US20110246010A1 - Technique for Optimizing the Use of the Motor in Hybrid Vehicles - Google Patents

Technique for Optimizing the Use of the Motor in Hybrid Vehicles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110246010A1
US20110246010A1 US13/076,050 US201113076050A US2011246010A1 US 20110246010 A1 US20110246010 A1 US 20110246010A1 US 201113076050 A US201113076050 A US 201113076050A US 2011246010 A1 US2011246010 A1 US 2011246010A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
engine
battery
power
trip
vehicle
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/076,050
Inventor
Jose de la Torre Bueno
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Law Office of Scott C Harris Inc
Original Assignee
Law Office of Scott C Harris Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US11/450,049 external-priority patent/US7665559B2/en
Application filed by Law Office of Scott C Harris Inc filed Critical Law Office of Scott C Harris Inc
Priority to US13/076,050 priority Critical patent/US20110246010A1/en
Assigned to DE LA TORRE BUENO, JOSE, LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT C HARRIS, INC reassignment DE LA TORRE BUENO, JOSE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DE LA TORRE BUENO, JOSE
Publication of US20110246010A1 publication Critical patent/US20110246010A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W10/00Conjoint control of vehicle sub-units of different type or different function
    • B60W10/04Conjoint control of vehicle sub-units of different type or different function including control of propulsion units
    • B60W10/06Conjoint control of vehicle sub-units of different type or different function including control of propulsion units including control of combustion engines
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60KARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PROPULSION UNITS OR OF TRANSMISSIONS IN VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PLURAL DIVERSE PRIME-MOVERS IN VEHICLES; AUXILIARY DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; INSTRUMENTATION OR DASHBOARDS FOR VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH COOLING, AIR INTAKE, GAS EXHAUST OR FUEL SUPPLY OF PROPULSION UNITS IN VEHICLES
    • B60K6/00Arrangement or mounting of plural diverse prime-movers for mutual or common propulsion, e.g. hybrid propulsion systems comprising electric motors and internal combustion engines ; Control systems therefor, i.e. systems controlling two or more prime movers, or controlling one of these prime movers and any of the transmission, drive or drive units Informative references: mechanical gearings with secondary electric drive F16H3/72; arrangements for handling mechanical energy structurally associated with the dynamo-electric machine H02K7/00; machines comprising structurally interrelated motor and generator parts H02K51/00; dynamo-electric machines not otherwise provided for in H02K see H02K99/00
    • B60K6/20Arrangement or mounting of plural diverse prime-movers for mutual or common propulsion, e.g. hybrid propulsion systems comprising electric motors and internal combustion engines ; Control systems therefor, i.e. systems controlling two or more prime movers, or controlling one of these prime movers and any of the transmission, drive or drive units Informative references: mechanical gearings with secondary electric drive F16H3/72; arrangements for handling mechanical energy structurally associated with the dynamo-electric machine H02K7/00; machines comprising structurally interrelated motor and generator parts H02K51/00; dynamo-electric machines not otherwise provided for in H02K see H02K99/00 the prime-movers consisting of electric motors and internal combustion engines, e.g. HEVs
    • B60K6/42Arrangement or mounting of plural diverse prime-movers for mutual or common propulsion, e.g. hybrid propulsion systems comprising electric motors and internal combustion engines ; Control systems therefor, i.e. systems controlling two or more prime movers, or controlling one of these prime movers and any of the transmission, drive or drive units Informative references: mechanical gearings with secondary electric drive F16H3/72; arrangements for handling mechanical energy structurally associated with the dynamo-electric machine H02K7/00; machines comprising structurally interrelated motor and generator parts H02K51/00; dynamo-electric machines not otherwise provided for in H02K see H02K99/00 the prime-movers consisting of electric motors and internal combustion engines, e.g. HEVs characterised by the architecture of the hybrid electric vehicle
    • B60K6/46Series type
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60LPROPULSION OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; SUPPLYING ELECTRIC POWER FOR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRODYNAMIC BRAKE SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES IN GENERAL; MAGNETIC SUSPENSION OR LEVITATION FOR VEHICLES; MONITORING OPERATING VARIABLES OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRIC SAFETY DEVICES FOR ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES
    • B60L1/00Supplying electric power to auxiliary equipment of vehicles
    • B60L1/02Supplying electric power to auxiliary equipment of vehicles to electric heating circuits
    • B60L1/04Supplying electric power to auxiliary equipment of vehicles to electric heating circuits fed by the power supply line
    • B60L1/06Supplying electric power to auxiliary equipment of vehicles to electric heating circuits fed by the power supply line using only one supply
    • B60L1/08Methods and devices for control or regulation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60LPROPULSION OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; SUPPLYING ELECTRIC POWER FOR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRODYNAMIC BRAKE SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES IN GENERAL; MAGNETIC SUSPENSION OR LEVITATION FOR VEHICLES; MONITORING OPERATING VARIABLES OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRIC SAFETY DEVICES FOR ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES
    • B60L15/00Methods, circuits, or devices for controlling the traction-motor speed of electrically-propelled vehicles
    • B60L15/20Methods, circuits, or devices for controlling the traction-motor speed of electrically-propelled vehicles for control of the vehicle or its driving motor to achieve a desired performance, e.g. speed, torque, programmed variation of speed
    • B60L15/2045Methods, circuits, or devices for controlling the traction-motor speed of electrically-propelled vehicles for control of the vehicle or its driving motor to achieve a desired performance, e.g. speed, torque, programmed variation of speed for optimising the use of energy
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60LPROPULSION OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; SUPPLYING ELECTRIC POWER FOR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRODYNAMIC BRAKE SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES IN GENERAL; MAGNETIC SUSPENSION OR LEVITATION FOR VEHICLES; MONITORING OPERATING VARIABLES OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRIC SAFETY DEVICES FOR ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES
    • B60L50/00Electric propulsion with power supplied within the vehicle
    • B60L50/10Electric propulsion with power supplied within the vehicle using propulsion power supplied by engine-driven generators, e.g. generators driven by combustion engines
    • B60L50/16Electric propulsion with power supplied within the vehicle using propulsion power supplied by engine-driven generators, e.g. generators driven by combustion engines with provision for separate direct mechanical propulsion
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60LPROPULSION OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; SUPPLYING ELECTRIC POWER FOR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRODYNAMIC BRAKE SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES IN GENERAL; MAGNETIC SUSPENSION OR LEVITATION FOR VEHICLES; MONITORING OPERATING VARIABLES OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRIC SAFETY DEVICES FOR ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES
    • B60L50/00Electric propulsion with power supplied within the vehicle
    • B60L50/50Electric propulsion with power supplied within the vehicle using propulsion power supplied by batteries or fuel cells
    • B60L50/60Electric propulsion with power supplied within the vehicle using propulsion power supplied by batteries or fuel cells using power supplied by batteries
    • B60L50/61Electric propulsion with power supplied within the vehicle using propulsion power supplied by batteries or fuel cells using power supplied by batteries by batteries charged by engine-driven generators, e.g. series hybrid electric vehicles
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60LPROPULSION OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; SUPPLYING ELECTRIC POWER FOR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRODYNAMIC BRAKE SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES IN GENERAL; MAGNETIC SUSPENSION OR LEVITATION FOR VEHICLES; MONITORING OPERATING VARIABLES OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRIC SAFETY DEVICES FOR ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES
    • B60L53/00Methods of charging batteries, specially adapted for electric vehicles; Charging stations or on-board charging equipment therefor; Exchange of energy storage elements in electric vehicles
    • B60L53/10Methods of charging batteries, specially adapted for electric vehicles; Charging stations or on-board charging equipment therefor; Exchange of energy storage elements in electric vehicles characterised by the energy transfer between the charging station and the vehicle
    • B60L53/14Conductive energy transfer
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60LPROPULSION OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; SUPPLYING ELECTRIC POWER FOR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRODYNAMIC BRAKE SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES IN GENERAL; MAGNETIC SUSPENSION OR LEVITATION FOR VEHICLES; MONITORING OPERATING VARIABLES OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRIC SAFETY DEVICES FOR ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES
    • B60L58/00Methods or circuit arrangements for monitoring or controlling batteries or fuel cells, specially adapted for electric vehicles
    • B60L58/10Methods or circuit arrangements for monitoring or controlling batteries or fuel cells, specially adapted for electric vehicles for monitoring or controlling batteries
    • B60L58/12Methods or circuit arrangements for monitoring or controlling batteries or fuel cells, specially adapted for electric vehicles for monitoring or controlling batteries responding to state of charge [SoC]
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60LPROPULSION OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; SUPPLYING ELECTRIC POWER FOR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRODYNAMIC BRAKE SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES IN GENERAL; MAGNETIC SUSPENSION OR LEVITATION FOR VEHICLES; MONITORING OPERATING VARIABLES OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRIC SAFETY DEVICES FOR ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES
    • B60L8/00Electric propulsion with power supply from forces of nature, e.g. sun or wind
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60LPROPULSION OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; SUPPLYING ELECTRIC POWER FOR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRODYNAMIC BRAKE SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES IN GENERAL; MAGNETIC SUSPENSION OR LEVITATION FOR VEHICLES; MONITORING OPERATING VARIABLES OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRIC SAFETY DEVICES FOR ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES
    • B60L8/00Electric propulsion with power supply from forces of nature, e.g. sun or wind
    • B60L8/003Converting light into electric energy, e.g. by using photo-voltaic systems
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W10/00Conjoint control of vehicle sub-units of different type or different function
    • B60W10/24Conjoint control of vehicle sub-units of different type or different function including control of energy storage means
    • B60W10/26Conjoint control of vehicle sub-units of different type or different function including control of energy storage means for electrical energy, e.g. batteries or capacitors
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W20/00Control systems specially adapted for hybrid vehicles
    • B60W20/10Controlling the power contribution of each of the prime movers to meet required power demand
    • B60W20/11Controlling the power contribution of each of the prime movers to meet required power demand using model predictive control [MPC] strategies, i.e. control methods based on models predicting performance
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W40/00Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models
    • B60W40/12Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models related to parameters of the vehicle itself, e.g. tyre models
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60LPROPULSION OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; SUPPLYING ELECTRIC POWER FOR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRODYNAMIC BRAKE SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES IN GENERAL; MAGNETIC SUSPENSION OR LEVITATION FOR VEHICLES; MONITORING OPERATING VARIABLES OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRIC SAFETY DEVICES FOR ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES
    • B60L2240/00Control parameters of input or output; Target parameters
    • B60L2240/60Navigation input
    • B60L2240/62Vehicle position
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60LPROPULSION OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; SUPPLYING ELECTRIC POWER FOR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRODYNAMIC BRAKE SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES IN GENERAL; MAGNETIC SUSPENSION OR LEVITATION FOR VEHICLES; MONITORING OPERATING VARIABLES OF ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES; ELECTRIC SAFETY DEVICES FOR ELECTRICALLY-PROPELLED VEHICLES
    • B60L2260/00Operating Modes
    • B60L2260/40Control modes
    • B60L2260/50Control modes by future state prediction
    • B60L2260/54Energy consumption estimation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2510/00Input parameters relating to a particular sub-units
    • B60W2510/24Energy storage means
    • B60W2510/242Energy storage means for electrical energy
    • B60W2510/244Charge state
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2552/00Input parameters relating to infrastructure
    • B60W2552/20Road profile, i.e. the change in elevation or curvature of a plurality of continuous road segments
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2556/00Input parameters relating to data
    • B60W2556/45External transmission of data to or from the vehicle
    • B60W2556/50External transmission of data to or from the vehicle of positioning data, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System] data
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2710/00Output or target parameters relating to a particular sub-units
    • B60W2710/06Combustion engines, Gas turbines
    • B60W2710/0677Engine power
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/60Other road transportation technologies with climate change mitigation effect
    • Y02T10/62Hybrid vehicles
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/60Other road transportation technologies with climate change mitigation effect
    • Y02T10/64Electric machine technologies in electromobility
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/60Other road transportation technologies with climate change mitigation effect
    • Y02T10/70Energy storage systems for electromobility, e.g. batteries
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/60Other road transportation technologies with climate change mitigation effect
    • Y02T10/7072Electromobility specific charging systems or methods for batteries, ultracapacitors, supercapacitors or double-layer capacitors
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/60Other road transportation technologies with climate change mitigation effect
    • Y02T10/72Electric energy management in electromobility
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T90/00Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02T90/10Technologies relating to charging of electric vehicles
    • Y02T90/12Electric charging stations
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T90/00Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02T90/10Technologies relating to charging of electric vehicles
    • Y02T90/14Plug-in electric vehicles
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T90/00Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02T90/10Technologies relating to charging of electric vehicles
    • Y02T90/16Information or communication technologies improving the operation of electric vehicles

Definitions

  • a hybrid vehicle may operate using both hydrocarbon fuel and electric power.
  • a conventional engine may be fueled by the hydrocarbon fuel.
  • An electric motor is powered by a battery, and can create or supplement the engine's power.
  • Basic hybrids will be used to refer to the current generation of hybrid vehicles in which the amount of energy stored as liquid fuel is much greater than the energy capacity of the battery so the vehicle is being propelled by the engine most of the time.
  • the vehicle uses the combined power of both the engine and the motor to achieve acceptable performance in acceleration or hill climbing.
  • Performance may suffer if the battery is completely drained.
  • a basic hybrid may use the engine to operate a generator which charges the battery at times when the full power of the engine is not needed to propel the vehicle. During braking the electric motor can also act as a generator and recover kinetic energy to replenish the battery.
  • Pure hybrids or serial hybrids refer to more extreme hybrid vehicles that are being designed.
  • these “pure” or all-electric-drive hybrids one or more electric motors are the only source of power to the wheels.
  • the only function of the engine is to run a generator to charge the battery. In this type of vehicle it is even more important that there always be charge in the battery since the vehicle cannot move at all without it.
  • the battery pack In a pure hybrid the battery pack is typically much larger than in a basic hybrid. This design also has the advantage that the engine and generator can run while the vehicle is parked or stopped. Because most vehicles spend more time parked than moving in this kind of hybrid the engine can be much smaller than the engine in a conventional vehicle of the same weight.
  • Plug-in hybrid means one in which the driver has the option of plugging the vehicle into an exterior electric power when it is parked so that the battery does not have to be charged by the engine. Typically they have larger batteries than a basic hybrid. Of course if the battery is low and the vehicle is not plugged in the engine will power a generator to charge the battery as in a basic hybrid. Since electricity purchased from a utility is much cheaper than hydrocarbon fuels in terms of cost per unit of energy, it is advantageous to the user to charge from the grid as often as possible and minimize times the engine is charging the battery.
  • a plug-in hybrid often has a larger battery, so that on local trips the vehicle may be able to run on battery power except when maximal power is needed and thus achieve a higher effective miles per gallon of hydrocarbon fuel.
  • the capacity to plug in is a feature that can be added to the other types mentioned above so a plug-in hybrid will also be either a basic or pure hybrid.
  • Solar hybrids will be used to refer to newly proposed hybrid vehicles which have solar panels on the body to provide part of the electricity for the electric motor.
  • the area available on the top of a typical car is insufficient to provide enough electricity to power the car. In fact, typically the ratio is 1/8 to 1/10 of the area that would be needed to power such a vehicle.
  • a typical car belonging to an individual is parked 90% of the time. Therefore, if the battery is large enough, solar charging could provide a significant portion of the energy used.
  • the currently proposed solar hybrids may also be plug-in hybrids, so if sunlight is unavailable for any reason (weather, parked underground etc.) the battery can be charged from grid power. In addition since it is a hybrid, the battery can always be charged by the engine.
  • a controller may be formed by one or more processors associated with the vehicle.
  • the controller runs an optimized control algorithm that determines on a moment-to-moment basis when to use either the engine, the motor or both; in what ratio, and also when to charge the battery from the engine.
  • the controller also makes decisions about how and when to recharge the battery when the vehicle is stopped or parked.
  • the controller may also adjust the transmission and brakes as necessary to maintain optimal efficiency.
  • a hybrid vehicle includes a motor/generator that can provide some or all of the power needed and a battery which can not only store power in the form of electricity but can effectively be refilled whenever the power necessary to permit the chosen speed is less than the power provided by the motor. If the vehicle is decelerating or going downhill this can be positive even if the motor is off (this is referred to as regenerative breaking).
  • the motor, engine and generator can be arranged in different ways. For instance, in the Toyota Prius both the motor and the engine are attached mechanically to the driveshaft while in the Chevy Volt the motor powers a generator which charges a battery and all motive power comes through an electric motor connected to this battery.
  • the motor powers a generator which charges a battery and all motive power comes through an electric motor connected to this battery.
  • the techniques described here is executed by a computer, and works equally well regardless of the arrangement of the electric motor and the engine.
  • the present application describes new ways of controlling hybrid vehicles to increase the degree of optimization possible.
  • FIG. 1 shows a basic hybrid vehicle
  • FIGS. 2 and 3 show a flowchart of operation
  • FIG. 4 shows a chart of power and fuel.
  • Motor Used here as a short form of electric motor, meaning the one or more electric motors providing motive force to maintain the vehicle at the desired speed. This may be a motor/generator, which recovers energy when the vehicle is decelerating or going downhill.
  • Engine Used here to mean an internal combustion engine or a fuel cell or any other device that creates mechanical or electrical power by consuming some fuel. It is assumed that unlike the motor the engine cannot be run backwards to recover energy. The engine may or may not be connected directly to the drivechain.
  • Fuel This is used to mean whatever fuel the engine is consuming, examples would include without limitation, gasoline, diesel fuel, alcohol, natural gas and hydrogen.
  • Interval The time or distance unit over which engine power is being set by the proposed techniques.
  • a hybrid vehicle 100 is shown as an automobile with an engine 110 running on a combustible fuel, e.g., gasoline, and a motor 120 , powered by a rechargeable source (here a battery) 125 .
  • a generator 130 produces energy to charge the battery, regeneratively or with power from the motor. Note that in some designs the generator and the motor may be the same device.
  • a controller 140 determines how much engine power and/or motor power to use.
  • Existing designs may use various parameters, including the current and previous position of the gas pedal and brake pedal (which input the driver's intent to the controller), the current and past fuel consumption, the current and past speed and acceleration, and battery charge level as inputs.
  • the “gas pedal” is not actually controlling the fuel pump in some hybrid vehicles, but is taken by the controller as an indication of the driver's desire.
  • the controller 140 may control the fuel flow to engine 110 , as well as the amount of current delivered to the electric motor 120 .
  • the controller may also take other actions, such as shifting the continuously variable transmission.
  • variables may also be used to help the controller 140 in making its decision. These may include the slope of the road, the current temperature and the current air pressure. Variables such as these may form second order influences on the optimization carried out by the controller.
  • the controller 140 operates according to the flowchart of FIGS. 2 and 3 , to determine when to use battery charge, and how much to use.
  • the controller's goal is to use as. much of the battery charge as possible—while never really completely emptying the battery charge.
  • the controller must make if a hybrid vehicle has climbed a hill steep and long enough that the battery had to be significantly drained to achieve the driver's desired speed. If the vehicle then reaches a level stretch, the controller will detect a need to replenish the battery and will aggressively charge the battery. For example, the controller may run the conventional engine at a level greater than needed to maintain speed in order to have extra power to recharge the battery. Note that this action is triggered by a rule, perhaps the cardinal rule in the controller which dictates that “if the battery is below a certain charge level and the current power requirement is less than the capacity of the conventional engine, then recharge the battery.”
  • the controller 110 uses knowledge of the future path of the vehicle as part of its determination of how much battery charge to use at any given time.
  • the future path is determined from a GPS navigator 150 associated with the vehicle, that communicates with (or is part of) controller 140 .
  • the user manually tells the controller about the trip that is going to be taken. This is generically shown as the “trip energy expenditure data”, 210 in FIG. 2 .
  • the controller may determine this based on GPS map data 215 , as well as based on dynamic information 220 , such as weather and traffic.
  • the suggested algorithm is to use the engine to recharge the battery whenever the battery level is below 40%. This is a safe algorithm but clearly not the most cost efficient possible.
  • the controller might be running the engine harder than necessary in order to charge the battery when it is in fact possible to charge the battery from a cheaper source at the destination.
  • An embodiment describes informing the controller of how far the vehicle must go (as well as the speed and any hills to be climbed) before grid recharging is available. Given this information, the control algorithm becomes able to calculate the energy needed to complete the trip in order to use as much as possible of the energy in the battery so that it could be recharged from the less expensive source.
  • Another aspect provides information for the controller to know how long grid power is going to be available and how much energy is needed for the next trip.
  • the driver's intent and the vehicle's future path are often available in computer compatible form when the driver is using a GPS navigator.
  • a modern GPS stores a map of the area which optionally can include contour information.
  • the driver indicates the destination at the start of the trip, shown as 200 in FIG. 2 .
  • the controller determines the desired end battery state at 205 . This may be a set amount, or may be controllable.
  • the GPS provides information indicative of the length and contour of the trip (data 215 ) ahead to the controller as well as continuously updating the controller with the current position.
  • Standard interconnection methods such as Ethernet, USB, infra red, or wireless Ethernet, for example, can be used to communicate between the devices.
  • a dedicated GPS chipset can be associated with the controller. Given the availability of this information, more sophisticated control algorithms can be used.
  • the algorithm can calculate the amount of energy that could be recovered given the contour of the road ahead. If the future path is downhill, that may override the requirement to keep the battery charged to a certain level, thus maximizing efficiency.
  • the driver changes the route, this will cause the vehicle's battery to be in a non optimal state; for instance if at the top of the slope posited above, the driver were to leave the programmed route and take a detour that leads further uphill, that driver might be informed that either the speed will be restricted or the vehicle must park while the conventional engine recharges the battery. This may be a worst case cost of the efficiency improvements. If the driver were to begin a trip without indicating a destination to the GPS, the controller might default to the current style of algorithm. The only cost of doing this would be a loss of efficiency; otherwise the vehicle would operate normally.
  • the controller could use the current position forwarded by the GPS as well as the information on the distance to the destination and contour of the road ahead to model the energy required to complete the trip. At the moment the computed energy necessary to complete the trip is less than the current energy stored in the battery, the controller could stop using the engine to charge the battery and let it discharge (obviously keeping some minimal reserve level) so that it could accept the maximum charge from the grid recharge point.
  • a simple form of this optimization could be achieved by giving the driver a control to inhibit further recharging of the battery by the engine.
  • a driver who was familiar with the route could learn when they could activate the switch to optimize use of battery charge. It could become possible to over-drain the battery, but with an attentive driver on a familiar route this would be feasible and would increase efficiency without any modification to the existing controllers.
  • the controller would need to know whether the destination had grid charging available. This information can be available to the controller as a data item on the GPS. In most GPS/electronic map units, the user can have the GPS remember locations and can give the locations (called waypoints) names and in some cases choose a symbol. This may be used to define grid points. Grid points can also be added as “points of interest”. In this method when the driver enters waypoints into the integrated GPS they would indicate whether grid based battery charging was reliably available at each waypoint. When the driver started a trip they would enter the destination waypoint. In this case the control algorithm would know not only the distance and contour to be crossed to get to the destination but whether less expensive recharge for the battery is available. Given this information, the control algorithm could use the engine as little as possible to arrive with some minimal charge in the battery.
  • the driver were to input the destination for the next trip and when they expected to start when they leave the vehicle further optimizations are possible.
  • the plug-in hybrid which is parked overnight. If the driver enters the time they next expected to derive and the controller had access to data on electricity rates, it might calculate that rates would go lower before the time the driver next needed the car and therefore the optimum behavior might be to delay fully recharging the battery until rates go down.
  • the algorithm might be modified to require bringing the battery up to some minimal charge (for instance enough to get to the nearest hospital) as quickly as possible and then doing the rest of the charging during off peak rates.
  • the dynamic information includes information that changes from time to time.
  • the amount of traffic on the road serves as an indication of the probable fuel economy. This data allows more accurately estimation of the energy needed to complete the trip.
  • Another input is weather, the current and future wind speed and direction along the route will exert a non-trivial effect on energy needed, in addition the future cloud cover is a variable the control algorithm should have in order to decide whether a solar hybrid will be able to recharge from sunlight in the time available.
  • Future speed can also be used to optimize performance.
  • real time information on the current average speed of travel for each segment of the local highways is now on the web. This information may be used as part of the model.
  • the data could be distributed in computer readable form such as XML or RSS. If it were, a vehicle equipped with a wireless internet connection could continuously download this information and the control algorithm would be able to estimate future speed as well as distance and hills in optimizing the use of power sources.
  • An internet connection could also be used to download weather forecasts in order to have anticipated wind speed and direction as an input. For the optimization of charging by a Solar Hybrid as described above knowledge of the future cloud cover would be a needed input.
  • Another embodiment uses stop information as part of the optimization scenario.
  • the stops that a driver plans on making, as well as the estimated time at each waypoint can be used.
  • the controller algorithm may use this information to check that time to charge the battery will be available at a charging waypoint, if not it might still do some charging with the engine.
  • the stops can also be used with solar hybrids, to determine the amount of time for solar charging.
  • Another embodiment uses a remote control with which the driver could instruct the controller a few minutes before they leave to activate a preparation sequence which would bring the battery to full charge and heat the catalytic converter.
  • controller more aggressively draws from the battery until the catalytic converter is heated, thereby reducing engine operation and hence reducing engine exhaust via the un-optimized catalytic converter.
  • the battery use during times of cool catalytic converter is more aggressive than during other times. This is shown generically as 230 in the flowchart.
  • control algorithms mentioned above assume that the energy needed to move the vehicle a given speed on a given slope is known.
  • One way of deriving this information is to perform experiments during the design of the vehicle and program the factors so discovered into the controller. If the user is entering the destination into a GPS which is available to the controller more customizable algorithms are possible.
  • the control algorithm could as a side effect of its operation store the energy used for each segment of a trip recording the speed and slope along with the energy used. This data could be averaged and consulted by the algorithm when it needed to compute the energy needed to complete a given trip as described above.
  • the advantage of this method is that the vehicle would in effect learn the driver's habits and the efficiency of the vehicle as it changed over time.
  • Another way to store and use this data would be to record the energy used on each trip averaging trips between the same waypoints together. Most vehicles make the same trips repeatedly so if the driver's input to the GPS indicated a trip for which there were prior records the energy used on the prior trips could be used as an estimate of the energy needed to complete this trip. The advantage of this is again the customization that would occur as the vehicle in effect learned the driver's habits and the local weather and traffic. Further optimization could be achieved by sorting trips by time of day and weather and choosing the historical trips most similar to the proposed trip as the model. This is analogous to the precedent method of weather forecasting.
  • the controller could compute a confidence factor and could adjust the minimum battery charge to keep based on this factor. That is if the controller has a high degree of confidence in the projected energy use it would allow the battery to discharge to a lower level during the trip. If an adaptive algorithm such as this were used the vehicle would be more efficient on familiar trips. The same applies to projections based on knowledge of the route and the anticipated slopes, traffic and weather. If there is a large database of similar situations the controller could have a higher degree of confidence in the calculated energy requirements.
  • a web based subscription service could be offered in which, the controller uses a wireless internet connection (or any other method of real time communication) to upload the actual energy usage experience on whatever trips it takes.
  • controllers belonging to registered users of the site could download information to make better predictions for upcoming trips either examples of the same trip or general data on the energy usage of cars of that model under various conditions of slope speed weather etc.
  • 235 determines the energy for the remainder of the trip, based on the GPS data.
  • 240 determines the total future motor run time, and 245 allows distributing that run time over the trip.
  • FIG. 3 illustrate a “parked” flowchart. As described above, this allows obtaining the time and destination of the next trip at 300 , determining the energy that is needed for later driving at 305 , and then charging at 310 .
  • the inventor has recognized an additional critical Problem to be Solved. Specifically, a critically important feature of any vehicle is how much fuel it consumes to make any given trip. In a hybrid vehicle the designer has the option to choose how much power comes from the engine at any moment. This makes it possible to operate the engine more frequently at its most efficient RPM. In a plug in hybrid, there are effectively two sources of energy; electricity, which can be added directly to the battery when it is plugged in and whatever fuel the engine uses. At this time electricity is significantly less expensive per unit of energy content that most available fuels so the designer of a plug in hybrid would like to design the techniques that decides on the relative rate at which the engine and motor run in such a way as to maximize the use of electricity and minimizes the use of fuel over the course of a trip. This is difficult to do if the future course of the trip is unknown.
  • FIG. 4 shows the relevant functions including the power needed, curved 400 , the engine power, curved 410 , the motor power, curved for 20 , fuel level curve 430 , and battery level curve 440 .
  • FIG. 4 shows the Power needed and battery and fuel levels over the course of a trip.
  • FIG. 4 shows that the power needed to accomplish each portion (interval) of the trip has been calculated from the information available from the GPS as disclosed in the embodiment of FIGS. 1-3 . This is not instantaneous power, which cannot be predicted, but an anticipated average power needed averaged over some intermediate time or distance scale (for instance tenths of seconds to several minutes or tenths of miles to several miles).
  • the techniques will choose the average level at which to run the engine.
  • the goal of the techniques is to select a curve for the engine power over trip intervals such that the integrated fuel consumption over the trip is minimized.
  • the curve to be developed is subject to several constraints:
  • the level of battery charge can never exceed 100% or be less than zero (or some other higher limit selected to maximize battery life). (Unless the techniques is designed to allow a trip that must be finished on engine power alone in a non-series hybrid.)
  • the fuel level in general, should be controlled must not go below zero. (Unless the techniques is designed to allow a trip that must be finished on battery power only.)
  • the techniques may also include further constraints. For instance it might not be desirable to arrive at a destination with the battery at the lowest possible charge level in case the driver needed to make an emergency trip before the vehicle has had time to recharge.
  • An embodiment describes techniques that can analytically derive an ideal curve of engine power over intervals.
  • proposed curves can be generated at random and a good one selected by an evolutionary process.
  • the curve of required power over trip intervals would be developed as soon as the driver entered the destination into the GPS as described in the earlier patent. This would take into account the topography over the planned trip, the speed limits of the roads involved, optionally the traffic and weather and optionally the history of actual power usage over earlier trips on the same route.
  • the remaining solutions are sorted in order of increasing fuel consumption and a fraction chosen to generate the next generation of solutions starting with the best one.
  • the fraction chosen can be selected to optimize the run time of the techniques but might be one to ten percent.
  • a new population of possible solutions is generated by combining features of the selected best solutions from the previous generation.
  • One possible way to do this is to create a member of the next population of potential solutions by selecting two solutions at random from the population of best solutions from the previous generation, picking an interval at random and combining the beginning of one selected solution with the end of the other.
  • the number of trial solutions in each generation, the number selected to generate the next generation and the method of combining solutions to create the next generation of solutions can all be varied to optimize the speed at which the techniques arrives at an acceptable solution.
  • next generation it may be useful to include the very best of the previous generation unmodified.
  • Another variation would be to create a member of the next generation by averaging two selected good members of the previous generation at each interval.
  • the computer controlling the motor and engine can use anticipatory information about upcoming features of a trip to minimize the use of fuel and make the vehicle have the highest possible miles per gallon and lowest cost to operate. This improves the performance of the vehicle without adding any significant additional hardware.
  • Another embodiment describes using any other kind of computer algorithm to solve this problem, and preferably one that is adapted for solving problems where the number of possible solutions for those problems approaches infinity, such as the traveling salesman problems.
  • DSP Digital Signal Processor
  • ASIC Application Specific Integrated Circuit
  • FPGA Field Programmable Gate Array
  • a general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine.
  • the processor can be part of a computer system that also has a user interface port that communicates with a user interface, and which receives commands entered by a user, has at least one memory (e.g., hard drive or other comparable storage, and random access memory) that stores electronic information including a program that operates under control of the processor and with communication via the user interface port, and a video output that produces its output via any kind of video output format, e.g., VGA, DVI, HDMI, displayport, or any other form.
  • a memory e.g., hard drive or other comparable storage, and random access memory
  • a processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration. These devices may also be used to select values for devices as described herein.
  • a software module may reside in Random Access Memory (RAM), flash memory, Read Only Memory (ROM), Electrically Programmable ROM (EPROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable ROM (EEPROM), registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art.
  • An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such that the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium.
  • the storage medium may be integral to the processor.
  • the processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC.
  • the ASIC may reside in a user terminal.
  • the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user terminal.
  • the functions described may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. If implemented in software, the functions may be stored on or transmitted over as one or more instructions or code on a computer-readable medium.
  • Computer-readable media includes both computer storage media and communication media including any medium that facilitates transfer of a computer program from one place to another.
  • a storage media may be any available media that can be accessed by a computer.
  • such computer-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a computer.
  • the memory storage can also be rotating magnetic hard disk drives, optical disk drives, or flash memory based storage drives or other such solid state, magnetic, or optical storage devices.
  • any connection is properly termed a computer-readable medium.
  • the software is transmitted from a website, server, or other remote source using a coaxial cable, fiber optic cable, twisted pair, digital subscriber line (DSL), or wireless technologies such as infrared, radio, and microwave, then the coaxial cable, fiber optic cable, twisted pair, DSL, or wireless technologies such as infrared, radio, and microwave are included in the definition of medium.
  • DSL digital subscriber line
  • Disk and disc includes compact disc (CD), laser disc, optical disc, digital versatile disc (DVD), floppy disk and blu-ray disc where disks usually reproduce data magnetically, while discs reproduce data optically with lasers. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.
  • the computer readable media can be an article comprising a machine-readable non-transitory tangible medium embodying information indicative of instructions that when performed by one or more machines result in computer implemented operations comprising the actions described throughout this specification.
  • Operations as described herein can be carried out on or over a website.
  • the website can be operated on a server computer, or operated locally, e.g., by being downloaded to the client computer, or operated via a server farm.
  • the website can be accessed over a mobile phone or a PDA, or on any other client.
  • the website can use HTML code in any form, e.g., MHTML, or XML, and via any form such as cascading style sheets (“CSS”) or other.
  • the computers described herein may be any kind of computer, either general purpose, or some specific purpose computer such as a workstation.
  • the programs may be written in C, or Java, Brew or any other programming language.
  • the programs may be resident on a storage medium, e.g., magnetic or optical, e.g. the computer hard drive, a removable disk or media such as a memory stick or SD media, or other removable medium.
  • the programs may also be run over a network, for example, with a server or other machine sending signals to the local machine, which allows the local machine to carry out the operations described herein.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Transportation (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Hybrid Electric Vehicles (AREA)
  • Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)

Abstract

In a hybrid vehicle, selecting the relative usage of the electric motor and the fossil fuel powered engine from moment to moment and also managing the storage of energy in the battery. A computer is used for determining information about a complete trip between a start point and a destination, dividing said complete trip into a plurality of different intervals, and determining, for each of said different intervals, a power level to run the engine at said each of said intervals. An embodiment uses evolutionary computing techniques to determine the most efficient routes.

Description

  • This application claims priority from provisional application number 61319194, filed Mar. 30, 2010, the entire contents of which are herewith incorporated by reference. This is also a continuation in part of application Ser. No. 12/710,350, filed Feb. 22, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. ______ which is a divisional of 11450049 filed Jun. 9, 2006, which claims priority from 60639689, filed Jun. 20, 2005.
  • BACKGROUND
  • A hybrid vehicle may operate using both hydrocarbon fuel and electric power. A conventional engine may be fueled by the hydrocarbon fuel. An electric motor is powered by a battery, and can create or supplement the engine's power. There are several levels of hybrid vehicles available or in design. Some definitions:
  • Basic hybrids will be used to refer to the current generation of hybrid vehicles in which the amount of energy stored as liquid fuel is much greater than the energy capacity of the battery so the vehicle is being propelled by the engine most of the time. The vehicle uses the combined power of both the engine and the motor to achieve acceptable performance in acceleration or hill climbing.
  • Performance may suffer if the battery is completely drained.
  • A basic hybrid may use the engine to operate a generator which charges the battery at times when the full power of the engine is not needed to propel the vehicle. During braking the electric motor can also act as a generator and recover kinetic energy to replenish the battery.
  • Pure hybrids or serial hybrids refer to more extreme hybrid vehicles that are being designed. In these “pure” or all-electric-drive hybrids, one or more electric motors are the only source of power to the wheels. The only function of the engine is to run a generator to charge the battery. In this type of vehicle it is even more important that there always be charge in the battery since the vehicle cannot move at all without it.
  • In a pure hybrid the battery pack is typically much larger than in a basic hybrid. This design also has the advantage that the engine and generator can run while the vehicle is parked or stopped. Because most vehicles spend more time parked than moving in this kind of hybrid the engine can be much smaller than the engine in a conventional vehicle of the same weight.
  • Plug-in hybrid means one in which the driver has the option of plugging the vehicle into an exterior electric power when it is parked so that the battery does not have to be charged by the engine. Typically they have larger batteries than a basic hybrid. Of course if the battery is low and the vehicle is not plugged in the engine will power a generator to charge the battery as in a basic hybrid. Since electricity purchased from a utility is much cheaper than hydrocarbon fuels in terms of cost per unit of energy, it is advantageous to the user to charge from the grid as often as possible and minimize times the engine is charging the battery.
  • A plug-in hybrid often has a larger battery, so that on local trips the vehicle may be able to run on battery power except when maximal power is needed and thus achieve a higher effective miles per gallon of hydrocarbon fuel. The capacity to plug in is a feature that can be added to the other types mentioned above so a plug-in hybrid will also be either a basic or pure hybrid.
  • Solar hybrids will be used to refer to newly proposed hybrid vehicles which have solar panels on the body to provide part of the electricity for the electric motor.
  • It is well known that the area available on the top of a typical car is insufficient to provide enough electricity to power the car. In fact, typically the ratio is 1/8 to 1/10 of the area that would be needed to power such a vehicle. On the other hand, a typical car belonging to an individual is parked 90% of the time. Therefore, if the battery is large enough, solar charging could provide a significant portion of the energy used. The currently proposed solar hybrids may also be plug-in hybrids, so if sunlight is unavailable for any reason (weather, parked underground etc.) the battery can be charged from grid power. In addition since it is a hybrid, the battery can always be charged by the engine.
  • A controller may be formed by one or more processors associated with the vehicle. The controller runs an optimized control algorithm that determines on a moment-to-moment basis when to use either the engine, the motor or both; in what ratio, and also when to charge the battery from the engine. In pure, plug-in and solar hybrids, the controller also makes decisions about how and when to recharge the battery when the vehicle is stopped or parked. The controller may also adjust the transmission and brakes as necessary to maintain optimal efficiency.
  • In a normal internal combustion vehicle there is no energy stored except in the fuel. The power produced by the engine must be equal to the power necessary to overcome all losses at every moment. The designer of a hybrid vehicle has greater flexibility. A hybrid vehicle includes a motor/generator that can provide some or all of the power needed and a battery which can not only store power in the form of electricity but can effectively be refilled whenever the power necessary to permit the chosen speed is less than the power provided by the motor. If the vehicle is decelerating or going downhill this can be positive even if the motor is off (this is referred to as regenerative breaking).
  • The motor, engine and generator can be arranged in different ways. For instance, in the Toyota Prius both the motor and the engine are attached mechanically to the driveshaft while in the Chevy Volt the motor powers a generator which charges a battery and all motive power comes through an electric motor connected to this battery. In this patent application we are concerned only with the techniques that select the relative usage of the electric motor and the engine from moment to moment and the storage of energy in the battery. The techniques described here is executed by a computer, and works equally well regardless of the arrangement of the electric motor and the engine.
  • SUMMARY
  • The present application describes new ways of controlling hybrid vehicles to increase the degree of optimization possible.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows a basic hybrid vehicle; and
  • FIGS. 2 and 3 show a flowchart of operation; and
  • FIG. 4 shows a chart of power and fuel.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • In this application, the following words may have the following meanings:
  • Definitions:
  • Motor: Used here as a short form of electric motor, meaning the one or more electric motors providing motive force to maintain the vehicle at the desired speed. This may be a motor/generator, which recovers energy when the vehicle is decelerating or going downhill.
  • Engine: Used here to mean an internal combustion engine or a fuel cell or any other device that creates mechanical or electrical power by consuming some fuel. It is assumed that unlike the motor the engine cannot be run backwards to recover energy. The engine may or may not be connected directly to the drivechain.
  • Fuel: This is used to mean whatever fuel the engine is consuming, examples would include without limitation, gasoline, diesel fuel, alcohol, natural gas and hydrogen.
  • Series hybrid: A hybrid vehicle in which the engine only charges the battery and all motive power comes from the motor(s). Also known as a range extended electric vehicle.
  • Interval: The time or distance unit over which engine power is being set by the proposed techniques.
  • An embodiment as shown in FIG. 1. A hybrid vehicle 100 is shown as an automobile with an engine 110 running on a combustible fuel, e.g., gasoline, and a motor 120, powered by a rechargeable source (here a battery) 125. A generator 130 produces energy to charge the battery, regeneratively or with power from the motor. Note that in some designs the generator and the motor may be the same device. A controller 140 determines how much engine power and/or motor power to use.
  • Existing designs may use various parameters, including the current and previous position of the gas pedal and brake pedal (which input the driver's intent to the controller), the current and past fuel consumption, the current and past speed and acceleration, and battery charge level as inputs. Note that the “gas pedal” is not actually controlling the fuel pump in some hybrid vehicles, but is taken by the controller as an indication of the driver's desire. Based on this information and the other variables, the controller 140 may control the fuel flow to engine 110, as well as the amount of current delivered to the electric motor 120. The controller may also take other actions, such as shifting the continuously variable transmission.
  • Other variables may also be used to help the controller 140 in making its decision. These may include the slope of the road, the current temperature and the current air pressure. Variables such as these may form second order influences on the optimization carried out by the controller.
  • The controller 140 operates according to the flowchart of FIGS. 2 and 3, to determine when to use battery charge, and how much to use. The controller's goal is to use as. much of the battery charge as possible—while never really completely emptying the battery charge.
  • Consider the decision the controller must make if a hybrid vehicle has climbed a hill steep and long enough that the battery had to be significantly drained to achieve the driver's desired speed. If the vehicle then reaches a level stretch, the controller will detect a need to replenish the battery and will aggressively charge the battery. For example, the controller may run the conventional engine at a level greater than needed to maintain speed in order to have extra power to recharge the battery. Note that this action is triggered by a rule, perhaps the cardinal rule in the controller which dictates that “if the battery is below a certain charge level and the current power requirement is less than the capacity of the conventional engine, then recharge the battery.”
  • The inventor recognized, however, that recharging the battery at this moment may or may not be the optimum action in terms of fuel economy. If there is another hill coming up, it may be the correct action—otherwise if the battery is not fully charged by the start of the next hill, the vehicle may not be able to climb that at an acceptable speed without the additional energy from the battery. In contrast, if the route is going to go downhill next, the system will have the option of using the electric motor as a brake and recovering energy into the battery for future use. The previous aggressive charging might not have been necessary. Once the battery has been fully charged, the recovered energy is essentially wasted—the controller will have to use the mechanical brake to control the downhill speed and the energy will be lost as heat instead.
  • The inventor noticed that this less than—optimum decision by the controller algorithm is caused because the controller does not use knowledge of the future path of the vehicle. If there were an input to inform the algorithm of future opportunities to recharge the battery, then a more optimum sequence could be chosen and the net efficiency could improve.
  • In an embodiment, the controller 110 uses knowledge of the future path of the vehicle as part of its determination of how much battery charge to use at any given time. In an embodiment, the future path is determined from a GPS navigator 150 associated with the vehicle, that communicates with (or is part of) controller 140. In another embodiment, the user manually tells the controller about the trip that is going to be taken. This is generically shown as the “trip energy expenditure data”, 210 in FIG. 2. The controller may determine this based on GPS map data 215, as well as based on dynamic information 220, such as weather and traffic.
  • In a plug-in hybrid, the problem of the controller not knowing the drivers intent is exacerbated. In proposed designs for plug in hybrids, the suggested algorithm is to use the engine to recharge the battery whenever the battery level is below 40%. This is a safe algorithm but clearly not the most cost efficient possible. Consider the situation in which the driver is on their way to a parking place where grid electricity is available. In this case, letting the battery be run to almost zero as the vehicle arrives is a good strategy,* since it will allow the maximum amount of energy to be obtained and stored at the lower cost—since electricity is almost always cheaper per unit energy than liquid fuels. Under the 40% rule, the controller might be running the engine harder than necessary in order to charge the battery when it is in fact possible to charge the battery from a cheaper source at the destination.
  • An embodiment describes informing the controller of how far the vehicle must go (as well as the speed and any hills to be climbed) before grid recharging is available. Given this information, the control algorithm becomes able to calculate the energy needed to complete the trip in order to use as much as possible of the energy in the battery so that it could be recharged from the less expensive source.
  • Another aspect provides information for the controller to know how long grid power is going to be available and how much energy is needed for the next trip.
  • If time of day metering is available at charging locations, a further cost optimization is possible in plug-in hybrids. Consider the case in which the driver has arrived home and plugged in the vehicle. Should the controller recharge the battery as fast as possible? If the driver intends to use the vehicle again soon, this could be the desired behavior. However, if the vehicle will not be used until the next day and cheaper electricity is available at night, then it might be better to delay recharging until the electricity rate comes down. In the absence of information on when and how the vehicle will next be used, the designer of the algorithm must make pessimistic assumptions which will lead the algorithm to charge the battery as quickly as possible regardless of cost.
  • This issue of when and from what source to charge the battery is even more complex in a solar hybrid. Consider the scenario in which the driver has commuted to work and parked the vehicle at a spot that has grid power available. Obviously the driver should plug in the vehicle but should the controller begin to draw grid power? Given enough time, the solar hybrid can recharge the battery from the solar collectors on the vehicle but what if the driver intends to make another trip soon? If the battery is not recharged, the next trip will at the least use more engine time and therefore more expensive fuel. Again, lack of knowledge of the driver's future intent forces the designer of the control algorithm to make pessimistic assumptions.
  • The driver's intent and the vehicle's future path are often available in computer compatible form when the driver is using a GPS navigator. In addition to knowing the current position, a modern GPS stores a map of the area which optionally can include contour information. In order to use the navigation assistance feature of a GPS, the driver indicates the destination at the start of the trip, shown as 200 in FIG. 2. The controller determines the desired end battery state at 205. This may be a set amount, or may be controllable.
  • In an embodiment, the GPS provides information indicative of the length and contour of the trip (data 215) ahead to the controller as well as continuously updating the controller with the current position. Standard interconnection methods such as Ethernet, USB, infra red, or wireless Ethernet, for example, can be used to communicate between the devices. Alternatively, a dedicated GPS chipset can be associated with the controller. Given the availability of this information, more sophisticated control algorithms can be used.
  • In the hill example given above, the algorithm can calculate the amount of energy that could be recovered given the contour of the road ahead. If the future path is downhill, that may override the requirement to keep the battery charged to a certain level, thus maximizing efficiency.
  • If the driver changes the route, this will cause the vehicle's battery to be in a non optimal state; for instance if at the top of the slope posited above, the driver were to leave the programmed route and take a detour that leads further uphill, that driver might be informed that either the speed will be restricted or the vehicle must park while the conventional engine recharges the battery. This may be a worst case cost of the efficiency improvements. If the driver were to begin a trip without indicating a destination to the GPS, the controller might default to the current style of algorithm. The only cost of doing this would be a loss of efficiency; otherwise the vehicle would operate normally.
  • In the example of the plug-in hybrid approaching its destination described above, the controller could use the current position forwarded by the GPS as well as the information on the distance to the destination and contour of the road ahead to model the energy required to complete the trip. At the moment the computed energy necessary to complete the trip is less than the current energy stored in the battery, the controller could stop using the engine to charge the battery and let it discharge (obviously keeping some minimal reserve level) so that it could accept the maximum charge from the grid recharge point.
  • A simple form of this optimization could be achieved by giving the driver a control to inhibit further recharging of the battery by the engine. A driver who was familiar with the route could learn when they could activate the switch to optimize use of battery charge. It could become possible to over-drain the battery, but with an attentive driver on a familiar route this would be feasible and would increase efficiency without any modification to the existing controllers.
  • For the automatic anticipation optimization to work properly, the controller would need to know whether the destination had grid charging available. This information can be available to the controller as a data item on the GPS. In most GPS/electronic map units, the user can have the GPS remember locations and can give the locations (called waypoints) names and in some cases choose a symbol. This may be used to define grid points. Grid points can also be added as “points of interest”. In this method when the driver enters waypoints into the integrated GPS they would indicate whether grid based battery charging was reliably available at each waypoint. When the driver started a trip they would enter the destination waypoint. In this case the control algorithm would know not only the distance and contour to be crossed to get to the destination but whether less expensive recharge for the battery is available. Given this information, the control algorithm could use the engine as little as possible to arrive with some minimal charge in the battery.
  • If the driver were to input the destination for the next trip and when they expected to start when they leave the vehicle further optimizations are possible. Consider the examples of the plug-in hybrid which is parked overnight. If the driver enters the time they next expected to derive and the controller had access to data on electricity rates, it might calculate that rates would go lower before the time the driver next needed the car and therefore the optimum behavior might be to delay fully recharging the battery until rates go down. For pure hybrids which cannot be used at all if the battery is discharged, the algorithm might be modified to require bringing the battery up to some minimal charge (for instance enough to get to the nearest hospital) as quickly as possible and then doing the rest of the charging during off peak rates.
  • Knowledge of the time before the vehicle would be next used and the next destination might also improve the optimization algorithms for solar hybrids. Consider the example of the solar hybrid that has just been parked, if the user indicates that the next trip will occur in a short time and will be a long trip the algorithm might dictate recharging the battery right away from grid power even though it is more expensive than sunlight. On the other hand if the user indicates that they will not use the vehicle for 8 hours or the next trip is to another location which also has charging and which the vehicle can reach with the current charge then the control algorithm might conclude that recharging with solar alone is the optimum choice.
  • Other optimization information may be used as 200. The dynamic information includes information that changes from time to time. The amount of traffic on the road serves as an indication of the probable fuel economy. This data allows more accurately estimation of the energy needed to complete the trip.
  • Another input is weather, the current and future wind speed and direction along the route will exert a non-trivial effect on energy needed, in addition the future cloud cover is a variable the control algorithm should have in order to decide whether a solar hybrid will be able to recharge from sunlight in the time available.
  • Future speed can also be used to optimize performance. In certain jurisdictions, real time information on the current average speed of travel for each segment of the local highways is now on the web. This information may be used as part of the model. The data could be distributed in computer readable form such as XML or RSS. If it were, a vehicle equipped with a wireless internet connection could continuously download this information and the control algorithm would be able to estimate future speed as well as distance and hills in optimizing the use of power sources. An internet connection could also be used to download weather forecasts in order to have anticipated wind speed and direction as an input. For the optimization of charging by a Solar Hybrid as described above knowledge of the future cloud cover would be a needed input.
  • Another embodiment uses stop information as part of the optimization scenario. The stops that a driver plans on making, as well as the estimated time at each waypoint can be used. The controller algorithm may use this information to check that time to charge the battery will be available at a charging waypoint, if not it might still do some charging with the engine. The stops can also be used with solar hybrids, to determine the amount of time for solar charging.
  • This same information on future use could be used to minimize pollution as well. It is a known property of catalytic converters that they do not work well until they become hot. It has been proposed that as a vehicle is started battery power be used in resistive heating elements to bring the converter up to temperature as quickly as possible in order to minimize pollution caused by short trips. In a plug in hybrid which is trying to maximize the use of the battery the use of electricity to heat something is a poor use of a limited resource. If the driver enters the time the vehicle would next be used when they plug in, the controller could start warming the catalytic converter while the vehicle is still connected to grid power. This would allow the vehicle to start a trip with the battery fully charged and the catalytic converter at optimum temperature.
  • Another embodiment uses a remote control with which the driver could instruct the controller a few minutes before they leave to activate a preparation sequence which would bring the battery to full charge and heat the catalytic converter.
  • Another alternative is that the controller more aggressively draws from the battery until the catalytic converter is heated, thereby reducing engine operation and hence reducing engine exhaust via the un-optimized catalytic converter. In this embodiment, the battery use during times of cool catalytic converter is more aggressive than during other times. This is shown generically as 230 in the flowchart.
  • The control algorithms mentioned above assume that the energy needed to move the vehicle a given speed on a given slope is known. One way of deriving this information is to perform experiments during the design of the vehicle and program the factors so discovered into the controller. If the user is entering the destination into a GPS which is available to the controller more customizable algorithms are possible. The control algorithm could as a side effect of its operation store the energy used for each segment of a trip recording the speed and slope along with the energy used. This data could be averaged and consulted by the algorithm when it needed to compute the energy needed to complete a given trip as described above. The advantage of this method is that the vehicle would in effect learn the driver's habits and the efficiency of the vehicle as it changed over time. Another way to store and use this data would be to record the energy used on each trip averaging trips between the same waypoints together. Most vehicles make the same trips repeatedly so if the driver's input to the GPS indicated a trip for which there were prior records the energy used on the prior trips could be used as an estimate of the energy needed to complete this trip. The advantage of this is again the customization that would occur as the vehicle in effect learned the driver's habits and the local weather and traffic. Further optimization could be achieved by sorting trips by time of day and weather and choosing the historical trips most similar to the proposed trip as the model. This is analogous to the precedent method of weather forecasting.
  • If the database of previous trips between the same waypoints is large enough the control algorithm would have a higher degree of confidence in the estimated future energy consumption. In this case the controller could compute a confidence factor and could adjust the minimum battery charge to keep based on this factor. That is if the controller has a high degree of confidence in the projected energy use it would allow the battery to discharge to a lower level during the trip. If an adaptive algorithm such as this were used the vehicle would be more efficient on familiar trips. The same applies to projections based on knowledge of the route and the anticipated slopes, traffic and weather. If there is a large database of similar situations the controller could have a higher degree of confidence in the calculated energy requirements.
  • Another way to have a larger database either of specific trips or performance in various situations is to share with other users of the same type of car. A web based subscription service could be offered in which, the controller uses a wireless internet connection (or any other method of real time communication) to upload the actual energy usage experience on whatever trips it takes. In return controllers belonging to registered users of the site could download information to make better predictions for upcoming trips either examples of the same trip or general data on the energy usage of cars of that model under various conditions of slope speed weather etc.
  • It should be obvious that other methods of communication could be used to achieve this result including exchanging data before and after trips when non wireless methods are available.
  • In summary of the above techniques, 235 determines the energy for the remainder of the trip, based on the GPS data. 240 determines the total future motor run time, and 245 allows distributing that run time over the trip.
  • FIG. 3 illustrate a “parked” flowchart. As described above, this allows obtaining the time and destination of the next trip at 300, determining the energy that is needed for later driving at 305, and then charging at 310.
  • The inventor has recognized an additional critical Problem to be Solved. Specifically, a critically important feature of any vehicle is how much fuel it consumes to make any given trip. In a hybrid vehicle the designer has the option to choose how much power comes from the engine at any moment. This makes it possible to operate the engine more frequently at its most efficient RPM. In a plug in hybrid, there are effectively two sources of energy; electricity, which can be added directly to the battery when it is plugged in and whatever fuel the engine uses. At this time electricity is significantly less expensive per unit of energy content that most available fuels so the designer of a plug in hybrid would like to design the techniques that decides on the relative rate at which the engine and motor run in such a way as to maximize the use of electricity and minimizes the use of fuel over the course of a trip. This is difficult to do if the future course of the trip is unknown.
  • The techniques described here builds on the inventions disclosed in the parent patent Inputs for Optimizing Performance in Hybrid Vehicles (U.S. Pat. No. 7,665,559) from which this claims priority. That patent discloses a method of using information from a GPS unit in which the driver has entered the destination as well as information from previous trips and public data sources such as weather and traffic websites to anticipate the power requirements over the course of the trip. The instantaneous power requirement cannot be predicted as it will depend on interactions with other traffic and traffic signals. However, the average power needed over some interval will depend on topography and average speed, which can be predicted.
  • Knowing the average future requirements for power, there are certain optimizations that can be made. For instance:
  • In a plug in hybrid it would be desirable to arrive at a location that has charging available with the battery in the lowest possible state of charge so that as much as possible of the total power used was electrical power.
  • In any hybrid it would be desirable to arrive at the bottom of a hill with the battery in a high state of charge to avoid the requirement to run the engine at a higher and less efficient power level while climbing the hill. If the size of the engine is such that the hill cannot be climbed at a desired speed on engine power alone this is a requirement for acceptable performance. This logic also applies to any portion of the trip to be accomplished at high speed.
  • It would be desirable to arrive at the top of a hill with a long downhill slope to be traversed with the battery in the lowest state of charge possible so that as much as possible of the breaking energy can be recovered and stored.
  • Given the possibilities of optimization, the problem can be generalized to be the selection of some function giving the optimum average power level of the engine as a function of distance along the trip. FIG. 4 shows the relevant functions including the power needed, curved 400, the engine power, curved 410, the motor power, curved for 20, fuel level curve 430, and battery level curve 440.
  • FIG. 4 shows the Power needed and battery and fuel levels over the course of a trip. FIG. 4 shows that the power needed to accomplish each portion (interval) of the trip has been calculated from the information available from the GPS as disclosed in the embodiment of FIGS. 1-3. This is not instantaneous power, which cannot be predicted, but an anticipated average power needed averaged over some intermediate time or distance scale (for instance tenths of seconds to several minutes or tenths of miles to several miles).
  • Over any interval, the techniques will choose the average level at which to run the engine. The goal of the techniques is to select a curve for the engine power over trip intervals such that the integrated fuel consumption over the trip is minimized.
  • The curve to be developed is subject to several constraints:
  • There is a maximal power that the engine can develop.
  • There is a curve of engine efficiency as a function of power that will determine the rate of fuel consumption for a given power.
  • There is a maximal power that the motor can develop.
  • There is a curve of motor efficiency as a function of power that will determine the rate of electricity consumption for a given power.
  • There is a maximum rate at which the regenerative breaking system can return energy to the battery and the efficiency of regenerative breaking may vary with the rate power is being returned.
  • The level of battery charge can never exceed 100% or be less than zero (or some other higher limit selected to maximize battery life). (Unless the techniques is designed to allow a trip that must be finished on engine power alone in a non-series hybrid.)
  • The fuel level, in general, should be controlled must not go below zero. (Unless the techniques is designed to allow a trip that must be finished on battery power only.)
  • To accomplish the trip at the assumed speed the power available must be equal or greater than the power required at all times. In a series hybrid this is simply the power of the motor but in a hybrid with a transmission that can combine mechanical power from the motor and engine it is the sum of their powers. (Assuming that both fuel and battery power are available at that moment.)
  • The techniques may also include further constraints. For instance it might not be desirable to arrive at a destination with the battery at the lowest possible charge level in case the driver needed to make an emergency trip before the vehicle has had time to recharge.
  • Different characteristics may be used for series as compared with non-series hybrids. In a series hybrid, the engine power level is in some sense buffered from the instantaneous power requirements by the battery so that the engine power level for a given increment of the trip can be considered a constant. In a non-series hybrid the movement of the gas pedal will impose overrides which will bias the power from the long-term optimal levels developed by the techniques.
  • Even subject to these constraints, there are a very large set of engine power over interval curves that satisfy the constraints. In fact, the set of curves approaches infinity as the variables are considered continuous. The inventor recognizes that the designer must create techniques that will select the curve that results in the lowest possible fuel use over the trip using techniques that can accommodate all of these different possible options.
  • This is an example of a problem in which evaluating a proposed solution is much easier than analytically solving for an optimal solution. For any given curve of engine power over intervals, it is easy to integrate usage of fuel and check for violations of the constraints. It is much more difficult to analytically solve for a curve that optimizes fuel usage given an arbitrary curve of power required and the curves for engine and motor efficiency.
  • An embodiment describes techniques that can analytically derive an ideal curve of engine power over intervals. By the use of evolutionary techniques, proposed curves can be generated at random and a good one selected by an evolutionary process.
  • The techniques work as follows:
  • The curve of required power over trip intervals would be developed as soon as the driver entered the destination into the GPS as described in the earlier patent. This would take into account the topography over the planned trip, the speed limits of the roads involved, optionally the traffic and weather and optionally the history of actual power usage over earlier trips on the same route.
  • A large number (hundreds to thousands) of possible curves of engine power level over trip intervals would be generated at random by choosing an engine power randomly from the range of possible engine power levels for each interval. Each of these is a potential solution.
  • These resultant curves would each be evaluated by assuming that motor power in each interval is equal to the difference between required power in that interval and the engine power. (In a series hybrid the engine power available is zero so all engine power is assumed to go into charging the battery and the motor power must equal the required power). Given motor and engine power these can be multiplied by their efficiencies at the given power levels and integrated to develop the fuel level and battery state of charge.
  • Some possible curves will result in the violation of one or more constraints at some interval; these potential solutions can be discarded immediately.
  • The remaining solutions are sorted in order of increasing fuel consumption and a fraction chosen to generate the next generation of solutions starting with the best one. The fraction chosen can be selected to optimize the run time of the techniques but might be one to ten percent.
  • A new population of possible solutions (curves) is generated by combining features of the selected best solutions from the previous generation. One possible way to do this is to create a member of the next population of potential solutions by selecting two solutions at random from the population of best solutions from the previous generation, picking an interval at random and combining the beginning of one selected solution with the end of the other.
  • Once a large number of potential solutions have been created return to step 3.
  • Cycle the techniques between steps 3 and 7 until the best solution ceases to improve or as much time is available has elapsed.
  • This method will not result in a provably best solution but it will generally arrive at an economically acceptable one in reasonable time. The first solutions generated fully at random will not be very good but as the techniques runs the best solutions in each generation will get better and better. In this application the computer controlling the motor and engine could run this techniques once as the trip starts and then periodically afterwards to adapt the future usage of the motor and engine to actual conditions.
  • The number of trial solutions in each generation, the number selected to generate the next generation and the method of combining solutions to create the next generation of solutions can all be varied to optimize the speed at which the techniques arrives at an acceptable solution.
  • For instance when creating the next generation it may be useful to include the very best of the previous generation unmodified. Another variation would be to create a member of the next generation by averaging two selected good members of the previous generation at each interval.
  • By using these techniques the computer controlling the motor and engine can use anticipatory information about upcoming features of a trip to minimize the use of fuel and make the vehicle have the highest possible miles per gallon and lowest cost to operate. This improves the performance of the vehicle without adding any significant additional hardware.
  • Another embodiment describes using any other kind of computer algorithm to solve this problem, and preferably one that is adapted for solving problems where the number of possible solutions for those problems approaches infinity, such as the traveling salesman problems.
  • Although only a few embodiments have been disclosed in detail above, other embodiments are possible and the inventors intend these to be encompassed within this specification. The specification describes specific examples to accomplish a more general goal that may be accomplished in another way. This disclosure is intended to be exemplary, and the claims are intended to cover any modification or alternative which might be predictable to a person having ordinary skill in the art. For example, other devices and other operations can be controlled in this way.
  • Those of skill would further appreciate that the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the exemplary embodiments of the invention.
  • The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, and circuits described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein, may be implemented or performed with a general purpose processor, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. The processor can be part of a computer system that also has a user interface port that communicates with a user interface, and which receives commands entered by a user, has at least one memory (e.g., hard drive or other comparable storage, and random access memory) that stores electronic information including a program that operates under control of the processor and with communication via the user interface port, and a video output that produces its output via any kind of video output format, e.g., VGA, DVI, HDMI, displayport, or any other form.
  • A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration. These devices may also be used to select values for devices as described herein.
  • The steps of a method or algorithm described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. A software module may reside in Random Access Memory (RAM), flash memory, Read Only Memory (ROM), Electrically Programmable ROM (EPROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable ROM (EEPROM), registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art. An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such that the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium may be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC. The ASIC may reside in a user terminal. In the alternative, the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user terminal.
  • In one or more exemplary embodiments, the functions described may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. If implemented in software, the functions may be stored on or transmitted over as one or more instructions or code on a computer-readable medium. Computer-readable media includes both computer storage media and communication media including any medium that facilitates transfer of a computer program from one place to another. A storage media may be any available media that can be accessed by a computer. By way of example, and not limitation, such computer-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a computer. The memory storage can also be rotating magnetic hard disk drives, optical disk drives, or flash memory based storage drives or other such solid state, magnetic, or optical storage devices. Also, any connection is properly termed a computer-readable medium. For example, if the software is transmitted from a website, server, or other remote source using a coaxial cable, fiber optic cable, twisted pair, digital subscriber line (DSL), or wireless technologies such as infrared, radio, and microwave, then the coaxial cable, fiber optic cable, twisted pair, DSL, or wireless technologies such as infrared, radio, and microwave are included in the definition of medium. Disk and disc, as used herein, includes compact disc (CD), laser disc, optical disc, digital versatile disc (DVD), floppy disk and blu-ray disc where disks usually reproduce data magnetically, while discs reproduce data optically with lasers. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media. The computer readable media can be an article comprising a machine-readable non-transitory tangible medium embodying information indicative of instructions that when performed by one or more machines result in computer implemented operations comprising the actions described throughout this specification.
  • Operations as described herein can be carried out on or over a website. The website can be operated on a server computer, or operated locally, e.g., by being downloaded to the client computer, or operated via a server farm. The website can be accessed over a mobile phone or a PDA, or on any other client. The website can use HTML code in any form, e.g., MHTML, or XML, and via any form such as cascading style sheets (“CSS”) or other.
  • Also, the inventors intend that only those claims which use the words “means for” are intended to be interpreted under 35 USC 112, sixth paragraph. Moreover, no limitations from the specification are intended to be read into any claims, unless those limitations are expressly included in the claims. The computers described herein may be any kind of computer, either general purpose, or some specific purpose computer such as a workstation. The programs may be written in C, or Java, Brew or any other programming language. The programs may be resident on a storage medium, e.g., magnetic or optical, e.g. the computer hard drive, a removable disk or media such as a memory stick or SD media, or other removable medium. The programs may also be run over a network, for example, with a server or other machine sending signals to the local machine, which allows the local machine to carry out the operations described herein.
  • Where a specific numerical value is mentioned herein, it should be considered that the value may be increased or decreased by 20%, while still staying within the teachings of the present application, unless some different range is specifically mentioned. Where a specified logical sense is used, the opposite logical sense is also intended to be encompassed.
  • The previous description of the disclosed exemplary embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these exemplary embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.

Claims (4)

1. A system for optimizing use of the engine of a hybrid vehicle to minimize fuel use by maximizing use of electrical energy in the engine, said system using a computer for determining information about a complete trip between a start point and a destination, dividing said complete trip into a plurality of different intervals, and determining, for each of said different intervals, a power level to run the engine at said each of said intervals.
2. A system as in claim 1, wherein said determining uses evolutionary techniques to select the power level at which to run the engine at each interval of a trip.
3. A method of optimizing use of the engine of a hybrid vehicle to minimize fuel use by maximizing use of electrical energy in the engine, comprising:
using a computer for determining information about a complete trip between a start point and a destination, dividing said complete trip into a plurality of different intervals, and determining, for each of said different intervals, a power level to run the engine at said each of said intervals.
4. A method as in claim 3, wherein said determining uses evolutionary techniques to select the power level at which to run the engine at each interval of a trip.
US13/076,050 2006-06-09 2011-03-30 Technique for Optimizing the Use of the Motor in Hybrid Vehicles Abandoned US20110246010A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/076,050 US20110246010A1 (en) 2006-06-09 2011-03-30 Technique for Optimizing the Use of the Motor in Hybrid Vehicles

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/450,049 US7665559B2 (en) 2005-06-10 2006-06-09 Inputs for optimizing performance in hybrid vehicles
US12/710,350 US7958958B2 (en) 2005-06-10 2010-02-22 Inputs for optimizing performance in hybrid vehicles
US31919410P 2010-03-30 2010-03-30
US13/076,050 US20110246010A1 (en) 2006-06-09 2011-03-30 Technique for Optimizing the Use of the Motor in Hybrid Vehicles

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/710,350 Continuation-In-Part US7958958B2 (en) 2005-06-10 2010-02-22 Inputs for optimizing performance in hybrid vehicles

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110246010A1 true US20110246010A1 (en) 2011-10-06

Family

ID=44710594

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/076,050 Abandoned US20110246010A1 (en) 2006-06-09 2011-03-30 Technique for Optimizing the Use of the Motor in Hybrid Vehicles

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20110246010A1 (en)

Cited By (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120109515A1 (en) * 2010-10-27 2012-05-03 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Bev routing system and method
FR2988061A1 (en) * 2012-03-15 2013-09-20 Renault Sa Method for determining maximum mileage range of electric vehicle, involves determining moment at which state of change of battery tends to zero following evolution of energy state of vehicle along trajectory
US20140005917A1 (en) * 2012-06-27 2014-01-02 International Business Machines Corporation Determining fuel economy by fuel source location
US20140312839A1 (en) * 2013-04-19 2014-10-23 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for electric vehicle charging analysis and feedback
WO2014091238A3 (en) * 2012-12-12 2014-11-27 Teva Motors Limited Range extender control
US20140365105A1 (en) * 2008-10-31 2014-12-11 Clarion Co., Ltd. Navigation System and Navigation Method of Route Planning Using Variations of Mechanical Energy
US9008858B1 (en) 2014-03-31 2015-04-14 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. System and method for providing adaptive vehicle settings based on a known route
US9266443B2 (en) 2014-03-31 2016-02-23 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. System and method for adaptive battery charge and discharge rates and limits on known routes
US9290108B2 (en) 2014-03-31 2016-03-22 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. System and method for adaptive battery temperature control of a vehicle over a known route
US20160167642A1 (en) * 2013-05-03 2016-06-16 Renault S.A.S. Method for optimising the energy consumption of a hybrid vehicle
WO2016095936A1 (en) * 2014-12-15 2016-06-23 Volvo Truck Corporation A method and device for charging an electric energy storage system in a vehicle
US9679422B2 (en) * 2014-07-23 2017-06-13 William D. Nicholson Method for increasing accuracy of vehicle data
US9695760B2 (en) 2014-03-31 2017-07-04 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. System and method for improving energy efficiency of a vehicle based on known route segments
US9776624B1 (en) 2016-05-04 2017-10-03 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and system for engine control
US9873435B2 (en) 2016-05-04 2018-01-23 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and system for engine control
US9925975B2 (en) 2016-05-04 2018-03-27 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and system for hybrid vehicle control
US9944276B2 (en) 2016-05-04 2018-04-17 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and system for engine control
US10060362B2 (en) 2016-05-04 2018-08-28 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and system for engine control
US10081238B2 (en) 2014-11-25 2018-09-25 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Drive system and vehicle
US10145316B2 (en) 2016-05-04 2018-12-04 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and system for engine control
JP2019099016A (en) * 2017-12-05 2019-06-24 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Hybrid automobile and control apparatus incorporated therein
JP2019099015A (en) * 2017-12-05 2019-06-24 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Hybrid automobile and control apparatus incorporated therein
US20190256078A1 (en) * 2018-02-19 2019-08-22 General Electric Company Hybrid vehicle control system
US10435007B2 (en) 2015-09-23 2019-10-08 Cummins, Inc. Systems and methods of engine stop/start control of an electrified powertrain
US10676077B2 (en) 2015-12-10 2020-06-09 Cummins, Inc. Systems and methods of energy management and control of vehicle accessories
US10894482B2 (en) 2015-08-07 2021-01-19 Cummins, Inc. Systems and methods of battery management and control for a vehicle
US20210188246A1 (en) * 2019-12-18 2021-06-24 Cummins Inc. Supervisory genset control in range-extended electric vehicle
US11235665B2 (en) * 2019-03-26 2022-02-01 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Regenerative braking control system
US11247552B2 (en) 2015-08-03 2022-02-15 Cummins, Inc. Systems and methods of energy management and control of an electrified powertrain
US20220348185A1 (en) * 2021-05-02 2022-11-03 Cummins Inc. Power management for hybrid electric vehicles
US11783264B2 (en) 2017-05-11 2023-10-10 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Vehicle driver safety performance based on relativity
US11970209B2 (en) 2017-09-13 2024-04-30 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Real-time vehicle driver feedback based on analytics
US12013695B1 (en) * 2017-05-16 2024-06-18 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Autonomous vehicle operation based on real-time analytics

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030060977A1 (en) * 2001-09-21 2003-03-27 General Motors Corporation. Method and system for mobile vehicle re-routing
US20070100537A1 (en) * 2005-10-28 2007-05-03 Parikh Jayendra S System for and method of updating traffic data using probe vehicles having exterior sensors
US20070112475A1 (en) * 2005-11-17 2007-05-17 Motility Systems, Inc. Power management systems and devices
US20080004802A1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2008-01-03 Microsoft Corporation Route planning with contingencies
US20080071472A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Denso Corporation Control information output device

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030060977A1 (en) * 2001-09-21 2003-03-27 General Motors Corporation. Method and system for mobile vehicle re-routing
US20070100537A1 (en) * 2005-10-28 2007-05-03 Parikh Jayendra S System for and method of updating traffic data using probe vehicles having exterior sensors
US20070112475A1 (en) * 2005-11-17 2007-05-17 Motility Systems, Inc. Power management systems and devices
US20080004802A1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2008-01-03 Microsoft Corporation Route planning with contingencies
US20080071472A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Denso Corporation Control information output device

Cited By (58)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9043141B2 (en) * 2008-10-31 2015-05-26 Clarion Co., Ltd. Navigation system and navigation method of route planning using variations of mechanical energy
US20140365105A1 (en) * 2008-10-31 2014-12-11 Clarion Co., Ltd. Navigation System and Navigation Method of Route Planning Using Variations of Mechanical Energy
US20120109515A1 (en) * 2010-10-27 2012-05-03 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Bev routing system and method
US8942919B2 (en) * 2010-10-27 2015-01-27 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. BEV routing system and method
FR2988061A1 (en) * 2012-03-15 2013-09-20 Renault Sa Method for determining maximum mileage range of electric vehicle, involves determining moment at which state of change of battery tends to zero following evolution of energy state of vehicle along trajectory
US20140005917A1 (en) * 2012-06-27 2014-01-02 International Business Machines Corporation Determining fuel economy by fuel source location
US9256842B2 (en) * 2012-06-27 2016-02-09 International Business Machines Corporation Determining fuel economy by fuel source location
US10696165B2 (en) * 2012-12-12 2020-06-30 Tevva Motors Limited Range extender control
CN104853947A (en) * 2012-12-12 2015-08-19 特瓦汽车有限公司 Range extender control
GB2525338A (en) * 2012-12-12 2015-10-21 Tevva Motors Ltd Range extender control
US20150298555A1 (en) * 2012-12-12 2015-10-22 Tevva Motors Limited Range extender control
GB2525338B (en) * 2012-12-12 2016-01-06 Tevva Motors Ltd Range extender control
WO2014091238A3 (en) * 2012-12-12 2014-11-27 Teva Motors Limited Range extender control
GB2532872A (en) * 2012-12-12 2016-06-01 Tevva Motors Ltd Range extender control
US20140312839A1 (en) * 2013-04-19 2014-10-23 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for electric vehicle charging analysis and feedback
US20180118047A1 (en) * 2013-04-19 2018-05-03 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for electric vehicle charging analysis and feedback
US20160167642A1 (en) * 2013-05-03 2016-06-16 Renault S.A.S. Method for optimising the energy consumption of a hybrid vehicle
US9290108B2 (en) 2014-03-31 2016-03-22 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. System and method for adaptive battery temperature control of a vehicle over a known route
US9008858B1 (en) 2014-03-31 2015-04-14 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. System and method for providing adaptive vehicle settings based on a known route
US9695760B2 (en) 2014-03-31 2017-07-04 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. System and method for improving energy efficiency of a vehicle based on known route segments
US9266443B2 (en) 2014-03-31 2016-02-23 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. System and method for adaptive battery charge and discharge rates and limits on known routes
US9679422B2 (en) * 2014-07-23 2017-06-13 William D. Nicholson Method for increasing accuracy of vehicle data
US10493833B2 (en) 2014-11-25 2019-12-03 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Current supply system, electric power supply system, and control device
US10081238B2 (en) 2014-11-25 2018-09-25 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Drive system and vehicle
US10434859B2 (en) * 2014-11-25 2019-10-08 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Vehicle and engine generator unit for driving vehicle
US10358022B2 (en) 2014-11-25 2019-07-23 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Vehicle having a generator with inductance-adjustable windings
US10449846B2 (en) 2014-11-25 2019-10-22 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Transmission, control device, and vehicle
US10434858B2 (en) 2014-11-25 2019-10-08 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Electric power supply system, control device, vehicle, and engine generator unit for driving vehicle
CN107107764A (en) * 2014-12-15 2017-08-29 沃尔沃卡车集团 For the method and apparatus to the electric energy storage system charging in vehicle
WO2016095936A1 (en) * 2014-12-15 2016-06-23 Volvo Truck Corporation A method and device for charging an electric energy storage system in a vehicle
US10377261B2 (en) 2014-12-15 2019-08-13 Volvo Truck Corporation Method and device for charging an electric energy storage system in a vehicle
US11247552B2 (en) 2015-08-03 2022-02-15 Cummins, Inc. Systems and methods of energy management and control of an electrified powertrain
US11745616B2 (en) 2015-08-07 2023-09-05 Cummins Inc. Systems and methods of battery management and control for a vehicle
US10894482B2 (en) 2015-08-07 2021-01-19 Cummins, Inc. Systems and methods of battery management and control for a vehicle
US11535233B2 (en) 2015-09-23 2022-12-27 Cummins Inc. Systems and methods of engine stop/start control of an electrified powertrain
US10435007B2 (en) 2015-09-23 2019-10-08 Cummins, Inc. Systems and methods of engine stop/start control of an electrified powertrain
US10676077B2 (en) 2015-12-10 2020-06-09 Cummins, Inc. Systems and methods of energy management and control of vehicle accessories
US11325578B2 (en) 2015-12-10 2022-05-10 Cummins Inc. Systems and methods of energy management and control of vehicle accessories
US9873435B2 (en) 2016-05-04 2018-01-23 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and system for engine control
US9925975B2 (en) 2016-05-04 2018-03-27 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and system for hybrid vehicle control
US10145316B2 (en) 2016-05-04 2018-12-04 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and system for engine control
US10060362B2 (en) 2016-05-04 2018-08-28 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and system for engine control
US9776624B1 (en) 2016-05-04 2017-10-03 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and system for engine control
US9944276B2 (en) 2016-05-04 2018-04-17 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and system for engine control
US10378460B2 (en) 2016-05-04 2019-08-13 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and system for engine control
US11783264B2 (en) 2017-05-11 2023-10-10 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Vehicle driver safety performance based on relativity
US12013695B1 (en) * 2017-05-16 2024-06-18 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Autonomous vehicle operation based on real-time analytics
US11970209B2 (en) 2017-09-13 2024-04-30 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Real-time vehicle driver feedback based on analytics
JP6992460B2 (en) 2017-12-05 2022-01-13 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Hybrid vehicle and control device mounted on it
JP2019099015A (en) * 2017-12-05 2019-06-24 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Hybrid automobile and control apparatus incorporated therein
JP2019099016A (en) * 2017-12-05 2019-06-24 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Hybrid automobile and control apparatus incorporated therein
JP6992459B2 (en) 2017-12-05 2022-01-13 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Hybrid vehicle and control device mounted on it
US20190256078A1 (en) * 2018-02-19 2019-08-22 General Electric Company Hybrid vehicle control system
US10829104B2 (en) * 2018-02-19 2020-11-10 Ge Global Sourcing Llc Hybrid vehicle control system
US11235665B2 (en) * 2019-03-26 2022-02-01 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Regenerative braking control system
US20210188246A1 (en) * 2019-12-18 2021-06-24 Cummins Inc. Supervisory genset control in range-extended electric vehicle
US11794717B2 (en) * 2021-05-02 2023-10-24 Cummins Inc. Power management for hybrid electric vehicles
US20220348185A1 (en) * 2021-05-02 2022-11-03 Cummins Inc. Power management for hybrid electric vehicles

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20110246010A1 (en) Technique for Optimizing the Use of the Motor in Hybrid Vehicles
US7665559B2 (en) Inputs for optimizing performance in hybrid vehicles
US9043061B2 (en) Methods, systems, and apparatuses for driveline load management
JP6758025B2 (en) Control system for hybrid vehicles with a high degree of hybridization
EP3340131B1 (en) Dynamically limiting vehicle operation for best effort economy
CN102233807B (en) Self-learning satellite navigation assisted hybrid vehicle controls system
US9522669B2 (en) Method for optimizing the power usage of a vehicle
US10065628B2 (en) Location enhanced distance until charge (DUC) estimation for a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV)
US20090259355A1 (en) Power management of a hybrid vehicle
US20090114463A1 (en) Self-learning control system for plug-in hybrid vehicles
KR20100099165A (en) Method and system for managing the operation of a motor vehicle as a function of driving conditions
CN102395498B (en) Optimize the method for the energy ezpenditure of mixing and plug-in vehicle and realize the mixing of the method and plug-in vehicle
CN104627185A (en) Vehicle energy management device
CN102887144A (en) Adaptive energy management in a hybrid vehicle
JP2003047110A (en) Method of using on-board navigation system for hybrid electric vehicle for vehicle energy management
CN113071474B (en) Energy management method and system of vehicle and vehicle
CN103918152B (en) Method and system for managing the power of a hybrid vehicle
EP3215405A1 (en) A hybrid vehicle and a method for energy management of a hybrid vehicle
CN115996857A (en) Method and system for controlling powertrain in hybrid vehicle
CN107074238B (en) Engine control system
JP2000324609A (en) Controlling device for hybrid vehicle
WO2014058383A2 (en) Identification and use of free energy
Hasan et al. Energy management strategy in electric buses for public transport using ECO-driving
CN109421551B (en) Electric vehicle, control method thereof, power management system, and vehicle control apparatus
Bassett et al. GPS Based Energy Management Control for Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: DE LA TORRE BUENO, JOSE, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DE LA TORRE BUENO, JOSE;REEL/FRAME:026050/0501

Effective date: 20110329

Owner name: LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT C HARRIS, INC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DE LA TORRE BUENO, JOSE;REEL/FRAME:026050/0501

Effective date: 20110329

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION