US20110081272A1 - Low-lead copper alloy - Google Patents
Low-lead copper alloy Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110081272A1 US20110081272A1 US12/575,183 US57518309A US2011081272A1 US 20110081272 A1 US20110081272 A1 US 20110081272A1 US 57518309 A US57518309 A US 57518309A US 2011081272 A1 US2011081272 A1 US 2011081272A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- lead
- brass
- low
- alloy
- copper
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 229910000881 Cu alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 28
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 47
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 229910052797 bismuth Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- JCXGWMGPZLAOME-UHFFFAOYSA-N bismuth atom Chemical compound [Bi] JCXGWMGPZLAOME-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 abstract description 46
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 abstract description 43
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 abstract description 18
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 abstract description 10
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 abstract description 10
- JBQYATWDVHIOAR-UHFFFAOYSA-N tellanylidenegermanium Chemical compound [Te]=[Ge] JBQYATWDVHIOAR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 2
- 229910001369 Brass Inorganic materials 0.000 description 63
- 239000010951 brass Substances 0.000 description 63
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 description 19
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 18
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 16
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 15
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 13
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 13
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 12
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 12
- 239000010956 nickel silver Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 11
- 241001275902 Parabramis pekinensis Species 0.000 description 9
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000002893 slag Substances 0.000 description 5
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 229910052745 lead Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000011574 phosphorus Substances 0.000 description 4
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- ATJFFYVFTNAWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Tin Chemical compound [Sn] ATJFFYVFTNAWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229910002804 graphite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000010439 graphite Substances 0.000 description 3
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000011135 tin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052718 tin Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910021592 Copper(II) chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 2
- ORTQZVOHEJQUHG-UHFFFAOYSA-L copper(II) chloride Chemical compound Cl[Cu]Cl ORTQZVOHEJQUHG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000002386 leaching Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006911 nucleation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010899 nucleation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- JOJYUFGTMHSFEE-YONYXQDTSA-M Cytarabine ocfosphate Chemical compound [Na+].O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](COP([O-])(=O)OCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)O[C@H]1N1C(=O)N=C(N)C=C1 JOJYUFGTMHSFEE-YONYXQDTSA-M 0.000 description 1
- BUGBHKTXTAQXES-UHFFFAOYSA-N Selenium Chemical compound [Se] BUGBHKTXTAQXES-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920001807 Urea-formaldehyde Polymers 0.000 description 1
- GZCGUPFRVQAUEE-SLPGGIOYSA-N aldehydo-D-glucose Chemical compound OC[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)C=O GZCGUPFRVQAUEE-SLPGGIOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000000137 annealing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052785 arsenic Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- RQNWIZPPADIBDY-UHFFFAOYSA-N arsenic atom Chemical compound [As] RQNWIZPPADIBDY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007849 furan resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007654 immersion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012770 industrial material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011031 large-scale manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- WABPQHHGFIMREM-UHFFFAOYSA-N lead(0) Chemical compound [Pb] WABPQHHGFIMREM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000003754 machining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007769 metal material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920003986 novolac Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005498 polishing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011669 selenium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052711 selenium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000002269 spontaneous effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008399 tap water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020679 tap water Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000012085 test solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007669 thermal treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C9/00—Alloys based on copper
- C22C9/04—Alloys based on copper with zinc as the next major constituent
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B15/00—Obtaining copper
- C22B15/0026—Pyrometallurgy
- C22B15/006—Pyrometallurgy working up of molten copper, e.g. refining
Definitions
- the present invention relates to copper alloys, and more particularly, to a low-lead brass alloy.
- Brass comprises copper and zinc, as major ingredients, usually in a ratio of about 7:3 or 6:4.
- brass usually comprises a small amount of impurities.
- a conventional brass contains lead (mostly in the range of 1 to 3 wt %) to achieve the desired mechanical properties for use in the industry, thereby becoming an important industrial material that is widely applicable to metallic devices and valves for use in pipelines, faucets and water supply and discharge systems.
- brass by definition, contains zinc. However, if the zinc content of brass exceeds 20 wt %, corrosion (such as dezincification) is likely to occur. Because dezincification seriously damages the structure of brass, the surface integrity of brass products is lowered and even pores may be formed in brass pipes. This significantly decreases the lifespan of brass products, thereby causing application problems.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,417,929 discloses a formulation comprising iron, aluminum and silicon
- U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,507,885 and 6,395,110 disclose formulations comprising phosphorus, tin and nickel
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,653,827 discloses a formulation comprising iron, nickel and bismuth
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,974,509 discloses a formulation comprising tin, bismuth, iron, nickel and phosphorus
- 6,787,101 discloses a formulation comprising phosphorus, tin, nickel, iron, aluminum, silicon and arsenic, all at the same time
- U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,599,378 and 5,637,160 disclose adding selenium and phosphorus in a brass alloy, all of these formulations aimed at addressing the dezincification problem.
- Conventional dezincification-resistant brasses usually have higher lead contents (most in the range of 1 to 3 wt %), which facilitates cold/thermal processing of brass materials.
- lead leaching is high and lead contamination is likely to occur during processes.
- the present invention provides a low-lead copper alloy, comprising: 0.05 to 0.3 wt % of lead (Pb), 0.3 to 0.8 wt % of aluminum (Al), 0.01 to 0.4 wt % of bismuth (Bi), 0.1 to 2 wt % of nickel (Ni), and more than 96.5 wt % of copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn), wherein copper is present in an amount ranging from 58 to 70 wt %.
- Pb lead
- Al aluminum
- Bi bismuth
- Ni nickel
- Cu copper
- Zn zinc
- the low-lead copper alloy of the present invention is a brass alloy.
- the total amount of copper and zinc can be higher than 96.5 wt %.
- copper is in an amount ranging from 58 to 70 wt %.
- a copper content in this range can provide excellent toughness for the alloy, facilitating subsequent processing of the alloy material.
- the copper content ranges from 62 to 65 wt %.
- the aluminum content ranges from 0.3 to 0.8 wt %. In a preferred embodiment, the aluminum content ranges from 0.4 to 0.7 wt %, and preferably 0.5 to 0.65 wt %. Addition of an appropriate amount of aluminum can increase the fluidity of a copper liquid and improve the casting properties of the alloy material.
- the bismuth content is less than 0.4 wt %. In a preferred embodiment, the bismuth content ranges from 0.01 to 4 wt %, preferably 0.05 to 0.3 wt %, and more preferably 0.1 to 0.2 wt %.
- the nickel content ranges from 0.1 to 2 wt %. In a preferred embodiment, the bismuth content ranges from 0.5 to 1 wt %.
- Nickel used in an appropriate amount in the copper alloy can result in a copper alloy having a high melting point. Nickel acts as heterogeneous nucleus formed in non-spontaneous nucleation when the alloy crystallizes, so that the number of nucleation sites is increased, thereby refining the alloy grains. Further, nickel can purify the copper matrix and the grain boundary, thereby increasing the kinetic properties and corrosion resistance of the copper alloy.
- the copper alloy of the present invention comprises extremely low lead content, i.e., less than 0.3 wt %.
- the lead content ranges from 0.05 to 0.3 wt %, preferably 0.1 to 0.25 wt %, and more preferably 0.15 to 0.20 wt %.
- the alloy may possibly contain impurities. The amount of unavoidable impurities is less than 0.1 wt %.
- the copper alloy of the present invention can substitute for conventional lead-containing brasses, and is more likely to meet environmental demands and lower the effects of lead contamination. Further, the alloy has advantages like having dezincification corrosion resistance, desirable casting properties, machinability and mechanical properties possessed by conventional lead-containing brasses.
- FIG. 1A is a metallographic structural distribution of a specimen of a low-lead copper alloy of the present invention
- FIG. 1B is a metallographic structural distribution of a specimen of a lead-free high nickel brass alloy
- FIG. 1C is a metallographic structural distribution of a specimen of an C85710 lead brass
- FIG. 1D is a metallographic structural distribution of a specimen of lead-free low bismuth brass
- FIG. 2A is a metallographic structural distribution of a specimen of the low-lead copper alloy of the present invention after a test of dezincification corrosion resistance was performed.
- FIG. 2B is a metallographic structural distribution of a specimen of the C85710 lead brass after a test of dezincification corrosion resistance was performed.
- the ingredients comprised in the dezincification-resistant copper alloy of the present invention are all based on the total weight of the alloy, and are expressed in weight percentages (wt %).
- the low-lead brass alloy formulation according to the present invention only needs to use less than 0.4 wt % of bismuth. This not only facilitates elimination of defects like material cracking, but also allows for desirable material properties (such as machinability) of lead brasses (such as conventional C85710 lead brasses).
- the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention can substantially lower the amount of bismuth used, thereby effectively lowering the production cost thereof. This is extremely advantageous to commercial-scale productions and applications.
- the low-lead brass alloy formulation according to the present invention can lower the lead content to a range of 0.05 to 3 wt %, to comply with the international standards for lead content in pipeline materials in contact with water. Therefore, the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention is suitable for applications to faucets and lavatory components, pipelines for tap water, water supply systems, etc.
- the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention comprises 0.05 to 0.3 wt % of lead, 0.3 to 0.8 wt % of aluminum, 0.01 to 0.4 wt % of bismuth, 0.1 to 2 wt % of bismuth, and 96.5 to 99.54 wt % of copper and zinc, wherein copper is in an amount ranging from 58 to 70 wt %.
- the nickel-containing low-lead brass alloy of the present invention comprises 0.1 to 0.25 wt % of lead, 0.4 to 0.7 wt % of aluminum, 0.05 to 0.3 wt % of bismuth, 0.5 to 1 wt % of nickel, 58 to 70 wt % of copper, and zinc in balance, wherein unavoidable impurities are less than 0.1 wt %.
- the nickel-containing low-lead brass alloy of the present invention comprises 0.15 to 0.20 wt % of lead, 0.5 to 0.65 wt % of aluminum, 0.1 to 0.2 wt % of bismuth, 0.5 to 1 wt % of nickel, 62 to 65 wt % of copper, and zinc in balance, wherein unavoidable impurities are less than 0.1 wt %.
- Rounded sand, a urea formaldehyde resin, a furan resin and a curing agent were used as raw materials to prepare sand core using a core shooter, and the gas evolutions of the resins were measured using a testing machine for testing gas evolutions.
- the obtained sand core must be completely used within 5 hours, or it needs to be baked dry.
- the dezincification-resistant low-lead brass alloy of the present invention and scrap returns were preheated for 15 minutes to reach a temperature higher than 400° C. Then, the alloy of the present invention and the scrap returns were mixed at a weight ratio of 7:1, along with addition of 0.2 wt % of refining slag, for melting in an induction furnace until the brass alloy reached a certain molten state (hereinafter referred to as “molten copper liquid”).
- a metallic gravity casting machine coupled with the sand core and the gravity casting molds to perform casting, and a temperature monitoring system further controlled temperatures so as to maintain the casting temperature at a range of 1010 to 1060° C. In each casting, the feed amount was preferably 1 to 2 kilograms, and the casting time was controlled to a range of 3 to 8 seconds.
- the molds were opened and the casting head was cleaned.
- the mold temperatures were monitored so as to control the mold temperatures in the range of 200 to 220° C. to form casting parts.
- the casting parts were released from the molds.
- the molds were cleaned to ensure that the site of the core head was clean.
- a graphite liquid was spread on the surfaces of the molds followed by cooling by immersion.
- the temperature of the graphite liquid for cooling the mold was preferably maintained at a range of 30 to 36° C., and the specific weight of the graphite liquid ranged from 1.05 to 1.06.
- O.P. Yield Number of Non-Defective Products/Total Number of Products ⁇ 100%
- the overall production yield (O. P. Yield) reflects the qualitative stability of production processes. High qualitative stability of production processes ensures normal production.
- a lead-free high nickel brass and a conventional lead brass were used as comparative examples to produce products by the same process as described above.
- the ingredients, processing characteristics and overall production yield of each of the alloys are shown in FIG. 1 , wherein a lead content of less than 0.05 wt % of a lead-free copper is regarded as “lead-free brass”.
- the lead-free high nickel brass had higher degrees of hardness. Thus, it was difficult to perform mechanical processing on the lead-free high nickel brass. When the same feeding amount and cutting speed were applied on the above three copper materials, cuts were likely to be found on the surfaces of the lead-free high nickel brass product, and the roughness of the surfaces could not meet requirements (i.e., an Ra value of 3.2 ⁇ m). Hence, the production yield of the lead-free high nickel was lower.
- the production yield was as high as 85 wt %. This was comparable to that of the conventional C85710 lead bass.
- the low-lead brass of the present invention can indeed be used as a substitute brass material.
- the low-lead brass of the present invention can have substantially lowered lead content, thereby effectively avoiding the lead contamination that arose during processing and lowering lead leaching when using the casting product. As such, desirable material properties are achieved while meeting environmental demands at the same time.
- FIGS. 1A to 1D show the structural distributions of the materials of the low-lead copper alloy of the present invention (Example 1), lead-free high nickel brass (Comparative Example 1), C85710 lead brass (Comparative Example 3) and lead-free low nickel brass (Comparative Example 5), respectively, when the specimens were examined under an optical metallographic microscope at 100 ⁇ magnification to observe the structural distributions of the materials.
- FIG. 1A shows the metallographic structural distribution of the bismuth-containing low-lead brass of Example 1.
- smaller grains were formed (i.e., the particle diameter of the grains ranged from 15 to 25 ⁇ m). This provided excellent material toughness, so that defects like cracks were not likely to occur.
- the grains of the ⁇ phase of Example 1 were smaller, and the grains of the ⁇ phase were more refined, indicating that the material had excellent mechanical properties.
- the measured values of the ingredients of the lead-free high nickel brass of Comparative Example 1 are as follows: Cu: 61.01 wt %, Al: 0.574 wt %, Pb: 0.0067 wt %, Bi: 0.134 wt % and Ni: 2.324 wt %.
- FIG. 1B shows the metallographic structural distribution of the lead-free high nickel brass of Comparative Example 1. In FIG. 1B , the grains were in the shape of small particles. Thus, the brass could provide higher degrees of hardness for the material.
- FIG. 1C shows the metallographic structural distribution of the C85710 lead brass of Comparative Example 3.
- the alloy had a phase, and the grains were globular, with particle diameters ranging from 30 to 40 ⁇ m, and had good toughness.
- FIG. 1D shows the metallographic structural distribution of the lead-free low bismuth brass of Comparative Example 5.
- the grains were elongated and bulky, and the particle diameters of the grains ranged from 40 to 50 ⁇ m, indicating that the lead-free low bismuth brass did not experience grain refining.
- a dezincification test was performed on the brass alloys of Example 3 and Comparative Example 3 to test the corrosion resistance of the brasses.
- the dezincification test was performed according to the Australian standard AS2345-2006 “Dezincification resistance of copper alloys.”
- a novolak resin was used for inlaying to make the exposed area of each of the specimens to be 100 mm 2 . All the specimens were ground flat using a 600# metallographic abrasive paper, followed by washing using distilled water. Then, the specimens were baked dry.
- the test solution was a 1% CuCl 2 solution prepared before use, and the test temperature was 75 ⁇ 2° C.
- the specimens and the CuCl 2 solution were placed in a temperature-controlled water bath to react for 24 ⁇ 0.5 hours.
- the specimens were removed from the water bath, and cut along the vertical direction.
- the cross-sections of the specimens were polished, and then the depths of corrosion of the specimens were measured and observed under a digital metallographic electronic microscope. Results are shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B .
- the average depth of dezincification of the low-lead brass of the present invention of Example 3 was 141.72 ⁇ m.
- the average depth of dezincification of the C85710 lead brass of Comparative Example 3 was 307.94 ⁇ m. Based on the above, it is clear that the low-lead brass of the present invention had better dezincification resistance.
- Example 2 As shown in Table 2, the tensile strength and elongation for Example 1 were comparable to that of the conventional C85710 lead brass for Example 3, indicating that the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention had mechanical properties comparable to those of the C85710 lead brass. However, the low-lead brass of the present invention had lower lead content, thereby better complying with environmental demands. Thus, the low-lead bass of the present invention can indeed substitute for the C85710 lead brass in manufacturing of products.
- the lead content of the material of Comparative Example 3 exceeded the upper limit of the standard value before a lead stripping treatment was performed. Only the material of Example 1 reached the standard value without the need to perform a lead stripping treatment. Further, the precipitation amount of the heavy metal, lead, of the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention was still significantly lower than that of the C85710 lead brass that underwent a lead-stripping treatment. Hence, the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention was more environmentally friendly and reducing risks to human health.
- the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention has a refined grain structure and good alloy integrity and toughness, such that it is not likely to cause defects like cracks and slag inclusions or even casting defects, thereby achieving the desirable properties possessed by lead brasses. This facilitates the application of the alloy material to subsequent processes.
- the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention can have a low-lead precipitation amount without experiencing a lead-stripping treatment, thereby decreasing the production costs of the process. This is extremely advantageous to commercial-scale production and applications.
Abstract
The present invention provides a low-lead copper alloy, comprising 0.05 to 0.3 wt % of lead (Pb), 0.3 to 0.8 wt % of aluminum (Al), 0.01 to 0.4 wt % of bismuth (Bi), 0.1 to 2 wt % of nickel (Ni), and more than 96.5 wt % of copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn), wherein copper is in an amount ranging from 58 to 70 wt %. The low-lead copper alloy of the present invention has excellent material properties as well as good toughness and processability, thereby increasing the alloy strength and corrosion resistance thereof.
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates to copper alloys, and more particularly, to a low-lead brass alloy.
- 2. Description of Related Art
- Brass comprises copper and zinc, as major ingredients, usually in a ratio of about 7:3 or 6:4. In addition, brass usually comprises a small amount of impurities. In the context of improving the properties of brass, a conventional brass contains lead (mostly in the range of 1 to 3 wt %) to achieve the desired mechanical properties for use in the industry, thereby becoming an important industrial material that is widely applicable to metallic devices and valves for use in pipelines, faucets and water supply and discharge systems.
- However, as awareness of the importance of environmental protection increases and the impact of heavy metals on human health becomes better understood, there is a tendency to restrict the use of lead-containing alloys. Various countries, such as Japan and the United States, have progressively amended relevant regulations in an intensive effort to lower the lead content in the environment by particularly requiring that no lead shall leach from lead-containing alloys used in products ranging from household appliances and automobiles to residential water pipes and municipal water systems, while also requiring that lead contamination shall be avoided during processing.
- As mentioned, brass, by definition, contains zinc. However, if the zinc content of brass exceeds 20 wt %, corrosion (such as dezincification) is likely to occur. Because dezincification seriously damages the structure of brass, the surface integrity of brass products is lowered and even pores may be formed in brass pipes. This significantly decreases the lifespan of brass products, thereby causing application problems.
- Regarding the above issues of high lead content and dezincification, the industry continues to develop copper alloy formulations. For example, in addition to copper and zinc as essential and primary ingredients, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,413,330 and 7,354,489, and US Patent Application Publication Nos. 20070062615, 20060078458 and 2004023441 disclose lead-free copper alloys with other components to address the above concerns. However, these alloys have poor machinability, low processing efficiencies, unsuitability for large-scale productions and susceptibility to defects like cracks and slag inclusions. In addition, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,297,215, 6,974,509, 6,955,378, 6,149,739, 5,942,056, 5,637,160, 5,653,827, 5,487,867 and 5,330,712, and US Patent Application Publication Nos. 20060005901, 20040094243 and US20070039667, etc., disclose lead-free or low-lead bismuth-containing brass alloy formulations, wherein the bismuth content of the formulations ranges from 0.5 wt % to 7 wt %. However, high bismuth content is likely to lead to defects like cracks and slag inclusions, leading to low processing efficiencies.
- Furthermore, regarding formulations designed to combat dezincification, in addition to copper and zinc as essential ingredients, U.S. Pat. No. 4,417,929 discloses a formulation comprising iron, aluminum and silicon, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,507,885 and 6,395,110 disclose formulations comprising phosphorus, tin and nickel, U.S. Pat. No. 5,653,827 discloses a formulation comprising iron, nickel and bismuth, U.S. Pat. No. 6,974,509 discloses a formulation comprising tin, bismuth, iron, nickel and phosphorus, U.S. Pat. No. 6,787,101 discloses a formulation comprising phosphorus, tin, nickel, iron, aluminum, silicon and arsenic, all at the same time, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,599,378 and 5,637,160 disclose adding selenium and phosphorus in a brass alloy, all of these formulations aimed at addressing the dezincification problem. Conventional dezincification-resistant brasses usually have higher lead contents (most in the range of 1 to 3 wt %), which facilitates cold/thermal processing of brass materials. However, these brasses do not meet environmental demands, because lead leaching is high and lead contamination is likely to occur during processes.
- Thus, the industry continues to develop brass materials, and to seek an alloy formulation that can substitute for lead-containing brasses and achieve dezincification corrosion resistance, while possessing desirable properties such as good casting characteristics, machinability, corrosion-resistance as well as mechanical properties.
- In order to attain the above and other objectives, the present invention provides a low-lead copper alloy, comprising: 0.05 to 0.3 wt % of lead (Pb), 0.3 to 0.8 wt % of aluminum (Al), 0.01 to 0.4 wt % of bismuth (Bi), 0.1 to 2 wt % of nickel (Ni), and more than 96.5 wt % of copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn), wherein copper is present in an amount ranging from 58 to 70 wt %.
- The low-lead copper alloy of the present invention is a brass alloy. The total amount of copper and zinc can be higher than 96.5 wt %. In an embodiment, copper is in an amount ranging from 58 to 70 wt %. A copper content in this range can provide excellent toughness for the alloy, facilitating subsequent processing of the alloy material. In a preferred embodiment, the copper content ranges from 62 to 65 wt %.
- In the copper alloy of the present invention, the aluminum content ranges from 0.3 to 0.8 wt %. In a preferred embodiment, the aluminum content ranges from 0.4 to 0.7 wt %, and preferably 0.5 to 0.65 wt %. Addition of an appropriate amount of aluminum can increase the fluidity of a copper liquid and improve the casting properties of the alloy material.
- In the copper alloy of the present invention, the bismuth content is less than 0.4 wt %. In a preferred embodiment, the bismuth content ranges from 0.01 to 4 wt %, preferably 0.05 to 0.3 wt %, and more preferably 0.1 to 0.2 wt %.
- In the copper alloy of the present invention, the nickel content ranges from 0.1 to 2 wt %. In a preferred embodiment, the bismuth content ranges from 0.5 to 1 wt %. Nickel used in an appropriate amount in the copper alloy can result in a copper alloy having a high melting point. Nickel acts as heterogeneous nucleus formed in non-spontaneous nucleation when the alloy crystallizes, so that the number of nucleation sites is increased, thereby refining the alloy grains. Further, nickel can purify the copper matrix and the grain boundary, thereby increasing the kinetic properties and corrosion resistance of the copper alloy.
- The copper alloy of the present invention comprises extremely low lead content, i.e., less than 0.3 wt %. In an embodiment, the lead content ranges from 0.05 to 0.3 wt %, preferably 0.1 to 0.25 wt %, and more preferably 0.15 to 0.20 wt %. The alloy may possibly contain impurities. The amount of unavoidable impurities is less than 0.1 wt %.
- The copper alloy of the present invention can substitute for conventional lead-containing brasses, and is more likely to meet environmental demands and lower the effects of lead contamination. Further, the alloy has advantages like having dezincification corrosion resistance, desirable casting properties, machinability and mechanical properties possessed by conventional lead-containing brasses.
-
FIG. 1A is a metallographic structural distribution of a specimen of a low-lead copper alloy of the present invention; -
FIG. 1B is a metallographic structural distribution of a specimen of a lead-free high nickel brass alloy; -
FIG. 1C is a metallographic structural distribution of a specimen of an C85710 lead brass; -
FIG. 1D is a metallographic structural distribution of a specimen of lead-free low bismuth brass; -
FIG. 2A is a metallographic structural distribution of a specimen of the low-lead copper alloy of the present invention after a test of dezincification corrosion resistance was performed; and -
FIG. 2B is a metallographic structural distribution of a specimen of the C85710 lead brass after a test of dezincification corrosion resistance was performed. - The detailed description of the present invention is illustrated by the following specific examples. Persons skilled in the art can conceive the other advantages and effects of the present invention based on the disclosure contained in the specification of the present invention.
- Unless otherwise specified, the ingredients comprised in the dezincification-resistant copper alloy of the present invention, as discussed herein, are all based on the total weight of the alloy, and are expressed in weight percentages (wt %).
- When a conventional high amount of bismuth (i.e., more than 1 wt %) is added to a brass alloy, at the micro level, a liquid-state bismuth film is likely to be first formed in the brass alloy, and then continuously flaky bismuth is formed on the grain boundary to shield the grain boundary, disrupting the mechanical integrity of the alloy and then increasing the hot shortness and cold shortness of the alloy, thereby causing material cracking. Nevertheless, the low-lead brass alloy formulation according to the present invention only needs to use less than 0.4 wt % of bismuth. This not only facilitates elimination of defects like material cracking, but also allows for desirable material properties (such as machinability) of lead brasses (such as conventional C85710 lead brasses). Further, defects like cracks or slag inclusions are unlikely to occur. Hence, the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention can substantially lower the amount of bismuth used, thereby effectively lowering the production cost thereof. This is extremely advantageous to commercial-scale productions and applications.
- Moreover, the low-lead brass alloy formulation according to the present invention can lower the lead content to a range of 0.05 to 3 wt %, to comply with the international standards for lead content in pipeline materials in contact with water. Therefore, the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention is suitable for applications to faucets and lavatory components, pipelines for tap water, water supply systems, etc.
- In an embodiment, the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention comprises 0.05 to 0.3 wt % of lead, 0.3 to 0.8 wt % of aluminum, 0.01 to 0.4 wt % of bismuth, 0.1 to 2 wt % of bismuth, and 96.5 to 99.54 wt % of copper and zinc, wherein copper is in an amount ranging from 58 to 70 wt %.
- In another embodiment, the nickel-containing low-lead brass alloy of the present invention comprises 0.1 to 0.25 wt % of lead, 0.4 to 0.7 wt % of aluminum, 0.05 to 0.3 wt % of bismuth, 0.5 to 1 wt % of nickel, 58 to 70 wt % of copper, and zinc in balance, wherein unavoidable impurities are less than 0.1 wt %.
- In a further embodiment, the nickel-containing low-lead brass alloy of the present invention comprises 0.15 to 0.20 wt % of lead, 0.5 to 0.65 wt % of aluminum, 0.1 to 0.2 wt % of bismuth, 0.5 to 1 wt % of nickel, 62 to 65 wt % of copper, and zinc in balance, wherein unavoidable impurities are less than 0.1 wt %.
- The present invention is illustrated in detail by the following exemplary examples.
- The ingredients of the low-lead copper alloy of the present invention used in the following test examples are described below, wherein each of the ingredients is added at a proportion based on the total weight of the alloy.
-
-
Cu: 61.54 wt % Al: 0.457 wt % Bi: 0.197 wt % Ni: 0.584 wt % Pb: 0.144 wt % Zn: in balance -
-
Cu: 62.72 wt % Al: 0.634 wt % Bi: 0.126 wt % Ni: 0.853 wt % Pb: 0.178 wt % Zn: in balance -
-
Cu: 62.45 wt % Al: 0.582 wt % Bi: 0.159 wt % Ni: 0.696 wt % Pb: 0.156 wt % Zr: in balance - Rounded sand, a urea formaldehyde resin, a furan resin and a curing agent were used as raw materials to prepare sand core using a core shooter, and the gas evolutions of the resins were measured using a testing machine for testing gas evolutions. The obtained sand core must be completely used within 5 hours, or it needs to be baked dry.
- The dezincification-resistant low-lead brass alloy of the present invention and scrap returns were preheated for 15 minutes to reach a temperature higher than 400° C. Then, the alloy of the present invention and the scrap returns were mixed at a weight ratio of 7:1, along with addition of 0.2 wt % of refining slag, for melting in an induction furnace until the brass alloy reached a certain molten state (hereinafter referred to as “molten copper liquid”). A metallic gravity casting machine coupled with the sand core and the gravity casting molds to perform casting, and a temperature monitoring system further controlled temperatures so as to maintain the casting temperature at a range of 1010 to 1060° C. In each casting, the feed amount was preferably 1 to 2 kilograms, and the casting time was controlled to a range of 3 to 8 seconds.
- After the molds were cooled, the molds were opened and the casting head was cleaned. The mold temperatures were monitored so as to control the mold temperatures in the range of 200 to 220° C. to form casting parts. Then, the casting parts were released from the molds. Then, the molds were cleaned to ensure that the site of the core head was clean. A graphite liquid was spread on the surfaces of the molds followed by cooling by immersion. The temperature of the graphite liquid for cooling the mold was preferably maintained at a range of 30 to 36° C., and the specific weight of the graphite liquid ranged from 1.05 to 1.06.
- Inspection was performed on the cooled casting parts, and the casting parts were sent into a sand cleaning drum for cleaning. Then, an as-cast treatment was performed, wherein a thermal treatment for distressing annealing was performed on as-casts to eliminate the internal stress generated by casting. The as-casts were subsequently mechanically processed and polished, so that no sand, metal powder or other impurities adhered to the cavities of the casting parts. A quality analysis was performed and the overall production yield was calculated by the following equation:
-
O.P. Yield=Number of Non-Defective Products/Total Number of Products×100% - The overall production yield (O. P. Yield) reflects the qualitative stability of production processes. High qualitative stability of production processes ensures normal production.
- Moreover, a lead-free high nickel brass and a conventional lead brass were used as comparative examples to produce products by the same process as described above. The ingredients, processing characteristics and overall production yield of each of the alloys are shown in
FIG. 1 , wherein a lead content of less than 0.05 wt % of a lead-free copper is regarded as “lead-free brass”. -
TABLE 1 Ingredients, Processing Characteristics and Tl. Non-Defectiveness in Making the Alloys Lead-free high Ni brass C85710 lead brass Comp. Comp. Comp. Comp. Low-lead brass alloy for invention Category Exp. 1 Exp. 2 Exp. 3 Exp. 4 Exp. 1 Exp. 2 Exp. 3 Measured Cu 61.01 62.74 59.7 61.1 61.54 62.72 62.45 content (%) Measured Al 0.574 0.621 0.521 0.589 0.457 0.634 0.582 content (%) Measured Pb 0.0067 0.0115 2.16 1.54 0.144 0.178 0.156 content (%) Measured Bi 0.134 0.118 0.0074 0.0089 0.197 0.126 0.159 content (%) Measured Ni 2.324 2.101 0.0103 0.0057 0.584 0.853 0.696 content (%) Casting Yield 91% 90% 93% 95% 92% 91% 91% Proc. Yield 80% 82% 98% 99% 98% 98% 97% Polishing yield 94% 95% 95% 94% 96% 97% 97% Overall Prod. 68.4% 70.1% 86.6% 88.4% 86.6% 86.5% 85.6% Yield - The lead-free high nickel brass had higher degrees of hardness. Thus, it was difficult to perform mechanical processing on the lead-free high nickel brass. When the same feeding amount and cutting speed were applied on the above three copper materials, cuts were likely to be found on the surfaces of the lead-free high nickel brass product, and the roughness of the surfaces could not meet requirements (i.e., an Ra value of 3.2 μm). Hence, the production yield of the lead-free high nickel was lower.
- As for the test group in which the low-lead brass of the present invention was used as a raw material, the production yield was as high as 85 wt %. This was comparable to that of the conventional C85710 lead bass. Thus, the low-lead brass of the present invention can indeed be used as a substitute brass material. Further, the low-lead brass of the present invention can have substantially lowered lead content, thereby effectively avoiding the lead contamination that arose during processing and lowering lead leaching when using the casting product. As such, desirable material properties are achieved while meeting environmental demands at the same time.
-
FIGS. 1A to 1D show the structural distributions of the materials of the low-lead copper alloy of the present invention (Example 1), lead-free high nickel brass (Comparative Example 1), C85710 lead brass (Comparative Example 3) and lead-free low nickel brass (Comparative Example 5), respectively, when the specimens were examined under an optical metallographic microscope at 100× magnification to observe the structural distributions of the materials. - The measured values of the ingredients of the bismuth-containing low-lead brass of Example 1 are as follows: Cu: 61.54 wt %, Al: 0.457 wt %, Pb: 0.144 wt %, Bi: 0.197 wt % and Ni: 0.584 wt %.
FIG. 1A shows the metallographic structural distribution of the bismuth-containing low-lead brass of Example 1. InFIG. 1A , smaller grains were formed (i.e., the particle diameter of the grains ranged from 15 to 25 μm). This provided excellent material toughness, so that defects like cracks were not likely to occur. As compared with the comparative examples, the grains of the α phase of Example 1 were smaller, and the grains of the α phase were more refined, indicating that the material had excellent mechanical properties. - The measured values of the ingredients of the lead-free high nickel brass of Comparative Example 1 are as follows: Cu: 61.01 wt %, Al: 0.574 wt %, Pb: 0.0067 wt %, Bi: 0.134 wt % and Ni: 2.324 wt %.
FIG. 1B shows the metallographic structural distribution of the lead-free high nickel brass of Comparative Example 1. InFIG. 1B , the grains were in the shape of small particles. Thus, the brass could provide higher degrees of hardness for the material. - The measured values of the major ingredients of the C85710 lead brass of Comparative Example 3 are as follows: Cu: 59.7 wt %, Al: 0.521 wt %, Pb: 2.16 wt %, Bi: 0.0074 wt % and Ni: 0.0103 wt %.
FIG. 1C shows the metallographic structural distribution of the C85710 lead brass of Comparative Example 3. InFIG. 1C , the alloy had a phase, and the grains were globular, with particle diameters ranging from 30 to 40 μm, and had good toughness. - The measured values of the major ingredients of the lead-free low bismuth brass of Comparative Example 5 are as follows: Cu: 63.28 wt %, Al: 0.597 wt %, Pb: 0.037 wt %, Bi: 0.114 wt % and Ni: 0.063 wt %.
FIG. 1D shows the metallographic structural distribution of the lead-free low bismuth brass of Comparative Example 5. InFIG. 1D , the grains were elongated and bulky, and the particle diameters of the grains ranged from 40 to 50 μm, indicating that the lead-free low bismuth brass did not experience grain refining. - A dezincification test was performed on the brass alloys of Example 3 and Comparative Example 3 to test the corrosion resistance of the brasses. The dezincification test was performed according to the Australian standard AS2345-2006 “Dezincification resistance of copper alloys.” Before a corrosion experiment was performed, a novolak resin was used for inlaying to make the exposed area of each of the specimens to be 100 mm2. All the specimens were ground flat using a 600# metallographic abrasive paper, followed by washing using distilled water. Then, the specimens were baked dry. The test solution was a 1% CuCl2 solution prepared before use, and the test temperature was 75±2° C. The specimens and the CuCl2 solution were placed in a temperature-controlled water bath to react for 24±0.5 hours. The specimens were removed from the water bath, and cut along the vertical direction. The cross-sections of the specimens were polished, and then the depths of corrosion of the specimens were measured and observed under a digital metallographic electronic microscope. Results are shown in
FIGS. 2A and 2B . - As shown in
FIG. 2A , the average depth of dezincification of the low-lead brass of the present invention of Example 3 was 141.72 μm. As shown inFIG. 2B , the average depth of dezincification of the C85710 lead brass of Comparative Example 3 was 307.94 μm. Based on the above, it is clear that the low-lead brass of the present invention had better dezincification resistance. - A test of the mechanical properties was performed on specimens of the examples according to the standard set forth in ISO6998-1998 “Tensile experiments on metallic materials at room temperature.” Results are shown in Table 2.
-
TABLE 2 Results of the Testing of Mechanical Properties Mechanical Properties Type of Tensile Strength (Mpa) Elongation (%) Hardness (HRB) Material 1 2 3 4 5 Avg. 1 2 3 4 5 Avg. 1 2 3 4 5 Avg. Exp. 1 377 395 401 385 378 387.2 14 13 12 11 12 12.4 52 56 69 64 67 61.6 Comp. 392 413 394 388 405 398.4 12 12 13 14 11 12.4 57 68 72 77 69 68.6 Exp. 1 Comp. 356 337 363 374 367 359.6 12 11 13 13 12 12.2 54 53 62 49 64 56.4 Exp. 3 - As shown in Table 2, the tensile strength and elongation for Example 1 were comparable to that of the conventional C85710 lead brass for Example 3, indicating that the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention had mechanical properties comparable to those of the C85710 lead brass. However, the low-lead brass of the present invention had lower lead content, thereby better complying with environmental demands. Thus, the low-lead bass of the present invention can indeed substitute for the C85710 lead brass in manufacturing of products.
- Although the intensity and degrees of hardness of the lead-free high nickel brass of Comparative Example 1 were higher, the high degrees of hardness were detrimental to machining processing. The level of difficulty in cold processing and production costs were increased, such that the lead-free high nickel brass of Comparative Example 1 was not suitable for use in manufacturing lavatory components.
- A test was performed according to the standard set forth in NSF 61-2007a SPAC for the allowable precipitation amounts of metals in products, to examine the precipitation amounts of the metals of the brass alloys in an aqueous environment. Results are shown in Table 3.
-
TABLE 3 Precipitation Amounts of the Metals in the Products Upper Limit of Comp. Exp. 3 Standard Value Comp. (after a lead- Element (μg/L) Exp. 3 stripping treatment) Exp. 1 Lead 5.0 17.542 0.891 0.281 Bismuth 50.0 0.009 0.005 0.023 Aluminum 5.0 0.045 0.009 0.146 Nickel 20.0 0.0238 0.0144 0.843 - The lead content of the material of Comparative Example 3 exceeded the upper limit of the standard value before a lead stripping treatment was performed. Only the material of Example 1 reached the standard value without the need to perform a lead stripping treatment. Further, the precipitation amount of the heavy metal, lead, of the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention was still significantly lower than that of the C85710 lead brass that underwent a lead-stripping treatment. Hence, the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention was more environmentally friendly and reducing risks to human health.
- In light of the above, the low-lead brass alloy of the present invention has a refined grain structure and good alloy integrity and toughness, such that it is not likely to cause defects like cracks and slag inclusions or even casting defects, thereby achieving the desirable properties possessed by lead brasses. This facilitates the application of the alloy material to subsequent processes. The low-lead brass alloy of the present invention can have a low-lead precipitation amount without experiencing a lead-stripping treatment, thereby decreasing the production costs of the process. This is extremely advantageous to commercial-scale production and applications.
- The invention has been described using exemplary preferred embodiments. However, it is to be understood that the scope of the invention is not limited to the disclosed arrangements. The scope of the claims, therefore, should be accorded the broadest interpretation, so as to encompass all such modifications and similar arrangements.
Claims (6)
1. A low-lead copper alloy, comprising:
0.05 to 0.3 wt % of lead;
0.3 to 0.8 wt % of aluminum;
0.01 to 4 wt % of bismuth;
0.1 to 2 wt % of nickel; and
more than 96.5% of copper and zinc, wherein the copper is in an amount ranging from 58 to 70 wt %.
2. The low-lead copper alloy of claim 1 , wherein the copper is in an amount ranging from 62 to 65 wt %.
3. The low-lead copper alloy of claim 1 , wherein the lead is in an amount ranging from 0.15 to 0.25 wt %.
4. The low-lead copper alloy of claim 1 , wherein the aluminum is in an amount ranging from 0.5 to 0.65 wt %.
5. The low-lead copper alloy of claim 1 , wherein the bismuth is in an amount ranging from 0.1 to 0.2 wt %.
6. The low-lead copper alloy of claim 1 , wherein the nickel is in an amount ranging from 0.5 to 1 wt %.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/575,183 US20110081272A1 (en) | 2009-10-07 | 2009-10-07 | Low-lead copper alloy |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/575,183 US20110081272A1 (en) | 2009-10-07 | 2009-10-07 | Low-lead copper alloy |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110081272A1 true US20110081272A1 (en) | 2011-04-07 |
Family
ID=43823330
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/575,183 Abandoned US20110081272A1 (en) | 2009-10-07 | 2009-10-07 | Low-lead copper alloy |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20110081272A1 (en) |
Citations (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4417929A (en) * | 1980-09-11 | 1983-11-29 | Kitz Corporation | Special brass with dezincification corrosion resistance |
US5330712A (en) * | 1993-04-22 | 1994-07-19 | Federalloy, Inc. | Copper-bismuth alloys |
US5487567A (en) * | 1992-04-24 | 1996-01-30 | Francois-Charles Oberthur Group | Printing method and copy-evident secure document |
US5507885A (en) * | 1994-01-17 | 1996-04-16 | Kitz Corporation | Copper-based alloy |
US5637160A (en) * | 1991-03-01 | 1997-06-10 | Olin Corporation | Corrosion-resistant bismuth brass |
US5653827A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1997-08-05 | Starline Mfg. Co., Inc. | Brass alloys |
US5942056A (en) * | 1993-04-22 | 1999-08-24 | Federalloy, Inc. | Plumbing fixtures and fittings employing copper-bismuth casting alloys |
US5974509A (en) * | 1996-05-01 | 1999-10-26 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method for purging unused data from a cache memory |
US6149739A (en) * | 1997-03-06 | 2000-11-21 | G & W Electric Company | Lead-free copper alloy |
US6395110B2 (en) * | 1997-04-08 | 2002-05-28 | Kitz Corporation | Copper-based alloy excelling in corrosion resistance, method for production thereof, and products made of the copper-based alloy |
US6413330B1 (en) * | 1998-10-12 | 2002-07-02 | Sambo Copper Alloy Co., Ltd. | Lead-free free-cutting copper alloys |
US20020110478A1 (en) * | 1999-12-13 | 2002-08-15 | Lawrence Benjamin L. | Copper base alloy that contains intermetallic constituents rich in calcium and/or magnesium |
US6599378B1 (en) * | 1999-05-07 | 2003-07-29 | Kitz Corporation | Copper-based alloy, method for production of the alloy, and products using the alloy |
US20040023441A1 (en) * | 2002-08-01 | 2004-02-05 | Trivedi Jigish D. | Edge intensive antifuse and method for making the same |
US20040094243A1 (en) * | 2002-11-15 | 2004-05-20 | Albert Wynne | Lead-free copper alloys |
US6757101B2 (en) * | 2001-10-05 | 2004-06-29 | Agiltron, Inc. | None-mechanical dual stage optical switches |
US6955378B2 (en) * | 2001-04-30 | 2005-10-18 | Southco, Inc. | Latch assembly |
US6974509B2 (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2005-12-13 | Kitz Corporation | Brass |
US20060005901A1 (en) * | 2002-09-09 | 2006-01-12 | Kazuhito Kurose | Copper base alloy, and cast ingot and parts to be contacted with liquid |
US20060078458A1 (en) * | 2004-10-11 | 2006-04-13 | Diehl Metall Stiftung & Co. Kg | Copper-zinc-silicon alloy, products using the alloy and processes for producing the alloy |
US20070039667A1 (en) * | 2004-03-29 | 2007-02-22 | San-Etsu Metals Co., Ltd. | Brass material |
US20070062615A1 (en) * | 2005-09-22 | 2007-03-22 | Sanbo Shindo Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Free-cutting copper alloy containing very low lead |
US7354489B2 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2008-04-08 | Wieland-Werke Ag | Lead-free copper alloy and a method of manufacture |
-
2009
- 2009-10-07 US US12/575,183 patent/US20110081272A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4417929A (en) * | 1980-09-11 | 1983-11-29 | Kitz Corporation | Special brass with dezincification corrosion resistance |
US5637160A (en) * | 1991-03-01 | 1997-06-10 | Olin Corporation | Corrosion-resistant bismuth brass |
US5487567A (en) * | 1992-04-24 | 1996-01-30 | Francois-Charles Oberthur Group | Printing method and copy-evident secure document |
US5942056A (en) * | 1993-04-22 | 1999-08-24 | Federalloy, Inc. | Plumbing fixtures and fittings employing copper-bismuth casting alloys |
US5330712A (en) * | 1993-04-22 | 1994-07-19 | Federalloy, Inc. | Copper-bismuth alloys |
US5487867A (en) * | 1993-04-22 | 1996-01-30 | Federalloy, Inc. | Copper-bismuth casting alloys |
US5507885A (en) * | 1994-01-17 | 1996-04-16 | Kitz Corporation | Copper-based alloy |
US5653827A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1997-08-05 | Starline Mfg. Co., Inc. | Brass alloys |
US5974509A (en) * | 1996-05-01 | 1999-10-26 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method for purging unused data from a cache memory |
US6149739A (en) * | 1997-03-06 | 2000-11-21 | G & W Electric Company | Lead-free copper alloy |
US6395110B2 (en) * | 1997-04-08 | 2002-05-28 | Kitz Corporation | Copper-based alloy excelling in corrosion resistance, method for production thereof, and products made of the copper-based alloy |
US6413330B1 (en) * | 1998-10-12 | 2002-07-02 | Sambo Copper Alloy Co., Ltd. | Lead-free free-cutting copper alloys |
US6599378B1 (en) * | 1999-05-07 | 2003-07-29 | Kitz Corporation | Copper-based alloy, method for production of the alloy, and products using the alloy |
US20020110478A1 (en) * | 1999-12-13 | 2002-08-15 | Lawrence Benjamin L. | Copper base alloy that contains intermetallic constituents rich in calcium and/or magnesium |
US6974509B2 (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2005-12-13 | Kitz Corporation | Brass |
US6955378B2 (en) * | 2001-04-30 | 2005-10-18 | Southco, Inc. | Latch assembly |
US6757101B2 (en) * | 2001-10-05 | 2004-06-29 | Agiltron, Inc. | None-mechanical dual stage optical switches |
US20040023441A1 (en) * | 2002-08-01 | 2004-02-05 | Trivedi Jigish D. | Edge intensive antifuse and method for making the same |
US20060005901A1 (en) * | 2002-09-09 | 2006-01-12 | Kazuhito Kurose | Copper base alloy, and cast ingot and parts to be contacted with liquid |
US7297215B2 (en) * | 2002-09-09 | 2007-11-20 | Kitz Corporation | Copper base alloy, and cast ingot and parts to be contacted with liquid |
US20040094243A1 (en) * | 2002-11-15 | 2004-05-20 | Albert Wynne | Lead-free copper alloys |
US7354489B2 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2008-04-08 | Wieland-Werke Ag | Lead-free copper alloy and a method of manufacture |
US20070039667A1 (en) * | 2004-03-29 | 2007-02-22 | San-Etsu Metals Co., Ltd. | Brass material |
US20060078458A1 (en) * | 2004-10-11 | 2006-04-13 | Diehl Metall Stiftung & Co. Kg | Copper-zinc-silicon alloy, products using the alloy and processes for producing the alloy |
US20070062615A1 (en) * | 2005-09-22 | 2007-03-22 | Sanbo Shindo Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Free-cutting copper alloy containing very low lead |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP6335194B2 (en) | Lead-free, easy-to-cut, corrosion-resistant brass alloy with good thermoformability | |
TWI550106B (en) | Low lead free bismuth no silicon brass alloy | |
JP5383633B2 (en) | Brass alloy having excellent stress corrosion resistance and method for producing the same | |
JP2011179121A (en) | Environment-friendly manganese brass alloy and manufacturing method thereof | |
US20110064602A1 (en) | Dezincification-resistant copper alloy | |
CN101225487A (en) | Arsenic-containing low-lead brass alloy | |
CN110923500A (en) | Brass alloy, machined part and water contact part | |
CN102618747A (en) | Free cutting brass alloy | |
CN101988164A (en) | Dezincification resistant brass alloy with low lead content | |
JP2008214760A (en) | Lead-free free-cutting brass alloy and its manufacturing method | |
CN101994024B (en) | Anti-dezincification copper alloy and preparation method of objects made of same | |
TWI550105B (en) | Lead - free bismuth - free silicon - brass alloy | |
CA2680218C (en) | Low-lead copper alloy | |
CN104195365A (en) | Low-lead brass alloy and preparing method thereof | |
CA2678078C (en) | Dezincification-resistant copper alloy | |
CN104004940B (en) | Tin-brass alloy that lead-free free-cutting corrosion resistance is good and preparation method thereof | |
CA2680214C (en) | Low lead copper alloy | |
TWI387656B (en) | Preparation of Low Lead Brass Alloy and Its | |
US20110142715A1 (en) | Brass alloy | |
US20110081272A1 (en) | Low-lead copper alloy | |
CN102140593A (en) | Lead-free brass alloy | |
CA2696156C (en) | Lead-free brass alloy | |
CN104726743B (en) | Brass alloys and its manufacture method | |
CA2678074C (en) | Dezincification-resistant copper alloy and method for producing product comprising the same | |
US8349097B2 (en) | Dezincification-resistant copper alloy and method for producing product comprising the same |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MODERN ISLANDS CO., LTD., VIRGIN ISLANDS, BRITISH Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LO, WEN LIN;PENG, XIAO MNG;REEL/FRAME:023340/0313 Effective date: 20090728 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |