US20100023693A1 - Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network - Google Patents
Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20100023693A1 US20100023693A1 US12/577,232 US57723209A US2010023693A1 US 20100023693 A1 US20100023693 A1 US 20100023693A1 US 57723209 A US57723209 A US 57723209A US 2010023693 A1 US2010023693 A1 US 2010023693A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- content
- cdn
- server
- region
- request
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/2866—Architectures; Arrangements
- H04L67/2885—Hierarchically arranged intermediate devices, e.g. for hierarchical caching
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L65/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
- H04L65/60—Network streaming of media packets
- H04L65/61—Network streaming of media packets for supporting one-way streaming services, e.g. Internet radio
- H04L65/612—Network streaming of media packets for supporting one-way streaming services, e.g. Internet radio for unicast
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/52—Network services specially adapted for the location of the user terminal
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/56—Provisioning of proxy services
- H04L67/564—Enhancement of application control based on intercepted application data
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/56—Provisioning of proxy services
- H04L67/565—Conversion or adaptation of application format or content
- H04L67/5651—Reducing the amount or size of exchanged application data
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/56—Provisioning of proxy services
- H04L67/568—Storing data temporarily at an intermediate stage, e.g. caching
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
- H04L9/40—Network security protocols
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W4/00—Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
- H04W4/02—Services making use of location information
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/30—Definitions, standards or architectural aspects of layered protocol stacks
- H04L69/32—Architecture of open systems interconnection [OSI] 7-layer type protocol stacks, e.g. the interfaces between the data link level and the physical level
- H04L69/322—Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions
- H04L69/329—Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions in the application layer [OSI layer 7]
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to techniques for reducing traffic to origin servers for very popular and large, potentially flash-popular objects.
- a CDN is a network of geographically-distributed content delivery nodes that are arranged for efficient delivery of content on behalf of third party content providers.
- a CDN is implemented as a combination of a content delivery infrastructure, a request-routing mechanism, and a distribution infrastructure.
- the content delivery infrastructure usually comprises a set of “surrogate” origin servers that are located at strategic locations (e.g., Internet network access points, Internet Points of Presence, and the like) for delivering content to requesting end users.
- the request-routing mechanism allocates servers in the content delivery infrastructure to requesting clients in a way that, for web content delivery, minimizes a given client's response time and, for streaming media delivery, provides for the highest quality.
- the distribution infrastructure consists of on-demand or push-based mechanisms that move content from the origin server to the surrogates.
- An effective CDN serves frequently-accessed content from a surrogate that is optimal for a given requesting client.
- a single service provider operates the request-routers, the surrogates, and the content distributors.
- that service provider establishes business relationships with content publishers and acts on behalf of their origin server sites to provide a distributed delivery system.
- a well-known commercial CDN service that provides web content and media streaming is provided by Akamai Technologies, Inc. of Cambridge, Mass.
- each cache in the hierarchy independently decides whether to fetch a requested reference from the object's home site or from its parent or sibling caches using a resolution protocol.
- the object is fetched directly from the object's home, rather than through the cache hierarchy. This feature is used to force the cache to resolve non-cacheable URLs and local URLs directly from the object's home. If the URL's domain name matches a configurable list of substrings, then the object is resolved through the particular parent bound to that domain. Otherwise, when a cache receives a request for a URL that misses, the cache performs a remote call to all of its siblings and parents, checking if the URL hits any sibling or parent. The cache then retrieves the object from the site with the lowest measured latency.
- Yet another object of the invention is to facilitate control over a tiered distribution of content in a CDN using object-specific metadata.
- a still further object of the invention is to provide for a tiered distribution method and system in a content delivery network to ensure that end users can obtain desired content quickly and reliably, while effectively buffering web site infrastructure, thereby ensuring that an origin site is not overwhelmed with requests for popular content or large files.
- Another more specific object of the present invention is to enable a cache hierarchy in a content delivery network wherein a given edge server region is associated with either a single parent region or a subset of intermediate regions to buffer the content provider origin server from flash crowds.
- a cache hierarchy is established in the CDN comprising a given edge server region and either (a) a single parent region, or (b) a subset of well-connected “core” parent server regions.
- the request is provided to either the single parent region or to a given one of the subset of server regions for handling, preferably as a function of metadata associated with the given object request.
- the given object request is then serviced, if possible, by a given CDN server in either the single parent region or the given parent region.
- a given CDN server in either the single parent region or the given parent region.
- the original request is only forwarded on to the origin server if it cannot be serviced by the intermediate node in the hierarchy.
- the single parent region is located at, adjacent, or near a data center at which the content provider origin server is located.
- a given single parent region may be dedicated to a particular CDN content provider.
- the edge server regions typically are co-located in large hosting data centers in the well-connected “core” of the Internet web hosting infrastructure. By funneling (i.e., forwarding) edge requests through this smaller subset of regions (or to the single parent region), the CDNSP can significantly reduce the amount of traffic on origin servers and exploit server-to-server optimizations.
- the tiered distribution service is intended to reduce traffic to origin servers for very popular content and large, potentially flash-popular objects.
- Metadata is information about the content provider's (CP's) content served by the CDN.
- metadata is a set of control options and parameters that determine how an edge server handles a request for an object.
- a given metadata tag is used enable the tiered distribution service or feature and to specify a policy or type of hierarchy parent to be used.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a known content delivery network in which the present invention may be implemented
- FIG. 2 illustrates a typical machine configuration for a CDN content edge server
- FIG. 3 is a simplified diagram illustrating a tiered distribution scheme according to the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a more detailed representation of the tiered distribution scheme wherein a given edge server may communicate with an intermediate core region or a dedicated parent region;
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of software components that provide the cache hierarchy functionality according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating how a content server implements the cache hierarchy functionality according to the present invention.
- an Internet content delivery infrastructure usually comprises a set of “surrogate” origin servers 102 that are located at strategic locations (e.g., Internet network access points, and the like) for delivering copies of content to requesting end users 119 .
- a surrogate origin server is defined, for example, in IETF Internet Draft titled “Requirements for Surrogates in the HTTP” dated Aug. 9, 2000, which is incorporated herein by reference.
- the request-routing mechanism 104 allocates servers 102 in the content delivery infrastructure to requesting clients in a way that, for web content delivery, minimizes a given client's response time and, for streaming media delivery, provides for the highest quality.
- the distribution infrastructure consists of on-demand or push-based mechanisms that move content from the origin server to the surrogates.
- a CDN service provider may organize sets of surrogate origin servers as a “region.”
- a CDN region 106 typically comprises a set of one or more content servers that share a common backend, e.g., a LAN, and that are located at or near an Internet access point.
- a typical CDN region may be co-located within an Internet Service Provider (ISP) Point of Presence (PoP) 108 .
- ISP Internet Service Provider
- PoP Point of Presence
- a representative CDN content server is a Pentium-based caching appliance running an operating system (e.g., Linux, Windows NT, Windows 2000) and having suitable RAM and disk storage for CDN applications and content delivery network content (e.g., HTTP content, streaming media and applications).
- CDN applications are sometimes referred to as “edge” servers as they are located at or near the so-called outer reach or “edge” of the Internet.
- the CDN typically also includes network agents 109 that monitor the network as well as the server loads. These network agents are typically co-located at third party data centers or other locations.
- Map maker software 107 receives data generated from the network agents and periodically creates maps that dynamically associate IP addresses (e.g., the IP addresses of client-side local name servers) with the CDN regions.
- content is tagged for delivery from the CDN using a content migrator or rewrite tool 106 operated, for example, at a participating content provider server.
- Tool 106 rewrites embedded object URLs to point to the CDNSP domain.
- a request for tagged content is resolved through a CDNSP-managed DNS to identify a “best” region, and then to identify an edge server within the region that is not overloaded and that is likely to host the requested content.
- a participating content provider may simply direct the CDNSP to serve an entire domain (or subdomain) by a DNS directive (e.g., a CNAME).
- the CDNSP may provide object-specific metadata to the CDN content servers to determine how the CDN content servers will handle a request for an object being served by the CDN.
- Metadata as used herein, thus refers to the set of all control options and parameters for the object (e.g., coherence information, origin server identity information, load balancing information, customer code, other control codes, etc.), and such information may be provided to the CDN content servers via a configuration file, in HTTP headers, or in other ways.
- the CDNSP operates a metadata transmission system 116 comprising a set of one or more servers to enable metadata to be provided to the CDNSP content servers.
- the system 116 may comprise at least one control server 118 , and one or more staging servers 120 a - n, each of which is typically an HTTP server (e.g., Apache).
- Metadata is provided to the control server 118 by the CDNSP or the content provider (e.g., using a secure extranet application) and periodically delivered to the staging servers 120 a - n.
- the staging servers deliver the metadata to the CDN content servers as necessary.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a typical machine configuration for a CDN content edge server.
- the content server 200 is a caching appliance running an operating system kernel 202 , a file system cache 204 , CDN software 206 , TCP connection manager 208 , and disk storage 210 .
- CDN software 206 creates and manages a “hot” object cache 212 for popular objects being served by the CDN. It may also provide other CDN-related functions, such as request routing, in-region load balancing, and the like.
- the content server 200 receives end user requests for content, determines whether the requested object is present in the hot object cache or the disk storage, serves the requested object via HTTP (if it is present) or establishes a connection to another content server or an origin server to attempt to retrieve the requested object upon a cache miss.
- FIG. 3 illustrates the basic technique for tiered distribution according to the present invention.
- the CDN (or other distributed delivery system, as the case may be) employs a tiered infrastructure using two or more tiers: a set of edge servers and a hierarchical set of “parent” or hub regions that service the edge servers.
- the CDN service provider operates a plurality of CDN edge servers 302 a - n and a set of tiered distribution hubs 304 a - n.
- the tiered distribution hubs accelerate content delivery to end users 306 a - n and buffer the origin server 308 .
- the tiered distribution hubs ensure that the edge servers have the information requested by the end users.
- a tiered distribution hub 304 maintains a persistent connection to the origin server 308 , although this is not a requirement.
- the distribution hubs ensure that end users 306 do not flood the origin site with requests if the site is experiencing high traffic load or if the content is stale, large, or infrequently accessed.
- the tiered distribution hubs act as accelerators for the end users, ensuring that the users obtain their desired content quickly and reliably, and the hubs acts as buffers for the origin site's internal infrastructure, guaranteeing that the site is not overwhelmed with requests for popular content or large files.
- a given content delivery network 400 may comprise a set of regions 402 a - n, each of which comprises a set of content (or “edge”) servers 404 a - n.
- CDN customers include a set of content providers (CPs), each of which typically operates a set of one or more origin servers 406 .
- CPs content providers
- the object may be retrieved from another edge server in the region or, failing that, from the origin server. This known operation is modified according to the present invention.
- given content may be marked for distribution from a so-called cache hierarchy that includes a given edge region 402 and either (a) a given subset of the origin server regions (a “multi-region” cache hierarchy) or (b) a dedicated single parent region (a “single-region” cache hierarchy).
- the given subset of parent regions includes regions 408 a - n.
- a given region 408 includes a cluster of “parent” servers, for example, servers 410 a - n that, for illustrative purposes only, may be co-located in large hosting data centers in well-connected “core” portions of the Internet web hosting infrastructure.
- Representative “core” locations include, without limitation, well-connected data centers in the Internet that have high-speed backbones (today these are optical networks running at multiple gigabits per second) and are connected to at least several (e.g., three (3)) other high-speed optical backbone networks. Connection to multiple backbone networks is very desirable to ensure requests can be routed quickly and reliably within the Internet.
- the number of parent regions in the given subset is variable and their particular location and configuration (e.g., number of servers, connectivity, etc.) is selectable, however, these machines should be relatively powerful and well-connected.
- An alternative to the multi-region cache hierarchy is a “single region” hierarchy that includes a given edge server region 402 and the single parent region 412 having a cluster of servers 414 a - n. Again, the location of the parent region and the number of servers within that region and their connectivity are variable. Typically, however, the single parent region 412 is associated with a particular content provider and, as a preference, it would be located nearby the content provider's origin server or server farm. The single parent region may also be located on the same provider network and geographically close.
- the CDNSP By funneling requests that cannot be serviced in edge regions (because the object is not in cache or is in cache but needs to be validated) through either the multi-region or single-region parent clusters, the CDNSP significantly reduces the amount of traffic on content provider origin servers for very popular content and large, potentially flash-sensitive objects. As a result, the cache hierarchy protects the content providers from requests for large, popular objects causing the CDN to make more requests than the content provider can handle. In addition, the cache hierarchy reduces average latency and improves connectivity and content access in what might otherwise be poorly-connected edge regions.
- Metadata is delivered to the CDN edge servers using a convenient transport mechanism such as illustrated in FIG. 1 .
- Object metadata may be specified by customer, by directory, by object type, or in any other convenient manner. The syntax described is merely representative.
- the CDN edge server has received object metadata
- software executing in the edge server changes a9.g.aka.net (the original tag) to a9.c.aka.net for the multi-region approach (for resolution against a core map) or, alternatively, to something like a9.48.aka.net for the single region approach (with “r48” being region 48, presumably somewhere near the origin server).
- application of metadata determines the name of the server region through which the request is funneled to fetch or validate the object being requested. This is the origin server by default, but it can also be a cache hierarchy parent, as described above.
- a9.c.aka.net then gets resolved, e.g., through a first DNS level in the request routing mechanism (such as described in the '703 patent) to identify a best core region (e.g., a core region closest to the edge region) and then perhaps through a second DNS level to identify the best edge server in that region. If the metadata implements the single region parent, the first level returns second level servers specific to region 48.
- a first DNS level in the request routing mechanism such as described in the '703 patent
- the first level returns second level servers specific to region 48.
- the use of multi-level DNS is merely illustrative. Generalizing, while the actual format of the edge server request to its parent varies, it may of the form aSerial.rRegion.cdnsp.net.
- edge server region contacts either a core region or a dedicated parent region (edge server ⁇ region core region or single backing region) as a function of given object service metadata.
- the origin server preferably is only contacted when a server in a parent region needs to fetch content, or when the server in the parent region needs to revalidate existing content. While the above description shows an edge server contacting an intermediate core region or a parent region, it should also be appreciated that the core region may be backed up by a single region so that the hierarchy is as follows: edge server region ⁇ core region ⁇ single backing region ⁇ origin server.
- FIG. 5 illustrates the basic software and data components useful in the cache hierarchy.
- This software may be implemented as part of the CDN software running in each edge server as illustrated in FIG. 2 .
- the functionality may be implemented on a standalone basis.
- an edge server includes a cache for storing content provider content. The server receives end-user requests for origin server content and serves this content authoritatively if it can do so.
- a monitor 502 is a software process that monitors and reports edge server performance for load balancing and customer analysis.
- a guide process 504 preferably is a component of the CDN edge server software (although it may be a standalone process) that directs the edge server to use another CDN server (i.e., an intermediate) instead of the customer's origin server for given content requests that are being managed by the cache hierarchy.
- a C map 506 is a mapping from a client network address to a nearest CDN region that preferably is used by the CDN's DNS-based request routing mechanism to direct client requests.
- the C map 506 is a map that contains a subset of the regions in a more global G map 508 used by the CDN service provider as part of the request routing mechanism. These subset regions are sometimes referred to herein as “parent” regions.
- FIG. 6 illustrates a flowchart of a preferred operation of the present invention when a given edge server receives a client request for an object.
- the routine begins at step 602 with the edge server cache management process looking for the object in the content server's cache. If the requested object is in cache and is fresh as indicated by a positive outcome of the test at step 604 , the object is served back to the requesting client at step 606 ; otherwise, the process attempts to validate the object at step 608 . If the object is not in cache or needs to be validated, the edge server makes a request (e.g., via a cache sharing protocol) to other edge servers in the region (each a “peer”) to see if one of them has a fresh copy of the object. This is step 610 .
- a request e.g., via a cache sharing protocol
- the edge server continues at step 616 to update its cache and, at step 618 , to return the object to the requesting client. This completes the processing. If, however, the outcome of the test at step 612 indicates that a peer has not returned a hit, i.e., no peer copy of the object is available, the process continues.
- the edge server queries its associated guide process to identify where to go to get the object.
- the guide process makes a determination whether the object is a candidate for using the hierarchy. As noted above, preferably this determination is made by having the guide process examine object metadata for a given tag, e.g., “use-hierarchy,” in a data string.
- An illustrative data string is a resource locator that has been modified to point to the CDN.
- object metadata e.g., “use-hierarchy” in the CDN resource locator are candidates for using the cache hierarchy; candidates that use features inconsistent with the scheme (see below) preferably are not served through the cache hierarchy.
- the guide process at step 624 returns a peer list that includes just a given directive (e.g., DIRECT), which causes the server, at step 626 to talk to the origin server to obtain the object as usual.
- a given directive e.g., DIRECT
- the guide process examines the “use-hierarchy” metadata information at step 628 and, at step 630 , the process constructs a list of one or more parent region(s) or a dedicated parent region.
- the server opens a connection (or uses a persistent one) to a parent region on the list and, at step 634 , it sends the request to a server in the parent region.
- the requesting server preferably adds a request header to the request, which serves to nominate the receiving server (in the parent region) as a hierarchy parent.
- the edge server generates a DNS query to the CDN request routing mechanism to identify a best core region and best server within that core region per the dual-level DNS scheme described above.
- the parent serves the request either from its cache if it has it, or by making a request to the origin server.
- a parent will not make a request to another server in the hierarchy; rather, its guide process by default will return only to the origin server as a valid destination. This completes the process.
- the edge server includes an application programming interface (API) for the guide process to facilitate location of a parent region (from which the object can be fetched).
- Data may be feed to the guide API by the content serving process, or from other external sources. This data may include, but is not limited to, information from the request received by the content server, and information from object metadata that applies to the requested object.
- the guide API preferably includes routines that allow the content server to initialize the guide, to shutdown the guide, and to lookup a list of servers that should be contacted to request an object given the data provided to the guide.
- Each entry in the list of servers preferably includes a DNS name or IP address for each server, and an indication of whether that server is an origin server or a parent server.
- a defined, specific subset of objects may be serviced using the hierarchy while other objects are fetched using a default mechanism (which could be thought of as a degenerate hierarchy with one root, namely, the content provider origin server).
- Use of the hierarchy preferably is determined via a metadata component that overrides an edge server default hierarchy mechanism.
- this metadata component is controlled by the CDN service provider.
- this metadata preferably is settable on a per-object basis from the outset, but it may be desirable also to enable all of a customer's files to use a non-default.
- the edge server When a particular edge server communicates with another server in the hierarchy, the edge server preferably acts as a proxy. This may necessitate some changes to the HTTP headers in the client request (to indicate that the client is an edge server) and in the server response (so that the edge server receives all of the information it needs to correctly serve the object).
- the parent In creating its response to a child (an edge server requesting the content from another server in the hierarchy), the parent preferably passes along any information so that the child can correctly construct the metadata and current coherence state of the object.
- the parent should send the headers it received for object unchanged, possibly with a few exceptions, so that the child sees the object the same way that the serving parent saw it.
- the response should also include an Age header to reflect how long that the object has been in the CDN (replacing the Age header received from an upstream proxy if necessary), and a Date header updated to the current time.
- given content is associated with the cache hierarchy functionality using metadata.
- This functionality thus can be applied to specific paths and extensions.
- the alternate resource locator for the content is unmodified (from what it would be normally in the CDN).
- edge-of-network content servers running CDN software
- parent regions get the content (if needed) from the origin server(s).
- servers in parent regions are not dedicated; rather, they run CDN software and may act as edge servers for some requests.
- a machine that serves as a parent machine is well-provisioned with good connectivity and a large amount of disk storage.
- a parent typically sends a child (an edge server running the CDN software) with information about how long (time-to-live or TTL) the content may stay in the child cache and still be deemed fresh.
- Cache hierarchy uses a hierarchy of servers to distribute content closer to the requesting end users. This functionality is particularly advantageous for flash-popular content or for very large content because it allows the CDN edge servers to go to a selected set of machines for the content (as opposed to the origin server). As a consequence, the origin server will be expected to have to fulfill much fewer requests.
- Representative content servers running CDN software are Intel Pentium-based computers running a Linux or Linux-variant operating system.
- One or more of the processes described above are implemented as computer programs, namely, as a set of computer instructions, for performing the functionality described.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
- Small-Scale Networks (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
A tiered distribution service is provided in a content delivery network (CDN) having a set of surrogate origin (namely, “edge”) servers organized into regions and that provide content delivery on behalf of participating content providers, wherein a given content provider operates an origin server. According to the invention, a cache hierarchy is established in the CDN comprising a given edge server region and either (a) a single parent region, or (b) a subset of the edge server regions. In response to a determination that a given object request cannot be serviced in the given edge region, instead of contacting the origin server, the request is provided to either the single parent region or to a given one of the subset of edge server regions for handling, preferably as a function of metadata associated with the given object request. The given object request is then serviced, if possible, by a given CDN server in either the single parent region or the given subset region. The original request is only forwarded on to the origin server if the request cannot be serviced by an intermediate node.
Description
- This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 12/122,776, filed May 19, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,603,439, which application was a continuation of Ser. No. 11/593,287, filed Nov. 6, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,376,716, which application was a continuation of Ser. No. 10/118,989, filed Apr. 9, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,133,905.
- 1. Technical Field
- The present invention relates generally to techniques for reducing traffic to origin servers for very popular and large, potentially flash-popular objects.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- It is well-known to deliver digital content (e.g., HTTP content, streaming media and applications) using an Internet content delivery network (CDN). A CDN is a network of geographically-distributed content delivery nodes that are arranged for efficient delivery of content on behalf of third party content providers. Typically, a CDN is implemented as a combination of a content delivery infrastructure, a request-routing mechanism, and a distribution infrastructure. The content delivery infrastructure usually comprises a set of “surrogate” origin servers that are located at strategic locations (e.g., Internet network access points, Internet Points of Presence, and the like) for delivering content to requesting end users. The request-routing mechanism allocates servers in the content delivery infrastructure to requesting clients in a way that, for web content delivery, minimizes a given client's response time and, for streaming media delivery, provides for the highest quality. The distribution infrastructure consists of on-demand or push-based mechanisms that move content from the origin server to the surrogates. An effective CDN serves frequently-accessed content from a surrogate that is optimal for a given requesting client. In a typical CDN, a single service provider operates the request-routers, the surrogates, and the content distributors. In addition, that service provider establishes business relationships with content publishers and acts on behalf of their origin server sites to provide a distributed delivery system. A well-known commercial CDN service that provides web content and media streaming is provided by Akamai Technologies, Inc. of Cambridge, Mass.
- It is desirable to reduce wide-area network bandwidth and the load on a content provider's origin server as much as possible. To this end, the prior art has proposed a hierarchical proxy cache architecture wherein caches resolve misses through other caches higher in a hierarchy. This architecture is described, for example, in a paper titled “A Hierarchical Internet Object Cache,” to Danzig et al., 1996 USENIX Technical Conference, Jan. 22-26, 1996, San Diego, Calif. In this approach, each cache in the hierarchy independently decides whether to fetch a requested reference from the object's home site or from its parent or sibling caches using a resolution protocol. According to the protocol, if the URL identifying the reference contains any of a configurable list of substrings, then the object is fetched directly from the object's home, rather than through the cache hierarchy. This feature is used to force the cache to resolve non-cacheable URLs and local URLs directly from the object's home. If the URL's domain name matches a configurable list of substrings, then the object is resolved through the particular parent bound to that domain. Otherwise, when a cache receives a request for a URL that misses, the cache performs a remote call to all of its siblings and parents, checking if the URL hits any sibling or parent. The cache then retrieves the object from the site with the lowest measured latency.
- While the cache hierarchy described in the above-identified publication provides benefits in the form of reduced access latency to the home site, the scheme is overly complex and costly (in terms of network bandwidth) due to the requirement of measuring latency between the cache and all of its siblings and parents upon a cache miss.
- It is a primary object of the present invention to provide a technique for delivering Internet traffic using tiered distribution, namely, a cache hierarchy, in which requests for content that cannot be serviced in edge servers are funneled through intermediate nodes.
- It is another primary object of the present invention to provide a content delivery method and system that insulates a content provider origin server from excessive traffic when requesting end users are unable to be served from edge servers, e.g., because the requested content is unavailable, is available but stale, or un-cacheable.
- It is still another more general object of the invention to enable CDN edge servers operating within a given CDN region to obtain content from one or more intermediate distribution hubs instead of traversing long haul links to fetch such content from content provider origin servers.
- Yet another object of the invention is to facilitate control over a tiered distribution of content in a CDN using object-specific metadata.
- A still further object of the invention is to provide for a tiered distribution method and system in a content delivery network to ensure that end users can obtain desired content quickly and reliably, while effectively buffering web site infrastructure, thereby ensuring that an origin site is not overwhelmed with requests for popular content or large files.
- Another more specific object of the present invention is to enable a cache hierarchy in a content delivery network wherein a given edge server region is associated with either a single parent region or a subset of intermediate regions to buffer the content provider origin server from flash crowds.
- These and other objects and technical advantages are provided in a content delivery network (CDN) having a set of surrogate origin (namely, “edge”) servers organized into regions and that provide content delivery on behalf of participating content providers, wherein a given content provider operates an origin server. According to the invention, a cache hierarchy is established in the CDN comprising a given edge server region and either (a) a single parent region, or (b) a subset of well-connected “core” parent server regions. In response to a determination that a given object request cannot be serviced in the given edge region, instead of contacting the origin server, the request is provided to either the single parent region or to a given one of the subset of server regions for handling, preferably as a function of metadata associated with the given object request. The given object request is then serviced, if possible, by a given CDN server in either the single parent region or the given parent region. Preferably, the original request is only forwarded on to the origin server if it cannot be serviced by the intermediate node in the hierarchy.
- Preferably, the single parent region is located at, adjacent, or near a data center at which the content provider origin server is located. In addition, a given single parent region may be dedicated to a particular CDN content provider. The edge server regions typically are co-located in large hosting data centers in the well-connected “core” of the Internet web hosting infrastructure. By funneling (i.e., forwarding) edge requests through this smaller subset of regions (or to the single parent region), the CDNSP can significantly reduce the amount of traffic on origin servers and exploit server-to-server optimizations. The tiered distribution service is intended to reduce traffic to origin servers for very popular content and large, potentially flash-popular objects.
- As used herein, metadata is information about the content provider's (CP's) content served by the CDN. Typically, metadata is a set of control options and parameters that determine how an edge server handles a request for an object. Preferably, a given metadata tag is used enable the tiered distribution service or feature and to specify a policy or type of hierarchy parent to be used.
- The foregoing has outlined some of the more pertinent features of the present invention. These features should be construed to be merely illustrative. Many other beneficial results can be attained by applying the disclosed invention in a different manner or by modifying the invention as will be described.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a known content delivery network in which the present invention may be implemented; -
FIG. 2 illustrates a typical machine configuration for a CDN content edge server; -
FIG. 3 is a simplified diagram illustrating a tiered distribution scheme according to the present invention; -
FIG. 4 is a more detailed representation of the tiered distribution scheme wherein a given edge server may communicate with an intermediate core region or a dedicated parent region; and -
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of software components that provide the cache hierarchy functionality according to an embodiment of the present invention; and -
FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating how a content server implements the cache hierarchy functionality according to the present invention. - As seen in
FIG. 1 , an Internet content delivery infrastructure usually comprises a set of “surrogate”origin servers 102 that are located at strategic locations (e.g., Internet network access points, and the like) for delivering copies of content to requestingend users 119. A surrogate origin server is defined, for example, in IETF Internet Draft titled “Requirements for Surrogates in the HTTP” dated Aug. 9, 2000, which is incorporated herein by reference. The request-routing mechanism 104 allocatesservers 102 in the content delivery infrastructure to requesting clients in a way that, for web content delivery, minimizes a given client's response time and, for streaming media delivery, provides for the highest quality. The distribution infrastructure consists of on-demand or push-based mechanisms that move content from the origin server to the surrogates. A CDN service provider (CDNSP) may organize sets of surrogate origin servers as a “region.” In this type of arrangement, aCDN region 106 typically comprises a set of one or more content servers that share a common backend, e.g., a LAN, and that are located at or near an Internet access point. Thus, for example, a typical CDN region may be co-located within an Internet Service Provider (ISP) Point of Presence (PoP) 108. A representative CDN content server is a Pentium-based caching appliance running an operating system (e.g., Linux, Windows NT, Windows 2000) and having suitable RAM and disk storage for CDN applications and content delivery network content (e.g., HTTP content, streaming media and applications). Such content servers are sometimes referred to as “edge” servers as they are located at or near the so-called outer reach or “edge” of the Internet. The CDN typically also includesnetwork agents 109 that monitor the network as well as the server loads. These network agents are typically co-located at third party data centers or other locations.Map maker software 107 receives data generated from the network agents and periodically creates maps that dynamically associate IP addresses (e.g., the IP addresses of client-side local name servers) with the CDN regions. - In one type of service offering, known as Akamai FreeFlow, from Akamai Technologies, Inc. of Cambridge, Mass., content is tagged for delivery from the CDN using a content migrator or
rewrite tool 106 operated, for example, at a participating content provider server.Tool 106 rewrites embedded object URLs to point to the CDNSP domain. A request for tagged content is resolved through a CDNSP-managed DNS to identify a “best” region, and then to identify an edge server within the region that is not overloaded and that is likely to host the requested content. Instead of using content provider-side migration (e.g., using the tool 106), a participating content provider may simply direct the CDNSP to serve an entire domain (or subdomain) by a DNS directive (e.g., a CNAME). In either case, the CDNSP may provide object-specific metadata to the CDN content servers to determine how the CDN content servers will handle a request for an object being served by the CDN. Metadata, as used herein, thus refers to the set of all control options and parameters for the object (e.g., coherence information, origin server identity information, load balancing information, customer code, other control codes, etc.), and such information may be provided to the CDN content servers via a configuration file, in HTTP headers, or in other ways. A configuration file is advantageous as it enables a change in the metadata to apply to an entire domain, to any set of directories, or to any set of file extensions. In one approach, the CDNSP operates a metadata transmission system 116 comprising a set of one or more servers to enable metadata to be provided to the CDNSP content servers. The system 116 may comprise at least onecontrol server 118, and one or more staging servers 120 a-n, each of which is typically an HTTP server (e.g., Apache). Metadata is provided to thecontrol server 118 by the CDNSP or the content provider (e.g., using a secure extranet application) and periodically delivered to the staging servers 120 a-n. The staging servers deliver the metadata to the CDN content servers as necessary. -
FIG. 2 illustrates a typical machine configuration for a CDN content edge server. Typically, the content server 200 is a caching appliance running anoperating system kernel 202, afile system cache 204,CDN software 206,TCP connection manager 208, and disk storage 210.CDN software 206 creates and manages a “hot”object cache 212 for popular objects being served by the CDN. It may also provide other CDN-related functions, such as request routing, in-region load balancing, and the like. In operation as an HTTP cache for example, the content server 200 receives end user requests for content, determines whether the requested object is present in the hot object cache or the disk storage, serves the requested object via HTTP (if it is present) or establishes a connection to another content server or an origin server to attempt to retrieve the requested object upon a cache miss. -
FIG. 3 illustrates the basic technique for tiered distribution according to the present invention. As the name implies, preferably the CDN (or other distributed delivery system, as the case may be) employs a tiered infrastructure using two or more tiers: a set of edge servers and a hierarchical set of “parent” or hub regions that service the edge servers. In this example, the CDN service provider operates a plurality of CDN edge servers 302 a-n and a set of tiered distribution hubs 304 a-n. The tiered distribution hubs accelerate content delivery to end users 306 a-n and buffer theorigin server 308. The tiered distribution hubs ensure that the edge servers have the information requested by the end users. If the edge servers do not have the appropriate file when it is requested, the servers in the tiered distribution hubs will provide the edge servers with the requested content. Preferably, a tiered distribution hub 304 maintains a persistent connection to theorigin server 308, although this is not a requirement. The distribution hubs ensure that end users 306 do not flood the origin site with requests if the site is experiencing high traffic load or if the content is stale, large, or infrequently accessed. In effect, the tiered distribution hubs act as accelerators for the end users, ensuring that the users obtain their desired content quickly and reliably, and the hubs acts as buffers for the origin site's internal infrastructure, guaranteeing that the site is not overwhelmed with requests for popular content or large files. - As illustrated in
FIG. 4 , a givencontent delivery network 400 may comprise a set ofregions 402 a-n, each of which comprises a set of content (or “edge”) servers 404 a-n. CDN customers include a set of content providers (CPs), each of which typically operates a set of one or more origin servers 406. Typically, when a given requested object is not available from a given content server 404, the object may be retrieved from another edge server in the region or, failing that, from the origin server. This known operation is modified according to the present invention. In particular, given content may be marked for distribution from a so-called cache hierarchy that includes a givenedge region 402 and either (a) a given subset of the origin server regions (a “multi-region” cache hierarchy) or (b) a dedicated single parent region (a “single-region” cache hierarchy). In the illustrated example, the given subset of parent regions includes regions 408 a-n. A given region 408 includes a cluster of “parent” servers, for example, servers 410 a-n that, for illustrative purposes only, may be co-located in large hosting data centers in well-connected “core” portions of the Internet web hosting infrastructure. Representative “core” locations include, without limitation, well-connected data centers in the Internet that have high-speed backbones (today these are optical networks running at multiple gigabits per second) and are connected to at least several (e.g., three (3)) other high-speed optical backbone networks. Connection to multiple backbone networks is very desirable to ensure requests can be routed quickly and reliably within the Internet. The number of parent regions in the given subset is variable and their particular location and configuration (e.g., number of servers, connectivity, etc.) is selectable, however, these machines should be relatively powerful and well-connected. An alternative to the multi-region cache hierarchy is a “single region” hierarchy that includes a givenedge server region 402 and thesingle parent region 412 having a cluster of servers 414 a-n. Again, the location of the parent region and the number of servers within that region and their connectivity are variable. Typically, however, thesingle parent region 412 is associated with a particular content provider and, as a preference, it would be located nearby the content provider's origin server or server farm. The single parent region may also be located on the same provider network and geographically close. - By funneling requests that cannot be serviced in edge regions (because the object is not in cache or is in cache but needs to be validated) through either the multi-region or single-region parent clusters, the CDNSP significantly reduces the amount of traffic on content provider origin servers for very popular content and large, potentially flash-sensitive objects. As a result, the cache hierarchy protects the content providers from requests for large, popular objects causing the CDN to make more requests than the content provider can handle. In addition, the cache hierarchy reduces average latency and improves connectivity and content access in what might otherwise be poorly-connected edge regions. Preferably, only a relatively small, specific subset of objects are serviced using the hierarchy, while most objects are fetched using a default mechanism where the edge server contacts the origin server to handle a request that cannot be serviced in the edge region. This selectivity is accomplished preferably using object “metadata.”
- The following is a representative description of CDN metadata that may be used to create the multiple region or single region parent according to an embodiment of the present invention. Metadata is delivered to the CDN edge servers using a convenient transport mechanism such as illustrated in
FIG. 1 . Object metadata may be specified by customer, by directory, by object type, or in any other convenient manner. The syntax described is merely representative. -
- The metadata tag “use-hierarchy” turns on the cache hierarchy feature, specifies the policy or type of hierarchy parent, and lists the base domain to be used.
- The default setting for cache hierarchy is OA:
- <md name=“use-hierarchy”>OA</md>
- OA indicates that the edge server is to go direct to the (O)rigin-server specified in the (A)RL), where the ARL is a modified URL (or portion thereof) that points an end user browser to attempt to retrieve the object from the CDN. This setting is essentially the equivalent of turning the cache hierarchy off.
- To turn on cache hierarchy for a typical CDN customer, the metadata tag may be of the following format:
- <md name=“use-hierarchy”>coremap</md>
- Other possible policy settings include, for example, PS or PD followed by an appropriate domain or IP address.
- PS (serial) indicates a parent cache with an object's serial number (“a###.”) prepended to a specified domain name. The following is a typical setting, for which “coremap” is established as an alias. For example:
- <md name=“use-hierarchy”>PSch.cdnsp.net</md>
- This results in the edge server doing a DNS lookup for aX.ch.cdnsp.net, where X is a serial number. The sub-domain listed may change depending on the customer.
- PD (domain) indicates a parent cache with a specified hostname or IP address. For example:
- <md name=“use-hierarchy”>PDmyparent.cdnsp.com</md>
- This results in the edge server doing a DNS lookup for myparent.cdnsp.com as a hierarchy parent.
- <md name=“use-hierarchy”>PD204.178.107.233</md>
- This results in the edge server using the listed IP as a hierarchy parent.
- To provide a concrete example, assume that a content provider object has been tagged for delivery by the CDN (either explicitly or implicitly) using the tag a9.g.aka.net, where a9 is a serial number useful for load balancing purposes. One such technique is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,108,703, which is incorporated herein by reference. An end user browser looking for that object is directed to an optimal CDN edge server in a given region using a dynamic DNS request routing mechanism, again as described in the above-identified patent. Now, assume that the CDN edge server either does not have the object in cache or that the object in cache is stale. If the CDN edge server has received object metadata, software executing in the edge server changes a9.g.aka.net (the original tag) to a9.c.aka.net for the multi-region approach (for resolution against a core map) or, alternatively, to something like a9.48.aka.net for the single region approach (with “r48” being region 48, presumably somewhere near the origin server). Thus, application of metadata determines the name of the server region through which the request is funneled to fetch or validate the object being requested. This is the origin server by default, but it can also be a cache hierarchy parent, as described above. In the example, a9.c.aka.net then gets resolved, e.g., through a first DNS level in the request routing mechanism (such as described in the '703 patent) to identify a best core region (e.g., a core region closest to the edge region) and then perhaps through a second DNS level to identify the best edge server in that region. If the metadata implements the single region parent, the first level returns second level servers specific to region 48. Of course, the use of multi-level DNS is merely illustrative. Generalizing, while the actual format of the edge server request to its parent varies, it may of the form aSerial.rRegion.cdnsp.net.
- Thus, in accordance with an embodiment of the tiered distribution scheme, as edge server region contacts either a core region or a dedicated parent region (edge server→region core region or single backing region) as a function of given object service metadata. With respect to objects that have been identified to be distributed via the cache hierarchy, the origin server preferably is only contacted when a server in a parent region needs to fetch content, or when the server in the parent region needs to revalidate existing content. While the above description shows an edge server contacting an intermediate core region or a parent region, it should also be appreciated that the core region may be backed up by a single region so that the hierarchy is as follows: edge server region→core region→single backing region→origin server.
-
FIG. 5 illustrates the basic software and data components useful in the cache hierarchy. This software may be implemented as part of the CDN software running in each edge server as illustrated inFIG. 2 . The functionality may be implemented on a standalone basis. As noted above, an edge server includes a cache for storing content provider content. The server receives end-user requests for origin server content and serves this content authoritatively if it can do so. Amonitor 502 is a software process that monitors and reports edge server performance for load balancing and customer analysis. Aguide process 504 preferably is a component of the CDN edge server software (although it may be a standalone process) that directs the edge server to use another CDN server (i.e., an intermediate) instead of the customer's origin server for given content requests that are being managed by the cache hierarchy.A C map 506 is a mapping from a client network address to a nearest CDN region that preferably is used by the CDN's DNS-based request routing mechanism to direct client requests. In an illustrative embodiment, theC map 506 is a map that contains a subset of the regions in a moreglobal G map 508 used by the CDN service provider as part of the request routing mechanism. These subset regions are sometimes referred to herein as “parent” regions. -
FIG. 6 illustrates a flowchart of a preferred operation of the present invention when a given edge server receives a client request for an object. The routine begins atstep 602 with the edge server cache management process looking for the object in the content server's cache. If the requested object is in cache and is fresh as indicated by a positive outcome of the test atstep 604, the object is served back to the requesting client atstep 606; otherwise, the process attempts to validate the object atstep 608. If the object is not in cache or needs to be validated, the edge server makes a request (e.g., via a cache sharing protocol) to other edge servers in the region (each a “peer”) to see if one of them has a fresh copy of the object. This isstep 610. If the peer then returns a valid object, the edge server continues atstep 616 to update its cache and, atstep 618, to return the object to the requesting client. This completes the processing. If, however, the outcome of the test atstep 612 indicates that a peer has not returned a hit, i.e., no peer copy of the object is available, the process continues. - At
step 620, the edge server queries its associated guide process to identify where to go to get the object. Atstep 622, the guide process makes a determination whether the object is a candidate for using the hierarchy. As noted above, preferably this determination is made by having the guide process examine object metadata for a given tag, e.g., “use-hierarchy,” in a data string. An illustrative data string is a resource locator that has been modified to point to the CDN. Preferably, only objects with a “use-hierarchy” tag in the CDN resource locator are candidates for using the cache hierarchy; candidates that use features inconsistent with the scheme (see below) preferably are not served through the cache hierarchy. If the object is not a candidate for distribution through the hierarchy, the guide process atstep 624 returns a peer list that includes just a given directive (e.g., DIRECT), which causes the server, atstep 626 to talk to the origin server to obtain the object as usual. If, however, the object is a candidate for tiered distribution, the guide process examines the “use-hierarchy” metadata information atstep 628 and, atstep 630, the process constructs a list of one or more parent region(s) or a dedicated parent region. Atstep 632, the server opens a connection (or uses a persistent one) to a parent region on the list and, atstep 634, it sends the request to a server in the parent region. The requesting server preferably adds a request header to the request, which serves to nominate the receiving server (in the parent region) as a hierarchy parent. - In the alternative, the edge server generates a DNS query to the CDN request routing mechanism to identify a best core region and best server within that core region per the dual-level DNS scheme described above.
- At
step 636, the parent serves the request either from its cache if it has it, or by making a request to the origin server. Preferably, a parent will not make a request to another server in the hierarchy; rather, its guide process by default will return only to the origin server as a valid destination. This completes the process. - Preferably, the edge server includes an application programming interface (API) for the guide process to facilitate location of a parent region (from which the object can be fetched). Data may be feed to the guide API by the content serving process, or from other external sources. This data may include, but is not limited to, information from the request received by the content server, and information from object metadata that applies to the requested object. The guide API preferably includes routines that allow the content server to initialize the guide, to shutdown the guide, and to lookup a list of servers that should be contacted to request an object given the data provided to the guide. Each entry in the list of servers preferably includes a DNS name or IP address for each server, and an indication of whether that server is an origin server or a parent server.
- As noted above, a defined, specific subset of objects may be serviced using the hierarchy while other objects are fetched using a default mechanism (which could be thought of as a degenerate hierarchy with one root, namely, the content provider origin server). Use of the hierarchy preferably is determined via a metadata component that overrides an edge server default hierarchy mechanism. Preferably, this metadata component is controlled by the CDN service provider. To service the needs of multiple content providers, this metadata preferably is settable on a per-object basis from the outset, but it may be desirable also to enable all of a customer's files to use a non-default.
- When a particular edge server communicates with another server in the hierarchy, the edge server preferably acts as a proxy. This may necessitate some changes to the HTTP headers in the client request (to indicate that the client is an edge server) and in the server response (so that the edge server receives all of the information it needs to correctly serve the object). In creating its response to a child (an edge server requesting the content from another server in the hierarchy), the parent preferably passes along any information so that the child can correctly construct the metadata and current coherence state of the object. In an illustrative embodiment, the parent should send the headers it received for object unchanged, possibly with a few exceptions, so that the child sees the object the same way that the serving parent saw it. Some exceptions are that the response should also include an Age header to reflect how long that the object has been in the CDN (replacing the Age header received from an upstream proxy if necessary), and a Date header updated to the current time.
- Thus, according to a preferred embodiment, given content is associated with the cache hierarchy functionality using metadata. This functionality thus can be applied to specific paths and extensions. Preferably, the alternate resource locator for the content is unmodified (from what it would be normally in the CDN). Moreover, preferably only edge-of-network content servers (running CDN software) get such content from the parent regions (if they do not already have it), and parent regions get the content (if needed) from the origin server(s). Preferably, servers in parent regions are not dedicated; rather, they run CDN software and may act as edge servers for some requests. Typically, a machine that serves as a parent machine is well-provisioned with good connectivity and a large amount of disk storage. A parent typically sends a child (an edge server running the CDN software) with information about how long (time-to-live or TTL) the content may stay in the child cache and still be deemed fresh.
- The present invention provides numerous advantages. Cache hierarchy uses a hierarchy of servers to distribute content closer to the requesting end users. This functionality is particularly advantageous for flash-popular content or for very large content because it allows the CDN edge servers to go to a selected set of machines for the content (as opposed to the origin server). As a consequence, the origin server will be expected to have to fulfill much fewer requests.
- Representative content servers running CDN software according to the present invention are Intel Pentium-based computers running a Linux or Linux-variant operating system. One or more of the processes described above are implemented as computer programs, namely, as a set of computer instructions, for performing the functionality described.
Claims (6)
1. A method operative in a content delivery network (CDN) having a set of servers organized into regions and that provide content delivery on behalf of participating content providers, comprising:
establishing a cache hierarchy in the CDN for each of first and second content providers that are distinct from one another and distinct from a service provider that operates the content delivery network, each cache hierarchy comprising a CDN content server and one of: (a) a single parent region located in a selected location, and (b) a subset of parent regions located in a set of selected locations, wherein the selected locations are variable such that a cache hierarchy in the CDN for the first content provider differs from a cache hierarchy in the CDN for the second content provider;
in response to a first determination that a first object request cannot be serviced in a CDN content server, directing a first new request to the cache hierarchy associated with the first content provider instead of an origin server associated with the first content provider; and
in response to a second determination that a second object request cannot be serviced in a CDN content server, directing a second new request to the cache hierarchy associated with the second content provider instead of an origin server associated with the second content provider.
2. The method as described in claim 1 wherein the respective first new request or the second new request is directed based on content provider-specific metadata associated with the object request.
3. The method as described in claim 1 further including, in response to the first new request, receiving a response from the cache hierarchy in the CDN for the first content provider, where the response includes the content object associated with the first object request and time-to-live (TTL) information for the content object.
4. The method as described in claim 1 further including, in response to the second new request, receiving a response from the cache hierarchy in the CDN for the second content provider, where the response includes a content object associated with the second object request and time-to-live (TTL) information for the content object.
5. The method as described in claim 4 wherein the single parent region is associated with only the first content provider and the selected location is nearby the origin server associated with the first content provider.
6. The method as described in claim 4 wherein the single parent region is associated with only the first content provider and the selected location is co-located with the origin server associated with the first content provider.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/577,232 US20100023693A1 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2009-10-12 | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/118,989 US7133905B2 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2002-04-09 | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
US11/593,287 US7376716B2 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2006-11-06 | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
US12/122,776 US7603439B2 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2008-05-19 | System for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
US12/577,232 US20100023693A1 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2009-10-12 | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/122,776 Continuation US7603439B2 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2008-05-19 | System for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100023693A1 true US20100023693A1 (en) | 2010-01-28 |
Family
ID=29248235
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/118,989 Expired - Lifetime US7133905B2 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2002-04-09 | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
US11/593,287 Expired - Lifetime US7376716B2 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2006-11-06 | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
US12/122,776 Expired - Lifetime US7603439B2 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2008-05-19 | System for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
US12/577,232 Abandoned US20100023693A1 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2009-10-12 | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
Family Applications Before (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/118,989 Expired - Lifetime US7133905B2 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2002-04-09 | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
US11/593,287 Expired - Lifetime US7376716B2 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2006-11-06 | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
US12/122,776 Expired - Lifetime US7603439B2 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2008-05-19 | System for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US7133905B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1493094B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE516554T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003228479A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003088065A1 (en) |
Cited By (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110225206A1 (en) * | 2010-03-15 | 2011-09-15 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for creating a plurality of cnames for a website |
US20120066360A1 (en) * | 2010-09-14 | 2012-03-15 | Cdnetworks Co., Ltd. | Cname-based round-trip time measurement in a content delivery network |
US20120198071A1 (en) * | 2011-02-01 | 2012-08-02 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Distributed Landing Pad and Brick Topology for Content Storage in Content Delivery Networks |
US20130041972A1 (en) * | 2011-08-09 | 2013-02-14 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Content Delivery Network Routing Using Border Gateway Protocol |
US8396970B2 (en) | 2011-02-01 | 2013-03-12 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Content processing between locations workflow in content delivery networks |
US20130103786A1 (en) * | 2011-10-20 | 2013-04-25 | Allen Miglore | System and method for transporting files between networked or connected systems and devices |
US8458290B2 (en) | 2011-02-01 | 2013-06-04 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Multicast mapped look-up on content delivery networks |
US8478858B2 (en) | 2011-02-01 | 2013-07-02 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Policy management for content storage in content delivery networks |
US20130173716A1 (en) * | 2012-01-01 | 2013-07-04 | Sean S. ROGERS | Data delivery optimization |
US20130191499A1 (en) * | 2011-11-02 | 2013-07-25 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Multi-domain configuration handling in an edge network server |
US8521813B2 (en) | 2011-02-01 | 2013-08-27 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Content replication workflow in content delivery networks |
US20130268616A1 (en) * | 2010-11-16 | 2013-10-10 | Edgecast Networks, Inc. | Discrete Mapping for Targeted Caching |
US8615577B2 (en) | 2011-02-01 | 2013-12-24 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Policy based processing of content objects in a content delivery network using mutators |
US20140365613A1 (en) * | 2013-06-06 | 2014-12-11 | Ericsson Television Inc. | Defragmentation of adaptive streaming segment files in a content delivery network |
US9325805B2 (en) | 2004-08-02 | 2016-04-26 | Steve J Shattil | Content delivery in wireless wide area networks |
EP3005176A4 (en) * | 2013-06-06 | 2017-01-25 | Ericsson Television Inc. | Defragmentation of adaptive streaming segment files in a content delivery network |
US10255305B2 (en) * | 2016-09-09 | 2019-04-09 | Intel Corporation | Technologies for object-based data consistency in distributed architectures |
US10419533B2 (en) | 2010-03-01 | 2019-09-17 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Edge server selection for device-specific network topologies |
US11330046B2 (en) | 2010-03-01 | 2022-05-10 | Tybalt, Llc | Content delivery in wireless wide area networks |
Families Citing this family (380)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8225002B2 (en) | 1999-01-22 | 2012-07-17 | Network Disk, Inc. | Data storage and data sharing in a network of heterogeneous computers |
US6248081B1 (en) * | 1999-09-28 | 2001-06-19 | Scimed Life Systems, Inc. | Endoscopic submucosal core biopsy device |
US6405252B1 (en) | 1999-11-22 | 2002-06-11 | Speedera Networks, Inc. | Integrated point of presence server network |
US6694358B1 (en) * | 1999-11-22 | 2004-02-17 | Speedera Networks, Inc. | Performance computer network method |
EP1388073B1 (en) * | 2001-03-01 | 2018-01-10 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Optimal route selection in a content delivery network |
US7149797B1 (en) * | 2001-04-02 | 2006-12-12 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Content delivery network service provider (CDNSP)-managed content delivery network (CDN) for network service provider (NSP) |
WO2002079905A2 (en) * | 2001-04-02 | 2002-10-10 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Scalable, high performance and highly available distributed storage system for internet content |
US7774492B2 (en) | 2001-07-26 | 2010-08-10 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System, method and computer program product to maximize server throughput while avoiding server overload by controlling the rate of establishing server-side net work connections |
US6892224B2 (en) * | 2001-08-31 | 2005-05-10 | Intel Corporation | Network interface device capable of independent provision of web content |
US7860964B2 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2010-12-28 | Level 3 Communications, Llc | Policy-based content delivery network selection |
US7822871B2 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2010-10-26 | Level 3 Communications, Llc | Configurable adaptive global traffic control and management |
US9167036B2 (en) | 2002-02-14 | 2015-10-20 | Level 3 Communications, Llc | Managed object replication and delivery |
US7133905B2 (en) * | 2002-04-09 | 2006-11-07 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
AU2003240964A1 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2003-12-19 | Context Media, Inc. | Cataloging and managing the distribution of distributed digital assets |
US7260639B2 (en) * | 2002-07-09 | 2007-08-21 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for protecting web sites from public internet threats |
US7395355B2 (en) * | 2002-07-11 | 2008-07-01 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Method for caching and delivery of compressed content in a content delivery network |
US7284030B2 (en) * | 2002-09-16 | 2007-10-16 | Network Appliance, Inc. | Apparatus and method for processing data in a network |
US7171469B2 (en) | 2002-09-16 | 2007-01-30 | Network Appliance, Inc. | Apparatus and method for storing data in a proxy cache in a network |
US7552223B1 (en) | 2002-09-16 | 2009-06-23 | Netapp, Inc. | Apparatus and method for data consistency in a proxy cache |
JP4007594B2 (en) * | 2002-09-26 | 2007-11-14 | 株式会社東芝 | Moving picture coding apparatus and method, moving picture coding system conversion apparatus and method |
JP4214271B2 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2009-01-28 | アークレイ株式会社 | Test piece for measuring creatinine |
US7136922B2 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2006-11-14 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for providing on-demand content delivery for an origin server |
US7715363B1 (en) * | 2003-03-10 | 2010-05-11 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Wide area network with a large number of endpoints and a high bandwidth optical backbone |
US20040205162A1 (en) * | 2003-04-11 | 2004-10-14 | Parikh Jay G. | Method of executing an edge-enabled application in a content delivery network (CDN) |
US7373416B2 (en) * | 2003-04-24 | 2008-05-13 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for constraining server usage in a distributed network |
US8423662B1 (en) | 2003-04-28 | 2013-04-16 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Forward request queuing in a distributed edge processing environment |
US7143170B2 (en) * | 2003-04-30 | 2006-11-28 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Automatic migration of data via a distributed computer network |
US20040249965A1 (en) * | 2003-05-05 | 2004-12-09 | Huggins Guy Dwayne | Node caching system for streaming media applications |
US8473635B1 (en) | 2003-05-19 | 2013-06-25 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Provisioning tool for a distributed computer network |
US7978716B2 (en) | 2003-11-24 | 2011-07-12 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a VPN solution |
US7631081B2 (en) * | 2004-02-27 | 2009-12-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for hierarchical selective personalization |
EP1730918B1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2018-05-09 | Telecom Italia S.p.A. | Method and system for controlling content distribution, related network and computer program product therefor |
EP1747658B1 (en) * | 2004-05-18 | 2008-03-19 | BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS public limited company | Peer-to-peer networks |
US7757074B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2010-07-13 | Citrix Application Networking, Llc | System and method for establishing a virtual private network |
US8495305B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2013-07-23 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and device for performing caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US8739274B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2014-05-27 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and device for performing integrated caching in a data communication network |
US7975018B2 (en) * | 2004-07-07 | 2011-07-05 | Emc Corporation | Systems and methods for providing distributed cache coherence |
US7603131B2 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2009-10-13 | Sellerbid, Inc. | System and method for providing locally applicable internet content with secure action requests and item condition alerts |
EP2267951B1 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2016-12-28 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method for routing packets from an endpoint to a gateway |
EP1771998B1 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2015-04-15 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for optimizing communications between network nodes |
US8986780B2 (en) | 2004-11-19 | 2015-03-24 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method and apparatus for depositing LED organic film |
US7966310B2 (en) * | 2004-11-24 | 2011-06-21 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Method, system, and software for correcting uniform resource locators |
US7810089B2 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2010-10-05 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for automatic installation and execution of a client-side acceleration program |
US8549149B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2013-10-01 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP multiplexing |
US8706877B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2014-04-22 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing client-side dynamic redirection to bypass an intermediary |
US8700695B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2014-04-15 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP pooling |
US8954595B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2015-02-10 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP buffering |
US8255456B2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2012-08-28 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for performing flash caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US20060259690A1 (en) * | 2005-05-10 | 2006-11-16 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Methods and system for prepositioning frequently accessed web content |
CN1941736A (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2007-04-04 | 西门子通信技术(北京)有限公司 | Content distributing system and method for re-directing user request |
US8306918B2 (en) | 2005-10-11 | 2012-11-06 | Apple Inc. | Use of media storage structure with multiple pieces of content in a content-distribution system |
US8291117B1 (en) * | 2012-02-15 | 2012-10-16 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Scaled domain name service |
US7707314B2 (en) | 2005-11-21 | 2010-04-27 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Domain name resolution resource allocation |
US7921184B2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2011-04-05 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for performing flash crowd caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US8447837B2 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2013-05-21 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Site acceleration with content prefetching enabled through customer-specific configurations |
US8301839B2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2012-10-30 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for performing granular invalidation of cached dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US7765275B2 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2010-07-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Caching of private data for a configurable time period |
WO2007096979A1 (en) * | 2006-02-24 | 2007-08-30 | Fujitsu Limited | Information processor and data transfer method |
US8151323B2 (en) * | 2006-04-12 | 2012-04-03 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing levels of access and action control via an SSL VPN appliance |
US8224751B2 (en) | 2006-05-03 | 2012-07-17 | Apple Inc. | Device-independent management of cryptographic information |
US8230098B2 (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2012-07-24 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | System and method for streaming media objects |
US20070266120A1 (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2007-11-15 | Dell Products L.P. | System and method for handling instructions in a pre-boot execution environment |
ATE459045T1 (en) * | 2006-06-13 | 2010-03-15 | British Telecomm | PEER-TO-PEER QUALITY OF SERVICE REPUTATION REPORTING SYSTEM |
US8244857B2 (en) | 2006-06-13 | 2012-08-14 | British Telecommunications Plc | Computer network |
US20090327509A1 (en) * | 2006-08-10 | 2009-12-31 | Joris Roussel | Method for the diffusion of information in a distributed network |
GB2440761A (en) * | 2006-08-11 | 2008-02-13 | Cachelogic Ltd | Using a proxy server as a cache in a peer to peer network to speed up the multicast distribution of large files. |
US20080216142A1 (en) * | 2006-08-17 | 2008-09-04 | Goldberg Brett M | System and method of digital media distribution |
US11303684B2 (en) | 2006-09-14 | 2022-04-12 | Opentv, Inc. | Methods and systems for data transmission |
US8335873B2 (en) | 2006-09-14 | 2012-12-18 | Opentv, Inc. | Method and systems for data transmission |
CN101150421B (en) * | 2006-09-22 | 2011-05-04 | 华为技术有限公司 | A distributed content distribution method, edge server and content distribution network |
US7882200B2 (en) * | 2006-10-30 | 2011-02-01 | Bank Of America Corporation | Method and apparatus for distribution of data among computing resources |
US8621092B2 (en) * | 2006-12-19 | 2013-12-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Remote portlet consumer with enhanced resource URL processing |
US7619545B2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2009-11-17 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of using application and protocol specific parsing for compression |
US7827237B2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2010-11-02 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for identifying long matches of data in a compression history |
US8255570B2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2012-08-28 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of compression history expiration and synchronization |
US7532134B2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2009-05-12 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for sharing compression histories between multiple devices |
EP2651092B1 (en) * | 2007-03-12 | 2015-08-12 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method of determining a precedence for matching fingerprints in a compression history |
US7460038B2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2008-12-02 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of clustered sharing of compression histories |
US7865585B2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2011-01-04 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing dynamic ad hoc proxy-cache hierarchies |
US8032421B1 (en) * | 2007-05-02 | 2011-10-04 | Tp Lab, Inc. | Method and system to distribute online video |
US9311492B2 (en) | 2007-05-22 | 2016-04-12 | Apple Inc. | Media storage structures for storing content, devices for using such structures, systems for distributing such structures |
JP5135433B2 (en) * | 2007-06-14 | 2013-02-06 | マサチューセッツ インスティテュート オブ テクノロジー | Control method and control apparatus for controlling thin film lamination |
US7991910B2 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2011-08-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Updating routing information based on client location |
US8028090B2 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2011-09-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing utilizing client location information |
US20090086625A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Thyagarajan Nandagopal | Method and Apparatus For Providing a Distributed Control Plane for a Mobility Home Agent |
WO2009056743A2 (en) * | 2007-10-26 | 2009-05-07 | France Telecom | Device and method for supervising source equipment |
AU2007231759B2 (en) * | 2007-10-30 | 2011-05-26 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Adaptive content caching |
US8434076B2 (en) * | 2007-12-12 | 2013-04-30 | Oracle International Corporation | Efficient compilation and execution of imperative-query languages |
US20090156997A1 (en) * | 2007-12-12 | 2009-06-18 | Rockford Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Services, Llc | Rotator cuff patch delivery device |
US8392053B2 (en) * | 2007-12-13 | 2013-03-05 | Service Solutions U.S., Llc | Graphing device and method |
US20090164471A1 (en) * | 2007-12-19 | 2009-06-25 | Jinmei Shen | Managing Distributed Data |
US8543667B2 (en) | 2008-01-14 | 2013-09-24 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Policy-based content insertion |
EP2093965B1 (en) * | 2008-02-21 | 2019-01-23 | Nokia Solutions and Networks GmbH & Co. KG | Reliable, location and load aware service search proxy (SSP) |
US7962597B2 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2011-06-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing based on class |
US7970820B1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2011-06-28 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Locality based content distribution |
US8447831B1 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2013-05-21 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Incentive driven content delivery |
US8156243B2 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2012-04-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing |
US8606996B2 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2013-12-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Cache optimization |
US8601090B1 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2013-12-03 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Network resource identification |
US8533293B1 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2013-09-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Client side cache management |
US8321568B2 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2012-11-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Content management |
US10924573B2 (en) * | 2008-04-04 | 2021-02-16 | Level 3 Communications, Llc | Handling long-tail content in a content delivery network (CDN) |
CN102047244B (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2013-02-27 | 第三雷沃通讯有限责任公司 | Handling long-tail content in a content delivery network (CDN) |
US9762692B2 (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2017-09-12 | Level 3 Communications, Llc | Handling long-tail content in a content delivery network (CDN) |
US11975546B2 (en) | 2008-06-13 | 2024-05-07 | Kateeva, Inc. | Gas enclosure assembly and system |
US8632145B2 (en) | 2008-06-13 | 2014-01-21 | Kateeva, Inc. | Method and apparatus for printing using a facetted drum |
US12018857B2 (en) | 2008-06-13 | 2024-06-25 | Kateeva, Inc. | Gas enclosure assembly and system |
US8383202B2 (en) * | 2008-06-13 | 2013-02-26 | Kateeva, Inc. | Method and apparatus for load-locked printing |
US12064979B2 (en) | 2008-06-13 | 2024-08-20 | Kateeva, Inc. | Low-particle gas enclosure systems and methods |
US10434804B2 (en) | 2008-06-13 | 2019-10-08 | Kateeva, Inc. | Low particle gas enclosure systems and methods |
US8537835B2 (en) | 2008-06-20 | 2013-09-17 | Alcatel Lucent | Methods and apparatus for self-organized caching in a content delivery network |
US9407681B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2016-08-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Latency measurement in resource requests |
US7925782B2 (en) * | 2008-06-30 | 2011-04-12 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing using network computing components |
US9912740B2 (en) | 2008-06-30 | 2018-03-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Latency measurement in resource requests |
WO2010023424A1 (en) * | 2008-08-26 | 2010-03-04 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Operation of a content distribution network |
EP2159983A1 (en) * | 2008-08-26 | 2010-03-03 | BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS public limited company | Content distribution network |
US8954548B2 (en) * | 2008-08-27 | 2015-02-10 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | Targeted caching to reduce bandwidth consumption |
AU2010276462B1 (en) | 2010-12-27 | 2012-01-12 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Partial object caching |
AU2010202034B1 (en) * | 2010-04-07 | 2010-12-23 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Partial object distribution in content delivery network |
US8516082B2 (en) * | 2009-03-25 | 2013-08-20 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Publishing-point management for content delivery network |
WO2010033938A2 (en) * | 2008-09-19 | 2010-03-25 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Content delivery network stream server vignette distribution |
US7930393B1 (en) | 2008-09-29 | 2011-04-19 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Monitoring domain allocation performance |
US7865594B1 (en) | 2008-09-29 | 2011-01-04 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing resources consolidation configurations |
US8286176B1 (en) | 2008-09-29 | 2012-10-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Optimizing resource configurations |
US8122124B1 (en) | 2008-09-29 | 2012-02-21 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Monitoring performance and operation of data exchanges |
US8117306B1 (en) | 2008-09-29 | 2012-02-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Optimizing content management |
US8316124B1 (en) | 2008-09-29 | 2012-11-20 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing network data display |
US20100088405A1 (en) * | 2008-10-08 | 2010-04-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Determining Network Delay and CDN Deployment |
US8949915B2 (en) * | 2008-10-20 | 2015-02-03 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, Lp | System and method for delivery of Video-on-Demand |
US20120209942A1 (en) * | 2008-10-28 | 2012-08-16 | Cotendo, Inc. | System combining a cdn reverse proxy and an edge forward proxy with secure connections |
WO2010049876A2 (en) * | 2008-10-28 | 2010-05-06 | Cotendo Ltd | System and method for sharing transparent proxy between isp and cdn |
US8122098B1 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2012-02-21 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing content delivery network service providers by a content broker |
US8065417B1 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2011-11-22 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Service provider registration by a content broker |
US8060616B1 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2011-11-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing CDN registration by a storage provider |
US8521880B1 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2013-08-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing content delivery network service providers |
US8073940B1 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2011-12-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing content delivery network service providers |
US8732309B1 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2014-05-20 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing utilizing cost information |
US8171106B2 (en) * | 2008-12-12 | 2012-05-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Per file system usage of networks |
US7991883B1 (en) * | 2008-12-15 | 2011-08-02 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Server communication in a multi-tier server architecture |
US7930429B2 (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2011-04-19 | At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp | System and method for obtaining content from a content delivery network |
US8103780B2 (en) | 2008-12-18 | 2012-01-24 | At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp | Systems and methods for determining the location of a request on a content delivery network |
US8392530B1 (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2013-03-05 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Media streaming in a multi-tier client-server architecture |
US20100188457A1 (en) * | 2009-01-05 | 2010-07-29 | Madigan Connor F | Method and apparatus for controlling the temperature of an electrically-heated discharge nozzle |
US8356106B2 (en) * | 2009-02-02 | 2013-01-15 | George Mason Intellectual Properties, Inc. | Cache validating SCIT DNS server |
US9197677B2 (en) * | 2009-03-09 | 2015-11-24 | Arris Canada, Inc. | Multi-tiered scalable media streaming systems and methods |
US9485299B2 (en) * | 2009-03-09 | 2016-11-01 | Arris Canada, Inc. | Progressive download gateway |
CN101841553B (en) * | 2009-03-17 | 2014-03-12 | 日电(中国)有限公司 | Method, user node and server for requesting location information of resources on network |
US7917618B1 (en) | 2009-03-24 | 2011-03-29 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Monitoring web site content |
US8688837B1 (en) | 2009-03-27 | 2014-04-01 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Dynamically translating resource identifiers for request routing using popularity information |
US8521851B1 (en) | 2009-03-27 | 2013-08-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | DNS query processing using resource identifiers specifying an application broker |
US8412823B1 (en) | 2009-03-27 | 2013-04-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing tracking information entries in resource cache components |
US8756341B1 (en) | 2009-03-27 | 2014-06-17 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing utilizing popularity information |
CN101860720B (en) * | 2009-04-10 | 2015-05-20 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Content positioning method and content distribution network node |
EP2420035B1 (en) | 2009-04-15 | 2017-09-27 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Method and apparatus for reducing traffic in a communications network |
US8046432B2 (en) | 2009-04-17 | 2011-10-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Network caching for multiple contemporaneous requests |
WO2010127328A2 (en) * | 2009-05-01 | 2010-11-04 | Kateeva, Inc. | Method and apparatus for organic vapor printing |
US8874708B2 (en) * | 2009-05-26 | 2014-10-28 | Red Hat, Inc. | Location discovery based on DNS |
US8073972B2 (en) * | 2009-05-26 | 2011-12-06 | Red Hat, Inc. | System and method for location discovery based on DNS |
US8782236B1 (en) | 2009-06-16 | 2014-07-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing resources using resource expiration data |
US9015335B1 (en) | 2009-06-17 | 2015-04-21 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Server side stream switching |
US9800690B1 (en) * | 2009-06-26 | 2017-10-24 | Tata Communications (America) Inc. | Content-based redirection |
US9137300B1 (en) | 2009-06-30 | 2015-09-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Opportunistic pipe switching |
US9137301B1 (en) | 2009-06-30 | 2015-09-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Client based opportunistic routing |
US9118680B1 (en) | 2009-06-30 | 2015-08-25 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Opportunistic routing |
CA2711311C (en) | 2009-08-10 | 2016-08-23 | Seawell Networks Inc. | Methods and systems for scalable video chunking |
CN102792291B (en) * | 2009-08-17 | 2015-11-25 | 阿卡麦科技公司 | Based on the method and system of the stream distribution of HTTP |
US8397073B1 (en) * | 2009-09-04 | 2013-03-12 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing secure content in a content delivery network |
US8433771B1 (en) | 2009-10-02 | 2013-04-30 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Distribution network with forward resource propagation |
US8626876B1 (en) | 2012-11-28 | 2014-01-07 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Intermediate content processing for content delivery networks |
US8219645B2 (en) * | 2009-10-02 | 2012-07-10 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Content delivery network cache grouping |
US20120246214A1 (en) * | 2009-11-02 | 2012-09-27 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method for supporting service setting |
US8458769B2 (en) * | 2009-12-12 | 2013-06-04 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Cloud based firewall system and service |
US8331371B2 (en) | 2009-12-17 | 2012-12-11 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Distributed routing architecture |
US8331370B2 (en) | 2009-12-17 | 2012-12-11 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Distributed routing architecture |
US8769614B1 (en) | 2009-12-29 | 2014-07-01 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Security framework for HTTP streaming architecture |
US9495338B1 (en) | 2010-01-28 | 2016-11-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Content distribution network |
US9386116B2 (en) | 2010-05-13 | 2016-07-05 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | System, apparatus for content delivery for internet traffic and methods thereof |
WO2011146742A2 (en) | 2010-05-19 | 2011-11-24 | Akamai Technologies Inc. | Edge server http post message processing |
WO2011149558A2 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2011-12-01 | Abelow Daniel H | Reality alternate |
AU2011268104B2 (en) | 2010-06-18 | 2016-12-15 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Extending a content delivery network (CDN) into a mobile or wireline network |
US8190677B2 (en) * | 2010-07-23 | 2012-05-29 | Seawell Networks Inc. | Methods and systems for scalable video delivery |
US8756272B1 (en) | 2010-08-26 | 2014-06-17 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Processing encoded content |
US9712484B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2017-07-18 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing request routing information utilizing client identifiers |
CN102137138B (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2013-04-24 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method, device and system for cache collaboration |
US10958501B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2021-03-23 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing information based on client IP groupings |
US9003035B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2015-04-07 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Point of presence management in request routing |
US8930513B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2015-01-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Latency measurement in resource requests |
US8468247B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2013-06-18 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Point of presence management in request routing |
US10097398B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2018-10-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Point of presence management in request routing |
US8924528B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2014-12-30 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Latency measurement in resource requests |
US8819283B2 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2014-08-26 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing in a networked environment |
US8577992B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2013-11-05 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing management based on network components |
US8938526B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2015-01-20 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing management based on network components |
US20120089700A1 (en) * | 2010-10-10 | 2012-04-12 | Contendo, Inc. | Proxy server configured for hierarchical caching and dynamic site acceleration and custom object and associated method |
US20120124372A1 (en) * | 2010-10-13 | 2012-05-17 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Protecting Websites and Website Users By Obscuring URLs |
US8626718B2 (en) * | 2010-10-29 | 2014-01-07 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Content caching based on refresh and expiration times |
US9444876B2 (en) | 2010-11-08 | 2016-09-13 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Content distribution system |
US8452874B2 (en) | 2010-11-22 | 2013-05-28 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing processing |
US9391949B1 (en) | 2010-12-03 | 2016-07-12 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing processing |
US8626950B1 (en) | 2010-12-03 | 2014-01-07 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing processing |
US8880633B2 (en) | 2010-12-17 | 2014-11-04 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Proxy server with byte-based include interpreter |
US9418353B2 (en) | 2010-12-20 | 2016-08-16 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Methods and systems for delivering content to differentiated client devices |
US9161080B2 (en) * | 2011-01-28 | 2015-10-13 | Level 3 Communications, Llc | Content delivery network with deep caching infrastructure |
CA2825393C (en) | 2011-01-28 | 2019-03-12 | Level 3 Communications, Llc | Content delivery network with deep caching infrastructure |
US8612550B2 (en) | 2011-02-07 | 2013-12-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Proxy-based cache content distribution and affinity |
US8867337B2 (en) | 2011-04-26 | 2014-10-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Structure-aware caching |
US10467042B1 (en) | 2011-04-27 | 2019-11-05 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Optimized deployment based upon customer locality |
US9226034B1 (en) * | 2011-05-10 | 2015-12-29 | Google Inc. | Apparatus and methods for generating clips using recipes with slice definitions |
ES2410654B1 (en) * | 2011-05-12 | 2014-05-21 | Telefónica, S.A. | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING THE INFRASTRUCTURE OF A NETWORK DISTRIBUTION NETWORK SERVICE IN AN ISP NETWORK |
US8925022B2 (en) | 2011-05-25 | 2014-12-30 | Motorola Mobility Llc | Method and apparatus for transferring content |
JP5932987B2 (en) | 2011-06-08 | 2016-06-08 | コニンクリーケ・ケイピーエヌ・ナムローゼ・フェンノートシャップ | Location and extraction of segmented content |
US8850075B2 (en) * | 2011-07-06 | 2014-09-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Predictive, multi-layer caching architectures |
US9432704B2 (en) | 2011-11-06 | 2016-08-30 | Akamai Technologies Inc. | Segmented parallel encoding with frame-aware, variable-size chunking |
US9531691B2 (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2016-12-27 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Providing forward secrecy in a terminating TLS connection proxy |
US9647835B2 (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2017-05-09 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Terminating SSL connections without locally-accessible private keys |
US9531685B2 (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2016-12-27 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Providing forward secrecy in a terminating SSL/TLS connection proxy using Ephemeral Diffie-Hellman key exchange |
US9742858B2 (en) | 2011-12-23 | 2017-08-22 | Akamai Technologies Inc. | Assessment of content delivery services using performance measurements from within an end user client application |
WO2013096934A1 (en) * | 2011-12-23 | 2013-06-27 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Host/path-based data differencing in an overlay network using a compression and differencing engine |
US9231903B2 (en) * | 2011-12-30 | 2016-01-05 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | System and method for resolving a DNS request using metadata |
US9419852B1 (en) | 2011-12-30 | 2016-08-16 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for identifying and characterizing client devices |
US8904009B1 (en) | 2012-02-10 | 2014-12-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic content delivery |
US10021179B1 (en) | 2012-02-21 | 2018-07-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Local resource delivery network |
US9817916B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2017-11-14 | Akamai Technologies Inc. | Methods and apparatus for accelerating content authored for multiple devices |
US9083743B1 (en) | 2012-03-21 | 2015-07-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing request routing information utilizing performance information |
US10623408B1 (en) * | 2012-04-02 | 2020-04-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Context sensitive object management |
US9712887B2 (en) | 2012-04-12 | 2017-07-18 | Arris Canada, Inc. | Methods and systems for real-time transmuxing of streaming media content |
US10893119B2 (en) | 2012-05-22 | 2021-01-12 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Time-based data caching |
US9232240B2 (en) * | 2012-06-08 | 2016-01-05 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Distributed content delivery network architecture |
US9154551B1 (en) | 2012-06-11 | 2015-10-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Processing DNS queries to identify pre-processing information |
US9628542B2 (en) | 2012-08-24 | 2017-04-18 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Hybrid HTTP and UDP content delivery |
CN104685486B (en) | 2012-08-27 | 2018-10-09 | 阿卡麦科技公司 | Preventing TCP too fast becomes too cautious |
US9525659B1 (en) * | 2012-09-04 | 2016-12-20 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing utilizing point of presence load information |
US9135048B2 (en) | 2012-09-20 | 2015-09-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Automated profiling of resource usage |
US9323577B2 (en) | 2012-09-20 | 2016-04-26 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Automated profiling of resource usage |
US8875287B2 (en) | 2012-10-04 | 2014-10-28 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Server with mechanism for reducing internal resources associated with a selected client connection |
US9246998B2 (en) | 2012-10-16 | 2016-01-26 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Load balancer bypass |
US9374276B2 (en) | 2012-11-01 | 2016-06-21 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | CDN traffic management in the cloud |
US9537973B2 (en) * | 2012-11-01 | 2017-01-03 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | CDN load balancing in the cloud |
US9160809B2 (en) * | 2012-11-26 | 2015-10-13 | Go Daddy Operating Company, LLC | DNS overriding-based methods of accelerating content delivery |
CN103838779B (en) * | 2012-11-27 | 2019-02-05 | 深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司 | It is multiplexed the cloud code-transferring method and system, distributed document device of idle computing resources |
US9325711B2 (en) | 2012-12-11 | 2016-04-26 | Servmax, Inc. | Apparatus and data processing systems for accessing an object |
US9654355B2 (en) | 2012-12-13 | 2017-05-16 | Level 3 Communications, Llc | Framework supporting content delivery with adaptation services |
US9390052B1 (en) | 2012-12-19 | 2016-07-12 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Distributed caching system |
US9621399B1 (en) * | 2012-12-19 | 2017-04-11 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Distributed caching system |
US10205698B1 (en) | 2012-12-19 | 2019-02-12 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Source-dependent address resolution |
US10642738B1 (en) | 2012-12-19 | 2020-05-05 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Distributed caching system |
US9509804B2 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2016-11-29 | Akami Technologies, Inc. | Scalable content delivery network request handling mechanism to support a request processing layer |
US9654579B2 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2017-05-16 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Scalable content delivery network request handling mechanism |
CN105074688B (en) | 2012-12-27 | 2018-04-17 | 阿卡麦科技公司 | Use the data deduplication based on stream of peer node figure |
US9729605B2 (en) | 2012-12-27 | 2017-08-08 | Akamai Technologies Inc. | Mechanism for distinguishing between content to be served through first or second delivery channels |
US10257249B1 (en) * | 2013-02-14 | 2019-04-09 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Method and system for communicating content to a client device by pulling content from a publisher from a content delivery network when first requested by the client device |
WO2014124692A1 (en) * | 2013-02-15 | 2014-08-21 | Nec Europe Ltd. | Method and system for providing content in content delivery networks |
US9294391B1 (en) | 2013-06-04 | 2016-03-22 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing network computing components utilizing request routing |
US9813515B2 (en) | 2013-10-04 | 2017-11-07 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for caching content with notification-based invalidation with extension to clients |
US9648125B2 (en) | 2013-10-04 | 2017-05-09 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for caching content with notification-based invalidation |
US9641640B2 (en) | 2013-10-04 | 2017-05-02 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for controlling cacheability and privacy of objects |
US9819721B2 (en) | 2013-10-31 | 2017-11-14 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Dynamically populated manifests and manifest-based prefetching |
WO2015084878A1 (en) | 2013-12-02 | 2015-06-11 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Virtual private network (vpn)-as-a-service with delivery optimizations while maintaining end-to-end data security |
JP2015108970A (en) * | 2013-12-04 | 2015-06-11 | ソニー株式会社 | Server device and information processing method |
WO2015100283A1 (en) * | 2013-12-23 | 2015-07-02 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for delivering content to clients that are suboptimally mapped |
KR101878084B1 (en) | 2013-12-26 | 2018-07-12 | 카티바, 인크. | Apparatus and techniques for thermal treatment of electronic devices |
US9485456B2 (en) | 2013-12-30 | 2016-11-01 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Frame-rate conversion in a distributed computing system |
EP2894871A1 (en) * | 2014-01-10 | 2015-07-15 | Thomson Licensing | Method for obtaining a network information by a client terminal configured for receiving a multimedia content divided into segments |
KR102307190B1 (en) | 2014-01-21 | 2021-09-30 | 카티바, 인크. | Apparatus and techniques for electronic device encapsulation |
US9866655B2 (en) | 2014-03-31 | 2018-01-09 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Server initiated multipath content delivery |
US9576070B2 (en) | 2014-04-23 | 2017-02-21 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Creation and delivery of pre-rendered web pages for accelerated browsing |
KR102390045B1 (en) | 2014-04-30 | 2022-04-22 | 카티바, 인크. | Gas cushion apparatus and techniques for substrate coating |
US20150339691A1 (en) * | 2014-05-23 | 2015-11-26 | Moose Loop Holdings, LLC | Systems and Methods for Adjusting Prices for a Service |
US9531720B2 (en) | 2014-09-02 | 2016-12-27 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | System and methods for leveraging an object cache to monitor network traffic |
US10785293B2 (en) | 2014-11-11 | 2020-09-22 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Content delivery to physically-proximate devices using a mesh-assisted cache |
US10097448B1 (en) | 2014-12-18 | 2018-10-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Routing mode and point-of-presence selection service |
US10091096B1 (en) | 2014-12-18 | 2018-10-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Routing mode and point-of-presence selection service |
US10033627B1 (en) | 2014-12-18 | 2018-07-24 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Routing mode and point-of-presence selection service |
US10771583B2 (en) | 2014-12-29 | 2020-09-08 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Managing mobile device user subscription and service preferences to predictively pre-fetch content |
US10063653B2 (en) | 2014-12-29 | 2018-08-28 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Distributed server architecture for supporting a predictive content pre-fetching service for mobile device users |
US10154068B2 (en) | 2014-12-30 | 2018-12-11 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Self-adjusting tiered caching system to optimize traffic performance and origin offload |
US10812580B2 (en) | 2015-01-30 | 2020-10-20 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Using resource timing data for server push |
US10313463B2 (en) | 2015-02-19 | 2019-06-04 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for avoiding server push of objects already cached at a client |
US10630771B1 (en) | 2015-02-26 | 2020-04-21 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Content delivery network with network storage and support for on-demand content upload |
US10225326B1 (en) | 2015-03-23 | 2019-03-05 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Point of presence based data uploading |
US9887932B1 (en) | 2015-03-30 | 2018-02-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Traffic surge management for points of presence |
US9887931B1 (en) | 2015-03-30 | 2018-02-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Traffic surge management for points of presence |
US9819567B1 (en) * | 2015-03-30 | 2017-11-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Traffic surge management for points of presence |
CN104834722B (en) * | 2015-05-12 | 2018-03-02 | 网宿科技股份有限公司 | Content Management System based on CDN |
US9832141B1 (en) | 2015-05-13 | 2017-11-28 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Routing based request correlation |
US10425499B2 (en) * | 2015-06-18 | 2019-09-24 | Line Corporation | Server and method for providing content to users |
US10616179B1 (en) | 2015-06-25 | 2020-04-07 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Selective routing of domain name system (DNS) requests |
US10097566B1 (en) | 2015-07-31 | 2018-10-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Identifying targets of network attacks |
US9742795B1 (en) | 2015-09-24 | 2017-08-22 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Mitigating network attacks |
US9794281B1 (en) | 2015-09-24 | 2017-10-17 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Identifying sources of network attacks |
US9774619B1 (en) | 2015-09-24 | 2017-09-26 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Mitigating network attacks |
US10270878B1 (en) | 2015-11-10 | 2019-04-23 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Routing for origin-facing points of presence |
WO2017091709A1 (en) | 2015-11-25 | 2017-06-01 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Uniquely identifying and securely communicating with an appliance in an uncontrolled network |
US10257307B1 (en) | 2015-12-11 | 2019-04-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Reserved cache space in content delivery networks |
US10049051B1 (en) | 2015-12-11 | 2018-08-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Reserved cache space in content delivery networks |
US10348639B2 (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2019-07-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Use of virtual endpoints to improve data transmission rates |
US10075551B1 (en) | 2016-06-06 | 2018-09-11 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request management for hierarchical cache |
US10110694B1 (en) | 2016-06-29 | 2018-10-23 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Adaptive transfer rate for retrieving content from a server |
WO2018020291A1 (en) * | 2016-07-25 | 2018-02-01 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Content delivery network (cdn) for uploading, caching and delivering user content |
US10375154B2 (en) | 2016-07-29 | 2019-08-06 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Interchangeable retrieval of content |
US9992086B1 (en) | 2016-08-23 | 2018-06-05 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | External health checking of virtual private cloud network environments |
US10033691B1 (en) | 2016-08-24 | 2018-07-24 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Adaptive resolution of domain name requests in virtual private cloud network environments |
US10693947B2 (en) * | 2016-09-09 | 2020-06-23 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Interchangeable retrieval of sensitive content via private content distribution networks |
US10616250B2 (en) | 2016-10-05 | 2020-04-07 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Network addresses with encoded DNS-level information |
US9667619B1 (en) | 2016-10-14 | 2017-05-30 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for utilizing client side authentication to select services available at a given port number |
US10831549B1 (en) | 2016-12-27 | 2020-11-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Multi-region request-driven code execution system |
US10372499B1 (en) | 2016-12-27 | 2019-08-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Efficient region selection system for executing request-driven code |
WO2018126134A1 (en) | 2016-12-30 | 2018-07-05 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Unified, browser-based enterprise collaboration platform |
US10084855B2 (en) | 2017-01-23 | 2018-09-25 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Pixel-based load balancing |
US10938884B1 (en) | 2017-01-30 | 2021-03-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Origin server cloaking using virtual private cloud network environments |
US9986269B1 (en) | 2017-03-03 | 2018-05-29 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Maintaining stream continuity counter in a stateless multiplexing system |
US11088940B2 (en) | 2017-03-07 | 2021-08-10 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Cooperative multipath |
WO2018169083A1 (en) * | 2017-03-16 | 2018-09-20 | ソフトバンク株式会社 | Relay device and program |
US10447702B2 (en) * | 2017-03-20 | 2019-10-15 | Screening Room Media, Inc. | Digital credential tiers |
US10503613B1 (en) | 2017-04-21 | 2019-12-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Efficient serving of resources during server unavailability |
US11075987B1 (en) | 2017-06-12 | 2021-07-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Load estimating content delivery network |
US10447648B2 (en) | 2017-06-19 | 2019-10-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Assignment of a POP to a DNS resolver based on volume of communications over a link between client devices and the POP |
US10764391B2 (en) | 2017-09-14 | 2020-09-01 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Origin and cache server cooperation for compute-intensive content delivery |
US10887385B2 (en) | 2017-09-20 | 2021-01-05 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Marker based reporting system for hybrid content delivery network and peer to peer network |
US10742593B1 (en) | 2017-09-25 | 2020-08-11 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Hybrid content request routing system |
US10531134B2 (en) | 2017-11-10 | 2020-01-07 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Determining a time budget for transcoding of video |
US10581948B2 (en) | 2017-12-07 | 2020-03-03 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Client side cache visibility with TLS session tickets |
US10439925B2 (en) | 2017-12-21 | 2019-10-08 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Sandbox environment for testing integration between a content provider origin and a content delivery network |
US10630769B2 (en) | 2017-12-26 | 2020-04-21 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Distributed system of record transaction receipt handling in an overlay network |
US11977924B2 (en) | 2017-12-26 | 2024-05-07 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | High performance distributed system of record with distributed random oracle |
US10250708B1 (en) | 2017-12-26 | 2019-04-02 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | High performance distributed system of record |
US11606190B2 (en) | 2017-12-26 | 2023-03-14 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | High performance distributed system of record with cryptographic service support |
US11018850B2 (en) | 2017-12-26 | 2021-05-25 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Concurrent transaction processing in a high performance distributed system of record |
US10531130B2 (en) * | 2018-01-23 | 2020-01-07 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Protocol and architecture for the decentralization of content delivery |
US10810279B2 (en) | 2018-02-07 | 2020-10-20 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Content delivery network (CDN) providing accelerated delivery of embedded resources from CDN and third party domains |
US10764402B2 (en) | 2018-03-03 | 2020-09-01 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Leveraging time-windows generated by web browser pre-connections |
US10440142B2 (en) | 2018-03-06 | 2019-10-08 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Automated TTL adjustment using cache performance and purge data |
US10592578B1 (en) | 2018-03-07 | 2020-03-17 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Predictive content push-enabled content delivery network |
US10958649B2 (en) | 2018-03-21 | 2021-03-23 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for internet-wide monitoring and protection of user credentials |
EP3769489A4 (en) | 2018-03-22 | 2021-12-15 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Traffic forwarding and disambiguation by using local proxies and addresses |
US10681001B2 (en) | 2018-03-29 | 2020-06-09 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | High precision mapping with intermediary DNS filtering |
US10452563B1 (en) | 2018-05-07 | 2019-10-22 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Cache eviction scheme for acceptable substitutes in online media |
CN108737405B (en) * | 2018-05-10 | 2020-02-18 | 网宿科技股份有限公司 | Method, CCL server and system for guiding direct broadcasting video stream |
EP3808043B1 (en) | 2018-06-18 | 2024-10-23 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Download management with congestion mitigation for over the air content delivery to vehicles |
US11012362B2 (en) | 2018-06-18 | 2021-05-18 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Download management with congestion mitigation for over the air content delivery to vehicles |
US10667172B2 (en) | 2018-06-18 | 2020-05-26 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Download management with congestion mitigation for over the air content delivery to vehicles |
WO2019243021A1 (en) * | 2018-06-21 | 2019-12-26 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Path selection for content delivery network |
US10650023B2 (en) * | 2018-07-24 | 2020-05-12 | Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. | Process for establishing trust between multiple autonomous systems for the purposes of command and control |
US10834138B2 (en) | 2018-08-13 | 2020-11-10 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Device discovery for cloud-based network security gateways |
US10931695B2 (en) | 2018-08-22 | 2021-02-23 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Nonce injection and observation system for detecting eavesdroppers |
US10798006B2 (en) | 2018-10-12 | 2020-10-06 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Overload protection for data sinks in a distributed computing system |
US10917493B2 (en) * | 2018-10-19 | 2021-02-09 | Bby Solutions, Inc. | Dynamic edge cache content management |
US11310201B2 (en) | 2018-10-23 | 2022-04-19 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Network security system with enhanced traffic analysis based on feedback loop |
US10972576B2 (en) * | 2018-11-14 | 2021-04-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Content acceleration for cross-site resources by CDN |
US11019034B2 (en) | 2018-11-16 | 2021-05-25 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for proxying encrypted traffic to protect origin servers from internet threats |
US10862852B1 (en) | 2018-11-16 | 2020-12-08 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Resolution of domain name requests in heterogeneous network environments |
US11483347B2 (en) | 2018-12-05 | 2022-10-25 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | High performance distributed system of record with secure interoperability to external systems |
US10951589B2 (en) | 2018-12-06 | 2021-03-16 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Proxy auto-configuration for directing client traffic to a cloud proxy |
US11025747B1 (en) | 2018-12-12 | 2021-06-01 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Content request pattern-based routing system |
US11930439B2 (en) | 2019-01-09 | 2024-03-12 | Margo Networks Private Limited | Network control and optimization (NCO) system and method |
US10931778B2 (en) * | 2019-01-09 | 2021-02-23 | Margo Networks Pvt. Ltd. | Content delivery network system and method |
CN109618003B (en) * | 2019-01-14 | 2022-02-22 | 网宿科技股份有限公司 | Server planning method, server and storage medium |
US10924534B2 (en) | 2019-03-01 | 2021-02-16 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic placement of computing tasks in a distributed computing environment |
US10834222B1 (en) | 2019-05-09 | 2020-11-10 | Akamai Technologies Inc. | Server utilizing multiple object retrieval candidates |
CN110460866A (en) * | 2019-07-29 | 2019-11-15 | 网宿科技股份有限公司 | Push method, system and the server of stream medium data |
US10771524B1 (en) * | 2019-07-31 | 2020-09-08 | Theta Labs, Inc. | Methods and systems for a decentralized data streaming and delivery network |
US20210173888A1 (en) | 2019-12-08 | 2021-06-10 | Akamai Technologies Inc. | Proxy server caching of database content |
GB2592211A (en) * | 2020-02-19 | 2021-08-25 | Nchain Holdings Ltd | Adapting connections of a layered network |
GB2594684A (en) | 2020-02-19 | 2021-11-10 | Nchain Holdings Ltd | Layered network |
US11431690B1 (en) * | 2020-06-23 | 2022-08-30 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Protecting data within an edge location while providing access to associated metadata |
IT202000017023A1 (en) * | 2020-07-14 | 2022-01-14 | Mainstreaming S P A | METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTING FILES THROUGH A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK ALSO BASED ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ALGORITHMS, TELEMATIC SYSTEM AND SERVERS THAT ALLOW TO IMPLEMENT IT |
US11687497B2 (en) * | 2020-07-21 | 2023-06-27 | Akamai Technologies Inc. | Learning-based storage reduction in an overlay network |
US12047648B2 (en) | 2020-07-21 | 2024-07-23 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for midstream selection of content to insert into a media stream |
US11233768B1 (en) * | 2020-09-30 | 2022-01-25 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | CDN configuration tuning based on domain scan analysis |
US11445225B2 (en) * | 2020-10-27 | 2022-09-13 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Measuring and improving origin offload and resource utilization in caching systems |
US11379281B2 (en) | 2020-11-18 | 2022-07-05 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Detection and optimization of content in the payloads of API messages |
US11343348B1 (en) | 2021-04-12 | 2022-05-24 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Real-time message delivery and update service in a proxy server network |
US11343344B1 (en) | 2021-04-23 | 2022-05-24 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Proxy server entity transfer modes |
EP4327543A1 (en) | 2021-04-23 | 2024-02-28 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Proxy server entity transfer modes |
US12062068B2 (en) | 2021-05-04 | 2024-08-13 | Margo Networks Pvt. Ltd. | Oneapp system and method |
US11695855B2 (en) | 2021-05-17 | 2023-07-04 | Margo Networks Pvt. Ltd. | User generated pluggable content delivery network (CDN) system and method |
US11997096B2 (en) | 2021-05-18 | 2024-05-28 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Fast, secure, and scalable data store at the edge for connecting network enabled devices |
US11748263B2 (en) | 2021-11-15 | 2023-09-05 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Internet caches with object hints |
US11445045B1 (en) | 2021-12-21 | 2022-09-13 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for preventing the caching of rarely requested objects |
WO2023224680A1 (en) | 2022-05-18 | 2023-11-23 | Margo Networks Pvt. Ltd. | Peer to peer (p2p) encrypted data transfer/offload system and method |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6108703A (en) * | 1998-07-14 | 2000-08-22 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Global hosting system |
US20010052016A1 (en) * | 1999-12-13 | 2001-12-13 | Skene Bryan D. | Method and system for balancing load distrubution on a wide area network |
US6389462B1 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2002-05-14 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for transparently directing requests for web objects to proxy caches |
US20020107944A1 (en) * | 2000-11-01 | 2002-08-08 | Bai Joseph J. | Cooperative management of distributed network caches |
US6542964B1 (en) * | 1999-06-02 | 2003-04-01 | Blue Coat Systems | Cost-based optimization for content distribution using dynamic protocol selection and query resolution for cache server |
US6754699B2 (en) * | 2000-07-19 | 2004-06-22 | Speedera Networks, Inc. | Content delivery and global traffic management network system |
US20040194102A1 (en) * | 2001-01-16 | 2004-09-30 | Neerdaels Charles J | Using virutal domain name service (dns) zones for enterprise content delivery |
US6829654B1 (en) * | 2000-06-23 | 2004-12-07 | Cloudshield Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and method for virtual edge placement of web sites |
US7133905B2 (en) * | 2002-04-09 | 2006-11-07 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
Family Cites Families (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5611049A (en) | 1992-06-03 | 1997-03-11 | Pitts; William M. | System for accessing distributed data cache channel at each network node to pass requests and data |
US6026452A (en) | 1997-02-26 | 2000-02-15 | Pitts; William Michael | Network distributed site cache RAM claimed as up/down stream request/reply channel for storing anticipated data and meta data |
US6003030A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1999-12-14 | Intervu, Inc. | System and method for optimized storage and retrieval of data on a distributed computer network |
US5991306A (en) * | 1996-08-26 | 1999-11-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Pull based, intelligent caching system and method for delivering data over a network |
US5924116A (en) * | 1997-04-02 | 1999-07-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Collaborative caching of a requested object by a lower level node as a function of the caching status of the object at a higher level node |
US6240461B1 (en) * | 1997-09-25 | 2001-05-29 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for caching network data traffic |
US6185598B1 (en) * | 1998-02-10 | 2001-02-06 | Digital Island, Inc. | Optimized network resource location |
US6112279A (en) | 1998-03-31 | 2000-08-29 | Lucent Technologies, Inc. | Virtual web caching system |
US6351767B1 (en) * | 1999-01-25 | 2002-02-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for automatically caching dynamic content based on a cacheability determination |
US6785704B1 (en) * | 1999-12-20 | 2004-08-31 | Fastforward Networks | Content distribution system for operation over an internetwork including content peering arrangements |
US6405252B1 (en) | 1999-11-22 | 2002-06-11 | Speedera Networks, Inc. | Integrated point of presence server network |
US6484143B1 (en) | 1999-11-22 | 2002-11-19 | Speedera Networks, Inc. | User device and system for traffic management and content distribution over a world wide area network |
US6820133B1 (en) | 2000-02-07 | 2004-11-16 | Netli, Inc. | System and method for high-performance delivery of web content using high-performance communications protocol between the first and second specialized intermediate nodes to optimize a measure of communications performance between the source and the destination |
US7024466B2 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2006-04-04 | Movielink, Llc | Network configured for delivery of content for download to a recipient |
US7240100B1 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2007-07-03 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Content delivery network (CDN) content server request handling mechanism with metadata framework support |
US6996616B1 (en) | 2000-04-17 | 2006-02-07 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | HTML delivery from edge-of-network servers in a content delivery network (CDN) |
US6976090B2 (en) * | 2000-04-20 | 2005-12-13 | Actona Technologies Ltd. | Differentiated content and application delivery via internet |
US7299291B1 (en) | 2000-05-18 | 2007-11-20 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Client-side method for identifying an optimum server |
US7032031B2 (en) * | 2000-06-23 | 2006-04-18 | Cloudshield Technologies, Inc. | Edge adapter apparatus and method |
WO2002044915A1 (en) * | 2000-11-30 | 2002-06-06 | Appfluent Technology, Inc. | System and method for delivering dynamic content |
US20020092026A1 (en) * | 2001-01-09 | 2002-07-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for broadcast delivery of content to a client-side cache based on user preferences |
US6647466B2 (en) | 2001-01-25 | 2003-11-11 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and apparatus for adaptively bypassing one or more levels of a cache hierarchy |
EP1388073B1 (en) | 2001-03-01 | 2018-01-10 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Optimal route selection in a content delivery network |
WO2002071191A2 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2002-09-12 | Kasenna, Inc. | Metadata enabled push-pull model for efficient low-latency video-content distribution over a network |
US7213071B2 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2007-05-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Quality of service improvements for network transactions |
US7200681B1 (en) | 2001-07-30 | 2007-04-03 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Edge side components and application programming environment for building and delivering highly distributed heterogenous component-based web applications |
US7155478B2 (en) * | 2001-10-03 | 2006-12-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Selectively handling data processing requests in a computer communications network |
US6954456B2 (en) * | 2001-12-14 | 2005-10-11 | At & T Corp. | Method for content-aware redirection and content renaming |
US7254634B1 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2007-08-07 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Managing web tier session state objects in a content delivery network (CDN) |
US7136922B2 (en) | 2002-10-15 | 2006-11-14 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for providing on-demand content delivery for an origin server |
US7305252B2 (en) * | 2003-12-09 | 2007-12-04 | Nokia Corporation | System and method for service naming and related directory structure in a mobile data network |
-
2002
- 2002-04-09 US US10/118,989 patent/US7133905B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2003
- 2003-04-09 AU AU2003228479A patent/AU2003228479A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-04-09 WO PCT/US2003/010882 patent/WO2003088065A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2003-04-09 EP EP03726233A patent/EP1493094B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-04-09 AT AT03726233T patent/ATE516554T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2006
- 2006-11-06 US US11/593,287 patent/US7376716B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2008
- 2008-05-19 US US12/122,776 patent/US7603439B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2009
- 2009-10-12 US US12/577,232 patent/US20100023693A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6108703A (en) * | 1998-07-14 | 2000-08-22 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Global hosting system |
US6389462B1 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2002-05-14 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for transparently directing requests for web objects to proxy caches |
US6542964B1 (en) * | 1999-06-02 | 2003-04-01 | Blue Coat Systems | Cost-based optimization for content distribution using dynamic protocol selection and query resolution for cache server |
US20010052016A1 (en) * | 1999-12-13 | 2001-12-13 | Skene Bryan D. | Method and system for balancing load distrubution on a wide area network |
US6829654B1 (en) * | 2000-06-23 | 2004-12-07 | Cloudshield Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and method for virtual edge placement of web sites |
US6754699B2 (en) * | 2000-07-19 | 2004-06-22 | Speedera Networks, Inc. | Content delivery and global traffic management network system |
US20020107944A1 (en) * | 2000-11-01 | 2002-08-08 | Bai Joseph J. | Cooperative management of distributed network caches |
US20040194102A1 (en) * | 2001-01-16 | 2004-09-30 | Neerdaels Charles J | Using virutal domain name service (dns) zones for enterprise content delivery |
US7133905B2 (en) * | 2002-04-09 | 2006-11-07 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
Cited By (33)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9774505B2 (en) | 2004-08-02 | 2017-09-26 | Steve J Shattil | Content delivery in wireless wide area networks |
US9806953B2 (en) | 2004-08-02 | 2017-10-31 | Steve J Shattil | Content delivery in wireless wide area networks |
US9325805B2 (en) | 2004-08-02 | 2016-04-26 | Steve J Shattil | Content delivery in wireless wide area networks |
US10021175B2 (en) | 2004-08-02 | 2018-07-10 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Edge server selection for device-specific network topologies |
US10735503B2 (en) | 2010-03-01 | 2020-08-04 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Content delivery in wireless wide area networks |
US10419533B2 (en) | 2010-03-01 | 2019-09-17 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Edge server selection for device-specific network topologies |
US11330046B2 (en) | 2010-03-01 | 2022-05-10 | Tybalt, Llc | Content delivery in wireless wide area networks |
US11778019B2 (en) | 2010-03-01 | 2023-10-03 | Tybalt, Llc | Content delivery in wireless wide area networks |
US9031996B2 (en) * | 2010-03-15 | 2015-05-12 | Salesforce.Com | System, method and computer program product for creating a plurality of CNAMES for a website |
US20110225206A1 (en) * | 2010-03-15 | 2011-09-15 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for creating a plurality of cnames for a website |
US20120066360A1 (en) * | 2010-09-14 | 2012-03-15 | Cdnetworks Co., Ltd. | Cname-based round-trip time measurement in a content delivery network |
US8489724B2 (en) * | 2010-09-14 | 2013-07-16 | Cdnetworks Co., Ltd. | CNAME-based round-trip time measurement in a content delivery network |
US9037690B2 (en) * | 2010-11-16 | 2015-05-19 | Edgecast Networks, Inc. | Discrete mapping for targeted caching |
US20130268616A1 (en) * | 2010-11-16 | 2013-10-10 | Edgecast Networks, Inc. | Discrete Mapping for Targeted Caching |
US8478858B2 (en) | 2011-02-01 | 2013-07-02 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Policy management for content storage in content delivery networks |
US20120198071A1 (en) * | 2011-02-01 | 2012-08-02 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Distributed Landing Pad and Brick Topology for Content Storage in Content Delivery Networks |
US8615577B2 (en) | 2011-02-01 | 2013-12-24 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Policy based processing of content objects in a content delivery network using mutators |
US8521813B2 (en) | 2011-02-01 | 2013-08-27 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Content replication workflow in content delivery networks |
US8291083B2 (en) * | 2011-02-01 | 2012-10-16 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Distributed landing pad and brick topology for content storage in content delivery networks |
US8856329B2 (en) | 2011-02-01 | 2014-10-07 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Multicast mapped look-up on content delivery networks |
US8396970B2 (en) | 2011-02-01 | 2013-03-12 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Content processing between locations workflow in content delivery networks |
US8458290B2 (en) | 2011-02-01 | 2013-06-04 | Limelight Networks, Inc. | Multicast mapped look-up on content delivery networks |
US11178244B2 (en) * | 2011-08-09 | 2021-11-16 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Content delivery network routing using border gateway protocol |
US20130041972A1 (en) * | 2011-08-09 | 2013-02-14 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Content Delivery Network Routing Using Border Gateway Protocol |
US20130103786A1 (en) * | 2011-10-20 | 2013-04-25 | Allen Miglore | System and method for transporting files between networked or connected systems and devices |
US8898244B2 (en) * | 2011-10-20 | 2014-11-25 | Allen Miglore | System and method for transporting files between networked or connected systems and devices |
US9769238B2 (en) * | 2011-11-02 | 2017-09-19 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Multi-domain configuration handling in an edge network server |
US20130191499A1 (en) * | 2011-11-02 | 2013-07-25 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Multi-domain configuration handling in an edge network server |
US20130173716A1 (en) * | 2012-01-01 | 2013-07-04 | Sean S. ROGERS | Data delivery optimization |
US9160697B2 (en) * | 2012-01-01 | 2015-10-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Data delivery optimization |
EP3005176A4 (en) * | 2013-06-06 | 2017-01-25 | Ericsson Television Inc. | Defragmentation of adaptive streaming segment files in a content delivery network |
US20140365613A1 (en) * | 2013-06-06 | 2014-12-11 | Ericsson Television Inc. | Defragmentation of adaptive streaming segment files in a content delivery network |
US10255305B2 (en) * | 2016-09-09 | 2019-04-09 | Intel Corporation | Technologies for object-based data consistency in distributed architectures |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20070055764A1 (en) | 2007-03-08 |
US20080222281A1 (en) | 2008-09-11 |
EP1493094B1 (en) | 2011-07-13 |
US20030233423A1 (en) | 2003-12-18 |
US7376716B2 (en) | 2008-05-20 |
US7603439B2 (en) | 2009-10-13 |
EP1493094A1 (en) | 2005-01-05 |
AU2003228479A1 (en) | 2003-10-27 |
ATE516554T1 (en) | 2011-07-15 |
US7133905B2 (en) | 2006-11-07 |
WO2003088065A1 (en) | 2003-10-23 |
EP1493094A4 (en) | 2008-11-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7133905B2 (en) | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network | |
US7565450B2 (en) | System and method for using a mapping between client addresses and addresses of caches to support content delivery | |
US8806008B2 (en) | HTML delivery from edge-of-network servers in a content delivery network (CDN) | |
US7908337B2 (en) | System and method for using network layer uniform resource locator routing to locate the closest server carrying specific content | |
US7343422B2 (en) | System and method for using uniform resource locators to map application layer content names to network layer anycast addresses | |
US6542964B1 (en) | Cost-based optimization for content distribution using dynamic protocol selection and query resolution for cache server | |
US7577754B2 (en) | System and method for controlling access to content carried in a caching architecture | |
US7111006B2 (en) | System and method for providing distributed database services | |
US20020016860A1 (en) | System and method for resolving network layer anycast addresses to network layer unicast addresses | |
US8224986B1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for redirecting requests for content | |
US7562153B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for content distribution network brokering and peering | |
US20030079027A1 (en) | Content request routing and load balancing for content distribution networks | |
EP1277327B1 (en) | System and method for using network layer uniform resource locator routing to locate the closest server carrying specific content | |
Iyengar et al. | Web caching, consistency, and content distribution | |
WO2001084802A2 (en) | System and method for using uniform resource locators to map application layer content names to network layer anycast addresses | |
WO2001084803A2 (en) | System and method for resolving network layer anycast addresses to network layer unicast addresses |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DILLEY, JOHN A.;BERKHEIMER, ANDREW D.;REEL/FRAME:023356/0352;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020404 TO 20020408 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |