US20090159503A1 - Electrochemical treatment of heavy oil streams followed by caustic extraction or thermal treatment - Google Patents

Electrochemical treatment of heavy oil streams followed by caustic extraction or thermal treatment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090159503A1
US20090159503A1 US12/288,565 US28856508A US2009159503A1 US 20090159503 A1 US20090159503 A1 US 20090159503A1 US 28856508 A US28856508 A US 28856508A US 2009159503 A1 US2009159503 A1 US 2009159503A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
sulfur
electrolyte
feedstream
compounds
volts
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/288,565
Inventor
Mark A. Greaney
Kun Wang
Frank C. Wang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US12/288,565 priority Critical patent/US20090159503A1/en
Priority to PCT/US2008/013108 priority patent/WO2009082425A1/en
Priority to CA2708395A priority patent/CA2708395C/en
Publication of US20090159503A1 publication Critical patent/US20090159503A1/en
Priority to US13/232,500 priority patent/US8557101B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G32/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils by electric or magnetic means, by irradiation, or by using microorganisms
    • C10G32/02Refining of hydrocarbon oils by electric or magnetic means, by irradiation, or by using microorganisms by electric or magnetic means
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G53/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes
    • C10G53/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes plural serial stages only
    • C10G53/12Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes plural serial stages only including at least one alkaline treatment step

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the electrochemical conversion of dibenzothiophene type molecules of petroleum feedstreams to mercaptans that can then be removed, in one embodiment, by caustic extraction.
  • the mercaptans can be thermally decomposed, removing sulfur as hydrogen sulfide.
  • the conversion of dibenzothiophenes to mercaptans is performed by electrochemical means without the required addition of hydrogen and in the substantial absence of water.
  • Sulfur is currently removed from petroleum feedstreams by various processes depending on the nature of the feedstream. Processes such as coking, distillation, and alkali metal dispersions are primarily used to remove sulfur from heavy feedstreams, such as bitumens which are complex mixtures and typically contain hydrocarbons, heteroatoms, and metals, with carbon chains in excess of about 2,000 carbon atoms. For lighter petroleum feedstreams, such as distillates, catalytic hydrodesulfurization is typically used.
  • the sulfur species in such feedstreams span a range of molecular types including sulfides, thiols, thiophenes, benzothiophenes to dibenzothiophenes in order of decreasing hydrodesulfurization (HDS) reactivity.
  • the most difficult to remove sulfur is found in sterically hindered dibenzothiophene molecules such as diethyl dibenzothiophene.
  • the space velocity, temperature and hydrogen pressures of catalytic HDS units are determined primarily by the slow reaction kinetics of these relatively minor components of the feed. These are the molecules that are typically left in the product after conventional low-pressure hydrotreating.
  • a process for removing sulfur from petroleum feedstreams containing sulfur in the form of hindered dibenzothiophene compounds comprising:
  • the reduced-sulfur petroleum product stream has a lower sulfur content by wt % than the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream.
  • the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream is comprised of a bitumen.
  • the feedstream is a distillate boiling range hydrocarbon stream and an effective amount of an electrolyte is mixed with the distillate boiling range stream to be treated.
  • Also in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention is a process for removing sulfur from petroleum feedstreams containing sulfur in the form of hindered dibenzothiophene compounds, comprising:
  • the reduced-sulfur petroleum product stream has a lower sulfur content by wt % than the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream.
  • the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream is comprised of a bitumen.
  • the feedstream is a distillate boiling range stream and an effective amount of an electrolyte is mixed with the distillate boiling range stream to be treated.
  • FIG. 1 hereof is a plot of conductivity versus temperature for various petroleum residues and crudes.
  • Feedstreams suitable for use in the present invention range from heavy oil feedstreams, such as bitumens to those boiling in the distillate range.
  • the heavy oil feedstream contains at least about 10 wt. %, preferably at least about 25 wt. % of material boiling above about 1050° F. (565° C.), both at atmospheric pressure (0 psig).
  • Such streams include bitumens, heavy oils, whole or topped crude oils and residua.
  • the bitumen can be whole, topped or froth-treated bitumen.
  • Non-limiting examples of distillate boiling range streams that are suitable for use herein include diesel fuels, jet fuels, heating oils, kerosenes, and lubes.
  • Such streams typically have a boiling range from about 302° F. (150° C.) to about 1112° F. (600° C.), preferably from about 662° F. (350° C.) to about 1022° F. (550° C.).
  • Other preferred streams are those typically known as Low Sulfur Automotive Diesel Oil (“LSADO”).
  • LSADO will typically have a boiling range of about 350° F. (176° C.) to about 550° F. (287° C.) and contain from about 200 wppm sulfur to about 2 wppm sulfur, preferably from about 100 wppm sulfur to about 10 wppm sulfur.
  • the process embodiments of the present invention electrochemically treat a sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream resulting in a reduced-sulfur petroleum product stream which has a lower sulfur concentration by wt % than the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream.
  • a major of the sulfur contained in heavy oils and distillates are in the form of hindered dibenzothiophene molecules. Although such molecules are difficult to remove by conventional hydrodesulfurization processes without using severe conditions, such as high temperatures and pressures, such molecules are converted by the practice of the present invention to sulfur species that are more easily removed by conventional non-catalytic processes.
  • the electrochemical step of the present invention converts the hindered dibenzothiophene (“DBT”) molecules, which are substantially refractory to conventional hydrodesulfurization, to hydrogenated naphthenobenzothiophene mercaptan molecules that are more readily extracted with use of caustic solution or by thermal decomposition.
  • DBT hindered dibenzothiophene
  • This capability can significantly debottleneck existing distillate hydrotreating process units by converting the slowest to convert molecules (hindered dibenzothiophenes) into much more readily extractable mercaptan species, preferably alkylated biphenyl mercaptan species.
  • the process of the present invention does not require the addition of an electrolyte when heavy oil is the feedstream, but rather, relies on the intrinsic conductivity of the heavy oil at elevated temperatures.
  • the term “heavy oil” and “heavy oil feedstream” as used herein includes both bitumen and other heavy oil feedstreams, such as crude oils, atmospheric resids, and vacuum resids.
  • This process is preferably utilized to upgrade bitumens and/or crude oils that have an API gravity of less than about 15.
  • the inventors hereof have undertaken studies to determine the electrochemical conductivity of crudes and residues at temperatures up to about 572° F. (300° C.) and have demonstrated an exponential increase in electrical conductivity with temperature as illustrated in FIG. 1 hereof.
  • a 4 mA/cm 2 electrical current density at 662° F. (350° C.) with an applied voltage of 150 volts and a cathode-to-anode gap of 1 mm was measured for an American crude oil. Though this is lower than would be utilized in preferred commercial embodiments of the present invention, the linear velocity for this measurement was lower than the preferred velocity ranges by about three orders of magnitude: 0.1 cm/s vs. 100 cm/s. Using a 0.8 exponent for the impact of increased flow velocity on current density at an electrode, it is estimated that the current density would increase to about 159 mA/cm 2 at a linear velocity of about 100 cm/s. This suggests that more commercially attractive current densities achieved at higher applied voltages. Narrower gap electrode designs or fluidized bed electrode systems could also be used to lower the required applied voltage.
  • an electrolyte such as a conductive salt.
  • an electrolyte such as a conductive salt.
  • the direct addition of a conductive salt to the distillate feedstream can be difficult for several reasons.
  • the term “effective amount of electrolyte” as used herein means at least than amount needed to produce conductivity between the anode and the cathode of the electrochemical cell. Typically this amount will be from about 0.5 wt. % to about 50 wt.
  • Non-limiting examples of such salts include: 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluoro phosphate, 1-butyl-1-methyl pyrrolidinium trifluoro-methyl sulfonated, trihexyltetradecylphosphonium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate and ethyl-dimethylpropyl-ammonium bis(trifluoro-methylsulfonyl)imide.
  • the feedstream can be dispersed in a conductive, immiscible, non-aqueous electrolyte.
  • a conductive, immiscible, non-aqueous electrolyte Such a two-phase system of oil dispersed in a continuous conductive phase provides a suitable electrolysis medium.
  • the continuous conductive phase provides the sufficient conductivity between the cathode and anode of an electrochemical cell to maintain a constant electrode potential. Turbulent flow through the electrochemical cell brings droplets of the feedstream in contact with the cathode, at which point electrons are transferred from the electrode to sulfur containing species on the droplet surface.
  • the immiscible electrolyte from the treated feedstream is separated by any suitable conventional means resulting in a reduced sulfur product stream.
  • the immiscible electrolyte can be recycled.
  • the electrolyte in the immiscible electrolysis medium is preferably an electrolyte that dissolves, or dissociates, in the solvent to produce electrically conducting ions, but that does not undergo a redox reaction in the range of the applied potentials used.
  • Suitable organic electrolytes for use in the present invention include quaternary carbyl- and hydrocarbyl-onium salts, e.g., alkylammonium hydroxides.
  • Non-limiting examples of inorganic electrolytes include, e.g., NaOH, KOH and sodium phosphates, and mixtures thereof.
  • Non-limiting examples of onium ions that can be used in the practice of the present invention include mono- and bis-phosphonium, sulfonium and ammonium, preferably ammonium.
  • Preferred carbyl and hydrocarbyl moieties are alkyl carbyl and hydrocarbyl moieties.
  • Suitable quaternary alkyl ammonium ions include tetrabuytyl ammonium, and tetrabutyl ammonium toluene sulfonate.
  • additives known in the art to enhance performance of the electrodes can also be used.
  • Non-limiting examples of such additives suitable for use herein include surfactants, detergents, emulsifying agents and anodic depolarizing agents. Basic electrolytes are most preferred.
  • the concentration of salt in the electrolysis medium should be sufficient to generate an electrically conducting solution in the presence of the feedstream. Typically, a concentration of about 1 to about 50 wt % conductive phase, preferably about 5 to about 25 wt % based on the overall weight of the oil/water/electrolyte mixture is suitable. It is preferred that petroleum stream immiscible solvents be chosen, such as dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethylformamide or acetonitrile.
  • Dispersions are preferred for ease of separation following electrolysis. However, more stable oil-in-solvent emulsions can also be used. Following electrolytic treatment, the resulting substantially stable emulsion can be broken by the addition of heat and/or a de-emulsifying agent.
  • the electrochemical cell used in the practice of the present invention may be divided or undivided. Such systems include stirred batch or flow through reactors. The foregoing may be purchased commercially or made using technology known in the art. Suitable electrodes known in the art may be used. Included as suitable electrodes are three-dimensional electrodes, such as carbon or metallic foams. The optimal electrode design would depend upon normal electrochemical engineering considerations and could include divided and undivided plate and frame cells, bipolar stacks, fluidized bed electrodes and porous three dimensional electrode designs; see Electrode Processes and Electrochemical Engineering by Fumio Hine (Plenum Press, New York 1985). While direct current is typically used, electrode performance may be enhanced using alternating current or other voltage/current waveforms.
  • the gap between electrode surfaces will preferably be about 1 to about 50 mm, more preferably from about 1 to about 25 mm, and the linear velocity in the electrochemical cell will be in the range of about 1 to about 500 cm/s, more preferably in the range of about 50 to about 200 cm/s.
  • the applied cell voltage that is, the total voltage difference between the cathode and anode will vary depending upon the cell design and electrolytes used. What is critical, however, is that the cathode be polarized sufficiently to achieve electron transfer to the dibenzothiophene molecules, which occurs at reduction potentials more negative than ⁇ 2.3 Volts versus a standard calomel electrode. Normal electrochemical practices can be used to ensure that the cell is operated under these conditions.
  • the voltage across the electrochemical cell will be about 4 to about 500 volts, preferably from about 100 to about 200 volts, with a resulting current density of about 10 mA/cm 2 to about 1000 mA/cm 2 , preferably from about 100 mA/cm 2 to about 500 mA/cm 2 .
  • At least a portion of the hindered dibenzothiophene compounds in the feedstream are converted to the corresponding alkylated biphenyl mercaptan compounds in the electrochemical cell.
  • the mercaptans containing treated feedstream is passed to a caustic wash step wherein it is contacted with an aqueous caustic solution for extraction of the mercaptan species.
  • Any suitable caustic wash technology can be used in the practice of the present invention.
  • the most preferred caustic wash would be an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide having a strength from about 0.5 M to about 5 M and mixing the mercaptan-containing stream with air and the caustic solution to remove the mercaptan species in the caustic solution.
  • Non-limiting examples of caustic extraction processes that can be used in the practice of the present invention include the UOP® MEROX® process and the Merichem® THIOLEX® and EXOMER® processes.
  • the MEROX® Process was announced to the industry in 1959.
  • the Oil & Gas J. 57(44), 73-8 (1959) contains a discussion of the MEROX® Process.
  • the MEROX® oxidation process mercaptan compounds are extracted from the feed and then oxidized by air in the caustic phase in the presence of the MEROX® catalyst, which is typically an iron group chelate (cobalt phthalocyanine) to form disulfides which are then redissolved in the hydrocarbon phase, leaving the process as disulfides in the hydrocarbon product.
  • the disulfides, which are not soluble in the caustic solution can be separated and recycled for mercaptan extraction.
  • the treated stream is usually sent to a water wash in order to reduce the sodium content.
  • Such mercaptan extractions are widely used in the petroleum refining industry and it is likely that every refinery has at least one such unit.
  • the extracted mercaptans can be readily oxidized to disulfides, separated from the caustic stream, and recycled for more mercaptan extraction.
  • the hindered dibenzothiophene (“DBT”) species which are removed from the feedstream are converted to a relatively small substantially pure stream of disulfides that can be disposed of via combustion. They can also be fed to a coking unit for thermal decomposition. Being able to target hindered DBT molecules can also enable the disposition of Light Catalytic Cycle Oil (“LCCO”), which is rich in DBTs, to distillate hydrotreaters.
  • LCCO Light Catalytic Cycle Oil
  • a thermal decomposition reaction of the mercaptans is performed to decompose them with loss of hydrogen sulfide from the mercaptan molecule.
  • This thermal decomposition can be performed at temperatures from about 302° F. to about 932° F. (150° C. to 500° C.), preferably from about 482° F. to about 932° F. (250° C. to 500° C.) and at ambient to autogenous pressure. Subsequent removal of this hydrogen sulfide from the petroleum stream will produce a reduced sulfur product stream that is lower is sulfur content by wt % than the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream treated by the current process.
  • the following three examples were performed using a 300-cc autoclave (Parr Instruments, Moline, Ill.) was modified to allow two insulating glands (Conax, Buffalo, N.Y.) to feed through the autoclave head. Two cylindrical stainless steel (316) mesh electrodes are connected to the Conax glands, where the power supply (GW Laboratory DC Power Supply, Model GPR-1810HD) is connected to the other end.
  • the autoclave body is fitted with a glass insert, a thermal-couple and a stirring rod.
  • the autoclave can be charged with desired gas under pressure and run either in a batch- or a flow-through mode.
  • the autoclave was opened and the content acidified with 10% HCl (50 ml).
  • the acidified solution was then diluted with 100 ml of de-ionized (“DI”) water, extracted with ether (50 ml ⁇ 3).
  • DI de-ionized
  • the ether layer was separated and dried over anhydrous Na 2 SO 4 , and ether was allowed to evaporate under a stream of N 2 .
  • the isolated dry products were analyzed by GC-MS. A conversion of 12% was found for DBT and the products are as the following.
  • DBT dibenzothiophene
  • TAPF 6 tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate
  • DMSO dimethyl sulfoxide
  • the autoclave was opened and the content acidified with 10% HCI (50 ml).
  • the acidified solution was then diluted with 100 ml of DI water, extracted with ether (50 ml ⁇ 3).
  • the ether layer was separated and dried over anhydrous Na 2 SO 4 , and ether was allowed to evaporate under a stream of N 2 .
  • the isolated dry products were analyzed by GC-MS. A conversion of 16.5% was found for DBT and the products are as the following.
  • DEDBT 4,6-diethyl dibenzothiophene
  • TAPF 6 tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate
  • DMSO dimethyl sulfoxide
  • the autoclave was opened and the content acidified with 10% HCl (50 ml).
  • the acidified solution was then diluted with 100 ml of DI water, extracted with ether (50 ml ⁇ 3).
  • the ether layer was separated and dried over anhydrous Na 2 SO 4 , and ether was allowed to evaporate under a stream of N 2 .
  • the isolated dry products were analyzed by GC-MS. A conversion of 16% was found for DEDBT and the products are as the following.
  • DEDBT Diethyl Dibenzothiophene
  • H 2 sterically hindered Diethyl Dibenzothiophene
  • Solvent decomposition also occurs in this case.
  • electrochemical desulfurization of DBT and hindered DBT has been achieved under H 2 in the 212° F. to 257° F. (100° C. to 125° C.) temperature range, the conversion is still quite low. Increased conversions were attempted by extending the run time by operating within this temperature range or by running at higher temperature of about 392° F. (200° C.) to about 482° F. (250° C.).
  • the first example illustrates that DBT's can be readily converted into alkylated biphenyl mercaptans electrochemically without the addition of hydrogen or water.
  • the mercaptans can be removed by caustic extraction.
  • standard MEROX® caustic treatment could be used to remove these molecules from the electro-treated LSADO producing ultra-low sulfur distillate without the need for additional hydrotreatment. Due to the low concentration of these molecules in the LSADO, the power consumption should be minimal.
  • the comparative examples demonstrate that, electrochemical reduction in the presence of hydrogen leads to production of hydrogenated naphtheno dibenzothiophenes and not biphenyl mercaptans. These species are not caustic extractable. By limiting the availability of hydrogen sources by eliminating the hydrogen or water content, the products of the electrolysis can be controlled.
  • the chemistry of conversion to biphenyl mercaptans and subsequent extraction processes are as follows:
  • the biphenyl mercaptan can be desulfurized by thermal treatment. This reaction could occur simultaneously with electrochemical processing if conducted at sufficiently elevated temperatures or may require a separate thermal soak step.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Abstract

This invention relates to the electrochemical conversion of dibenzothiophene type molecules of petroleum feedstreams to mercaptans that can then be removed, in one embodiment, by caustic extraction. In another embodiment, the mercaptans can be thermally decomposed, removing sulfur as hydrogen sulfide. The conversion of dibenzothiophenes to mercaptans is performed by electrochemical means without the required addition of hydrogen and in the substantial absence of water.

Description

  • This Application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/008,413 filed Dec. 20, 2007.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to the electrochemical conversion of dibenzothiophene type molecules of petroleum feedstreams to mercaptans that can then be removed, in one embodiment, by caustic extraction. In another embodiment, the mercaptans can be thermally decomposed, removing sulfur as hydrogen sulfide. The conversion of dibenzothiophenes to mercaptans is performed by electrochemical means without the required addition of hydrogen and in the substantial absence of water.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The sulfur content of petroleum products is continuing to be regulated to lower and lower levels throughout the world. Sulfur specifications in motor gasoline (“mogas”) and on-road diesel have been most recently reduced and future specifications will further lower the allowable sulfur content of off-road diesel and heating oils. Sulfur is currently removed from petroleum feedstreams by various processes depending on the nature of the feedstream. Processes such as coking, distillation, and alkali metal dispersions are primarily used to remove sulfur from heavy feedstreams, such as bitumens which are complex mixtures and typically contain hydrocarbons, heteroatoms, and metals, with carbon chains in excess of about 2,000 carbon atoms. For lighter petroleum feedstreams, such as distillates, catalytic hydrodesulfurization is typically used. The sulfur species in such feedstreams span a range of molecular types including sulfides, thiols, thiophenes, benzothiophenes to dibenzothiophenes in order of decreasing hydrodesulfurization (HDS) reactivity. The most difficult to remove sulfur is found in sterically hindered dibenzothiophene molecules such as diethyl dibenzothiophene. The space velocity, temperature and hydrogen pressures of catalytic HDS units are determined primarily by the slow reaction kinetics of these relatively minor components of the feed. These are the molecules that are typically left in the product after conventional low-pressure hydrotreating. Further removing these molecules often requires higher hydrogen pressure and higher temperature (“deep desulfurization”) which leads to higher hydrogen consumption and shorter catalyst run lengths which are costly results. Therefore, it is desirable to have alternative processes that are capable of removing these refractory sulfur molecules without incurring more severe reaction conditions for catalytic hydrotreating, which can result in significant capital and energy savings.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention there is provided a process for removing sulfur from petroleum feedstreams containing sulfur in the form of hindered dibenzothiophene compounds, comprising:
  • a) passing a sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream to an electrochemical cell;
  • b) subjecting said feedstream to an effective voltage and current that will result in the conversion of at least a portion of said hindered dibenzothiophene compounds to mercaptan compounds;
  • c) passing the electrochemically treated petroleum feedstream containing said mercaptans compounds to a caustic treatment zone wherein it is contacted with an aqueous caustic solution wherein mercaptan-containing compounds are extracted by the aqueous caustic solution; and
  • d) collecting a reduced-sulfur petroleum product stream from the caustic treatment zone;
  • wherein the reduced-sulfur petroleum product stream has a lower sulfur content by wt % than the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream is comprised of a bitumen.
  • In another preferred embodiment, the feedstream is a distillate boiling range hydrocarbon stream and an effective amount of an electrolyte is mixed with the distillate boiling range stream to be treated.
  • Also in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention is a process for removing sulfur from petroleum feedstreams containing sulfur in the form of hindered dibenzothiophene compounds, comprising:
  • a) passing a sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream to an electrochemical cell;
  • b) subjecting said feedstream to an effective voltage and current that will result in the conversion of at least a portion of said hindered dibenzothiophene compounds to mercaptan compounds;
  • c) passing the electrochemically treated petroleum feedstream containing mercaptan compounds to a thermal decomposition zone wherein at least a portion of the mercaptans are decomposed to hydrogen sulfide at temperatures from about 302° F. to about 932° F. (150° C. to 500° C.); and
  • d) collecting a reduced-sulfur petroleum product stream from the thermal decomposition zone;
  • wherein the reduced-sulfur petroleum product stream has a lower sulfur content by wt % than the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream is comprised of a bitumen.
  • In another preferred embodiment, the feedstream is a distillate boiling range stream and an effective amount of an electrolyte is mixed with the distillate boiling range stream to be treated.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • FIG. 1 hereof is a plot of conductivity versus temperature for various petroleum residues and crudes.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Feedstreams suitable for use in the present invention range from heavy oil feedstreams, such as bitumens to those boiling in the distillate range. In a preferred embodiment the heavy oil feedstream contains at least about 10 wt. %, preferably at least about 25 wt. % of material boiling above about 1050° F. (565° C.), both at atmospheric pressure (0 psig). Such streams include bitumens, heavy oils, whole or topped crude oils and residua. The bitumen can be whole, topped or froth-treated bitumen. Non-limiting examples of distillate boiling range streams that are suitable for use herein include diesel fuels, jet fuels, heating oils, kerosenes, and lubes. Such streams typically have a boiling range from about 302° F. (150° C.) to about 1112° F. (600° C.), preferably from about 662° F. (350° C.) to about 1022° F. (550° C.). Other preferred streams are those typically known as Low Sulfur Automotive Diesel Oil (“LSADO”). LSADO will typically have a boiling range of about 350° F. (176° C.) to about 550° F. (287° C.) and contain from about 200 wppm sulfur to about 2 wppm sulfur, preferably from about 100 wppm sulfur to about 10 wppm sulfur. The process embodiments of the present invention electrochemically treat a sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream resulting in a reduced-sulfur petroleum product stream which has a lower sulfur concentration by wt % than the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream.
  • A major of the sulfur contained in heavy oils and distillates are in the form of hindered dibenzothiophene molecules. Although such molecules are difficult to remove by conventional hydrodesulfurization processes without using severe conditions, such as high temperatures and pressures, such molecules are converted by the practice of the present invention to sulfur species that are more easily removed by conventional non-catalytic processes. For example, the electrochemical step of the present invention converts the hindered dibenzothiophene (“DBT”) molecules, which are substantially refractory to conventional hydrodesulfurization, to hydrogenated naphthenobenzothiophene mercaptan molecules that are more readily extracted with use of caustic solution or by thermal decomposition. This capability can significantly debottleneck existing distillate hydrotreating process units by converting the slowest to convert molecules (hindered dibenzothiophenes) into much more readily extractable mercaptan species, preferably alkylated biphenyl mercaptan species.
  • The process of the present invention does not require the addition of an electrolyte when heavy oil is the feedstream, but rather, relies on the intrinsic conductivity of the heavy oil at elevated temperatures. It will be understood that the term “heavy oil” and “heavy oil feedstream” as used herein includes both bitumen and other heavy oil feedstreams, such as crude oils, atmospheric resids, and vacuum resids. This process is preferably utilized to upgrade bitumens and/or crude oils that have an API gravity of less than about 15. The inventors hereof have undertaken studies to determine the electrochemical conductivity of crudes and residues at temperatures up to about 572° F. (300° C.) and have demonstrated an exponential increase in electrical conductivity with temperature as illustrated in FIG. 1 hereof. It is believed that the electrical conductivity in crudes and residues is primarily carried by electron-hopping in the π-orbitals of aromatic and heterocyclic molecules. Experimental support for this is illustrated by the simple equation, shown in FIG. 1 hereof, that can be used to calculate the conductivity of various cuts of a crude using only its temperature dependent viscosity and its Conradson carbon content. The molecules that contribute to Concarbon are primarily the large multi-ring aromatic and heterocyclic components.
  • A 4 mA/cm2 electrical current density at 662° F. (350° C.) with an applied voltage of 150 volts and a cathode-to-anode gap of 1 mm was measured for an American crude oil. Though this is lower than would be utilized in preferred commercial embodiments of the present invention, the linear velocity for this measurement was lower than the preferred velocity ranges by about three orders of magnitude: 0.1 cm/s vs. 100 cm/s. Using a 0.8 exponent for the impact of increased flow velocity on current density at an electrode, it is estimated that the current density would increase to about 159 mA/cm2 at a linear velocity of about 100 cm/s. This suggests that more commercially attractive current densities achieved at higher applied voltages. Narrower gap electrode designs or fluidized bed electrode systems could also be used to lower the required applied voltage.
  • Unlike bitumen, performing controlled potential electrolysis on a non-conductive fluid such as a LSADO, or other petroleum distillate streams, requires the introduction of an effective amount of an electrolyte, such as a conductive salt. There is an insufficient concentration of large multi-ring aromatic and heterocyclic molecules in distillate boiling range feedstreams to produce sufficient intrinsic conductivity without the use of an electrolyte. The direct addition of a conductive salt to the distillate feedstream can be difficult for several reasons. The term “effective amount of electrolyte” as used herein means at least than amount needed to produce conductivity between the anode and the cathode of the electrochemical cell. Typically this amount will be from about 0.5 wt. % to about 50 wt. %, preferably from about 0.5 wt. % to about 10 wt. %, of added electrolytic material based on the total weight of the feed plus the electrolyte. Once dissolved in the oil, most salts are difficult to remove after electrolysis. Incomplete salt removal is unacceptable due to product specifications, negative impact on further catalytic processing, potential corrosivity and equipment fouling. Even salts that are soluble in a low dielectric medium are often poorly ionized and therefore unacceptable high concentrations are required to achieve suitable conductivities. In addition, such salts are typically very expensive. However, recent advances in the field of ionic liquids have resulted in new organic soluble salts having melting points lower than about 212° F. (100° C.) that can be used in the present invention. They can be recovered by solvent washing the petroleum stream after electrolysis. Non-limiting examples of such salts include: 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluoro phosphate, 1-butyl-1-methyl pyrrolidinium trifluoro-methyl sulfonated, trihexyltetradecylphosphonium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate and ethyl-dimethylpropyl-ammonium bis(trifluoro-methylsulfonyl)imide.
  • An alternate solution to the low conductivity problem of distillate boiling range feedstreams to produce a two phase system. Rather than adding an electrolyte to the feedstream, the feedstream can be dispersed in a conductive, immiscible, non-aqueous electrolyte. Such a two-phase system of oil dispersed in a continuous conductive phase provides a suitable electrolysis medium. The continuous conductive phase provides the sufficient conductivity between the cathode and anode of an electrochemical cell to maintain a constant electrode potential. Turbulent flow through the electrochemical cell brings droplets of the feedstream in contact with the cathode, at which point electrons are transferred from the electrode to sulfur containing species on the droplet surface.
  • After reaction, the immiscible electrolyte from the treated feedstream is separated by any suitable conventional means resulting in a reduced sulfur product stream. The immiscible electrolyte can be recycled. The electrolyte in the immiscible electrolysis medium is preferably an electrolyte that dissolves, or dissociates, in the solvent to produce electrically conducting ions, but that does not undergo a redox reaction in the range of the applied potentials used. Suitable organic electrolytes for use in the present invention, other than those previously mentioned, include quaternary carbyl- and hydrocarbyl-onium salts, e.g., alkylammonium hydroxides. Non-limiting examples of inorganic electrolytes include, e.g., NaOH, KOH and sodium phosphates, and mixtures thereof. Non-limiting examples of onium ions that can be used in the practice of the present invention include mono- and bis-phosphonium, sulfonium and ammonium, preferably ammonium. Preferred carbyl and hydrocarbyl moieties are alkyl carbyl and hydrocarbyl moieties. Suitable quaternary alkyl ammonium ions include tetrabuytyl ammonium, and tetrabutyl ammonium toluene sulfonate. Optionally, additives known in the art to enhance performance of the electrodes can also be used. Non-limiting examples of such additives suitable for use herein include surfactants, detergents, emulsifying agents and anodic depolarizing agents. Basic electrolytes are most preferred. The concentration of salt in the electrolysis medium should be sufficient to generate an electrically conducting solution in the presence of the feedstream. Typically, a concentration of about 1 to about 50 wt % conductive phase, preferably about 5 to about 25 wt % based on the overall weight of the oil/water/electrolyte mixture is suitable. It is preferred that petroleum stream immiscible solvents be chosen, such as dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethylformamide or acetonitrile.
  • Dispersions are preferred for ease of separation following electrolysis. However, more stable oil-in-solvent emulsions can also be used. Following electrolytic treatment, the resulting substantially stable emulsion can be broken by the addition of heat and/or a de-emulsifying agent.
  • The electrochemical cell used in the practice of the present invention may be divided or undivided. Such systems include stirred batch or flow through reactors. The foregoing may be purchased commercially or made using technology known in the art. Suitable electrodes known in the art may be used. Included as suitable electrodes are three-dimensional electrodes, such as carbon or metallic foams. The optimal electrode design would depend upon normal electrochemical engineering considerations and could include divided and undivided plate and frame cells, bipolar stacks, fluidized bed electrodes and porous three dimensional electrode designs; see Electrode Processes and Electrochemical Engineering by Fumio Hine (Plenum Press, New York 1985). While direct current is typically used, electrode performance may be enhanced using alternating current or other voltage/current waveforms. The gap between electrode surfaces will preferably be about 1 to about 50 mm, more preferably from about 1 to about 25 mm, and the linear velocity in the electrochemical cell will be in the range of about 1 to about 500 cm/s, more preferably in the range of about 50 to about 200 cm/s.
  • The applied cell voltage, that is, the total voltage difference between the cathode and anode will vary depending upon the cell design and electrolytes used. What is critical, however, is that the cathode be polarized sufficiently to achieve electron transfer to the dibenzothiophene molecules, which occurs at reduction potentials more negative than −2.3 Volts versus a standard calomel electrode. Normal electrochemical practices can be used to ensure that the cell is operated under these conditions. In preferred embodiments, the voltage across the electrochemical cell will be about 4 to about 500 volts, preferably from about 100 to about 200 volts, with a resulting current density of about 10 mA/cm2 to about 1000 mA/cm2, preferably from about 100 mA/cm2 to about 500 mA/cm2.
  • At least a portion of the hindered dibenzothiophene compounds in the feedstream are converted to the corresponding alkylated biphenyl mercaptan compounds in the electrochemical cell. The mercaptans containing treated feedstream is passed to a caustic wash step wherein it is contacted with an aqueous caustic solution for extraction of the mercaptan species. Any suitable caustic wash technology can be used in the practice of the present invention. The most preferred caustic wash would be an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide having a strength from about 0.5 M to about 5 M and mixing the mercaptan-containing stream with air and the caustic solution to remove the mercaptan species in the caustic solution. Non-limiting examples of caustic extraction processes that can be used in the practice of the present invention include the UOP® MEROX® process and the Merichem® THIOLEX® and EXOMER® processes. The MEROX® Process was announced to the industry in 1959. The Oil & Gas J. 57(44), 73-8 (1959) contains a discussion of the MEROX® Process. In the MEROX® oxidation process, mercaptan compounds are extracted from the feed and then oxidized by air in the caustic phase in the presence of the MEROX® catalyst, which is typically an iron group chelate (cobalt phthalocyanine) to form disulfides which are then redissolved in the hydrocarbon phase, leaving the process as disulfides in the hydrocarbon product. The disulfides, which are not soluble in the caustic solution, can be separated and recycled for mercaptan extraction. The treated stream is usually sent to a water wash in order to reduce the sodium content.
  • All of these processes take advantage of the acidity of the mercaptan species. By contacting a petroleum stream that contains acidic mercaptan species with an aqueous base solution, the mercaptans are de-protonated, converted to salts and are now more soluble in the aqueous stream and thus can be extracted nearly quantitatively from the petroleum stream. Such an extraction is ineffective with the original, non-acidic dibenzothiophenic sulfur species. The desulfurized petroleum stream is then separated from the resulting mercaptide containing caustic solution. The caustic solution can then be regenerated and the mercaptides isolated in a variety of conventional ways depending on the process design. Such mercaptan extractions are widely used in the petroleum refining industry and it is likely that every refinery has at least one such unit. The extracted mercaptans can be readily oxidized to disulfides, separated from the caustic stream, and recycled for more mercaptan extraction. The hindered dibenzothiophene (“DBT”) species which are removed from the feedstream are converted to a relatively small substantially pure stream of disulfides that can be disposed of via combustion. They can also be fed to a coking unit for thermal decomposition. Being able to target hindered DBT molecules can also enable the disposition of Light Catalytic Cycle Oil (“LCCO”), which is rich in DBTs, to distillate hydrotreaters.
  • In a second embodiment of the present invention, following, or simultaneous with the electrochemical conversion of the dibenzothiophenic species to mercaptans, a thermal decomposition reaction of the mercaptans is performed to decompose them with loss of hydrogen sulfide from the mercaptan molecule. This thermal decomposition can be performed at temperatures from about 302° F. to about 932° F. (150° C. to 500° C.), preferably from about 482° F. to about 932° F. (250° C. to 500° C.) and at ambient to autogenous pressure. Subsequent removal of this hydrogen sulfide from the petroleum stream will produce a reduced sulfur product stream that is lower is sulfur content by wt % than the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream treated by the current process.
  • The present invention will be better understood with reference to the following examples which are presented for illustrative purposes and are not to be taken as limiting the invention in anyway.
  • The following three examples were performed using a 300-cc autoclave (Parr Instruments, Moline, Ill.) was modified to allow two insulating glands (Conax, Buffalo, N.Y.) to feed through the autoclave head. Two cylindrical stainless steel (316) mesh electrodes are connected to the Conax glands, where the power supply (GW Laboratory DC Power Supply, Model GPR-1810HD) is connected to the other end. The autoclave body is fitted with a glass insert, a thermal-couple and a stirring rod. The autoclave can be charged with desired gas under pressure and run either in a batch- or a flow-through mode.
  • EXAMPLE 1 Electrochemical Treatment of DBT Under N2 in Dimethyl Sulfoxide Solvent with Tetrabutylammonium Hexaflouorphosphate Electrolyte
  • To the glass insert was added 1.0 g dibenzothiophene (“DBT”), 3.87 g tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6), and 100 milliliter (“ml”) anhydrous dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Aldrich). After the content was dissolved, the glass insert was loaded into the autoclave body, the autoclave head assembled and pressure tested. The autoclave was charged with 70 psig of N2 and heated to 212° F. (100° C.) with stirring (300 rpm). A voltage of 5 Volts was applied and the current was 0.8 Amp. The current gradually decreased with time and after two hours, the run was stopped. The autoclave was opened and the content acidified with 10% HCl (50 ml). The acidified solution was then diluted with 100 ml of de-ionized (“DI”) water, extracted with ether (50 ml×3). The ether layer was separated and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and ether was allowed to evaporate under a stream of N2. The isolated dry products were analyzed by GC-MS. A conversion of 12% was found for DBT and the products are as the following.
  • Figure US20090159503A1-20090625-C00001
  • This example shows that the electrochemical reduction of DBT under N2 resulted in: 12% DBT conversion after 2 h at 212° F. GC-MS revealed that the products consisted of 35% 2-phenyl benzenethiol, 8% tetrahydro-DBT, and 57% of a species with a mass of 214. The assignment of this peak as 2-phenyl benzenethiol was done by comparing with an authentic sample. The mass 214 species was tentatively assigned as 2-phenyl benzenethiol with two methyl groups added. Addition of methyl groups to DBT indicates that decomposition of solvent DMSO occurred since it is the only source of methyl groups in this system. No desulfurization product biphenyl was observed in this run.
  • COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE A Electrochemical Treatment of DBT Under Hydrogen in Dimethyl Sulfoxide Solvent with Tetrabutylammonium Hexaflouorphosphate Electrolyte
  • To the glass insert was added 0.5 g dibenzothiophene (“DBT”), 3.87 g tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6), and 100 ml anhydrous dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Aldrich). After the content was dissolved, the glass insert was loaded into the autoclave body, the autoclave head assembled and pressure tested. The autoclave was charged with 300 psig of H2 and heated to 257° F. (125° C.) with stirring (300 rpm). A voltage of 4.5 Volts was applied and the current was 1.0 Amp. The current gradually decreased with time and after three and half (3.5) hours, the run was stopped. The autoclave was opened and the content acidified with 10% HCI (50 ml). The acidified solution was then diluted with 100 ml of DI water, extracted with ether (50 ml×3). The ether layer was separated and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and ether was allowed to evaporate under a stream of N2. The isolated dry products were analyzed by GC-MS. A conversion of 16.5% was found for DBT and the products are as the following.
  • Figure US20090159503A1-20090625-C00002
  • COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE B Electrochemical Treatment of DEDBT Under Hydrogen in Dimethyl Sulfoxide Solvent with Tetrabutylammonium Hexaflouorphosphate Electrolyte
  • To the glass insert was added 1.0 g 4,6-diethyl dibenzothiophene (“DEDBT”), 3.87 g tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6), and 100 ml anhydrous dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Aldrich). After the content is dissolved, the glass insert was loaded into the autoclave body, the autoclave head assembled and pressure tested. The autoclave was charged with 200 psig of H2 and heated to 100° C. with stirring (300 rpm). A voltage of 7 Volts was applied and the current was 1.0 Amp. The current gradually decreased with time and after two and half (2.5) hours, the run was stopped. The autoclave was opened and the content acidified with 10% HCl (50 ml). The acidified solution was then diluted with 100 ml of DI water, extracted with ether (50 ml×3). The ether layer was separated and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and ether was allowed to evaporate under a stream of N2. The isolated dry products were analyzed by GC-MS. A conversion of 16% was found for DEDBT and the products are as the following.
  • Figure US20090159503A1-20090625-C00003
  • Similarly, desulfurization was also observed for sterically hindered Diethyl Dibenzothiophene (DEDBT) under H2. A conversion of 16% of the DEDBT was observed and the products contained 53% desulfurized compounds, 46% dihydro-DEDBT and a trace amount of tetrahydro-DEDBT. Solvent decomposition also occurs in this case. Although electrochemical desulfurization of DBT and hindered DBT has been achieved under H2 in the 212° F. to 257° F. (100° C. to 125° C.) temperature range, the conversion is still quite low. Increased conversions were attempted by extending the run time by operating within this temperature range or by running at higher temperature of about 392° F. (200° C.) to about 482° F. (250° C.).
  • The first example illustrates that DBT's can be readily converted into alkylated biphenyl mercaptans electrochemically without the addition of hydrogen or water. The mercaptans can be removed by caustic extraction. For example, standard MEROX® caustic treatment could be used to remove these molecules from the electro-treated LSADO producing ultra-low sulfur distillate without the need for additional hydrotreatment. Due to the low concentration of these molecules in the LSADO, the power consumption should be minimal. The comparative examples demonstrate that, electrochemical reduction in the presence of hydrogen leads to production of hydrogenated naphtheno dibenzothiophenes and not biphenyl mercaptans. These species are not caustic extractable. By limiting the availability of hydrogen sources by eliminating the hydrogen or water content, the products of the electrolysis can be controlled. The chemistry of conversion to biphenyl mercaptans and subsequent extraction processes are as follows:
  • Figure US20090159503A1-20090625-C00004
  • EXAMPLE 2 Thermal Decomposition of 2-Phenylthiophenol in Tetralin at 400° C.
  • A volume of 1.5 ml of a tetralin solution containing 0.1 M of 2-phenylthiopheol was placed into 3 ml stainless-steel mini-bomb inside a dry-box. The mini-bomb was heated at 400° C. in an oven for a certain period of time and the content analyzed by GC/MS. Results in Table 1 below indicate desulfurization of 2-phenylthiophenol, giving biphenyl as the major product.
  • EXAMPLE 3 Thermal Decomposition of 2-Phenylthiophenol in Tetralin at 375° C.
  • A volume of 1.5 ml of a tetralin solution containing 0.1 M of 2-phenylthiopheol was placed into 3 ml stainless-steel mini-bomb inside a dry-box. The mini-bomb was heated at 375° C. in an oven for a certain period of time and the content analyzed by GC/MS. Results in Table 1 below indicate desulfurization of 2-phenylthiophenol, giving biphenyl as the major product.
  • EXAMPLE 4 Thermal Decomposition of 2-Phenylthiophenol in Tetralin at 350° C.
  • A volume of 1.5 ml of a tetralin solution containing 0.1 M of 2-phenylthiopheol was placed into 3 ml stainless-steel mini-bomb inside a dry-box. The mini-bomb was heated at 350° C. in an oven for a certain period of time and the content analyzed by GC/MS. Results in Table 1 below indicate desulfurization of 2-phenylthiophenol, giving biphenyl as the major product. Based on the thermal decomposition rates at various temperatures, the activation energy for 2-phenylthiophenol thermal decomposition was determined to be ˜29.2 kcal/mol.
  • EXAMPLE 5 Thermal Decomposition of Phenyl Disulfide in Tetralin at 300° C.
  • A volume of 1.5 ml of a tetralin solution containing 0.1 M of phenyl disulfide (PhS—SPh) was placed into 3 ml stainless-steel mini-bomb inside a dry-box. The mini-bomb was heated at 572° F. (300° C.) in an oven for 4h and the content analyzed by GC/MS. All disulfide is converted into thiophenol. By analogy, biphenyl disulfide (Ph-Ph-S—S-Ph-Ph) can be converted into 2-phenylthiophenol, which can be desulfurized at higher temperature as shown in Examples 2 through 4 herein. Equation 5 illustrates the thermal conversion of 2-phenylthiophenol to biphenyl and hydrogen sulfide.
  • Figure US20090159503A1-20090625-C00005
  • TABLE 1
    Thermal Decomposition of 2-Phenylthiophenol (0.1 M) in Tetralin
    Temp. (° C.) Time (h)
    Figure US20090159503A1-20090625-C00006
    Figure US20090159503A1-20090625-C00007
    Figure US20090159503A1-20090625-C00008
    Figure US20090159503A1-20090625-C00009
    400 0  100%   0     0     0  
    2 22.1% 60.4%   4% 12.5%
    4 29.3%   53% 4.7%   12%
    375 1 83.6% 11.9% 1.3%  3.1%
    3 59.7%   31% 3.8%  5.4%
    350 1 95.1%  3.6%  1.3%
    4 72.6% 17.4% 5.7%  4.3%
  • As Examples 2 through 5 clearly demonstrate, the biphenyl mercaptan can be desulfurized by thermal treatment. This reaction could occur simultaneously with electrochemical processing if conducted at sufficiently elevated temperatures or may require a separate thermal soak step.

Claims (29)

1. A process for removing sulfur from a sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream having at least a portion of its sulfur in the form of hindered dibenzothiophene compounds, comprising:
a) passing a sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream to an electrochemical cell;
b) subjecting said feedstream to an effective voltage and current that will result in the conversion of at least a portion of said hindered dibenzothiophene compounds to mercaptan compounds;
c) passing the electrochemically treated petroleum feedstream containing said mercaptans compounds to a caustic treatment zone wherein it is contacted with an aqueous caustic solution wherein mercaptan-containing compounds are extracted by the aqueous caustic solution; and
d) collecting a reduced-sulfur petroleum product stream from the caustic treatment zone;
wherein the reduced-sulfur petroleum product stream has a lower sulfur content by wt % than the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream.
2. The process of claim 1, wherein the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream is comprised of a bitumen.
3. The process of claim 2, wherein the electrochemical cell is run at about 4 volts to about 500 volts and a current density of about 10 to about 1000 mA/cm2.
4. The process of claim 3, wherein the aqueous caustic solution is a sodium hydroxide solution.
5. The process of claim 4, wherein the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream is comprised of a bitumen.
6. The process of claim 1, wherein the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream is a distillate boiling range hydrocarbon stream and an effective amount of an electrolyte is mixed with the mixture of water and distillate boiling range hydrocarbon stream.
7. The process of claim 6, wherein the distillate boiling range hydrocarbon stream is a low sulfur automotive diesel oil.
8. The process of claim 6, wherein the electrolyte is an organic electrolyte.
9. The process of claim 8, wherein the organic electrolyte is selected from quaternary carbyl- and hydrocarbyl-onium salts.
10. The process of claim 8, wherein the organic electrolyte is comprised of an organic soluble salt selected from the group consisting of 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluoro phosphate, 1-butyl-1-methyl pyrrolidinium trifluoro-methyl sulfonated, trihexyltetradecylphosphonium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate and ethyl-dimethylpropyl-ammonium bis(trifluoro-methylsulfonyl)imide.
11. The process of claim 8, wherein the electrolyte is an inorganic electrolyte selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide and sodium phosphates.
12. The process of claim 6, wherein the electrochemical cell is run at about 4 volts to about 500 volts and a current density of about 10 to about 1000 mA/cm2.
13. The process of claim 12, wherein the aqueous caustic solution is a sodium hydroxide solution.
14. The process of claim 12, at least a portion of the mercaptan compounds are alkylated biphenyl mercaptan compounds.
15. A process for removing sulfur from a sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream having at least a portion of its sulfur in the form of hindered dibenzothiophene compounds, which method comprising:
a) passing a sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream to an electrochemical cell;
b) subjecting said feedstream to an effective voltage and current that will result in the conversion of at least a portion of said hindered dibenzothiophene compounds to mercaptan compounds;
c) passing the electrochemically treated petroleum feedstream containing mercaptan compounds to a thermal decomposition zone wherein at least a portion of the mercaptans are decomposed to hydrogen sulfide at temperatures from about 302° F. to about 932° F. (150° C. to 500° C.); and
d) collecting a reduced-sulfur petroleum product stream from the thermal decomposition zone;
wherein the reduced-sulfur petroleum product stream has a lower sulfur content by wt % than the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream.
16. The process of claim 15, wherein the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream is comprised of a bitumen.
17. The process of claim 16, wherein the electrochemical cell is run at about 4 volts to about 500 volts and a current density of about 10 to about 1000 mA/cm2.
18. The process of claim 17, wherein the thermal decomposition temperature is from about 482° F. to about 932° F. (250° C. to 500° C.).
19. The process of claim 18, wherein the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream is comprised of a bitumen.
20. The process of claim 15, wherein the sulfur-containing petroleum feedstream is a distillate boiling range hydrocarbon stream and an effective amount of an electrolyte is mixed with the mixture of water and distillate boiling range hydrocarbon stream.
21. The process of claim 20, wherein the distillate boiling range hydrocarbon stream is a low sulfur automotive diesel oil.
22. The process of claim 20, wherein the electrolyte is an organic electrolyte.
23. The process of claim 22, wherein the organic electrolyte is selected from quaternary carbyl- and hydrocarbyl-onium salts.
24. The process of claim 22, wherein the organic electrolyte is selected from the organic soluble salt is selected from the group consisting of 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluoro phosphate, 1-butyl-1-methyl pyrrolidinium trifluoro-methyl sulfonated, trihexyltetradecylphosphonium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate and ethyl-dimethylpropyl-ammonium bis(trifluoro-methylsulfonyl)imide.
25. The process of claim 20, wherein the electrolyte is an inorganic electrolyte selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide and sodium phosphates.
26. The process of claim 20, wherein the electrolyte is an organic electrolyte selected from quaternary carbyl- and hydrocarbyl-onium salts.
27. The process of claim 20, wherein the electrochemical cell is run at about 4 volts to about 500 volts and a current density of about 10 to about 1000 mA/cm2.
28. The process of claim 27, at least a portion of the mercaptan compounds are alkylated biphenyl mercaptan compounds.
29. The process of claim 27, wherein the thermal decomposition temperature is from about 482° F. to about 932° F. (250° C. to 500° C.).
US12/288,565 2007-12-20 2008-10-21 Electrochemical treatment of heavy oil streams followed by caustic extraction or thermal treatment Abandoned US20090159503A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/288,565 US20090159503A1 (en) 2007-12-20 2008-10-21 Electrochemical treatment of heavy oil streams followed by caustic extraction or thermal treatment
PCT/US2008/013108 WO2009082425A1 (en) 2007-12-20 2008-11-25 Electrochemical treatment of heavy oil streams followed by caustic extraction or thermal treatment
CA2708395A CA2708395C (en) 2007-12-20 2008-11-25 Electrochemical treatment of heavy oil streams followed by caustic extraction or thermal treatment
US13/232,500 US8557101B2 (en) 2007-12-20 2011-09-14 Electrochemical treatment of heavy oil streams followed by caustic extraction

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US841307P 2007-12-20 2007-12-20
US12/288,565 US20090159503A1 (en) 2007-12-20 2008-10-21 Electrochemical treatment of heavy oil streams followed by caustic extraction or thermal treatment

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/232,500 Continuation-In-Part US8557101B2 (en) 2007-12-20 2011-09-14 Electrochemical treatment of heavy oil streams followed by caustic extraction

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090159503A1 true US20090159503A1 (en) 2009-06-25

Family

ID=40787340

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/288,565 Abandoned US20090159503A1 (en) 2007-12-20 2008-10-21 Electrochemical treatment of heavy oil streams followed by caustic extraction or thermal treatment

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20090159503A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2708395C (en)
WO (1) WO2009082425A1 (en)

Citations (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1642624A (en) * 1924-11-20 1927-09-13 Petroleum Hydrogenation Compan Process and apparatus for the conversion of heavy petroleum oils into lighter oils
US1998849A (en) * 1932-04-11 1935-04-23 Phillips Petroleum Co Process for desulphurizing mercaptan-containing petroleum oil
US2504058A (en) * 1946-04-04 1950-04-11 Unschuld Process of removing sulfur from oils
US3409520A (en) * 1965-09-23 1968-11-05 Mobil Oil Corp Removal of hydrogen sulfide from a hydrogen sulfide-hydrocarbon gas mixture by electrolysis
US3546105A (en) * 1969-08-08 1970-12-08 Chevron Res Hydrodesulfurization process
US3788978A (en) * 1972-05-24 1974-01-29 Exxon Research Engineering Co Process for the desulfurization of petroleum oil stocks
US3915819A (en) * 1974-07-03 1975-10-28 Electro Petroleum Electrolytic oil purifying method
US4043881A (en) * 1976-08-23 1977-08-23 University Of Southern California Electrolytic recovery of economic values from shale oil retort water
US4043885A (en) * 1976-08-23 1977-08-23 University Of Southern California Electrolytic pyrite removal from kerogen materials
US4045313A (en) * 1976-08-23 1977-08-30 The University Of Southern California Electrolytic recovery from bituminous materials
US4066739A (en) * 1976-03-30 1978-01-03 Chen Wu Chi Process for recovering hydrogen and elemental sulfur from hydrogen sulfide and/or mercaptans-containing gases
US4081337A (en) * 1977-04-22 1978-03-28 Robert Spitzer Electrolytic production of hydrogen
US4204923A (en) * 1978-06-08 1980-05-27 Carpenter Neil L Method and apparatus for recovery of hydrocarbons from tar-sands
US4260394A (en) * 1979-08-08 1981-04-07 Advanced Energy Dynamics, Inc. Process for reducing the sulfur content of coal
US4362610A (en) * 1978-06-08 1982-12-07 Carpenter Neil L Apparatus for recovery of hydrocarbons from tar-sands
US4371507A (en) * 1980-09-23 1983-02-01 Phillips Petroleum Company Catalytic hydrogenation of olefins, hydrodesulfurization of organic sulfur compounds and/or selective removal of hydrogen sulfide from fluid streams
US4849094A (en) * 1986-04-30 1989-07-18 Shmeleva Ljubov A Process for desulphurization of heavy petroleum residues using electric current
US4920015A (en) * 1988-09-29 1990-04-24 Gas Research Institute Electrochemical H2 S conversion
US4954229A (en) * 1987-12-31 1990-09-04 Korea Advanced Institute Of Science And Technology Bioelectrochemical desulfurization of petroleum
US5391278A (en) * 1993-02-25 1995-02-21 Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. Process for removal of hydrogen sulfide
US5514252A (en) * 1994-12-27 1996-05-07 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Method for reducing Conradson carbon content of petroleum streams
US5578189A (en) * 1995-01-11 1996-11-26 Ceramatec, Inc. Decomposition and removal of H2 S into hydrogen and sulfur
US5879529A (en) * 1997-07-15 1999-03-09 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Method for decreasing the conradson carbon content of petroleum feedstreams
US5935421A (en) * 1995-05-02 1999-08-10 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Continuous in-situ combination process for upgrading heavy oil
US6132590A (en) * 1998-01-09 2000-10-17 Huron Tech Corp Electrolytic process for treating aqueous waste streams
US6238530B1 (en) * 1999-02-15 2001-05-29 Permelec Electrode Ltd. Cathode for electrolysis and electrolytic cell using the same
US6241871B1 (en) * 1998-04-16 2001-06-05 Ethyl Tech Inc. Electrochemical oxidation of hydrogen sulfide
US6274026B1 (en) * 1999-06-11 2001-08-14 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Electrochemical oxidation of sulfur compounds in naphtha using ionic liquids
US6338788B1 (en) * 1999-06-11 2002-01-15 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Electrochemical oxidation of sulfur compounds in naphtha
US6368495B1 (en) * 1999-06-07 2002-04-09 Uop Llc Removal of sulfur-containing compounds from liquid hydrocarbon streams
US6402940B1 (en) * 2000-09-01 2002-06-11 Unipure Corporation Process for removing low amounts of organic sulfur from hydrocarbon fuels
US6497973B1 (en) * 1995-12-28 2002-12-24 Millennium Cell, Inc. Electroconversion cell
US20030102123A1 (en) * 2001-10-26 2003-06-05 Wittle J. Kenneth Electrochemical process for effecting redox-enhanced oil recovery
US20060102523A1 (en) * 2004-11-08 2006-05-18 Intevep, S.A. Desulfurization process of hydrocarbon feeds with electrolytic hydrogen
US20060254930A1 (en) * 2005-05-12 2006-11-16 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for treating a sulfur-containing spent caustic refinery stream using a membrane electrolyzer powered by a fuel cell
US20070175798A1 (en) * 2003-07-11 2007-08-02 Fokema Mark D Methods and compositions for desulfurization of hydrocarbon fuels

Patent Citations (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1642624A (en) * 1924-11-20 1927-09-13 Petroleum Hydrogenation Compan Process and apparatus for the conversion of heavy petroleum oils into lighter oils
US1998849A (en) * 1932-04-11 1935-04-23 Phillips Petroleum Co Process for desulphurizing mercaptan-containing petroleum oil
US2504058A (en) * 1946-04-04 1950-04-11 Unschuld Process of removing sulfur from oils
US3409520A (en) * 1965-09-23 1968-11-05 Mobil Oil Corp Removal of hydrogen sulfide from a hydrogen sulfide-hydrocarbon gas mixture by electrolysis
US3546105A (en) * 1969-08-08 1970-12-08 Chevron Res Hydrodesulfurization process
US3788978A (en) * 1972-05-24 1974-01-29 Exxon Research Engineering Co Process for the desulfurization of petroleum oil stocks
US3915819A (en) * 1974-07-03 1975-10-28 Electro Petroleum Electrolytic oil purifying method
US4066739A (en) * 1976-03-30 1978-01-03 Chen Wu Chi Process for recovering hydrogen and elemental sulfur from hydrogen sulfide and/or mercaptans-containing gases
US4043885A (en) * 1976-08-23 1977-08-23 University Of Southern California Electrolytic pyrite removal from kerogen materials
US4045313A (en) * 1976-08-23 1977-08-30 The University Of Southern California Electrolytic recovery from bituminous materials
US4043881A (en) * 1976-08-23 1977-08-23 University Of Southern California Electrolytic recovery of economic values from shale oil retort water
US4081337A (en) * 1977-04-22 1978-03-28 Robert Spitzer Electrolytic production of hydrogen
US4204923A (en) * 1978-06-08 1980-05-27 Carpenter Neil L Method and apparatus for recovery of hydrocarbons from tar-sands
US4362610A (en) * 1978-06-08 1982-12-07 Carpenter Neil L Apparatus for recovery of hydrocarbons from tar-sands
US4260394A (en) * 1979-08-08 1981-04-07 Advanced Energy Dynamics, Inc. Process for reducing the sulfur content of coal
US4371507A (en) * 1980-09-23 1983-02-01 Phillips Petroleum Company Catalytic hydrogenation of olefins, hydrodesulfurization of organic sulfur compounds and/or selective removal of hydrogen sulfide from fluid streams
US4849094A (en) * 1986-04-30 1989-07-18 Shmeleva Ljubov A Process for desulphurization of heavy petroleum residues using electric current
US4954229A (en) * 1987-12-31 1990-09-04 Korea Advanced Institute Of Science And Technology Bioelectrochemical desulfurization of petroleum
US4920015A (en) * 1988-09-29 1990-04-24 Gas Research Institute Electrochemical H2 S conversion
US5391278A (en) * 1993-02-25 1995-02-21 Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. Process for removal of hydrogen sulfide
US5514252A (en) * 1994-12-27 1996-05-07 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Method for reducing Conradson carbon content of petroleum streams
US5578189A (en) * 1995-01-11 1996-11-26 Ceramatec, Inc. Decomposition and removal of H2 S into hydrogen and sulfur
US5935421A (en) * 1995-05-02 1999-08-10 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Continuous in-situ combination process for upgrading heavy oil
US6497973B1 (en) * 1995-12-28 2002-12-24 Millennium Cell, Inc. Electroconversion cell
US5879529A (en) * 1997-07-15 1999-03-09 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Method for decreasing the conradson carbon content of petroleum feedstreams
US6132590A (en) * 1998-01-09 2000-10-17 Huron Tech Corp Electrolytic process for treating aqueous waste streams
US6241871B1 (en) * 1998-04-16 2001-06-05 Ethyl Tech Inc. Electrochemical oxidation of hydrogen sulfide
US6238530B1 (en) * 1999-02-15 2001-05-29 Permelec Electrode Ltd. Cathode for electrolysis and electrolytic cell using the same
US6368495B1 (en) * 1999-06-07 2002-04-09 Uop Llc Removal of sulfur-containing compounds from liquid hydrocarbon streams
US6338788B1 (en) * 1999-06-11 2002-01-15 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Electrochemical oxidation of sulfur compounds in naphtha
US6274026B1 (en) * 1999-06-11 2001-08-14 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Electrochemical oxidation of sulfur compounds in naphtha using ionic liquids
US6402940B1 (en) * 2000-09-01 2002-06-11 Unipure Corporation Process for removing low amounts of organic sulfur from hydrocarbon fuels
US20030102123A1 (en) * 2001-10-26 2003-06-05 Wittle J. Kenneth Electrochemical process for effecting redox-enhanced oil recovery
US6877556B2 (en) * 2001-10-26 2005-04-12 Electro-Petroleum, Inc. Electrochemical process for effecting redox-enhanced oil recovery
US20050161217A1 (en) * 2001-10-26 2005-07-28 Wittle J. K. Method and system for producing methane gas from methane hydrate formations
US20070175798A1 (en) * 2003-07-11 2007-08-02 Fokema Mark D Methods and compositions for desulfurization of hydrocarbon fuels
US20060102523A1 (en) * 2004-11-08 2006-05-18 Intevep, S.A. Desulfurization process of hydrocarbon feeds with electrolytic hydrogen
US20070108101A1 (en) * 2004-11-08 2007-05-17 Baez Victor B Desulfurization process of hydrocarbon feeds with electrolytic hydrogen
US7244351B2 (en) * 2004-11-08 2007-07-17 Intevep, S.A. Desulfurization process of hydrocarbon feeds with electrolytic hydrogen
US20060254930A1 (en) * 2005-05-12 2006-11-16 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for treating a sulfur-containing spent caustic refinery stream using a membrane electrolyzer powered by a fuel cell

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2708395C (en) 2016-07-05
WO2009082425A1 (en) 2009-07-02
CA2708395A1 (en) 2009-07-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Lam et al. A review of electrochemical desulfurization technologies for fossil fuels
US8177963B2 (en) Partial electro-hydrogenation of sulfur containing feedstreams followed by sulfur removal
CA2709692C (en) Electrodesulfurization of heavy oils using a divided electrochemical cell
EP0800566B1 (en) Method for reducing conradson carbon content of petroleum streams
US8075762B2 (en) Electrodesulfurization of heavy oils
US5529684A (en) Method for demetallating refinery feedstreams
US8557101B2 (en) Electrochemical treatment of heavy oil streams followed by caustic extraction
EP0849348B1 (en) Process for demetallating a petroleum feedstream
US5879529A (en) Method for decreasing the conradson carbon content of petroleum feedstreams
CA2708395C (en) Electrochemical treatment of heavy oil streams followed by caustic extraction or thermal treatment
US5855764A (en) Method for demetallating petroleum streams
US5911869A (en) Method for demetallating petroleum streams (LAW639)
US6303019B1 (en) Treatment of refinery feedstreams to remove peroxides and prevent subsequent refinery fouling using an electrochemical reduction method (Law890)
CA2221536A1 (en) Method for anodically decreasing conradson carbon content of petroleum streams
MXPA00000013A (en) Method for demetallating petroleum streams

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION