US20120160018A1 - Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion - Google Patents

Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120160018A1
US20120160018A1 US13/408,655 US201213408655A US2012160018A1 US 20120160018 A1 US20120160018 A1 US 20120160018A1 US 201213408655 A US201213408655 A US 201213408655A US 2012160018 A1 US2012160018 A1 US 2012160018A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
reservoir
sample
formation
measurements
fluid
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/408,655
Inventor
Christopher M. Jones
Louis W. Elrod
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Original Assignee
Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Halliburton Energy Services Inc filed Critical Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Priority to US13/408,655 priority Critical patent/US20120160018A1/en
Publication of US20120160018A1 publication Critical patent/US20120160018A1/en
Priority to US15/074,315 priority patent/US10775359B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/24Earth materials
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N15/00Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume, or surface-area of porous materials
    • G01N15/08Investigating permeability, pore-volume, or surface area of porous materials
    • G01N15/0806Details, e.g. sample holders, mounting samples for testing
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N15/00Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume, or surface-area of porous materials
    • G01N15/08Investigating permeability, pore-volume, or surface area of porous materials
    • G01N15/088Investigating volume, surface area, size or distribution of pores; Porosimetry
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/24Earth materials
    • G01N33/241Earth materials for hydrocarbon content

Definitions

  • Embodiments of the present invention relate to the measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion. Specifically, embodiments of the present invention relate to the measurement of porosity and permeability for application in the oilfield industry.
  • Diagnosing the structure of porous materials is relevant to a broad range of scientific and technological problems.
  • Knowledge of the fluid transport properties of reservoir rocks is important for the monitoring of contaminant levels in reservoir rock samples and for information related to extracting oil, such as in determining oil well value and characterizing formations for making real-time or near real-time decisions in drilling.
  • Understanding porosity and permeability is important for determining the quantity and producibility of hydrocarbons in a reservoir system.
  • permeability is a measure of the ability of a rock to transmit fluid through pore spaces.
  • Effective porosity describes the interconnected pore volume or void space in a rock that contributes to fluid flow or permeability in a reservoir. Effective porosity excludes isolated pores and pore volume occupied by water adsorbed on clay minerals or other grains.
  • Porosity and permeability measurements are readily measured with existing techniques, but are usually measured separately and the methods can be invasive, toxic, or both. Effective porosity is also difficult to measure directly utilizing current techniques.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a block flow diagram describing the measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion, according to some embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a block flow diagram describing the measurement of porosity and permeability properties by diffusion, according to some embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates block flow diagram describing the continuous measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion, according to some embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a block flow diagram describing the continuous measurement of porosity and permeability properties by diffusion, according to some embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a perspective view of an apparatus to measure formation rock properties by diffusion, according to some embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a graphical view depicting the concentration of a species versus time.
  • references in the specification to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “an example embodiment”, etc., indicate that the embodiment described may include a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every embodiment may not necessarily include the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover, such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic is described in connection with an embodiment, it is submitted that it is within the knowledge of one skilled in the art to affect such feature, structure, or characteristic in connection with other embodiments whether or not explicitly described.
  • the embodiments of the present invention relate the measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion.
  • a sample ( 1 ) may be placed ( 3 ) in a reservoir ( 5 ). While the reservoir and sample are equilibrating, an aliquot ( 9 ) may be removed ( 7 ) for analysis ( 11 ), providing formation measurements ( 13 ).
  • FIG. 2 a method to provide porosity and permeability measurements by diffusion is shown, according to some embodiments of the invention.
  • An alternative sample ( 15 ) is analyzed ( 17 ) to determine its salinity ( 19 ).
  • the salinity determined alternative sample ( 19 ) is then used to adjust the salinity of the reservoir ( 21 ) to match any samples ( 1 ).
  • a sample ( 1 ) is placed in the reservoir ( 3 ) in which the salinity has been adjusted ( 5 ). While the reservoir and sample are equilibrating, aliquots ( 9 ) may be removed ( 7 ).
  • the aliquots are analyzed ( 11 ) for diffusion measurements ( 13 ).
  • the sample is removed to determine surface area ( 23 ).
  • the surface area measurements ( 25 ) and diffusion measurements ( 13 ) are used to calculate formation information ( 27 ), such as porosity and permeability ( 29 ).
  • a sample ( 1 ) may be placed ( 3 ) in a reservoir ( 5 ). While the reservoir and sample are equilibrating, continuous analysis is performed ( 31 ), providing formation measurements ( 13 ).
  • FIG. 4 a method to provide continuous porosity and permeability measurements by diffusion is shown, according to some embodiments of the invention.
  • An alternative sample ( 15 ) is analyzed ( 17 ) to determine its salinity ( 19 ).
  • the salinity determined alternative sample ( 19 ) is then used to adjust the salinity of the reservoir ( 21 ) to match any samples ( 1 ).
  • a sample ( 1 ) is placed in the reservoir ( 3 ) in which the salinity has been adjusted ( 5 ). While the reservoir and sample are equilibrating, continuous analysis is performed ( 31 ), providing diffusion measurements ( 13 ).
  • the sample is removed to determine surface area ( 23 ).
  • the surface area measurements ( 25 ) and diffusion measurements ( 13 ) are used to calculate formation information ( 27 ), such as porosity and permeability ( 29 ).
  • a reservoir ( 33 ) may be coupled to an injection port ( 35 ).
  • the reservoir ( 33 ) may be further coupled to a sampler ( 37 ).
  • An agitator ( 47 ) may be positioned adjacent to the reservoir ( 33 ).
  • An instrument for analysis ( 41 ) may be coupled to the sampler ( 37 ).
  • an automatic fluid titrator ( 39 ) may be coupled to the reservoir ( 33 ).
  • a screen ( 45 ) may also be positioned near the bottom of the reservoir ( 33 ).
  • a computer ( 43 ) may optionally be coupled to any one or combination of the sampler ( 37 ), instrument for analysis ( 41 ), automatic fluid titrator ( 39 ), injection port ( 35 ), agitator ( 47 ) and reservoir ( 33 ).
  • sample ( 1 ) is collected and placed ( 3 ) in a reservoir ( 5 ).
  • sample ( 1 ) refers to a representative portion of a whole.
  • sample ( 1 ) may be defined as a small segment or quantity taken as evidence of the quality or character of the entire group or lot.
  • samples may be in liquid, solid or gas form, and in the oilfield industry, taken from the cuttings or core.
  • Further examples of samples include any rock samples of sufficient size including core chips, core trim, sidewall cores, and outcrop samples. Cuttings refer to rock particles brought to the surface in well drilling.
  • Core refers to a cylindrical sample of rock retrieved from a well.
  • the cuttings or core may be rinsed of drilling or coring fluid and, if cuttings, may be sieved to an appropriate mesh size.
  • mesh size refers to one of the openings between the threads, cords or wires of a screen or net. Mesh size is often used to designate a size of screen or of the material passed by a screen in terms of the number of such openings per linear inch.
  • Sieving may refer to separating or separating out by putting through a sieve or sifter or meshed material.
  • An alternative sample ( 15 ) is used to determine the salinity ( 17 ) of the target sample ( 1 ) by various techniques used in the industry.
  • salinity refers to a concentration of salt.
  • the alternative sample ( 15 ) may be cuttings or core and preferably collected simultaneously or near in time and place to the target sample ( 1 ).
  • Salinity is important to maintain because changes in salinity may affect porosity and permeability measurements of a sample ( 1 ). Effort must be taken to retain the salinity in the sample while allowing water to freely exchange between the sample and reservoir. For example, fresh water may swell clay samples, destroying both porosity and permeability.
  • One method to maintain salinity may be to use a semi-permeable membrane placed between the sample ( 1 ) and reservoir ( 33 ).
  • An undesirable effect may be that osmotic pressure builds at the interface. Therefore, the osmotic pressure could be monitored and mathematically-experimentally accounted for or the pressure could be balanced by adjusting the salinity of the reservoir side of the interface.
  • a quick titration could be performed until osmotic pressures balance and then measurements could be carried out.
  • a saline addition to the reservoir side of the interface could be prepared ahead of time by matching the expected salinity of the sample ( 1 ) with information derived from the alternative sample ( 15 ).
  • An advantage of using a semi-permeable membrane is that only salinity need be matched without regard to the specific water composition.
  • a semi-permeable membrane may work better in dealing with a core sample rather than cuttings.
  • Salinity may also be matched without the use of a semi-permeable membrane. If no membrane is used and only salinity is matched, the cations of the reservoir solution may exchange with the cations at the surface of the sample, which may change the sample properties. This effect may be negligible, but should be considered. To remedy such an effect, one skilled in the art could use an ion that is more soluble than other ions. By matching the salinity with this ion, it ensures that the salinity-matching ion will not exchange with ions on the surface of the sample. For example, cesium may be such an ion.
  • Another technique to regulate the salinity of the reservoir may be to mimic the properties of the target sample in the reservoir solution, using pre-measurements of an alternative sample ( 15 ).
  • Formation water sample water
  • the reservoir could be titrated to match the salinity of the sample to a reasonable degree of accuracy. All sample pre-measurements, titration, salinity calculations and osmotic measurements could be automated.
  • the sample in reservoir ( 5 ) is optionally agitated to assist in equilibrating the sample and reservoir.
  • the agitator may be a stirrer or more specifically, a magnetic stirrer. If a porous body saturated with fluid, such as a cuttings or core sample, is placed into a solution that is miscible with the saturation fluid, the fluids will exchange on a molecular level driven by diffusion even in the absence of any fluid potential. In some embodiments, diffusion refers to the random motion of molecules in a liquid or gas (or, very slowly, in a solid). The exchange will continue until equilibrium is reached with a rate described as an exponential process with respect to time.
  • Fluid properties may be subdivided into solute and solution properties.
  • the diffusion constant for a solute is higher at higher temperatures and lower for particles of higher mass.
  • Another important solute property is characterized as the interaction of the solute particle with the medium of interest, called solute and medium (SAM) interaction.
  • SAM solute and medium
  • the SAM interaction may be high for an organic molecule on a clay surface, but low for an uncharged silver colloid particle of equal mass.
  • the main solution property of interest is viscosity, in which the diffusion constant depends.
  • the viscosity may be referred to as a fluid's internal resistance to motion.
  • the diffusion constant is inversely proportional to the fluid viscosity and particle radius. Since most fluids' viscosity is a function of temperature, the temperature effect of diffusion to a higher order will be nonlinear.
  • Properties of the porous medium may be the SAM interactions mentioned, as well as the critical pore size.
  • the critical pore size may be defined as the average of the largest openings connecting pores of a medium along a continuous path, also called the pore throat.
  • the pore throat is the critical parameter of permeability.
  • permeability refers to the property of a porous material that is measured by the rate by volume at which a fluid of unit viscosity passes through unit cross section of the material under unit pressure gradient.
  • the rate of decrease in the amount of substance is proportional to a concentration gradient throughout the porous medium, the surface area of the porous medium exposed to the fluid, and the diffusion constant. Therefore, as the total reservoir concentration decreases, the rate of diffusion decreases. If one skilled in the art were to monitor the concentration of particles in the reservoir, an exponential decrease would be observed over time.
  • the concentration may be monitored ( 11 ) by removing ( 7 ) small aliquots ( 9 ) from the sample in reservoir ( 5 ) as equilibrium is being established. Aliquot may refer to a portion of a solution. In some embodiments, equilibrium refers to the state in which the forward and reverse rates of all diffusion processes are equal, so that the concentrations of all species remain constant.
  • a probe may be used to monitor ( 31 ) the concentration in the reservoir continuously or intermittently without removing a portion of the sample ( 1 ), as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 .
  • the concentration may be analyzed or monitored using an analysis instrument.
  • the concentration may be measured in the reservoir solution or in the headspace of a closed container, for example.
  • the analysis instrument may utilize spectroscopy, for example.
  • spectroscopy refers to the science that deals with the interactions of various types of radiation with matter.
  • a radiation source first interacts with a sample.
  • a detector then records the type of interaction, such as absorbance, transmittance or emission.
  • the electrical signals from the detector are converted to useful numbers or a visual display such as a spectrum.
  • laser spectroscopy may be employed and refers to spectroscopy in which a laser is utilized as the source of radiation. Laser is an acronym for light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation.
  • spectrometer refers to an instrument that provides information about the intensity of radiation as a function of wavelength or frequency. The concentration may be monitored by detecting an isotopic species in the reservoir.
  • isotopic species refers to a detectable isotope used to track a process or analyze a sample. For example, deuterated water or 18 O labeled water could be the isotopic species detected in the reservoir. Alternatively, specific ions may be detected by the analysis instrument, such as cesium iodide or cesium bromide salt.
  • porosity refers to the ratio of the volume of interstices of a material to the volume of its mass.
  • Effective porosity may be defined as the interconnected pore volume or void space in a rock that contributes to fluid flow or permeability in a reservoir. Effective porosity excludes isolated pores and pore volume occupied by water adsorbed on clay minerals or other grains. Total porosity is the total void space in the rock whether or not it contributes to fluid flow. Effective porosity is typically less than total porosity.
  • solute particles generally only exchange with a miscible phase, it is only the volume of effective pore space occupied by a miscible phase that is measured. For example, if oil and water are present or if oil, water and gas are present, it will only be the volume occupied by the water that is measured. If the effective pore space is measured by saturation of the media with a single phase then both the true effective pore space and water saturation can be determined.
  • FIG. 6 is an example of a concentration measurement to calculate effective porosity.
  • the initial concentration was defined at 30 ppm and the equilibrium concentration at 10 ppm.
  • the exponential constant of diffusion multiplied by the surface area was defined for a 4′′ cube of cuttings, each with a diameter of 0.25 cm from a well-sorted sand stone reservoir.
  • a constant error line of 2% was added to this line in the plot.
  • the first line shows the extrapolated curve for the defined situation as compared to the second line which is the extrapolated noisy line.
  • the fit parameters show close agreement with the defined parameters.
  • the defined effective porosity was 0.260.
  • the porosity calculation was completed without the use of the exponential constant. Although the calculation was completed assuming a total volume of a 4′′ cube, once could monitor the volume of displacement in the reservoir to calculate the bulk volume of cuttings. Because this calculation is independent of surface area, the measurement should only be limited by the accuracy with which the concentrations can be determined.
  • C e (C I V R +C M V M )/(V R +V M ) where C e is the equilibrium concentration, C I is the initial concentration of the reservoir, V R is the volume of the reservoir, V M is the volume of the medium and C M is the initial concentration of the porous medium.
  • This measurement may require a background measurement of the porous medium's fluid content.
  • the experimental curve shown in FIG. 6 may be more complicated if two types of permeability exist, such as matrix and secondary-fracture, for example.
  • Matrix permeability may be created by the finer grained, interstitial particles that lie between larger particles or in which larger particles are embedded in sedimentary rocks such as sandstones and conglomerates.
  • Secondary fracture permeability may be created by an alteration in the rock.
  • the experimental curve may then be the sum of the two exponential processes.
  • the curve may be modeled as a double exponential. The fit would then yield parameters specific to the matrix permeability, fracture permeability, matrix porosity and fracture porosity.
  • the cuttings or core sample may be removed ( 23 ) from the reservoir in order to conduct surface area measurements ( 25 ).
  • knowledge of the surface area may be a trivial matter.
  • To determine the surface area of cuttings a more rigorous approach is usually needed.
  • Various methods may be employed to determine the surface area of a sample ( 1 ), such as image analysis, characterization of cuttings based on a repeated sieve cut, measuring the charge buildup on a sample, measuring surface adsorption of a gas onto a solid object or measuring the volume of a thin film of a viscous fluid on the surface of the sample.
  • Diffusion and permeability both depend on the pore throat and the distance that the detected species travels. Flow of a fluid is proportional to the difference in pressure over a distance with the constant being permeability. Diffusion is proportional to a difference in concentration over a distance with the constant being the diffusion constant. Therefore, the diffusion constant measurements can be used to calculate permeability and porosity information.
  • a reservoir ( 33 ) may be coupled to an injection port ( 35 ).
  • reservoir refers to a part of an apparatus in which a liquid is held.
  • the reservoir may be any shape or size, so long as it is capable of holding a sample ( 1 ) and a solution which is capable of diffusing into the sample ( 1 ).
  • Injection port may refer to the port in which an element or factor is introduced in or into some situation or subject.
  • the injection port may be automated or be any device or port that allows for introduction of a sample.
  • the reservoir ( 33 ) may be further coupled to a sampler ( 37 ).
  • sampler refers to a device that collects a representative sample for analysis.
  • sampler ( 37 ) refers to a probe that takes continuous or intermittent readings from the reservoir or reservoir headspace.
  • the sampler ( 37 ) may also be a probe that can measure concentration continuously or intermittently within the reservoir.
  • An agitator ( 47 ) may be positioned adjacent to the reservoir ( 33 ). Agitator may refer to a power-driven apparatus for stirring.
  • the agitator may be a magnetic stirring device, for example.
  • An instrument for analysis may be coupled to the sampler ( 37 ).
  • the analysis instrument may be a spectrometer. Further, the analysis instrument may be a laser spectrometer, for example.
  • an automatic fluid titrator 39 ) may be coupled to the reservoir ( 33 ). The titrator may be used to adjust salinity, for example.
  • a screen ( 45 ) may also be positioned near the bottom of the reservoir ( 33 ). In some embodiments, screen refers to a perforated plate, cylinder or similar device or a meshed wire or cloth fabric usually mounted on a frame and used to separate coarser from finer parts or to allow the passage of smaller portions while preventing that of larger.
  • the screen may be used to prevent the sample ( 1 ) from coming into contact with the reservoir ( 33 ) bottom.
  • a computer ( 43 ) may optionally be coupled to any one or combination of the sampler ( 37 ), instrument for analysis ( 41 ), automatic fluid titrator ( 39 ), injection port ( 35 ), agitator ( 47 ) and reservoir ( 33 ).
  • the computer ( 43 ) may be utilized to control the parameters of the experiment or to store data derived from experimental procedure.

Abstract

Embodiments of the present invention relate to a method to determine formation measurements, the method comprising placing a sample in a reservoir, removing aliquots from the reservoir containing the sample or continuously monitoring the reservoir or headspace as the sample and reservoir equilibrate and analyzing the aliquots or readings sufficient to provide diffusion measurements.

Description

  • This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/418,669, filed May 5, 2006, which application and publication are incorporated by reference in their entirety and made a part hereof.
  • FIELD OF TECHNOLOGY
  • Embodiments of the present invention relate to the measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion. Specifically, embodiments of the present invention relate to the measurement of porosity and permeability for application in the oilfield industry.
  • BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
  • Diagnosing the structure of porous materials is relevant to a broad range of scientific and technological problems. Knowledge of the fluid transport properties of reservoir rocks is important for the monitoring of contaminant levels in reservoir rock samples and for information related to extracting oil, such as in determining oil well value and characterizing formations for making real-time or near real-time decisions in drilling. Understanding porosity and permeability is important for determining the quantity and producibility of hydrocarbons in a reservoir system. These data can impact reserves estimates as well as production and development planning.
  • Two of the most important parameters used to characterize porous materials are permeability and effective porosity. Permeability is a measure of the ability of a rock to transmit fluid through pore spaces. Effective porosity describes the interconnected pore volume or void space in a rock that contributes to fluid flow or permeability in a reservoir. Effective porosity excludes isolated pores and pore volume occupied by water adsorbed on clay minerals or other grains.
  • Porosity and permeability measurements are readily measured with existing techniques, but are usually measured separately and the methods can be invasive, toxic, or both. Effective porosity is also difficult to measure directly utilizing current techniques.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Embodiments of the invention may be best understood by referring to the following description and accompanying drawings which illustrate such embodiments. In the drawings:
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a block flow diagram describing the measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion, according to some embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a block flow diagram describing the measurement of porosity and permeability properties by diffusion, according to some embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates block flow diagram describing the continuous measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion, according to some embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a block flow diagram describing the continuous measurement of porosity and permeability properties by diffusion, according to some embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a perspective view of an apparatus to measure formation rock properties by diffusion, according to some embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a graphical view depicting the concentration of a species versus time.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
  • References in the specification to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “an example embodiment”, etc., indicate that the embodiment described may include a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every embodiment may not necessarily include the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover, such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic is described in connection with an embodiment, it is submitted that it is within the knowledge of one skilled in the art to affect such feature, structure, or characteristic in connection with other embodiments whether or not explicitly described. The embodiments of the present invention relate the measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion.
  • Referring to FIG. 1, a method to provide formation measurements by diffusion is shown, according to some embodiments of the invention. A sample (1) may be placed (3) in a reservoir (5). While the reservoir and sample are equilibrating, an aliquot (9) may be removed (7) for analysis (11), providing formation measurements (13).
  • Referring to FIG. 2, a method to provide porosity and permeability measurements by diffusion is shown, according to some embodiments of the invention. An alternative sample (15) is analyzed (17) to determine its salinity (19). The salinity determined alternative sample (19) is then used to adjust the salinity of the reservoir (21) to match any samples (1). A sample (1) is placed in the reservoir (3) in which the salinity has been adjusted (5). While the reservoir and sample are equilibrating, aliquots (9) may be removed (7). The aliquots are analyzed (11) for diffusion measurements (13). The sample is removed to determine surface area (23). The surface area measurements (25) and diffusion measurements (13) are used to calculate formation information (27), such as porosity and permeability (29).
  • Referring to FIG. 3, a method to provide continuous formation measurements by diffusion is shown, according to some embodiments of the invention. A sample (1) may be placed (3) in a reservoir (5). While the reservoir and sample are equilibrating, continuous analysis is performed (31), providing formation measurements (13).
  • Referring to FIG. 4, a method to provide continuous porosity and permeability measurements by diffusion is shown, according to some embodiments of the invention. An alternative sample (15) is analyzed (17) to determine its salinity (19). The salinity determined alternative sample (19) is then used to adjust the salinity of the reservoir (21) to match any samples (1). A sample (1) is placed in the reservoir (3) in which the salinity has been adjusted (5). While the reservoir and sample are equilibrating, continuous analysis is performed (31), providing diffusion measurements (13). The sample is removed to determine surface area (23). The surface area measurements (25) and diffusion measurements (13) are used to calculate formation information (27), such as porosity and permeability (29).
  • Referring to FIG. 5, an apparatus to provide formation measurements by diffusion is shown. A reservoir (33) may be coupled to an injection port (35). The reservoir (33) may be further coupled to a sampler (37). An agitator (47) may be positioned adjacent to the reservoir (33). An instrument for analysis (41) may be coupled to the sampler (37). Optionally, an automatic fluid titrator (39) may be coupled to the reservoir (33). A screen (45) may also be positioned near the bottom of the reservoir (33). A computer (43) may optionally be coupled to any one or combination of the sampler (37), instrument for analysis (41), automatic fluid titrator (39), injection port (35), agitator (47) and reservoir (33).
  • Referring to FIGS. 1-4, methods to determine formation measurements by diffusion are shown, according to some embodiments of the invention. A sample (1) is collected and placed (3) in a reservoir (5). In some embodiments, sample (1) refers to a representative portion of a whole. Further, sample (1) may be defined as a small segment or quantity taken as evidence of the quality or character of the entire group or lot. Examples of samples may be in liquid, solid or gas form, and in the oilfield industry, taken from the cuttings or core. Further examples of samples include any rock samples of sufficient size including core chips, core trim, sidewall cores, and outcrop samples. Cuttings refer to rock particles brought to the surface in well drilling. Core refers to a cylindrical sample of rock retrieved from a well. The cuttings or core may be rinsed of drilling or coring fluid and, if cuttings, may be sieved to an appropriate mesh size. In some embodiments, mesh size refers to one of the openings between the threads, cords or wires of a screen or net. Mesh size is often used to designate a size of screen or of the material passed by a screen in terms of the number of such openings per linear inch. Sieving may refer to separating or separating out by putting through a sieve or sifter or meshed material.
  • An alternative sample (15) is used to determine the salinity (17) of the target sample (1) by various techniques used in the industry. In some embodiments, salinity refers to a concentration of salt. The alternative sample (15) may be cuttings or core and preferably collected simultaneously or near in time and place to the target sample (1). Salinity is important to maintain because changes in salinity may affect porosity and permeability measurements of a sample (1). Effort must be taken to retain the salinity in the sample while allowing water to freely exchange between the sample and reservoir. For example, fresh water may swell clay samples, destroying both porosity and permeability.
  • One method to maintain salinity may be to use a semi-permeable membrane placed between the sample (1) and reservoir (33). An undesirable effect may be that osmotic pressure builds at the interface. Therefore, the osmotic pressure could be monitored and mathematically-experimentally accounted for or the pressure could be balanced by adjusting the salinity of the reservoir side of the interface. A quick titration could be performed until osmotic pressures balance and then measurements could be carried out. A saline addition to the reservoir side of the interface could be prepared ahead of time by matching the expected salinity of the sample (1) with information derived from the alternative sample (15). With the addition prepared ahead of time, an already quick titration could be sped up and minimize the time of any errors due to the short time of osmotic imbalance. An advantage of using a semi-permeable membrane is that only salinity need be matched without regard to the specific water composition. A semi-permeable membrane may work better in dealing with a core sample rather than cuttings.
  • Salinity may also be matched without the use of a semi-permeable membrane. If no membrane is used and only salinity is matched, the cations of the reservoir solution may exchange with the cations at the surface of the sample, which may change the sample properties. This effect may be negligible, but should be considered. To remedy such an effect, one skilled in the art could use an ion that is more soluble than other ions. By matching the salinity with this ion, it ensures that the salinity-matching ion will not exchange with ions on the surface of the sample. For example, cesium may be such an ion.
  • Another technique to regulate the salinity of the reservoir may be to mimic the properties of the target sample in the reservoir solution, using pre-measurements of an alternative sample (15). Formation water (sample water) generally conforms to a few expected patterns. With some pre-measurements of an alternative sample (15), the reservoir could be titrated to match the salinity of the sample to a reasonable degree of accuracy. All sample pre-measurements, titration, salinity calculations and osmotic measurements could be automated.
  • Once the salinity determining technique has been performed, the sample in reservoir (5) is optionally agitated to assist in equilibrating the sample and reservoir. The agitator may be a stirrer or more specifically, a magnetic stirrer. If a porous body saturated with fluid, such as a cuttings or core sample, is placed into a solution that is miscible with the saturation fluid, the fluids will exchange on a molecular level driven by diffusion even in the absence of any fluid potential. In some embodiments, diffusion refers to the random motion of molecules in a liquid or gas (or, very slowly, in a solid). The exchange will continue until equilibrium is reached with a rate described as an exponential process with respect to time.
  • Frick's Law describes diffusion by the equation dq/dt=−DS(dc/dx) where q is the change in quantity of the substance, D is the diffusion constant, S is the surface area, c is the concentration of the substance, x is the distance it migrates and t is the time involved. Frick's Law explains that diffusion is proportional to the surface area of a porous material. Further, the diffusion constant described in Frick's Law is dependent on both fluid and medium properties.
  • Fluid properties may be subdivided into solute and solution properties. The diffusion constant for a solute is higher at higher temperatures and lower for particles of higher mass. Another important solute property is characterized as the interaction of the solute particle with the medium of interest, called solute and medium (SAM) interaction. For example, the SAM interaction may be high for an organic molecule on a clay surface, but low for an uncharged silver colloid particle of equal mass. As opposed to solute properties, the main solution property of interest is viscosity, in which the diffusion constant depends. The viscosity may be referred to as a fluid's internal resistance to motion. The diffusion constant is inversely proportional to the fluid viscosity and particle radius. Since most fluids' viscosity is a function of temperature, the temperature effect of diffusion to a higher order will be nonlinear.
  • Properties of the porous medium may be the SAM interactions mentioned, as well as the critical pore size. The critical pore size may be defined as the average of the largest openings connecting pores of a medium along a continuous path, also called the pore throat. Generally, the pore throat is the critical parameter of permeability. In some embodiments, permeability refers to the property of a porous material that is measured by the rate by volume at which a fluid of unit viscosity passes through unit cross section of the material under unit pressure gradient.
  • The rate of decrease in the amount of substance is proportional to a concentration gradient throughout the porous medium, the surface area of the porous medium exposed to the fluid, and the diffusion constant. Therefore, as the total reservoir concentration decreases, the rate of diffusion decreases. If one skilled in the art were to monitor the concentration of particles in the reservoir, an exponential decrease would be observed over time. The concentration may be monitored (11) by removing (7) small aliquots (9) from the sample in reservoir (5) as equilibrium is being established. Aliquot may refer to a portion of a solution. In some embodiments, equilibrium refers to the state in which the forward and reverse rates of all diffusion processes are equal, so that the concentrations of all species remain constant. Alternatively, a probe may be used to monitor (31) the concentration in the reservoir continuously or intermittently without removing a portion of the sample (1), as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4.
  • The concentration may be analyzed or monitored using an analysis instrument. The concentration may be measured in the reservoir solution or in the headspace of a closed container, for example. The analysis instrument may utilize spectroscopy, for example. In some embodiments, spectroscopy refers to the science that deals with the interactions of various types of radiation with matter. A radiation source first interacts with a sample. A detector then records the type of interaction, such as absorbance, transmittance or emission. The electrical signals from the detector are converted to useful numbers or a visual display such as a spectrum. Specifically, laser spectroscopy may be employed and refers to spectroscopy in which a laser is utilized as the source of radiation. Laser is an acronym for light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation. Examples of types of spectroscopy devices used may include Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometers (FTIR) and Tunable Diode Laser Spectrometers (TDLS). In some embodiments, spectrometer refers to an instrument that provides information about the intensity of radiation as a function of wavelength or frequency. The concentration may be monitored by detecting an isotopic species in the reservoir. In some embodiments, isotopic species refers to a detectable isotope used to track a process or analyze a sample. For example, deuterated water or 18O labeled water could be the isotopic species detected in the reservoir. Alternatively, specific ions may be detected by the analysis instrument, such as cesium iodide or cesium bromide salt.
  • As concentration is monitored, it approaches a constant value asymptotically. Either the doped species or its residual may be monitored in the reservoir. This value can be extrapolated without waiting for a final equilibrium to be reached. The extrapolated concentration is the concentration that would be achieved if the reservoir were diluted with the volume of fluid in the pore space. Assuming the initial concentration of particles in the sample is zero, the concentration of particles at equilibrium can be found by using the following equation: Ce=CI*VR/(VR+VM) where Ce is the equilibrium concentration, CI is the initial concentration of the reservoir, VR is the volume of the reservoir and VM is the volume of the medium. Because only the interconnected pore space is filled with particles of solute, it is the effective porosity that is measured. In some embodiments, porosity refers to the ratio of the volume of interstices of a material to the volume of its mass. Effective porosity may be defined as the interconnected pore volume or void space in a rock that contributes to fluid flow or permeability in a reservoir. Effective porosity excludes isolated pores and pore volume occupied by water adsorbed on clay minerals or other grains. Total porosity is the total void space in the rock whether or not it contributes to fluid flow. Effective porosity is typically less than total porosity. In addition, because solute particles generally only exchange with a miscible phase, it is only the volume of effective pore space occupied by a miscible phase that is measured. For example, if oil and water are present or if oil, water and gas are present, it will only be the volume occupied by the water that is measured. If the effective pore space is measured by saturation of the media with a single phase then both the true effective pore space and water saturation can be determined.
  • FIG. 6 is an example of a concentration measurement to calculate effective porosity. For this example, the initial concentration was defined at 30 ppm and the equilibrium concentration at 10 ppm. The exponential constant of diffusion multiplied by the surface area was defined for a 4″ cube of cuttings, each with a diameter of 0.25 cm from a well-sorted sand stone reservoir. To this line in the plot, a constant error line of 2% was added. The first line shows the extrapolated curve for the defined situation as compared to the second line which is the extrapolated noisy line. The fit parameters show close agreement with the defined parameters. With an initial reservoir volume of 136 ml, an effective porosity of 0.263 was determined. The defined effective porosity was 0.260. The porosity calculation was completed without the use of the exponential constant. Although the calculation was completed assuming a total volume of a 4″ cube, once could monitor the volume of displacement in the reservoir to calculate the bulk volume of cuttings. Because this calculation is independent of surface area, the measurement should only be limited by the accuracy with which the concentrations can be determined.
  • It is possible the porous medium being tested have an initial concentration of the solute species being monitored. The equation that would apply would be Ce=(CIVR+CMVM)/(VR+VM) where Ce is the equilibrium concentration, CI is the initial concentration of the reservoir, VR is the volume of the reservoir, VM is the volume of the medium and CM is the initial concentration of the porous medium. This measurement may require a background measurement of the porous medium's fluid content.
  • The experimental curve shown in FIG. 6 may be more complicated if two types of permeability exist, such as matrix and secondary-fracture, for example. Matrix permeability may be created by the finer grained, interstitial particles that lie between larger particles or in which larger particles are embedded in sedimentary rocks such as sandstones and conglomerates. Secondary fracture permeability may be created by an alteration in the rock. The experimental curve may then be the sum of the two exponential processes. The curve may be modeled as a double exponential. The fit would then yield parameters specific to the matrix permeability, fracture permeability, matrix porosity and fracture porosity.
  • Returning to FIGS. 1-4, the cuttings or core sample may be removed (23) from the reservoir in order to conduct surface area measurements (25). For a core sample, knowledge of the surface area may be a trivial matter. To determine the surface area of cuttings, a more rigorous approach is usually needed. Various methods may be employed to determine the surface area of a sample (1), such as image analysis, characterization of cuttings based on a repeated sieve cut, measuring the charge buildup on a sample, measuring surface adsorption of a gas onto a solid object or measuring the volume of a thin film of a viscous fluid on the surface of the sample.
  • Diffusion and permeability both depend on the pore throat and the distance that the detected species travels. Flow of a fluid is proportional to the difference in pressure over a distance with the constant being permeability. Diffusion is proportional to a difference in concentration over a distance with the constant being the diffusion constant. Therefore, the diffusion constant measurements can be used to calculate permeability and porosity information.
  • Referring to FIG. 5, an apparatus to provide formation measurements by diffusion is shown. A reservoir (33) may be coupled to an injection port (35). In some embodiments, reservoir refers to a part of an apparatus in which a liquid is held. The reservoir may be any shape or size, so long as it is capable of holding a sample (1) and a solution which is capable of diffusing into the sample (1). Injection port may refer to the port in which an element or factor is introduced in or into some situation or subject. The injection port may be automated or be any device or port that allows for introduction of a sample.
  • The reservoir (33) may be further coupled to a sampler (37). In some embodiments, sampler refers to a device that collects a representative sample for analysis. In another example, sampler (37) refers to a probe that takes continuous or intermittent readings from the reservoir or reservoir headspace. The sampler (37) may also be a probe that can measure concentration continuously or intermittently within the reservoir. An agitator (47) may be positioned adjacent to the reservoir (33). Agitator may refer to a power-driven apparatus for stirring. The agitator may be a magnetic stirring device, for example.
  • An instrument for analysis (41) may be coupled to the sampler (37). The analysis instrument may be a spectrometer. Further, the analysis instrument may be a laser spectrometer, for example. Optionally, an automatic fluid titrator (39) may be coupled to the reservoir (33). The titrator may be used to adjust salinity, for example. A screen (45) may also be positioned near the bottom of the reservoir (33). In some embodiments, screen refers to a perforated plate, cylinder or similar device or a meshed wire or cloth fabric usually mounted on a frame and used to separate coarser from finer parts or to allow the passage of smaller portions while preventing that of larger. The screen may be used to prevent the sample (1) from coming into contact with the reservoir (33) bottom. A computer (43) may optionally be coupled to any one or combination of the sampler (37), instrument for analysis (41), automatic fluid titrator (39), injection port (35), agitator (47) and reservoir (33). The computer (43) may be utilized to control the parameters of the experiment or to store data derived from experimental procedure.

Claims (26)

1. A method to determine formation measurements, the method comprising:
collecting a plurality of formation samples;
analyzing a first formation sample of the plurality to determine a salinity of the first formation sample;
sufficiently matching a salinity of fluid in a reservoir to the salinity of the first formation sample;
placing a second formation sample of the plurality in the fluid of the reservoir; and
analyzing the fluid in the reservoir as the second formation sample and fluid equilibrate sufficient to provide diffusion measurements.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the fluid in the reservoir includes removing aliquots from the fluid as the second formation sample and fluid equilibrate sufficient to provide diffusion measurements.
3. The method of claim 2, further comprising, before removing aliquots, agitating the fluid and the second formation sample in the reservoir.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the aliquots are liquid samples from the reservoir.
5. The method of claim 2, wherein the aliquots are vapor samples from the headspace of the reservoir.
6. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of measuring the surface area of the second formation sample, sufficient to provide surface area measurements.
7. The method of claim 6, further comprising the step of calculating formation information from the surface area measurements and diffusion measurements, sufficient to provide porosity and permeability information.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the second formation sample comprises cuttings.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the second formation sample comprises a core.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the reservoir comprises essentially an isotopically labeled species fluid.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the reservoir further comprises essentially deuterated water.
12. The method of claim 10, wherein the reservoir comprises essentially 180 water.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the analysis is performed by spectroscopy.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the analysis if further performed by laser spectroscopy.
15. A method to determine formation measurements, the method comprising:
collecting a plurality of formation samples;
analyzing a first formation sample of the plurality to determine a salinity of the first formation sample;
sufficiently matching a salinity of fluid in a reservoir to the salinity of the first formation sample using information about the salinity of the first formation sample;
placing a second formation sample of the plurality in the reservoir;
analyzing the fluid in the reservoir as the second formation sample and fluid equilibrate sufficient to provide diffusion measurements;
measuring the surface area of the second formation sample, sufficient to provide surface area measurements; and
calculating formation information from the surface area measurements and diffusion measurements, sufficient to provide porosity and permeability information.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein analyzing the fluid in the reservoir includes removing aliquots from the fluid as the second formation sample and fluid equilibrate sufficient to provide diffusion measurements.
17. A method to determine formation measurements, the method comprising:
placing a formation sample in a fluid reservoir, the formation sample comprising a plurality of cuttings from the formation; and
analyzing the reservoir fluid as the sample and reservoir equilibrate, sufficient to provide diffusion measurements.
18. The method of 17, wherein the headspace of the reservoir is analyzed.
19. The method of claim 17, further comprising before analyzing the reservoir, agitating the sample in the reservoir.
20. The method of claim 17, further comprising before placing a sample in a reservoir, adjusting a salinity in a reservoir.
21. The method of claim 17, further comprising the step of measuring the surface area of the sample, sufficient to provide surface area measurements.
22. The method of claim 21, further comprising the step of calculating formation information from the surface area measurements and diffusion measurements, sufficient to provide porosity and permeability information.
23. The method of claim 17, wherein the analysis is performed by spectroscopy.
24. The method of claim 23, wherein the analysis if further performed by laser spectroscopy.
25. A method to determine formation measurements, the method comprising:
collecting a plurality of samples;
analyzing a first sample to determine a salinity of the first sample;
using information about the salinity of the first sample to sufficiently match a salinity of fluid in a reservoir to a reasonable degree of accuracy;
placing a second sample in the reservoir;
analyzing the reservoir fluid as the second sample and reservoir fluid equilibrate, sufficient to provide diffusion measurements;
measuring the surface area of the second sample, sufficient to provide surface area measurements; and
calculating formation information from the surface area measurements and diffusion measurements, sufficient to provide porosity and permeability information.
26. A method to determine formation measurements, the method comprising:
adjusting a salinity in a reservoir;
placing a sample in the reservoir;
analyzing a headspace of the reservoir as the sample and reservoir equilibrate, sufficient to provide diffusion measurements;
measuring the surface area of the sample, sufficient to provide surface area measurements; and
calculating formation information from the surface area measurements and diffusion measurements, sufficient to provide porosity and permeability information.
US13/408,655 2006-05-05 2012-02-29 Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion Abandoned US20120160018A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/408,655 US20120160018A1 (en) 2006-05-05 2012-02-29 Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion
US15/074,315 US10775359B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2016-03-18 Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/418,669 US20070259433A1 (en) 2006-05-05 2006-05-05 Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion
US13/408,655 US20120160018A1 (en) 2006-05-05 2012-02-29 Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/418,669 Continuation US20070259433A1 (en) 2006-05-05 2006-05-05 Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/074,315 Continuation US10775359B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2016-03-18 Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120160018A1 true US20120160018A1 (en) 2012-06-28

Family

ID=38661663

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/418,669 Abandoned US20070259433A1 (en) 2006-05-05 2006-05-05 Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion
US13/408,655 Abandoned US20120160018A1 (en) 2006-05-05 2012-02-29 Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion
US15/074,315 Active 2027-07-06 US10775359B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2016-03-18 Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/418,669 Abandoned US20070259433A1 (en) 2006-05-05 2006-05-05 Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/074,315 Active 2027-07-06 US10775359B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2016-03-18 Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (3) US20070259433A1 (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120293180A1 (en) * 2011-05-18 2012-11-22 Korea Institute Of Geoscience And Mineral Resources (Kigam) Apparatus for measuring permittivity of rocks and fault clays using permittivity sensor
CN103163057A (en) * 2013-03-18 2013-06-19 河海大学 Testing device and measuring and calculating method for gas permeability of compact rock material
US8885163B2 (en) 2009-12-23 2014-11-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Interferometry-based downhole analysis tool
CN104237106A (en) * 2014-09-29 2014-12-24 三峡大学 Constant-speed pushing device for micro injection on rock wall
US8921768B2 (en) 2010-06-01 2014-12-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Spectroscopic nanosensor logging systems and methods
CN105424573A (en) * 2015-11-03 2016-03-23 三峡大学 Method for detecting tile porosity and pore distribution
CN105651678A (en) * 2016-03-31 2016-06-08 中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司 Device and method for testing transverse isotropic permeability coefficients of stratified rock masses
US10378347B2 (en) 2015-12-07 2019-08-13 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Sidewall core detection
US10775359B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2020-09-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion
CN112485159A (en) * 2020-11-03 2021-03-12 中国原子能科学研究院 Device and method for measuring diffusion coefficient of crack filler

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2012057740A1 (en) 2010-10-27 2012-05-03 Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Reconstructing dead oil
CN103558358B (en) * 2013-09-04 2015-05-06 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Intraformational heterogeneous model interlayer crack effect detection method and system thereof
FR3028950B1 (en) * 2014-11-24 2018-03-23 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PERMEATION MEASUREMENT BY MASS SPECTROMETRY
US10330657B2 (en) * 2014-12-10 2019-06-25 Bp Corporation North America Inc. Estimation of conductivity for nanoporous materials
CN111664825B (en) * 2020-06-10 2021-07-09 西安石油大学 Method for improving accuracy of pore structure parameter measurement

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070259433A1 (en) 2006-05-05 2007-11-08 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Rees, K.C.J., et al., Evaluation of laboratory techniques for measuring diffusion coefficients in sediments, 1991, Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 25(9), pp 1605-1611 *

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10775359B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2020-09-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion
US8885163B2 (en) 2009-12-23 2014-11-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Interferometry-based downhole analysis tool
US8921768B2 (en) 2010-06-01 2014-12-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Spectroscopic nanosensor logging systems and methods
US20120293180A1 (en) * 2011-05-18 2012-11-22 Korea Institute Of Geoscience And Mineral Resources (Kigam) Apparatus for measuring permittivity of rocks and fault clays using permittivity sensor
US8717029B2 (en) * 2011-05-18 2014-05-06 Korea Institute Of Geoscience And Mineral Resources (Kigam) Apparatus for measuring permittivity of rocks and fault clays using permittivity sensor
CN103163057A (en) * 2013-03-18 2013-06-19 河海大学 Testing device and measuring and calculating method for gas permeability of compact rock material
CN104237106A (en) * 2014-09-29 2014-12-24 三峡大学 Constant-speed pushing device for micro injection on rock wall
CN105424573A (en) * 2015-11-03 2016-03-23 三峡大学 Method for detecting tile porosity and pore distribution
US10378347B2 (en) 2015-12-07 2019-08-13 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Sidewall core detection
CN105651678A (en) * 2016-03-31 2016-06-08 中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司 Device and method for testing transverse isotropic permeability coefficients of stratified rock masses
CN112485159A (en) * 2020-11-03 2021-03-12 中国原子能科学研究院 Device and method for measuring diffusion coefficient of crack filler

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20070259433A1 (en) 2007-11-08
US10775359B2 (en) 2020-09-15
US20160202230A1 (en) 2016-07-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10775359B2 (en) Measurement of formation rock properties by diffusion
CA2474712C (en) Method and device for evaluating physical parameters of an underground deposit from rock cuttings sampled therein
US10371691B2 (en) System and method for logging isotope fractionation effects during mud gas logging
AU2006223089B2 (en) Determination of coal bed natural gas production factors and a system to determine same
US8797517B2 (en) PVT analysis of pressurized fluids
Saasen et al. Automatic measurement of drilling fluid and drill-cuttings properties
US9322268B2 (en) Methods for reservoir evaluation employing non-equilibrium compositional gradients
US8342004B2 (en) Gas analyzer
CN101035964A (en) Method and apparatus for downhole detection of CO2 and H2S using resonators coated with CO2 and H2S sorbents
US20180016896A1 (en) Assessing Permeability
CN111007230B (en) Method for quantitatively evaluating oil content of low-porosity compact oil reservoir of continental-phase lake basin
AU2007327547B2 (en) Downhole fluid property chromatography
US7281435B2 (en) Measurement of non-aqueous phase liquid flow in porous media by tracer dilution
Padin et al. Experimental and theoretical study of water and solute transport in organic-rich carbonate mudrocks
US11119062B2 (en) Method and assembly for measuring diffusion in nanoporous media
Mitchell et al. A robust nuclear magnetic resonance workflow for quantitative determination of petrophysical properties from drill cuttings
US6715347B2 (en) Apparatus and method for determining measures of the permeability of HC-bearing formations using fluorescence
US11441995B2 (en) Method for determining a representative parameter of a porous sample and related assembly
EP1604187B1 (en) A method and apparatus for downhole quantification of methane using near infrared spectroscopy
CN105683332B (en) Density determination method and system
Krumm et al. Workflow for Measurement of Steady-State To Liquid Permeability in Nano-Darcy Reservoir Rock
Lamarre Downhole geochemical analysis of critical desorption pressure and gas content for carbonaceous reservoirs
US20150140674A1 (en) Method for Determining Weight Concentration of A Polymer Penetrated into A Porous Medium
Singer et al. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Rock Cleaning
Padhy et al. Fluid Characterization Using a Novel Formation Testing Technology, A Case study

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION