US20110078825A1 - Modulation of plant cell number - Google Patents
Modulation of plant cell number Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110078825A1 US20110078825A1 US12/806,688 US80668810A US2011078825A1 US 20110078825 A1 US20110078825 A1 US 20110078825A1 US 80668810 A US80668810 A US 80668810A US 2011078825 A1 US2011078825 A1 US 2011078825A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- ang4
- plant
- seq
- ler
- leaf
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims description 121
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 claims description 78
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 39
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 claims description 32
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 claims description 21
- 108091028043 Nucleic acid sequence Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical class 0.000 claims 8
- 108020004707 nucleic acids Proteins 0.000 claims 6
- 102000039446 nucleic acids Human genes 0.000 claims 6
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 claims 4
- 101100216078 Mus musculus Ang4 gene Proteins 0.000 abstract description 88
- 101100108860 Homo sapiens ANGPT4 gene Proteins 0.000 abstract description 87
- 102100033402 Angiopoietin-4 Human genes 0.000 description 68
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 49
- 230000022131 cell cycle Effects 0.000 description 41
- 230000021953 cytokinesis Effects 0.000 description 35
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 30
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 22
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 22
- 241000219194 Arabidopsis Species 0.000 description 18
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 18
- 210000000349 chromosome Anatomy 0.000 description 18
- 230000032823 cell division Effects 0.000 description 17
- 208000005652 acute fatty liver of pregnancy Diseases 0.000 description 16
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 16
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 16
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 16
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 16
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 15
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 14
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 13
- 230000002786 root growth Effects 0.000 description 12
- 101100495911 Arabidopsis thaliana CHR10 gene Proteins 0.000 description 10
- 108050006400 Cyclin Proteins 0.000 description 10
- 108010063296 Kinesin Proteins 0.000 description 10
- 108091023040 Transcription factor Proteins 0.000 description 10
- 102000040945 Transcription factor Human genes 0.000 description 10
- 108700028369 Alleles Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 102000016736 Cyclin Human genes 0.000 description 9
- 102000010638 Kinesin Human genes 0.000 description 9
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 9
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000011890 leaf development Effects 0.000 description 9
- 102000019293 Kinesin-like proteins Human genes 0.000 description 8
- 108050006659 Kinesin-like proteins Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 108700026244 Open Reading Frames Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 230000010261 cell growth Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000002299 complementary DNA Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000000684 flow cytometry Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 7
- 241000219195 Arabidopsis thaliana Species 0.000 description 6
- 101100119032 Arabidopsis thaliana ERF034 gene Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 108091026890 Coding region Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 108091092195 Intron Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000002493 microarray Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000002018 overexpression Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000002792 vascular Effects 0.000 description 6
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000002015 leaf growth Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 5
- 101150111419 ATH1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000007469 Actins Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010085238 Actins Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 101100433747 Arabidopsis thaliana ABCA2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 101100288148 Arabidopsis thaliana KNAT5 gene Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 101100135611 Arabidopsis thaliana PAP12 gene Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 101150002428 Atoh1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 101100057132 Candida albicans (strain SC5314 / ATCC MYA-2876) ATC1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 108020004705 Codon Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 108090000266 Cyclin-dependent kinases Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 108700024394 Exon Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 235000007164 Oryza sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 102100029373 Transcription factor ATOH1 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 102000006275 Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010083111 Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010367 cloning Methods 0.000 description 4
- 210000001339 epidermal cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 230000035784 germination Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 4
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetic acid Chemical compound CC(O)=O QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 101100288145 Arabidopsis thaliana KNAT2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 229930192334 Auxin Natural products 0.000 description 3
- 101100501247 Caenorhabditis elegans elo-2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000003903 Cyclin-dependent kinases Human genes 0.000 description 3
- WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Formaldehyde Chemical compound O=C WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 102000009331 Homeodomain Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010048671 Homeodomain Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 235000003332 Ilex aquifolium Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 241000209027 Ilex aquifolium Species 0.000 description 3
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 102000029749 Microtubule Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108091022875 Microtubule Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 108020005038 Terminator Codon Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 239000002363 auxin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000027455 binding Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- XUJNEKJLAYXESH-UHFFFAOYSA-N cysteine Natural products SCC(N)C(O)=O XUJNEKJLAYXESH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000021121 meiosis Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000004688 microtubule Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 231100000350 mutagenesis Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 230000008121 plant development Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000002864 sequence alignment Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000013518 transcription Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000035897 transcription Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 3
- 108010016281 ADP-Ribosylation Factor 1 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100034341 ADP-ribosylation factor 1 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- HRPVXLWXLXDGHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acrylamide Chemical compound NC(=O)C=C HRPVXLWXLXDGHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 101710197649 Actin-8 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000589155 Agrobacterium tumefaciens Species 0.000 description 2
- 101100492776 Arabidopsis thaliana ATHB-6 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101100181122 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN14C gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101100073911 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN7N gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101100288149 Arabidopsis thaliana KNAT6 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101100537309 Arabidopsis thaliana TKPR1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- LZZYPRNAOMGNLH-UHFFFAOYSA-M Cetrimonium bromide Chemical compound [Br-].CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC[N+](C)(C)C LZZYPRNAOMGNLH-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 230000004568 DNA-binding Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 2
- 102100034343 Integrase Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101150100920 KTI12 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- TWRXJAOTZQYOKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L Magnesium chloride Chemical compound [Mg+2].[Cl-].[Cl-] TWRXJAOTZQYOKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 102000009664 Microtubule-Associated Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 102000003505 Myosin Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108060008487 Myosin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000005604 Myosin Heavy Chains Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010084498 Myosin Heavy Chains Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108091093105 Nuclear DNA Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000209094 Oryza Species 0.000 description 2
- 240000007594 Oryza sativa Species 0.000 description 2
- 108700001094 Plant Genes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010010469 Qa-SNARE Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010092799 RNA-directed DNA polymerase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000010240 RT-PCR analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 102000050389 Syntaxin Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 102000023732 binding proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108091008324 binding proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001364 causal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000024321 chromosome segregation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004624 confocal microscopy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000021186 dishes Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010195 expression analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 2
- SEOVTRFCIGRIMH-UHFFFAOYSA-N indole-3-acetic acid Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(CC(=O)O)=CNC2=C1 SEOVTRFCIGRIMH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000000366 juvenile effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229930027917 kanamycin Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 229960000318 kanamycin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- SBUJHOSQTJFQJX-NOAMYHISSA-N kanamycin Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CN)O[C@@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)O)[C@H](N)C[C@@H]1N SBUJHOSQTJFQJX-NOAMYHISSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229930182823 kanamycin A Natural products 0.000 description 2
- JVTAAEKCZFNVCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N lactic acid Chemical compound CC(O)C(O)=O JVTAAEKCZFNVCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002703 mutagenesis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002773 nucleotide Substances 0.000 description 2
- 125000003729 nucleotide group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000009566 rice Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009331 sowing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012353 t test Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013519 translation Methods 0.000 description 2
- YHVHQZYJGWGAKN-ZUWUZHNASA-N (3s,6s,9r,12s)-6-(4-aminobutyl)-12-benzyl-9-(1h-indol-3-ylmethyl)-3-[(1r)-1-phenylmethoxyethyl]-1,4,7,10,13-pentazacycloicosane-2,5,8,11,14-pentone Chemical compound O([C@H](C)[C@H]1C(NCCCCCCC(=O)N[C@@H](CC=2C=CC=CC=2)C(=O)N[C@H](CC=2C3=CC=CC=C3NC=2)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N1)=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1 YHVHQZYJGWGAKN-ZUWUZHNASA-N 0.000 description 1
- BUOYTFVLNZIELF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-phenyl-1h-indole-4,6-dicarboximidamide Chemical compound N1C2=CC(C(=N)N)=CC(C(N)=N)=C2C=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 BUOYTFVLNZIELF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- DVLFYONBTKHTER-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid Chemical compound OS(=O)(=O)CCCN1CCOCC1 DVLFYONBTKHTER-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101150033839 4 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- FWBHETKCLVMNFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4',6-Diamino-2-phenylindol Chemical compound C1=CC(C(=N)N)=CC=C1C1=CC2=CC=C(C(N)=N)C=C2N1 FWBHETKCLVMNFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108091006112 ATPases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000015693 Actin Depolymerizing Factors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010038798 Actin Depolymerizing Factors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000057290 Adenosine Triphosphatases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 101100054772 Arabidopsis thaliana ACT2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100434207 Arabidopsis thaliana ACT8 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100378512 Arabidopsis thaliana ADF9 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100323729 Arabidopsis thaliana ARF11 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100495264 Arabidopsis thaliana CDC25 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100220779 Arabidopsis thaliana CDKB1-2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100220781 Arabidopsis thaliana CDKB2-1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100220783 Arabidopsis thaliana CDKB2-2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100439831 Arabidopsis thaliana CKS2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100497317 Arabidopsis thaliana CRK8 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100059331 Arabidopsis thaliana CYCA1-1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100112524 Arabidopsis thaliana CYCA2-3 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100112525 Arabidopsis thaliana CYCA2-4 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100327146 Arabidopsis thaliana CYCB1-4 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100327147 Arabidopsis thaliana CYCB1-5 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100327150 Arabidopsis thaliana CYCB2-1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100327153 Arabidopsis thaliana CYCB2-2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100327157 Arabidopsis thaliana CYCB2-4 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100382825 Arabidopsis thaliana CYCB3-1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100117388 Arabidopsis thaliana DPA gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100278886 Arabidopsis thaliana E2FF gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100064591 Arabidopsis thaliana EB1C gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100065572 Arabidopsis thaliana ERF055 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100065582 Arabidopsis thaliana ERF071 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100281590 Arabidopsis thaliana FPP2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100175473 Arabidopsis thaliana GL1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100018368 Arabidopsis thaliana ICR2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100454001 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN10A gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100454007 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN12A gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100454009 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN12B gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100454014 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN12E gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100454016 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN12F gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100181124 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN14D gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100234528 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN14L gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100234532 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN14N gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100234538 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN14Q gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100234540 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN14R gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100020274 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN5A gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100020276 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN5B gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100510298 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN7A gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100510301 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN7B gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100073908 Arabidopsis thaliana KIN7L gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100422900 Arabidopsis thaliana KN gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100181409 Arabidopsis thaliana LAX3 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100129204 Arabidopsis thaliana MAP65-3 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100236650 Arabidopsis thaliana MYB3R4 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100186114 Arabidopsis thaliana NAC037 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100534227 Arabidopsis thaliana SCL28 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100310320 Arabidopsis thaliana SIM gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100206197 Arabidopsis thaliana TCP4 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100045632 Arabidopsis thaliana TCX2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100045492 Arabidopsis thaliana TUBA2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100045527 Arabidopsis thaliana TUBB7 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000662893 Arabidopsis thaliana Telomere repeat-binding factor 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000662890 Arabidopsis thaliana Telomere repeat-binding factor 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000662891 Arabidopsis thaliana Telomere repeat-binding factor 3 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000662896 Arabidopsis thaliana Telomere repeat-binding factor 4 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000662897 Arabidopsis thaliana Telomere repeat-binding factor 5 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100540863 Arabidopsis thaliana WRKY26 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100079074 Arabidopsis thaliana XI-2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101710105220 CDPK-related protein kinase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101150117862 CPP1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101710112112 Carboxy-terminal kinesin 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000005483 Cell Cycle Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010031896 Cell Cycle Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100020736 Chromosome-associated kinesin KIF4A Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229920001651 Cyanoacrylate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 102100032522 Cyclin-dependent kinases regulatory subunit 2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000007400 DNA extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000005156 Dehydration Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 101100234413 Dictyostelium discoideum kif9 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100021740 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase BRE1A Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101710089897 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase BRE1A Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100021739 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase BRE1B Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101710089902 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase BRE1B Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101710167754 Elongator complex protein 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000206602 Eukaryota Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000010190 G1 phase Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010337 G2 phase Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004668 G2/M phase Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108700005087 Homeobox Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101001139157 Homo sapiens Chromosome-associated kinesin KIF4A Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000942317 Homo sapiens Cyclin-dependent kinases regulatory subunit 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000670093 Homo sapiens Dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide-protein glycosyltransferase subunit 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000624643 Homo sapiens M-phase inducer phosphatase 3 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000702559 Homo sapiens Probable global transcription activator SNF2L2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000580039 Homo sapiens Ras-specific guanine nucleotide-releasing factor 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000702545 Homo sapiens Transcription activator BRG1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241001026509 Kata Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000761557 Lamina Species 0.000 description 1
- 102100023330 M-phase inducer phosphatase 3 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091077621 MAPRE family Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108060004795 Methyltransferase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010020004 Microtubule-Associated Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 240000008467 Oryza sativa Japonica Group Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005043 Oryza sativa Japonica Group Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000012408 PCR amplification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010222 PCR analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108010002747 Pfu DNA polymerase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 235000014676 Phragmites communis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 108090000708 Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004245 Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 240000001749 Quercus lobata Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000013400 Quercus lobata Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000002123 RNA extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108091013841 Spermatogenesis-associated protein 6 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108091081024 Start codon Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000048514 Stomatin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108700037714 Stomatin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000000692 Student's t-test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229930006000 Sucrose Natural products 0.000 description 1
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N Sucrose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004830 Super Glue Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000592342 Tracheophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 102100031027 Transcription activator BRG1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229920004890 Triton X-100 Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000013504 Triton X-100 Substances 0.000 description 1
- 101710166555 Tubulin alpha-2/alpha-4 chain Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101710203525 Tubulin beta-7 chain Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108091023045 Untranslated Region Proteins 0.000 description 1
- PTFCDOFLOPIGGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc dication Chemical compound [Zn+2] PTFCDOFLOPIGGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101710185494 Zinc finger protein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100023597 Zinc finger protein 816 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 239000012190 activator Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000003275 alpha amino acid group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 125000000539 amino acid group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000019552 anatomical structure morphogenesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003484 anatomy Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- FPPNZSSZRUTDAP-UWFZAAFLSA-N carbenicillin Chemical compound N([C@H]1[C@H]2SC([C@@H](N2C1=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)C(=O)C(C(O)=O)C1=CC=CC=C1 FPPNZSSZRUTDAP-UWFZAAFLSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960003669 carbenicillin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000003197 catalytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108700021031 cdc Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000006369 cell cycle progression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000024245 cell differentiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000033081 cell fate specification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009134 cell regulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000033077 cellular process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013068 control sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000000151 cysteine group Chemical group N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)* 0.000 description 1
- 230000002548 cytokinetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000805 cytoplasm Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- OPTASPLRGRRNAP-UHFFFAOYSA-N cytosine Chemical class NC=1C=CNC(=O)N=1 OPTASPLRGRRNAP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000003436 cytoskeletal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004292 cytoskeleton Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002615 epidermis Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000031376 exit from mitosis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013401 experimental design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001723 extracellular space Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008124 floral development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000034356 gene-regulatory proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091006104 gene-regulatory proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000008571 general function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N glutamine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004209 hair Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 125000000487 histidyl group Chemical group [H]N([H])C(C(=O)O*)C([H])([H])C1=C([H])N([H])C([H])=N1 0.000 description 1
- 238000013427 histology analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000005556 hormone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940088597 hormone Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000010191 image analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008595 infiltration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001764 infiltration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004310 lactic acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000014655 lactic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037356 lipid metabolism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910001629 magnesium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000034217 membrane fusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000013706 meristem initiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000017653 meristem maintenance Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000386 microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008880 microtubule cytoskeleton organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000011278 mitosis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000394 mitotic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007479 molecular analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010369 molecular cloning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000869 mutational effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052754 neon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- GKAOGPIIYCISHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N neon atom Chemical compound [Ne] GKAOGPIIYCISHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000004940 nucleus Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229960000988 nystatin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- VQOXZBDYSJBXMA-NQTDYLQESA-N nystatin A1 Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@@H](N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@H]1/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/CC/C=C/C=C/[C@H](C)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](C)[C@H](C)OC(=O)C[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)CC[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)C[C@](O)(C[C@H](O)[C@H]2C(O)=O)O[C@H]2C1 VQOXZBDYSJBXMA-NQTDYLQESA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000021368 organ growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003463 organelle Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000059 patterning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008363 phosphate buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004161 plant tissue culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006116 polymerization reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000379 polymerizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920001184 polypeptide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000009648 positive gravitropism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000027762 primary root development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 description 1
- XJMOSONTPMZWPB-UHFFFAOYSA-M propidium iodide Chemical compound [I-].[I-].C12=CC(N)=CC=C2C2=CC=C(N)C=C2[N+](CCC[N+](C)(CC)CC)=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 XJMOSONTPMZWPB-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 230000017854 proteolysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006798 recombination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005215 recombination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000022983 regulation of cell cycle Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008521 reorganization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000001509 sodium citrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- NLJMYIDDQXHKNR-UHFFFAOYSA-K sodium citrate Chemical compound O.O.[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[O-]C(=O)CC(O)(CC([O-])=O)C([O-])=O NLJMYIDDQXHKNR-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000020347 spindle assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000012391 spindle elongation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000130 stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000005720 sucrose Substances 0.000 description 1
- SEEPANYCNGTZFQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N sulfadiazine Chemical compound C1=CC(N)=CC=C1S(=O)(=O)NC1=NC=CC=N1 SEEPANYCNGTZFQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960004306 sulfadiazine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108010058651 thioglucosidase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229950003937 tolonium Drugs 0.000 description 1
- HNONEKILPDHFOL-UHFFFAOYSA-M tolonium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].C1=C(C)C(N)=CC2=[S+]C3=CC(N(C)C)=CC=C3N=C21 HNONEKILPDHFOL-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- -1 tubulins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000010981 turquoise Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000001493 tyrosinyl group Chemical class [H]OC1=C([H])C([H])=C(C([H])=C1[H])C([H])([H])C([H])(N([H])[H])C(*)=O 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108700026220 vif Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000011782 vitamin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013343 vitamin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229940088594 vitamin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229930003231 vitamin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000003722 vitamin derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
- C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
- C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A40/00—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production
- Y02A40/10—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production in agriculture
- Y02A40/146—Genetically Modified [GMO] plants, e.g. transgenic plants
Definitions
- the invention relates to the use of the ANG4 gene, or a variant thereof, to modulate the cell number of a plant organ.
- the modulation can be used to increase the plant biomass, or to adapt the plant architecture.
- Plant architecture is an important factor in the determination of the plant productivity. Therefore, the study of genes involved in plant architecture and their regulation has drawn a lot of attention by several research groups.
- genes controlling plant architecture especially for genes capable of controlling the cell number in specific plant organs.
- a first aspect of the invention is the use of a gene encoding a protein comprising SEQ ID NO:2 (TAIR_At2g44950, FIG. 10 ), or a functional fragment or variant thereof, to modulate the cell number of a plant organ, or a part thereof.
- the gene encodes a protein consisting of SEQ ID NO:2.
- Gene as used here refers to the coding sequence, which may be linked to its own promoter, but is preferably operably linked to a promoter which is not its own.
- the promoter can be any promoter suitable for expression in plants.
- the promoter is a strong promoter, such as, but not limited to the 35S promoter.
- Gene refers both to the genomic sequence (including possible introns) as well as to the cDNA derived from the spliced messenger, operably linked to a promoter sequence.
- Coding sequence is a nucleotide sequence, which is transcribed into mRNA and/or translated into a polypeptide when placed under the control of appropriate regulatory sequences. The boundaries of the coding sequence are determined by a translation start codon at the 5′-terminus and a translation stop codon at the 3′-terminus.
- a coding sequence can include, but is not limited to mRNA, cDNA, recombinant nucleotide sequences or genomic DNA, while introns may be present as well under certain circumstances.
- Operably linked refers to a juxtaposition wherein the components so described are in a relationship permitting them to function in their intended manner.
- a promoter sequence “operably linked” to a coding sequence is ligated in such a way that expression of the coding sequence is achieved under conditions compatible with the promoter sequence.
- a variant is a plant gene comprising a ring finger, with a homology with SEQ ID NO:2 of at least 25% identities and/or 45% positives, preferably at least 35% identifies and/or 55% positives, more preferably at least 45% identities and/or 65% positives, even more preferably at least 55% identities and/or 75% positives, most preferably at least 65% identities and/or 85% positives, as measured by a protein-protein Blast search.
- the variant has E3 ubiquitin protein ligase activity.
- Preferred variants are the Oryza sativa ANG4 homologues CAD41603 and NP922769, as listed in FIG. 10 .
- Plant organs as used here, comprise roots, stem, leaves and flowers.
- the plant organ is a plant leaf and/or a plant root.
- Parts of a plant organ are, as a non-limiting example, the palisade cells of the leaves, or the lateral roots.
- One preferred embodiment is the use according to the invention, whereby the modulation of the cell number is used to modulate the leaf morphology.
- a functional fragment, as used here, is any fragment that still has the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase activity.
- Still another aspect of the invention is the use of a gene encoding a protein comprising, preferably consisting of SEQ ID NO:2, or a functional fragment or variant thereof, to modulate the root length.
- the gene, variant of functional fragment is overexpressed and the modulation is an increase in root length.
- the gene comprises SEQ ID NO:1 (genbank NM — 130060).
- Another aspect of the invention is the use of a gene encoding a protein comprising, preferably consisting of SEQ ID NO:2, or a functional fragment or variant thereof, to increase biomass.
- the increase of biomass is obtained by an overexpression of the gene, variant or functional fragment.
- FIG. 1 Leaf phenotype of angusta4 and wild-type.
- Panel A In vivo condition, fully grown rosettes of Ler and angusta4.
- Panel B Juvenile and adult fully expanded leaves of Ler.
- Panel C Juvenile and adult fully expanded leaves of angusta4.
- FIG. 2 In vitro leaf phenotype of wild-type and angusta4 mutant plant (26 days after germination)
- FIG. 3 Leaf phenotype of angusta4.
- Panel A Transversal sections at the widest location of expanded lamina of first leaves of wild-type (Ler)-(top) and angusta4 (bottom).
- Panel B Mean value of palisade cell number in first leaves of angusta4 and the wild-type (asterisk indicates statically significant difference).
- Panel C Cross section of wild-type at the midvein (Adaxial surface is up).
- Panel D Close up of wild-type vascular tissue.
- Panel E Cross section of angusta4 at the midvein (Adaxial surface is up).
- Panel F Close up of angusta4 vascular tissue (V: vascular bundle; P: palisade cell; x: xylem; ph: phloem; I: inter cellular space).
- Panels G, H, I Morphological data of expanded leaves of ang4-1 mutant (Panels A, B, C). Bars represent mean values and standard deviation. *** means statistical difference at p ⁇ 0.001 from the t test. Histological observations of expanded leaves of ang4 mutant and Ler.
- FIG. 4A In vitro root growth after 15 days of germination.
- FIG. 4B Biomass of ang4-1, ang4-2, ang4-3 mutants, Ler and Col in soil conditions. Average of two assays, four blocks per assay and eight plants per block. The bars correspond to the standard deviation.
- FIG. 5 Panel A: Root growth kinetics of angusta4 in comparison with wild-type (Ler). Panels B and C: Longitudinal sections by confocal microscopy through the root apical meristem in the root tip in wild-type and the angusta4 mutants.
- FIG. 6 Fine mapping of the ANG4 gene: The figure indicates the map-based cloning strategy where a set of eight AFLP primer combinations was applied to 20 F2 individual mutants that indicated that the ANG4 mutation was located on chromosome 2 (blue and white pattern). Further application of AFLP marker SM33 — 202 and SM26 — 495 narrowed the ANG4 interval to 293 kb. Finally, InDel and SNP markers were used on a total of 1062 recombinants that delimited the ANG4 area to 27 kb at the bottom of chromosome 2 flanked by SNP markers CER458218 and CER458367. The 27 kb region contained four genes, one of which was the ANG4 candidate gene.
- FIG. 7 Separation of PCR products of At2g44960 gene following amplification with two primer sets.
- Lane 1 contains a 1 kb molecular weight marker.
- Lanes 2-7 contains PCR products from Ler At2g44960 gene while lanes 8-13 contains PCR products from ANG4 At2g44960 gene.
- PCR products of lanes 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, and 10 were amplified with primer combinations Defle 12 and Defle 13 while PCR products of lanes 5, 6, 7, 11, 12 and 13 were amplified with primer combination: Defle 14 and Defle 15.
- FIG. 8 Example of an alignment performed by CLUSTALW 1.8. This alignment is between 2652 bp and 3873 bp part of the At2g44950 gene that was amplified by 5′CTCGCCCATTGTTGTTTCAG3′ (SEQ ID NO:3) and 5′AATTGCGGAAACCATGTTCC 3′ (SEQ ID NO:4) primer combination. It clearly demonstrates the point mutation induced by EMS as a C was changed to a T generating a stop codon UAG. Aligned Ang sequence in FIG. 8 is represented in SEQ ID NO:47. Aligned Ler sequence in FIG. 8 is represented in SEQ ID NO:48.
- FIG. 9 ANG4 gene structure. Shown are the ANG4 candidate genes covering a 27 kb region on chromosome 2 and linked by CER458218 and CER458367 SNP markers.
- the unspliced mRNA of ANG4 has 19 exons and 18 introns covering a region of 6298 bp while the full length cDNA covers a region of 2637 bp.
- EMS mutagenization caused a C to change to a T generating a stop codon at the end of exon 16 hence truncating the protein from 878 amino acids to 844 amino acids (Exons in blue boxes, and introns in orange boxes).
- FIG. 10 An alignment of the ANG4 homologues in different species. The orange underlined sequence indicates the conserved RING finger motif. Conserved cystein and histidine residues are colored with red and blue colors respectively.
- At2g44950 is ANG4 sequence with 878 amino acid residues.
- At1g55250 is the ANG4 homologue on chromosome 1 in Arabidopsis with 899 amino acids.
- NP — 55586 and AAK58539 are ANG4 homologues in human genome with 1001 and 975 amino acids respectively.
- CAD41603 and NP922769 are the ANG4 homologues in Oryza sativa with 883 and 789 amino acids respectively.
- FIG. 10 is represented in SEQ ID NO:2.
- AAP36593.1 in FIG. 10 is represented in SEQ ID NO:49.
- AAK58539_RFP — 20 in FIG. 10 is represented in SEQ ID NO:50.
- CAD41603.3 in FIG. 10 is represented in SEQ ID NO:51.
- MIPS_At1g55250 in FIG. 10 is represented in SEQ ID NO:52.
- NP055586_RFP — 40 in FIG. 10 is represented in SEQ ID NO:53.
- NP922769.1 in FIG. 10 is represented in SEQ ID NO:54.
- FIG. 11 RT-PCR analysis of ANG4 gene expression in different Ler organs. The expression pattern was visualized on acrylamide gel. Four ⁇ l samples were loaded an acrylamide gel in 1 ⁇ Tris-Boric acid-EDTA buffer and electrophoresed at 3000V. Primers Defle 44 and syana — 01 were labeled with P 33 . Numbers on the gel indicate different Ler organs as follows: 1—Ler apex, 2—Ler shoot apex, 3—Ler roots, 4—Ler cotyledons, 5—Ler young leaves, 6—Ler Expanded leaves, 7—Ler flowers and 8—water as a control sample.
- FIG. 12 Summary of Arabidopsis genes with altered mRNA expression in ang4 and two other leaf development mutants, elo2 and drl1-2.
- RNA was extracted from shoot apex of young plants and expression measured using ATH1 microarrays (Affymetrix) method in triplicates. Comparisons of expression level were done between each mutant and the wild-type Ler following the Bayesian test of linear model performed with Bioconductor programs. Values without parenthesis are the number of DE genes equally expressed in different mutants, and values in parenthesis, the number of DE genes up-regulated in one mutant and down-regulated in another.
- FIG. 13 Kinematic analysis of leaf growth of the first leaf pair of the wild-type Ler and the ang4-1 mutant.
- FIG. 14A Flow cytometry analysis of nuclear DNA content of the Ler.
- FIG. 14B Flow cytometry analysis of nuclear DNA content of the ang4-1 mutant (B).
- FIG. 15 Ler wild-type and OE-ANG4 (T1) plants two weeks after transfer to soil.
- Plants of the wild-type Landsberg erecta (Ler) and angusta4 (ang4) were grown in in vitro conditions with following conditions: 16/8 hours (d/n) with white light (Neon tubes, cool white), 100 ⁇ Em- 2 h-1 PAR and 20° C.
- the medium was 2.15 g/l MS salts (micro and macro elements), 1g/l sucrose, 0.5 g/l MES, pH 6.0, 6 g/l plant tissue culture agar. Seeds were sowed in 150 ⁇ 25 mm round dishes, sealed with Urgopore tape. Sixty seeds were sowed per plate. The vernalization period was three days after sowing.
- ang4-2 and ang4-3 lines were selected in in vitro medium containing kanamycin 25 mg/l for the ang4-2 or sulfadiazine 11.25 mg/l for the ang4-3 line.
- the phenotype of the T-DNA insertion lines was scored in soil growth conditions.
- the cleared first and third Ler and ang4 leaves prepared for the imaging analysis have been used to perform DIC (Differential Interference Contrast) optics analysis.
- DIC Different Interference Contrast
- This technique allows counting the number of cells of a determinate histological tissue layer and most importantly measuring the cell area from the adaxial side using a Scion Image.
- PCN Palisade Cell Number
- Tissue infiltration was realized in a gradually permeation of Historesin and was achieved by first putting the leaves for 4 hours in a mix of 50% EtOH and 50% Historesin, followed by another mix of 30% EtOH and 70% Historesin for 4 hours and finally in 100% Historesin for 4 hours. During that time, the samples were always kept for 30 minutes in vacuum. During the last step, the leaves were shacking at room temperature for three days. The leaves were then immerged in a new basic resin solution containing a 1% temperature-sensitive activator and left shaking ON. Leaves were finally oriented in beds which were half-filled with the resin solution, covered with new resin and left polymerizing at 45° C. for at least 2 hours.
- the histology analysis has been performed on 5 ⁇ m sections collected on glass slides by using a Reichert Jung Ultracut Microtome using homemade glass knives.
- the Historesin leaf-containing blocks obtained after polymerization were oriented on a plastic cube and fixed with super-glue.
- the plastic cubes were holder by the micro tube climb.
- Cytoplasm were stained in each sections by toluidin blue following the process below: The treated glass slides were stained for 8 minutes in 0.05% Teledyne blue and 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.8 for 10 minutes. After two washes (5 to 10 minutes each) in sterilize water, the slides were dried and mounted with DePex. Photographs were taken by using an Olympus CAMEDIA C-3040 digital camera zoom 3.3 mega pixel at the same magnification and pictures image were performed by Adobe Photoshop 6.0 program.
- the flow cytometry analysis was performed as described by De Veylder et al. (2001). The first two leaves were chopped with a razor blade in 300 ⁇ l of buffer (45 mM MgCl 2 , 30 mM sodium citrate, 20 mM 3-[N-morpholino]propanesulphonic acid, pH 7, and 1% Triton X-100) (Galbraight et al., 1991). To the supernatant, which was filtered over a 30- ⁇ m mesh, 1 ⁇ l of 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) from a stock of 1 mg/mL was added. The nuclei were analyzed with the BRYTE HS flow cytometer, using Win-Bryte software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.). Of each time point, two biological and three technical replicates were taken.
- buffer 45 mM MgCl 2 , 30 mM sodium citrate, 20 mM 3-[N-morpholino]
- Leaf growth was analyzed kinematically from 5 to 28 days after sowing as described (De Veylder et al., 2001).
- the wild-type and ang4-1 plants were germinated and grown in in vitro conditions in GM+V medium. The following parameters were determined: total area of all cells in the drawing, total number of cells, and number of guard cells. From these data, we calculated the average cell area and estimated the total number of cells per leaf by dividing the leaf area by the average cell area (averaged between the apical and basal positions). Finally, average cell division rates for the whole leaf were determined as the slope of the log 2 -transformed number of cells per leaf, which was done using five-point differentiation formulas (Erickson, 1976).
- the DNA extraction, AFLP, insertion/deletion (InDel) and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis were done according to (Peters et al., 2004) and (Cnops et al., 2004).
- a standard set of eight AFLP markers were analyzed on 20 F 2 mutants and identified the mutation in a 493 kb interval on chromosome 2.
- the fine-mapping of the ANG4 locus was done using the InDel and SNP markers described in Table S1. Recombinants were used for fine-mapping and delineated the locus to 97 and 27 kb regions flanked by SNP markers. The last interval covered a 27 kb region between CER458218 and CER458367 SNP markers and contained four genes that were sequenced.
- the candidate genes identified in the last mapping interval were amplified from DNA and cDNA, and fully sequenced in at least three replicates to identify the base exchange in the ang4-1 mutant compared to Ler.
- the experimental design comprised three replicates of Ler and ang4, one replicate corresponding to one RNA extraction and about 150 apexis.
- Microarrays experiment was done by the VIB Microarrays Facility lab (Paul van Hummelen, Leuven, Belgium; worldwideweb.microarras.be/) using ATH1 Affymetrix chips of 23,800 probes sets for Arabidopsis thaliana .
- the raw data were normalized and summarized using Robust Multi-Array average method from affy package of Bioconductor statistical R programs (Wu and Irizarry, 2004).
- the genes were ranking in order of evidence for differential expression DE between mutant and wild-type using an empirical Bayes method performed with the limma package of Bioconductor.
- This method consists to combine at the gene level with means and standard deviation from the three replicates to form a statistic B which is a Bayes log posterior log-odds that each gene is DE (Lonnstedt and Speed, 2002; Smyth et al., 2003).
- the p value calculating from B data was corrected by Holm's method and the cut-off value of p was 0.01.
- the ang4-2 and ang4-3 mutants with T-DNA insertion respectively in the exon 6 and the exon 19 of ANG4 gene were studied (worldwideweb.arabidopsis.org).
- the T-DNA insertion was checked by PCR on F2 plants using primers designed before (P1) and after (P3) the putative position of the T-DNA and a primer specific of the left border of the T-DNA (P2).
- P1 and P2 validates the position of the T-DNA insertion.
- a coincident positive or negative amplification using P1 and P3 shows that the line is respectively heterozygous or homozygous.
- ANG4 the open reading frame (including ATG and stop codon) of ANG4 (2637 bp) was amplified by Pfu polymerase and cloned into the pDONRT221 vector using the GATEWAY recombination strategy (Invitrogen) to obtain ENTRY clones.
- the ENTRY clone was recombined with the pK7WG2 vector (Karimi et al., 2002) to obtain a DESTINATION vector with the ORF under the control of a 35S promotor.
- This construct was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens and subsequently Ler or ang4-1 plants were transformed with the Agrobacterium tumefaciens suspension through floral dip.
- the T 0 seeds were grown in high density on growth medium containing Kanamycin (50 ⁇ g/ml), Nystatin (50 ⁇ g/ml) and Carbenicillin (250 ⁇ g/ml) to select the transformants. These T 1 transformants were transferred to soil to obtain T 2 seeds.
- Major trait of the angusta class of mutants is narrow leaf lamina (Berna et al., 1999; FIG. 1 ).
- the reduced leaf size in ang4-1 mutant was confirmed by morphological measurements of expanded leaves. The measurements showed a significant decrease of lamina length and width, petiole length and total lamina and petiole length ( FIG. 3 , Panel G).
- the lamina area of ang4-1 first and second expanded leaves was 10.7 ⁇ 2.4 mm 2 , i.e., 55% of Ler lamina area which was 19.3 ⁇ 2.5 mm 2 ( FIG. 3 , Panel H).
- the length/width ratio of the lamina was significantly increased in ang4-1 mutant showing a modification of the lamina proportions and to a narrower shape ( FIG. 3 , Panel I).
- the fresh weight of the rosette leaves at the flower emergence stage of development were significantly reduced in ang4 mutants: ang4-1 biomass was 40% of Ler biomass, and ang4-2 and ang4-3 fresh weight were respectively 51% and 55% compared to Col ( FIG. 4B ).
- the dry weight was also strongly affected by the mutation in ANG4 with 39% for the ang4-1 plants compared to Ler, and respectively 45% and 49% for the ang4-2 and ang4-3 plants compared to Col.
- FIG. 3 Panel A
- the number of palisade cells was counted in a number of serial sections at the widest width of the leaf to be used as a measure for lateral growth of the leaf lamina (Tsuge et al., 1996).
- the number of palisade cells of angusta4 was smaller than wild-type.
- the data showed that the number of palisade cells is 30 in the angusta4, and about 66 cells in Ler ( FIG. 3 , Panel B).
- palisade cells were reduced by about 50% in angusta4 compared to wild-type.
- the structure of palisade cell was larger and distributed more irregularly than in Landsberg ( FIG. 3 , Panels C and E).
- the vascular tissue of Ler wild-type and angusta4 mutants was also visualized under the microscope.
- the polarity was correct in the mutant: xylem at the dorsal side and phloem at the ventral side.
- the midvein of wild-type and mutant are shown ( FIG. 3 , Panels D-F).
- cells surrounding xylem and phloem were bigger than in Ler.
- the number of cells is also higher in the vascular bundle in the angusta4 midvein ( FIG. 3 , Panels E and F).
- ANGUSTA4 primary root growth was analysed. Sixty seedlings of angusta4 and Ler were germinated in the square plates and kept in vertical position in the tissue culture room. The root tip was marked every two days with a scalpel blade. The mean value was calculated for each time point. A graphical representation of these mean values is shown in FIG. 5 , Panel A. After 15 days, the length of angusta4 reached 1 cm, which is much shorter than the 5 cm of the Ler line. In addition, angusta4 roots started to form adventitious roots after four days germination; each angusta4 plant had two to three adventitious roots.
- FIG. 5 Panels B and C showed the meristem zone of the primaty root in angusta4 and wild-type. Longitudinal section of root meristem region of angusta4 showed no difference in cell division and cell expansion. It indicates no defective root meristem activity.
- the flower organization is also altered by ANG4 mutation.
- the floral diagrams of ang4-1 showed an asymmetric position of the petals and missing anther or carpel.
- the flower of ang4-2 and ang4-3 plants was not modified but the inflorescence stem appeared thinner as compared to Col.
- the root growth rate was analyzed and compared to Col alleles and wild-types. The root growth was strongly decreased in ang4-1 plants compared to the wild-type Ler.
- the root growth of ang4-2 and ang4-3 was similar to that of the wild-type Col suggesting that the mutation of ANG4 gene does not alter the root growth in the genetic background of Col.
- the ANG4 gene has a function in leaf and flower development and root growth.
- the mutant, ang4 was obtained from the collection of 255 mutant lines induced by EMS mutagenesis (Berna et al., 1999). The aim of this work was to verify the ANG4 region delimited by AFLP, InDel and SNPs markers and by recombinant analysis. The Ler mutant was crossed with Col-0 wild-type and the resulting F1s were allowed to self in order to produce F2 mapping populations (Robles and Micol., 2001). 320 F2 mutants together with their Ler and Col-0 parents were analyzed using a standard set of eight AFLP primer combinations shown in Table 1 in order to visualize 85 AFLP markers on the genome (Peters et al., 2004).
- AFLP AFLP linkage to chromosome 2 and non-linkage to other chromosomes was observed.
- Table 2 shows the genotypic scoring that was done using AFLP, InDel and SNP markers. Presence of the AFLP marker signifies that the marker behaves as the Col parent and is represented in Table 2 as number 1. For the F2 individuals this means that the marker is either homozygous or heterozygous. Absence of the AFLP marker indicates that the marker is homozygous Ler and it is indicated as number zero (0) in Table 2.
- F3 recombinants 670, 227, and 1389 were scored as homozygous mutants (100% ang4) while recombinants 635,1472, 1747 and 387, 1607,1716 were scored as heterozygote (1 ang4: 3 wild-type) and homozygote (100% Ler) respectively.
- recombinant 1747 a cross-over event took place between markers CER458218 and CER442324. This recombinant was used to delimit ANG4 mutation from the top of chromosome 2 and hence marker CER442324 was taken as the top marker that limited the ANG4 interval.
- Phenotypic scores were done at four time points over a period of 4 weeks to determine whether the F3 was homozygous mutant (100% ang4), heterozygous (1 ang4: 3 wild-type) or homozygous wild-type (100% wild-type Ler) and these scores are summarized in Table 3, and compared to the previous less extensive scoring. Recombinants 635, 670, and 1389 were scored differently compared to previous scoring.
- recombinant 670 was scored as a homozygous mutant before and from Table 3, it was scored as heterozygous (1 mutant: 3 wild-type). It was therefore decided that a number of recombinants that were not clearly scored and therefore not very informative, including recombinants 387,670,1389,1607 and 1716 would be ignored and that recombinants that were clearly scored as shown in Table 4 will be used to delimit the ANG4 mutation.
- the SNP marker that delimited ANG4 mutation from the top of chromosome 2 was CER458218 based on recombinant 227 while marker CER458367 delimited ANG4 mutation from the bottom of chromosome 2 based on recombinant 1472.
- markers are within a 27 kb (26,647 mb) region. This region was the minimal region delimited by markers while the maximal ANG4 region was between CER458219 as the top marker based on recombinants 377 and 1775 and CER458367 as the bottom marker based on recombinant 1472.
- Recombinant lines that were most informative were those with Ler scoring because Col-0 is a recombinant inbreed line (RIL) and as such any cross over event in it does not necessarily indicate linkage to the mutation of interest as shown in Table 4 for recombinant 635.
- RIL recombinant inbreed line
- the ANG4 interval was determined at 27 kb and flanked by CER458218 and CER458367 markers. This was based on the recombinant analysis of 1062 F2 plants. We checked the phenotypic region of the remaining recombinants in the F3 generation both in vivo and in vitro at four time points over a period of four weeks. The ANG4 region was determined and allowed to deduce the F2 genotypes. This F2 genotypic information was integrated in Table 4 and the ANG4 interval delineated to a 27 kb region containing 4 intact genes one of which has to be ANG4 gene.
- Total genomic DNA from ang4 mutant and Ler were extracted using the CTAB method and DNeasy Plant mini kit. Ler DNA acted as a control.
- Ler DNA acted as a control.
- four candidate genes were amplified by performing three independent PCR for each of the primer combinations (Table 9). The same primer combinations were used to three independent PCR to amplify the four genes present in the genomic DNA of Ler.
- Primer pairs were designed for all the candidate genes that amplified overlapping segments of 800 bp-1200 bp spanning the entire 27 kb region ( FIG. 6 ; Table 9). Three independent PCR reactions of these segments were sequenced. An example of this PCR amplification is shown in FIG. 7 where each band indicates DNA amplified with two primer sets.
- Sequence alignment was performed by CLUSTALW 1.8 software and compared with that of the wild-type plant Ler. An example of sequence alignment is shown in FIG. 8 with the gene At2g44950. Sequencing of these fragments and comparison with the wild-type Ler sequence identified a mis-sense change in the candidate gene At2g44950 generating a stop codon UAG instead of the CAG codon corresponding to amino acid glutamine in the predicted exon 16 ( FIG. 9 ). Sequence alignment of other candidate genes, At2g44940, At2g44970 and At2g44980 genes did not show any mutation.
- the At2g44950 gene is within the 27 kb region on chromosome 2 together with At2g44940, At2g44970 and At2g44980 genes flanked with CER458218 marker from the top of chromosome 2 and CER458367 marker from the bottom of chromosome 2 as shown in FIG. 9 .
- ANG4 is the largest covering a region of 6298 bp with an open reading frame (ORF) of 5245 bp; while the At2g44940, At2g44970 and At2g44980 genes covers 1157 bp with an ORF of 887 bp, 3337 bp with an ORF of 3020 bp and 4230 bp with the same number of base pairs as its ORF respectively.
- ANG4 gene has two untranslated regions, one at the 5′ end covering a region of 344 bp and the other at the 3′ end with 307 bp. It consists of 19 exons and 18 introns. Once the introns have been spliced, the exons form the full length cDNA that consists of 2637 bp and this is translated in a protein of 878 amino acids (worldwideweb.arabidopsis.org).
- the mutation that was found in the At2g44950 gene ( FIG. 8 ), truncated the protein from 878 to 844 amino acids. This was as a result of the stop codon, UAG that was created at position 5183 in the unspliced mRNA and at position 2134 in the spliced mRNA when cytosine nucleotide changed to a tyrosine nucleotide that was caused by an EMS mutagenesis.
- the At2g44950 gene has a RING-finger motif that begins with the amino acid cystein at position 826 in the amino acid sequence and ends with amino acid cystein at position 864 (CKACNDR-PKEVVITKCYHLFCNPCVQK-LTGTRQKKCPTC) as shown in FIG. 10 (SEQ ID NO:2). Eighteen amino acids of the RING finger motif are part of the 844 amino acids that makes a protein after the mutation and 23 amino acids of the RING finger motif are lost ( FIG. 9 ). This means that the RING finger motif that functions as part of the E3 ligase was inactivated in the ang4 mutant and that this might have lead to defect in the degradation of a number of proteins in the proteasome.
- ANG4 Molecular cloning of ANG4 demonstrates that map-based cloning using AFLP markers is a reliable strategy for accessing genes from the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana . Cloning of ANG4 will facilitate studies on its function for crop improvement.
- At2g44950 homologues as uncharacterized cDNA or open reading frames obtained from genome projects in a number of organisms including Arabidopsis thaliana , humans, and rice.
- ANG4 has a close homologue in Arabidopsis thaliana located on chromosome 1 (At1g55250). Sequence comparison analysis indicates that NP — 055586 is the human orthologue of the Arabidopsis ANG4.
- the human genome also contains a second ANG4 homologue, AAK58539 (RING finger protein 20), which is encoded by a gene that is distinct from the NP — 055586 gene (RING finger protein 40).
- FIG. 10 shows an alignment of the amino acids of ang4 mutant and its homologues in humans, Arabidopsis and rice which revealed a conserved Really Interesting New Gene motif (RING finger) at the end of the sequences indicating that ANG4 is an evolutionary conserved protein.
- the RING finger domain has been classified into 20 different subgroups in Arabidopsis thaliana (Stone et al., 2005). In this sub groups, ANG4 was classified as having an ATP binding domain.
- T-DNA insertion lines are also available for the ANG4 homologue in Arabidopsis (At1g55250) (Tables 6 A and 6B).
- the melting temperature for these standard primers that acted as control in this experiment was 59° C. for both.
- ANG4 gene the following gene specific primers were used: syana — 01 as a forward primer and syana — 02 as a reverse primer with the following sequences: TGCTCGAATCAGATGGAAGA (SEQ ID NO:7) and AGCTAGCTGACCGCACAAAT (SEQ ID NO:8), respectively.
- the melting temperature for syana — 01 was 59° C. while for syana — 02 was 60° C.
- Actin is a fundamental component of the cytoskeleton in all eukaryotes and directs the spatial organization of many crucial sub cellular processes.
- FIG. 11 shows the result of a typical RT-PCR analysis of the expression pattern of ANG4 in different Ler organs.
- Primers Defle 44 and Defle 45 amplified a single 253 bp actin PCR product while primers syana — 01 and syana — 02 amplified a predicted single 164 bp ANG4 PCR product. This analysis shows that the ANG4 gene is expressed in all organs studied.
- ANG4 gene function is related to cell division processes.
- Kinesins represent a super-family of microtubule motor proteins involved in the transport of vesicles and organelles, spindle formation and elongation, chromosome segregation, microtubule dynamics and morphogenesis (Reddy and Day, 2001).
- the HINKEL gene another kinesin, plays a role in the reorganization of phragmoplast microtubules during cell plate formation (Strompen et al., 2002).
- cytokinesis related genes are also DE in ang4, as the cytoskeletal components actin 8, tubulins, myosin like proteins and microtubule-associated proteins.
- the PLEIADE gene that has a function in the stabilization of cytokinetic structures of cell plate during cytokinesis is also down-regulated in ang4 mutant (Muller et al., 2002).
- the KNOLLE gene a cell-cycle-regulated syntaxin involved in membrane fusion in cytokinesis, is also repressed in ang4 (Muller et al., 2003).
- the SIAMESE gene required for coordinating cell division and cell differentiation during the development of trichomes and may function as a repressor of mitosis in the endoreduplication cell cycle, is up-regulated in ang4.
- the GLABRA1 gene is a MYB transcription factor that specify the primary cell fate during development of epidermal hairs in Arabidopsis (Schiefelbein, 2003).
- the homeobox genes KNAT2 and KNAT6 have a role in meristem initiation and maintenance (Tsiantis and Hay, 2003).
- the genes NAM and AINTEGUMENTA are known to be involved in organ initiation and separation (Traas and Vernoux, 2002).
- SCARECROW SCR
- Two genes related to auxins are DE in ang4: a putative ARF1 auxin responsive transcription factor and a putative AUX1-like permease, a regulator of root gravitropism (Liscum and Reed, 2002).
- Leaf blade area was similar in Ler and the ang4-1 mutant at the earliest observations. However, the increase in leaf area was slower in ang4-1 compared to Ler between 5 and 8 DAS ( FIG. 13 , Panel A). At maturity, the leaf blade area of ang4-1 was about 47% of those of Ler, with respectively 11 and 24 mm 2 . During the same period, the number of cells per leaf also increased quicker in Ler than in ang4-1 ( FIG. 13 , Panel B). So, at maturity (after 18 DAS), the ang4-1 leaves contained only 48% the number of epidermal cells of Ler.
- the stomata index indicates the exit from cell cycle and the end of proliferation activity, which starts from the tip to the base of the leaf in Arabidopsis (De Veylder, 2001).
- the SI also increased slower in ang4-1 compared to Ler between 5 and 8 DAS, resulting in the final SI in mature leaves being lower with 0.23 in average for ang4-1 and 0.35 for Ler ( FIG. 13 , Panel F).
- the average cell cycle duration which is the inverse of cell division rate, was almost 50% longer in ang4-1 (20.6 hours) than in Ler (14.1 hours), and it was longer until 11 DAS where the cell cycle duration was the same in both genotypes (respectively 48.4 hours and 50.7 hours for Ler and ang4-1).
- the flow cytometry profile of the ang1 allele, GABI — 634H04 differs from that of the Col control and is similar but weaker to that of ang4: more endopolyploidy (presence of 32C), slight shift in the G1-to-G2 cell populations (reduced 2C cell number and increased 4C cell number).
- the mutational analysis of the ang1 allele indicates that ANGL (At1g55250) is also functional and might have functional redundancy with the ANG4 gene (At2g44950).
- Photographical observations of ANG4 overexpression plants clearly indicate that the plants have improved growth performance compared to wild-type plants. For example, the rosette leaf size of the overexpression plants are considerably increased as can be seen in FIG. 15 .
- Phenotypic scores of nine recombinants The scores were done at four time points over a period of four weeks both in soil and in vitro. In both growth conditions the scores were the same. Heterozygous indicates that the wild-type and the mutants were observed while homozygous mutant implies only mutants were observed. Homozygous wild-type indicates no mutant was observed in those recombinants. F3 PROGENY ang4 NO. OF PREVIOUS RECOMBINANT WILD- NO.
- ANG4 candidate genes The four candidate genes in the 27 kb region and their functions based on TAIR annotation.
- GENE CODE FUNCTION At2g44940 Involved in DNA binding and transcription regulation by its AP2 domain
- At2g44950 It is a C3HC4 type zinc finger protein involved in zinc ion binding and as a E3ligase
- At2g44970 It is an expressed protein playing a role in lipid metabolism and catalytic activity
- At2g44980 Putative SNF2 transcription regulatory protein involved in ATP, DNA binding (Helicase activity) At— Arabidopsis thaliana , g—genomic.
Abstract
Description
- This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/660,483, filed Apr. 22, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. ______, which itself is the national stage of PCT International Application Number PCT/EP2005/054031, filed Aug. 16, 2005, which itself claims priority to EP 04103971.0, filed Aug. 18, 2004, the disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated herein by this reference in their entirety.
- The invention relates to the use of the ANG4 gene, or a variant thereof, to modulate the cell number of a plant organ. The modulation can be used to increase the plant biomass, or to adapt the plant architecture.
- Plant architecture, especially leaf and root morphology, is an important factor in the determination of the plant productivity. Therefore, the study of genes involved in plant architecture and their regulation has drawn a lot of attention by several research groups.
- The isolation, identification, characterization and manipulation of genes that are candidates for controlling leaf development is a key in understanding how plant leaves are constructed. Several methods have been used to study genes and their functions that regulate leaf development such as forward or reverse genetics. During leaf development processes, there are at least two factors that affect the leaf phenotype, at first cell division, that results in a given cell number, and second is cell expansion, which is required for the establishment of the cell size and shape. The length and width of leaves are regulated by cell division and cell expansion according to a gradient (Pyke et al., 1991; Van Lijsebettens and Clarke, 1998). In addition, the leaves are also modulated by environmental factors such as water, nutrients, light and CO2 concentration. Berna et al. (1999) gives an overview of mutations and phenotypic classes that influence leaf morphology in Arabidopsis. Some of those mutations were characterized on gene level. Genes that regulate cell number along the width axis are DRL1 and SWP1 genes that act mainly on lateral growth of the lamina (Nelissen et al., 2003, and Autran et al., 2002).
- Although these genes might be used to modulate the plant biomass, there is still a further need for genes controlling plant architecture, especially for genes capable of controlling the cell number in specific plant organs.
- In this invention, we studied a mutant with narrow leaves, angusta4, from the seed collection of Berna et al. (1999), and identified the causal gene, which we called ANG4. The mutant was originally created by EMS method (
FIG. 1 , Panel A). Molecular analysis surprisingly showed that the causal gene for the angusta4 mutation, which is located onchromosome 2, is a RING finger protein (Anami, 2004; Stone et al., 2005) with E3 ligase activity. This activity is related to protein degradation, but has never been linked to altered leaf morphology. The width and length of angusta4 laminas was compared to wild-type (Landsberg erecta) (FIG. 1 , Panel A). The data showed that total length lamina in the angusta4 leaves is significantly reduced compared to Ler. angusta 4 had narrow first leaf and shorter petioles than Landsberg. The epidermal and palisade cell area in the angusta4 (11 mm2) is smaller than in wild-type (19 mm2) as well. Even more surprisingly, we found that that the phenotype of the leaf is due to a drastic reduction in the number of palisade cells. Moreover, we found that the same mutation has a dramatical effect on root growth too, making the gene an interesting tool for biomass modulation. - A first aspect of the invention is the use of a gene encoding a protein comprising SEQ ID NO:2 (TAIR_At2g44950,
FIG. 10 ), or a functional fragment or variant thereof, to modulate the cell number of a plant organ, or a part thereof. Preferably, the gene encodes a protein consisting of SEQ ID NO:2. Gene as used here, refers to the coding sequence, which may be linked to its own promoter, but is preferably operably linked to a promoter which is not its own. The promoter can be any promoter suitable for expression in plants. Preferably, the promoter is a strong promoter, such as, but not limited to the 35S promoter. “Gene” refers both to the genomic sequence (including possible introns) as well as to the cDNA derived from the spliced messenger, operably linked to a promoter sequence. Coding sequence is a nucleotide sequence, which is transcribed into mRNA and/or translated into a polypeptide when placed under the control of appropriate regulatory sequences. The boundaries of the coding sequence are determined by a translation start codon at the 5′-terminus and a translation stop codon at the 3′-terminus. A coding sequence can include, but is not limited to mRNA, cDNA, recombinant nucleotide sequences or genomic DNA, while introns may be present as well under certain circumstances. - Operably linked refers to a juxtaposition wherein the components so described are in a relationship permitting them to function in their intended manner. A promoter sequence “operably linked” to a coding sequence is ligated in such a way that expression of the coding sequence is achieved under conditions compatible with the promoter sequence.
- A variant, as used herein, is a plant gene comprising a ring finger, with a homology with SEQ ID NO:2 of at least 25% identities and/or 45% positives, preferably at least 35% identifies and/or 55% positives, more preferably at least 45% identities and/or 65% positives, even more preferably at least 55% identities and/or 75% positives, most preferably at least 65% identities and/or 85% positives, as measured by a protein-protein Blast search. Preferably, the variant has E3 ubiquitin protein ligase activity. Preferred variants are the Oryza sativa ANG4 homologues CAD41603 and NP922769, as listed in
FIG. 10 . Plant organs, as used here, comprise roots, stem, leaves and flowers. Preferably, the plant organ is a plant leaf and/or a plant root. Parts of a plant organ are, as a non-limiting example, the palisade cells of the leaves, or the lateral roots. One preferred embodiment is the use according to the invention, whereby the modulation of the cell number is used to modulate the leaf morphology. A functional fragment, as used here, is any fragment that still has the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase activity. - Still another aspect of the invention is the use of a gene encoding a protein comprising, preferably consisting of SEQ ID NO:2, or a functional fragment or variant thereof, to modulate the root length. Preferably, the gene, variant of functional fragment is overexpressed and the modulation is an increase in root length. Preferably, the gene comprises SEQ ID NO:1 (genbank NM—130060).
- Another aspect of the invention is the use of a gene encoding a protein comprising, preferably consisting of SEQ ID NO:2, or a functional fragment or variant thereof, to increase biomass. Preferably, the increase of biomass is obtained by an overexpression of the gene, variant or functional fragment.
-
FIG. 1 : Leaf phenotype of angusta4 and wild-type. Panel A: In vivo condition, fully grown rosettes of Ler and angusta4. Panel B: Juvenile and adult fully expanded leaves of Ler. Panel C: Juvenile and adult fully expanded leaves of angusta4. -
FIG. 2 : In vitro leaf phenotype of wild-type and angusta4 mutant plant (26 days after germination) -
FIG. 3 : Leaf phenotype of angusta4. Panel A: Transversal sections at the widest location of expanded lamina of first leaves of wild-type (Ler)-(top) and angusta4 (bottom). Panel B: Mean value of palisade cell number in first leaves of angusta4 and the wild-type (asterisk indicates statically significant difference). Panel C: Cross section of wild-type at the midvein (Adaxial surface is up). Panel D: Close up of wild-type vascular tissue. Panel E: Cross section of angusta4 at the midvein (Adaxial surface is up). Panel F: Close up of angusta4 vascular tissue (V: vascular bundle; P: palisade cell; x: xylem; ph: phloem; I: inter cellular space). Panels G, H, I: Morphological data of expanded leaves of ang4-1 mutant (Panels A, B, C). Bars represent mean values and standard deviation. *** means statistical difference at p<0.001 from the t test. Histological observations of expanded leaves of ang4 mutant and Ler. -
FIG. 4A : In vitro root growth after 15 days of germination.FIG. 4B : Biomass of ang4-1, ang4-2, ang4-3 mutants, Ler and Col in soil conditions. Average of two assays, four blocks per assay and eight plants per block. The bars correspond to the standard deviation. -
FIG. 5 : Panel A: Root growth kinetics of angusta4 in comparison with wild-type (Ler). Panels B and C: Longitudinal sections by confocal microscopy through the root apical meristem in the root tip in wild-type and the angusta4 mutants. -
FIG. 6 : Fine mapping of the ANG4 gene: The figure indicates the map-based cloning strategy where a set of eight AFLP primer combinations was applied to 20 F2 individual mutants that indicated that the ANG4 mutation was located on chromosome 2 (blue and white pattern). Further application ofAFLP marker SM33 —202 andSM26 —495 narrowed the ANG4 interval to 293 kb. Finally, InDel and SNP markers were used on a total of 1062 recombinants that delimited the ANG4 area to 27 kb at the bottom ofchromosome 2 flanked by SNP markers CER458218 and CER458367. The 27 kb region contained four genes, one of which was the ANG4 candidate gene. -
FIG. 7 : Separation of PCR products of At2g44960 gene following amplification with two primer sets.Lane 1 contains a 1 kb molecular weight marker. Lanes 2-7 contains PCR products from Ler At2g44960 gene while lanes 8-13 contains PCR products from ANG4 At2g44960 gene. PCR products oflanes Defle 13 while PCR products oflanes Defle 15. -
FIG. 8 : Example of an alignment performed by CLUSTALW 1.8. This alignment is between 2652 bp and 3873 bp part of the At2g44950 gene that was amplified by 5′CTCGCCCATTGTTGTTTCAG3′ (SEQ ID NO:3) and 5′AATTGCGGAAACCATGTTCC 3′ (SEQ ID NO:4) primer combination. It clearly demonstrates the point mutation induced by EMS as a C was changed to a T generating a stop codon UAG. Aligned Ang sequence inFIG. 8 is represented in SEQ ID NO:47. Aligned Ler sequence inFIG. 8 is represented in SEQ ID NO:48. -
FIG. 9 : ANG4 gene structure. Shown are the ANG4 candidate genes covering a 27 kb region onchromosome 2 and linked by CER458218 and CER458367 SNP markers. The unspliced mRNA of ANG4 has 19 exons and 18 introns covering a region of 6298 bp while the full length cDNA covers a region of 2637 bp. EMS mutagenization caused a C to change to a T generating a stop codon at the end ofexon 16 hence truncating the protein from 878 amino acids to 844 amino acids (Exons in blue boxes, and introns in orange boxes). Figure drawn to scale; for the candidate genes structure, 1 cm=2 kb and for the unspliced mRNA and the spliced mRNA, 1 cm=1 kb. -
FIG. 10 : An alignment of the ANG4 homologues in different species. The orange underlined sequence indicates the conserved RING finger motif. Conserved cystein and histidine residues are colored with red and blue colors respectively. At2g44950 is ANG4 sequence with 878 amino acid residues. At1g55250 is the ANG4 homologue onchromosome 1 in Arabidopsis with 899 amino acids. NP—55586 and AAK58539 are ANG4 homologues in human genome with 1001 and 975 amino acids respectively. CAD41603 and NP922769 are the ANG4 homologues in Oryza sativa with 883 and 789 amino acids respectively. TAIR_At2g44950 inFIG. 10 is represented in SEQ ID NO:2. AAP36593.1 inFIG. 10 is represented in SEQ ID NO:49.AAK58539_RFP —20 inFIG. 10 is represented in SEQ ID NO:50. CAD41603.3 inFIG. 10 is represented in SEQ ID NO:51. MIPS_At1g55250 inFIG. 10 is represented in SEQ ID NO:52.NP055586_RFP —40 inFIG. 10 is represented in SEQ ID NO:53. NP922769.1 inFIG. 10 is represented in SEQ ID NO:54. -
FIG. 11 : RT-PCR analysis of ANG4 gene expression in different Ler organs. The expression pattern was visualized on acrylamide gel. Four μl samples were loaded an acrylamide gel in 1× Tris-Boric acid-EDTA buffer and electrophoresed at 3000V. Primers Defle 44 and syana—01 were labeled with P33. Numbers on the gel indicate different Ler organs as follows: 1—Ler apex, 2—Ler shoot apex, 3—Ler roots, 4—Ler cotyledons, 5—Ler young leaves, 6—Ler Expanded leaves, 7—Ler flowers and 8—water as a control sample. -
FIG. 12 : Summary of Arabidopsis genes with altered mRNA expression in ang4 and two other leaf development mutants, elo2 and drl1-2. RNA was extracted from shoot apex of young plants and expression measured using ATH1 microarrays (Affymetrix) method in triplicates. Comparisons of expression level were done between each mutant and the wild-type Ler following the Bayesian test of linear model performed with Bioconductor programs. Values without parenthesis are the number of DE genes equally expressed in different mutants, and values in parenthesis, the number of DE genes up-regulated in one mutant and down-regulated in another. -
FIG. 13 : Kinematic analysis of leaf growth of the first leaf pair of the wild-type Ler and the ang4-1 mutant. (Panel A) leaf blade area, (Panel B) epidermal cell number on the abaxial side of the leaf, (Panel C) relative leaf expansion rate, (Panel D) average cell division rates of the epidermal cells on the abaxial side of the leaf, (Panel E) average epidermal cell size on the abaxial side of the leaf, (Panel F) stomatal index on the abaxial side of the leaf. Error bars correspond to the standard deviation (n=5). -
FIG. 14A : Flow cytometry analysis of nuclear DNA content of the Ler.FIG. 14B : Flow cytometry analysis of nuclear DNA content of the ang4-1 mutant (B). -
FIG. 15 : Ler wild-type and OE-ANG4 (T1) plants two weeks after transfer to soil. - Seeds of the Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Landsberg erecta (Ler) and the ang4-2 mutant (SALK—122512) were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre. The ang4-1 homozygous mutant was provided by J. L. Micol (Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain) (Berna et al., 1999). The T-DNA insertion line ang4-3 (GABI—276D08) was supplied from GABI-Kat.
- Plants of the wild-type Landsberg erecta (Ler) and angusta4 (ang4) were grown in in vitro conditions with following conditions: 16/8 hours (d/n) with white light (Neon tubes, cool white), 100 μEm-2h-1 PAR and 20° C. The medium was 2.15 g/l MS salts (micro and macro elements), 1g/l sucrose, 0.5 g/l MES, pH 6.0, 6 g/l plant tissue culture agar. Seeds were sowed in 150×25 mm round dishes, sealed with Urgopore tape. Sixty seeds were sowed per plate. The vernalization period was three days after sowing.
- For the root growth experiment, one lane of five plants was sowed in square plate in vertical position. The homozygous ang4-2 and ang4-3 lines were selected in in vitro
medium containing kanamycin 25 mg/l for the ang4-2 or sulfadiazine 11.25 mg/l for the ang4-3 line. The phenotype of the T-DNA insertion lines was scored in soil growth conditions. - Eight to twelve expanded first and third leaves of 30-days-old and 40-days-old Ler and ang4 in vitro grown plants have been harvested, treated with 100
% methanol 0/N, cleared with 90% lactic acid for two to three days O/N and put on a slide for image analysis. Petiole, lamina and leaf length, lamina width and area of first and third leaves have been measured with the Scion Image software (version β-3b; Scion Corp., Frederick, Md.) from digital pictures directly taken from binocular observations. - The statistical significance of the mean differences (p≦0.05) was analyzed by t-test using the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 10.0.5, SPSS, Inc.; Chicago, Ill.) software on normally distributed data.
- Fifteen seeds of each angusta4 line was sown out (made only or one row per plates) in the square plates with GM medium contain vitamin. The plates were oriented in a vertical position. By using scalpel, roots of these lines were marked every two days until 14 days.
- The cleared first and third Ler and ang4 leaves prepared for the imaging analysis have been used to perform DIC (Differential Interference Contrast) optics analysis. This technique allows counting the number of cells of a determinate histological tissue layer and most importantly measuring the cell area from the adaxial side using a Scion Image.
- Twenty-six-day-old fully expanded first and third leaves of Ler and angusta4 plants were harvested and immediately fixed in FAA (90% EtOH, 5% acetic acid, 5% formaldehyde) at 4° C. overnight. The process of dehydratation was done by increasing concentrations of EtOH as followed: 2×30
minutes EtOH 50%, 2hours EtOH 50%, 2hours EtOH 70%, 2hours EtOH 80%, 0/N EtOH 80%, 2×2 hours EtOH 90% and ultimately 0/N EtOH 95%. Tissue infiltration was realized in a gradually permeation of Historesin and was achieved by first putting the leaves for 4 hours in a mix of 50% EtOH and 50% Historesin, followed by another mix of 30% EtOH and 70% Historesin for 4 hours and finally in 100% Historesin for 4 hours. During that time, the samples were always kept for 30 minutes in vacuum. During the last step, the leaves were shacking at room temperature for three days. The leaves were then immerged in a new basic resin solution containing a 1% temperature-sensitive activator and left shaking ON. Leaves were finally oriented in beds which were half-filled with the resin solution, covered with new resin and left polymerizing at 45° C. for at least 2 hours. The histology analysis has been performed on 5 μm sections collected on glass slides by using a Reichert Jung Ultracut Microtome using homemade glass knives. The Historesin leaf-containing blocks obtained after polymerization were oriented on a plastic cube and fixed with super-glue. The plastic cubes were holder by the micro tube climb. - Cytoplasm were stained in each sections by toluidin blue following the process below: The treated glass slides were stained for 8 minutes in 0.05% Teledyne blue and 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.8 for 10 minutes. After two washes (5 to 10 minutes each) in sterilize water, the slides were dried and mounted with DePex. Photographs were taken by using an Olympus CAMEDIA C-3040 digital camera zoom 3.3 mega pixel at the same magnification and pictures image were performed by Adobe Photoshop 6.0 program.
- Five μm transversal sections of 28-day-old Ler and ang4 first and third full-expanded leaves have been made with a Reichert Jung Ultracut microtome in order to determine with the aid of a binocular microscope the Palisade Cell Number (PCN) present at the widest part of the lamina. This parameter is an indicator of leaf blade lateral growth (Tsuge et al., 1996). Several leaves have been entirely sectioned from tip to petiole: one section every ten has been collected and put on a glass slide. The glass slides were subsequently stained with toluidine blue and mounted with DePex.
- Seven-day-old seedling of angusta4 were stained with 100 ng/ml propidium iodide solution for 3 minutes and washed three times by sterilized water. Stained root were observed under a MRC600 Biorad confocal microscope using 543 nm excitation 560 LB light.
- The flow cytometry analysis was performed as described by De Veylder et al. (2001). The first two leaves were chopped with a razor blade in 300 μl of buffer (45 mM MgCl2, 30 mM sodium citrate, 20 mM 3-[N-morpholino]propanesulphonic acid,
pH - Leaf growth was analyzed kinematically from 5 to 28 days after sowing as described (De Veylder et al., 2001). The wild-type and ang4-1 plants were germinated and grown in in vitro conditions in GM+V medium. The following parameters were determined: total area of all cells in the drawing, total number of cells, and number of guard cells. From these data, we calculated the average cell area and estimated the total number of cells per leaf by dividing the leaf area by the average cell area (averaged between the apical and basal positions). Finally, average cell division rates for the whole leaf were determined as the slope of the log2-transformed number of cells per leaf, which was done using five-point differentiation formulas (Erickson, 1976).
- The DNA extraction, AFLP, insertion/deletion (InDel) and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis were done according to (Peters et al., 2004) and (Cnops et al., 2004). A standard set of eight AFLP markers were analyzed on 20 F2 mutants and identified the mutation in a 493 kb interval on
chromosome 2. The fine-mapping of the ANG4 locus was done using the InDel and SNP markers described in Table S1. Recombinants were used for fine-mapping and delineated the locus to 97 and 27 kb regions flanked by SNP markers. The last interval covered a 27 kb region between CER458218 and CER458367 SNP markers and contained four genes that were sequenced. - The candidate genes identified in the last mapping interval were amplified from DNA and cDNA, and fully sequenced in at least three replicates to identify the base exchange in the ang4-1 mutant compared to Ler.
- The studied organs, shoot apex of plants (comprising shoot apex meristem, first and second rosette leaf primordia at petiole-less stage), were harvested removing the cotyledons and the hypocotyls. The harvesting was done in the laboratory conditions under additional light and 20° C. between 11 am and 6 pm. The age of the plants at the harvesting step were between 8 and 15 days after germination depending of the delay of mutant development. RNA were extracted with TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies, Breda, The Netherlands). The experimental design comprised three replicates of Ler and ang4, one replicate corresponding to one RNA extraction and about 150 apexis.
- Microarrays experiment was done by the VIB Microarrays Facility lab (Paul van Hummelen, Leuven, Belgium; worldwideweb.microarras.be/) using ATH1 Affymetrix chips of 23,800 probes sets for Arabidopsis thaliana. The raw data were normalized and summarized using Robust Multi-Array average method from affy package of Bioconductor statistical R programs (Wu and Irizarry, 2004). The genes were ranking in order of evidence for differential expression DE between mutant and wild-type using an empirical Bayes method performed with the limma package of Bioconductor. This method consists to combine at the gene level with means and standard deviation from the three replicates to form a statistic B which is a Bayes log posterior log-odds that each gene is DE (Lonnstedt and Speed, 2002; Smyth et al., 2003). The p value calculating from B data was corrected by Holm's method and the cut-off value of p was 0.01.
- The ang4-2 and ang4-3 mutants with T-DNA insertion respectively in the
exon 6 and the exon 19 of ANG4 gene were studied (worldwideweb.arabidopsis.org). The T-DNA insertion was checked by PCR on F2 plants using primers designed before (P1) and after (P3) the putative position of the T-DNA and a primer specific of the left border of the T-DNA (P2). A positive amplification between P1 and P2 validates the position of the T-DNA insertion. A coincident positive or negative amplification using P1 and P3 shows that the line is respectively heterozygous or homozygous. - To obtain overexpression lines of ANG4 the open reading frame (including ATG and stop codon) of ANG4 (2637 bp) was amplified by Pfu polymerase and cloned into the pDONRT221 vector using the GATEWAY recombination strategy (Invitrogen) to obtain ENTRY clones. The ENTRY clone was recombined with the pK7WG2 vector (Karimi et al., 2002) to obtain a DESTINATION vector with the ORF under the control of a 35S promotor. This construct was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens and subsequently Ler or ang4-1 plants were transformed with the Agrobacterium tumefaciens suspension through floral dip. The T0 seeds were grown in high density on growth medium containing Kanamycin (50 μg/ml), Nystatin (50 μg/ml) and Carbenicillin (250 μg/ml) to select the transformants. These T1 transformants were transferred to soil to obtain T2 seeds.
- We performed an anatomical analysis in the first leaf by using light microscopy to identify phenotypic functions of the
ANGUSTA 4 gene. Our interest was to focus on the number of palisade cells, structure of vascular tissue in the leaf as well as primary root development of mutant plants in comparison with that of wild-type. - We looked at the anatomy of angusta4 leaves to determine whether cell division or cell expansion was affected and to check polarity and studied root growth kinetic as a measure for root apical meristem activity in the mutants. In plant, cell expansion and cell division are key parameter in the determination of organ shape.
- Major trait of the angusta class of mutants is narrow leaf lamina (Berna et al., 1999;
FIG. 1 ). The reduced leaf size in ang4-1 mutant was confirmed by morphological measurements of expanded leaves. The measurements showed a significant decrease of lamina length and width, petiole length and total lamina and petiole length (FIG. 3 , Panel G). The lamina area of ang4-1 first and second expanded leaves was 10.7±2.4 mm2, i.e., 55% of Ler lamina area which was 19.3±2.5 mm2 (FIG. 3 , Panel H). The length/width ratio of the lamina was significantly increased in ang4-1 mutant showing a modification of the lamina proportions and to a narrower shape (FIG. 3 , Panel I). The fresh weight of the rosette leaves at the flower emergence stage of development were significantly reduced in ang4 mutants: ang4-1 biomass was 40% of Ler biomass, and ang4-2 and ang4-3 fresh weight were respectively 51% and 55% compared to Col (FIG. 4B ). The dry weight was also strongly affected by the mutation in ANG4 with 39% for the ang4-1 plants compared to Ler, and respectively 45% and 49% for the ang4-2 and ang4-3 plants compared to Col. - Serial sections through historesin embedded expanded first leaves (26-day-old seedlings) were taken (
FIG. 3 , Panel A). The number of palisade cells was counted in a number of serial sections at the widest width of the leaf to be used as a measure for lateral growth of the leaf lamina (Tsuge et al., 1996). The number of palisade cells of angusta4 was smaller than wild-type. The data showed that the number of palisade cells is 30 in the angusta4, and about 66 cells in Ler (FIG. 3 , Panel B). Thus, palisade cells were reduced by about 50% in angusta4 compared to wild-type. The structure of palisade cell was larger and distributed more irregularly than in Landsberg (FIG. 3 , Panels C and E). - The vascular tissue of Ler wild-type and angusta4 mutants was also visualized under the microscope. The polarity was correct in the mutant: xylem at the dorsal side and phloem at the ventral side. The midvein of wild-type and mutant are shown (
FIG. 3 , Panels D-F). In the angusta4 mutants, cells surrounding xylem and phloem were bigger than in Ler. The number of cells is also higher in the vascular bundle in the angusta4 midvein (FIG. 3 , Panels E and F). These data show that the ANGUSTA4 gene is involved in the regulation of cell number during leaf growth; it has no function in leaf polarity. - To investigate in more detail the function of the ANGUSTA4 gene, primary root growth was analysed. Sixty seedlings of angusta4 and Ler were germinated in the square plates and kept in vertical position in the tissue culture room. The root tip was marked every two days with a scalpel blade. The mean value was calculated for each time point. A graphical representation of these mean values is shown in
FIG. 5 , Panel A. After 15 days, the length of angusta4 reached 1 cm, which is much shorter than the 5 cm of the Ler line. In addition, angusta4 roots started to form adventitious roots after four days germination; each angusta4 plant had two to three adventitious roots. - Moreover, apical sections from in planta Arabidopsis roots (seven-day-old seedling and n=20) were visualized under confocal microscope to investigate the structure of the root apical meristem.
FIG. 5 , Panels B and C showed the meristem zone of the primaty root in angusta4 and wild-type. Longitudinal section of root meristem region of angusta4 showed no difference in cell division and cell expansion. It indicates no defective root meristem activity. - The flower organization is also altered by ANG4 mutation. The floral diagrams of ang4-1 showed an asymmetric position of the petals and missing anther or carpel. The flower of ang4-2 and ang4-3 plants was not modified but the inflorescence stem appeared thinner as compared to Col. To verify if ang4 mutation only affected aerial organs, the root growth rate was analyzed and compared to Col alleles and wild-types. The root growth was strongly decreased in ang4-1 plants compared to the wild-type Ler. However, the root growth of ang4-2 and ang4-3 was similar to that of the wild-type Col suggesting that the mutation of ANG4 gene does not alter the root growth in the genetic background of Col.
- Thus, the ANG4 gene has a function in leaf and flower development and root growth.
- The mutant, ang4, was obtained from the collection of 255 mutant lines induced by EMS mutagenesis (Berna et al., 1999). The aim of this work was to verify the ANG4 region delimited by AFLP, InDel and SNPs markers and by recombinant analysis. The Ler mutant was crossed with Col-0 wild-type and the resulting F1s were allowed to self in order to produce F2 mapping populations (Robles and Micol., 2001). 320 F2 mutants together with their Ler and Col-0 parents were analyzed using a standard set of eight AFLP primer combinations shown in Table 1 in order to visualize 85 AFLP markers on the genome (Peters et al., 2004). After scoring the resulting 85 AFLP markers, linkage to
chromosome 2 and non-linkage to other chromosomes was observed. Table 2 shows the genotypic scoring that was done using AFLP, InDel and SNP markers. Presence of the AFLP marker signifies that the marker behaves as the Col parent and is represented in Table 2 asnumber 1. For the F2 individuals this means that the marker is either homozygous or heterozygous. Absence of the AFLP marker indicates that the marker is homozygous Ler and it is indicated as number zero (0) in Table 2. - Initially, as shown in Table 2, F3 recombinants 670, 227, and 1389 were scored as homozygous mutants (100% ang4) while recombinants 635,1472, 1747 and 387, 1607,1716 were scored as heterozygote (1 ang4: 3 wild-type) and homozygote (100% Ler) respectively. During meiosis, for recombinant 1747, a cross-over event took place between markers CER458218 and CER442324. This recombinant was used to delimit ANG4 mutation from the top of
chromosome 2 and hence marker CER442324 was taken as the top marker that limited the ANG4 interval. In contrast, a cross over event occurred between markers CER458218 and CER458219 for recombinant 670 and 227, markers CER442324 and CER458218 for recombinant 1389 and markers CER442323 and CER458367 for recombinants1472. All these markers delimited the ANG4 mutation from the bottom ofchromosome 2. Delimiting the ANG4 region became rather difficult because the mutant was phenotypically very clear in the Ler background and less clear after crossing (i.e., it was difficult to score the phenotype in the F2 derived F3 populations). - In order to verify the ANG4 interval of 27 kb, and probably reduce this region to about 10 to 20 kb, phenotypic scores of the F3 of nine recombinants that were not very informative in the previous scoring were repeated. In vitro, thirty seeds of each recombinant were planted on GM medium in 150×25 mm Petri dishes in replicate. Two hundred seeds of each recombinant were planted in vivo on trays containing 52 wells in which one seed was planted in each well. Phenotypic scores were done at four time points over a period of 4 weeks to determine whether the F3 was homozygous mutant (100% ang4), heterozygous (1 ang4: 3 wild-type) or homozygous wild-type (100% wild-type Ler) and these scores are summarized in Table 3, and compared to the previous less extensive scoring. Recombinants 635, 670, and 1389 were scored differently compared to previous scoring.
- Earlier phenotypic scores had shown that recombinant 635 was heterozygote while recombinants 670, 1385, and 1472 were homozygote mutant. Table 3, which indicates new phenotypic scoring, revised these earlier scores. Recombinant 227 was very difficult to score in the second round of phenotype scoring, as it was less clear in vitro. Scores from in vivo growth conditions indicated that it was homozygous mutant.
- For instance, recombinant 670 was scored as a homozygous mutant before and from Table 3, it was scored as heterozygous (1 mutant: 3 wild-type). It was therefore decided that a number of recombinants that were not clearly scored and therefore not very informative, including recombinants 387,670,1389,1607 and 1716 would be ignored and that recombinants that were clearly scored as shown in Table 4 will be used to delimit the ANG4 mutation. As indicated in Table 4, the SNP marker that delimited ANG4 mutation from the top of
chromosome 2 was CER458218 based on recombinant 227 while marker CER458367 delimited ANG4 mutation from the bottom ofchromosome 2 based on recombinant 1472. These markers are within a 27 kb (26,647 mb) region. This region was the minimal region delimited by markers while the maximal ANG4 region was between CER458219 as the top marker based on recombinants 377 and 1775 and CER458367 as the bottom marker based on recombinant 1472. Recombinant lines that were most informative were those with Ler scoring because Col-0 is a recombinant inbreed line (RIL) and as such any cross over event in it does not necessarily indicate linkage to the mutation of interest as shown in Table 4 for recombinant 635. - Verification of the ANG4 mutation after the phenotypic scores showed that, indeed the ANG4 mutation was within the 27 kb region delimited by genotypic scoring as indicated in Table 2 and
FIG. 6 . Within this 27 kb region; there are four intact genes, one of which has to be ANG4 gene. - The ANG4 interval was determined at 27 kb and flanked by CER458218 and CER458367 markers. This was based on the recombinant analysis of 1062 F2 plants. We checked the phenotypic region of the remaining recombinants in the F3 generation both in vivo and in vitro at four time points over a period of four weeks. The ANG4 region was determined and allowed to deduce the F2 genotypes. This F2 genotypic information was integrated in Table 4 and the ANG4 interval delineated to a 27 kb region containing 4 intact genes one of which has to be ANG4 gene.
- Four candidate genes are situated in the 27 kb interval delimited by the recombinant analysis and are listed in Table 5 with their respective functions. For each gene, the genomic DNA was amplified from the ang4 mutant and compared to the wild-type Ler in order to determine the single base change.
- Total genomic DNA from ang4 mutant and Ler were extracted using the CTAB method and DNeasy Plant mini kit. Ler DNA acted as a control. For ang4 mutant, four candidate genes were amplified by performing three independent PCR for each of the primer combinations (Table 9). The same primer combinations were used to three independent PCR to amplify the four genes present in the genomic DNA of Ler. Primer pairs were designed for all the candidate genes that amplified overlapping segments of 800 bp-1200 bp spanning the entire 27 kb region (
FIG. 6 ; Table 9). Three independent PCR reactions of these segments were sequenced. An example of this PCR amplification is shown inFIG. 7 where each band indicates DNA amplified with two primer sets. Sequence alignment was performed by CLUSTALW 1.8 software and compared with that of the wild-type plant Ler. An example of sequence alignment is shown inFIG. 8 with the gene At2g44950. Sequencing of these fragments and comparison with the wild-type Ler sequence identified a mis-sense change in the candidate gene At2g44950 generating a stop codon UAG instead of the CAG codon corresponding to amino acid glutamine in the predicted exon 16 (FIG. 9 ). Sequence alignment of other candidate genes, At2g44940, At2g44970 and At2g44980 genes did not show any mutation. - The At2g44950 gene is within the 27 kb region on
chromosome 2 together with At2g44940, At2g44970 and At2g44980 genes flanked with CER458218 marker from the top ofchromosome 2 and CER458367 marker from the bottom ofchromosome 2 as shown inFIG. 9 . Amongst these candidate genes, ANG4 is the largest covering a region of 6298 bp with an open reading frame (ORF) of 5245 bp; while the At2g44940, At2g44970 and At2g44980 genes covers 1157 bp with an ORF of 887 bp, 3337 bp with an ORF of 3020 bp and 4230 bp with the same number of base pairs as its ORF respectively. ANG4 gene has two untranslated regions, one at the 5′ end covering a region of 344 bp and the other at the 3′ end with 307 bp. It consists of 19 exons and 18 introns. Once the introns have been spliced, the exons form the full length cDNA that consists of 2637 bp and this is translated in a protein of 878 amino acids (worldwideweb.arabidopsis.org). - The mutation that was found in the At2g44950 gene (
FIG. 8 ), truncated the protein from 878 to 844 amino acids. This was as a result of the stop codon, UAG that was created at position 5183 in the unspliced mRNA and at position 2134 in the spliced mRNA when cytosine nucleotide changed to a tyrosine nucleotide that was caused by an EMS mutagenesis. - The At2g44950 gene has a RING-finger motif that begins with the amino acid cystein at position 826 in the amino acid sequence and ends with amino acid cystein at position 864 (CKACNDR-PKEVVITKCYHLFCNPCVQK-LTGTRQKKCPTC) as shown in
FIG. 10 (SEQ ID NO:2). Eighteen amino acids of the RING finger motif are part of the 844 amino acids that makes a protein after the mutation and 23 amino acids of the RING finger motif are lost (FIG. 9 ). This means that the RING finger motif that functions as part of the E3 ligase was inactivated in the ang4 mutant and that this might have lead to defect in the degradation of a number of proteins in the proteasome. - Molecular cloning of ANG4 demonstrates that map-based cloning using AFLP markers is a reliable strategy for accessing genes from the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. Cloning of ANG4 will facilitate studies on its function for crop improvement.
- Data base searches revealed the presence of At2g44950 homologues as uncharacterized cDNA or open reading frames obtained from genome projects in a number of organisms including Arabidopsis thaliana, humans, and rice. ANG4 has a close homologue in Arabidopsis thaliana located on chromosome 1 (At1g55250). Sequence comparison analysis indicates that NP—055586 is the human orthologue of the Arabidopsis ANG4. The human genome also contains a second ANG4 homologue, AAK58539 (RING finger protein 20), which is encoded by a gene that is distinct from the NP—055586 gene (RING finger protein 40). In Oryza sativa (japonica cultivar-group), there appears to be two ANG4 homologues with accession numbers CAD41603 and NP922769.
FIG. 10 shows an alignment of the amino acids of ang4 mutant and its homologues in humans, Arabidopsis and rice which revealed a conserved Really Interesting New Gene motif (RING finger) at the end of the sequences indicating that ANG4 is an evolutionary conserved protein. The RING finger domain has been classified into 20 different subgroups in Arabidopsis thaliana (Stone et al., 2005). In this sub groups, ANG4 was classified as having an ATP binding domain. We searched for this ATP binding domain (the P-loop) using Prosite (worldwideweb.expasy.org/cgi-bin/prosite/S) and was not found though the ANG4 homology to ATPases involved in chromosome segregation and cell division was found. Search for other functional motifs was done but no other functional domain was found besides the RING finger. - A number of alleles for At2g44950 gene with T-DNA insertions are available from Signal (worldwideweb.signal.salk.edu/cgi-bin/tdnaexpress?GENE=at2g44950&FUNCTION=& TDNA=) and GABI (worldwideweb.mpiz-koeln.mpg.de/GABI-Kat/db/search.php?type=seq&term=60-K015154-022-276-D08-8409) collections. T-DNA insertion lines are also available for the ANG4 homologue in Arabidopsis (At1g55250) (Tables 6 A and 6B).
- To examine the expression pattern of ANG4 gene in Ler organs, we performed semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR analysis with different tissues including shoot apex, flower, young leaves, expanded leaves, cotyledon and roots. RNA was extracted from different frozen ground Ler organs using TRIZOL reagent (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) according to manufacturer's protocol. The cDNA samples were standardized on actin transcript (At3g18780) amount using primers Defle 44 and Defle 45 with the following sequences: TGCTGGACGTGACCTTACTG (SEQ ID NO:5) as a forward primer and GGGCTGGAACAAGACTTCTG (SEQ ID NO:6) as a reverse primer. The melting temperature for these standard primers that acted as control in this experiment was 59° C. for both. For ANG4 gene, the following gene specific primers were used: syana—01 as a forward primer and
syana —02 as a reverse primer with the following sequences: TGCTCGAATCAGATGGAAGA (SEQ ID NO:7) and AGCTAGCTGACCGCACAAAT (SEQ ID NO:8), respectively. The melting temperature for syana—01 was 59° C. while forsyana —02 was 60° C. Actin is a fundamental component of the cytoskeleton in all eukaryotes and directs the spatial organization of many crucial sub cellular processes. Hightower and Meagher (1986) proposed that the six subclasses of actin have been conserved during vascular plant evolution and hence it can be used as a reference for expression analysis of other plant genes.FIG. 11 shows the result of a typical RT-PCR analysis of the expression pattern of ANG4 in different Ler organs. Primers Defle 44 and Defle 45 amplified a single 253 bp actin PCR product while primers syana—01 andsyana —02 amplified a predicted single 164 bp ANG4 PCR product. This analysis shows that the ANG4 gene is expressed in all organs studied. - The expression pattern of ANG4 gene in all Ler organs studied could indicate that it may play a basic role in all these organs. The understanding of whether ANG4 gene may be involved in other possible roles, it would be important to investigate its expression levels in response to hormone and stress treatment. In addition, the expression analysis at the cellular level will be analyzed using the GFP marker line. Expression of At2g44950 gene in all organs means that it is required for fundamental or basic processes in all plant organs and throughout the life cycle. Cellular experimental analysis would also indicate whether ANG4 gene function is related to cell division processes.
- A total of 1821 genes were differentially expressed (DE) in the apex of young plants of ang4 compared to Ler, that represents 8% of the Arabidopsis genome. Comparing these results with those obtained in other narrow leaf mutants (elo2 and drl1-2 involved in independent process to ang4), 1314 genes appeared differentially expressed specifically in ang4 (
FIG. 12 ). Considering the level of expression, 494 genes are DE at a two-fold change expression threshold. The number of genes regulated by ANG4 is higher than those regulated by the DRL1 and ELP1 genes, respectively mutated in drl1-2 and elo2 mutants, showing the general function of ANG4 in the development. - Most of the genes regulated by ANG4 are involved in cytokinesis and cell cycle. A partial list of the DE genes in ang4 shows that 24 cell cycle genes and 27 microtubule and myosin related genes, are regulated in ang4 mutant (Table 7). Among these, one finds eight genes related to E2F-DP complex regulating the G1 to S transition in plants (De Veylder et al., 2003). Eight A- and B-type cyclins genes and three B-type cyclin-dependent kinase genes involved in G2 to M transition in cell cycle are down-regulated in ang4 genotype. Kinesins represent a super-family of microtubule motor proteins involved in the transport of vesicles and organelles, spindle formation and elongation, chromosome segregation, microtubule dynamics and morphogenesis (Reddy and Day, 2001). Among the 61 kinesin genes identified in Arabidopsis genome, 19 are down-regulated in ang4, that TETRASPORE involved in the formation of tetrad of microspores after meiosis (Yang et al., 2003). The HINKEL gene, another kinesin, plays a role in the reorganization of phragmoplast microtubules during cell plate formation (Strompen et al., 2002). Other cytokinesis related genes are also DE in ang4, as the
cytoskeletal components actin 8, tubulins, myosin like proteins and microtubule-associated proteins. The PLEIADE gene that has a function in the stabilization of cytokinetic structures of cell plate during cytokinesis is also down-regulated in ang4 mutant (Muller et al., 2002). The KNOLLE gene, a cell-cycle-regulated syntaxin involved in membrane fusion in cytokinesis, is also repressed in ang4 (Muller et al., 2003). The SIAMESE gene, required for coordinating cell division and cell differentiation during the development of trichomes and may function as a repressor of mitosis in the endoreduplication cell cycle, is up-regulated in ang4. These results suggest an implication of ANG4 gene in cell cycle regulation. - Some genes related to plant development are also regulated by ANG4 gene expression (Table 8). The GLABRA1 gene is a MYB transcription factor that specify the primary cell fate during development of epidermal hairs in Arabidopsis (Schiefelbein, 2003). The homeobox genes KNAT2 and KNAT6 have a role in meristem initiation and maintenance (Tsiantis and Hay, 2003). The genes NAM and AINTEGUMENTA are known to be involved in organ initiation and separation (Traas and Vernoux, 2002). In Arabidopsis, SCARECROW (SCR) is essential for the asymmetric division of the cortex/endodermis progenitor cell in the root (Kamiya et al., 2003). Two genes related to auxins are DE in ang4: a putative ARF1 auxin responsive transcription factor and a putative AUX1-like permease, a regulator of root gravitropism (Liscum and Reed, 2002).
- The effect of the ang4 mutation on leaf development and cell cycle duration was analyzed by a kinematic analysis on the first leaf pair of in vitro grown plants. Leaf blade area was similar in Ler and the ang4-1 mutant at the earliest observations. However, the increase in leaf area was slower in ang4-1 compared to Ler between 5 and 8 DAS (
FIG. 13 , Panel A). At maturity, the leaf blade area of ang4-1 was about 47% of those of Ler, with respectively 11 and 24 mm2. During the same period, the number of cells per leaf also increased quicker in Ler than in ang4-1 (FIG. 13 , Panel B). So, at maturity (after 18 DAS), the ang4-1 leaves contained only 48% the number of epidermal cells of Ler. Differences in the rate of increase of leaf area and cell number must be due to effects on cell expansion and division respectively. Indeed, between 5 and 10 DAS, the cell division rate and the relative leaf expansion rate (RLE) were lower in ang4-1 compared to Ler, but they decreased more slowly in the mutant (FIG. 13 , Panels C and D). Consequently, the cell division rate and the RLE rate became similar in ang4-1 and Ler from the 10 DAS and along the expansion phase until no cell was dividing anymore at the 15 DAS. The expansion continued in both Ler and ang4-1 until the 18 DAS when the leaf reached the maturity. So, the ANG4 mutation alters the cell division and the leaf expansion only during the early stage of leaf development. - At this stage, the cells of ang4-1 were bigger than in Ler with an average cell area respectively of 82 μm2 and 54 μm2 at day 5 (
FIG. 13 , Panel E). After 7 DAS, no difference of the cell area could be observed at the later stages between ang4-1 and Ler showing that the balance between division and expansion rates is the same in ang4-1 and in Ler. - Because the final divisions give rise to stomata, the stomata index (SI) indicates the exit from cell cycle and the end of proliferation activity, which starts from the tip to the base of the leaf in Arabidopsis (De Veylder, 2001). The SI also increased slower in ang4-1 compared to Ler between 5 and 8 DAS, resulting in the final SI in mature leaves being lower with 0.23 in average for ang4-1 and 0.35 for Ler (
FIG. 13 , Panel F). These data validate the previous data showing that the ANG4 mutation decreases the cell division activity at the early stage of leaf growth without modifying the duration of the proliferation and expansion phases. At 5 DAS, the average cell cycle duration, which is the inverse of cell division rate, was almost 50% longer in ang4-1 (20.6 hours) than in Ler (14.1 hours), and it was longer until 11 DAS where the cell cycle duration was the same in both genotypes (respectively 48.4 hours and 50.7 hours for Ler and ang4-1). - To investigate deeper the effect of ang4 mutation on cell cycle progression, we analyzed wild-type and mutant leaves by means of flow cytometry. The ploidy level of the first leaf pair was determined throughout the development of wild-type and mutant leaves to reveal the changes in relative duration of G1/G2 phase during mitotic cell division and timing and amount of endoreduplication in the ang4-1 mutant.
- At 8 DAS when leaves could first be harvested, a shift is seen in the G1-to-G2 populations in the ang4-1 mutant compared to Ler (
FIG. 14 ). In the mutant, the population of cells in 4C is similar to that in 2C (ang4-1; 2C=46.2%, 4C=44.0%), while in wild-type, the number of cells in 4C is only half of those in 2C (Ler; 2C=66.2%, 4C=33.8%), suggesting that increased cell cycle duration is associated with a block at the G2-to-M transition point of the cell cycle in ang4-1. The exit from mitosis coincided with the start of the endocycles and could be seen by the increase of 4C content and the appearance of higher ploidy levels (8C, 16C). Cell cycle activity ended as evidenced by a stable DNA distribution around 18 DAS, coinciding with the end of growth. The endocycle was enhanced in the ang4-1 mutant from earliest stage with already 10% of the cells in 8C at 8 DAS, while this level of 8C was only reached at 13 DAS in Ler. The consequence was a higher ploidy levels in ang4-1. In the mature leaves, more than 4% of the cells contained a ploidy level of 32C in the ang4-1 mutant, while the ploidy level in mature Ler leaves only reached 16C. The exit from the endocycle occurred at the same date for both ang4-1 and Ler, at 18 DAS. So, when ANG4 is mutated, cells arrest in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle and proceed into endocycles instead. We postulate that the ANG4 protein has a function in the degradation of a cell cycle regulator(s) working at the G2-M transition of the cell cycle during early organ growth. - To confirm that these effects were not specific for the leaves, flow cytometry was done on roots, hypocotyls and first leaves at one time point in development (12 DAS). The ploidy levels obtained for the root and hypocotyls were comparable to those of the first leaves, indicating that ANG4 affects the cell cycle throughout plant development.
- The flow cytometry profile of the ang1 allele, GABI—634H04, differs from that of the Col control and is similar but weaker to that of ang4: more endopolyploidy (presence of 32C), slight shift in the G1-to-G2 cell populations (reduced 2C cell number and increased 4C cell number). The mutational analysis of the ang1 allele indicates that ANGL (At1g55250) is also functional and might have functional redundancy with the ANG4 gene (At2g44950).
- Photographical observations of ANG4 overexpression plants (T1) clearly indicate that the plants have improved growth performance compared to wild-type plants. For example, the rosette leaf size of the overexpression plants are considerably increased as can be seen in
FIG. 15 . -
-
TABLE 1 Standard set of eight AFLP primer combinations used to detect linkage between 85 Col/Ler AFLP markers and ANG4 locus. Table obtained from Peters et al., 2004. Selective Selective Selective Selective Marker nucleotide nucleotide nucleotide nucleotide Number of code SacI + 1 SacI + 2 MseI + 1 MseI + 2 AFLP markers SM8 A A C T 9 SM57 A T G A 13 SM61 A T T A 9 SM205 T A T A 12 SM229 T G C A 14 SM233 T G G A 10 SM236 T G G T 10 SM240 T G T T 8 -
TABLE 2 Genotypic scores of nine recombinants using AFLP, InDel and SNP markers and L - indicates co-dominant marker, 1 - dominant marker, 0 -3 No marker MARKER POSITION ON PARENTS F3 RECOMBINANTS NAME CONTINUOUS SEQ COL-0 Ler 227 387 635 670 1389 1472 1607 1716 1747 CER458222 18657105 C L H C C H H H H C L CER442328 18519888 C L H C C H H CER458219 18528422 C L H C H H H H C C L CER458218 18539154 C L L C H H H C C L CER442324 18549847 C L L C H L L H C ? H CER442323 18559130 C L L C H L L H C C H CER458367 18565840 C L L C H L L L C C H CER442612 C L L C H L L L C C/H H SM33_202.4 18745473 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 CER458362 18753831 C L L H H L L L C H H H—heterozygous. Numbers in top row indicate the F3 individual recombinants. Recombinants indicated in blue were scored as ang4 mutants, green as wild-type and turquoise as heterozygote. indicates data missing or illegible when filed -
TABLE 3 Phenotypic scores of nine recombinants: The scores were done at four time points over a period of four weeks both in soil and in vitro. In both growth conditions the scores were the same. Heterozygous indicates that the wild-type and the mutants were observed while homozygous mutant implies only mutants were observed. Homozygous wild-type indicates no mutant was observed in those recombinants. F3 PROGENY ang4 NO. OF PREVIOUS RECOMBINANT WILD- NO. OF NEW PHENOTYPIC PHENOTYPIC LINE TYPE MUTANTS INTERPRETATION INTERPRETATION 227 0 66 Homozygous mutant Homozygous mutant 387 53 0 Homozygous wild-type Homozygous wild-type 635 52 0 Homozygous wild-type Heterozygous 670 118 25 Heterozygous Homozygous mutant 1389 28 5 Heterozygous Homozygous wild-type 1472 170 50 Heterozygous Heterozygous 1607 53 0 Homozygous wild-type Homozygous wild-type 1716 39 0 Homozygous wild-type Homozygous wild-type 1747 63 18 Heterozygous Heterozygous -
TABLE 4 Recombinant used to delimit the ang4 mutation. Marker Position on F3 RECOMBINANTS Name Continuous Seq. Col Ler 227 377 635 1472 1607 1775 1747 CER458222 18657105 C L H L C H H H L CER442328 C L H L C CER458219 18670459 C L H H H H C H L CER458218 18681209 C L L H H H C C L CER442324 18691819 C L L H H H C ? ? CER442323 C L L H H H C C/H H CER458367 18707856 C L L H H L C C H CER442612 C L L H H L C C/H H SM33_202,4 18745473 1 0 0 1 1 CER458362 18753831 C L L H H L C C H Only seven recombinants shown on the top row of the Table from recombinant 227 through recombinant 1747 were selected because they were the most informative recombinants while the other recombinants were ignored. The SNP markers and their position on continuous sequence are indicated indicates heterozygozity after a cross over event during meiosis. L—Ler, and C—Col ecotypes. The (?) in the Table means that the scoring of the recombinants was not clear. -
TABLE 5 ANG4 candidate genes: The four candidate genes in the 27 kb region and their functions based on TAIR annotation. GENE CODE FUNCTION At2g44940 Involved in DNA binding and transcription regulation by its AP2 domain At2g44950 It is a C3HC4 type zinc finger protein involved in zinc ion binding and as a E3ligase At2g44970 It is an expressed protein playing a role in lipid metabolism and catalytic activity At2g44980 Putative SNF2 transcription regulatory protein involved in ATP, DNA binding (Helicase activity) At—Arabidopsis thaliana, g—genomic. -
TABLE 6 INSERTION SALK LINES GABI LINES SITE A - At2g44950 POSITION IN CHROMOSOME 2SALK_122512 EXON 1 18549684 SALK_044415 INTRON 3 18550469 GABI_306H08 INTRON 2 18550191 GABI_276D08 INTRON 13 18553269 B - At1g55250 POSITION ON CHROMOSOME 1SALK_071289 EXON 17 20615235 SALK_141948 EXON 19 20615962 GABI_634H04 EXON 13 20614348 GABI_529603 INTRON19 20616201 Alleles for At2g44950 and At1g55250 genes: A, ANG4 alleles. Two SALK lines, SALK_122512 and SALK_044415 from SIGnAL collections and two GABI line, GABI_276D08, and GABI_306H08. B, alleles for the ANG4 homologues in Arabidopsis (At1g55250); SALK_071289 and SAKL_141948 from SIGnAL collections and GABI_634H04 and GABI_529603 from GABI collections. -
TABLE 7 Differentially expressed genes in ang4 mutant compared to Ler and related to cell cycle and cytokinesis. Data were performed on microarrays ATH1 experiment with RNA from shoot apex of young plants grown in in vitro conditions. The p values are calculated according a Bayesian test of linear model and corrected by Holm's method. probes name Sequence P. value expression fold change derived from gene descriptions process related 1.29E−05 248413_at 0.21 At5g51600 PLEIADE gene cytokinesis 5.78E−06 258098_at 0.23 At3g23670 hypothetical protein similar to kinesin like protein cytokinesis 6.79E−06 248057_at 0.26 At5g55520 putative myosin heavy chain protein cytokinesis 2.18E−06 261660_at 0.26 At1g18370 HINKEL, kinesin heavy chain isolog cytokinesis 3.23E−06 264802_at 0.26 At1g08560 KNOLLE, putative syntaxin-related protein cytokinesis 5.42E−07 261159_s_at 0.28 At1g34460 putative cyclin cell cycle 2.89E−05 252691_at 0.30 At3g44050 kinesin-like protein KLP2 protein cytokinesis 1.31E−04 257115_at 0.30 At3g20150 kinesin-like protein cytokinesis 1.74E−06 247039_at 0.31 At5g67270 putative microtubule-associated protein cytokinesis 2.97E−05 245607_at 0.32 At4g14330 kinesin like protein cytokinesis 3.40E−06 255265_at 0.32 At4g05190 kinesin like protein A cytokinesis 9.40E−05 253978_at 0.32 At4g26660 putative kinesin cytokinesis 5.48E−05 263441_at 0.33 At2g28620 putative kinesin-like spindle protein cytokinesis 1.12E−04 266009_at 0.33 At2g37420 putative kinesin heavy chain cytokinesis 4.74E−05 261780_at 0.36 At1g76310 CYCB2_4 (cyclin) cell cycle 2.53E−05 259151_at 0.36 At3g10310 kinesin-like protein similar to carboxy-terminal kinesin 2 cytokinesis 8.84E−06 265349_at 0.36 At2g22610 putative kinesin heavy chain cytokinesis 5.35E−06 257008_at 0.38 At3q14210 Myrosinase-associated protein cell cycle 5.45E−04 253148_at 0.38 At4g35620 CYCB2_2 (cyclin) cell cycle 2.41E−05 267618_at 0.38 At2g26760 CYCB1_4 (cyclin) cell cycle 3.51E−05 254400_at 0.40 At4g21270 kinesin-related protein katA cytokinesis 6.86E−05 245739_at 0.40 At1g44110 CYCA1_1 (cyclin) cell cycle 1.80E−06 258573_at 0.41 At3g04260 BC010 (E2Fb binding protein) cell cycle 2.96E−05 259851_at 0.42 At1g72250 putative kinesin cytokinesis 1.53E−06 259978_at 0.43 At1g76540 CDKB2_1 (Cyclin dependent kinase) cell cycle 2.71E−04 266401_s_at 0.43 At2g38620 CDKB1_2 (Cyclin-dependent kinase) cell cycle 3.12E−04 262802_at 0.45 At1g20930 CDKB2_2 (Cyclin-dependent kinase) cell cycle 2.30E−04 257267_at 0.46 At3g15030 TCP family (E2Fa-DPa induced Transcription factor) cell cycle 1.69E−05 257524_at 0.46 At3g01330 DEL3 (E2F-DP-like protein) cell cycle 3.53E−06 248150_at 0.46 At5g54670 kinesin-like protein cytokinesis 3.35E−04 262081_at 0.47 At1g59540 kinesin motor protein (kin2) cytokinesis 6.18E−05 245259_at 0.47 At4g14150 kinesin like protein cytokinesis 2.72E−04 261605_at 0.48 At1g49580 CDPK-related protein kinase cell cycle 1.59E−05 260329_at 0.49 At1g80370 CYCA2_4 (cyclin) cell cycle 5.13E−05 263017_at 0.49 At2g17620 CYCB2_1 (cyclin) cell cycle 4.54E−04 262752_at 0.49 At1g16330 CYCB3_1 (cyclin) cell cycle 2.60E−05 266295_at 0.49 At2g29550 tubulin beta-7 chain cytokinesis 3.78E−04 261765_at 0.51 At1g15570 CYCA2_3 (cyclin) cell cycle 4.48E−04 252736_at 0.52 At3g43210 TETRASPORE (TES), kinesin-like protein ZCF125 cytokinesis 7.37E−04 262494_at 0.54 At1g21810 myosin-like protein cytokinesis 8.43E−04 265464_at 0.54 At2g37080 putative myosin heavy chain cytokinesis 7.93E−04 250386_at 0.55 At5g11510 MYB3R4 (transcription factor) cell cycle 1.06E−03 264061_at 0.55 At2g27970 CKS2 (CDK binding protein) cell cycle 1.06E−03 246683_at 0.56 At5g33300 putative protein chromokinesin KIF4 cytokinesis 8.76E−03 250685_at 0.56 At5g06670 kinesin heavy chain-like protein cytokinesis 8.23E−04 261639_at 0.57 At1g50010 putative tubulin alpha-2/alpha-4 chain cytokinesis 3.16E−03 245576_at 0.57 At4g14770 CPP1-related transcription factor family (E2Fa-DPa cell cycle induced TF). 4.07E−03 249095_at 1.44 At5g43900 myosin heavy chain MYA2 cytokinesis 1.08E−03 251052_at 1.54 At5g02470 DPA transcription factor cell cycle 1.45E−04 250923_at 1.69 At5g03455 GTPV2 (putative CDC25 homolog) cell cycle 4.59E−04 260765_at 1.79 At1g49240 actin 8 cytokinesis 2.13E−04 250844_at 1.97 At5g04470 SIAMESE gene (SIM) cell cycle 4.89E−03 264006_at 2.02 At2g22430 homeodomain (ATHB-6) (E2Fa-DPa induced TF) cell cycle 1.93E−06 253217_at 2.58 At4g34970 actin depolymerizing factor-like protein cytokinesis 1.17E−03 250666_at 3.25 At5g07100 WRKY family (E2Fa-DPa induced Transcription factor) cell cycle 1.65E−09 253890_s_at 3.84 At5g54100 Putative protein contains similarity to stomatin like cell cycle protein -
TABLE 8 Differentially expressed genes in ang4 mutant compared to Ler and related to plant development. Data were performed on microarrays ATH1 experiment with RNA from shoot apex of young plants grown in in vitro conditions. The p values are calculated according a Bayesian test of linear model and corrected by Holm's method. fold change Sequence P. value probes name expression derived from gene descriptions 3.28E−06 259686_at 0.26 At1g63100 transcription factor SCARECROW development 2.15E−03 257221_at 0.46 At3g27920 GLABRA1 (GL1), MYB family transcription factor development 1.26E−05 265454_at 0.50 At2g46530 putative ARF1 family auxin responsive transcription development factor 1.86E−03 263013_at 1.92 At1g23380 KNAT6, knotted-like homeobox protein development 9.50E−05 260334_at 1.96 At1g70510 KNAT2, homeotic protein (ATK1) development 7.91E−04 263194_at 2.58 At1g36060 AP2 domain transcription factor development 5.10E−07 259680_at 2.86 At1g77690 putative AUX1-like permease development 3.21E−08 265813_at 3.47 At2g18060 putative NAM (no apical meristem)-like protein development 3.23E−10 245173_at 8.79 At2g47520 putative AP2 domain transcription factor, development aintegumenta-like protein -
TABLE 9 Primers used for ANG4 candidate genes amplification and sequencing GENE PRIMER MIPS FRAGMENT NAME DIRECTION POSITION PRIMER SEQUENCE SIZE At2g44940 F 67 TGTT AAGAGGTGAC GCACATG 943 (SEQ ID NO: 9) R 1010 CGGCGGCTTGAATGTCTTTA (SEQ ID NO: 10) At2g44940 F 800 T AGAGGAGTGA GGATGAGGAG TT 723 (SEQ ID NO: 11) R 1523 GCTAGGAAAAAAAAAAGAAATTGT (SEQ ID NO: 12) At2g44960 F 166 TTTTT GTTTCTGTGAGTGCTGTG 1119 (SEQ ID NO: 13) R 1285 TCTCAGTAGCACCAGTTTCAAG (SEQ ID NO: 14) At2g44960 F 625 CTTCT TCATCTCCCC CTTGTGC 1327 (SEQ ID NO: 15) R 1952 ATAAATACACAGGCGTGGAATTGG (SEQ ID NO: 16) At2g44970 F 86 TATGT GTCGCCCGTC TTCTTTCTT 854 (SEQ ID NO: 17) R 940 ATGCCAATGAACAACAAGTAAAGA (SEQ ID NO: 18) At2g44970 F 800 TTCCTAATGT TGTTTGCCGTTTCA 827 (SEQ ID NO: 19) R 1627 CATGGGGGTGGAAATAGTATCCT (SEQ ID NO: 20) At2g44970 F 1468 TAC TCAGTATGCA ATTCCACGTT CATAT 1114 (SEQ ID NO: 21) R 2582 TCTCTCTCGCATTTTTCTCAACCG (SEQ ID NO: 22) At2g44970 F 2443 AACGAAAT TCTCAAAGATGGGTTT 1238 (SEQ ID NO: 23) R 3681 AACGAAATTCTCAAAGATGGGTTT (SEQ ID NO: 24) At2g44980 F 73 CGTCACAC CATCCACACC ACTTG 1120 (SEQ ID NO: 25) R 1193 GACGGCAATACTTATCGCCAACATAT (SEQ ID NO: 26) At2g44980 F 927 AATT GGACCAGATG GGATTGGGAA AG 1032 (SEQ ID NO: 27) R 1959 TCCACACAAAAATGTCAGAGTGCTTAGC (SEQ ID NO: 28) At2g44980 F 1799 CTTGATTACTGG CACACCTATC CA 943 (SEQ ID NO: 29) R 2742 GGGAAAAGAGGAGGACACGATG (SEQ ID NO: 30) At2g44980 F 2480 T GTTTATCTCC CTATCTATTT CCTTG 927 (SEQ ID NO: 31) R 3404 CTTTCTCTCTGCCCTCCTCAA (SEQ ID NO: 32) At2g44980 F 3122 TGGAATACA TCGGCATAGA GAAAG 1053 (SEQ ID NO: 33) R 4175 TAAACTCGGATGCTCGGTGATAAG (SEQ ID NO: 34) At2g44980 F 3836 CCAGGAAAAAGGCA GAAGAGAAGA 980 (SEQ ID NO: 35) R 4816 CATTGTGTGATTCAGGGAGATCGA (SEQ ID NO: 36) At2g44950 F 11 GGGCGTTTTTCCCAGTGTTG 1014 (SEQ ID NO: 37) R 1005 TCAGCCCGCAGAGAATGAAT (SEQ ID NO: 38) At2g44950 F 845 TCCCACCCACACCTGTTTCA 1182 (SEQ ID NO: 39) R 2007 TTCCGCAGCAGCCAACATTT (SEQ ID NO: 40) At2g44950 F 1886 GAAGCCAAGGAACAGGAGTA 947 (SEQ ID NO: 41) R 2813 CATACGGGCACACACAGATA (SEQ ID NO: 42) At2g44950 F 2652 CTCGCCCATTGTTGTTTCAG 1241 (SEQ ID NO: 43) R 3873 AATTGCGGAAACCATGTTCC (SEQ ID NO: 44) At2g44950 F 3065 TGGGGCATTAGAACTGGAAC 1010 (SEQ ID NO: 45) R 4055 TCCCAAGGATCGAAGTCTTT (SEQ ID NO: 46) -
- Anami S. (2004). Cloning and functional analysis of genes controlling organ growth and development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Masters thesis for International Post-graduate course on Molecular Biology (VUB, Brussels).
- Autran D., C. Jonak, K. Belcram, G. T. S. Beemster, J. Kronenberger, O. Grandjean, D. Inzé, and J. Traas (2002). Cell numbers and leaf development in Arabidopsis: a functional analysis of the STRUWWELPETER gene. The EMBO Journal 21:6036-6049.
- Berna G., P. Robles, and J. L. Micol (1999). A mutational analysis of leaf morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 152:729-742.
- De Veylder L., J. Joubes, and D. Inze (2003). Plant cell cycle transitions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6:536-543.
- Cnops G., S. Jover-Gil, J. Peters, P. Neyt, S. De Block, P. Robles, M. Ponce, T. Gerats, J. Micol, and M. Van Lijsebettens (2004). The rotunda2 mutants identify a role for the LEUNIG gene in vegetative leaf morphogenesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 55:1529-1539.
- De Veylder L., T. Beeckman, G. T. S. Beemster, L. Krols, F. Terras, I. Landrieu, E. Van Der Schueren, S. Maes, M. Naudts, and D. Inzé (2001). Functional analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13:1653-1667.
- Erickson R. O. (1976). Modeling of plant growth. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 27:407-434.
- Galbraight D. W., K. R. Harkins, and S. Knapp (1991). Systemic endopolyploidy in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 96:985-989.
- Hightower R. C. and R. B. Meagher (1986). The molecular evolution of actin. Genetics 114:315-332.
- Kamiya N., J. Itoh, A. Morikami, Y. Nagato, and M. Matsuoka (2003). The SCARECROW gene's role in asymmetric cell divisions in rice plants. Plant J. 36:45-54.
- Karimi M., D. Inzé, and A. Depicker (2002). GATEWAY vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends in Plant Sciences 7:193-195.
- Liscum E, and J. W. Reed (2002). Genetics of Aux/IAA and ARF action in plant growth and development. Plant Mol. Biol. 49:387-400.
- Lonnstedt I. and T. Speed (2002). Replicated microarray data. Statistica Sinica 12:31-46.
- Muller S., E. Fuchs, M. Ovecka, J. Wysocka-Diller, P. N. Benfey, and M. T. Hauser (2002). Two new loci, PLEIADE and HYADE, implicate organ-specific regulation of cytokinesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 130:312-324.
- Muller I., W. Wagner, A. Volker, S. Schellmann, P. Nacry, F. Kuttner, Z. Schwarz-Sommer, U. Mayer, and G. Jurgens (2003). Syntaxin specificity of cytokinesis in Arabidopsis. Nat. Cell. Biol. 5:531-534.
- Nelissen H., J. H. Clarke, M. De Block, S. De Block, R. Vanderhaeghen, R. E. Zielinski, T. Dyer, S. Lust, D. Inzé, and M. Van Lijsebettens (2003). DRL1, a homolog of the yeast TOT4/KTI12 protein, has a function in meristem activity and organ growth in plants. The Plant Cell 15:639-654.
- Peters J. L., G. Cnops, P. Neyt, J. Zethof, K. Cornelis, M. Van Lijsebettens, and T. Gerats (2004). An AFLP-based genome-wide mapping strategy: a practical approach to positional cloning. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108:321-327.
- Pyke K. A., J. L. Marrison, and R. M. Leech (1991). Temporal and spatial development of the cells of the expanding first leaf of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Journal of Experimental Botany 42:1407-1416.
- Reddy A. S., and I. S. Day (2001). Kinesins in the Arabidopsis genome: a comparative analysis among eukaryotes. BMC Genomics. 2,
Epub 25. - Robles P. and J. L. Micol (2001). Genome-wide linkage analysis of Arabidopsis genes required for leaf development. Mol. Genet. Genomics 266:12-19.
- Schiefelbein J. (2003). Cell-fate specification in the epidermis: a common patterning mechanism in the root and shoot. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6:74-78.
- Smyth G. K., Y. H. Yang, and T. Speed (2003). Statistical issues in cDNA microarray data analysis. Meth. Mol. Biol. 224:111-136.
- Stone S., H. Hauksdóttir, J. Herschleb, E. Kraft, and J. Callis (2005). Functional analysis of the RING-type ubiquitin ligase family of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 137:13-30.
- Strompen G., F. El Kasmi, S. Richter, W. Lukowitz, F. F. Assaad, G. Jurgens, and U. Mayer (2002). The Arabidopsis HINKEL gene encodes a kinesin-related protein involved in cytokinesis and is expressed in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Curr Biol. 12:153-158.
- Traas J., and T. Vernoux (2002). The shoot apical meristem: the dynamics of a stable structure. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 357:737-747.
- Tsiantis M., and A. Hay (2003). Comparative plant development: the time of the leaf? Nat. Rev. Genet. 4:169-180.
- Tsuge T., H. Tsukaya, and H. Uchimiya (1996). Two independent and polarized processes of cell elongation regulate leaf blade expansion in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Development 122:1589-1600.
- Van Lijsebettens M., and J. Clarke (1998). Leaf development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 36:47-60.
- Wu Z., and K. A. Irizarry (2004). Preprocessing of oligonucleotide array data. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:656-658.
- Yang C. Y., M. Spielman, J. P. Coles, Y. Li, S. Ghelani, V. Bourdon, R. C. Brown, B. E. Lemmon, R. J. Scott, and H. G. Dickinson (2003). TETRASPORE encodes a kinesin required for male meiotic cytokinesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 34:229-240.
Claims (16)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/806,688 US20110078825A1 (en) | 2004-08-18 | 2010-08-18 | Modulation of plant cell number |
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EPEP04103971.0 | 2004-08-18 | ||
EP04103971 | 2004-08-18 | ||
PCT/EP2005/054031 WO2006027310A2 (en) | 2004-08-18 | 2005-08-16 | Modulation of plant cell number |
US66048308A | 2008-04-22 | 2008-04-22 | |
US12/806,688 US20110078825A1 (en) | 2004-08-18 | 2010-08-18 | Modulation of plant cell number |
Related Parent Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/054031 Continuation WO2006027310A2 (en) | 2004-08-18 | 2005-08-16 | Modulation of plant cell number |
US66048308A Continuation | 2004-08-18 | 2008-04-22 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110078825A1 true US20110078825A1 (en) | 2011-03-31 |
Family
ID=35771199
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/660,483 Expired - Fee Related US7829758B2 (en) | 2004-08-18 | 2005-08-16 | Modulation of plant cell number |
US12/806,688 Abandoned US20110078825A1 (en) | 2004-08-18 | 2010-08-18 | Modulation of plant cell number |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/660,483 Expired - Fee Related US7829758B2 (en) | 2004-08-18 | 2005-08-16 | Modulation of plant cell number |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7829758B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1789565B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE438726T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2005281753B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2577503C (en) |
DE (1) | DE602005015868D1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2329269T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006027310A2 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100152253A1 (en) * | 2006-10-12 | 2010-06-17 | Vib Vzw | Non-steroidal brassinosteroid mimetic |
US20110162109A1 (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2011-06-30 | Basf Plant Science Gmbh | Plants Having Modified Growth Characteristics and a Method for Making the Same |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ES2329269T3 (en) * | 2004-08-18 | 2009-11-24 | Vib Vzw | MODULATION OF THE NUMBER OF CELLS OF A PLANT. |
CN101501195A (en) * | 2006-06-13 | 2009-08-05 | 圭尔夫大学 | Nitrogen limitation adaptibility gene and protein and modulation thereof |
CN101265293B (en) * | 2007-03-16 | 2010-09-29 | 中国农业大学 | Flowering time correlated albumen from arabidopsis, and coding gene and application thereof |
CN106573050B (en) | 2014-05-29 | 2021-09-24 | 宏观基因有限公司 | Trispecific binding molecules that specifically bind to multiple cancer antigens and methods of use thereof |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020040490A1 (en) * | 2000-01-27 | 2002-04-04 | Jorn Gorlach | Expressed sequences of arabidopsis thaliana |
US20040034888A1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2004-02-19 | Jingdong Liu | Nucleic acid molecules and other molecules associated with plants and uses thereof for plant improvement |
US7829758B2 (en) * | 2004-08-18 | 2010-11-09 | Vib Vzw | Modulation of plant cell number |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1033405A3 (en) | 1999-02-25 | 2001-08-01 | Ceres Incorporated | Sequence-determined DNA fragments and corresponding polypeptides encoded thereby |
US20040123349A1 (en) * | 2002-12-20 | 2004-06-24 | Qi Xie | SINAT5, an Arabidopsis thaliana gene promotes ubiquitin related degradation |
-
2005
- 2005-08-16 ES ES05811173T patent/ES2329269T3/en active Active
- 2005-08-16 CA CA2577503A patent/CA2577503C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-08-16 EP EP05811173A patent/EP1789565B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2005-08-16 AU AU2005281753A patent/AU2005281753B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2005-08-16 US US11/660,483 patent/US7829758B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-08-16 DE DE602005015868T patent/DE602005015868D1/en active Active
- 2005-08-16 WO PCT/EP2005/054031 patent/WO2006027310A2/en active Application Filing
- 2005-08-16 AT AT05811173T patent/ATE438726T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2010
- 2010-08-18 US US12/806,688 patent/US20110078825A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040034888A1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2004-02-19 | Jingdong Liu | Nucleic acid molecules and other molecules associated with plants and uses thereof for plant improvement |
US20020040490A1 (en) * | 2000-01-27 | 2002-04-04 | Jorn Gorlach | Expressed sequences of arabidopsis thaliana |
US7829758B2 (en) * | 2004-08-18 | 2010-11-09 | Vib Vzw | Modulation of plant cell number |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
Mukoko Bopopi et al (2010, Journal of Experimental Botany 61(1):297-310) * |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100152253A1 (en) * | 2006-10-12 | 2010-06-17 | Vib Vzw | Non-steroidal brassinosteroid mimetic |
US8273775B2 (en) | 2006-10-12 | 2012-09-25 | Vib Vzw | Non-steroidal brassinosteroid mimetic |
US20110162109A1 (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2011-06-30 | Basf Plant Science Gmbh | Plants Having Modified Growth Characteristics and a Method for Making the Same |
US9074006B2 (en) | 2008-07-31 | 2015-07-07 | Basf Plant Science Gmbh | Use of HUB1 polynucleotides for improving growth characteristics in plants |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2005281753B2 (en) | 2009-06-11 |
ATE438726T1 (en) | 2009-08-15 |
CA2577503A1 (en) | 2006-03-16 |
US20080271208A1 (en) | 2008-10-30 |
DE602005015868D1 (en) | 2009-09-17 |
WO2006027310A3 (en) | 2006-06-15 |
EP1789565B1 (en) | 2009-08-05 |
CA2577503C (en) | 2015-07-14 |
WO2006027310A2 (en) | 2006-03-16 |
US7829758B2 (en) | 2010-11-09 |
ES2329269T3 (en) | 2009-11-24 |
EP1789565A2 (en) | 2007-05-30 |
AU2005281753A1 (en) | 2006-03-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Tanaka et al. | Axillary meristem formation in rice requires the WUSCHEL ortholog TILLERS ABSENT1 | |
Zhang et al. | OsIAA20, an Aux/IAA protein, mediates abiotic stress tolerance in rice through an ABA pathway | |
Dan et al. | MicroTom—a high-throughput model transformation system for functional genomics | |
Song et al. | Key divisions in the early Arabidopsis embryo require POL and PLL1 phosphatases to establish the root stem cell organizer and vascular axis | |
Zhao et al. | Genome-wide identification and analysis of the AP2 transcription factor gene family in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) | |
US9309527B2 (en) | Protein IPA1 related to plant architecture, its coding genes and uses | |
US10982225B2 (en) | Flowering time-regulating genes and related constructs and applications thereof | |
US20200095600A1 (en) | Corn genes zmspl1 and zmspl2 and uses thereof | |
US20110078825A1 (en) | Modulation of plant cell number | |
Deyholos et al. | VARICOSE, a WD-domain protein, is required for leaf blade development | |
Yuan et al. | The genome of the recretohalophyte Limonium bicolor provides insights into salt gland development and salinity adaptation during terrestrial evolution | |
Aswath et al. | IbMADS4 regulates the vegetative shoot development in transgenic chrysanthemum (Dendrathema grandiflora (Ramat.) Kitamura) | |
CN111153975B (en) | Plant drought-resistant related protein TaNAC15, and coding gene and application thereof | |
WO2019129145A1 (en) | Flowering time-regulating gene cmp1 and related constructs and applications thereof | |
Abraham et al. | Ectopic expression of E2FB, a cell cycle transcription factor, accelerates flowering and increases fruit yield in tomato | |
US10563219B2 (en) | Corn genes ZmSPL1 and ZmSPL2 and uses thereof | |
CN108892714B (en) | Plant salt tolerance associated protein GmLURP17 and application of coding gene thereof | |
CN104862319A (en) | Arabidopis thaliana gene AtTIE 1 controlling plant branching and applications thereof | |
Sun et al. | A WOX homolog disrupted by a transposon led to the loss of spines and contributed to the domestication of lettuce | |
Zhao et al. | Genome-wide analysis of the TIFY family in Lycium and the negative regulation of stomatal development by LrJAZ2 gene | |
Lu et al. | Convergent evolution of water-conducting cells in Marchantia recruited the ZHOUPI gene promoting cell wall reinforcement and programmed cell death | |
CN117143212A (en) | Transcription factor AmbHLH148 and application thereof in drought resistance | |
Zhang et al. | Functional Analysis of Tadhn1312 by Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) in Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) | |
김희진 | Hairs absent is Involved in Type I Trichome Initiation in Tomato | |
CN113913441A (en) | Application of rice nascent polypeptide binding complex alpha subunit NACA gene in plant osmotic stress resistance |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: VIB VZW, BELGIUM Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CNOPS, GERDA;FLEURY, DELPHINE;INZE, DIRK G.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070528 TO 20080414;REEL/FRAME:024898/0878 Owner name: UNIVERSITEIT GENT, BELGIUM Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CNOPS, GERDA;FLEURY, DELPHINE;INZE, DIRK G.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070528 TO 20080414;REEL/FRAME:024898/0878 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: VIB VZW, BELGIUM Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THIRD INVENTOR'S NAME, PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 024898 FRAME 0878;ASSIGNORS:CNOPS, GERDA;FLEURY, DELPHINE;INZE, DIRK G.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070528 TO 20080414;REEL/FRAME:025162/0251 Owner name: UNIVERSITEIT GENT, BELGIUM Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THIRD INVENTOR'S NAME, PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 024898 FRAME 0878;ASSIGNORS:CNOPS, GERDA;FLEURY, DELPHINE;INZE, DIRK G.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070528 TO 20080414;REEL/FRAME:025162/0251 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |