US20090126940A1 - Method and System for Well Production - Google Patents
Method and System for Well Production Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090126940A1 US20090126940A1 US12/275,675 US27567508A US2009126940A1 US 20090126940 A1 US20090126940 A1 US 20090126940A1 US 27567508 A US27567508 A US 27567508A US 2009126940 A1 US2009126940 A1 US 2009126940A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- icd
- filtercake
- wellbore
- completion
- pressure
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 24
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 7
- 239000012065 filter cake Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 49
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 32
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 31
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002028 premature Effects 0.000 description 2
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 101100328086 Caenorhabditis elegans cla-1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000012267 brine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001143 conditioned effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009545 invasion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009533 lab test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- HPALAKNZSZLMCH-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium;chloride;hydrate Chemical compound O.[Na+].[Cl-] HPALAKNZSZLMCH-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B37/00—Methods or apparatus for cleaning boreholes or wells
- E21B37/08—Methods or apparatus for cleaning boreholes or wells cleaning in situ of down-hole filters, screens, e.g. casing perforations, or gravel packs
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/02—Subsoil filtering
- E21B43/08—Screens or liners
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/12—Methods or apparatus for controlling the flow of the obtained fluid to or in wells
Definitions
- Hydrocarbon fluids such as oil and natural gas are obtained from a subterranean geologic formation, referred to as a reservoir, by drilling a well that penetrates the hydrocarbon-bearing formation.
- a viscous drilling fluid or drill mud
- Another purpose of the drill mud is also to provide a filtercake along the wellbore to prevent fluid loss into the formation.
- a screen completion is often installed in this drilling mud.
- This drilling mud containing particles from the drilling phase may to some extent be removed by circulating fresh or conditioned mud into the well or be displaced by a clean completion fluid such as brine.
- the well bore may be covered by a filtercake. Once the well is completed, the filtercake may be removed to produce the well. To remove this filtercake, a certain differential pressure is required across the filtercake (i.e., the formation pressure on the formation side of the filtercake must be higher than the pressure on the borehole side of the filtercake to break the filtercake off of the borehole wall).
- the drilling fluid system (including the filtercake) must flow back through the sand screens. If the screen completion becomes long (for example, in the range beyond 300 m to 500 m), it may be a challenge to remove the fluid system properly along the whole interval. Also, a certain pressure drop is required to initiate the flow of reservoir fluid. This is both (1) because of the required differential pressure to lift off the filter cake and (2) to break circulation as the drilling fluid starts flowing in various tortuous paths of the screen completion. In addition, pressure increases along the tubing in long horizontal wells makes it more difficult to achieve the needed liftoff pressure because as you move upstream in the tubing, the pressure increases.
- the differential pressure between the formation and the tubing decreases as you move from the heel of the well to the toe of the well (also called the heel-toe effect).
- this decrease in differential pressure will contribute to the difficulty of removing the filtercake along the upstream portions of the wellbore.
- the required pressure may no longer be available in the remaining part of the well. Consequently, the cleanup process will in many cases stop before the whole well is cleaned up and can contribute.
- the flow performance of long, screen-based completions may be a challenge due to problems related to well cleanup.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing of a well and completion.
- FIG. 2 is a second schematic drawing of a well and completion wherein an upstream portion of the filtercake has been broken and the formation adjacent to the broken filtercake is producing fluids.
- FIG. 3 is a third schematic drawing of a well and completion wherein substantially all of the filtercake is broken and the formation is producing fluids along substantially the entire length of the completion.
- FIGS. 4 and 5 are schematic drawings intended to illustrate the physical principals underlying the embodiments described herein.
- a lower completion 40 is run into a wellbore 10 and positioned adjacent a formation 20 that is desired to be produced.
- packers 60 may be set to isolate the annulus adjacent to the formation from the annulus above the packers 60 .
- the pressure drop caused by annular flow will also have a similar effect, particularly if the annulus is small. This is also the case for a partly collapsed annulus that contributes to a compartmentalization of the well.
- a filtercake 30 comprising solids remaining downhole from the drilling operation.
- filtercake in this document is a layer of particulate solids (e.g., mud) deposited on the well bore wall and eventually partly into the formation that has the purpose of preventing or limiting the fluid invasion into the formation during the drilling and completion phase.
- particulate solids e.g., mud
- the pressure drop across the filtercake i.e., from the formation to the annulus 45 outside the lower completion 40
- the pressure differential across the downstream portion of the filter cake 30 once production has started in one portion (e.g., the upstream portion) of the lower completion 40 , is often less than the threshold level necessary to remove the filter cake 30 .
- the threshold level necessary to remove the filter cake 30 .
- only the formation adjacent to the downstream portion of the lower completion begins producing (shown by dark arrows). The fluids further down the lower completion 40 can not break filter cake 30 and consequently does not contribute to flow.
- ICD inflow control devices
- ICDs Two primary types of ICDs are available to the market—(1) the tube/channel type ICD (such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,393), which provides a friction pressure drop as fluid is flowing, and (2) the nozzle-based type ICD (such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,419,002), which provides a pressure drop as pressure is transferred into velocity and then absorbed downstream of the nozzle.
- tube/channel type ICD such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,393
- nozzle-based type ICD such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,419,002
- embodiments of the present invention include a method to design a required pressure drop and a system to make it possible to apply this pressure drop to effectively clean the well of drill mud.
- This pressure drop is a function of the fluid system (e.g., drill mud) and the reservoir properties.
- the pressure drop can be determined either by calculations or practical experiments.
- the pressure drop through the formation is normally described by the Darcy law which may be describe as:
- the drilling fluid commonly used when drilling a well has Bingham type properties, meaning that a certain differential pressure has to be exceeded to initiate flow.
- the pressure required to initiate a flow is proportional to the wetted area of a given flow channel divided by its cross section areas. This may result in a threshold pressure to initiate flow, particularly through narrow openings.
- a tube/channel based ICD on the other hand has a much larger wetted area in the flow tube/channel which may result in a significant threshold pressure.
- the ICD is in most cases connected to a sand screen.
- the screen design itself may also add to this threshold pressure.
- a mesh type screen can have a fairly tortuous path through the filter media compared to a wire wrapped screen having a well defined slot opening more in the shape of an orifice.
- the drainage layer under the screen section leading to the ICD housing should be designed with proper cross section area to reduce the threshold pressure to a minimum.
- the total pressure drop can be determined. This pressure drop is the combination of the pressure drop across the formation to remove the filtercake and the pressure drop required to initiate the fluid flow through the ICD.
- ICD setting (4) Calculate the ICD setting that will provide sufficient pressure drop in the flowing zones or sections to reduce the tubing pressure to a level whereby non cleaned up sections gets exposed to the required differential pressure.
- the ICD setting is directly associated with ct (nozzle or turbulent mode) or cla (tube/channel based ICD in laminar mode):
- the denominator is squared with flow rate compared to the laminar case. This result in a relatively smaller pressure drop required through the ICDs along the well to achieve the cleanup.
- ICDs may be used along the whole length of the completion to ensure that the whole completion interval can take benefit of the pressure regulating effect.
- the minimum pressure drop setting for the ICDs can be calculated. If the calculations are associated with uncertainties, the pressure drop setting for the ICDs can be increased to accommodate for this uncertainty. Consequently, a method is available whereby the control of the flow path and the setting of the ICDs as flow dependent pressure drop elements can ensure that the required pressure drop is applied to the required locations on the wall of the well bore and to the completion itself to make it possible to achieve a proper well cleanup.
- the design of the ICD and the connected screen can have a significant impact on the required pressure drop to initiate the flow.
- the depth filter mesh screen typically built up of a metal weave on a drainage layer and surrounded by a protective shroud.
- a higher pressure is required to break the shear strength of the fluid and initiate the flow of formation fluid.
- a higher pressure drop is required to initiate the flow than by using a nozzle based ICD. This is due to the long and narrow flow channels.
- a differential pressure proportional to the channel length and inverse proportional to the channel length is required.
- the use of a depth filter type screen will have the same effect.
- the tortuous path requires higher pressure to overcome the shear strength of the fluid.
- a depth filter type screen may get packed with drill solids settled at the bottom of the well. This means that a wire wrapped screen with a drainage layer providing proper flow cross section area may be more beneficial.
- FIGS. 4 and 5 The effect of the limited pressure drop that can be applied in long horizontal well is illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5 .
- a pipe or tube has large holes 100 (e.g., standard sand screens) formed in a regular pattern.
- drawdown pressure is applied to the well
- the majority of the flow will exit the first holes near the inlet.
- smaller holes 110 e.g., replacing the standard sand screens with ICDs
- the pressure drop across the holes e.g., ICDs
- an injector well it may be desirable, in an injector well, to initially put the wellbore into production (as outlined above) in order to clean up the filtercake. Once the desired amount of filtercake removal is effected, the well may then be used to inject liquid or gas into the formation.
- ICD completion described herein with or without a sand screen associated with the completion.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Filtering Materials (AREA)
- Filtration Of Liquid (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application claims priority to provisional U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/989,468 filed on Nov. 21, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
- Hydrocarbon fluids such as oil and natural gas are obtained from a subterranean geologic formation, referred to as a reservoir, by drilling a well that penetrates the hydrocarbon-bearing formation. When drilling the well, a viscous drilling fluid (or drill mud) with certain increased shear strength characteristics is often used to maximize removal of drill cuttings to be transported out of the well. Still, settlement of drill cutting particles must be expected. Another purpose of the drill mud is also to provide a filtercake along the wellbore to prevent fluid loss into the formation. To save rig time, a screen completion is often installed in this drilling mud. This drilling mud containing particles from the drilling phase may to some extent be removed by circulating fresh or conditioned mud into the well or be displaced by a clean completion fluid such as brine. In any case, the well bore may be covered by a filtercake. Once the well is completed, the filtercake may be removed to produce the well. To remove this filtercake, a certain differential pressure is required across the filtercake (i.e., the formation pressure on the formation side of the filtercake must be higher than the pressure on the borehole side of the filtercake to break the filtercake off of the borehole wall).
- When the well is to be put on production, the drilling fluid system (including the filtercake) must flow back through the sand screens. If the screen completion becomes long (for example, in the range beyond 300 m to 500 m), it may be a challenge to remove the fluid system properly along the whole interval. Also, a certain pressure drop is required to initiate the flow of reservoir fluid. This is both (1) because of the required differential pressure to lift off the filter cake and (2) to break circulation as the drilling fluid starts flowing in various tortuous paths of the screen completion. In addition, pressure increases along the tubing in long horizontal wells makes it more difficult to achieve the needed liftoff pressure because as you move upstream in the tubing, the pressure increases. Thus the differential pressure between the formation and the tubing decreases as you move from the heel of the well to the toe of the well (also called the heel-toe effect). As explained herein, this decrease in differential pressure will contribute to the difficulty of removing the filtercake along the upstream portions of the wellbore. As the first part (typically high-permeable zones) of the well starts flowing, the required pressure may no longer be available in the remaining part of the well. Consequently, the cleanup process will in many cases stop before the whole well is cleaned up and can contribute.
- Accordingly, the flow performance of long, screen-based completions may be a challenge due to problems related to well cleanup.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing of a well and completion. -
FIG. 2 is a second schematic drawing of a well and completion wherein an upstream portion of the filtercake has been broken and the formation adjacent to the broken filtercake is producing fluids. -
FIG. 3 is a third schematic drawing of a well and completion wherein substantially all of the filtercake is broken and the formation is producing fluids along substantially the entire length of the completion. -
FIGS. 4 and 5 are schematic drawings intended to illustrate the physical principals underlying the embodiments described herein. - In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the present invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments may be possible.
- With respect to
FIG. 1 , alower completion 40 is run into awellbore 10 and positioned adjacent aformation 20 that is desired to be produced. Once thelower completion 40 is positioned as desired,packers 60 may be set to isolate the annulus adjacent to the formation from the annulus above thepackers 60. As an alternative to packers, the pressure drop caused by annular flow will also have a similar effect, particularly if the annulus is small. This is also the case for a partly collapsed annulus that contributes to a compartmentalization of the well. Along the wellbore wall and in theannulus 45 between thelower completion 40 and theformation 20 is afiltercake 30 comprising solids remaining downhole from the drilling operation. The term filtercake in this document is a layer of particulate solids (e.g., mud) deposited on the well bore wall and eventually partly into the formation that has the purpose of preventing or limiting the fluid invasion into the formation during the drilling and completion phase. In order to begin producing fluids from theformation 20, it is necessary to remove at least a portion of thefiltercake 30 adjacent to theformation 20. In many cases, it is desirable to remove as much offiltercake 30 as possible in order to produce fluids from theformation 20 evenly along theformation 20. If only a portion of the filtercake is removed, theformation 20 will drain unevenly which may lead to undesirable consequences, such as premature water coning. - In order to break
filtercake 30, it is necessary that the pressure drop across the filtercake (i.e., from the formation to theannulus 45 outside the lower completion 40) is above a threshold level. In practice, as is shown inFIG. 2 , the pressure differential across the downstream portion of thefilter cake 30, once production has started in one portion (e.g., the upstream portion) of thelower completion 40, is often less than the threshold level necessary to remove thefilter cake 30. Thus, in many instances, only the formation adjacent to the downstream portion of the lower completion begins producing (shown by dark arrows). The fluids further down thelower completion 40 can not breakfilter cake 30 and consequently does not contribute to flow. - One way to ensure an even flow across the entire formation is the use of inflow control devices (ICD) as part of the lower completion. An exemplary ICD is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,419,002, incorporated herein by reference. Without the use of an inflow control device, most screen-based completions provide sufficient flow capacity over just a few joints of screened tubing. As discussed above, the inflow in the first few upstream joints has two effects. First, it increases the pressure within the tubing of the completion. Second, it decreases the formation draw down pressure in the areas adjacent to the area that is producing. This means that there is limited differential pressure across the remaining filter cake (i.e., further down into the well). Because of this limited pressure differential, the filtercake in areas downstream of the producing portion of the formation may not be broken and removed. Consequently, the downstream areas of the formation are not able to be produced. This failure to produce the downstream areas of the formation may lead to reduced overall production and premature water coning or other problems.
- Two primary types of ICDs are available to the market—(1) the tube/channel type ICD (such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,393), which provides a friction pressure drop as fluid is flowing, and (2) the nozzle-based type ICD (such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,419,002), which provides a pressure drop as pressure is transferred into velocity and then absorbed downstream of the nozzle.
- In general, embodiments of the present invention include a method to design a required pressure drop and a system to make it possible to apply this pressure drop to effectively clean the well of drill mud. This pressure drop is a function of the fluid system (e.g., drill mud) and the reservoir properties. The pressure drop can be determined either by calculations or practical experiments. The pressure drop through the formation is normally described by the Darcy law which may be describe as:
- Δpr=cr×q, where cr describes reservoir flow geometry, permeability and fluid viscosity and q is the flow rate
- The pressure drop across the ICD is given by:
- Δpi=ct×q2 for a nozzle based ICD or a channel tube based ICD when flow is in turbulent mode and:
- Δpi=cla×q when a channel/tube based ICD is in laminar mode, where ct is a constant given by geometry and fluid density and cla is a constant given by geometry and fluid viscosity. The flow or pressure between formation and annulus can have two states:
- qf=0 (or close to 0) if the cleanup threshold pressure has not been exceeded and
- Δpf=0 or approximately 0 if the cleanup threshold pressure has been exceeded and Δpfc is the threshold pressure
- When assuming to different zones 1 and 2, each of them having homogenous properties within each zone and zone 1 being cleaned up and zone 2 not, the below equations describes to flow and pressure in the system. In this example, the following assumptions are made: no annular flow between the zones, and no pressure drop inside the tubing between the two zones.
- q=q1 and q2=0
-
Δp=Δp1=Δp2=Δpr1+Δpi1=Δpf<Δpfc - By setting
- Δp=Δp1=Δp2=Δpf=Δpfc the minimum required ICD pressure drop to clean up the filtercake can be calculated:
-
Δpi1=Δpfc−Δpr1 - This assumes no pressure drop or threshold pressure through a non flowing ICD. The drilling fluid commonly used when drilling a well has Bingham type properties, meaning that a certain differential pressure has to be exceeded to initiate flow. The pressure required to initiate a flow is proportional to the wetted area of a given flow channel divided by its cross section areas. This may result in a threshold pressure to initiate flow, particularly through narrow openings. This means a nozzle based ICD having short nozzles more in the shape of an orifice has a short length giving a very small wetted area. A tube/channel based ICD on the other hand has a much larger wetted area in the flow tube/channel which may result in a significant threshold pressure. The ICD is in most cases connected to a sand screen. The screen design itself may also add to this threshold pressure. As an example, a mesh type screen can have a fairly tortuous path through the filter media compared to a wire wrapped screen having a well defined slot opening more in the shape of an orifice. Further, the drainage layer under the screen section leading to the ICD housing should be designed with proper cross section area to reduce the threshold pressure to a minimum.
- By determining the required pressure drop required to initiate the flow of the fluid system in the well through the ICD system and eventually also the connected screen, the total pressure drop can be determined. This pressure drop is the combination of the pressure drop across the formation to remove the filtercake and the pressure drop required to initiate the fluid flow through the ICD.
- The design of the completion and the total flow rate has a significant impact on the pressure drop available to lift off the filter cake and break the circulation. In most cases the maximum flow rate is limited, thus the completion design must be optimized to achieve the desired cleanup over the whole completion interval.
- The method to design the ICDs and thereby the method to cleanup the well is as follows:
- (1) Determine the required pressure to lift off the filter cake. This can be done by performing laboratory tests on representative core plugs with the given fluid system from the well. A commonly used method is to apply a filter cake on the core plug and apply a pressure through the core plug towards the backside of the filtercake and measure the required pressure drop to initiate flow.
- (2) Determine the required pressure to initiate flow through the ICD screen. This depends on the screen design. For a nozzle based ICD with wire wrapped screen and sufficient drainage area under the wrapping and into the ICD housing, the pressure required to initiate flow will in most cases be close to zero. For other designs, this threshold pressure can be significant. To determine this pressure, a flow test in the actual mud system may be carried out.
- (3) Take benefit of the fact that the pressure drop through an ICD is small when fluid is not flowing through it and high when fluid is flowing. This means that zones or sections not cleaned-up will basically be exposed to the differential pressure from the formation into the tubing. The tubing pressure will be kept at a lower level due to the added pressure drop through the ICDs in the flowing zones.
- (4) Calculate the ICD setting that will provide sufficient pressure drop in the flowing zones or sections to reduce the tubing pressure to a level whereby non cleaned up sections gets exposed to the required differential pressure. This ICD setting can be calculated based on the equation above (Δpi1=Δpfc−Δpr). The ICD setting is directly associated with ct (nozzle or turbulent mode) or cla (tube/channel based ICD in laminar mode):
-
Ct1=(Δpfc−cr1×q1)/q1̂2 -
Cla1=(Δpfc−cr1×q1)/q1 - As can be seen from the nozzle or turbulent case, the denominator is squared with flow rate compared to the laminar case. This result in a relatively smaller pressure drop required through the ICDs along the well to achieve the cleanup.
- The above calculations are based on simplified conditions. In a real well, the conditions are more complex and numerical models may be needed to solve the equations and determine the appropriate ICD setting. This may be done according to the work flow listed below.
-
- (a) The well performance is estimated based on permeability data and fluid properties.
- (b) This performance is compared with expected PI values to calibrate the model.
- (c) The average flux is calculated to as a reference for the nozzle calculation.
- (d) A proposed nozzle size (or ICD pressure drop setting) is calculated based on the expected well performance and the length of the productive completion interval.
- (e) If the reservoir has similar properties along the whole length, the nozzle setting (or ICD setting) should normally be the same in all joints.
- (f) If different reservoirs with different properties are penetrated, it might be beneficial to have different nozzle setting (or ICD setting) in the different zones.
- (g) The combination of the ICD setting and the reservoir model with features to include the effect of filter cake removal and initiation of a Bingham type fluid flow should be run.
- (h) The model should have an optimizer algorithm included or the model may be run repeatedly to optimize the result.
- (i) The model may be run to optimize return on investment or optimized recovery of the reserves or somewhere between
- (5) ICDs may be used along the whole length of the completion to ensure that the whole completion interval can take benefit of the pressure regulating effect.
- By use of the method outlined above, the minimum pressure drop setting for the ICDs can be calculated. If the calculations are associated with uncertainties, the pressure drop setting for the ICDs can be increased to accommodate for this uncertainty. Consequently, a method is available whereby the control of the flow path and the setting of the ICDs as flow dependent pressure drop elements can ensure that the required pressure drop is applied to the required locations on the wall of the well bore and to the completion itself to make it possible to achieve a proper well cleanup.
- The design of the ICD and the connected screen can have a significant impact on the required pressure drop to initiate the flow. There are two main screen designs available to the market—(1) the surface type wire wrapped screens, and (2) the depth filter mesh screen (typically built up of a metal weave on a drainage layer and surrounded by a protective shroud). As the flow path becomes more tortuous, a higher pressure is required to break the shear strength of the fluid and initiate the flow of formation fluid. When using a tube/channel type ICD, a higher pressure drop is required to initiate the flow than by using a nozzle based ICD. This is due to the long and narrow flow channels. To break the circulation of a fluid that has a certain shear strength, a differential pressure proportional to the channel length and inverse proportional to the channel length is required. The use of a depth filter type screen will have the same effect. The tortuous path requires higher pressure to overcome the shear strength of the fluid. Additionally, a depth filter type screen may get packed with drill solids settled at the bottom of the well. This means that a wire wrapped screen with a drainage layer providing proper flow cross section area may be more beneficial.
- The effect of the limited pressure drop that can be applied in long horizontal well is illustrated in
FIGS. 4 and 5 . InFIG. 4 , a pipe or tube has large holes 100 (e.g., standard sand screens) formed in a regular pattern. When fluid pressure is applied within the pipe or tube (e.g., drawdown pressure is applied to the well) the majority of the flow will exit the first holes near the inlet. By using smaller holes 110 (e.g., replacing the standard sand screens with ICDs) as illustrated inFIG. 5 , the pressure drop across the holes (e.g., ICDs) becomes bigger and a larger fraction of the flow is forced further into the pipe. - As a further embodiment, it may be desirable, in an injector well, to initially put the wellbore into production (as outlined above) in order to clean up the filtercake. Once the desired amount of filtercake removal is effected, the well may then be used to inject liquid or gas into the formation.
- Additionally, it may be desirable to run the ICD completion described herein with or without a sand screen associated with the completion.
- While the invention has been disclosed with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims (14)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/275,675 US7753128B2 (en) | 2007-11-21 | 2008-11-21 | Method and system for well production |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US98946807P | 2007-11-21 | 2007-11-21 | |
US12/275,675 US7753128B2 (en) | 2007-11-21 | 2008-11-21 | Method and system for well production |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090126940A1 true US20090126940A1 (en) | 2009-05-21 |
US7753128B2 US7753128B2 (en) | 2010-07-13 |
Family
ID=40640724
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/275,675 Expired - Fee Related US7753128B2 (en) | 2007-11-21 | 2008-11-21 | Method and system for well production |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7753128B2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2477176A (en) * | 2009-12-03 | 2011-07-27 | Baker Hughes Inc | Method of Designing a Flow Control Device using a Simulator |
WO2015076779A1 (en) * | 2013-11-19 | 2015-05-28 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Measuring critical shear stress for mud filtercake removal |
WO2015195099A1 (en) * | 2014-06-17 | 2015-12-23 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Sacrificial screen shroud |
US20210088908A1 (en) * | 2019-09-19 | 2021-03-25 | Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. | Composition for forming silicon-containing resist underlayer film and patterning process |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2154329A1 (en) * | 2008-08-11 | 2010-02-17 | Services Pétroliers Schlumberger | Movable well bore cleaning device |
US20130146284A1 (en) * | 2011-12-07 | 2013-06-13 | Archon Technologies Ltd. | Staggered horizontal well oil recovery process |
AU2014201020B2 (en) * | 2013-02-28 | 2016-05-19 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Erosion ports for shunt tubes |
US20150316048A1 (en) * | 2014-04-30 | 2015-11-05 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and system for delivering fluids into a formation to promote formation breakdown |
US11352545B2 (en) | 2020-08-12 | 2022-06-07 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Lost circulation material for reservoir section |
Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5293940A (en) * | 1992-03-26 | 1994-03-15 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Automatic tubing release |
US6273187B1 (en) * | 1998-09-10 | 2001-08-14 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for downhole safety valve remediation |
US6315050B2 (en) * | 1999-04-21 | 2001-11-13 | Schlumberger Technology Corp. | Packer |
US6419023B1 (en) * | 1997-09-05 | 2002-07-16 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Deviated borehole drilling assembly |
US6439313B1 (en) * | 2000-09-20 | 2002-08-27 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole machining of well completion equipment |
US20050006102A1 (en) * | 2003-07-11 | 2005-01-13 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Cutting Tool |
US6945331B2 (en) * | 2002-07-31 | 2005-09-20 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Multiple interventionless actuated downhole valve and method |
US6973970B2 (en) * | 2002-06-24 | 2005-12-13 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Apparatus and methods for establishing secondary hydraulics in a downhole tool |
US20070017675A1 (en) * | 2005-07-19 | 2007-01-25 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and Apparatus for Completing a Well |
US20070044963A1 (en) * | 2005-09-01 | 2007-03-01 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and Method for Controlling Undesirable Fluid Incursion During Hydrocarbon Production |
US20070107908A1 (en) * | 2005-11-16 | 2007-05-17 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Oilfield Elements Having Controlled Solubility and Methods of Use |
US20080099209A1 (en) * | 2006-11-01 | 2008-05-01 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and Method for Protecting Downhole Components During Deployment and Wellbore Conditioning |
US20080105438A1 (en) * | 2006-02-09 | 2008-05-08 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Degradable whipstock apparatus and method of use |
US20080149345A1 (en) * | 2006-12-20 | 2008-06-26 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Smart actuation materials triggered by degradation in oilfield environments and methods of use |
US7419002B2 (en) * | 2001-03-20 | 2008-09-02 | Reslink G.S. | Flow control device for choking inflowing fluids in a well |
US7451819B2 (en) * | 2000-03-02 | 2008-11-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Openhole perforating |
US20090050334A1 (en) * | 2007-08-24 | 2009-02-26 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Conditioning Ferrous Alloys into Cracking Susceptible and Fragmentable Elements for Use in a Well |
-
2008
- 2008-11-21 US US12/275,675 patent/US7753128B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5293940A (en) * | 1992-03-26 | 1994-03-15 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Automatic tubing release |
US6419023B1 (en) * | 1997-09-05 | 2002-07-16 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Deviated borehole drilling assembly |
US6273187B1 (en) * | 1998-09-10 | 2001-08-14 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for downhole safety valve remediation |
US6315050B2 (en) * | 1999-04-21 | 2001-11-13 | Schlumberger Technology Corp. | Packer |
US7451819B2 (en) * | 2000-03-02 | 2008-11-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Openhole perforating |
US6439313B1 (en) * | 2000-09-20 | 2002-08-27 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole machining of well completion equipment |
US7419002B2 (en) * | 2001-03-20 | 2008-09-02 | Reslink G.S. | Flow control device for choking inflowing fluids in a well |
US6973970B2 (en) * | 2002-06-24 | 2005-12-13 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Apparatus and methods for establishing secondary hydraulics in a downhole tool |
US6945331B2 (en) * | 2002-07-31 | 2005-09-20 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Multiple interventionless actuated downhole valve and method |
US20050006102A1 (en) * | 2003-07-11 | 2005-01-13 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Cutting Tool |
US20070017675A1 (en) * | 2005-07-19 | 2007-01-25 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and Apparatus for Completing a Well |
US20070044963A1 (en) * | 2005-09-01 | 2007-03-01 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and Method for Controlling Undesirable Fluid Incursion During Hydrocarbon Production |
US20070107908A1 (en) * | 2005-11-16 | 2007-05-17 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Oilfield Elements Having Controlled Solubility and Methods of Use |
US20080105438A1 (en) * | 2006-02-09 | 2008-05-08 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Degradable whipstock apparatus and method of use |
US20080099209A1 (en) * | 2006-11-01 | 2008-05-01 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and Method for Protecting Downhole Components During Deployment and Wellbore Conditioning |
US20080149345A1 (en) * | 2006-12-20 | 2008-06-26 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Smart actuation materials triggered by degradation in oilfield environments and methods of use |
US20090050334A1 (en) * | 2007-08-24 | 2009-02-26 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Conditioning Ferrous Alloys into Cracking Susceptible and Fragmentable Elements for Use in a Well |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2477176A (en) * | 2009-12-03 | 2011-07-27 | Baker Hughes Inc | Method of Designing a Flow Control Device using a Simulator |
GB2477176B (en) * | 2009-12-03 | 2014-07-02 | Baker Hughes Inc | Method of Designing a Flow Control Device Using a Simulator |
WO2015076779A1 (en) * | 2013-11-19 | 2015-05-28 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Measuring critical shear stress for mud filtercake removal |
US20160356697A1 (en) * | 2013-11-19 | 2016-12-08 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Measuring critical shear stress for mud filtercake removal |
US9945771B2 (en) * | 2013-11-19 | 2018-04-17 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Measuring critical shear stress for mud filtercake removal |
WO2015195099A1 (en) * | 2014-06-17 | 2015-12-23 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Sacrificial screen shroud |
US20210088908A1 (en) * | 2019-09-19 | 2021-03-25 | Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. | Composition for forming silicon-containing resist underlayer film and patterning process |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7753128B2 (en) | 2010-07-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7753128B2 (en) | Method and system for well production | |
US8403038B2 (en) | Flow control device that substantially decreases flow of a fluid when a property of the fluid is in a selected range | |
US6857475B2 (en) | Apparatus and methods for flow control gravel pack | |
US10378307B2 (en) | Permeable lost circulation drilling liner | |
US8463585B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for modeling well designs and well performance | |
US7099811B2 (en) | Method of determining by numerical simulation the restoration conditions, by the fluids of a reservoir, of a complex well damaged by drilling operations | |
US20040134656A1 (en) | Sand control screen assembly having an internal seal element and treatment method using the same | |
WO2017223483A1 (en) | Method for selecting choke sizes, artificial lift parameters, pipe sizes and surface facilities under production system constraints for oil and gas wells | |
Galoppini et al. | Asphaltene deposition monitoring and removal treatments: an experience in ultra deep wells | |
Moen et al. | Inflow control device and near-wellbore interaction | |
Garcia et al. | Identifying well completion applications for passive inflow control devices | |
Raffn et al. | Case histories of improved horizontal well cleanup and sweep efficiency with nozzle based inflow control devices (ICD) in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs | |
CN110847874B (en) | Fracturing filling and desanding pipe column and fracturing filling and desanding method | |
CA2342775C (en) | Method of packing extended reach horizontal wells with lightweight proppants | |
Bryant et al. | Completion and production results from alternate-path gravel-packed wells | |
Burton et al. | Drilling and Completion of Horizontal Wells Requiring Sand Control | |
GB2476148A (en) | Method of making a flow control device that reduces flow of the fluid when a selected property of the fluid is in a selected range | |
M. Ariffin et al. | Revitalising low contrast viscosities between oil and water reservoir using autonomous inflow control device AICD completion strategy | |
Al-Khelaiwi et al. | Advanced well flow control technologies can improve well cleanup | |
Olowoleru et al. | Efficient intelligent well cleanup using downhole monitoring | |
US11346181B2 (en) | Engineered production liner for a hydrocarbon well | |
US11136858B2 (en) | Methods and systems for packing extended reach wells using inflow control devices | |
Yushchenko et al. | Operation features of wells with an extended horizontal wellbore and multistage hydraulic fracturing operation in bazhenov formation | |
Pelgrom et al. | Improved Well Design Maximises Oil-Rim Profitability | |
Abdel Rafea et al. | Autonomous Inflow Control Device Pilot Application for Extra Heavy Oil Field |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MOEN, TERJE;REEL/FRAME:021874/0095 Effective date: 20081120 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552) Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20220713 |