US20100275279A1 - Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits - Google Patents
Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20100275279A1 US20100275279A1 US12/658,677 US65867710A US2010275279A1 US 20100275279 A1 US20100275279 A1 US 20100275279A1 US 65867710 A US65867710 A US 65867710A US 2010275279 A1 US2010275279 A1 US 2010275279A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- qtl
- igf2
- nucleic acid
- allele
- animal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 88
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- 210000003205 muscle Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 47
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 38
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 108020004707 nucleic acids Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 102000039446 nucleic acids Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 238000003307 slaughter Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 108700028369 Alleles Proteins 0.000 claims description 155
- 101001076292 Homo sapiens Insulin-like growth factor II Proteins 0.000 claims description 90
- 241000282898 Sus scrofa Species 0.000 claims description 89
- 102100025947 Insulin-like growth factor II Human genes 0.000 claims description 88
- 229940068935 insulin-like growth factor 2 Drugs 0.000 claims description 88
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims description 66
- 210000000349 chromosome Anatomy 0.000 claims description 65
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 claims description 48
- 230000008775 paternal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 39
- 241000282414 Homo sapiens Species 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 claims description 26
- 230000008774 maternal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 21
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 claims description 18
- 235000020997 lean meat Nutrition 0.000 claims description 18
- 108091028043 Nucleic acid sequence Proteins 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 210000001161 mammalian embryo Anatomy 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000009261 transgenic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 103
- 241000255969 Pieris brassicae Species 0.000 description 62
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 44
- 108091092878 Microsatellite Proteins 0.000 description 39
- 241000282887 Suidae Species 0.000 description 34
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 34
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 29
- 235000013372 meat Nutrition 0.000 description 28
- 101150002416 Igf2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 27
- 208000024191 minimally invasive lung adenocarcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 27
- 238000005204 segregation Methods 0.000 description 26
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 24
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 22
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 18
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 17
- NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N insulin Chemical compound N1C(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)CN)C(C)CC)CSSCC(C(NC(CO)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CCC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CSSCC(NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(C)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2NC=NC=2)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)CNC2=O)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC(O)=CC=3)C(=O)NC(C(C)O)C(=O)N3C(CCC3)C(=O)NC(CCCCN)C(=O)NC(C)C(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(O)=O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)CC)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)C(C(C)O)NC(=O)C1CSSCC2NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(N)CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(C)C)CC1=CN=CN1 NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 13
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 13
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 13
- 230000036973 muscularity Effects 0.000 description 13
- 239000002299 complementary DNA Substances 0.000 description 11
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 10
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 10
- 210000002027 skeletal muscle Anatomy 0.000 description 10
- 108020005345 3' Untranslated Regions Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 238000007476 Maximum Likelihood Methods 0.000 description 9
- 210000004185 liver Anatomy 0.000 description 9
- 108090001061 Insulin Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 8
- 102000054765 polymorphisms of proteins Human genes 0.000 description 8
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- 102000004877 Insulin Human genes 0.000 description 7
- 241000699670 Mus sp. Species 0.000 description 7
- 229940125396 insulin Drugs 0.000 description 7
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000003387 muscular Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000001364 causal effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000002509 fluorescent in situ hybridization Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 description 6
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 description 5
- 102100027221 CD81 antigen Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108091026890 Coding region Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 101000914479 Homo sapiens CD81 antigen Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 206010020880 Hypertrophy Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 5
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000008267 milk Substances 0.000 description 5
- 210000004080 milk Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 235000013336 milk Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000003757 reverse transcription PCR Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 5
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 5
- 108020004705 Codon Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 101150089655 Ins2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 238000012408 PCR amplification Methods 0.000 description 4
- 241001494479 Pecora Species 0.000 description 4
- 101001023030 Toxoplasma gondii Myosin-D Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 210000000579 abdominal fat Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000003754 fetus Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 238000003205 genotyping method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000009396 hybridization Methods 0.000 description 4
- 244000144972 livestock Species 0.000 description 4
- 239000002773 nucleotide Substances 0.000 description 4
- 125000003729 nucleotide group Chemical group 0.000 description 4
- 230000007542 postnatal development Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001850 reproductive effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000013179 statistical model Methods 0.000 description 4
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102100022144 Achaete-scute homolog 2 Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 101710165189 Achaete-scute homolog 2 Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 201000000046 Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 210000001015 abdomen Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002939 deleterious effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 102000015694 estrogen receptors Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010038795 estrogen receptors Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 230000035558 fertility Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000003734 kidney Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000037257 muscle growth Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009237 prenatal development Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002062 proliferating effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005215 recombination Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000006798 recombination Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000000952 spleen Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000004003 subcutaneous fat Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 3
- 102100032050 Elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 2 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 230000010558 Gene Alterations Effects 0.000 description 2
- -1 H19 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000921368 Homo sapiens Elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 2 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000824318 Homo sapiens Protocadherin Fat 1 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000685678 Homo sapiens Solute carrier family 22 member 18 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108700012441 IGF2 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000699666 Mus <mouse, genus> Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000699660 Mus musculus Species 0.000 description 2
- 208000008589 Obesity Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 102100022095 Protocadherin Fat 1 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 238000012300 Sequence Analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 102100023102 Solute carrier family 22 member 18 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101100072652 Xenopus laevis ins-b gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002457 bidirectional effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000747 cardiac effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002759 chromosomal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002224 dissection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009509 drug development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013401 experimental design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 2
- 208000021005 inheritance pattern Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000007918 intramuscular administration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011813 knockout mouse model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004807 localization Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000031864 metaphase Effects 0.000 description 2
- 101150042523 myod gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000001114 myogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000020824 obesity Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000010422 painting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004983 pleiotropic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 244000144977 poultry Species 0.000 description 2
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011808 rodent model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000022379 skeletal muscle tissue development Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000001835 viscera Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- ABEXEQSGABRUHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 16-methylheptadecyl 16-methylheptadecanoate Chemical compound CC(C)CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCOC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(C)C ABEXEQSGABRUHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- UBOKASXZHPZFRZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-phenyl-1h-indole-4,6-diamine Chemical compound N1C2=CC(N)=CC(N)=C2C=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 UBOKASXZHPZFRZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- FWBHETKCLVMNFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4',6-Diamino-2-phenylindol Chemical compound C1=CC(C(=N)N)=CC=C1C1=CC2=CC=C(C(N)=N)C=C2N1 FWBHETKCLVMNFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 description 1
- 101150045282 CD81 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100072611 Caenorhabditis elegans impt-1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000282994 Cervidae Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000004480 Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p57 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010017222 Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p57 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000001712 DNA sequencing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000287828 Gallus gallus Species 0.000 description 1
- 108700039691 Genetic Promoter Regions Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010071602 Genetic polymorphism Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 101100286576 Homo sapiens IGF2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000973618 Homo sapiens NF-kappa-B essential modulator Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000583692 Homo sapiens Pleckstrin homology-like domain family A member 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108090001117 Insulin-Like Growth Factor II Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000764238 Isis Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000014021 KCNQ1 Potassium Channel Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010011185 KCNQ1 Potassium Channel Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000024556 Mendelian disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000699667 Mus spretus Species 0.000 description 1
- 108700001591 MyoD Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004472 Myostatin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010056852 Myostatin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100022219 NF-kappa-B essential modulator Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000009004 PCR Kit Methods 0.000 description 1
- 240000007643 Phytolacca americana Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000009074 Phytolacca americana Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 102100030887 Pleckstrin homology-like domain family A member 1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000700159 Rattus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000283984 Rodentia Species 0.000 description 1
- 102100030852 Run domain Beclin-1-interacting and cysteine-rich domain-containing protein Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000001424 Ryanodine receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101150091507 Slc22a18 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000008314 Type 1 Melanocortin Receptor Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010021428 Type 1 Melanocortin Receptor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010067584 Type 1 diabetes mellitus Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108091000117 Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000000577 adipose tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000003975 animal breeding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010171 animal model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000015278 beef Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000002902 bimodal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010241 blood sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037396 body weight Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000988 bone and bone Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 244000309464 bull Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013480 data collection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000005315 distribution function Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000013020 embryo development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002257 embryonic structure Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001605 fetal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006543 gametophyte development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012239 gene modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009395 genetic defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010353 genetic engineering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 102000054766 genetic haplotypes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 230000011365 genetic imprinting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005017 genetic modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012248 genetic selection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013617 genetically modified food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- BCQZXOMGPXTTIC-UHFFFAOYSA-N halothane Chemical compound FC(F)(F)C(Cl)Br BCQZXOMGPXTTIC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960003132 halothane Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003917 human chromosome Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005417 image-selected in vivo spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012739 integrated shape imaging system Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002372 labelling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004698 lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000007479 molecular analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003098 myoblast Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004940 nucleus Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000000287 oocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012856 packing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011056 performance test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001558 permutation test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002085 persistent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001303 quality assessment method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108091052345 ryanodine receptor (TC 1.A.3.1) family Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000000582 semen Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000011580 syndromic disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000011830 transgenic mouse model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6876—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K2227/00—Animals characterised by species
- A01K2227/10—Mammal
- A01K2227/108—Swine
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K2267/00—Animals characterised by purpose
- A01K2267/02—Animal zootechnically ameliorated
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/124—Animal traits, i.e. production traits, including athletic performance or the like
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/156—Polymorphic or mutational markers
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/172—Haplotypes
Definitions
- the invention relates generally to biotechnology and, more particularly, to methods for selecting breeding animals or animals destined for slaughter having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties, in particular, related to muscle mass and/or fat deposition.
- DNA markers can be used to localize genes or alleles responsible for qualitative traits like coat color, and they can also be used to detect genes or alleles with substantial effects on quantitative traits like growth rate, IMF etc.
- the approach is referred to as QTL (quantitative trait locus) mapping, wherein a QTL comprises at least a part of the nucleic acid genome of an animal where genetic information capable of influencing the quantitative trait (in the animal or in its offspring) is located.
- Information at DNA level can not only help to fix a specific major gene in a population, but also assist in the selection of a quantitative trait which is already selected for.
- Molecular information in addition to phenotypic data can increase the accuracy of selection and therefore the selection response.
- Improving meat quality or carcass quality is not just about changing levels of traits like tenderness or marbling, but it is also about increasing uniformity.
- the existence of major genes provides excellent opportunities for improving meat quality because it allows large steps to be made in the desired direction. Secondly, it will help to reduce variation, since we can fix relevant genes in our products.
- Another aspect is that selecting for major genes allows differentiation for specific markets. Studies are underway in several species, particularly, pigs, sheep, deer and beef cattle.
- a method for selecting a domestic animal for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties comprising testing the animal for the presence of a parentally imprinted qualitative or quantitative trait locus (QTL).
- QTL quantitative trait locus
- a domestic animal is defined as an animal being selected or having been derived from an animal having been selected for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties.
- domestic animals provide a rich resource of genetic and phenotypic variation; traditionally, domestication involves selecting an animal or its offspring for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties. This selection process has in the past century been facilitated by a growing understanding and utilization of the laws of Mendelian inheritance.
- One of the major problems in breeding programs of domestic animals is the negative genetic correlation between reproductive capacity and production traits. This is, for example, the case in cattle (a high milk production generally results in slim cows and bulls) poultry, broiler lines have a low level of egg production and layers have generally very low muscle growth), pigs (very prolific sows are, in general, fat and have comparatively less meat) or sheep (high prolific breeds have low carcass quality and vice versa).
- the invention now provides that knowledge of the parental imprinting character of various traits allows selection of, for example, sire lines, homozygous for a paternally imprinted QTL, for example, linked with muscle production or growth; the selection for such traits can thus be less stringent in dam lines in favor of the reproductive quality.
- the phenomenon of genetic or parental imprinting has never been utilized in selecting domestic animals, it was never considered feasible to employ this elusive genetic characteristic in practical breeding programs.
- a breeding program wherein knowledge of the parental imprinting character of a desired trait, as demonstrated herein, results in a breeding program, for example in a BLUP program, with a modified animal model. This increases the accuracy of the breeding value estimation and speeds up selection compared to conventional breeding programs.
- alleles linked with meat quality traits such as intra-muscular fat or muscle mass
- meat quality traits such as intra-muscular fat or muscle mass
- alleles linked with reduced back fat could be fixed in the sire lines.
- Other desirable combinations are, for example, fertility and/or milk yield in the female line with growth rates and/or muscle mass in the male lines.
- FIG. 1 Test statistic curves obtained in QTL analyses of chromosome 2 in a Wild Boar/Large White intercross.
- the graph plots the F ratio testing the hypothesis of a single QTL at a given position along the chromosome for the traits indicated.
- the marker map with the distances between markers in Kosambi centiMorgan is given on the X-axis.
- the horizontal lines represent genome-wise significant (P ⁇ 0.05) and suggestive levels for the trait lean meat in ham; similar significance thresholds were obtained for the other traits.
- FIG. 2 Piétrain pig with characteristic muscular hypertrophy.
- FIG. 3 Lodscore curves obtained in a Piétrain x Large White intercross for six phenotypes measuring muscle mass and fat deposition on pig chromosome 2. The most likely positions of the Igf2 and MyoD genes determined by linkage analysis with respect to the microsatellite marker map are shown. H 0 was defined as the null-hypothesis of no QTL, H 1 as testing for the presence of a Mendelian QTL, H 2 as testing for the presence of a paternally expressed QTL, and H 3 as testing for the presence of a maternally expressed QTL.
- FIG. 3A log 10 (H 1 /H 0 )
- FIG. 3B log 10 (H 2 /H 0 )
- FIG. 3C log 10 (H 3 /H 0 ).
- FIG. 4 Panel A. Structure of the human Igf2 gene according to reference 17, with aligned porcine adult liver cDNA sequence as reported in reference 16. The position of the nt241(G-A) transition and Swc9 microsatellite are shown. Panel B. The corresponding markers were used to demonstrate the monoallelic (paternal) expression of Igf2 in skeletal muscle and liver of ten-week-old fetuses.
- PCR amplification of the nt421(G-A) polymorphism and Swc9 microsatellite from genomic DNA clearly shows the heterozygosity of the fetus, while only the paternal allele is detected in liver cDNA (nt421(G-A) and Swc9) and muscle cDNA (Swc9).
- the absence of RT-PCR product for nt421(G-A) from in-fetal muscle points towards the absence of mRNA including exon 2 in this tissue. Parental origin of the fetal alleles was determined from the genotypes of sire and dam (data not shown).
- FIG. 5 A NotI restriction map showing the relative position of BAC-PIGF2-1 (comprising INS and IGF2 genes), and BAC-PIGF2-2 (comprising IGF2 and H19 genes).
- FIG. 6 Nucleic acid sequences of contig 1 to contig 115 derived from BAC-PIGF2-1, which was shotgun sequenced using standard procedures and automatic sequencers (SEQ ID NOS:10-117).
- FIG. 7 Similarity between porcine contigs of FIG. 6 and orthologous sequences in human.
- FIG. 8 Nucleic acid sequences of contig 1 to contig 7 derived from BAC-PIGF2-2, (the 24 Kb NotI fragment not present in BAC-PIGF2-1) which was subcloned and sequenced using the EZ::TN transposon approach and ABI automatic sequencers (SEQ ID NOS:118-124).
- FIG. 9 Similarity between porcine contigs of FIG. 8 and orthologous sequences in human.
- FIG. 10 DNA sequence polymorphisms in the IGF2 and flanking loci from genomic DNA isolated from Piétrain, Large White and Wild Boar individuals.
- Polymorphisms Tyrosine Hydroxylase Gene C3 (1-4) (SEQ ID NOS:128-132), Polymorphism Insulin-IGF2 C4 (5-23) (SEQ ID NOS:133-170), Polymorphismes in Coding Region C10 (24-28) (SEQ ID NOS:171-180), Microsatellites (29-31) (SEQ ID NOS:181-183).
- FIG. 11 Representation of a suitable marker-assisted selection program for the IGF2 mutation.
- a method for selecting a domestic animal for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties comprising testing a nucleic acid sample from the animal for the presence of a parentally imprinted quantitative trait locus (QTL).
- a nucleic acid sample can, in general, be obtained from various parts of the animal's body by methods known in the art.
- Traditional samples for the purpose of nucleic acid testing are blood samples or skin or mucosal surface samples, but samples from other tissues can be used as well, particularly, sperm samples, oocyte or embryo samples can be used.
- the presence and/or sequence of a specific nucleic acid can be determined with methods known in the art, such as hybridization or nucleic acid amplification or sequencing techniques known in the art.
- methods known in the art such as hybridization or nucleic acid amplification or sequencing techniques known in the art.
- testing such a sample for the presence of nucleic acid wherein a QTL or allele associated therewith is associated with the phenomenon of parental imprinting, for example where it is determined whether a paternal or maternal allele of the QTL is capable of being predominantly expressed in the animal.
- the inventors herein undertook two independent experiments to determine the practical use of parental imprinting of a QTL.
- implementation of marker-assisted segregation analysis, selection (MAS) and introgression (MAI), can be performed using genetic markers that are linked to the QTL, genetic markers that are in linkage disequilibrium with the QTL, or using the actual causal mutations within the QTL.
- the parent-of-origin effect characterizing a QTL allows for its optimal use in breeding programs. Indeed, marker-assisted segregation analysis under a model of parental imprinting will yield better estimates of QTL allele effects. Moreover, it allows for the application of specific breeding schemes to optimally exploit a QTL.
- the most favorable QTL alleles would be fixed in breeding animal lines and, for example, used to generate commercial, crossbred males by marker-assisted selection (MAS, within lines) and marker-assisted introgression (MAI, between lines).
- MAS marker-assisted selection
- MAI marker-assisted introgression
- the worst QTL alleles would be fixed in the animal lines used to generate commercial crossbred females by MAS (within lines) and MAI (between lines).
- the animal is a pig.
- the QTL is located at a position corresponding to a QTL located at chromosome 2 in the pig.
- SSC2p is homologous to HSA11pter-q13.
- 12 HSA11pter-q13 is known to harbor a cluster of imprinted genes: IGF2, INS2, H19, MAH2, P57 KIP2 , K v LQTL1, Tapa1/CD81, Orctl2, Impt1 and Ip1.
- the cluster of imprinted genes located in HSA11pter-q13 is characterized by eight maternally expressed genes H19, MASH2, P57 KIP2 , K v LQTL1, TAPA1/CD81, ORCTL2, IMPT1 and IP1, and two paternally expressed genes: IGF2 and INS.
- Jenson et al. Genomics 25:682-690, 1995
- Reik et al. Trends in Genetics 13:330-334, 1997) show that the whereabouts of these loci in various animals are not clear.
- the HSA11 and MMU7 loci do not correspond among each other, the MMU7 and the SSC2 loci do not correspond, whereas the HSA11 and SSC2 loci seem to correspond, and no guidance is given where one or more of, for example, the above-identified parentally expressed individual genes are localized on the three species' chromosomes.
- a method is provided wherein the QTL is related to the potential muscle mass and/or fat deposition, e.g., with limited effects on other traits, such as meat quality and daily gain of the animal, or wherein the QTL comprises at least a part of an insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF2) allele.
- IGF2 insulin-like growth factor-2
- a method for selecting a pig for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties comprising testing a sample from the pig for the presence of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) located at a Sus scrofa chromosome 2 mapping at position 2p1.7.
- QTL quantitative trait locus
- the methods relate to the use of genetic markers for the telomeric end of pig chromosome 2p in marker selection (MAS) of a parentally imprinted Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) affecting carcass yield and quality in pigs.
- the methods relate to the use of genetic markers associated with the IGF2 locus in MAS in pigs, such as polymorphisms and microsatellites and other characterizing nucleic acid sequences shown herein, such as shown in FIGS. 4 to 10 .
- a QTL located at the distal tip of Sus scrofa chromosomes 2 with effects on varies measurements of carcass quality and quantity, particularly muscle mass and fat deposition.
- the marker map of chromosome 2p was improved as part of this invention by adding microsatellite markers in order to cover the entire chromosome arm.
- the following microsatellite markers were used: Swc9, Sw2443, Sw2623, and Swr2516, all from the distal end of 2p. 7 QTL analyses of body composition, fatness, meat quality, and growth traits were carried out with the new chromosome 2 map. Clear evidence for a QTL located at the very distal tip of 2p was obtained ( FIG. 1 ; Table 1). The QTL had very large effects on lean meat content in ham and explained an astonishing 30% of the residual phenotypic variance in the F 2 population. Large effects on the area of the longissumus dorsi muscle, on the weight of the heart, and on back-fat thickness (subcutaneous fat) were also noted. A moderate effect on one meat quality trait, reflectance value, was indicated.
- the QTL had no significant effect on abdominal fat, birth weight, growth, weight of liver, kidney, or spleen (data not shown).
- the Large White allele at this QTL was associated with larger muscle mass and reduced back-fat thickness consistent with the difference between this breed and the Wild Boar population.
- microsatellite marker map was used to analyze chromosome 2;:SW2443, SWC9 and SW2623, SWR2516-(0,20)-SWR783-(0,29)-SW240-(0,20)-SW776-(0,08)-S0010-(0,04)-SW1695-(0,36)-SW R308.
- the QTL had no significant effect on abdominal fat, birth weight, growth, weight of liver, kidney, or spleen (data not shown).
- the Large White allele at this QTL when compared to the Wild Boar allele, was associated with larger muscle mass and reduced back-fat thickness consistent with the difference between this breed and the Wild Boar population.
- the strong imprinting effect observed for all affected traits shows that a single causative locus is involved.
- the pleiotropic effects on skeletal muscle mass and the size of the heart appear adaptive from a physiological point of view as a larger muscle mass requires a larger cardiac output.
- a method for selecting a pig for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties comprising testing a sample from the pig for the presence of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) located at a Sus scrofa chromosome 2 mapping at position 2p1.7., wherein the QTL comprises at least a part of a Sus scrofa insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF2) allele or a genomic area closely related thereto, such as polymorphisms and microsatellites and other characterizing nucleic acid sequences shown herein, such as shown in FIGS. 4 to 10 .
- IGF2 insulin-like growth factor-2
- a genomic IGF2 clone was isolated by screening a porcine BAC library. FISH analysis with this BAC clone gave a strong consistent signal on the terminal part of chromosome 2p.
- a polymorphic microsatellite is located in the 3′UTR of IGF2 in mice (GenBank U71085), humans (GenBank S62623), and horse (GenBank AF020598).
- the possible presence of a corresponding porcine microsatellite was investigated by direct sequencing of the IFG2 3′UTR using the BAC clone.
- a complex microsatellite was identified about 800 bp downstream of the stop codon; a sequence comparison revealed that this microsatellite was identical to a previously described anonymous microsatellite, Swc9. 6 This marker was used in the initial QTL mapping experiments and its location on the genetic map correspond with the most likely position of the QTL both in the Piétrain X Large White and in the Large White x Wild Boar pedigree.
- the knowledge of this QTL provides a method for the selection of animals such as pigs with improved carcass merit.
- Different embodiments of the invention are envisaged, including: marker-assisted segregation analysis to identify the segregation of functionally distinct QTL alleles in the populations of interest; marker-assisted selection (MAS) performed within lines to enhance genetic response by increasing selection accuracy, selection intensity or by reducing the generation interval; marker-assisted introgression (MAI) to efficiently transfer favorable QTL alleles from a donor to a recipient population, thereby enhancing genetic response in the recipient population.
- marker-assisted segregation analysis to identify the segregation of functionally distinct QTL alleles in the populations of interest
- MAS marker-assisted selection
- MAI marker-assisted introgression
- MAS marker-assisted segregation analysis, selection
- MAI introgression
- IGF2 insulin-like growth factor 2
- G-A This single nucleotide substitution (G-A), located at position 3072 in the intron 3 of IGF2 gene, increases gene expression of IGF2 in muscle threefold, stimulates muscle growth at the expense of back fat and results in leaner swine carcass and lower back fat.
- the objective of this experiment was to investigate a possible effect of the QTN at the IGF2 gene on prolificacy and longevity.
- Example 5 The details of the experiment are described in Example 5. It was found that sows that inherited the wild type allele from their father had significantly more piglets born alive, total born and weaned, while there was no effect on stillborn piglets (See, Example 5, Table 4). No effect on any of these prolificacy data could be observed when data were analyzed according to the allele inherited from the mother (maternal allele). Also, if sows from heterozygous dams were taken into account and grouped according to the maternal allele, again no significant effect on prolificacy could be observed, which was expected since the maternal allele is not expressed.
- the IGF2-intron3 G3072A mutation (herein also referred to as IGF2+ or A-allele; the wild type being the igf2- or G-allele) has an influence on prolificacy and longevity in sows, which allows for the possibility to use the same imprinted QTN for different selection in sire and dam lines.
- Terminal sires should be homozygous for the lean allele to give uniform and lean slaughter pigs, while dam lines can benefit from a selection for the wild type allele since this has a beneficial effect on prolificacy and longevity. Because of the imprinted character of the gene, selection for the fatter allele in sow lines will not influence the carcass quality of the offspring.
- a method for selecting a domestic animal for having desired genotypic properties comprising testing the animal for the presence of a parentally imprinted quantitative trait locus (QTL) or a mutation therein and to the use of an isolated and/or recombinant nucleic acid comprising a parentally imprinted quantitative trait locus (QTL) or a mutation therein or functional fragment derived thereof to select a breeding animal or animal destined for slaughter having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties.
- QTL parentally imprinted quantitative trait locus
- QTL parentally imprinted quantitative trait locus
- the test may, for instance, comprise testing a sample from the pig for the presence of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) located at a Sus scrofa chromosome 2 mapping at position 2p1.7., wherein the QTL is paternally expressed, i.e., is expressed from the paternal allele.
- QTL quantitative trait locus
- genotypic or potential phenotypic properties are selected from the group consisting of muscle mass, fat deposition, lean meat, lean back fat, sow prolificacy and sow longevity.
- improved sow prolificacy may include such phenotypic expressions as higher teat number, more piglets born alive, higher litter size, higher number of total born and weaned piglets with no effect on stillborn piglets.
- Improved sow longevity may in particular include such phenotypic expressions as parity or average number of cycles per sow.
- the above-described IGF2 mutation influencing lean meat also influences a number of other positive traits and allows for marker-assisted selection in opposite directions in sire and dam lines due to the parentally imprinting character of the mutation.
- the mutation increases muscle mass at the expense of back fat with on average 2-4% more lean meat.
- This effect on leanness is of the same magnitude as reported for the Halothane gene but without any of the well-known deleterious effects on meat quality and animal health.
- Homozygous positive terminal sires (IGF2+/IGF2+) will pass the full effect to the slaughter pigs, regardless of the genotype of the mother.
- selection principle allows for the possibility to push a far higher proportion of lower grading pigs into the higher payment categories.
- Example 5 The experiment described in Example 5 shows that parent sows benefit from inheriting the negative gene (igf2 ⁇ ) from their father: they are more prolific and have an increased longevity. Parent sows are fatter but this will have no effect on the carcass quality of the slaughter pig (see illustration in Example 5).
- a method for selecting a pig for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties comprising testing a sample from the pig for the presence of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) located at a Sus scrofa chromosome 2 mapping at position 2p1.7., wherein the QTL is paternally expressed, i.e., is expressed from the paternal allele.
- QTL quantitative trait locus
- Igf2 is known to be imprinted and to be expressed exclusively from the paternal allele in several tissues.
- nucleic acid or functional fragment derived thereof comprising a parentally imprinted quantitative trait locus (QTL) or fragment thereof capable of being predominantly expressed by one parental allele.
- QTL quantitative trait locus
- an isolated and/or recombinant nucleic acid or fragment derived thereof comprising a synthetic parentally imprinted quantitative trait locus (QTL) or functional fragment thereof derived from at least one chromosome.
- QTL quantitative trait locus
- “Synthetic” herein describes a parentally expressed QTL wherein various elements are combined that originate from distinct locations from the genome of one or more animals.
- recombinant nucleic acid wherein sequences related to parental imprinting of one QTL are combined with sequences relating to genes or favorable alleles of a second QTL.
- Such a gene construct is favorably used to obtain transgenic animals wherein the second QTL has been equipped with paternal imprinting, as opposed to the inheritance pattern in the native animal from which the second QTL is derived.
- Such a second QTL can, for example, be derived from the same chromosome where the parental imprinting region is located, but can also be derived from a different chromosome from the same or even a different species.
- such a second QTL can, for example, be related to an estrogen receptor (ESR)-gene (Rothschild et al., PNAS 93, 201-201, 1996) or a FAT-QTL (Andersson, Science 263, 1771-1774, 1994) for example derived from another pig chromosome, such as chromosome 4.
- ESR estrogen receptor
- a second or further QTL can also be derived from another (domestic) animal or a human.
- IGF2 insulin-like growth factor-2
- a genomic IGF2 clone was isolated by screening a porcine BAC library. FISH analysis with this BAC clone gave a strong consistent signal on the terminal part of chromosome 2p.
- a polymorphic microsatellite is located in the 3′UTR of IGF2 in mice (GenBank U71085), humans (GenBank S62623), and horse (GenBank AF020598).
- the possible presence of a corresponding porcine microsatellite was investigated by direct sequencing of the IGF2 3′UTR using the BAC clone. A complex microsatellite was identified about 800 by downstream of the stop codon; a sequence comparison revealed that this microsatellite is identical to a previously described anonymous microsatellite, Swc9.
- IGF2ms microsatellite
- nucleic acid or functional fragment derived thereof according to the invention in a method according to the invention.
- use of a method according to the invention is provided to select a breeding animal or animal destined for slaughter, or embryos or semen derived from these animals for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties.
- the properties are related to muscle mass and/or fat deposition.
- the QTL as provided by the invention may be exploited or used to improve, for example, lean meat content or back-fat thickness by marker-assisted selection within populations or by marker-assisted introgression of favorable alleles from one population to another.
- Examples of marker-assisted selection using the QTL as provided by the invention are use of marker-assisted segregation analysis with linked markers or with markers in disequilibrium to identify functionally distinct QTL alleles. Furthermore, identification of a causative mutation in the QTL is now possible, again leading to identifying functionally distinct QTL alleles. Such functionally distinct QTL alleles located at the distal tip of chromosome 2p with large effects on skeletal muscle mass, the size of the heart, and on back-fat thickness are also provided by the invention. The observation of a similar QTL effect in a Large White x Wild Boar as well as in a Piétrain x Large White intercross provides proof of the existence of a series of at least three distinct functional alleles.
- an animal selected by using a method according to the invention For example, a pig characterized in being homozygous for an allele in a QTL located at a Sus scrofa chromosome 2 mapping at position 2p1.7 can now be selected and is thus provided by the invention. Since the QTL is related to the potential muscle mass and/or fat deposition of the pig and/or the QTL comprises at least a part of a Sus scrofa insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF2) allele, it is possible to select promising pigs to be used for breeding or to be slaughtered. In particular, an animal according to the invention which is a male is provided.
- IGF2 insulin-like growth factor-2
- Such a male, or its sperm or an embryo derived thereof can advantageously be used in breeding animals for creating breeding lines or for finally breeding animals destined for slaughter.
- a male, or its sperm deliberately selected for being homozygous for an allele causing the extreme muscular hypertrophy and leanness, is used to produce offspring heterozygous for such an allele. Due to the allele's paternal expression, the offspring will also show the favorable traits for example related to muscle mass, even if the parent female has a different genetic background.
- transgenic animal sperm and an embryo derived thereof, comprising a synthetic parentally imprinted QTL or functional fragment thereof as provided by the invention, e.g., it is provided by the invention to introduce a favorable recombinant allele; for example, to introduce the estrogen receptor locus related to increased litter size of an animal homozygously in a parentally imprinted region of a grandparent animal (for example, the father of a hybrid sow if the region was paternally imprinted and the grandparent was a boar); to introduce a favorable fat-related allele or muscle mass-related recombinant allele in a paternally imprinted region, and so on.
- a favorable recombinant allele for example, to introduce the estrogen receptor locus related to increased litter size of an animal homozygously in a parentally imprinted region of a grandparent animal (for example, the father of a hybrid sow if the region was paternally imprinted and the grandparent was a boar); to introduce a favorable fat-related allele or
- Recombinant alleles that are interesting or favorable from the maternal side are often the ones that have opposite effects to alleles from the paternal side.
- meat animals such as pigs
- recombinant alleles linked with meat quality traits such as intra-muscular fat or muscle mass could be fixed in the dam lines while recombinant alleles linked with reduced back fat could be fixed in the sire lines.
- Other desirable combinations are, for example, fertility and/or milk yield in the female line with growth rates and/or muscle mass in the male lines.
- IGF2 primers F:5′-GGCAAGTTCTTCCGCTAATGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:1) and R:5′-GCACCGCAGAATTACGACAA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:2)
- F:5′-GGCAAGTTCTTCCGCTAATGA-3′ SEQ ID NO:1
- R:5′-GCACCGCAGAATTACGACAA-3′ SEQ ID NO:2
- the primers were used to screen a porcine BAC library and the clone 253G10 was isolated. Crude BAC DNA was prepared as described.
- the BAC DNA was linearized with EcoRV and purified with QIAEXII (QIAGEN GmbH, Germany). The clone was labeled with biotin-14-dATP using the GIBCO-BRL Bionick labeling system (BRL18246-015). Porcine metaphase chromosomes were obtained from pokeweed (Seromed) stimulated lymphocytes using standard techniques. The slides were aged for two days at room temperature and then kept at ⁇ 20° C. until use. FISH analysis was carried out as previously described. 25 The final concentration of the probe in the hybridization mix was 10 ng/ml. Repetitive sequences were suppressed with standard concentrations of porcine genomic DNA.
- the biotinylated probe was detected with two layers of avidin-FITC (Vector A-2011).
- the chromosomes were counterstained with 0.3 mg/ml DAPI (4,6-Diamino-2-phenylindole; Sigma D9542), which produced a G-banding like pattern. No post hybridization banding was needed, since chromosome 2 is easily recognized without banding.
- a total of 20 metaphase spreads were examined under an Olympus BX-60 fluorescence microscope connected to an IMAC-CCD S30 video camera and equipped with an ISIS 1.65 (Metasystems) software.
- a primer set (F:5′-GTTTCTCCTGTACCCACACGCATCCC-3′ (SEQ ID NO:3) and R:5′-Fluorescein-CTACAAGCTGGGCTCAGGG-3′ (SEQ ID NO:4) was designed for the amplification of the IGF2 microsatellite, which is about 250 by long and located approximately 800 by downstream from the stop codon.
- microsatellite was PCR amplified using fluorescently labeled primers and the genotyping was carried out using an ABI377 sequencer and the GeneScan/Genotyper software (Perkin Elmer, USA). Two-point and multipoint linkage analysis were done with the Cri-Map software.
- the intercross pedigree comprised two European Wild Boar males and eight Large White females, 4 F 1 males and 22 F 1 females, and 200 F 2 progeny. 1
- the F 2 animals were sacrificed at a live weight of at least 80 kg or at a maximum age of 190 days.
- Phenotypic data on birth weight, growth, fat deposition, body composition, weight of internal organs, and meat quality were collected; a detailed description of the phenotypic traits are provided by Andersson et al. 1 and Andersson-Eklund et al. 4
- Interval mapping for the presence of QTL were carried out with a least squares method developed for the analysis of crosses between outbred lines. 27 The method is based on the assumption that the two divergent lines are fixed for alternative QTL alleles. There are four possible genotypes in the F 2 generation as regards the grandparental origin of the alleles at each locus. This makes it possible to fit three effects: additive, dominance, and imprinting. 2 The latter is estimated as the difference between the two types of heterozygotes, the one receiving the Wild Boar allele through an F 1 sire and the one receiving it from an F 1 dam. An F-ratio was calculated using this model (with 3 d.f.) versus a reduced model without a QTL effect for each cM of chromosome 2.
- the most likely position of a QTL was obtained as the location giving the highest F-ratio. Genome-wise significance thresholds were obtained empirically by a permutation test 28 as described. 2 The QTL model including an imprinting effect was compared with a model without imprinting (with 1 d.f.) to test whether the imprinting effect was significant.
- the statistical models also included the fixed effects and covariates that were relevant for the respective traits; see Andersson-Eklund et al. 4 for a more detailed description of the statistical models used.
- Family was included to account for background genetic effects and maternal effects.
- Carcass weight was included as a covariate to discern QTL effects on correlated traits, which means that all results concerning body composition were compared at equal weights.
- Least-squares means for each genotype class at the IGF2 locus were estimated with a single point analysis using Procedure GLM of SAS; 29 the model included the same fixed effects and covariates as used in the interval mapping analyses.
- the QTL shows a clear parent of origin-specific expression and the map position coincides with that of the insulin-like growth factor II gene (IGF2), indicating IGF2 as the causative gene.
- IGF2 insulin-like growth factor II gene
- a highly significant segregation distortion was also observed at this locus.
- the results demonstrate an important effect of the IGF2 region on postnatal development and it is possible that the presence of a paternally expressed IGF2-linked QTL in humans and in rodent model organisms has so far been overlooked due to experimental design or statistical treatment of data. The study also has important implications for quantitative genetics theory and practical pig breeding.
- IGF2 was identified as a positional candidate gene for this QTL due to the observed similarity between pig chromosome 2p and human chromosome 11p.
- a genomic IGF2 clone was isolated by screening a porcine BAC library. FISH analysis with this BAC clone gave a strong consistent signal on the terminal part of chromosome 2p ( FIG. 1 ).
- a polymorphic microsatellite is located in the 3′UTR of IGF2 in mice (GenBank U71085), humans (GenBank S62623), and horse (GenBank AF020598). The possible presence of a corresponding porcine microsatellite was investigated by direct sequencing of the IGF2 3′UTR using the BAC clone.
- a complex microsatellite was identified about 800 by downstream of the stop codon; a sequence comparison revealed that this microsatellite is identical to a previously described anonymous microsatellite, Swc9. 6 PCR primers were designed and the microsatellite (IGF2ms) was found to be highly polymorphic with three different alleles among the two Wild Boar founders and another two among the eight Large White founders. IGF2ms was fully informative in the intercross as the breed of origin as well as the parent of origin could be determined with confidence for each allele in each F 2 animal.
- the QTL had no significant effect on abdominal fat, birth weight, growth, weight of liver, kidney, or spleen (data not shown).
- the Large White allele at this QTL was associated with larger muscle mass and reduced back-fat thickness consistent with the difference between this breed and the Wild Boar population.
- the strong imprinting effect observed for all affected traits strongly suggests a single causative locus.
- the pleiotropic effects on skeletal muscle mass and the size of the heart appear adaptive from a physiological point of view as a larger muscle mass requires a larger cardiac output.
- the clear paternal expression of this QTL is illustrated by the least squares means which fall into two classes following the population origin of the paternally inherited allele (Table 1).
- the IGF2-linked QTL and the FAT1 QTL on chromosome 4 1, 9 are by far the two loci with the largest effect on body composition and fatness segregating in this Wild Boar intercross.
- the IGF2 QTL controls primarily muscle mass whereas FAT1 has major effects on fat deposition including abdominal fat, a trait that was not affected by the IGF2 QTL ( FIG. 2 ). No significant interaction between the two loci was indicated and they control a very large proportion of the residual phenotypic variance in the F 2 generation.
- a model including both QTLs explains 33.1% of the variance for percentage lean meat in ham, 31.3% for the percentage of lean meat plus bone in back, and 26.2% for average back fat depth (compare with a model including only chromosome 2 effects, Table 1).
- the two QTLs must have played a major role in the response during selection for lean growth and muscle mass in the Large White domestic pig.
- the segregation distortion may be due to codominant expression of the maternal and paternal allele in some tissues and/or during a critical period of embryo development.
- Biallelic IGF2 expression has been reported to occur to some extent during human development 10, 11 and interestingly a strong influence of the parental species background on IGF2 expression was recently found in a cross between Mus musculus and Mus spretus. 12 It is also interesting that a VNTR polymorphism at the insulin gene, which is very closely linked to IGF2, is associated with size at birth in humans. 13 It is possible that the IGF2-linked QTL in pigs has a minor effect on birth weight but in our data it was far from significant ( FIG. 2 ) and there was no indication of an imprinting effect.
- IGF2 is the causative gene for the now reported QTL. Firstly, there is a perfect agreement in map localization ( FIG. 2 ). Secondly, it has been shown that IGF2 is paternally expressed in mice, humans, and now in pigs, like the QTL. There are several other imprinted genes in the near vicinity of IGF2 in mice and humans (Mash2, INS2, H19, KVLQT1, TAPA1/CD81, and CDKN1C/p57 KIP2 ) but only IGF2 is paternally expressed in adult tissues. 22 We believe that this locus provides a unique opportunity for molecular characterization of a QTL. The clear paternal expression can be used to exclude genes that do not show this mode of inheritance.
- allelic series should facilitate the difficult distinction between causative mutations and linked neutral polymorphism.
- IGF2 alleles from Piétrain and Large White pigs suggesting that the causative mutations occur in regulatory sequences.
- An obvious step is to sequence the entire IGF2 gene and its multiple promoters from the three populations.
- the paternal expression of the QTL facilitates its detection using large paternal half-sib families as the female contribution can be ignored.
- the QTL is exploited to improve lean meat content by marker-assisted selection within populations or by marker-assisted introgression of favorable alleles from one population to another.
- Pedigree material The pedigree material utilized to map QTL was selected from a previously described Piétrain x Large White F2 pedigree comprising >1,800 individuals. 6, 7 To assemble this F2 material, 27 Piétrain boars were mated to 20 Large White sows to generate an F1 generation comprising 456 individuals. 31 F1 boars were mated to unrelated 82 F1 sows from 1984 to 1989, yielding a total of 1862 F2 offspring. F1 boars were mated on average to 7 females, and F1 sows to an average of 2.7 males. Average offspring per boar were 60 and per sow 23.
- Phenotypic information (i) Data collection: A total of 21 distinct phenotypes were recorded in the F2 generation. 6, 7 These included:
- Marker genotyping Primer pairs utilized for PCR amplification of microsatellite markers are as described. 19 Marker genotyping was performed as previously described. 20 Genotypes at the CRC and MyoD loci were determined using conventional methods as described. 1, 12 The LAR test for the Igf2 SNP was developed according to Baron et al.
- Map construction Marker maps were constructed using the TWOPOINT, BUILD and CHROMPIC options of the CRIMAP package. 22 To allow utilization of this package, full-sib families related via the boar or sow were disconnected and treated independently. By doing so, some potentially usable information was neglected, yielding, however, unbiased estimates of recombination rates.
- QTL mapping (i) Mapping Mendelian QTL: Conventional QTL mapping was performed using a multipoint maximum likelihood method. The applied model assumed one segregating QTL per chromosome, and fixation of alternate QTL alleles in the respective parental lines, Piétrain (P) and Large White (LW). A specific analysis program had to be developed to account for the missing genotypes of the parental generation, resulting in the fact that the parental origin of the F1 chromosomes could not be determined. Using a typical “interval mapping” strategy, a hypothetical QTL was moved along the marker map using user-defined steps. At each position, the likelihood (L) of the pedigree data was computed as:
- M i , ⁇ , ⁇ ) is the probability of the considered QTL genotype, given (i) M i : the marker genotype of the ith F2 offspring and its F1 parents, (ii): the vector of recombination rates between adjacent markers and between the hypothetical QTL and its flanking markers, and (iii) ⁇ the considered marker-QTL phase combination of the F1 parents.
- G) is the probability of the phenotypic value of (y i ) of offspring i, given the QTL genotype under consideration. This probability is computed from the normal density function:
- ⁇ G is the phenotypic mean of the considered QTL genotype (PP, PL, LP or LL) and ⁇ 2 the residual variance ⁇ 2 was considered to be the same for the four QTL genotypic classes.
- ⁇ 2 2 (4.6 T) denotes one minus the cumulative distribution function of the chi-squared distribution with 2 d.f.
- Single point 2 ln(LR) were assumed to be distributed as a chi-squared distribution with two degrees of freedom, as we were fitting both an additive and dominance component.
- significance levels were adjusted by applying a Bonferoni correction corresponding to the effective number of independent traits that were analyzed. This effective number was estimated at 16 following the approach described by Spelman et al.
- Example 2 we report the identification of a QTL with major effect on muscle mass and fat deposition mapping to porcine 2p1.7 The QTL shows clear evidence for parental imprinting strongly suggesting the involvement of the Igf2 locus.
- a Piétrain X Large White intercross comprising 1125 F 2 offspring was generated as described. 6, 7
- the Large White and Piétrain parental breeds differ for a number of economically important phenotypes. Piétrains are famed for their exceptional muscularity and leanness 8 ( FIG. 2 ), while Large Whites show superior growth performance. Twenty-one distinct phenotypes measuring (i) growth performance (5), (ii) muscularity (6), (iii) fat deposition (6), and (iv) meat quality (4), were recorded on all F 2 offspring.
- Bidirectional chromosome painting establishes a correspondence between SSC2p and HSA11pter-q13.
- At least two serious candidate genes map to this region in man: the myogenic basic helix-loop-helix factor, MyoD, maps to HSA11p15.4, while Igf2 maps to HSA11p15.5 MyoD is a well known key regulator of myogenesis and is one of the first myogenic markers to be switched on during development.
- MyoD maps to HSA11p15.4
- Igf2 maps to HSA11p15.5 MyoD is a well known key regulator of myogenesis and is one of the first myogenic markers to be switched on during development.
- a previously described amplified sequence polymorphism in the porcine MyoD gene 12 proved to segregate in our F 2 material, which was entirely genotyped for this marker.
- Linkage analysis positioned the MyoD gene in the SW240-SW776 (odds >1000) interval, therefore well outside the lod-2 drop off support interval for the QTL ( FIG. 1 ).
- Igf2 is known to enhance both proliferation and differentiation of myoblasts in vitro 13 and to cause a muscular hypertrophy when overexpressed in vivo.
- 14 we designed primer pairs allowing us to amplify the entire Igf2 coding sequence with 222 by of leader and 280 by of trailer sequence from adult skeletal muscle cDNA. Piétrain and Large White RT-PCR products were sequenced indicating that the coding sequences were identical in both breeds and with the published sequence.
- Igf2 therefore appeared as a strong positional allele having the observed QTL effect.
- Igf2 is known to be imprinted and to be expressed exclusively from the paternal allele in several tissues. 15 Analysis of skeletal muscle cDNA from pigs heterozygous for the SNP and/or SWC9, shows that the same imprinting holds in this tissue in the pig as well ( FIG. 4 ).
- Igf2 were responsible for the observed effect, and knowing that only the paternal Igf2 allele is expressed, one can predict that (i) the paternal allele transmitted by F1 boars (P or LW) would have an effect on phenotype of F2 offspring, (ii) the maternal allele transmitted by F1 sows (P or LW) would have no effect on phenotype of F2 offspring, and (iii) the likelihood of the data would be superior under a model of a bimodal (1:1) F2 population sorted by inherited paternal allele when compared to a conventional “Mendelian” model of a trimodal (1:2:1) F2 population.
- H 0 was defined as the null-hypothesis of no QTL
- H 1 as testing for the presence of a Mendelian QTL
- H 2 as testing for the presence of a paternally expressed QTL
- H 3 testing for the presence of a maternally expressed QTL.
- FIG. 3 summarizes the obtained results.
- FIGS. 3A , 3 B and 3 C respectively, show the lodscore curves corresponding to log 10 (H 2 /H 0 ), log 10 (H 3 /H 0 ) and log 10 (H 2 /H 1 ). It can be seen that very significant lodscores are obtained when testing for the presence of a paternally expressed QTL, while there is no evidence at all for the segregation of a QTL when studying the chromosomes transmitted by the sows. Also, the hypothesis of a paternally expressed QTL is significantly more likely (log 10 (H 2 /H 1 )>3) than the hypothesis of a “Mendelian” QTL for all examined traits.
- Table 2 reports the ML phenotypic means for the F2 offspring sorted by inherited paternal QTL allele. Note that when performing the analysis under a model of a Mendelian QTL, the Piétrain and Large White QTL alleles appeared to behave in an additive fashion, the heterozygous genotype exhibiting a phenotypic mean corresponding exactly to the midpoint between the two homzygous genotypes. This is exactly what one would predict when dealing with an imprinted QTL as half of the heterozygous offspring are expected to have inherited the P allele from their sire, the other half inheriting the LW allele.
- the QTL described in this work is the second example of a gene affecting muscle development in livestock species that exhibits a non-Mendelian inheritance pattern. Indeed, we have previously shown that the callipyge locus (related to the qualitative trait wherein muscles are doubled) is characterized by polar overdominance in which only the heterozygous individuals that inherit the CLPG mutation from their sire express the double-muscling phenotype. 5 This demonstrates that parent-of-origin effects affecting genes underlying production traits in livestock might be relatively common.
- an imprinted QTL with major effect on muscle mass mapping to the IGF2 locus in the pig, and use of the QTL as tool in marker-assisted selection.
- this tool for marker-assisted selection as well as to further identify a causal mutation, we have further generated a reference sequence encompassing the entire porcine IGF2 sequence as well as that from flanking genes.
- BAC-PIGF2-1 proved to contain the INS and IGF2 genes
- BAC-PIGF2-2 proved to contain the IGF2 and H19 genes.
- the NotI map as well as the relative position of the two BACs is shown in FIG. 5 .
- BAC-PIGF2-1 was shotgun sequenced using standard procedures and automatic sequencers. The resulting sequences were assembled using standard software yielding a total of 115 contigs. The corresponding sequences are reported in FIG. 6 . Similarity searches were performed between the porcine contigs and the orthologous sequences in human. Significant homologies were detected for 18 contigs and are reported in FIG. 7 .
- BAC-PIGF2-2 For BAC-PIGF2-2, the 24 Kb NotI fragment not present in BAC-PIGF2-1 was subcloned and sequenced using the EZ::TN transposon approach and ABI automatic sequencers. Resulting sequences were assembled using the Phred-Phrap-Consed program suit, yielding seven distinct contigs ( FIG. 8 ). The contig sequences were aligned with the corresponding orthologous human sequences using the compare and dotplot programs of the GCG suite. FIG. 9 summarizes the corresponding results.
- This example shows presently described unique inheritance method of paternal imprinting, wherein only the gene inherited from the father is expressed, and wherein the gene inherited from the mother is a silent gene and has no effect on the carcass quality of the offspring.
- mice The animals used in this experiment are purebred animals belonging to three different closed dam lines based on Large White and Landrace breeds. From 1999 until 2005 blood samples were collected from all nucleus sows and boars. Genotypic frequencies per line were calculated on 555 sows in total.
- Genotyping DNA was extracted from the pig blood samples using the Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit according to procedures provided by the manufacturer (Promega, Madison Wis., US). An allelic discrimination assay was performed using the ABI Prism 7700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). The final concentrations used in the 5 ⁇ l master mix were: 2.5 ⁇ l Taqman Universal PCR Master Mix, NoAmpErase Ung (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.), 1 ⁇ Assay Mix, 10 ng DNA and 2,375 ⁇ l H 2 O (Foster City, Calif.).
- a suitable marker-assisted selection program for the IGF2 mutation may now be represented as depicted in FIG. 11 .
- QTL is the test statistic for the presence of a QTL under a genetic model with additive, dominance, and imprinting effects (3 d.f.) while “Imprinting” is the test statistic for the presence of an imprinting effect (1 d.f.), both obtained at the position of the QTL peak.
- IGF2 is located at 0.3 cM. 4
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
- Saccharide Compounds (AREA)
- Catching Or Destruction (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
- Measuring And Recording Apparatus For Diagnosis (AREA)
- Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Fodder In General (AREA)
- Feed For Specific Animals (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is a divisional of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/357,733, filed Feb. 17, 2006, which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/868,732, filed on Nov. 1, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,255,987, issued Aug. 14, 2007, which is a national stage entry under 35
U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/EP99/10209, filed on Dec. 16, 1999, and published in English as International Publication No. WO 00/36143, on Jun. 22, 2000, which claims the benefit underArticle 8 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty of European Patent Application EP 98204291.3, filed on Dec. 16, 1998, the contents of the entirety of each of which are incorporated herein by this reference. - Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §1.52(e)(1)(iii), a compact disc containing an electronic version of the Sequence Listing has been submitted concomitant with this application, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. A second compact disc is submitted and is an identical copy of the first compact disc. The discs are labeled “
copy 1” and “copy 2,” respectively, and each disc contains one file entitled “2183-7695US Sequence Listing.ST25.txt” which is 170 KB and created on Jul. 17, 2006. - The invention relates generally to biotechnology and, more particularly, to methods for selecting breeding animals or animals destined for slaughter having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties, in particular, related to muscle mass and/or fat deposition.
- Breeding schemes for domestic animals have so far focused on farm performance traits and carcass quality. This has resulted in substantial improvements in traits like reproductive success, milk production, lean/fat ratio, prolificacy, growth rate and feed efficiency. Relatively simple performance test data have been the basis for these improvements, and selected traits were assumed to be influenced by a large number of genes, each of small effect (the infinitesimal gene model). There are now some important changes occurring in this area. First, the breeding goal of some breeding organizations has begun to include meat quality attributes in addition to the “traditional” production traits. Secondly, evidence is accumulating that current and new breeding goal traits may involve relatively large effects (known as major genes), as opposed to the infinitesimal model that has been relied on so far.
- Modern DNA-technologies provide the opportunity to exploit these major genes, and this approach is a very promising route for the improvement of meat quality, especially since direct meat quality assessment is not viable for potential breeding animals. Also for other traits such as lean/fat ratio, growth rate and feed efficiency, modern DNA technology can be very effective. Also these traits are not always easy to measure in the living animal.
- The evidence for several of the major genes was originally obtained using segregation analysis, i.e., without any DNA marker information. Afterwards, molecular studies were performed to detect the location of these genes on the genetic map. In practice, and except for alleles of very large effect, DNA studies are required to dissect the genetic nature of most traits of economic importance. DNA markers can be used to localize genes or alleles responsible for qualitative traits like coat color, and they can also be used to detect genes or alleles with substantial effects on quantitative traits like growth rate, IMF etc. In this case, the approach is referred to as QTL (quantitative trait locus) mapping, wherein a QTL comprises at least a part of the nucleic acid genome of an animal where genetic information capable of influencing the quantitative trait (in the animal or in its offspring) is located. Information at DNA level can not only help to fix a specific major gene in a population, but also assist in the selection of a quantitative trait which is already selected for. Molecular information in addition to phenotypic data can increase the accuracy of selection and therefore the selection response.
- Improving meat quality or carcass quality is not just about changing levels of traits like tenderness or marbling, but it is also about increasing uniformity. The existence of major genes provides excellent opportunities for improving meat quality because it allows large steps to be made in the desired direction. Secondly, it will help to reduce variation, since we can fix relevant genes in our products. Another aspect is that selecting for major genes allows differentiation for specific markets. Studies are underway in several species, particularly, pigs, sheep, deer and beef cattle.
- In particular, intense selection for meat production has resulted in animals with extreme muscularity and leanness in several livestock species. In recent years, it has become feasible to map and clone several of the genes causing these phenotypes, paving the way towards more efficient marker-assisted selection, targeted drug development (performance enhancing products) and transgenesis. Mutations in the ryanodine receptor (Fuji et al., 1991; MacLennan and Phillips, 1993) and myostatin (Grobet et al., 1997; Kambadur et al., 1997; McPherron and Lee, 1997) have been shown to cause muscular hypertrophies in pigs and cattle respectively, while genes with major effects on muscularity and/or fat deposition have, for instance, been mapped to pig chromosome 4 (Andersson et al., 1994) and sheep chromosome 18 (Cocket et al., 1996).
- However, although there have been successes in identifying QTLs, the information is currently of limited use within commercial breeding programs. Many workers in this field conclude that it is necessary to identify the particular genes underlying the QTL. This is a substantial task, as the QTL region is usually relatively large and may contain many genes. Identification of the relevant genes from the many that may be involved thus remains a significant hurdle in farm animals.
- In one aspect, provided is a method for selecting a domestic animal for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties, the method comprising testing the animal for the presence of a parentally imprinted qualitative or quantitative trait locus (QTL). Herein, a domestic animal is defined as an animal being selected or having been derived from an animal having been selected for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties.
- Domestic animals provide a rich resource of genetic and phenotypic variation; traditionally, domestication involves selecting an animal or its offspring for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties. This selection process has in the past century been facilitated by a growing understanding and utilization of the laws of Mendelian inheritance. One of the major problems in breeding programs of domestic animals is the negative genetic correlation between reproductive capacity and production traits. This is, for example, the case in cattle (a high milk production generally results in slim cows and bulls) poultry, broiler lines have a low level of egg production and layers have generally very low muscle growth), pigs (very prolific sows are, in general, fat and have comparatively less meat) or sheep (high prolific breeds have low carcass quality and vice versa). The invention now provides that knowledge of the parental imprinting character of various traits allows selection of, for example, sire lines, homozygous for a paternally imprinted QTL, for example, linked with muscle production or growth; the selection for such traits can thus be less stringent in dam lines in favor of the reproductive quality. The phenomenon of genetic or parental imprinting has never been utilized in selecting domestic animals, it was never considered feasible to employ this elusive genetic characteristic in practical breeding programs. Provided is a breeding program, wherein knowledge of the parental imprinting character of a desired trait, as demonstrated herein, results in a breeding program, for example in a BLUP program, with a modified animal model. This increases the accuracy of the breeding value estimation and speeds up selection compared to conventional breeding programs. Until now, the effect of a parentally imprinted trait in the estimation of a conventional BLUP program was neglected; using and understanding the parental character of the desired trait, as provided by the invention, allows selecting on parental imprinting, even without DNA testing. For example, selecting genes characterized by paternal imprinting is provided to help increase uniformity; a (terminal) parent homozygous for the “good or wanted” alleles will pass them to all offspring, regardless of the other parent's alleles, and the offspring will all express the desired parent's alleles. This results in more uniform offspring. Alleles that are interesting or favorable from the maternal side are often the ones that have opposite effects to alleles from the paternal side. For example, in meat animals, such as pigs, alleles linked with meat quality traits, such as intra-muscular fat or muscle mass, could be fixed in the dam lines while alleles linked with reduced back fat could be fixed in the sire lines. Other desirable combinations are, for example, fertility and/or milk yield in the female line with growth rates and/or muscle mass in the male lines.
-
FIG. 1 : Test statistic curves obtained in QTL analyses ofchromosome 2 in a Wild Boar/Large White intercross. The graph plots the F ratio testing the hypothesis of a single QTL at a given position along the chromosome for the traits indicated. The marker map with the distances between markers in Kosambi centiMorgan is given on the X-axis. The horizontal lines represent genome-wise significant (P<0.05) and suggestive levels for the trait lean meat in ham; similar significance thresholds were obtained for the other traits. -
FIG. 2 : Piétrain pig with characteristic muscular hypertrophy. -
FIG. 3 : Lodscore curves obtained in a Piétrain x Large White intercross for six phenotypes measuring muscle mass and fat deposition onpig chromosome 2. The most likely positions of the Igf2 and MyoD genes determined by linkage analysis with respect to the microsatellite marker map are shown. H0 was defined as the null-hypothesis of no QTL, H1 as testing for the presence of a Mendelian QTL, H2 as testing for the presence of a paternally expressed QTL, and H3 as testing for the presence of a maternally expressed QTL.FIG. 3A : log10(H1/H0),FIG. 3B : log10 (H2/H0),FIG. 3C : log10 (H3/H0). -
FIG. 4 : Panel A. Structure of the human Igf2 gene according toreference 17, with aligned porcine adult liver cDNA sequence as reported inreference 16. The position of the nt241(G-A) transition and Swc9 microsatellite are shown. Panel B. The corresponding markers were used to demonstrate the monoallelic (paternal) expression of Igf2 in skeletal muscle and liver of ten-week-old fetuses. PCR amplification of the nt421(G-A) polymorphism and Swc9 microsatellite from genomic DNA clearly shows the heterozygosity of the fetus, while only the paternal allele is detected in liver cDNA (nt421(G-A) and Swc9) and muscle cDNA (Swc9). The absence of RT-PCR product for nt421(G-A) from in-fetal muscle points towards the absence ofmRNA including exon 2 in this tissue. Parental origin of the fetal alleles was determined from the genotypes of sire and dam (data not shown). -
FIG. 5 : A NotI restriction map showing the relative position of BAC-PIGF2-1 (comprising INS and IGF2 genes), and BAC-PIGF2-2 (comprising IGF2 and H19 genes). -
FIG. 6 : Nucleic acid sequences ofcontig 1 to contig 115 derived from BAC-PIGF2-1, which was shotgun sequenced using standard procedures and automatic sequencers (SEQ ID NOS:10-117). -
FIG. 7 : Similarity between porcine contigs ofFIG. 6 and orthologous sequences in human. -
FIG. 8 : Nucleic acid sequences ofcontig 1 tocontig 7 derived from BAC-PIGF2-2, (the 24 Kb NotI fragment not present in BAC-PIGF2-1) which was subcloned and sequenced using the EZ::TN transposon approach and ABI automatic sequencers (SEQ ID NOS:118-124). -
FIG. 9 : Similarity between porcine contigs ofFIG. 8 and orthologous sequences in human. -
FIG. 10 : DNA sequence polymorphisms in the IGF2 and flanking loci from genomic DNA isolated from Piétrain, Large White and Wild Boar individuals. (Polymorphisms Tyrosine Hydroxylase Gene C3 (1-4) (SEQ ID NOS:128-132), Polymorphism Insulin-IGF2 C4 (5-23) (SEQ ID NOS:133-170), Polymorphismes in Coding Region C10 (24-28) (SEQ ID NOS:171-180), Microsatellites (29-31) (SEQ ID NOS:181-183). -
FIG. 11 : Representation of a suitable marker-assisted selection program for the IGF2 mutation. - In certain embodiments, provided is a method for selecting a domestic animal for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties, the method comprising testing a nucleic acid sample from the animal for the presence of a parentally imprinted quantitative trait locus (QTL). A nucleic acid sample can, in general, be obtained from various parts of the animal's body by methods known in the art. Traditional samples for the purpose of nucleic acid testing are blood samples or skin or mucosal surface samples, but samples from other tissues can be used as well, particularly, sperm samples, oocyte or embryo samples can be used. In such a sample, the presence and/or sequence of a specific nucleic acid, be it DNA or RNA, can be determined with methods known in the art, such as hybridization or nucleic acid amplification or sequencing techniques known in the art. Provided is testing such a sample for the presence of nucleic acid wherein a QTL or allele associated therewith is associated with the phenomenon of parental imprinting, for example where it is determined whether a paternal or maternal allele of the QTL is capable of being predominantly expressed in the animal.
- The purpose of breeding programs in livestock is to enhance the performances of animals by improving their genetic composition. In essence, this improvement accrues by increasing the frequency of the most favorable alleles for the genes influencing the performance characteristics of interest. These genes are referred to as QTL. Until the beginning of the nineties, genetic improvement was achieved via the use of biometrical methods, but without molecular knowledge of the underlying QTL.
- Since the beginning of the Nineties, and due to recent developments in genomics, it is conceivable to identify the QTL underlying a trait of interest. The invention now provides identifying and using parentally imprinted QTLs which are useful for selecting animals by mapping quantitative trait loci. Again, the phenomenon of genetic or paternal imprinting has never been utilized in selecting domestic animals, it was never considered feasible to employ this elusive genetic characteristic in practical breeding programs. For example, Kovacs and Kloting (Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 44:399-405, 1998), where parental imprinting is not mentioned, and not suggested, found linkage of a trait in female rats, but not in males, suggesting a possible sex specificity associated with a chromosomal region, which of course excludes parental imprinting, a phenomenon wherein the imprinted trait of one parent is preferably but gender-aspecifically expressed in his or her offspring.
- Provided is the initial localization of a parentally imprinted QTL on the genome by linkage analysis with genetic markers, and the actual identification of the parentally imprinted gene(s) and causal mutations therein. Molecular knowledge of such a parentally imprinted QTL allows for more efficient breeding designs herewith provided. Applications of molecular knowledge of parentally imprinted QTLs in breeding programs include: marker-assisted segregation analysis to identify the segregation of functionally distinct parentally imprinted QTL alleles in the populations of interest, marker-assisted selection (MAS) performed within lines to enhance genetic response by increasing selection accuracy, selection intensity or by reducing the generation interval using the understanding of the phenomenon of parental imprinting, marker-assisted introgression (MAI) to efficiently transfer favorable parentally imprinted QTL alleles from a donor to a recipient population, genetic engineering of the identified parentally QTL and genetic modification of the breeding stock using transgenic technology, development of performance enhancing products using targeted drug development exploiting molecular knowledge of the QTL.
- The inventors herein undertook two independent experiments to determine the practical use of parental imprinting of a QTL.
- In a first experiment, performed in a previously described Piétrain x Large White intercross, the likelihood of the data was computed under a model of paternal (paternal allele only expressed) and maternal imprinting (maternal allele only expressed) and compared with the likelihood of the data under a model of a conventional “Mendelian” QTL. The results strikingly demonstrated that the QTL was indeed paternally expressed, the QTL allele (Piétrain or Large White) inherited from the F1 sow having no affect whatsoever on the carcass quality and quantity of the F2 offspring. It was seen that very significant lodscores were obtained when testing for the presence of a paternally expressed QTL, while there was no evidence at all for the segregation of a QTL when studying the chromosomes transmitted by the sows. The same tendency was observed for all traits showing that the same imprinted gene is responsible for the effects observed on the different traits. Table 1 reports the maximum likelihood (ML) phenotypic means for the F2 offspring sorted by inherited paternal QTL allele.
- In a second experiment performed in the Wild Boar X Large White intercross, QTL analyses of body composition, fatness, meat quality, and growth traits was carried out with the
chromosome 2 map using a statistical model testing for the presence of an imprinting effect. Clear evidence for a paternally expressed QTL located at the very distal tip of 2p was obtained (FIG. 2 ; Table 1). The clear paternal expression of a QTL is illustrated by the least squares means which fall into two classes following the population origin of the paternally inherited allele (Table 1). For a given paternally imprinted QTL, implementation of marker-assisted segregation analysis, selection (MAS) and introgression (MAI), can be performed using genetic markers that are linked to the QTL, genetic markers that are in linkage disequilibrium with the QTL, or using the actual causal mutations within the QTL. - Understanding the parent-of-origin effect characterizing a QTL allows for its optimal use in breeding programs. Indeed, marker-assisted segregation analysis under a model of parental imprinting will yield better estimates of QTL allele effects. Moreover, it allows for the application of specific breeding schemes to optimally exploit a QTL. In one embodiment of the invention, the most favorable QTL alleles would be fixed in breeding animal lines and, for example, used to generate commercial, crossbred males by marker-assisted selection (MAS, within lines) and marker-assisted introgression (MAI, between lines). In another embodiment, the worst QTL alleles would be fixed in the animal lines used to generate commercial crossbred females by MAS (within lines) and MAI (between lines).
- In certain embodiments of the invention, the animal is a pig. Note, for example, that provided is the insight that today half of the offspring from commercially popular Piétrainx Large White crossbred boars inherit an unfavorable Large White muscle mass QTL as provided by the invention causing considerable loss, and the invention now, for example, provides the possibility to select the better half of the population in that respect. However, it is also possible to select commercial sow lines enriched with the boar's unfavorable alleles, allowing to equip the sows with other alleles that are more desirable, for example, for reproductive purposes.
- In certain embodiments of a method provided by the invention, the QTL is located at a position corresponding to a QTL located at
chromosome 2 in the pig. For example, it is known from comparative mapping data between pig and human, including bidirectional chromosome painting, that SSC2p is homologous to HSA11pter-q13.11, 12 HSA11pter-q13 is known to harbor a cluster of imprinted genes: IGF2, INS2, H19, MAH2, P57KIP2, KvLQTL1, Tapa1/CD81, Orctl2, Impt1 and Ip1. The cluster of imprinted genes located in HSA11pter-q13 is characterized by eight maternally expressed genes H19, MASH2, P57KIP2, KvLQTL1, TAPA1/CD81, ORCTL2, IMPT1 and IP1, and two paternally expressed genes: IGF2 and INS. However, Johanson et al. (Genomics 25:682-690, 1995) and Reik et al. (Trends in Genetics 13:330-334, 1997) show that the whereabouts of these loci in various animals are not clear. For example, the HSA11 and MMU7 loci do not correspond among each other, the MMU7 and the SSC2 loci do not correspond, whereas the HSA11 and SSC2 loci seem to correspond, and no guidance is given where one or more of, for example, the above-identified parentally expressed individual genes are localized on the three species' chromosomes. - Other domestic animals, such as cattle, sheep, poultry and fish, having similar regions in their genome harboring such a cluster of imprinted genes or QTLs, provided is the use of these orthologous regions of other domestic animals in applying the phenomenon of parental imprinting in breeding programs. In pigs, the cluster is mapped at around position 2p1.7 of
chromosome 2, however, a method as provided by the invention employing (fragments of) the maternally or paternally expressed orthologous or homologous genes or QTLs are advantageously used in other animals as well for breeding and selecting purposes. For example, a method is provided wherein the QTL is related to the potential muscle mass and/or fat deposition, e.g., with limited effects on other traits, such as meat quality and daily gain of the animal, or wherein the QTL comprises at least a part of an insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF2) allele. Reik et al. (Trends in Genetics 13:330-334, 1997) explain that this gene in humans is related to Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, an apparently parentally imprinted disease syndrome most commonly seen with human fetuses, where the gene has an important role in prenatal development. No relationship is shown or suggested with postnatal development relating to muscle development or fatness in animals. - In certain embodiments, provided is a method for selecting a pig for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties, the method comprising testing a sample from the pig for the presence of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) located at a
Sus scrofa chromosome 2 mapping at position 2p1.7. In particular, the methods relate to the use of genetic markers for the telomeric end of pig chromosome 2p in marker selection (MAS) of a parentally imprinted Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) affecting carcass yield and quality in pigs. Furthermore, the methods relate to the use of genetic markers associated with the IGF2 locus in MAS in pigs, such as polymorphisms and microsatellites and other characterizing nucleic acid sequences shown herein, such as shown inFIGS. 4 to 10 . In certain embodiments, provided is a QTL located at the distal tip of Sus scrofachromosomes 2 with effects on varies measurements of carcass quality and quantity, particularly muscle mass and fat deposition. - In a first experiment, a QTL mapping analysis was performed in a Wild Boar X Large White intercross counting 200 F2 individuals. The F2 animals were sacrificed at a live eight of at least 80 kg or at a maximum age of 190 days. Phenotypic data on birth weight, growth, fat deposition, body composition, weight of internal organs, and meat quality were collected; a detailed description of the phenotypic traits are provided by Andersson et al.1 and Andersson-Eklund et al.4
- A QTL (without any significant effect on back-fat thickness) at an unspecified locus on the proximal end of
chromosome 2 with moderate effect on muscle mass, and located about 30 cm away from the parentally imprinted QTL reported here, was previously reported by the inventors; whereas the QTL as now provided has a very large effect, explaining at least 20-30% of variance, making the QTL of the present invention commercially very attractive, which is even more so because the present QTL is parentally imprinted. The marker map of chromosome 2p was improved as part of this invention by adding microsatellite markers in order to cover the entire chromosome arm. The following microsatellite markers were used: Swc9, Sw2443, Sw2623, and Swr2516, all from the distal end of 2p.7 QTL analyses of body composition, fatness, meat quality, and growth traits were carried out with thenew chromosome 2 map. Clear evidence for a QTL located at the very distal tip of 2p was obtained (FIG. 1 ; Table 1). The QTL had very large effects on lean meat content in ham and explained an astonishing 30% of the residual phenotypic variance in the F2 population. Large effects on the area of the longissumus dorsi muscle, on the weight of the heart, and on back-fat thickness (subcutaneous fat) were also noted. A moderate effect on one meat quality trait, reflectance value, was indicated. The QTL had no significant effect on abdominal fat, birth weight, growth, weight of liver, kidney, or spleen (data not shown). The Large White allele at this QTL was associated with larger muscle mass and reduced back-fat thickness consistent with the difference between this breed and the Wild Boar population. - In a second experiment, QTL mapping was performed in a Piétrain X Large White intercross comprising 1125 F2 offspring. The Large White and Piétrain parental breeds differ for a number of economically important phenotypes. Piétrains are famous for their exceptional muscularity and leanness10 (
FIG. 2 , while Large Whites show superior growth performance. Twenty-one distinct phenotypes measuring growth performance (5), muscularity (6), fat deposition (6), and meat quality (4), were recorded on all F2 offspring. In order to map QTL underlying the genetic differences between these breeds, the inventors undertook a whole genome scan using microsatellite markers on an initial sample of 677 F2 individuals. The following microsatellite marker map was used to analyzechromosome 2;:SW2443, SWC9 and SW2623, SWR2516-(0,20)-SWR783-(0,29)-SW240-(0,20)-SW776-(0,08)-S0010-(0,04)-SW1695-(0,36)-SW R308. Analysis ofpig chromosome 2 using a Maximum Likelihood multipoint algorithm, revealed highly significant lodscores (up to 20) for three of the six phenotypes measuring muscularity (% lean cuts, % ham, % loin) and three of the six phenotypes measuring fat deposition (back-fat thickness (BFT), % back fat, % fat cuts) at the distal end of the short arm of chromosome 2 (FIG. 1 ). Positive lodscores were obtained in the corresponding chromosome region for the remaining six muscularity and fatness phenotypes, however, not reaching the experiment-wise significance threshold) (a=5%. There was no evidence for an effect of the corresponding QTL on growth performance (including birth weight) or recorded meat quality measurements (data not shown). To confirm this finding, the remaining sample of 355 F2 offspring was genotyped for the four most distal 2p markers and QTL analysis performed for the traits yielding the highest lodscores in the first analysis. Lodscores ranged from 2.1 to 7.7, clearly confirming the presence of a major QTL in this region. Table 2 reports the corresponding ML estimates for the three genotypic means as well as the residual variance. Evidence based on marker-assisted segregation analysis points towards residual segregation at this locus within the Piétrain population. - These experiments therefore clearly indicated the existence of a QTL with major effect on carcass quality and quantity on the telomeric end of pig chromosome arm 2p; the likely existence of an allelic series at this QTL with at least three alleles: Wild-Boar<Large White<Piétrain, and possibly more given the observed segregation within the Piétrain breed.
- The effects of the identified QTL on muscle mass and fat deposition are truly major, being of the same magnitude of those reported for the CRC locus though apparently without the associated deleterious effects on meat quality. We estimate that both loci jointly explain close to 50% of the Piétrain versus Large White breed difference for muscularity and leanness. The QTL had very large effects on lean meat content in ham and explained an astonishing 30% of the residual phenotypic variance in the F2 population. Large effects on the area of the longissumus dorsi muscle, on the weight of the heart, and on back-fat thickness (subcutaneous fat) were also noted. A moderate effect on one meat quality trait, reflectance value, was indicated. The QTL had no significant effect on abdominal fat, birth weight, growth, weight of liver, kidney, or spleen (data not shown). The Large White allele at this QTL, when compared to the Wild Boar allele, was associated with larger muscle mass and reduced back-fat thickness consistent with the difference between this breed and the Wild Boar population. The strong imprinting effect observed for all affected traits shows that a single causative locus is involved. The pleiotropic effects on skeletal muscle mass and the size of the heart appear adaptive from a physiological point of view as a larger muscle mass requires a larger cardiac output.
- In a further embodiment, provided is a method for selecting a pig for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties comprising testing a sample from the pig for the presence of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) located at a
Sus scrofa chromosome 2 mapping at position 2p1.7., wherein the QTL comprises at least a part of a Sus scrofa insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF2) allele or a genomic area closely related thereto, such as polymorphisms and microsatellites and other characterizing nucleic acid sequences shown herein, such as shown inFIGS. 4 to 10 . The important role of IGF2 for prenatal development is well-documented from knock-out mice as well as from its causative role in the human Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. This invention demonstrates an important role for the IGF2-region also for postnatal development. - To show the role of Igf2, the inventors performed the following three experiments:
- A genomic IGF2 clone was isolated by screening a porcine BAC library. FISH analysis with this BAC clone gave a strong consistent signal on the terminal part of chromosome 2p.
- A polymorphic microsatellite is located in the 3′UTR of IGF2 in mice (GenBank U71085), humans (GenBank S62623), and horse (GenBank AF020598). The possible presence of a corresponding porcine microsatellite was investigated by direct sequencing of the
IFG2 3′UTR using the BAC clone. A complex microsatellite was identified about 800 bp downstream of the stop codon; a sequence comparison revealed that this microsatellite was identical to a previously described anonymous microsatellite, Swc9.6 This marker was used in the initial QTL mapping experiments and its location on the genetic map correspond with the most likely position of the QTL both in the Piétrain X Large White and in the Large White x Wild Boar pedigree. - Analysis of skeletal muscle and liver cDNA from ten-week-old fetuses heterozygous for a nt241 (G-A) transversion in the second exon of the porcine IGFII gene and SWC9, shows that the IGFII gene is imprinted in these tissues in the pig as well and only expressed from the paternal allele.
- Based on a published porcine adult liver cDNA sequence,16 the inventors designed primer pairs allowing amplification of the entire IgfII coding sequence with 222 by of leader and 280 by of trailer sequence from adult skeletal muscle cDNA. Piétrain and Large White RT-PCR products were sequenced indication that the coding sequences are identical in both breeds and with the published sequence. However, a GA transition was found in the leader sequence corresponding to
exon 2 in man. Following conventional nomenclature, this polymorphism will be referred to as nt241(G-A). We developed a screening test for this single nucleotide polymorphism 9(SNP) based on the ligation amplification reaction (LAR), allowing us to genotype our pedigree material. Based on these data, IgfII was shown to colocalize with the SWC9 microsatellite marker (0=0%), therefore virtually coinciding with the most likely position of the QTL, and well within the 95% support interval for the QTL. Subsequent sequence analysis demonstrated that the microsatellite marker SWC9 is actually located within the 3′UTR of the IgfII gene. - As previously mentioned, the knowledge of this QTL provides a method for the selection of animals such as pigs with improved carcass merit. Different embodiments of the invention are envisaged, including: marker-assisted segregation analysis to identify the segregation of functionally distinct QTL alleles in the populations of interest; marker-assisted selection (MAS) performed within lines to enhance genetic response by increasing selection accuracy, selection intensity or by reducing the generation interval; marker-assisted introgression (MAI) to efficiently transfer favorable QTL alleles from a donor to a recipient population, thereby enhancing genetic response in the recipient population. Implementation of embodiments marker-assisted segregation analysis, selection (MAS) and introgression (MAI), can be performed using genetic markers that are linked to the QTL; genetic markers that are in linkage disequilibrium with the QTL, the actual causal mutations within the QTL.
- As indicated above, the insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) gene was mapped to the distal tip of the short arm on
chromosome 2 in swine. Gene mapping studies indicated that this paternally expressed QTL at the IGF2 gene region has a large effect on back fat thickness and carcass leanness (e.g., Jeon et al. (1999),Nature Genetics 21, 157-158; Nezer et al. (1999),Nature Genetics 21, 155-156). Recently, a mutation in the regulatory region of the IGF2 gene has been identified to be the cause underlying the QTL effect on muscle growth and fat deposition (Van Laere et al. (2003) Nature 425:832-836). This single nucleotide substitution (G-A), located at position 3072 in theintron 3 of IGF2 gene, increases gene expression of IGF2 in muscle threefold, stimulates muscle growth at the expense of back fat and results in leaner swine carcass and lower back fat. - The large effect of the QTL on lean meat and back fat without influence on growth or meat quality, makes this an attractive QTL to use in the breeding program. Terminal sires have been selected to be homozygous for the lean allele (AA) in order to pass the full effect to their offspring. Field results have been reported by several authors (Scheller et al. (2002) Proceedings of the 27th Annual National Swine Improvement Federation, Des Moines, Iowa, USA; Buys, N. (2003) Proceedings of the 28th Annual National Swine Improvement Federation, Des Moines, Iowa, USA, pp 146-149).
- It is generally believed that prolificacy and sow longevity is reducing as a result of the genetic selection for increased leanness and lowering fat deposition (See, e.g., P. Mathur and Y. Liu (2003), Proceedings of the 28th Annual National Swine Improvement Federation, Des Moines, Iowa, USA, pp 155-163). Body fat deposition is necessary to sustain sow reproduction performance, for example, to support adequate milk production and to limit body weight loss. The selection for leaner carcasses, demanded by the packing industry and consumers, may conflict with the prolificacy and longevity of the sow and lead to increased replacement costs of sows in pig production. The QTN (quantitative trait nucleotide) in the IGF2 gene might provide a possibility to overcome this conflict. The imprinting character of the gene might be used to produce lean slaughter pigs from fatter dams, that inherited the wild type allele from their father (genotype of Grand parent boar=GG), crossed with terminal sires being homozygous for the lean allele (AA). The objective of this experiment was to investigate a possible effect of the QTN at the IGF2 gene on prolificacy and longevity.
- The details of the experiment are described in Example 5. It was found that sows that inherited the wild type allele from their father had significantly more piglets born alive, total born and weaned, while there was no effect on stillborn piglets (See, Example 5, Table 4). No effect on any of these prolificacy data could be observed when data were analyzed according to the allele inherited from the mother (maternal allele). Also, if sows from heterozygous dams were taken into account and grouped according to the maternal allele, again no significant effect on prolificacy could be observed, which was expected since the maternal allele is not expressed.
- The parity or average number of cycles per sow was also found to be higher in sows that inherited G from their father as compared to those that received the A allele, which points to a beneficial effect on longevity. This is related to higher litter size, since that is a major criterion for elimination in the selection program.
- Thus, the IGF2-intron3 G3072A mutation (herein also referred to as IGF2+ or A-allele; the wild type being the igf2- or G-allele) has an influence on prolificacy and longevity in sows, which allows for the possibility to use the same imprinted QTN for different selection in sire and dam lines. Terminal sires should be homozygous for the lean allele to give uniform and lean slaughter pigs, while dam lines can benefit from a selection for the wild type allele since this has a beneficial effect on prolificacy and longevity. Because of the imprinted character of the gene, selection for the fatter allele in sow lines will not influence the carcass quality of the offspring.
- Thus, provided is a method for selecting a domestic animal for having desired genotypic properties comprising testing the animal for the presence of a parentally imprinted quantitative trait locus (QTL) or a mutation therein and to the use of an isolated and/or recombinant nucleic acid comprising a parentally imprinted quantitative trait locus (QTL) or a mutation therein or functional fragment derived thereof to select a breeding animal or animal destined for slaughter having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties. The test may, for instance, comprise testing a sample from the pig for the presence of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) located at a
Sus scrofa chromosome 2 mapping at position 2p1.7., wherein the QTL is paternally expressed, i.e., is expressed from the paternal allele. - In particular, the genotypic or potential phenotypic properties are selected from the group consisting of muscle mass, fat deposition, lean meat, lean back fat, sow prolificacy and sow longevity. In particular, improved sow prolificacy may include such phenotypic expressions as higher teat number, more piglets born alive, higher litter size, higher number of total born and weaned piglets with no effect on stillborn piglets. Improved sow longevity may in particular include such phenotypic expressions as parity or average number of cycles per sow.
- Thus, the above-described IGF2 mutation influencing lean meat also influences a number of other positive traits and allows for marker-assisted selection in opposite directions in sire and dam lines due to the parentally imprinting character of the mutation. The mutation increases muscle mass at the expense of back fat with on average 2-4% more lean meat. This effect on leanness is of the same magnitude as reported for the Halothane gene but without any of the well-known deleterious effects on meat quality and animal health. Homozygous positive terminal sires (IGF2+/IGF2+) will pass the full effect to the slaughter pigs, regardless of the genotype of the mother. Furthermore, such selection principle allows for the possibility to push a far higher proportion of lower grading pigs into the higher payment categories. The experiment described in Example 5 shows that parent sows benefit from inheriting the negative gene (igf2−) from their father: they are more prolific and have an increased longevity. Parent sows are fatter but this will have no effect on the carcass quality of the slaughter pig (see illustration in Example 5).
- In a further embodiment, provided is a method for selecting a pig for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties comprising testing a sample from the pig for the presence of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) located at a
Sus scrofa chromosome 2 mapping at position 2p1.7., wherein the QTL is paternally expressed, i.e., is expressed from the paternal allele. In man and mouse, Igf2 is known to be imprinted and to be expressed exclusively from the paternal allele in several tissues. Analysis of skeletal muscle cDNA from pigs heterozygous for the SNP and/or SWC9, shows that the same imprinting holds in the pig as well. Understanding the parent-of-origin effect characterizing the QTL as provided by the invention now allows for its optimal use in breeding programs. Indeed, today half of the offspring from commercially popular Piétrain x Large White crossbred boars inherit the unfavorable Large White allele causing considerable loss. Using a method as provided by the invention avoids this problem. - Furthermore provided is an isolated and/or recombinant nucleic acid or functional fragment derived thereof comprising a parentally imprinted quantitative trait locus (QTL) or fragment thereof capable of being predominantly expressed by one parental allele. Having such a nucleic acid as provided by the invention available allows constructing transgenic animals wherein favorable genes are capable of being exclusively or predominantly expressed by one parental allele, thereby equipping the offspring of the animal homozygous for a desired trait with desired properties related to that parental allele that is expressed.
- In certain embodiments, provided is an isolated and/or recombinant nucleic acid or fragment derived thereof comprising a synthetic parentally imprinted quantitative trait locus (QTL) or functional fragment thereof derived from at least one chromosome. “Synthetic” herein describes a parentally expressed QTL wherein various elements are combined that originate from distinct locations from the genome of one or more animals. Provided is recombinant nucleic acid wherein sequences related to parental imprinting of one QTL are combined with sequences relating to genes or favorable alleles of a second QTL. Such a gene construct is favorably used to obtain transgenic animals wherein the second QTL has been equipped with paternal imprinting, as opposed to the inheritance pattern in the native animal from which the second QTL is derived. Such a second QTL can, for example, be derived from the same chromosome where the parental imprinting region is located, but can also be derived from a different chromosome from the same or even a different species. In the pig, such a second QTL can, for example, be related to an estrogen receptor (ESR)-gene (Rothschild et al.,
PNAS 93, 201-201, 1996) or a FAT-QTL (Andersson, Science 263, 1771-1774, 1994) for example derived from another pig chromosome, such aschromosome 4. A second or further QTL can also be derived from another (domestic) animal or a human. - Furthermore provided is an isolated and/or recombinant nucleic acid or functional fragment derived thereof at least partly corresponding to a QTL of a pig located at a
Sus scrofa chromosome 2 mapping at position 2p1.7 wherein the QTL is related to the potential muscle mass and/or fat deposition of the pig and/or wherein the QTL comprises at least a part of a Sus scrofa insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF2) allele, preferably at least spanning a region between INS and H19, or preferably derived from a domestic pig, such as a Pietrain, Meishan, Duroc, Landrace or Large White, or from a Wild Boar. For example, a genomic IGF2 clone was isolated by screening a porcine BAC library. FISH analysis with this BAC clone gave a strong consistent signal on the terminal part of chromosome 2p. A polymorphic microsatellite is located in the 3′UTR of IGF2 in mice (GenBank U71085), humans (GenBank S62623), and horse (GenBank AF020598). The possible presence of a corresponding porcine microsatellite was investigated by direct sequencing of theIGF2 3′UTR using the BAC clone. A complex microsatellite was identified about 800 by downstream of the stop codon; a sequence comparison revealed that this microsatellite is identical to a previously described anonymous microsatellite, Swc9. PCR primers were designed and the microsatellite (IGF2ms) was found to be highly polymorphic with three different alleles among the two Wild Boar founders and another two among the eight Large White founders. IGF2ms was fully informative in the intercross as the breed of origin as well as the parent of origin could be determined with confidence for each allele in each F2 animal. - A linkage analysis using the intercross pedigree was carried out with IGF2ms and the microsatellites Sw2443, Sw2623, and Swr2516, all from the distal end of 2p.7 IGF2 was firmly assigned to 2p by highly significant lod scores (e.g., Z=89.0, 0=0.003 against Swr2516). Multipoint analyses, including previously typed
chromosome 2 markers, revealed the following order of loci (sex-average map distances in Kosambi cM): Sw2443/Swr2516-0.3-IGF2-14.9-Sw2623-10.3-Sw256. No recombinant was observed between Sw2443 and Swr2516, and the suggested proximal location of IGF2 in relation to these loci is based on a single recombinant giving a lod score support of 0.8 for the reported order. The most distal marker in our previous QTL study, Sw256, is located about 25 cM from the distal end of the linkage group. - Furthermore provided is use of a nucleic acid or functional fragment derived thereof according to the invention in a method according to the invention. In certain embodiments, use of a method according to the invention is provided to select a breeding animal or animal destined for slaughter, or embryos or semen derived from these animals for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties. In particular, provided is such use wherein the properties are related to muscle mass and/or fat deposition. The QTL as provided by the invention may be exploited or used to improve, for example, lean meat content or back-fat thickness by marker-assisted selection within populations or by marker-assisted introgression of favorable alleles from one population to another. Examples of marker-assisted selection using the QTL as provided by the invention are use of marker-assisted segregation analysis with linked markers or with markers in disequilibrium to identify functionally distinct QTL alleles. Furthermore, identification of a causative mutation in the QTL is now possible, again leading to identifying functionally distinct QTL alleles. Such functionally distinct QTL alleles located at the distal tip of chromosome 2p with large effects on skeletal muscle mass, the size of the heart, and on back-fat thickness are also provided by the invention. The observation of a similar QTL effect in a Large White x Wild Boar as well as in a Piétrain x Large White intercross provides proof of the existence of a series of at least three distinct functional alleles. Moreover, preliminary evidence based on marker-assisted segregation analysis points towards residual segregation at this locus within the Piétrain population (data not shown). The occurrence of an allelic series as provided by the invention allows identifying causal polymorphisms which—based on the quantitative nature of the observed effect—are unlikely to be gross gene alterations but rather subtle regulatory mutations. The effects on muscle mass of the three alleles rank in the same order as the breeds in which they are found, e.g., Piétrain pigs are more muscular than Large White pigs that in turn have higher lean meat content than Wild Boars. Furthermore provided is use of the alleles as provided by the invention for within line selection or for marker-assisted introgression using linked markers, markers in disequilibrium or alleles comprising causative mutations.
- Furthermore provided is an animal selected by using a method according to the invention. For example, a pig characterized in being homozygous for an allele in a QTL located at a
Sus scrofa chromosome 2 mapping at position 2p1.7 can now be selected and is thus provided by the invention. Since the QTL is related to the potential muscle mass and/or fat deposition of the pig and/or the QTL comprises at least a part of a Sus scrofa insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF2) allele, it is possible to select promising pigs to be used for breeding or to be slaughtered. In particular, an animal according to the invention which is a male is provided. Such a male, or its sperm or an embryo derived thereof, can advantageously be used in breeding animals for creating breeding lines or for finally breeding animals destined for slaughter. In certain embodiments of such use as provided by the invention, a male, or its sperm, deliberately selected for being homozygous for an allele causing the extreme muscular hypertrophy and leanness, is used to produce offspring heterozygous for such an allele. Due to the allele's paternal expression, the offspring will also show the favorable traits for example related to muscle mass, even if the parent female has a different genetic background. Moreover, it is now possible to positively select the female(s) for having different traits, for example related to fertility, without having a negative effect on the muscle mass trait that is inherited from the allele from the selected male. For example, earlier such males could occasionally be seen with Piétrain pigs but, genetically, it was not understood how to most profitably use these traits in breeding programs. - Furthermore, provided is a transgenic animal, sperm and an embryo derived thereof, comprising a synthetic parentally imprinted QTL or functional fragment thereof as provided by the invention, e.g., it is provided by the invention to introduce a favorable recombinant allele; for example, to introduce the estrogen receptor locus related to increased litter size of an animal homozygously in a parentally imprinted region of a grandparent animal (for example, the father of a hybrid sow if the region was paternally imprinted and the grandparent was a boar); to introduce a favorable fat-related allele or muscle mass-related recombinant allele in a paternally imprinted region, and so on. Recombinant alleles that are interesting or favorable from the maternal side are often the ones that have opposite effects to alleles from the paternal side. For example, in meat animals, such as pigs, recombinant alleles linked with meat quality traits such as intra-muscular fat or muscle mass could be fixed in the dam lines while recombinant alleles linked with reduced back fat could be fixed in the sire lines. Other desirable combinations are, for example, fertility and/or milk yield in the female line with growth rates and/or muscle mass in the male lines.
- The invention is further described in the following illustrative Examples.
- Methods: Isolation of an IGF2 BAC clone and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). IGF2 primers (F:5′-GGCAAGTTCTTCCGCTAATGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:1) and R:5′-GCACCGCAGAATTACGACAA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:2)) for PCR amplification of a part of the last exon and 3′UTR were designed on the basis of a porcine IGF2 cDNA sequence (GenBank X56094). The primers were used to screen a porcine BAC library and the clone 253G10 was isolated. Crude BAC DNA was prepared as described.24 The BAC DNA was linearized with EcoRV and purified with QIAEXII (QIAGEN GmbH, Germany). The clone was labeled with biotin-14-dATP using the GIBCO-BRL Bionick labeling system (BRL18246-015). Porcine metaphase chromosomes were obtained from pokeweed (Seromed) stimulated lymphocytes using standard techniques. The slides were aged for two days at room temperature and then kept at −20° C. until use. FISH analysis was carried out as previously described.25 The final concentration of the probe in the hybridization mix was 10 ng/ml. Repetitive sequences were suppressed with standard concentrations of porcine genomic DNA. After post-hybridization washing, the biotinylated probe was detected with two layers of avidin-FITC (Vector A-2011). The chromosomes were counterstained with 0.3 mg/ml DAPI (4,6-Diamino-2-phenylindole; Sigma D9542), which produced a G-banding like pattern. No post hybridization banding was needed, since
chromosome 2 is easily recognized without banding. A total of 20 metaphase spreads were examined under an Olympus BX-60 fluorescence microscope connected to an IMAC-CCD S30 video camera and equipped with an ISIS 1.65 (Metasystems) software. - Sequence, Microsatellite, and Linkage Analysis.
- About two μg of linearized and purified BAC DNA was used for direct sequencing with 20 pmoles of primers and BigDye Terminator chemistry (Perkin Elmer, USA). DNA sequencing was done from the 3′ end of the last exon towards the 3′ end of the UTR until a microsatellite was detected. A primer set (F:5′-GTTTCTCCTGTACCCACACGCATCCC-3′ (SEQ ID NO:3) and R:5′-Fluorescein-CTACAAGCTGGGCTCAGGG-3′ (SEQ ID NO:4)) was designed for the amplification of the IGF2 microsatellite, which is about 250 by long and located approximately 800 by downstream from the stop codon. The microsatellite was PCR amplified using fluorescently labeled primers and the genotyping was carried out using an ABI377 sequencer and the GeneScan/Genotyper software (Perkin Elmer, USA). Two-point and multipoint linkage analysis were done with the Cri-Map software.26
- Animals and Phenotypic Data.
- The intercross pedigree comprised two European Wild Boar males and eight Large White females, 4 F1 males and 22 F1 females, and 200 F2 progeny.1 The F2 animals were sacrificed at a live weight of at least 80 kg or at a maximum age of 190 days. Phenotypic data on birth weight, growth, fat deposition, body composition, weight of internal organs, and meat quality were collected; a detailed description of the phenotypic traits are provided by Andersson et al.1 and Andersson-Eklund et al.4
- Statistical Analysis.
- Interval mapping for the presence of QTL were carried out with a least squares method developed for the analysis of crosses between outbred lines.27 The method is based on the assumption that the two divergent lines are fixed for alternative QTL alleles. There are four possible genotypes in the F2 generation as regards the grandparental origin of the alleles at each locus. This makes it possible to fit three effects: additive, dominance, and imprinting.2 The latter is estimated as the difference between the two types of heterozygotes, the one receiving the Wild Boar allele through an F1 sire and the one receiving it from an F1 dam. An F-ratio was calculated using this model (with 3 d.f.) versus a reduced model without a QTL effect for each cM of
chromosome 2. The most likely position of a QTL was obtained as the location giving the highest F-ratio. Genome-wise significance thresholds were obtained empirically by a permutation test28 as described.2 The QTL model including an imprinting effect was compared with a model without imprinting (with 1 d.f.) to test whether the imprinting effect was significant. - The statistical models also included the fixed effects and covariates that were relevant for the respective traits; see Andersson-Eklund et al.4 for a more detailed description of the statistical models used. Family was included to account for background genetic effects and maternal effects. Carcass weight was included as a covariate to discern QTL effects on correlated traits, which means that all results concerning body composition were compared at equal weights. Least-squares means for each genotype class at the IGF2 locus were estimated with a single point analysis using Procedure GLM of SAS;29 the model included the same fixed effects and covariates as used in the interval mapping analyses.
- The QTL shows a clear parent of origin-specific expression and the map position coincides with that of the insulin-like growth factor II gene (IGF2), indicating IGF2 as the causative gene. A highly significant segregation distortion (excess of Wild Boar-derived alleles) was also observed at this locus. The results demonstrate an important effect of the IGF2 region on postnatal development and it is possible that the presence of a paternally expressed IGF2-linked QTL in humans and in rodent model organisms has so far been overlooked due to experimental design or statistical treatment of data. The study also has important implications for quantitative genetics theory and practical pig breeding.
- IGF2 was identified as a positional candidate gene for this QTL due to the observed similarity between pig chromosome 2p and human chromosome 11p. A genomic IGF2 clone was isolated by screening a porcine BAC library. FISH analysis with this BAC clone gave a strong consistent signal on the terminal part of chromosome 2p (
FIG. 1 ). A polymorphic microsatellite is located in the 3′UTR of IGF2 in mice (GenBank U71085), humans (GenBank S62623), and horse (GenBank AF020598). The possible presence of a corresponding porcine microsatellite was investigated by direct sequencing of theIGF2 3′UTR using the BAC clone. A complex microsatellite was identified about 800 by downstream of the stop codon; a sequence comparison revealed that this microsatellite is identical to a previously described anonymous microsatellite, Swc9.6 PCR primers were designed and the microsatellite (IGF2ms) was found to be highly polymorphic with three different alleles among the two Wild Boar founders and another two among the eight Large White founders. IGF2ms was fully informative in the intercross as the breed of origin as well as the parent of origin could be determined with confidence for each allele in each F2 animal. - A linkage analysis using the intercross pedigree was carried out with IGF2ms and the microsatellites Sw2443, Sw2623, and Swr2516, all from the distal end of 2p.7 IGF2 was firmly assigned to 2p by highly significant lod scores (e.g., Z=89.0, 0=0.003 against Swr2516). Multipoint analyses, including previously typed
chromosome 2 markers,8 revealed the following order of loci (sex-average map distances in Kosambi cM): Sw2443/Swr2516-0.3-IGF2-14.9-Sw2623-10.3-Sw256. No recombinant was observed between Sw2443 and Swr2516, and the suggested proximal location of IGF2 in relation to these loci is based on a single recombinant giving a lod score support of 0.8 for the reported order. The most distal marker in our previous QTL study, Sw256, is located about 25 cM from the distal end of the linkage group. - QTL analyses of body composition, fatness, meat quality, and growth traits were carried out with the
new chromosome 2 map using a statistical model testing for the possible presence of an imprinting effect as expected for IGF2. Clear evidence for a paternally expressed QTL located at the very distal tip of 2p was obtained (FIG. 2 ; Table 1). The QTL had very large effects on lean meat content in ham and explained an astonishing 30% of the residual phenotypic variance in the F2 population. Large effects on the area of the longissumus dorsi muscle, on the weight of the heart, and on back-fat thickness (subcutaneous fat) were also noted. A moderate effect on one meat quality trait, reflectance value, was indicated. The QTL had no significant effect on abdominal fat, birth weight, growth, weight of liver, kidney, or spleen (data not shown). The Large White allele at this QTL was associated with larger muscle mass and reduced back-fat thickness consistent with the difference between this breed and the Wild Boar population. The strong imprinting effect observed for all affected traits strongly suggests a single causative locus. The pleiotropic effects on skeletal muscle mass and the size of the heart appear adaptive from a physiological point of view as a larger muscle mass requires a larger cardiac output. The clear paternal expression of this QTL is illustrated by the least squares means which fall into two classes following the population origin of the paternally inherited allele (Table 1). It is worth noticing though that there was a non-significant trend towards less extreme values for the two heterozygous classes, in particular for the estimated effect on the area of longissimus dorsi. This may be due to chance, but could have a biological explanation, e.g., that there is some expression of the maternally inherited allele or that there is a linked, non-imprinted QTL with minor effects on the traits in question. - The IGF2-linked QTL and the FAT1 QTL on
chromosome 41, 9 are by far the two loci with the largest effect on body composition and fatness segregating in this Wild Boar intercross. The IGF2 QTL controls primarily muscle mass whereas FAT1 has major effects on fat deposition including abdominal fat, a trait that was not affected by the IGF2 QTL (FIG. 2 ). No significant interaction between the two loci was indicated and they control a very large proportion of the residual phenotypic variance in the F2 generation. A model including both QTLs explains 33.1% of the variance for percentage lean meat in ham, 31.3% for the percentage of lean meat plus bone in back, and 26.2% for average back fat depth (compare with a model includingonly chromosome 2 effects, Table 1). The two QTLs must have played a major role in the response during selection for lean growth and muscle mass in the Large White domestic pig. - A highly significant segregation distortion was observed in the IGF2 region (excess of Wild Boar-derived alleles) as shown in Table 1 (χ=11.7, d.f.=2; P=0.003). The frequency of Wild Boar-derived IGF2 alleles was 59% in contrast to the expected 50% and there was twice as many “Wild Boar” as “Large White” homozygotes. This deviation was observed with all three loci at the distal tip and is thus not due to typing errors. The effect was also observed with other loci but the degree of distortion decreased as a function of the distance to the distal tip of the chromosome. Blood samples for DNA preparation were collected at 12 weeks of age and we are convinced that the deviation from expected Mendelian ratios was present at birth as the number of animals lost prior to blood sampling was not sufficient to cause a deviation of this magnitude. No other of the more than 250 loci analyzed in this pedigree show such a marked segregation distortion (L. Andersson, unpublished). The segregation distortion did not show an imprinting effect, as the frequencies of the two reciprocal types of heterozygotes were identical (Table 1). This does not exclude the possibility that the QTL effects and the segregation distortion are controlled by the same locus. The segregation distortion may be due to meiotic drive favoring the paternally expressed allele during gametogenesis, as the F1 parents were all sired by Wild Boar males. Another possibility is that the segregation distortion may be due to codominant expression of the maternal and paternal allele in some tissues and/or during a critical period of embryo development. Biallelic IGF2 expression has been reported to occur to some extent during human development10, 11 and interestingly a strong influence of the parental species background on IGF2 expression was recently found in a cross between Mus musculus and Mus spretus.12 It is also interesting that a VNTR polymorphism at the insulin gene, which is very closely linked to IGF2, is associated with size at birth in humans.13 It is possible that the IGF2-linked QTL in pigs has a minor effect on birth weight but in our data it was far from significant (
FIG. 2 ) and there was no indication of an imprinting effect. - This study is an advance in the general knowledge concerning the biological importance of the IGF2 locus. The important role of IGF2 for prenatal development is well-documented from knock-out mice,14 as well as from its causative role in the human Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.15 This study demonstrates an important role for the IGF2-region also for postnatal development. It should be stressed that our intercross between outbred populations is particularly powerful to detect QTL with a parent of origin-specific effect on a multifactorial trait. This is because multiple alleles (or haplotypes) are segregating and we could deduce whether a heterozygous F2 animal received the Wild Boar allele from the F1 male or female. It is quite possible that the segregation of a paternally expressed IGF2-linked QTL affecting a trait like obesity has been Overlooked in human studies or in intercrosses between inbred rodent populations because of experimental design or statistical treatment of data. An imprinting effect cannot be detected in an intercross between two inbred lines as only two alleles are segregating at each locus. Our result has therefore significant bearings on the future analysis of the association between genetic polymorphism in the insulin-IGF2 region and Type I diabetes,16 obesity,17 and variation in birth weight13 in humans, as well as for the genetic dissection of complex traits using inbred rodent models. A major impetus for generating an intercross between the domestic pig and its wild ancestor was to explore the possibilities to map and identify major loci that have responded to selection. We have now showed that two single QTLs on chromosome 2 (this study) and 41, 2 explain as much as one third of the phenotypic variance for lean meat content in the F2 generation. This is a gross deviation from the underlying assumption in the classical infinitesimal model in quantitative genetics theory namely that quantitative traits are controlled by an infinite number of loci each with an infinitesimal effect. If a large proportion of the genetic difference between two divergent populations (e.g., Wild Boar and Large White) is controlled by a few loci, one would assume that selection would quickly fix QTL alleles with large effects leading to a selection plateau. However, this is not the experience in animal breeding programs or selection experiments where good persistent long-term selection responses are generally obtained, provided that the effective population size is reasonably large.18 A possible explanation for this paradox is that QTL alleles controlling a large proportion of genetic differences between two populations may be due to several consecutive mutations; this may be mutations in the same gene or at several closely linked genes affecting the same trait. It has been argued that new mutations contribute substantially to long-term selection responses,19 but the genomic distribution of such mutations is unknown.
- The search for a single causative mutation is the paradigm with regard to the analysis of genetic defects in mice and monogenic disorders in humans. We propose that this may not be the case for loci that have been under selection for a large number of generations in domestic animals, crops, or natural populations. This hypothesis predicts the presence of multiple alleles at major QTL. It gains some support from our recent characterization of porcine coat color variation. We have found that both the alleles for dominant white color and for black-spotting differ from the corresponding wild type alleles by at least two consecutive mutations with phenotypic effects at the KIT and MC1R loci, respectively.20, 21 In this context it is highly interesting that in the accompanying example we have identified a third allele at the IGF2-linked QTL. The effects on muscle mass of the three alleles rank in the same order as the breeds in which they are found i.e., Piétrain pigs are more muscular than Large White pigs that in turn have higher lean meat content than Wild Boars.
- There are good reasons to decide that IGF2 is the causative gene for the now reported QTL. Firstly, there is a perfect agreement in map localization (
FIG. 2 ). Secondly, it has been shown that IGF2 is paternally expressed in mice, humans, and now in pigs, like the QTL. There are several other imprinted genes in the near vicinity of IGF2 in mice and humans (Mash2, INS2, H19, KVLQT1, TAPA1/CD81, and CDKN1C/p57KIP2) but only IGF2 is paternally expressed in adult tissues.22 We believe that this locus provides a unique opportunity for molecular characterization of a QTL. The clear paternal expression can be used to exclude genes that do not show this mode of inheritance. Moreover, the presence of an allelic series should facilitate the difficult distinction between causative mutations and linked neutral polymorphism. We have already shown that there is no difference in coding sequence between IGF2 alleles from Piétrain and Large White pigs suggesting that the causative mutations occur in regulatory sequences. An obvious step is to sequence the entire IGF2 gene and its multiple promoters from the three populations. The recent report that a VNTR polymorphism in the promoter region of the insulin (INS) gene affects IGF2 expression23 suggests that the causative mutations may be at a considerable distance from the IGF2 coding sequence. - The results have several important implications for the pig breeding industry. They show that genetic imprinting is not an esoteric academic question but need to be considered in practical breeding programs. The detection of three different alleles in Wild Boar, Large White, and Piétrain populations indicates that further alleles at the IGF2-linked QTL segregate within commercial populations. The paternal expression of the QTL facilitates its detection using large paternal half-sib families as the female contribution can be ignored. The QTL is exploited to improve lean meat content by marker-assisted selection within populations or by marker-assisted introgression of favorable alleles from one population to another.
- Methods
- Pedigree material: The pedigree material utilized to map QTL was selected from a previously described Piétrain x Large White F2 pedigree comprising >1,800 individuals.6, 7 To assemble this F2 material, 27 Piétrain boars were mated to 20 Large White sows to generate an F1 generation comprising 456 individuals. 31 F1 boars were mated to unrelated 82 F1 sows from 1984 to 1989, yielding a total of 1862 F2 offspring. F1 boars were mated on average to 7 females, and F1 sows to an average of 2.7 males. Average offspring per boar were 60 and per
sow 23. - Phenotypic information: (i) Data collection: A total of 21 distinct phenotypes were recorded in the F2 generation.6, 7 These included:
-
- five growth traits: birth weight (g), weaning weight (Kg), grower weight (Kg), finisher weight (Kg) and average daily gain (ADG; Kg/day; grower to finisher period);
- two body proportion measurements: carcass length (cm); and a conformation score (0 to 10 scale; reference 6);
- ten measurements of carcass composition obtained by dissection of the chilled
carcasses 24 hours after slaughter. These include measurements of muscularity: % ham (weight hams/carcass weight), % loin (weight loin/carcass weight), % shoulder (weight shoulder/carcass weight), % lean cuts (% ham+% loin+% shoulder); and measurements of fatness: average back-fat thickness (BFT; cm), % back fat (weight back fat/carcass weight), % belly (weight belly/carcass weight), % leaf fat (weight leaf fat/carcass weight), % jowl (weight jowl/carcass weight), and “% fat cuts” (% back fat+% belly+% leaf fat+% jowl). - four meat quality measurements: pHLD1 (
Longissimus dorsi 1 hour after slaughter), pHLD24 (Longissimus dorsi 24 hours after slaughter), pHG1 (Gracilis 1 hour after slaughter) and pHG24 (Gracilis 24 hours after slaughter). (ii) Data processing: Individual phenotypes were preadjusted for fixed effects (sire, dam, CRC genotype, sex, year-season, parity) and covariates (litter size, birth weight, weaning weight, grower weight, finisher weight) that proved to significantly affect the corresponding trait. Variables included in the model were selected by stepwise regression.
- Marker genotyping: Primer pairs utilized for PCR amplification of microsatellite markers are as described.19 Marker genotyping was performed as previously described.20 Genotypes at the CRC and MyoD loci were determined using conventional methods as described.1, 12 The LAR test for the Igf2 SNP was developed according to Baron et al.21 using a primer pair for PCR amplification (5′-CCCCTGAACTTGAGGACGAGCAGCC-3′ (SEQ ID NO:5); 5′-ATCGCTGTGGGCTGGGTGGGCTGCC-3′ (SEQ ID NO:6)) and a set of three primers for the LAR step (5′-FAM-CGCCCCAGCTGCCCCCCAG-3′ (SEQ ID NO:7); 5′-HEX-CGCCCCA GCTGCCCCCCAA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:8); 5′-CCTGAGCTGCAGCAGGCCAG-3′ (SEQ ID NO:9)).
- Map construction: Marker maps were constructed using the TWOPOINT, BUILD and CHROMPIC options of the CRIMAP package.22 To allow utilization of this package, full-sib families related via the boar or sow were disconnected and treated independently. By doing so, some potentially usable information was neglected, yielding, however, unbiased estimates of recombination rates.
- QTL mapping: (i) Mapping Mendelian QTL: Conventional QTL mapping was performed using a multipoint maximum likelihood method. The applied model assumed one segregating QTL per chromosome, and fixation of alternate QTL alleles in the respective parental lines, Piétrain (P) and Large White (LW). A specific analysis program had to be developed to account for the missing genotypes of the parental generation, resulting in the fact that the parental origin of the F1 chromosomes could not be determined. Using a typical “interval mapping” strategy, a hypothetical QTL was moved along the marker map using user-defined steps. At each position, the likelihood (L) of the pedigree data was computed as:
-
- where
-
- is the sum over all possible marker-QTL phase combinations of the F1 generation. As there are two possible phases for each parent (left chromosome P or right chromosome P), there is a total of 2r combinations for r F1 parents.
-
- is the product over the n F2
-
- is the sum, for the ith F2 offspring, over the four possible QTL genotypes: P/P, P/LW, LW/P and LW/LW
- P(G|Mi,θ,φ) is the probability of the considered QTL genotype, given (i) Mi: the marker genotype of the ith F2 offspring and its F1 parents, (ii): the vector of recombination rates between adjacent markers and between the hypothetical QTL and its flanking markers, and (iii) θ the considered marker-QTL phase combination of the F1 parents.
- Recombination rates and marker linkage phase of F1 parents are assumed to be known when computing this probability. Both were determined using CRIMAP in the map construction phase (see above).
- P(yi|G) is the probability of the phenotypic value of (yi) of offspring i, given the QTL genotype under consideration. This probability is computed from the normal density function:
-
- where μG is the phenotypic mean of the considered QTL genotype (PP, PL, LP or LL) and σ2 the residual variance σ2 was considered to be the same for the four QTL genotypic classes.
- The values of μPP, μPL=μLP, μLL and σ2 maximizing L were determined using the GEMINI optimization routine.23
- The likelihood obtained under this alternative H1 hypothesis was compared with the likelihood obtained under the null hypothesis H0 of no QTL, in which the phenotypic means of the four QTL genotypic classes were forced to be identical. The difference between the logarithms of the corresponding likelihoods yields a lodscore measuring the evidence in favor of a QTL at the corresponding map position.
- (ii) Significance thresholds: Following Lander & Botstein,24 lodscore thresholds (T) associated with a chosen genome-wise significance level, were computed such that:
-
α=(C+9.21GT)χ2 2(4.6 T) - where C corresponds to the number of chromosomes (=19), G corresponds to the length of the genome in Morgans (=29), and χ2 2(4.6 T) denotes one minus the cumulative distribution function of the chi-squared distribution with 2 d.f.
Single point 2 ln(LR) were assumed to be distributed as a chi-squared distribution with two degrees of freedom, as we were fitting both an additive and dominance component. To account for the fact that we were analyzing multiple traits, significance levels were adjusted by applying a Bonferoni correction corresponding to the effective number of independent traits that were analyzed. This effective number was estimated at 16 following the approach described by Spelman et al.25 Altogether, this allowed us to set the lodscore threshold associated with an experiment-wise significance level of 5% at 5.8. When attempting to confirm the identified QTL in an independent sample, the same approach was used, however, setting C at 1, G at 25 cM and correcting for the analysis of 4.5 independent traits (as only six traits were analyzed in this sample). This yielded a lodscore threshold associated with a Type I error of 5% of 2. - (iii). Testing for an imprinted QTL: To test for an imprinted QTL, we assumed that only the QTL alleles transmitted by the parent of a given sex would have an effect on phenotype, the QTL alleles transmitted by the other parent being “neutral.” The likelihood of the pedigree data under this hypothesis was computed using
equation 1. To compute P(yi|G), however, the phenotypic means of the four QTL genotypes were set at μPP=μPL=μP and μLP=μLL=μL to test for a QTL for which the paternal allele only is expressed, and μPP=μLP=μP and μPL=μLL=μL to test for a QTL for which the maternal allele only is expressed. It is assumed in this notation that the first subscript refers to the paternal allele, the second subscript to the maternal allele. H0 was defined as the null-hypothesis of no QTL, H1 testing the presence of a Mendelian QTL; H2 testing the presence of a paternally expressed QTL, and H3 testing the presence of a maternally expressed QTL. - RT-PCR: Total RNA was extracted from skeletal muscle according to Chirgwin et al.26 RT-PCR was performed using the Gene-Amp RNA PCR Kit (Perkin-Elmer) The PCR products were purified using QiaQuick PCR Purification kit (Qiagen) and sequenced using Dye terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction (Perkin Elmer) and an AB1373 automatic sequencer.
- In Example 2, we report the identification of a QTL with major effect on muscle mass and fat deposition mapping to porcine 2p1.7 The QTL shows clear evidence for parental imprinting strongly suggesting the involvement of the Igf2 locus.
- A Piétrain X Large White intercross comprising 1125 F2 offspring was generated as described.6, 7 The Large White and Piétrain parental breeds differ for a number of economically important phenotypes. Piétrains are famed for their exceptional muscularity and leanness8 (
FIG. 2 ), while Large Whites show superior growth performance. Twenty-one distinct phenotypes measuring (i) growth performance (5), (ii) muscularity (6), (iii) fat deposition (6), and (iv) meat quality (4), were recorded on all F2 offspring. - In order to map QTL underlying the genetic differences between these breeds, we undertook a whole genome scan using microsatellite markers on an initial sample of 677 F2 individuals. Analysis of
pig chromosome 2 using a ML multipoint algorithm, revealed highly significant lodscores (up to 20) for six of the 12 phenotypes measuring muscularity and fat deposition at the distal end of the short arm of chromosome 2 (FIG. 3A ). Positive lodscores were obtained for the remaining six phenotypes, however, not reaching the genome-wise significance threshold (=5%). To confirm this finding, the remaining sample of 355 F2 offspring was genotyped for the five most distal 2p markers and QTL analysis performed for the traits yielding the highest lodscores in the first analysis. Lodscores ranged from 2.1 to 7.7, clearly confirming the presence of a major QTL in this region. Table 2 reports the corresponding ML estimates for the three genotypic means as well as the corresponding residual variance. - Bidirectional chromosome painting establishes a correspondence between SSC2p and HSA11pter-q13.9, 10 At least two serious candidate genes map to this region in man: the myogenic basic helix-loop-helix factor, MyoD, maps to HSA11p15.4, while Igf2 maps to HSA11p15.5 MyoD is a well known key regulator of myogenesis and is one of the first myogenic markers to be switched on during development.11 A previously described amplified sequence polymorphism in the porcine MyoD gene12 proved to segregate in our F2 material, which was entirely genotyped for this marker. Linkage analysis positioned the MyoD gene in the SW240-SW776 (odds >1000) interval, therefore well outside the lod-2 drop off support interval for the QTL (
FIG. 1 ). Igf2 is known to enhance both proliferation and differentiation of myoblasts in vitro13 and to cause a muscular hypertrophy when overexpressed in vivo. Based on a published porcine adult liver cDNA sequence,14 we designed primer pairs allowing us to amplify the entire Igf2 coding sequence with 222 by of leader and 280 by of trailer sequence from adult skeletal muscle cDNA. Piétrain and Large White RT-PCR products were sequenced indicating that the coding sequences were identical in both breeds and with the published sequence. However, a G A transition was found in the leader sequence corresponding toexon 2 in man (FIG. 4 ). We developed a screening test for this single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) based on the ligation amplification reaction (LAR), allowing us to genotype our pedigree material. Based on these data, Igf2 was shown to colocalize with the SWC9 microsatellite marker (=0%), therefore located at approximately 2 centimorgan from the most likely position of the QTL and well within the 95% support interval for the QTL (FIG. 1 ). Subsequent sequence analysis demonstrated that the microsatellite marker SWC9 is actually located within the 3′ UTR of the Igf2 gene. Combined with available comparative mapping data for the PGA and FSH loci, these results suggest the occurrence of an interstitial inversion of a chromosome segment containing MyoD, but not Igf2 which has remained telomeric in both species. - Igf2 therefore appeared as a strong positional allele having the observed QTL effect. In man and mouse, Igf2 is known to be imprinted and to be expressed exclusively from the paternal allele in several tissues.15 Analysis of skeletal muscle cDNA from pigs heterozygous for the SNP and/or SWC9, shows that the same imprinting holds in this tissue in the pig as well (
FIG. 4 ). Therefore if Igf2 were responsible for the observed effect, and knowing that only the paternal Igf2 allele is expressed, one can predict that (i) the paternal allele transmitted by F1 boars (P or LW) would have an effect on phenotype of F2 offspring, (ii) the maternal allele transmitted by F1 sows (P or LW) would have no effect on phenotype of F2 offspring, and (iii) the likelihood of the data would be superior under a model of a bimodal (1:1) F2 population sorted by inherited paternal allele when compared to a conventional “Mendelian” model of a trimodal (1:2:1) F2 population. The QTL mapping programs were adapted in order to allow testing of the corresponding hypotheses. H0 was defined as the null-hypothesis of no QTL, H1 as testing for the presence of a Mendelian QTL, H2 as testing for the presence of a paternally expressed QTL, and H3 as testing for the presence of a maternally expressed QTL. -
FIG. 3 summarizes the obtained results.FIGS. 3A , 3B and 3C, respectively, show the lodscore curves corresponding to log10 (H2/H0), log10 (H3/H0) and log10 (H2/H1). It can be seen that very significant lodscores are obtained when testing for the presence of a paternally expressed QTL, while there is no evidence at all for the segregation of a QTL when studying the chromosomes transmitted by the sows. Also, the hypothesis of a paternally expressed QTL is significantly more likely (log10(H2/H1)>3) than the hypothesis of a “Mendelian” QTL for all examined traits. The fact that the same tendency is observed for all traits indicates that it is likely the same imprinted gene that is responsible for the effects observed on the different traits. Table 2 reports the ML phenotypic means for the F2 offspring sorted by inherited paternal QTL allele. Note that when performing the analysis under a model of a Mendelian QTL, the Piétrain and Large White QTL alleles appeared to behave in an additive fashion, the heterozygous genotype exhibiting a phenotypic mean corresponding exactly to the midpoint between the two homzygous genotypes. This is exactly what one would predict when dealing with an imprinted QTL as half of the heterozygous offspring are expected to have inherited the P allele from their sire, the other half inheriting the LW allele. - These data therefore confirmed our hypothesis of the involvement of an imprinted gene expressed exclusively from the paternal allele. The fact that the identified chromosomal segment coincides precisely with an imprinted domain documented in man and mice strongly implicates the orthologous region in pigs. At least seven imprinted genes mapping to this domain have been documented (Igf2, Ins2, H19, Mash2, p57KIP2, KvLQTL1 and TDAG51) (
reference 15 and Andrew Feinberg, personal communication). Amongst these, only Igf2 and Ins2 are paternally expressed. While we cannot exclude that the observed QTL effect is due to an as of yet unidentified imprinted gene in this region, its reported effects on myogenesis in vitro and in vivo13 strongly implicate Igf2. Particularly the muscular hypertrophy observed in transgenic mice overexpressing Igf2 from a muscle specific promoter is in support of this hypothesis (Nadia Rosenthal, personal communication. Note that allelic variants of the INS VNTR have recently been shown to be associated with size at birth in man,16 and that the same VNTR has been shown to affect the level of Igf2 expression.17 - The observation of the same QTL effect in a Large White x Wild Boar intercross indicates the existence of a series of at least three distinct functional alleles. Moreover, preliminary evidence based on marker-assisted segregation analysis points towards residual segregation at this locus within the Piétrain population (data not shown). The occurrence of an allelic series might be invaluable in identifying the causal polymorphisms which—based on the quantitative nature of the observed effect—are unlikely to be gross gene alterations but rather subtle regulatory mutations.
- The effects of the identified QTL on muscle mass and fat deposition are truly major, being of the same magnitude of those reported for the CRC locus6, 7 though apparently without the associated deleterious effects on meat quality. We estimate that both loci jointly explain close to 50% of the Piétrain versus Large White breed difference for muscularity and leanness. Understanding the parent-of-origin effect characterizing this locus will allow for its optimal use in breeding programs. Indeed, today half of the offspring from commercially popular Piétrain x Large White crossbred boars inherit the unfavorable Large White allele causing considerable loss.
- The QTL described in this work is the second example of a gene affecting muscle development in livestock species that exhibits a non-Mendelian inheritance pattern. Indeed, we have previously shown that the callipyge locus (related to the qualitative trait wherein muscles are doubled) is characterized by polar overdominance in which only the heterozygous individuals that inherit the CLPG mutation from their sire express the double-muscling phenotype.5 This demonstrates that parent-of-origin effects affecting genes underlying production traits in livestock might be relatively common.
- Provided is an imprinted QTL with major effect on muscle mass mapping to the IGF2 locus in the pig, and use of the QTL as tool in marker-assisted selection. To fine tune this tool for marker-assisted selection, as well as to further identify a causal mutation, we have further generated a reference sequence encompassing the entire porcine IGF2 sequence as well as that from flanking genes.
- To achieve this, we screened a porcine BAC library with IGF2 probes and identified two BACs. BAC-PIGF2-1 proved to contain the INS and IGF2 genes, while BAC-PIGF2-2 proved to contain the IGF2 and H19 genes. The NotI map as well as the relative position of the two BACs is shown in
FIG. 5 . BAC-PIGF2-1 was shotgun sequenced using standard procedures and automatic sequencers. The resulting sequences were assembled using standard software yielding a total of 115 contigs. The corresponding sequences are reported inFIG. 6 . Similarity searches were performed between the porcine contigs and the orthologous sequences in human. Significant homologies were detected for 18 contigs and are reported inFIG. 7 . - For BAC-PIGF2-2, the 24 Kb NotI fragment not present in BAC-PIGF2-1 was subcloned and sequenced using the EZ::TN transposon approach and ABI automatic sequencers. Resulting sequences were assembled using the Phred-Phrap-Consed program suit, yielding seven distinct contigs (
FIG. 8 ). The contig sequences were aligned with the corresponding orthologous human sequences using the compare and dotplot programs of the GCG suite.FIG. 9 summarizes the corresponding results. - Based on the reference sequence obtained as described in Example 1, we resequenced part of the IGF2 and flanking loci from genomic DNA isolated from Piétrain, Large White and Wild Boar individuals, allowing identification of DNA sequence polymorphisms such as reported in
FIG. 10 . - This example shows presently described unique inheritance method of paternal imprinting, wherein only the gene inherited from the father is expressed, and wherein the gene inherited from the mother is a silent gene and has no effect on the carcass quality of the offspring.
- Material and Methods
- Animals. The animals used in this experiment are purebred animals belonging to three different closed dam lines based on Large White and Landrace breeds. From 1999 until 2005 blood samples were collected from all nucleus sows and boars. Genotypic frequencies per line were calculated on 555 sows in total.
- Measurements. Individual blood samples are linked to individual phenotypes. For all sows the following parameters were recorded: total born, live born, stillborn and weaned piglets per litter. At test weight of 110 kg carcass measures were performed on live animals using Piglog 105 (including back
fat 1, back fat 2 (3rd-4th rib), loin eye depth and lean meat percentage). - Genotyping. DNA was extracted from the pig blood samples using the Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit according to procedures provided by the manufacturer (Promega, Madison Wis., US). An allelic discrimination assay was performed using the ABI Prism 7700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). The final concentrations used in the 5 μl master mix were: 2.5 μl Taqman Universal PCR Master Mix, NoAmpErase Ung (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.), 1× Assay Mix, 10 ng DNA and 2,375 μl H2O (Foster City, Calif.).
- Statistical analyses. The statistical analysis was performed using the statistical software SAS. The gene frequencies were calculated from PROC FREQ. IGF2 effects were analyzed using SAS PROC GLM with paternal or maternal allele as class variables and taking into account parity and sire. For the calculation of the effect of the IGF2 mutation on the traits measured, a subset of data was made in which only sows that originate from sires that are heterozygous for the IGF2 mutation were used. Sows that inherited the G allele were compared with those that inherited the A allele. Another subset of data was made in which only sows from heterozygous dams were retained. In this dataset the effect of the maternal allele was analyzed.
- Results and Discussion. Allelic frequencies are presented in Table 3. All three dam lines segregate for the IGF2 mutation, although frequencies differ according to the line.
- A subset of data was made in which only sows derived from heterozygous sires that segregate in the population were retained. A comparison was made between sows that inherited the A or the G allele from their father.
- Sows that inherited the wild type allele from their father had significantly more piglets born alive, total born and weaned, while there was no effect on stillborn piglets (Table 4). If the same dataset was analyzed according to the allele inherited from the mother (maternal allele) no effect on any of these prolificacy data could be observed. A second subset of data was created in which only sows from heterozygous dams were taken into account and grouped according to the maternal allele. Again, no significant effect on prolificacy could be observed, which was expected since the maternal allele is not expressed.
- The parity or average number of cycles per sow was also higher in sows that inherited G from their father as compared to those that received the A allele, which points to a beneficial effect on longevity. This is related to higher litter size, since that is a major criterion for elimination in the selection program.
- The effect of the paternal allele for IGF2 was also analyzed on conformation measures at ca. 110 kg live weight. These data are presented in Table 5.
- Although no significant effects of IGF2 paternal allele on Piglog results could be observed, there is a tendency towards higher muscularity and lower back fat in the sows that inherited the A allele form their father. The fact that this difference is not significant could be due to the low number of animals on the one hand, and the use of a threshold value on back fat in the selection program on the other.
- These results show an influence of the IGF2-intron3 G3072A mutation on prolificacy and longevity in sows. This opens the possibilities to use the same imprinted QTN for different selection in sire and dam lines. Terminal sires should be homozygous for the lean allele to give uniform and lean slaughter pigs, while dam lines can benefit from a selection for the wild type allele since this has a beneficial effect on prolificacy and longevity. Because of the imprinted character of the gene, selection for the fatter allele in sow lines will not influence the carcass quality of the offspring.
- A suitable marker-assisted selection program for the IGF2 mutation may now be represented as depicted in
FIG. 11 . -
- 1. Andersson L. et al. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigs. Science 263, 1771-1774 (1994).
- 2. Knott S. A. et al. Multiple marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in a cross between outbred wild boar and Large White pigs. Genetics 149, 1069-1080 (1998).
- 3. Edfors-Lilja I. et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci for immune capacity in the pig. Journal of Immunology 161, 829-835 (1998).
- 4. Andersson-Eklund L. et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci for carcass and meat quality traits in a wild boar x Large White intercross. Journal of Animal Science 76, 694-700 (1998).
- 5. Fronicke L., B. P. Chowdhary, H. Scherthan and I. Gustaysson. A comparative map of the porcine and human genomes demonstrates ZOO-FISH and gene mapping-based chromosomal homologies. Mamm.
Genome 7, 285-90 (1996). - 6. Alexander L. J. et al. Physical assignments of 68 porcine cosmids and lambda clones containing microsatellites.
Mammalian Genome 7, 368-372 (1996). - 7. Rohrer G. A. et al. A comprehensive map of the porcine genome.
Genome Research 6, 371-391 (1996). - 8. Marklund L. et al. A comprehensive linkage map of the pig based on a wild pig-Large White intercross. Anim. Genet. 27, 255-69 (1996).
- 9. Marklund L., P. E. Nyström, S. Stern, L. Andersson-Eklund and L. Andersson. Quantitative trait loci for fatness and growth on
pig chromosome 4. Heredity In press (1998). - 10. Ohlsson R., F. Hedborg, L. Holmgren, C. Walsh and T. J. Ekstrom. Overlapping patterns of IGF2 and H19 expression during human development: biallelic IGF2 expression correlates with a lack of H19 expression.
Development 120, 361-368 (1994). - 11. Ekström T. J., H. Cui, X. Li and R. Ohlsson. Promoter-specific IGF2 imprinting status and its plasticity during human liver development. Development 121, 309-316 (1995).
- 12. Hemberger M. et al. H19 and Igf2 are expressed and differentially imprinted in neuroectoderm-derived cells in the mouse brain. Dev. Genes Evol. 208, 393-402 (1998).
- 13. Dunger D. B. et al. Association of the INS VNTR with size at birth.
Nature Genetics 19, 98-100 (1998). - 14. DeChiara T. M., E. J. Robertson and A. Efstratiadis. Parental imprinting of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II gene.
Cell 64, 849-859 (1991). - 15. Sun F. L., W. L. Dean, G. Kelsey, N. D. Allen and W. Reik. Transactivation of Igf2 in a mouse model of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Nature 389, 809-815 (1997).
- 16. Davies J. L. et al. A genome-wide search for
human type 1 diabetes susceptibility genes.Nature 371, 130-136 (1994). - 17. O'Dell S. D. et al. ApaI polymorphism in insulin-like growth factor II (IGF2) gene and weight in middle-aged males. International Journal of
Obesity 21, 822-825 (1997). - 18. Falconer D. S. and T. F. C. Mackay. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, (Longman, England, 1996).
- 19. Hill W. G. Rates of change in quantitative traits from fixation of new mutations. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 79, 142-145 (1982). - 20. Marklund S. et al. Molecular basis for the dominant white phenotype in the domestic pig.
Genome Research 8, 826-833 (1998). - 21. Kijas J. M. H. et al. Melanocortin receptor 1 (MC1R) mutations and coat color in the pig. Genetics In press (1998).
- 22. Beechey C. V. personal communication (1998).
- 23. Paquette J., N. Giannoukakis, C. Polychronakos, P. Vafiadis and C. Deal. The
INS 5′ variable number of tandem repeats is associated with IGF2 expression in humans. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, 14158-14164 (1998). - 24. Sambrook J., E. F. Fritsch and T. Maniatis. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual., (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, 1989).
- 25. Chowdhary B. P., C. de la Sena, I. Harbitz, L. Eriksson and I. Gustaysson. FISH on metaphase and interphase chromosomes demonstrates the physical order of the genes for GPI, CRC, and LIPE in pigs.
Cytogenetics Cell Genetics 71, 175-178 (1995). - 26. Green P., K. Falls, and S. Crook. Documentation for CRI-MAP, version 2.4., (Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo., 1990).
- 27. Haley C. S., S. A. Knott, and J. M. Elsen. Mapping quantitative trait loci in crosses between outbred lines using least squares. Genetics 136, 1195-1207 (1994).
- 28. Churchill G. A. and R. W. Doerge. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138, 963-971 (1994).
- 29. Anonymous. SAS version 6.10, (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N. C., 1990).
-
- 1. Fuji J., K. Otsu, F. Zorzato, S. Deleon, V. K. Khanna, J. E. Weiler, P. J. O'Brien and D. H. MacLennan (1991). Identification of a mutation in the porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science 253: 448-451.
- 2. MacLennan D. H. and M. S. Phillips (1993). Malignant hyperthermia. Science 256:789-794.
- 3. Grobet L., L. J. Royo Martin, D. Poncelet, D. Pirottin, B. Brouwers, J. Riquet, A. Schoeberlein, S. Dunner, F. Ménissier, J. Massabanda, R. Fries, R. Hanset, M. Georges (1997) A deletion in the myostatin gene causes double-muscling in cattle. Nature Genetics 17:71-74.
- 4. Andersson L., C. S. Haley, H. Ellegren, S. A. Knott, M. Johansson, K. Andersson, L. Andersson-Eklund, I. Edfors-Lilja, M. Fredholm, I. Hansson, J. Håkansson and K. Lundström (1994). Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigs. Science 263:1771-1774.
- 5. Cockett N., S. Jackson, T. Shaw, F. Farnir, S. Berghmans, G. Snowder, D. Nielsen and M. Georges (1996). Polar overdominance at the ovine callipyge locus. Science 273:236-238.
- 6. Hanset R., C. Dasnois, S. Scalais, C. Michaux and L. Grobet (1995). Genetypes at the locus for halothane sensitivity and performance in a Piétrain x Large White F2. Genet. Sel. Evol. 27: 63-76.
- 7. Hanset R., C. Dasnois, S. Scalais, C. Michaux and L. Grobet (1995). Introgression into the Piétrain genome of the normal allele at the locus for halothane sensitivity. Genet. Sel. Evol. 27: 77-88.
- 8. Olivier L. and J. J. Lauvergne (1967). A study of the inheritance of the muscular hypertrophy of the Piétrain pig: preliminary results. Annales de Médecine Vétérinaire 111: 104-109.
- 9. Rettenberger G., C. Klett, U. Zechner, J. Kunz, W. Vogel and H. Hameister (1995). Visualisation of the conservation of synteny between humans and pigs by heterologous chromosome painting. Genomics 26: 372-378.
- 10. Goureau A., M. Yerle, A. Schmitz, J. Riquet, D. Milan, P. Pinton, G. Frelat and J. Gellin (1996). Human and porcine correspondence of chromosome segments using bidirectional chromosome painting. Genomics 36:252-262.
- 11. Yun K. and B. Wold (1996). Skeletal muscle determination and differentiation: story of a core regulatory network and its context. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 8:877-889.
- 12. Knoll A., M. Nebola, J. Dvorak and S. Cepica (1997). Detection of a DdeI PCR RFLP within
intron 1 of the porcine MYOD1(MYF3) locus.Animal Genetics 28, 308-322. - 13. Florini J. R., D. Z. Ewton and F. J. McWade (1995). IGFs, muscle growth, and myogenesis. Diabetes Review 3:73-92.
- 14. Catchpole I. R. and W. Engström (1990). Nucleotide sequence of a porcine insulin-like growth factor II cDNA. Nucleic Acids Research 18(21):6430.
- 15. Feil R., T. F. Moore, J. Oswald, J. Walter, F. Sun and W. Reik (1997). The imprinted insulin like
growth factor 2 gene. Pp70 In Genomic Imprinting. Eds. Reik & Surani. IRL Press at Oxford University Press. - 16. Dunger D. B., K. K. L. Ong, S. J. Huxtable, A. Sherriff, K. A. Woods, M. L. Ahmed, J. Golding, M. E. Pembrey, R. Ring, the ALSPAC study team, S. T. Bennett and J. A. Todd (1998). Association of the INS VNTR with size at birth. Nature Genetics 19: 98-100.
- 17. Paquette J., N. Giannoukakis, C. Polychronakos, P. Vafiadis and C. Deal (1998) The
INS 5′ variable number of tandem repeats is associated with IGF2 expression in humans. J. Biol. Chem. 273(23):14158-14164. - 18. Andersson-Eklund L., L. Marklund, K. Lundström, C. S. Haley, K. Andersson, I. Hansson, M. Moller and L. Andersson (1998). Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci for carcass and meat quality traits in a Wild Boar x Large White intercross. J. Anim. Sci. 76:694-700.
- 19. Rohrer G. A., L. J. Alexander, Z. Hu, J. W. Keele, T. P. Smith, C. W. Beattie (1996). A comprehensive map of the porcine genome. Genome Research, in the press.
- 20. Georges M., D. Nielsen, M. Mackinnon, A. Mishra, R. Okimoto, A. T. Pasquino, L. S. Sargeant, A. Sorensen, M. R. Steele, X. Zhao, J. E. Womack and I. Hoeschele (1995). Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production by exploiting progeny testing. Genetics 139: 907-920.
- 21. Baron H., S. Fung, A. Aydin, S. Bahring, F. C. Luft and H. Schuster (1996). Oligonucleotide ligation assay (OLA) for the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Nat. Biotechnol. 14(10):1279-1282.
- 22. Lander E. and P. Green (1987) Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans. Proceedings of National Academy of Science (USA) 84: 2363-2367.
- 23. Lalouel J. M. (1983). Optimization of functions. Contrib. Epidemiol. Biostat. 4:235-259.
- 24. Lander E. S. and D. Botstein (1989). Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121:185-199.
- 25. Spelman R. L., W. Coppieters, L. Karim, J. A. M. van Arendonk and H. Bovenhuis (1996). Quantitative trait loci analysis for five milk production traits on chromosome six in the Dutch Holstein-Friesian population. Genetics 144:1799-1808.
- 26. Chirgwin J. M., A. E. Przybyla, R. J. MacDonald and W. J. Rutter (1979) Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry 18:5294-5299.
-
TABLE 1 Summary of QTL analysis for pig chromosome 2 in a Wild Boar/Large White intercross1Least squares means5 F ratio2 Map Percent of F2 WP/WM WP/LM LP/WM LP/LM Trait QTL Imprinting position3 variance4 n = 62 n = 43 n = 43 n = 30 Body composition traits Lean meat in ham, % 24.4*** 19.1*** 0 30.6 63.6a 64.2a 66.4b 67.3b Lean meat mass in ham, kg 18.1*** 16.8*** 1 24.3 4.69a 4.72a 4.94b 5.02b Lean meat + bone in back, % 12.2** 9.6** 0 17.4 66.3a 66.7a 69.3b 70.8b Longissimus muscle area, cm2 10.3** 4.8* 1 15.4 31.9a 33.0a 34.5b 35.2b Fatness traits Average back fat depth, mm 7.1* 8.7** 0 10.4 27.2a 27.7a 25.5b 24.7b Weight of internal organs Heart, gram 9.7** 11.4*** 0 14.4 226a 225a 238b 244b Meat quality traits Reflectance value, EEL 5.7 6.1* 1 8.1 18.6a 18.4a 21.8b 19.7a *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 1Only the traits for which the QTL peak was in the IGF2 region (0-10 cM) and the test statistic reached the nominal significance threshold of F = 3.9 are included. 2“QTL” is the test statistic for the presence of a QTL under a genetic model with additive, dominance, and imprinting effects (3 d.f.) while “Imprinting” is the test statistic for the presence of an imprinting effect (1 d.f.), both obtained at the position of the QTL peak. Genome-wise, significance thresholds, estimated by permutation, were used for the QTL test while nominal significance thresholds were used for the Imprinting test. 3In cM from the distal end of 2p; IGF2 is located at 0.3 cM. 4 The reduction in the residual variance of the F2 population effected by inclusion of an imprinted QTL at the given position. 5Means and standard errors estimated at the IGF2 locus by classifying the genotypes according to the population and parent of origin of each allele. W and L represent alleles derived from the Wild Boar and Large White founders, respectively; superscript P and M represent a paternal and maternal origin, respectively. Figures with different letters (superscript a or b) are significantly different at least at the 5% level, most of them are different at the 1% or 0.1% level. -
TABLE 2 Maximum likelihood phenotypic means for the different F2 genotypes estimated under (i) a model of a Mendelian QTL, and (ii) a model assuming an imprinted QTL. Mendelian QTL Imprinted QTL Traits μLW/LW μLW/P μP/P R μPAT/LW μPAT/P R BFT (cm) 2.98 2.84 2.64 0.27 2.94 2.70 0.27 % ham 21.10 21.56 22.15 0.83 21.23 21.95 0.83 % loin 24.96 25.53 26.46 0.91 25.12 26.14 0.93 % lean cuts 65.02 65.96 67.60 1.65 65.23 67.05 1.67 % back fat 6.56 6.02 5.33 0.85 6.43 5.56 0.85 % fat cuts 28.92 27.68 26.66 1.46 28.54 26.99 1.49 -
TABLE 3 Allele frequencies for the IGF2-intron3 G3072A mutation in sows of dam lines (Number of sows within genotypes is presented in parenthesis) Line AA GA GG A 0.04 (4) 0.28 (25) 0.68 (61) B 0.30 (42) 0.37 (52) 0.33 (46) C 0.80 (259) 0.19 (62) 0.01 (4) -
TABLE 4 Effect of paternal allele inherited from heterozygous sires on prolificacy Trait A G Significance* Number of cycles 240 276 analyzed* Born alive/litter 10.37 ± 0.18 10.90 ± 0.16 0.0075 Total born/litter 11.04 ± 0.19 11.48 ± 0.17 0.0371 Stillborn/litter 0.63 ± 0.07 0.59 ± 0.06 NS Weaned/litter 9.11 ± 0.21 9.92 ± 0.16 0.0134 Parity 2.95 ± 0.12 3.54 ± 0.12 0.0035 *Model taking parity and sire into account, NS = not significant P > 0.05 -
TABLE 5 Effect of paternal allele inherited from heterozygous sires on carcass measures at 110 kg live weight (Piglog 105) Trait A G Significance* Number of sows analyzed* 70 64 Back fat 1 (mm) 14.90 ± 0.27 15.08 ± 0.27 NS Back fat 2 (mm) 13.20 ± 0.29 14.14 ± 0.30 NS Loin eye (mm) 56.28 ± 0.45 55.72 ± 0.41 NS % lean meat 57.31 ± 0.26 56.69 ± 0.28 NS *Model taking sire into account. NS = not significant P > 0.05
Claims (31)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/658,677 US20100275279A1 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 2010-02-12 | Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits |
Applications Claiming Priority (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP98204291 | 1998-12-16 | ||
EP98204291.3 | 1998-12-16 | ||
PCT/EP1999/010209 WO2000036143A2 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 1999-12-16 | Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits |
US86873201A | 2001-11-01 | 2001-11-01 | |
US11/357,733 US7892736B2 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 2006-08-17 | Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits |
US12/658,677 US20100275279A1 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 2010-02-12 | Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/357,733 Division US7892736B2 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 2006-08-17 | Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100275279A1 true US20100275279A1 (en) | 2010-10-28 |
Family
ID=8234480
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/868,732 Expired - Fee Related US7255987B1 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 1999-12-16 | Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits |
US11/357,733 Expired - Fee Related US7892736B2 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 2006-08-17 | Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits |
US12/658,677 Abandoned US20100275279A1 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 2010-02-12 | Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/868,732 Expired - Fee Related US7255987B1 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 1999-12-16 | Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits |
US11/357,733 Expired - Fee Related US7892736B2 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 2006-08-17 | Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits |
Country Status (21)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US7255987B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1141418B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2002535963A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20010102957A (en) |
CN (1) | CN100406571C (en) |
AT (1) | ATE366823T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU779393B2 (en) |
BG (1) | BG105636A (en) |
BR (1) | BR9916362B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2355897C (en) |
CZ (1) | CZ20012159A3 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69936539T2 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1141418T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2291048T3 (en) |
HU (1) | HUP0104603A3 (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA01006130A (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ512721A (en) |
PL (1) | PL349521A1 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2262229C2 (en) |
SK (1) | SK8522001A3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2000036143A2 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100281547A1 (en) * | 2003-01-10 | 2010-11-04 | Leif Andersson | Selecting animals for desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties |
CN109913559A (en) * | 2019-03-28 | 2019-06-21 | 甘肃农业大学 | RYR2 gene is as the molecular labeling and its application for influencing sheep forage conversion ratio |
Families Citing this family (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
SK8522001A3 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 2002-01-07 | Univ Liege | Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits |
CA2415119C (en) * | 2000-07-05 | 2010-03-16 | Jeremy Francis Taylor | Method of managing and marketing livestock based on genetic profiles |
JP2004537310A (en) * | 2001-07-31 | 2004-12-16 | ピエレ ボーグナーズ | Method for assessing obesity risk based on allyl variants in the 5 'flanking region of the insulin gene |
US20050260603A1 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2005-11-24 | Mmi Genomics, Inc. | Compositions for inferring bovine traits |
WO2007133075A2 (en) * | 2006-05-12 | 2007-11-22 | Institute For Pig Genetics B.V. | Igf2 marker assisted selection for porcine reproductive traits |
US20080163824A1 (en) * | 2006-09-01 | 2008-07-10 | Innovative Dairy Products Pty Ltd, An Australian Company, Acn 098 382 784 | Whole genome based genetic evaluation and selection process |
EP2027771B1 (en) * | 2007-08-24 | 2012-06-13 | Hermitage Pedigree Pigs Ltd. | Sequencing the mitochondrial DNA with reference to the fertility as a means for the optimization of sow breeding lines |
WO2009073397A1 (en) | 2007-11-29 | 2009-06-11 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Meat products with increased levels of beneficial fatty acids |
US20110076379A1 (en) * | 2008-06-13 | 2011-03-31 | Means Michael M | High omega saturated fat free meat products |
CN101463352B (en) * | 2009-01-13 | 2011-03-30 | 中国农业大学 | DNA fragment related to pig intramuscular fat deposition and use thereof |
US10445846B2 (en) | 2011-04-14 | 2019-10-15 | Elwha Llc | Cost-effective resource apportionment technologies suitable for facilitating therapies |
US10853819B2 (en) | 2011-04-14 | 2020-12-01 | Elwha Llc | Cost-effective resource apportionment technologies suitable for facilitating therapies |
RU2514634C2 (en) * | 2012-08-06 | 2014-04-27 | Виктор Данилович Кабанов | Method of increasing meat productivity of pigs by selection using genetic marker |
CN103409440B (en) * | 2013-07-02 | 2015-05-06 | 江西农业大学 | PHKG1 (phosphorylase kinase, gamma 1) gene and application thereof in genetic improvement for breeding pig meat quality traits |
JP6201265B2 (en) * | 2014-10-22 | 2017-09-27 | 静岡県 | Method for producing pigs having desired traits |
DE102017005000A1 (en) * | 2017-05-24 | 2018-11-29 | Gvg Genetic Monitoring Gmbh | Method for genotyping mouse strains |
CN114672572B (en) * | 2022-03-14 | 2023-05-02 | 上海市农业科学院 | Molecular marker related to 10-week-old weight of meat geese and application thereof |
CN116287281B (en) * | 2022-08-10 | 2024-03-15 | 武汉中粮肉食品有限公司 | SNP molecular marker related to eye muscle area and lean muscle performance of Changbai pigs and application thereof |
CN116083604A (en) * | 2023-03-09 | 2023-05-09 | 西北农林科技大学 | SNP molecular marker affecting sheep weaning weight and application thereof |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5935784A (en) | 1996-07-19 | 1999-08-10 | Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Prolactin receptor gene as a genetic marker for increased litter size in pigs |
SK8522001A3 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2002-01-07 | Univ Liege | Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits |
ATE440967T1 (en) * | 2003-01-10 | 2009-09-15 | Univ Liege | SELECTION OF ANIMALS FOR DESIRED GENOTYPIC AND POTENTIAL PHENOTYPIC CHARACTERISTICS BASED ON A SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM (SNP) IN INTRON 3 OF THE IGF2 GENE |
-
1999
- 1999-12-16 SK SK852-2001A patent/SK8522001A3/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1999-12-16 CN CNB998161918A patent/CN100406571C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-12-16 DE DE69936539T patent/DE69936539T2/en not_active Revoked
- 1999-12-16 BR BRPI9916362-4B1A patent/BR9916362B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-12-16 HU HU0104603A patent/HUP0104603A3/en unknown
- 1999-12-16 CZ CZ20012159A patent/CZ20012159A3/en unknown
- 1999-12-16 US US09/868,732 patent/US7255987B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1999-12-16 PL PL99349521A patent/PL349521A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1999-12-16 ES ES99969219T patent/ES2291048T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-12-16 AT AT99969219T patent/ATE366823T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-12-16 DK DK99969219T patent/DK1141418T3/en active
- 1999-12-16 NZ NZ512721A patent/NZ512721A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-12-16 KR KR1020017007600A patent/KR20010102957A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1999-12-16 MX MXPA01006130A patent/MXPA01006130A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-12-16 AU AU27952/00A patent/AU779393B2/en not_active Expired
- 1999-12-16 EP EP99969219A patent/EP1141418B1/en not_active Revoked
- 1999-12-16 JP JP2000588390A patent/JP2002535963A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1999-12-16 RU RU2001119473/13A patent/RU2262229C2/en active
- 1999-12-16 CA CA002355897A patent/CA2355897C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-12-16 WO PCT/EP1999/010209 patent/WO2000036143A2/en active IP Right Grant
-
2001
- 2001-06-21 BG BG105636A patent/BG105636A/en active Pending
-
2006
- 2006-08-17 US US11/357,733 patent/US7892736B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-02-12 US US12/658,677 patent/US20100275279A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100281547A1 (en) * | 2003-01-10 | 2010-11-04 | Leif Andersson | Selecting animals for desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties |
CN109913559A (en) * | 2019-03-28 | 2019-06-21 | 甘肃农业大学 | RYR2 gene is as the molecular labeling and its application for influencing sheep forage conversion ratio |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
BG105636A (en) | 2002-12-29 |
US20060288433A1 (en) | 2006-12-21 |
EP1141418B1 (en) | 2007-07-11 |
CA2355897A1 (en) | 2000-06-22 |
US7255987B1 (en) | 2007-08-14 |
RU2262229C2 (en) | 2005-10-20 |
JP2002535963A (en) | 2002-10-29 |
DK1141418T3 (en) | 2007-11-12 |
HUP0104603A2 (en) | 2002-04-29 |
WO2000036143A3 (en) | 2000-10-26 |
SK8522001A3 (en) | 2002-01-07 |
BR9916362A (en) | 2002-07-23 |
PL349521A1 (en) | 2002-07-29 |
ATE366823T1 (en) | 2007-08-15 |
HUP0104603A3 (en) | 2003-10-28 |
ES2291048T3 (en) | 2008-02-16 |
CZ20012159A3 (en) | 2002-01-16 |
DE69936539D1 (en) | 2007-08-23 |
NZ512721A (en) | 2004-01-30 |
KR20010102957A (en) | 2001-11-17 |
AU2795200A (en) | 2000-07-03 |
CN100406571C (en) | 2008-07-30 |
MXPA01006130A (en) | 2002-03-27 |
AU779393B2 (en) | 2005-01-20 |
CA2355897C (en) | 2008-06-10 |
CN1361830A (en) | 2002-07-31 |
DE69936539T2 (en) | 2008-02-14 |
EP1141418A2 (en) | 2001-10-10 |
WO2000036143A2 (en) | 2000-06-22 |
BR9916362B1 (en) | 2013-06-25 |
US7892736B2 (en) | 2011-02-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7892736B2 (en) | Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits | |
US7732137B2 (en) | Selecting animals for desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties | |
US9856531B2 (en) | Methods and compositions for genetically detecting improved milk production traits in cattle | |
Wang et al. | Insulin-like growth factor 2 as a candidate gene influencing growth and carcass traits and its bialleleic expression in chicken | |
CN113736890B (en) | SNP molecular marker related to healthy number and living number rate and application thereof | |
Freking et al. | The Callipyge mutation for sheep muscular hypertrophy-genetics, physiology and meat quality. | |
EP1798292A1 (en) | Methods for improving turkey meat production | |
Horák et al. | Genetic variability of the CRC and MYF4 genes in genetic resource, Přeštice Black-Pied pig | |
Kutzer et al. | Current state of development of genome analysis in livestock | |
Wagner | Mapping phenotypic traits in swine | |
Yu et al. | A paper to be submitted to Journal of Animal Science | |
Class et al. | Patent application title: SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS ASSOCIATED WITH BULL FERTILITY Inventors: Hasan Khatib (Fitchburg, WI, US) Hasan Khatib (Fitchburg, WI, US) | |
Yu | The role of PIT1 in the putative quantitative trait loci region on pig chromosome 13 | |
Area et al. | SW1515 SWR2300 SQQ08 SQ312 S0331 SW974 |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SEGHERSGENTEC N.V., BELGIUM Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ANDERSSON, LEIF;GEORGES, MICHEL;SPINCEMAILLE, GEERT;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060526 TO 20060618;REEL/FRAME:024011/0407 Owner name: MELICA HB, SWEDEN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ANDERSSON, LEIF;GEORGES, MICHEL;SPINCEMAILLE, GEERT;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060526 TO 20060618;REEL/FRAME:024011/0407 Owner name: LIEGE, UNIVERSITY OF, BELGIUM Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ANDERSSON, LEIF;GEORGES, MICHEL;SPINCEMAILLE, GEERT;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060526 TO 20060618;REEL/FRAME:024011/0407 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MELICA HB, SWEDEN Free format text: RE-RECORD TO CORRECT THE ADDRESS OF THE ASSIGNEE, PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 024011 FRAME 0407;ASSIGNORS:ANDERSSON, LEIF;GEORGES, MICHEL;SPINCEMAILLE, GEERT;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060526 TO 20060618;REEL/FRAME:024791/0797 Owner name: SEGHERSGENTEC N.V., BELGIUM Free format text: RE-RECORD TO CORRECT THE ADDRESS OF THE ASSIGNEE, PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 024011 FRAME 0407;ASSIGNORS:ANDERSSON, LEIF;GEORGES, MICHEL;SPINCEMAILLE, GEERT;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060526 TO 20060618;REEL/FRAME:024791/0797 Owner name: UNIVERSITY OF LIEGE, BELGIUM Free format text: RE-RECORD TO CORRECT THE ADDRESS OF THE ASSIGNEE, PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 024011 FRAME 0407;ASSIGNORS:ANDERSSON, LEIF;GEORGES, MICHEL;SPINCEMAILLE, GEERT;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060526 TO 20060618;REEL/FRAME:024791/0797 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GENTEC N.V., BELGIUM Free format text: AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:SEGHERS GENTEC N.V.;REEL/FRAME:025897/0817 Effective date: 20021104 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GENTEC N. V., BELGIUM Free format text: ADDRESS CHANGE;ASSIGNOR:GENTEC N V;REEL/FRAME:026114/0891 Effective date: 20110401 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |