US20110153509A1 - Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110153509A1 US20110153509A1 US11/915,718 US91571806A US2011153509A1 US 20110153509 A1 US20110153509 A1 US 20110153509A1 US 91571806 A US91571806 A US 91571806A US 2011153509 A1 US2011153509 A1 US 2011153509A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- information
- matter
- node
- client
- area
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 17
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 12
- 230000015654 memory Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000005291 magnetic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013480 data collection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007274 generation of a signal involved in cell-cell signaling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004973 liquid crystal related substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/18—Legal services
- G06Q50/184—Intellectual property management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/242—Query formulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
Definitions
- This patent document pertains generally to data collection and presentation, and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to a method and apparatus for cross-referencing important intellectual property relationships.
- claims define the scope of an issued patent, and consequently, the claims also define the scope and breadth of the associated intellectual rights or property.
- a system and method to concisely catalog and describe pending and issue claims may assist a practitioner when providing advice to a client, drafting well-formed claims, and avoiding unnecessary costs during prosecution.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example embodiment of a hierarchy used to display client and matter information in a patent information warehouse system.
- FIG. 2 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a home node.
- FIG. 3 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a product space grandchild node.
- FIG. 4 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a concept ontology grandchild node.
- FIG. 5 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a claims grandchild node.
- FIG. 6 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a references grandchild node.
- FIG. 7 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a claims grandchild node.
- FIG. 8 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a prosecution grandchild node.
- FIG. 9 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a prosecution grandchild node.
- FIG. 10 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a product space grandchild node.
- FIG. 11 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a concepts grandchild node.
- FIG. 12 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a cited references grandchild node.
- FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating a method of cataloging and providing intellectual property information, in accordance with an example embodiment.
- FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating a client-server networked environment, in accordance with an example embodiment.
- FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating a machine in the example form of a computer system, within which a set or sequence of instructions for causing the machine to perform any one of the methodologies discussed herein may be executed.
- one or more of the features described below are included to provide a system or method for cross-referencing important intellectual property relationships.
- information describing patent applications and related information is displayed within one or more screens on a computer display.
- the screens may, for example, be child screens in a framed web presentation.
- navigational links are provided, such as by tabs at the top of a computer display screen. Using the navigational links or tabs, a user can view refined subsets of information.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example embodiment of a hierarchy 100 used to display client and matter information in a patent information warehouse system.
- a home node 102 which may have the physical embodiment of a home page in a web page environment, may provide two child nodes (e.g., sub-screens), such as a client node 104 and a matter node 106 .
- two child nodes e.g., sub-screens
- client node 104 e.g., sub-screens
- a matter node 106 e.g., sub-screens
- fewer or more child nodes are available from the home node 102 , such as a search node (not shown), a billing node (not shown), or a reports node (not shown).
- each grandchild node is designed to display information from a particular perspective.
- the matter node 106 information related to the matter is available, such as the matter name, number, file date, client identification, file status, and the like.
- the general information in the matter node 106 is made available using a static area of a web presentation.
- the matter node 106 may have, in various embodiments, one or more related grandchild nodes.
- the matter node 106 has a claims node 116 , a prosecution node 118 , a product space node 120 , a concepts node 122 , and a cited references node 124 as related grandchild nodes.
- the grandchild nodes 108 - 124 may additionally have related great grandchild nodes, which may provide further refined views of related information.
- FIG. 2 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a home node 102 .
- two or more tabs are provided in a navigational area of a web page.
- a computer display screen may be divided into two or more areas including a navigational area 204 and a content area 206 .
- the navigational area 204 may include hypertext links, for example in the form of graphical tabs, and form input controls, for example a drop down or text input controls to input search criteria or navigate the browser display.
- a matters tab 200 and a client tab 202 are provided to a user. Activating the matters tab 200 may load content into the content area 206 .
- FIG. 3 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node 104 and a product space grandchild node 108 .
- the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
- the content is arranged into two areas, a client information area 300 and a client specific content area 302 .
- the client information area 300 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the client specific content area 302 .
- the client specific information illustrated in FIG. 3 includes product space information.
- a product space may be described using one or more attributes, such as a product space name or description 304 , a product space protection indicia 306 , a product space status 308 , related claims 310 to each product space, and related patents or patent applications 312 to each product space.
- a product space may have a protection indicia of selected, none, or broad.
- a product space may have a status of pending, issued, or not available (N/A).
- one or more claims may be listed as related to a particular product space.
- one or more file numbers which refer to files, such as patent applications or issued patents, may be listed as related to a particular product space.
- FIG. 4 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node 104 and a concept ontology grandchild node 110 .
- the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
- the content is arranged into two areas, a client information area 400 and a client specific content area 402 .
- the client information area 400 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the client specific content area 402 .
- the client specific information illustrated in FIG. 4 includes concept ontology information.
- the concept ontology is represented as a graph, including nodes that represent concepts, and lines or arrows connecting the nodes that represent relationships.
- the concept ontology is represented in a chart or structured list, where a genus concept is arranged in a position relative to its related species concepts.
- a concept ontology may be represented as a bulleted list, where each species is listed under its related genus.
- FIG. 5 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node 104 and a claims grandchild node 112 .
- the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
- the content is arranged into two areas, a client information area 500 and a client specific content area 502 .
- the client information area 500 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the client specific content area 502 .
- the client specific information illustrated in FIG. 5 includes information about related claims.
- related information may include an application or patent name or description 504 , one or more related claims 506 , a product space 508 , a status 510 , and related concepts 512 .
- a claim may have a protection indicia of selected, none, or broad.
- claims may have a status of pending, issued, or not applicable (NA).
- one or more concepts may be listed as related to a particular claim.
- FIG. 6 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node 104 and a references grandchild node 114 .
- the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
- the content is arranged into two areas, a client information area 600 and a client specific content area 602 .
- the client information area 600 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the client specific content area 602 .
- the client specific information illustrated in FIG. 6 includes information about related references.
- each related reference 604 may include information showing a claim 606 the reference was cited against, a patent or application identifier 608 where the reference was used, an alleged teaching 610 of the reference, for example by an examiner in an office action, an applicant's arguments 612 , for example in an attempt to overcome the alleged teaching 610 , and a status 614 of the reference's use in the particular patent or application 608 for the particular claim 604 .
- a status may include an indicia that the applicant's argument was rejected, accepted, declared moot, or is pending.
- FIG. 7 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a claims grandchild node 116 .
- the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
- the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 700 and a matter specific content area 702 .
- the matter information area 700 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 702 .
- the matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 7 includes information about related claims.
- each related claim may be grouped by claim sets, organized by when a claim was filed, and include a status of the claim or claim set.
- Information about related claims may be organized, for example, to include a claim identification or description 704 , a related product space 706 , and related claims or claim sets 708 .
- the claim identification of description includes a date and a date type.
- a date type may include “Filed”, “Preliminary Amendment”, “Amendment”, “Allowed”, or “Issued” dates.
- additional claim sets 710 and related information are displayed and described in the same display.
- FIG. 8 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a prosecution grandchild node 118 .
- the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
- the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 800 and a matter specific content area 802 .
- the matter information area 800 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 802 .
- the matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 8 includes information about prosecution history.
- two or more views are provided, such as a condensed view and an expanded view.
- each claim may be grouped by claim sets 804 , organized by when a claim was filed, and include a status of the claim or claim set.
- Information about related claims may be organized, for example, to include an amendment status 806 , an examination status 808 , related art cited 810 , reasons for an Patent and Trademark Office Examiner's position 812 , and any arguments by the applicant 814 .
- additional claim sets and related information are displayed and described in the same display.
- the examination status 808 includes allowed, rejected, unamended, or objected to.
- FIG. 9 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a prosecution grandchild node 118 .
- FIG. 9 is an example of an expanded or detailed view of the information provided in FIG. 8 .
- claims, represented by their claim number in the collapsed view illustrated in FIG. 8 are displayed in some or all of the text of the claim in the expanded or detailed view in FIG. 9 .
- FIG. 10 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a product space grandchild node 120 .
- the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
- the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 1000 and a matter specific content area 1002 .
- the matter information area 1000 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 1002 .
- the matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 10 includes information about related product space. In the example illustrated in FIG.
- each product space 1004 may include attributes, such as an indicia of protection 1006 , a status 1008 , and related claims 1010 .
- the indicia of protection 1006 may include selected, none, or broad.
- the status 1008 may include pending, issued, or not applicable (NA).
- related claims 1010 may be listed by claim number or an indicia of a claim set and a claim number.
- FIG. 11 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a concepts grandchild node 122 .
- the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
- the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 1100 and a matter specific content area 1102 .
- the matter information area 1100 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 1102 .
- the matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 11 includes information about concepts related to the matter. In the example illustrated in FIG.
- each concept 1104 may include one or more related claims 1106 .
- an indicia such as a check mark or an “x,” is provided in the intersecting portion of the table.
- FIG. 12 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node 106 and a cited references grandchild node 124 .
- the displayed content may be arranged in the content area 206 , as described in FIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display.
- the content is arranged into two areas, a matter information area 1200 and a matter specific content area 1202 .
- the matter information area 1200 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matter specific content area 1202 .
- the matter specific information illustrated in FIG. 12 includes information about cited references related to the matter. In the example illustrated in FIG.
- each cited reference 1204 may include one or more related claims 1206 , an alleged teaching 1208 related to each claim 1206 , an applicant's argument 1210 , and a status 1212 .
- a status may include an indicia that the applicant's argument was rejected, accepted, declared moot, or is pending.
- FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating a method 1300 of cataloging and providing intellectual property information, in accordance with an example embodiment.
- information is collected and stored.
- Information may include data related to a patent portfolio, such as concepts, products, product spaces, patents, references, and the like. Information may also include prosecution history related to the patents or references.
- relationships are generated. Relationships may include mappings between a claim and a reference, a claim and a concept, or the like.
- one or more of the relationships are provided. In an embodiment, the relationships are provided using a graphical user interface, such as a web browser.
- FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating a client-server networked environment 1400 , in accordance with an example embodiment.
- Embodiments of the inventive subject matter may find application in many different types of computer-based or network-based facilities or systems. Accordingly, the example embodiment is not intended to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter solely to such systems.
- the client-server networked environment 1400 includes a web server 1402 , which can communicate over a network 1404 to a client computer 1406 .
- the web server 1402 additionally can communicate using one or more direct or networked connections with other servers, such as an application server (not shown), an email server (not shown), and a database management server (not shown).
- a database 1408 is communicatively coupled to the network 1404 .
- the client-server networked environment 1400 is accessed by a client program, for example a browser 1410 (e.g., Internet Explorer distributed by Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, Wash.) that executes on the client computer 1406 and accesses the web server 1402 via the network 1404 .
- the network 1404 may include the Internet, a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), a wireless network (e.g., a cellular network), the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) network, or the like.
- WAN wide area network
- LAN local area network
- PSTN Public Switched Telephone Network
- the web server 1402 uses software 1412 to receive a request from a client computer 1406 , where in response to the request, the web server 1402 accesses the database 1408 and provides information to the client computer 1406 .
- the information may include intellectual property information, as described above.
- FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating a machine in the example form of a computer system 1500 , within which a set or sequence of instructions for causing the machine to perform any one of the methodologies discussed herein may be executed.
- the machine may comprise a computer, a network router, a network switch, a network bridge, Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, a web appliance, set-top box (STB) or any machine capable of executing a sequence of instructions that specify actions to be taken by that machine.
- PDA Personal Digital Assistant
- STB set-top box
- the computer system 1500 includes a processor 1502 , a main memory 1504 and a static memory 1506 , which communicate with each other via a bus 608 .
- the computer system 1500 may further include a video display unit 1510 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)).
- the computer system 1500 also includes an alphanumeric input device 1512 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 1514 (e.g., a mouse), a disk drive unit 1516 , a signal generation device 1518 (e.g., a speaker) and a network interface device 1520 to interface the computer system to a network 1522 .
- the disk drive unit 1516 includes a machine-readable medium 1524 on which is stored a set of instructions or software 1526 embodying any one, or all, of the methodologies described herein.
- the software 1526 is also shown to reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 1504 and/or within the processor 1502 .
- the software 1526 may further be transmitted or received via the network interface device 1520 .
- the term “machine-readable medium” shall be taken to include any medium which is capable of storing or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one of the methodologies of the inventive subject matter.
- machine-readable medium shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic disks, and carrier wave signals. Further, while the software is shown in FIG. 15 to reside within a single device, it will be appreciated that the software could be distributed across multiple machines or storage media, which may include the machine-readable medium.
- Method embodiments described herein may be computer-implemented. Some embodiments may include computer-readable media encoded with a computer program (e.g., software), which includes instructions operable to cause an electronic device to perform methods of various embodiments.
- a software implementation (or method) may include microcode, assembly language code, or a higher-level language code, which further may include computer readable instructions for performing various methods.
- the code may form portions of computer program products. Further, the code may be tangibly stored on one or more volatile or non-volatile computer-readable media during execution or at other times.
- These computer-readable media may include, but are not limited to, hard disks, removable magnetic disks, removable optical disks (e.g., compact disks and digital video disks), magnetic cassettes, memory cards or sticks, random access memories (RAMS), read only memories (ROMs), and the like.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)
- Stored Programmes (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This patent document pertains generally to data collection and presentation, and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to a method and apparatus for cross-referencing important intellectual property relationships.
- In a patent application, claims define the scope of an issued patent, and consequently, the claims also define the scope and breadth of the associated intellectual rights or property. A system and method to concisely catalog and describe pending and issue claims may assist a practitioner when providing advice to a client, drafting well-formed claims, and avoiding unnecessary costs during prosecution.
- In the drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, like numerals describe substantially similar components throughout the several views. Like numerals having different letter suffixes represent different instances of substantially similar components. The drawings illustrate generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, various embodiments discussed in the present document.
-
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example embodiment of a hierarchy used to display client and matter information in a patent information warehouse system. -
FIG. 2 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a home node. -
FIG. 3 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a product space grandchild node. -
FIG. 4 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a concept ontology grandchild node. -
FIG. 5 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a claims grandchild node. -
FIG. 6 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a client child node and a references grandchild node. -
FIG. 7 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a claims grandchild node. -
FIG. 8 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a prosecution grandchild node. -
FIG. 9 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a prosecution grandchild node. -
FIG. 10 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a product space grandchild node. -
FIG. 11 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a concepts grandchild node. -
FIG. 12 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of a matter child node and a cited references grandchild node. -
FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating a method of cataloging and providing intellectual property information, in accordance with an example embodiment. -
FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating a client-server networked environment, in accordance with an example embodiment. -
FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating a machine in the example form of a computer system, within which a set or sequence of instructions for causing the machine to perform any one of the methodologies discussed herein may be executed. - The following detailed description includes references to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the detailed description. The drawings show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments, which are also referred to herein as “examples,” are described in enough detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. The embodiments may be combined, other embodiments may be utilized, or structural, logical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
- In this document, the terms “a” or “an” are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one. In this document, the term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive or, unless otherwise indicated.
- In various embodiments, one or more of the features described below are included to provide a system or method for cross-referencing important intellectual property relationships.
- The High Level Purposes of CoreIP are as follows:
-
- Map relationships between the following data:
- Claim Space—this is the “atomic” level of IP protection. Claims define what the IP exclusivity is. Claims are the core of patents. While claims belong to patents, we are tracking first and foremost claims, and only secondarily the patents these claims belong to.
- Claim space includes claims as filed, as amended during prosecution, and as allowed and issued.
- Product space—this is the “space” that the business people live in. They think in terms of products and services, product lines, product features, product functions. We want CoreIP to be able to show business people what they have for IP protection with respect to this space, so that they can quickly understand where they stand on IP protection. Also, this capability will allow patent attorneys to see the strategic value of the protection they are getting for the client.
- Claims are mapped to the Product space, so that a user can see which if any claims cover which products/features
- Concept Space. Claims are made up of concepts. There are Common Concepts and Specialization Concepts
- A concept ontology is provided, having a hierarchy with nodes.
- Claims are indexed/mapped using the ontology
- Claims as a whole are mapped to at least one (or more) of the narrowest nodes in the ontology that is broader than the breadth of the claim.
- A Claimed Concept space can be filtered to eliminate patents that are not of a scope of interest
- References Space. This is the space of prior art. In particular, the references space includes prior art patents or other prior art teachings, such as prior products or publications.
- References are mapped to claims
- References can also be mapped to the concept space
- Prosecution History Space. The prosecution space is defined by the prosecution history. In this context, the prosecution space focuses on the history of filed claims, claim amendments, prior art citation and patent office rejections/objections, and attorney arguments.
- Rejections/rejections are mapped to claims
- attorney arguments are mapped to claims and references
- Claim Space—this is the “atomic” level of IP protection. Claims define what the IP exclusivity is. Claims are the core of patents. While claims belong to patents, we are tracking first and foremost claims, and only secondarily the patents these claims belong to.
- Using the above indexes and mappings, attorneys will be able to do the following:
- Find all other instances of a reference being cited or argued in the same or another case
- Continuously understand the relationship between the Product Space and the Claims
- Quickly understand the scope of claims by looking at the Concept Space map for a claim
- Quickly find claims of a particular scope by searching and filtering in the Claimed Concept space
- Cross reference Claimed Concept space to the Product Space
- Find References that have been cited against concepts in a particular branch of the Concept space
- View a summary/compact view of the file history space to quickly
- Map relationships between the following data:
- The simplest way to track and display claims is to model it as follows:
-
- claims are tracked as a “Set”
- an application is filed with an Initial Set of claims (“claims as filed”)
- if a Set of claims is amended, it is amended on a certain Date
- the Set of allowed claims has an “allowance date”
- a Set of issued claims has an “issue date”
- So, claims are grouped in Sets, and each Set has a Date associated with it, and each Date can have a Date Type, like “Filed”, “Preliminary Amendment”, “Amendment”, “Allowed”, “Issued”
- Thus, we have: Claims in Sets and each Set has a Date and each Date has a Date Type.
- Now, for each Claim in each Set, we want to be able to assign an Amendment Status.
- The Amendment Status's are as follows:
-
- Filed
- Amended— <number> (for example: Amended-1, Amended-2, etc. . . . (allow up to 20 for a number)
- Cancelled
- New
- Now, for each Claim in each Set, we also want to be able to assign an Examination Status.
- The Amendment Status's are as follows:
-
- Not Examined
- Rejected
- Objected to
- Allowed
- Restricted Out
- Now, for each Claim in each Set, we also want to be able to track Prior Art Cited against each claim.
- The Prior Art Cited for each claim includes the following:
-
- Identify Patent cited
- Reason Claim Rejected
- take this text from patent office paperwork
- In addition, for each claim, we want to keep track of:
-
- all arguments made for patentability with respect to the claim; AND
- all arguments made for patentability with respect to a particular prior art Reference
- In an embodiment, information describing patent applications and related information is displayed within one or more screens on a computer display. The screens may, for example, be child screens in a framed web presentation. In an embodiment, navigational links are provided, such as by tabs at the top of a computer display screen. Using the navigational links or tabs, a user can view refined subsets of information.
-
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example embodiment of ahierarchy 100 used to display client and matter information in a patent information warehouse system. In an embodiment, ahome node 102, which may have the physical embodiment of a home page in a web page environment, may provide two child nodes (e.g., sub-screens), such as aclient node 104 and amatter node 106. In alternative embodiments, fewer or more child nodes are available from thehome node 102, such as a search node (not shown), a billing node (not shown), or a reports node (not shown). - At the
client node 104, general information regarding is available, such as in a static area of a web page. In addition, one or more grandchild nodes may be provided to allow a user to drill down into further detail regarding theclient node 104. In an embodiment, aproduct space node 108, aconcept ontology node 110, aclaims node 112, and areferences node 114 are provided as children to theclient node 104. While, in some example embodiments, the grandchildren node 108-114 may display some of the same or substantially similar information, each grandchild node is designed to display information from a particular perspective. - At the
matter node 106, information related to the matter is available, such as the matter name, number, file date, client identification, file status, and the like. In an embodiment, the general information in thematter node 106 is made available using a static area of a web presentation. As with theclient node 104, thematter node 106, may have, in various embodiments, one or more related grandchild nodes. In this example embodiment, thematter node 106 has aclaims node 116, aprosecution node 118, aproduct space node 120, aconcepts node 122, and a cited referencesnode 124 as related grandchild nodes. - In various embodiments, the grandchild nodes 108-124 may additionally have related great grandchild nodes, which may provide further refined views of related information.
-
FIG. 2 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of ahome node 102. InFIG. 2 , two or more tabs are provided in a navigational area of a web page. For example, a computer display screen may be divided into two or more areas including anavigational area 204 and acontent area 206. Thenavigational area 204 may include hypertext links, for example in the form of graphical tabs, and form input controls, for example a drop down or text input controls to input search criteria or navigate the browser display. In an example embodiment illustrated inFIG. 2 , amatters tab 200 and aclient tab 202 are provided to a user. Activating thematters tab 200 may load content into thecontent area 206. -
FIG. 3 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of aclient child node 104 and a productspace grandchild node 108. InFIG. 3 , the displayed content may be arranged in thecontent area 206, as described inFIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. InFIG. 3 , the content is arranged into two areas, aclient information area 300 and a clientspecific content area 302. In an embodiment, theclient information area 300 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the clientspecific content area 302. The client specific information illustrated inFIG. 3 includes product space information. For example, a product space may be described using one or more attributes, such as a product space name ordescription 304, a productspace protection indicia 306, aproduct space status 308,related claims 310 to each product space, and related patents orpatent applications 312 to each product space. In an embodiment, a product space may have a protection indicia of selected, none, or broad. In an embodiment, a product space may have a status of pending, issued, or not available (N/A). In some embodiments, one or more claims may be listed as related to a particular product space. In some embodiments, one or more file numbers, which refer to files, such as patent applications or issued patents, may be listed as related to a particular product space. -
FIG. 4 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of aclient child node 104 and a conceptontology grandchild node 110. InFIG. 4 , the displayed content may be arranged in thecontent area 206, as described inFIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. InFIG. 4 , as was the case inFIG. 3 , the content is arranged into two areas, aclient information area 400 and a clientspecific content area 402. In an embodiment, theclient information area 400 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the clientspecific content area 402. The client specific information illustrated inFIG. 4 includes concept ontology information. In various embodiments, the concept ontology is represented as a graph, including nodes that represent concepts, and lines or arrows connecting the nodes that represent relationships. In alternative embodiments, the concept ontology is represented in a chart or structured list, where a genus concept is arranged in a position relative to its related species concepts. For example, a concept ontology may be represented as a bulleted list, where each species is listed under its related genus. -
FIG. 5 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of aclient child node 104 and aclaims grandchild node 112. InFIG. 5 , the displayed content may be arranged in thecontent area 206, as described inFIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. InFIG. 5 , as was the case inFIG. 3 , the content is arranged into two areas, aclient information area 500 and a clientspecific content area 502. In an embodiment, theclient information area 500 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the clientspecific content area 502. The client specific information illustrated inFIG. 5 includes information about related claims. For example, related information may include an application or patent name ordescription 504, one or morerelated claims 506, aproduct space 508, astatus 510, andrelated concepts 512. In an embodiment, a claim may have a protection indicia of selected, none, or broad. In an embodiment, claims may have a status of pending, issued, or not applicable (NA). In some embodiments, one or more concepts may be listed as related to a particular claim. -
FIG. 6 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of aclient child node 104 and areferences grandchild node 114. InFIG. 6 , the displayed content may be arranged in thecontent area 206, as described inFIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. InFIG. 6 , as was the case inFIG. 3 , the content is arranged into two areas, aclient information area 600 and a clientspecific content area 602. In an embodiment, theclient information area 600 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the client specific information in the clientspecific content area 602. The client specific information illustrated inFIG. 6 includes information about related references. For example, eachrelated reference 604 may include information showing aclaim 606 the reference was cited against, a patent orapplication identifier 608 where the reference was used, analleged teaching 610 of the reference, for example by an examiner in an office action, an applicant'sarguments 612, for example in an attempt to overcome thealleged teaching 610, and astatus 614 of the reference's use in the particular patent orapplication 608 for theparticular claim 604. In an embodiment, a status may include an indicia that the applicant's argument was rejected, accepted, declared moot, or is pending. -
FIG. 7 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of amatter child node 106 and aclaims grandchild node 116. InFIG. 7 , the displayed content may be arranged in thecontent area 206, as described inFIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. InFIG. 7 , the content is arranged into two areas, amatter information area 700 and a matterspecific content area 702. In an embodiment, thematter information area 700 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matterspecific content area 702. The matter specific information illustrated inFIG. 7 includes information about related claims. For example, each related claim may be grouped by claim sets, organized by when a claim was filed, and include a status of the claim or claim set. Information about related claims may be organized, for example, to include a claim identification ordescription 704, arelated product space 706, and related claims or claim sets 708. In an embodiment, the claim identification of description includes a date and a date type. A date type may include “Filed”, “Preliminary Amendment”, “Amendment”, “Allowed”, or “Issued” dates. In addition, in some example embodiments, additional claim sets 710 and related information are displayed and described in the same display. -
FIG. 8 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of amatter child node 106 and aprosecution grandchild node 118. InFIG. 8 , the displayed content may be arranged in thecontent area 206, as described inFIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. InFIG. 8 , the content is arranged into two areas, amatter information area 800 and a matterspecific content area 802. In an embodiment, thematter information area 800 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matterspecific content area 802. The matter specific information illustrated inFIG. 8 includes information about prosecution history. In some example embodiments, two or more views are provided, such as a condensed view and an expanded view. For example, in a condensed view, such as the one illustrated inFIG. 8 , claim numbers only or hypertext links may be used to conserve display screen space. In another example, an expanded or detailed view may include some or all of the text for a particular field. In the example illustrated inFIG. 8 , each claim may be grouped by claim sets 804, organized by when a claim was filed, and include a status of the claim or claim set. Information about related claims may be organized, for example, to include anamendment status 806, anexamination status 808, related art cited 810, reasons for an Patent and Trademark Office Examiner'sposition 812, and any arguments by theapplicant 814. In addition, in some example embodiments, additional claim sets and related information are displayed and described in the same display. In an embodiment, theexamination status 808 includes allowed, rejected, unamended, or objected to. -
FIG. 9 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of amatter child node 106 and aprosecution grandchild node 118.FIG. 9 is an example of an expanded or detailed view of the information provided inFIG. 8 . For example, claims, represented by their claim number in the collapsed view illustrated inFIG. 8 , are displayed in some or all of the text of the claim in the expanded or detailed view inFIG. 9 . -
FIG. 10 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of amatter child node 106 and a productspace grandchild node 120. InFIG. 10 , the displayed content may be arranged in thecontent area 206, as described inFIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. InFIG. 10 , the content is arranged into two areas, amatter information area 1000 and a matterspecific content area 1002. In an embodiment, thematter information area 1000 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matterspecific content area 1002. The matter specific information illustrated inFIG. 10 includes information about related product space. In the example illustrated inFIG. 10 , eachproduct space 1004 may include attributes, such as an indicia ofprotection 1006, astatus 1008, andrelated claims 1010. In an embodiment, the indicia ofprotection 1006 may include selected, none, or broad. In an embodiment, thestatus 1008 may include pending, issued, or not applicable (NA). In various embodiments,related claims 1010 may be listed by claim number or an indicia of a claim set and a claim number. -
FIG. 11 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of amatter child node 106 and aconcepts grandchild node 122. InFIG. 11 , the displayed content may be arranged in thecontent area 206, as described inFIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. InFIG. 11 , the content is arranged into two areas, amatter information area 1100 and a matterspecific content area 1102. In an embodiment, thematter information area 1100 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matterspecific content area 1102. The matter specific information illustrated inFIG. 11 includes information about concepts related to the matter. In the example illustrated inFIG. 11 , eachconcept 1104 may include one or morerelated claims 1106. In an embodiment, if aconcept 1104 exists in aclaim 1106, then an indicia, such as a check mark or an “x,” is provided in the intersecting portion of the table. -
FIG. 12 is a display screen illustrating an example embodiment of amatter child node 106 and a cited referencesgrandchild node 124. InFIG. 12 , the displayed content may be arranged in thecontent area 206, as described inFIG. 2 , or alternatively, the displayed content may be provided on a new web page or display. InFIG. 12 , the content is arranged into two areas, amatter information area 1200 and a matterspecific content area 1202. In an embodiment, thematter information area 1200 is a frame in HTML and remains static while the user navigates the matter specific information in the matterspecific content area 1202. The matter specific information illustrated inFIG. 12 includes information about cited references related to the matter. In the example illustrated inFIG. 12 , each citedreference 1204 may include one or morerelated claims 1206, analleged teaching 1208 related to eachclaim 1206, an applicant'sargument 1210, and astatus 1212. In an embodiment, a status may include an indicia that the applicant's argument was rejected, accepted, declared moot, or is pending. -
FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating amethod 1300 of cataloging and providing intellectual property information, in accordance with an example embodiment. At 1302, information is collected and stored. Information may include data related to a patent portfolio, such as concepts, products, product spaces, patents, references, and the like. Information may also include prosecution history related to the patents or references. At 1304, relationships are generated. Relationships may include mappings between a claim and a reference, a claim and a concept, or the like. At 1306, one or more of the relationships are provided. In an embodiment, the relationships are provided using a graphical user interface, such as a web browser. -
FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating a client-servernetworked environment 1400, in accordance with an example embodiment. Embodiments of the inventive subject matter may find application in many different types of computer-based or network-based facilities or systems. Accordingly, the example embodiment is not intended to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter solely to such systems. - In an embodiment, the client-server
networked environment 1400 includes aweb server 1402, which can communicate over anetwork 1404 to aclient computer 1406. Theweb server 1402 additionally can communicate using one or more direct or networked connections with other servers, such as an application server (not shown), an email server (not shown), and a database management server (not shown). In addition, adatabase 1408 is communicatively coupled to thenetwork 1404. - In an embodiment, the client-server
networked environment 1400 is accessed by a client program, for example a browser 1410 (e.g., Internet Explorer distributed by Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, Wash.) that executes on theclient computer 1406 and accesses theweb server 1402 via thenetwork 1404. In various embodiments, thenetwork 1404 may include the Internet, a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), a wireless network (e.g., a cellular network), the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) network, or the like. - In an embodiment, the
web server 1402 usessoftware 1412 to receive a request from aclient computer 1406, where in response to the request, theweb server 1402 accesses thedatabase 1408 and provides information to theclient computer 1406. The information may include intellectual property information, as described above. -
FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating a machine in the example form of acomputer system 1500, within which a set or sequence of instructions for causing the machine to perform any one of the methodologies discussed herein may be executed. In alternative embodiments, the machine may comprise a computer, a network router, a network switch, a network bridge, Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, a web appliance, set-top box (STB) or any machine capable of executing a sequence of instructions that specify actions to be taken by that machine. - The
computer system 1500 includes aprocessor 1502, amain memory 1504 and astatic memory 1506, which communicate with each other via abus 608. Thecomputer system 1500 may further include a video display unit 1510 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). Thecomputer system 1500 also includes an alphanumeric input device 1512 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 1514 (e.g., a mouse), adisk drive unit 1516, a signal generation device 1518 (e.g., a speaker) and anetwork interface device 1520 to interface the computer system to anetwork 1522. - The
disk drive unit 1516 includes a machine-readable medium 1524 on which is stored a set of instructions or software 1526 embodying any one, or all, of the methodologies described herein. The software 1526 is also shown to reside, completely or at least partially, within themain memory 1504 and/or within theprocessor 1502. The software 1526 may further be transmitted or received via thenetwork interface device 1520. For the purposes of this specification, the term “machine-readable medium” shall be taken to include any medium which is capable of storing or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one of the methodologies of the inventive subject matter. The term “machine-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic disks, and carrier wave signals. Further, while the software is shown inFIG. 15 to reside within a single device, it will be appreciated that the software could be distributed across multiple machines or storage media, which may include the machine-readable medium. - The foregoing description of specific embodiments reveals the general nature of the inventive subject matter sufficiently that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and/or adapt it for various applications without departing from the generic concept. Therefore, such adaptations and modifications are within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments. The phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. Accordingly, the inventive subject matter embraces all such alternatives, modifications, equivalents and variations as fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.
- Method embodiments described herein may be computer-implemented. Some embodiments may include computer-readable media encoded with a computer program (e.g., software), which includes instructions operable to cause an electronic device to perform methods of various embodiments. A software implementation (or method) may include microcode, assembly language code, or a higher-level language code, which further may include computer readable instructions for performing various methods. The code may form portions of computer program products. Further, the code may be tangibly stored on one or more volatile or non-volatile computer-readable media during execution or at other times. These computer-readable media may include, but are not limited to, hard disks, removable magnetic disks, removable optical disks (e.g., compact disks and digital video disks), magnetic cassettes, memory cards or sticks, random access memories (RAMS), read only memories (ROMs), and the like.
- It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative and not restrictive. For example, the above-described embodiments (and/or aspects thereof) may be used in combination with each other. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Also, in the following claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are open-ended, that is, a system, device, article, or process that includes elements in addition to those listed after such a term in a claim are still deemed to fall within the scope of that claim. Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,” “second,” and “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects.
- The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. §1.72(b), which requires that it allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. Also, in the above Detailed Description, various features may be grouped together to streamline the disclosure. This should not be interpreted as intending that an unclaimed disclosed feature is essential to any claim. Rather, inventive subject matter may lie in less than all features of a particular disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.
Claims (2)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/915,718 US20110153509A1 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2006-05-30 | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US68575905P | 2005-05-27 | 2005-05-27 | |
PCT/US2006/020950 WO2006128183A2 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2006-05-30 | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships |
US11/915,718 US20110153509A1 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2006-05-30 | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2006/020950 A-371-Of-International WO2006128183A2 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2006-05-30 | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/536,320 Continuation US20150134549A1 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2014-11-07 | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110153509A1 true US20110153509A1 (en) | 2011-06-23 |
Family
ID=37453004
Family Applications (5)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/915,718 Abandoned US20110153509A1 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2006-05-30 | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships |
US14/536,320 Abandoned US20150134549A1 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2014-11-07 | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships |
US14/750,559 Active 2028-05-24 US10810693B2 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2015-06-25 | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important IP relationships |
US17/025,847 Active 2027-03-16 US11798111B2 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2020-09-18 | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important IP relationships |
US18/369,715 Pending US20240281914A1 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2023-09-18 | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships |
Family Applications After (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/536,320 Abandoned US20150134549A1 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2014-11-07 | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships |
US14/750,559 Active 2028-05-24 US10810693B2 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2015-06-25 | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important IP relationships |
US17/025,847 Active 2027-03-16 US11798111B2 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2020-09-18 | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important IP relationships |
US18/369,715 Pending US20240281914A1 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2023-09-18 | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (5) | US20110153509A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006128183A2 (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080216013A1 (en) * | 2006-08-01 | 2008-09-04 | Lundberg Steven W | Patent tracking |
US20100131513A1 (en) * | 2008-10-23 | 2010-05-27 | Lundberg Steven W | Patent mapping |
US20130086045A1 (en) * | 2011-10-03 | 2013-04-04 | Steven W. Lundberg | Patent mapping |
US9201956B2 (en) | 2005-07-27 | 2015-12-01 | Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. | Patent mapping |
US9904726B2 (en) | 2011-05-04 | 2018-02-27 | Black Hills IP Holdings, LLC. | Apparatus and method for automated and assisted patent claim mapping and expense planning |
US10579662B2 (en) | 2013-04-23 | 2020-03-03 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Patent claim scope evaluator |
US10810693B2 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2020-10-20 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important IP relationships |
US11048709B2 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2021-06-29 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Patent mapping |
US11080807B2 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2021-08-03 | Lucid Patent Llc | Patent mapping |
US11461862B2 (en) | 2012-08-20 | 2022-10-04 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Analytics generation for patent portfolio management |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2020012116A1 (en) | 2018-07-09 | 2020-01-16 | Arkyan | Method, device and information medium for estimating the chances and/or probable date of granting a patent application |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030033295A1 (en) * | 2001-07-11 | 2003-02-13 | Adler Marc Stephen | Method for analyzing and recording innovations |
US20030046307A1 (en) * | 1997-06-02 | 2003-03-06 | Rivette Kevin G. | Using hyperbolic trees to visualize data generated by patent-centric and group-oriented data processing |
US20030167181A1 (en) * | 2002-03-01 | 2003-09-04 | Schwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, P.A. | Systems and methods for managing information disclosure statement (IDS) references |
US20040054672A1 (en) * | 2002-09-03 | 2004-03-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Information search support system, application server, information search method, and program product |
US20050246194A1 (en) * | 2004-04-06 | 2005-11-03 | Lundberg Steven W | System and method for information disclosure statement management |
US20060190449A1 (en) * | 2005-02-18 | 2006-08-24 | Lundberg Steven W | System and method for prior art cross citation |
US20070198578A1 (en) * | 2005-07-27 | 2007-08-23 | Lundberg Steven W | Patent mapping |
US20080216013A1 (en) * | 2006-08-01 | 2008-09-04 | Lundberg Steven W | Patent tracking |
US20100131513A1 (en) * | 2008-10-23 | 2010-05-27 | Lundberg Steven W | Patent mapping |
US20120284199A1 (en) * | 2011-05-04 | 2012-11-08 | Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. | Apparatus and method for automated and assisted patent claim mapping and expense planning |
Family Cites Families (338)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2156112A (en) | 1984-03-20 | 1985-10-02 | Brian Ledwith | Data processing system and method |
JPS61220027A (en) | 1985-03-27 | 1986-09-30 | Hitachi Ltd | Information memory system |
US5553226A (en) | 1985-03-27 | 1996-09-03 | Hitachi, Ltd. | System for displaying concept networks |
US5404506A (en) | 1985-03-27 | 1995-04-04 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Knowledge based information retrieval system |
US5696916A (en) | 1985-03-27 | 1997-12-09 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Information storage and retrieval system and display method therefor |
US6182062B1 (en) | 1986-03-26 | 2001-01-30 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Knowledge based information retrieval system |
US4807154A (en) | 1987-01-29 | 1989-02-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for developing automatic replies in an interactive electronic calendaring system |
US5557515A (en) | 1989-08-11 | 1996-09-17 | Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Inc. | Computerized system and method for work management |
JP2943447B2 (en) | 1991-01-30 | 1999-08-30 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Text information extraction device, text similarity matching device, text search system, text information extraction method, text similarity matching method, and question analysis device |
JPH05303531A (en) | 1991-01-31 | 1993-11-16 | Fields Software Group Inc | Electronic system and method for processing format |
US5592664A (en) | 1991-07-29 | 1997-01-07 | Borland International Inc. | Database server system with methods for alerting clients of occurrence of database server events of interest to the clients |
GB2260007A (en) | 1991-09-20 | 1993-03-31 | Hitachi Ltd | Information storage/retrieval system and display method |
US5329447A (en) | 1992-03-12 | 1994-07-12 | Leedom Jr Charles M | High integrity computer implemented docketing system |
US5742834A (en) | 1992-06-24 | 1998-04-21 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Document processing apparatus using a synonym dictionary |
JPH06176081A (en) | 1992-12-02 | 1994-06-24 | Hitachi Ltd | Hierarchical structure browsing method and device |
US5799325A (en) | 1993-11-19 | 1998-08-25 | Smartpatents, Inc. | System, method, and computer program product for generating equivalent text files |
US5991751A (en) | 1997-06-02 | 1999-11-23 | Smartpatents, Inc. | System, method, and computer program product for patent-centric and group-oriented data processing |
US5623679A (en) | 1993-11-19 | 1997-04-22 | Waverley Holdings, Inc. | System and method for creating and manipulating notes each containing multiple sub-notes, and linking the sub-notes to portions of data objects |
US6963920B1 (en) | 1993-11-19 | 2005-11-08 | Rose Blush Software Llc | Intellectual asset protocol for defining data exchange rules and formats for universal intellectual asset documents, and systems, methods, and computer program products related to same |
US5623681A (en) | 1993-11-19 | 1997-04-22 | Waverley Holdings, Inc. | Method and apparatus for synchronizing, displaying and manipulating text and image documents |
US5548506A (en) | 1994-03-17 | 1996-08-20 | Srinivasan; Seshan R. | Automated, electronic network based, project management server system, for managing multiple work-groups |
US5745745A (en) | 1994-06-29 | 1998-04-28 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Text search method and apparatus for structured documents |
US5548753A (en) | 1994-09-14 | 1996-08-20 | Johnson Service Company | Automatic electronic mail notification of database events |
US5664063A (en) | 1994-12-01 | 1997-09-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic user notification of certain meeting attributes of a posted calendar event |
US5530852A (en) | 1994-12-20 | 1996-06-25 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method for extracting profiles and topics from a first file written in a first markup language and generating files in different markup languages containing the profiles and topics for use in accessing data described by the profiles and topics |
US5664714A (en) | 1995-01-18 | 1997-09-09 | Navarro; Jose | Vehicular entertainment component stand |
US5768580A (en) | 1995-05-31 | 1998-06-16 | Oracle Corporation | Methods and apparatus for dynamic classification of discourse |
US5694523A (en) | 1995-05-31 | 1997-12-02 | Oracle Corporation | Content processing system for discourse |
US5907837A (en) | 1995-07-17 | 1999-05-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Information retrieval system in an on-line network including separate content and layout of published titles |
EP0856175A4 (en) | 1995-08-16 | 2000-05-24 | Univ Syracuse | Multilingual document retrieval system and method using semantic vector matching |
US5699528A (en) | 1995-10-31 | 1997-12-16 | Mastercard International, Inc. | System and method for bill delivery and payment over a communications network |
US5774833A (en) | 1995-12-08 | 1998-06-30 | Motorola, Inc. | Method for syntactic and semantic analysis of patent text and drawings |
US5754840A (en) | 1996-01-23 | 1998-05-19 | Smartpatents, Inc. | System, method, and computer program product for developing and maintaining documents which includes analyzing a patent application with regards to the specification and claims |
US5659729A (en) | 1996-02-01 | 1997-08-19 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and system for implementing hypertext scroll attributes |
US6076088A (en) | 1996-02-09 | 2000-06-13 | Paik; Woojin | Information extraction system and method using concept relation concept (CRC) triples |
US5758328A (en) | 1996-02-22 | 1998-05-26 | Giovannoli; Joseph | Computerized quotation system and method |
US5926811A (en) | 1996-03-15 | 1999-07-20 | Lexis-Nexis | Statistical thesaurus, method of forming same, and use thereof in query expansion in automated text searching |
US5787411A (en) | 1996-03-20 | 1998-07-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for database filter generation by display selection |
US5970463A (en) | 1996-05-01 | 1999-10-19 | Practice Patterns Science, Inc. | Medical claims integration and data analysis system |
US5794236A (en) | 1996-05-29 | 1998-08-11 | Lexis-Nexis | Computer-based system for classifying documents into a hierarchy and linking the classifications to the hierarchy |
US5721910A (en) | 1996-06-04 | 1998-02-24 | Exxon Research And Engineering Company | Relational database system containing a multidimensional hierachical model of interrelated subject categories with recognition capabilities |
US5850520A (en) | 1996-07-01 | 1998-12-15 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Method and system for electronic publication distribution including return receipt |
US5870745A (en) | 1996-09-26 | 1999-02-09 | Mciworldcom, Inc. | Automated system and method for processing and tracking requests and responses required for repetitive tasks |
US6049801A (en) | 1996-10-07 | 2000-04-11 | Whitmyer, Jr.; Wesley W. | Web site providing professional services |
US5895468A (en) | 1996-10-07 | 1999-04-20 | Whitmyer, Jr.; Wesley W. | System automating delivery of professional services |
US6038561A (en) | 1996-10-15 | 2000-03-14 | Manning & Napier Information Services | Management and analysis of document information text |
US6415319B1 (en) | 1997-02-07 | 2002-07-02 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Intelligent network browser using incremental conceptual indexer |
US5940821A (en) | 1997-05-21 | 1999-08-17 | Oracle Corporation | Information presentation in a knowledge base search and retrieval system |
US5903881A (en) | 1997-06-05 | 1999-05-11 | Intuit, Inc. | Personal online banking with integrated online statement and checkbook user interface |
US6363361B1 (en) | 1997-07-22 | 2002-03-26 | Patent & Trademark Fee Management, Llc | Computerized patent and trademark fee payment method and system for law firms |
US7680733B1 (en) | 1997-07-22 | 2010-03-16 | Patent And Trademark Fee Management, Llc | Computerized patent and trademark fee payment method and system |
US6216128B1 (en) | 1997-10-09 | 2001-04-10 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | System and method for private information retrieval from a single electronic storage device using commodities |
US5991756A (en) | 1997-11-03 | 1999-11-23 | Yahoo, Inc. | Information retrieval from hierarchical compound documents |
US5953726A (en) | 1997-11-24 | 1999-09-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for maintaining multiple inheritance concept hierarchies |
US6055538A (en) | 1997-12-22 | 2000-04-25 | Hewlett Packard Company | Methods and system for using web browser to search large collections of documents |
US6094652A (en) | 1998-06-10 | 2000-07-25 | Oracle Corporation | Hierarchical query feedback in an information retrieval system |
US7383294B1 (en) | 1998-06-30 | 2008-06-03 | Emc Corporation | System for determining the mapping of logical objects in a data storage system |
US6363375B1 (en) | 1998-09-30 | 2002-03-26 | Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Company | Classification tree based information retrieval scheme |
US6363378B1 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2002-03-26 | Oracle Corporation | Ranking of query feedback terms in an information retrieval system |
US6415283B1 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2002-07-02 | Orack Corporation | Methods and apparatus for determining focal points of clusters in a tree structure |
US6453312B1 (en) | 1998-10-14 | 2002-09-17 | Unisys Corporation | System and method for developing a selectably-expandable concept-based search |
US6226792B1 (en) | 1998-10-14 | 2001-05-01 | Unisys Corporation | Object management system supporting the use of application domain knowledge mapped to technology domain knowledge |
US20030069873A1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2003-04-10 | Kevin L. Fox | Multiple engine information retrieval and visualization system |
EP1129417A4 (en) | 1998-12-04 | 2004-06-30 | Technology Enabling Company Ll | Systems and methods for organizing data |
US6327593B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2001-12-04 | Unisys Corporation | Automated system and method for capturing and managing user knowledge within a search system |
US8095581B2 (en) | 1999-02-05 | 2012-01-10 | Gregory A Stobbs | Computer-implemented patent portfolio analysis method and apparatus |
WO2000052645A1 (en) | 1999-03-01 | 2000-09-08 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Document image processor, method for extracting document title, and method for imparting document tag information |
US6654731B1 (en) | 1999-03-01 | 2003-11-25 | Oracle Corporation | Automated integration of terminological information into a knowledge base |
US7966328B2 (en) | 1999-03-02 | 2011-06-21 | Rose Blush Software Llc | Patent-related tools and methodology for use in research and development projects |
US7716060B2 (en) | 1999-03-02 | 2010-05-11 | Germeraad Paul B | Patent-related tools and methodology for use in the merger and acquisition process |
WO2000054185A1 (en) | 1999-03-08 | 2000-09-14 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Method and apparatus for building a user-defined technical thesaurus using on-line databases |
US6405190B1 (en) | 1999-03-16 | 2002-06-11 | Oracle Corporation | Free format query processing in an information search and retrieval system |
US6513027B1 (en) | 1999-03-16 | 2003-01-28 | Oracle Corporation | Automated category discovery for a terminological knowledge base |
US20020004775A1 (en) | 1999-03-17 | 2002-01-10 | Nir Kossovsky | Online patent and license exchange |
US6629097B1 (en) | 1999-04-28 | 2003-09-30 | Douglas K. Keith | Displaying implicit associations among items in loosely-structured data sets |
US6269361B1 (en) | 1999-05-28 | 2001-07-31 | Goto.Com | System and method for influencing a position on a search result list generated by a computer network search engine |
US6711585B1 (en) | 1999-06-15 | 2004-03-23 | Kanisa Inc. | System and method for implementing a knowledge management system |
US6981007B1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2005-12-27 | Whitmyer Jr Wesley W | Onsite backup for internet-based data processing |
WO2001011559A1 (en) | 1999-08-06 | 2001-02-15 | Lexis-Nexis | System and method for classifying legal concepts using legal topic scheme |
US6556992B1 (en) | 1999-09-14 | 2003-04-29 | Patent Ratings, Llc | Method and system for rating patents and other intangible assets |
US7016852B1 (en) | 1999-09-30 | 2006-03-21 | Eugene M. Lee | Fee transaction system and method for intellectual property acquisition and/or maintenance |
US20040103112A1 (en) | 1999-10-08 | 2004-05-27 | Colson Thomas J. | Computer based method and apparatus for mining and displaying patent data |
JP3754253B2 (en) | 1999-11-19 | 2006-03-08 | 株式会社東芝 | Structured document search method, structured document search apparatus, and structured document search system |
US7634415B2 (en) | 1999-12-30 | 2009-12-15 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Systems and processes for technology asset management |
US7801830B1 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2010-09-21 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | System and method for marketing, managing, and maintaining intellectual property |
US7127405B1 (en) | 1999-12-30 | 2006-10-24 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corp. | System and method for selecting and protecting intellectual property assets |
EP1115076A1 (en) | 2000-01-06 | 2001-07-11 | Venner, Alan J. | A reminder and actioning system |
US7849117B2 (en) | 2000-01-12 | 2010-12-07 | Knowledge Sphere, Inc. | Multi-term frequency analysis |
US6751621B1 (en) | 2000-01-27 | 2004-06-15 | Manning & Napier Information Services, Llc. | Construction of trainable semantic vectors and clustering, classification, and searching using trainable semantic vectors |
US6640098B1 (en) | 2000-02-14 | 2003-10-28 | Action Engine Corporation | System for obtaining service-related information for local interactive wireless devices |
US8386456B1 (en) | 2000-02-24 | 2013-02-26 | Richard Paiz | Codex search patterns |
US6847979B2 (en) | 2000-02-25 | 2005-01-25 | Synquiry Technologies, Ltd | Conceptual factoring and unification of graphs representing semantic models |
US20010049707A1 (en) | 2000-02-29 | 2001-12-06 | Tran Bao Q. | Systems and methods for generating intellectual property |
EP1275042A2 (en) | 2000-03-06 | 2003-01-15 | Kanisa Inc. | A system and method for providing an intelligent multi-step dialog with a user |
US6970842B1 (en) | 2000-03-21 | 2005-11-29 | Halo Management, Llc | Project docket management apparatus and method |
US7757168B1 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2010-07-13 | Xerox Corporation | Meta-document and method of managing |
US20020022974A1 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2002-02-21 | Urban Lindh | Display of patent information |
US20020163541A1 (en) | 2000-05-04 | 2002-11-07 | Williams G. Thomas | System and method for organizing and presenting information relating to the interpretation of multiple information elements, such as patent claim elements, in at least one reference source and graphical user interface incorporating the same |
US6885999B1 (en) | 2000-05-10 | 2005-04-26 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Digital identifiers and digital identifier control systems for intellectual properties |
US6490581B1 (en) | 2000-05-24 | 2002-12-03 | At&T Corp. | System and method for providing an object-oriented interface to a relational database |
AU2001268167A1 (en) | 2000-06-02 | 2001-12-11 | First To File, Inc. | Computer-implemented method for securing intellectual property |
US20020091541A1 (en) | 2000-06-16 | 2002-07-11 | Seekip.Com | Method and apparatus for intellectual property management on the internet |
US6839665B1 (en) | 2000-06-27 | 2005-01-04 | Text Analysis International, Inc. | Automated generation of text analysis systems |
US20020078090A1 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2002-06-20 | Hwang Chung Hee | Ontological concept-based, user-centric text summarization |
US6678692B1 (en) | 2000-07-10 | 2004-01-13 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Hierarchy statistical analysis system and method |
US6675159B1 (en) | 2000-07-27 | 2004-01-06 | Science Applic Int Corp | Concept-based search and retrieval system |
US6823331B1 (en) | 2000-08-28 | 2004-11-23 | Entrust Limited | Concept identification system and method for use in reducing and/or representing text content of an electronic document |
AU2001290682A1 (en) | 2000-09-06 | 2002-03-22 | Daryl Craig Josephson | Data gathering and distribution apparatus and methods |
US20040260569A1 (en) | 2000-09-07 | 2004-12-23 | Cyber Legal Solutions, Inc. | Expert legal task management |
US20020035571A1 (en) | 2000-09-15 | 2002-03-21 | Coult John H | Digital patent marking method |
CA2423964A1 (en) | 2000-09-29 | 2002-04-04 | Gavagai Technology Incorporated | A method and system for describing and identifying concepts in natural language text for information retrieval and processing |
US20020042784A1 (en) | 2000-10-06 | 2002-04-11 | Kerven David S. | System and method for automatically searching and analyzing intellectual property-related materials |
US7487114B2 (en) | 2000-10-23 | 2009-02-03 | Costar Group, Inc. | System and method for associating aerial images, map features, and information |
JP3266602B1 (en) | 2000-10-30 | 2002-03-18 | 洋一 奥寺 | Address inquiry system, computer program product and method thereof |
US6999956B2 (en) | 2000-11-16 | 2006-02-14 | Ward Mullins | Dynamic object-driven database manipulation and mapping system |
US20020111824A1 (en) | 2000-11-27 | 2002-08-15 | First To File, Inc. | Method of defining workflow rules for managing intellectual property |
US20020065677A1 (en) | 2000-11-27 | 2002-05-30 | First To File, Inc. | Computer implemented method of managing information disclosure statements |
US20020116363A1 (en) | 2000-11-27 | 2002-08-22 | First To File, Inc. | Method of deleting unnecessary information from a database |
US20020065675A1 (en) | 2000-11-27 | 2002-05-30 | Grainger Jeffry J. | Computer implemented method of managing information disclosure statements |
US20020161733A1 (en) | 2000-11-27 | 2002-10-31 | First To File, Inc. | Method of creating electronic prosecution experience for patent applicant |
US20020111953A1 (en) | 2000-11-27 | 2002-08-15 | First To File, Inc. | Docketing system |
US7653551B2 (en) | 2000-12-05 | 2010-01-26 | Ipwealth.Com, Inc. | Method and system for searching and submitting online via an aggregation portal |
US6678677B2 (en) | 2000-12-19 | 2004-01-13 | Xerox Corporation | Apparatus and method for information retrieval using self-appending semantic lattice |
US7051022B1 (en) | 2000-12-19 | 2006-05-23 | Oracle International Corporation | Automated extension for generation of cross references in a knowledge base |
US20030220891A1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2003-11-27 | Fish Robert D | Matter management computer software |
US6839707B2 (en) | 2001-01-17 | 2005-01-04 | General Electric Company | Web-based system and method for managing legal information |
US6766316B2 (en) | 2001-01-18 | 2004-07-20 | Science Applications International Corporation | Method and system of ranking and clustering for document indexing and retrieval |
US6526440B1 (en) | 2001-01-30 | 2003-02-25 | Google, Inc. | Ranking search results by reranking the results based on local inter-connectivity |
US20020107896A1 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2002-08-08 | Abraham Ronai | Patent application drafting assistance tool |
US20030160812A1 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2003-08-28 | Gary Dommer | Representation of EPG programming information |
US8484177B2 (en) | 2001-03-21 | 2013-07-09 | Eugene M. Lee | Apparatus for and method of searching and organizing intellectual property information utilizing a field-of-search |
US6662178B2 (en) | 2001-03-21 | 2003-12-09 | Knowledge Management Objects, Llc | Apparatus for and method of searching and organizing intellectual property information utilizing an IP thesaurus |
EP1386262A4 (en) | 2001-03-29 | 2007-12-19 | Schwegman Lundberg Woessner & | Internet-based patent and trademark application management system |
US20020184234A1 (en) | 2001-06-01 | 2002-12-05 | Lundberg Steven W. | Internet-based patent and trademark applicaton management system |
US6665670B2 (en) | 2001-03-30 | 2003-12-16 | M.Cam, Inc. | Method and system for graphical representation of multitemporal, multidimensional data relationships |
JP3842573B2 (en) | 2001-03-30 | 2006-11-08 | 株式会社東芝 | Structured document search method, structured document management apparatus and program |
JP3842577B2 (en) | 2001-03-30 | 2006-11-08 | 株式会社東芝 | Structured document search method, structured document search apparatus and program |
US6976016B2 (en) | 2001-04-02 | 2005-12-13 | Vima Technologies, Inc. | Maximizing expected generalization for learning complex query concepts |
US20020147738A1 (en) | 2001-04-06 | 2002-10-10 | Reader Scot A. | Method and appratus for finding patent-relevant web documents |
US6970881B1 (en) | 2001-05-07 | 2005-11-29 | Intelligenxia, Inc. | Concept-based method and system for dynamically analyzing unstructured information |
JP4489994B2 (en) | 2001-05-11 | 2010-06-23 | 富士通株式会社 | Topic extraction apparatus, method, program, and recording medium for recording the program |
US6980984B1 (en) | 2001-05-16 | 2005-12-27 | Kanisa, Inc. | Content provider systems and methods using structured data |
US6871324B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2005-03-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for efficiently and dynamically updating monitored metrics in a heterogeneous system |
US7103843B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2006-09-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for visualizing metrics in a data space |
US6968341B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2005-11-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for post-analyzing, and sequentially visualizing plurality of predefined metrics in a stored dynamic data values associated identifiers within determined time range |
GB2377047A (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2002-12-31 | Nokia Corp | Intellectual property rights contract |
US8326851B2 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2012-12-04 | Grune Guerry L | Simultaneous intellectual property search and valuation system and methodology (SIPS-VSM) |
KR20030009704A (en) | 2001-07-23 | 2003-02-05 | 한국전자통신연구원 | System for drawing patent map using technical field word, its method |
EP1429258A4 (en) | 2001-07-26 | 2007-08-29 | Ibm | Data processing method, data processing system, and program |
US9460414B2 (en) | 2001-08-28 | 2016-10-04 | Eugene M. Lee | Computer assisted and/or implemented process and system for annotating and/or linking documents and data, optionally in an intellectual property management system |
US6778995B1 (en) | 2001-08-31 | 2004-08-17 | Attenex Corporation | System and method for efficiently generating cluster groupings in a multi-dimensional concept space |
US8078545B1 (en) | 2001-09-24 | 2011-12-13 | Aloft Media, Llc | System, method and computer program product for collecting strategic patent data associated with an identifier |
US20030084066A1 (en) | 2001-10-31 | 2003-05-01 | Waterman Scott A. | Device and method for assisting knowledge engineer in associating intelligence with content |
US20040006594A1 (en) | 2001-11-27 | 2004-01-08 | Ftf Technologies Inc. | Data access control techniques using roles and permissions |
US20030115191A1 (en) | 2001-12-17 | 2003-06-19 | Max Copperman | Efficient and cost-effective content provider for customer relationship management (CRM) or other applications |
AU2003210795A1 (en) | 2002-02-01 | 2003-09-02 | John Fairweather | System and method for analyzing data |
US20030154085A1 (en) | 2002-02-08 | 2003-08-14 | Onevoice Medical Corporation | Interactive knowledge base system |
US8589413B1 (en) | 2002-03-01 | 2013-11-19 | Ixreveal, Inc. | Concept-based method and system for dynamically analyzing results from search engines |
US20030187832A1 (en) | 2002-04-02 | 2003-10-02 | Reader Scot A. | Method for locating patent-relevant web pages and search agent for use therein |
US20030191654A1 (en) | 2002-04-05 | 2003-10-09 | Panchal Kiran D. | Patent product map |
DE10215495A1 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2003-10-30 | Bayer Ag | Computer system and method for research, statistical evaluation and analysis of documents |
US6847966B1 (en) | 2002-04-24 | 2005-01-25 | Engenium Corporation | Method and system for optimally searching a document database using a representative semantic space |
US20040024670A1 (en) | 2002-04-29 | 2004-02-05 | Contentguard Holdings, Inc. | Rights management system using legality expression language |
US20030212706A1 (en) | 2002-05-07 | 2003-11-13 | Shih Yu Li | Patent management system |
US7085771B2 (en) | 2002-05-17 | 2006-08-01 | Verity, Inc | System and method for automatically discovering a hierarchy of concepts from a corpus of documents |
US20040015481A1 (en) | 2002-05-23 | 2004-01-22 | Kenneth Zinda | Patent data mining |
US6996575B2 (en) | 2002-05-31 | 2006-02-07 | Sas Institute Inc. | Computer-implemented system and method for text-based document processing |
US7024408B2 (en) | 2002-07-03 | 2006-04-04 | Word Data Corp. | Text-classification code, system and method |
US7016895B2 (en) | 2002-07-05 | 2006-03-21 | Word Data Corp. | Text-classification system and method |
US20040006547A1 (en) | 2002-07-03 | 2004-01-08 | Dehlinger Peter J. | Text-processing database |
US7181451B2 (en) | 2002-07-03 | 2007-02-20 | Word Data Corp. | Processing input text to generate the selectivity value of a word or word group in a library of texts in a field is related to the frequency of occurrence of that word or word group in library |
US7003516B2 (en) | 2002-07-03 | 2006-02-21 | Word Data Corp. | Text representation and method |
US20040006459A1 (en) | 2002-07-05 | 2004-01-08 | Dehlinger Peter J. | Text-searching system and method |
KR100490725B1 (en) | 2002-07-11 | 2005-05-24 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Method for constructing database of technique classification patent map |
US7493253B1 (en) | 2002-07-12 | 2009-02-17 | Language And Computing, Inc. | Conceptual world representation natural language understanding system and method |
US20060225000A1 (en) | 2005-04-01 | 2006-10-05 | Paul Albrecht | Graphical application interface using browser |
US7136807B2 (en) | 2002-08-26 | 2006-11-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Inferencing using disambiguated natural language rules |
US20040044688A1 (en) | 2002-08-30 | 2004-03-04 | Brudz John Jason | Patent asset management systems and methods |
US7158983B2 (en) | 2002-09-23 | 2007-01-02 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Text analysis technique |
US20040059994A1 (en) | 2002-09-23 | 2004-03-25 | Ronny Fogel | Method of checking patent claims |
US6886010B2 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2005-04-26 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Method for data and text mining and literature-based discovery |
US7904453B2 (en) | 2002-10-17 | 2011-03-08 | Poltorak Alexander I | Apparatus and method for analyzing patent claim validity |
EP1411448A3 (en) | 2002-10-17 | 2007-12-05 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Data searching apparatus |
US7801909B2 (en) | 2002-10-17 | 2010-09-21 | Poltorak Alexander I | Apparatus and method for identifying and/or for analyzing potential patent infringement |
US7296015B2 (en) | 2002-10-17 | 2007-11-13 | Poltorak Alexander I | Apparatus and method for identifying and/or for analyzing potential patent infringement |
AU2002368316A1 (en) | 2002-10-24 | 2004-06-07 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Method and system for discovering knowledge from text documents |
US20040186738A1 (en) | 2002-10-24 | 2004-09-23 | Richard Reisman | Method and apparatus for an idea adoption marketplace |
US7142713B1 (en) | 2002-10-24 | 2006-11-28 | Foundationip, Llc | Automated docketing system |
US7231384B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2007-06-12 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | Navigation tool for exploring a knowledge base |
WO2004043444A1 (en) | 2002-11-06 | 2004-05-27 | Mount Sinai School Of Medicine | Treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with nimesulide |
US20040199400A1 (en) | 2002-12-17 | 2004-10-07 | Lundberg Steven W. | Internet-based patent and trademark application management system |
US20040122841A1 (en) | 2002-12-19 | 2004-06-24 | Ford Motor Company | Method and system for evaluating intellectual property |
US20040167875A1 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2004-08-26 | Eriks Sneiders | Information processing method and system |
US8694504B2 (en) | 2003-03-05 | 2014-04-08 | Spore, Inc. | Methods and systems for technology analysis and mapping |
US20040181417A1 (en) | 2003-03-14 | 2004-09-16 | Gunther Piller | Managing the definition of a product innovation |
US20040186705A1 (en) | 2003-03-18 | 2004-09-23 | Morgan Alexander P. | Concept word management |
US20120102427A1 (en) | 2010-10-21 | 2012-04-26 | Marc Aaron Fenster | Systems and methods for automated claim chart generation |
US7406459B2 (en) | 2003-05-01 | 2008-07-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Concept network |
CA2523586A1 (en) | 2003-05-01 | 2004-11-11 | Axonwave Software Inc. | A method and system for concept generation and management |
US7496892B2 (en) | 2003-05-06 | 2009-02-24 | Andrew Nuss | Polymorphic regular expressions |
WO2004104762A2 (en) | 2003-05-16 | 2004-12-02 | Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. | Apparatus, method and computer readable medium for evaluating a network of entities and assets |
US20050004806A1 (en) | 2003-06-20 | 2005-01-06 | Dah-Chih Lin | Automatic patent claim reader and computer-aided claim reading method |
JP3966515B2 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2007-08-29 | 日本アイ・ビー・エム株式会社 | Network system, server, data recording / reproducing apparatus, method and program thereof |
US20050005239A1 (en) | 2003-07-03 | 2005-01-06 | Richards James L. | System and method for automatic insertion of cross references in a document |
US7171618B2 (en) | 2003-07-30 | 2007-01-30 | Xerox Corporation | Multi-versioned documents and method for creation and use thereof |
US7568109B2 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2009-07-28 | Ipx, Inc. | System for software source code comparison |
TW200511048A (en) | 2003-09-12 | 2005-03-16 | Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd | Patent family analysis system and method |
US7219105B2 (en) | 2003-09-17 | 2007-05-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and computer program product for profiling entities |
US20050171760A1 (en) | 2003-10-08 | 2005-08-04 | Marc Tinkler | Visual thesaurus |
US20070271366A1 (en) | 2003-10-09 | 2007-11-22 | Demers Timothy B | Multimedia player and browser system |
US7555441B2 (en) | 2003-10-10 | 2009-06-30 | Kronos Talent Management Inc. | Conceptualization of job candidate information |
US9483551B2 (en) | 2003-10-11 | 2016-11-01 | Spore, Inc. | Methods and systems for technology analysis and mapping |
US10198478B2 (en) | 2003-10-11 | 2019-02-05 | Magic Number, Inc. | Methods and systems for technology analysis and mapping |
US9922383B2 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2018-03-20 | Spore, Inc. | Patent claims analysis system and method |
US7185172B1 (en) | 2003-10-31 | 2007-02-27 | Integrated Device Technology, Inc. | CAM-based search engine devices having index translation capability |
WO2005048055A2 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2005-05-26 | Spore, Inc. | Patent claims analysis system and method |
US20050120011A1 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2005-06-02 | Word Data Corp. | Code, method, and system for manipulating texts |
US20050234738A1 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2005-10-20 | Hodes Alan S | Competitive product intelligence system and method, including patent analysis and formulation using one or more ontologies |
US20050144177A1 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2005-06-30 | Hodes Alan S. | Patent analysis and formulation using ontologies |
CN1622083A (en) | 2003-11-29 | 2005-06-01 | 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 | Patent download system and method |
KR100452086B1 (en) | 2003-12-22 | 2004-10-13 | 엔에이치엔(주) | Search System For Providing Information of Keyword Input Frequency By Category And Method Thereof |
US20060106793A1 (en) | 2003-12-29 | 2006-05-18 | Ping Liang | Internet and computer information retrieval and mining with intelligent conceptual filtering, visualization and automation |
US7447678B2 (en) | 2003-12-31 | 2008-11-04 | Google Inc. | Interface for a universal search engine |
US7702516B2 (en) | 2004-01-13 | 2010-04-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Payment control to inventors in patent tracking system |
KR100452085B1 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2004-10-12 | 엔에이치엔(주) | Search System For Providing Information of Keyword Input Frequency By Category And Method Thereof |
US8868405B2 (en) | 2004-01-27 | 2014-10-21 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L. P. | System and method for comparative analysis of textual documents |
US20050198026A1 (en) | 2004-02-03 | 2005-09-08 | Dehlinger Peter J. | Code, system, and method for generating concepts |
US20050182755A1 (en) | 2004-02-14 | 2005-08-18 | Bao Tran | Systems and methods for analyzing documents over a network |
US20050210009A1 (en) | 2004-03-18 | 2005-09-22 | Bao Tran | Systems and methods for intellectual property management |
US20050210008A1 (en) | 2004-03-18 | 2005-09-22 | Bao Tran | Systems and methods for analyzing documents over a network |
US20050210042A1 (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2005-09-22 | Goedken James F | Methods and apparatus to search and analyze prior art |
US8612208B2 (en) | 2004-04-07 | 2013-12-17 | Oracle Otc Subsidiary Llc | Ontology for use with a system, method, and computer readable medium for retrieving information and response to a query |
US20050228684A1 (en) | 2004-04-13 | 2005-10-13 | Pavel Pogodin | Integrated computerized system and method for management of intellectual property |
US20050234881A1 (en) | 2004-04-16 | 2005-10-20 | Anna Burago | Search wizard |
US7962453B2 (en) | 2004-04-26 | 2011-06-14 | Oracle International Corporation | Dynamic redistribution of a distributed memory index when individual nodes have different lookup indexes |
US20070067297A1 (en) | 2004-04-30 | 2007-03-22 | Kublickis Peter J | System and methods for a micropayment-enabled marketplace with permission-based, self-service, precision-targeted delivery of advertising, entertainment and informational content and relationship marketing to anonymous internet users |
EP2487599A1 (en) | 2004-05-04 | 2012-08-15 | Boston Consulting Group, Inc. | Method and apparatus for selecting, analyzing and visualizing related database records as a network |
US7447665B2 (en) | 2004-05-10 | 2008-11-04 | Kinetx, Inc. | System and method of self-learning conceptual mapping to organize and interpret data |
US7996753B1 (en) | 2004-05-10 | 2011-08-09 | Google Inc. | Method and system for automatically creating an image advertisement |
US20050256734A1 (en) | 2004-05-14 | 2005-11-17 | Clikeman Richard R | Method and data structure for augmenting invention and analysis of intellectual property |
DE602004022517D1 (en) | 2004-06-15 | 2009-09-24 | Sap Ag | A data processing system and method for monitoring database replication |
US20050289524A1 (en) | 2004-06-22 | 2005-12-29 | Mcginnes Simon | Systems and methods for software based on business concepts |
EP1774432A4 (en) | 2004-07-27 | 2009-04-22 | Schwegman Lundberg Woessner & | Patent mapping |
US20060026174A1 (en) | 2004-07-27 | 2006-02-02 | Lundberg Steven W | Patent mapping |
US20060036451A1 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2006-02-16 | Lundberg Steven W | Patent mapping |
US8145640B2 (en) | 2004-08-11 | 2012-03-27 | Allan Williams | System and method for patent evaluation and visualization of the results thereof |
US8145639B2 (en) | 2004-08-11 | 2012-03-27 | Allan Williams | System and methods for patent evaluation |
US7840460B2 (en) | 2004-08-11 | 2010-11-23 | Allan Williams | System and method for patent portfolio evaluation |
US20060036453A1 (en) | 2004-08-11 | 2006-02-16 | Allan Williams | Bias compensated method and system for patent evaluation |
US8161049B2 (en) | 2004-08-11 | 2012-04-17 | Allan Williams | System and method for patent evaluation using artificial intelligence |
US20060074836A1 (en) | 2004-09-03 | 2006-04-06 | Biowisdom Limited | System and method for graphically displaying ontology data |
US20060074980A1 (en) | 2004-09-29 | 2006-04-06 | Sarkar Pte. Ltd. | System for semantically disambiguating text information |
US20060173903A1 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2006-08-03 | Zimmerman Mark C | Methods and apparatus to automatically generate claim charts |
US20060085478A1 (en) | 2004-10-18 | 2006-04-20 | Michael Landau | Third-party automated tracking, analysis, and distribution of registry status information |
US7801874B2 (en) | 2004-10-22 | 2010-09-21 | Mahle Powertrain Llc | Reporting tools |
US20080077570A1 (en) | 2004-10-25 | 2008-03-27 | Infovell, Inc. | Full Text Query and Search Systems and Method of Use |
US8805814B2 (en) | 2004-10-27 | 2014-08-12 | Elsevier B.V. | Methods and systems for searching databases and displaying search results |
US7444589B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2008-10-28 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Automated patent office documentation |
US8229905B2 (en) | 2005-01-14 | 2012-07-24 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | Adaptive document management system using a physical representation of a document |
US20060212480A1 (en) | 2005-03-21 | 2006-09-21 | Lundberg Steven W | System and method for matter clusters in an IP management system |
US20060212402A1 (en) | 2005-03-21 | 2006-09-21 | Lundberg Steven W | System and method for export control of technical documents |
US7853629B2 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2010-12-14 | Executive Data Systems, Inc. | Document imaging and management system for paperless workflow |
US20060218491A1 (en) | 2005-03-25 | 2006-09-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | System, method and program product for community review of documents |
US20060258397A1 (en) | 2005-05-10 | 2006-11-16 | Kaplan Mark M | Integrated mobile application server and communication gateway |
JP2008537225A (en) | 2005-04-11 | 2008-09-11 | テキストディガー,インコーポレイテッド | Search system and method for queries |
WO2006113597A2 (en) | 2005-04-14 | 2006-10-26 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Method for information retrieval |
US20110153509A1 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2011-06-23 | Ip Development Venture | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships |
US8805781B2 (en) | 2005-06-15 | 2014-08-12 | Geronimo Development | Document quotation indexing system and method |
US20070130112A1 (en) | 2005-06-30 | 2007-06-07 | Intelligentek Corp. | Multimedia conceptual search system and associated search method |
US7849049B2 (en) | 2005-07-05 | 2010-12-07 | Clarabridge, Inc. | Schema and ETL tools for structured and unstructured data |
US20070057967A1 (en) | 2005-07-13 | 2007-03-15 | Armstrong Orin R | System and method for the display of versioned documents and amendments |
AU2012200701B2 (en) | 2005-07-27 | 2014-01-30 | Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. | Patent Mapping |
US8566789B2 (en) | 2005-08-25 | 2013-10-22 | Infosys Limited | Semantic-based query techniques for source code |
US7716226B2 (en) | 2005-09-27 | 2010-05-11 | Patentratings, Llc | Method and system for probabilistically quantifying and visualizing relevance between two or more citationally or contextually related data objects |
US20080015968A1 (en) | 2005-10-14 | 2008-01-17 | Leviathan Entertainment, Llc | Fee-Based Priority Queuing for Insurance Claim Processing |
US7702640B1 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2010-04-20 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Stratified unbalanced trees for indexing of data items within a computer system |
US7676485B2 (en) | 2006-01-20 | 2010-03-09 | Ixreveal, Inc. | Method and computer program product for converting ontologies into concept semantic networks |
US8060357B2 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2011-11-15 | Xerox Corporation | Linguistic user interface |
KR100785352B1 (en) | 2006-04-21 | 2007-12-18 | 엔에이치엔(주) | Method and system for creating search-result-list |
US8069182B2 (en) | 2006-04-24 | 2011-11-29 | Working Research, Inc. | Relevancy-based domain classification |
US20080005144A1 (en) | 2006-05-23 | 2008-01-03 | Seapass Solutions Inc. | Apparatus and method for transferring data between incompatible computer systems |
US20070288256A1 (en) | 2006-06-07 | 2007-12-13 | Speier Gary J | Patent claim reference generation |
US20080005103A1 (en) | 2006-06-08 | 2008-01-03 | Invequity, Llc | Intellectual property search, marketing and licensing connection system and method |
US20080021900A1 (en) | 2006-07-14 | 2008-01-24 | Ficus Enterprises, Llc | Examiner information system |
US8392174B2 (en) | 2006-08-07 | 2013-03-05 | International Characters, Inc. | Method and apparatus for lexical analysis using parallel bit streams |
US9318108B2 (en) | 2010-01-18 | 2016-04-19 | Apple Inc. | Intelligent automated assistant |
US20090282054A1 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2009-11-12 | Casey Michael R | IDS Reference Tracking System |
US20080109454A1 (en) | 2006-11-03 | 2008-05-08 | Willse Alan R | Text analysis techniques |
US8037051B2 (en) | 2006-11-08 | 2011-10-11 | Intertrust Technologies Corporation | Matching and recommending relevant videos and media to individual search engine results |
US8065307B2 (en) | 2006-12-20 | 2011-11-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Parsing, analysis and scoring of document content |
US7890521B1 (en) | 2007-02-07 | 2011-02-15 | Google Inc. | Document-based synonym generation |
US7881937B2 (en) | 2007-05-31 | 2011-02-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for analyzing patent claims |
US7801749B2 (en) | 2007-06-07 | 2010-09-21 | Ingenix, Inc. | System and method for grouping claim records associated with a procedure |
US8271473B2 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2012-09-18 | Jobs2Web, Inc. | System and method for career website optimization |
CN101334771A (en) | 2007-06-28 | 2008-12-31 | 冠亚智财股份有限公司 | Correlation screening system and method for patent constituted element combination |
US20090006328A1 (en) | 2007-06-29 | 2009-01-01 | Nokia Corporation | Identifying commonalities between contacts |
KR101103766B1 (en) | 2007-07-03 | 2012-01-12 | 성균관대학교산학협력단 | Terminal, method, recording medium for collecting user preference information using tag information |
US20090043797A1 (en) | 2007-07-27 | 2009-02-12 | Sparkip, Inc. | System And Methods For Clustering Large Database of Documents |
KR100901938B1 (en) | 2007-08-14 | 2009-06-10 | 엔에이치엔비즈니스플랫폼 주식회사 | Method and system for revising click through rate |
US20090228777A1 (en) | 2007-08-17 | 2009-09-10 | Accupatent, Inc. | System and Method for Search |
US20090083049A1 (en) | 2007-09-24 | 2009-03-26 | Sciarrino David M | Claim chart creation system |
US8862622B2 (en) | 2007-12-10 | 2014-10-14 | Sprylogics International Corp. | Analysis, inference, and visualization of social networks |
US8965787B2 (en) | 2007-12-17 | 2015-02-24 | Smooth Productions Inc. | Communications system and method for serving electronic content |
US8112174B2 (en) | 2008-02-25 | 2012-02-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Processor, method and computer program product for fast selective invalidation of translation lookaside buffer |
US8218487B2 (en) | 2008-04-09 | 2012-07-10 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | System and method of adaptive frequency hopping with look ahead interference prediction |
GB2473155A (en) | 2008-05-26 | 2011-03-02 | Kenshoo Ltd | A system for finding website invitation cueing keywords and for attribute-based generation of invitation-cueing instructions |
US10007882B2 (en) | 2008-06-24 | 2018-06-26 | Sharon Belenzon | System, method and apparatus to determine associations among digital documents |
US20100023386A1 (en) | 2008-07-23 | 2010-01-28 | Sol Avisar | Social networking platform for intellectual property assets |
US20100082395A1 (en) | 2008-09-29 | 2010-04-01 | Anthony Bernard De Andrade | Systems and methods for analyzing a portfolio of intellectual property assets |
US9336304B2 (en) | 2008-11-10 | 2016-05-10 | Gary J. Speier | Patent analytics system |
US20100174698A1 (en) | 2009-01-06 | 2010-07-08 | Global Patent Solutions, Llc | Method for a customized and automated forward and backward patent citation search |
US8768960B2 (en) | 2009-01-20 | 2014-07-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Enhancing keyword advertising using online encyclopedia semantics |
JP5784586B2 (en) | 2009-04-20 | 2015-09-24 | エムペグ エルエイ,エルエルシー | System and method for managing patent licenses |
US20100306825A1 (en) | 2009-05-27 | 2010-12-02 | Lucid Ventures, Inc. | System and method for facilitating user interaction with a simulated object associated with a physical location |
US8756229B2 (en) | 2009-06-26 | 2014-06-17 | Quantifind, Inc. | System and methods for units-based numeric information retrieval |
US8572084B2 (en) | 2009-07-28 | 2013-10-29 | Fti Consulting, Inc. | System and method for displaying relationships between electronically stored information to provide classification suggestions via nearest neighbor |
US20110029476A1 (en) | 2009-07-29 | 2011-02-03 | Kas Kasravi | Indicating relationships among text documents including a patent based on characteristics of the text documents |
US8713078B2 (en) | 2009-08-13 | 2014-04-29 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method for building taxonomy of topics and categorizing videos |
US20110047166A1 (en) | 2009-08-20 | 2011-02-24 | Innography, Inc. | System and methods of relating trademarks and patent documents |
US20110246473A1 (en) | 2009-09-16 | 2011-10-06 | John Stec | Computerized method for analyizing innovation interrelationships within and between large patent portfolios |
US20110112824A1 (en) | 2009-11-06 | 2011-05-12 | Craig Peter Sayers | Determining at least one category path for identifying input text |
US8954893B2 (en) | 2009-11-06 | 2015-02-10 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Visually representing a hierarchy of category nodes |
US9183288B2 (en) | 2010-01-27 | 2015-11-10 | Kinetx, Inc. | System and method of structuring data for search using latent semantic analysis techniques |
US20110231449A1 (en) | 2010-03-17 | 2011-09-22 | Ashley William B | System, Method, and Apparatus for Managing Patent Reference Reporting |
US9384678B2 (en) | 2010-04-14 | 2016-07-05 | Thinkmap, Inc. | System and method for generating questions and multiple choice answers to adaptively aid in word comprehension |
US20110320582A1 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2011-12-29 | Lewis George C | Online presence management system |
US20120095984A1 (en) | 2010-10-18 | 2012-04-19 | Peter Michael Wren-Hilton | Universal Search Engine Interface and Application |
KR20120046671A (en) | 2010-11-02 | 2012-05-10 | (주)광개토연구소 | System and method on making patent evaluation model, generating patent evalucation information, generating patent litigation prediction information, making patent litigation prediction model, generating patent licensing prediction information, generating patent risk hedging information |
US8712894B2 (en) | 2010-11-04 | 2014-04-29 | National Yunlin University Of Science And Technology | Method and system for evaluating/analyzing patent portfolio using patent priority approach |
US8316030B2 (en) | 2010-11-05 | 2012-11-20 | Nextgen Datacom, Inc. | Method and system for document classification or search using discrete words |
US20120174017A1 (en) | 2010-12-29 | 2012-07-05 | Verisign, Inc. | Systems, methods and computer software for innovation management |
US9665637B2 (en) | 2011-02-23 | 2017-05-30 | H. Paul Zellweger | Method and apparatus for creating binary attribute data relations |
US20120240026A1 (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2012-09-20 | Anaqua, Inc. | Method and system for related art citation management |
EP2697710A4 (en) | 2011-04-15 | 2014-10-08 | Ip Street Inc | Evaluating intellectual property |
US8856181B2 (en) | 2011-07-08 | 2014-10-07 | First Retail, Inc. | Semantic matching |
US20130086080A1 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2013-04-04 | Steven W. Lundberg | System and method for information disclosure statement management and prior art cross-citation control |
US20130085946A1 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2013-04-04 | Steven W. Lundberg | Systems, methods and user interfaces in a patent management system |
US20130282409A1 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2013-10-24 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Systems and methods for patent portfolio management |
-
2006
- 2006-05-30 US US11/915,718 patent/US20110153509A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2006-05-30 WO PCT/US2006/020950 patent/WO2006128183A2/en active Application Filing
-
2014
- 2014-11-07 US US14/536,320 patent/US20150134549A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2015
- 2015-06-25 US US14/750,559 patent/US10810693B2/en active Active
-
2020
- 2020-09-18 US US17/025,847 patent/US11798111B2/en active Active
-
2023
- 2023-09-18 US US18/369,715 patent/US20240281914A1/en active Pending
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030046307A1 (en) * | 1997-06-02 | 2003-03-06 | Rivette Kevin G. | Using hyperbolic trees to visualize data generated by patent-centric and group-oriented data processing |
US20030033295A1 (en) * | 2001-07-11 | 2003-02-13 | Adler Marc Stephen | Method for analyzing and recording innovations |
US20030167181A1 (en) * | 2002-03-01 | 2003-09-04 | Schwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, P.A. | Systems and methods for managing information disclosure statement (IDS) references |
US20040054672A1 (en) * | 2002-09-03 | 2004-03-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Information search support system, application server, information search method, and program product |
US20050246194A1 (en) * | 2004-04-06 | 2005-11-03 | Lundberg Steven W | System and method for information disclosure statement management |
US20060190449A1 (en) * | 2005-02-18 | 2006-08-24 | Lundberg Steven W | System and method for prior art cross citation |
US20070198578A1 (en) * | 2005-07-27 | 2007-08-23 | Lundberg Steven W | Patent mapping |
US20080216013A1 (en) * | 2006-08-01 | 2008-09-04 | Lundberg Steven W | Patent tracking |
US20100131513A1 (en) * | 2008-10-23 | 2010-05-27 | Lundberg Steven W | Patent mapping |
US20120284199A1 (en) * | 2011-05-04 | 2012-11-08 | Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. | Apparatus and method for automated and assisted patent claim mapping and expense planning |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
"A translational approach to portable ontology specifications", Thomas R. Gruber, Knowledge Acquisition, 1993, 24 total pages * |
Cited By (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11776084B2 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2023-10-03 | Lucid Patent Llc | Patent mapping |
US11080807B2 (en) | 2004-08-10 | 2021-08-03 | Lucid Patent Llc | Patent mapping |
US10810693B2 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2020-10-20 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important IP relationships |
US11798111B2 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2023-10-24 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important IP relationships |
US9201956B2 (en) | 2005-07-27 | 2015-12-01 | Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. | Patent mapping |
US9659071B2 (en) | 2005-07-27 | 2017-05-23 | Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. | Patent mapping |
US20080216013A1 (en) * | 2006-08-01 | 2008-09-04 | Lundberg Steven W | Patent tracking |
US10546273B2 (en) | 2008-10-23 | 2020-01-28 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Patent mapping |
US11301810B2 (en) | 2008-10-23 | 2022-04-12 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Patent mapping |
US20100131513A1 (en) * | 2008-10-23 | 2010-05-27 | Lundberg Steven W | Patent mapping |
US10885078B2 (en) | 2011-05-04 | 2021-01-05 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Apparatus and method for automated and assisted patent claim mapping and expense planning |
US11714839B2 (en) | 2011-05-04 | 2023-08-01 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Apparatus and method for automated and assisted patent claim mapping and expense planning |
US9904726B2 (en) | 2011-05-04 | 2018-02-27 | Black Hills IP Holdings, LLC. | Apparatus and method for automated and assisted patent claim mapping and expense planning |
US11360988B2 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2022-06-14 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Systems, methods and user interfaces in a patent management system |
US11797546B2 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2023-10-24 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Patent mapping |
US11803560B2 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2023-10-31 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Patent claim mapping |
US10860657B2 (en) * | 2011-10-03 | 2020-12-08 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Patent mapping |
US11256706B2 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2022-02-22 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | System and method for patent and prior art analysis |
US11714819B2 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2023-08-01 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Patent mapping |
US11048709B2 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2021-06-29 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Patent mapping |
US20130086045A1 (en) * | 2011-10-03 | 2013-04-04 | Steven W. Lundberg | Patent mapping |
US11775538B2 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2023-10-03 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Systems, methods and user interfaces in a patent management system |
US11789954B2 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2023-10-17 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | System and method for patent and prior art analysis |
US11461862B2 (en) | 2012-08-20 | 2022-10-04 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Analytics generation for patent portfolio management |
US12008670B2 (en) | 2012-08-20 | 2024-06-11 | Black Hills IP Holdings, LLC. | Analytics generation for patent portfolio management |
US10579662B2 (en) | 2013-04-23 | 2020-03-03 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Patent claim scope evaluator |
US11354344B2 (en) | 2013-04-23 | 2022-06-07 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Patent claim scope evaluator |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20210073932A1 (en) | 2021-03-11 |
US20240281914A1 (en) | 2024-08-22 |
WO2006128183A2 (en) | 2006-11-30 |
US20150134549A1 (en) | 2015-05-14 |
US10810693B2 (en) | 2020-10-20 |
US11798111B2 (en) | 2023-10-24 |
US20150371349A1 (en) | 2015-12-24 |
WO2006128183A3 (en) | 2007-03-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20240281914A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for cross-referencing important ip relationships | |
Zupic et al. | Bibliometric methods in management and organization | |
Debreceny et al. | The production and use of semantically rich accounting reports on the Internet: XML and XBRL | |
Shepherd et al. | Online corporate environmental reporting: improvements and innovation to enhance stakeholder value | |
US20110197133A1 (en) | Methods and apparatuses for identifying and monitoring information in electronic documents over a network | |
US20050102308A1 (en) | Adaptively interfacing with a data repository | |
JP7290391B2 (en) | Information processing device and program | |
Linderman et al. | Defensive Design for the Web: How to improve error messages, help, forms, and other crisis points | |
US20110191663A1 (en) | Efficient presentation of important profile information to a profile reader | |
US8341176B1 (en) | Structure-based expansion of user element selection | |
Verhoeven et al. | Experiences with the ARIADNE pedagogical document repository | |
EP1014283A1 (en) | Intranet-based cataloguing and publishing system and method | |
Tan et al. | Web information monitoring: an analysis of Web page updates | |
Thammaboosadee et al. | Sentence identification system based on criminal law ontology | |
KR102062832B1 (en) | Paper curation service system and method based on Web | |
Hofstetter | A step-by-step guide for data scraping | |
Kojima et al. | Seamless management of paper and electronic documents for task knowledge sharing | |
Salminen et al. | Usability evaluation of a structured document archive | |
Singhal et al. | What Exactly Are the Indexing Services of Medical Journals? | |
Coe | Whom should we aim to please when creating ebook indexes? | |
JP7485706B2 (en) | Information processing device, information processing method, and information processing program | |
Abelson | Integrity of the research process | |
Hostetler et al. | Web accessibility trends and implementation in dynamic web applications | |
Whitman | Intellogist: an online community dedicated to comparing major patent search systems | |
Pribeanu et al. | A corpus of design guidelines for electronic commerce web sites |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: IP DEVELOPMENT VENTURE, MINNESOTA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LUNDBERG, STEVEN W.;KALIS, JANAL M.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20061016 TO 20061222;REEL/FRAME:018763/0678 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A., MINNESOTA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LUNDBERG, STEVEN W.;KALIS, JANAL M.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080626 TO 20080627;REEL/FRAME:021229/0395 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A., MINNESOTA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LUNDBERG, STEVEN W;KALIS, JANAL M;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080626 TO 20080627;REEL/FRAME:050277/0006 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BLACK HILLS IP HOLDINGS, LLC, MINNESOTA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A.;REEL/FRAME:054099/0540 Effective date: 20201017 |