US20100312496A1 - Devices, systems and methods of detecting defects in workpieces - Google Patents

Devices, systems and methods of detecting defects in workpieces Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100312496A1
US20100312496A1 US12/745,983 US74598308A US2010312496A1 US 20100312496 A1 US20100312496 A1 US 20100312496A1 US 74598308 A US74598308 A US 74598308A US 2010312496 A1 US2010312496 A1 US 2010312496A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
workpiece
transducer
signal
detecting
defect
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/745,983
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Peter Robert Armitage
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Exeter
Original Assignee
University of Exeter
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Exeter filed Critical University of Exeter
Priority to US12/745,983 priority Critical patent/US20100312496A1/en
Assigned to UNIVERSITY OF EXETER reassignment UNIVERSITY OF EXETER ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ARMITAGE, PETER ROBERT
Publication of US20100312496A1 publication Critical patent/US20100312496A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/04—Analysing solids
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/04—Analysing solids
    • G01N29/043—Analysing solids in the interior, e.g. by shear waves
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/04—Analysing solids
    • G01N29/12—Analysing solids by measuring frequency or resonance of acoustic waves
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/34—Generating the ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
    • G01N29/348—Generating the ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor with frequency characteristics, e.g. single frequency signals, chirp signals
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/36—Detecting the response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
    • G01N29/42—Detecting the response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor by frequency filtering or by tuning to resonant frequency
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/44—Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
    • G01N29/4445—Classification of defects
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/01—Indexing codes associated with the measuring variable
    • G01N2291/014—Resonance or resonant frequency
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/10—Number of transducers
    • G01N2291/106—Number of transducers one or more transducer arrays
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/26—Scanned objects
    • G01N2291/269—Various geometry objects
    • G01N2291/2694—Wings or other aircraft parts

Definitions

  • This invention relates to devices, systems and methods for use in detecting a defect in a work piece and in particular, but not exclusively, to detecting defects in parts of aircraft.
  • the present invention describes a number of embodiments, which serve to mitigate one or more of these problems.
  • the invention consists in the device for use in detecting a defect in a workpiece including:
  • a broad band transducer for contacting the workpiece;
  • a driving circuit connectable to the transducer to operate the transducer in an actuator mode;
  • a signal output circuit connectable to operate the transducer in a sensor mode; and
  • a control for selectively connecting the transducer to the driving circuit or the signal output circuit.
  • the device includes a data interface and the microprocessor may form both control and the interface.
  • the microprocessor may be linked to at least one of an analogue to digital converter; a digital-to-analogue converter; a data memory; a wireless connection and a communication link.
  • the driving circuit may include a pair of oscillators for generating signals of frequency F 1 and F 2 respectively and summer for summing the signals F 1 , F 2 to provide a driving signal for the transducer.
  • the invention may also include a defect detecting system including an array of devices as set out above in a central computer linked to the interface of each device by a communication link.
  • the computer may be arranged for generating control signals to be sent by the communication link to instruct the controls of the respective device to operate the associated transducer in an actuator or sensor mode.
  • the array may be in the form of a grid for extending across a workpiece in which case the computer may operate the devices in a time reversal mode and the location of the time reverse defect generated signals may be determined by determining the location of the sensor nearest the focus of the time reverse defect generated signals.
  • the devices may be embedded in the workpiece.
  • the system may additionally include a dedicated actuator, such as a narrow band actuator.
  • a dedicated actuator such as a narrow band actuator.
  • the system may additionally include a dedicated sensor.
  • the system may monitor the signal received by at least one device, which is in sensor mode, for one or more harmonics, such as a third harmonic, in the output signal and may produce an output in response to that detection.
  • harmonics such as a third harmonic
  • system may include electronic circuitry to monitor the signal frequency and may produce an output in response to that detection.
  • the invention consists in a system for detecting defects including a plurality of transducers each having an interface and a configuration device for configuring at least some of the transducers as either a sensor or an actuator, a communication link connecting the interfaces to a central computer, whereby the computer can instruct the configuration devices via the interfaces to configure their respective transducer.
  • the invention consists of a method of detecting micro-cracking or de-lamination in a workpiece including: inputting a sonic or ultrasonic impasse into the workpiece; detecting the resultant signal in the workpiece; monitoring the signal to detect the appearance of harmonics, such as the third harmonic of the impulse frequency and thereby detecting the presence of micro-cracking or de-lamination.
  • the method may also include monitoring the signal to detect the subsequent variation in the relative magnitude of the harmonics, such as the reduction in or disappearance of the third harmonic, and thereby detecting the imminent transition to structural failure.
  • the invention includes a method of detecting a defect in a workpiece including inputting into the workpiece two signals at respective frequencies F 1 and F 2 to create vibrations in the workpiece, detecting a resultant output at another location on the workpiece with wideband receiver and monitoring one or more of the resultant harmonics, overtones or sidebands to determine the presence or absence of a defect.
  • Another aspect of the invention includes a method of detecting a defect in a workpiece including:
  • step of monitoring includes feeding the detected signal through a phase lock loop including a voltage controlled oscillator VCO having the sonic input frequency as its input signal and determining the frequency shift from the VCO control voltage.
  • Another aspect of the invention includes a method of detecting a defect in a workpiece including inputting two sonic ultrasonic impulses into a workpiece, the impulses being of equal amplitude but 180° out of phase, detecting the resultant vibrations in the workpiece to generate respective output signals, summing the output signals and monitoring the amplitude of the summed signals for determining the presence or absence of a defect.
  • the invention consists in the broad band piezoelectric transducer including:
  • a piezoelectric element (a) a piezoelectric element; (b) an acoustic matching front plate; and (c) a tungsten particle containing epoxy resin backing block for providing acoustic attenuation over a range of operating frequencies.
  • the backing block may contain tungsten particles of 250, 25 and ⁇ 1 micron diameters. It may additionally or alternatively include a mounting rod extending through at least part of the backing block. Preferably a mounting rod is of a semi-rigid material.
  • FIG. 1 is a stylised view of a transducer unit
  • FIG. 2 is a picture of a transducer unit for use in the device of FIG. 1 ;
  • FIGS. 3 and 4 are views from above and below respectively of an actual unit of the type illustrated in FIG. 1 ;
  • FIGS. 5 to 8 illustrate a variety of electronic configurations for use in the device of FIG. 1 ;
  • FIGS. 9 to 12 illustrate a variety of configuration transducers devices linked to a central computer for use in different test modes
  • FIGS. 13( a ) to ( c ) show a number of device locations on the test workpiece, which incorporates a defect
  • FIGS. 14( a ) to ( c ) show the corresponding outputs
  • FIGS. 15( a ) to ( g ) illustrate the output of a transducer device in sensor mode for a workpiece which is stimulated by a transducer device in transmission mode with increasing loading on the workpiece;
  • FIGS. 16( a ) to ( d ) form a sequential description of time reversal defect detection
  • FIGS. 17( a ) to 17 ( d ) show waveforms connected with another embodiment
  • FIG. 18 is a graph illustrating non-linear stress v strain
  • FIG. 19 is a graph showing the resultant wave form distortion
  • FIG. 20 illustrates schematically transducer configurations on concrete samples
  • FIG. 21 is photographs of cracked and undamaged concrete samples
  • FIG. 22 shows test results from the samples of FIG. 21 ;
  • FIG. 23 is a photograph of a concrete sample prepared for testing
  • FIG. 24 illustrates test results from the sample of FIG. 23 ;
  • FIG. 25 shows the combination of two sine waves
  • FIG. 26 illustrates the inter-modulation products resulting from the use of combined sine waves
  • FIG. 27 illustrates a test configuration and test samples
  • FIGS. 28 and 29 are test results of test on the samples of FIG. 27 ;
  • FIGS. 31 and 32 show comparable results for a through core test and a surface core test respectively.
  • FIG. 33 is a schematic circuit of a detection device.
  • Ultrasonic techniques for detecting defects in workpieces are well known and a variety of transducers are utilised.
  • an ultrasonic transducer is passed over the surface of a workpiece sending ultrasonic pulses into, the workpiece and the reflected signal is detected.
  • a transmitter is placed at one location on a workpiece and one or more receivers on the workpiece detect the resultant signal.
  • the transducers and receivers are designed very specifically for a particular purpose and tend only to be able to handle a narrow band of signals.
  • the techniques used can also be very workpiece specific. Problems have also been encountered when trying to use such techniques with composite materials.
  • transducers and methodology which is more flexible, and in particular, is capable of determining whether or not a component has a defect both quickly and easily.
  • the Applicants have developed a number of approaches in this connection, which are in part based on the insight that if they could configure a broadband ultrasound transducer, which could be operated either as a transmitter or a receiver then it would be possible to implement a wide range of techniques, which the user could select in accordance with the issues that needed to be dealt with.
  • the device is capable of being pre-programmed with the desired waveform data and consequently able to transmit a variety of complicated waveforms, some examples that have been evaluated are sine wave bursts of a specific duration, sine wave sum bursts and frequency sweeps.
  • the microprocessor 33 is connected to SRAM memory which is addressed by an independent counter, the ND converter 31 or the D/A converter 32 directly accesses this memory when the device is either sampling a received signal or transmitting a pre-programmed waveform, the counter being incremented for each data sample received or transmitted.
  • the counter can be made to count in reverse, that is decrement.
  • the microprocessor can implement a pre-determined series of count instructions to the counters, thereby allowing the data to be fetched or loaded in any part of the memory space. This method can be usefully employed when using time reversal techniques that require the data to be filtered for harmonic content.
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate aspects of a basic transducer assembly.
  • the transducer 10 comprises a piezoelectric crystal 11 mounted on a tungsten epoxy backing 12 .
  • a spring loaded threaded nylon rod 13 and nut 14 is used to secure the transducer into its housing and provide a force when the transducer is placed in contact with the work piece.
  • Electrical connections 15 also pass through the backing 12 , whilst a matching front plate 16 is mounted on the front surface of the crystal 11 .
  • the piezoelectric is preferably composed of a epoxy/PZT composite and the ratio of PZT to Epoxy can be changed to match the workpiece material.
  • the workpiece is made of aluminium, aluminium has an acoustic impedance of 12MRayls and the PZT/Epoxy element has also 12MRayls acoustic impedance, and likewise the tungsten/Epoxy backing material has an acoustic impedance of 12MRayls.
  • the tungsten, in the epoxy, has typically been made of spheres of a single size according to the frequency at which the transducer has been intended to be used. However, for lower frequencies, where large spheres are required, this has been particularly unsuccessful because only a limited number of spheres per unit volume could be inserted.
  • the Applicants have realised that they can overcome the restricted frequency range of such transducers by having a range of sphere sizes, which not only enables them to achieve the desired density of tungsten, but also provides spheres of requisite size for different frequencies.
  • a backing block containing tungsten particles of 250, 25, and less than 1 micron diameters has provided a particularly practical transducer.
  • the semi-rigid nature of the nylon rod 14 is also efficacious as this would not introduce resonators in the backing.
  • the transducer 10 is mounted in a frame 17 , with associated circuit boards 18 . Examples of such overall box assemblies are shown, indicated 19 , at FIGS. 3 and 4 .
  • FIG. 5 shows the circuitry for one such arrangement 19 , where analogue signals are utilized, throughout for the signal processing.
  • the transducer 10 can receive and transmit signals to relay controlled multiple pole switch at 21 . If it is acting as a receiver, then the switch is connected as shown in FIG. 5 and its output signal passes to a differential charge amplifier 22 and thence to another amplifier and level converter 23 , whose output is fed to a further switch 24 and thence to an interface 25 , which can be connected to a data bus. If the transducer is in transmit mode, switches 24 and 21 are switched to form a separate channel. In this case the transmission signal passes through an amplifier and level converter 26 and a power amplifier differential output 27 and thence to the transducer 10 through switch 21 . The position of the switches 21 , 24 is controlled from the interface 25 on output 28 and the interface also provides the necessary power supply at 29 . It may also adjust the gain of the amplifiers 23 , 26 on output 30 .
  • the transducer 10 can operate on a broadband and because it can be remotely configured as a transmitter or a receiver via the interface 25 , the Applicants have created an extremely flexible arrangement for use in defect detection.
  • FIG. 6 shows the corresponding arrangement in which the signals to be transmitted or received are respectively analogue to digitally or digitally to analogue converted by the respective converters 31 , 32 , with the microprocessor 33 acting as the interface.
  • the transducer is connected to the amplifier module, which essentially substitutes for components 22 , 23 , 26 and 27 in FIG. 5 . It will be understood that the advantage of using digital signals is that it is easier to communicate these with a central computer.
  • FIG. 7 shows a further development in which the control circuitry includes sine wave generators 34 , 35 for generating respective frequencies in F 1 and F 2 . These can be summed together at 36 for embodiments where it is desirable for the transducer 10 to transmit two frequencies simultaneously.
  • FIG. 8 shows a similar “analogue” version for transmitting signals F 1 and F 2 and otherwise corresponds to FIG. 5 .
  • FIG. 9 illustrates a basic system configuration.
  • Two units 19 are applied to a workpiece 37 with the right hand one set to transmit and the left hand one set to receive. They are connected to a communication link 38 , e.g. a data bus which is in turn connected to a local computer 39 , which may be connected to other computers or a mainframe computer by an internet connection 40 .
  • a communication link 38 e.g. a data bus which is in turn connected to a local computer 39 , which may be connected to other computers or a mainframe computer by an internet connection 40 .
  • FIG. 10 illustrates an alternative arrangement which is essentially the same as FIG. 9 except that at 41 a unit 19 is used to operate either an actuator or a hammer schematically illustrated at 42 .
  • FIG. 11 exactly corresponds to FIG. 9 but recognises the possibility of transmitting two pulses.
  • FIG. 12 illustrates units 19 configured in an array across the workpiece.
  • the central unit 19 is set to transmit and the surrounding units are set to receive. It will be appreciated that a variety of arrays can be built up, for example five by five.
  • the basic configuration illustrated in FIG. 9 could be used in a typical industry way wherein the unit 19 set to transmit transmits a suitable resonant frequency an the receiving unit records the resonant decaying signal. If there is a defect there will be a shift in frequency as the amplitude decays.
  • FIG. 16 A person skilled in the art will also be familiar with the concept of time reversal, but for convenience this is set out in FIG. 16 .
  • the Applicants' ability to build extremely flexible arrays with transducers which can operate both as receivers and transmitters makes the achievement of time reversal much more than a theoretical possibility and enables the initial pilot signal (the source in FIG. 16 ) to be generated at any point in the array.
  • the Applicants have realised that if the time reverse retransmission is made at high power then considerable energy will be delivered at the point of origin of the source. In this way highly focused energy can be provided at any point on the surface of the test material underneath the array. If there should be a defect at the refocusing position itself, then harmonics will be generated and these will be observed by the surrounding units 19 as well as the unit at the refocusing point.
  • the relationship between the units 19 in their respective transmit (T) and receive (R) modes with the defect can be any of the instances illustrated in FIGS. 13 ( a ), ( b ) and ( c ). Corresponding outputs are shown in FIGS. 14 ( a ), ( b ) and ( c ). It will be particularly noted that in FIGS. 14 ( a ) and 14 ( b ) the third harmonic initially rises sharply under low impact, but then falls away as the second harmonic rises under higher impact. It is considered that the rising third harmonic indicates where the workpiece is in a condition of micro-cracking, but when delamination occurs then this falls away and the second harmonic rises rapidly. The Applicants have therefore developed an approach which enables the detection of micro-cracking and distinguishing this from the onset of de-lamination. They are not aware of any other system which can achieve this. The effect is also illustrated in the graphs of FIG. 15 .
  • FIG. 17 illustrates another mode of operation in which two impulses of equal frequency and amplitude but phase shifted 180° are transmitted.
  • FIG. 17 ( a ) shows the received signals from the workpiece which are generated by the impulses and
  • FIG. 17( b ) shows their summed output.
  • FIGS. 17 ( a ) and ( b ) illustrate the situation where there, is no defect.
  • FIGS. 17 ( c ) and ( d ) are the corresponding results where there is a defect. It will be noted that in FIG. 17( d ) there is a clear output, whereas in FIG. 17( b ) the signal is essentially null.
  • This process thus very quickly provides a readable output showing the existence of a defect, without the need for extensive frequency analysis using extensive computation and time.
  • a ratio is generated from the respective maximum amplitude of the signals. The value of the ratio is indicative of the presence or absence of a defect.
  • the waveform at (a) is essentially triangular, whereas at (b) the waves are more in the form of a sine wave. It is believed that this is a result of the undamaged carbon fibres in the test piece being locked up by each other, hence producing the triangular wave but when damage has occurred, they are more free to move and the sine wave output results. The degree of transition between the two wave forms may provide an early indication of damage.
  • the wide bandwidth of the transducers in, for example the FIG. 9 configuration, enables the transducers to pick up sidebands.
  • the presence of these sidebands has also been determined to be an indication of damage and they can be quantified using a modulation index.
  • These sidebands are usually generated where two frequencies are transmitted. They can either be transmitted from a single transmitter 19 , using the circuitry described earlier, or two separate transmitters can be utilised.
  • a loudspeaker may also be used to bring the workpiece up to resonance and, then after the input is discontinued the frequency shift can be measured as the workpiece's vibration dies down.
  • a laser interferometer may be used to measure a resonant peak when a frequency sweep is applied to the loudspeaker.
  • This resonant frequency is applied to bring the workpiece up to a high amplitude oscillation.
  • the loudspeaker is then turned off and the frequency shift measured as the oscillation dies away.
  • Nonlinear acoustic methods seek to determine how an ultrasonic waveform changes when it propagates through or over the surface region of a medium. These changes are directly related to the stress strain relationship and the hysteretic properties of a material and are not unduly effected by the ray path. In damaged materials, particularly ones that have microcracking, the stress strain relationship does not obey Hooke's Law of elasticity, stress is not proportional to strain, it is not linear.
  • the simplest method in a practical system that measures nonlinear effects in a material using acoustic waves is to measure the harmonics generated when a pure tone (pure sine wave) is transmitted through or over the surface of a material. This is illustrated below in FIG. 20 where a transmitter 43 and a receiver 44 are mounted on a workpiece 45 .
  • the harmonics are measured by examining the power spectra of the received signal.
  • the transmitted frequencies (fundamental) amplitude is compared to that of the amplitudes of each of the harmonic frequencies.
  • These harmonics are expressed in terms of decibels (dB) down from the fundamental, that is the number of decibels below the fundamentals amplitude. These values can be converted to a distortion factor that is expressed as a percentage.
  • FIG. 21 shows the photographs of two concrete test cylinders (size 300 mm long, 150 mm diameter).
  • FIG. 22 shows the results obtained by sending a 50 kHz sine wave over the surface of these two cylinders of concrete.
  • the second harmonic generated in the severely cracked region is clearly visible and has a level of distortion above 1%.
  • the third and fourth harmonics are not so prominent but have values above 0.5%.
  • the undamaged concrete sample does not produce any clear harmonics and consists of noise predominately below 0.25%.
  • FIG. 28 shows a microdamaged drilled test core with an ultrasonic transmitter on the right and a receiver on the left.
  • the blue trace of the spectral plot in FIG. 24 shows that transmitting and receiving in a line through the concrete close to the crack produces relatively high levels of 2, 3 and 4, harmonics above 0.5%. Transmitting and receiving in a line away from the crack (shown in red) produces little harmonic content. If two sine waves of different frequency are added together the resulting power spectrum is unaltered, this is illustrated in FIG. 9 below.
  • a ( t ) 1 ⁇ 2[1 cos(2 a )]+[cos( ab )cos( a+b )]+1 ⁇ 2[1 cos(2 b )]
  • a ( t ) 1+cos( ab )cos( a+b ) ⁇ 1 ⁇ 2 cos(2 a ) ⁇ 1 ⁇ 2 cos(2 b )
  • FIG. 26 shows a graphical representation of this process.
  • the frequencies are; the second harmonics of f 1 and f 2 that is (2*f 1 ) and (2*f 2 ).
  • the sum and difference frequencies of f 1 and f 2 that is (f 1 +f 2 ) and (f 1 f 2 ).
  • the second harmonics are half the amplitude of the sum and difference frequencies. As there is a larger variation in the generation of the sum and difference frequencies these should provide greater sensitivity in the indication of non-linearity. If the sine wave sum is subject to nonlinearity that is of a higher order than a square law stress strain relationship then many'other multiples, sum and difference combinations result, these will all appear in the spectra.
  • FIG. 11 shows a photograph of the transmitter and receiver placed against a test sample cube of concrete (size 50 ⁇ 50 ⁇ 50 mm). Two concrete test samples were selected and are shown in this figure, one has a crack running through its entire length, the other is undamaged.
  • the transmitter comprises a single piezoelectric wide band actuator that is continuously sending the sum of two sine waveforms at preprogrammed frequencies.
  • FIG. 28 shows the time and spectrum plots for the received waveform having passed through each of the concrete test cubes.
  • the difference in the amplitude of the two frequencies results from the ultrasonic attenuation of concrete being frequency dependent, losses are greater at higher frequencies.
  • the data for the damaged sample is shown in blue, and the good sample shown in red.
  • the damaged sample shows clearly that harmonics and intermodulation products have been generated by the crack.
  • the upper side band (f 1 +f 2 ) at 160 KHz is below 0.5% for the good sample and rises above 1% in the damaged sample.
  • the second harmonic of f 2 at 240 kHz changes from, 56 dB (0.16%) in the good sample and rising above 0.5% in the damaged sample.
  • the effect of the combinations of the harmonics and intermodulation products are very noticeable in the frequency range 200 to 350 kHz.
  • 2f 2 240 kHz
  • 2f 1 +f 2 200 kHz
  • f 1 +2f 2 280 kHz
  • 2f 1 +2f 2 320 kHz
  • the result is the formation of peaks and troughs within this range, corresponding to the interaction of their frequencies and phases, this effect can mask the changes between the good and bad samples.
  • the correct choice of the two frequencies f 2 and f 1 is an important factor.
  • FIG. 29 illustrates this by showing the spectra resulting from two different frequency combinations, f 1 +f 2 is reduced by the effect of the third harmonic of f 1 (3*f 1 ).
  • FIG. 30 shows a spectral plot taken over the surface of a mildly damaged region of the concrete test cylinders, shown previously in FIG. 21 .
  • This test was performed at the two frequencies 40 and 70 kHz.
  • the two fundamental frequencies are not sufficiently separated to form clear spectral peaks, however the intermodulation products and in particular the second multiple of f 1 +f 2 that is 2*(f 1 +f 2 ) shows a very clear peak above 1% distortion in the damaged region.
  • FIG. 31 shows a dual frequency being applied to the microdamaged drilled core.
  • the dual frequency ultrasonic waveform was transmitted through the sample at two locations, one along the crack, shown in blue and the other away from the crack shown in red. The difference between the two locations is very clear.
  • the cracked region produces harmonics and intermodulation products well above 0.5% distortion factor and f 1 +f 2 is above 1%.
  • the less cracked region has all levels below 0.5% and for frequencies above 250 kHz is below 0.25%.
  • FIG. 32 shows the same core but this time tested on one side only, the receiver positions are indicated by the letter R and the transmitter positions by letter T.
  • the red trace corresponds to a position away from the crack and the blue near to the crack. There is less difference between the two positions at low frequency however at higher frequencies, above 300 kHz, the cracked region does produce a significantly higher levels of intermodulation produces particularly at 3f 2 +f 1 (310 KHz).
  • the transmitter 43 may be powered by a signal generator 46 and the receiver 44 may transmit its output to a monitor/comparator 47 which measures the amplitude of the harmonics and/or intermodulation products to compare them with one or more predetermine levels (e.g. the 0.5% and 1% levels previously indicated).
  • the monitor comparator 47 may then produce either pass or fail signals or pass, check or fail signals which can be displayed by indicator 48 for example using a red and green light display or a red, amber, green display, as shown at 49 .

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
US12/745,983 2007-12-04 2008-12-04 Devices, systems and methods of detecting defects in workpieces Abandoned US20100312496A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/745,983 US20100312496A1 (en) 2007-12-04 2008-12-04 Devices, systems and methods of detecting defects in workpieces

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0723622.7 2007-12-04
GBGB0723622.7A GB0723622D0 (en) 2007-12-04 2007-12-04 Devices, systems and methods of detecting defects in workpieces
US1313007P 2007-12-12 2007-12-12
PCT/GB2008/004001 WO2009071889A2 (en) 2007-12-04 2008-12-04 Devices, systems and methods of detecting defects in workpieces
US12/745,983 US20100312496A1 (en) 2007-12-04 2008-12-04 Devices, systems and methods of detecting defects in workpieces

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2008/004001 A-371-Of-International WO2009071889A2 (en) 2007-12-04 2008-12-04 Devices, systems and methods of detecting defects in workpieces

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/319,342 Division US10132780B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2014-06-30 Devices, systems and methods of detecting defects in workpieces

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100312496A1 true US20100312496A1 (en) 2010-12-09

Family

ID=38962530

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/745,983 Abandoned US20100312496A1 (en) 2007-12-04 2008-12-04 Devices, systems and methods of detecting defects in workpieces
US14/319,342 Active 2031-04-15 US10132780B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2014-06-30 Devices, systems and methods of detecting defects in workpieces

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/319,342 Active 2031-04-15 US10132780B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2014-06-30 Devices, systems and methods of detecting defects in workpieces

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US20100312496A1 (de)
EP (3) EP2223099B1 (de)
JP (1) JP2011505571A (de)
CN (2) CN101889203B (de)
GB (1) GB0723622D0 (de)
WO (1) WO2009071889A2 (de)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160165359A1 (en) * 2013-07-25 2016-06-09 Kyocera Corporation Measurement system
US9939420B2 (en) 2014-04-29 2018-04-10 NLA Diagnostics LLC Apparatus and method for non-destructive testing of concrete
US10126271B2 (en) 2015-09-15 2018-11-13 NLA Diagnostics LLC Apparatus and method for non-destructive testing of materials
US20210164945A1 (en) * 2018-07-27 2021-06-03 Wisys Technology Foundation, Inc. Non-Destructive Concrete Stress Evaluation

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102507748A (zh) * 2011-11-15 2012-06-20 北京理工大学 平面腐蚀性缺陷几何形态阵列超声换能器装置
DE202012009675U1 (de) * 2012-10-10 2014-01-13 Ulrich Seuthe Vorrichtung zur Erkennung einer Rissbildung bei einem Bauteil infolge Induktionshärtens des Bauteils
CN102980945B (zh) * 2012-10-11 2015-01-14 北京工业大学 基于双谱分析的结构微裂纹混频非线性超声检测方法
US11255825B2 (en) * 2016-10-31 2022-02-22 The Boeing Company Wrinkle characterization and performance prediction for composite structures
EP3435044A1 (de) * 2017-07-27 2019-01-30 Aif Management Bvba Vorrichtung und verfahren zur durchführung einer aufprallerregungstechnik
CN112393999B (zh) * 2020-08-05 2024-04-30 万向一二三股份公司 一种软包电池硬度测试装置及其方法
CN115467378B (zh) * 2022-08-16 2024-01-30 江苏鸿基节能新技术股份有限公司 一种移动式地基基础工程智能无线检测设备

Citations (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2007772A (en) * 1931-12-24 1935-07-09 Gen Electric Magnetic testing apparatus
US4581070A (en) * 1983-05-09 1986-04-08 Systems Research Laboratories, Inc. Multiphase backing materials for piezoelectric broadband transducers
US4823609A (en) * 1988-06-23 1989-04-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Ultrasonic method and apparatus for determining crack opening load
US5214955A (en) * 1991-08-26 1993-06-01 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States National Aeronautics And Space Administration Constant frequency pulsed phase-locked loop measuring device
US5269189A (en) * 1988-04-13 1993-12-14 Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. Method and means of transmitting and receiving broad-band unipolar, ultrasonic pulses for ultrasonic inspection
US5351543A (en) * 1991-12-27 1994-10-04 The Regents Of The University Of California, Office Of Technology Transfer Crack detection using resonant ultrasound spectroscopy
US5578888A (en) * 1994-12-05 1996-11-26 Kulicke And Soffa Investments, Inc. Multi resonance unibody ultrasonic transducer
US5736642A (en) * 1997-01-08 1998-04-07 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Nonlinear ultrasonic scanning to detect material defects
US6161434A (en) * 1996-06-13 2000-12-19 Fink; Mathias Method and device for detecting and locating a reflecting sound source
US6211925B1 (en) * 1998-06-15 2001-04-03 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Video intermediate-frequency signal processing device capable of receiving FM broadcasts
US20040113524A1 (en) * 2002-12-11 2004-06-17 Baumgartner Charles E Backing material for micromachined ultrasonic transducer devices
US20050001517A1 (en) * 2003-07-03 2005-01-06 Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc. Composite backing layer for a downhole acoustic sensor
US20050061076A1 (en) * 2003-09-22 2005-03-24 Hyeung-Yun Kim Sensors and systems for structural health monitoring
US20050104585A1 (en) * 2003-11-13 2005-05-19 Yuli Bilik Methods and devices for eddy current PCB inspection
US20050268720A1 (en) * 2004-06-03 2005-12-08 The Regents Of The University Of California Matrix switched phased array ultrasonic guided wave system
US20060071668A1 (en) * 2004-03-04 2006-04-06 The Boeing Company 3D acoustic imaging using sensor array, longitudinal wave and algebraic reconstruction
US20060169046A1 (en) * 2005-01-28 2006-08-03 Honeywell International, Inc. Drive, transmit & receive circuit for structural health monitoring systems
US20070125174A1 (en) * 2005-12-01 2007-06-07 General Electric Company Ultrasonic inspection system and method
US7322244B2 (en) * 2003-09-22 2008-01-29 Hyeung-Yun Kim Interrogation system for active monitoring of structural conditions
US7325456B2 (en) * 2003-09-22 2008-02-05 Hyeung-Yun Kim Interrogation network patches for active monitoring of structural health conditions
US20090301198A1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2009-12-10 Carnegie Mellon University Methods, Apparatuses, and Systems for Damage Detection

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4658649A (en) * 1985-06-06 1987-04-21 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Ultrasonic method and device for detecting and measuring defects in metal media
JPS62240854A (ja) * 1986-04-14 1987-10-21 Mitsubishi Electric Corp 超音波探傷装置
FR2642640B1 (fr) * 1989-02-08 1991-05-10 Centre Nat Rech Scient Procede et dispositif de focalisation d'ultrasons dans les tissus
US5203823A (en) * 1989-02-28 1993-04-20 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Detecting apparatus
JPH0781995B2 (ja) * 1989-10-25 1995-09-06 三菱電機株式会社 超音波探触子および超音波探傷装置
FR2696573B1 (fr) * 1992-10-02 1996-08-30 Univ Paris Procede et dispositif d'examen acoustique a retournement temporel.
AU688334B2 (en) * 1993-09-07 1998-03-12 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. Broadband phased array transducer design with frequency controlled two dimension capability and methods for manufacture thereof
US6312379B1 (en) * 1997-08-15 2001-11-06 Acuson Corporation Ultrasonic harmonic imaging system and method using waveform pre-distortion
FR2778462B1 (fr) * 1998-05-07 2000-07-13 Snecma Procede de controle ultrasonore en immersion de pieces a geometrie cylindrique
JP2000121613A (ja) * 1998-10-16 2000-04-28 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd 表面欠陥検出装置
JP2001318139A (ja) * 2000-05-01 2001-11-16 Hitachi Medical Corp 信号伝送回路及びそれを備えた計測装置
JP4484351B2 (ja) * 2000-10-20 2010-06-16 株式会社荏原製作所 非破壊検査方法および装置
JP3937755B2 (ja) * 2001-05-28 2007-06-27 松下電工株式会社 超音波美容器
US6988410B2 (en) * 2003-10-24 2006-01-24 General Electric Company Inspection method and apparatus for determining incipient mechanical failure
JP4430997B2 (ja) * 2004-07-13 2010-03-10 富士フイルム株式会社 超音波送受信装置
CN100462116C (zh) * 2004-07-29 2009-02-18 上海交通大学 功率超声换能器激励电路
US7319639B2 (en) * 2004-12-20 2008-01-15 Luna Innovations Incorporated Acoustic concealed item detector
CA2510972C (en) * 2005-06-28 2013-05-14 Nimtech Inc. Advanced ultrasonic interferometer and method of non-linear classification and indentification of matter using same

Patent Citations (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2007772A (en) * 1931-12-24 1935-07-09 Gen Electric Magnetic testing apparatus
US4581070A (en) * 1983-05-09 1986-04-08 Systems Research Laboratories, Inc. Multiphase backing materials for piezoelectric broadband transducers
US5269189A (en) * 1988-04-13 1993-12-14 Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. Method and means of transmitting and receiving broad-band unipolar, ultrasonic pulses for ultrasonic inspection
US4823609A (en) * 1988-06-23 1989-04-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Ultrasonic method and apparatus for determining crack opening load
US5214955A (en) * 1991-08-26 1993-06-01 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States National Aeronautics And Space Administration Constant frequency pulsed phase-locked loop measuring device
US5351543A (en) * 1991-12-27 1994-10-04 The Regents Of The University Of California, Office Of Technology Transfer Crack detection using resonant ultrasound spectroscopy
US5578888A (en) * 1994-12-05 1996-11-26 Kulicke And Soffa Investments, Inc. Multi resonance unibody ultrasonic transducer
US6161434A (en) * 1996-06-13 2000-12-19 Fink; Mathias Method and device for detecting and locating a reflecting sound source
US5736642A (en) * 1997-01-08 1998-04-07 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Nonlinear ultrasonic scanning to detect material defects
US6211925B1 (en) * 1998-06-15 2001-04-03 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Video intermediate-frequency signal processing device capable of receiving FM broadcasts
US20040113524A1 (en) * 2002-12-11 2004-06-17 Baumgartner Charles E Backing material for micromachined ultrasonic transducer devices
US6831394B2 (en) * 2002-12-11 2004-12-14 General Electric Company Backing material for micromachined ultrasonic transducer devices
US20050001517A1 (en) * 2003-07-03 2005-01-06 Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc. Composite backing layer for a downhole acoustic sensor
US7246521B2 (en) * 2003-09-22 2007-07-24 Hyeung-Yun Kim Diagnostic system for monitoring structural health conditions
US7325456B2 (en) * 2003-09-22 2008-02-05 Hyeung-Yun Kim Interrogation network patches for active monitoring of structural health conditions
US20050061076A1 (en) * 2003-09-22 2005-03-24 Hyeung-Yun Kim Sensors and systems for structural health monitoring
US7322244B2 (en) * 2003-09-22 2008-01-29 Hyeung-Yun Kim Interrogation system for active monitoring of structural conditions
US7197931B2 (en) * 2003-09-22 2007-04-03 Hyeung-Yun Kim Sensors for monitoring structural health conditions
US7281428B2 (en) * 2003-09-22 2007-10-16 Advanced Structure Monitoring, Inc. Diagnostic system for monitoring structural health conditions
US20050104585A1 (en) * 2003-11-13 2005-05-19 Yuli Bilik Methods and devices for eddy current PCB inspection
US20060071668A1 (en) * 2004-03-04 2006-04-06 The Boeing Company 3D acoustic imaging using sensor array, longitudinal wave and algebraic reconstruction
US20050268720A1 (en) * 2004-06-03 2005-12-08 The Regents Of The University Of California Matrix switched phased array ultrasonic guided wave system
US7267008B2 (en) * 2005-01-28 2007-09-11 Honeywell International, Inc. Drive, transmit & receive circuit for structural health monitoring systems
US20060169046A1 (en) * 2005-01-28 2006-08-03 Honeywell International, Inc. Drive, transmit & receive circuit for structural health monitoring systems
US20070125174A1 (en) * 2005-12-01 2007-06-07 General Electric Company Ultrasonic inspection system and method
US20090301198A1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2009-12-10 Carnegie Mellon University Methods, Apparatuses, and Systems for Damage Detection

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
M. Kögl et al., "Finite Element simulation of non-destructive damage detection with higher harmonics", 2004, NDT & E Intl. 37 (2004) 195-205 *
S. Bailey et al., "Fatigue Crack Monitoring With Nonlinear Acoustics Modal Analysis Conference 2007 (IMAC-XXV): A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics 19-22 February 2007, Orlando, Florida, 9 pageshttp://sem-proceedings.com/25i/sem.org-IMAC-XXV-s19p07-Fatigue-Crack-Monitoring-with-Nonlinear-Acoustics.pdf *

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160165359A1 (en) * 2013-07-25 2016-06-09 Kyocera Corporation Measurement system
US9699569B2 (en) * 2013-07-25 2017-07-04 Kyocera Corporation Measurement system
US9939420B2 (en) 2014-04-29 2018-04-10 NLA Diagnostics LLC Apparatus and method for non-destructive testing of concrete
US10436767B2 (en) 2014-04-29 2019-10-08 NLA Diagnostics LLC Apparatus and method for non-destructive testing of concrete
US10126271B2 (en) 2015-09-15 2018-11-13 NLA Diagnostics LLC Apparatus and method for non-destructive testing of materials
US20210164945A1 (en) * 2018-07-27 2021-06-03 Wisys Technology Foundation, Inc. Non-Destructive Concrete Stress Evaluation
US11906472B2 (en) * 2018-07-27 2024-02-20 Wisys Technology Foundation, Inc. Non-destructive concrete stress evaluation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2011505571A (ja) 2011-02-24
US20140311244A1 (en) 2014-10-23
EP2574914A2 (de) 2013-04-03
EP2223099A2 (de) 2010-09-01
CN101889203A (zh) 2010-11-17
WO2009071889A3 (en) 2009-10-22
WO2009071889A2 (en) 2009-06-11
EP2574915A3 (de) 2013-05-15
EP2223099B1 (de) 2021-01-27
GB0723622D0 (en) 2008-01-09
US10132780B2 (en) 2018-11-20
CN101889203B (zh) 2013-08-07
EP2574914A3 (de) 2013-07-10
EP2574915A2 (de) 2013-04-03
CN103512952A (zh) 2014-01-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10132780B2 (en) Devices, systems and methods of detecting defects in workpieces
Perez et al. Acoustic emission detection using fiber Bragg gratings
Johnson et al. Observation and implications of nonlinear elastic wave response in rock
US7267008B2 (en) Drive, transmit & receive circuit for structural health monitoring systems
Agrahari et al. Active detection of block mass and notch‐type damages in metallic plates using a refined time‐reversed Lamb wave technique
Tanasoiu et al. Nondestructive testing techniques and piezoelectric ultrasonics transducers for wood and built in wooden structures
Ohara et al. Detection of internal micro defects by nonlinear resonant ultrasonic method using water immersion
CN107490625A (zh) 一种frp‑混凝土粘结界面的剥离损伤检测系统
Gachagan et al. A flexible piezoelectric transducer design for efficient generation and reception of ultrasonic Lamb waves
US5569854A (en) Apparatus and method for transmitting and receiving ultrasonic waves having an acoustoelectric, ultrasonic transducer
CN105651857B (zh) 一种飞机板孔连接结构疲劳损伤的动态实时监控方法
WO2006088708A2 (en) Multi-layer gas matrix piezoelectric composite transducer
CN109238354A (zh) 一种超声导波锚杆质量无损检测仪
JP4319402B2 (ja) 超音波測長装置
CN112946077A (zh) 碳纤维复合材料表面临界折射纵波激发检测系统及方法
Brunner et al. Composites from piezoelectric fibers as sensors and emitters for acoustic applications
Veidt et al. Experimental investigation of the acousto-ultrasonic transfer characteristics of adhesively bonded piezoceramic transducers
CN108344809A (zh) 超声波信号产生方法、装置及超声无损检测方法
CN103616441A (zh) 一种用于铁磁材料的电磁超声信号激励装置
Fukuda et al. Application of a double-layered piezoelectric transducer in the generation of short ultrasonic pulses
US12130259B2 (en) Non-baseline on-line stress monitoring system and monitoring method based on multi-mode lamb wave data fusion
Gachagan et al. Development of a Manual Air‐Coupled Ultrasonic Inspection Instrument for Use on Aeronautical Structures Under In‐Service Conditions
Xiaoyu et al. Experimental analysis of Galfenol rod Transducer for detecting aluminum plate at low frequency
Sundaresan et al. Structural Health Monitoring Static Test of a Wind Turbine Blade: August 1999
Veidt et al. Validated Simulation Tools for Structural Wave Acousto Ultrasonics Based on Piezoelectric Transducers

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: UNIVERSITY OF EXETER, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ARMITAGE, PETER ROBERT;REEL/FRAME:024803/0176

Effective date: 20100616

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION