US20110120361A1 - Foreship arrangement for a vessel of the displacement type - Google Patents
Foreship arrangement for a vessel of the displacement type Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110120361A1 US20110120361A1 US12/700,386 US70038610A US2011120361A1 US 20110120361 A1 US20110120361 A1 US 20110120361A1 US 70038610 A US70038610 A US 70038610A US 2011120361 A1 US2011120361 A1 US 2011120361A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- lwl
- bwl
- tdwl
- vessel
- htdwl
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B1/00—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils
- B63B1/02—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils deriving lift mainly from water displacement
- B63B1/04—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils deriving lift mainly from water displacement with single hull
- B63B1/06—Shape of fore part
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B39/00—Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude
- B63B39/06—Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude to decrease vessel movements by using foils acting on ambient water
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B1/00—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils
- B63B1/02—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils deriving lift mainly from water displacement
- B63B1/04—Hydrodynamic or hydrostatic features of hulls or of hydrofoils deriving lift mainly from water displacement with single hull
- B63B1/06—Shape of fore part
- B63B1/063—Bulbous bows
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T70/00—Maritime or waterways transport
- Y02T70/10—Measures concerning design or construction of watercraft hulls
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a new design of the foreship of a vessel of the displacement type. More specifically, the invention relates to an arrangement as disclosed in the preamble of independent claim 1 .
- the bow design has been a raked bow or straight stem line up to the design water line and above that a raked bow, or a solution including a bulb and a raked bow where the bulb can be defined as a bulge in the hull, primarily below the water line, to improve the wave system and resistance.
- Typical negative effects of the aforementioned conventional bow forms are that they reflect incoming waves to too great a degree (wave formation gives energy loss), they are heavily subjected to the slamming of waves against the ship side, they generate a great deal of spray and they are subjected to the occurrence of green water on the deck in front of the superstructure.
- the submerged volume (later referred to as “facing volume”) increases very quickly, buoyancy increases as quickly and the retardation force becomes very large.
- Vessels with their superstructure and wheelhouse located on the weather deck immediately aft of the collision bulkhead and having a hull shape as described above are highly vulnerable to heavy weather damage.
- the maximum speed at sea for these vessels is determined primarily by the water line length, entry angles of the foreship and the proportion of outwardly sloping frame lines in the bow, and by available thrust forces from the propeller(s).
- Typical maximum speed in calm water is about 13-16 knots, and they will normally have a loss of speed of about 3 to 5 knots in head sea.
- the speed loss in head sea is a direct result of the energy loss due to reflected waves, which results in retardation of the vessel.
- the design of the foreship according to the invention is intended for displacement hulls in the speed range of up to about 24 knots and with the forward bulkhead of the superstructure preferably arranged forward of amidships.
- the new bow shape is primarily intended to be used in vessels that are engaged in marine operations, such as construction vessels, pipelaying vessels, platform supply vessels, anchor handling vessels, diving ships, etc.
- the foreship is designed transversely symmetrical about the centre line (CL) of the vessel.
- the frame lines of the hull increase in width from the base line (BL).
- the bottom is flat or has a deadrise and merges into the bilge at a given bilge radius. From the bilge up to a given height, the frame lines are slightly outwardly sloping. At the level of the forecastle deck, the outwardly sloping line form is terminated and is run on upwards as a curved line form back towards the centre line.
- a new form of foreship which reduces or eliminates the negative effects that the commonly known bow shapes have.
- the foreship is designed to have slender water lines so that the submersion of the facing volume takes place over a considerable period of time, which means that the vessel cuts into the wave and the wave laps over the bow form and out to the side.
- the buoyancy force is distributed over time and the retardation forces are substantially reduced.
- This solution reduces reflection of waves, it eliminates the slamming of waves against the vessel's sides and bottom, the speed loss in head sea is reduced by about one knot as compared with the standard bow shapes, and the stem line has a profile which is designed to prevent the waves from reaching too high up. Pitch and heave motions will be reduced due to improved distribution of internal volume and more slender entry lines of the foreship.
- the hull in the example is run/extended up to the weather deck.
- the stem line is advantageously bent forwards to form a barrier in the form of a spray board to prevent sea spray from reaching this deck. This means that an enclosed volume is formed that extends up to the weather deck. Waves are thus allowed to creep up to the weather deck in the case of the largest waves.
- FIG. 1 is a side view of the profile of the foreship stem line.
- FIG. 2 is a front view of an extract of frame lines for the foreship.
- FIG. 3 shows the water line for the foreship.
- FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a hull, principally from below, with the foreship designed according to the invention.
- FIG. 5 is another perspective view of the basic shape of the hull in FIG. 4 , principally from the side.
- FIG. 6 is a further perspective view of the hull in FIG. 4 , principally from the side.
- the vessel is in a three-dimensional coordinate system where the vessel's length direction, breadth direction and height direction correspond respectively to the x-axis, y-axis and z-axis of the coordinate system, wherein the x-axis and the y-axis are oriented in the horizontal plane whilst the z-axis is oriented in the vertical plane. Furthermore, the forward direction of the ship corresponds to the positive x-direction.
- FIG. 1 shows the vessel's stem line 1 , which starts at the base line 3 at point A and then rises with an increasing curvature whilst being drawn forwards in the length direction (x-direction) to a point B slightly above the design water line, Tdwl. From point B, the stem line 1 rises further, but now with a diminishing curvature and backwards (in the negative x-direction) until it reaches point C. At point C, the stem line is advantageously bent forwards and is terminated as the top of spray board 5 .
- FIG. 2 shows the frame lines 10 , 20 , 30 , 40 , 50 of the hull which start at points D 1 , D 2 , D 3 , D 4 and D 5 and run almost perpendicularly from CL and increase in breadth (the y-direction) from CL.
- the frame lines 10 , 20 , 30 , 40 , 50 then respectively merge into the bilge G 1 , G 2 , G 3 , G 4 , G 5 at a given bilge radius.
- the outwardly sloping frame line form is terminated and is run on upwards as a curved frame line form, either back to the centre line CL at points F 1 , F 2 , F 3 or further upwards in a very gentle curve towards the centre line CL to points F 4 and F 5 . From the figure, it can also be seen that the bottom of the vessel is flat at zero intersection 7 .
- FIG. 3 shows the water line/entry angle seen in the xy-plane (length/breadth direction), which for the embodiment illustrated in this figure is 20.3 degrees, and which advantageously is between about 16 and 25 degrees relative to the centre line CL at the design water line Tdwl for reduced or increased slenderness.
- FIGS. 4 , 5 and 6 show the foreship according to the illustrated embodiment of the invention in different perspectives, advantageously provided with spray board 5 .
- the table below shows advantageous ratios between water lines, slenderness and hull height for different ranges of water line length, where the water line Lwl is given in metres and at a given draught Tdwl, and where the hull breadth Bwl is measured at the zero intersection and at a given draught Tdwl.
- Tdwl 6 metres
- Lwl 81.1 metres
- Bwl 18.5 metres
- Htdwl 14.8 metres.
- the spray board 5 advantageously has a vertical height of 1 metre, so that the height measured from Tdwl to the transition to the spray board is thus 13.8 metres.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Filling Or Discharging Of Gas Storage Vessels (AREA)
- Revetment (AREA)
- Other Liquid Machine Or Engine Such As Wave Power Use (AREA)
- Ship Loading And Unloading (AREA)
- Structures Of Non-Positive Displacement Pumps (AREA)
- Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
- Warehouses Or Storage Devices (AREA)
- Toys (AREA)
- Containers Having Bodies Formed In One Piece (AREA)
- Underground Or Underwater Handling Of Building Materials (AREA)
- Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
- Casting Devices For Molds (AREA)
- Details Of Rigid Or Semi-Rigid Containers (AREA)
Abstract
A foreship arrangement for a vessel of the displacement type, which foreship consists of the part of the ship in front of the vessel's midship mark (2) and which vessel has a transversely symmetrical hull form about its centre line (CL) and a substantially conventional bow form below its design water line (Tdwl), characterised in that the stem line (1) of the vessel turns substantially backwards in relation to the length direction of the ship from a transition point (B) at or immediately above the design water line (Tdwl).
Description
- The present invention relates to a new design of the foreship of a vessel of the displacement type. More specifically, the invention relates to an arrangement as disclosed in the preamble of independent claim 1.
- Ever since the start of oil activities in the North Sea, all vessels engaged in marine operations have been characterised by having their wheelhouse and superstructure with equipment located immediately behind the forecastle deck and extending right up to the collision bulkhead. A large loading deck or working deck has been located aft of the superstructure and wheelhouse. This arrangement is a legacy of the first platform supply vessels which were used on the British continental shelf in the 1950s and is still the dominant solution today.
- When these vessels are not in operation or are waiting on the weather (backing), they will normally have their bow turned upwind and into the waves.
- The bow design has been a raked bow or straight stem line up to the design water line and above that a raked bow, or a solution including a bulb and a raked bow where the bulb can be defined as a bulge in the hull, primarily below the water line, to improve the wave system and resistance.
- Typical negative effects of the aforementioned conventional bow forms are that they reflect incoming waves to too great a degree (wave formation gives energy loss), they are heavily subjected to the slamming of waves against the ship side, they generate a great deal of spray and they are subjected to the occurrence of green water on the deck in front of the superstructure.
- When this type of bow shape meets incoming waves, the submerged volume (later referred to as “facing volume”) increases very quickly, buoyancy increases as quickly and the retardation force becomes very large. These effects intensify with increasing wave height and increasing speed of the vessel into the wave direction.
- Vessels with their superstructure and wheelhouse located on the weather deck immediately aft of the collision bulkhead and having a hull shape as described above are highly vulnerable to heavy weather damage.
- The maximum speed at sea for these vessels is determined primarily by the water line length, entry angles of the foreship and the proportion of outwardly sloping frame lines in the bow, and by available thrust forces from the propeller(s). Typical maximum speed in calm water is about 13-16 knots, and they will normally have a loss of speed of about 3 to 5 knots in head sea. The speed loss in head sea is a direct result of the energy loss due to reflected waves, which results in retardation of the vessel.
- Both during headway, in particular in head sea, and during backing/waiting, the crew, who have their quarters forward, will experience large accelerations and retardations. Such motions reduce the quality of their rest periods and have an adverse effect on their capacity to work. Reduced resting time and difficult working conditions increase the risk of accidents and injuries.
- To reduce or eliminate the aforementioned drawbacks of the prior art, there is provided, according to the present invention, an arrangement as disclosed in the characterising clause of claim 1.
- Advantageous embodiments of the invention are set forth in the dependent claims.
- The design of the foreship according to the invention is intended for displacement hulls in the speed range of up to about 24 knots and with the forward bulkhead of the superstructure preferably arranged forward of amidships. The new bow shape is primarily intended to be used in vessels that are engaged in marine operations, such as construction vessels, pipelaying vessels, platform supply vessels, anchor handling vessels, diving ships, etc.
- The foreship is designed transversely symmetrical about the centre line (CL) of the vessel. The frame lines of the hull increase in width from the base line (BL). The bottom is flat or has a deadrise and merges into the bilge at a given bilge radius. From the bilge up to a given height, the frame lines are slightly outwardly sloping. At the level of the forecastle deck, the outwardly sloping line form is terminated and is run on upwards as a curved line form back towards the centre line.
- According to the invention, a new form of foreship has been developed which reduces or eliminates the negative effects that the commonly known bow shapes have. The foreship is designed to have slender water lines so that the submersion of the facing volume takes place over a considerable period of time, which means that the vessel cuts into the wave and the wave laps over the bow form and out to the side. Thus, the buoyancy force is distributed over time and the retardation forces are substantially reduced. This solution reduces reflection of waves, it eliminates the slamming of waves against the vessel's sides and bottom, the speed loss in head sea is reduced by about one knot as compared with the standard bow shapes, and the stem line has a profile which is designed to prevent the waves from reaching too high up. Pitch and heave motions will be reduced due to improved distribution of internal volume and more slender entry lines of the foreship.
- The hull in the example is run/extended up to the weather deck. At the weather deck, the stem line is advantageously bent forwards to form a barrier in the form of a spray board to prevent sea spray from reaching this deck. This means that an enclosed volume is formed that extends up to the weather deck. Waves are thus allowed to creep up to the weather deck in the case of the largest waves.
- The new design of the foreship will result in the following positive effects:
-
- Lower accelerations and retardations, which give higher average speed at sea, thereby reducing power requirement and consumption of fuel.
- A reduction in the amount of or the elimination of green water on deck.
- Model tests carried out by Marintek/SINTEF in February 2005 verify the positive effects of the new design of the foreship.
- Apart from the advantages mentioned above, the new foreship design will result in:
-
- A lower probability of heavy weather damage to the foreship because the reflection of waves is reduced.
- The elimination of the possibility of heavy weather damage to the front bulkhead in the superstructure.
- Improved working environment on board with regard to
- accelerations and retardations, thereby improving safety during navigation and providing higher operability, especially in head sea.
- reduction of noise and vibrations because of gentle motions and reduced slamming of the waves against the hull, thereby increasing comfort and improving safety with a view to efficient utilisation of the crew's resting and working time.
- Protection of mooring equipment that is usually located on the forecastle deck.
- Simpler and stronger construction of skin plates and stiffeners due to a large proportion of double-curved area.
- A reduction in loads on skin plates and stiffeners due to elimination of flare.
- Smooth foreship all the way up to the bridge deck, which results in reduced danger of icing. All deck equipment that is normally exposed to wind, weather and icing is protected.
- Smooth foreship all the way up to bridge deck, which results in simpler installation of de-icing equipment.
- In the following, a non-limiting embodiment of the arrangement according to the invention is described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
-
FIG. 1 is a side view of the profile of the foreship stem line. -
FIG. 2 is a front view of an extract of frame lines for the foreship. -
FIG. 3 shows the water line for the foreship. -
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a hull, principally from below, with the foreship designed according to the invention. -
FIG. 5 is another perspective view of the basic shape of the hull inFIG. 4 , principally from the side. -
FIG. 6 is a further perspective view of the hull inFIG. 4 , principally from the side. - In the following description and in the claims, unless otherwise specified, all disclosures of direction are explained on the basis that the vessel is in a three-dimensional coordinate system where the vessel's length direction, breadth direction and height direction correspond respectively to the x-axis, y-axis and z-axis of the coordinate system, wherein the x-axis and the y-axis are oriented in the horizontal plane whilst the z-axis is oriented in the vertical plane. Furthermore, the forward direction of the ship corresponds to the positive x-direction.
- The new foreship, shown from the
midship mark 2 of the vessel, has a slender and distinctive bow shape.FIG. 1 shows the vessel's stem line 1, which starts at the base line 3 at point A and then rises with an increasing curvature whilst being drawn forwards in the length direction (x-direction) to a point B slightly above the design water line, Tdwl. From point B, the stem line 1 rises further, but now with a diminishing curvature and backwards (in the negative x-direction) until it reaches point C. At point C, the stem line is advantageously bent forwards and is terminated as the top ofspray board 5. - The frame lines of the foreship are designed transversely symmetrical about the centre line (CL) of the vessel.
FIG. 2 shows theframe lines -
FIG. 3 shows the water line/entry angle seen in the xy-plane (length/breadth direction), which for the embodiment illustrated in this figure is 20.3 degrees, and which advantageously is between about 16 and 25 degrees relative to the centre line CL at the design water line Tdwl for reduced or increased slenderness. -
FIGS. 4 , 5 and 6 show the foreship according to the illustrated embodiment of the invention in different perspectives, advantageously provided withspray board 5. - The table below shows advantageous ratios between water lines, slenderness and hull height for different ranges of water line length, where the water line Lwl is given in metres and at a given draught Tdwl, and where the hull breadth Bwl is measured at the zero intersection and at a given draught Tdwl.
-
Lwl 60-90 90-120 120-150 150-180 180-210 210- Bwl/Tdwl 2 3 3.5 3.5 4 5 Lwl/Bwl 3 4.5 5 5.5 6 10 Lwl/ Tdwl 5 13 17 20 22 23 Htdwl/Bwl 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.55 0.45 5 Lwl/ Htdwl 2 5.5 7.5 10.5 13.5 15 - The use of the above-mentioned ratios for the given water line length ranges Lwl results in more slender entry lines, increased water line length and only slightly outwardly sloping hull or frame lines (small flare).
- The abbreviations, which are used in this application, and in particular in the above table, have the following definitions:
-
- Tdwl: Draught (at the design water line)
- Bwl: Breadth measured at a given draught Tdwl
- Lwl: Water line length measured at a given draught Tdwl; in other words total length of the submerged volume.
- Htdwl: Hull height measured from Tdwl up to the top of the spray board.
- For the illustrated and described exemplary embodiment, it may be specified that Tdwl=6 metres, Lwl=81.1 metres, Bwl=18.5 metres and Htdwl=14.8 metres. The
spray board 5 advantageously has a vertical height of 1 metre, so that the height measured from Tdwl to the transition to the spray board is thus 13.8 metres.
Claims (14)
1. A foreship arrangement for a vessel of the displacement type, which foreship consists of the part of the ship in front of the vessel's midship mark (2) and which vessel has a transversely symmetrical hull shape about its centre line (CL) and a substantially conventional bow form below its design water line (Tdwl), characterised in that the stem line (1) of the vessel turns substantially backwards in relation to the ship length direction (negative x-direction) from a transition point (B) at or just above the design water line (Tdwl).
2. The arrangement according to claim 1 , characterised in that the stem line (1), starting from a lower point (A) at the vessel's base line (3) rises and has a substantially increasing curvature in the forward direction of the vessel to the transition point (B), and that the stem line (1) from the point (B) continues to rise, but with a substantially diminishing curvature and in the aftward direction of the vessel, optionally broken by one or more straight portions, to an upper point (C).
3. The arrangement according to claim 2 , characterised in that a spray board (5) extends out from the upper point (C), the stem line (1) being bent sharply forward at said point (C) and being terminated at the top of the spray board (5).
4. The arrangement according to claim 1 , characterised in that the vessel's flare angles in the foreship, and above the design water line (Tdwl) are in the range of 9-45 degrees relative to the height direction of the vessel.
5. The arrangement according to claim 1 , characterised in that the vessel's stem angles between the transition point (B) and the upper point (C) increase from 0 degrees at the transition point (B) to 55 degrees at the upper point (C) relative to the height direction of the vessel.
6. The arrangement according to claim 1 , characterised in that the entry angle of the bow at the design water line (Tdwl). and in a plane coincident with the horizontal plane (the xy plane) is in the range of 16-25 degrees relative to the centre line (CL).
7. The arrangement according to claim 1 , characterised in that the frame lines (10, 20, 30, 40, 50) of the foreship are designed transversely symmetrical about the centre line (CL), and starting respectively from first points (D1, D2, D3, D4, D5) run almost perpendicularly from CL and increase in breadth (the y-direction) from the centre line (CL), whereafter the frame lines (10, 20, 30, 40, 50) respectively merge into the bilge (G1, G2, G3, G4, G5) at a given bilge radius, from which bilge and up to second points (E1, E2, E3, E4, E5) the frame lines (10, 20, 30, 40, 50) are outwardly sloping, and at which points (E1, E2, E3, E4, E5) the outwardly sloping frame line form is terminated and then runs respectively upwards as a curved frame line form back to the centre line (CL) at third points (F1, F2, F3) and continues upwards with very gentle curvature towards the centre line CL to third points (F4, F5).
8. The arrangement according to claim 3 , characterised by the following ratios for a water line length (Lwl) in the range of 60-90 metres: Bwl/Tdwl=2, Lwl/Bwl=3, Lwl/Tdwl=5, Htdwl/Bwl=0.5 and Lwl/Htdwl=2.
9. The arrangement according to claim 3 , characterised by the following ratios for a water line length (Lwl) in the range of 90-120 metres: Bwl/Tdwl=3, Lwl/Bwl=4.5, Lwl/Tdwl=13, Htdwl/Bwl=0.8 and Lwl/Htdwl=5.5.
10. The arrangement according to claim 3 , characterised by the following ratios for a water line length (Lwl) in the range of 120-150 metres: Bwl/Tdwl=3.5, Lwl/Bwl=5, Lwl/Tdwl=17, Htdwl/Bwl=0.7 and Lwl/Htdwl=7.5.
11. The arrangement according to claim 3 , characterised by the following ratios for a water line length (Lwl) in the range of 150-180 metres: Bwl/Tdwl=3.5, Lwl/Bwl=5.5, Lwl/Tdwl=20, Htdwl/Bwl=0.55 and Lwl/Htdwl=10.5.
12. The arrangement according to claim 3 , characterised by the following ratios for a water line length (Lwl) in the range of 180-210 metres: Bwl/Tdwl=4, Lwl/Bwl=6, Lwl/Tdwl=22, Htdwl/Bwl=0.45 and Lwl/Htdwl=13.5.
13. The arrangement according to claim 3 , characterised by the following ratios for a water line length (Lwl) in the range of 210 metres and above: Bwl/Tdwl=5, Lwl/Bwl=10, Lwl/Tdwl=23, Htdwl/Bwl=5 and Lwl/Htdwl=15.
14. (canceled)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/700,386 US20110120361A1 (en) | 2005-03-09 | 2010-02-04 | Foreship arrangement for a vessel of the displacement type |
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
NO20051221A NO324744B3 (en) | 2005-03-09 | 2005-03-09 | Device for displacement of a displacement type vessel. |
NO20051221 | 2005-03-09 | ||
PCT/NO2006/000073 WO2006096066A1 (en) | 2005-03-09 | 2006-02-23 | A foreship arrangement for a vessel of the deplacement type |
US81687107A | 2007-08-22 | 2007-08-22 | |
US12/700,386 US20110120361A1 (en) | 2005-03-09 | 2010-02-04 | Foreship arrangement for a vessel of the displacement type |
Related Parent Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2006/000073 Continuation WO2006096066A1 (en) | 2005-03-09 | 2006-02-23 | A foreship arrangement for a vessel of the deplacement type |
US81687107A Continuation | 2005-03-09 | 2007-08-22 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110120361A1 true US20110120361A1 (en) | 2011-05-26 |
Family
ID=35253700
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/816,871 Active US7658159B2 (en) | 2005-03-09 | 2006-02-23 | Foreship arrangement for a vessel of the displacement type |
US12/700,386 Abandoned US20110120361A1 (en) | 2005-03-09 | 2010-02-04 | Foreship arrangement for a vessel of the displacement type |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/816,871 Active US7658159B2 (en) | 2005-03-09 | 2006-02-23 | Foreship arrangement for a vessel of the displacement type |
Country Status (18)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7658159B2 (en) |
EP (3) | EP1855937B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN101137536B (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0608837A2 (en) |
CY (2) | CY1115152T1 (en) |
DK (2) | DK2530008T3 (en) |
ES (2) | ES2631821T3 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1116747A1 (en) |
LT (1) | LT2530008T (en) |
NO (1) | NO324744B3 (en) |
PL (2) | PL1855937T3 (en) |
PT (2) | PT1855937E (en) |
RU (1) | RU2374120C2 (en) |
SG (1) | SG160350A1 (en) |
SI (2) | SI2530008T1 (en) |
TR (1) | TR201709760T4 (en) |
UA (2) | UA110456C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006096066A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1873051A1 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2008-01-02 | Technische Universiteit Delft | Ship |
JP4933487B2 (en) * | 2008-05-21 | 2012-05-16 | 旭洋造船株式会社 | Fuel efficient transport ship |
KR101541574B1 (en) * | 2008-09-19 | 2015-08-03 | 스테나 레데리 에이비 | Hull form intended for vessels provided with an air cavity |
JP2012517931A (en) * | 2009-02-16 | 2012-08-09 | ロールス−ロイス マリーン アクティーゼルスカブ | Method and configuration for spherical bow |
JP5782250B2 (en) * | 2010-06-10 | 2015-09-24 | ジャパンマリンユナイテッド株式会社 | Bow shape and ship |
CN102167133A (en) * | 2011-04-12 | 2011-08-31 | 上海珐伊玻璃钢船艇有限公司 | Rubber dinghy |
CN103625601A (en) * | 2012-08-20 | 2014-03-12 | 中集船舶海洋工程设计研究院有限公司 | Head structure of container ship |
ES2719688T3 (en) | 2013-07-18 | 2019-07-12 | Baltic Workboats As | Hull for an ocean work vessel |
UA117143C2 (en) * | 2013-10-11 | 2018-06-25 | Ульстейн Дізайн Енд Солюшнз Ас | Vessel having an improved hull shape |
CA155857S (en) | 2013-10-11 | 2015-02-10 | Ulstein Design & Solutions As | Ship hull |
RU2570511C2 (en) * | 2013-11-28 | 2015-12-10 | Российская Федерация, От Имени Которой Выступает Министерство Промышленности И Торговли Российской Федерации | Shape of ship fore freeboard for operation under high-intensity heaving |
CN104890805B (en) * | 2014-03-03 | 2018-03-09 | 中集船舶海洋工程设计研究院有限公司 | Ship |
CN104890806B (en) * | 2014-03-03 | 2018-03-09 | 中集船舶海洋工程设计研究院有限公司 | Ship |
CN104890807B (en) * | 2014-03-03 | 2018-03-30 | 中集船舶海洋工程设计研究院有限公司 | Ship |
CN103921892A (en) * | 2014-04-23 | 2014-07-16 | 大连理工大学 | Novel ship bow |
TWI585004B (en) * | 2014-09-05 | 2017-06-01 | 台灣國際造船股份有限公司 | Bow structure of ship |
RU2607136C2 (en) * | 2015-03-02 | 2017-01-10 | Василий Николаевич Храмушин | Fore end of high-speed surface ship or relatively low-speed civil ship of high thunderstorm navigability and ice flotation in autonomous navigation |
WO2016193169A1 (en) * | 2015-05-29 | 2016-12-08 | Ulstein Design & Solutions As | Stern extention for a vessel |
CN105651262B (en) * | 2015-11-26 | 2018-02-13 | 重庆交通大学 | A kind of the Changjiang river navigational datum determines method |
RU2672227C1 (en) * | 2017-12-07 | 2018-11-12 | Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Калининградский государственный технический университет" | Ship hull |
RU2672225C1 (en) * | 2017-12-07 | 2018-11-12 | Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Калининградский государственный технический университет" | Ship hull |
CN108528628B (en) * | 2018-03-26 | 2019-05-31 | 珠海云洲智能科技有限公司 | A kind of surveying vessel |
USD920211S1 (en) | 2018-08-22 | 2021-05-25 | Ulstein Design & Solutions As | Ship |
TWI767158B (en) * | 2019-04-02 | 2022-06-11 | 國立臺灣海洋大學 | Wave sheltering vessel |
USD971117S1 (en) * | 2021-01-21 | 2022-11-29 | Ulstein Design & Solutions As | Ship |
USD959352S1 (en) * | 2021-03-18 | 2022-08-02 | Ulstein Design & Solutions As | Ship |
RU2761360C1 (en) * | 2021-04-22 | 2021-12-07 | Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Калининградский государственный технический университет" | Forward end of ship hull |
CN113799923A (en) * | 2021-10-29 | 2021-12-17 | 广船国际有限公司 | Bow structure and boats and ships |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3443544A (en) * | 1967-07-13 | 1969-05-13 | Vladimir Nikolaevich Begizov | Shape of ship's bow |
US3511203A (en) * | 1969-05-05 | 1970-05-12 | Lubbertus Buyscoll | Ship having a plow stem |
US3521590A (en) * | 1967-08-15 | 1970-07-21 | Alexbow Canada | Ship's bow construction |
USRE26997E (en) * | 1968-12-17 | 1970-12-08 | Ship s hull construction | |
US3653352A (en) * | 1969-05-16 | 1972-04-04 | Nippon Kokan Kk | Hull form of a ship provided with a cylindrical bow |
US20030089290A1 (en) * | 2001-09-27 | 2003-05-15 | Peter Van Diepen | Wave piercing bow of a monohull marine craft |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS5112915B1 (en) * | 1965-04-08 | 1976-04-23 | ||
DE2655734A1 (en) * | 1976-12-09 | 1978-06-15 | Lindenau Schiffswerft | Configured bulbous bow for ship - has specified portion of above water-line surface sloping between given limits |
DE3801317A1 (en) * | 1988-01-19 | 1989-08-03 | Gerhard Cammann | SHIP, ESPECIALLY MOTORSPORTBOAT |
DE4311051A1 (en) * | 1993-04-03 | 1994-10-06 | Hans Joachim Dipl Ing Hoffmann | Ship's bow |
DE19608415A1 (en) * | 1996-03-05 | 1997-09-11 | Eberhard Floegel | High speed ship |
DE19609574A1 (en) * | 1996-03-12 | 1997-09-18 | Eberhard Floegel | Catamaran or single-bottom vessel |
JP3324391B2 (en) * | 1996-04-25 | 2002-09-17 | 日本鋼管株式会社 | Ship bow shape |
-
2005
- 2005-03-09 NO NO20051221A patent/NO324744B3/en unknown
-
2006
- 2006-02-23 BR BRPI0608837-6A patent/BRPI0608837A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2006-02-23 SI SI200632180T patent/SI2530008T1/en unknown
- 2006-02-23 UA UAA201104267A patent/UA110456C2/en unknown
- 2006-02-23 DK DK12181965.0T patent/DK2530008T3/en active
- 2006-02-23 SG SG201001352-2A patent/SG160350A1/en unknown
- 2006-02-23 EP EP06716749.4A patent/EP1855937B1/en not_active Revoked
- 2006-02-23 US US11/816,871 patent/US7658159B2/en active Active
- 2006-02-23 PT PT67167494T patent/PT1855937E/en unknown
- 2006-02-23 EP EP12181965.0A patent/EP2530008B1/en not_active Revoked
- 2006-02-23 ES ES12181965.0T patent/ES2631821T3/en active Active
- 2006-02-23 UA UAA200711127A patent/UA95070C2/en unknown
- 2006-02-23 WO PCT/NO2006/000073 patent/WO2006096066A1/en active Application Filing
- 2006-02-23 SI SI200631752T patent/SI1855937T1/en unknown
- 2006-02-23 ES ES06716749.4T patent/ES2451500T3/en active Active
- 2006-02-23 DK DK06716749.4T patent/DK1855937T3/en active
- 2006-02-23 EP EP17160661.9A patent/EP3199442A3/en active Pending
- 2006-02-23 PT PT121819650T patent/PT2530008T/en unknown
- 2006-02-23 CN CN2006800076076A patent/CN101137536B/en active Active
- 2006-02-23 RU RU2007137131/11A patent/RU2374120C2/en active
- 2006-02-23 PL PL06716749T patent/PL1855937T3/en unknown
- 2006-02-23 TR TR2017/09760T patent/TR201709760T4/en unknown
- 2006-02-23 PL PL12181965T patent/PL2530008T3/en unknown
- 2006-02-23 LT LTEP12181965.0T patent/LT2530008T/en unknown
-
2008
- 2008-05-21 HK HK08105640.5A patent/HK1116747A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2010
- 2010-02-04 US US12/700,386 patent/US20110120361A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2014
- 2014-03-06 CY CY20141100177T patent/CY1115152T1/en unknown
-
2017
- 2017-06-30 CY CY20171100696T patent/CY1119034T1/en unknown
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3443544A (en) * | 1967-07-13 | 1969-05-13 | Vladimir Nikolaevich Begizov | Shape of ship's bow |
US3521590A (en) * | 1967-08-15 | 1970-07-21 | Alexbow Canada | Ship's bow construction |
USRE26997E (en) * | 1968-12-17 | 1970-12-08 | Ship s hull construction | |
US3511203A (en) * | 1969-05-05 | 1970-05-12 | Lubbertus Buyscoll | Ship having a plow stem |
US3653352A (en) * | 1969-05-16 | 1972-04-04 | Nippon Kokan Kk | Hull form of a ship provided with a cylindrical bow |
US20030089290A1 (en) * | 2001-09-27 | 2003-05-15 | Peter Van Diepen | Wave piercing bow of a monohull marine craft |
Also Published As
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7658159B2 (en) | Foreship arrangement for a vessel of the displacement type | |
US3521590A (en) | Ship's bow construction | |
US10457354B2 (en) | Vessel having an improved hull shape | |
US10858070B2 (en) | Multi hull pontoon boat aft cockpit extension | |
WO2014042127A1 (en) | Commercial cargo ship | |
US6176196B1 (en) | Boat bottom hull design | |
JP4414793B2 (en) | Ship | |
CN112272637B (en) | Small wind resistance ship | |
JP2002347688A (en) | Enlarged ship | |
NO309463B1 (en) | Hull shape of an icebreaking ship | |
US20120067266A1 (en) | Boat Hull | |
EP3050792B1 (en) | Wave piercing ship hull | |
KR101041991B1 (en) | High speed boat for decreasing roll with planing line shape | |
US6736080B2 (en) | Seagoing vessels | |
WO2004020276A1 (en) | Vessel provided with a foil situated below the waterline | |
JP3279284B2 (en) | Large ship | |
CN219948479U (en) | Energy-saving speed-increasing ship | |
Watanabe et al. | A proposed standard of stability for passenger ships | |
JP7017378B2 (en) | Ship | |
JP3279285B2 (en) | Large ship | |
JP2005088627A (en) | Shape of bow of single hull type sea navigation vessel | |
SE542220C2 (en) | A device for reducing the resistance of water surface vessels |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |