US20090236213A1 - Enrichment of light hydrocarbon mixture - Google Patents
Enrichment of light hydrocarbon mixture Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090236213A1 US20090236213A1 US12/469,552 US46955209A US2009236213A1 US 20090236213 A1 US20090236213 A1 US 20090236213A1 US 46955209 A US46955209 A US 46955209A US 2009236213 A1 US2009236213 A1 US 2009236213A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- liquid
- vapor
- distillation column
- light hydrocarbon
- column
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 title claims abstract description 29
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 title claims abstract description 28
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 23
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 title claims description 27
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 92
- 238000004821 distillation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 58
- 239000012510 hollow fiber Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 49
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- ATUOYWHBWRKTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Propane Chemical compound CCC ATUOYWHBWRKTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- QQONPFPTGQHPMA-UHFFFAOYSA-N propylene Natural products CC=C QQONPFPTGQHPMA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 125000004805 propylene group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])([*:1])C([H])([H])[*:2] 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 238000009835 boiling Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 239000001294 propane Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 claims description 60
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 45
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 claims description 39
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 claims description 33
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- -1 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 5
- 229920002492 poly(sulfone) Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- VGGSQFUCUMXWEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethene Chemical compound C=C VGGSQFUCUMXWEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000005977 Ethylene Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 150000002148 esters Chemical class 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000006260 foam Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000012982 microporous membrane Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004698 Polyethylene Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920000573 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000002033 PVDF binder Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 229910010293 ceramic material Inorganic materials 0.000 claims 1
- 229920002981 polyvinylidene fluoride Polymers 0.000 claims 1
- 239000007791 liquid phase Substances 0.000 abstract description 19
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 10
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 38
- 238000012856 packing Methods 0.000 description 37
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 24
- 239000012808 vapor phase Substances 0.000 description 16
- 150000001336 alkenes Chemical class 0.000 description 12
- JRZJOMJEPLMPRA-UHFFFAOYSA-N olefin Natural products CCCCCCCC=C JRZJOMJEPLMPRA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- 239000012188 paraffin wax Substances 0.000 description 11
- OFBQJSOFQDEBGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Pentane Chemical compound CCCCC OFBQJSOFQDEBGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 238000010992 reflux Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000002411 thermogravimetry Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000011068 loading method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 6
- HDMHBHNRWDNNCD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1-[(2-hydroxyethoxy)methyl]-6-(phenylsulfanyl)thymine Chemical compound OCCOCN1C(=O)NC(=O)C(C)=C1SC1=CC=CC=C1 HDMHBHNRWDNNCD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000010408 film Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000009736 wetting Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000005465 channeling Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000001000 micrograph Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012229 microporous material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003960 organic solvent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003208 petroleum Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007858 starting material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- KRHYYFGTRYWZRS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Fluoride anion Chemical compound [F-] KRHYYFGTRYWZRS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009833 condensation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005494 condensation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010612 desalination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005265 energy consumption Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012527 feed solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002657 fibrous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012467 final product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005194 fractionation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000015203 fruit juice Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006193 liquid solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013335 mesoporous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003348 petrochemical agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004417 polycarbonate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000515 polycarbonate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000012805 post-processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004382 potting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- XTUSEBKMEQERQV-UHFFFAOYSA-N propan-2-ol;hydrate Chemical compound O.CC(C)O XTUSEBKMEQERQV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002277 temperature effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009827 uniform distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07C—ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
- C07C7/00—Purification; Separation; Use of additives
- C07C7/04—Purification; Separation; Use of additives by distillation
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D3/00—Distillation or related exchange processes in which liquids are contacted with gaseous media, e.g. stripping
- B01D3/14—Fractional distillation or use of a fractionation or rectification column
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D61/00—Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
- B01D61/36—Pervaporation; Membrane distillation; Liquid permeation
- B01D61/364—Membrane distillation
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2313/00—Details relating to membrane modules or apparatus
- B01D2313/08—Flow guidance means within the module or the apparatus
- B01D2313/083—Bypass routes
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2313/00—Details relating to membrane modules or apparatus
- B01D2313/60—Specific sensors or sensor arrangements
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to enrichment of a light hydrocarbon mixture using a distillation column.
- Ethylene and propylene are two of the largest commodity chemicals in the U.S. and are major building blocks for the petrochemicals industry. These olefins are mostly separated by cryogenic distillation that demands extremely low temperatures and high pressures. Over 75 billion pounds of ethylene and propylene are distilled annually in the U.S. at an estimated energy requirement of 400 trillion BTU's.
- Non-selective micro-porous membranes have been used as a barrier material in membrane contactors for vapor/liquid or liquid/liquid mass transfer, desalination, concentrating fruit juice and enriching the oxygen in blood during open-heart surgery (reference: “Hollow fiber membrane contactors”, Journal of Membrane Science, 159 (1999) 61-106).
- a unique feature of micro-porous membranes is a large surface area within a small volume, normally more than 3000 m 2 /m 3 , that provides an increased rate of mass transfer at least 10-20 times faster than the conventional tray and structured packing materials (creating an intimate contact between liquid and vapor phases).
- the high efficient Sulzer Chemtech® structured packing materials AG Corporation
- 250 Y/X have conquered the chemical industry globally in the past twenty years, it has not been used in the C 3 and C 4 splitters since they require high liquid loads where structured packings typically deteriorate in performance.
- An advantage of using hollow fibers as structured packing is that the liquid and vapor velocity are not interrupted by the two-phase fluid mechanics. Therefore, the column packed with hollow fibers can operate above the normal flooding limits and below the normal loading limits.
- the present invention includes the uses of a non-selective mesoporous and/or microporous membrane to separate olefinic mixtures from light vapor byproducts at higher temperatures and lower pressures than are currently required.
- the present invention includes an apparatus and method for use of distillation packing material made from a non-selective meso/microporous membrane that separates light hydrocarbon mixtures.
- FIG. 1 is a pictorial illustration of a membrane contactor module.
- FIG. 2 pictorially shows the concentration profile change across a non-wetting membrane.
- FIG. 3 a pictorially illustrates the intimate contact between liquid and vapor within the wall of porous material used as structured packing.
- FIG. 3 b pictorially illustrates the concentration profile change across a wetting membrane.
- FIG. 4 pictorially illustrates parallel porous tubes within a distillation column.
- FIG. 5 a is a schematic of a partial reflux distillation setup.
- FIG. 5 b is a schematic of a total reflux distillation setup.
- FIG. 6 is a schematic detailing liquid and vapor flow paths within a total reflux embodiment of the membrane distillation setup.
- FIG. 7 is a schematic detailing the test setup of the present invention.
- FIG. 8 a shows a scanning electron microscope image detailing the morphology of the porous materials used in Module-2.
- FIG. 8 b shows a scanning electron microscope image detailing the morphology of the porous materials used in Module-4.
- FIG. 9 graphically shows the thermogravimetry analysis (TGA) results of several hollow fiber samples tested in LANL modules.
- FIG. 10 graphically shows the swellability test results of hollow fiber samples in hollow fiber modules.
- FIG. 11 graphically shows the effect of temperature on the length change of hollow fiber samples.
- FIG. 12 graphically shows flow parameter vs. flow capacity.
- FIG. 13 graphically shows the effect of temperature and fluid capacity on the separation efficiency of hollow fiber modules.
- FIG. 14 graphically shows the effect of operation temperature on the mass transfer time obtained from hollow fiber modules for the propylene/propane separation.
- FIG. 15 graphically shows the column separation efficiency for Modules 2 , 4 , and 6 .
- the present invention includes the use of non-selective mesoporous and/or microporous fibers as structured packing for separation of light hydrocarbons like olefinic mixtures and olefin and paraffin mixtures.
- Microporous is defined as a material with pore size of less than 0.01 micrometer.
- Mesoporous is defined as a material with pore size in the micrometer range (a few hundred micrometers to 0.01 micrometer). Testing results prove that the hollow fiber made of non-selective mesoporous and/or microporous fibers can be used as structured packing, thus, allowing for an alternative technology for conventional distillation.
- Non-selective mesoporous and/or microporous materials that may be used in this application include, but are not limited to: plastics (e.g. polypropylene, polysulfone, polyethylene, polyvinylididene, mixed ester, and polyestersulfone), ceramics, and metals.
- plastics e.g. polypropylene, polysulfone, polyethylene, polyvinylididene, mixed ester, and polyestersulfone
- ceramics e.g. polypropylene, polysulfone, polyethylene, polyvinylididene, mixed ester, and polyestersulfone
- ceramics e.g. aluminum silicas
- metals e.g. aluminum silicadiene-s
- Preferred embodiments of these materials exhibit pore sizes that range from about 0.02 to a few hundred micrometers for fiber wall thicknesses ranging from about 30 to 500 micrometers, and, more precisely, when the pore size is less than about
- hollow fiber material as structured packing overcomes flooding or loading concerns, and offers a wide range of operating conditions. Furthermore, the large mass transfer area provided by the hollow fibers increases separation efficiency and, therefore, reduces the operating and capital cost when compared to use of conventional distillation packing materials.
- fluid # 1 flows through the lumen side of the hollow fiber, and fluid # 2 flows on the shell side of the hollow fiber.
- the liquid phase does not penetrate the pores in the membrane.
- X, X* are the mole fraction of volatile compounds in liquid phase at operational and equilibrium conditions
- Y, Y* are the mole fraction of more volatile compounds in vapor phase at operational and equilibrium conditions
- the transport subject to more volatile species occurs by evaporation from the liquid phase into the pores of membrane at the pore mouth of the liquid side, followed by vapor molecules' diffusion across membrane to the opposite side.
- the equilibrium between liquid and vapor phases occurs at the pore mouth, along the membrane surface of the liquid side.
- the contact area is limited to the open pores on the surface to where liquid contacts.
- the pore sizes used in this type of membrane contactor ranges from 100 ⁇ to 0.5 ⁇ m.
- the micro-porous materials in tube shape e.g. hollow fiber used in this work
- the process liquid pores can filled with liquid (see FIG. 3 b )
- the penetration rate of liquid can be controlled and thus allow the liquid phase to form an ultra-thin film uniformly coating the curvature of the large pores (pore size on the vapor side of the membrane can be larger than 50 ⁇ m).
- This surface feature exists within the wall of the fiber at the boundary contacting with the vapor phase (see FIG. 3 a ).
- the asymmetric structures with a denser structure contacts the liquid phase while the open cellular foam structured (pore size ranges from 0.5 to several hundred micrometers) contacts the vapor phase.
- the more volatile species evaporates into the vapor phase at the boundary at the vapor side while the condensed phase flows downward on the membrane surface and/or inside the wall of the membrane.
- the liquid Due to the wettibility of the porous materials, the liquid can penetrate through the entire membrane and thus ensures the full usage of the surface of the porous materials. Therefore, the mass transfer rate can be accelerated as the vapor flows through the curvature of the pores where the thin liquid film is covered to disturb the boundary layer of the vapor phase, thus reduce the resistance of mass transfer process.
- a system for separating olefin/paraffin mixtures includes a fluid tight column and a porous material that divides the column into a liquid and vapor chamber. Inside the housing, the vapor and liquid counter-currently flow through both sides of the boundary materials that can be wetted with the process liquid.
- the vapor and liquid phases interact with each other either at the membrane surface contacting with vapor phase and/or inside the wall of the porous materials where the high boiling point material, e.g. paraffin in the olefin/paraffin mixture is condensed into the liquid phase and purer low boiling point material, e.g. olefin is left in the vapor phase (see FIG. 3 a ).
- porous tubes 1 orientated in parallel inside column 5
- liquid flows within porous tubes 1 while vapor flows counter currently within channels 2 that are defined by outside wall 3 of porous tubes 1 and column 5 inner wall 4 .
- the liquid phase is evenly distributed and driven by the gravity flow downward inside the porous tube, the wettability of the porous materials allows the liquid to drain freely across the membrane while a thin film can be uniformly formed on the other side of the tube along the entire tube (where the liquid and vapor phases are contacting).
- Distillation is the process of heating a liquid solution to drive off a vapor and then collecting and condensing the vapor.
- the separation mechanism is based on the difference in volatility of components in the mixture.
- feed solution 10 is fed into middle section 20 of column 5 ; high boiling point component 11 is concentrated and removed from reboiler 25 while low boiling point component 12 is collected after condenser 30 .
- partial amount 13 of low boiling point component 12 is returned back to column 5 with remaining distillate (final product) 14 routed to post-processing (not shown).
- vapor 45 flows up the outside of hollow fiber 41 while liquid 47 flows down the inside of hollow fiber 41 .
- the analysis of differential distillation is simplified when analyzing total reflux conditions. The overall mass balance between the vapor and liquid condensate at any point is simply:
- Equation 4 Equation 4:
- Equations (4) may be written as:
- HTU is a height of a transfer unit defined as:
- NTU is the number of transfer unit given by:
- NTU ⁇ y 0 y l ⁇ ⁇ y y * - y ⁇ ( 7 )
- HETP height equivalent to a theoretical plate
- the HEPT is related to the HTU through a linearization of operating and equilibrium curves expression as follows:
- HETP HTU ⁇ Ln ⁇ ( mG / L ) mG / L - 1 , ( 7 )
- Vapor supply system 140 was used to initially charge reboiler 110 with starting materials.
- Five sampling stations 210 , 212 , 214 , 216 , and 218 were used to monitor the vapor and liquid composition at different sections of system 100 during operation.
- Heater/chiller system 112 was used to precisely control operating temperature during operation. Thus, by controlling the temperature difference between the heater and chiller, the liquid flow rate was controlled. Drain 135 was used to prevent liquid buildup on the vapor side.
- Bypass 115 was used to add liquid to reservoir 125 in preparation for initial startup.
- View port 170 mounted between condenser 120 and the top of membrane module 130 was used to ensure that hollow fibers 40 were filled with liquid during the experiment.
- a rheonik coriolis meter 200 Liquid controls, LLC, with RHM 03 sensor and RHE08-transmitter, was used to measure the liquid flow. As the system was working in a total reflux condition, the vapor flow rate was back calculated from the liquid flow based on the mass balance between the vapor and liquid flow.
- the hollow fiber modules were fabricated by potting the fibers inside polycarbonate tubes with an active length of 36.8 cm.
- the inner diameters of the tubes were about 0.5 inch (1.27 cm).
- Table 1 The detailed fiber and module parameters are summarized in Table 1. Five types of fibers with the pore size ranging from 0.04 to 30 ⁇ m, and the wall thickness from 30 to 440 ⁇ m were selected for the evaluation tests.
- Module fibers used in this experiment were procured from Setec, Inc. (Module-2), Pall company (Module-3), Spectrumlab (Module-4 and Module-9), and Celgard® fiber company (Module-6).
- the mass transfer area per unit volume ranged from 1094 to 1473 m 2 /m 3 , which was calculated based on the outside surface area of hollow fibers. Comparing to Sulzer Chemtech® 250 and 500 structured packing materials, the mass transfer area is about 4 to 6 times larger. The packing density ranged from 11-45%. Note that the across area ratio (A g /A L ) of vapor to liquid defines the open area between vapor and liquid to flow within column.
- Module - 2 Module - 3
- Module - 4 Module - 6
- Module - 9 Fiber Polypropylene Polyvinylididene Polysulfone Polypropylene Mixed Ester material Fluoride Pore size 0.1-30 ⁇ 0.02 0.05-0.5 0.04 0.1-1.0 ( ⁇ m) Fiber ID 1.74 0.626 0.480 0.240 0.680 (mm) Fiber OD 2.62 1.20 0.630 0.300 0.850 (mm) Thickness 440 288 75 30 85 ( ⁇ m) Number of 19 20 70 198 47 fibers Packing 45 17 17 11 22 density (%) Packing 2287 327.7 587 637 873 factor (ft ⁇ 1 ) A g /A L 0.55 17.1 8.28 12.56 5.64 a 12.35 5.95 10.94 14.73 13.39 (cm 2 /cm 3 )
- FIGS. 8 a and 8 b show the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the polypropylene fiber used in Module-2 module and polysulfone fiber used in Module-4 module, respectively.
- thermogravimetry analysis was used to test the stability of the hollow fiber samples in all the modules.
- the TGA results for these aged fiber samples are shown in FIG. 9 .
- the TGA results show that the weight percent (W %) change over time is almost identical for each fiber sample, concluding that all of these fibers samples are stable after they were soaked in pentane at room temperature for one year.
- Several hollow fiber samples were tested in olefin and paraffin mixture for several months with the corresponding TGA results essentially the same as the results obtained from samples soaked in pentane, indicating that pentane can be used as surrogate solvent to test the hollow fibers.
- the material characteristic of minimum swellability is preferred in fiber material in order to minimize geometry change during operation.
- the swellability of the fiber modules has been tested in several organic solvents as well.
- the tested results, shown in FIG. 10 indicate the swellability of these fibers was less than 10% in all tested solvents. Based on observation of liquid flow down the fibers while using pentane as the solvent, it is apparent that all of the fibers are easily wetted with light hydrocarbon materials.
- FIG. 12 is a plot of flow parameter vs flow capacity for the tested modules shown in Table 1.
- the plot demonstrates that a column (or module) including porous tubes in hollow fiber form can handle a wide range of flow conditions. These flow conditions are at least 100 times larger than the flooding limit of conventional packing materials. Further, the tested modules operated below the loading line of conventional packing materials. This proves that the tube-shell configuration of porous materials in a distillation column can provide separate channels for vapor and liquid to prevent flooding and loading problems, and at the same time provide a preferred large contact area between the vapor and liquid.
- Module-3 still provided a mass transfer time of less than 40 seconds. Whereas, for the Sulzer Chemtech® series packing materials, the mass transfer time is greater than 40 seconds (reference: “Non-selective membrane for separations”, E. L. Cussler, Journal of Chem. Tech. and Biotech, 78, 98-102).
- thermodynamic efficiency is typically larger than 85% when the modules are operated at their optimized operation zone (see FIG. 15 ).
- porous tube materials such as mesoporous and microporous hollow fibers
- a pore size on the liquid side of wall that is less than a few micrometers, but includes a wall thickness with the same order of magnitude as the tubes inside diameter (from about ten micrometers to a few hundred micrometers) (see FIG. 8 a ).
- the liquid in the liquid phase is uniformly distributed into the tube while the liquid thin film forms on the wall of the pores and/or the outer surface.
- the total amount of liquid required to cover the surface of porous materials is much less than that required to cover the surface of conventional packing materials. Therefore, when the liquid loading drops below the loading line (dashed line) in FIG. 12 , the modules were able to maintain their separation efficiency.
- the present invention provides more surface area and a more uniform distribution of liquid per unit volume of material than conventional materials, and, thus, correspondingly yields enhanced mass transfer per unit of volume.
- the liquid flow is below 2.5 g/min ( ⁇ 0.1 cm 3 /cm 2 ⁇ sec)
- the HETP is still below 15 cm ( ⁇ 6 inch).
- the present invention is a porous tube material that may be used as structured packing in a distillation process that provides a larger process flow rate operating range than current conventional packing materials.
- the present invention provides for an HETP of less than 10 cm and mass transfer time less than 1 second.
- a wide range of materials may be used as the porous tube material, to include ceramics, metals, and polymers. Therefore, the operational ranges of distillations systems using these materials can cover temperatures from about ⁇ 60° C. to 200° C., and pressures from a few psig to several hundred psig.
- any type of distillation process within these parameters may be performed with the present invention, to include separation of light hydrocarbons such as olefin and paraffin.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Separation Using Semi-Permeable Membranes (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is a continuation of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/266,123 filed Nov. 3, 2005, entitled “Porous Membrane Materials as Structured Packing for Distillation,” which claims the benefit of provisional application No. 60/664,800 filed on Mar. 23, 2005, titled “Porous Membrane Materials as Structured Packing for Distillation”, all hereby incorporated by reference.
- This invention was made with government support under Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.
- The present invention relates generally to enrichment of a light hydrocarbon mixture using a distillation column.
- The petroleum industry uses 6.9 quadrillion BTU's of energy per year, 40% of this energy is used for distillation nation wide. The energy consumption used in the distillation process is even larger worldwide. Ethylene and propylene (olefins) are two of the largest commodity chemicals in the U.S. and are major building blocks for the petrochemicals industry. These olefins are mostly separated by cryogenic distillation that demands extremely low temperatures and high pressures. Over 75 billion pounds of ethylene and propylene are distilled annually in the U.S. at an estimated energy requirement of 400 trillion BTU's.
- The largest potential area for energy reduction is in the cryogenic isolation of the product hydrocarbons from the reaction by-products, methane and hydrogen. This separation requires temperatures as low as −150° F. and pressures exceeding 450 psig.
- Light hydrocarbon olefin/paraffin separations are dominated by cryogenic distillation technology at an estimated 1.2×1014 BTU's expended annually. In addition, there is enormous capital and operating costs associated with distillation. This has motivated an appreciable amount of effort towards pursuing alternative olefin/paraffin separation technologies. In the past decade, reactive or selective membranes for the olefin and paraffin separation had been widely investigated. However, the difficulty of long term stability associated with these facilitated transport membranes is a major obstacle.
- Recently, the possibility of capillary condensation using a porous structure to separate light gases was explored, and the potential of using non-selective membrane for the olefin/paraffin separation was shown (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,039,792). In 2003, work was reported on using non-selective and non-porous membrane as structured packing to replace the distillation column for water-isopropanol separation and also suggested the possibility of using this technology for light hydrocarbon mixture separations (reference: Zhang, G. et al., “Hollow fibers as structured distillation packing,” Journal of Membrane Science 2003, 215, 185-193).
- Non-selective micro-porous membranes have been used as a barrier material in membrane contactors for vapor/liquid or liquid/liquid mass transfer, desalination, concentrating fruit juice and enriching the oxygen in blood during open-heart surgery (reference: “Hollow fiber membrane contactors”, Journal of Membrane Science, 159 (1999) 61-106).
- A unique feature of micro-porous membranes is a large surface area within a small volume, normally more than 3000 m2/m3, that provides an increased rate of mass transfer at least 10-20 times faster than the conventional tray and structured packing materials (creating an intimate contact between liquid and vapor phases). Although the high efficient Sulzer Chemtech® structured packing materials (AG Corporation), such as 250 Y/X, have conquered the chemical industry globally in the past twenty years, it has not been used in the C3 and C4 splitters since they require high liquid loads where structured packings typically deteriorate in performance. An advantage of using hollow fibers as structured packing is that the liquid and vapor velocity are not interrupted by the two-phase fluid mechanics. Therefore, the column packed with hollow fibers can operate above the normal flooding limits and below the normal loading limits.
- However, the general requirement for use of a porous membrane in membrane distillation is that the membrane should not be wetted by the process liquids, because it is believed that the membrane wall once filled with liquid will increase the mass transfer resistance between the liquid and vapor phase, as well as reduce the flux of process fluid passed through the membrane wall. Therefore, historically it has been a requirement that the membrane used in the membrane distillation exhibit non-wetting characteristics (reference: “Membrane distillation”, K. W. Lawson et al., Journal of Membrane Science, 124 (1997) 1-25; “Hollow fiber membrane contactors”, Journal of Membrane Science, 159 (1999) 61-106; and, “Designing hollow fiber contactors”, M. C. Yang et al., AlChE Journal, 32 (1986) 1910-1916).
- The present invention includes the uses of a non-selective mesoporous and/or microporous membrane to separate olefinic mixtures from light vapor byproducts at higher temperatures and lower pressures than are currently required.
- Various objectives, advantages and novel features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objectives and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
- In accordance with the purposes of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, the present invention includes an apparatus and method for use of distillation packing material made from a non-selective meso/microporous membrane that separates light hydrocarbon mixtures.
- The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, illustrate the embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
-
FIG. 1 is a pictorial illustration of a membrane contactor module. -
FIG. 2 pictorially shows the concentration profile change across a non-wetting membrane. -
FIG. 3 a pictorially illustrates the intimate contact between liquid and vapor within the wall of porous material used as structured packing. -
FIG. 3 b pictorially illustrates the concentration profile change across a wetting membrane. -
FIG. 4 pictorially illustrates parallel porous tubes within a distillation column. -
FIG. 5 a is a schematic of a partial reflux distillation setup. -
FIG. 5 b is a schematic of a total reflux distillation setup. -
FIG. 6 is a schematic detailing liquid and vapor flow paths within a total reflux embodiment of the membrane distillation setup. -
FIG. 7 is a schematic detailing the test setup of the present invention. -
FIG. 8 a shows a scanning electron microscope image detailing the morphology of the porous materials used in Module-2. -
FIG. 8 b shows a scanning electron microscope image detailing the morphology of the porous materials used in Module-4. -
FIG. 9 graphically shows the thermogravimetry analysis (TGA) results of several hollow fiber samples tested in LANL modules. -
FIG. 10 graphically shows the swellability test results of hollow fiber samples in hollow fiber modules. -
FIG. 11 graphically shows the effect of temperature on the length change of hollow fiber samples. -
FIG. 12 graphically shows flow parameter vs. flow capacity. -
FIG. 13 graphically shows the effect of temperature and fluid capacity on the separation efficiency of hollow fiber modules. -
FIG. 14 graphically shows the effect of operation temperature on the mass transfer time obtained from hollow fiber modules for the propylene/propane separation. -
FIG. 15 graphically shows the column separation efficiency forModules - The present invention includes the use of non-selective mesoporous and/or microporous fibers as structured packing for separation of light hydrocarbons like olefinic mixtures and olefin and paraffin mixtures. Microporous is defined as a material with pore size of less than 0.01 micrometer. Mesoporous is defined as a material with pore size in the micrometer range (a few hundred micrometers to 0.01 micrometer). Testing results prove that the hollow fiber made of non-selective mesoporous and/or microporous fibers can be used as structured packing, thus, allowing for an alternative technology for conventional distillation.
- Non-selective mesoporous and/or microporous materials that may be used in this application include, but are not limited to: plastics (e.g. polypropylene, polysulfone, polyethylene, polyvinylididene, mixed ester, and polyestersulfone), ceramics, and metals. Preferred embodiments of these materials exhibit pore sizes that range from about 0.02 to a few hundred micrometers for fiber wall thicknesses ranging from about 30 to 500 micrometers, and, more precisely, when the pore size is less than about 0.05 micrometers the corresponding wall thickness should be less than about 100 micrometers. When the pore size is larger than a few micrometers, the corresponding fiber wall thickness is preferably thicker than 100 micrometers.
- The use of hollow fiber material as structured packing overcomes flooding or loading concerns, and offers a wide range of operating conditions. Furthermore, the large mass transfer area provided by the hollow fibers increases separation efficiency and, therefore, reduces the operating and capital cost when compared to use of conventional distillation packing materials.
- Referring to
FIG. 1 , when a membrane contactor is used for liquid/vapor separation,fluid # 1 flows through the lumen side of the hollow fiber, andfluid # 2 flows on the shell side of the hollow fiber. The liquid phase does not penetrate the pores in the membrane. Referring now toFIG. 2 , where X, X* are the mole fraction of volatile compounds in liquid phase at operational and equilibrium conditions, and Y, Y* are the mole fraction of more volatile compounds in vapor phase at operational and equilibrium conditions, the transport subject to more volatile species occurs by evaporation from the liquid phase into the pores of membrane at the pore mouth of the liquid side, followed by vapor molecules' diffusion across membrane to the opposite side. In this scenario, the equilibrium between liquid and vapor phases occurs at the pore mouth, along the membrane surface of the liquid side. The contact area is limited to the open pores on the surface to where liquid contacts. Typically, the pore sizes used in this type of membrane contactor ranges from 100 Å to 0.5 μm. - Referring to
FIG. 3 a, in the present invention, unlike the method above, the micro-porous materials in tube shape, e.g. hollow fiber used in this work, can be wetted with the process liquid (pores can filled with liquid (seeFIG. 3 b)). By judiciously selecting the morphology of porous membrane and controlling the pressure difference across the membrane, the penetration rate of liquid can be controlled and thus allow the liquid phase to form an ultra-thin film uniformly coating the curvature of the large pores (pore size on the vapor side of the membrane can be larger than 50 μm). This surface feature exists within the wall of the fiber at the boundary contacting with the vapor phase (seeFIG. 3 a). - Therefore, it is preferred that the asymmetric structures with a denser structure (pore size <0.5 μm) contacts the liquid phase while the open cellular foam structured (pore size ranges from 0.5 to several hundred micrometers) contacts the vapor phase. The more volatile species evaporates into the vapor phase at the boundary at the vapor side while the condensed phase flows downward on the membrane surface and/or inside the wall of the membrane.
- Due to the wettibility of the porous materials, the liquid can penetrate through the entire membrane and thus ensures the full usage of the surface of the porous materials. Therefore, the mass transfer rate can be accelerated as the vapor flows through the curvature of the pores where the thin liquid film is covered to disturb the boundary layer of the vapor phase, thus reduce the resistance of mass transfer process.
- A system for separating olefin/paraffin mixtures includes a fluid tight column and a porous material that divides the column into a liquid and vapor chamber. Inside the housing, the vapor and liquid counter-currently flow through both sides of the boundary materials that can be wetted with the process liquid. The vapor and liquid phases interact with each other either at the membrane surface contacting with vapor phase and/or inside the wall of the porous materials where the high boiling point material, e.g. paraffin in the olefin/paraffin mixture is condensed into the liquid phase and purer low boiling point material, e.g. olefin is left in the vapor phase (see
FIG. 3 a). - Although a great effort has been devoted to improve the uniformity of liquid fed across the column, the thickness of the liquid layer on the surface of the packing materials is difficult to control. The appreciable amount of channeling and maldistribution of liquid is always a limiting mass transfer process and thus reduces the separation efficiency of the packing materials. Also, there is not a clear boundary between the liquid and vapor phases; for example, even the widely used Sulzer Chemtech® structure packing material 250 Y that provides high separation efficiency, has not been commercially utilized for propane and propylene mixture separation due to the difficulty of disengagement of the vapor from the liquid phase.
- However, referring now to
FIG. 4 , by usingporous tubes 1 orientated in parallelinside column 5, liquid flows withinporous tubes 1 while vapor flows counter currently withinchannels 2 that are defined byoutside wall 3 ofporous tubes 1 andcolumn 5inner wall 4. The liquid phase is evenly distributed and driven by the gravity flow downward inside the porous tube, the wettability of the porous materials allows the liquid to drain freely across the membrane while a thin film can be uniformly formed on the other side of the tube along the entire tube (where the liquid and vapor phases are contacting). - Experimental results show that the largest mass transfer coefficients (>0.01 cm/sec) are obtained with fibers containing large pores (<1 μm-30 μm) and exhibiting a thicker wall (up to 450 μm), which is consistent with the preceding discussion. The height equivalent to theoretical plate (HETP) using these fibers has been reduced to <20 cm when the liquid flux is up to 200 m3/m3-hr compared to values of >30 cm at the liquid flux less than 100 m3/m3-hr of Sulzer Chemtech® packing materials. In this work, the mass transfer surface area is about 500-2300 m2/m3. If the mass transfer area is larger than 3000 m2/m3, HETP's less than a few centimeters can obtain.
- Since a large specific mass transfer area (a (m2/m3)>1000) is the inherent advantage of hollow fiber configuration, together with the enhanced mass transfer coefficient (KG), the mass transfer time (1/KG·a)—reciprocal of the product of mass transfer coefficient and the specific area can largely be reduced from >50 sec (for conventional packing materials) to <1 sec for the current design.
- Distillation is the process of heating a liquid solution to drive off a vapor and then collecting and condensing the vapor. The separation mechanism is based on the difference in volatility of components in the mixture. Referring now to
FIG. 5 a, which showstypical distillation column 5, in a typical distillation process, feedsolution 10 is fed intomiddle section 20 ofcolumn 5; high boiling point component 11 is concentrated and removed fromreboiler 25 while lowboiling point component 12 is collected aftercondenser 30. In order to increase the separation efficiency, partial amount 13 of lowboiling point component 12 is returned back tocolumn 5 with remaining distillate (final product) 14 routed to post-processing (not shown). - In evaluating a distillation process, it is convenient to assume a condition of total reflux (all the condensed liquid is returned to the column) as illustrated in
FIG. 5 b because this simplifies the operation on a pilot plant (or on a laboratory scale) by limiting continuous feed and withdrawl of distillate from the system, thereby reducing the difficulty of determining the height of a transfer unit (HTU) or HEPT for the packing materials used in the distillation process. - Referring now to
FIG. 6 , within hollowfiber distillation column 40,vapor 45 flows up the outside ofhollow fiber 41 while liquid 47 flows down the inside ofhollow fiber 41. The analysis of differential distillation is simplified when analyzing total reflux conditions. The overall mass balance between the vapor and liquid condensate at any point is simply: -
G=L, (1) - where G and L are the molar vapor and liquid flowrate in
column 40. In a steady-state flow condition, Ö, G and L are constant. For thetotal reflux 50, Ö called the operation line on a MaCable-Thiele Diagram is simply: -
x=y, (2) - where x and y are the mole fraction of the more volatile species in the vapor and the liquid phase, respectively. For the mass balance on either vapor or liquid phase alone a column, the following equations apply:
-
- where Ky is the overall vapor phase and liquid phase mass transfer coefficients, respectively, a is the mass transfer area (cm2/cm3), z is the distance measured from the bottom of the column, y is the mole fraction of the most volatile species in the vapor, and y* is the mole fraction in equilibrium with the liquid. Thus, the rate equations derived from the integrated form of
Equation 3 is Equation 4: -
- Equations (4) may be written as:
-
l=HTU·NTU (5) - where HTU is a height of a transfer unit defined as:
-
- and NTU is the number of transfer unit given by:
-
- In the petroleum industry, the height equivalent to a theoretical plate (HETP) is commonly used to replace HTU to express mass transfer capability for the structured packing materials in the distillation tower. The HEPT is related to the HTU through a linearization of operating and equilibrium curves expression as follows:
-
- where m is the slope of equilibrium curve. Since mG/L will change considerably throughout a distillation, the HETP will change as the composition changes, even the HTU may not. Therefore, HEPT, combining more factors than HTU, is widely accepted by the fractionation researchers.
- Referring to
FIG. 7 , there were three major components for thedistillation system 100 in which the experiments were carried out: reboiler 110,condenser 120, andmembrane module 130. Vapor supply system 140 was used to initially charge reboiler 110 with starting materials. Fivesampling stations system 100 during operation. Heater/chiller system 112 was used to precisely control operating temperature during operation. Thus, by controlling the temperature difference between the heater and chiller, the liquid flow rate was controlled. Drain 135 was used to prevent liquid buildup on the vapor side.Bypass 115 was used to add liquid toreservoir 125 in preparation for initial startup. - View port 170, mounted between
condenser 120 and the top ofmembrane module 130 was used to ensure thathollow fibers 40 were filled with liquid during the experiment. A rheonik coriolis meter 200 (Liquid controls, LLC), withRHM 03 sensor and RHE08-transmitter, was used to measure the liquid flow. As the system was working in a total reflux condition, the vapor flow rate was back calculated from the liquid flow based on the mass balance between the vapor and liquid flow. - During the experimental run, the vapor and liquid samples (˜10 ml and 40 Psig) were collected into a sample bottle at the five sample stations. HP M series micro gas chromatograph (GC) (Model number G2762A) was used to characterize the vapor compositions. Two columns were dedicated to different gases: column A, MS-5A 10m, was used for compressed gases such as He, H2 and light vapor molecules and column B was used for compressed gases, such as CO2, N2 and light hydrocarbons.
- The hollow fiber modules were fabricated by potting the fibers inside polycarbonate tubes with an active length of 36.8 cm. The inner diameters of the tubes were about 0.5 inch (1.27 cm). The detailed fiber and module parameters are summarized in Table 1. Five types of fibers with the pore size ranging from 0.04 to 30 μm, and the wall thickness from 30 to 440 μm were selected for the evaluation tests. Module fibers used in this experiment were procured from Setec, Inc. (Module-2), Pall company (Module-3), Spectrumlab (Module-4 and Module-9), and Celgard® fiber company (Module-6).
- The mass transfer area per unit volume ranged from 1094 to 1473 m2/m3, which was calculated based on the outside surface area of hollow fibers. Comparing to
Sulzer Chemtech® - Five trials, and, thus, five differing hollow fiber modules were tested under total reflux conditions, were conducted using the setup in
FIG. 7 . An olefinic/paraffinic mixture of ˜30% propane and 70% propylene mole percent was used as the starting material. During the experiments, the concentration of propane and propylene changes within 10%, thus the slope of their equilibrium line is almost constant. Therefore, the NTU was determined from the measured propylene compositions at the top and the bottom of the column. -
TABLE 1 A summary of module hollow fiber parameters Module - 2 Module - 3 Module - 4 Module - 6 Module - 9 Fiber Polypropylene Polyvinylididene Polysulfone Polypropylene Mixed Ester material Fluoride Pore size 0.1-30 <0.02 0.05-0.5 0.04 0.1-1.0 (μm) Fiber ID 1.74 0.626 0.480 0.240 0.680 (mm) Fiber OD 2.62 1.20 0.630 0.300 0.850 (mm) Thickness 440 288 75 30 85 (μm) Number of 19 20 70 198 47 fibers Packing 45 17 17 11 22 density (%) Packing 2287 327.7 587 637 873 factor (ft−1) Ag/AL 0.55 17.1 8.28 12.56 5.64 a 12.35 5.95 10.94 14.73 13.39 (cm2/cm3) -
FIGS. 8 a and 8 b show the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the polypropylene fiber used in Module-2 module and polysulfone fiber used in Module-4 module, respectively. - A thermogravimetry analysis (TGA) was used to test the stability of the hollow fiber samples in all the modules. The TGA results for these aged fiber samples are shown in
FIG. 9 . The TGA results show that the weight percent (W %) change over time is almost identical for each fiber sample, concluding that all of these fibers samples are stable after they were soaked in pentane at room temperature for one year. Several hollow fiber samples were tested in olefin and paraffin mixture for several months with the corresponding TGA results essentially the same as the results obtained from samples soaked in pentane, indicating that pentane can be used as surrogate solvent to test the hollow fibers. - The material characteristic of minimum swellability is preferred in fiber material in order to minimize geometry change during operation. Thus, the swellability of the fiber modules has been tested in several organic solvents as well. The tested results, shown in
FIG. 10 , indicate the swellability of these fibers was less than 10% in all tested solvents. Based on observation of liquid flow down the fibers while using pentane as the solvent, it is apparent that all of the fibers are easily wetted with light hydrocarbon materials. - Referring to
FIG. 11 , once the hollow fibers were soaked in pentane, the temperature effect on the change in length of the hollow fibers, and, therefore on separation performance was negligible. All of these results prove that the thermal stability of these hollow fibers is suitable to the distillation application for organic solvents. -
FIG. 12 is a plot of flow parameter vs flow capacity for the tested modules shown in Table 1. The plot demonstrates that a column (or module) including porous tubes in hollow fiber form can handle a wide range of flow conditions. These flow conditions are at least 100 times larger than the flooding limit of conventional packing materials. Further, the tested modules operated below the loading line of conventional packing materials. This proves that the tube-shell configuration of porous materials in a distillation column can provide separate channels for vapor and liquid to prevent flooding and loading problems, and at the same time provide a preferred large contact area between the vapor and liquid. - The separation performance of these modules is summarized in Table 2. The HETP value determined from the Module-2 module was 3.0 inch (7.6 cm), indicating a mass transfer time as low as ˜0.40 sec, which was the best mass transfer rate of all the modules tested. Thus, these results prove that hollow fiber materials can be used as structured packing materials in olefin/paraffin distillation separation. It is worthy to note that among these modules, Module-3 has the worst performance (meaning larger mass transfer time). This poor performance is due to the fibers packed in Module-3 having much smaller pore sizes (0.02 μm) and a large wall thickness (˜288 μm).
- The dense morphology creates a greater resistance layer between liquid and vapor, thereby reducing both the heat and mass transfer rate between the two phases. This observation again proves that the large and/or open porous structure inside the membrane wall is critical to allow the process liquid to easily flow across the membrane under a small driving force (<0.5 psi) and to interact with the vapor phase promoting heat and mass transfer.
- Note that the comparatively poor separation performance of Module-3 still provided a mass transfer time of less than 40 seconds. Whereas, for the Sulzer Chemtech® series packing materials, the mass transfer time is greater than 40 seconds (reference: “Non-selective membrane for separations”, E. L. Cussler, Journal of Chem. Tech. and Biotech, 78, 98-102).
-
TABLE 2 Summary of separation performance of tested modules Module-2 Module-3 Module-4 Module-6 Module-9 Module 24.3 21.1 17.6 19.7 17.5 temp (° C.) System 151.3 140.4 124.9 131.7 124.0 pressure (Psig) Liquid 8.0 4.67 4.12 11.2 11.2 flowrate (g/min) Vapor 22.26 3.36 3.36 8.02 9.87 velocity Vg (cm/sec) C3 = (Top 86.0 72.6 75.1 76.9 75.0 of module) C3 = (Bottom 79.0 71.3 71.7 70.4 70.0 of module) NTU 4.5 0.65 1.53 2.63 2.00 HTU (cm) 8.2 56.6 24.2 13.9 18.4 HEPT (cm) 10.5 68.8 29.4 16.9 22.4 Mass 0.224 0.010 0.013 0.041 0.040 transfer coeff - KG (cm/sec) Mass 12.35 5.95 10.94 14.73 13.39 transfer area (a) (cm2/cm3) Mass 0.37 16.8 7.18 1.73 1.86 transfer time 1/(KG·a) (sec) - In distillation processes, as the temperature increases, the relative volatility increases favoring separation. However, the density ratio between the liquid and vapor for propane and propylene increase from 22 to 46 as the temperature decreases from 25 to 0° C., and so disengagement of liquid and vapor becomes easier in the lower temperature range.
- In order to explore the effect of temperature on the separation performance, a series of experiments was conducted over a temperature range from 0 to 25° C. for the previously mentioned modules. Referring to
FIG. 13 , the experimental results proved that higher separation efficiency was achieved at lower temperatures. The HETP remains low (<40 cm) for a large liquid flux range (>200 cm3/cm3-sec) for both Module-4 and Module-6. Note that when the operation temperature was less than 6° C., the mass transfer time (1/KG·a) was typically less than 10 seconds, which is at least 5 times better than the conventional packing materials (seeFIG. 14 ). - Historically, the separation of propylene and propane has been a difficult separation for the petrochemical industry. This is due in part to the narrow boiling point difference between propylene and propane at ambient conditions, which is only 7.5° C. The relative volatility is less than 1.2 when the temperature is close to 0° C. A 1° C. temperature difference along the column for a propylene/propane (70/30) mixture can result in ˜15% propylene concentration difference. However, due to the largely open structure in the conventional packing materials, convective heat transfer between liquid and vapor is large, making it difficult to maintain a couple of degrees temperature gradient within a short distance (<50 cm).
- On the contrary, due to the confined diameter of the hollow fibers inside dimension and meso/microporous structure on the wall, the liquid flow is typically in the laminar flow region. Thus, the convection among the fluids is largely decreased making larger temperature gradients within short distances possible. Thus, a small HETP (or HTU) is expected. The thermodynamic efficiency is typically larger than 85% when the modules are operated at their optimized operation zone (see
FIG. 15 ). - Theoretically, when the liquid flow slows down, convection between the two phases is reduced and high separation efficiency is expected. However, at very low flows, an uneven liquid film on the surface of the packing materials can occur. This can be the result of insufficient liquid to cover the surface area of the packing material or channeling of liquid flow. Thus, the reduced liquid surface area results in less efficient mass transfer.
- However, with the present invention, utilization of porous tube materials, such as mesoporous and microporous hollow fibers, provides a pore size on the liquid side of wall that is less than a few micrometers, but includes a wall thickness with the same order of magnitude as the tubes inside diameter (from about ten micrometers to a few hundred micrometers) (see
FIG. 8 a). Thus, the liquid in the liquid phase is uniformly distributed into the tube while the liquid thin film forms on the wall of the pores and/or the outer surface. - Due to a much thinner and uniform film formed on the surface of the porous materials, the total amount of liquid required to cover the surface of porous materials is much less than that required to cover the surface of conventional packing materials. Therefore, when the liquid loading drops below the loading line (dashed line) in
FIG. 12 , the modules were able to maintain their separation efficiency. - The present invention provides more surface area and a more uniform distribution of liquid per unit volume of material than conventional materials, and, thus, correspondingly yields enhanced mass transfer per unit of volume. For example, referring to
FIG. 13 for Module-2, when the liquid flow is below 2.5 g/min (<0.1 cm3/cm2·sec), the HETP is still below 15 cm (<6 inch). These results cannot be achieved through the use of conventional packing materials. - In summary, the present invention is a porous tube material that may be used as structured packing in a distillation process that provides a larger process flow rate operating range than current conventional packing materials. The present invention provides for an HETP of less than 10 cm and mass transfer time less than 1 second. A wide range of materials may be used as the porous tube material, to include ceramics, metals, and polymers. Therefore, the operational ranges of distillations systems using these materials can cover temperatures from about −60° C. to 200° C., and pressures from a few psig to several hundred psig. Thus, any type of distillation process within these parameters may be performed with the present invention, to include separation of light hydrocarbons such as olefin and paraffin.
- The foregoing description of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching.
- The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto.
Claims (17)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/469,552 US7771569B2 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2009-05-20 | Enrichment of light hydrocarbon mixture |
US12/827,981 US8066852B2 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2010-06-30 | Enrichment of light hydrocarbon mixture |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US66480005P | 2005-03-23 | 2005-03-23 | |
US11/266,123 US20060213757A1 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2005-11-03 | Porous membrane materials as structured packing for distillation |
US12/469,552 US7771569B2 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2009-05-20 | Enrichment of light hydrocarbon mixture |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/266,123 Continuation US20060213757A1 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2005-11-03 | Porous membrane materials as structured packing for distillation |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/827,981 Continuation US8066852B2 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2010-06-30 | Enrichment of light hydrocarbon mixture |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090236213A1 true US20090236213A1 (en) | 2009-09-24 |
US7771569B2 US7771569B2 (en) | 2010-08-10 |
Family
ID=37034087
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/266,123 Abandoned US20060213757A1 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2005-11-03 | Porous membrane materials as structured packing for distillation |
US12/469,552 Expired - Fee Related US7771569B2 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2009-05-20 | Enrichment of light hydrocarbon mixture |
US12/827,981 Expired - Fee Related US8066852B2 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2010-06-30 | Enrichment of light hydrocarbon mixture |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/266,123 Abandoned US20060213757A1 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2005-11-03 | Porous membrane materials as structured packing for distillation |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/827,981 Expired - Fee Related US8066852B2 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2010-06-30 | Enrichment of light hydrocarbon mixture |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US20060213757A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7771569B2 (en) * | 2005-03-23 | 2010-08-10 | Los Alamos National Security, Llc | Enrichment of light hydrocarbon mixture |
WO2011149883A1 (en) * | 2010-05-25 | 2011-12-01 | Hpd, Llc | Gasification process |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8500862B2 (en) * | 2006-12-22 | 2013-08-06 | Nanovapor Fuels Group, Inc. | System and method for removing volatile vapors from containers |
US8465791B2 (en) * | 2009-10-16 | 2013-06-18 | Msp Corporation | Method for counting particles in a gas |
US9248405B2 (en) | 2009-10-28 | 2016-02-02 | Oasys Water, Inc. | Forward osmosis separation processes |
US9044711B2 (en) | 2009-10-28 | 2015-06-02 | Oasys Water, Inc. | Osmotically driven membrane processes and systems and methods for draw solute recovery |
DE102011113314A1 (en) * | 2011-09-14 | 2013-03-14 | Aaa Water Technologies Ag | rectification |
US8603300B2 (en) * | 2011-09-15 | 2013-12-10 | United Technologies Corporation | Fuel fractionation using membrane distillation |
WO2013037088A1 (en) * | 2011-09-16 | 2013-03-21 | General Electric Company | A method for improving performance of a membrane used in membrane distillation |
US9440216B2 (en) * | 2012-03-15 | 2016-09-13 | Geosepaa Llc | Minimal surface area mass and heat transfer packing |
WO2015134731A1 (en) * | 2014-03-07 | 2015-09-11 | Watt Fuel Cell Corp. | Active filtration systems for hydrocarbon fuels, methods, and filter elements |
WO2016168644A1 (en) * | 2015-04-17 | 2016-10-20 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Hollow fiber membranes for solubilizing a gas into a liquid, devices for same, and processes of same |
EP3603777A4 (en) * | 2017-03-24 | 2021-05-05 | Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha | Porous membrane for membrane distillation, and method for operating membrane distillation module |
AU2018355018B2 (en) * | 2017-10-25 | 2024-02-08 | Memsift Innovations Pte. Ltd. | Membrane water treatment system and method thereof |
Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3758605A (en) * | 1972-09-13 | 1973-09-11 | Standard Oil Co | Process |
US4614524A (en) * | 1984-12-31 | 1986-09-30 | Monsanto Company | Water-free hydrocarbon separation membrane and process |
US5062866A (en) * | 1988-10-13 | 1991-11-05 | Exxon Research And Engineering Co. | Polymeric membrane and process for separation of aliphatically unsaturated hydrocarbons |
US5107059A (en) * | 1990-12-05 | 1992-04-21 | Exxon Research & Engineering Company | Iso/normal paraffin separation by membrane extraction |
US5332424A (en) * | 1993-07-28 | 1994-07-26 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Hydrocarbon fractionation by adsorbent membranes |
US5472607A (en) * | 1993-12-20 | 1995-12-05 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Hollow fiber semipermeable membrane of tubular braid |
US5670051A (en) * | 1996-05-23 | 1997-09-23 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Olefin separation membrane and process |
US5773844A (en) * | 1995-09-25 | 1998-06-30 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Method of forming a polycrystalline silicon layer, a thin film transistor having the polycrystalline silicon layer, method of manufacturing the same, and a liquid crystal display device having the thin film transistor |
US5954858A (en) * | 1995-11-22 | 1999-09-21 | North Carolina State University | Bioreactor process for the continuous removal of organic compounds from a vapor phase process stream |
US6039792A (en) * | 1997-06-24 | 2000-03-21 | Regents Of The University Of California And Bp Amoco Corporation | Methods of forming and using porous structures for energy efficient separation of light gases by capillary condensation |
US6271319B1 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2001-08-07 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Membrane-augmented polypropylene manufacturing |
US6309550B1 (en) * | 1994-06-22 | 2001-10-30 | Fls Miljo A/S | Mass transfer method and apparatus |
US6316684B1 (en) * | 1999-09-01 | 2001-11-13 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Filled superglassy membrane |
US6361582B1 (en) * | 2000-05-19 | 2002-03-26 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Gas separation using C3+ hydrocarbon-resistant membranes |
US7067597B2 (en) * | 2004-02-25 | 2006-06-27 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Process of making polypropylene from intermediate grade propylene |
US7250545B2 (en) * | 2003-01-27 | 2007-07-31 | L'air Societe Anonyme A Directoire Et Conseil De Surveillance Pour L'etude At L'exploration Des Procedes Georges Claude | Method of separating olefins from mixtures with paraffins |
US7479227B2 (en) * | 2003-03-07 | 2009-01-20 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Liquid-phase separation of low molecular weight organic compounds |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5984858A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1999-11-16 | Crosscart, Inc. | Meniscal xenografts |
US5863420A (en) * | 1996-10-15 | 1999-01-26 | Kwasniewski; Vincent J. | Unsaturated hydrocarbon separation and recovery process |
US6802972B1 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2004-10-12 | Mykrolis Corporation | Microporous hollow fiber membranes from perfluorinated thermoplastic polymers |
US6899743B2 (en) * | 2002-06-12 | 2005-05-31 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Separation of organic mixtures using gas separation or pervaporation and dephlegmation |
US7070694B2 (en) * | 2003-03-20 | 2006-07-04 | Bp Corporation North America Inc. | Purification of fluid compounds utilizing a distillation - membrane separation process |
US7771562B2 (en) * | 2003-11-19 | 2010-08-10 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Etch system with integrated inductive coupling |
US7318854B2 (en) * | 2004-10-29 | 2008-01-15 | New Jersey Institute Of Technology | System and method for selective separation of gaseous mixtures using hollow fibers |
US20060213757A1 (en) * | 2005-03-23 | 2006-09-28 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Porous membrane materials as structured packing for distillation |
-
2005
- 2005-11-03 US US11/266,123 patent/US20060213757A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2009
- 2009-05-20 US US12/469,552 patent/US7771569B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-06-30 US US12/827,981 patent/US8066852B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3758605A (en) * | 1972-09-13 | 1973-09-11 | Standard Oil Co | Process |
US4614524A (en) * | 1984-12-31 | 1986-09-30 | Monsanto Company | Water-free hydrocarbon separation membrane and process |
US5062866A (en) * | 1988-10-13 | 1991-11-05 | Exxon Research And Engineering Co. | Polymeric membrane and process for separation of aliphatically unsaturated hydrocarbons |
US5107059A (en) * | 1990-12-05 | 1992-04-21 | Exxon Research & Engineering Company | Iso/normal paraffin separation by membrane extraction |
US5332424A (en) * | 1993-07-28 | 1994-07-26 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Hydrocarbon fractionation by adsorbent membranes |
US5472607A (en) * | 1993-12-20 | 1995-12-05 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Hollow fiber semipermeable membrane of tubular braid |
US6309550B1 (en) * | 1994-06-22 | 2001-10-30 | Fls Miljo A/S | Mass transfer method and apparatus |
US5773844A (en) * | 1995-09-25 | 1998-06-30 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Method of forming a polycrystalline silicon layer, a thin film transistor having the polycrystalline silicon layer, method of manufacturing the same, and a liquid crystal display device having the thin film transistor |
US5954858A (en) * | 1995-11-22 | 1999-09-21 | North Carolina State University | Bioreactor process for the continuous removal of organic compounds from a vapor phase process stream |
US5670051A (en) * | 1996-05-23 | 1997-09-23 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Olefin separation membrane and process |
US6039792A (en) * | 1997-06-24 | 2000-03-21 | Regents Of The University Of California And Bp Amoco Corporation | Methods of forming and using porous structures for energy efficient separation of light gases by capillary condensation |
US6316684B1 (en) * | 1999-09-01 | 2001-11-13 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Filled superglassy membrane |
US6361582B1 (en) * | 2000-05-19 | 2002-03-26 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Gas separation using C3+ hydrocarbon-resistant membranes |
US6271319B1 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2001-08-07 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Membrane-augmented polypropylene manufacturing |
US7399897B2 (en) * | 2002-12-02 | 2008-07-15 | L'Air Liquide Societe Anonyme A Directoire et Conseil de Surveillance pour l'Etude et l'Exploration des Procedes George Claude | Method of separating olefins from mixtures with paraffins |
US7250545B2 (en) * | 2003-01-27 | 2007-07-31 | L'air Societe Anonyme A Directoire Et Conseil De Surveillance Pour L'etude At L'exploration Des Procedes Georges Claude | Method of separating olefins from mixtures with paraffins |
US7479227B2 (en) * | 2003-03-07 | 2009-01-20 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Liquid-phase separation of low molecular weight organic compounds |
US7067597B2 (en) * | 2004-02-25 | 2006-06-27 | Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Process of making polypropylene from intermediate grade propylene |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7771569B2 (en) * | 2005-03-23 | 2010-08-10 | Los Alamos National Security, Llc | Enrichment of light hydrocarbon mixture |
WO2011149883A1 (en) * | 2010-05-25 | 2011-12-01 | Hpd, Llc | Gasification process |
AU2011258487A1 (en) * | 2010-05-25 | 2012-12-13 | Veolia Water Technologies, Inc. | Gasification process |
US8491680B2 (en) | 2010-05-25 | 2013-07-23 | Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies North America, Inc. | Gasification process |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7771569B2 (en) | 2010-08-10 |
US8066852B2 (en) | 2011-11-29 |
US20100264012A1 (en) | 2010-10-21 |
US20060213757A1 (en) | 2006-09-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8066852B2 (en) | Enrichment of light hydrocarbon mixture | |
US7610775B2 (en) | Distillation process using microchannel technology | |
US7305850B2 (en) | Distillation process using microchannel technology | |
US6899743B2 (en) | Separation of organic mixtures using gas separation or pervaporation and dephlegmation | |
Dindore et al. | Membrane–solvent selection for CO2 removal using membrane gas–liquid contactors | |
Guo et al. | Pervaporation study on the dehydration of aqueous butanol solutions: a comparison of flux vs. permeance, separation factor vs. selectivity | |
Yang et al. | Hollow fibers as structured packing for olefin/paraffin separations | |
Neel et al. | Basic aspects of pervaporation | |
AU2004224457B2 (en) | Purification of fluid compounds utilizing a distillation-membrane separation process | |
Bernal et al. | Characterization of zeolite membranes by temperature programmed permeation and step desorption | |
KR20140079367A (en) | Process and apparatus for the separation of the components of a liquid mixture | |
US20100213125A1 (en) | Pervaporation process and apparatus for carrying out same | |
Luis | Membrane contactors | |
Yang et al. | Light hydrocarbon distillation using hollow fibers as structured packings | |
Arregoitia-Sarabia et al. | Polyether-block-amide thin-film composite hollow fiber membranes for the recovery of butanol from ABE process by pervaporation | |
Rajabzadeh et al. | Experimental and theoretical study on propylene absorption by using PVDF hollow fiber membrane contactors with various membrane structures | |
EP1370346B1 (en) | Fractionation of liquid mixtures using membrane contactors | |
Uchytil et al. | Influence of capillary condensation effects on mass transport through porous membranes | |
US10047306B2 (en) | Method of fractionating mixtures of low molecular weight hydrocarbons | |
Marx et al. | Pervaporation separation of methanol from methanol/tert-amyl methyl ether mixtures with a commercial membrane | |
Bottenus et al. | Process intensification of distillation using a microwick technology to demonstrate separation of propane and propylene | |
Yang et al. | Enrichment of light hydrocarbon mixture | |
Scholes et al. | Mass transfer correlations for membrane gas-solvent contactors undergoing carbon dioxide desorption | |
Yang et al. | Effect of hollow fiber morphology and compatibility on propane/propylene separation | |
Norkobilov | Design of hybrid separation processes incorporating membrane technologies |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, CALIF Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:YANG, DALI;DEVLIN, DAVID;BARBERO, ROBERT S.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:022715/0158;SIGNING DATES FROM 20051006 TO 20060105 Owner name: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, CALIF Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:YANG, DALI;DEVLIN, DAVID;BARBERO, ROBERT S.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20051006 TO 20060105;REEL/FRAME:022715/0158 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ENERGY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY;REEL/FRAME:023258/0379 Effective date: 20090708 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC, NEW MEXICO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERISITY OF CALIFORNIA;REEL/FRAME:023300/0575 Effective date: 20090929 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20140810 |