US20100171002A1 - Method for reducing the turbulence and gust influences on the flying characteristics of aircraft, and a control device for this purpose - Google Patents

Method for reducing the turbulence and gust influences on the flying characteristics of aircraft, and a control device for this purpose Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100171002A1
US20100171002A1 US11/381,192 US38119206A US2010171002A1 US 20100171002 A1 US20100171002 A1 US 20100171002A1 US 38119206 A US38119206 A US 38119206A US 2010171002 A1 US2010171002 A1 US 2010171002A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
aircraft
angle
drive signal
function
control device
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11/381,192
Other versions
US7757993B1 (en
Inventor
Klaus-Uwe Hahn
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft und Raumfahrt eV
Original Assignee
Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft und Raumfahrt eV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft und Raumfahrt eV filed Critical Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft und Raumfahrt eV
Assigned to DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUER LUFT-UND RAUMFART C. V. reassignment DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUER LUFT-UND RAUMFART C. V. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DR.-ING. KLAUS-UWE HAHN
Publication of US20100171002A1 publication Critical patent/US20100171002A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7757993B1 publication Critical patent/US7757993B1/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C13/00Control systems or transmitting systems for actuating flying-control surfaces, lift-increasing flaps, air brakes, or spoilers
    • B64C13/02Initiating means
    • B64C13/16Initiating means actuated automatically, e.g. responsive to gust detectors
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05DSYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
    • G05D1/00Control of position, course or altitude of land, water, air, or space vehicles, e.g. automatic pilot
    • G05D1/08Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw
    • G05D1/0808Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw specially adapted for aircraft
    • G05D1/0816Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw specially adapted for aircraft to ensure stability
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T50/00Aeronautics or air transport
    • Y02T50/10Drag reduction

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for reducing the turbulence and gust influences on the flying characteristics of aircraft, and to a control device for this purpose.
  • the flying characteristics of aircraft are disadvantageously influenced by turbulence and gusts in the air masses surrounding the aircraft.
  • turbulence and gusts in particular of airplanes, are disadvantageously influenced by turbulence and gusts in the air masses surrounding the aircraft.
  • a large increase in lift, low wing loadings and high airspeeds as well as low altitudes have negative influences on the turbulence and gust behavior of aircraft.
  • strong turbulence (“clear air turbulence” CAT) can occur even at high altitudes and can produce considerable structural loads, and can even lead to danger to the aircraft occupants.
  • a control method based on the principle of application of disturbance variables in order to reduce gust loads and to improve passenger comfort is known from Bschreibet, H.; Krag, B.; Skudridakis, J.: “OLGA—An Open Loop Gust Alleviation System”, in: AGARD CP No. 384, Toronto, Canada, 1985.
  • the flying characteristics are not changed, with a reaction taking place to the original disturbance itself, and compensating for it before the disturbance caused by turbulence or gusts acts on the aircraft itself.
  • the angle of attack of a gust must be known precisely. This must be determined from sensor signals.
  • the control surfaces of the wings and of the tailplane are adjusted as a function of the gust angles of attack in such a way that additional lift forces and pitch moments caused by the gusts are compensated for. In this case, the handling characteristics of the aircraft remain unchanged.
  • the efficiency of the control system is highly dependent on the accuracy of the calculation of the gust angle of attack, and on the degree of deflection of the control surfaces.
  • the control method based on the principle of application of disturbance variables, in which the so-called wind incidence angle is calculated from air data and inertial data is described in König, R., Hahn, K-U.: “Load Alleviation and Rights Musing Investigations using ATTAS”, in: 17th ICAS Congress, Sweden, 1990.
  • the wind incidence angle is the additional incidence angle which changes the lift and results from atmospheric turbulence and gusts. Only the aircraft longitudinal movement is taken into account, in order to avoid complex gust vector determination.
  • the wind incidence angle ⁇ W is calculated using the following formula:
  • ⁇ w ⁇ L - ⁇ + H . V + q ⁇ r s V
  • ⁇ L is the incidence angle measured by an incidence angle sensor (for example aircraft)
  • is the longitudinal attitude angle, also referred to as the pitch angle
  • ⁇ dot over (H) ⁇ is the instantaneous vertical velocity of the aircraft
  • V is the airspeed of the aircraft with respect to the air
  • q is the pitch rate of the aircraft
  • r s is the distance between the wind attack sensor and the center of gravity of the aircraft.
  • the pitch angle is in this case the angle between the aircraft longitudinal axis in the aircraft-fixed coordinates system and the node axis k 1 as the projection of the aircraft-fixed aircraft longitudinal axis x f onto the geodetic horizontal plane, that is to say the x g -y g -plane.
  • the pitch rate q is the angular velocity of the aircraft about the aircraft lateral axis y f .
  • the described control method is not suitable for adequate turbulence and gust compensation when in turning flight as a result of the simplified consideration of only the aircraft longitudinal movement, particularly when sideslip angles also occur in this case between the lateral axis and the lateral force axis of the aircraft.
  • One object of the invention is to provide an improved method for reducing the turbulence and gust influences on the flying characteristics of aircraft, as well as a corresponding control device, in order nevertheless to determine a sufficiently accurate additional incidence angle drive signal without any complex gust vector determination, independently of the flight motion of the aircraft, that is to say even when in turning flight.
  • the object is achieved by the method and the control device of the type mentioned initially, according to the invention, in that the additional incidence angle drive signal is determined for control surfaces on surfaces which generate an air force, in particular wing and/or tailplane of the aircraft as a function of an instantaneous bank angle and sideslip angle.
  • the bank angle and the sideslip angle can easily be determined in a known manner by means of sensors, and can be determined from measurement data available in an aircraft for the attitude, position and velocity of the aircraft.
  • is the bank angle
  • ⁇ dot over (H) ⁇ is the vertical velocity of the aircraft
  • V is the airspeed of the aircraft with respect to the surrounding air
  • ⁇ 0 is the longitudinal attitude angle of the aircraft
  • is the incidence angle of the wings of the aircraft
  • q is the pitch rate of the aircraft
  • r AoA is the distance between the incidence angle sensor and the center of gravity of the aircraft
  • r is the yaw rate
  • f AoS is the distance between the sideslip angle sensor and the center of gravity.
  • the bank angle ⁇ is used for correct transformation to the aircraft-fixed coordinate system, and the sideslip angle ⁇ , as additional influences.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a device for determination of the wind incidence angle
  • FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of open-loop control of control surfaces on wings and on the tailplane as a function of the wind incidence angle
  • FIG. 3 shows a definition of axes and angles in the geodetic (g) and aircraft-fixed (f) coordinate system in accordance with DIN 9300;
  • FIG. 4 shows a definition of axes and angles in the aircraft-fixed (f), aerodynamic (a) and experimental (e) coordinate system in accordance with DIN 9300.
  • FIG. 5 shows a cross-sectional view of a wing in order to illustrate the change in the air force vector as a consequence of an upward wind gust.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a control device for determination of the wind incidence angle ⁇ Wf in the vehicle-fixed coordinate system which, after high-pass filtering, is used as a drive signal ⁇ Wf II for open-loop control based on the disturbance-variable application principle.
  • the velocity V of the aircraft with respect to the air is determined by means of an air data system.
  • the geodetic vertical velocity ⁇ dot over (H) ⁇ of the aircraft is determined either from the air data system as the barometric altitude change ⁇ dot over (H) ⁇ baro , from the inertial reference system (IRS) as ⁇ dot over (H) ⁇ inertial or with the aid of complementary filtering from the barometric altitude signal ⁇ dot over (H) ⁇ baro and the inertial vertical acceleration ⁇ dot over (H) ⁇ inertial .
  • the inertial reference system (IRS) is used to detect the bank angle ⁇ , the longitudinal attitude angle ⁇ , the pitch rate q and the yaw rate r.
  • the incidence angle ⁇ is detected by an incidence angle sensor.
  • the sideslip angle ⁇ is detected by a sideslip angle sensor. All of the sensor signals are conditioned (signal conditioning) at least in such a way that they are calibrated and synchronized.
  • the component ⁇ Wf caused by a vertical air mass movement of the wind incidence angle on the aircraft plane of symmetry is defined in the aircraft-fixed coordinate system using the formula:
  • the factors cos( ⁇ ) and sin( ⁇ ) and the sideslip angle ⁇ are used to correctly determine the wind incidence angle ⁇ Wf on the aircraft plane of symmetry resulting from a vertical air mass movement even when the boundary conditions change, for example when turning.
  • the vertical wind component acting on the aircraft plane of symmetry produces the wind incidence angle ⁇ Wf , which acts as an additional incidence angle on the wing and thus causes a change in lift.
  • the effective component ⁇ Wf can be compensated for, for example, with the aid of control surfaces for direct lift control.
  • FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of an open-loop control system, in which the component ⁇ Wf of the wind incidence angle on the aircraft plane of symmetry is applied to the control signals as a disturbance variable in order to control the control surfaces on the wings and on the tailplane (in general the elevator).
  • the control surfaces on the wings are used for direct lift control.
  • the delay time T T1 takes account of the delay time of the gust disturbance from the location of the incidence-angle or sideslip-angle measurement to the lift-generating wing.
  • Different difference control signals which in some cases are delayed by T T1 or (T T1 +T T2 ), are supplied to the tailplane control surfaces in order to control the pitch moment budget.
  • FIG. 3 shows the aircraft-fixed coordinate system with the index “f”.
  • the aircraft-fixed coordinate system is defined by the aircraft longitudinal axis x f , the aircraft lateral axis y f and the aircraft vertical axis z f .
  • a first node axis k 1 is defined as the projection of the aircraft longitudinal axis x f onto the geodetic horizontal plane x g , y g .
  • the longitudinal inclination or the pitch angle is the angle between the aircraft longitudinal axis x f in the aircraft-fixed coordinate system and the first node axis k 1 .
  • the pitch angle is at right angles to the horizontal plane x g , y g between the node axis k 1 and the longitudinal axis x f in the aircraft-fixed coordinate system.
  • the bank angle or roll angle ⁇ is defined between a second node axis k 2 and the aircraft lateral axis y f in the aircraft-fixed coordinate system.
  • the second node axis k 2 lies in the geodetic horizontal plane x g , y g and is at right angles to the first node axis k 1 .
  • the yaw angle, the pitch angle and the roll angle ⁇ are referred to together as Euler angles. These Euler angles are not at right angles to one another, so that the sequence of the individual rotations in the transformation from the aircraft-fixed coordinate system to an aerodynamic coordinate system and vice versa is important.
  • FIG. 4 shows the aerodynamic coordinate system x a , y a , z a with the index “a”.
  • An aircraft-fixed coordinate system x f , y f and z f is also shown.
  • FIG. 4 also shows the experimental coordinate system (index “e”).
  • the y axis in the aerodynamic coordinate system forms the lateral force axis y a .
  • V denotes the airspeed vector with respect to the air, which is sketched as an arrow.
  • FIG. 5 shows a cross-sectional view of a wing T with an incident flow.
  • the left-hand image shows the relationships during steady-state flight in a steady-state atmosphere.
  • the direction of the resultant air force F A is also slightly changed by ⁇ W .
  • the change in the magnitude of the resultant air force F A is the dominant factor.

Abstract

A control device for aircraft for reducing the turbulence and gust influences on the flying characteristics is designed to generate an additional incidence angle drive signal for control surfaces on surfaces which generate an air force, in particular wing and/or tailplane as a function of an instantaneous bank angle (Φ) and sideslip angle (β).

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to a method for reducing the turbulence and gust influences on the flying characteristics of aircraft, and to a control device for this purpose.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The flying characteristics of aircraft, in particular of airplanes, are disadvantageously influenced by turbulence and gusts in the air masses surrounding the aircraft. In particular, a large increase in lift, low wing loadings and high airspeeds as well as low altitudes have negative influences on the turbulence and gust behavior of aircraft. These result in a deterioration to passenger comfort and in an increase in structural loads. However, strong turbulence (“clear air turbulence” CAT) can occur even at high altitudes and can produce considerable structural loads, and can even lead to danger to the aircraft occupants.
  • A system for reducing gust loads and for damping structural oscillations is described in O'Connel, R. F.: “Design, Development and Implementation of an Active Control System for Load Alleviation for a Commercial Airplane”, in: AGARD Report No. 683, 1979 and in rolling vehicles, G.; Ellgoth, H.; Beuck, G.: “Identification of Dynamic Response, Simulation and Design of a Highly Nonlinear Digital Load Alleviation System for a Modern Transport Aircraft”, in; 17th ICAS Congress, Stockholm, Sweden, based on the principle of signal (feedback closed loop system). However, this control system reacts only after the flying characteristics resulting from turbulence and/or gusts have already notably changed.
  • A control method based on the principle of application of disturbance variables in order to reduce gust loads and to improve passenger comfort is known from Böhret, H.; Krag, B.; Skudridakis, J.: “OLGA—An Open Loop Gust Alleviation System”, in: AGARD CP No. 384, Toronto, Canada, 1985. In this case, the flying characteristics are not changed, with a reaction taking place to the original disturbance itself, and compensating for it before the disturbance caused by turbulence or gusts acts on the aircraft itself.
  • Comparable control methods are also described in Hahn, K.-U.; König, R.: “LARS—Auslegung eines fortschrittlichen Böenabminderungssystems mit ATTAS”, (LARS—design of an advanced gust reduction system using ATTAS), in: Deutscher Luft and Raumfahrtkongress, (German Aviation Space Flight Congress), 1991 and in Hahn, K.-U.; König, R.: “ATTAS Flight Test and Simulation Results of the Advanced Gust Management System LARS”, in: AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Hilton Head Island, S.C., USA, 1992.
  • When using the principle of signal feedback (closed loop), the reaction of the aircraft to the gusts is measured and is fed back to the wing control surfaces in order to reduce this reaction. This does not require any complex calculation of the gust angle. However, accelerations results from flight maneuvers are also fed back via the control system and can counteract the pilot commands.
  • In the case of open-loop control methods, the angle of attack of a gust must be known precisely. This must be determined from sensor signals. The control surfaces of the wings and of the tailplane are adjusted as a function of the gust angles of attack in such a way that additional lift forces and pitch moments caused by the gusts are compensated for. In this case, the handling characteristics of the aircraft remain unchanged. However, the efficiency of the control system is highly dependent on the accuracy of the calculation of the gust angle of attack, and on the degree of deflection of the control surfaces.
  • The control method based on the principle of application of disturbance variables, in which the so-called wind incidence angle is calculated from air data and inertial data is described in König, R., Hahn, K-U.: “Load Alleviation and Rights Musing Investigations using ATTAS”, in: 17th ICAS Congress, Stockholm, Sweden, 1990. The wind incidence angle is the additional incidence angle which changes the lift and results from atmospheric turbulence and gusts. Only the aircraft longitudinal movement is taken into account, in order to avoid complex gust vector determination. The wind incidence angle αW is calculated using the following formula:
  • α w = α L - θ + H . V + q · r s V
  • In this case, αL is the incidence angle measured by an incidence angle sensor (for example aircraft), θ is the longitudinal attitude angle, also referred to as the pitch angle, {dot over (H)} is the instantaneous vertical velocity of the aircraft, V is the airspeed of the aircraft with respect to the air, q is the pitch rate of the aircraft and rs is the distance between the wind attack sensor and the center of gravity of the aircraft.
  • The stated variables are defined unambiguously in DIN 9300 “Luft-und Raumfahrt; Begriffe, Gröβen und Formelzeichen der Flugmechanik” (aviation and space flight; terminology, variables and formula symbols for flight mechanics).
  • The pitch angle is in this case the angle between the aircraft longitudinal axis in the aircraft-fixed coordinates system and the node axis k1 as the projection of the aircraft-fixed aircraft longitudinal axis xf onto the geodetic horizontal plane, that is to say the xg-yg-plane. The pitch rate q is the angular velocity of the aircraft about the aircraft lateral axis yf.
  • The described control method is not suitable for adequate turbulence and gust compensation when in turning flight as a result of the simplified consideration of only the aircraft longitudinal movement, particularly when sideslip angles also occur in this case between the lateral axis and the lateral force axis of the aircraft.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • One object of the invention is to provide an improved method for reducing the turbulence and gust influences on the flying characteristics of aircraft, as well as a corresponding control device, in order nevertheless to determine a sufficiently accurate additional incidence angle drive signal without any complex gust vector determination, independently of the flight motion of the aircraft, that is to say even when in turning flight.
  • The object is achieved by the method and the control device of the type mentioned initially, according to the invention, in that the additional incidence angle drive signal is determined for control surfaces on surfaces which generate an air force, in particular wing and/or tailplane of the aircraft as a function of an instantaneous bank angle and sideslip angle.
  • The bank angle and the sideslip angle can easily be determined in a known manner by means of sensors, and can be determined from measurement data available in an aircraft for the attitude, position and velocity of the aircraft.
  • It is particularly advantageous when the formula mentioned initially for calculation of the wind incidence angle is modified in such a way that the component αWf of the wind incidence angle caused by a vertical air mass movement is determined on the plane of symmetry of the aircraft using the following formula:
  • α Wf = cos ( φ ) [ f ( H . V ) - θ + cos ( φ ) ( α + q · r AoA V ) + sin ( φ ) ( β - r · r AoS V ) ]
  • In this case, Φ is the bank angle, {dot over (H)} is the vertical velocity of the aircraft, V is the airspeed of the aircraft with respect to the surrounding air, θ0 is the longitudinal attitude angle of the aircraft, α is the incidence angle of the wings of the aircraft, q is the pitch rate of the aircraft, rAoA is the distance between the incidence angle sensor and the center of gravity of the aircraft, r is the yaw rate and fAoS is the distance between the sideslip angle sensor and the center of gravity.
  • f ( H . V )
  • is a function of the ratio of the vertical velocity to the airspeed. The bank angle Φ is used for correct transformation to the aircraft-fixed coordinate system, and the sideslip angle β, as additional influences.
  • The stated variables are defined unambiguously in DIN 9300, to which reference is made.
  • It is particularly advantageous for the determination of the drive signal to be formed using the function
  • f ( H . V ) equal to H . V or arcsin ( H . V )
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES
  • The invention will be explained in more detail in the following text using the attached drawings by way of example, in which:
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a device for determination of the wind incidence angle;
  • FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of open-loop control of control surfaces on wings and on the tailplane as a function of the wind incidence angle;
  • FIG. 3 shows a definition of axes and angles in the geodetic (g) and aircraft-fixed (f) coordinate system in accordance with DIN 9300;
  • FIG. 4 shows a definition of axes and angles in the aircraft-fixed (f), aerodynamic (a) and experimental (e) coordinate system in accordance with DIN 9300.
  • FIG. 5 shows a cross-sectional view of a wing in order to illustrate the change in the air force vector as a consequence of an upward wind gust.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a control device for determination of the wind incidence angle αWf in the vehicle-fixed coordinate system which, after high-pass filtering, is used as a drive signal αWf II for open-loop control based on the disturbance-variable application principle.
  • The velocity V of the aircraft with respect to the air is determined by means of an air data system. The geodetic vertical velocity {dot over (H)} of the aircraft is determined either from the air data system as the barometric altitude change {dot over (H)}baro, from the inertial reference system (IRS) as {dot over (H)}inertial or with the aid of complementary filtering from the barometric altitude signal {dot over (H)}baro and the inertial vertical acceleration {dot over (H)}inertial. Furthermore, the inertial reference system (IRS) is used to detect the bank angle Φ, the longitudinal attitude angle θ, the pitch rate q and the yaw rate r. The incidence angle α is detected by an incidence angle sensor. The sideslip angle β is detected by a sideslip angle sensor. All of the sensor signals are conditioned (signal conditioning) at least in such a way that they are calibrated and synchronized.
  • The component αWf caused by a vertical air mass movement of the wind incidence angle on the aircraft plane of symmetry is defined in the aircraft-fixed coordinate system using the formula:
  • α Wf = cos ( φ ) [ f ( H . V ) - θ + cos ( φ ) ( α + q · r AoA V ) + sin ( φ ) ( β - r · r AoS V ) ]
  • The factors cos(φ) and sin(φ) and the sideslip angle β are used to correctly determine the wind incidence angle αWf on the aircraft plane of symmetry resulting from a vertical air mass movement even when the boundary conditions change, for example when turning. The vertical wind component acting on the aircraft plane of symmetry produces the wind incidence angle αWf, which acts as an additional incidence angle on the wing and thus causes a change in lift. It is advantageous to filter the calculated wind incidence angle αWf by means of a high-pass filter. If necessary, any constant sensor errors, slow sensor drifts and very low-frequency air mass movements (which are not relevant for gust loads) are filtered out in the case of the filtered wind incidence angle
  • α II Wf
  • produced in this way. The effective component αWf can be compensated for, for example, with the aid of control surfaces for direct lift control.
  • FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of an open-loop control system, in which the component αWf of the wind incidence angle on the aircraft plane of symmetry is applied to the control signals as a disturbance variable in order to control the control surfaces on the wings and on the tailplane (in general the elevator). The control surfaces on the wings are used for direct lift control.
  • The delay time TT1 takes account of the delay time of the gust disturbance from the location of the incidence-angle or sideslip-angle measurement to the lift-generating wing. The wind incidence angle
  • α II Wf
  • delayed by the delay time TT1 is multiplied by the gain factor K1 and, after low-pass filtering, is used as a difference manipulated variable for controlling the control surfaces on the wings.
  • Different difference control signals, which in some cases are delayed by TT1 or (TT1+TT2), are supplied to the tailplane control surfaces in order to control the pitch moment budget.
  • The measurement variables which are used to determine the wind incidence angle αWf will be explained in more detail in the following text with reference to FIGS. 3 and 4, with reference also being made to DIN 9300.
  • FIG. 3 shows the aircraft-fixed coordinate system with the index “f”. The aircraft-fixed coordinate system is defined by the aircraft longitudinal axis xf, the aircraft lateral axis yf and the aircraft vertical axis zf. Furthermore, a first node axis k1 is defined as the projection of the aircraft longitudinal axis xf onto the geodetic horizontal plane xg, yg. The longitudinal inclination or the pitch angle is the angle between the aircraft longitudinal axis xf in the aircraft-fixed coordinate system and the first node axis k1. The pitch angle is at right angles to the horizontal plane xg, yg between the node axis k1 and the longitudinal axis xf in the aircraft-fixed coordinate system.
  • The bank angle or roll angle φ is defined between a second node axis k2 and the aircraft lateral axis yf in the aircraft-fixed coordinate system. The second node axis k2 lies in the geodetic horizontal plane xg, yg and is at right angles to the first node axis k1. The yaw angle, the pitch angle and the roll angle φ are referred to together as Euler angles. These Euler angles are not at right angles to one another, so that the sequence of the individual rotations in the transformation from the aircraft-fixed coordinate system to an aerodynamic coordinate system and vice versa is important.
  • FIG. 4 shows the aerodynamic coordinate system xa, ya, za with the index “a”. An aircraft-fixed coordinate system xf, yf and zf is also shown. FIG. 4 also shows the experimental coordinate system (index “e”). The lateral axis of the aircraft yf and the ye axis in the experimental coordinate system coincide: yf=ye. The za axis in the aerodynamic coordinate system and the ze axis in the experimental coordinate system coincide: za=ze.
  • The z axis in the aerodynamic coordinate system forms the lift axis za=ze. The y axis in the aerodynamic coordinate system forms the lateral force axis ya.
  • The sideslip angle β is the required rotation angle about the za=ze axis in order to change the xe axis to the xe axis to the xa axis.
  • The incidence angle α is the required rotation angle about the yf=ye axis in order to change the xe axis to the xf axis.
  • V denotes the airspeed vector with respect to the air, which is sketched as an arrow.
  • FIG. 5 shows a cross-sectional view of a wing T with an incident flow. The left-hand image shows the relationships during steady-state flight in a steady-state atmosphere. The airspeed V=V0 of the aircraft (V=velocity of the incident flow onto the wing T) generates an air force FA=F0 A. If an upward wind gust now acts on the wing, the magnitude and direction of the airspeed V change. The magnitude of the airspeed becomes slightly larger (V>V0), and the wing T of the airspeed becomes slightly larger (V>V0) and the flow strikes the wing T from a steeper direction. In comparison to the original incident flow direction of the wing T, the upward wind gust would generate the wind incidence angle (=additional incidence angle) αW. The two effects lead to an increase in the resultant air force FA=F0 A. The direction of the resultant air force FA is also slightly changed by αW. However, the change in the magnitude of the resultant air force FA is the dominant factor.

Claims (9)

1. A control device for aircraft for reducing the turbulence and gust influences on the flying characteristics, comprising:
a sideslip angle sensor for determining the instantaneous sideslip angle (β);
a bank angle sensor for determining the instantaneous bank angle (Φ); and
controller for generating an additional incidence angle drive signal for control surfaces on said aircraft which generate an air force as a function of the instantaneous bank angle (Φ) and sideslip angle (β), said additional incidence angle drive signal being provided to be added to a main drive signal for the control surfaces, wherein the control device determines the drive signal as a function of a component (αWf) of the wind incidence, caused by a vertical air mass movement, on the plane of symmetry of the aircraft, using the formula:
α Wf = cos ( φ ) [ f ( H . V ) - θ + cos ( φ ) ( α + q · r AoA V ) + sin ( φ ) ( β - r · r AoS V ) ]
where Φ is the bank angle, {dot over (H)} is the vertical velocity of the aircraft, V is the airspeed of the aircraft with respect to the surrounding air, θ is the longitudinal attitude angle of the aircraft, α is the angle of attack, q is the pitch rate of the aircraft, rAoA, is the distance between the incidence angle sensor and the center of gravity of the aircraft, r is the yaw rate and rAoS is the distance between the sideslip angle sensor and the center of gravity, and
f ( H . V )
is a function of the ratio of the vertical velocity {dot over (H)} to the airspeed V.
2-4. (canceled)
5. The control device as claimed in claim 4, wherein the control device is designed to determine the drive signal using the function
f ( H . V ) equal to H . V or arcsin ( H . V ) .
6-8. (canceled)
9. A method for reducing the turbulence and gust influences on the flying characteristics of aircraft, comprising the steps of:
determining the instantaneous sideslip angle (β);
determining the instantaneous bank angle (Φ); and
generating an additional incidence angle (αWf) control signal for control surfaces of said aircraft which generate an air force as a function of the control signal, said additional incidence angle drive signal being provided to be added to a main drive signal for the control surfaces, said control signal being a function of the instantaneous bank angle (Φ) and sideslip angle (β), said main drive signal together with the superimposed control signal controlling the control surfaces wherein said generating step uses the formula:
α Wf = cos ( φ ) [ f ( H . V ) - θ + cos ( φ ) ( α + q · r AoA V ) + sin ( φ ) ( β - r · r AoS V ) ]
where Φ is the bank angle, {dot over (H)} is the vertical velocity of the aircraft, V is the airspeed of the aircraft with respect to the surrounding air, θ is the longitudinal attitude angle of the aircraft, α is the angle of attack, q is the pitch rate of the aircraft, rAoA is the distance between the incidence angle sensor and the center of gravity of the aircraft, r is the yaw rate and rAoS is the distance between the sideslip angle sensor and the center of gravity, and
f ( H . V )
is a function of the ratio of the vertical velocity {dot over (H)} to the airspeed V.
10. (canceled)
11. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the function is
f ( H . V ) equal to H . V or arcsin ( H . V )
12. The control device as recited in claim 1 wherein said additional incidence angle drive signal generated is for a wing.
13. The control device as recited in claim 1 wherein said additional incidence angle drive signal generated is for a tailplane.
US11/381,192 2005-05-03 2006-05-02 Method for reducing the turbulence and gust influences on the flying characteristics of aircraft, and a control device for this purpose Expired - Fee Related US7757993B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102005020660 2005-05-03
DE102005020660A DE102005020660B4 (en) 2005-05-03 2005-05-03 Method for reducing the turbulence and gust effects on the flight behavior of aircraft and control device therefor
DE102005020660.3-22 2005-05-03

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100171002A1 true US20100171002A1 (en) 2010-07-08
US7757993B1 US7757993B1 (en) 2010-07-20

Family

ID=37111416

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/381,192 Expired - Fee Related US7757993B1 (en) 2005-05-03 2006-05-02 Method for reducing the turbulence and gust influences on the flying characteristics of aircraft, and a control device for this purpose

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US7757993B1 (en)
DE (1) DE102005020660B4 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130311011A1 (en) * 2011-01-30 2013-11-21 Elbit Systems Ltd. Dynamic limitation of monoblock flight control surfaces inclinations during stall susceptibility conditions
US8706321B1 (en) * 2007-11-21 2014-04-22 The Boeing Company Longitudinal and vertical gust feed forward compensation using lateral control surfaces
US20150021443A1 (en) * 2011-07-28 2015-01-22 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Method and Apparatus for Minimizing Dynamic Structural Loads of an Aircraft
US20150028162A1 (en) * 2011-06-10 2015-01-29 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Method and apparatus for minimizing dynamic structural loads of an aircraft
US20170144748A1 (en) * 2015-11-23 2017-05-25 Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Air vehicles and systems for preemptive turbulence mitigation
CN110989667A (en) * 2019-12-11 2020-04-10 西北工业大学 Small unmanned aerial vehicle stability augmentation control device and method based on micro air pressure sensor

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2927427B1 (en) * 2008-02-11 2014-12-12 Airbus France METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ATTENUATING AIRBORNE EFFECTS MADE BY TURBULENCE
FR2938085B1 (en) * 2008-11-05 2010-12-03 Airbus France METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MITIGATING THE EFFECTS OF A TURBULENCE ON AN AIRCRAFT
FR2948781B1 (en) * 2009-08-03 2012-02-24 Airbus Operations Sas METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MITIGATING AIRBORNE EFFECTS MADE BY TURBULENCE
CN110345902B (en) * 2019-07-16 2021-07-09 北京普利永华科技发展有限公司 Method for testing control surface corner in non-horizontal state of airplane
CN112214834B (en) * 2020-09-11 2024-02-06 北京空间飞行器总体设计部 Axisymmetric aircraft pneumatic database establishment method
DE102022110727A1 (en) 2022-05-02 2023-11-02 Airbus Defence and Space GmbH Device for detecting turbulence

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3240447A (en) * 1962-01-10 1966-03-15 North American Aviation Inc Vehicle control system
US3654443A (en) * 1969-11-03 1972-04-04 Sperry Rand Corp Angle-of-attack computer
US5331558A (en) * 1991-11-19 1994-07-19 Raytheon Company Autopilot having an adaptive deadband feature
US5375794A (en) * 1990-09-24 1994-12-27 The Boeing Company Apparatus and method for reducing aircraft loads resulting from atmospheric turbulence and gusts
US5590853A (en) * 1992-02-03 1997-01-07 Safe Flight Instrument Corporation Aircraft control system
US5669582A (en) * 1995-05-12 1997-09-23 The Boeing Company Method and apparatus for reducing unwanted sideways motion in the aft cabin and roll-yaw upsets of an airplane due to atmospheric turbulence and wind gusts
US5797105A (en) * 1994-08-23 1998-08-18 National Aerospace Laboratory Of Science & Technology Air active control aircraft using three dimensional true airspeed detection system
US6273370B1 (en) * 1999-11-01 2001-08-14 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method and system for estimation and correction of angle-of-attack and sideslip angle from acceleration measurements

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3830635A1 (en) * 1988-09-09 1990-03-15 Bodenseewerk Geraetetech FLIGHT DATA SENSOR

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3240447A (en) * 1962-01-10 1966-03-15 North American Aviation Inc Vehicle control system
US3654443A (en) * 1969-11-03 1972-04-04 Sperry Rand Corp Angle-of-attack computer
US5375794A (en) * 1990-09-24 1994-12-27 The Boeing Company Apparatus and method for reducing aircraft loads resulting from atmospheric turbulence and gusts
US5331558A (en) * 1991-11-19 1994-07-19 Raytheon Company Autopilot having an adaptive deadband feature
US5590853A (en) * 1992-02-03 1997-01-07 Safe Flight Instrument Corporation Aircraft control system
US5797105A (en) * 1994-08-23 1998-08-18 National Aerospace Laboratory Of Science & Technology Air active control aircraft using three dimensional true airspeed detection system
US5669582A (en) * 1995-05-12 1997-09-23 The Boeing Company Method and apparatus for reducing unwanted sideways motion in the aft cabin and roll-yaw upsets of an airplane due to atmospheric turbulence and wind gusts
US6273370B1 (en) * 1999-11-01 2001-08-14 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method and system for estimation and correction of angle-of-attack and sideslip angle from acceleration measurements

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8706321B1 (en) * 2007-11-21 2014-04-22 The Boeing Company Longitudinal and vertical gust feed forward compensation using lateral control surfaces
US20130311011A1 (en) * 2011-01-30 2013-11-21 Elbit Systems Ltd. Dynamic limitation of monoblock flight control surfaces inclinations during stall susceptibility conditions
US8958930B2 (en) * 2011-01-30 2015-02-17 Elbit Systems Ltd. Dynamic limitation of monoblock flight control surfaces inclinations during stall susceptibility conditions
US20150028162A1 (en) * 2011-06-10 2015-01-29 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Method and apparatus for minimizing dynamic structural loads of an aircraft
US9242723B2 (en) * 2011-06-10 2016-01-26 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Method and apparatus for minimizing dynamic structural loads of an aircraft
US20150021443A1 (en) * 2011-07-28 2015-01-22 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Method and Apparatus for Minimizing Dynamic Structural Loads of an Aircraft
US9446837B2 (en) * 2011-07-28 2016-09-20 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Method and apparatus for minimizing dynamic structural loads of an aircraft
US20170144748A1 (en) * 2015-11-23 2017-05-25 Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Air vehicles and systems for preemptive turbulence mitigation
US9889926B2 (en) * 2015-11-23 2018-02-13 Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Air vehicles and systems for preemptive turbulence mitigation
CN110989667A (en) * 2019-12-11 2020-04-10 西北工业大学 Small unmanned aerial vehicle stability augmentation control device and method based on micro air pressure sensor

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102005020660A1 (en) 2006-11-09
DE102005020660B4 (en) 2007-10-11
US7757993B1 (en) 2010-07-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7757993B1 (en) Method for reducing the turbulence and gust influences on the flying characteristics of aircraft, and a control device for this purpose
JP2952397B2 (en) Active air control aircraft using air speed vector measurement device
CN109033485B (en) System for estimating airspeed of aircraft based on weather buffer model
US8219266B2 (en) Method and device for reducing on an aircraft lateral effects of a turbulence
EP1854717B1 (en) Apparatus and method for reducing the impact of turbulence and gusts on aircraft
US20120239227A1 (en) Variable Maximum Commandable Roll Rate for Directional Control During Engine-Out Rolling Maneuver
US8190306B2 (en) Method and device for reducing on an aircraft the effects of a vertical turbulence
JP4617990B2 (en) Automatic flight control device, automatic flight control method, and automatic flight control program
Matt et al. Frequency domain system identification of a small flying-wing uas
Goron et al. A simulation-based framework for structural loads assessment during dynamic maneuvers
US8340840B2 (en) Method and device for reducing on an aircraft lateral effects of a turbulence
Manai et al. Identification of a UAV and design of a hardware-in-the-loop system for nonlinear control purposes
EP2955106B1 (en) Rotorcraft flight parameter estimation
Tian et al. UAV flight test evaluation of fusion algorithms for estimation of angle of attack and sideslip angle
US20200351451A1 (en) Systems and methods for video display
US9889926B2 (en) Air vehicles and systems for preemptive turbulence mitigation
Seiler et al. Robustness analysis of an L1 adaptive controller
McLaren Velocity estimate following air data system failure
Colgren The Feasibility of using an INS for control system feedbacks
Li et al. Incremental Nonlinear Control for Aircraft with Sensors Measurement Compensation
Colgren et al. Flight Test validation of sideslip estimation using inertial accelerations
CN116700358B (en) Nonlinear height-fixing compensation control method for unmanned aerial vehicle in turning stage
Galffy et al. Calibration and flight test of a 3D printed 5-hole probe for high-dynamic wind measurements for UAV
Pisano et al. Control limitations of small unmanned aerial vehicles in turbulent environments
Penev Tandem UAV with inverse dynamics control

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUER LUFT-UND RAUMFART C. V., GE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DR.-ING. KLAUS-UWE HAHN;REEL/FRAME:018250/0567

Effective date: 20060809

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.)

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20180720