US20110055993A1 - Helmet including a protective shell with variable rigidity - Google Patents
Helmet including a protective shell with variable rigidity Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110055993A1 US20110055993A1 US12/876,339 US87633910A US2011055993A1 US 20110055993 A1 US20110055993 A1 US 20110055993A1 US 87633910 A US87633910 A US 87633910A US 2011055993 A1 US2011055993 A1 US 2011055993A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- helmet
- protective shell
- visor
- helmet according
- composite material
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A42—HEADWEAR
- A42B—HATS; HEAD COVERINGS
- A42B3/00—Helmets; Helmet covers ; Other protective head coverings
- A42B3/04—Parts, details or accessories of helmets
- A42B3/0406—Accessories for helmets
- A42B3/042—Optical devices
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A42—HEADWEAR
- A42B—HATS; HEAD COVERINGS
- A42B3/00—Helmets; Helmet covers ; Other protective head coverings
- A42B3/04—Parts, details or accessories of helmets
- A42B3/06—Impact-absorbing shells, e.g. of crash helmets
- A42B3/062—Impact-absorbing shells, e.g. of crash helmets with reinforcing means
- A42B3/063—Impact-absorbing shells, e.g. of crash helmets with reinforcing means using layered structures
Definitions
- the invention relates to the field of protective helmets and, more particularly, helmets carrying an optical system for projecting images onto a visor.
- Protective helmets comprise a protective shell made of a high-performance composite material, surrounding a thick and rigid inner protective layer.
- the inner protective layer is intended to protect the pilot's skull against impacts, while the protective helmet is intended to protect the pilot against perforation aggressions such as ballistic aggressions.
- Helmets for military aircraft pilots are also intended to carry an opto-electronic system. The mounting and integration of a system of this type on a pilot's helmet is problematic for the following reasons.
- a visualisation function and a collimator are mounted in order to display visual information on the visor.
- the visualisation function is implemented by way of an image source, such as a cathode-ray tube or a flat-screen display, located on the top of the head.
- the collimation optical system is mounted on the top of the front for the image projection onto the visor.
- the surface of the visor is treated with a layer of reflective material allowing synthetic sighting and navigation images or images originating from a thermal camera for flights in low-visibility conditions to be displayed in the pilot's field of view.
- the environment of the aircraft cockpit presents numerous stresses in terms of vibrations and substantial thermal deviations, for example.
- the helmet is also subject to deformations when it is donned or when an oxygen mask is attached.
- the French patent FR 2717045A1 describes a helmet including a mechanical structure allowing an optronic equipment to be mounted on the shell of the helmet.
- This rigid mechanical structure is connected to the helmet via an assembly of deformable connections. Its purpose is to permit the necessary deformations of the helmet, while retaining a rigid part which allows the optronic equipment to be isolated from these deformations of the helmet.
- this rigid mechanical structure mounted on the shell of the helmet increases the mass of the optronic system.
- a head tracking system may also be added to the pilot's helmet.
- the lightest HTS function is the electromagnetic HTS.
- the optical and HTS functions are attached to a mechanical structure independent from the deformations of the protective helmet.
- the HTS function sensor is attached to the mechanical structure of the optical system for reasons of precision, i.e. on the front and the top of the helmet.
- the advantage of this principle is to shift the mass of the HTS function towards the back for better balance, but the main disadvantage is the greater mass of the mechanical structure of the visual system.
- the surface of the structure is extended towards the back to maintain the LEDs in a precise and stable position in relation to the optical system.
- the mechanical structure of the visual system resembles a second shell superimposed on the protective shell.
- the mass and the centring of the helmet visor are critical safety parameters. In fact, too high a mass may cause injuries to the cervical spine in the event of repeated stresses linked to load factors or in the event of an ejection.
- the centre of mass of the helmet affects its stability on the pilot's head during manoeuvres and in the event of an ejection where a centring which is too far forward and/or too high, may cause irreversible injuries.
- the electronic systems mounted on the helmet need to be isolated from the deformations of the helmet for reasons of precision of the optical functions.
- the invention overcomes the aforementioned problems and dispense with a heavy and unwieldy mechanical structure for mounting electronic equipment such as a visor projection device and a head tracking device.
- the invention relates to a helmet including a protective shell, characterised in that the protective shell is made up of an upper part disposed in the top part of the helmet and a lower part, the upper part being made of a “sandwich” composite material including two skins, disposed on either side of a core, themselves including a plurality of composite tissue layers, the lower part being made of a monolithic composite material.
- the helmet includes an inner protective layer disposed in the top part of the helmet, and advantageously the upper part of the protective shell is disposed opposite the inner protective layer and the lower part extends towards the bottom of the helmet beyond the inner protective layer.
- the upper part of the protective shell preferably covers more or less the entire parietal, frontal and upper occipital part of the neurocranium of the wearer.
- the monolithic composite material of the lower part is formed with at least one skin of sandwich composite material of the upper part of the shell, said skin being extended beyond the core.
- the monolithic composite material is preferably formed by the two skins extended beyond the core, the two skins then being bonded to one another through polymerisation.
- the tissue layers of the lower part of the shell include fibres whose orientation is offset by around 45° in relation to a vertical axis of the plane of symmetry of the helmet.
- the edge of the core of the sandwich composite material in the area between the upper part and the lower part of the protective shell is wedge-shaped.
- the helmet including a head equipment mounted on the protective shell, said equipment is fixed onto the outer surface of the sandwich composite material skin.
- At least one head equipment is fixed between the two sandwich composite material skins, a part of the core of said composite material being hollowed in order to insert said head equipment.
- the upper part of the protective shell includes two sub-parts, a rear sub-part connected to the lower part of the protective shell and fixed to the inner protective layer and an immovable front sub-part, fixing elements mounted on said sub-parts allowing said sub-parts to be joined together and separated.
- the core of the composite material of the front sub-part of the upper part of the protective shell includes a material thickness greater than the core of the composite material of the rear sub-part.
- the helmet is a helmet for a military aircraft pilot comprising a visor
- the head equipment is a device for projecting images onto said visor and, advantageously, the projection device and the visor are mounted on the front part of the upper part of the protective shell.
- a second head equipment is a head tracking system.
- the core of the first composite material is a foam material intended for impact protection.
- the protective shell of the helmet has a structure which reacts differently to stresses according to the stressed areas of the helmet.
- the high rigidity of the upper part of the shell due to the use of a sandwich composite material, eliminates the need for an additional mechanical structure to be used to hold one or more electronic equipments as well as the visor in place.
- the invention proposes a solution allowing the mass of the helmet to be reduced and the positioning of the centre of gravity of the helmet assembly in relation to the centre of gravity of the head of the wearer to be improved.
- the lower part has reversible deformation capabilities allowing the pilot's comfort to be improved when donning the helmet and when using the oxygen mask to hold the headphones in place, and also when adjusting the retention system.
- the elasticity and suppleness of the material of the lower part of the protective shell allow the helmet to react to stresses without transmitting the structural deformations to the electronic equipment.
- the rigidity of the upper part of the shell is much greater than that of the lower part and allows said electronic equipment to be isolated from any deformation.
- the protective shell comprising two parts which have deformation capabilities that are variable according to the areas of the helmet and, more particularly, a substantial rigidity on the upper part allows electronic equipment to be mounted directly on the protective shell. Thus, it is not necessary to use an additional mechanical structure or a high-rigidity double protective shell.
- FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the helmet according to the invention, showing the upper and lower part of the protective shell. Stresses are exerted on the shell and the lower part is shown in places as a double line to symbolise the deformations of the lower part of the shell.
- FIG. 2 shows a first embodiment of the helmet according to a section implemented in the plane of symmetry of the helmet.
- the section allows the materials that make up the protective shell of the helmet to be shown.
- the helmet is donned on the head of a wearer and an electronic equipment is mounted on the outer surface of the protective shell.
- FIG. 3 shows a second embodiment in which the electronic equipment is integrated within the sandwich material.
- the upper part of the protective shell includes a front sub-part and a rear sub-part.
- FIG. 4 shows a third modular embodiment of the helmet including an immovable front sub-part of the protective shell supporting the electronic equipment.
- the layers of material that make up the protective shell are shown transparently.
- the invention is intended in particular for military aircraft pilots' helmets to hold the electronic equipment in place on the protective shell.
- the scope of the invention is not limited to this type of helmet and applies to any type of protective helmet, with or without head equipment.
- the invention proposes a technical solution for maintaining the necessary precision for electronic systems for projecting an image on a visor.
- the protective shell comprising a plurality of parts having variable deformation capabilities allows the equipment and the visor to be isolated from the stresses linked to the use of the helmet.
- FIG. 1 shows with arrows the mechanical stresses acting on a helmet. Most of the time, these mechanical stresses act on the lower part 2 of the helmet when it is placed on the head of the wearer. In this case, this involves in particular the lower lateral working parts. In fact, once it is in place, the wearer tends to remove the sides of the helmet. The oxygen mask is similarly attached to this lower part. The pilot's movements cause deformations on the lower part of the protective shell.
- the deformations acting on the helmet may be oriented towards the front, the rear, or in the lateral direction.
- the constitution of the lower part 2 of the protective shell offers properties of increased flexibility and suppleness in these directions.
- the nature of the material of the lower part is shown in more detail in the description which follows.
- the upper part 1 of the protective shell is implemented according to a structure which differs from the structure of the lower part 2 .
- the shell has a structural junction between the upper part 1 and the lower part 2 .
- This junction is positioned more or less on the edge of the inner protective layer. However, said junction may be located either slightly higher or slightly lower than the edge of the inner protective layer.
- the rigid inner protective layer more or less covers the parietal, frontal and upper occipital part of the neurocranium of the wearer, as these are critical areas to be protected.
- FIG. 1 does not show this inner protective layer. This will be shown in the following figures.
- the section A-A implemented in the plane of symmetry of the helmet, shown in FIG. 2 describes the layers of the materials forming the protective shell.
- FIG. 2 shows a first embodiment of the helmet according to the section A-A.
- the helmet is made up of an upper part 1 and a lower part 2 .
- the upper part 1 is implemented in a “sandwich” composite material.
- a “sandwich” composite material refers collectively to a material formed from two layers, also referred to as skins, which may be identical or different, closely connected via an intermediate substance also referred to as a core.
- the upper part 1 of the shell includes a first skin 12 and a second skin 13 disposed on either side of a core 11 .
- the lower part 2 is implemented in a composite material comprising the extension of the skins 12 and 13 towards the bottom part of the helmet.
- monolithic refers to a layer of material in general, or the layer of the shell in the present embodiment, comprising a plurality of folds associated with and joined directly to one another, with no intermediate core.
- the helmet includes a rigid inner protective layer 3 serving as a shockproof protective layer.
- This layer is rounded in shape, disposed in the top part of the helmet.
- the upper part 1 is disposed opposite the inner protective layer 3 .
- the lower part 2 of the shell corresponds to the part which extends towards the bottom of the helmet and which is not opposite the inner protective layer 3 .
- This protective layer is generally covered with a foam layer 4 in contact with the head of the wearer to improve the comfort of the wearer.
- a non-rigid, supple foam 9 providing comfort and support for the head is fixed to the lower part of the protective shell.
- the sandwich material includes the skin 12 and the skin 13 disposed on either side of the core 11 .
- the skins 12 and 13 comprise a plurality of layers (also referred to as folds), themselves including a plurality of stratified layers of composite carbon and aramid or polyethylene tissues.
- folds also referred to as folds
- the skins 12 and 13 offer high performance in terms of elasticity and resistance to perforation.
- Other types of material can be used to form the folds in order to obtain similar or higher performances.
- the number of folds forming the skins 12 and 13 depends on the stresses imposed for the military applications of the helmet.
- the folds of the skins 12 and 13 comprise a plurality of pieces of crossed-fibre tissue 17 and 18 .
- the two skins 12 and 13 are indirectly connected by the shockproof foam core 11 .
- the core 11 may be made from the same material as the inner shockproof foam 3 or from a material having more or less similar properties in terms of rigidity, deformation and shock-resistance performance.
- the formation of the sandwich composite material with a high-rigidity core and composite skins offering high performance in terms of suppleness and resistance to perforation allows a protective shell to be obtained which offers good performance in terms of both rigidity and perforation. This part of the shell offers the advantage of a high resistance to external stresses and notably to the stresses of deformation.
- the main advantage of this structure of the upper part 1 of the protective shell is the possibility of fixing to it the electronic image projection equipment 7 , a head tracking equipment in any place on this part of the shell and also the visor 6 .
- the high rigidity of this part of the shell allows high optical precision to be obtained and the same mechanical holding structure to be used for these three helmet equipments.
- the different equipment is fixed onto separate mechanical structures which, when deformations of the shell occur, may present a shift in positioning, resulting in a degradation of the precision of the head-tracking calculations and the quality of the images displayed on the visor.
- an additional protective shell 8 is positioned on the top. However, it is not necessary for this shell to have a high rigidity capability.
- the upper part 1 of the protective shell includes means for fixing electronic and optical equipment, said fixing means being positioned between the two skins 12 and 13 of the upper part 1 of the protective shell and being fixed with the aid of a resin with a density and rigidity greater than the core 11 in order to transmit the stresses to the two skins 12 and 13 .
- these fixing means are tapped to receive fixing screws or comprise feet or bores for positioning the optical equipment requiring good precision.
- These fixing means are generally made of metal or a composite material.
- the lower part 2 of the protective shell is made of a monolithic composite material.
- This material comprises a plurality of stratified layers of composite carbon-fibre and aramid-fibre, glass or polyethylene tissues.
- Other types of material with similar or higher performances may of course be used without, however, being excluded from the scope of the invention.
- This part of the shell is formed with the extension of at least one of the skins 12 and 13 beyond the core of the sandwich material of the upper part 1 .
- the lower part is preferably formed with the two skins 12 and 13 together which are directly bonded to one another through polymerisation.
- this part of the shell offers the same performances in terms of resistance to perforation as the upper part of the shell.
- Fibres 21 and 22 are disposed in parallel and offset at an angle of around 45° in relation to a vertical axis 23 of the plane of symmetry of the helmet.
- Fibres 22 are also disposed in parallel, offset at an angle of around 45° in relation to the vertical axis 23 and perpendicular to the fibres 21 .
- This offset in the orientation of the fibres in relation to a vertical axis of the plane of symmetry of the helmet allows the suppleness of the composite to be increased. In fact, when the wearer dons the helmet, he removes the sides of the shell, perpendicular to the plane of symmetry, in particular to put on headphones.
- the advantage of the structure of the lower part 2 is that it is less rigid than that of the upper part 1 of the shell.
- the suppleness in this area of the helmet improves comfort when the helmet is donned and offers reversible deformation capabilities which allow the working life of the shell to be increased.
- the lower part of the shell is thus subjected to stresses without transmitting them to the more rigid upper part.
- the helmet retention system is also fixed onto this lower part and is also the cause of deformations of the shell.
- this area of the helmet it is advantageous for this area of the helmet to have suppleness capabilities. The same applies to the holding in place of the oxygen mask.
- This area of the helmet also integrates headphones 5 for which it is preferable for shell suppleness facilities to be provided for.
- the junction area 24 between the upper part and the lower part of the shell is determined by the edge of the core of the sandwich material.
- the thickness of the core 11 preferably reduces progressively in the direction towards the lower part 2 .
- the edge 14 of the core is then wedge-shaped. This particular form offers the advantage of avoiding concentrations of stress and shearing between the core 11 and the skins 12 and 13 .
- the entire outer layer of the protective shell, comprising the skin 12 of the upper part 1 and the composite material layer of the lower part 2 forms a single polymerised unit.
- the composite material layer of the lower part 2 is formed with the skin 12 and/or the skin 13 . In the case where it is formed with the two skins, the latter are then polymerised in the lower part 2 .
- FIG. 3 shows a version of the helmet integrating the head equipment between the two sandwich material skins.
- the protective shell comprises three parts: a lower part 60 designed in the same way as the lower part of the helmet according to the first embodiment, and an upper part including a front sub-part 70 and a rear sub-part 50 .
- the helmet includes an inner protective layer 54 and a comfort foam 55 fixed onto the inner surface of the protective layer 54 .
- the design of the lower part 60 is similar to that of the helmet described in the first embodiment.
- This part comprises a monolithic composite material whose fibres 63 and 62 of the composite tissue layers are oriented at around 45° in relation to a vertical axis in the plane of symmetry of the helmet.
- the lower part also has low rigidity properties.
- the rear upper sub-part 50 comprises a sandwich composite material similar to that described in the first embodiment.
- This material includes a shockproof foam core 51 and two skins 52 and 53 comprising a plurality of composite tissue layers.
- the fibres 57 and 58 of the tissues are oriented in the longitudinal and transverse direction of the plane of symmetry of the helmet.
- the front sub-part 70 of the helmet corresponds to the front upper part of the helmet onto which the head equipment, the display device 74 , the collimation device 76 and 77 and the visor 75 are fixed.
- This front sub-part is implemented in a sandwich composite material of the same type as that of the rear sub-part, this material including a skin 72 and a skin 73 disposed on either side of a core 71 . It therefore offers the same rigidity performances allowing the head equipment to be fixed directly onto the protective shell, the shell structure rigidity being sufficient to dispense with a dedicated mechanical structure.
- the image projection equipment 74 is inserted between the two skins 72 and 73 . Thus, it is not necessary to use a second shell to protect the electronic equipment.
- the thickness of the core 71 is greater than that of the core 51 of the rear sub-part.
- the area between the two skins 72 and 73 integrates the fixing parts of the visor, the collimation optical system 76 and 77 and the sensor or LEDs of the HTS function.
- the geometry of the inner and outer skins and the thickness of the core can be adapted according to the overall size of the optical elements and the HTS function inserted between the skins in such a way as to obtain smooth surfaces, in particular for an even distribution of the stresses on the inside of the helmet caused by an impact, and to avoid the risks of snagging with the cockpit on the outside.
- the density of the foam constituting the core can also be adapted according to its thickness. The greater the thickness, the lower the density of the absorbent foam and the lower the stress transmitted to the head in the event of an impact.
- the electronic equipment fixing means are fixed onto one of the skins 72 or 73 of the upper part of the shell to mount the equipment.
- FIG. 4 shows a modular version of the protective shell.
- the front sub-part 70 and the rear sub-part 50 are designed from the same materials as those of the upper part of the protective shell of the second embodiment.
- the head equipment is also inserted between the two sandwich material skins comprising the protective shell.
- the front sub-part 70 of the helmet may be separated from the rear sub-part 50 .
- the rear sub-part 50 is connected to the lower part 60 of the protective shell.
- the composite materials of the lower part 60 comprise the same materials as those of the skins of the material of the rear sub-part 50 , differing only in terms of the orientation of the tissue fibres which constitute these materials.
- Fixing elements 81 , 82 , 83 and 84 are mounted on the upper part of the protective shell.
- the visor-fixing inserts are also mounted on the immovable front sub-part 70 .
- the advantage of this modular version of the shell is that a standard part of the helmet, comprising the rear sub-part and the lower part of the shell, can be implemented, and the front part of the helmet carrying the head equipment can easily be modified or replaced.
- the invention is intended particularly for aircraft pilots' helmets. However, it also applies to any protective helmet on which head equipment is or is not mounted, for example helmets in the automotive field.
Landscapes
- Helmets And Other Head Coverings (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a helmet including a protective shell. The protective shell includes an upper part and a lower part extending towards the bottom of the helmet. The upper part includes a sandwich composite material including two skins, disposed on either side of a core, themselves including a plurality of composite tissue layers, The lower part includes a monolithic composite material. The invention applies in a general manner to protective helmets and more particularly in the field of aeronautics where the rigid structure allows head equipment to be fixed directly onto the protective shell.
Description
- This application claims priority to foreign French patent application No. FR 09 04270, filed on Sep. 8, 2009, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- The invention relates to the field of protective helmets and, more particularly, helmets carrying an optical system for projecting images onto a visor.
- In the field of aeronautics and notably of military aircraft, pilots generally wear a protective helmet. Protective helmets comprise a protective shell made of a high-performance composite material, surrounding a thick and rigid inner protective layer. The inner protective layer is intended to protect the pilot's skull against impacts, while the protective helmet is intended to protect the pilot against perforation aggressions such as ballistic aggressions. Helmets for military aircraft pilots are also intended to carry an opto-electronic system. The mounting and integration of a system of this type on a pilot's helmet is problematic for the following reasons.
- A visualisation function and a collimator are mounted in order to display visual information on the visor. The visualisation function is implemented by way of an image source, such as a cathode-ray tube or a flat-screen display, located on the top of the head. The collimation optical system is mounted on the top of the front for the image projection onto the visor. To do this, the surface of the visor is treated with a layer of reflective material allowing synthetic sighting and navigation images or images originating from a thermal camera for flights in low-visibility conditions to be displayed in the pilot's field of view. For reasons relating to optical precision and quality of the displayed image, it is important for the visor of the helmet and the optical system to present little play in maintaining their positions relative to one another. However, the environment of the aircraft cockpit presents numerous stresses in terms of vibrations and substantial thermal deviations, for example. The helmet is also subject to deformations when it is donned or when an oxygen mask is attached.
- Solutions are known which entail the integration of the mechanical structure of an opto-electronic system and the associated visor. For example, European patent EP 0651952B1 describes a mechanical structure supporting the optical system and the visor. This solution allows the optical system to be isolated from deformations of the protective helmet and includes heavy and unwieldy mechanical fittings positioned on the top of the helmet. This solution significantly increases the mass of the optical system assembly and consequently presents a danger to the pilot and also reduces the ease of use of the helmet.
- The French patent FR 2717045A1 describes a helmet including a mechanical structure allowing an optronic equipment to be mounted on the shell of the helmet. This rigid mechanical structure is connected to the helmet via an assembly of deformable connections. Its purpose is to permit the necessary deformations of the helmet, while retaining a rigid part which allows the optronic equipment to be isolated from these deformations of the helmet. Similarly, this rigid mechanical structure mounted on the shell of the helmet increases the mass of the optronic system.
- A head tracking system (HTS) may also be added to the pilot's helmet. The lightest HTS function is the electromagnetic HTS. For the aforementioned same reasons of precision, the optical and HTS functions are attached to a mechanical structure independent from the deformations of the protective helmet. Thus, the visualisation system is isolated from the deformations of the helmet occurring when it is donned and from the stresses due to the oxygen mask and the retention system on the shell of the helmet under a load factor. The HTS function sensor is attached to the mechanical structure of the optical system for reasons of precision, i.e. on the front and the top of the helmet. Some helmets integrate an electro-optical head tracking system whose LEDs (Light Emitting Diodes) are located at the back and the side of the helmet. The advantage of this principle is to shift the mass of the HTS function towards the back for better balance, but the main disadvantage is the greater mass of the mechanical structure of the visual system. In fact, the surface of the structure is extended towards the back to maintain the LEDs in a precise and stable position in relation to the optical system. In this case, the mechanical structure of the visual system resembles a second shell superimposed on the protective shell.
- Finally, it is important to remember that the mass and the centring of the helmet visor are critical safety parameters. In fact, too high a mass may cause injuries to the cervical spine in the event of repeated stresses linked to load factors or in the event of an ejection. The centre of mass of the helmet affects its stability on the pilot's head during manoeuvres and in the event of an ejection where a centring which is too far forward and/or too high, may cause irreversible injuries. As a result, it is necessary, as far as possible, to reduce the mass of the helmet and to align the centre of gravity of the helmet with the centre of gravity of the wearer's head. In parallel, the electronic systems mounted on the helmet need to be isolated from the deformations of the helmet for reasons of precision of the optical functions.
- Existing solutions have hitherto proposed the implementation of additional mechanical structures, thereby increasing the rigidity of the structure of the helmet but, conversely, increasing the mass. In designing a visor helmet, the person skilled in the art is therefore faced with a dilemma between, on the one hand, isolating the display equipment in order to maintain good optical precision and, on the other hand, reducing the mass of the helmet. Moreover, it is necessary for the helmet to have reversible deformation capabilities sufficient for the comfort of the pilot when the latter dons the helmet or attaches the oxygen mask. These deformations must not be passed on to the structure which holds the optical system in place.
- The invention overcomes the aforementioned problems and dispense with a heavy and unwieldy mechanical structure for mounting electronic equipment such as a visor projection device and a head tracking device.
- More precisely, the invention relates to a helmet including a protective shell, characterised in that the protective shell is made up of an upper part disposed in the top part of the helmet and a lower part, the upper part being made of a “sandwich” composite material including two skins, disposed on either side of a core, themselves including a plurality of composite tissue layers, the lower part being made of a monolithic composite material.
- According to one preferred embodiment, the helmet includes an inner protective layer disposed in the top part of the helmet, and advantageously the upper part of the protective shell is disposed opposite the inner protective layer and the lower part extends towards the bottom of the helmet beyond the inner protective layer. The upper part of the protective shell preferably covers more or less the entire parietal, frontal and upper occipital part of the neurocranium of the wearer.
- Advantageously, the monolithic composite material of the lower part is formed with at least one skin of sandwich composite material of the upper part of the shell, said skin being extended beyond the core. The monolithic composite material is preferably formed by the two skins extended beyond the core, the two skins then being bonded to one another through polymerisation.
- Advantageously, the tissue layers of the lower part of the shell include fibres whose orientation is offset by around 45° in relation to a vertical axis of the plane of symmetry of the helmet.
- According to one preferred embodiment, the edge of the core of the sandwich composite material in the area between the upper part and the lower part of the protective shell is wedge-shaped.
- According to a first embodiment of the helmet including a head equipment mounted on the protective shell, said equipment is fixed onto the outer surface of the sandwich composite material skin.
- According to a second embodiment of the helmet, at least one head equipment is fixed between the two sandwich composite material skins, a part of the core of said composite material being hollowed in order to insert said head equipment.
- According to a third embodiment of the helmet, the upper part of the protective shell includes two sub-parts, a rear sub-part connected to the lower part of the protective shell and fixed to the inner protective layer and an immovable front sub-part, fixing elements mounted on said sub-parts allowing said sub-parts to be joined together and separated.
- According to any one of the last two embodiments, the core of the composite material of the front sub-part of the upper part of the protective shell includes a material thickness greater than the core of the composite material of the rear sub-part.
- According to one particular embodiment, the helmet is a helmet for a military aircraft pilot comprising a visor, and the head equipment is a device for projecting images onto said visor and, advantageously, the projection device and the visor are mounted on the front part of the upper part of the protective shell. Advantageously, for this last embodiment, a second head equipment is a head tracking system.
- According to any one of the preceding embodiments, the core of the first composite material is a foam material intended for impact protection.
- The protective shell of the helmet has a structure which reacts differently to stresses according to the stressed areas of the helmet. The high rigidity of the upper part of the shell, due to the use of a sandwich composite material, eliminates the need for an additional mechanical structure to be used to hold one or more electronic equipments as well as the visor in place. In this way, the invention proposes a solution allowing the mass of the helmet to be reduced and the positioning of the centre of gravity of the helmet assembly in relation to the centre of gravity of the head of the wearer to be improved.
- The lower part has reversible deformation capabilities allowing the pilot's comfort to be improved when donning the helmet and when using the oxygen mask to hold the headphones in place, and also when adjusting the retention system. The elasticity and suppleness of the material of the lower part of the protective shell allow the helmet to react to stresses without transmitting the structural deformations to the electronic equipment. In fact, the rigidity of the upper part of the shell is much greater than that of the lower part and allows said electronic equipment to be isolated from any deformation. Thus, the precision required for the positioning and holding in place of the electronic equipment and the visor in working mode is improved and is sufficient to obtain a good display quality.
- The protective shell comprising two parts which have deformation capabilities that are variable according to the areas of the helmet and, more particularly, a substantial rigidity on the upper part allows electronic equipment to be mounted directly on the protective shell. Thus, it is not necessary to use an additional mechanical structure or a high-rigidity double protective shell.
- The invention will be more readily understood and other advantages will become evident from reading the non-limiting description which follows, referring also to the attached drawings, in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the helmet according to the invention, showing the upper and lower part of the protective shell. Stresses are exerted on the shell and the lower part is shown in places as a double line to symbolise the deformations of the lower part of the shell. -
FIG. 2 shows a first embodiment of the helmet according to a section implemented in the plane of symmetry of the helmet. The section allows the materials that make up the protective shell of the helmet to be shown. The helmet is donned on the head of a wearer and an electronic equipment is mounted on the outer surface of the protective shell. -
FIG. 3 shows a second embodiment in which the electronic equipment is integrated within the sandwich material. The upper part of the protective shell includes a front sub-part and a rear sub-part. -
FIG. 4 shows a third modular embodiment of the helmet including an immovable front sub-part of the protective shell supporting the electronic equipment. The layers of material that make up the protective shell are shown transparently. - The invention is intended in particular for military aircraft pilots' helmets to hold the electronic equipment in place on the protective shell. However, the scope of the invention is not limited to this type of helmet and applies to any type of protective helmet, with or without head equipment.
- In the embodiment described below, the invention proposes a technical solution for maintaining the necessary precision for electronic systems for projecting an image on a visor. The protective shell comprising a plurality of parts having variable deformation capabilities allows the equipment and the visor to be isolated from the stresses linked to the use of the helmet.
FIG. 1 shows with arrows the mechanical stresses acting on a helmet. Most of the time, these mechanical stresses act on thelower part 2 of the helmet when it is placed on the head of the wearer. In this case, this involves in particular the lower lateral working parts. In fact, once it is in place, the wearer tends to remove the sides of the helmet. The oxygen mask is similarly attached to this lower part. The pilot's movements cause deformations on the lower part of the protective shell. The deformations acting on the helmet may be oriented towards the front, the rear, or in the lateral direction. The constitution of thelower part 2 of the protective shell offers properties of increased flexibility and suppleness in these directions. The nature of the material of the lower part is shown in more detail in the description which follows. - The
upper part 1 of the protective shell is implemented according to a structure which differs from the structure of thelower part 2. The shell has a structural junction between theupper part 1 and thelower part 2. This junction is positioned more or less on the edge of the inner protective layer. However, said junction may be located either slightly higher or slightly lower than the edge of the inner protective layer. Generally, the rigid inner protective layer more or less covers the parietal, frontal and upper occipital part of the neurocranium of the wearer, as these are critical areas to be protected.FIG. 1 does not show this inner protective layer. This will be shown in the following figures. The section A-A implemented in the plane of symmetry of the helmet, shown inFIG. 2 , describes the layers of the materials forming the protective shell. - Description of the First Embodiment of the Helmet:
-
FIG. 2 shows a first embodiment of the helmet according to the section A-A. The helmet is made up of anupper part 1 and alower part 2. Theupper part 1 is implemented in a “sandwich” composite material. A “sandwich” composite material refers collectively to a material formed from two layers, also referred to as skins, which may be identical or different, closely connected via an intermediate substance also referred to as a core. Theupper part 1 of the shell includes afirst skin 12 and asecond skin 13 disposed on either side of acore 11. Thelower part 2 is implemented in a composite material comprising the extension of theskins - The helmet includes a rigid inner protective layer 3 serving as a shockproof protective layer. This layer is rounded in shape, disposed in the top part of the helmet. The
upper part 1 is disposed opposite the inner protective layer 3. Thelower part 2 of the shell corresponds to the part which extends towards the bottom of the helmet and which is not opposite the inner protective layer 3. This protective layer is generally covered with afoam layer 4 in contact with the head of the wearer to improve the comfort of the wearer. A non-rigid, supple foam 9 providing comfort and support for the head is fixed to the lower part of the protective shell. - This paragraph describes the constitution of the
upper part 1 of the shell. The sandwich material includes theskin 12 and theskin 13 disposed on either side of thecore 11. Theskins skins skins upper part 1 of the helmet, the folds of theskins fibre tissue FIG. 2 shows an enlarged sample of the disposition of the pieces of tissues oriented in the longitudinal and transverse direction in relation to the plane of symmetry of the helmet (section view A-A). The twoskins shockproof foam core 11. The core 11 may be made from the same material as the inner shockproof foam 3 or from a material having more or less similar properties in terms of rigidity, deformation and shock-resistance performance. The formation of the sandwich composite material with a high-rigidity core and composite skins offering high performance in terms of suppleness and resistance to perforation allows a protective shell to be obtained which offers good performance in terms of both rigidity and perforation. This part of the shell offers the advantage of a high resistance to external stresses and notably to the stresses of deformation. - Consequently, the main advantage of this structure of the
upper part 1 of the protective shell is the possibility of fixing to it the electronicimage projection equipment 7, a head tracking equipment in any place on this part of the shell and also the visor 6. The high rigidity of this part of the shell allows high optical precision to be obtained and the same mechanical holding structure to be used for these three helmet equipments. In prior solutions, the different equipment is fixed onto separate mechanical structures which, when deformations of the shell occur, may present a shift in positioning, resulting in a degradation of the precision of the head-tracking calculations and the quality of the images displayed on the visor. To protect the electronic equipment, an additional protective shell 8 is positioned on the top. However, it is not necessary for this shell to have a high rigidity capability. - The
upper part 1 of the protective shell includes means for fixing electronic and optical equipment, said fixing means being positioned between the twoskins upper part 1 of the protective shell and being fixed with the aid of a resin with a density and rigidity greater than the core 11 in order to transmit the stresses to the twoskins - This paragraph describes the constitution of the
lower part 2 of the shell. Thelower part 2 of the protective shell is made of a monolithic composite material. This material comprises a plurality of stratified layers of composite carbon-fibre and aramid-fibre, glass or polyethylene tissues. Other types of material with similar or higher performances may of course be used without, however, being excluded from the scope of the invention. This part of the shell is formed with the extension of at least one of theskins upper part 1. However, the lower part is preferably formed with the twoskins fibres FIG. 2 .Fibres 21 are disposed in parallel and offset at an angle of around 45° in relation to avertical axis 23 of the plane of symmetry of the helmet.Fibres 22 are also disposed in parallel, offset at an angle of around 45° in relation to thevertical axis 23 and perpendicular to thefibres 21. This offset in the orientation of the fibres in relation to a vertical axis of the plane of symmetry of the helmet allows the suppleness of the composite to be increased. In fact, when the wearer dons the helmet, he removes the sides of the shell, perpendicular to the plane of symmetry, in particular to put on headphones. - The advantage of the structure of the
lower part 2 is that it is less rigid than that of theupper part 1 of the shell. The suppleness in this area of the helmet improves comfort when the helmet is donned and offers reversible deformation capabilities which allow the working life of the shell to be increased. The lower part of the shell is thus subjected to stresses without transmitting them to the more rigid upper part. The helmet retention system is also fixed onto this lower part and is also the cause of deformations of the shell. For reasons of comfort and in order to increase the working life of the shell, it is advantageous for this area of the helmet to have suppleness capabilities. The same applies to the holding in place of the oxygen mask. This area of the helmet also integrates headphones 5 for which it is preferable for shell suppleness facilities to be provided for. - The
junction area 24 between the upper part and the lower part of the shell is determined by the edge of the core of the sandwich material. The thickness of the core 11 preferably reduces progressively in the direction towards thelower part 2. Theedge 14 of the core is then wedge-shaped. This particular form offers the advantage of avoiding concentrations of stress and shearing between the core 11 and theskins skin 12 of theupper part 1 and the composite material layer of thelower part 2, forms a single polymerised unit. The composite material layer of thelower part 2 is formed with theskin 12 and/or theskin 13. In the case where it is formed with the two skins, the latter are then polymerised in thelower part 2. - Description of the Second Embodiment of the Helmet:
-
FIG. 3 shows a version of the helmet integrating the head equipment between the two sandwich material skins. The protective shell comprises three parts: alower part 60 designed in the same way as the lower part of the helmet according to the first embodiment, and an upper part including afront sub-part 70 and arear sub-part 50. The helmet includes an inner protective layer 54 and acomfort foam 55 fixed onto the inner surface of the protective layer 54. - The design of the
lower part 60 is similar to that of the helmet described in the first embodiment. This part comprises a monolithic composite material whosefibres - The rear
upper sub-part 50 comprises a sandwich composite material similar to that described in the first embodiment. This material includes ashockproof foam core 51 and twoskins fibres - The
front sub-part 70 of the helmet corresponds to the front upper part of the helmet onto which the head equipment, thedisplay device 74, thecollimation device visor 75 are fixed. This front sub-part is implemented in a sandwich composite material of the same type as that of the rear sub-part, this material including askin 72 and askin 73 disposed on either side of acore 71. It therefore offers the same rigidity performances allowing the head equipment to be fixed directly onto the protective shell, the shell structure rigidity being sufficient to dispense with a dedicated mechanical structure. Theimage projection equipment 74 is inserted between the twoskins core 71 is greater than that of thecore 51 of the rear sub-part. The area between the twoskins optical system - It is in fact necessary for the surface of the protective shell in contact with the absorbent foam to be as smooth as possible in order to reduce the penetration of the shell into the absorbent foam (an angular-shaped shell will more easily penetrate the absorbent foam and will risk coming into contact with the head, subjecting the head to significant stress).
- The density of the foam constituting the core can also be adapted according to its thickness. The greater the thickness, the lower the density of the absorbent foam and the lower the stress transmitted to the head in the event of an impact.
- In this embodiment, the electronic equipment fixing means are fixed onto one of the
skins - Description of a Third Embodiment of the Helmet:
-
FIG. 4 shows a modular version of the protective shell. Thefront sub-part 70 and therear sub-part 50 are designed from the same materials as those of the upper part of the protective shell of the second embodiment. The head equipment is also inserted between the two sandwich material skins comprising the protective shell. Unlike the second embodiment of the helmet described above, thefront sub-part 70 of the helmet may be separated from therear sub-part 50. Therear sub-part 50 is connected to thelower part 60 of the protective shell. The composite materials of thelower part 60 comprise the same materials as those of the skins of the material of therear sub-part 50, differing only in terms of the orientation of the tissue fibres which constitute these materials. Fixingelements front sub-part 70 and therear sub-part 50 to be joined and separated. The visor-fixing inserts are also mounted on theimmovable front sub-part 70. The advantage of this modular version of the shell is that a standard part of the helmet, comprising the rear sub-part and the lower part of the shell, can be implemented, and the front part of the helmet carrying the head equipment can easily be modified or replaced. - The invention is intended particularly for aircraft pilots' helmets. However, it also applies to any protective helmet on which head equipment is or is not mounted, for example helmets in the automotive field.
Claims (19)
1. A helmet comprising a protective shell, wherein
the protective shell comprises an upper part disposed in the top part of the helmet and a lower part,
the upper part comprises a sandwich composite material including two skins, disposed on either side of a core, themselves comprising a plurality of composite tissue layers, and
the lower part comprises a monolithic composite material.
2. The helmet according to claim 1 , further comprising an inner protective layer disposed in the top part of the helmet, wherein the upper part of the protective shell is disposed opposite the inner protective layer and the lower part extends towards the bottom of the helmet beyond the inner protective layer.
3. The helmet according to claim 2 , wherein the monolithic composite material of the lower part is formed with at least one skin of sandwich composite material of the upper part of the shell, said skin being extended beyond the core.
4. The helmet according to claim 3 , wherein the tissue layers of the lower part of the shell include fibres whose orientation is offset by around 45° in relation to a vertical axis of the plane of symmetry of the helmet.
5. The helmet according to claim 4 , wherein the edge of the core of the sandwich composite material in the area between the upper part and the lower part of the protective shell is wedge-shaped.
6. The helmet according to the claim 1 , on which at least one head equipment is mounted, wherein said equipment is fixed onto the outer surface of the skin of the sandwich composite material.
7. The helmet according to claim 1 , on which at least one head equipment is mounted, wherein said equipment is fixed between the two skins of the sandwich composite material, a part of the core of said composite material being hollowed in order to insert said head equipment.
8. The helmet according to claim 7 , wherein the core of the composite material of the front sub-part of the upper part of the protective shell includes a material thickness greater than the core of the composite material of the rear sub-part.
9. The helmet according to claim 1 , wherein the upper part of the protective shell includes two sub-parts, a rear sub-part connected to the lower part of the protective shell and an immovable front sub-part, fixing elements mounted on said sub-parts allowing said sub-parts to be joined together and separated.
10. The helmet according to claim 6 for a military aircraft pilot comprising a visor and the head equipment being a device for projecting images onto said visor, wherein the projection device and the visor are mounted on the front part of the upper part of the protective shell.
11. The helmet according to claim 7 for a military aircraft pilot comprising a visor and the head equipment being a device for projecting images onto said visor, wherein the projection device and the visor are mounted on the front part of the upper part of the protective shell.
12. The helmet according to claim 8 for a military aircraft pilot comprising a visor and the head equipment being a device for projecting images onto said visor, wherein the projection device and the visor are mounted on the front part of the upper part of the protective shell.
13. The helmet according to claim 9 for a military aircraft pilot comprising a visor and the head equipment being a device for projecting images onto said visor, wherein the projection device and the visor are mounted on the front part of the upper part of the protective shell
14. The helmet according to claim 10 , wherein a second head equipment is a head tracking system.
15. The helmet according to claim 11 , wherein a second head equipment is a head tracking system.
16. The helmet according to claim 12 , wherein a second head equipment is a head tracking system.
17. The helmet according to claim 13 , wherein a second head equipment is a head tracking system.
18. The helmet according to claim 1 , wherein the core of the sandwich composite material is a foam material intended for impact protection.
19. The helmet according to claim 1 , wherein the upper part of the protective shell covers more or less the entire parietal, frontal and upper occipital part of the neurocranium of the wearer.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR0904270 | 2009-09-08 | ||
FR0904270A FR2949648B1 (en) | 2009-09-08 | 2009-09-08 | HELMET COMPRISING A VARIABLE RIGIDITY PROTECTION SHELL |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110055993A1 true US20110055993A1 (en) | 2011-03-10 |
Family
ID=42269565
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/876,339 Abandoned US20110055993A1 (en) | 2009-09-08 | 2010-09-07 | Helmet including a protective shell with variable rigidity |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20110055993A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2292111A1 (en) |
FR (1) | FR2949648B1 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20140198262A1 (en) * | 2013-01-17 | 2014-07-17 | Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. | Video playing system |
US9222758B2 (en) | 2011-08-26 | 2015-12-29 | Velocity Systems, Llc | Versatile protective helmet appliqué assembly |
US20160157545A1 (en) * | 2014-12-05 | 2016-06-09 | Michael R. Bowman | Collapsible safety helmet |
US20210145105A1 (en) * | 2012-05-14 | 2021-05-20 | William A. Jacob | Energy Dissipating Helmet |
Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2296335A (en) * | 1940-11-29 | 1942-09-22 | David R Brady | Athletic protector |
US2351235A (en) * | 1942-06-18 | 1944-06-13 | Gen Motors Corp | Helmet |
US3471866A (en) * | 1968-07-24 | 1969-10-14 | American Safety Equip | Safety helmet suspension |
US3923370A (en) * | 1974-10-15 | 1975-12-02 | Honeywell Inc | Head mounted displays |
US4075717A (en) * | 1975-02-28 | 1978-02-28 | Lemelson Jerome H | Helmate |
US4081209A (en) * | 1975-04-29 | 1978-03-28 | Elliott Brothers (London) Limited | Headgear with spherical semi-reflecting surface |
US4349815A (en) * | 1979-01-11 | 1982-09-14 | Redifon Simulation Limited | Head-movable frame-scanner for head-coupled display |
US4446480A (en) * | 1981-12-14 | 1984-05-01 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Head position and orientation sensor |
US5112667A (en) * | 1987-08-03 | 1992-05-12 | Allied-Signal Inc. | Impact resistant helmet |
US5113177A (en) * | 1988-10-04 | 1992-05-12 | Allied-Signal Inc. | Apparatus for a display system |
US5341242A (en) * | 1991-09-05 | 1994-08-23 | Elbit Ltd. | Helmet mounted display |
US20020010958A1 (en) * | 1997-09-03 | 2002-01-31 | Paul Schiebl | Protective headgear and chin pad |
US6641893B1 (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 2003-11-04 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Functionally-graded materials and the engineering of tribological resistance at surfaces |
US7046215B1 (en) * | 1999-03-01 | 2006-05-16 | Bae Systems Plc | Head tracker system |
US7130447B2 (en) * | 2002-09-27 | 2006-10-31 | The Boeing Company | Gaze tracking system, eye-tracking assembly and an associated method of calibration |
US20060256140A1 (en) * | 2005-05-11 | 2006-11-16 | L-3 Communications Corporation | Dynamic display optimization method and system with image motion |
WO2009046979A1 (en) * | 2007-10-12 | 2009-04-16 | Dsm Ip Assets B.V. | A helmet containing polyethylene fibers |
US20100283412A1 (en) * | 2009-05-05 | 2010-11-11 | Thales | "Lip Light" Automatically Controlled by the Position of the Head |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3314924A1 (en) * | 1983-02-26 | 1984-09-06 | Kálmán 2125 Garlstorf Györy | Crash helmet for motor-cyclists |
JPH0593308A (en) * | 1991-09-27 | 1993-04-16 | Shimadzu Corp | Helmet |
IL107502A (en) | 1993-11-04 | 1999-12-31 | Elbit Systems Ltd | Helmet display mounting system |
FR2717045B1 (en) | 1994-03-11 | 1996-05-31 | Sextant Avionique | Head equipment with isostatic connection between hull and optronic equipment. |
FR2763483B3 (en) * | 1997-05-22 | 1999-06-18 | Xavier Thuault | PROTECTION DEVICE FOR HEAD WITH HIGH ENERGY DISSIPATION RATE |
-
2009
- 2009-09-08 FR FR0904270A patent/FR2949648B1/en active Active
-
2010
- 2010-09-06 EP EP10175485A patent/EP2292111A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-09-07 US US12/876,339 patent/US20110055993A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2296335A (en) * | 1940-11-29 | 1942-09-22 | David R Brady | Athletic protector |
US2351235A (en) * | 1942-06-18 | 1944-06-13 | Gen Motors Corp | Helmet |
US3471866A (en) * | 1968-07-24 | 1969-10-14 | American Safety Equip | Safety helmet suspension |
US3923370A (en) * | 1974-10-15 | 1975-12-02 | Honeywell Inc | Head mounted displays |
US4075717A (en) * | 1975-02-28 | 1978-02-28 | Lemelson Jerome H | Helmate |
US4081209A (en) * | 1975-04-29 | 1978-03-28 | Elliott Brothers (London) Limited | Headgear with spherical semi-reflecting surface |
US4349815A (en) * | 1979-01-11 | 1982-09-14 | Redifon Simulation Limited | Head-movable frame-scanner for head-coupled display |
US4446480A (en) * | 1981-12-14 | 1984-05-01 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Head position and orientation sensor |
US5112667A (en) * | 1987-08-03 | 1992-05-12 | Allied-Signal Inc. | Impact resistant helmet |
US5113177A (en) * | 1988-10-04 | 1992-05-12 | Allied-Signal Inc. | Apparatus for a display system |
US5341242A (en) * | 1991-09-05 | 1994-08-23 | Elbit Ltd. | Helmet mounted display |
US6641893B1 (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 2003-11-04 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Functionally-graded materials and the engineering of tribological resistance at surfaces |
US20020010958A1 (en) * | 1997-09-03 | 2002-01-31 | Paul Schiebl | Protective headgear and chin pad |
US7046215B1 (en) * | 1999-03-01 | 2006-05-16 | Bae Systems Plc | Head tracker system |
US7130447B2 (en) * | 2002-09-27 | 2006-10-31 | The Boeing Company | Gaze tracking system, eye-tracking assembly and an associated method of calibration |
US20060256140A1 (en) * | 2005-05-11 | 2006-11-16 | L-3 Communications Corporation | Dynamic display optimization method and system with image motion |
WO2009046979A1 (en) * | 2007-10-12 | 2009-04-16 | Dsm Ip Assets B.V. | A helmet containing polyethylene fibers |
US20100283412A1 (en) * | 2009-05-05 | 2010-11-11 | Thales | "Lip Light" Automatically Controlled by the Position of the Head |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9222758B2 (en) | 2011-08-26 | 2015-12-29 | Velocity Systems, Llc | Versatile protective helmet appliqué assembly |
US9557144B2 (en) | 2011-08-26 | 2017-01-31 | Velocity Systems Llc | Versatile protective helmet applique assembly |
US20210145105A1 (en) * | 2012-05-14 | 2021-05-20 | William A. Jacob | Energy Dissipating Helmet |
US20140198262A1 (en) * | 2013-01-17 | 2014-07-17 | Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. | Video playing system |
US9383584B2 (en) * | 2013-01-17 | 2016-07-05 | Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. | Video playing system |
US20160157545A1 (en) * | 2014-12-05 | 2016-06-09 | Michael R. Bowman | Collapsible safety helmet |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
FR2949648A1 (en) | 2011-03-11 |
FR2949648B1 (en) | 2011-11-25 |
EP2292111A1 (en) | 2011-03-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10182606B2 (en) | Helmut with monocular optical display | |
US6279172B1 (en) | Custom fitting assembly for helmet | |
EP0066402B1 (en) | Night vision goggles | |
US5267708A (en) | Head support apparatus | |
US20110055993A1 (en) | Helmet including a protective shell with variable rigidity | |
US5584073A (en) | Integrated helmet system | |
US20150062707A1 (en) | Head mounted display | |
US20170123451A1 (en) | Audio communications and display system worn on the head of a user and comprising a retractable nape support device | |
US8947268B2 (en) | Stepped instrument panel for aircraft | |
US10921600B2 (en) | Aircraft head-mounted visualization system with hasps compatible with audio headphones | |
KR101623925B1 (en) | An aircraft having a cockpit with optimized outside visibility, and a method | |
EP2810118B1 (en) | Improvements in or relating to image display systems | |
US20120200917A1 (en) | Binocular system | |
GB2247822A (en) | A pilot's helmet. | |
JP4929725B2 (en) | Helmet mount display | |
US20220091424A1 (en) | Helmet-mounted display system comprising a helmet-mounted display and a movable visor compatible with the use of binoculars | |
US4508424A (en) | Binocular display of information with two combiner means | |
US20220128823A1 (en) | Helmet display system comprising a removable helmet-mounted display compatible with the use of binoculars | |
US20230367130A1 (en) | Head-mounted or helmet-mounted display module | |
Melzer et al. | An integrated approach to helmet display system design | |
EP0643563B1 (en) | An article of headwear | |
Crowley et al. | Flight helmets: How they work and why you should wear one | |
Sedillo et al. | Helmets: conventional to cueing | |
Cameron et al. | Viper helmet-mounted display (HMD): from design concept to flight test | |
Kliusnikov et al. | Trends in the improvement of the equipment of the military pilots |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: THALES, FRANCE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BAUDOU, JOEL;VIOT, PHILIPPE;REEL/FRAME:025097/0977 Effective date: 20100922 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |