols. RDP is a multiple-channel capable protocol that allows for separate virtual channels carrying device communication and presentation data from the application server, as well as encrypted client mouse and keyboard data. RDP uses its own video driver to render display output by constructing the rendering information into network packets using RDP protocol and sending them over the network to the client. On the client, RDP receives rendering data and interprets the packets into corresponding Microsoft Win32 graphics device interface (GDI) API calls. For the input path, client mouse and keyboard events are redirected from the client to the server.
- Another protocol that provides similar functionality is the Independent Computing Architecture (“ICA”) sold by Citrix Systems of Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. ICA is a protocol that enables separate screen updates and user input processing from the rest of an application's logic. All application logic executes on a first computing system and only screen updates, mouse movements, and keystrokes are transmitted during a session between the displaying computing system and the first computing system.
- Distributed application processing systems have performed well for typical, office applications. However, certain applications that are graphically intense can adversely affect the performance of a distributed application processing system. Examples of graphically intense applications can include, but are not limited to, computer-aided drafting (“CAD”) applications, video editing applications, and computer games. In these graphically-intense applications, display updates typically require a large amount of bandwidth because they are large, bitmap images. This problem is exacerbated when an executing application program sends multiple display updates in a short period of time, such as when a CAD/CAM program rotates a three-dimensional model of a device for the user to view. The delay in output due to the large size of the respective screen updates adversely affects user experience and interaction with the application program and makes use of the application program impractical in a distributed application processing environment.
- In one aspect, the invention features a method of updating a remote display unit. The method includes copying display information from a video buffer of a computing device executing an application remotely located from the display unit to generate a display update, calculating a size of the display update, and determining an amount of available bandwidth of a network connecting the computing device and the display unit. The method also includes calculating a time period required to communicate the display update from the computing device to the display unit, transmitting the display update to the display, and repeating one or more of the steps after the time period has elapsed.
- In various embodiments, the method includes writing display information to the video buffer by the application during at least one of the steps. The method can also include generating at least one bounding rectangle indicative of a region of change of the video buffer as part of the display update, and tracking an amount of change to the video buffer to determine if a high update period exists.
- In one embodiment, the method includes applying a lossy compression algorithm to the display update during a high update period to create a lossy display update, transmitting the lossy display update to the display, and transmitting a lossless display update to replace the lossy display update after the high update period.
- In another aspect, the invention features a system for updating a display unit remotely located from a computing system. The system includes a video buffer, a driver, and a thread. The video buffer stores display data representing graphical output of an application program executing on the computer system. The driver determines a characteristic of a network between the computing system and the remote display unit and transmits a signal regarding network availability. The thread receives the signal and creates a display update for communication to the remote display that is responsive to the data stored in the video buffer.
- In various embodiments, the signal regarding network availability includes a dynamically determined time period. The system can also have a timer module that communicates with the thread for executing the dynamically determined time period and signaling the thread to copy the local video buffer. The system can also include an update region in communication with video buffer for storing bounding rectangle information. An accumulator for tracking the amount of change made to the video buffer can also be included. Further, the system can include a compressor module that communicates with the driver to compress the display update before transmitting the display update to the remote display unit when the accumulator reaches a predetermined threshold.
- In another aspect, the invention features a system for updating a display unit remotely located from a computing system. The system includes buffering means, driving means, and thread means. The buffering means stores display data representative of graphical output of an application program executing on the computer system. The driving means communicates with a network to determine a characteristic of the network and transmits a signal regarding network availability. The thread means receives the signal and creates a display update that is communicated to the remote display unit.
- The invention may be better understood by referring to the following description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like numerals indicate like structural elements and features in various figures. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a distributed application processing system constructed according to principles of the present invention. -
FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating an operational mode of the distributed application processing system ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a computing unit agent ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 4 is a flow chart of a method of operation of the producer thread ofFIG. 3 . -
FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a method of operation of the consumer thread ofFIG. 3 . -
FIG. 6 is a flow chart of an embodiment of a method providing updates to a remote display according to principles of the invention. - The present invention features systems and methods of updating a display of a remote display unit. In one embodiment, the invention uses the current dynamic state of the bandwidth speed and the amount of pending data on the network to identify the next interval to send a display update. The interval is determined by the size of the update and the speed of the network. The display driver allows the application to update a local video buffer. The buffer contains the most up to date representation of the display screen. As updates occur, the display driver maintains a list of affected bounding rectangles that result from each update. When the network is ready, updates can be sent from the list of affected rectangles and the buffer. Double image buffering can be used. That is, the list of affected rectangle is copied and provided to the driver for transmission across the network. Copying the list of affected rectangles allows the application to issue many updates to the buffer while the slower process of transmitting the updates to the remote display occurs. A lossy image compression can be used on the updates sent to the remote display during periods of frequent updates. The affected regions of the updates that are lossy compressed and saved on a list. Once the period of frequent updates has stop, the list of lossy compressed regions can be retransmitted from the Local Video Buffer in a lossless way.
- One advantage of the invention is the decoupling the application from the updates to the remote location. The application can make as many updates to the screen without forcing the updates down the slower network path. The updates that get sent to the remote location occur only when the network can handle the updates. This allows for many updates to occur by the application, but also allows only the most recent display image to be sent over the network. Thus, there is increased interactivity in the presentation of the display to the end-user.
- With reference to
FIG. 1 , a distributedapplication processing system 100 includes one or moreremote display units 110′, 110″ (hereinafter each remote display unit or plurality of remote display units is generally referred to as 110) in communication with one ormore computing devices 150′, 150″ (hereinafter each computing device or plurality of computing devices is generally referred to as 150) via acommunications network 140. Thenetwork 140 can be a local-area network (LAN), a medium-area network (MAN), or a wide area network (WAN) such as the Internet or the World Wide Web. Users of theremote display unit 110 can be connected to thenetwork 140 through a variety of connections including standard telephone lines, LAN or WAN links (e.g., T1, T3, 56 kb, X.25), broadband connections (e.g., ISDN, Frame Relay, ATM), and wireless connections (e.g., IEEE 802.11). The connections can be established using a variety of communication protocols (e.g., TCP/IP, IPX, SPX, NetBIOS, and direct asynchronous connections). In some particularly advantageous embodiments, the protocol used may be the Independent Computing Architecture protocol manufactured by Citrix Systems, Inc. of Fort Lauderdale, Fla. or the Remote Display Protocol manufactured by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash. - The bandwidth of the
network 140 is one factor that affects the performance of the distributedapplication processing system 100. Anetwork 140 having a larger bandwidth relative a second network typically can support transmission of more display data to theremote display unit 110. During operation of the distributedapplication processing system 100, the bandwidth of thenetwork 140 fluctuates. As data is transmitted through thenetwork 140 the amount of available bandwidth of the network is reduced. As display data is received by theremote display unit 110, the available bandwidth of thenetwork 140 increases, assuming no additional data is placed on the network. One aspect of the invention monitors the available bandwidth of thenetwork 140 and uses the measurement to dynamically determine when to send a display update frame to theremote display unit 110. - The
remote display unit 110 typically includes aprocessor 112, a volatile memory 114 (e.g., RAM cache), anoperating system 116, adisplay agent 118, apersistent storage memory 120, a network interface 122 (e.g., a network interface card), adisplay application program 123, akeyboard 124, at least one input device 126 (e.g., a mouse, trackball, space ball, light pen and tablet, stylus, and any other input device), and adisplay 128.Operating system 116 can include, without limitation, WINDOWS 3.x, WINDOWS 95, WINDOWS 98, WINDOWS NT 3.51, WINDOWS NT 4.0, WINDOWS 2000, WINDOWS CE, MAC/OS, Java, PALM OS, SYMBIAN OS, LINUX, SMARTPHONE OS, and UNIX. Thedisplay agent 118 receives commands and data from thecomputing device 150 and from a user (not shown) of theremote display unit 110. Theclient agent 118 uses the received information when interacting with other components of the remote display unit 110 (e.g., when directing theoperating system 116 to output data onto the display 128). Thedisplay agent 118 also transmits requests and data to thecomputing device 150 in response to computing device-issued commands or user actions at theremote display unit 110. - The
remote display unit 110 can be any personal computer (e.g., 286, 386, 486, Pentium, Pentium II, Macintosh computer), Windows-based terminal, Network Computer, wireless device, information appliance, RISC Power PC, X-device, workstation, minicomputer, main frame computer, cellular telephone or other computing device that provides sufficient memory for executing theoperating system 116 and thedisplay application program 123. It should be understood that thedisplay application program 123 can be integral with theoperating system 116 or a stand-alone application. Thedisplay presentation program 123 uses commands and data sent to it by thecomputing device 150 across thenetwork 140 to render a graphical output to the user of thedisplay 128 of the display unit. - Similarly, the
computing device 150 may include aprocessor 152, avolatile memory 154, anoperating system 156, anapplication program 158, acomputing device agent 160,persistent storage memory 162, and anetwork interface 164. Thecomputing device agent 160 interfaces with thedisplay agent 118 and other components of thecomputing device 150 to support the remote display and operability of theapplication program 158. In the distributedapplication processing system 100, execution of application programs occurs primarily on acomputing device 150 and the user interface produced by application execution is transmitted over thenetwork 140 to theremote display unit 110. The user provides inputs, such as keystrokes and mouse movements, at thedisplay unit 110 which are transmitted over thenetwork 140 to thecomputing device 150 to instruct the application programs to perform further tasks. - Each
computing device 150 hosts one ormore application programs 158 that can be accessed by theremote display units 110. Examples of such applications include word processing programs such as MICROSOFT WORD and spreadsheet programs such as MICROSOFT EXCEL, both manufactured by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash., financial reporting programs, customer registration programs, programs providing technical support information, customer database applications, application set managers, or computer-aided design and manufacturing applications, such as AUTOCAD sold by Autodesk of San Rafael, Calif., CATIA sold by Dassault Systemes of Suresnes Cedex, France, and PRO/ENGINEER sold by Parametric Technology Corporation of Needham, Mass. -
FIG. 2 provides an operational overview of the distributed application processing system shown inFIG. 1 . Theapplication program 158 generates output (step 210) responsive to user manipulation of themouse 126 andkeyboard 124 that is interpreted by theoperating system 156, which in turn, issues drawing commands indicative of the graphical output of theapplication program 158. The drawing commands are written (step 214) to a buffer of thecomputing device 150. Periodically the contents of the buffer are communicated (step 218) to theremote display unit 110 and processed (step 222) by thedisplay agent 118 of theremote display unit 110 to update thedisplay 128. Thecomputing device 150 communicates with theremote display unit 110 over a transport mechanism (part of the computing device agent 160). In one embodiment, the transport mechanism provides multiple virtual channels and one of the virtual channels provides a protocol for transmission of graphical screen data from thecomputing device 150 to theremote display unit 110. - Still referring to
FIG. 2 , and in greater detail, theapplication program 158 generates output (step 210) and issues drawing commands indicative of the graphical output of theapplication program 158. Examples of drawing commands can include, but are not limited to, raster operations, GDI commands provided by WINDOWS-based operating systems, and QUICKDRAW or QUARTZ commands provided by MAC/OS-based operating systems. In some embodiments, the drawing commands issued by the application program are “hooked,” that is, the drawing commands are intercepted by code not associated with the application program and further processed as described below. In these embodiments, the drawing commands also may be provided tooperating system 116 for processing in addition to being processed as described below. For easy of reference drawing command will be referred to as “GDI commands” throughout the remainder of the specification. - The drawing commands are written (step 214) to a buffer provided by the
computing device 150. In some embodiments, lower-level commands, such as interface calls to a device driver associated with the graphical display of thecomputing device 150 are written to the buffer. In still other embodiments, both drawing commands and lower-level commands are stored in a buffer provided by thecomputing device 150. Drawing commands can be stored in the buffer at the same time that stored commands are transmitted to theremote display unit 110 to update the display provided by the remote display unit. - Periodically the contents of the buffer are communicated (step 218) to the
remote display unit 110. How often the contents of the buffer are communicated to the remote display unit is a function of the amount of data presently pending on the network, as described in more detail below. Thecomputing device 150 communicates with theremote display unit 110 over a transport mechanism (part of the computing device agent 160). In one embodiment, the transport mechanism provides multiple virtual channels and one of the virtual channels provides a protocol for transmission of graphical screen data from thecomputing device 150 to theremote display unit 110. - The
display agent 118 of theremote display unit 110 processes the received buffer content (step 222) to update thedisplay 128. In one embodiment, the display agent issues drawing commands to theoperating system 116 of theremote display unit 110 that correspond to the drawing commands issued by theapplication program 158 of thecomputing device 150. -
FIG. 3 is shows a conceptual block diagram of various components of thecomputing device agent 160. In one embodiment thecomputing device agent 160 includes a producer thread 300, abuffer 304, aconsumer thread 308, and adriver 312. The producer thread 300 is in communication with thebuffer 304. Theconsumer thread 308 is in communication with thebuffer 304 and thedriver 312. - The producer thread 300 includes one or more application threads 314′, 314″ (referred to generally as application thread 314) that issue drawing commands, such as GDI commands, which are processed and stored in the
buffer 304 as graphical images. The drawing commands are typically issued to a graphics rendering engine, which in turn, renders the commands into thebuffer 304. The output of the graphic rendering engine can be a complex bitmap or similar graphical representation. In essence, thebuffer 304 functions as a “virtual” display for storing display image for later transmission to theremote display unit 110. - The producer thread 300 also tracks the changes to the
buffer 304 by hooking the GDI commands prior to issuing them to the graphics rendering engine. The procedure thread 300 examines the GDI commands and generates one or more bounding rectangles that indicate areas of change in the bitmap of thebuffer 304. The bounding rectangles are stored in anupdate array 316 that is in communication or integral with thebuffer 304. The producer thread 300 can continually update thebuffer 304 and theupdate array 316 during the operation of theconsumer thread 308. Said another way, the producer thread 300 operates independently of theconsumer thread 308. - In one embodiment, the
buffer 304 is a dedicated and dynamically reconfigurable section of thevolatile memory 154 or thepersistent storage 162. As previously stated, a portion of thebuffer 304 is reserved as anupdate array 316 for storing the bounding rectangles. In another embodiment, the buffer comprises a special-purpose memory, such as dual-port RAM, provided specifically to serve as the buffer. - As the number of bounding rectangles increases, various algorithms operate on the bounding rectangles to remove overlapping regions of change to prevent sending multiple updates for a single region in a single update frame. For example, if region X changes during a first write to the
buffer 304, a bounding rectangle indicating the coordinates of the change region is stored in theupdate array 316. If a subsequent write to thebuffer 304 results in a change to a region includes region X, the bounding rectangle related to region X is removed and replaced with the new bounding rectangle information. - The
consumer thread 308 includes anaccumulator module 320, acopy module 324, atimer module 328, and acompressor module 332. Theaccumulator module 320 is in communication with thebuffer 304 and provides a running total of the amount of display data that has changed in the display image of thebuffer 304. The total is used to trigger a mode of operation that included lossy compression, which is described in more detail below. - The
copy module 324 is in communication with thebuffer 304 and is capable of accessing thebuffer 304 to copy the display image of the buffer and the bounding rectangles in theupdate array 316 to create a display update frame for transmission to theremote display unit 110. - The
compressor module 328 is in communication with thecopy module 324 and theaccumulator module 320. Thecompressor module 328 provides a means to perform lossy compression on the display update frame to create a lossy display update frame. The running total is used to activate and deactivate the compressor module as required. - The
timer 332 module is in communication with thedriver 312 and thecopy module 324. The function of thetimer module 332 is to trigger a copy operation from thebuffer 304 after dynamically determined time period. The length of the dynamically determined time period of thetimer module 332 is dependent on the available bandwidth of thenetwork 140 and the size of a respective display frame update. By dynamically determining the time period, the invention provides a “just-in-time” delivery of the display update frame toremote display unit 110. - The
driver 312 includes atranslator module 336 for formatting the display update frame according to the communication protocol of the distributedapplication processing system 100. Thedriver 312 also dynamically determines the time period used by thetimer module 328. In one embodiment, thedriver module 312 monitors a round-trip time for the display update frame. Other methods of determining the dynamically determined time period can also be used. For example, the number of drawing operations that were issued by the application thread 314 can be used. - Referring now to
FIG. 4 , the operation of the producer thread 300 is described. As a general overview, the producer thread 300 issues (step 400) drawing commands; writes (step 410) a display image to thebuffer 304; generates (step 420) the bounding rectangles; stores (step 430) the bounding rectangles in theupdate display region 316; and converges (step 440) the bounding rectangles. - In more detail, the application program threads 314 issue (step 400) GDI drawing commands to the graphical rendering engine. Write commands from the graphical rendering engine generate (step 410) a display image that is stored in the
buffer 304. Subsequent writes to thebuffer 304 result in changes to the display image. - The producer thread 300 generates (step 420) one or more bounding rectangles that identify an area of the display image that has changed since the last write to the
buffer 304. In one embodiment, the GDI commands that are issued to the graphics rendering engine are hooked before they are passed through to the graphics rendering engine. Subsequent GDI commands are compared against previously issued commands to determine which areas of the image have changed. - The
update array 316 stores (step 430) the bounding rectangles. Prior to writing a new bounding rectangle to theupdate array 316, the producer thread 300 determines if any of the existing rectangles in theupdate array 316 intersect or overlaps with the new bounding rectangle. One method know to those of ordinary skill in the art is the use of rectangle collision detection algorithms. - If intersection or overlap exists, the bounding rectangles are converged (step 440). As user herein, converging refers to replacing, combining, or segmenting, an existing rectangle with the new rectangle. In some embodiments, if the new bounding rectangle describes a region of change that overlaps an existing bounding rectangle, the new bounding rectangle is written to the
update region 316 and the existing bounding rectangle is removed. - With reference to
FIG. 5 , the operation of theconsumer thread 308 is described. Generally, theconsumer thread 308 periodically generates and transmits the display update frame to theremote display unit 110 by copying (step 510) the contents of thedisplay buffer 304 andupdate array 316; extracting (step 520) the changes to the display; determine (step 530) the amount of change to the display; creating (step 540) the display update frame; optionally the display update frame is lossy compressed (step 550); calculating (step 560) the size of the display update frame; communicating (step 570) the display update frame to the translator; calculating (step 580) the time required to transmit the update to theremote display unit 110; and pausing (step 590) operation of the consumer thread for a predetermined time. - In more detail and with continued reference to
FIG. 5 , thecopy module 324, upon the expiration of the dynamically determined time period, copies (step 510) the contents of thebuffer 304 and theupdate array 316. In other words, theconsumer thread 308 takes a “snap shot” of thebuffer 304 and theupdate array 316. Once the snap shot is taken, theapplication programming threads 316 continually write to thebuffer 304 anddisplay update region 316 to make further changes thereto independent of the operation of theconsumer thread 308. Therefore, thebuffer 304 has the most up-to-date display information. - From the snap shot, the consumer thread extracts (step 520) the changes in the display from the
buffer 304 contents, which is typically a complex bitmap image. In one embodiment, the bounding rectangles are used to determine which areas of the display have changed. In another embodiment, the previous update display frame is saved and compared to the present update display frame using a logic operation such as an exclusive or (XOR). - The amount of change in the display image is determined (step 530) using any number of various methods known to those of ordinary skill in the art and communicated to the accumulator module to update the running total. In one embodiment, the size of the affected area is calculated. In one embodiment, the amount of change information is transmitted to the
accumulator module 320, which updates the running total. - In one embodiment, the running count is used to determine if a high update period is occurring. If no updates to the
buffer 304 occur, the accumulator module 326 decreases the running count by a predetermined amount. If the running count exceeds a predetermined threshold, each display update frame is subjected to a lossy compression technique before transmission to the remote display. Determining the end of the high update period can be accomplished in various ways. In one embodiment, if no changes to thebuffer 304 andupdate array 316 occur for a predetermined period of time (e.g., 1 second) theconsumer thread 308 exits the lossy compression mode and returns to transmitting lossless compression display frame updates to theremote display unit 110. - After determining the amount of change in the display, the
consumer thread 308 creates the display update frame (step 540). If so required, theconsumer thread 308 applies (step 550) a lossy compression technique to the update display frame to create a lossy update display frame for transmission to theremote display unit 110. In one embodiment, a photographic codec is used (e.g., JPEG compression using arithmetic encoding). While this type of encoding is more processor intensive, it can decrease the size of the display update frame by as much as thirty percent relative to other codes (e.g., JPEG compression using optimized Huffman encoding). Before applying the lossy compression algorithm, theconsumer thread 308 caches the display update frames prior to applying the lossy compression algorithm. The cached display update frames are subsequently forwarded to the remote display unit once the high update period has ended. - Once the display update frame is constructed, the
consumer thread 308 determines (step 560) the size of the display update frame. The display update frame is communicated (step 570) to thetranslator module 336 of thedriver 312. In one embodiment, thetranslator module 336 converts the display update frame according the transmission protocol of the distributedapplication processing system 100. As part of the conversation, the size of the display update frame is used to determine the time required to send the display update frame to theremote display unit 110. - In one embodiment, the
driver module 312 calculates (step 580) the estimated transmission time by dividing the size of the display update frame by the available bandwidth of thenetwork 140. This calculation results in the dynamically determined time period used by thetimer 332 of theconsumer thread 308. The translated display update frame is send to thenetwork interface 164 and transmitted to theremote display unit 110. - After transmitting the display update frame, the consumer thread remains inactive (step 590) or pauses until the expiration of the dynamically determined time period. After the expiration of the dynamically determined time period, the consumer thread takes another snap shot of the
buffer 304 andupdate array 316 and performs the same process. - In summary and referring to
FIG. 6 , amethod 600 for transmitting screen updates to theremote display unit 110 includes copying display information from a video buffer of a computing device executing an application remotely located from the display unit to generate a display update (step 610); calculating a size of the display update (step 620); determining an amount of available bandwidth of a network connecting the computing device and the display unit (step 630); calculating a time period required to communicate the display update from the computing device to the display unit (step 640); transmitting the display update to the display (step 650); and repeating the method when the calculated time period has elapsed (step 660). - Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific details, it is not intended that such details should be regarded as limitations upon the scope of the invention, except as and to the extent that they are included in the accompanying claims.
Claims (17)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/434,502 US20120191877A1 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2012-03-29 | Method and apparatus for updating a graphical display in a distributed processing environment |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/906,954 US8171169B2 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2005-03-14 | Method and apparatus for updating a graphical display in a distributed processing environment |
US13/434,502 US20120191877A1 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2012-03-29 | Method and apparatus for updating a graphical display in a distributed processing environment |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/906,954 Continuation US8171169B2 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2005-03-14 | Method and apparatus for updating a graphical display in a distributed processing environment |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20120191877A1 true US20120191877A1 (en) | 2012-07-26 |
Family
ID=36972457
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/906,954 Active 2027-06-28 US8171169B2 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2005-03-14 | Method and apparatus for updating a graphical display in a distributed processing environment |
US13/434,502 Abandoned US20120191877A1 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2012-03-29 | Method and apparatus for updating a graphical display in a distributed processing environment |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/906,954 Active 2027-06-28 US8171169B2 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2005-03-14 | Method and apparatus for updating a graphical display in a distributed processing environment |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8171169B2 (en) |
EP (2) | EP1859601A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2008539449A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20070120108A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2006223048A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2601036A1 (en) |
IL (1) | IL185941A0 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006099442A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10713837B1 (en) * | 2014-12-03 | 2020-07-14 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | System and method for causing graphical information to be rendered |
Families Citing this family (42)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7117239B1 (en) | 2000-07-28 | 2006-10-03 | Axeda Corporation | Reporting the state of an apparatus to a remote computer |
US8108543B2 (en) | 2000-09-22 | 2012-01-31 | Axeda Corporation | Retrieving data from a server |
US7185014B1 (en) | 2000-09-22 | 2007-02-27 | Axeda Corporation | Retrieving data from a server |
US7254601B2 (en) | 2001-12-20 | 2007-08-07 | Questra Corporation | Method and apparatus for managing intelligent assets in a distributed environment |
US7178149B2 (en) | 2002-04-17 | 2007-02-13 | Axeda Corporation | XML scripting of soap commands |
US7966418B2 (en) | 2003-02-21 | 2011-06-21 | Axeda Corporation | Establishing a virtual tunnel between two computer programs |
TWI295438B (en) * | 2005-05-11 | 2008-04-01 | Newsoft Technology Corp | Method, system and receiving apparatus for transmitting screen frame from one to many terminals |
US8345768B1 (en) * | 2005-07-28 | 2013-01-01 | Teradici Corporation | Progressive block encoding using region analysis |
US8073941B2 (en) * | 2006-05-25 | 2011-12-06 | AppToU Technologies Ltd. | Method and system for providing remote access to applications |
US8370479B2 (en) | 2006-10-03 | 2013-02-05 | Axeda Acquisition Corporation | System and method for dynamically grouping devices based on present device conditions |
US8065397B2 (en) | 2006-12-26 | 2011-11-22 | Axeda Acquisition Corporation | Managing configurations of distributed devices |
CN101216808A (en) * | 2007-01-04 | 2008-07-09 | 联想(北京)有限公司 | Play system and method |
US8681811B2 (en) * | 2008-02-27 | 2014-03-25 | Ncomputing Inc. | System and method for obtaining cross compatibility with a plurality of thin-client platforms |
JP4827950B2 (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2011-11-30 | 富士通株式会社 | Server device |
CN101645004A (en) * | 2008-08-04 | 2010-02-10 | 优诺威讯国际有限公司 | Method for window display |
US8307086B2 (en) | 2008-08-19 | 2012-11-06 | Facebook, Inc. | Resource management of social network applications |
US8549093B2 (en) * | 2008-09-23 | 2013-10-01 | Strategic Technology Partners, LLC | Updating a user session in a mach-derived system environment |
US8180905B2 (en) * | 2008-12-09 | 2012-05-15 | Microsoft Corporation | User-mode based remote desktop protocol (RDP) encoding architecture |
US9665383B2 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2017-05-30 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Methods and systems for interacting with an imaging device |
JP5353381B2 (en) * | 2009-03-31 | 2013-11-27 | 日本電気株式会社 | Server client system, server, terminal, control method, and program |
US8732749B2 (en) | 2009-04-16 | 2014-05-20 | Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd. | Virtual desktop services |
JP5402415B2 (en) * | 2009-09-02 | 2014-01-29 | カシオ計算機株式会社 | Image transmitting apparatus and program |
US9229734B2 (en) | 2010-01-15 | 2016-01-05 | Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd. | Hospitality media system employing virtual user interfaces |
JP5471794B2 (en) * | 2010-05-10 | 2014-04-16 | 富士通株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, image transmission program, and image display method |
US9003455B2 (en) | 2010-07-30 | 2015-04-07 | Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd. | Hospitality media system employing virtual set top boxes |
US20120082395A1 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2012-04-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Entropy Coder for Image Compression |
JP5259683B2 (en) * | 2010-11-19 | 2013-08-07 | 株式会社東芝 | Server apparatus and program |
JP5664289B2 (en) * | 2011-01-31 | 2015-02-04 | 富士通株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, image transmission program, and image display method |
GB2491165A (en) | 2011-05-26 | 2012-11-28 | Realvnc Ltd | Mobile device having a priority adjusting thread for link wi th remote terminal |
JP5899897B2 (en) * | 2011-12-20 | 2016-04-06 | 富士通株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program |
EP2821920A4 (en) * | 2012-03-02 | 2015-03-25 | Fujitsu Ltd | Image-transmission method, program, and device |
CN102984552B (en) * | 2012-10-23 | 2016-06-22 | 深圳市深信服电子科技有限公司 | Flow control methods and device based on remote application |
JP5821927B2 (en) * | 2013-10-25 | 2015-11-24 | カシオ計算機株式会社 | Image processing apparatus and program |
US9842422B1 (en) | 2014-02-18 | 2017-12-12 | Google Inc. | Methods, systems, and media for presenting interstitial animations |
JP2015191630A (en) * | 2014-03-28 | 2015-11-02 | 富士通株式会社 | Information processing device, change detection method and change detection program |
US9456181B2 (en) | 2015-02-04 | 2016-09-27 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Smart selection of video feeds during an online meeting |
US10572460B2 (en) * | 2016-02-11 | 2020-02-25 | Pure Storage, Inc. | Compressing data in dependence upon characteristics of a storage system |
US9912957B1 (en) | 2017-04-01 | 2018-03-06 | Intel Corporation | Lossless compression for multisample render targets alongside fragment compression |
CN112463277B (en) * | 2018-05-04 | 2022-06-24 | 茨特里克斯系统公司 | Computer system providing hierarchical display remoting with user and system prompt optimization and related methods |
US11824785B2 (en) | 2018-05-04 | 2023-11-21 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for remote computing session display based upon user input event prioritization |
US11017748B2 (en) * | 2018-08-20 | 2021-05-25 | Red Hat, Inc. | Copy-on-write (COW) rendering of graphical object models |
CN109213560B (en) * | 2018-09-12 | 2020-11-27 | 南京尚网网络科技有限公司 | Method and equipment for displaying information page |
Family Cites Families (169)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3596257A (en) * | 1969-09-17 | 1971-07-27 | Burroughs Corp | Method and apparatus for allocating small memory spaces to a computer program |
US4013828A (en) * | 1976-02-20 | 1977-03-22 | Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated | Method and arrangement for reducing the bandwidth and/or time required to transmit a dithered image |
US4410916A (en) | 1979-08-24 | 1983-10-18 | Compression Labs, Inc. | Dual mode facsimile coding system and method |
DE2939411C2 (en) * | 1979-09-28 | 1982-09-02 | Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München | Data processing system with virtual memory addressing |
US4322795A (en) * | 1980-01-24 | 1982-03-30 | Honeywell Information Systems Inc. | Cache memory utilizing selective clearing and least recently used updating |
US4463424A (en) * | 1981-02-19 | 1984-07-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for dynamically allocating LRU/MRU managed memory among concurrent sequential processes |
US4562423A (en) | 1981-10-15 | 1985-12-31 | Codex Corporation | Data compression |
US4430712A (en) * | 1981-11-27 | 1984-02-07 | Storage Technology Corporation | Adaptive domain partitioning of cache memory space |
US4503501A (en) * | 1981-11-27 | 1985-03-05 | Storage Technology Corporation | Adaptive domain partitioning of cache memory space |
USRE32632E (en) * | 1982-07-19 | 1988-03-29 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Display system |
US4499499A (en) * | 1982-12-29 | 1985-02-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for identification and compression of facsimile symbols in text processing systems |
US4545016A (en) | 1983-01-07 | 1985-10-01 | Tandy Corporation | Memory management system |
DE3483489D1 (en) | 1983-04-13 | 1990-12-06 | Nec Corp | MEMORY ACCESS DEVICE IN A DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM. |
JP2785821B2 (en) | 1983-10-07 | 1998-08-13 | ソニー株式会社 | Digital signal generation circuit |
US4796003A (en) * | 1984-06-28 | 1989-01-03 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company | Data compaction |
GB2172127B (en) | 1985-03-06 | 1988-10-12 | Ferranti Plc | Data compression system |
JPS62282328A (en) | 1986-02-21 | 1987-12-08 | Hitachi Ltd | Multiple picture control system |
US4899149A (en) * | 1986-02-28 | 1990-02-06 | Gary Kahan | Method of and apparatus for decoding Huffman or variable-length coees |
US4862392A (en) | 1986-03-07 | 1989-08-29 | Star Technologies, Inc. | Geometry processor for graphics display system |
US4937036A (en) * | 1986-04-28 | 1990-06-26 | Xerox Corporation | Concurrent display of data from two different display processors and user interface therefore |
JP2608400B2 (en) * | 1986-06-16 | 1997-05-07 | 富士写真フイルム株式会社 | Image reconstruction method from compressed image data |
US4862167A (en) | 1987-02-24 | 1989-08-29 | Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc. | Adaptive data compression method and apparatus |
US5072412A (en) | 1987-03-25 | 1991-12-10 | Xerox Corporation | User interface with multiple workspaces for sharing display system objects |
US4949281A (en) | 1987-04-23 | 1990-08-14 | H. Berthold Ag | Method and apparatus for generating and producing two-dimensional graphic object by polynominal parametric curves |
US4992954A (en) * | 1987-08-05 | 1991-02-12 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method of storing character patterns and character pattern utilization system |
US4903218A (en) * | 1987-08-13 | 1990-02-20 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Console emulation for a graphics workstation |
US4928247A (en) * | 1987-08-13 | 1990-05-22 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method and apparatus for the continuous and asynchronous traversal and processing of graphics data structures |
US4870662A (en) | 1987-12-01 | 1989-09-26 | Concord Data Systems, Inc. | System and method for compressing transmitted or stored data |
JPH01246656A (en) | 1988-03-29 | 1989-10-02 | Nec Corp | Inter-processor sharing memory control system |
US5103303A (en) * | 1988-04-19 | 1992-04-07 | Konica Corporation | Multicolor imaging forming apparatus |
US4958303A (en) | 1988-05-12 | 1990-09-18 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Apparatus for exchanging pixel data among pixel processors |
CA1341310C (en) | 1988-07-15 | 2001-10-23 | Robert Filepp | Interactive computer network and method of operation |
JP2790815B2 (en) * | 1988-08-10 | 1998-08-27 | 株式会社リコー | Image data compression method |
US4905141A (en) * | 1988-10-25 | 1990-02-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Partitioned cache memory with partition look-aside table (PLAT) for early partition assignment identification |
US5043919A (en) | 1988-12-19 | 1991-08-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of and system for updating a display unit |
US5126739A (en) * | 1989-01-13 | 1992-06-30 | Stac Electronics | Data compression apparatus and method |
US5016009A (en) * | 1989-01-13 | 1991-05-14 | Stac, Inc. | Data compression apparatus and method |
EP0389151A3 (en) * | 1989-03-22 | 1992-06-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for partitioned cache memory management |
US5394531A (en) * | 1989-04-03 | 1995-02-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic storage allocation system for a prioritized cache |
KR930003126B1 (en) * | 1989-04-20 | 1993-04-19 | 가부시기가이샤 도시바 | Method and system for detemining connection states of straight short vectors |
US5305440A (en) * | 1989-05-15 | 1994-04-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | File extension by clients in a distributed data processing system |
JP2858795B2 (en) * | 1989-07-14 | 1999-02-17 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Real memory allocation method |
EP0416768B1 (en) | 1989-09-08 | 1998-06-17 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Thread private memory storage for multi-thread digital data processors |
JP2805096B2 (en) | 1989-10-31 | 1998-09-30 | ソニー株式会社 | Digital modulation method and demodulation method |
US5119319A (en) * | 1989-12-14 | 1992-06-02 | Options Unlimited Research Corp. | Full-duplex video communication system |
US5001478A (en) * | 1989-12-28 | 1991-03-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of encoding compressed data |
US5309555A (en) * | 1990-05-15 | 1994-05-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Realtime communication of hand drawn images in a multiprogramming window environment |
US5269003A (en) | 1990-05-24 | 1993-12-07 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Memory architecture for storing twisted pixels |
US5049881A (en) | 1990-06-18 | 1991-09-17 | Intersecting Concepts, Inc. | Apparatus and method for very high data rate-compression incorporating lossless data compression and expansion utilizing a hashing technique |
EP0463874A2 (en) * | 1990-06-29 | 1992-01-02 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Cache arrangement for file system in digital data processing system |
US5051745A (en) | 1990-08-21 | 1991-09-24 | Pkware, Inc. | String searcher, and compressor using same |
JPH0799508B2 (en) | 1990-10-15 | 1995-10-25 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション | Method and system for dynamically partitioning cache storage |
US5544317A (en) * | 1990-11-20 | 1996-08-06 | Berg; David A. | Method for continuing transmission of commands for interactive graphics presentation in a computer network |
US5241625A (en) | 1990-11-27 | 1993-08-31 | Farallon Computing, Inc. | Screen image sharing among heterogeneous computers |
US5307456A (en) * | 1990-12-04 | 1994-04-26 | Sony Electronics, Inc. | Integrated multi-media production and authoring system |
US5339411A (en) | 1990-12-21 | 1994-08-16 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Method for managing allocation of memory space |
DE69133032T2 (en) * | 1990-12-26 | 2003-01-30 | Canon K.K., Tokio/Tokyo | Multimedia communication device |
US5161015A (en) | 1990-12-31 | 1992-11-03 | Zenith Electronics Corporation | System for peaking a video signal with a control signal representative of the perceptual nature of blocks of video pixels |
GB9100732D0 (en) | 1991-01-14 | 1991-02-27 | Xerox Corp | A data access system |
US5317732A (en) * | 1991-04-26 | 1994-05-31 | Commodore Electronics Limited | System for relocating a multimedia presentation on a different platform by extracting a resource map in order to remap and relocate resources |
US5164727A (en) | 1991-04-30 | 1992-11-17 | Regents Of The Unversity Of California | Optimal decoding method and apparatus for data acquisition applications of sigma delta modulators |
US5359712A (en) | 1991-05-06 | 1994-10-25 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for transitioning between sequences of digital information |
CA2069355C (en) | 1991-06-07 | 1998-10-06 | Robert C. Pike | Global user interface |
US6643656B2 (en) * | 1991-07-31 | 2003-11-04 | Richard Esty Peterson | Computerized information retrieval system |
EP0526064B1 (en) * | 1991-08-02 | 1997-09-10 | The Grass Valley Group, Inc. | Video editing system operator interface for visualization and interactive control of video material |
US5321806A (en) * | 1991-08-21 | 1994-06-14 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmitting graphics command in a computer graphics system |
US5315698A (en) * | 1991-08-21 | 1994-05-24 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method and apparatus for varying command length in a computer graphics system |
US5140321A (en) | 1991-09-04 | 1992-08-18 | Prime Computer, Inc. | Data compression/decompression method and apparatus |
CA2083634C (en) * | 1991-12-30 | 1999-01-19 | Hung Ping Wong | Method and apparatus for mapping page table trees into virtual address space for address translation |
GB9205774D0 (en) | 1992-03-17 | 1992-04-29 | Int Computers Ltd | Computer security system |
US5351129A (en) | 1992-03-24 | 1994-09-27 | Rgb Technology D/B/A Rgb Spectrum | Video multiplexor-encoder and decoder-converter |
JPH06511582A (en) | 1992-07-24 | 1994-12-22 | マイクロソフト コーポレイション | Computer method and system for allocating and freeing memory |
US5404316A (en) * | 1992-08-03 | 1995-04-04 | Spectra Group Ltd., Inc. | Desktop digital video processing system |
JPH0659982A (en) | 1992-08-10 | 1994-03-04 | Hitachi Ltd | Method and device for controlling virtual storage |
US5406279A (en) * | 1992-09-02 | 1995-04-11 | Cirrus Logic, Inc. | General purpose, hash-based technique for single-pass lossless data compression |
US5434992A (en) * | 1992-09-04 | 1995-07-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and means for dynamically partitioning cache into a global and data type subcache hierarchy from a real time reference trace |
US5491808A (en) * | 1992-09-30 | 1996-02-13 | Conner Peripherals, Inc. | Method for tracking memory allocation in network file server |
DE69324204T2 (en) * | 1992-10-22 | 1999-12-23 | Cabletron Systems, Inc. | Searching for addresses during packet transmission using hashing and a content-addressed memory |
US5537551A (en) * | 1992-11-18 | 1996-07-16 | Denenberg; Jeffrey N. | Data compression method for use in a computerized informational and transactional network |
US5455576A (en) | 1992-12-23 | 1995-10-03 | Hewlett Packard Corporation | Apparatus and methods for Lempel Ziv data compression with improved management of multiple dictionaries in content addressable memory |
US5469540A (en) | 1993-01-27 | 1995-11-21 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for generating and displaying multiple simultaneously-active windows |
IL104568A (en) * | 1993-01-31 | 1995-12-31 | Age Computational Graphics Ltd | Method and system for producing enhanced output signals |
CA2127053C (en) * | 1993-07-02 | 2005-01-04 | Makoto Furuhashi | Method and apparatus for time-sharing cpu system bus in image generation system |
US5521597A (en) * | 1993-08-02 | 1996-05-28 | Mircosoft Corporation | Data compression for network transport |
US5432871A (en) * | 1993-08-04 | 1995-07-11 | Universal Systems & Technology, Inc. | Systems and methods for interactive image data acquisition and compression |
WO1995012165A1 (en) | 1993-10-22 | 1995-05-04 | Gestalt Technologies, Incorporated | Distributed management in a partitioned memory system |
US5384568A (en) * | 1993-12-02 | 1995-01-24 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Data compression |
US5515508A (en) * | 1993-12-17 | 1996-05-07 | Taligent, Inc. | Client server system and method of operation including a dynamically configurable protocol stack |
US5461711A (en) | 1993-12-22 | 1995-10-24 | Interval Research Corporation | Method and system for spatial accessing of time-based information |
US5550965A (en) | 1993-12-27 | 1996-08-27 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and system for operating a data processor to index primary data in real time with iconic table of contents |
US5473742A (en) | 1994-02-22 | 1995-12-05 | Paragraph International | Method and apparatus for representing image data using polynomial approximation method and iterative transformation-reparametrization technique |
US5537635A (en) * | 1994-04-04 | 1996-07-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for assignment of reclaim vectors in a partitioned cache with a virtual minimum partition size |
US5754187A (en) | 1994-05-16 | 1998-05-19 | Agfa Division, Bayer Corporation | Method for data compression of digital data to produce a scaleable font database |
US5734388A (en) | 1994-05-16 | 1998-03-31 | Agfa Division, Bayer Corporation | Method and apparatus for data compression of digital data to produce a scaleable font database |
US5729710A (en) * | 1994-06-22 | 1998-03-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for management of mapped and unmapped regions of memory in a microkernel data processing system |
US5572206A (en) | 1994-07-06 | 1996-11-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Data compression method and system |
US5485460A (en) * | 1994-08-19 | 1996-01-16 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for running multiple incompatible network protocol stacks |
US5566288A (en) | 1994-09-02 | 1996-10-15 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and method for automatically fitting a B-spline curve to a set of data points |
US5802281A (en) | 1994-09-07 | 1998-09-01 | Rsi Systems, Inc. | Peripheral audio/video communication system that interfaces with a host computer and determines format of coded audio/video signals |
US7190284B1 (en) * | 1994-11-16 | 2007-03-13 | Dye Thomas A | Selective lossless, lossy, or no compression of data based on address range, data type, and/or requesting agent |
US5574845A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1996-11-12 | Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. | Method and apparatus video data management |
US5771383A (en) * | 1994-12-27 | 1998-06-23 | International Business Machines Corp. | Shared memory support method and apparatus for a microkernel data processing system |
US5771034A (en) * | 1995-01-23 | 1998-06-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Font format |
EP0734144A3 (en) | 1995-03-20 | 1999-08-18 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and apparatus for determination of user charges in a subscriber apparatus |
US5621660A (en) | 1995-04-18 | 1997-04-15 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Software-based encoder for a software-implemented end-to-end scalable video delivery system |
US5651136A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1997-07-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for increasing cache efficiency through optimized data allocation |
US5864711A (en) * | 1995-07-05 | 1999-01-26 | Microsoft Corporation | System for determining more accurate translation between first and second translator, and providing translated data to second computer if first translator is more accurate |
US5874960A (en) * | 1995-07-05 | 1999-02-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for sharing applications between computer systems |
US5742797A (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 1998-04-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic off-screen display memory manager |
US5767849A (en) * | 1995-08-18 | 1998-06-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Personality neutral window management subsystem |
US5835959A (en) | 1995-12-01 | 1998-11-10 | Sand Technology Systems International, Inc. | Memory management system and method using dual indexing structures |
US5850632A (en) | 1995-09-08 | 1998-12-15 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Memory access controller utilizing cache memory to store configuration information |
US6081623A (en) * | 1995-10-11 | 2000-06-27 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method for lossless bandwidth compression of a series of glyphs |
US6016535A (en) * | 1995-10-11 | 2000-01-18 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method for dynamically and efficiently caching objects by subdividing cache memory blocks into equally-sized sub-blocks |
US5826027A (en) | 1995-10-11 | 1998-10-20 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method for supporting an extensible and dynamically bindable protocol stack in a distrubited process system |
US5717879A (en) * | 1995-11-03 | 1998-02-10 | Xerox Corporation | System for the capture and replay of temporal data representing collaborative activities |
US6161126A (en) | 1995-12-13 | 2000-12-12 | Immersion Corporation | Implementing force feedback over the World Wide Web and other computer networks |
JPH09233467A (en) | 1996-02-21 | 1997-09-05 | Fujitsu Ltd | Image data communication equipment and communication data amount control method for image data communication system |
US5961588A (en) | 1996-02-22 | 1999-10-05 | Alcatel Usa Sourcing, L.P. | Handling of commands passed between the server and client stations of a telecommunications system |
US5740171A (en) * | 1996-03-28 | 1998-04-14 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | Address translation mechanism for a high-performance network switch |
US5923654A (en) * | 1996-04-25 | 1999-07-13 | Compaq Computer Corp. | Network switch that includes a plurality of shared packet buffers |
US5864678A (en) * | 1996-05-08 | 1999-01-26 | Apple Computer, Inc. | System for detecting and reporting data flow imbalance between computers using grab rate outflow rate arrival rate and play rate |
US6034689A (en) * | 1996-06-03 | 2000-03-07 | Webtv Networks, Inc. | Web browser allowing navigation between hypertext objects using remote control |
US6057857A (en) * | 1996-06-12 | 2000-05-02 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method for the lossless compression of lines in a distributed computer system |
US6014133A (en) * | 1996-06-14 | 2000-01-11 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Data transmitter/receiver apparatus, data transmitter, data receiver, and data compression method |
KR100203266B1 (en) | 1996-07-09 | 1999-06-15 | 윤종용 | A contour decoding apparatus |
US5757925A (en) * | 1996-07-23 | 1998-05-26 | Faybishenko; Yaroslav | Secure platform independent cross-platform remote execution computer system and method |
US5918019A (en) * | 1996-07-29 | 1999-06-29 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Virtual dial-up protocol for network communication |
US5761734A (en) * | 1996-08-13 | 1998-06-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Token-based serialisation of instructions in a multiprocessor system |
US6052120A (en) * | 1996-10-01 | 2000-04-18 | Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. | Method of operating a portable interactive graphics display tablet and communications systems |
US5944791A (en) | 1996-10-04 | 1999-08-31 | Contigo Software Llc | Collaborative web browser |
US5931904A (en) | 1996-10-11 | 1999-08-03 | At&T Corp. | Method for reducing the delay between the time a data page is requested and the time the data page is displayed |
US5913230A (en) * | 1997-01-07 | 1999-06-15 | Richardson; John J. | Object and method for providing efficient multi-user access to shared operating system kernal code using instancing |
US5949975A (en) | 1997-03-12 | 1999-09-07 | Microsoft Corp. | Method and system for negotiating capabilities when sharing an application program with multiple computer systems |
GB2323946B (en) | 1997-04-04 | 2002-04-17 | Sony Uk Ltd | Database accessing method and apparatus |
US6061714A (en) * | 1997-05-07 | 2000-05-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Persistent cache synchronization and start up system |
US5983190A (en) | 1997-05-19 | 1999-11-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Client server animation system for managing interactive user interface characters |
US5877757A (en) * | 1997-05-23 | 1999-03-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for providing user help information in network applications |
US6879266B1 (en) * | 1997-08-08 | 2005-04-12 | Quickshift, Inc. | Memory module including scalable embedded parallel data compression and decompression engines |
US5999950A (en) | 1997-08-11 | 1999-12-07 | Webtv Networks, Inc. | Japanese text input method using a keyboard with only base kana characters |
US5999179A (en) | 1997-11-17 | 1999-12-07 | Fujitsu Limited | Platform independent computer network management client |
US6363511B1 (en) * | 1998-03-31 | 2002-03-26 | Stmicroelectronics N.V. | Device and method for decoding data streams from storage media |
US6253212B1 (en) * | 1998-06-23 | 2001-06-26 | Oracle Corporation | Method and system for maintaining checkpoint values |
US6624761B2 (en) * | 1998-12-11 | 2003-09-23 | Realtime Data, Llc | Content independent data compression method and system |
US6233226B1 (en) * | 1998-12-14 | 2001-05-15 | Verizon Laboratories Inc. | System and method for analyzing and transmitting video over a switched network |
JP4473455B2 (en) * | 1999-01-12 | 2010-06-02 | 富士通株式会社 | Access control apparatus and method for controlling access to recording medium |
US6822589B1 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2004-11-23 | Quickshift, Inc. | System and method for performing scalable embedded parallel data decompression |
US7129860B2 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2006-10-31 | Quickshift, Inc. | System and method for performing scalable embedded parallel data decompression |
US20010054131A1 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2001-12-20 | Alvarez Manuel J. | System and method for perfoming scalable embedded parallel data compression |
US6483515B1 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2002-11-19 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for displaying data patterns in information systems |
US6778346B2 (en) * | 2000-03-30 | 2004-08-17 | Sony Corporation | Recording and reproducing apparatus and file managing method using the same |
US7218784B1 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2007-05-15 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for controlling image quality and compression ratios |
US20020029285A1 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2002-03-07 | Henry Collins | Adapting graphical data, processing activity to changing network conditions |
JP4332770B2 (en) * | 2000-08-02 | 2009-09-16 | ソニー株式会社 | Image processing apparatus, image processing method, and recording medium |
US7212726B2 (en) * | 2000-09-15 | 2007-05-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method of processing MPEG streams for file index insertion |
US20030051005A1 (en) * | 2001-09-13 | 2003-03-13 | Burch Charles Carroll | Apparatus for encapsulating data within a self-defining file and method thereof |
US7143046B2 (en) * | 2001-12-28 | 2006-11-28 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | System and method for compressing a data table using models |
US6753870B2 (en) * | 2002-01-30 | 2004-06-22 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Graphics system configured to switch between multiple sample buffer contexts |
US7328150B2 (en) * | 2002-09-04 | 2008-02-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Innovations in pure lossless audio compression |
US7424434B2 (en) * | 2002-09-04 | 2008-09-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Unified lossy and lossless audio compression |
US7536305B2 (en) * | 2002-09-04 | 2009-05-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Mixed lossless audio compression |
US6798362B2 (en) * | 2002-10-30 | 2004-09-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Polynomial-time, sequential, adaptive system and method for lossy data compression |
JP4305055B2 (en) * | 2003-05-22 | 2009-07-29 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Image recording device |
WO2004111773A2 (en) * | 2003-06-02 | 2004-12-23 | Infocus Corporation | Image display device and method of announcing a presence of an image display device over network |
US7251372B2 (en) * | 2004-01-14 | 2007-07-31 | Nec Solutions (America) Inc. | Method and system for compressing digitized fingerprint images by a uniform degree of compression |
US7656561B2 (en) * | 2004-05-31 | 2010-02-02 | Phase One A/S | Image compression for rapid high-quality imaging |
US7283674B2 (en) * | 2004-06-25 | 2007-10-16 | Xerox Corporation | Using graphic objects in MFD scan-to-export function |
US7570819B2 (en) * | 2005-01-28 | 2009-08-04 | Chih-Ta Star Sung | Method and apparatus for displaying images with compression mechanism |
US20060195464A1 (en) * | 2005-02-28 | 2006-08-31 | Microsoft Corporation | Dynamic data delivery |
-
2005
- 2005-03-14 US US10/906,954 patent/US8171169B2/en active Active
-
2006
- 2006-03-14 EP EP06738283A patent/EP1859601A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2006-03-14 KR KR1020077021111A patent/KR20070120108A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2006-03-14 EP EP10184683.0A patent/EP2267975B1/en active Active
- 2006-03-14 AU AU2006223048A patent/AU2006223048A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2006-03-14 WO PCT/US2006/009204 patent/WO2006099442A1/en active Application Filing
- 2006-03-14 JP JP2008501980A patent/JP2008539449A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2006-03-14 CA CA002601036A patent/CA2601036A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2007
- 2007-09-16 IL IL185941A patent/IL185941A0/en active IP Right Grant
-
2012
- 2012-03-29 US US13/434,502 patent/US20120191877A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10713837B1 (en) * | 2014-12-03 | 2020-07-14 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | System and method for causing graphical information to be rendered |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US8171169B2 (en) | 2012-05-01 |
KR20070120108A (en) | 2007-12-21 |
CA2601036A1 (en) | 2006-09-21 |
IL185941A0 (en) | 2008-01-06 |
EP2267975A2 (en) | 2010-12-29 |
AU2006223048A1 (en) | 2006-09-21 |
EP2267975B1 (en) | 2018-11-14 |
US20060206820A1 (en) | 2006-09-14 |
WO2006099442A1 (en) | 2006-09-21 |
JP2008539449A (en) | 2008-11-13 |
EP2267975A3 (en) | 2012-01-18 |
EP1859601A1 (en) | 2007-11-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8171169B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for updating a graphical display in a distributed processing environment | |
US8677022B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for updating a graphical display in a distributed processing environment using compression | |
EP1285517B1 (en) | Method and system for efficiently reducing graphical display data for transmission over a low bandwidth transport protocol mechanism | |
EP1326405B1 (en) | Method and system for efficiently reducing graphical display data for transmission over a low bandwidth transport protocol mechanism | |
AU2006202299A1 (en) | Method and system for efficiently reducing graphical display data for transmission over a low bandwidth transport protocol mechanism | |
AU2006202293A1 (en) | Method and system for efficiently reducing graphical display data for transmission over a low bandwidth transport protocol mechanism |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., FLORIDA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BULLARD, JUSTIN;OPFERMAN, TOBY;REEL/FRAME:030259/0213 Effective date: 20050317 Owner name: CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., FLORIDA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:THE BOEING COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:030258/0370 Effective date: 20060105 Owner name: THE BOEING COMPANY, ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KASIK, DAVID J.;REEL/FRAME:030259/0220 Effective date: 20050317 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION |